summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--12186-0.txt8158
-rw-r--r--12186-h/12186-h.htm8267
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/12186-0.txt8579
-rw-r--r--old/12186-8.txt8579
-rw-r--r--old/12186-8.zipbin0 -> 147313 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/12186-h.zipbin0 -> 152671 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/12186-h/12186-h.htm8715
-rw-r--r--old/12186.txt8579
-rw-r--r--old/12186.zipbin0 -> 147287 bytes
12 files changed, 50893 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/12186-0.txt b/12186-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..87f9104
--- /dev/null
+++ b/12186-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,8158 @@
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 12186 ***
+
+The Principles of Masonic Law:
+
+A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,
+
+By
+
+Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,
+
+Author of
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie," "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry," Etc., Etc.,
+
+Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.
+
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; quæ lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."
+
+ Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.
+
+New York:
+Jno. W. Leonard & Co., Masonic Publishers,
+383 Broadway.
+
+1856.
+
+
+
+Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard & Co.,
+
+In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.
+
+
+
+
+To
+
+Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,
+
+Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,
+
+I Dedicate This Work,
+
+As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him
+As a Man,
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character
+As a Mason;
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our
+Sublime Institution.
+
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+
+
+Preface
+Introduction
+
+
+Book First. The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Historical Sketch.
+Chapter II. Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+Chapter III. Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Grand Master.
+ Section II. The Deputy Grand Master.
+ Section III. Of the Grand Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Grand Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Grand Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Grand Chaplain.
+ Section VII. Of the Grand Deacons.
+ Section VIII. Of the Grand Marshal.
+ Section IX. Of the Grand Stewards.
+ Section X. Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.
+ Section XI. Of the Grand Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. General View.
+ Section II. Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section III. Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+Book Second. Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+Chapter II. Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+Chapter III. Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Officers in General.
+ Section II. Of the Worshipful Master.
+ Section III. Of the Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Deacons.
+ Section VII. Of the Stewards.
+ Section VIII. Of the Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of Rules of Order.
+ Section I. Of the Order of Business.
+ Section II. Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.
+ Section III. Of the Mode of Taking the Question.
+ Section IV. Of Adjournments.
+ Section V. Of the Appointment of Committees.
+ Section VI. Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.
+
+
+Book Third. The Law of Individuals.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section I. Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section II. Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section III. Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section IV. Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section V. Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the
+ Action Thereon.
+ Section VI. Of Balloting for Candidates.
+ Section VII. Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.
+ Section VIII. Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.
+ Section IX. Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of
+ Candidates before Advancement
+ Section X. Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.
+ Section XI. Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.
+ Section XII. Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.
+ Section XIII. Of the Initiation of Non-residents.
+Chapter II. Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+Chapter III. Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+Chapter IV. Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+ Section I. Of the Right of Membership.
+ Section II. Of the Right of Visit.
+ Section III. Of the Examination of Visitors.
+ Section IV. Of Vouching for a Brother.
+ Section V. Of the Right of Claiming Relief.
+ Section VI. Of the Right of Masonic Burial.
+Chapter V. Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+Chapter VI. Of Affiliation.
+Chapter VII. Of Demitting.
+Chapter VIII. Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+Book Fourth. Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+Chapter I. Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+Chapter II. Of Masonic Punishments.
+ Section I. Of Censure.
+ Section II. Of Reprimand.
+ Section III. Of Exclusion from the Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of Definite Suspension.
+ Section V. Of Indefinite Suspension.
+ Section VI. Of Expulsion.
+Chapter III. Of Masonic Trials.
+ Section I. Of the Form of Trial.
+ Section II. Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.
+Chapter IV. Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+Chapter V. Of Appeals.
+Chapter VI. Of Restoration.
+
+
+Index.
+Footnotes.
+
+
+
+
+Preface.
+
+
+
+In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.
+
+When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.
+
+But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded--for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible--and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.
+
+Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.
+
+This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.
+
+Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work "The Principles of
+Masonic Law." It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.
+
+Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+"ab longo inter-vallo," to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:
+
+"He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet."
+
+Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this "general map" of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in "locating"
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.
+
+There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.
+
+The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.
+
+But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories--as a man, I am, of course, fallible--and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready--because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions--to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, "Strike, but
+hear me."
+
+Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.
+
+The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.
+
+Albert G. Mackey.
+
+Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.
+
+
+
+
+Introduction.
+
+The Authorities for Masonic Law.
+
+
+
+The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+_unwritten_ and _written,_ and may in a manner be compared with the "lex
+non scripta," or common law, and the "lex seripta," or statute law of
+English and American jurists.
+
+The "lex non scripta," or _unwritten law_ of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+"leges non scriptæ" of the English constitution--that "their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom." When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of "ancient usage."
+
+The "lex scripta," or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.
+
+1. The "Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity," and said to have been written in the reign of James II.[1]
+
+2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.[2]
+
+3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.
+
+4. "The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London," printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.[3]
+
+5. The thirty-nine "General Regulations," adopted "at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,"
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.
+
+6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.
+
+Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.
+
+Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the "Ancient Landmarks of the Order," to
+which reference is so often made.
+
+Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft--whether ritual or legislative--whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society--which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that "every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved."
+
+
+
+
+
+Book First
+
+The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Historical Sketch.
+
+
+Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.
+
+The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the "Gothic Constitutions"[4]
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, "a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly." The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them "good
+charges and regulations." We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.
+
+The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft "to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly." The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+"General Assembly of Masons." It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.[5] To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term "mass
+meetings."
+
+These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+"by the _yearly congregations_ and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their _general assemblies, _ the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken." This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this "mutual assembly," in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, "that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly."
+
+And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.
+
+But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.
+
+After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.
+
+At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, "a Grand
+Lodge _pro tempore;"_ resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.
+
+Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.
+
+This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.
+
+The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.
+
+At the same meeting, it was resolved "that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.
+
+The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of _all_ the Brethren before dinner, _even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice_[6]
+
+This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.
+
+In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.
+
+That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled--not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.
+
+It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.
+
+The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that _five_ lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only _four_ lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the "Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons," that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.
+
+In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only _three_ lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.
+
+Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.
+
+The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+It is an indisputable fact that the "General Assembly" which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,[7] and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, "resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation."
+
+Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:
+
+"The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places."
+
+From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.
+
+Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.[8] I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that "Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge." And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, "the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the _Masters and
+Wardens_ of all the regular lodges;" and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+"Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England," adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the "Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge." But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.
+
+On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.
+
+Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.
+
+In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, _essential_
+and _accidental_, or, as they are more usually called, _Grand_ and
+_Subordinate_. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.
+
+The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge "was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity _at
+large_ as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body."[9] The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.[10]
+
+The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,[11] seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, _pro hac vice_, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.
+
+The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the "lex non scripta," or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.[12]
+
+I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.
+
+It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. "An appeal," say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, "from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced."[13] This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.
+
+Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:--"If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation." But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+"proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."[14] This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed--it can be done in no other way--and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.
+
+II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:
+
+1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that "no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity."[15] But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.
+
+2. The next regulation prescribes "that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate." But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.
+
+3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain--because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.
+
+4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,[16] because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.
+
+5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing "that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality."
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles--which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.
+
+6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.
+
+But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.[17]
+
+III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:--
+
+"The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, _pro tempore_."
+
+But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.
+
+The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.
+
+IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.
+
+V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+_making Masons at sight_.
+
+The power to "make Masons at sight" is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, "an occasional lodge," especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only--the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.
+
+Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.[18]
+
+In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.
+
+In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he "formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk," and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.[19]
+
+I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in "an occasional
+lodge," over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,[20] because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called _a making at sight_. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.
+
+But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened "an
+occasional lodge" and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.[21]
+
+Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened "an occasional lodge," and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.[22]
+
+In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason "at an occasional lodge,
+convened," says Preston, "for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person."[23]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these "occasional lodges" were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the "makings" are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these "occasional lodges"
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.
+
+This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument _Ă  fortiori_, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.
+
+No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+"But this order, afterwards appearing," says the Book of
+Constitutions,[24] "to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed."
+
+It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.
+
+But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue _Ă  fortiori_ that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together "an occasional lodge," and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason "at sight," that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.
+
+It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting "that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper"--and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that "since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place."
+
+The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.[25] But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.
+
+In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.
+
+But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies--the conferring of degrees by "communication"
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_The Deputy Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that "a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born," because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:
+
+"The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship."
+
+The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.
+
+In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.
+
+There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Grand Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.
+
+According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason[26] who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Grand Treasurer._
+
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+"a brother of good worldly substance," whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Grand Secretary._
+
+
+This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Grand Chaplain._
+
+
+This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Grand Deacons._
+
+
+But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his "Masonic Miscellanies," and he thinks it "satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century."[27]
+
+But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled "Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics," sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.
+
+It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the "very latter end of the eighteenth century;" and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the "Ahiman Rezon" of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, "as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge." They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Grand Marshal._
+
+
+The _Grand Marshal_, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying "a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold," insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.
+
+The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the Grand Stewards._
+
+
+The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, "in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness," they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,[28] as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.
+
+The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of the Grand Sword-Bearer._
+
+
+_Grand Sword-Bearer._--It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+_Grand Pursuivant_.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Grand Tiler._
+
+
+It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.
+
+The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_General View._
+
+
+The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.
+
+The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:
+
+"Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."
+
+The expression which is put in capitals--"provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved"--is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that "it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry."
+
+"With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:
+
+"In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England."
+
+In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:--1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, "in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them." General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.
+
+Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that "the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint." Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a _quasi_ committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation _de novo_, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that "in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority." The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.
+
+The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.
+
+The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.
+
+These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, "the lord paramount" in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:--_It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks_.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Second
+
+Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+The old charges define a Lodge to be "a place where Masons assemble and
+work;" and also "that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons." The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that "a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work."
+
+Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.
+
+Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge "for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings," or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.
+
+Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.
+
+Preston says that the petition must be recommended "by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held." Dalcho says it must be recommended "by three other known and
+approved Master Masons," but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed "by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges." The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended "by the officers of some regular lodge." The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.
+
+If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a _dispensation_, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to "enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons." The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, "until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge." Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized "to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled." But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.
+
+If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, "true and lawful Brethren."
+
+Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.
+
+This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.
+
+The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.
+
+The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying "to give a formal existence to anything." Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the "warrant of constitution."
+
+The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge[29] having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil--the
+masonic elements of consecration--are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.
+
+This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating--a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes--was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: "Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground."
+
+The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of "the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy," they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the "health, peace, and plenty" that he enjoys.
+
+After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that "every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues."
+
+Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the "lines parallel." The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.
+
+The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.[30] The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.
+
+Selden[31] says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.
+
+The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:
+
+"In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;--and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings."
+
+This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term "a just and legally constituted lodge," and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.
+
+The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.
+
+The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, "it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent."[32] The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.
+
+The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.
+
+Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: "A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution." This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.
+
+But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: "That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+
+
+
+It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.
+
+A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may "admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;" no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be "with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge."[33]
+
+A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.
+
+With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence--a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.
+
+A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.
+
+As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership--they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+
+Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge._
+
+
+In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it--nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge--but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.[34] But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting _ad
+libitum_ was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the _old landmarks be carefully preserved_, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; "_the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory_."[35]
+
+The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.
+
+This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.
+
+A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the "general
+regulations" in the following words:
+
+"No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful."[36]
+
+But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.
+
+A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.
+
+By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.[37] The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;[38] but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.
+
+As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.
+
+The Master must be installed by a Past Master,[39] but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.[40] The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.
+
+Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.[41] The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.[42] This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed "to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank."[43] Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.
+
+The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: "The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge."[44]
+
+Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.[45] But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.
+
+A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. "In the
+Grand Lodge alone," they declare, "resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England." They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to _exclude_ a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.
+
+A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.
+
+A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.[46] But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.
+
+Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.[47] But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Duties of a Lodge._
+
+
+So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.
+
+The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry--to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission--declare that "it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry."
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even _it_ must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, "Nolumus leges Angliæ mutare!" so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, "We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry."
+
+In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.
+
+No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.
+
+No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that "no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work." And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. "It would
+be highly improper," says the Ahiman Rezon, "in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members."
+
+I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates--as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.
+
+In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, "without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another."
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.
+
+Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that "no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree." This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.
+
+There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: "No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity."
+
+All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.
+
+The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity--as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity--I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.
+
+I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Officers in General._
+
+
+Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the "Inner Guard." The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.
+
+The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.
+
+Dalcho lays down the rule, that "no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws." Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.
+
+If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.
+
+No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.
+
+Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.
+
+An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Worshipful Master._
+
+
+This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.
+
+A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.[48] This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.
+
+One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.
+
+The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.
+
+The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.
+
+He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.
+
+It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.
+
+The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body "on all convenient occasions."[49] When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.
+
+The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge "in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren--cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.
+
+Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.
+
+During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.
+
+In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.
+
+In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.
+
+The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Treasurer._
+
+
+Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.
+
+It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer "to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary." The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.
+
+The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.
+
+The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.
+
+It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Secretary._
+
+
+It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, "which may be committed to paper;" to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.
+
+In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.
+
+Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease _ex
+necessitate rei_, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Deacons._
+
+
+In every lodge there are two of these officers--a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.
+
+The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.
+
+The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.
+
+From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Stewards._
+
+
+The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, "to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for." They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.
+
+What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Tiler._
+
+
+This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of "cowans and eavesdroppers." The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be "a
+worthy Master Mason." An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.
+
+The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Rules of Order.
+
+
+
+The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+"whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is."[50] By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of "Parliamentary Law," have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Order of Business._
+
+
+When the Brethren have been "congregated," or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.
+
+The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren "around the lodge," whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.
+
+As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.
+
+After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.
+
+In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, "the order of the day," and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.
+
+The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: "Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?" In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.
+
+But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.[51]
+
+New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.
+
+In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him "Worshipful."
+
+When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.
+
+Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.
+
+A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.
+
+No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+"private committees," to be allowed.
+
+Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of "Brother,"
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.
+
+In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.
+
+It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the "work" of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.
+
+When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.
+
+The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: "Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?" The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.
+
+The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair._
+
+
+Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by _courtesy_, "is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed _the right
+to take_ appeals."[52] If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+"in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.
+
+It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Mode of Taking the Question._
+
+
+The question in Masonry is not taken _viva voce_ or by "aye" and "nay."
+This should always be done by "a show of hands." The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, "and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry," and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words--"The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons."[53]
+
+Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.
+
+Moving the "previous question," a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Adjournments._
+
+
+Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by _closing_ the lodge, or by _calling from labor to refreshment_. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.
+
+But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of "setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor." He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his "will and pleasure" only that it is opened, so is it by his "will and
+pleasure" only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.
+
+The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.
+
+"All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, _and not desert the Master till the work is finished_."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Appointment of Committees._
+
+
+It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.
+
+The Master is also, _ex officio_, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes._
+
+
+Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.
+
+The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.
+
+"A regular communication of ---- Lodge, NO. ----, was holden at ----; on
+----, the ---- day of ----A.: L.: 58--.
+
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B----, W.: Master.
+ " B. C----, S.: Warden.
+ " C. D----, J.: Warden.
+ " D. E----, Treasurer.
+ " E. F----, Secretary.
+ " F. G----, S.: Deacon.
+ " G. H----, J.: Deacon.
+ " H. I----, } Stewards.
+ " I. K----, }
+ " K. L----, Tiler.
+
+ _Members._
+ Bro.: L. M----
+ M. N----
+ N. O----
+ O. P----
+
+ _Visitors._
+ P. Q----
+ Q. R----
+ R. S----
+ S. T----
+
+The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.
+
+"The minutes of the regular communication of ---- were read and
+confirmed.[54]
+
+"The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.---- and H. I.----, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.----, L. M.----, and O. P.----.
+
+"Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.
+
+"A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.----, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.
+
+"The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. ---- at the communication of ----, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.
+
+"The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.
+
+"Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+Amount received this evening, as follows:
+
+ Petition of Mr. G. F., $5
+ Fee of Bro. C. B., 5
+ do. of Bro. S. R., 5
+ do. of Bro. W. Y., 5--Total, $20
+
+all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.
+
+There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.
+
+E. F----,
+
+_Secretary._
+
+Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Third.
+
+The Law Of Individuals.
+
+
+
+Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+
+
+
+The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character--moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.
+
+The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as "a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science."
+
+The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+"depositary of his heart," as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, "a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul."
+
+The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.
+
+Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.
+
+These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.
+
+_Morally_, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living "under the tongue of good
+report."
+
+_Physically_, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a _man_ ought to be.
+
+_Intellectually_, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.
+
+_Politically_, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.
+
+The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.
+
+But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The old charges state, that "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law." It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, "moral law,"
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.
+
+The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be "a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine." A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.
+
+The word "libertine" has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a "free-thinker," or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:--
+
+"Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished."
+
+The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.
+
+These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be "a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country."
+
+Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that "The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men--no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report."
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.
+
+The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+"_a man_." No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.
+
+As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+"of mature and discreet age." But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that "no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more."[55] In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,[56]
+"unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;" in Ireland, twenty-one, except "by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;" in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army--such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.
+
+Our ritual excludes "an old man in his dotage" equally with a "young man
+under age." But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.
+
+The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+"a perfect youth," has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided "the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry."
+
+The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares "that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of _able_ body."[57]
+
+Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, "of able body," and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:
+
+"Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that _he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have."_[58]
+
+The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:
+
+"No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art."
+
+Notwithstanding the positive demand for _perfection_, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have _no maim or defect_, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is _perfect_ is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all--it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, "words," says Blackstone, "are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,"
+and then "perfect" would mean, "complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant." But another source of interpretation is, the "comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point."[59] Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word "perfect," if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must "_have his right limbs as a man ought to have_."
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.
+
+But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, "the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law" is, to consider
+"the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it." Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be _perfect_, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, "that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens," of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. "The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea," says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,[60] "that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration." If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words _perfect youth_ are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has "his right limbs as a man ought to
+have."[61]
+
+It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word "perfect," and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word "_that_." He must have no maim or defect
+_that_ may render him incapable; that is, _because_, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.
+
+In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be "men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch." It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.
+
+A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.
+
+In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+"deformed or dismembered at the time of their making."
+
+In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that "every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be."
+
+In the "Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual," published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be "hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making."[62]
+
+Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.
+
+In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not "sound in mind
+and _all their members_," and she adopted a resolution asserting that "the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage."[63]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency[64] has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.
+
+"We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed."--_Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia_, 1848, _page_ 36.
+
+"The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.[65] It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish--a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &c....
+
+"The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a _man_
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity."--_Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in_ 1848.[66]
+
+"The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order--the ancient charges--forbid
+it."--_Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70._
+
+"The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of _entire
+limbs_"--_Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848._
+
+"I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach _us_ to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries."--_Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849._
+
+"The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution."--_Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in_ 1849.
+
+"As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman."--_Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in_ 1849.
+
+Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply--guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law--and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683--I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?
+
+During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a _fool_ nor an _idiot_, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:
+
+"He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import," etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, "Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order." If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.
+
+It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: "No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity." And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.
+
+But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.
+
+From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.
+
+As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.
+
+Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.
+
+A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.
+
+Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be _free-born_. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude--though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty--is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency, and
+zeal," which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+"Children," says Oliver, "cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman."
+
+The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.
+
+Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former--the accepted one, to whom the promise was given--was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have "his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him," was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, "Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son." Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he "had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women." The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word δουλοπĎεπεια or, "slave manners," to designate any very great
+impropriety of manners.
+
+The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge "to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison," and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that "it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action thereon_.
+
+
+The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+"petition." This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be "a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge."[67] This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.
+
+The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.
+
+The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:
+
+"No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid."
+
+The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.
+
+But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.
+
+The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.
+
+This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: "No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;"
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.
+
+If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.
+
+Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without "due
+inquiry" into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.
+
+But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of "making Masons," I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates._
+
+
+The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be "formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent _in their own prudent way_ either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.
+
+From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right--to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.[68]
+
+The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.
+
+No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+"and if," as Wayland says, "from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms." Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.
+
+And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.
+
+The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: "but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the _unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge_ then present when the candidate is proposed."
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+"New Regulations," adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted "only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks," it is said: "but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance."[69]
+
+The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.
+
+Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that _every member present_ shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted "by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed." This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called "an inherent
+privilege," which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.
+
+Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.[70]
+
+The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:--The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic _circumambulation_
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.
+
+These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.
+
+As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.
+
+The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats
+
+The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to "take charge of the ballot box." That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that "the box is clear in the South,"
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that "the box is foul in the
+South." The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of "West" and "East."
+
+If the box is _clear_--that is, if all the ballots are white--the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.
+
+But if the box is declared to be _foul_, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be "clear," or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, "if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge."
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot._
+
+
+There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.
+
+I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the _quantity_ than to the _quality_ of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.
+
+Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.
+
+In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is "clear," all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is "foul," each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.
+
+But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a _reconsideration_, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.
+
+The _motion for reconsideration_ is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that _the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box_. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.
+
+In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.
+
+If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;--now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast--the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.
+
+But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken--the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.
+
+But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.
+
+In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.[71] After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.
+
+Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.
+
+It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.
+
+It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this--that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of "Duty of
+Members" (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren "are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." And the regulation goes on to
+say: "Nor is this inherent privilege _subject to a dispensation_, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge." This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+"to give their consent in their own prudent way;" it would be an
+infringement of an "inherent privilege," and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.
+
+I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:
+
+1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.
+
+2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.
+
+3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.
+
+4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates._
+
+
+As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?
+
+It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:
+
+Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation--there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions--and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren--it must be again referred to
+a committee--lie over for a month--and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.
+
+If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the necessary Probation and due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement_.
+
+
+There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts--the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher--and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember "a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly."
+
+An hundred years ago it was said that "Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry."[72] And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.
+
+There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a "suitable proficiency" in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made "suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree."
+
+In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved--made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, "that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords."
+
+Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.
+
+This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, "that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander." In the same charges, it is prescribed that "no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years."
+
+In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: "Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work[73] who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed."
+
+These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.
+
+In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the "Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons" to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that "a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love."
+
+Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that "no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;"
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, "_on very particular occasions only_, may be
+requested."
+
+The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:
+
+"No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree."[74]
+
+This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.
+
+Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:
+
+"The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work--and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees."[75]
+
+In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:
+
+"To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness."
+
+The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty "of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree." And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.
+
+The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: "All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge."
+
+But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:
+
+"No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree."
+
+It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented--and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.
+
+This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.
+
+"Many persons," says that able philosopher of Masonry, "are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain."[76]
+
+Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree._
+
+
+Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.
+
+The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.
+
+Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.
+
+Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.
+
+Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have "due and timely notice," and be prepared to exercise his
+"inherent privilege" of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.
+
+If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.
+
+But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, "a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it."
+
+The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.
+
+I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication._
+
+
+The fourth General Regulation decrees that "no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time." This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.
+
+This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.
+
+The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that "no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge."
+
+Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.
+
+
+
+Section XII.
+
+_Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another._
+
+
+It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.
+
+This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:
+
+"None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it."
+
+There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A----, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B----, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A----, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A---- to grant permission
+to the lodge at B---- to confer them on the candidate.
+
+But how shall this permission be given--by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A----? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A----, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a "fractious member will be imposed on
+them," as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B----. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A---. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B---, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.
+
+I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.
+
+
+
+Section XIII.
+
+_Of the Initiation of Non-residents._
+
+
+The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:--First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.
+
+1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.
+
+2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made "in due form," and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?
+
+The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.
+
+In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:
+
+"Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members."
+
+The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, "that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason."
+
+The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:
+
+"Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution."[77]
+
+It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal--the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge--and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.
+
+Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the _mode how_, they might also have prescribed
+the _place where_, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.
+
+A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid--as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done--the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.
+
+The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.
+
+What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, "a distrust of his
+acceptance" at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+
+
+
+In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.
+
+At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.
+
+These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.
+
+But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is _ex gratia_,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd--because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.
+
+It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.
+
+If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.
+
+The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.
+
+But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.
+
+These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.
+
+Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.
+
+The question next occurs--What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor--that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light--and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it--it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, "unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election," and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,[78] it is said that "the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,"
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.
+
+"As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment."[79]
+
+This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, _mutatis mutandis_,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+
+
+
+When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Right of Membership._
+
+
+The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: "Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge."[80] If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.
+
+How long before he loses this right by a _non-user_, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.
+
+The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.
+
+But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.
+
+A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.
+
+A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+"good standing" until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the "good standing" of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.
+
+If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.
+
+In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.
+
+"No man can be made or _admitted a member_ of a particular lodge," says
+the fifth regulation, "without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge."
+
+And the sixth regulation adds, that "no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or _admitted to be a member_ thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present."
+
+So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.
+
+But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.
+
+A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.
+
+A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.
+
+Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Right of Visit._
+
+
+Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the "Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,"
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,[81]it is directed "that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge."
+
+This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, "received, and
+cherished," and "set on work," that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.
+
+In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, "that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty."[82]
+
+A lodge, when not opened for "general masonic business," but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened "_en
+famille_."
+
+To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:
+
+"A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft."
+
+A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.
+
+A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.
+
+Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.
+
+There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,[83] and which is in the following words:
+
+"3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept." This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.
+
+Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Examination of Visitors._
+
+
+It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.
+
+Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.
+
+The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words
+
+"I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.
+
+This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of "commencing at the beginning" should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted--categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+"rusty," or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.
+
+Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: "I am not
+satisfied," or, "I do not recognize you," and not in more specific terms,
+such as, "You did not answer this inquiry," or, "You are ignorant on that
+point." The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.
+
+Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called "leading
+questions," or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.
+
+Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry _it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted_.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Vouching for a Brother._
+
+
+An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity--since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful--that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.
+
+To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+"_strict trial, due examination, or lawful information_."
+
+Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be _competent_ to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.
+
+Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.
+
+If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: "A.B. is a Mason," is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: "I know this
+man to be a Master Mason," for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.
+
+If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a "Lodge of Master Masons." A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Right of Claiming Relief._
+
+
+One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. "As we have therefore
+opportunity," says St. Paul, "let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith."
+
+This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of "Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:"
+
+"You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.
+
+"But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances."
+
+This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.
+
+He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word " benefit," as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.
+
+He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, "true and genuine." True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of "faithful" or "trusty." A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.
+
+But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.
+
+It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Right of Masonic Burial._
+
+
+After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.[84] As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.
+
+But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.
+
+The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.[85]
+
+"No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member--foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies."
+
+This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.
+
+The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, "by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members."[86] It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+
+
+
+I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,[87] and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.
+
+In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.
+
+In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as "virtual" and as "actual" Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.
+
+An _actual Past Master_ is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A _virtual
+Past Master_ is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.
+
+Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?
+
+The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.
+
+In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.
+
+In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that "it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters."[88]
+
+Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider "that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;" and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such "legal means" of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.
+
+This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: "The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least _three installed Masters_"[89]
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, "this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but _installed_
+Masters be present."[90]
+
+And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.
+
+The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times--that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.
+
+On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.
+
+A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.
+
+He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.
+
+By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Affiliation.
+
+
+
+Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be "initiated," but a Mason is
+"affiliated."[91]
+
+Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.
+
+A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. "No man can be made, _or admitted a member_ * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;" are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: "But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, _or admitted to be a member_ thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge."
+
+None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a "demit," and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.
+
+Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.
+
+A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.
+
+In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.
+
+The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that "no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality." This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, "this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete."[92] Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.
+
+The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VII.
+
+Of Demitting.
+
+
+
+To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a _demit_.
+
+The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation "that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another." Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors "of
+his own free will and accord," and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that
+
+ "A man convinced against his will,
+ Is of the same opinion still,"
+
+and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.
+
+The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.
+
+But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.
+
+There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:
+
+"No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge."
+
+It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.
+
+With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VIII.
+
+Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+
+An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: "every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations."
+
+Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed--Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.
+
+A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that "it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member."[93] A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.
+
+Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the _right_ of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association--the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:[94] "The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, _nolens volens,_ money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, _Free_ and Accepted."
+
+But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.
+
+We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the _Lodge organization_ of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened--he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple--the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.
+
+But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of "once a Mason,
+and always a Mason," it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.
+
+Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says "if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire _as to anything_." But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone "lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother," that
+we are in cases of "imminent peril" to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when _duly_ called for.
+
+I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:
+
+1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.
+
+2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when _he asks for that aid in
+the_ proper _and conventional way_.
+
+3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.
+
+4. He loses the general right to visit[95] lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.
+
+5. He loses the right of masonic burial.
+
+6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Fourth.
+
+Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+
+
+
+The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.
+
+In replying to the question, "what are masonic crimes?" by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.
+
+But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.
+
+Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.
+
+Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, "to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;" and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.
+
+In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+"that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, _they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible_"
+
+The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.
+
+The first charge says: "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law." Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be "the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions."[96] Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we "should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)[97]
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due."
+
+If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.
+
+But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all "wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander."
+
+The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.
+
+From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Masonic Punishments.
+
+
+
+Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of Censure._
+
+
+A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.
+
+Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.
+
+A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Reprimand._
+
+
+A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.
+
+A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.
+
+If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.
+
+The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.
+
+A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of Exclusion from the Lodge._
+
+
+Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.
+
+1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.
+
+I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged "to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge," it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.
+
+2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, _suspension from the lodge,_ and sometimes _erasure from the
+roll_. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.
+
+But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.
+
+The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.
+
+Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.
+
+The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term "expelled" is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the craft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called "exclusion." The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Definite Suspension._
+
+
+Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.
+
+Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.
+
+In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.
+
+At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of _Restoration._
+
+By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason--is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren--is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.
+
+The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of Indefinite Suspension._
+
+
+Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.
+
+All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.
+
+The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits--the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.
+
+No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Expulsion._[98]
+
+
+Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.
+
+It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.[99]
+
+The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.
+
+As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure--he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.
+
+The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:--Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:--
+
+"A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason."[100]
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of Masonic Trials.
+
+
+
+Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Form of Trial._
+
+
+Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.
+
+A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.
+
+This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.
+
+The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.
+
+Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.
+
+It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.
+
+If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge--that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.
+
+The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.
+
+The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.
+
+When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.
+
+Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.
+
+If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.
+
+He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.
+
+For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.
+
+The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.
+
+If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.
+
+In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials._
+
+
+In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.
+
+The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.
+
+1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.[101]
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.
+
+2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that "an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath."
+
+3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, "such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath." Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,[102] that "the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity."
+
+4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.
+
+Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:
+
+"I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest."
+
+The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.
+
+To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.
+
+The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great "Treatise on the Law of Evidence," says: "In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end."
+
+Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.
+
+Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen--and
+this is a very conceivable case--that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.
+
+If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected--if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.
+
+But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as "profanes" would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself--of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.
+
+But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an _alibi_, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a "profane" is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.
+
+It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.
+
+The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.
+
+The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.
+
+The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer--the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+
+
+
+The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.
+
+The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.
+
+The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.
+
+1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.
+
+2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.
+
+This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.
+
+3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.
+
+4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.
+
+5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Appeals.
+
+
+
+Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.
+
+As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.
+
+But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced _de novo_, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate--either too severe, or not sufficiently so--in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.
+
+Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.
+
+During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason "under charges."
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Restoration.
+
+
+
+The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.
+
+I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.
+
+Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member--for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.
+
+Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.
+
+But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, _shall
+not_ be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment--and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world--the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived--could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.
+
+On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned _sine
+die_; for it has done all that is required--the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.
+
+The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+"Another capital offense against public justice," says Blackstone, "is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+_before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported." _ Mark these qualifying words: "before the expiration of
+the term:" they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return _after_ the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:
+
+_It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended_.
+
+Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.
+
+But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.
+
+Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: "I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?" Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.
+
+The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens--every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty--and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.
+
+But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely--that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge--may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.
+
+But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing--both are equally unconnected with the institution--the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.
+
+The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.
+
+Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.
+
+In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.
+
+In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.
+
+But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.
+
+The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.
+
+I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.
+
+The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that "no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members"--which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, "lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge." But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones--to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent--clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong--so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.
+
+
+
+
+Index.
+
+
+
+A.
+
+
+Accused, to what he is entitled
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425
+ " " " it was never enforced
+Actual Past Master, term defined
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry
+ " motion for, cannot be entertained
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges
+Affiliation, what it is
+ " mode of
+ " requires unanimity
+ " Master Masons only entitled to it
+ " rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges
+ " may be made with more than one lodge
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted
+ " not to be entertained in a lodge
+ " cannot be taken from the chair
+ " doctrine of, discussed
+ " from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge
+ " every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge
+ " pending one, the sentence is in abeyance
+Apprentices, rights of _(see Entered Apprentice_)
+Arrears, non-payment of
+ " to lodges, history of their origin
+ " do not accrue during suspension
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban
+ " " " in 926 at York
+ " " governed the craft for nearly 800 years
+ " " how organized
+Atheist cannot be a Mason
+Authorities for masonic law
+
+
+
+B.
+
+
+Balloting for candidates
+ every member must take a part in it
+ secrecy of, inviolable
+ must be unanimous
+ Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge
+ not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears
+ mode of
+Balloting in each degree
+ not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied
+ must be unanimous
+Ballot, reconsideration of
+ motion for, out of order
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge
+Burial, masonic, right of
+ must be requested except for strangers
+ Master Masons only entitled to it
+ dispensation for, not usually required
+Business, order of
+ may be suspended at any time by the Master
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+C.
+
+
+Calling from labor to refreshment
+Censure, a masonic punishment
+Certificates, masonic
+Chaplain, Grand (_see Grand Chaplain_)
+Charges of accusation, how to be made
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates
+Committees to be appointed by the Master
+ Master is chairman of, when present
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated
+Consecration of a lodge how performed
+ meaning of
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of
+ meaning of
+Constitutions, how to be altered
+" Gothic, adopted in 926,
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,
+" " " why elements,
+Crimes, masonic,
+" " definition of,
+" " enumeration of
+
+
+
+D.
+
+
+Deacons,
+" two in each lodge,
+" are appointed officers,
+" not removable by Master or Senior Warden
+" Grand _(see Grand Deacons_)
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed
+" to whom, and why,
+" meaning of
+Definite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication
+Demitting
+" right of, not denied until recently,
+" regulations concerning
+" of many at one time may be refused
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+" " office of, not very ancient
+" " exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence
+"" cannot be more than one
+"" originally appointed by Grand Master
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,
+Dispensation what and where to be granted
+"for a lodge
+"" " tenure of its duration
+"" " difference from a Warrant
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates
+" meaning of the term
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage
+" non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates
+
+
+
+E.
+
+
+Emergency, rule upon the subject
+Entered Apprentice, rights of
+ formerly a member of his lodge
+ formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications
+ may sit in a lodge of his degree
+ cannot speak or vote
+ cannot be deprived of his rights without trial
+ after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment
+Evidence in masonic trials
+Examination of visitors
+ how to be conducted
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge
+Expulsion is masonic death
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment
+ should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval
+ from higher degrees, its effect
+ restoration from
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+F.
+
+
+Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief
+Fellow Craft, rights of
+ they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity
+ formerly permitted to speak, but not vote
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another
+Fool cannot be a Mason
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making
+Free-born, a Mason must be
+ reason for the rule
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+G.
+
+
+General Assembly. (_See Assembly, General._)
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926
+Grand Chaplain,
+ office established in 1775
+ duties of
+Grand Deacons
+ office more ancient than Oliver supposes
+ duties of
+ how appointed
+Grand Lodge held in 1717
+ mode of organizing one
+ three lodges necessary to organize one
+ dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,
+ all the Craft formerly members of
+ Masters and Wardens of lodges are members
+ Grand Officers are also members
+ Past Masters are not members by inherent right
+ its powers and prerogatives
+ may make new regulations
+ must observe the landmarks
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of
+ are comparatively modern institutions
+Grand Marshal
+ appointed by the Grand Master
+ duties of
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+ office of has existed since the origin of Masonry
+ an elective officer
+ by whom to be installed
+ prerogatives of, derived from two sources
+ no appeal from his decision
+ may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses
+ entitled to two votes
+ how to be punished
+ may grant dispensations
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight
+ may constitute new lodges
+ cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons
+ his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him
+Grand Pursuivant
+Grand Secretary
+ office of established in 1723
+ duties of
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant
+Grand Stewards
+ " " first mentioned in 1721
+ " " duties of
+ " " appointed by Junior Grand Warden
+Grand Stewards' Lodge
+Grand Sword-Bearer
+ " " duties of
+ " " office of, constituted in 1731
+Grand Tiler
+" " office of, must have existed from the earliest times
+" " must not be a member of the Grand Lodge
+" " sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected
+Grand Treasurer
+" " office of, established in 1724
+" " duties of
+" " has always been elected
+Grand Wardens
+" " originally appointed by the Grand Master
+" " succeed the Grand Master and Deputy
+
+
+
+H.
+
+
+Heresy not a masonic crime
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from
+Historical sketch
+
+
+
+I.
+
+
+Idiot cannot be made a Mason
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are
+Indefinite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate
+Installation
+ " whence the term derived
+ " necessary to legal existence of an officer
+ " of a Master of a lodge
+ " of the Grand Master
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge
+Investigation of character must be by a committee
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason
+ " " definition of the term
+
+
+
+J.
+
+
+Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,
+Junior Grand Warden
+Junior Warden,
+ " " presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,
+ " " does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,
+ " " presides over the craft during refreshment
+ " " appoints the stewards
+Jurisdiction of a lodge
+ " geographical or personal
+ " is over all its members
+ " " " unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity
+ " cannot extend beyond State lines,
+ " none over its Master
+
+
+
+K.
+
+
+Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason
+
+
+
+L.
+
+
+Labor, calling from, to refreshment
+Landmarks, what they are,
+ " ritual and legislative
+ " must be observed by the Grand Lodge
+Law of Grand Lodges
+ " subordinate lodges
+ " individuals
+Lawful information, what it is
+Laws, how to be interpreted
+ " of Masonry are of two kinds--written and unwritten
+ " written, whence derived
+ " unwritten, whence derived
+ " " same as ancient usage
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason
+ meaning of the term
+Lodge, subordinate
+ definition of
+ how organized
+ must have been congregated by some superior authority
+Lodge, under dispensation
+ definition of
+ generally precedes a warranted lodge
+ how formed
+ cannot make by-laws
+ cannot elect officers
+ cannot install officers
+ cannot elect members
+Lodge, warranted
+ its powers and rights
+ must be consecrated
+ must be dedicated
+ must be constituted
+ its officers must be installed
+ ceremony of installation in
+ its powers are inherent in it
+ its reserved rights are secured by the regulations
+ an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity
+ may select its own members
+ elects its own officers
+ what officers of, are elected in England
+ may install its officers
+ Master of, must be installed by a past Master
+ may be represented in the Grand Lodge
+ representatives of
+ may instruct its representatives
+ may frame by-laws
+ may suspend or exclude a member
+ may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge
+ may levy annual contributions
+ may select its name
+ cannot select its number
+ duties of
+ cannot alter the ritual
+ must elect officers at a particular time
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge
+ " " cannot initiate without previous notice
+ " " cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time
+ " " cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time
+ " " must meet once a month
+ " " neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant
+ " " cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge
+ " " may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions
+ " " officers of
+
+
+
+M.
+
+
+Madmen cannot be Masons
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates
+ " reason for the rule relating to
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge
+Master, Grand. _(See Grand Master_.)
+Master Mason, rights of
+ " " becomes a member by signing the by-laws
+ " " how this right is forfeited
+ " " may apply to any lodge for membership
+ " " to whom subject for discipline
+ " " may speak and vote on all questions
+ " " may hold any office to which elected
+ " " but to serve as Master must have been a Warden
+ " " may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+ " " may visit any lodge, after examination
+Master of a lodge
+ " " " must have previously served as Warden
+ " " " must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced
+ " " " must be installed by a Past Master
+ " " " has the warrant in charge
+ " " " may call special meetings of his lodge
+ " " " may close his lodge at any time
+ " " " presides over business as well as labor
+ " " " is supreme in his lodge
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand
+Lodge
+ moral qualifications of
+ intellectual qualifications of
+ who is to judge of them
+ is a member of the Grand Lodge
+ may exclude a member temporarily
+Membership, right of
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers
+Minutes, when to be read
+ how to be amended
+ not to be read at special communications
+ formula for keeping
+Moral law, what it is
+ a Mason must obey it
+Motions, when to be entertained
+
+
+
+N.
+
+
+Name of a lodge to be selected by itself
+Non-residents, initiation of
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency
+ of candidates to be initiated at one communication
+
+
+
+O.
+
+
+Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion
+ not vacated by suspension
+Officers of a Grand Lodge
+ subordinate lodge
+ warranted lodge must be installed
+ how to be installed
+ time of election determined by Grand Lodge
+ elected annually
+ vacancies in, how to be supplied
+ cannot resign
+Order, rules of
+ whence derived
+
+
+
+P.
+
+
+Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry
+Past Masters
+ rights of
+ not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right
+ may install their successors
+ of two kinds--actual and virtual
+ may preside in a lodge
+ eligible to election to the chair
+ entitled to a seat in the East
+ eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden
+ virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate
+Petition of candidate
+ must be read at a regular communication
+ referred to a committee of three
+ reported on at next regular communication
+ report on, cannot be made at a special communication
+ renewal of, in case of rejection
+ how to be renewed, if rejected
+ for advancement to a higher degree
+ if rejected, how to be renewed
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge
+ what they must set forth
+ must be recommended by nearest lodge
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Political qualifications of candidates
+Postponed business, when to be called up
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of
+ officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry
+Probation of candidates
+ for initiation
+ for advancement
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials
+Proficiency of candidates
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable
+Punishments, masonic
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer
+
+
+
+Q.
+
+
+Qualifications of a Master of a lodge
+ of candidates,
+ moral
+ religious
+ physical
+ intellectual
+ political, 184
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717
+Question, how to be taken on a motion
+
+
+
+R.
+
+
+Reading, a qualification of candidates
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one
+ of candidate, must be by two members
+Reconsideration of ballot
+ motion for, is out of order,
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge
+ renewed petition of, when to be made,
+Relief, right of claiming it
+ unworthy Masons not entitled to it
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment
+Restoration
+ from definite suspension
+ indefinite supension
+ expulsion
+ must be at a stated communication
+ may be by Grand Lodge
+ requires a unanimous vote
+ to membership discussed
+
+
+
+S.
+
+
+Secretary, Grand. (_See Grand Secretary._)
+ of a lodge
+ his duty
+ is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer
+ is a check upon the treasurer
+ often receives compensation
+ in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected
+ but not in case of removal, or sickness
+Senior Grand Warden. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+Senior Warden
+ presides in absence of Master
+ may invite a Past Master to preside
+ presides over the craft during labor
+ appoints the Junior Deacon
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained
+ ---- is in abeyance pending an appeal
+Stewards, Grand. (_See Grand Stewards._)
+ of a lodge
+ appointed by Junior Warden
+ duties of
+ not removable by Junior Warden
+Stranger, initiation of
+Suspension
+ definite
+ indefinite
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (_See Grand Sword Bearer._)
+
+
+
+T.
+
+
+Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials
+Tiler, Grand. (_See Grand Tiler._)
+ of a lodge
+ office existed from beginning of the institution
+ no lodge can be without one
+ must be a worthy Master Mason
+ if a member, the office does not disfranchise him
+ when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place
+ may be removed for misconduct
+Tiler's obligation, form of it
+Transient persons, initiation of
+Treasurer, Grand. _(See Grand Treasurer_.)
+ " " of a lodge
+ " " duties of
+ " " is the only banker of the lodge
+ " " is a disbursing officer
+ " " a Brother of worldly substance usually selected
+ " " in case of death, a successor may be elected
+ " " but not in case of sickness, or removal
+Trials, masonic
+ " " form of
+ " " evidence in
+
+
+U.
+
+
+Unaffiliated Masons
+ " " tax sometimes levied on
+ " " position, rights, and duties of
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry
+ " effect of, on a Mason
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment
+ " " their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution
+
+
+V.
+
+
+Virtual Past Masters, who they are
+Visit, right of
+ " only affiliated Mason entitled to it
+ " must be preceded by an examination
+ " requires a certificate to insure it
+Visitors, examination of, described
+ " must take the Tiler's obligation
+Voting must always be by a show of hands
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present
+Voucher must be a competent Mason
+Vouching for a visitor
+
+
+
+W.
+
+
+Wardens, Grand. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+ of a lodge are assistants of the Master
+ entitled to membership in Grand Lodge
+Warden, Senior. (_See Senior Warden._)
+Warden, Junior. (_See Junior Warden._)
+Warrant of constitution
+ what it is
+ its difference from a dispensation
+ can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge
+ confers powers of installation and succession
+ not necessary before 1717
+ cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge
+Warranted lodges. (_See Lodges, Warranted._)
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of
+ definition of incompetent ones
+Woman cannot be made a Mason
+Writing, a qualification of candidates
+
+
+
+Y.
+
+
+Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term
+
+
+
+
+Footnotes
+
+
+
+[1] They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.
+
+[2] Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).
+
+[3] In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723--a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.
+
+[4] The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.
+
+[5] Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).
+
+[6] General Regulations, art. xxxix.
+
+[7] Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact "does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted."--p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. "The Brethren,"
+he says, "by a majority of hands, elected," &c.
+
+[8] Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.
+
+[9] Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).
+
+[10] Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.
+
+[11] Article xxxiv.
+
+[12] His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.
+
+[13] Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.
+
+[14] Art. xxxix.
+
+[15] The word "time" has been interpreted to mean _communication_.
+
+[16] And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.
+
+[17] What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.
+
+[18] It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.
+
+[19] Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.
+
+[20] Book of Const., p. 233.
+
+[21] Book of Const., p. 313.
+
+[22] Book of Constitutions, p. 319.
+
+[23] Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).
+
+[24] Book of Constitutions, p. 247
+
+[25] The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.
+
+[26] That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.
+
+[27] Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).
+
+[28] It was abolished in New York in 1854.
+
+[29] This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.
+
+[30] "What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it." Deut. xx. 5.
+
+[31] De Syned. Vet. Ebræor., 1. iii., c. xiv., § 1.
+
+[32] Cicero, Brut. i.
+
+[33] See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.
+
+[34] Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).
+
+[35] Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).
+
+[36] General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.
+
+[37] Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. _Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England_, 1847, _p_. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[38] The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. _English
+Constitutions, as above, p._ 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[39] It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.
+
+[40] No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. _English
+Constitutions_ (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[41] Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. _English
+Constitutions, p_. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[42] We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.
+
+[43] Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).
+
+[44] General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).
+
+[45] English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[46] In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.
+
+[47] Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.
+
+[48] "No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden."--_Old Charges_, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).
+
+[49] Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).
+
+[50] Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.
+
+[51] One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, "the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and _carefully finish
+the work they begin_."--Oliver's Preston, p. 27, _note_ (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).
+
+[52] Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.
+
+[53] Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.
+
+[54] If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.
+
+[55] Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).
+
+[56] Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.
+
+[57] See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).
+
+[58] Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).
+
+[59] Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., § 2.
+
+[60] In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.
+
+[61] Potter, 184.
+
+[62] Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, "provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry."
+
+[63] Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.
+
+[64] When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!
+
+[65] Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.
+
+[66] See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.
+
+[67] Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.
+
+[68] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, _Ballot_.
+
+[69] Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.
+
+[70] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. _Ballot_
+
+[71] Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.
+
+[72] Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.
+
+[73] That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.
+
+[74] This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.
+
+[75] Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.
+
+[76] Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).
+
+[77] Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.
+
+[78] Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).
+
+[79] Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).
+
+[80] Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.
+
+[81] Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, _note_ (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).
+
+[82] See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).
+
+[83] Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)
+
+[84] See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.
+
+[85] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).
+
+[86] Preston, Oliver's Edit" p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).
+
+[87] Book I., chap. iii.
+
+[88] Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.
+
+[89] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).
+
+[90] Ibid
+
+[91] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, _in voce_.
+
+[92] Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.
+
+[93] Proceedings for 1853.
+
+[94] Proceedings for 1847.
+
+[95] The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.
+
+[96] Blackstone, Introd., § i.
+
+[97] For so we should interpret the word "honeste."
+
+[98] I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my "Lexicon of
+Freemasonry," and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.
+
+[99] In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called "exclusion," and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.
+
+[100] Lexicon of Freemasonry.
+
+[101] Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.
+
+[102] Chief Baron Gilbert.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 12186 ***
diff --git a/12186-h/12186-h.htm b/12186-h/12186-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2d2e4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/12186-h/12186-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,8267 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html
+ PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
+<title>The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey, M.D.</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ body {
+ margin: 0.5em;
+ font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;
+ }
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center;
+ font-weight: bold;
+ }
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4 {
+ font-variant: small-caps
+ }
+
+ .smallcaps { font-variant: small-caps }
+
+ a { text-decoration: none; }
+
+ a:hover { background-color: #ffffcc }
+
+ div.book {
+ margin-top: 6em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ div.chapter {
+ margin-top: 4em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ div.sec {
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ hr {
+ height: 1px;
+ border-width: 1px;
+ border-style: dashed;
+ }
+
+ p.abs, blockquote.epi {
+ width: 80%;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ }
+
+ p.byline {
+ text-align: center;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+ }
+
+ #tp, #verso, #dedication { text-align: center; }
+
+ #tp blockquote.epi {
+ text-align: left;
+ width: 40%;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ }
+
+ #toc ul {
+ list-style-type: none;
+ }
+ -->
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 12186 ***</div>
+
+<div id="tp">
+<h1 class="title">The Principles of Masonic Law:</h1>
+
+<h2>A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,</h2>
+
+<p class='byline'>By</p>
+
+<h2 class="author">Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,</h2>
+
+<h3>Author of<br />
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie,"<br /> "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry,"<br /> Etc., Etc.,</h3>
+
+<h4>Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.</h4>
+
+<blockquote class="epi"><p>
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; qu&aelig; lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."</p>
+
+<p> Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.</p></blockquote>
+
+<h4>New York:<br />
+Jno. W. Leonard &amp; Co., Masonic Publishers,<br />
+383 Broadway.</h4>
+
+<h5>1856.</h5>
+</div>
+
+<div id="verso">
+<p>Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard &amp; Co.,</p>
+
+<p>In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div id="dedication">
+<h2>To</h2>
+
+<h3>Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,</h3>
+
+<p>Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,</p>
+
+<p>I Dedicate This Work,</p>
+
+<p>As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him<br />
+As a Man,<br />
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character<br />
+As a Mason;<br />
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the<br />
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,<br />
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our<br />
+Sublime Institution.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="chapter" id="toc">
+<h2>Table of Contents</h2>
+
+
+
+<p><a href="#preface">Preface</a></p>
+<p><a href="#intro">Introduction</a></p>
+
+<h3>Book First.<br /><a href="#b1">The Law of Grand Lodges.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b1-01">Historical Sketch.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b1-02">Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b1-03">Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b1-04">Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-04-01"><i>Of the Grand Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-04-02"><i>The Deputy Grand Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-04-03"><i>Of the Grand Wardens.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-04-04"><i>Of the Grand Treasurer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b1-04-05"><i>Of the Grand Secretary.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b1-04-06"><i>Of the Grand Chaplain.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b1-04-07"><i>Of the Grand Deacons.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b1-04-08"><i>Of the Grand Marshal.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IX. <a href="#b1-04-09"><i>Of the Grand Stewards.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section X. <a href="#b1-04-10"><i>Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XI. <a href="#b1-04-11"><i>Of the Grand Tiler.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b1-05">Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-05-01"><i>General View.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-05-02"><i>Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-05-03"><i>Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-05-04"><i>Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Second.<br /><a href="#b2">Laws of Subordinate Lodges.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b2-01">Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b2-02">Of Lodges under Dispensation.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b2-03">Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b2-04">Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b2-04-01"><i>Of the Officers in General.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b2-04-02"><i>Of the Worshipful Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b2-04-03"><i>Of the Wardens.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b2-04-04"><i>Of the Treasurer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b2-04-05"><i>Of the Secretary.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b2-04-06"><i>Of the Deacons.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b2-04-07"><i>Of the Stewards.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b2-04-08"><i>Of the Tiler.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b2-05">Of Rules of Order.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-05-01"><i>Of the Order of Business.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-05-02"><i>Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-05-03"><i>Of the Mode of Taking the Question.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-05-04"><i>Of Adjournments.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b2-05-05"><i>Of the Appointment of Committees.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b2-05-06"><i>Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Third.<br /><a href="#b3">The Law of Individuals.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b3-01">Of the Qualifications of Candidates.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b3-01-01"><i>Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b3-01-02"><i>Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b3-01-03"><i>Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b3-01-04"><i>Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b3-01-05"><i>Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action Thereon.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b3-01-06"><i>Of Balloting for Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b3-01-07"><i>Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b3-01-08"><i>Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IX. <a href="#b3-01-09"><i>Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of Candidates before Advancement</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section X. <a href="#b3-01-10"><i>Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XI. <a href="#b3-01-11"><i>Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XII. <a href="#b3-01-12"><i>Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XIII. <a href="#b3-01-12"><i>Of the Initiation of Non-residents.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b3-02">Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b3-03">Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b3-04">Of the Rights of Master Masons.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b3-04-01"><i>Of the Right of Membership.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b3-04-02"><i>Of the Right of Visit.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b3-04-03"><i>Of the Examination of Visitors.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b3-04-04"><i>Of Vouching for a Brother.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b3-04-05"><i>Of the Right of Claiming Relief.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b3-04-06"><i>Of the Right of Masonic Burial.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b3-05">Of the Rights of Past Masters.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VI. <a href="#b3-06">Of Affiliation.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VII. <a href="#b3-07">Of Demitting.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VIII. <a href="#b3-08">Of Unaffiliated Masons.</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Fourth.<br /><a href="#b3">Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b4-01">Of What Are Masonic Crimes.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b4-02">Of Masonic Punishments.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b4-02-01"><i>Of Censure.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b4-02-02"><i>Of Reprimand.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b4-02-03"><i>Of Exclusion from the Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b4-02-04"><i>Of Definite Suspension.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b4-02-05"><i>Of Indefinite Suspension.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b4-02-06"><i>Of Expulsion.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b4-03">Of Masonic Trials.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b4-03-01"><i>Of the Form of Trial.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b4-03-02"><i>Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b4-04">Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b4-05">Of Appeals.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VI. <a href="#b4-06">Of Restoration.</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p><a href="#index">Index.</a></p>
+<p><a href="#footnotes">Footnotes.</a></p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="preface">
+<h2>Preface.</h2>
+
+
+
+<p>In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.</p>
+
+<p>When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.</p>
+
+<p>But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded&mdash;for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible&mdash;and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.</p>
+
+<p>Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.</p>
+
+<p>This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.</p>
+
+<p>Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work &quot;The Principles of
+Masonic Law.&quot; It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.</p>
+
+<p>Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+&quot;ab longo inter-vallo,&quot; to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this &quot;general map&quot; of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in &quot;locating&quot;
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.</p>
+
+<p>There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.</p>
+
+<p>The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.</p>
+
+<p>But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories&mdash;as a man, I am, of course, fallible&mdash;and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready&mdash;because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions&mdash;to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, &quot;Strike, but
+hear me.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.</p>
+
+<p>The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.</p>
+
+<p>Albert G. Mackey.</p>
+
+<p>Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="intro">
+<h2>Introduction.</h2>
+
+<h3>The Authorities for Masonic Law.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+<i>unwritten</i> and <i>written,</i> and may in a manner be compared with the &quot;lex
+non scripta,&quot; or common law, and the &quot;lex seripta,&quot; or statute law of
+English and American jurists.</p>
+
+<p>The &quot;lex non scripta,&quot; or <i>unwritten law</i> of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+&quot;leges non script&aelig;&quot; of the English constitution&mdash;that &quot;their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom.&quot; When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of &quot;ancient usage.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The &quot;lex scripta,&quot; or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.</p>
+
+<p>1. The &quot;Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity,&quot; and said to have been written in the reign of James II.<sup><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.<sup><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>4. &quot;The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London,&quot; printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.<sup><a href="#fn3">3</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>5. The thirty-nine &quot;General Regulations,&quot; adopted &quot;at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,&quot;
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.</p>
+
+<p>6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.</p>
+
+<p>Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.</p>
+
+<p>Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the &quot;Ancient Landmarks of the Order,&quot; to
+which reference is so often made.</p>
+
+<p>Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft&mdash;whether ritual or legislative&mdash;whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society&mdash;which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that &quot;every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b1">
+<h2>Book First</h2>
+
+<h3>The Law of Grand Lodges.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Historical Sketch.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the &quot;Gothic Constitutions&quot;<sup><a href="#fn4">4</a></sup>
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, &quot;a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly.&quot; The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them &quot;good
+charges and regulations.&quot; We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft &quot;to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly.&quot; The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+&quot;General Assembly of Masons.&quot; It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.<sup><a href="#fn5">5</a></sup> To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term &quot;mass
+meetings.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+&quot;by the <i>yearly congregations</i> and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their <i>general assemblies, </i> the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken.&quot; This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this &quot;mutual assembly,&quot; in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, &quot;that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.</p>
+
+<p>But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.</p>
+
+<p>After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.</p>
+
+<p>At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, &quot;a Grand
+Lodge <i>pro tempore;&quot;</i> resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.</p>
+
+<p>This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.</p>
+
+<p>The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.</p>
+
+<p>At the same meeting, it was resolved &quot;that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of <i>all</i> the Brethren before dinner, <i>even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice</i><sup><a href="#fn6">6</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.</p>
+
+<p>That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled&mdash;not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.</p>
+
+<p>It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.</p>
+
+<p>The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that <i>five</i> lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only <i>four</i> lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the &quot;Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons,&quot; that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.</p>
+
+<p>In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only <i>three</i> lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>It is an indisputable fact that the &quot;General Assembly&quot; which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,<sup><a href="#fn7">7</a></sup> and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, &quot;resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.</p>
+
+<p>Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.<sup><a href="#fn8">8</a></sup> I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that &quot;Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge.&quot; And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, &quot;the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the <i>Masters and
+Wardens</i> of all the regular lodges;&quot; and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+&quot;Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England,&quot; adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the &quot;Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge.&quot; But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.</p>
+
+<p>On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.</p>
+
+<p>Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.</p>
+
+<p>In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, <i>essential</i>
+and <i>accidental</i>, or, as they are more usually called, <i>Grand</i> and
+<i>Subordinate</i>. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.</p>
+
+<p>The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-01">
+<h3>Section I.</h3>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge &quot;was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity <i>at
+large</i> as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn9">9</a></sup> The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.<sup><a href="#fn10">10</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,<sup><a href="#fn11">11</a></sup> seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, <i>pro hac vice</i>, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the &quot;lex non scripta,&quot; or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.<sup><a href="#fn12">12</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.</p>
+
+<p>It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. &quot;An appeal,&quot; say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, &quot;from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn13">13</a></sup> This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.</p>
+
+<p>Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:&mdash;&quot;If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation.&quot; But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+&quot;proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn14">14</a></sup> This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed&mdash;it can be done in no other way&mdash;and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.</p>
+
+<p>II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:</p>
+
+<p>1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that &quot;no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn15">15</a></sup> But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.</p>
+
+<p>2. The next regulation prescribes &quot;that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate.&quot; But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.</p>
+
+<p>3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain&mdash;because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.</p>
+
+<p>4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,<sup><a href="#fn16">16</a></sup> because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.</p>
+
+<p>5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing &quot;that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality.&quot;
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles&mdash;which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.</p>
+
+<p>6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.</p>
+
+<p>But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.<sup><a href="#fn17">17</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, <i>pro tempore</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.</p>
+
+<p>The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.</p>
+
+<p>IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.</p>
+
+<p>V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+<i>making Masons at sight</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The power to &quot;make Masons at sight&quot; is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only&mdash;the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.<sup><a href="#fn18">18</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.</p>
+
+<p>In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he &quot;formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk,&quot; and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.<sup><a href="#fn19">19</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in &quot;an occasional
+lodge,&quot; over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,<sup><a href="#fn20">20</a></sup> because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called <i>a making at sight</i>. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.</p>
+
+<p>But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened &quot;an
+occasional lodge&quot; and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.<sup><a href="#fn21">21</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.<sup><a href="#fn22">22</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason &quot;at an occasional lodge,
+convened,&quot; says Preston, &quot;for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn23">23</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these &quot;occasional lodges&quot; were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the &quot;makings&quot; are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these &quot;occasional lodges&quot;
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.</p>
+
+<p>This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument <i>&agrave; fortiori</i>, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.</p>
+
+<p>No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+&quot;But this order, afterwards appearing,&quot; says the Book of
+Constitutions,<sup><a href="#fn24">24</a></sup> &quot;to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue <i>&agrave; fortiori</i> that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason &quot;at sight,&quot; that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.</p>
+
+<p>It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting &quot;that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper&quot;&mdash;and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that &quot;since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.<sup><a href="#fn25">25</a></sup> But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.</p>
+
+<p>In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies&mdash;the conferring of degrees by &quot;communication&quot;
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>The Deputy Grand Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that &quot;a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born,&quot; because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.</p>
+
+<p>In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.</p>
+
+<p>There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Wardens.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.</p>
+
+<p>According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason<sup><a href="#fn26">26</a></sup> who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Treasurer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+&quot;a brother of good worldly substance,&quot; whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.</p>
+
+<p>The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Secretary.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Chaplain.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Deacons.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his &quot;Masonic Miscellanies,&quot; and he thinks it &quot;satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn27">27</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled &quot;Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics,&quot; sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.</p>
+
+<p>It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the &quot;very latter end of the eighteenth century;&quot; and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the &quot;Ahiman Rezon&quot; of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, &quot;as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge.&quot; They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Marshal.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The <i>Grand Marshal</i>, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying &quot;a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold,&quot; insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-09">
+<h4>Section IX.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Stewards.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, &quot;in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness,&quot; they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,<sup><a href="#fn28">28</a></sup> as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.</p>
+
+<p>The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-10">
+<h4>Section X.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p><i>Grand Sword-Bearer.</i>&mdash;It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+<i>Grand Pursuivant</i>.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-11">
+<h4>Section XI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Tiler.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>General View.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.</p>
+
+<p>The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The expression which is put in capitals&mdash;&quot;provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved&quot;&mdash;is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that &quot;it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:&mdash;1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, &quot;in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them.&quot; General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that &quot;the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint.&quot; Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a <i>quasi</i> committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation <i>de novo</i>, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that &quot;in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority.&quot; The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.</p>
+
+<p>The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.</p>
+
+<p>These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, &quot;the lord paramount&quot; in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:&mdash;<i>It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks</i>.</p>
+</div></div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b2">
+<h2>Book Second</h2>
+
+<h3>Laws of Subordinate Lodges.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The old charges define a Lodge to be &quot;a place where Masons assemble and
+work;&quot; and also &quot;that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons.&quot; The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that &quot;a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.</p>
+
+<p>Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge &quot;for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings,&quot; or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.</p>
+
+<p>Preston says that the petition must be recommended &quot;by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held.&quot; Dalcho says it must be recommended &quot;by three other known and
+approved Master Masons,&quot; but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed &quot;by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges.&quot; The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended &quot;by the officers of some regular lodge.&quot; The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.</p>
+
+<p>If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a <i>dispensation</i>, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to &quot;enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons.&quot; The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, &quot;until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge.&quot; Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized &quot;to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled.&quot; But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.</p>
+
+<p>If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, &quot;true and lawful Brethren.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.</p>
+
+<p>This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.</p>
+
+<p>The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying &quot;to give a formal existence to anything.&quot; Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the &quot;warrant of constitution.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge<sup><a href="#fn29">29</a></sup> having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil&mdash;the
+masonic elements of consecration&mdash;are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.</p>
+
+<p>This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating&mdash;a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes&mdash;was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: &quot;Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of &quot;the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy,&quot; they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the &quot;health, peace, and plenty&quot; that he enjoys.</p>
+
+<p>After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that &quot;every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the &quot;lines parallel.&quot; The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.<sup><a href="#fn30">30</a></sup> The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.</p>
+
+<p>Selden<sup><a href="#fn31">31</a></sup> says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.</p>
+
+<p>The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;&mdash;and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term &quot;a just and legally constituted lodge,&quot; and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, &quot;it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn32">32</a></sup> The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.</p>
+
+<p>Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: &quot;A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution.&quot; This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.</p>
+
+<p>But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: &quot;That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Lodges under Dispensation.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may &quot;admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;&quot; no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be &quot;with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn33">33</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence&mdash;a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership&mdash;they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-03-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it&mdash;nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge&mdash;but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.<sup><a href="#fn34">34</a></sup> But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting <i>ad
+libitum</i> was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the <i>old landmarks be carefully preserved</i>, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; &quot;<i>the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory</i>.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn35">35</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.</p>
+
+<p>This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the &quot;general
+regulations&quot; in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn36">36</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.<sup><a href="#fn37">37</a></sup> The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;<sup><a href="#fn38">38</a></sup> but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.</p>
+
+<p>The Master must be installed by a Past Master,<sup><a href="#fn39">39</a></sup> but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.<sup><a href="#fn40">40</a></sup> The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.</p>
+
+<p>Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.<sup><a href="#fn41">41</a></sup> The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.<sup><a href="#fn42">42</a></sup> This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed &quot;to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn43">43</a></sup> Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.</p>
+
+<p>The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: &quot;The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn44">44</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.<sup><a href="#fn45">45</a></sup> But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. &quot;In the
+Grand Lodge alone,&quot; they declare, &quot;resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England.&quot; They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to <i>exclude</i> a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.<sup><a href="#fn46">46</a></sup> But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.<sup><a href="#fn47">47</a></sup> But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-03-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Duties of a Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.</p>
+
+<p>The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry&mdash;to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission&mdash;declare that &quot;it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry.&quot;
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even <i>it</i> must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, &quot;Nolumus leges Angli&aelig; mutare!&quot; so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, &quot;We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.</p>
+
+<p>No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.</p>
+
+<p>No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that &quot;no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work.&quot; And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. &quot;It would
+be highly improper,&quot; says the Ahiman Rezon, &quot;in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates&mdash;as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, &quot;without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another.&quot;
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.</p>
+
+<p>Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that &quot;no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree.&quot; This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.</p>
+
+<p>There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: &quot;No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.</p>
+
+<p>The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity&mdash;as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity&mdash;I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.</p>
+
+<p>I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Officers in General.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the &quot;Inner Guard.&quot; The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.</p>
+
+<p>The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.</p>
+
+<p>Dalcho lays down the rule, that &quot;no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws.&quot; Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.</p>
+
+<p>If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.</p>
+
+<p>No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.</p>
+
+<p>Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.</p>
+
+<p>An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Worshipful Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.</p>
+
+<p>A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.<sup><a href="#fn48">48</a></sup> This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.</p>
+
+<p>One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.</p>
+
+<p>The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.</p>
+
+<p>The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.</p>
+
+<p>He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.</p>
+
+<p>The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body &quot;on all convenient occasions.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn49">49</a></sup> When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge &quot;in an unjust or arbitrary manner.&quot; But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren&mdash;cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.</p>
+
+<p>Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Wardens.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.</p>
+
+<p>In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.</p>
+
+<p>In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.</p>
+
+<p>The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Treasurer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.</p>
+
+<p>It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer &quot;to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary.&quot; The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.</p>
+
+<p>The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.</p>
+
+<p>The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.</p>
+
+<p>It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Secretary.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, &quot;which may be committed to paper;&quot; to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.</p>
+
+<p>In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.</p>
+
+<p>Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease <i>ex
+necessitate rei</i>, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Deacons.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In every lodge there are two of these officers&mdash;a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.</p>
+
+<p>The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.</p>
+
+<p>The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.</p>
+
+<p>From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Stewards.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, &quot;to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for.&quot; They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.</p>
+
+<p>What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Tiler.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of &quot;cowans and eavesdroppers.&quot; The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be &quot;a
+worthy Master Mason.&quot; An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.</p>
+
+<p>The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Rules of Order.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+&quot;whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn50">50</a></sup> By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of &quot;Parliamentary Law,&quot; have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Order of Business.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>When the Brethren have been &quot;congregated,&quot; or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren &quot;around the lodge,&quot; whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.</p>
+
+<p>As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.</p>
+
+<p>After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.</p>
+
+<p>In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, &quot;the order of the day,&quot; and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: &quot;Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?&quot; In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.</p>
+
+<p>But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.<sup><a href="#fn51">51</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.</p>
+
+<p>In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him &quot;Worshipful.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.</p>
+
+<p>Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.</p>
+
+<p>A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.</p>
+
+<p>No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+&quot;private committees,&quot; to be allowed.</p>
+
+<p>Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of &quot;Brother,&quot;
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.</p>
+
+<p>In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.</p>
+
+<p>It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the &quot;work&quot; of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.</p>
+
+<p>When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.</p>
+
+<p>The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: &quot;Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?&quot; The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.</p>
+
+<p>The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by <i>courtesy</i>, &quot;is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed <i>the right
+to take</i> appeals.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn52">52</a></sup> If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+&quot;in an unjust or arbitrary manner.&quot; But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.</p>
+
+<p>In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Mode of Taking the Question.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The question in Masonry is not taken <i>viva voce</i> or by &quot;aye&quot; and &quot;nay.&quot;
+This should always be done by &quot;a show of hands.&quot; The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, &quot;and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry,&quot; and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words&mdash;&quot;The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn53">53</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Moving the &quot;previous question,&quot; a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Adjournments.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by <i>closing</i> the lodge, or by <i>calling from labor to refreshment</i>. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.</p>
+
+<p>But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of &quot;setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor.&quot; He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his &quot;will and pleasure&quot; only that it is opened, so is it by his &quot;will and
+pleasure&quot; only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.</p>
+
+<p>The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, <i>and not desert the Master till the work is finished</i>.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Appointment of Committees.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.</p>
+
+<p>The Master is also, <i>ex officio</i>, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.</p>
+
+<p>The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A regular communication of &mdash;&mdash; Lodge, NO. &mdash;&mdash;, was holden at &mdash;&mdash;; on
+----, the &mdash;&mdash; day of &mdash;&mdash;A.: L.: 58&mdash;.</p>
+
+<pre>
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B&mdash;&mdash;, W.: Master.
+ &quot; B. C&mdash;&mdash;, S.: Warden.
+ &quot; C. D&mdash;&mdash;, J.: Warden.
+ &quot; D. E&mdash;&mdash;, Treasurer.
+ &quot; E. F&mdash;&mdash;, Secretary.
+ &quot; F. G&mdash;&mdash;, S.: Deacon.
+ &quot; G. H&mdash;&mdash;, J.: Deacon.
+ &quot; H. I&mdash;&mdash;, } Stewards.
+ &quot; I. K&mdash;&mdash;, }
+ &quot; K. L&mdash;&mdash;, Tiler.
+
+ <i>Members.</i>
+ Bro.: L. M&mdash;&mdash;
+ M. N&mdash;&mdash;
+ N. O&mdash;&mdash;
+ O. P&mdash;&mdash;
+
+ <i>Visitors.</i>
+ P. Q&mdash;&mdash;
+ Q. R&mdash;&mdash;
+ R. S&mdash;&mdash;
+ S. T&mdash;&mdash;
+</pre>
+
+<p>The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The minutes of the regular communication of &mdash;&mdash; were read and
+confirmed.<sup><a href="#fn54">54</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.&mdash;&mdash; and H. I.&mdash;&mdash;, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.&mdash;&mdash;, L. M.&mdash;&mdash;, and O. P.&mdash;&mdash;.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.&mdash;&mdash;, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. &mdash;&mdash; at the communication of &mdash;&mdash;, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>Amount received this evening, as follows:</p>
+
+<table summary="amount received">
+<tr><td> Petition </td><td>of </td><td>Mr. G. F., </td><td>$5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> Fee </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. C. B., </td><td>5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> do. </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. S. R., </td><td>5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> do. </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. W. Y., </td><td>5&mdash;</td><td>Total, $20</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.</p>
+
+<p>There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.</p>
+
+<p>E. F&mdash;&mdash;,</p>
+
+<p><i>Secretary.</i></p>
+
+<p>Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.</p>
+</div></div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b3">
+<h2>Book Third.</h2>
+
+<h3>The Law of Individuals.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Qualifications of Candidates.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character&mdash;moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.</p>
+
+<p>The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.</p>
+
+<p>The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as &quot;a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+&quot;depositary of his heart,&quot; as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, &quot;a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.</p>
+
+<p>Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.</p>
+
+<p>These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.</p>
+
+<p><i>Morally</i>, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living &quot;under the tongue of good
+report.&quot;</p>
+
+<p><i>Physically</i>, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a <i>man</i> ought to be.</p>
+
+<p><i>Intellectually</i>, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.</p>
+
+<p><i>Politically</i>, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.</p>
+
+<p>But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The old charges state, that &quot;a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law.&quot; It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, &quot;moral law,&quot;
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be &quot;a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine.&quot; A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.</p>
+
+<p>The word &quot;libertine&quot; has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a &quot;free-thinker,&quot; or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.</p>
+
+<p>These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be &quot;a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that &quot;The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men&mdash;no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.</p>
+
+<p>The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+&quot;<i>a man</i>.&quot; No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.</p>
+
+<p>As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+&quot;of mature and discreet age.&quot; But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that &quot;no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn55">55</a></sup> In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,<sup><a href="#fn56">56</a></sup>
+&quot;unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;&quot; in Ireland, twenty-one, except &quot;by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;&quot; in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army&mdash;such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.</p>
+
+<p>Our ritual excludes &quot;an old man in his dotage&quot; equally with a &quot;young man
+under age.&quot; But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.</p>
+
+<p>The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+&quot;a perfect youth,&quot; has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided &quot;the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares &quot;that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of <i>able</i> body.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn57">57</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, &quot;of able body,&quot; and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that <i>he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have.&quot;</i><sup><a href="#fn58">58</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Notwithstanding the positive demand for <i>perfection</i>, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have <i>no maim or defect</i>, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is <i>perfect</i> is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all&mdash;it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, &quot;words,&quot; says Blackstone, &quot;are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,&quot;
+and then &quot;perfect&quot; would mean, &quot;complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant.&quot; But another source of interpretation is, the &quot;comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn59">59</a></sup> Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word &quot;perfect,&quot; if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must &quot;<i>have his right limbs as a man ought to have</i>.&quot;
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.</p>
+
+<p>But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, &quot;the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law&quot; is, to consider
+&quot;the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it.&quot; Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be <i>perfect</i>, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, &quot;that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens,&quot; of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. &quot;The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea,&quot; says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,<sup><a href="#fn60">60</a></sup> &quot;that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration.&quot; If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words <i>perfect youth</i> are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has &quot;his right limbs as a man ought to
+have.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn61">61</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word &quot;perfect,&quot; and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word &quot;<i>that</i>.&quot; He must have no maim or defect
+<i>that</i> may render him incapable; that is, <i>because</i>, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.</p>
+
+<p>In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be &quot;men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch.&quot; It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.</p>
+
+<p>A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.</p>
+
+<p>In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+&quot;deformed or dismembered at the time of their making.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that &quot;every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In the &quot;Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual,&quot; published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be &quot;hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn62">62</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.</p>
+
+<p>In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not &quot;sound in mind
+and <i>all their members</i>,&quot; and she adopted a resolution asserting that &quot;the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn63">63</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency<sup><a href="#fn64">64</a></sup> has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed.&quot;&mdash;<i>Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia</i>, 1848, <i>page</i> 36.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.<sup><a href="#fn65">65</a></sup> It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish&mdash;a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &amp;c....</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a <i>man</i>
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity.&quot;&mdash;<i>Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in</i> 1848.<sup><a href="#fn66">66</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order&mdash;the ancient charges&mdash;forbid
+it.&quot;&mdash;<i>Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of <i>entire
+limbs</i>&quot;&mdash;<i>Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach <i>us</i> to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries.&quot;&mdash;<i>Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution.&quot;&mdash;<i>Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in</i> 1849.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman.&quot;&mdash;<i>Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in</i> 1849.</p>
+
+<p>Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply&mdash;guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law&mdash;and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683&mdash;I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?</p>
+
+<p>During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a <i>fool</i> nor an <i>idiot</i>, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import,&quot; etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, &quot;Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order.&quot; If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.</p>
+
+<p>It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: &quot;No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity.&quot; And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.</p>
+
+<p>But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.</p>
+
+<p>From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.</p>
+
+<p>As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.</p>
+
+<p>Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.</p>
+
+<p>A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.</p>
+
+<p>Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be <i>free-born</i>. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude&mdash;though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty&mdash;is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that &quot;freedom, fervency, and
+zeal,&quot; which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+&quot;Children,&quot; says Oliver, &quot;cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.</p>
+
+<p>Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former&mdash;the accepted one, to whom the promise was given&mdash;was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have &quot;his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him,&quot; was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, &quot;Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son.&quot; Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he &quot;had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women.&quot; The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word &#948;&#959;&#965;&#955;&#959;&#960;&#961;&#949;&#960;&#949;&#953;&#945; or, &quot;slave manners,&quot; to
+designate any very great impropriety of manners.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge &quot;to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison,&quot; and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that &quot;it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action Thereon.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+&quot;petition.&quot; This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be &quot;a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn67">67</a></sup> This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.</p>
+
+<p>The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.</p>
+
+<p>But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.</p>
+
+<p>The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: &quot;No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;&quot;
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.</p>
+
+<p>If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.</p>
+
+<p>Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without &quot;due
+inquiry&quot; into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.</p>
+
+<p>But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of &quot;making Masons,&quot; I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Balloting for Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be &quot;formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent <i>in their own prudent way</i> either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity.&quot; Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.</p>
+
+<p>From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right&mdash;to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.<sup><a href="#fn68">68</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.</p>
+
+<p>No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+&quot;and if,&quot; as Wayland says, &quot;from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms.&quot; Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.</p>
+
+<p>And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.</p>
+
+<p>The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: &quot;but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the <i>unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge</i> then present when the candidate is proposed.&quot;
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+&quot;New Regulations,&quot; adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted &quot;only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks,&quot; it is said: &quot;but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn69">69</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.</p>
+
+<p>Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that <i>every member present</i> shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted &quot;by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed.&quot; This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called &quot;an inherent
+privilege,&quot; which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.</p>
+
+<p>Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.<sup><a href="#fn70">70</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:&mdash;The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic <i>circumambulation</i>
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.</p>
+
+<p>These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.</p>
+
+<p>As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.</p>
+
+<p>The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats</p>
+
+<p>The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to &quot;take charge of the ballot box.&quot; That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that &quot;the box is clear in the South,&quot;
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that &quot;the box is foul in the
+South.&quot; The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of &quot;West&quot; and &quot;East.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>If the box is <i>clear</i>&mdash;that is, if all the ballots are white&mdash;the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.</p>
+
+<p>But if the box is declared to be <i>foul</i>, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be &quot;clear,&quot; or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, &quot;if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.</p>
+
+<p>I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the <i>quantity</i> than to the <i>quality</i> of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.</p>
+
+<p>Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.</p>
+
+<p>In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is &quot;clear,&quot; all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is &quot;foul,&quot; each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.</p>
+
+<p>But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a <i>reconsideration</i>, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>motion for reconsideration</i> is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that <i>the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box</i>. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.</p>
+
+<p>In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.</p>
+
+<p>If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;&mdash;now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast&mdash;the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.</p>
+
+<p>But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken&mdash;the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.<sup><a href="#fn71">71</a></sup> After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.</p>
+
+<p>Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.</p>
+
+<p>It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.</p>
+
+<p>It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this&mdash;that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of &quot;Duty of
+Members&quot; (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren &quot;are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity.&quot; And the regulation goes on to
+say: &quot;Nor is this inherent privilege <i>subject to a dispensation</i>, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge.&quot; This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+&quot;to give their consent in their own prudent way;&quot; it would be an
+infringement of an &quot;inherent privilege,&quot; and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.</p>
+
+<p>I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:</p>
+
+<p>1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.</p>
+
+<p>2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.</p>
+
+<p>3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.</p>
+
+<p>4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?</p>
+
+<p>It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:</p>
+
+<p>Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation&mdash;there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions&mdash;and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren&mdash;it must be again referred to
+a committee&mdash;lie over for a month&mdash;and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.</p>
+
+<p>If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-09">
+<h4>Section IX.</h4>
+
+<p><i>Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement</i>.</p>
+
+
+<p>There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts&mdash;the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher&mdash;and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember &quot;a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>An hundred years ago it was said that &quot;Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn72">72</a></sup> And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.</p>
+
+<p>There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a &quot;suitable proficiency&quot; in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made &quot;suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved&mdash;made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, &quot;that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.</p>
+
+<p>This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, &quot;that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander.&quot; In the same charges, it is prescribed that &quot;no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: &quot;Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work<sup><a href="#fn73">73</a></sup> who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the &quot;Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons&quot; to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that &quot;a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that &quot;no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;&quot;
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, &quot;<i>on very particular occasions only</i>, may be
+requested.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn74">74</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work&mdash;and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn75">75</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty &quot;of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree.&quot; And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: &quot;All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented&mdash;and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.</p>
+
+<p>This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Many persons,&quot; says that able philosopher of Masonry, &quot;are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn76">76</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-10">
+<h4>Section X.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.</p>
+
+<p>The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.</p>
+
+<p>Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.</p>
+
+<p>Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have &quot;due and timely notice,&quot; and be prepared to exercise his
+&quot;inherent privilege&quot; of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.</p>
+
+<p>If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.</p>
+
+<p>But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, &quot;a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.</p>
+
+<p>I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-11">
+<h4>Section XI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The fourth General Regulation decrees that &quot;no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time.&quot; This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.</p>
+
+<p>The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that &quot;no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-12">
+<h4>Section XII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A&mdash;&mdash;, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B&mdash;&mdash;, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A&mdash;&mdash;, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A&mdash;&mdash; to grant permission
+to the lodge at B&mdash;&mdash; to confer them on the candidate.</p>
+
+<p>But how shall this permission be given&mdash;by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A&mdash;&mdash;? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A&mdash;&mdash;, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a &quot;fractious member will be imposed on
+them,&quot; as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B&mdash;&mdash;. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A&mdash;-. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B&mdash;-, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.</p>
+
+<p>I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-13">
+<h4>Section XIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Initiation of Non-residents.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:&mdash;First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.</p>
+
+<p>2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made &quot;in due form,&quot; and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?</p>
+
+<p>The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.</p>
+
+<p>In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, &quot;that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn77">77</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal&mdash;the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge&mdash;and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.</p>
+
+<p>Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the <i>mode how</i>, they might also have prescribed
+the <i>place where</i>, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.</p>
+
+<p>A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid&mdash;as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done&mdash;the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.</p>
+
+<p>The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.</p>
+
+<p>What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, &quot;a distrust of his
+acceptance&quot; at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.</p>
+
+<p>At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.</p>
+
+<p>These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.</p>
+
+<p>But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is <i>ex gratia</i>,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd&mdash;because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.</p>
+
+<p>It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.</p>
+
+<p>If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.</p>
+
+<p>The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.</p>
+
+<p>But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.</p>
+
+<p>Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.</p>
+
+<p>The question next occurs&mdash;What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor&mdash;that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light&mdash;and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it&mdash;it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, &quot;unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election,&quot; and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,<sup><a href="#fn78">78</a></sup> it is said that &quot;the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,&quot;
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn79">79</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, <i>mutatis mutandis</i>,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Master Masons.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Membership.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: &quot;Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn80">80</a></sup> If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.</p>
+
+<p>How long before he loses this right by a <i>non-user</i>, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.</p>
+
+<p>But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.</p>
+
+<p>A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+&quot;good standing&quot; until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the &quot;good standing&quot; of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.</p>
+
+<p>If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.</p>
+
+<p>In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be made or <i>admitted a member</i> of a particular lodge,&quot; says
+the fifth regulation, &quot;without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>And the sixth regulation adds, that &quot;no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or <i>admitted to be a member</i> thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.</p>
+
+<p>But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.</p>
+
+<p>A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.</p>
+
+<p>Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Visit.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the &quot;Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,&quot;
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,<sup><a href="#fn81">81</a></sup>it is directed &quot;that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, &quot;received, and
+cherished,&quot; and &quot;set on work,&quot; that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, &quot;that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn82">82</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>A lodge, when not opened for &quot;general masonic business,&quot; but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened &quot;<i>en
+famille</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.</p>
+
+<p>Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.</p>
+
+<p>There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,<sup><a href="#fn83">83</a></sup> and which is in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept.&quot; This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.</p>
+
+<p>Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Examination of Visitors.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.</p>
+
+<p>Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words</p>
+
+<p>&quot;I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of &quot;commencing at the beginning&quot; should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted&mdash;categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+&quot;rusty,&quot; or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.</p>
+
+<p>Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: &quot;I am not
+satisfied,&quot; or, &quot;I do not recognize you,&quot; and not in more specific terms,
+such as, &quot;You did not answer this inquiry,&quot; or, &quot;You are ignorant on that
+point.&quot; The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.</p>
+
+<p>Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called &quot;leading
+questions,&quot; or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry <i>it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted</i>.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Vouching for a Brother.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity&mdash;since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful&mdash;that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.</p>
+
+<p>To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+&quot;<i>strict trial, due examination, or lawful information</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be <i>competent</i> to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.</p>
+
+<p>Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.</p>
+
+<p>If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: &quot;A.B. is a Mason,&quot; is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: &quot;I know this
+man to be a Master Mason,&quot; for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.</p>
+
+<p>If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a &quot;Lodge of Master Masons.&quot; A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Claiming Relief.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. &quot;As we have therefore
+opportunity,&quot; says St. Paul, &quot;let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of &quot;Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:&quot;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.</p>
+
+<p>He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word &quot; benefit,&quot; as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.</p>
+
+<p>He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, &quot;true and genuine.&quot; True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of &quot;faithful&quot; or &quot;trusty.&quot; A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Masonic Burial.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.<sup><a href="#fn84">84</a></sup> As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.</p>
+
+<p>But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.</p>
+
+<p>The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.<sup><a href="#fn85">85</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member&mdash;foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.</p>
+
+<p>The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, &quot;by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn86">86</a></sup> It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Past Masters.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,<sup><a href="#fn87">87</a></sup> and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.</p>
+
+<p>In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as &quot;virtual&quot; and as &quot;actual&quot; Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.</p>
+
+<p>An <i>actual Past Master</i> is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A <i>virtual
+Past Master</i> is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.</p>
+
+<p>Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?</p>
+
+<p>The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.</p>
+
+<p>In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.</p>
+
+<p>In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that &quot;it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn88">88</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider &quot;that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;&quot; and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such &quot;legal means&quot; of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.</p>
+
+<p>This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: &quot;The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least <i>three installed Masters</i>&quot;<sup><a href="#fn89">89</a></sup>
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, &quot;this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but <i>installed</i>
+Masters be present.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn90">90</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.</p>
+
+<p>The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times&mdash;that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.</p>
+
+<p>On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.</p>
+
+<p>A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.</p>
+
+<p>He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.</p>
+
+<p>By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-06">
+<h3>Chapter VI.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Affiliation.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be &quot;initiated,&quot; but a Mason is
+&quot;affiliated.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn91">91</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.</p>
+
+<p>A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. &quot;No man can be made, <i>or admitted a member</i> * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;&quot; are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: &quot;But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, <i>or admitted to be a member</i> thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a &quot;demit,&quot; and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.</p>
+
+<p>Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.</p>
+
+<p>A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.</p>
+
+<p>In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.</p>
+
+<p>The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that &quot;no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality.&quot; This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, &quot;this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn92">92</a></sup> Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-07">
+<h3>Chapter VII.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Demitting.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a <i>demit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation &quot;that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another.&quot; Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors &quot;of
+his own free will and accord,&quot; and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that</p>
+
+<blockquote class="poetry"><p>
+<span class="line"> &quot;A man convinced against his will,<br /></span>
+<span class="line"> Is of the same opinion still,&quot;</span>
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.</p>
+
+<p>The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.</p>
+
+<p>But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.</p>
+
+<p>There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.</p>
+
+<p>With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-08">
+<h3>Chapter VIII.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Unaffiliated Masons.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: &quot;every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed&mdash;Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that &quot;it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn93">93</a></sup> A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.</p>
+
+<p>Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the <i>right</i> of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association&mdash;the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:<sup><a href="#fn94">94</a></sup> &quot;The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, <i>nolens volens,</i> money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, <i>Free</i> and Accepted.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.</p>
+
+<p>We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the <i>Lodge organization</i> of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened&mdash;he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple&mdash;the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.</p>
+
+<p>But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of &quot;once a Mason,
+and always a Mason,&quot; it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.</p>
+
+<p>Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says &quot;if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire <i>as to anything</i>.&quot; But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone &quot;lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother,&quot; that
+we are in cases of &quot;imminent peril&quot; to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when <i>duly</i> called for.</p>
+
+<p>I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:</p>
+
+<p>1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when <i>he asks for that aid in
+the</i> proper <i>and conventional way</i>.</p>
+
+<p>3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.</p>
+
+<p>4. He loses the general right to visit<sup><a href="#fn95">95</a></sup> lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.</p>
+
+<p>5. He loses the right of masonic burial.</p>
+
+<p>6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b4">
+<h2>Book Fourth.</h2>
+
+<h3>Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.</h3>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of What Are Masonic Crimes.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.</p>
+
+<p>In replying to the question, &quot;what are masonic crimes?&quot; by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.</p>
+
+<p>But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.</p>
+
+<p>Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.</p>
+
+<p>Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, &quot;to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;&quot; and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.</p>
+
+<p>In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+&quot;that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, <i>they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible</i>&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.</p>
+
+<p>The first charge says: &quot;a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law.&quot; Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be &quot;the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn96">96</a></sup> Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we &quot;should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)<sup><a href="#fn97">97</a></sup>
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.</p>
+
+<p>But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all &quot;wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.</p>
+
+<p>From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Masonic Punishments.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Censure.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.</p>
+
+<p>Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.</p>
+
+<p>A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<a name="b4-02-02"></a>
+<h5><i>Of Reprimand.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.</p>
+
+<p>A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.</p>
+
+<p>If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.</p>
+
+<p>The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.</p>
+
+<p>A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Exclusion from the Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.</p>
+
+<p>1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.</p>
+
+<p>I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged &quot;to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge,&quot; it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.</p>
+
+<p>2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, <i>suspension from the lodge,</i> and sometimes <i>erasure from the
+roll</i>. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.</p>
+
+<p>But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.</p>
+
+<p>The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.</p>
+
+<p>Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.</p>
+
+<p>The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term &quot;expelled&quot; is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the raft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called &quot;exclusion.&quot; The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Definite Suspension.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.</p>
+
+<p>Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.</p>
+
+<p>In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.</p>
+
+<p>At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of <i>Restoration.</i></p>
+
+<p>By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason&mdash;is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren&mdash;is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Indefinite Suspension.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.</p>
+
+<p>All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.</p>
+
+<p>By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.</p>
+
+<p>The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits&mdash;the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.</p>
+
+<p>No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Expulsion.</i><sup><a href="#fn98">98</a></sup></h5>
+
+
+<p>Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.</p>
+
+<p>It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.<sup><a href="#fn99">99</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.</p>
+
+<p>As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure&mdash;he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.</p>
+
+<p>The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:&mdash;Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn100">100</a></sup></p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Masonic Trials.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-03-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Form of Trial.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.</p>
+
+<p>A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.</p>
+
+<p>This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.</p>
+
+<p>The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.</p>
+
+<p>Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.</p>
+
+<p>It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.</p>
+
+<p>If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge&mdash;that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.</p>
+
+<p>The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.</p>
+
+<p>When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.</p>
+
+<p>Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.</p>
+
+<p>If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.</p>
+
+<p>For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.</p>
+
+<p>The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.</p>
+
+<p>If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.</p>
+
+<p>In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-03-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.</p>
+
+<p>The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.</p>
+
+<p>1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.<sup><a href="#fn101">101</a></sup>
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.</p>
+
+<p>2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that &quot;an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, &quot;such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath.&quot; Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,<sup><a href="#fn102">102</a></sup> that &quot;the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.</p>
+
+<p>Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.</p>
+
+<p>The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great &quot;Treatise on the Law of Evidence,&quot; says: &quot;In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.</p>
+
+<p>Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen&mdash;and
+this is a very conceivable case&mdash;that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.</p>
+
+<p>If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected&mdash;if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.</p>
+
+<p>But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as &quot;profanes&quot; would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself&mdash;of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.</p>
+
+<p>But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an <i>alibi</i>, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a &quot;profane&quot; is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.</p>
+
+<p>It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.</p>
+
+<p>The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.</p>
+
+<p>The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.</p>
+
+<p>The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer&mdash;the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.</p>
+
+<p>The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.</p>
+
+<p>The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.</p>
+
+<p>1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.</p>
+
+<p>2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.</p>
+
+<p>This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.</p>
+
+<p>3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.</p>
+
+<p>4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Appeals.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.</p>
+
+<p>But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced <i>de novo</i>, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate&mdash;either too severe, or not sufficiently so&mdash;in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.</p>
+
+<p>During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason &quot;under charges.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-06">
+<h3>Chapter VI.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Restoration.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.</p>
+
+<p>I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.</p>
+
+<p>Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member&mdash;for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.</p>
+
+<p>Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.</p>
+
+<p>But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, <i>shall
+not</i> be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment&mdash;and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world&mdash;the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived&mdash;could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.</p>
+
+<p>On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned <i>sine
+die</i>; for it has done all that is required&mdash;the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+&quot;Another capital offense against public justice,&quot; says Blackstone, &quot;is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+<i>before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported.&quot; </i> Mark these qualifying words: &quot;before the expiration of
+the term:&quot; they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return <i>after</i> the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:</p>
+
+<p><i>It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.</p>
+
+<p>But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.</p>
+
+<p>Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: &quot;I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?&quot; Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.</p>
+
+<p>The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens&mdash;every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty&mdash;and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.</p>
+
+<p>But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.</p>
+
+<p>Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely&mdash;that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge&mdash;may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.</p>
+
+<p>But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing&mdash;both are equally unconnected with the institution&mdash;the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.</p>
+
+<p>Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.</p>
+
+<p>In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.</p>
+
+<p>But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.</p>
+
+<p>The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.</p>
+
+<p>The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that &quot;no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members&quot;&mdash;which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, &quot;lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge.&quot; But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones&mdash;to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent&mdash;clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong&mdash;so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+<a name="index"></a>
+<div class="chapter">
+<h2>Index.</h2>
+
+
+
+<h3>A.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Accused, to what he is entitled<br />
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;it was never enforced<br />
+Actual Past Master, term defined<br />
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, cannot be entertained<br />
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges<br />
+Affiliation, what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;requires unanimity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Master Masons only entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may be made with more than one lodge<br />
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to<br />
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;not to be entertained in a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be taken from the chair<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;doctrine of, discussed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;pending one, the sentence is in abeyance<br />
+Apprentices, rights of <i>(see Entered Apprentice</i>)<br />
+Arrears, non-payment of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to lodges, history of their origin<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;do not accrue during suspension<br />
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;in 926 at York<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;governed the craft for nearly 800 years<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how organized<br />
+Atheist cannot be a Mason<br />
+Authorities for masonic law</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>B.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Balloting for candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;every member must take a part in it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;secrecy of, inviolable<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be unanimous<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of<br />
+Balloting in each degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be unanimous<br />
+Ballot, reconsideration of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, out of order<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be granted by dispensation<br />
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry<br />
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge<br />
+Burial, masonic, right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be requested except for strangers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master Masons only entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;dispensation for, not usually required<br />
+Business, order of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be suspended at any time by the Master<br />
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>C.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Calling from labor to refreshment<br />
+Censure, a masonic punishment<br />
+Certificates, masonic<br />
+Chaplain, Grand (<i>see Grand Chaplain</i>)<br />
+Charges of accusation, how to be made<br />
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master<br />
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates<br />
+Committees to be appointed by the Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master is chairman of, when present<br />
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated<br />
+Consecration of a lodge how performed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Constitutions, how to be altered<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;Gothic, adopted in 926,<br />
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;why elements,<br />
+Crimes, masonic,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;enumeration of</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>D.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Deacons,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;two in each lodge,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;are appointed officers,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;not removable by Master or Senior Warden<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;Grand <i>(see Grand Deacons</i>)<br />
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;to whom, and why,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Definite suspension<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication<br />
+Demitting<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;right of, not denied until recently,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;regulations concerning<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;of many at one time may be refused<br />
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;office of, not very ancient<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;cannot be more than one<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;originally appointed by Grand Master<br />
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,<br />
+Dispensation what and where to be granted<br />
+&quot;for a lodge<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;&quot; tenure of its duration<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;&quot; difference from a Warrant<br />
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention<br />
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;meaning of the term<br />
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>E.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Emergency, rule upon the subject<br />
+Entered Apprentice, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly a member of his lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may sit in a lodge of his degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot speak or vote<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be deprived of his rights without trial<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge<br />
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment<br />
+Evidence in masonic trials<br />
+Examination of visitors<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be conducted<br />
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment<br />
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+Expulsion is masonic death<br />
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;from higher degrees, its effect<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>F.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief<br />
+Fellow Craft, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly permitted to speak, but not vote<br />
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another<br />
+Fool cannot be a Mason<br />
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making<br />
+Free-born, a Mason must be<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;reason for the rule<br />
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>G.</h3>
+
+
+<p>General Assembly. (<i>See Assembly, General.</i>)<br />
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate<br />
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926<br />
+Grand Chaplain,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office established in 1775<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Deacons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office more ancient than Oliver supposes<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how appointed<br />
+Grand Lodge held in 1717<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of organizing one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;three lodges necessary to organize one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;all the Craft formerly members of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Masters and Wardens of lodges are members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Grand Officers are also members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Past Masters are not members by inherent right<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers and prerogatives<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may make new regulations<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must observe the landmarks<br />
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;are comparatively modern institutions<br />
+Grand Marshal<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by the Grand Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office of has existed since the origin of Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;an elective officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;by whom to be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;prerogatives of, derived from two sources<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;no appeal from his decision<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to two votes<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be punished<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may grant dispensations<br />
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may constitute new lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him<br />
+Grand Pursuivant<br />
+Grand Secretary<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office of established in 1723<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant<br />
+Grand Stewards<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;first mentioned in 1721<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by Junior Grand Warden<br />
+Grand Stewards' Lodge<br />
+Grand Sword-Bearer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, constituted in 1731<br />
+Grand Tiler<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, must have existed from the earliest times<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must not be a member of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected<br />
+Grand Treasurer<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, established in 1724<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;has always been elected<br />
+Grand Wardens<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;originally appointed by the Grand Master<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;succeed the Grand Master and Deputy</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>H.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Heresy not a masonic crime<br />
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from<br />
+Historical sketch</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>I.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Idiot cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination<br />
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are<br />
+Indefinite suspension<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry<br />
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate<br />
+Installation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;whence the term derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;necessary to legal existence of an officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of a Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of the Grand Master<br />
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge<br />
+Investigation of character must be by a committee<br />
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of the term</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>J.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,<br />
+Junior Grand Warden<br />
+Junior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over the craft during refreshment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;appoints the stewards<br />
+Jurisdiction of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;geographical or personal<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;is over all its members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot extend beyond State lines,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;none over its Master</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>K.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>L.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Labor, calling from, to refreshment<br />
+Landmarks, what they are,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;ritual and legislative<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be observed by the Grand Lodge<br />
+Law of Grand Lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;subordinate lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;individuals<br />
+Lawful information, what it is<br />
+Laws, how to be interpreted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;of Masonry are of two kinds&mdash;written and unwritten<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;written, whence derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;unwritten, whence derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;same as ancient usage<br />
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of the term<br />
+Lodge, subordinate<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how organized<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must have been congregated by some superior authority<br />
+Lodge, under dispensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;generally precedes a warranted lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how formed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot make by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot elect officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot install officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot elect members<br />
+Lodge, warranted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers and rights<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be consecrated<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be dedicated<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be constituted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its officers must be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;ceremony of installation in<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers are inherent in it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its reserved rights are secured by the regulations<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may select its own members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;elects its own officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what officers of, are elected in England<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may install its officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master of, must be installed by a past Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be represented in the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;representatives of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may instruct its representatives<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may frame by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may suspend or exclude a member<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may levy annual contributions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may select its name<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot select its number<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot alter the ritual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must elect officers at a particular time<br />
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot initiate without previous notice<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must meet once a month<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;officers of</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>M.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Madmen cannot be Masons<br />
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;reason for the rule relating to<br />
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge<br />
+Master, Grand. <i>(See Grand Master</i>.)<br />
+Master Mason, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;becomes a member by signing the by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how this right is forfeited<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may apply to any lodge for membership<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to whom subject for discipline<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may speak and vote on all questions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may hold any office to which elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;but to serve as Master must have been a Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may appeal to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may visit any lodge, after examination<br />
+Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must have previously served as Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be installed by a Past Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;has the warrant in charge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;may call special meetings of his lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;may close his lodge at any time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over business as well as labor<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;is supreme in his lodge<br />
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand<br />
+Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;moral qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;intellectual qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;who is to judge of them<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a member of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may exclude a member temporarily<br />
+Membership, right of<br />
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers<br />
+Minutes, when to be read<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be amended<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not to be read at special communications<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formula for keeping<br />
+Moral law, what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a Mason must obey it<br />
+Motions, when to be entertained</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>N.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Name of a lodge to be selected by itself<br />
+Non-residents, initiation of<br />
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidates to be initiated at one communication</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>O.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not vacated by suspension<br />
+Officers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;subordinate lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;warranted lodge must be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;time of election determined by Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;elected annually<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;vacancies in, how to be supplied<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot resign<br />
+Order, rules of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;whence derived</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>P.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry<br />
+Past Masters<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may install their successors<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of two kinds&mdash;actual and virtual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may preside in a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;eligible to election to the chair<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to a seat in the East<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master<br />
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge<br />
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term<br />
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate<br />
+Petition of candidate<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be read at a regular communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;referred to a committee of three<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;reported on at next regular communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;report on, cannot be made at a special communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;renewal of, in case of rejection<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be renewed, if rejected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for advancement to a higher degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;if rejected, how to be renewed<br />
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what they must set forth<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be recommended by nearest lodge<br />
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge<br />
+Political qualifications of candidates<br />
+Postponed business, when to be called up<br />
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers<br />
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time<br />
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry<br />
+Probation of candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for initiation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for advancement<br />
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one<br />
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials<br />
+Proficiency of candidates<br />
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable<br />
+Punishments, masonic<br />
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>Q.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Qualifications of a Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidates,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;moral<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;religious<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;physical<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;intellectual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;political, 184<br />
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717<br />
+Question, how to be taken on a motion</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>R.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Reading, a qualification of candidates<br />
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidate, must be by two members<br />
+Reconsideration of ballot<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, is out of order,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be granted by dispensation<br />
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;renewed petition of, when to be made,<br />
+Relief, right of claiming it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;unworthy Masons not entitled to it<br />
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be<br />
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge<br />
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of<br />
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are<br />
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment<br />
+Restoration<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;from definite suspension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;indefinite supension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;expulsion<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be at a stated communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be by Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;requires a unanimous vote<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;to membership discussed</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>S.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Secretary, Grand. (<i>See Grand Secretary.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;his duty<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a check upon the treasurer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;often receives compensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;but not in case of removal, or sickness<br />
+Senior Grand Warden. (<i>See Grand Wardens.</i>)<br />
+Senior Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;presides in absence of Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may invite a Past Master to preside<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over the craft during labor<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appoints the Junior Deacon<br />
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash; is in abeyance pending an appeal<br />
+Stewards, Grand. (<i>See Grand Stewards.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by Junior Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not removable by Junior Warden<br />
+Stranger, initiation of<br />
+Suspension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definite<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;indefinite<br />
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (<i>See Grand Sword Bearer.</i>)</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>T.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials<br />
+Tiler, Grand. (<i>See Grand Tiler.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office existed from beginning of the institution<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;no lodge can be without one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be a worthy Master Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;if a member, the office does not disfranchise him<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be removed for misconduct<br />
+Tiler's obligation, form of it<br />
+Transient persons, initiation of<br />
+Treasurer, Grand. <i>(See Grand Treasurer</i>.)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;is the only banker of the lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;is a disbursing officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a Brother of worldly substance usually selected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;in case of death, a successor may be elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;but not in case of sickness, or removal<br />
+Trials, masonic<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;form of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;evidence in</p>
+
+
+<h3>U.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Unaffiliated Masons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;tax sometimes levied on<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;position, rights, and duties of<br />
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;effect of, on a Mason<br />
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions<br />
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution</p>
+
+
+<h3>V.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Virtual Past Masters, who they are<br />
+Visit, right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;only affiliated Mason entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be preceded by an examination<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;requires a certificate to insure it<br />
+Visitors, examination of, described<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must take the Tiler's obligation<br />
+Voting must always be by a show of hands<br />
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present<br />
+Voucher must be a competent Mason<br />
+Vouching for a visitor</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>W.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Wardens, Grand. (<i>See Grand Wardens.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge are assistants of the Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to membership in Grand Lodge<br />
+Warden, Senior. (<i>See Senior Warden.</i>)<br />
+Warden, Junior. (<i>See Junior Warden.</i>)<br />
+Warrant of constitution<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its difference from a dispensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;confers powers of installation and succession<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not necessary before 1717<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge<br />
+Warranted lodges. (<i>See Lodges, Warranted.</i>)<br />
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of incompetent ones<br />
+Woman cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Writing, a qualification of candidates</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>Y.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic<br />
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term<br /></p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="footnotes">
+<h2>Footnotes</h2>
+
+
+
+<div id="fn1"><p>1. They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn2"><p>2. Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn3"><p>3. In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723&mdash;a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn4"><p>4. The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn5"><p>5. Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn6"><p>6. General Regulations, art. xxxix.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn7"><p>7. Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact &quot;does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted.&quot;&mdash;p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. &quot;The Brethren,&quot;
+he says, &quot;by a majority of hands, elected,&quot; &amp;c.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn8"><p>8. Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn9"><p>9. Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn10"><p>10. Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn11"><p>11. Article xxxiv.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn12"><p>12. His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn13"><p>13. Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn14"><p>14. Art. xxxix.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn15"><p>15. The word &quot;time&quot; has been interpreted to mean <i>communication</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn16"><p>16. And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn17"><p>17. What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn18"><p>18. It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn19"><p>19. Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn20"><p>20. Book of Const., p. 233.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn21"><p>21. Book of Const., p. 313.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn22"><p>22. Book of Constitutions, p. 319.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn23"><p>23. Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn24"><p>24. Book of Constitutions, p. 247</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn25"><p>25. The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn26"><p>26. That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn27"><p>27. Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn28"><p>28. It was abolished in New York in 1854.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn29"><p>29. This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn30"><p>30. &quot;What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it.&quot; Deut. xx. 5.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn31"><p>31. De Syned. Vet. Ebr&aelig;or., 1. iii., c. xiv., &sect; 1.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn32"><p>32. Cicero, Brut. i.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn33"><p>33. See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn34"><p>34. Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn35"><p>35. Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn36"><p>36. General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn37"><p>37. Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. <i>Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England</i>, 1847, <i>p</i>. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn38"><p>38. The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. <i>English
+Constitutions, as above, p.</i> 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn39"><p>39. It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn40"><p>40. No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. <i>English
+Constitutions</i> (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn41"><p>41. Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. <i>English
+Constitutions, p</i>. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn42"><p>42. We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn43"><p>43. Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn44"><p>44. General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn45"><p>45. English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn46"><p>46. In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn47"><p>47. Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn48"><p>48. &quot;No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden.&quot;&mdash;<i>Old Charges</i>, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn49"><p>49. Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn50"><p>50. Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn51"><p>51. One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, &quot;the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and <i>carefully finish
+the work they begin</i>.&quot;&mdash;Oliver's Preston, p. 27, <i>note</i> (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn52"><p>52. Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn53"><p>53. Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn54"><p>54. If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn55"><p>55. Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn56"><p>56. Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn57"><p>57. See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn58"><p>58. Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn59"><p>59. Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., &sect; 2.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn60"><p>60. In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn61"><p>61. Potter, 184.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn62"><p>62. Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, &quot;provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry.&quot;</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn63"><p>63. Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn64"><p>64. When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn65"><p>65. Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn66"><p>66. See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn67"><p>67. Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn68"><p>68. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, <i>Ballot</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn69"><p>69. Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn70"><p>70. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. <i>Ballot</i></p></div>
+
+<div id="fn71"><p>71. Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn72"><p>72. Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn73"><p>73. That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn74"><p>74. This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn75"><p>75. Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn76"><p>76. Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn77"><p>77. Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn78"><p>78. Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn79"><p>79. Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn80"><p>80. Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn81"><p>81. Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, <i>note</i> (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn82"><p>82. See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn83"><p>83. Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn84"><p>84. See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn85"><p>85. Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn86"><p>86. Preston, Oliver's Edit&quot; p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn87"><p>87. Book I., chap. iii.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn88"><p>88. Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn89"><p>89. Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn90"><p>90. Ibid</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn91"><p>91. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, <i>in voce</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn92"><p>92. Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn93"><p>93. Proceedings for 1853.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn94"><p>94. Proceedings for 1847.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn95"><p>95. The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn96"><p>96. Blackstone, Introd., &sect; i.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn97"><p>97. For so we should interpret the word &quot;honeste.&quot;</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn98"><p>98. I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my &quot;Lexicon of
+Freemasonry,&quot; and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn99"><p>99. In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called &quot;exclusion,&quot; and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn100"><p>100. Lexicon of Freemasonry.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn101"><p>101. Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn102"><p>102. Chief Baron Gilbert.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 12186 ***</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+
+
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fbbca1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #12186 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12186)
diff --git a/old/12186-0.txt b/old/12186-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9e30e52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,8579 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Principles of Masonic Law
+ A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+ Freemasonry
+
+
+Author: Albert G. Mackey
+
+Release Date: April 28, 2004 [EBook #12186]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+
+
+
+The Principles of Masonic Law:
+
+A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,
+
+By
+
+Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,
+
+Author of
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie," "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry," Etc., Etc.,
+
+Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.
+
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; quæ lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."
+
+ Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.
+
+New York:
+Jno. W. Leonard & Co., Masonic Publishers,
+383 Broadway.
+
+1856.
+
+
+
+Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard & Co.,
+
+In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.
+
+
+
+
+To
+
+Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,
+
+Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,
+
+I Dedicate This Work,
+
+As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him
+As a Man,
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character
+As a Mason;
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our
+Sublime Institution.
+
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+
+
+Preface
+Introduction
+
+
+Book First. The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Historical Sketch.
+Chapter II. Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+Chapter III. Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Grand Master.
+ Section II. The Deputy Grand Master.
+ Section III. Of the Grand Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Grand Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Grand Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Grand Chaplain.
+ Section VII. Of the Grand Deacons.
+ Section VIII. Of the Grand Marshal.
+ Section IX. Of the Grand Stewards.
+ Section X. Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.
+ Section XI. Of the Grand Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. General View.
+ Section II. Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section III. Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+Book Second. Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+Chapter II. Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+Chapter III. Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Officers in General.
+ Section II. Of the Worshipful Master.
+ Section III. Of the Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Deacons.
+ Section VII. Of the Stewards.
+ Section VIII. Of the Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of Rules of Order.
+ Section I. Of the Order of Business.
+ Section II. Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.
+ Section III. Of the Mode of Taking the Question.
+ Section IV. Of Adjournments.
+ Section V. Of the Appointment of Committees.
+ Section VI. Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.
+
+
+Book Third. The Law of Individuals.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section I. Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section II. Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section III. Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section IV. Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section V. Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the
+ Action Thereon.
+ Section VI. Of Balloting for Candidates.
+ Section VII. Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.
+ Section VIII. Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.
+ Section IX. Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of
+ Candidates before Advancement
+ Section X. Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.
+ Section XI. Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.
+ Section XII. Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.
+ Section XIII. Of the Initiation of Non-residents.
+Chapter II. Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+Chapter III. Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+Chapter IV. Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+ Section I. Of the Right of Membership.
+ Section II. Of the Right of Visit.
+ Section III. Of the Examination of Visitors.
+ Section IV. Of Vouching for a Brother.
+ Section V. Of the Right of Claiming Relief.
+ Section VI. Of the Right of Masonic Burial.
+Chapter V. Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+Chapter VI. Of Affiliation.
+Chapter VII. Of Demitting.
+Chapter VIII. Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+Book Fourth. Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+Chapter I. Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+Chapter II. Of Masonic Punishments.
+ Section I. Of Censure.
+ Section II. Of Reprimand.
+ Section III. Of Exclusion from the Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of Definite Suspension.
+ Section V. Of Indefinite Suspension.
+ Section VI. Of Expulsion.
+Chapter III. Of Masonic Trials.
+ Section I. Of the Form of Trial.
+ Section II. Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.
+Chapter IV. Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+Chapter V. Of Appeals.
+Chapter VI. Of Restoration.
+
+
+Index.
+Footnotes.
+
+
+
+
+Preface.
+
+
+
+In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.
+
+When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.
+
+But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded--for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible--and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.
+
+Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.
+
+This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.
+
+Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work "The Principles of
+Masonic Law." It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.
+
+Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+"ab longo inter-vallo," to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:
+
+"He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet."
+
+Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this "general map" of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in "locating"
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.
+
+There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.
+
+The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.
+
+But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories--as a man, I am, of course, fallible--and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready--because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions--to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, "Strike, but
+hear me."
+
+Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.
+
+The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.
+
+Albert G. Mackey.
+
+Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.
+
+
+
+
+Introduction.
+
+The Authorities for Masonic Law.
+
+
+
+The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+_unwritten_ and _written,_ and may in a manner be compared with the "lex
+non scripta," or common law, and the "lex seripta," or statute law of
+English and American jurists.
+
+The "lex non scripta," or _unwritten law_ of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+"leges non scriptæ" of the English constitution--that "their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom." When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of "ancient usage."
+
+The "lex scripta," or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.
+
+1. The "Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity," and said to have been written in the reign of James II.[1]
+
+2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.[2]
+
+3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.
+
+4. "The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London," printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.[3]
+
+5. The thirty-nine "General Regulations," adopted "at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,"
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.
+
+6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.
+
+Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.
+
+Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the "Ancient Landmarks of the Order," to
+which reference is so often made.
+
+Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft--whether ritual or legislative--whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society--which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that "every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved."
+
+
+
+
+
+Book First
+
+The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Historical Sketch.
+
+
+Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.
+
+The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the "Gothic Constitutions"[4]
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, "a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly." The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them "good
+charges and regulations." We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.
+
+The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft "to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly." The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+"General Assembly of Masons." It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.[5] To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term "mass
+meetings."
+
+These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+"by the _yearly congregations_ and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their _general assemblies, _ the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken." This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this "mutual assembly," in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, "that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly."
+
+And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.
+
+But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.
+
+After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.
+
+At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, "a Grand
+Lodge _pro tempore;"_ resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.
+
+Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.
+
+This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.
+
+The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.
+
+At the same meeting, it was resolved "that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.
+
+The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of _all_ the Brethren before dinner, _even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice_[6]
+
+This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.
+
+In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.
+
+That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled--not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.
+
+It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.
+
+The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that _five_ lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only _four_ lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the "Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons," that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.
+
+In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only _three_ lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.
+
+Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.
+
+The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+It is an indisputable fact that the "General Assembly" which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,[7] and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, "resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation."
+
+Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:
+
+"The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places."
+
+From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.
+
+Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.[8] I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that "Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge." And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, "the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the _Masters and
+Wardens_ of all the regular lodges;" and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+"Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England," adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the "Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge." But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.
+
+On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.
+
+Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.
+
+In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, _essential_
+and _accidental_, or, as they are more usually called, _Grand_ and
+_Subordinate_. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.
+
+The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge "was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity _at
+large_ as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body."[9] The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.[10]
+
+The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,[11] seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, _pro hac vice_, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.
+
+The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the "lex non scripta," or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.[12]
+
+I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.
+
+It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. "An appeal," say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, "from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced."[13] This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.
+
+Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:--"If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation." But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+"proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."[14] This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed--it can be done in no other way--and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.
+
+II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:
+
+1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that "no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity."[15] But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.
+
+2. The next regulation prescribes "that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate." But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.
+
+3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain--because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.
+
+4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,[16] because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.
+
+5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing "that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality."
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles--which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.
+
+6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.
+
+But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.[17]
+
+III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:--
+
+"The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, _pro tempore_."
+
+But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.
+
+The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.
+
+IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.
+
+V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+_making Masons at sight_.
+
+The power to "make Masons at sight" is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, "an occasional lodge," especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only--the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.
+
+Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.[18]
+
+In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.
+
+In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he "formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk," and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.[19]
+
+I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in "an occasional
+lodge," over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,[20] because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called _a making at sight_. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.
+
+But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened "an
+occasional lodge" and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.[21]
+
+Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened "an occasional lodge," and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.[22]
+
+In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason "at an occasional lodge,
+convened," says Preston, "for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person."[23]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these "occasional lodges" were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the "makings" are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these "occasional lodges"
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.
+
+This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument _Ă  fortiori_, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.
+
+No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+"But this order, afterwards appearing," says the Book of
+Constitutions,[24] "to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed."
+
+It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.
+
+But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue _Ă  fortiori_ that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together "an occasional lodge," and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason "at sight," that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.
+
+It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting "that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper"--and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that "since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place."
+
+The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.[25] But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.
+
+In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.
+
+But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies--the conferring of degrees by "communication"
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_The Deputy Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that "a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born," because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:
+
+"The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship."
+
+The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.
+
+In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.
+
+There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Grand Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.
+
+According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason[26] who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Grand Treasurer._
+
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+"a brother of good worldly substance," whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Grand Secretary._
+
+
+This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Grand Chaplain._
+
+
+This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Grand Deacons._
+
+
+But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his "Masonic Miscellanies," and he thinks it "satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century."[27]
+
+But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled "Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics," sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.
+
+It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the "very latter end of the eighteenth century;" and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the "Ahiman Rezon" of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, "as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge." They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Grand Marshal._
+
+
+The _Grand Marshal_, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying "a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold," insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.
+
+The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the Grand Stewards._
+
+
+The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, "in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness," they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,[28] as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.
+
+The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of the Grand Sword-Bearer._
+
+
+_Grand Sword-Bearer._--It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+_Grand Pursuivant_.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Grand Tiler._
+
+
+It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.
+
+The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_General View._
+
+
+The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.
+
+The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:
+
+"Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."
+
+The expression which is put in capitals--"provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved"--is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that "it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry."
+
+"With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:
+
+"In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England."
+
+In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:--1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, "in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them." General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.
+
+Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that "the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint." Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a _quasi_ committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation _de novo_, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that "in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority." The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.
+
+The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.
+
+The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.
+
+These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, "the lord paramount" in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:--_It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks_.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Second
+
+Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+The old charges define a Lodge to be "a place where Masons assemble and
+work;" and also "that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons." The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that "a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work."
+
+Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.
+
+Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge "for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings," or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.
+
+Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.
+
+Preston says that the petition must be recommended "by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held." Dalcho says it must be recommended "by three other known and
+approved Master Masons," but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed "by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges." The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended "by the officers of some regular lodge." The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.
+
+If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a _dispensation_, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to "enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons." The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, "until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge." Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized "to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled." But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.
+
+If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, "true and lawful Brethren."
+
+Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.
+
+This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.
+
+The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.
+
+The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying "to give a formal existence to anything." Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the "warrant of constitution."
+
+The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge[29] having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil--the
+masonic elements of consecration--are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.
+
+This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating--a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes--was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: "Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground."
+
+The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of "the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy," they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the "health, peace, and plenty" that he enjoys.
+
+After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that "every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues."
+
+Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the "lines parallel." The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.
+
+The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.[30] The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.
+
+Selden[31] says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.
+
+The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:
+
+"In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;--and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings."
+
+This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term "a just and legally constituted lodge," and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.
+
+The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.
+
+The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, "it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent."[32] The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.
+
+The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.
+
+Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: "A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution." This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.
+
+But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: "That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+
+
+
+It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.
+
+A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may "admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;" no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be "with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge."[33]
+
+A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.
+
+With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence--a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.
+
+A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.
+
+As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership--they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+
+Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge._
+
+
+In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it--nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge--but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.[34] But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting _ad
+libitum_ was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the _old landmarks be carefully preserved_, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; "_the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory_."[35]
+
+The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.
+
+This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.
+
+A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the "general
+regulations" in the following words:
+
+"No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful."[36]
+
+But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.
+
+A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.
+
+By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.[37] The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;[38] but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.
+
+As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.
+
+The Master must be installed by a Past Master,[39] but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.[40] The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.
+
+Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.[41] The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.[42] This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed "to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank."[43] Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.
+
+The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: "The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge."[44]
+
+Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.[45] But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.
+
+A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. "In the
+Grand Lodge alone," they declare, "resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England." They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to _exclude_ a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.
+
+A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.
+
+A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.[46] But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.
+
+Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.[47] But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Duties of a Lodge._
+
+
+So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.
+
+The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry--to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission--declare that "it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry."
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even _it_ must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, "Nolumus leges Angliæ mutare!" so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, "We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry."
+
+In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.
+
+No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.
+
+No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that "no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work." And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. "It would
+be highly improper," says the Ahiman Rezon, "in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members."
+
+I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates--as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.
+
+In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, "without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another."
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.
+
+Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that "no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree." This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.
+
+There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: "No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity."
+
+All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.
+
+The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity--as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity--I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.
+
+I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Officers in General._
+
+
+Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the "Inner Guard." The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.
+
+The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.
+
+Dalcho lays down the rule, that "no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws." Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.
+
+If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.
+
+No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.
+
+Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.
+
+An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Worshipful Master._
+
+
+This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.
+
+A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.[48] This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.
+
+One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.
+
+The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.
+
+The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.
+
+He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.
+
+It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.
+
+The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body "on all convenient occasions."[49] When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.
+
+The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge "in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren--cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.
+
+Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.
+
+During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.
+
+In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.
+
+In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.
+
+The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Treasurer._
+
+
+Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.
+
+It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer "to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary." The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.
+
+The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.
+
+The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.
+
+It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Secretary._
+
+
+It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, "which may be committed to paper;" to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.
+
+In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.
+
+Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease _ex
+necessitate rei_, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Deacons._
+
+
+In every lodge there are two of these officers--a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.
+
+The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.
+
+The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.
+
+From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Stewards._
+
+
+The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, "to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for." They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.
+
+What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Tiler._
+
+
+This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of "cowans and eavesdroppers." The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be "a
+worthy Master Mason." An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.
+
+The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Rules of Order.
+
+
+
+The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+"whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is."[50] By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of "Parliamentary Law," have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Order of Business._
+
+
+When the Brethren have been "congregated," or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.
+
+The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren "around the lodge," whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.
+
+As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.
+
+After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.
+
+In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, "the order of the day," and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.
+
+The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: "Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?" In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.
+
+But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.[51]
+
+New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.
+
+In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him "Worshipful."
+
+When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.
+
+Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.
+
+A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.
+
+No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+"private committees," to be allowed.
+
+Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of "Brother,"
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.
+
+In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.
+
+It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the "work" of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.
+
+When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.
+
+The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: "Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?" The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.
+
+The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair._
+
+
+Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by _courtesy_, "is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed _the right
+to take_ appeals."[52] If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+"in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.
+
+It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Mode of Taking the Question._
+
+
+The question in Masonry is not taken _viva voce_ or by "aye" and "nay."
+This should always be done by "a show of hands." The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, "and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry," and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words--"The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons."[53]
+
+Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.
+
+Moving the "previous question," a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Adjournments._
+
+
+Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by _closing_ the lodge, or by _calling from labor to refreshment_. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.
+
+But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of "setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor." He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his "will and pleasure" only that it is opened, so is it by his "will and
+pleasure" only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.
+
+The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.
+
+"All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, _and not desert the Master till the work is finished_."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Appointment of Committees._
+
+
+It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.
+
+The Master is also, _ex officio_, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes._
+
+
+Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.
+
+The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.
+
+"A regular communication of ---- Lodge, NO. ----, was holden at ----; on
+----, the ---- day of ----A.: L.: 58--.
+
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B----, W.: Master.
+ " B. C----, S.: Warden.
+ " C. D----, J.: Warden.
+ " D. E----, Treasurer.
+ " E. F----, Secretary.
+ " F. G----, S.: Deacon.
+ " G. H----, J.: Deacon.
+ " H. I----, } Stewards.
+ " I. K----, }
+ " K. L----, Tiler.
+
+ _Members._
+ Bro.: L. M----
+ M. N----
+ N. O----
+ O. P----
+
+ _Visitors._
+ P. Q----
+ Q. R----
+ R. S----
+ S. T----
+
+The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.
+
+"The minutes of the regular communication of ---- were read and
+confirmed.[54]
+
+"The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.---- and H. I.----, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.----, L. M.----, and O. P.----.
+
+"Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.
+
+"A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.----, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.
+
+"The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. ---- at the communication of ----, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.
+
+"The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.
+
+"Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+Amount received this evening, as follows:
+
+ Petition of Mr. G. F., $5
+ Fee of Bro. C. B., 5
+ do. of Bro. S. R., 5
+ do. of Bro. W. Y., 5--Total, $20
+
+all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.
+
+There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.
+
+E. F----,
+
+_Secretary._
+
+Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Third.
+
+The Law Of Individuals.
+
+
+
+Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+
+
+
+The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character--moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.
+
+The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as "a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science."
+
+The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+"depositary of his heart," as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, "a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul."
+
+The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.
+
+Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.
+
+These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.
+
+_Morally_, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living "under the tongue of good
+report."
+
+_Physically_, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a _man_ ought to be.
+
+_Intellectually_, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.
+
+_Politically_, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.
+
+The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.
+
+But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The old charges state, that "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law." It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, "moral law,"
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.
+
+The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be "a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine." A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.
+
+The word "libertine" has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a "free-thinker," or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:--
+
+"Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished."
+
+The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.
+
+These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be "a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country."
+
+Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that "The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men--no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report."
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.
+
+The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+"_a man_." No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.
+
+As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+"of mature and discreet age." But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that "no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more."[55] In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,[56]
+"unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;" in Ireland, twenty-one, except "by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;" in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army--such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.
+
+Our ritual excludes "an old man in his dotage" equally with a "young man
+under age." But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.
+
+The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+"a perfect youth," has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided "the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry."
+
+The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares "that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of _able_ body."[57]
+
+Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, "of able body," and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:
+
+"Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that _he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have."_[58]
+
+The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:
+
+"No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art."
+
+Notwithstanding the positive demand for _perfection_, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have _no maim or defect_, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is _perfect_ is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all--it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, "words," says Blackstone, "are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,"
+and then "perfect" would mean, "complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant." But another source of interpretation is, the "comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point."[59] Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word "perfect," if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must "_have his right limbs as a man ought to have_."
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.
+
+But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, "the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law" is, to consider
+"the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it." Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be _perfect_, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, "that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens," of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. "The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea," says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,[60] "that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration." If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words _perfect youth_ are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has "his right limbs as a man ought to
+have."[61]
+
+It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word "perfect," and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word "_that_." He must have no maim or defect
+_that_ may render him incapable; that is, _because_, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.
+
+In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be "men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch." It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.
+
+A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.
+
+In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+"deformed or dismembered at the time of their making."
+
+In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that "every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be."
+
+In the "Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual," published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be "hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making."[62]
+
+Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.
+
+In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not "sound in mind
+and _all their members_," and she adopted a resolution asserting that "the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage."[63]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency[64] has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.
+
+"We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed."--_Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia_, 1848, _page_ 36.
+
+"The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.[65] It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish--a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &c....
+
+"The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a _man_
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity."--_Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in_ 1848.[66]
+
+"The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order--the ancient charges--forbid
+it."--_Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70._
+
+"The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of _entire
+limbs_"--_Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848._
+
+"I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach _us_ to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries."--_Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849._
+
+"The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution."--_Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in_ 1849.
+
+"As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman."--_Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in_ 1849.
+
+Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply--guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law--and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683--I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?
+
+During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a _fool_ nor an _idiot_, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:
+
+"He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import," etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, "Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order." If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.
+
+It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: "No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity." And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.
+
+But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.
+
+From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.
+
+As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.
+
+Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.
+
+A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.
+
+Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be _free-born_. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude--though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty--is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency, and
+zeal," which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+"Children," says Oliver, "cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman."
+
+The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.
+
+Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former--the accepted one, to whom the promise was given--was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have "his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him," was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, "Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son." Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he "had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women." The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word δουλοπĎεπεια or, "slave manners," to designate any very great
+impropriety of manners.
+
+The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge "to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison," and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that "it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action thereon_.
+
+
+The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+"petition." This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be "a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge."[67] This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.
+
+The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.
+
+The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:
+
+"No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid."
+
+The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.
+
+But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.
+
+The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.
+
+This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: "No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;"
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.
+
+If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.
+
+Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without "due
+inquiry" into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.
+
+But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of "making Masons," I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates._
+
+
+The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be "formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent _in their own prudent way_ either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.
+
+From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right--to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.[68]
+
+The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.
+
+No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+"and if," as Wayland says, "from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms." Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.
+
+And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.
+
+The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: "but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the _unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge_ then present when the candidate is proposed."
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+"New Regulations," adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted "only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks," it is said: "but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance."[69]
+
+The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.
+
+Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that _every member present_ shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted "by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed." This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called "an inherent
+privilege," which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.
+
+Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.[70]
+
+The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:--The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic _circumambulation_
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.
+
+These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.
+
+As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.
+
+The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats
+
+The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to "take charge of the ballot box." That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that "the box is clear in the South,"
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that "the box is foul in the
+South." The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of "West" and "East."
+
+If the box is _clear_--that is, if all the ballots are white--the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.
+
+But if the box is declared to be _foul_, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be "clear," or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, "if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge."
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot._
+
+
+There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.
+
+I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the _quantity_ than to the _quality_ of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.
+
+Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.
+
+In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is "clear," all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is "foul," each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.
+
+But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a _reconsideration_, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.
+
+The _motion for reconsideration_ is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that _the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box_. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.
+
+In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.
+
+If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;--now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast--the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.
+
+But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken--the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.
+
+But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.
+
+In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.[71] After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.
+
+Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.
+
+It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.
+
+It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this--that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of "Duty of
+Members" (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren "are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." And the regulation goes on to
+say: "Nor is this inherent privilege _subject to a dispensation_, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge." This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+"to give their consent in their own prudent way;" it would be an
+infringement of an "inherent privilege," and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.
+
+I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:
+
+1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.
+
+2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.
+
+3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.
+
+4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates._
+
+
+As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?
+
+It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:
+
+Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation--there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions--and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren--it must be again referred to
+a committee--lie over for a month--and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.
+
+If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the necessary Probation and due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement_.
+
+
+There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts--the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher--and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember "a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly."
+
+An hundred years ago it was said that "Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry."[72] And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.
+
+There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a "suitable proficiency" in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made "suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree."
+
+In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved--made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, "that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords."
+
+Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.
+
+This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, "that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander." In the same charges, it is prescribed that "no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years."
+
+In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: "Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work[73] who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed."
+
+These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.
+
+In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the "Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons" to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that "a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love."
+
+Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that "no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;"
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, "_on very particular occasions only_, may be
+requested."
+
+The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:
+
+"No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree."[74]
+
+This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.
+
+Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:
+
+"The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work--and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees."[75]
+
+In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:
+
+"To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness."
+
+The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty "of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree." And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.
+
+The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: "All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge."
+
+But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:
+
+"No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree."
+
+It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented--and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.
+
+This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.
+
+"Many persons," says that able philosopher of Masonry, "are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain."[76]
+
+Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree._
+
+
+Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.
+
+The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.
+
+Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.
+
+Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.
+
+Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have "due and timely notice," and be prepared to exercise his
+"inherent privilege" of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.
+
+If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.
+
+But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, "a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it."
+
+The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.
+
+I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication._
+
+
+The fourth General Regulation decrees that "no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time." This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.
+
+This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.
+
+The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that "no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge."
+
+Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.
+
+
+
+Section XII.
+
+_Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another._
+
+
+It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.
+
+This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:
+
+"None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it."
+
+There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A----, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B----, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A----, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A---- to grant permission
+to the lodge at B---- to confer them on the candidate.
+
+But how shall this permission be given--by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A----? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A----, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a "fractious member will be imposed on
+them," as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B----. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A---. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B---, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.
+
+I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.
+
+
+
+Section XIII.
+
+_Of the Initiation of Non-residents._
+
+
+The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:--First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.
+
+1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.
+
+2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made "in due form," and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?
+
+The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.
+
+In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:
+
+"Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members."
+
+The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, "that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason."
+
+The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:
+
+"Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution."[77]
+
+It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal--the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge--and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.
+
+Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the _mode how_, they might also have prescribed
+the _place where_, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.
+
+A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid--as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done--the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.
+
+The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.
+
+What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, "a distrust of his
+acceptance" at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+
+
+
+In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.
+
+At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.
+
+These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.
+
+But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is _ex gratia_,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd--because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.
+
+It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.
+
+If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.
+
+The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.
+
+But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.
+
+These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.
+
+Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.
+
+The question next occurs--What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor--that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light--and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it--it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, "unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election," and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,[78] it is said that "the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,"
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.
+
+"As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment."[79]
+
+This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, _mutatis mutandis_,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+
+
+
+When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Right of Membership._
+
+
+The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: "Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge."[80] If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.
+
+How long before he loses this right by a _non-user_, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.
+
+The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.
+
+But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.
+
+A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.
+
+A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+"good standing" until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the "good standing" of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.
+
+If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.
+
+In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.
+
+"No man can be made or _admitted a member_ of a particular lodge," says
+the fifth regulation, "without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge."
+
+And the sixth regulation adds, that "no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or _admitted to be a member_ thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present."
+
+So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.
+
+But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.
+
+A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.
+
+A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.
+
+Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Right of Visit._
+
+
+Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the "Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,"
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,[81]it is directed "that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge."
+
+This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, "received, and
+cherished," and "set on work," that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.
+
+In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, "that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty."[82]
+
+A lodge, when not opened for "general masonic business," but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened "_en
+famille_."
+
+To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:
+
+"A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft."
+
+A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.
+
+A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.
+
+Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.
+
+There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,[83] and which is in the following words:
+
+"3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept." This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.
+
+Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Examination of Visitors._
+
+
+It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.
+
+Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.
+
+The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words
+
+"I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.
+
+This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of "commencing at the beginning" should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted--categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+"rusty," or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.
+
+Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: "I am not
+satisfied," or, "I do not recognize you," and not in more specific terms,
+such as, "You did not answer this inquiry," or, "You are ignorant on that
+point." The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.
+
+Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called "leading
+questions," or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.
+
+Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry _it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted_.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Vouching for a Brother._
+
+
+An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity--since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful--that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.
+
+To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+"_strict trial, due examination, or lawful information_."
+
+Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be _competent_ to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.
+
+Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.
+
+If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: "A.B. is a Mason," is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: "I know this
+man to be a Master Mason," for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.
+
+If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a "Lodge of Master Masons." A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Right of Claiming Relief._
+
+
+One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. "As we have therefore
+opportunity," says St. Paul, "let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith."
+
+This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of "Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:"
+
+"You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.
+
+"But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances."
+
+This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.
+
+He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word " benefit," as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.
+
+He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, "true and genuine." True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of "faithful" or "trusty." A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.
+
+But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.
+
+It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Right of Masonic Burial._
+
+
+After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.[84] As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.
+
+But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.
+
+The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.[85]
+
+"No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member--foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies."
+
+This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.
+
+The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, "by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members."[86] It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+
+
+
+I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,[87] and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.
+
+In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.
+
+In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as "virtual" and as "actual" Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.
+
+An _actual Past Master_ is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A _virtual
+Past Master_ is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.
+
+Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?
+
+The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.
+
+In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.
+
+In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that "it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters."[88]
+
+Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider "that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;" and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such "legal means" of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.
+
+This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: "The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least _three installed Masters_"[89]
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, "this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but _installed_
+Masters be present."[90]
+
+And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.
+
+The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times--that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.
+
+On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.
+
+A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.
+
+He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.
+
+By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Affiliation.
+
+
+
+Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be "initiated," but a Mason is
+"affiliated."[91]
+
+Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.
+
+A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. "No man can be made, _or admitted a member_ * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;" are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: "But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, _or admitted to be a member_ thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge."
+
+None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a "demit," and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.
+
+Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.
+
+A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.
+
+In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.
+
+The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that "no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality." This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, "this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete."[92] Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.
+
+The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VII.
+
+Of Demitting.
+
+
+
+To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a _demit_.
+
+The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation "that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another." Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors "of
+his own free will and accord," and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that
+
+ "A man convinced against his will,
+ Is of the same opinion still,"
+
+and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.
+
+The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.
+
+But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.
+
+There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:
+
+"No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge."
+
+It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.
+
+With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VIII.
+
+Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+
+An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: "every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations."
+
+Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed--Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.
+
+A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that "it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member."[93] A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.
+
+Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the _right_ of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association--the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:[94] "The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, _nolens volens,_ money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, _Free_ and Accepted."
+
+But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.
+
+We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the _Lodge organization_ of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened--he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple--the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.
+
+But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of "once a Mason,
+and always a Mason," it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.
+
+Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says "if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire _as to anything_." But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone "lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother," that
+we are in cases of "imminent peril" to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when _duly_ called for.
+
+I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:
+
+1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.
+
+2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when _he asks for that aid in
+the_ proper _and conventional way_.
+
+3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.
+
+4. He loses the general right to visit[95] lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.
+
+5. He loses the right of masonic burial.
+
+6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Fourth.
+
+Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+
+
+
+The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.
+
+In replying to the question, "what are masonic crimes?" by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.
+
+But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.
+
+Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.
+
+Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, "to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;" and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.
+
+In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+"that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, _they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible_"
+
+The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.
+
+The first charge says: "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law." Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be "the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions."[96] Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we "should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)[97]
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due."
+
+If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.
+
+But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all "wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander."
+
+The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.
+
+From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Masonic Punishments.
+
+
+
+Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of Censure._
+
+
+A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.
+
+Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.
+
+A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Reprimand._
+
+
+A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.
+
+A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.
+
+If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.
+
+The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.
+
+A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of Exclusion from the Lodge._
+
+
+Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.
+
+1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.
+
+I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged "to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge," it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.
+
+2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, _suspension from the lodge,_ and sometimes _erasure from the
+roll_. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.
+
+But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.
+
+The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.
+
+Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.
+
+The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term "expelled" is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the craft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called "exclusion." The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Definite Suspension._
+
+
+Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.
+
+Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.
+
+In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.
+
+At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of _Restoration._
+
+By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason--is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren--is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.
+
+The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of Indefinite Suspension._
+
+
+Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.
+
+All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.
+
+The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits--the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.
+
+No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Expulsion._[98]
+
+
+Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.
+
+It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.[99]
+
+The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.
+
+As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure--he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.
+
+The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:--Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:--
+
+"A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason."[100]
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of Masonic Trials.
+
+
+
+Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Form of Trial._
+
+
+Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.
+
+A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.
+
+This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.
+
+The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.
+
+Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.
+
+It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.
+
+If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge--that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.
+
+The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.
+
+The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.
+
+When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.
+
+Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.
+
+If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.
+
+He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.
+
+For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.
+
+The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.
+
+If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.
+
+In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials._
+
+
+In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.
+
+The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.
+
+1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.[101]
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.
+
+2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that "an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath."
+
+3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, "such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath." Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,[102] that "the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity."
+
+4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.
+
+Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:
+
+"I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest."
+
+The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.
+
+To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.
+
+The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great "Treatise on the Law of Evidence," says: "In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end."
+
+Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.
+
+Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen--and
+this is a very conceivable case--that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.
+
+If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected--if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.
+
+But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as "profanes" would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself--of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.
+
+But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an _alibi_, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a "profane" is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.
+
+It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.
+
+The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.
+
+The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.
+
+The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer--the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+
+
+
+The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.
+
+The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.
+
+The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.
+
+1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.
+
+2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.
+
+This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.
+
+3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.
+
+4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.
+
+5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Appeals.
+
+
+
+Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.
+
+As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.
+
+But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced _de novo_, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate--either too severe, or not sufficiently so--in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.
+
+Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.
+
+During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason "under charges."
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Restoration.
+
+
+
+The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.
+
+I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.
+
+Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member--for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.
+
+Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.
+
+But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, _shall
+not_ be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment--and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world--the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived--could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.
+
+On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned _sine
+die_; for it has done all that is required--the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.
+
+The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+"Another capital offense against public justice," says Blackstone, "is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+_before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported." _ Mark these qualifying words: "before the expiration of
+the term:" they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return _after_ the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:
+
+_It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended_.
+
+Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.
+
+But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.
+
+Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: "I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?" Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.
+
+The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens--every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty--and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.
+
+But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely--that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge--may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.
+
+But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing--both are equally unconnected with the institution--the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.
+
+The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.
+
+Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.
+
+In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.
+
+In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.
+
+But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.
+
+The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.
+
+I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.
+
+The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that "no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members"--which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, "lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge." But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones--to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent--clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong--so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.
+
+
+
+
+Index.
+
+
+
+A.
+
+
+Accused, to what he is entitled
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425
+ " " " it was never enforced
+Actual Past Master, term defined
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry
+ " motion for, cannot be entertained
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges
+Affiliation, what it is
+ " mode of
+ " requires unanimity
+ " Master Masons only entitled to it
+ " rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges
+ " may be made with more than one lodge
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted
+ " not to be entertained in a lodge
+ " cannot be taken from the chair
+ " doctrine of, discussed
+ " from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge
+ " every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge
+ " pending one, the sentence is in abeyance
+Apprentices, rights of _(see Entered Apprentice_)
+Arrears, non-payment of
+ " to lodges, history of their origin
+ " do not accrue during suspension
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban
+ " " " in 926 at York
+ " " governed the craft for nearly 800 years
+ " " how organized
+Atheist cannot be a Mason
+Authorities for masonic law
+
+
+
+B.
+
+
+Balloting for candidates
+ every member must take a part in it
+ secrecy of, inviolable
+ must be unanimous
+ Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge
+ not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears
+ mode of
+Balloting in each degree
+ not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied
+ must be unanimous
+Ballot, reconsideration of
+ motion for, out of order
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge
+Burial, masonic, right of
+ must be requested except for strangers
+ Master Masons only entitled to it
+ dispensation for, not usually required
+Business, order of
+ may be suspended at any time by the Master
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+C.
+
+
+Calling from labor to refreshment
+Censure, a masonic punishment
+Certificates, masonic
+Chaplain, Grand (_see Grand Chaplain_)
+Charges of accusation, how to be made
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates
+Committees to be appointed by the Master
+ Master is chairman of, when present
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated
+Consecration of a lodge how performed
+ meaning of
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of
+ meaning of
+Constitutions, how to be altered
+" Gothic, adopted in 926,
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,
+" " " why elements,
+Crimes, masonic,
+" " definition of,
+" " enumeration of
+
+
+
+D.
+
+
+Deacons,
+" two in each lodge,
+" are appointed officers,
+" not removable by Master or Senior Warden
+" Grand _(see Grand Deacons_)
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed
+" to whom, and why,
+" meaning of
+Definite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication
+Demitting
+" right of, not denied until recently,
+" regulations concerning
+" of many at one time may be refused
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+" " office of, not very ancient
+" " exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence
+"" cannot be more than one
+"" originally appointed by Grand Master
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,
+Dispensation what and where to be granted
+"for a lodge
+"" " tenure of its duration
+"" " difference from a Warrant
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates
+" meaning of the term
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage
+" non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates
+
+
+
+E.
+
+
+Emergency, rule upon the subject
+Entered Apprentice, rights of
+ formerly a member of his lodge
+ formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications
+ may sit in a lodge of his degree
+ cannot speak or vote
+ cannot be deprived of his rights without trial
+ after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment
+Evidence in masonic trials
+Examination of visitors
+ how to be conducted
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge
+Expulsion is masonic death
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment
+ should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval
+ from higher degrees, its effect
+ restoration from
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+F.
+
+
+Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief
+Fellow Craft, rights of
+ they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity
+ formerly permitted to speak, but not vote
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another
+Fool cannot be a Mason
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making
+Free-born, a Mason must be
+ reason for the rule
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+G.
+
+
+General Assembly. (_See Assembly, General._)
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926
+Grand Chaplain,
+ office established in 1775
+ duties of
+Grand Deacons
+ office more ancient than Oliver supposes
+ duties of
+ how appointed
+Grand Lodge held in 1717
+ mode of organizing one
+ three lodges necessary to organize one
+ dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,
+ all the Craft formerly members of
+ Masters and Wardens of lodges are members
+ Grand Officers are also members
+ Past Masters are not members by inherent right
+ its powers and prerogatives
+ may make new regulations
+ must observe the landmarks
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of
+ are comparatively modern institutions
+Grand Marshal
+ appointed by the Grand Master
+ duties of
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+ office of has existed since the origin of Masonry
+ an elective officer
+ by whom to be installed
+ prerogatives of, derived from two sources
+ no appeal from his decision
+ may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses
+ entitled to two votes
+ how to be punished
+ may grant dispensations
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight
+ may constitute new lodges
+ cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons
+ his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him
+Grand Pursuivant
+Grand Secretary
+ office of established in 1723
+ duties of
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant
+Grand Stewards
+ " " first mentioned in 1721
+ " " duties of
+ " " appointed by Junior Grand Warden
+Grand Stewards' Lodge
+Grand Sword-Bearer
+ " " duties of
+ " " office of, constituted in 1731
+Grand Tiler
+" " office of, must have existed from the earliest times
+" " must not be a member of the Grand Lodge
+" " sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected
+Grand Treasurer
+" " office of, established in 1724
+" " duties of
+" " has always been elected
+Grand Wardens
+" " originally appointed by the Grand Master
+" " succeed the Grand Master and Deputy
+
+
+
+H.
+
+
+Heresy not a masonic crime
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from
+Historical sketch
+
+
+
+I.
+
+
+Idiot cannot be made a Mason
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are
+Indefinite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate
+Installation
+ " whence the term derived
+ " necessary to legal existence of an officer
+ " of a Master of a lodge
+ " of the Grand Master
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge
+Investigation of character must be by a committee
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason
+ " " definition of the term
+
+
+
+J.
+
+
+Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,
+Junior Grand Warden
+Junior Warden,
+ " " presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,
+ " " does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,
+ " " presides over the craft during refreshment
+ " " appoints the stewards
+Jurisdiction of a lodge
+ " geographical or personal
+ " is over all its members
+ " " " unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity
+ " cannot extend beyond State lines,
+ " none over its Master
+
+
+
+K.
+
+
+Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason
+
+
+
+L.
+
+
+Labor, calling from, to refreshment
+Landmarks, what they are,
+ " ritual and legislative
+ " must be observed by the Grand Lodge
+Law of Grand Lodges
+ " subordinate lodges
+ " individuals
+Lawful information, what it is
+Laws, how to be interpreted
+ " of Masonry are of two kinds--written and unwritten
+ " written, whence derived
+ " unwritten, whence derived
+ " " same as ancient usage
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason
+ meaning of the term
+Lodge, subordinate
+ definition of
+ how organized
+ must have been congregated by some superior authority
+Lodge, under dispensation
+ definition of
+ generally precedes a warranted lodge
+ how formed
+ cannot make by-laws
+ cannot elect officers
+ cannot install officers
+ cannot elect members
+Lodge, warranted
+ its powers and rights
+ must be consecrated
+ must be dedicated
+ must be constituted
+ its officers must be installed
+ ceremony of installation in
+ its powers are inherent in it
+ its reserved rights are secured by the regulations
+ an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity
+ may select its own members
+ elects its own officers
+ what officers of, are elected in England
+ may install its officers
+ Master of, must be installed by a past Master
+ may be represented in the Grand Lodge
+ representatives of
+ may instruct its representatives
+ may frame by-laws
+ may suspend or exclude a member
+ may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge
+ may levy annual contributions
+ may select its name
+ cannot select its number
+ duties of
+ cannot alter the ritual
+ must elect officers at a particular time
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge
+ " " cannot initiate without previous notice
+ " " cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time
+ " " cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time
+ " " must meet once a month
+ " " neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant
+ " " cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge
+ " " may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions
+ " " officers of
+
+
+
+M.
+
+
+Madmen cannot be Masons
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates
+ " reason for the rule relating to
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge
+Master, Grand. _(See Grand Master_.)
+Master Mason, rights of
+ " " becomes a member by signing the by-laws
+ " " how this right is forfeited
+ " " may apply to any lodge for membership
+ " " to whom subject for discipline
+ " " may speak and vote on all questions
+ " " may hold any office to which elected
+ " " but to serve as Master must have been a Warden
+ " " may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+ " " may visit any lodge, after examination
+Master of a lodge
+ " " " must have previously served as Warden
+ " " " must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced
+ " " " must be installed by a Past Master
+ " " " has the warrant in charge
+ " " " may call special meetings of his lodge
+ " " " may close his lodge at any time
+ " " " presides over business as well as labor
+ " " " is supreme in his lodge
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand
+Lodge
+ moral qualifications of
+ intellectual qualifications of
+ who is to judge of them
+ is a member of the Grand Lodge
+ may exclude a member temporarily
+Membership, right of
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers
+Minutes, when to be read
+ how to be amended
+ not to be read at special communications
+ formula for keeping
+Moral law, what it is
+ a Mason must obey it
+Motions, when to be entertained
+
+
+
+N.
+
+
+Name of a lodge to be selected by itself
+Non-residents, initiation of
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency
+ of candidates to be initiated at one communication
+
+
+
+O.
+
+
+Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion
+ not vacated by suspension
+Officers of a Grand Lodge
+ subordinate lodge
+ warranted lodge must be installed
+ how to be installed
+ time of election determined by Grand Lodge
+ elected annually
+ vacancies in, how to be supplied
+ cannot resign
+Order, rules of
+ whence derived
+
+
+
+P.
+
+
+Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry
+Past Masters
+ rights of
+ not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right
+ may install their successors
+ of two kinds--actual and virtual
+ may preside in a lodge
+ eligible to election to the chair
+ entitled to a seat in the East
+ eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden
+ virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate
+Petition of candidate
+ must be read at a regular communication
+ referred to a committee of three
+ reported on at next regular communication
+ report on, cannot be made at a special communication
+ renewal of, in case of rejection
+ how to be renewed, if rejected
+ for advancement to a higher degree
+ if rejected, how to be renewed
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge
+ what they must set forth
+ must be recommended by nearest lodge
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Political qualifications of candidates
+Postponed business, when to be called up
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of
+ officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry
+Probation of candidates
+ for initiation
+ for advancement
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials
+Proficiency of candidates
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable
+Punishments, masonic
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer
+
+
+
+Q.
+
+
+Qualifications of a Master of a lodge
+ of candidates,
+ moral
+ religious
+ physical
+ intellectual
+ political, 184
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717
+Question, how to be taken on a motion
+
+
+
+R.
+
+
+Reading, a qualification of candidates
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one
+ of candidate, must be by two members
+Reconsideration of ballot
+ motion for, is out of order,
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge
+ renewed petition of, when to be made,
+Relief, right of claiming it
+ unworthy Masons not entitled to it
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment
+Restoration
+ from definite suspension
+ indefinite supension
+ expulsion
+ must be at a stated communication
+ may be by Grand Lodge
+ requires a unanimous vote
+ to membership discussed
+
+
+
+S.
+
+
+Secretary, Grand. (_See Grand Secretary._)
+ of a lodge
+ his duty
+ is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer
+ is a check upon the treasurer
+ often receives compensation
+ in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected
+ but not in case of removal, or sickness
+Senior Grand Warden. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+Senior Warden
+ presides in absence of Master
+ may invite a Past Master to preside
+ presides over the craft during labor
+ appoints the Junior Deacon
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained
+ ---- is in abeyance pending an appeal
+Stewards, Grand. (_See Grand Stewards._)
+ of a lodge
+ appointed by Junior Warden
+ duties of
+ not removable by Junior Warden
+Stranger, initiation of
+Suspension
+ definite
+ indefinite
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (_See Grand Sword Bearer._)
+
+
+
+T.
+
+
+Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials
+Tiler, Grand. (_See Grand Tiler._)
+ of a lodge
+ office existed from beginning of the institution
+ no lodge can be without one
+ must be a worthy Master Mason
+ if a member, the office does not disfranchise him
+ when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place
+ may be removed for misconduct
+Tiler's obligation, form of it
+Transient persons, initiation of
+Treasurer, Grand. _(See Grand Treasurer_.)
+ " " of a lodge
+ " " duties of
+ " " is the only banker of the lodge
+ " " is a disbursing officer
+ " " a Brother of worldly substance usually selected
+ " " in case of death, a successor may be elected
+ " " but not in case of sickness, or removal
+Trials, masonic
+ " " form of
+ " " evidence in
+
+
+U.
+
+
+Unaffiliated Masons
+ " " tax sometimes levied on
+ " " position, rights, and duties of
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry
+ " effect of, on a Mason
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment
+ " " their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution
+
+
+V.
+
+
+Virtual Past Masters, who they are
+Visit, right of
+ " only affiliated Mason entitled to it
+ " must be preceded by an examination
+ " requires a certificate to insure it
+Visitors, examination of, described
+ " must take the Tiler's obligation
+Voting must always be by a show of hands
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present
+Voucher must be a competent Mason
+Vouching for a visitor
+
+
+
+W.
+
+
+Wardens, Grand. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+ of a lodge are assistants of the Master
+ entitled to membership in Grand Lodge
+Warden, Senior. (_See Senior Warden._)
+Warden, Junior. (_See Junior Warden._)
+Warrant of constitution
+ what it is
+ its difference from a dispensation
+ can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge
+ confers powers of installation and succession
+ not necessary before 1717
+ cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge
+Warranted lodges. (_See Lodges, Warranted._)
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of
+ definition of incompetent ones
+Woman cannot be made a Mason
+Writing, a qualification of candidates
+
+
+
+Y.
+
+
+Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term
+
+
+
+
+Footnotes
+
+
+
+[1] They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.
+
+[2] Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).
+
+[3] In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723--a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.
+
+[4] The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.
+
+[5] Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).
+
+[6] General Regulations, art. xxxix.
+
+[7] Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact "does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted."--p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. "The Brethren,"
+he says, "by a majority of hands, elected," &c.
+
+[8] Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.
+
+[9] Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).
+
+[10] Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.
+
+[11] Article xxxiv.
+
+[12] His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.
+
+[13] Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.
+
+[14] Art. xxxix.
+
+[15] The word "time" has been interpreted to mean _communication_.
+
+[16] And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.
+
+[17] What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.
+
+[18] It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.
+
+[19] Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.
+
+[20] Book of Const., p. 233.
+
+[21] Book of Const., p. 313.
+
+[22] Book of Constitutions, p. 319.
+
+[23] Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).
+
+[24] Book of Constitutions, p. 247
+
+[25] The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.
+
+[26] That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.
+
+[27] Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).
+
+[28] It was abolished in New York in 1854.
+
+[29] This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.
+
+[30] "What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it." Deut. xx. 5.
+
+[31] De Syned. Vet. Ebræor., 1. iii., c. xiv., § 1.
+
+[32] Cicero, Brut. i.
+
+[33] See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.
+
+[34] Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).
+
+[35] Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).
+
+[36] General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.
+
+[37] Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. _Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England_, 1847, _p_. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[38] The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. _English
+Constitutions, as above, p._ 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[39] It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.
+
+[40] No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. _English
+Constitutions_ (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[41] Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. _English
+Constitutions, p_. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[42] We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.
+
+[43] Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).
+
+[44] General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).
+
+[45] English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[46] In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.
+
+[47] Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.
+
+[48] "No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden."--_Old Charges_, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).
+
+[49] Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).
+
+[50] Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.
+
+[51] One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, "the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and _carefully finish
+the work they begin_."--Oliver's Preston, p. 27, _note_ (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).
+
+[52] Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.
+
+[53] Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.
+
+[54] If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.
+
+[55] Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).
+
+[56] Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.
+
+[57] See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).
+
+[58] Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).
+
+[59] Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., § 2.
+
+[60] In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.
+
+[61] Potter, 184.
+
+[62] Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, "provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry."
+
+[63] Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.
+
+[64] When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!
+
+[65] Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.
+
+[66] See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.
+
+[67] Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.
+
+[68] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, _Ballot_.
+
+[69] Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.
+
+[70] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. _Ballot_
+
+[71] Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.
+
+[72] Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.
+
+[73] That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.
+
+[74] This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.
+
+[75] Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.
+
+[76] Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).
+
+[77] Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.
+
+[78] Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).
+
+[79] Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).
+
+[80] Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.
+
+[81] Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, _note_ (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).
+
+[82] See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).
+
+[83] Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)
+
+[84] See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.
+
+[85] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).
+
+[86] Preston, Oliver's Edit" p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).
+
+[87] Book I., chap. iii.
+
+[88] Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.
+
+[89] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).
+
+[90] Ibid
+
+[91] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, _in voce_.
+
+[92] Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.
+
+[93] Proceedings for 1853.
+
+[94] Proceedings for 1847.
+
+[95] The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.
+
+[96] Blackstone, Introd., § i.
+
+[97] For so we should interpret the word "honeste."
+
+[98] I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my "Lexicon of
+Freemasonry," and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.
+
+[99] In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called "exclusion," and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.
+
+[100] Lexicon of Freemasonry.
+
+[101] Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.
+
+[102] Chief Baron Gilbert.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+***** This file should be named 12186-0.txt or 12186-0.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/2/1/8/12186/
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
+new filenames and etext numbers.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
+are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
+download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
+search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
+download by the etext year.
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06
+
+ (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,
+ 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
+
+EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
+filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
+of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
+identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
+digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
+example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234
+
+or filename 24689 would be found at:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689
+
+An alternative method of locating eBooks:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL
+
+
diff --git a/old/12186-8.txt b/old/12186-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..067e627
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,8579 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Principles of Masonic Law
+ A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+ Freemasonry
+
+
+Author: Albert G. Mackey
+
+Release Date: April 28, 2004 [EBook #12186]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+
+
+
+THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW:
+
+A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,
+
+By
+
+Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,
+
+Author of
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie," "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry," Etc., Etc.,
+
+Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.
+
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; quć lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."
+
+ Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.
+
+New York:
+Jno. W. Leonard & Co., Masonic Publishers,
+383 Broadway.
+
+1856.
+
+
+
+Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard & Co.,
+
+In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.
+
+
+
+
+To
+
+Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,
+
+Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,
+
+I Dedicate This Work,
+
+As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him
+As a Man,
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character
+As a Mason;
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our
+Sublime Institution.
+
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+
+
+Preface
+Introduction
+
+
+Book First. The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Historical Sketch.
+Chapter II. Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+Chapter III. Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Grand Master.
+ Section II. The Deputy Grand Master.
+ Section III. Of the Grand Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Grand Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Grand Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Grand Chaplain.
+ Section VII. Of the Grand Deacons.
+ Section VIII. Of the Grand Marshal.
+ Section IX. Of the Grand Stewards.
+ Section X. Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.
+ Section XI. Of the Grand Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. General View.
+ Section II. Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section III. Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+Book Second. Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+Chapter II. Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+Chapter III. Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Officers in General.
+ Section II. Of the Worshipful Master.
+ Section III. Of the Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Deacons.
+ Section VII. Of the Stewards.
+ Section VIII. Of the Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of Rules of Order.
+ Section I. Of the Order of Business.
+ Section II. Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.
+ Section III. Of the Mode of Taking the Question.
+ Section IV. Of Adjournments.
+ Section V. Of the Appointment of Committees.
+ Section VI. Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.
+
+
+Book Third. The Law of Individuals.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section I. Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section II. Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section III. Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section IV. Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section V. Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the
+ Action Thereon.
+ Section VI. Of Balloting for Candidates.
+ Section VII. Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.
+ Section VIII. Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.
+ Section IX. Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of
+ Candidates before Advancement
+ Section X. Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.
+ Section XI. Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.
+ Section XII. Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.
+ Section XIII. Of the Initiation of Non-residents.
+Chapter II. Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+Chapter III. Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+Chapter IV. Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+ Section I. Of the Right of Membership.
+ Section II. Of the Right of Visit.
+ Section III. Of the Examination of Visitors.
+ Section IV. Of Vouching for a Brother.
+ Section V. Of the Right of Claiming Relief.
+ Section VI. Of the Right of Masonic Burial.
+Chapter V. Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+Chapter VI. Of Affiliation.
+Chapter VII. Of Demitting.
+Chapter VIII. Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+Book Fourth. Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+Chapter I. Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+Chapter II. Of Masonic Punishments.
+ Section I. Of Censure.
+ Section II. Of Reprimand.
+ Section III. Of Exclusion from the Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of Definite Suspension.
+ Section V. Of Indefinite Suspension.
+ Section VI. Of Expulsion.
+Chapter III. Of Masonic Trials.
+ Section I. Of the Form of Trial.
+ Section II. Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.
+Chapter IV. Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+Chapter V. Of Appeals.
+Chapter VI. Of Restoration.
+
+
+Index.
+Footnotes.
+
+
+
+
+Preface.
+
+
+
+In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.
+
+When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.
+
+But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded--for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible--and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.
+
+Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.
+
+This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.
+
+Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work "The Principles of
+Masonic Law." It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.
+
+Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+"ab longo inter-vallo," to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:
+
+"He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet."
+
+Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this "general map" of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in "locating"
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.
+
+There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.
+
+The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.
+
+But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories--as a man, I am, of course, fallible--and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready--because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions--to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, "Strike, but
+hear me."
+
+Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.
+
+The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.
+
+Albert G. Mackey.
+
+Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.
+
+
+
+
+Introduction.
+
+The Authorities for Masonic Law.
+
+
+
+The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+_unwritten_ and _written,_ and may in a manner be compared with the "lex
+non scripta," or common law, and the "lex seripta," or statute law of
+English and American jurists.
+
+The "lex non scripta," or _unwritten law_ of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+"leges non scriptć" of the English constitution--that "their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom." When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of "ancient usage."
+
+The "lex scripta," or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.
+
+1. The "Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity," and said to have been written in the reign of James II.[1]
+
+2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.[2]
+
+3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.
+
+4. "The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London," printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.[3]
+
+5. The thirty-nine "General Regulations," adopted "at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,"
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.
+
+6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.
+
+Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.
+
+Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the "Ancient Landmarks of the Order," to
+which reference is so often made.
+
+Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft--whether ritual or legislative--whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society--which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that "every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved."
+
+
+
+
+
+Book First
+
+The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Historical Sketch.
+
+
+Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.
+
+The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the "Gothic Constitutions"[4]
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, "a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly." The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them "good
+charges and regulations." We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.
+
+The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft "to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly." The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+"General Assembly of Masons." It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.[5] To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term "mass
+meetings."
+
+These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+"by the _yearly congregations_ and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their _general assemblies, _ the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken." This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this "mutual assembly," in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, "that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly."
+
+And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.
+
+But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.
+
+After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.
+
+At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, "a Grand
+Lodge _pro tempore;"_ resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.
+
+Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.
+
+This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.
+
+The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.
+
+At the same meeting, it was resolved "that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.
+
+The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of _all_ the Brethren before dinner, _even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice_[6]
+
+This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.
+
+In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.
+
+That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled--not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.
+
+It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.
+
+The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that _five_ lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only _four_ lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the "Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons," that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.
+
+In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only _three_ lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.
+
+Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.
+
+The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+It is an indisputable fact that the "General Assembly" which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,[7] and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, "resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation."
+
+Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:
+
+"The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places."
+
+From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.
+
+Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.[8] I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that "Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge." And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, "the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the _Masters and
+Wardens_ of all the regular lodges;" and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+"Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England," adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the "Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge." But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.
+
+On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.
+
+Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.
+
+In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, _essential_
+and _accidental_, or, as they are more usually called, _Grand_ and
+_Subordinate_. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.
+
+The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge "was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity _at
+large_ as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body."[9] The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.[10]
+
+The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,[11] seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, _pro hac vice_, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.
+
+The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the "lex non scripta," or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.[12]
+
+I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.
+
+It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. "An appeal," say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, "from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced."[13] This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.
+
+Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:--"If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation." But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+"proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."[14] This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed--it can be done in no other way--and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.
+
+II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:
+
+1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that "no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity."[15] But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.
+
+2. The next regulation prescribes "that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate." But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.
+
+3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain--because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.
+
+4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,[16] because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.
+
+5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing "that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality."
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles--which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.
+
+6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.
+
+But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.[17]
+
+III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:--
+
+"The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, _pro tempore_."
+
+But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.
+
+The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.
+
+IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.
+
+V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+_making Masons at sight_.
+
+The power to "make Masons at sight" is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, "an occasional lodge," especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only--the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.
+
+Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.[18]
+
+In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.
+
+In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he "formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk," and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.[19]
+
+I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in "an occasional
+lodge," over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,[20] because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called _a making at sight_. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.
+
+But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened "an
+occasional lodge" and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.[21]
+
+Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened "an occasional lodge," and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.[22]
+
+In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason "at an occasional lodge,
+convened," says Preston, "for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person."[23]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these "occasional lodges" were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the "makings" are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these "occasional lodges"
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.
+
+This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument _ŕ fortiori_, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.
+
+No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+"But this order, afterwards appearing," says the Book of
+Constitutions,[24] "to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed."
+
+It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.
+
+But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue _ŕ fortiori_ that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together "an occasional lodge," and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason "at sight," that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.
+
+It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting "that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper"--and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that "since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place."
+
+The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.[25] But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.
+
+In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.
+
+But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies--the conferring of degrees by "communication"
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_The Deputy Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that "a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born," because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:
+
+"The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship."
+
+The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.
+
+In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.
+
+There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Grand Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.
+
+According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason[26] who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Grand Treasurer._
+
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+"a brother of good worldly substance," whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Grand Secretary._
+
+
+This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Grand Chaplain._
+
+
+This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Grand Deacons._
+
+
+But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his "Masonic Miscellanies," and he thinks it "satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century."[27]
+
+But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled "Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics," sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.
+
+It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the "very latter end of the eighteenth century;" and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the "Ahiman Rezon" of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, "as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge." They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Grand Marshal._
+
+
+The _Grand Marshal_, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying "a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold," insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.
+
+The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the Grand Stewards._
+
+
+The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, "in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness," they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,[28] as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.
+
+The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of the Grand Sword-Bearer._
+
+
+_Grand Sword-Bearer._--It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+_Grand Pursuivant_.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Grand Tiler._
+
+
+It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.
+
+The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_General View._
+
+
+The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.
+
+The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:
+
+"Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."
+
+The expression which is put in capitals--"provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved"--is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that "it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry."
+
+"With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:
+
+"In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England."
+
+In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:--1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, "in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them." General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.
+
+Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that "the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint." Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a _quasi_ committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation _de novo_, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that "in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority." The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.
+
+The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.
+
+The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.
+
+These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, "the lord paramount" in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:--_It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks_.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Second
+
+Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+The old charges define a Lodge to be "a place where Masons assemble and
+work;" and also "that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons." The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that "a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work."
+
+Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.
+
+Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge "for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings," or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.
+
+Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.
+
+Preston says that the petition must be recommended "by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held." Dalcho says it must be recommended "by three other known and
+approved Master Masons," but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed "by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges." The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended "by the officers of some regular lodge." The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.
+
+If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a _dispensation_, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to "enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons." The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, "until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge." Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized "to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled." But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.
+
+If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, "true and lawful Brethren."
+
+Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.
+
+This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.
+
+The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.
+
+The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying "to give a formal existence to anything." Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the "warrant of constitution."
+
+The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge[29] having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil--the
+masonic elements of consecration--are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.
+
+This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating--a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes--was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: "Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground."
+
+The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of "the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy," they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the "health, peace, and plenty" that he enjoys.
+
+After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that "every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues."
+
+Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the "lines parallel." The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.
+
+The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.[30] The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.
+
+Selden[31] says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.
+
+The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:
+
+"In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;--and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings."
+
+This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term "a just and legally constituted lodge," and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.
+
+The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.
+
+The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, "it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent."[32] The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.
+
+The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.
+
+Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: "A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution." This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.
+
+But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: "That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+
+
+
+It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.
+
+A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may "admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;" no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be "with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge."[33]
+
+A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.
+
+With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence--a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.
+
+A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.
+
+As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership--they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+
+Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge._
+
+
+In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it--nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge--but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.[34] But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting _ad
+libitum_ was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the _old landmarks be carefully preserved_, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; "_the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory_."[35]
+
+The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.
+
+This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.
+
+A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the "general
+regulations" in the following words:
+
+"No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful."[36]
+
+But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.
+
+A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.
+
+By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.[37] The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;[38] but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.
+
+As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.
+
+The Master must be installed by a Past Master,[39] but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.[40] The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.
+
+Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.[41] The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.[42] This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed "to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank."[43] Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.
+
+The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: "The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge."[44]
+
+Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.[45] But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.
+
+A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. "In the
+Grand Lodge alone," they declare, "resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England." They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to _exclude_ a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.
+
+A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.
+
+A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.[46] But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.
+
+Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.[47] But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Duties of a Lodge._
+
+
+So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.
+
+The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry--to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission--declare that "it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry."
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even _it_ must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, "Nolumus leges Anglić mutare!" so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, "We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry."
+
+In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.
+
+No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.
+
+No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that "no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work." And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. "It would
+be highly improper," says the Ahiman Rezon, "in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members."
+
+I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates--as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.
+
+In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, "without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another."
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.
+
+Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that "no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree." This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.
+
+There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: "No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity."
+
+All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.
+
+The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity--as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity--I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.
+
+I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Officers in General._
+
+
+Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the "Inner Guard." The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.
+
+The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.
+
+Dalcho lays down the rule, that "no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws." Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.
+
+If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.
+
+No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.
+
+Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.
+
+An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Worshipful Master._
+
+
+This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.
+
+A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.[48] This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.
+
+One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.
+
+The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.
+
+The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.
+
+He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.
+
+It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.
+
+The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body "on all convenient occasions."[49] When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.
+
+The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge "in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren--cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.
+
+Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.
+
+During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.
+
+In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.
+
+In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.
+
+The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Treasurer._
+
+
+Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.
+
+It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer "to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary." The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.
+
+The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.
+
+The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.
+
+It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Secretary._
+
+
+It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, "which may be committed to paper;" to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.
+
+In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.
+
+Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease _ex
+necessitate rei_, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Deacons._
+
+
+In every lodge there are two of these officers--a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.
+
+The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.
+
+The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.
+
+From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Stewards._
+
+
+The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, "to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for." They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.
+
+What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Tiler._
+
+
+This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of "cowans and eavesdroppers." The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be "a
+worthy Master Mason." An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.
+
+The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Rules of Order.
+
+
+
+The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+"whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is."[50] By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of "Parliamentary Law," have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Order of Business._
+
+
+When the Brethren have been "congregated," or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.
+
+The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren "around the lodge," whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.
+
+As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.
+
+After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.
+
+In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, "the order of the day," and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.
+
+The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: "Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?" In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.
+
+But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.[51]
+
+New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.
+
+In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him "Worshipful."
+
+When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.
+
+Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.
+
+A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.
+
+No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+"private committees," to be allowed.
+
+Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of "Brother,"
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.
+
+In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.
+
+It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the "work" of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.
+
+When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.
+
+The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: "Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?" The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.
+
+The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair._
+
+
+Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by _courtesy_, "is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed _the right
+to take_ appeals."[52] If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+"in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.
+
+It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Mode of Taking the Question._
+
+
+The question in Masonry is not taken _viva voce_ or by "aye" and "nay."
+This should always be done by "a show of hands." The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, "and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry," and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words--"The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons."[53]
+
+Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.
+
+Moving the "previous question," a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Adjournments._
+
+
+Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by _closing_ the lodge, or by _calling from labor to refreshment_. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.
+
+But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of "setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor." He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his "will and pleasure" only that it is opened, so is it by his "will and
+pleasure" only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.
+
+The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.
+
+"All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, _and not desert the Master till the work is finished_."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Appointment of Committees._
+
+
+It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.
+
+The Master is also, _ex officio_, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes._
+
+
+Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.
+
+The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.
+
+"A regular communication of ---- Lodge, NO. ----, was holden at ----; on
+----, the ---- day of ----A.: L.: 58--.
+
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B----, W.: Master.
+ " B. C----, S.: Warden.
+ " C. D----, J.: Warden.
+ " D. E----, Treasurer.
+ " E. F----, Secretary.
+ " F. G----, S.: Deacon.
+ " G. H----, J.: Deacon.
+ " H. I----, } Stewards.
+ " I. K----, }
+ " K. L----, Tiler.
+
+ _Members._
+ Bro.: L. M----
+ M. N----
+ N. O----
+ O. P----
+
+ _Visitors._
+ P. Q----
+ Q. R----
+ R. S----
+ S. T----
+
+The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.
+
+"The minutes of the regular communication of ---- were read and
+confirmed.[54]
+
+"The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.---- and H. I.----, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.----, L. M.----, and O. P.----.
+
+"Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.
+
+"A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.----, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.
+
+"The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. ---- at the communication of ----, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.
+
+"The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.
+
+"Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+Amount received this evening, as follows:
+
+ Petition of Mr. G. F., $5
+ Fee of Bro. C. B., 5
+ do. of Bro. S. R., 5
+ do. of Bro. W. Y., 5--Total, $20
+
+all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.
+
+There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.
+
+E. F----,
+
+_Secretary._
+
+Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Third.
+
+The Law Of Individuals.
+
+
+
+Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+
+
+
+The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character--moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.
+
+The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as "a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science."
+
+The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+"depositary of his heart," as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, "a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul."
+
+The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.
+
+Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.
+
+These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.
+
+_Morally_, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living "under the tongue of good
+report."
+
+_Physically_, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a _man_ ought to be.
+
+_Intellectually_, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.
+
+_Politically_, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.
+
+The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.
+
+But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The old charges state, that "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law." It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, "moral law,"
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.
+
+The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be "a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine." A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.
+
+The word "libertine" has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a "free-thinker," or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:--
+
+"Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished."
+
+The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.
+
+These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be "a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country."
+
+Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that "The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men--no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report."
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.
+
+The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+"_a man_." No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.
+
+As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+"of mature and discreet age." But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that "no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more."[55] In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,[56]
+"unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;" in Ireland, twenty-one, except "by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;" in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army--such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.
+
+Our ritual excludes "an old man in his dotage" equally with a "young man
+under age." But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.
+
+The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+"a perfect youth," has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided "the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry."
+
+The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares "that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of _able_ body."[57]
+
+Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, "of able body," and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:
+
+"Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that _he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have."_[58]
+
+The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:
+
+"No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art."
+
+Notwithstanding the positive demand for _perfection_, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have _no maim or defect_, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is _perfect_ is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all--it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, "words," says Blackstone, "are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,"
+and then "perfect" would mean, "complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant." But another source of interpretation is, the "comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point."[59] Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word "perfect," if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must "_have his right limbs as a man ought to have_."
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.
+
+But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, "the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law" is, to consider
+"the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it." Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be _perfect_, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, "that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens," of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. "The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea," says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,[60] "that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration." If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words _perfect youth_ are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has "his right limbs as a man ought to
+have."[61]
+
+It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word "perfect," and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word "_that_." He must have no maim or defect
+_that_ may render him incapable; that is, _because_, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.
+
+In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be "men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch." It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.
+
+A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.
+
+In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+"deformed or dismembered at the time of their making."
+
+In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that "every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be."
+
+In the "Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual," published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be "hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making."[62]
+
+Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.
+
+In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not "sound in mind
+and _all their members_," and she adopted a resolution asserting that "the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage."[63]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency[64] has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.
+
+"We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed."--_Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia_, 1848, _page_ 36.
+
+"The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.[65] It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish--a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &c....
+
+"The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a _man_
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity."--_Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in_ 1848.[66]
+
+"The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order--the ancient charges--forbid
+it."--_Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70._
+
+"The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of _entire
+limbs_"--_Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848._
+
+"I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach _us_ to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries."--_Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849._
+
+"The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution."--_Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in_ 1849.
+
+"As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman."--_Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in_ 1849.
+
+Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply--guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law--and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683--I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?
+
+During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a _fool_ nor an _idiot_, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:
+
+"He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import," etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, "Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order." If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.
+
+It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: "No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity." And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.
+
+But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.
+
+From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.
+
+As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.
+
+Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.
+
+A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.
+
+Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be _free-born_. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude--though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty--is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency, and
+zeal," which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+"Children," says Oliver, "cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman."
+
+The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.
+
+Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former--the accepted one, to whom the promise was given--was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have "his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him," was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, "Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son." Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he "had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women." The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word [Greek: douloprepeia] or, "slave manners," to designate any very
+great impropriety of manners.
+
+The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge "to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison," and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that "it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action thereon_.
+
+
+The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+"petition." This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be "a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge."[67] This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.
+
+The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.
+
+The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:
+
+"No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid."
+
+The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.
+
+But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.
+
+The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.
+
+This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: "No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;"
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.
+
+If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.
+
+Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without "due
+inquiry" into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.
+
+But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of "making Masons," I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates._
+
+
+The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be "formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent _in their own prudent way_ either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.
+
+From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right--to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.[68]
+
+The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.
+
+No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+"and if," as Wayland says, "from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms." Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.
+
+And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.
+
+The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: "but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the _unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge_ then present when the candidate is proposed."
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+"New Regulations," adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted "only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks," it is said: "but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance."[69]
+
+The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.
+
+Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that _every member present_ shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted "by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed." This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called "an inherent
+privilege," which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.
+
+Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.[70]
+
+The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:--The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic _circumambulation_
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.
+
+These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.
+
+As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.
+
+The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats
+
+The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to "take charge of the ballot box." That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that "the box is clear in the South,"
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that "the box is foul in the
+South." The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of "West" and "East."
+
+If the box is _clear_--that is, if all the ballots are white--the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.
+
+But if the box is declared to be _foul_, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be "clear," or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, "if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge."
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot._
+
+
+There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.
+
+I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the _quantity_ than to the _quality_ of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.
+
+Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.
+
+In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is "clear," all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is "foul," each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.
+
+But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a _reconsideration_, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.
+
+The _motion for reconsideration_ is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that _the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box_. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.
+
+In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.
+
+If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;--now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast--the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.
+
+But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken--the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.
+
+But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.
+
+In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.[71] After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.
+
+Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.
+
+It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.
+
+It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this--that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of "Duty of
+Members" (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren "are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." And the regulation goes on to
+say: "Nor is this inherent privilege _subject to a dispensation_, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge." This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+"to give their consent in their own prudent way;" it would be an
+infringement of an "inherent privilege," and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.
+
+I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:
+
+1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.
+
+2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.
+
+3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.
+
+4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates._
+
+
+As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?
+
+It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:
+
+Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation--there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions--and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren--it must be again referred to
+a committee--lie over for a month--and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.
+
+If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the necessary Probation and due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement_.
+
+
+There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts--the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher--and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember "a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly."
+
+An hundred years ago it was said that "Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry."[72] And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.
+
+There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a "suitable proficiency" in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made "suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree."
+
+In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved--made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, "that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords."
+
+Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.
+
+This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, "that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander." In the same charges, it is prescribed that "no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years."
+
+In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: "Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work[73] who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed."
+
+These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.
+
+In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the "Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons" to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that "a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love."
+
+Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that "no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;"
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, "_on very particular occasions only_, may be
+requested."
+
+The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:
+
+"No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree."[74]
+
+This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.
+
+Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:
+
+"The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work--and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees."[75]
+
+In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:
+
+"To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness."
+
+The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty "of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree." And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.
+
+The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: "All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge."
+
+But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:
+
+"No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree."
+
+It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented--and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.
+
+This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.
+
+"Many persons," says that able philosopher of Masonry, "are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain."[76]
+
+Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree._
+
+
+Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.
+
+The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.
+
+Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.
+
+Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.
+
+Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have "due and timely notice," and be prepared to exercise his
+"inherent privilege" of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.
+
+If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.
+
+But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, "a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it."
+
+The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.
+
+I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication._
+
+
+The fourth General Regulation decrees that "no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time." This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.
+
+This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.
+
+The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that "no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge."
+
+Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.
+
+
+
+Section XII.
+
+_Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another._
+
+
+It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.
+
+This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:
+
+"None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it."
+
+There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A----, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B----, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A----, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A---- to grant permission
+to the lodge at B---- to confer them on the candidate.
+
+But how shall this permission be given--by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A----? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A----, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a "fractious member will be imposed on
+them," as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B----. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A---. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B---, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.
+
+I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.
+
+
+
+Section XIII.
+
+_Of the Initiation of Non-residents._
+
+
+The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:--First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.
+
+1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.
+
+2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made "in due form," and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?
+
+The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.
+
+In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:
+
+"Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members."
+
+The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, "that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason."
+
+The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:
+
+"Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution."[77]
+
+It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal--the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge--and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.
+
+Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the _mode how_, they might also have prescribed
+the _place where_, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.
+
+A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid--as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done--the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.
+
+The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.
+
+What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, "a distrust of his
+acceptance" at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+
+
+
+In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.
+
+At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.
+
+These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.
+
+But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is _ex gratia_,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd--because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.
+
+It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.
+
+If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.
+
+The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.
+
+But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.
+
+These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.
+
+Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.
+
+The question next occurs--What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor--that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light--and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it--it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, "unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election," and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,[78] it is said that "the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,"
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.
+
+"As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment."[79]
+
+This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, _mutatis mutandis_,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+
+
+
+When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Right of Membership._
+
+
+The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: "Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge."[80] If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.
+
+How long before he loses this right by a _non-user_, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.
+
+The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.
+
+But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.
+
+A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.
+
+A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+"good standing" until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the "good standing" of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.
+
+If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.
+
+In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.
+
+"No man can be made or _admitted a member_ of a particular lodge," says
+the fifth regulation, "without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge."
+
+And the sixth regulation adds, that "no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or _admitted to be a member_ thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present."
+
+So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.
+
+But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.
+
+A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.
+
+A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.
+
+Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Right of Visit._
+
+
+Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the "Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,"
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,[81]it is directed "that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge."
+
+This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, "received, and
+cherished," and "set on work," that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.
+
+In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, "that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty."[82]
+
+A lodge, when not opened for "general masonic business," but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened "_en
+famille_."
+
+To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:
+
+"A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft."
+
+A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.
+
+A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.
+
+Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.
+
+There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,[83] and which is in the following words:
+
+"3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept." This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.
+
+Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Examination of Visitors._
+
+
+It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.
+
+Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.
+
+The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words
+
+"I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.
+
+This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of "commencing at the beginning" should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted--categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+"rusty," or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.
+
+Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: "I am not
+satisfied," or, "I do not recognize you," and not in more specific terms,
+such as, "You did not answer this inquiry," or, "You are ignorant on that
+point." The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.
+
+Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called "leading
+questions," or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.
+
+Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry _it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted_.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Vouching for a Brother._
+
+
+An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity--since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful--that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.
+
+To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+"_strict trial, due examination, or lawful information_."
+
+Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be _competent_ to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.
+
+Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.
+
+If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: "A.B. is a Mason," is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: "I know this
+man to be a Master Mason," for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.
+
+If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a "Lodge of Master Masons." A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Right of Claiming Relief._
+
+
+One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. "As we have therefore
+opportunity," says St. Paul, "let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith."
+
+This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of "Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:"
+
+"You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.
+
+"But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances."
+
+This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.
+
+He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word " benefit," as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.
+
+He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, "true and genuine." True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of "faithful" or "trusty." A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.
+
+But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.
+
+It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Right of Masonic Burial._
+
+
+After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.[84] As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.
+
+But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.
+
+The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.[85]
+
+"No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member--foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies."
+
+This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.
+
+The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, "by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members."[86] It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+
+
+
+I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,[87] and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.
+
+In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.
+
+In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as "virtual" and as "actual" Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.
+
+An _actual Past Master_ is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A _virtual
+Past Master_ is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.
+
+Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?
+
+The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.
+
+In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.
+
+In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that "it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters."[88]
+
+Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider "that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;" and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such "legal means" of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.
+
+This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: "The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least _three installed Masters_"[89]
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, "this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but _installed_
+Masters be present."[90]
+
+And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.
+
+The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times--that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.
+
+On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.
+
+A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.
+
+He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.
+
+By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Affiliation.
+
+
+
+Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be "initiated," but a Mason is
+"affiliated."[91]
+
+Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.
+
+A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. "No man can be made, _or admitted a member_ * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;" are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: "But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, _or admitted to be a member_ thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge."
+
+None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a "demit," and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.
+
+Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.
+
+A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.
+
+In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.
+
+The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that "no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality." This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, "this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete."[92] Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.
+
+The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VII.
+
+Of Demitting.
+
+
+
+To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a _demit_.
+
+The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation "that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another." Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors "of
+his own free will and accord," and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that
+
+ "A man convinced against his will,
+ Is of the same opinion still,"
+
+and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.
+
+The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.
+
+But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.
+
+There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:
+
+"No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge."
+
+It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.
+
+With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VIII.
+
+Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+
+An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: "every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations."
+
+Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed--Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.
+
+A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that "it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member."[93] A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.
+
+Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the _right_ of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association--the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:[94] "The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, _nolens volens,_ money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, _Free_ and Accepted."
+
+But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.
+
+We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the _Lodge organization_ of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened--he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple--the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.
+
+But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of "once a Mason,
+and always a Mason," it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.
+
+Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says "if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire _as to anything_." But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone "lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother," that
+we are in cases of "imminent peril" to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when _duly_ called for.
+
+I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:
+
+1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.
+
+2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when _he asks for that aid in
+the_ proper _and conventional way_.
+
+3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.
+
+4. He loses the general right to visit[95] lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.
+
+5. He loses the right of masonic burial.
+
+6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Fourth.
+
+Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+
+
+
+The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.
+
+In replying to the question, "what are masonic crimes?" by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.
+
+But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.
+
+Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.
+
+Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, "to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;" and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.
+
+In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+"that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, _they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible_"
+
+The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.
+
+The first charge says: "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law." Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be "the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions."[96] Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we "should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)[97]
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due."
+
+If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.
+
+But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all "wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander."
+
+The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.
+
+From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Masonic Punishments.
+
+
+
+Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of Censure._
+
+
+A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.
+
+Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.
+
+A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Reprimand._
+
+
+A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.
+
+A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.
+
+If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.
+
+The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.
+
+A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of Exclusion from the Lodge._
+
+
+Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.
+
+1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.
+
+I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged "to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge," it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.
+
+2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, _suspension from the lodge,_ and sometimes _erasure from the
+roll_. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.
+
+But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.
+
+The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.
+
+Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.
+
+The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term "expelled" is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the craft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called "exclusion." The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Definite Suspension._
+
+
+Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.
+
+Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.
+
+In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.
+
+At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of _Restoration._
+
+By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason--is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren--is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.
+
+The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of Indefinite Suspension._
+
+
+Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.
+
+All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.
+
+The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits--the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.
+
+No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Expulsion._[98]
+
+
+Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.
+
+It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.[99]
+
+The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.
+
+As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure--he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.
+
+The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:--Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:--
+
+"A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason."[100]
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of Masonic Trials.
+
+
+
+Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Form of Trial._
+
+
+Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.
+
+A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.
+
+This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.
+
+The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.
+
+Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.
+
+It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.
+
+If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge--that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.
+
+The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.
+
+The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.
+
+When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.
+
+Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.
+
+If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.
+
+He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.
+
+For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.
+
+The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.
+
+If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.
+
+In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials._
+
+
+In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.
+
+The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.
+
+1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.[101]
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.
+
+2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that "an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath."
+
+3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, "such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath." Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,[102] that "the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity."
+
+4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.
+
+Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:
+
+"I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest."
+
+The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.
+
+To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.
+
+The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great "Treatise on the Law of Evidence," says: "In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end."
+
+Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.
+
+Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen--and
+this is a very conceivable case--that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.
+
+If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected--if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.
+
+But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as "profanes" would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself--of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.
+
+But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an _alibi_, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a "profane" is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.
+
+It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.
+
+The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.
+
+The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.
+
+The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer--the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+
+
+
+The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.
+
+The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.
+
+The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.
+
+1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.
+
+2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.
+
+This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.
+
+3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.
+
+4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.
+
+5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Appeals.
+
+
+
+Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.
+
+As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.
+
+But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced _de novo_, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate--either too severe, or not sufficiently so--in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.
+
+Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.
+
+During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason "under charges."
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Restoration.
+
+
+
+The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.
+
+I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.
+
+Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member--for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.
+
+Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.
+
+But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, _shall
+not_ be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment--and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world--the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived--could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.
+
+On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned _sine
+die_; for it has done all that is required--the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.
+
+The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+"Another capital offense against public justice," says Blackstone, "is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+_before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported." _ Mark these qualifying words: "before the expiration of
+the term:" they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return _after_ the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:
+
+_It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended_.
+
+Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.
+
+But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.
+
+Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: "I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?" Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.
+
+The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens--every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty--and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.
+
+But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely--that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge--may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.
+
+But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing--both are equally unconnected with the institution--the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.
+
+The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.
+
+Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.
+
+In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.
+
+In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.
+
+But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.
+
+The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.
+
+I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.
+
+The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that "no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members"--which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, "lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge." But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones--to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent--clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong--so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.
+
+
+
+
+Index.
+
+
+
+A.
+
+
+Accused, to what he is entitled
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425
+ " " " it was never enforced
+Actual Past Master, term defined
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry
+ " motion for, cannot be entertained
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges
+Affiliation, what it is
+ " mode of
+ " requires unanimity
+ " Master Masons only entitled to it
+ " rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges
+ " may be made with more than one lodge
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted
+ " not to be entertained in a lodge
+ " cannot be taken from the chair
+ " doctrine of, discussed
+ " from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge
+ " every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge
+ " pending one, the sentence is in abeyance
+Apprentices, rights of _(see Entered Apprentice_)
+Arrears, non-payment of
+ " to lodges, history of their origin
+ " do not accrue during suspension
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban
+ " " " in 926 at York
+ " " governed the craft for nearly 800 years
+ " " how organized
+Atheist cannot be a Mason
+Authorities for masonic law
+
+
+
+B.
+
+
+Balloting for candidates
+ every member must take a part in it
+ secrecy of, inviolable
+ must be unanimous
+ Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge
+ not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears
+ mode of
+Balloting in each degree
+ not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied
+ must be unanimous
+Ballot, reconsideration of
+ motion for, out of order
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge
+Burial, masonic, right of
+ must be requested except for strangers
+ Master Masons only entitled to it
+ dispensation for, not usually required
+Business, order of
+ may be suspended at any time by the Master
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+C.
+
+
+Calling from labor to refreshment
+Censure, a masonic punishment
+Certificates, masonic
+Chaplain, Grand (_see Grand Chaplain_)
+Charges of accusation, how to be made
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates
+Committees to be appointed by the Master
+ Master is chairman of, when present
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated
+Consecration of a lodge how performed
+ meaning of
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of
+ meaning of
+Constitutions, how to be altered
+" Gothic, adopted in 926,
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,
+" " " why elements,
+Crimes, masonic,
+" " definition of,
+" " enumeration of
+
+
+
+D.
+
+
+Deacons,
+" two in each lodge,
+" are appointed officers,
+" not removable by Master or Senior Warden
+" Grand _(see Grand Deacons_)
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed
+" to whom, and why,
+" meaning of
+Definite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication
+Demitting
+" right of, not denied until recently,
+" regulations concerning
+" of many at one time may be refused
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+" " office of, not very ancient
+" " exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence
+"" cannot be more than one
+"" originally appointed by Grand Master
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,
+Dispensation what and where to be granted
+"for a lodge
+"" " tenure of its duration
+"" " difference from a Warrant
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates
+" meaning of the term
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage
+" non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates
+
+
+
+E.
+
+
+Emergency, rule upon the subject
+Entered Apprentice, rights of
+ formerly a member of his lodge
+ formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications
+ may sit in a lodge of his degree
+ cannot speak or vote
+ cannot be deprived of his rights without trial
+ after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment
+Evidence in masonic trials
+Examination of visitors
+ how to be conducted
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge
+Expulsion is masonic death
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment
+ should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval
+ from higher degrees, its effect
+ restoration from
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+F.
+
+
+Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief
+Fellow Craft, rights of
+ they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity
+ formerly permitted to speak, but not vote
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another
+Fool cannot be a Mason
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making
+Free-born, a Mason must be
+ reason for the rule
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+G.
+
+
+General Assembly. (_See Assembly, General._)
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926
+Grand Chaplain,
+ office established in 1775
+ duties of
+Grand Deacons
+ office more ancient than Oliver supposes
+ duties of
+ how appointed
+Grand Lodge held in 1717
+ mode of organizing one
+ three lodges necessary to organize one
+ dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,
+ all the Craft formerly members of
+ Masters and Wardens of lodges are members
+ Grand Officers are also members
+ Past Masters are not members by inherent right
+ its powers and prerogatives
+ may make new regulations
+ must observe the landmarks
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of
+ are comparatively modern institutions
+Grand Marshal
+ appointed by the Grand Master
+ duties of
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+ office of has existed since the origin of Masonry
+ an elective officer
+ by whom to be installed
+ prerogatives of, derived from two sources
+ no appeal from his decision
+ may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses
+ entitled to two votes
+ how to be punished
+ may grant dispensations
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight
+ may constitute new lodges
+ cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons
+ his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him
+Grand Pursuivant
+Grand Secretary
+ office of established in 1723
+ duties of
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant
+Grand Stewards
+ " " first mentioned in 1721
+ " " duties of
+ " " appointed by Junior Grand Warden
+Grand Stewards' Lodge
+Grand Sword-Bearer
+ " " duties of
+ " " office of, constituted in 1731
+Grand Tiler
+" " office of, must have existed from the earliest times
+" " must not be a member of the Grand Lodge
+" " sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected
+Grand Treasurer
+" " office of, established in 1724
+" " duties of
+" " has always been elected
+Grand Wardens
+" " originally appointed by the Grand Master
+" " succeed the Grand Master and Deputy
+
+
+
+H.
+
+
+Heresy not a masonic crime
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from
+Historical sketch
+
+
+
+I.
+
+
+Idiot cannot be made a Mason
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are
+Indefinite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate
+Installation
+ " whence the term derived
+ " necessary to legal existence of an officer
+ " of a Master of a lodge
+ " of the Grand Master
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge
+Investigation of character must be by a committee
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason
+ " " definition of the term
+
+
+
+J.
+
+
+Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,
+Junior Grand Warden
+Junior Warden,
+ " " presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,
+ " " does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,
+ " " presides over the craft during refreshment
+ " " appoints the stewards
+Jurisdiction of a lodge
+ " geographical or personal
+ " is over all its members
+ " " " unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity
+ " cannot extend beyond State lines,
+ " none over its Master
+
+
+
+K.
+
+
+Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason
+
+
+
+L.
+
+
+Labor, calling from, to refreshment
+Landmarks, what they are,
+ " ritual and legislative
+ " must be observed by the Grand Lodge
+Law of Grand Lodges
+ " subordinate lodges
+ " individuals
+Lawful information, what it is
+Laws, how to be interpreted
+ " of Masonry are of two kinds--written and unwritten
+ " written, whence derived
+ " unwritten, whence derived
+ " " same as ancient usage
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason
+ meaning of the term
+Lodge, subordinate
+ definition of
+ how organized
+ must have been congregated by some superior authority
+Lodge, under dispensation
+ definition of
+ generally precedes a warranted lodge
+ how formed
+ cannot make by-laws
+ cannot elect officers
+ cannot install officers
+ cannot elect members
+Lodge, warranted
+ its powers and rights
+ must be consecrated
+ must be dedicated
+ must be constituted
+ its officers must be installed
+ ceremony of installation in
+ its powers are inherent in it
+ its reserved rights are secured by the regulations
+ an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity
+ may select its own members
+ elects its own officers
+ what officers of, are elected in England
+ may install its officers
+ Master of, must be installed by a past Master
+ may be represented in the Grand Lodge
+ representatives of
+ may instruct its representatives
+ may frame by-laws
+ may suspend or exclude a member
+ may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge
+ may levy annual contributions
+ may select its name
+ cannot select its number
+ duties of
+ cannot alter the ritual
+ must elect officers at a particular time
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge
+ " " cannot initiate without previous notice
+ " " cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time
+ " " cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time
+ " " must meet once a month
+ " " neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant
+ " " cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge
+ " " may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions
+ " " officers of
+
+
+
+M.
+
+
+Madmen cannot be Masons
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates
+ " reason for the rule relating to
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge
+Master, Grand. _(See Grand Master_.)
+Master Mason, rights of
+ " " becomes a member by signing the by-laws
+ " " how this right is forfeited
+ " " may apply to any lodge for membership
+ " " to whom subject for discipline
+ " " may speak and vote on all questions
+ " " may hold any office to which elected
+ " " but to serve as Master must have been a Warden
+ " " may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+ " " may visit any lodge, after examination
+Master of a lodge
+ " " " must have previously served as Warden
+ " " " must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced
+ " " " must be installed by a Past Master
+ " " " has the warrant in charge
+ " " " may call special meetings of his lodge
+ " " " may close his lodge at any time
+ " " " presides over business as well as labor
+ " " " is supreme in his lodge
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand
+Lodge
+ moral qualifications of
+ intellectual qualifications of
+ who is to judge of them
+ is a member of the Grand Lodge
+ may exclude a member temporarily
+Membership, right of
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers
+Minutes, when to be read
+ how to be amended
+ not to be read at special communications
+ formula for keeping
+Moral law, what it is
+ a Mason must obey it
+Motions, when to be entertained
+
+
+
+N.
+
+
+Name of a lodge to be selected by itself
+Non-residents, initiation of
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency
+ of candidates to be initiated at one communication
+
+
+
+O.
+
+
+Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion
+ not vacated by suspension
+Officers of a Grand Lodge
+ subordinate lodge
+ warranted lodge must be installed
+ how to be installed
+ time of election determined by Grand Lodge
+ elected annually
+ vacancies in, how to be supplied
+ cannot resign
+Order, rules of
+ whence derived
+
+
+
+P.
+
+
+Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry
+Past Masters
+ rights of
+ not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right
+ may install their successors
+ of two kinds--actual and virtual
+ may preside in a lodge
+ eligible to election to the chair
+ entitled to a seat in the East
+ eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden
+ virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate
+Petition of candidate
+ must be read at a regular communication
+ referred to a committee of three
+ reported on at next regular communication
+ report on, cannot be made at a special communication
+ renewal of, in case of rejection
+ how to be renewed, if rejected
+ for advancement to a higher degree
+ if rejected, how to be renewed
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge
+ what they must set forth
+ must be recommended by nearest lodge
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Political qualifications of candidates
+Postponed business, when to be called up
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of
+ officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry
+Probation of candidates
+ for initiation
+ for advancement
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials
+Proficiency of candidates
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable
+Punishments, masonic
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer
+
+
+
+Q.
+
+
+Qualifications of a Master of a lodge
+ of candidates,
+ moral
+ religious
+ physical
+ intellectual
+ political, 184
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717
+Question, how to be taken on a motion
+
+
+
+R.
+
+
+Reading, a qualification of candidates
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one
+ of candidate, must be by two members
+Reconsideration of ballot
+ motion for, is out of order,
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge
+ renewed petition of, when to be made,
+Relief, right of claiming it
+ unworthy Masons not entitled to it
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment
+Restoration
+ from definite suspension
+ indefinite supension
+ expulsion
+ must be at a stated communication
+ may be by Grand Lodge
+ requires a unanimous vote
+ to membership discussed
+
+
+
+S.
+
+
+Secretary, Grand. (_See Grand Secretary._)
+ of a lodge
+ his duty
+ is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer
+ is a check upon the treasurer
+ often receives compensation
+ in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected
+ but not in case of removal, or sickness
+Senior Grand Warden. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+Senior Warden
+ presides in absence of Master
+ may invite a Past Master to preside
+ presides over the craft during labor
+ appoints the Junior Deacon
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained
+ ---- is in abeyance pending an appeal
+Stewards, Grand. (_See Grand Stewards._)
+ of a lodge
+ appointed by Junior Warden
+ duties of
+ not removable by Junior Warden
+Stranger, initiation of
+Suspension
+ definite
+ indefinite
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (_See Grand Sword Bearer._)
+
+
+
+T.
+
+
+Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials
+Tiler, Grand. (_See Grand Tiler._)
+ of a lodge
+ office existed from beginning of the institution
+ no lodge can be without one
+ must be a worthy Master Mason
+ if a member, the office does not disfranchise him
+ when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place
+ may be removed for misconduct
+Tiler's obligation, form of it
+Transient persons, initiation of
+Treasurer, Grand. _(See Grand Treasurer_.)
+ " " of a lodge
+ " " duties of
+ " " is the only banker of the lodge
+ " " is a disbursing officer
+ " " a Brother of worldly substance usually selected
+ " " in case of death, a successor may be elected
+ " " but not in case of sickness, or removal
+Trials, masonic
+ " " form of
+ " " evidence in
+
+
+U.
+
+
+Unaffiliated Masons
+ " " tax sometimes levied on
+ " " position, rights, and duties of
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry
+ " effect of, on a Mason
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment
+ " " their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution
+
+
+V.
+
+
+Virtual Past Masters, who they are
+Visit, right of
+ " only affiliated Mason entitled to it
+ " must be preceded by an examination
+ " requires a certificate to insure it
+Visitors, examination of, described
+ " must take the Tiler's obligation
+Voting must always be by a show of hands
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present
+Voucher must be a competent Mason
+Vouching for a visitor
+
+
+
+W.
+
+
+Wardens, Grand. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+ of a lodge are assistants of the Master
+ entitled to membership in Grand Lodge
+Warden, Senior. (_See Senior Warden._)
+Warden, Junior. (_See Junior Warden._)
+Warrant of constitution
+ what it is
+ its difference from a dispensation
+ can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge
+ confers powers of installation and succession
+ not necessary before 1717
+ cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge
+Warranted lodges. (_See Lodges, Warranted._)
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of
+ definition of incompetent ones
+Woman cannot be made a Mason
+Writing, a qualification of candidates
+
+
+
+Y.
+
+
+Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term
+
+
+
+
+Footnotes
+
+
+
+[1] They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.
+
+[2] Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).
+
+[3] In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723--a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.
+
+[4] The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.
+
+[5] Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).
+
+[6] General Regulations, art. xxxix.
+
+[7] Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact "does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted."--p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. "The Brethren,"
+he says, "by a majority of hands, elected," &c.
+
+[8] Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.
+
+[9] Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).
+
+[10] Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.
+
+[11] Article xxxiv.
+
+[12] His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.
+
+[13] Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.
+
+[14] Art. xxxix.
+
+[15] The word "time" has been interpreted to mean _communication_.
+
+[16] And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.
+
+[17] What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.
+
+[18] It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.
+
+[19] Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.
+
+[20] Book of Const., p. 233.
+
+[21] Book of Const., p. 313.
+
+[22] Book of Constitutions, p. 319.
+
+[23] Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).
+
+[24] Book of Constitutions, p. 247
+
+[25] The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.
+
+[26] That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.
+
+[27] Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).
+
+[28] It was abolished in New York in 1854.
+
+[29] This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.
+
+[30] "What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it." Deut. xx. 5.
+
+[31] De Syned. Vet. Ebrćor., 1. iii., c. xiv., § 1.
+
+[32] Cicero, Brut. i.
+
+[33] See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.
+
+[34] Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).
+
+[35] Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).
+
+[36] General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.
+
+[37] Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. _Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England_, 1847, _p_. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[38] The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. _English
+Constitutions, as above, p._ 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[39] It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.
+
+[40] No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. _English
+Constitutions_ (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[41] Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. _English
+Constitutions, p_. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[42] We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.
+
+[43] Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).
+
+[44] General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).
+
+[45] English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[46] In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.
+
+[47] Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.
+
+[48] "No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden."--_Old Charges_, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).
+
+[49] Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).
+
+[50] Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.
+
+[51] One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, "the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and _carefully finish
+the work they begin_."--Oliver's Preston, p. 27, _note_ (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).
+
+[52] Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.
+
+[53] Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.
+
+[54] If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.
+
+[55] Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).
+
+[56] Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.
+
+[57] See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).
+
+[58] Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).
+
+[59] Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., § 2.
+
+[60] In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.
+
+[61] Potter, 184.
+
+[62] Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, "provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry."
+
+[63] Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.
+
+[64] When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!
+
+[65] Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.
+
+[66] See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.
+
+[67] Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.
+
+[68] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, _Ballot_.
+
+[69] Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.
+
+[70] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. _Ballot_
+
+[71] Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.
+
+[72] Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.
+
+[73] That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.
+
+[74] This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.
+
+[75] Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.
+
+[76] Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).
+
+[77] Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.
+
+[78] Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).
+
+[79] Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).
+
+[80] Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.
+
+[81] Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, _note_ (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).
+
+[82] See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).
+
+[83] Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)
+
+[84] See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.
+
+[85] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).
+
+[86] Preston, Oliver's Edit" p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).
+
+[87] Book I., chap. iii.
+
+[88] Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.
+
+[89] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).
+
+[90] Ibid
+
+[91] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, _in voce_.
+
+[92] Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.
+
+[93] Proceedings for 1853.
+
+[94] Proceedings for 1847.
+
+[95] The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.
+
+[96] Blackstone, Introd., § i.
+
+[97] For so we should interpret the word "honeste."
+
+[98] I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my "Lexicon of
+Freemasonry," and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.
+
+[99] In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called "exclusion," and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.
+
+[100] Lexicon of Freemasonry.
+
+[101] Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.
+
+[102] Chief Baron Gilbert.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+***** This file should be named 12186-8.txt or 12186-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/2/1/8/12186/
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
+new filenames and etext numbers.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
+are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
+download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
+search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
+download by the etext year.
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06
+
+ (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,
+ 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
+
+EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
+filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
+of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
+identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
+digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
+example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234
+
+or filename 24689 would be found at:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689
+
+An alternative method of locating eBooks:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL
+
+
diff --git a/old/12186-8.zip b/old/12186-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c0ec7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/12186-h.zip b/old/12186-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9efa33c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/12186-h/12186-h.htm b/old/12186-h/12186-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..22c4a20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186-h/12186-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,8715 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html
+ PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
+<title>The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey, M.D.</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ body {
+ margin: 0.5em;
+ font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;
+ }
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center;
+ font-weight: bold;
+ }
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4 {
+ font-variant: small-caps
+ }
+
+ .smallcaps { font-variant: small-caps }
+
+ a { text-decoration: none; }
+
+ a:hover { background-color: #ffffcc }
+
+ div.book {
+ margin-top: 6em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ div.chapter {
+ margin-top: 4em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ div.sec {
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ padding: 5px;
+ }
+
+ hr {
+ height: 1px;
+ border-width: 1px;
+ border-style: dashed;
+ }
+
+ p.abs, blockquote.epi {
+ width: 80%;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ }
+
+ p.byline {
+ text-align: center;
+ font-variant: small-caps;
+ }
+
+ #tp, #verso, #dedication { text-align: center; }
+
+ #tp blockquote.epi {
+ text-align: left;
+ width: 40%;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ }
+
+ #toc ul {
+ list-style-type: none;
+ }
+ -->
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Principles of Masonic Law
+ A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+ Freemasonry
+
+
+Author: Albert G. Mackey
+
+Release Date: April 28, 2004 [EBook #12186]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+<div id="tp">
+<h1 class="title">The Principles of Masonic Law:</h1>
+
+<h2>A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,</h2>
+
+<p class='byline'>By</p>
+
+<h2 class="author">Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,</h2>
+
+<h3>Author of<br />
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie,"<br /> "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry,"<br /> Etc., Etc.,</h3>
+
+<h4>Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.</h4>
+
+<blockquote class="epi"><p>
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; qu&aelig; lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."</p>
+
+<p> Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.</p></blockquote>
+
+<h4>New York:<br />
+Jno. W. Leonard &amp; Co., Masonic Publishers,<br />
+383 Broadway.</h4>
+
+<h5>1856.</h5>
+</div>
+
+<div id="verso">
+<p>Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard &amp; Co.,</p>
+
+<p>In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div id="dedication">
+<h2>To</h2>
+
+<h3>Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,</h3>
+
+<p>Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,</p>
+
+<p>I Dedicate This Work,</p>
+
+<p>As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him<br />
+As a Man,<br />
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character<br />
+As a Mason;<br />
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the<br />
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,<br />
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our<br />
+Sublime Institution.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="chapter" id="toc">
+<h2>Table of Contents</h2>
+
+
+
+<p><a href="#preface">Preface</a></p>
+<p><a href="#intro">Introduction</a></p>
+
+<h3>Book First.<br /><a href="#b1">The Law of Grand Lodges.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b1-01">Historical Sketch.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b1-02">Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b1-03">Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b1-04">Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-04-01"><i>Of the Grand Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-04-02"><i>The Deputy Grand Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-04-03"><i>Of the Grand Wardens.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-04-04"><i>Of the Grand Treasurer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b1-04-05"><i>Of the Grand Secretary.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b1-04-06"><i>Of the Grand Chaplain.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b1-04-07"><i>Of the Grand Deacons.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b1-04-08"><i>Of the Grand Marshal.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IX. <a href="#b1-04-09"><i>Of the Grand Stewards.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section X. <a href="#b1-04-10"><i>Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XI. <a href="#b1-04-11"><i>Of the Grand Tiler.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b1-05">Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-05-01"><i>General View.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-05-02"><i>Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-05-03"><i>Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-05-04"><i>Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Second.<br /><a href="#b2">Laws of Subordinate Lodges.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b2-01">Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b2-02">Of Lodges under Dispensation.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b2-03">Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b2-04">Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b2-04-01"><i>Of the Officers in General.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b2-04-02"><i>Of the Worshipful Master.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b2-04-03"><i>Of the Wardens.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b2-04-04"><i>Of the Treasurer.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b2-04-05"><i>Of the Secretary.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b2-04-06"><i>Of the Deacons.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b2-04-07"><i>Of the Stewards.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b2-04-08"><i>Of the Tiler.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b2-05">Of Rules of Order.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b1-05-01"><i>Of the Order of Business.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b1-05-02"><i>Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b1-05-03"><i>Of the Mode of Taking the Question.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b1-05-04"><i>Of Adjournments.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b2-05-05"><i>Of the Appointment of Committees.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b2-05-06"><i>Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Third.<br /><a href="#b3">The Law of Individuals.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b3-01">Of the Qualifications of Candidates.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b3-01-01"><i>Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b3-01-02"><i>Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b3-01-03"><i>Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b3-01-04"><i>Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b3-01-05"><i>Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action Thereon.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b3-01-06"><i>Of Balloting for Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VII. <a href="#b3-01-07"><i>Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VIII. <a href="#b3-01-08"><i>Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IX. <a href="#b3-01-09"><i>Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of Candidates before Advancement</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section X. <a href="#b3-01-10"><i>Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XI. <a href="#b3-01-11"><i>Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XII. <a href="#b3-01-12"><i>Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section XIII. <a href="#b3-01-12"><i>Of the Initiation of Non-residents.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b3-02">Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b3-03">Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b3-04">Of the Rights of Master Masons.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b3-04-01"><i>Of the Right of Membership.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b3-04-02"><i>Of the Right of Visit.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b3-04-03"><i>Of the Examination of Visitors.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b3-04-04"><i>Of Vouching for a Brother.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b3-04-05"><i>Of the Right of Claiming Relief.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b3-04-06"><i>Of the Right of Masonic Burial.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b3-05">Of the Rights of Past Masters.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VI. <a href="#b3-06">Of Affiliation.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VII. <a href="#b3-07">Of Demitting.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VIII. <a href="#b3-08">Of Unaffiliated Masons.</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>Book Fourth.<br /><a href="#b3">Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.</a></h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Chapter I. <a href="#b4-01">Of What Are Masonic Crimes.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter II. <a href="#b4-02">Of Masonic Punishments.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b4-02-01"><i>Of Censure.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b4-02-02"><i>Of Reprimand.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section III. <a href="#b4-02-03"><i>Of Exclusion from the Lodge.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section IV. <a href="#b4-02-04"><i>Of Definite Suspension.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section V. <a href="#b4-02-05"><i>Of Indefinite Suspension.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section VI. <a href="#b4-02-06"><i>Of Expulsion.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter III. <a href="#b4-03">Of Masonic Trials.</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li>Section I. <a href="#b4-03-01"><i>Of the Form of Trial.</i></a></li>
+ <li>Section II. <a href="#b4-03-02"><i>Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.</i></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li>Chapter IV. <a href="#b4-04">Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter V. <a href="#b4-05">Of Appeals.</a></li>
+ <li>Chapter VI. <a href="#b4-06">Of Restoration.</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p><a href="#index">Index.</a></p>
+<p><a href="#footnotes">Footnotes.</a></p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="preface">
+<h2>Preface.</h2>
+
+
+
+<p>In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.</p>
+
+<p>When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.</p>
+
+<p>But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded&mdash;for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible&mdash;and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.</p>
+
+<p>Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.</p>
+
+<p>This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.</p>
+
+<p>Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work &quot;The Principles of
+Masonic Law.&quot; It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.</p>
+
+<p>Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+&quot;ab longo inter-vallo,&quot; to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this &quot;general map&quot; of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in &quot;locating&quot;
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.</p>
+
+<p>There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.</p>
+
+<p>The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.</p>
+
+<p>But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories&mdash;as a man, I am, of course, fallible&mdash;and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready&mdash;because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions&mdash;to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, &quot;Strike, but
+hear me.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.</p>
+
+<p>The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.</p>
+
+<p>Albert G. Mackey.</p>
+
+<p>Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="intro">
+<h2>Introduction.</h2>
+
+<h3>The Authorities for Masonic Law.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+<i>unwritten</i> and <i>written,</i> and may in a manner be compared with the &quot;lex
+non scripta,&quot; or common law, and the &quot;lex seripta,&quot; or statute law of
+English and American jurists.</p>
+
+<p>The &quot;lex non scripta,&quot; or <i>unwritten law</i> of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+&quot;leges non script&aelig;&quot; of the English constitution&mdash;that &quot;their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom.&quot; When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of &quot;ancient usage.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The &quot;lex scripta,&quot; or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.</p>
+
+<p>1. The &quot;Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity,&quot; and said to have been written in the reign of James II.<sup><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.<sup><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>4. &quot;The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London,&quot; printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.<sup><a href="#fn3">3</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>5. The thirty-nine &quot;General Regulations,&quot; adopted &quot;at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,&quot;
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.</p>
+
+<p>6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.</p>
+
+<p>Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.</p>
+
+<p>Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the &quot;Ancient Landmarks of the Order,&quot; to
+which reference is so often made.</p>
+
+<p>Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft&mdash;whether ritual or legislative&mdash;whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society&mdash;which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that &quot;every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b1">
+<h2>Book First</h2>
+
+<h3>The Law of Grand Lodges.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Historical Sketch.</h4>
+
+
+<p>Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the &quot;Gothic Constitutions&quot;<sup><a href="#fn4">4</a></sup>
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, &quot;a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly.&quot; The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them &quot;good
+charges and regulations.&quot; We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft &quot;to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly.&quot; The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+&quot;General Assembly of Masons.&quot; It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.<sup><a href="#fn5">5</a></sup> To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term &quot;mass
+meetings.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+&quot;by the <i>yearly congregations</i> and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their <i>general assemblies, </i> the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken.&quot; This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this &quot;mutual assembly,&quot; in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, &quot;that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.</p>
+
+<p>But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.</p>
+
+<p>After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.</p>
+
+<p>At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, &quot;a Grand
+Lodge <i>pro tempore;&quot;</i> resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.</p>
+
+<p>This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.</p>
+
+<p>The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.</p>
+
+<p>At the same meeting, it was resolved &quot;that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of <i>all</i> the Brethren before dinner, <i>even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice</i><sup><a href="#fn6">6</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.</p>
+
+<p>That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled&mdash;not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.</p>
+
+<p>It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.</p>
+
+<p>The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that <i>five</i> lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only <i>four</i> lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the &quot;Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons,&quot; that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.</p>
+
+<p>In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only <i>three</i> lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>It is an indisputable fact that the &quot;General Assembly&quot; which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,<sup><a href="#fn7">7</a></sup> and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, &quot;resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.</p>
+
+<p>Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.<sup><a href="#fn8">8</a></sup> I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that &quot;Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge.&quot; And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, &quot;the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the <i>Masters and
+Wardens</i> of all the regular lodges;&quot; and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+&quot;Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England,&quot; adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the &quot;Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge.&quot; But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.</p>
+
+<p>On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.</p>
+
+<p>Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.</p>
+
+<p>In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, <i>essential</i>
+and <i>accidental</i>, or, as they are more usually called, <i>Grand</i> and
+<i>Subordinate</i>. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.</p>
+
+<p>The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-01">
+<h3>Section I.</h3>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge &quot;was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity <i>at
+large</i> as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn9">9</a></sup> The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.<sup><a href="#fn10">10</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,<sup><a href="#fn11">11</a></sup> seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, <i>pro hac vice</i>, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the &quot;lex non scripta,&quot; or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.<sup><a href="#fn12">12</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.</p>
+
+<p>It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. &quot;An appeal,&quot; say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, &quot;from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn13">13</a></sup> This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.</p>
+
+<p>Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:&mdash;&quot;If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation.&quot; But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+&quot;proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn14">14</a></sup> This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed&mdash;it can be done in no other way&mdash;and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.</p>
+
+<p>II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:</p>
+
+<p>1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that &quot;no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn15">15</a></sup> But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.</p>
+
+<p>2. The next regulation prescribes &quot;that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate.&quot; But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.</p>
+
+<p>3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain&mdash;because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.</p>
+
+<p>4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,<sup><a href="#fn16">16</a></sup> because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.</p>
+
+<p>5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing &quot;that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality.&quot;
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles&mdash;which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.</p>
+
+<p>6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.</p>
+
+<p>But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.<sup><a href="#fn17">17</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, <i>pro tempore</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.</p>
+
+<p>The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.</p>
+
+<p>IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.</p>
+
+<p>V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+<i>making Masons at sight</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The power to &quot;make Masons at sight&quot; is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only&mdash;the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.<sup><a href="#fn18">18</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.</p>
+
+<p>In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he &quot;formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk,&quot; and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.<sup><a href="#fn19">19</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in &quot;an occasional
+lodge,&quot; over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,<sup><a href="#fn20">20</a></sup> because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called <i>a making at sight</i>. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.</p>
+
+<p>But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened &quot;an
+occasional lodge&quot; and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.<sup><a href="#fn21">21</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.<sup><a href="#fn22">22</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason &quot;at an occasional lodge,
+convened,&quot; says Preston, &quot;for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn23">23</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these &quot;occasional lodges&quot; were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the &quot;makings&quot; are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these &quot;occasional lodges&quot;
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.</p>
+
+<p>This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument <i>&agrave; fortiori</i>, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.</p>
+
+<p>No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+&quot;But this order, afterwards appearing,&quot; says the Book of
+Constitutions,<sup><a href="#fn24">24</a></sup> &quot;to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue <i>&agrave; fortiori</i> that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together &quot;an occasional lodge,&quot; and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason &quot;at sight,&quot; that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.</p>
+
+<p>It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting &quot;that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper&quot;&mdash;and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that &quot;since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.<sup><a href="#fn25">25</a></sup> But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.</p>
+
+<p>In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies&mdash;the conferring of degrees by &quot;communication&quot;
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>The Deputy Grand Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that &quot;a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born,&quot; because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.</p>
+
+<p>In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.</p>
+
+<p>There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Wardens.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.</p>
+
+<p>According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason<sup><a href="#fn26">26</a></sup> who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Treasurer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+&quot;a brother of good worldly substance,&quot; whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.</p>
+
+<p>The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Secretary.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Chaplain.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Deacons.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his &quot;Masonic Miscellanies,&quot; and he thinks it &quot;satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn27">27</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled &quot;Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics,&quot; sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.</p>
+
+<p>It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the &quot;very latter end of the eighteenth century;&quot; and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the &quot;Ahiman Rezon&quot; of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, &quot;as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge.&quot; They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Marshal.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The <i>Grand Marshal</i>, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying &quot;a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold,&quot; insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-09">
+<h4>Section IX.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Stewards.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, &quot;in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness,&quot; they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,<sup><a href="#fn28">28</a></sup> as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.</p>
+
+<p>The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-10">
+<h4>Section X.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p><i>Grand Sword-Bearer.</i>&mdash;It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+<i>Grand Pursuivant</i>.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-04-11">
+<h4>Section XI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Grand Tiler.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b1-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>General View.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.</p>
+
+<p>The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The expression which is put in capitals&mdash;&quot;provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved&quot;&mdash;is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that &quot;it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:&mdash;1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, &quot;in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them.&quot; General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that &quot;the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint.&quot; Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a <i>quasi</i> committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation <i>de novo</i>, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b1-05-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that &quot;in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority.&quot; The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.</p>
+
+<p>The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.</p>
+
+<p>These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, &quot;the lord paramount&quot; in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:&mdash;<i>It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks</i>.</p>
+</div></div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b2">
+<h2>Book Second</h2>
+
+<h3>Laws of Subordinate Lodges.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The old charges define a Lodge to be &quot;a place where Masons assemble and
+work;&quot; and also &quot;that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons.&quot; The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that &quot;a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.</p>
+
+<p>Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge &quot;for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings,&quot; or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.</p>
+
+<p>Preston says that the petition must be recommended &quot;by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held.&quot; Dalcho says it must be recommended &quot;by three other known and
+approved Master Masons,&quot; but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed &quot;by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges.&quot; The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended &quot;by the officers of some regular lodge.&quot; The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.</p>
+
+<p>If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a <i>dispensation</i>, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to &quot;enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons.&quot; The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, &quot;until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge.&quot; Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized &quot;to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled.&quot; But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.</p>
+
+<p>If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, &quot;true and lawful Brethren.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.</p>
+
+<p>This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.</p>
+
+<p>The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying &quot;to give a formal existence to anything.&quot; Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the &quot;warrant of constitution.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge<sup><a href="#fn29">29</a></sup> having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil&mdash;the
+masonic elements of consecration&mdash;are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.</p>
+
+<p>This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating&mdash;a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes&mdash;was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: &quot;Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of &quot;the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy,&quot; they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the &quot;health, peace, and plenty&quot; that he enjoys.</p>
+
+<p>After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that &quot;every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the &quot;lines parallel.&quot; The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.<sup><a href="#fn30">30</a></sup> The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.</p>
+
+<p>Selden<sup><a href="#fn31">31</a></sup> says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.</p>
+
+<p>The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;&mdash;and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term &quot;a just and legally constituted lodge,&quot; and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, &quot;it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn32">32</a></sup> The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.</p>
+
+<p>The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.</p>
+
+<p>Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: &quot;A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution.&quot; This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.</p>
+
+<p>But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: &quot;That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Lodges under Dispensation.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may &quot;admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;&quot; no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be &quot;with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn33">33</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.</p>
+
+<p>With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence&mdash;a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership&mdash;they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-03-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it&mdash;nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge&mdash;but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.<sup><a href="#fn34">34</a></sup> But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting <i>ad
+libitum</i> was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the <i>old landmarks be carefully preserved</i>, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; &quot;<i>the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory</i>.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn35">35</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.</p>
+
+<p>This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the &quot;general
+regulations&quot; in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn36">36</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.<sup><a href="#fn37">37</a></sup> The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;<sup><a href="#fn38">38</a></sup> but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.</p>
+
+<p>The Master must be installed by a Past Master,<sup><a href="#fn39">39</a></sup> but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.<sup><a href="#fn40">40</a></sup> The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.</p>
+
+<p>Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.<sup><a href="#fn41">41</a></sup> The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.<sup><a href="#fn42">42</a></sup> This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed &quot;to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn43">43</a></sup> Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.</p>
+
+<p>The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: &quot;The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn44">44</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.<sup><a href="#fn45">45</a></sup> But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. &quot;In the
+Grand Lodge alone,&quot; they declare, &quot;resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England.&quot; They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to <i>exclude</i> a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.</p>
+
+<p>A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.<sup><a href="#fn46">46</a></sup> But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.<sup><a href="#fn47">47</a></sup> But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-03-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Duties of a Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.</p>
+
+<p>The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry&mdash;to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission&mdash;declare that &quot;it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry.&quot;
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even <i>it</i> must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, &quot;Nolumus leges Angli&aelig; mutare!&quot; so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, &quot;We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.</p>
+
+<p>No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.</p>
+
+<p>No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that &quot;no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work.&quot; And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. &quot;It would
+be highly improper,&quot; says the Ahiman Rezon, &quot;in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates&mdash;as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, &quot;without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another.&quot;
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.</p>
+
+<p>Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that &quot;no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree.&quot; This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.</p>
+
+<p>There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: &quot;No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.</p>
+
+<p>The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity&mdash;as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity&mdash;I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.</p>
+
+<p>I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Officers in General.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the &quot;Inner Guard.&quot; The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.</p>
+
+<p>The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.</p>
+
+<p>Dalcho lays down the rule, that &quot;no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws.&quot; Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.</p>
+
+<p>If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.</p>
+
+<p>No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.</p>
+
+<p>Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.</p>
+
+<p>An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Worshipful Master.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.</p>
+
+<p>A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.<sup><a href="#fn48">48</a></sup> This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.</p>
+
+<p>One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.</p>
+
+<p>The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.</p>
+
+<p>The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.</p>
+
+<p>He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.</p>
+
+<p>The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body &quot;on all convenient occasions.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn49">49</a></sup> When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge &quot;in an unjust or arbitrary manner.&quot; But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.</p>
+
+<p>The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren&mdash;cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.</p>
+
+<p>Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Wardens.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.</p>
+
+<p>In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.</p>
+
+<p>In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.</p>
+
+<p>The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Treasurer.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.</p>
+
+<p>It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer &quot;to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary.&quot; The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.</p>
+
+<p>The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.</p>
+
+<p>The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.</p>
+
+<p>It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Secretary.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, &quot;which may be committed to paper;&quot; to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.</p>
+
+<p>In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.</p>
+
+<p>Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease <i>ex
+necessitate rei</i>, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Deacons.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In every lodge there are two of these officers&mdash;a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.</p>
+
+<p>The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.</p>
+
+<p>The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.</p>
+
+<p>From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Stewards.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, &quot;to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for.&quot; They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.</p>
+
+<p>What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-04-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Tiler.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of &quot;cowans and eavesdroppers.&quot; The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be &quot;a
+worthy Master Mason.&quot; An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.</p>
+
+<p>The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b2-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Rules of Order.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+&quot;whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn50">50</a></sup> By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of &quot;Parliamentary Law,&quot; have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Order of Business.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>When the Brethren have been &quot;congregated,&quot; or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren &quot;around the lodge,&quot; whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.</p>
+
+<p>As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.</p>
+
+<p>After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.</p>
+
+<p>In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, &quot;the order of the day,&quot; and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: &quot;Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?&quot; In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.</p>
+
+<p>But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.<sup><a href="#fn51">51</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.</p>
+
+<p>In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him &quot;Worshipful.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.</p>
+
+<p>Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.</p>
+
+<p>A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.</p>
+
+<p>No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+&quot;private committees,&quot; to be allowed.</p>
+
+<p>Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of &quot;Brother,&quot;
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.</p>
+
+<p>In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.</p>
+
+<p>It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the &quot;work&quot; of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.</p>
+
+<p>When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.</p>
+
+<p>The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: &quot;Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?&quot; The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.</p>
+
+<p>The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by <i>courtesy</i>, &quot;is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed <i>the right
+to take</i> appeals.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn52">52</a></sup> If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+&quot;in an unjust or arbitrary manner.&quot; But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.</p>
+
+<p>In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Mode of Taking the Question.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The question in Masonry is not taken <i>viva voce</i> or by &quot;aye&quot; and &quot;nay.&quot;
+This should always be done by &quot;a show of hands.&quot; The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, &quot;and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry,&quot; and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words&mdash;&quot;The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn53">53</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Moving the &quot;previous question,&quot; a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Adjournments.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by <i>closing</i> the lodge, or by <i>calling from labor to refreshment</i>. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.</p>
+
+<p>But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of &quot;setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor.&quot; He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his &quot;will and pleasure&quot; only that it is opened, so is it by his &quot;will and
+pleasure&quot; only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.</p>
+
+<p>The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, <i>and not desert the Master till the work is finished</i>.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Appointment of Committees.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.</p>
+
+<p>The Master is also, <i>ex officio</i>, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b2-05-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.</p>
+
+<p>The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A regular communication of &mdash;&mdash; Lodge, NO. &mdash;&mdash;, was holden at &mdash;&mdash;; on
+----, the &mdash;&mdash; day of &mdash;&mdash;A.: L.: 58&mdash;.</p>
+
+<pre>
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B&mdash;&mdash;, W.: Master.
+ &quot; B. C&mdash;&mdash;, S.: Warden.
+ &quot; C. D&mdash;&mdash;, J.: Warden.
+ &quot; D. E&mdash;&mdash;, Treasurer.
+ &quot; E. F&mdash;&mdash;, Secretary.
+ &quot; F. G&mdash;&mdash;, S.: Deacon.
+ &quot; G. H&mdash;&mdash;, J.: Deacon.
+ &quot; H. I&mdash;&mdash;, } Stewards.
+ &quot; I. K&mdash;&mdash;, }
+ &quot; K. L&mdash;&mdash;, Tiler.
+
+ <i>Members.</i>
+ Bro.: L. M&mdash;&mdash;
+ M. N&mdash;&mdash;
+ N. O&mdash;&mdash;
+ O. P&mdash;&mdash;
+
+ <i>Visitors.</i>
+ P. Q&mdash;&mdash;
+ Q. R&mdash;&mdash;
+ R. S&mdash;&mdash;
+ S. T&mdash;&mdash;
+</pre>
+
+<p>The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The minutes of the regular communication of &mdash;&mdash; were read and
+confirmed.<sup><a href="#fn54">54</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.&mdash;&mdash; and H. I.&mdash;&mdash;, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.&mdash;&mdash;, L. M.&mdash;&mdash;, and O. P.&mdash;&mdash;.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.&mdash;&mdash;, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. &mdash;&mdash; at the communication of &mdash;&mdash;, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.</p>
+
+<p>Amount received this evening, as follows:</p>
+
+<table summary="amount received">
+<tr><td> Petition </td><td>of </td><td>Mr. G. F., </td><td>$5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> Fee </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. C. B., </td><td>5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> do. </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. S. R., </td><td>5</td></tr>
+<tr><td> do. </td><td>of </td><td>Bro. W. Y., </td><td>5&mdash;</td><td>Total, $20</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.</p>
+
+<p>There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.</p>
+
+<p>E. F&mdash;&mdash;,</p>
+
+<p><i>Secretary.</i></p>
+
+<p>Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.</p>
+</div></div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b3">
+<h2>Book Third.</h2>
+
+<h3>The Law of Individuals.</h3>
+
+
+
+<p>Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.</p>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Qualifications of Candidates.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character&mdash;moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.</p>
+
+<p>The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.</p>
+
+<p>The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as &quot;a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+&quot;depositary of his heart,&quot; as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, &quot;a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.</p>
+
+<p>Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.</p>
+
+<p>These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.</p>
+
+<p><i>Morally</i>, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living &quot;under the tongue of good
+report.&quot;</p>
+
+<p><i>Physically</i>, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a <i>man</i> ought to be.</p>
+
+<p><i>Intellectually</i>, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.</p>
+
+<p><i>Politically</i>, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.</p>
+
+<p>But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The old charges state, that &quot;a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law.&quot; It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, &quot;moral law,&quot;
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be &quot;a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine.&quot; A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.</p>
+
+<p>The word &quot;libertine&quot; has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a &quot;free-thinker,&quot; or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.</p>
+
+<p>These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be &quot;a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that &quot;The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men&mdash;no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.</p>
+
+<p>The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+&quot;<i>a man</i>.&quot; No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.</p>
+
+<p>As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+&quot;of mature and discreet age.&quot; But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that &quot;no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn55">55</a></sup> In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,<sup><a href="#fn56">56</a></sup>
+&quot;unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;&quot; in Ireland, twenty-one, except &quot;by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;&quot; in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army&mdash;such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.</p>
+
+<p>Our ritual excludes &quot;an old man in his dotage&quot; equally with a &quot;young man
+under age.&quot; But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.</p>
+
+<p>The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+&quot;a perfect youth,&quot; has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided &quot;the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares &quot;that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of <i>able</i> body.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn57">57</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, &quot;of able body,&quot; and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that <i>he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have.&quot;</i><sup><a href="#fn58">58</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Notwithstanding the positive demand for <i>perfection</i>, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have <i>no maim or defect</i>, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is <i>perfect</i> is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all&mdash;it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, &quot;words,&quot; says Blackstone, &quot;are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,&quot;
+and then &quot;perfect&quot; would mean, &quot;complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant.&quot; But another source of interpretation is, the &quot;comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn59">59</a></sup> Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word &quot;perfect,&quot; if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must &quot;<i>have his right limbs as a man ought to have</i>.&quot;
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.</p>
+
+<p>But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, &quot;the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law&quot; is, to consider
+&quot;the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it.&quot; Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be <i>perfect</i>, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, &quot;that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens,&quot; of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. &quot;The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea,&quot; says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,<sup><a href="#fn60">60</a></sup> &quot;that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration.&quot; If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words <i>perfect youth</i> are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has &quot;his right limbs as a man ought to
+have.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn61">61</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word &quot;perfect,&quot; and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word &quot;<i>that</i>.&quot; He must have no maim or defect
+<i>that</i> may render him incapable; that is, <i>because</i>, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.</p>
+
+<p>In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be &quot;men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch.&quot; It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.</p>
+
+<p>A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.</p>
+
+<p>In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+&quot;deformed or dismembered at the time of their making.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that &quot;every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In the &quot;Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual,&quot; published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be &quot;hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn62">62</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.</p>
+
+<p>In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not &quot;sound in mind
+and <i>all their members</i>,&quot; and she adopted a resolution asserting that &quot;the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn63">63</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency<sup><a href="#fn64">64</a></sup> has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed.&quot;&mdash;<i>Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia</i>, 1848, <i>page</i> 36.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.<sup><a href="#fn65">65</a></sup> It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish&mdash;a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &amp;c....</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a <i>man</i>
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity.&quot;&mdash;<i>Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in</i> 1848.<sup><a href="#fn66">66</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order&mdash;the ancient charges&mdash;forbid
+it.&quot;&mdash;<i>Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of <i>entire
+limbs</i>&quot;&mdash;<i>Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach <i>us</i> to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries.&quot;&mdash;<i>Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849.</i></p>
+
+<p>&quot;The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution.&quot;&mdash;<i>Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in</i> 1849.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman.&quot;&mdash;<i>Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in</i> 1849.</p>
+
+<p>Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply&mdash;guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law&mdash;and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683&mdash;I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?</p>
+
+<p>During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a <i>fool</i> nor an <i>idiot</i>, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import,&quot; etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, &quot;Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order.&quot; If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.</p>
+
+<p>It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: &quot;No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity.&quot; And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.</p>
+
+<p>But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.</p>
+
+<p>From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.</p>
+
+<p>As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.</p>
+
+<p>Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.</p>
+
+<p>A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.</p>
+
+<p>Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be <i>free-born</i>. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude&mdash;though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty&mdash;is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that &quot;freedom, fervency, and
+zeal,&quot; which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+&quot;Children,&quot; says Oliver, &quot;cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.</p>
+
+<p>Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former&mdash;the accepted one, to whom the promise was given&mdash;was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have &quot;his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him,&quot; was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, &quot;Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son.&quot; Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he &quot;had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women.&quot; The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word &#948;&#959;&#965;&#955;&#959;&#960;&#961;&#949;&#960;&#949;&#953;&#945; or, &quot;slave manners,&quot; to
+designate any very great impropriety of manners.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge &quot;to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison,&quot; and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that &quot;it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action Thereon.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+&quot;petition.&quot; This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be &quot;a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn67">67</a></sup> This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.</p>
+
+<p>The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.</p>
+
+<p>But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.</p>
+
+<p>The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: &quot;No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;&quot;
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.</p>
+
+<p>If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.</p>
+
+<p>Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without &quot;due
+inquiry&quot; into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.</p>
+
+<p>But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of &quot;making Masons,&quot; I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Balloting for Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be &quot;formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent <i>in their own prudent way</i> either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity.&quot; Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.</p>
+
+<p>From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right&mdash;to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.<sup><a href="#fn68">68</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.</p>
+
+<p>No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+&quot;and if,&quot; as Wayland says, &quot;from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms.&quot; Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.</p>
+
+<p>And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.</p>
+
+<p>The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: &quot;but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the <i>unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge</i> then present when the candidate is proposed.&quot;
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+&quot;New Regulations,&quot; adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted &quot;only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks,&quot; it is said: &quot;but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn69">69</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.</p>
+
+<p>Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that <i>every member present</i> shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted &quot;by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed.&quot; This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called &quot;an inherent
+privilege,&quot; which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.</p>
+
+<p>Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.<sup><a href="#fn70">70</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:&mdash;The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic <i>circumambulation</i>
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.</p>
+
+<p>These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.</p>
+
+<p>As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.</p>
+
+<p>The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats</p>
+
+<p>The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to &quot;take charge of the ballot box.&quot; That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that &quot;the box is clear in the South,&quot;
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that &quot;the box is foul in the
+South.&quot; The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of &quot;West&quot; and &quot;East.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>If the box is <i>clear</i>&mdash;that is, if all the ballots are white&mdash;the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.</p>
+
+<p>But if the box is declared to be <i>foul</i>, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be &quot;clear,&quot; or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, &quot;if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-07">
+<h4>Section VII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.</p>
+
+<p>I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the <i>quantity</i> than to the <i>quality</i> of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.</p>
+
+<p>Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.</p>
+
+<p>In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is &quot;clear,&quot; all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is &quot;foul,&quot; each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.</p>
+
+<p>But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a <i>reconsideration</i>, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>motion for reconsideration</i> is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that <i>the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box</i>. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.</p>
+
+<p>In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.</p>
+
+<p>If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;&mdash;now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast&mdash;the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.</p>
+
+<p>But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken&mdash;the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.<sup><a href="#fn71">71</a></sup> After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.</p>
+
+<p>Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.</p>
+
+<p>It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.</p>
+
+<p>It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this&mdash;that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of &quot;Duty of
+Members&quot; (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren &quot;are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity.&quot; And the regulation goes on to
+say: &quot;Nor is this inherent privilege <i>subject to a dispensation</i>, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge.&quot; This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+&quot;to give their consent in their own prudent way;&quot; it would be an
+infringement of an &quot;inherent privilege,&quot; and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.</p>
+
+<p>I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:</p>
+
+<p>1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.</p>
+
+<p>2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.</p>
+
+<p>3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.</p>
+
+<p>4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-08">
+<h4>Section VIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?</p>
+
+<p>It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:</p>
+
+<p>Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation&mdash;there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions&mdash;and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren&mdash;it must be again referred to
+a committee&mdash;lie over for a month&mdash;and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.</p>
+
+<p>If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-09">
+<h4>Section IX.</h4>
+
+<p><i>Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement</i>.</p>
+
+
+<p>There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts&mdash;the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher&mdash;and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember &quot;a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>An hundred years ago it was said that &quot;Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn72">72</a></sup> And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.</p>
+
+<p>There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a &quot;suitable proficiency&quot; in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made &quot;suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved&mdash;made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, &quot;that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.</p>
+
+<p>This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, &quot;that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander.&quot; In the same charges, it is prescribed that &quot;no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: &quot;Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work<sup><a href="#fn73">73</a></sup> who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the &quot;Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons&quot; to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that &quot;a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that &quot;no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;&quot;
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, &quot;<i>on very particular occasions only</i>, may be
+requested.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn74">74</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work&mdash;and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn75">75</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty &quot;of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree.&quot; And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: &quot;All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented&mdash;and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.</p>
+
+<p>This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Many persons,&quot; says that able philosopher of Masonry, &quot;are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn76">76</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-10">
+<h4>Section X.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.</p>
+
+<p>The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.</p>
+
+<p>Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.</p>
+
+<p>Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have &quot;due and timely notice,&quot; and be prepared to exercise his
+&quot;inherent privilege&quot; of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.</p>
+
+<p>If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.</p>
+
+<p>But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, &quot;a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.</p>
+
+<p>I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-11">
+<h4>Section XI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The fourth General Regulation decrees that &quot;no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time.&quot; This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.</p>
+
+<p>The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that &quot;no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-12">
+<h4>Section XII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A&mdash;&mdash;, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B&mdash;&mdash;, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A&mdash;&mdash;, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A&mdash;&mdash; to grant permission
+to the lodge at B&mdash;&mdash; to confer them on the candidate.</p>
+
+<p>But how shall this permission be given&mdash;by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A&mdash;&mdash;? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A&mdash;&mdash;, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a &quot;fractious member will be imposed on
+them,&quot; as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B&mdash;&mdash;. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A&mdash;-. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B&mdash;-, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.</p>
+
+<p>I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-01-13">
+<h4>Section XIII.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Initiation of Non-residents.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:&mdash;First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.</p>
+
+<p>2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made &quot;in due form,&quot; and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?</p>
+
+<p>The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.</p>
+
+<p>In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, &quot;that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn77">77</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal&mdash;the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge&mdash;and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.</p>
+
+<p>Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the <i>mode how</i>, they might also have prescribed
+the <i>place where</i>, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.</p>
+
+<p>A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid&mdash;as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done&mdash;the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.</p>
+
+<p>The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.</p>
+
+<p>What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, &quot;a distrust of his
+acceptance&quot; at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.</p>
+
+<p>At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.</p>
+
+<p>These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.</p>
+
+<p>But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is <i>ex gratia</i>,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd&mdash;because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.</p>
+
+<p>It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.</p>
+
+<p>If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.</p>
+
+<p>The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.</p>
+
+<p>But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.</p>
+
+<p>Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.</p>
+
+<p>The question next occurs&mdash;What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor&mdash;that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light&mdash;and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it&mdash;it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, &quot;unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election,&quot; and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,<sup><a href="#fn78">78</a></sup> it is said that &quot;the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,&quot;
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn79">79</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, <i>mutatis mutandis</i>,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Master Masons.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Membership.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: &quot;Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn80">80</a></sup> If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.</p>
+
+<p>How long before he loses this right by a <i>non-user</i>, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.</p>
+
+<p>The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.</p>
+
+<p>But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.</p>
+
+<p>A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+&quot;good standing&quot; until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the &quot;good standing&quot; of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.</p>
+
+<p>If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.</p>
+
+<p>In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No man can be made or <i>admitted a member</i> of a particular lodge,&quot; says
+the fifth regulation, &quot;without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>And the sixth regulation adds, that &quot;no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or <i>admitted to be a member</i> thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.</p>
+
+<p>But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.</p>
+
+<p>A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.</p>
+
+<p>Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Visit.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the &quot;Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,&quot;
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,<sup><a href="#fn81">81</a></sup>it is directed &quot;that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, &quot;received, and
+cherished,&quot; and &quot;set on work,&quot; that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.</p>
+
+<p>In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, &quot;that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn82">82</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>A lodge, when not opened for &quot;general masonic business,&quot; but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened &quot;<i>en
+famille</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.</p>
+
+<p>A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.</p>
+
+<p>Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.</p>
+
+<p>There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,<sup><a href="#fn83">83</a></sup> and which is in the following words:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept.&quot; This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.</p>
+
+<p>Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Examination of Visitors.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.</p>
+
+<p>Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words</p>
+
+<p>&quot;I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of &quot;commencing at the beginning&quot; should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted&mdash;categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+&quot;rusty,&quot; or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.</p>
+
+<p>Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: &quot;I am not
+satisfied,&quot; or, &quot;I do not recognize you,&quot; and not in more specific terms,
+such as, &quot;You did not answer this inquiry,&quot; or, &quot;You are ignorant on that
+point.&quot; The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.</p>
+
+<p>Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called &quot;leading
+questions,&quot; or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry <i>it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted</i>.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Vouching for a Brother.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity&mdash;since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful&mdash;that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.</p>
+
+<p>To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+&quot;<i>strict trial, due examination, or lawful information</i>.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be <i>competent</i> to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.</p>
+
+<p>Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.</p>
+
+<p>If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: &quot;A.B. is a Mason,&quot; is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: &quot;I know this
+man to be a Master Mason,&quot; for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.</p>
+
+<p>If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a &quot;Lodge of Master Masons.&quot; A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Claiming Relief.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. &quot;As we have therefore
+opportunity,&quot; says St. Paul, &quot;let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of &quot;Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:&quot;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.</p>
+
+<p>&quot;But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.</p>
+
+<p>He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word &quot; benefit,&quot; as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.</p>
+
+<p>He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, &quot;true and genuine.&quot; True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of &quot;faithful&quot; or &quot;trusty.&quot; A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.</p>
+
+<p>It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b3-04-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Right of Masonic Burial.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.<sup><a href="#fn84">84</a></sup> As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.</p>
+
+<p>But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.</p>
+
+<p>The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.<sup><a href="#fn85">85</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>&quot;No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member&mdash;foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.</p>
+
+<p>The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, &quot;by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn86">86</a></sup> It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Rights of Past Masters.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,<sup><a href="#fn87">87</a></sup> and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.</p>
+
+<p>In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as &quot;virtual&quot; and as &quot;actual&quot; Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.</p>
+
+<p>An <i>actual Past Master</i> is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A <i>virtual
+Past Master</i> is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.</p>
+
+<p>Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?</p>
+
+<p>The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.</p>
+
+<p>In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.</p>
+
+<p>In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that &quot;it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn88">88</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider &quot;that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;&quot; and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such &quot;legal means&quot; of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.</p>
+
+<p>This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: &quot;The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least <i>three installed Masters</i>&quot;<sup><a href="#fn89">89</a></sup>
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, &quot;this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but <i>installed</i>
+Masters be present.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn90">90</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.</p>
+
+<p>The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times&mdash;that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.</p>
+
+<p>On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.</p>
+
+<p>A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.</p>
+
+<p>He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.</p>
+
+<p>By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-06">
+<h3>Chapter VI.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Affiliation.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be &quot;initiated,&quot; but a Mason is
+&quot;affiliated.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn91">91</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.</p>
+
+<p>A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. &quot;No man can be made, <i>or admitted a member</i> * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;&quot; are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: &quot;But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, <i>or admitted to be a member</i> thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a &quot;demit,&quot; and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.</p>
+
+<p>Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.</p>
+
+<p>A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.</p>
+
+<p>In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.</p>
+
+<p>The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that &quot;no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality.&quot; This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, &quot;this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn92">92</a></sup> Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-07">
+<h3>Chapter VII.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Demitting.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a <i>demit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation &quot;that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another.&quot; Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors &quot;of
+his own free will and accord,&quot; and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that</p>
+
+<blockquote class="poetry"><p>
+<span class="line"> &quot;A man convinced against his will,<br /></span>
+<span class="line"> Is of the same opinion still,&quot;</span>
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.</p>
+
+<p>The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.</p>
+
+<p>But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.</p>
+
+<p>There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.</p>
+
+<p>With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b3-08">
+<h3>Chapter VIII.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Unaffiliated Masons.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: &quot;every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed&mdash;Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that &quot;it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn93">93</a></sup> A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.</p>
+
+<p>Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the <i>right</i> of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association&mdash;the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:<sup><a href="#fn94">94</a></sup> &quot;The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, <i>nolens volens,</i> money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, <i>Free</i> and Accepted.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.</p>
+
+<p>We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the <i>Lodge organization</i> of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened&mdash;he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple&mdash;the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.</p>
+
+<p>But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of &quot;once a Mason,
+and always a Mason,&quot; it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.</p>
+
+<p>Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says &quot;if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire <i>as to anything</i>.&quot; But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone &quot;lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother,&quot; that
+we are in cases of &quot;imminent peril&quot; to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when <i>duly</i> called for.</p>
+
+<p>I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:</p>
+
+<p>1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when <i>he asks for that aid in
+the</i> proper <i>and conventional way</i>.</p>
+
+<p>3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.</p>
+
+<p>4. He loses the general right to visit<sup><a href="#fn95">95</a></sup> lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.</p>
+
+<p>5. He loses the right of masonic burial.</p>
+
+<p>6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+
+<div class="book" id="b4">
+<h2>Book Fourth.</h2>
+
+<h3>Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.</h3>
+
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-01">
+<h3>Chapter I.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of What Are Masonic Crimes.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.</p>
+
+<p>In replying to the question, &quot;what are masonic crimes?&quot; by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.</p>
+
+<p>But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.</p>
+
+<p>Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.</p>
+
+<p>Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, &quot;to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;&quot; and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.</p>
+
+<p>In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+&quot;that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, <i>they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible</i>&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.</p>
+
+<p>The first charge says: &quot;a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law.&quot; Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be &quot;the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn96">96</a></sup> Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we &quot;should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)<sup><a href="#fn97">97</a></sup>
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.</p>
+
+<p>But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all &quot;wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.</p>
+
+<p>From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-02">
+<h3>Chapter II.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Masonic Punishments.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Censure.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.</p>
+
+<p>Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.</p>
+
+<p>A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<a name="b4-02-02"></a>
+<h5><i>Of Reprimand.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.</p>
+
+<p>A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.</p>
+
+<p>If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.</p>
+
+<p>The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.</p>
+
+<p>A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-03">
+<h4>Section III.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Exclusion from the Lodge.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.</p>
+
+<p>1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.</p>
+
+<p>I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged &quot;to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge,&quot; it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.</p>
+
+<p>2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, <i>suspension from the lodge,</i> and sometimes <i>erasure from the
+roll</i>. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.</p>
+
+<p>But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.</p>
+
+<p>The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.</p>
+
+<p>Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.</p>
+
+<p>The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term &quot;expelled&quot; is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the raft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called &quot;exclusion.&quot; The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-04">
+<h4>Section IV.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Definite Suspension.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.</p>
+
+<p>Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.</p>
+
+<p>In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.</p>
+
+<p>At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of <i>Restoration.</i></p>
+
+<p>By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason&mdash;is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren&mdash;is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-05">
+<h4>Section V.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Indefinite Suspension.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.</p>
+
+<p>All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.</p>
+
+<p>By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.</p>
+
+<p>The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits&mdash;the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.</p>
+
+<p>No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-02-06">
+<h4>Section VI.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of Expulsion.</i><sup><a href="#fn98">98</a></sup></h5>
+
+
+<p>Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.</p>
+
+<p>It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.<sup><a href="#fn99">99</a></sup></p>
+
+<p>The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.</p>
+
+<p>As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure&mdash;he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.</p>
+
+<p>The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:&mdash;Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>&quot;A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason.&quot;<sup><a href="#fn100">100</a></sup></p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-03">
+<h3>Chapter III.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Masonic Trials.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.</p>
+
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-03-01">
+<h4>Section I.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Form of Trial.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.</p>
+
+<p>A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.</p>
+
+<p>This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.</p>
+
+<p>The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.</p>
+
+<p>Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.</p>
+
+<p>It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.</p>
+
+<p>If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge&mdash;that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.</p>
+
+<p>The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.</p>
+
+<p>The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.</p>
+
+<p>When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.</p>
+
+<p>Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.</p>
+
+<p>If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.</p>
+
+<p>For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.</p>
+
+<p>The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.</p>
+
+<p>If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.</p>
+
+<p>In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="sec" id="b4-03-02">
+<h4>Section II.</h4>
+
+<h5><i>Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.</i></h5>
+
+
+<p>In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.</p>
+
+<p>The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.</p>
+
+<p>1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.<sup><a href="#fn101">101</a></sup>
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.</p>
+
+<p>2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that &quot;an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, &quot;such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath.&quot; Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,<sup><a href="#fn102">102</a></sup> that &quot;the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.</p>
+
+<p>Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:</p>
+
+<p>&quot;I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.</p>
+
+<p>The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great &quot;Treatise on the Law of Evidence,&quot; says: &quot;In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end.&quot;</p>
+
+<p>Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.</p>
+
+<p>Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen&mdash;and
+this is a very conceivable case&mdash;that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.</p>
+
+<p>If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected&mdash;if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.</p>
+
+<p>But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as &quot;profanes&quot; would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself&mdash;of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.</p>
+
+<p>But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an <i>alibi</i>, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a &quot;profane&quot; is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.</p>
+
+<p>It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.</p>
+
+<p>The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.</p>
+
+<p>The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.</p>
+
+<p>The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer&mdash;the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-04">
+<h3>Chapter IV.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.</p>
+
+<p>The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.</p>
+
+<p>The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.</p>
+
+<p>1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.</p>
+
+<p>2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.</p>
+
+<p>This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.</p>
+
+<p>3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.</p>
+
+<p>4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-05">
+<h3>Chapter V.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Appeals.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.</p>
+
+<p>But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced <i>de novo</i>, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate&mdash;either too severe, or not sufficiently so&mdash;in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.</p>
+
+<p>During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason &quot;under charges.&quot;</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="b4-06">
+<h3>Chapter VI.</h3>
+
+<h4>Of Restoration.</h4>
+
+
+
+<p>The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.</p>
+
+<p>Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.</p>
+
+<p>I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.</p>
+
+<p>Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member&mdash;for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.</p>
+
+<p>Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.</p>
+
+<p>But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, <i>shall
+not</i> be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment&mdash;and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world&mdash;the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived&mdash;could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.</p>
+
+<p>On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned <i>sine
+die</i>; for it has done all that is required&mdash;the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.</p>
+
+<p>The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+&quot;Another capital offense against public justice,&quot; says Blackstone, &quot;is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+<i>before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported.&quot; </i> Mark these qualifying words: &quot;before the expiration of
+the term:&quot; they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return <i>after</i> the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:</p>
+
+<p><i>It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.</p>
+
+<p>But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.</p>
+
+<p>Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: &quot;I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?&quot; Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.</p>
+
+<p>The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens&mdash;every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty&mdash;and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.</p>
+
+<p>But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.</p>
+
+<p>Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely&mdash;that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge&mdash;may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.</p>
+
+<p>But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing&mdash;both are equally unconnected with the institution&mdash;the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.</p>
+
+<p>Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.</p>
+
+<p>In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.</p>
+
+<p>In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.</p>
+
+<p>But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.</p>
+
+<p>The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.</p>
+
+<p>I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.</p>
+
+<p>The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that &quot;no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members&quot;&mdash;which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, &quot;lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge.&quot; But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones&mdash;to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent&mdash;clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong&mdash;so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.</p>
+</div></div>
+
+<a name="index"></a>
+<div class="chapter">
+<h2>Index.</h2>
+
+
+
+<h3>A.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Accused, to what he is entitled<br />
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;it was never enforced<br />
+Actual Past Master, term defined<br />
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, cannot be entertained<br />
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges<br />
+Affiliation, what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;requires unanimity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Master Masons only entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may be made with more than one lodge<br />
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to<br />
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;not to be entertained in a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be taken from the chair<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;doctrine of, discussed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;pending one, the sentence is in abeyance<br />
+Apprentices, rights of <i>(see Entered Apprentice</i>)<br />
+Arrears, non-payment of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to lodges, history of their origin<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;do not accrue during suspension<br />
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;in 926 at York<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;governed the craft for nearly 800 years<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how organized<br />
+Atheist cannot be a Mason<br />
+Authorities for masonic law</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>B.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Balloting for candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;every member must take a part in it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;secrecy of, inviolable<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be unanimous<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of<br />
+Balloting in each degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be unanimous<br />
+Ballot, reconsideration of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, out of order<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be granted by dispensation<br />
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry<br />
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge<br />
+Burial, masonic, right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be requested except for strangers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master Masons only entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;dispensation for, not usually required<br />
+Business, order of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be suspended at any time by the Master<br />
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>C.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Calling from labor to refreshment<br />
+Censure, a masonic punishment<br />
+Certificates, masonic<br />
+Chaplain, Grand (<i>see Grand Chaplain</i>)<br />
+Charges of accusation, how to be made<br />
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master<br />
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates<br />
+Committees to be appointed by the Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master is chairman of, when present<br />
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated<br />
+Consecration of a lodge how performed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Constitutions, how to be altered<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;Gothic, adopted in 926,<br />
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;why elements,<br />
+Crimes, masonic,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;enumeration of</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>D.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Deacons,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;two in each lodge,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;are appointed officers,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;not removable by Master or Senior Warden<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;Grand <i>(see Grand Deacons</i>)<br />
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;to whom, and why,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of<br />
+Definite suspension<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication<br />
+Demitting<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;right of, not denied until recently,<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;regulations concerning<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;of many at one time may be refused<br />
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;office of, not very ancient<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;cannot be more than one<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;originally appointed by Grand Master<br />
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,<br />
+Dispensation what and where to be granted<br />
+&quot;for a lodge<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;&quot; tenure of its duration<br />
+&quot;&quot;&nbsp;&quot; difference from a Warrant<br />
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention<br />
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;meaning of the term<br />
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>E.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Emergency, rule upon the subject<br />
+Entered Apprentice, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly a member of his lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may sit in a lodge of his degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot speak or vote<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be deprived of his rights without trial<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge<br />
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment<br />
+Evidence in masonic trials<br />
+Examination of visitors<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be conducted<br />
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment<br />
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+Expulsion is masonic death<br />
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;from higher degrees, its effect<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>F.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief<br />
+Fellow Craft, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formerly permitted to speak, but not vote<br />
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another<br />
+Fool cannot be a Mason<br />
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making<br />
+Free-born, a Mason must be<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;reason for the rule<br />
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>G.</h3>
+
+
+<p>General Assembly. (<i>See Assembly, General.</i>)<br />
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate<br />
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926<br />
+Grand Chaplain,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office established in 1775<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Deacons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office more ancient than Oliver supposes<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how appointed<br />
+Grand Lodge held in 1717<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;mode of organizing one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;three lodges necessary to organize one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;all the Craft formerly members of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Masters and Wardens of lodges are members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Grand Officers are also members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Past Masters are not members by inherent right<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers and prerogatives<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may make new regulations<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must observe the landmarks<br />
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;are comparatively modern institutions<br />
+Grand Marshal<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by the Grand Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office of has existed since the origin of Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;an elective officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;by whom to be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;prerogatives of, derived from two sources<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;no appeal from his decision<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to two votes<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be punished<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may grant dispensations<br />
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may constitute new lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him<br />
+Grand Pursuivant<br />
+Grand Secretary<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office of established in 1723<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant<br />
+Grand Stewards<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;first mentioned in 1721<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by Junior Grand Warden<br />
+Grand Stewards' Lodge<br />
+Grand Sword-Bearer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, constituted in 1731<br />
+Grand Tiler<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, must have existed from the earliest times<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must not be a member of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected<br />
+Grand Treasurer<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;office of, established in 1724<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;has always been elected<br />
+Grand Wardens<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;originally appointed by the Grand Master<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;succeed the Grand Master and Deputy</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>H.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Heresy not a masonic crime<br />
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from<br />
+Historical sketch</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>I.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Idiot cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination<br />
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are<br />
+Indefinite suspension<br />
+&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;restoration from<br />
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry<br />
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate<br />
+Installation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;whence the term derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;necessary to legal existence of an officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of a Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of the Grand Master<br />
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge<br />
+Investigation of character must be by a committee<br />
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of the term</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>J.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,<br />
+Junior Grand Warden<br />
+Junior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over the craft during refreshment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;appoints the stewards<br />
+Jurisdiction of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;geographical or personal<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;is over all its members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot extend beyond State lines,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;none over its Master</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>K.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>L.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Labor, calling from, to refreshment<br />
+Landmarks, what they are,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;ritual and legislative<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be observed by the Grand Lodge<br />
+Law of Grand Lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;subordinate lodges<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;individuals<br />
+Lawful information, what it is<br />
+Laws, how to be interpreted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;of Masonry are of two kinds&mdash;written and unwritten<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;written, whence derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;unwritten, whence derived<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;same as ancient usage<br />
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;meaning of the term<br />
+Lodge, subordinate<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how organized<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must have been congregated by some superior authority<br />
+Lodge, under dispensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;generally precedes a warranted lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how formed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot make by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot elect officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot install officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot elect members<br />
+Lodge, warranted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers and rights<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be consecrated<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be dedicated<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be constituted<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its officers must be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;ceremony of installation in<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its powers are inherent in it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its reserved rights are secured by the regulations<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may select its own members<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;elects its own officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what officers of, are elected in England<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may install its officers<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;Master of, must be installed by a past Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be represented in the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;representatives of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may instruct its representatives<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may frame by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may suspend or exclude a member<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may levy annual contributions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may select its name<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot select its number<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot alter the ritual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must elect officers at a particular time<br />
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot initiate without previous notice<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must meet once a month<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;officers of</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>M.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Madmen cannot be Masons<br />
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;reason for the rule relating to<br />
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge<br />
+Master, Grand. <i>(See Grand Master</i>.)<br />
+Master Mason, rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;becomes a member by signing the by-laws<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how this right is forfeited<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may apply to any lodge for membership<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to whom subject for discipline<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may speak and vote on all questions<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may hold any office to which elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;but to serve as Master must have been a Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may appeal to the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;may visit any lodge, after examination<br />
+Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must have previously served as Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be installed by a Past Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;has the warrant in charge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;may call special meetings of his lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;may close his lodge at any time<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over business as well as labor<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;is supreme in his lodge<br />
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand<br />
+Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;moral qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;intellectual qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;who is to judge of them<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a member of the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may exclude a member temporarily<br />
+Membership, right of<br />
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers<br />
+Minutes, when to be read<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be amended<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not to be read at special communications<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;formula for keeping<br />
+Moral law, what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a Mason must obey it<br />
+Motions, when to be entertained</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>N.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Name of a lodge to be selected by itself<br />
+Non-residents, initiation of<br />
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidates to be initiated at one communication</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>O.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not vacated by suspension<br />
+Officers of a Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;subordinate lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;warranted lodge must be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be installed<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;time of election determined by Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;elected annually<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;vacancies in, how to be supplied<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot resign<br />
+Order, rules of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;whence derived</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>P.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry<br />
+Past Masters<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;rights of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may install their successors<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of two kinds&mdash;actual and virtual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may preside in a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;eligible to election to the chair<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to a seat in the East<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master<br />
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge<br />
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term<br />
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate<br />
+Petition of candidate<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be read at a regular communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;referred to a committee of three<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;reported on at next regular communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;report on, cannot be made at a special communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;renewal of, in case of rejection<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;how to be renewed, if rejected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for advancement to a higher degree<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;if rejected, how to be renewed<br />
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what they must set forth<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be recommended by nearest lodge<br />
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge<br />
+Political qualifications of candidates<br />
+Postponed business, when to be called up<br />
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers<br />
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time<br />
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry<br />
+Probation of candidates<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for initiation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;for advancement<br />
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one<br />
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials<br />
+Proficiency of candidates<br />
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable<br />
+Punishments, masonic<br />
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>Q.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Qualifications of a Master of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidates,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;moral<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;religious<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;physical<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;intellectual<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;political, 184<br />
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717<br />
+Question, how to be taken on a motion</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>R.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Reading, a qualification of candidates<br />
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of candidate, must be by two members<br />
+Reconsideration of ballot<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;motion for, is out of order,<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be granted by dispensation<br />
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;renewed petition of, when to be made,<br />
+Relief, right of claiming it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;unworthy Masons not entitled to it<br />
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be<br />
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge<br />
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of<br />
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are<br />
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment<br />
+Restoration<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;from definite suspension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;indefinite supension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;expulsion<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be at a stated communication<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be by Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;requires a unanimous vote<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;to membership discussed</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>S.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Secretary, Grand. (<i>See Grand Secretary.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;his duty<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;is a check upon the treasurer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;often receives compensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;but not in case of removal, or sickness<br />
+Senior Grand Warden. (<i>See Grand Wardens.</i>)<br />
+Senior Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;presides in absence of Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may invite a Past Master to preside<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;presides over the craft during labor<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appoints the Junior Deacon<br />
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash; is in abeyance pending an appeal<br />
+Stewards, Grand. (<i>See Grand Stewards.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;appointed by Junior Warden<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not removable by Junior Warden<br />
+Stranger, initiation of<br />
+Suspension<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definite<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;indefinite<br />
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (<i>See Grand Sword Bearer.</i>)</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>T.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials<br />
+Tiler, Grand. (<i>See Grand Tiler.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;office existed from beginning of the institution<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;no lodge can be without one<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;must be a worthy Master Mason<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;if a member, the office does not disfranchise him<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;may be removed for misconduct<br />
+Tiler's obligation, form of it<br />
+Transient persons, initiation of<br />
+Treasurer, Grand. <i>(See Grand Treasurer</i>.)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;is the only banker of the lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;is a disbursing officer<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a Brother of worldly substance usually selected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;in case of death, a successor may be elected<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;but not in case of sickness, or removal<br />
+Trials, masonic<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;form of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;evidence in</p>
+
+
+<h3>U.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Unaffiliated Masons<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;tax sometimes levied on<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;position, rights, and duties of<br />
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;effect of, on a Mason<br />
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions<br />
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution</p>
+
+
+<h3>V.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Virtual Past Masters, who they are<br />
+Visit, right of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;only affiliated Mason entitled to it<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must be preceded by an examination<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;requires a certificate to insure it<br />
+Visitors, examination of, described<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;must take the Tiler's obligation<br />
+Voting must always be by a show of hands<br />
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present<br />
+Voucher must be a competent Mason<br />
+Vouching for a visitor</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>W.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Wardens, Grand. (<i>See Grand Wardens.</i>)<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;of a lodge are assistants of the Master<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;entitled to membership in Grand Lodge<br />
+Warden, Senior. (<i>See Senior Warden.</i>)<br />
+Warden, Junior. (<i>See Junior Warden.</i>)<br />
+Warrant of constitution<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;what it is<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;its difference from a dispensation<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;confers powers of installation and succession<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;not necessary before 1717<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge<br />
+Warranted lodges. (<i>See Lodges, Warranted.</i>)<br />
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of<br />
+&nbsp;&nbsp;definition of incompetent ones<br />
+Woman cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Writing, a qualification of candidates</p>
+
+
+
+<h3>Y.</h3>
+
+
+<p>Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic<br />
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason<br />
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term<br /></p>
+</div>
+
+
+<div class="chapter" id="footnotes">
+<h2>Footnotes</h2>
+
+
+
+<div id="fn1"><p>1. They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn2"><p>2. Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn3"><p>3. In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723&mdash;a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn4"><p>4. The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn5"><p>5. Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn6"><p>6. General Regulations, art. xxxix.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn7"><p>7. Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact &quot;does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted.&quot;&mdash;p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. &quot;The Brethren,&quot;
+he says, &quot;by a majority of hands, elected,&quot; &amp;c.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn8"><p>8. Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn9"><p>9. Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn10"><p>10. Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn11"><p>11. Article xxxiv.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn12"><p>12. His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn13"><p>13. Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn14"><p>14. Art. xxxix.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn15"><p>15. The word &quot;time&quot; has been interpreted to mean <i>communication</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn16"><p>16. And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn17"><p>17. What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn18"><p>18. It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn19"><p>19. Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn20"><p>20. Book of Const., p. 233.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn21"><p>21. Book of Const., p. 313.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn22"><p>22. Book of Constitutions, p. 319.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn23"><p>23. Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn24"><p>24. Book of Constitutions, p. 247</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn25"><p>25. The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn26"><p>26. That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn27"><p>27. Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn28"><p>28. It was abolished in New York in 1854.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn29"><p>29. This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn30"><p>30. &quot;What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it.&quot; Deut. xx. 5.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn31"><p>31. De Syned. Vet. Ebr&aelig;or., 1. iii., c. xiv., &sect; 1.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn32"><p>32. Cicero, Brut. i.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn33"><p>33. See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn34"><p>34. Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn35"><p>35. Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn36"><p>36. General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn37"><p>37. Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. <i>Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England</i>, 1847, <i>p</i>. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn38"><p>38. The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. <i>English
+Constitutions, as above, p.</i> 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn39"><p>39. It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn40"><p>40. No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. <i>English
+Constitutions</i> (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn41"><p>41. Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. <i>English
+Constitutions, p</i>. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn42"><p>42. We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn43"><p>43. Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn44"><p>44. General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn45"><p>45. English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn46"><p>46. In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn47"><p>47. Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn48"><p>48. &quot;No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden.&quot;&mdash;<i>Old Charges</i>, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn49"><p>49. Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn50"><p>50. Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn51"><p>51. One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, &quot;the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and <i>carefully finish
+the work they begin</i>.&quot;&mdash;Oliver's Preston, p. 27, <i>note</i> (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn52"><p>52. Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn53"><p>53. Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn54"><p>54. If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn55"><p>55. Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn56"><p>56. Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn57"><p>57. See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn58"><p>58. Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn59"><p>59. Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., &sect; 2.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn60"><p>60. In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn61"><p>61. Potter, 184.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn62"><p>62. Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, &quot;provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry.&quot;</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn63"><p>63. Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn64"><p>64. When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn65"><p>65. Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn66"><p>66. See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn67"><p>67. Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn68"><p>68. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, <i>Ballot</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn69"><p>69. Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn70"><p>70. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. <i>Ballot</i></p></div>
+
+<div id="fn71"><p>71. Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn72"><p>72. Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn73"><p>73. That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn74"><p>74. This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn75"><p>75. Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn76"><p>76. Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn77"><p>77. Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn78"><p>78. Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn79"><p>79. Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn80"><p>80. Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn81"><p>81. Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, <i>note</i> (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn82"><p>82. See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn83"><p>83. Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn84"><p>84. See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn85"><p>85. Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn86"><p>86. Preston, Oliver's Edit&quot; p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn87"><p>87. Book I., chap. iii.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn88"><p>88. Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn89"><p>89. Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn90"><p>90. Ibid</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn91"><p>91. See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, <i>in voce</i>.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn92"><p>92. Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn93"><p>93. Proceedings for 1853.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn94"><p>94. Proceedings for 1847.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn95"><p>95. The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn96"><p>96. Blackstone, Introd., &sect; i.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn97"><p>97. For so we should interpret the word &quot;honeste.&quot;</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn98"><p>98. I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my &quot;Lexicon of
+Freemasonry,&quot; and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn99"><p>99. In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called &quot;exclusion,&quot; and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn100"><p>100. Lexicon of Freemasonry.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn101"><p>101. Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.</p></div>
+
+<div id="fn102"><p>102. Chief Baron Gilbert.</p></div>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+***** This file should be named 12186-h.htm or 12186-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/2/1/8/12186/
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
+new filenames and etext numbers.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
+are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
+download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
+search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
+download by the etext year.
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06
+
+ (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,
+ 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
+
+EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
+filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
+of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
+identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
+digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
+example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234
+
+or filename 24689 would be found at:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689
+
+An alternative method of locating eBooks:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
+
+
diff --git a/old/12186.txt b/old/12186.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6ea4751
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,8579 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Principles of Masonic Law
+ A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+ Freemasonry
+
+
+Author: Albert G. Mackey
+
+Release Date: April 28, 2004 [EBook #12186]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+
+
+
+THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW:
+
+A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages And Landmarks of
+Freemasonry,
+
+By
+
+Albert G. Mackey, M.D.,
+
+Author of
+
+"The Lexicon of Freemasonry," "The Mystic Tie," "Legends and Traditions of
+Freemasonry," Etc., Etc.,
+
+Grand Lecturer and Grand Secretary of The Grand Lodge of South Carolina;
+Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Rite
+for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, Etc., Etc., Etc.
+
+ "Est enim unum jus, quo devincta est hominum societas, quod lex
+ constituit una; quae lex est recta ratio imperandi atque prohibendi,
+ quam qui ignorat is est injustus."
+
+ Cicero de Legibus. c. XV.
+
+New York:
+Jno. W. Leonard & Co., Masonic Publishers,
+383 Broadway.
+
+1856.
+
+
+
+Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by Jno. W.
+Leonard & Co.,
+
+In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the
+Southern District of New York.
+
+
+
+
+To
+
+Brother J.J.J. Gourgas,
+
+Sovereign Grand Inspector General in the Supreme Council for the Northern
+Jurisdiction of the United States,
+
+I Dedicate This Work,
+
+As a Slight Testimonial of My Friendship and Esteem for Him
+As a Man,
+And of My Profound Veneration for His Character
+As a Mason;
+Whose Long and Useful Life Has Been Well Spent in the
+Laborious Prosecution of the Science,
+And the Unremitting Conservation of the Principles of Our
+Sublime Institution.
+
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+
+
+Preface
+Introduction
+
+
+Book First. The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Historical Sketch.
+Chapter II. Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+Chapter III. Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Grand Master.
+ Section II. The Deputy Grand Master.
+ Section III. Of the Grand Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Grand Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Grand Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Grand Chaplain.
+ Section VII. Of the Grand Deacons.
+ Section VIII. Of the Grand Marshal.
+ Section IX. Of the Grand Stewards.
+ Section X. Of the Grand Sword-Bearer.
+ Section XI. Of the Grand Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section I. General View.
+ Section II. Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section III. Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+Book Second. Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+Chapter II. Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+Chapter III. Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+Chapter IV. Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+ Section I. Of the Officers in General.
+ Section II. Of the Worshipful Master.
+ Section III. Of the Wardens.
+ Section IV. Of the Treasurer.
+ Section V. Of the Secretary.
+ Section VI. Of the Deacons.
+ Section VII. Of the Stewards.
+ Section VIII. Of the Tiler.
+Chapter V. Of Rules of Order.
+ Section I. Of the Order of Business.
+ Section II. Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair.
+ Section III. Of the Mode of Taking the Question.
+ Section IV. Of Adjournments.
+ Section V. Of the Appointment of Committees.
+ Section VI. Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes.
+
+
+Book Third. The Law of Individuals.
+
+Chapter I. Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section I. Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section II. Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section III. Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section IV. Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates.
+ Section V. Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the
+ Action Thereon.
+ Section VI. Of Balloting for Candidates.
+ Section VII. Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot.
+ Section VIII. Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates.
+ Section IX. Of the Necessary Probation and Due Proficiency of
+ Candidates before Advancement
+ Section X. Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree.
+ Section XI. Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication.
+ Section XII. Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another.
+ Section XIII. Of the Initiation of Non-residents.
+Chapter II. Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+Chapter III. Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+Chapter IV. Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+ Section I. Of the Right of Membership.
+ Section II. Of the Right of Visit.
+ Section III. Of the Examination of Visitors.
+ Section IV. Of Vouching for a Brother.
+ Section V. Of the Right of Claiming Relief.
+ Section VI. Of the Right of Masonic Burial.
+Chapter V. Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+Chapter VI. Of Affiliation.
+Chapter VII. Of Demitting.
+Chapter VIII. Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+Book Fourth. Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+Chapter I. Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+Chapter II. Of Masonic Punishments.
+ Section I. Of Censure.
+ Section II. Of Reprimand.
+ Section III. Of Exclusion from the Lodge.
+ Section IV. Of Definite Suspension.
+ Section V. Of Indefinite Suspension.
+ Section VI. Of Expulsion.
+Chapter III. Of Masonic Trials.
+ Section I. Of the Form of Trial.
+ Section II. Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials.
+Chapter IV. Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+Chapter V. Of Appeals.
+Chapter VI. Of Restoration.
+
+
+Index.
+Footnotes.
+
+
+
+
+Preface.
+
+
+
+In presenting to the fraternity a work on the Principles of Masonic Law,
+it is due to those for whom it is intended, that something should be said
+of the design with which it has been written, and of the plan on which it
+has been composed. It is not pretended to present to the craft an
+encyclopedia of jurisprudence, in which every question that can possibly
+arise, in the transactions of a Lodge, is decided with an especial
+reference to its particular circumstances. Were the accomplishment of such
+an herculean task possible, except after years of intense and unremitting
+labor, the unwieldy size of the book produced, and the heterogeneous
+nature of its contents, so far from inviting, would rather tend to
+distract attention, and the object of communicating a knowledge of the
+Principles of Masonic Law, would be lost in the tedious collation of
+precedents, arranged without scientific system, and enunciated without
+explanation.
+
+When I first contemplated the composition of a work on this subject, a
+distinguished friend and Brother, whose opinion I much respect, and with
+whose advice I am always anxious to comply, unless for the most
+satisfactory reasons, suggested the expediency of collecting the decisions
+of all Grand Masters, Grand Lodges, and other masonic authorities upon
+every subject of Masonic Law, and of presenting them, without commentary,
+to the fraternity.
+
+But a brief examination of this method, led me to perceive that I would be
+thus constructing simply a digest of decrees, many of which would probably
+be the results of inexperience, of prejudice, or of erroneous views of the
+masonic system, and from which the authors themselves have, in repeated
+instances, subsequently receded--for Grand Masters and Grand Lodges,
+although entitled to great respect, are not infallible--and I could not,
+conscientiously, have consented to assist, without any qualifying remark,
+in the extension and perpetuation of edicts and opinions, which, however
+high the authority from which they emanated, I did not believe to be in
+accordance with the principles of Masonic jurisprudence.
+
+Another inconvenience which would have attended the adoption of such a
+method is, that the decisions of different Grand Lodges and Grand Masters
+are sometimes entirely contradictory on the same points of Masonic Law.
+The decree of one jurisdiction, on any particular question, will often be
+found at variance with that of another, while a third will differ from
+both. The consultor of a work, embracing within its pages such distracting
+judgments, unexplained by commentary, would be in doubt as to which
+decision he should adopt, so that coming to the inspection with the desire
+of solving a legal question, he would be constrained to close the volume,
+in utter despair of extracting truth or information from so confused a
+mass of contradictions.
+
+This plan I therefore at once abandoned. But knowing that the
+jurisprudence of Masonry is founded, like all legal science, on abstract
+principles, which govern and control its entire system, I deemed it to be
+a better course to present these principles to my readers in an elementary
+and methodical treatise, and to develop from them those necessary
+deductions which reason and common sense would justify.
+
+Hence it is that I have presumed to call this work "The Principles of
+Masonic Law." It is not a code of enactments, nor a collection of
+statutes, nor yet a digest of opinions; but simply an elementary treatise,
+intended to enable every one who consults it, with competent judgment, and
+ordinary intelligence, to trace for himself the bearings of the law upon
+any question which he seeks to investigate, and to form, for himself, a
+correct opinion upon the merits of any particular case.
+
+Blackstone, whose method of teaching I have endeavored, although I confess
+"ab longo inter-vallo," to pursue, in speaking of what an academical
+expounder of the law should do, says:
+
+"He should consider his course as a general map of the law, marking out
+the shape of the country, its connections, and boundaries, its greater
+divisions, and principal cities; it is not his business to describe
+minutely the subordinate limits, or to fix the longitude and latitude of
+every inconsiderable hamlet."
+
+Such has been the rule that has governed me in the compilation of this
+work. But in delineating this "general map" of the Masonic Law, I have
+sought, if I may continue the metaphor, so to define boundaries, and to
+describe countries, as to give the inspector no difficulty in "locating"
+(to use an Americanism) any subordinate point. I have treated, it is true,
+of principles, but I have not altogether lost sight of cases.
+
+There are certain fundamental laws of the Institution, concerning which
+there never has been any dispute, and which have come down to us with all
+the sanctions of antiquity, and universal acceptation. In announcing
+these, I have not always thought it necessary to defend their justice, or
+to assign a reason for their enactment.
+
+The weight of unanimous authority has, in these instances, been deemed
+sufficient to entitle them to respect, and to obedience.
+
+But on all other questions, where authority is divided, or where doubts of
+the correctness of my decision might arise, I have endeavored, by a course
+of argument as satisfactory as I could command, to assign a reason for my
+opinions, and to defend and enforce my views, by a reference to the
+general principles of jurisprudence, and the peculiar character of the
+masonic system. I ask, and should receive no deference to my own
+unsupported theories--as a man, I am, of course, fallible--and may often
+have decided erroneously. But I do claim for my arguments all the weight
+and influence of which they may be deemed worthy, after an attentive and
+unprejudiced examination. To those who may at first be ready--because I do
+not agree with all their preconceived opinions--to doubt or deny my
+conclusions, I would say, in the language of Themistocles, "Strike, but
+hear me."
+
+Whatever may be the verdict passed upon my labors by my Brethren, I trust
+that some clemency will be extended to the errors into which I may have
+fallen, for the sake of the object which I have had in view: that, namely,
+of presenting to the Craft an elementary work, that might enable every
+Mason to know his rights, and to learn his duties.
+
+The intention was, undoubtedly, a good one. How it has been executed, it
+is not for me, but for the masonic public to determine.
+
+Albert G. Mackey.
+
+Charleston, S.C., January 1st., 1856.
+
+
+
+
+Introduction.
+
+The Authorities for Masonic Law.
+
+
+
+The laws which govern the institution of Freemasonry are of two kinds,
+_unwritten_ and _written,_ and may in a manner be compared with the "lex
+non scripta," or common law, and the "lex seripta," or statute law of
+English and American jurists.
+
+The "lex non scripta," or _unwritten law_ of Freemasonry is derived from
+the traditions, usages and customs of the fraternity as they have existed
+from the remotest antiquity, and as they are universally admitted by the
+general consent of the members of the Order. In fact, we may apply to
+these unwritten laws of Masonry the definition given by Blackstone of the
+"leges non scriptae" of the English constitution--that "their original
+institution and authority are not set down in writing, as acts of
+parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of
+laws, by long and immemorial usage and by their universal reception
+throughout the kingdom." When, in the course of this work, I refer to
+these unwritten laws as authority upon any point, I shall do so under the
+appropriate designation of "ancient usage."
+
+The "lex scripta," or written law of Masonry, is derived from a variety of
+sources, and was framed at different periods. The following documents I
+deem of sufficient authority to substantiate any principle, or to
+determine any disputed question in masonic law.
+
+1. The "Ancient Masonic charges, from a manuscript of the Lodge of
+Antiquity," and said to have been written in the reign of James II.[1]
+
+2. The regulations adopted at the General Assembly held in 1663, of which
+the Earl of St. Albans was Grand Master.[2]
+
+3. The interrogatories propounded to the Master of a lodge at the time of
+his installation, and which, from their universal adoption, without
+alteration, by the whole fraternity, are undoubtedly to be considered as
+a part of the fundamental law of Masonry.
+
+4. "The Charges of a Freemason, extracted from the Ancient Records of
+Lodges beyond sea, and of those in England, Scotland, and Ireland, for the
+use of the Lodges in London," printed in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, and to be found from p. 49 to p. 56 of that work.[3]
+
+5. The thirty-nine "General Regulations," adopted "at the annual assembly
+and feast held at Stationers' hall on St. John the Baptist's day, 1721,"
+and which were published in the first edition of the Book of
+Constitutions, p. 58 to p.
+
+6. The subsequent regulations adopted at various annual communications by
+the Grand Lodge of England, up to the year 1769, and published in
+different editions of the Book of Constitutions. These, although not of
+such paramount importance and universal acceptation as the Old Charges
+and the Thirty-nine Regulations, are, nevertheless, of great value as the
+means of settling many disputed questions, by showing what was the law and
+usage of the fraternity at the times in which they were adopted.
+
+Soon after the publication of the edition of 1769 of the Book of
+Constitutions, the Grand Lodges of America began to separate from their
+English parent and to organize independent jurisdictions. From that
+period, the regulations adopted by the Grand Lodge of England ceased to
+have any binding efficacy over the craft in this country, while the laws
+passed by the American Grand Lodges lost the character of general
+regulations, and were invested only with local authority in their several
+jurisdictions.
+
+Before concluding this introductory section, it may be deemed necessary
+that something should be said of the "Ancient Landmarks of the Order," to
+which reference is so often made.
+
+Various definitions have been given of the landmarks. Some suppose them to
+be constituted of all the rules and regulations which were in existence
+anterior to the revival of Masonry in 1717, and which were confirmed and
+adopted by the Grand Lodge of England at that time. Others, more
+stringent in their definition, restrict them to the modes of recognition
+in use among the fraternity. I am disposed to adopt a middle course, and
+to define the Landmarks of Masonry to be, all those usages and customs of
+the craft--whether ritual or legislative--whether they relate to forms and
+ceremonies, or to the organization of the society--which have existed from
+time immemorial, and the alteration or abolition of which would materially
+affect the distinctive character of the institution or destroy its
+identity. Thus, for example, among the legislative landmarks, I would
+enumerate the office of Grand Master as the presiding officer over the
+craft, and among the ritual landmarks, the legend of the third degree. But
+the laws, enacted from time to time by Grand Lodges for their local
+government, no matter how old they may be, do not constitute landmarks,
+and may, at any time, be altered or expunged, since the 39th regulation
+declares expressly that "every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power
+and authority to make new regulations or to alter these (viz., the
+thirty-nine articles) for the real benefit of this ancient fraternity,
+provided always that the old landmarks be carefully preserved."
+
+
+
+
+
+Book First
+
+The Law of Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+It is proposed in this Book, first to present the reader with a brief
+historical sketch of the rise and progress of the system of Grand Lodges;
+and then to explain, in the subsequent sections, the mode in which such
+bodies are originally organized, who constitute their officers and
+members, and what are their acknowledged prerogatives.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Historical Sketch.
+
+
+Grand Lodges under their present organization, are, in respect to the
+antiquity of the Order, of a comparatively modern date. We hear of no such
+bodies in the earlier ages of the institution. Tradition informs us, that
+originally it was governed by the despotic authority of a few chiefs. At
+the building of the temple, we have reason to believe that King Solomon
+exercised an unlimited and irresponsible control over the craft, although
+a tradition (not, however, of undoubted authority) says that he was
+assisted in his government by the counsel of twelve superintendants,
+selected from the twelve tribes of Israel. But we know too little, from
+authentic materials, of the precise system adopted at that remote period,
+to enable us to make any historical deductions on the subject.
+
+The first historical notice that we have of the formation of a supreme
+controlling body of the fraternity, is in the "Gothic Constitutions"[4]
+which assert that, in the year 287, St. Alban, the protomartyr of England,
+who was a zealous patron of the craft, obtained from Carausius, the
+British Emperor, "a charter for the Masons to hold a general council, and
+gave it the name of assembly." The record further states, that St. Alban
+attended the meeting and assisted in making Masons, giving them "good
+charges and regulations." We know not, however, whether this assembly ever
+met again; and if it did, for how many years it continued to exist. The
+subsequent history of Freemasonry is entirely silent on the subject.
+
+The next general assemblage of the craft, of which the records of
+Freemasonry inform us, was that convened in 926, at the city of York, in
+England, by Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstane, and the grandson
+of Alfred the Great. This, we say, was the next general assemblage,
+because the Ashmole manuscript, which was destroyed at the revival of
+Freemasonry in 1717, is said to have stated that, at that time, the Prince
+obtained from his brother, the king, a permission for the craft "to hold a
+yearly communication and a general assembly." The fact that such a power
+of meeting was then granted, is conclusive that it did not before exist:
+and would seem to prove that the assemblies of the craft, authorised by
+the charter of Carausius, had long since ceased to be held. This yearly
+communication did not, however, constitute, at least in the sense we now
+understand it, a Grand Lodge. The name given to it was that of the
+"General Assembly of Masons." It was not restricted, as now, to the
+Masters and Wardens of the subordinate lodges, acting in the capacity of
+delegates or representatives, but was composed, as Preston has observed,
+of as many of the fraternity at large as, being within a convenient
+distance, could attend once or twice a year, under the auspices of one
+general head, who was elected and installed at one of these meetings, and
+who, for the time being, received homage as the governor of the whole
+body. Any Brethren who were competent to discharge the duty, were allowed,
+by the regulations of the Order, to open and hold lodges at their
+discretion, at such times and places as were most convenient to them, and
+without the necessity of what we now call a Warrant of Constitution, and
+then and there to initiate members into the Order.[5] To the General
+Assembly, however, all the craft, without distinction, were permitted to
+repair; each Mason present was entitled to take part in the deliberations,
+and the rules and regulations enacted were the result of the votes of the
+whole body. The General Assembly was, in fact, precisely similar to those
+political congregations which, in our modern phraseology, we term "mass
+meetings."
+
+These annual mass meetings or General Assemblies continued to be held, for
+many centuries after their first establishment, at the city of York, and
+were, during all that period, the supreme judicatory of the fraternity.
+There are frequent references to the annual assemblies of Freemasons in
+public documents. The preamble to an act passed in 1425, during the reign
+of Henry VI., just five centuries after the meeting at York, states that,
+"by the _yearly congregations_ and confederacies made by the Masons in
+their _general assemblies, _ the good course and effect of the statute of
+laborers were openly violated and broken." This act which forbade such
+meetings, was, however, never put in force; for an old record, quoted in
+the Book of Constitutions, speaks of the Brotherhood having frequented
+this "mutual assembly," in 1434, in the reign of the same king. We have
+another record of the General Assembly, which was held in York on the 27th
+December, 1561, when Queen Elizabeth, who was suspicious of their secrecy,
+sent an armed force to dissolve the meeting. A copy is still preserved of
+the regulations which were adopted by a similar assembly held in 1663, on
+the festival of St. John the Evangelist; and in these regulations it is
+declared that the private lodges shall give an account of all their
+acceptations made during the year to the General Assembly. Another
+regulation, however, adopted at the same time, still more explicitly
+acknowledges the existence of a General Assembly as the governing body of
+the fraternity. It is there provided, "that for the future, the said
+fraternity of Freemasons shall be regulated and governed by one Grand
+Master and as many Wardens as the said society shall think fit to appoint
+at every Annual General Assembly."
+
+And thus the interests of the institution continued, until the beginning
+of the eighteenth century, or for nearly eight hundred years, to be
+entrusted to those General Assemblies of the fraternity, who, without
+distinction of rank or office, annually met at York to legislate for the
+government of the craft.
+
+But in 1717, a new organization of the governing head was adopted, which
+gave birth to the establishment of a Grand Lodge, in the form in which
+these bodies now exist. So important a period in the history of Masonry
+demands our special attention.
+
+After the death, in 1702, of King William, who was himself a Mason, and a
+great patron of the craft, the institution began to languish, the lodges
+decreased in number, and the General Assembly was entirely neglected for
+many years. A few old lodges continued, it is true, to meet regularly, but
+they consisted of only a few members.
+
+At length, on the accession of George I., the Masons of London and its
+vicinity determined to revive the annual communications of the society.
+There were at that time only four lodges in the south of England, and the
+members of these, with several old Brethren, met in February, 1717, at the
+Apple Tree Tavern, in Charles street, Covent Garden, and organized by
+putting the oldest Master Mason, who was the Master of a lodge, in the
+chair; they then constituted themselves into what Anderson calls, "a Grand
+Lodge _pro tempore;"_ resolved to hold the annual assembly and feast, and
+then to choose a Grand Master.
+
+Accordingly, on the 24th of June, 1717, the assembly and feast were held;
+and the oldest Master of a lodge being in the chair, a list of candidates
+was presented, out of which Mr. Anthony Sayer was elected Grand Master,
+and Capt. Joseph Elliott and Mr. Jacob Lamball, Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Master then commanded the Masters and Wardens of lodges to meet
+the Grand Officers every quarter, in communication, at the place he should
+appoint in his summons sent by the Tiler.
+
+This was, then, undoubtedly, the commencement of that organization of the
+Masters and Wardens of lodges into a Grand Lodge, which has ever since
+continued to exist.
+
+The fraternity at large, however, still continued to claim the right of
+being present at the annual assembly; and, in fact, at that meeting, their
+punctual attendance at the next annual assembly and feast was recommended.
+
+At the same meeting, it was resolved "that the privilege of assembling as
+Masons, which had been hitherto unlimited, should be vested in certain
+lodges or assemblies of Masons convened in certain places; and that every
+lodge to be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time
+existing, should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand
+Master for the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition,
+with the consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and
+that, without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+In consequence of this regulation, several new lodges received Warrants of
+Constitution, and their Masters and Wardens were ordered to attend the
+communications of the Grand Lodge. The Brethren at large vested all their
+privileges in the four old lodges, in trust that they would never suffer
+the old charges and landmarks to be infringed; and the old lodges, in
+return, agreed that the Masters and Wardens of every new lodge that might
+be constituted, should be permitted to share with them all the privileges
+of the Grand Lodge, except precedence of rank. The Brethren, says Preston,
+considered their further attendance at the meetings of the society
+unnecessary after these regulations were adopted; and therefore trusted
+implicitly to their Masters and Wardens for the government of the craft;
+and thenceforward the Grand Lodge has been composed of all the Masters and
+Wardens of the subordinate lodges which constitute the jurisdiction.
+
+The ancient right of the craft, however, to take a part in the proceedings
+of the Grand Lodge or Annual Assembly, was fully acknowledged by a new
+regulation, adopted about the same time, in which it is declared that all
+alterations of the Constitutions must be proposed and agreed to, at the
+third quarterly communication preceding the annual feast, and be offered
+also to the perusal of _all_ the Brethren before dinner, _even of the
+youngest Entered Apprentice_[6]
+
+This regulation has, however, (I know not by what right,) become obsolete,
+and the Annual Assembly of Masons has long ceased to be held; the Grand
+Lodges having, since the beginning of the eighteenth century, assumed the
+form and organization which they still preserve, as strictly
+representative bodies.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Mode of Organizing Grand Lodges.
+
+
+
+The topic to be discussed in this section is, the answer to the question,
+How shall a Grand Lodge be established in any state or country where such
+a body has not previously existed, but where there are subordinate lodges
+working under Warrants derived from Grand Lodges in other states? In
+answering this question, it seems proper that I should advert to the
+course pursued by the original Grand Lodge of England, at its
+establishment in 1717, as from that body nearly all the Grand Lodges of
+the York rite now in existence derive their authority, either directly or
+indirectly, and the mode of its organization has, therefore, universally
+been admitted to have been regular and legitimate.
+
+In the first place, it is essentially requisite that the active existence
+of subordinate lodges in a state should precede the formation of a Grand
+Lodge; for the former are the only legitimate sources of the latter. A
+mass meeting of Masons cannot assemble and organize a Grand Lodge. A
+certain number of lodges, holding legal warrants from a Grand Lodge or
+from different Grand Lodges, must meet by their representatives and
+proceed to the formation of a Grand Lodge. When that process has been
+accomplished, the subordinate lodges return the warrants, under which they
+had theretofore worked, to the Grand Lodges from which they had originally
+received them, and take new ones from the body which they have formed.
+
+That a mass meeting of the fraternity of any state is incompetent to
+organize a Grand Lodge has been definitively settled--not only by general
+usage, but by the express action of the Grand Lodges of the United States
+which refused to recognize, in 1842, the Grand Lodge of Michigan which had
+been thus irregularly established in the preceding year. That unrecognized
+body was then dissolved by the Brethren of Michigan, who proceeded to
+establish four subordinate lodges under Warrants granted by the Grand
+Lodge of New York. These four lodges subsequently met in convention and
+organized the present Grand Lodge of Michigan in a regular manner.
+
+It seems, however, to have been settled in the case of Vermont, that where
+a Grand Lodge has been dormant for many years, and all of its subordinates
+extinct, yet if any of the Grand Officers, last elected, survive and are
+present, they may revive the Grand Lodge and proceed constitutionally to
+the exercise of its prerogatives.
+
+The next inquiry is, as to the number of lodges required to organize a new
+Grand Lodge. Dalcho says that _five_ lodges are necessary; and in this
+opinion he is supported by the Ahiman Rezon of Pennsylvania, published in
+1783 by William Smith, D.D., at that time the Grand Secretary of that
+jurisdiction, and also by some other authorities. But no such regulation
+is to be found in the Book of Constitutions, which is now admitted to
+contain the fundamental law of the institution. Indeed, its adoption would
+have been a condemnation of the legality of the Mother Grand Lodge of
+England, which was formed in 1717 by the union of only _four_ lodges. The
+rule, however, is to be found in the Ahiman Rezon of Laurence Dermott,
+which was adopted by the "Grand Lodge of Ancient Freemasons," that seceded
+from the lawful Grand Lodge in 1738. But as that body was undoubtedly,
+under our present views of masonic law, schismatic and illegal, its
+regulations have never been considered by masonic writers as being
+possessed of any authority.
+
+In the absence of any written law upon the subject, we are compelled to
+look to precedent for authority; and, although the Grand Lodges in the
+United States have seldom been established with a representation of less
+than four lodges, the fact that that of Texas was organized in 1837 by the
+representatives of only _three_ lodges, and that the Grand Lodge thus
+instituted was at once recognized as legal and regular by all its sister
+Grand Lodges, seems to settle the question that three subordinates are
+sufficient to institute a Grand Lodge.
+
+Three lodges, therefore, in any territory where a Grand Lodge does not
+already exist, may unite in convention and organize a Grand Lodge. It will
+then be necessary, that these lodges should surrender the warrants under
+which they had been previously working, and take out new warrants from the
+Grand Lodge which they have constituted; and, from that time forth, all
+masonic authority is vested in the Grand Lodge thus formed.
+
+The Grand Lodge having been thus constituted, the next inquiries that
+suggest themselves are as to its members and its officers, each of which
+questions will occupy a distinct discussion.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+It is an indisputable fact that the "General Assembly" which met at York
+in 926 was composed of all the members of the fraternity who chose to
+repair to it; and it is equally certain that, at the first Grand Lodge,
+held in 1717, after the revival of Masonry, all the craft who were present
+exercised the right of membership in voting for Grand Officers,[7] and
+must, therefore, have been considered members of the Grand Lodge. The
+right does not, however, appear to have been afterwards claimed. At this
+very assembly, the Grand Master who had been elected, summoned only the
+Master and Wardens of the lodges to meet him in the quarterly
+communications; and Preston distinctly states, that soon after, the
+Brethren of the four old lodges, which had constituted the Grand Lodge,
+considered their attendance on the future communications of the society
+unnecessary, and therefore concurred with the lodges which had been
+subsequently warranted in delegating the power of representation to their
+Masters and Wardens, "resting satisfied that no measure of importance
+would be adopted without their approbation."
+
+Any doubts upon the subject were, however, soon put at rest by the
+enactment of a positive law. In 1721, thirty-nine articles for the future
+government of the craft were approved and confirmed, the twelfth of which
+was in the following words:
+
+"The Grand Lodge consists of, and is formed by, the Masters and Wardens of
+all the regular particular lodges upon record, with the Grand Master at
+their head, and his Deputy on his left hand, and the Grand Wardens in
+their proper places."
+
+From time to time, the number of these constituents of a Grand Lodge were
+increased by the extension of the qualifications for membership. Thus, in
+1724, Past Grand Masters, and in 1725, Past Deputy Grand Masters, were
+admitted as members of the Grand Lodge. Finally it was decreed that the
+Grand Lodge should consist of the four present and all past grand
+officers; the Grand Treasurer, Secretary, and Sword-Bearer; the Master,
+Wardens, and nine assistants of the Grand Stewards' lodge, and the Masters
+and Wardens of all the regular lodges.
+
+Past Masters were not at first admitted as members of the Grand Lodge.
+There is no recognition of them in the old Constitutions. Walworth thinks
+it must have been after 1772 that they were introduced.[8] I have extended
+my researches to some years beyond that period, without any success in
+finding their recognition as members under the Constitution of England. It
+is true that, in 1772, Dermott prefixed a note to his edition of the
+Ahiman Rezon, in which he asserts that "Past Masters of warranted lodges
+on record are allowed this privilege (of membership) whilst they continue
+to be members of any regular lodge." And it is, doubtless, on this
+imperfect authority, that the Grand Lodges of America began at so early a
+period to admit their Past Masters to seats in the Grand Lodge. In the
+authorized Book of Constitutions, we find no such provision. Indeed,
+Preston records that in 1808, at the laying of the foundation-stone of the
+Covent Garden Theatre, by the Prince of Wales, as Grand Master, "the Grand
+Lodge was opened by Charles Marsh, Esq., attended by the _Masters and
+Wardens_ of all the regular lodges;" and, throughout the description of
+the ceremonies, no notice is taken of Past Masters as forming any part of
+the Grand Lodge. The first notice that we have been enabled to obtain of
+Past Masters, as forming any part of the Grand Lodge of England, is in the
+"Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges of England," adopted in
+1813, which declare that the Grand Lodge shall consist of the Grand and
+Past Grand Officers, of the actual Masters and Wardens of all the
+warranted lodges, and of the "Past Masters of Lodges who have regularly
+served and passed the chair before the day of Union, and who continued,
+without secession, regular contributing members of a warranted lodge." But
+it is provided, that after the decease of all these ancient Past Masters,
+the representation of every lodge shall consist of its Master and Wardens,
+and one Past Master only. There is, I presume, no doubt that, from 1772,
+Past Masters had held a seat in the Athol Grand Lodge of Ancient Masons,
+and that they did not in the original Grand Lodge, is, I believe, a fact
+equally indisputable. By the present constitutions of the United Grand
+Lodge of England, Past Masters are members of the Grand Lodge, while they
+continue subscribing members of a private lodge. In some of the Grand
+Lodges of the United States, Past Masters have been permitted to retain
+their membership, while in others, they have been disfranchised.
+
+On the whole, the result of this inquiry seems to be, that Past Masters
+have no inherent right, derived from the ancient landmarks, to a seat in
+the Grand Lodge; but as every Grand Lodge has the power, within certain
+limits, to make regulations for its own government, it may or may not
+admit them to membership, according to its own notion of expediency.
+
+Some of the Grand Lodges have not only disfranchised Past Masters but
+Wardens also, and restricted membership only to acting Masters. This
+innovation has arisen from the fact that the payment of mileage and
+expenses to three representative would entail a heavy burden on the
+revenue of the Grand Lodge. The reason may have been imperative; but in
+the practice, pecuniary expediency has been made to override an ancient
+usage.
+
+In determining, then, who are the constitutional members of a Grand Lodge,
+deriving their membership from inherent right, I should say that they are
+the Masters and Wardens of all regular lodges in the jurisdiction, with
+the Grand Officers chosen by them. All others, who by local regulations
+are made members, are so only by courtesy, and not by prescription or
+ancient law.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+The officers of a Grand Lodge may be divided into two classes, _essential_
+and _accidental_, or, as they are more usually called, _Grand_ and
+_Subordinate_. The former of these classes are, as the name imports,
+essential to the composition of a Grand Lodge, and are to be found in
+every jurisdiction, having existed from the earliest times. They are the
+Grand and Deputy Grand Masters, the Grand Wardens, Grand Treasurer, and
+Grand Secretary. The Grand Chaplain is also enumerated among the Grand
+Officers, but the office is of comparatively modern date.
+
+The subordinate officers of a Grand Lodge consist of the Deacons, Marshal,
+Pursuivant, or Sword-Bearer, Stewards, and others, whose titles and duties
+vary in different jurisdictions. I shall devote a separate section to the
+consideration of the duties of each and prerogatives of these officers.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Grand Master of Masons has existed from the very origin of
+the institution; for it has always been necessary that the fraternity
+should have a presiding head. There have been periods in the history of
+the institution when neither Deputies nor Grand Wardens are mentioned, but
+there is no time in its existence when it was without a Grand Master; and
+hence Preston, while speaking of that remote era in which the fraternity
+was governed by a General Assembly, says that this General Assembly or
+Grand Lodge "was not then restricted, as it is now understood to be, to
+the Masters and Wardens of private lodges, with the Grand Master and his
+Wardens at their head; it consisted of as many of the Fraternity _at
+large_ as, being within a convenient distance, could attend, once or twice
+in a year, under the auspices of one general head, who was elected and
+installed at one of these meetings; and who for the time being received
+homage as the sole governor of the whole body."[9] The office is one of
+great honour as well as power, and has generally been conferred upon some
+individual distinguished by an influential position in society; so that
+his rank and character might reflect credit upon the craft.[10]
+
+The Grand Mastership is an elective office, the election being annual and
+accompanied with impressive ceremonies of proclamation and homage made to
+him by the whole craft. Uniform usage, as well as the explicit declaration
+of the General Regulations,[11] seems to require that he should be
+installed by the last Grand Master. But in his absence the Deputy or some
+Past Grand Master may exercise the functions of installation or
+investiture. In the organization of a new Grand Lodge, ancient precedent
+and the necessity of the thing will authorize the performance of the
+installation by the Master of the oldest lodge present, who, however,
+exercises, _pro hac vice_, the prerogatives and assumes the place of a
+Grand Master.
+
+The Grand Master possesses a great variety of prerogatives, some of which
+are derived from the "lex non scripta," or ancient usage; and others from
+the written or statute law of Masonry.[12]
+
+I. He has the right to convene the Grand Lodge whenever he pleases, and to
+preside over its deliberation. In the decision of all questions by the
+Grand Lodge he is entitled to two votes. This is a privilege secured to
+him by Article XII. of the General Regulations.
+
+It seems now to be settled, by ancient usage as well as the expressed
+opinion of the generality of Grand Lodges and of masonic writers, that
+there is no appeal from his decision. In June, 1849, the Grand Master of
+New York, Bro. Williard, declared an appeal to be out of order and refused
+to submit it to the Grand Lodge. The proceedings on that eventful occasion
+have been freely discussed by the Grand Lodges of the United States, and
+none of them have condemned the act of the Grand Master, while several
+have sustained it in express terms. "An appeal," say the Committee of
+Correspondence of Maryland, "from the decision of the Grand Master is an
+anomaly at war with every principle of Freemasonry, and as such, not for
+a moment to be tolerated or countenanced."[13] This opinion is also
+sustained by the Committee of the Grand Lodge of Florida in the year 1851,
+and at various times by other Grand Lodges. On the other hand, several
+Grand Lodges have made decisions adverse to this prerogative, and the
+present regulations of the Grand Lodge of England seem, by a fair
+interpretation of their phraseology, to admit of an appeal from the Grand
+Master. Still the general opinion of the craft in this country appears to
+sustain the doctrine, that no appeal can be made from the decision of that
+officer. And this doctrine has derived much support in the way of analogy
+from the report adopted by the General Grand Chapter of the United States,
+declaring that no appeal could lie from the decision of the presiding
+officer of any Royal Arch body.
+
+Since we have enunciated this doctrine as masonic law, the question next
+arises, in what manner shall the Grand Master be punished, should he abuse
+his great prerogative? The answer to this question admits of no doubt. It
+is to be found in a regulation, adopted in 1721, by the Grand Lodge of
+England, and is in these words:--"If the Grand Master should abuse his
+great power, and render himself unworthy of the obedience and submission
+of the Lodges, he shall be treated in a way and manner to be agreed upon
+in a new regulation." But the same series of regulations very explicitly
+prescribe, how this new regulation is to be made; namely, it is to be
+"proposed and agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the
+annual Grand Feast, and offered to the perusal of all the Brethren before
+dinner, in writing, even of the youngest entered apprentice; the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."[14] This
+mode of making a new regulation is explicitly and positively
+prescribed--it can be done in no other way--and those who accept the old
+regulations as the law of Masonry, must accept this provision with them.
+This will, in the present organization of many Grand Lodges, render it
+almost impracticable to make such a new regulation, in which case the
+Grand Master must remain exempt from other punishment for his misdeeds,
+than that which arises from his own conscience, and the loss of his
+Brethren's regard and esteem.
+
+II. The power of granting dispensations is one of the most important
+prerogatives of the Grand Master. A dispensation may be defined to be an
+exemption from the observance of some law or the performance of some duty.
+In Masonry, no one has the authority to grant this exemption, except the
+Grand Master; and, although the exercise of it is limited within the
+observance of the ancient landmarks, the operation of the prerogative is
+still very extensive. The dispensing power may be exercised under the
+following circumstances:
+
+1. The fourth old Regulation prescribes that "no lodge shall make more
+than five new Brothers at one and the same time without an urgent
+necessity."[15] But of this necessity the Grand Master may judge, and, on
+good and sufficient reason being shown, he may grant a dispensation
+enabling any lodge to suspend this regulation and make more than five new
+Brothers.
+
+2. The next regulation prescribes "that no one can be accepted a member of
+a particular lodge without previous notice, one month before given to the
+lodge, in order to make due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of
+the candidate." But here, also, it is held that, in a suitable case of
+emergency, the Grand Master may exercise his prerogative and dispense with
+this probation of one month, permitting the candidate to be made on the
+night of his application.
+
+3. If a lodge should have omitted for any causes to elect its officers or
+any of them on the constitutional night of election, or if any officer so
+elected shall have died, been deposed or removed from the jurisdiction
+subsequent to his election, the Grand Master may issue a dispensation
+empowering the lodge to proceed to an election or to fill the vacancy at
+any other specified communication; but he cannot grant a dispensation to
+elect a new master in consequence of the death or removal of the old one,
+while the two Wardens or either of them remain--because the Wardens
+succeed by inherent right and in order of seniority to the vacant
+mastership. And, indeed, it is held that while one of the three officers
+remains, no election can be held, even by dispensation, to fill the other
+two places, though vacancies in them may have occurred by death or
+removal.
+
+4. The Grand Master may grant a dispensation empowering a lodge to elect
+a Master from among the members on the floor; but this must be done only
+when every Past Master, Warden, and Past Warden of the lodge has refused
+to serve,[16] because ordinarily a requisite qualification for the
+Mastership is, that the candidate shall, previously, have served in the
+office of Warden.
+
+5. In the year 1723 a regulation was adopted, prescribing "that no Brother
+should belong to more than one lodge within the bills of mortality."
+Interpreting the last expression to mean three miles--which is now
+supposed to be the geographical limit of a lodge's jurisdiction, this
+regulation may still be considered as a part of the law of Masonry; but in
+some Grand Lodges, as that of South Carolina, for instance, the Grand
+Master will sometimes exercise his prerogative, and, dispensing with this
+regulation, permit a Brother to belong to two lodges, although they may be
+within three miles of each other.
+
+6. But the most important power of the Grand Master connected with his
+dispensing prerogative is, that of constituting new lodges. It has
+already been remarked that, anciently, a warrant was not required for the
+formation of a lodge, but that a sufficient number of Masons, met together
+within a certain limit, were empowered, with the consent of the sheriff or
+chief magistrate of the place, to make Masons and practice the rites of
+Masonry, without such warrant of Constitution. But, in the year 1717, it
+was adopted as a regulation, that every lodge, to be thereafter convened,
+should be authorised to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for the
+time being, granted to certain persons by petition, with the consent and
+approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication. Ever since that time, no
+lodge has been considered as legally established, unless it has been
+constituted by the authority of the Grand Master. In the English
+Constitutions, the instrument thus empowering a lodge to meet, is called,
+when granted by the Grand Master, a Warrant of Constitution. It is granted
+by the Grand Master and not by the Grand Lodge. It appears to be a final
+instrument, notwithstanding the provision enacted in 1717, requiring the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge; for in the Constitution of the
+United Grand Lodge of England, there is no allusion whatever to this
+consent and approbation.
+
+But in this country, the process is somewhat different, and the Grand
+Master is deprived of a portion of his prerogative. Here, the instrument
+granted by the Grand Master is called a Dispensation. The lodge receiving
+it is not admitted into the register of lodges, nor is it considered as
+possessing any of the rights and privileges of a lodge, except that of
+making Masons, until a Warrant of Constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge. The ancient prerogative of the Grand Master is, however, preserved
+in the fact, that after a lodge has been thus warranted by the Grand
+Lodge, the ceremony of constituting it, which embraces its consecration
+and the installation of its officers, can only be performed by the Grand
+Master in person, or by his special Deputy appointed for that purpose.[17]
+
+III. The third prerogative of the Grand Master is that of visitation. He
+has a right to visit any lodge within his jurisdiction at such times as he
+pleases, and when there to preside; and it is the duty of the Master to
+offer him the chair and his gavel, which the Grand Master may decline or
+accept at his pleasure. This prerogative admits of no question, as it is
+distinctly declared in the first of the Thirty-nine Regulations, adopted
+in 1721, in the following words:--
+
+"The Grand Master or Deputy has full authority and right, not only to be
+present, but to preside in every lodge, with the Master of the lodge on
+his left hand, and to order his Grand Wardens to attend him, who are not
+to act as Wardens of particular lodges, but in his presence and at his
+command; for the Grand Master, while in a particular lodge, may command
+the Wardens of that lodge, or any other Master Masons, to act as his
+Wardens, _pro tempore_."
+
+But in a subsequent regulation it was provided, that as the Grand Master
+cannot deprive the Grand Wardens of that office without the consent of the
+Grand Lodge, he should appoint no other persons to act as Wardens in his
+visitation to a private lodge, unless the Grand Wardens were absent. This
+whole regulation is still in existence.
+
+The question has been lately mooted, whether, if the Grand Master declines
+to preside, he does not thereby place himself in the position of a
+private Brother, and become subject, as all the others present, to the
+control of the Worshipful Master. I answer, that of course he becomes
+subject to and must of necessity respect those rules of order and decorum
+which are obligatory on all good men and Masons; but that he cannot, by
+the exercise of an act of courtesy in declining to preside, divest himself
+of his prerogative, which, moreover, he may at any time during the evening
+assume, and demand the gavel. The Grand Master of Masons can, under no
+circumstances, become subject to the decrees and orders of the Master of a
+particular lodge.
+
+IV. Another prerogative of the Grand Master is that of appointment; which,
+however, in this country, has been much diminished. According to the old
+regulations, and the custom is still continued in the Constitutions of the
+Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Master has the right of appointing his
+Deputy and Wardens. In the United States, the office has been shorn of
+this high prerogative, and these Officers are elected by the Grand Lodge.
+The Deputy, however, is still appointed by the Grand Master, in some of
+the States, as Massachusetts, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Texas. The
+appointment of the principal subordinate officers, is also given to the
+Grand Master by the American Grand Lodges.
+
+V. The last and most extraordinary power of the Grand Master, is that of
+_making Masons at sight_.
+
+The power to "make Masons at sight" is a technical term, which may be
+defined to be the power to initiate, pass, and raise candidates by the
+Grand Master, in a lodge of emergency, or as it is called in the Book of
+Constitutions, "an occasional lodge," especially convened by him, and
+consisting of such Master Masons as he may call together for that purpose
+only--the lodge ceasing to exist as soon as the initiation, passing, or
+raising, has been accomplished and the Brethren have been dismissed by the
+Grand Master.
+
+Whether such a power is vested in the Grand Master, is a question that,
+within the last few years, has been agitated with much warmth, by some of
+the Grand Lodges of this country; but I am not aware that, until very
+lately, the prerogative was ever disputed.[18]
+
+In the Book of Constitutions, however, several instances are furnished of
+the exercise of this right by various Grand Masters.
+
+In 1731, Lord Lovel being Grand Master, he "formed an occasional lodge at
+Houghton Hall, Sir Robert Walpole's House in Norfolk," and there made the
+Duke of Lorraine, afterwards Emperor of Germany, and the Duke of
+Newcastle, Master Masons.[19]
+
+I do not quote the case of the initiation, passing, and raising of
+Frederick, Prince of Wales, in 1737, which was done in "an occasional
+lodge," over which Dr. Desaguliers presided,[20] because as Desaguliers
+was not the Grand Master, nor even, as has been incorrectly stated by the
+New York Committee of Correspondence, Deputy Grand Master, but only a Past
+Grand Master, it cannot be called _a making at sight_. He most probably
+acted under the dispensation of the Grand Master, who at that time was the
+Earl of Darnley.
+
+But in 1766, Lord Blaney, who was then Grand Master, convened "an
+occasional lodge" and initiated, passed, and raised the Duke of
+Gloucester.[21]
+
+Again in 1767, John Salter, the Deputy, then acting as Grand Master,
+convened "an occasional lodge," and conferred the three degrees on the
+Duke of Cumberland.[22]
+
+In 1787, the Prince of Wales was made a Mason "at an occasional lodge,
+convened," says Preston, "for the purpose, at the Star and Garter, Pall
+Mall, over which the Duke of Cumberland, (Grand Master) presided in
+person."[23]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances of the right, exercised by
+former Grand Masters, of congregating occasional lodges, and making Masons
+at sight. It has been said, however, by the oppugners of this prerogative,
+that these "occasional lodges" were only special communications of the
+Grand Lodge, and the "makings" are thus supposed to have taken place under
+the authority of that body, and not of the Grand Master. The facts,
+however, do not sustain this position. Throughout the Book of
+Constitutions, other meetings, whether regular or special, are distinctly
+recorded as meetings of the Grand Lodge, while these "occasional lodges"
+appear only to have been convened by the Grand Master, for the purpose of
+making Masons. Besides, in many instances, the lodge was held at a
+different place from that of the Grand Lodge, and the officers were not,
+with the exception of the Grand Master, the officers of the Grand Lodge.
+Thus the occasional lodge, which initiated the Duke of Lorraine, was held
+at the residence of Sir Robert Walpole, in Norfolk, while the Grand Lodge
+always met in London. In 1766, the Grand Lodge held its communications at
+the Crown and Anchor; but the occasional lodge, which, in the same year,
+conferred the degrees on the Duke of Gloucester, was convened at the Horn
+Tavern. In the following year, the lodge which initiated the Duke of
+Cumberland was convened at the Thatched House Tavern, the Grand Lodge
+continuing to meet at the Crown and Anchor.
+
+This may be considered very conclusive evidence of the existence of the
+prerogative of the Grand Master, which we are now discussing, but the
+argument _a fortiori_, drawn from his dispensing power, will tend to
+confirm the doctrine.
+
+No one doubts or denies the power of the Grand Master to constitute new
+lodges by dispensation. In 1741, the Grand Lodge of England forgot it for
+a moment, and adopted a new regulation, that no new lodge should be
+constituted until the consent of the Grand Lodge had been first obtained,
+"But this order, afterwards appearing," says the Book of
+Constitutions,[24] "to be an infringement on the prerogative of the Grand
+Master, and to be attended with many inconveniences and with damage to the
+craft, was repealed."
+
+It is, then, an undoubted prerogative of the Grand Master to constitute
+lodges by dispensation, and in these lodges, so constituted, Masons may be
+legally entered, passed, and raised. This is done every day. Seven Master
+Masons, applying to the Grand Master, he grants them a dispensation, under
+authority of which they proceed to open and hold a lodge, and to make
+Masons. This lodge is, however, admitted to be the mere creature of the
+Grand Master, for it is in his power, at any time, to revoke the
+dispensation he had granted, and thus to dissolve the lodge.
+
+But, if the Grand Master has the power thus to enable others to confer the
+degrees and make Masons by his individual authority out of his presence,
+are we not permitted to argue _a fortiori_ that he has also the right of
+congregating seven Brethren and causing a Mason, to be made in his sight?
+Can he delegate a power to others which he does not himself possess? And
+is his calling together "an occasional lodge," and making, with the
+assistance of the Brethren thus assembled, a Mason "at sight," that is to
+say, in his presence, anything more or less than the exercise of his
+dispensing power, for the establishment of a lodge under dispensation, for
+a temporary period, and for a special purpose. The purpose having been
+effected, and the Mason having been made, he revokes his dispensation, and
+the lodge is dismissed. If we assumed any other ground than this, we
+should be compelled to say, that though the Grand Master might authorise
+others to make Masons, when he was absent, as in the usual case of lodges
+under dispensation yet the instant that he attempted to convey the same
+powers to be exercised in his presence, and under his personal
+supervision, his authority would cease. This course of reasoning would
+necessarily lead to a contradiction in terms, if not to an actual
+absurdity.
+
+It is proper to state, in conclusion, that the views here set forth are
+not entertained by the very able Committee of Foreign Correspondence of
+the Grand Lodge of Florida, who only admit the power of the Grand Master
+to make Masons in the Grand Lodge. On the other hand, the Grand Lodge of
+Wisconsin, at its last communication, adopted a report, asserting "that
+the Grand Master has the right to make Masons at sight, in cases which he
+may deem proper"--and the Committee of Correspondence of New York
+declares, that "since the time when the memory of man runneth not to the
+contrary, Grand Masters have enjoyed the privilege of making Masons at
+sight, without any preliminaries, and at any suitable time or place."
+
+The opinions of the two last quoted Grand Lodges embody the general
+sentiment of the Craft on this subject.[25] But although the prerogative
+is thus almost universally ceded to Grand Masters, there are many very
+reasonable doubts as to the expediency of its exercise, except under
+extraordinary circumstances of emergency.
+
+In England, the practice has generally been confined to the making of
+Princes of the Royal Family, who, for reasons of state, were unwilling to
+reduce themselves to the level of ordinary candidates and receive their
+initiation publicly in a subordinate lodge.
+
+But in the exercise of this prerogative, the Grand Master cannot dispense
+with any of the requisite forms of initiation, prescribed by the oral laws
+of the Order. He cannot communicate the degrees, but must adhere to all
+the established ceremonies--the conferring of degrees by "communication"
+being a form unknown to the York rite. He must be assisted by the number
+of Brethren necessary to open and hold a lodge. Due inquiry must be made
+into the candidate's character, (though the Grand Master may, as in a case
+of emergency, dispense with the usual probation of a month). He cannot
+interfere with the business of a regular lodge, by making one whom it had
+rejected, nor finishing one which it had commenced. Nor can he confer the
+three degrees, at one and the same communication. In short, he must, in
+making Masons at sight, conform to the ancient usages and landmarks of the
+Order.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_The Deputy Grand Master._
+
+
+The office of Deputy Grand Master is one of great dignity, but not of much
+practical importance, except in case of the absence of the Grand Master,
+when he assumes all the prerogatives of that officer. Neither is the
+office, comparatively speaking, of a very ancient date. At the first
+reorganization of the Grand Lodge in 1717, and for two or three years
+afterwards, no Deputy was appointed, and it was not until 1721 that the
+Duke of Montagu conferred the dignity on Dr. Beal. Originally the Deputy
+was intended to relieve the Grand Master of all the burden and pressure of
+business, and the 36th of the Regulations, adopted in 1721, states that "a
+Deputy is said to have been always needful when the Grand Master was nobly
+born," because it was considered as a derogation from the dignity of a
+nobleman to enter upon the ordinary business of the craft. Hence we find,
+among the General Regulations, one which sets forth this principle in the
+following words:
+
+"The Grand Master should not receive any private intimations of business,
+concerning Masons and Masonry, but from his Deputy first, except in such
+cases as his worship can easily judge of; and if the application to the
+Grand Master be irregular, his worship can order the Grand Wardens, or any
+other so applying, to wait upon the Deputy, who is immediately to prepare
+the business, and to lay it orderly before his worship."
+
+The Deputy Grand Master exercises, in the absence of the Grand Master, all
+the prerogatives and performs all the duties of that officer. But he does
+so, not by virtue of any new office that he has acquired by such absence,
+but simply in the name of and as the representative of the Grand Master,
+from whom alone he derives all his authority. Such is the doctrine
+sustained in all the precedents recorded in the Book of Constitutions.
+
+In the presence of the Grand Master, the office of Deputy is merely one of
+honour, without the necessity of performing any duties, and without the
+power of exercising any prerogatives.
+
+There cannot be more than one Deputy Grand Master in a jurisdiction; so
+that the appointment of a greater number, as is the case in some of the
+States, is a manifest innovation on the ancient usages. District Deputy
+Grand Masters, which officers are also a modern invention of this
+country, seem to take the place in some degree of the Provincial Grand
+Masters of England, but they are not invested with the same prerogatives.
+The office is one of local origin, and its powers and duties are
+prescribed by the local regulations of the Grand Lodge which may have
+established it.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Grand Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Grand Wardens were originally appointed, like the
+Deputy, by the Grand Master, and are still so appointed in England; but in
+this country they are universally elected by the Grand Lodge. Their duties
+do not materially differ from those performed by the corresponding
+officers in a subordinate lodge. They accompany the Grand Master in his
+visitations, and assume the stations of the Wardens of the lodge visited.
+
+According to the regulations of 1721, the Master of the oldest lodge
+present was directed to take the chair of the Grand Lodge in the absence
+of both the Grand Master and Deputy; but this was found to be an
+interference with the rights of the Grand Wardens, and it was therefore
+subsequently declared that, in the absence of the Grand Master and Deputy,
+the last former Grand Master or Deputy should preside. But if no Past
+Grand or Past Deputy Grand Master should be present, then the Senior Grand
+Warden was to fill the chair, and, in his absence, the Junior Grand
+Warden, and lastly, in absence of both these, then the oldest
+Freemason[26] who is the present Master of a lodge. In this country,
+however, most of the Grand Lodges have altered this regulation, and the
+Wardens succeed according to seniority to the chair of the absent Grand
+Master and Deputy, in preference to any Past Grand Officer.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Grand Treasurer._
+
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer was first established in 1724, in
+consequence of a report of the Committee of Charity of the Grand Lodge of
+England. But no one was found to hold the trust until the 24th of June,
+1727, when, at the request of the Grand Master, the appointment was
+accepted by Nathaniel Blackerby, Deputy Grand Master. The duties of the
+office do not at all differ from those of a corresponding one in every
+other society; but as the trust is an important one in a pecuniary view,
+it has generally been deemed prudent that it should only be committed to
+"a brother of good worldly substance," whose ample means would place him
+beyond the chances of temptation.
+
+The office of Grand Treasurer has this peculiarity, that while all the
+other officers below the Grand Master were originally, and still are in
+England, appointed, that alone was always elective.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Grand Secretary._
+
+
+This is one of the most important offices in the Grand Lodge, and should
+always be occupied by a Brother of intelligence and education, whose
+abilities may reflect honor on the institution of which he is the
+accredited public organ. The office was established in the year 1723,
+during the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Wharton, previous to which
+time the duties appear to have been discharged by the Grand Wardens.
+
+The Grand Secretary not only records the proceedings of the Grand Lodge,
+but conducts its correspondence, and is the medium through whom all
+applications on masonic subjects are to be made to the Grand Master, or
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+According to the regulations of the Grand Lodges of England, New York and
+South Carolina, the Grand Secretary may appoint an assistant, who is not,
+however, by virtue of such appointment, a member of the Grand Lodge. The
+same privilege is also extended in South Carolina to the Grand Treasurer.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Grand Chaplain._
+
+
+This is the last of the Grand Offices that was established, having been
+instituted on the 1st of May, in the year 1775. The duties are confined to
+the reading of prayers, and other sacred portions of the ritual, in
+consecrations, dedications, funeral services, etc. The office confers no
+masonic authority at all, except that of a seat and a vote in the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Grand Deacons._
+
+
+But little need be said of the Grand Deacons. Their duties correspond to
+those of the same officers in subordinate lodges. The office of the
+Deacons, even in a subordinate lodge, is of comparatively modern
+institution. Dr. Oliver remarks that they are not mentioned in any of the
+early Constitutions of Masonry, nor even so late as 1797, when Stephen
+Jones wrote his "Masonic Miscellanies," and he thinks it "satisfactorily
+proved that Deacons were not considered necessary, in working the business
+of a lodge, before the very latter end of the eighteenth century."[27]
+
+But although the Deacons are not mentioned in the various works published
+previous to that period, which are quoted by Dr. Oliver, it is
+nevertheless certain that the office existed at a time much earlier than
+that which he supposes. In a work in my possession, and which is now lying
+before me, entitled "Every Young Man's Companion, etc., by W. Gordon,
+Teacher of the Mathematics," sixth edition printed at London, in 1777,
+there is a section, extending from page 413 to page 426, which is
+dedicated to the subject of Freemasonry and to a description of the
+working of a subordinate lodge. Here the Senior and Junior Deacons are
+enumerated among the officers, their exact positions described and their
+duties detailed, differing in no respect from the explanations of our own
+ritual at the present day. The positive testimony of this book must of
+course outweigh the negative testimony of the authorities quoted by
+Oliver, and shows the existence in England of Deacons in the year 1777 at
+least.
+
+It is also certain that the office of Deacon claims an earlier origin in
+America than the "very latter end of the eighteenth century;" and, as an
+evidence of this, it may be stated that, in the "Ahiman Rezon" of
+Pennsylvania, published in 1783, the Grand Deacons are named among the
+officers of the Grand Lodge, "as particular assistants to the Grand
+Master and Senior Warden, in conducting the business of the Lodge." They
+are to be found in all Grand Lodges of the York Rite, and are usually
+appointed, the Senior by the Grand Master, and the Junior by the Senior
+Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Grand Marshal._
+
+
+The _Grand Marshal_, as an officer of convenience, existed from an early
+period. We find him mentioned in the procession of the Grand Lodge, made
+in 1731, where he is described as carrying "a truncheon, blue, tipped with
+gold," insignia which he still retains. He takes no part in the usual work
+of the Lodge; but his duties are confined to the proclamation of the Grand
+Officers at their installation, and to the arrangement and superintendence
+of public processions.
+
+The Grand Marshal is usually appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the Grand Stewards._
+
+
+The first mention that is made of Stewards is in the Old Regulations,
+adopted in 1721. Previous to that time, the arrangements of the Grand
+Feast were placed in the hands of the Grand Wardens; and it was to relieve
+them of this labor that the regulation was adopted, authorizing the Grand
+Master, or his Deputy, to appoint a certain number of Stewards, who were
+to act in concert with the Grand Wardens. In 1728, it was ordered that the
+number of Stewards to be appointed should be twelve. In 1731, a regulation
+was adopted, permitting the Grand Stewards to appoint their successors.
+And, in 1735, the Grand Lodge ordered, that, "in consideration of their
+past service and future usefulness," they should be constituted a Lodge of
+Masters, to be called the Stewards' Lodge, which should have a registry in
+the Grand Lodge list, and exercise the privilege of sending twelve
+representatives. This was the origin of that body now known in the
+Constitutions of the Grand Lodges of England and New York,[28] as the
+Grand Stewards' Lodge, although it has been very extensively modified in
+its organization. In New York, it is now no more than a Standing Committee
+of the Grand Lodge; and in England, although it is regularly constituted,
+as a Lodge of Master Masons, it is by a special regulation deprived of all
+power of entering, passing, or raising Masons. In other jurisdictions, the
+office of Grand Stewards is still preserved, but their functions are
+confined to their original purpose of preparing and superintending the
+Grand Feast.
+
+The appointment of the Grand Stewards should be most appropriately vested
+in the Junior Grand Warden.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of the Grand Sword-Bearer._
+
+
+_Grand Sword-Bearer._--It was an ancient feudal custom, that all great
+dignitaries should have a sword of state borne before them, as the
+insignia of their dignity. This usage has to this day been preserved in
+the Masonic Institution, and the Grand Master's sword of state is still
+borne in all public processions by an officer specially appointed for that
+purpose. Some years after the reorganization of the Grand Lodge of
+England, the sword was borne by the Master of the Lodge to which it
+belonged; but, in 1730, the Duke of Norfolk, being then Grand Master,
+presented to the Grand Lodge the sword of Gustavus Adolphus, King of
+Sweden, which had afterwards been used in war by Bernard, Duke of Saxe
+Weimar, and which the Grand Master directed should thereafter be adopted
+as his sword of state. In consequence of this donation, the office of
+Grand Sword-Bearer was instituted in the following year. The office is
+still retained; but some Grand Lodges have changed the name to that of
+_Grand Pursuivant_.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Grand Tiler._
+
+
+It is evident from the Constitutions of Masonry, as well as from the
+peculiar character of the institution, that the office of Grand Tiler must
+have existed from the very first organization of a Grand Lodge. As, from
+the nature of the duties that he has to perform, the Grand Tiler is
+necessarily excluded from partaking of the discussions, or witnessing the
+proceedings of the Grand Lodge, it has very generally been determined,
+from a principle of expediency, that he shall not be a member of the Grand
+Lodge during the term of his office.
+
+The Grand Tiler is sometimes elected by the Grand Lodge, and sometimes
+appointed by the Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Powers and Prerogatives of a Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_General View._
+
+
+The necessary and usual officers of a Grand Lodge having been described,
+the rights, powers, and prerogatives of such a body is the next subject of
+our inquiry.
+
+The foundation-stone, upon which the whole superstructure of masonic
+authority in the Grand Lodge is built, is to be found in that conditional
+clause annexed to the thirty-eight articles, adopted in 1721 by the Masons
+of England, and which is in these words:
+
+"Every annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and authority to make new
+regulations, or to alter these for the real benefit of this ancient
+fraternity; PROVIDED ALWAYS THAT THE OLD LANDMARKS BE CAREFULLY
+PRESERVED; and that such alterations and new regulations be proposed and
+agreed to at the third quarterly communication preceding the annual Grand
+Feast; and that they be offered also to the perusal of all the Brethren
+before dinner, in writing, even of the youngest Entered Apprentice: the
+approbation and consent of the majority of all the Brethren present being
+absolutely necessary, to make the same binding and obligatory."
+
+The expression which is put in capitals--"provided always that the old
+landmarks be carefully preserved"--is the limiting clause which must be
+steadily borne in mind, whenever we attempt to enumerate the powers of a
+Grand Lodge. It must never be forgotten (in the words of another
+regulation, adopted in 1723, and incorporated in the ritual of
+installation), that "it is not in the power of any man, or body of men, to
+make any alteration or innovation in the body of Masonry."
+
+"With these views to limit us, the powers of a Grand Lodge may be
+enumerated in the language which has been adopted in the modern
+constitutions of England, and which seem to us, after a careful
+comparison, to be as comprehensive and correct as any that we have been
+able to examine. This enumeration is in the following language:
+
+"In the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting laws and
+regulations for the permanent government of the craft, and of altering,
+repealing, and abrogating them, always taking care that the ancient
+landmarks of the order are preserved. The Grand Lodge has also the
+inherent power of investigating, regulating, and deciding all matters
+relative to the craft, or to particular lodges, or to individual Brothers,
+which it may exercise either of itself, or by such delegated authority, as
+in its wisdom and discretion it may appoint; but in the Grand Lodge alone
+resides the power of erasing lodges, and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate authority
+in England."
+
+In this enumeration we discover the existence of three distinct classes of
+powers:--1, a legislative power; 2, a judicial power; and 3, an executive
+power. Each of these will occupy a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Legislative Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+In the passage already quoted from the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England it is said, "in the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of
+enacting laws and regulations for the government of the craft, and of
+altering, repealing, and abrogating them." General regulations for the
+government of the whole craft throughout the world can no longer be
+enacted by a Grand Lodge. The multiplication of these bodies, since the
+year 1717, has so divided the supremacy that no regulation now enacted can
+have the force and authority of those adopted by the Grand Lodge of
+England in 1721, and which now constitute a part of the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and as such are unchangeable by any modern Grand Lodge.
+
+Any Grand Lodge may, however, enact local laws for the direction of its
+own special affairs, and has also the prerogative of enacting the
+regulations which are to govern all its subordinates and the craft
+generally in its own jurisdiction. From this legislative power, which
+belongs exclusively to the Grand Lodge, it follows that no subordinate
+lodge can make any new bye-laws, nor alter its old ones, without the
+approval and confirmation of the Grand Lodge. Hence, the rules and
+regulations of every lodge are inoperative until they are submitted to and
+approved by the Grand Lodge. The confirmation of that body is the enacting
+clause; and, therefore, strictly speaking, it may be said that the
+subordinates only propose the bye-laws, and the Grand Lodge enacts them.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Judicial Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The passage already quoted from the English Constitutions continues to
+say, that "the Grand Lodge has the inherent power of investigating,
+regulating and deciding all matters relative to the craft, or to
+particular lodges, or to individual Brothers, which it may exercise,
+either of itself, or by such delegated authority as in its wisdom and
+discretion it may appoint." Under the first clause of this section, the
+Grand Lodge is constituted as the Supreme Masonic Tribunal of its
+jurisdiction. But as it would be impossible for that body to investigate
+every masonic offense that occurs within its territorial limits, with that
+full and considerate attention that the principles of justice require, it
+has, under the latter clause of the section, delegated this duty, in
+general, to the subordinate lodges, who are to act as its committees, and
+to report the results of their inquiry for its final disposition. From
+this course of action has risen the erroneous opinion of some persons,
+that the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge is only appellate in its
+character. Such is not the case. The Grand Lodge possesses an original
+jurisdiction over all causes occurring within its limits. It is only for
+expediency that it remits the examination of the merits of any case to a
+subordinate lodge as a _quasi_ committee. It may, if it thinks proper,
+commence the investigation of any matter concerning either a lodge, or an
+individual brother within its own bosom, and whenever an appeal from the
+decision of a lodge is made, which, in reality, is only a dissent from the
+report of the lodge, the Grand Lodge does actually recommence the
+investigation _de novo_, and, taking the matter out of the lodge, to whom
+by its general usage it had been primarily referred, it places it in the
+hands of another committee of its own body for a new report. The course of
+action is, it is true, similar to that in law, of an appeal from an
+inferior to a superior tribunal. But the principle is different. The Grand
+Lodge simply confirms or rejects the report that has been made to it, and
+it may do that without any appeal having been entered. It may, in fact,
+dispense with the necessity of an investigation by and report from a
+subordinate lodge altogether, and undertake the trial itself from the
+very inception. But this, though a constitutional, is an unusual course.
+The subordinate lodge is the instrument which the Grand Lodge employs in
+considering the investigation. It may or it may not make use of the
+instrument, as it pleases.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Executive Power of a Grand Lodge._
+
+
+The English Constitutions conclude, in the passage that has formed the
+basis of our previous remarks, by asserting that "in the Grand Lodge,
+alone, resides the power of erasing lodges and expelling Brethren from the
+craft, a power which it ought not to delegate to any subordinate
+authority." The power of the Grand Lodge to erase lodges is accompanied
+with a coincident power of constituting new lodges. This power it
+originally shared with the Grand Master, and still does in England; but in
+this country the power of the Grand Lodge is paramount to that of the
+Grand Master. The latter can only constitute lodges temporarily, by
+dispensation, and his act must be confirmed, or may be annulled by the
+Grand Lodge. It is not until a lodge has received its Warrant of
+Constitution from the Grand Lodge, that it can assume the rank and
+exercise the prerogatives of a regular and legal lodge.
+
+The expelling power is one that is very properly intrusted to the Grand
+Lodge, which is the only tribunal that should impose a penalty affecting
+the relations of the punished party with the whole fraternity. Some of the
+lodges in this country have claimed the right to expel independently of
+the action of the Grand Lodge. But the claim is founded on an erroneous
+assumption of powers that have never existed, and which are not recognized
+by the ancient constitutions, nor the general usages of the fraternity. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, under the provisions which
+have already been stated, and, according to the general usage of lodges in
+the United States, declares him expelled. But the sentence is of no force
+nor effect until it has been confirmed by the Grand Lodge, which may, or
+may not, give the required confirmation, and which, indeed, often refuses
+to do so, but actually reverses the sentence. It is apparent, from the
+views already expressed on the judicial powers of the Grand Lodge, that
+the sentence of expulsion uttered by the subordinate is to be taken in
+the sense of a recommendatory report, and that it is the confirmation and
+adoption of that report by the Grand Lodge that alone gives it vitality
+and effect.
+
+The expelling power presumes, of course, coincidently, the reinstating
+power. As the Grand Lodge alone can expel, it also alone can reinstate.
+
+These constitute the general powers and prerogatives of a Grand Lodge. Of
+course there are other local powers, assumed by various Grand Lodges, and
+differing in the several jurisdictions, but they are all derived from some
+one of the three classes that we have enumerated. From these views, it
+will appear that a Grand Lodge is the supreme legislative, judicial, and
+executive authority of the Masonic jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+It is, to use a feudal term, "the lord paramount" in Masonry. It is a
+representative body, in which, however, it constituents have delegated
+everything and reserved no rights to themselves. Its authority is almost
+unlimited, for it is restrained by but a single check:--_It cannot alter
+or remove the ancient landmarks_.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Second
+
+Laws of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+Having thus succinctly treated of the law in relation to Grand Lodges, I
+come next in order to consider the law as it respects the organization,
+rights, powers, and privileges of subordinate Lodges; and the first
+question that will engage our attention will be, as to the proper method
+of organizing a Lodge.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Nature and Organization of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+The old charges define a Lodge to be "a place where Masons assemble and
+work;" and also "that assembly, or duly organized society of Masons." The
+lecture on the first degree gives a still more precise definition. It says
+that "a lodge is an assemblage of Masons, duly congregated, having the
+Holy Bible, square, and compasses, and a charter, or warrant of
+constitution, empowering them to work."
+
+Every lodge of Masons requires for its proper organization, that it should
+have been congregated by the permission of some superior authority, which
+may be either a Grand Master or a Grand Lodge. When a lodge is organized
+by the authority of a Grand Master, it is said to work under a
+Dispensation, and when by the authority of a Grand Lodge, it is said to
+work under a warrant of constitution. In the history of a lodge, the
+former authority generally precedes the latter, the lodge usually working
+for some time under the dispensation of the Grand Master, before it is
+regularly warranted by the Grand Lodge. But this is not necessarily the
+case. A Grand Lodge will sometimes grant a warrant of constitution at
+once, without the previous exercise, on the part of the Grand Master, of
+his dispensing power. As it is, however, more usually the practice for the
+dispensation to precede the warrant of constitution, I shall explain the
+formation of a lodge according to that method.
+
+Any number of Master Masons, not under seven, being desirous of uniting
+themselves into a lodge, apply by petition to the Grand Master for the
+necessary authority. This petition must set forth that they now are, or
+have been, members of a regularly constituted lodge, and must assign, as a
+reason for their application, that they desire to form the lodge "for the
+conveniency of their respective dwellings," or some other sufficient
+reason. The petition must also name the brethren whom they desire to act
+as their Master and Wardens, and the place where they intend to meet; and
+it must be recommended by the nearest lodge.
+
+Dalcho says that not less than three Master Masons should sign the
+petition; but in this he differs from all the other authorities, which
+require not less than seven. This rule, too, seems to be founded in
+reason; for, as it requires seven Masons to constitute a quorum for
+opening and holding a lodge of Entered Apprentices, it would be absurd to
+authorize a smaller number to organize a lodge which, after its
+organization, could not be opened, nor make Masons in that degree.
+
+Preston says that the petition must be recommended "by the Masters of
+three regular lodges adjacent to the place where the new lodge is to be
+held." Dalcho says it must be recommended "by three other known and
+approved Master Masons," but does not make any allusion to any adjacent
+lodge. The laws and regulations of the Grand Lodge of Scotland require the
+recommendation to be signed "by the Masters and officers of two of the
+nearest lodges." The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England require
+that it must be recommended "by the officers of some regular lodge." The
+recommendation of a neighboring lodge is the general usage of the craft,
+and is intended to certify to the superior authority, on the very best
+evidence that can be obtained, that, namely, of an adjacent lodge, that
+the new lodge will be productive of no injury to the Order.
+
+If this petition be granted, the Grand Secretary prepares a document
+called a _dispensation_, which authorizes the officers named in the
+petition to open and hold a lodge, and to "enter, pass, and raise
+Freemasons." The duration of this dispensasation is generally expressed on
+its face to be, "until it shall be revoked by the Grand Master or the
+Grand Lodge, or until a warrant of constitution is granted by the Grand
+Lodge." Preston says, that the Brethren named in it are authorized "to
+assemble as Masons for forty days, and until such time as a warrant of
+constitution can be obtained by command of the Grand Lodge, or that
+authority be recalled." But generally, usage continues the dispensation
+only until the next meeting of the Grand Lodge, when it is either revoked,
+or a warrant of constitution granted.
+
+If the dispensation be revoked by either the Grand Master or the Grand
+Lodge (for either has the power to do so), the lodge of course at once
+ceases to exist. Whatever funds or property it has accumulated revert, as
+in the case of all extinct lodges, to the Grand Lodge, which may be called
+the natural heir of its subordinates; but all the work done in the lodge,
+under the dispensation, is regular and legal, and all the Masons made by
+it are, in every sense of the term, "true and lawful Brethren."
+
+Let it be supposed, however, that the dispensation is confirmed or
+approved by the Grand Lodge, and we thus arrive at another step in the
+history of the new lodge. At the next sitting of the Grand Lodge, after
+the dispensation has been issued by the Grand Master, he states that fact
+to the Grand Lodge, when, either at his request, or on motion of some
+Brother, the vote is taken on the question of constituting the new lodge,
+and, if a majority are in favor of it, the Grand Secretary is ordered to
+grant a warrant of constitution.
+
+This instrument differs from a dispensation in many important particulars.
+It is signed by all the Grand Officers, and emanates from the Grand Lodge,
+while the dispensation emanates from the office of the Grand Master, and
+is signed by him alone. The authority of the dispensation is temporary,
+that of the warrant permanent; the one can be revoked at pleasure by the
+Grand Master, who granted it; the other only for cause shown, and by the
+Grand Lodge; the one bestows only a name, the other both a name and a
+number; the one confers only the power of holding a lodge and making
+Masons, the other not only confers these powers, but also those of
+installation and of succession in office. From these differences in the
+characters of the two documents, arise important differences in the powers
+and privileges of a lodge under dispensation and of one that has been
+regularly constituted. These differences shall hereafter be considered.
+
+The warrant having been granted, there still remain certain forms and
+ceremonies to be observed, before the lodge can take its place among the
+legal and registered lodges of the jurisdiction in which it is situated.
+These are its consecration, its dedication, its constitution, and the
+installation of its officers. We shall not fully enter into a description
+of these various ceremonies, because they are laid down at length in all
+the Monitors, and are readily accessible to our readers. It will be
+sufficient if we barely allude to their character.
+
+The ceremony of constitution is so called, because by it the lodge becomes
+constituted or established. Orthoepists define the verb to constitute, as
+signifying "to give a formal existence to anything." Hence, to constitute
+a lodge is to give it existence, character, and standing as such; and the
+instrument that warrants the person so constituting or establishing it, in
+this act, is very properly called the "warrant of constitution."
+
+The consecration, dedication, and constitution of a lodge must be
+performed by the Grand Master in person; or, if he cannot conveniently
+attend, by some Past Master appointed by him as his special proxy or
+representative for that purpose. On the appointed evening, the Grand
+Master, accompanied by his Grand Officers, repairs to the place where the
+new lodge is to hold its meetings, the lodge[29] having been placed in the
+centre of the room and decently covered with a piece of white linen or
+satin. Having taken the chair, he examines the records of the lodge and
+the warrant of constitution; the officers who have been chosen are
+presented before him, when he inquires of the Brethren if they continue
+satisfied with the choice they have made. The ceremony of consecration is
+then performed. The Lodge is uncovered; and corn, wine, and oil--the
+masonic elements of consecration--are poured upon it, accompanied by
+appropriate prayers and invocations, and the lodge is finally declared to
+be consecrated to the honor and glory of God.
+
+This ceremony of consecration has been handed down from the remotest
+antiquity. A consecrating--a separating from profane things, and making
+holy or devoting to sacred purposes--was practiced by both the Jews and
+the Pagans in relation to their temples, their altars, and all their
+sacred utensils. The tabernacle, as soon as it was completed, was
+consecrated to God by the unction of oil. Among the Pagan nations, the
+consecration of their temples was often performed with the most sumptuous
+offerings and ceremonies; but oil was, on all occasions, made use of as an
+element of the consecration. The lodge is, therefore, consecrated to
+denote that henceforth it is to be set apart as an asylum sacred to the
+cultivation of the great masonic principles of Friendship, Morality, and
+Brotherly Love. Thenceforth it becomes to the conscientious Mason a place
+worthy of his reverence; and he is tempted, as he passes over its
+threshold, to repeat the command given to Moses: "Put off thy shoes from
+off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground."
+
+The corn, wine, and oil are appropriately adopted as the Masonic elements
+of consecration, because of the symbolic signification which they present
+to the mind of the Mason. They are enumerated by David as among the
+greatest blessings which we receive from the bounty of Divine Providence.
+They were annually offered by the ancients as the first fruits, in a
+thank-offering for the gifts of the earth; and as representatives of "the
+corn of nourishment, the wine of refreshment, and the oil of joy," they
+symbolically instruct the Mason that to the Grand Master of the Universe
+he is indebted for the "health, peace, and plenty" that he enjoys.
+
+After the consecration of the lodge, follows its dedication. This is a
+simple ceremony, and principally consists in the pronunciation of a
+formula of words by which the lodge is declared to be dedicated to the
+holy Saints John, followed by an invocation that "every Brother may revere
+their character and imitate their virtues."
+
+Masonic tradition tells us that our ancient Brethren dedicated their
+lodges to King Solomon, because he was their first Most Excellent Grand
+Master; but that modern Masons dedicate theirs to St. John the Baptist and
+St. John the Evangelist, because they were two eminent patrons of Masonry.
+A more appropriate selection of patrons to whom to dedicate the lodge,
+could not easily have been made; since St. John the Baptist, by
+announcing the approach of Christ, and by the mystical ablution to which
+he subjected his proselytes, and which was afterwards adopted in the
+ceremony of initiation into Christianity, might well be considered as the
+Grand Hierophant of the Church; while the mysterious and emblematic nature
+of the Apocalypse assimilated the mode of teaching adopted by St. John the
+Evangelist to that practiced by the fraternity. Our Jewish Brethren
+usually dedicate their lodges to King Solomon, thus retaining their
+ancient patron, although they thereby lose the benefit of that portion of
+the Lectures which refers to the "lines parallel." The Grand Lodge of
+England, at the union in 1813, agreed to dedicate to Solomon and Moses,
+applying the parallels to the framer of the tabernacle and the builder of
+the temple; but they have no warranty for this in ancient usage, and it is
+unfortunately not the only innovation on the ancient landmarks that that
+Grand Lodge has lately permitted.
+
+The ceremony of dedication, like that of consecration, finds its archetype
+in the remotest antiquity. The Hebrews made no use of any new thing until
+they had first solemnly dedicated it. This ceremony was performed in
+relation even to private houses, as we may learn from the book of
+Deuteronomy.[30] The 30th Psalm is a song said to have been made by David
+on the dedication of the altar which he erected on the threshing-floor of
+Ornan the Jebusite, after the grievous plague which had nearly devastated
+the kingdom. Solomon, it will be recollected, dedicated the temple with
+solemn ceremonies, prayers, and thank-offerings. The ceremony of
+dedication is, indeed, alluded to in various portions of the Scriptures.
+
+Selden[31] says that among the Jews sacred things were both dedicated and
+consecrated; but that profane things, such as private houses, etc., were
+simply dedicated, without consecration. The same writer informs us that
+the Pagans borrowed the custom of consecrating and dedicating their sacred
+edifices, altars, and images, from the Hebrews.
+
+The Lodge having been thus consecrated to the solemn objects of
+Freemasonry, and dedicated to the patrons of the institution, it is at
+length prepared to be constituted. The ceremony of constitution is then
+performed by the Grand Master, who, rising from his seat, pronounces the
+following formulary of constitution:
+
+"In the name of the most Worshipful Grand Lodge, I now constitute and form
+you, my beloved Brethren, into a regular lodge of Free and Accepted
+Masons. From this time forth, I empower you to meet as a regular lodge,
+constituted in conformity to the rites of our Order, and the charges of
+our ancient and honorable fraternity;--and may the Supreme Architect of
+the Universe prosper, direct, and counsel you, in all your doings."
+
+This ceremony places the lodge among the registered lodges of the
+jurisdiction in which it is situated, and gives it a rank and standing and
+permanent existence that it did not have before. In one word, it has, by
+the consecration, dedication, and constitution, become what we technically
+term "a just and legally constituted lodge," and, as such, is entitled to
+certain rights and privileges, of which we shall hereafter speak. Still,
+however, although the lodge has been thus fully and completely organized,
+its officers have as yet no legal existence. To give them this, it is
+necessary that they be inducted into their respective offices, and each
+officer solemnly bound to the faithful performance of the duties he has
+undertaken to discharge. This constitutes the ceremony of installation.
+The Worshipful Master of the new lodge is required publicly to submit to
+the ancient charges; and then all, except Past Masters, having retired, he
+is invested with the Past Master's degree, and inducted into the oriental
+chair of King Solomon. The Brethren are then introduced, and due homage is
+paid to their new Master, after which the other officers are obligated to
+the faithful discharge of their respective trusts, invested with their
+insignia of office, and receive the appropriate charge. This ceremony must
+be repeated at every annual election and change of officers.
+
+The ancient rule was, that when the Grand Master and his officers attended
+to constitute a new lodge, the Deputy Grand Master invested the new
+Master, the Grand Wardens invested the new Wardens, and the Grand
+Treasurer and Grand Secretary invested the Treasurer and Secretary. But
+this regulation has become obsolete, and the whole installation and
+investiture are now performed by the Grand Master. On the occasion of
+subsequent installations, the retiring Master installs his successor; and
+the latter installs his subordinate officers.
+
+The ceremony of installation is derived from the ancient custom of
+inauguration, of which we find repeated instances in the sacred as well as
+profane writings. Aaron was inaugurated, or installed, by the unction of
+oil, and placing on him the vestments of the High Priest; and every
+succeeding High Priest was in like manner installed, before he was
+considered competent to discharge the duties of his office. Among the
+Romans, augurs, priests, kings, and, in the times of the republic, consuls
+were always inaugurated or installed. And hence, Cicero, who was an augur,
+speaking of Hortensius, says, "it was he who installed me as a member of
+the college of augurs, so that I was bound by the constitution of the
+order to respect and honour him as a parent."[32] The object and intention
+of the ancient inauguration and the Masonic installation are precisely the
+same, namely, that of setting apart and consecrating a person to the
+duties of a certain office.
+
+The ceremonies, thus briefly described, were not always necessary to
+legalize a congregation of Masons. Until the year 1717, the custom of
+confining the privileges of Masonry, by a warrant of constitution, to
+certain individuals, was wholly unknown. Previous to that time, a
+requisite number of Master Masons were authorized by the ancient charges
+to congregate together, temporarily, at their own discretion, and as best
+suited their convenience, and then and there to open and hold lodges and
+make Masons; making, however, their return, and paying their tribute to
+the General Assembly, to which all the fraternity annually repaired, and
+by whose awards the craft were governed.
+
+Preston, speaking of this ancient privilege, says: "A sufficient number of
+Masons met together within a certain district, with the consent of the
+sheriff or chief magistrate of the place, were empowered at this time to
+make Masons and practice the rights of Masonry, without a warrant of
+constitution." This privilege, Preston says, was inherent in them as
+individuals, and continued to be enjoyed by the old lodges, which formed
+the Grand Lodge in 1717, as long as they were in existence.
+
+But on the 24th June, 1717, the Grand Lodge of England adopted the
+following regulation: "That the privilege of assembling as Masons, which
+had hitherto been unlimited, should be vested in certain lodges or
+assemblies of Masons, convened in certain places; and that every lodge to
+be hereafter convened, except the four old lodges at this time existing,
+should be legally authorized to act by a warrant from the Grand Master for
+the time being, granted to certain individuals by petition, with the
+consent and approbation of the Grand Lodge in communication; and that,
+without such warrant, no lodge should be hereafter deemed regular or
+constitutional."
+
+This regulation has ever since continued in force, and it is the original
+law under which warrants of constitution are now granted by Grand Lodges
+for the organization of their subordinates.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Lodges under Dispensation.
+
+
+
+It is evident, from what has already been said, that there are two kinds
+of lodges, each regular in itself, but each peculiar and distinct in its
+character. There are lodges working under a dispensation, and lodges
+working under a warrant of constitution. Each of these will require a
+separate consideration. The former will be the subject of the present
+chapter.
+
+A lodge working under a dispensation is a merely temporary body,
+originated for a special purpose, and is therefore possessed of very
+circumscribed powers. The dispensation, or authority under which it acts,
+expressly specifies that the persons to whom it is given are allowed to
+congregate that they may "admit, enter, pass, and raise Freemasons;" no
+other powers are conferred either by words or implication, and, indeed,
+sometimes the dispensation states, that that congregation is to be "with
+the sole intent and view, that the Brethren so congregated, admitted,
+entered, and made, when they become a sufficient number, may be duly
+warranted and constituted for being and holding a regular lodge."[33]
+
+A lodge under dispensation is simply the creature of the Grand Master. To
+him it is indebted for its existence, and on his will depends the duration
+of that existence. He may at any time revoke the dispensation, and the
+dissolution of the lodge would be the instant result. Hence a lodge
+working under a dispensation can scarcely, with strict technical
+propriety, be called a lodge; it is, more properly speaking, a
+congregation of Masons, acting as the proxy of the Grand Master.
+
+With these views of the origin and character of lodges under dispensation,
+we will be better prepared to understand the nature and extent of the
+powers which they possess.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can make no bye-laws. It is governed, during
+its temporary existence, by the general Constitutions of the Order and the
+rules and regulations of the Grand Lodge in whose jurisdiction it is
+situated. In fact, as the bye-laws of no lodge are operative until they
+are confirmed by the Grand Lodge, and as a lodge working under a
+dispensation ceases to exist as such as soon as the Grand Lodge meets, it
+is evident that it would be absurd to frame a code of laws which would
+have no efficacy, for want of proper confirmation, and which, when the
+time and opportunity for confirmation had arrived, would be needless, as
+the society for which they were framed would then have no legal
+existence--a new body (the warranted lodge) having taken its place.
+
+A lodge under dispensation cannot elect officers. The Master and Wardens
+are nominated by the Brethren, and, if this nomination is approved, they
+are appointed by the Grand Master. In giving them permission to meet and
+make Masons, he gave them no power to do anything else. A dispensation is
+itself a setting aside of the law, and an exception to a general
+principle; it must, therefore, be construed literally. What is not granted
+in express terms, is not granted at all. And, therefore, as nothing is
+said of the election of officers, no such election can be held. The Master
+may, however, and always does for convenience, appoint a competent
+Brother to keep a record of the proceedings; but this is a temporary
+appointment, at the pleasure of the Master, whose deputy or assistant he
+is; for the Grand Lodge looks only to the Master for the records, and the
+office is not legally recognized. In like manner, he may depute a trusty
+Brother to take charge of the funds, and must, of course, from time to
+time, appoint the deacons and tiler for the necessary working of the
+lodge.
+
+As there can be no election, neither can there be any installation, which,
+of course, always presumes a previous election for a determinate period.
+Besides, the installation of officers is a part of the ceremony of
+constitution, and therefore not even the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+under dispensation are entitled to be thus solemnly inducted into office.
+
+A lodge under dispensation can elect no members. The Master and Wardens,
+who are named in the dispensation, are, in point of fact, the only persons
+recognized as constituting the lodge. To them is granted the privilege, as
+proxies of the Grand Master, of making Masons; and for this purpose they
+are authorized to congregate a sufficient number of Brethren to assist
+them in the ceremonies. But neither the Master and Wardens, nor the
+Brethren, thus congregated have received any power of electing members.
+Nor are the persons made in a lodge under dispensation, to be considered
+as members of the lodge; for, as has already been shown, they have none of
+the rights and privileges which attach to membership--they can neither
+make bye-laws nor elect officers. They, however, become members of the
+lodge as soon as it receives its warrant of constitution.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+
+Of Lodges Working under a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Powers and Rights of a Lodge._
+
+
+In respect to the powers and privileges possessed by a lodge working under
+a warrant of constitution, we may say, as a general principle, that
+whatever it does possess is inherent in it--nothing has been delegated by
+either the Grand Master or the Grand Lodge--but that all its rights and
+powers are derived originally from the ancient regulations, made before
+the existence of Grand Lodges, and that what it does not possess, are the
+powers which were conceded by its predecessors to the Grand Lodge. This is
+evident from the history of warrants of constitution, the authority under
+which subordinate lodges act. The practice of applying by petition to the
+Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, for a warrant to meet as a regular
+lodge, commenced in the year 1718. Previous to that time, Freemasons were
+empowered by inherent privileges, vested, from time immemorial, in the
+whole fraternity, to meet as occasion might require, under the direction
+of some able architect; and the proceedings of these meetings, being
+approved by a majority of the Brethren convened at another lodge in the
+same district, were deemed constitutional.[34] But in 1718, a year after
+the formation of the Grand Lodge of England, this power of meeting _ad
+libitum_ was resigned into the hands of that body, and it was then agreed
+that no lodges should thereafter meet, unless authorized so to do by a
+warrant from the Grand Master, and with the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+But as a memorial that this abandonment of the ancient right was entirely
+voluntary, it was at the same time resolved that this inherent privilege
+should continue to be enjoyed by the four old lodges who formed the Grand
+Lodge. And, still more effectually to secure the reserved rights of the
+lodges, it was also solemnly determined, that while the Grand Lodge
+possesses the inherent right of making new regulations for the good of the
+fraternity, provided that the _old landmarks be carefully preserved_, yet
+that these regulations, to be of force, must be proposed and agreed to at
+the third quarterly communication preceding the annual grand feast, and
+submitted to the perusal of all the Brethren, in writing, even of the
+youngest entered apprentice; "_the approbation and consent of the majority
+of all the Brethren present being absolutely necessary, to make the same
+binding and obligatory_."[35]
+
+The corollary from all this is clear. All the rights, powers, and
+privileges, not conceded, by express enactment of the fraternity, to the
+Grand Lodge, have been reserved to themselves. Subordinate lodges are the
+assemblies of the craft in their primary capacity, and the Grand Lodge is
+the Supreme Masonic Tribunal, only because it consists of and is
+constituted by a representation of these primary assemblies. And,
+therefore, as every act of the Grand Lodge is an act of the whole
+fraternity thus represented, each new regulation that may be made is not
+an assumption of authority on the part of the Grand Lodge, but a new
+concession on the part of the subordinate lodges.
+
+This doctrine of the reserved rights of the lodges is very important, and
+should never be forgotten, because it affords much aid in the decision of
+many obscure points of masonic jurisprudence. The rule is, that any
+doubtful power exists and is inherent in the subordinate lodges, unless
+there is an express regulation conferring it on the Grand Lodge. With this
+preliminary view, we may proceed to investigate the nature and extent of
+these reserved powers of the subordinate lodges.
+
+A lodge has the right of selecting its own members, with which the Grand
+Lodge cannot interfere. This is a right that the lodges have expressly
+reserved to themselves, and the stipulation is inserted in the "general
+regulations" in the following words:
+
+"No man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a
+member thereof, without the unanimous consent of all the members of that
+lodge then present, when the candidate is proposed, and when their consent
+is formally asked by the Master. They are to give their consent in their
+own prudent way, either virtually or in form, but with unanimity. Nor is
+this inherent privilege subject to a dispensation, because the members of
+a particular lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a turbulent
+member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their harmony, or
+hinder the freedom of their communication; or even break and disperse the
+lodge, which ought to be avoided by all true and faithful."[36]
+
+But although a lodge has the inherent right to require unanimity in the
+election of a candidate, it is not necessarily restricted to such a degree
+of rigor.
+
+A lodge has the right to elect its own officers. This right is guaranteed
+to it by the words of the Warrant of Constitution. Still the right is
+subject to certain restraining regulations. The election must be held at
+the proper time, which, according to the usage of Masonry, in most parts
+of the world, is on or immediately before the festival of St. John the
+Evangelist. The proper qualifications must be regarded. A member cannot be
+elected as Master, unless he has previously served as a Warden, except in
+the instance of a new lodge, or other case of emergency. Where both of the
+Wardens refuse promotion, where the presiding Master will not permit
+himself to be reelected, and where there is no Past Master who will
+consent to take the office, then, and then only, can a member be elected
+from the floor to preside over the lodge.
+
+By the Constitutions of England, only the Master and Treasurer are elected
+officers.[37] The Wardens and all the other officers are appointed by the
+Master, who has not, however, the power of removal after appointment,
+except by consent of the lodge;[38] but American usage gives the election
+of all the officers, except the deacons, stewards, and, in some instances,
+the tiler, to the lodge.
+
+As a consequence of the right of election, every lodge has the power of
+installing its officers, subject to the same regulations, in relation to
+time and qualifications, as given in the case of elections.
+
+The Master must be installed by a Past Master,[39] but after his own
+installation he has the power to install the rest of the officers. The
+ceremony of installation is not a mere vain and idle one, but is
+productive of important results. Until the Master and Wardens of a lodge
+are installed, they cannot represent the lodge in the Grand Lodge, nor, if
+it be a new lodge, can it be recorded and recognized on the register of
+the Grand Lodge. No officer can permanently take possession of the office
+to which he has been elected, until he has been duly installed.[40] The
+rule of the craft is, that the old officer holds on until his successor is
+installed, and this rule is of universal application to officers of every
+grade, from the Tiler of a subordinate lodge, to the Grand Master of
+Masons.
+
+Every lodge that has been duly constituted, and its officers installed, is
+entitled to be represented in the Grand Lodge, and to form, indeed, a
+constituent part of that body.[41] The representatives of a lodge are its
+Master and two Wardens.[42] This character of representation was
+established in 1718, when the four old lodges, which organized the Grand
+Lodge of England, agreed "to extend their patronage to every lodge which
+should hereafter be constituted by the Grand Lodge, according to the new
+regulations of the society; and while such lodges acted in conformity to
+the ancient constitutions of the Order, to admit their Masters and Wardens
+to share with them all the privileges of the Grand Lodge, excepting
+precedence of rank."[43] Formerly all Master Masons were permitted to sit
+in the Grand Lodge, or, as it was then called, the General Assembly, and
+represent their lodge; and therefore this restricting the representation
+to the three superior officers was, in fact, a concession of the craft.
+This regulation is still generally observed; but I regret to see a few
+Grand Lodges in this country innovating on the usage, and still further
+confining the representation to the Masters alone.
+
+The Master and Wardens are not merely in name the representatives of the
+lodge, but are bound, on all questions that come before the Grand Lodge,
+truly to represent their lodge, and vote according to its instructions.
+This doctrine is expressly laid down in the General Regulations, in the
+following words: "The majority of every particular lodge, when
+congregated, not else, shall have the privilege of giving instructions to
+their Master and Wardens, before the meeting of the Grand Chapter, or
+Quarterly Communication; because the said officers are their
+representatives, and are supposed to speak the sentiments of their
+Brethren at the said Grand Lodge."[44]
+
+Every lodge has the power to frame bye-laws for its own government,
+provided they are not contrary to, nor inconsistent with, the general
+regulations of the Grand Lodge; nor the landmarks of the order.[45] But
+these bye-laws will not be valid, until they are submitted to and approved
+by the Grand Lodge. And this is the case, also, with every subsequent
+alteration of them, which must in like manner be submitted to the Grand
+Lodge for its approval.
+
+A lodge has the right of suspending or excluding a member from his
+membership in the lodge; but it has no power to expel him from the rights
+and privileges of Masonry, except with the consent of the Grand Lodge. A
+subordinate lodge tries its delinquent member, and, if guilty, declares
+him expelled; but the sentence is of no force until the Grand Lodge, under
+whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And it is optional
+with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done, to reverse the
+decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in this country
+claim the right to expel, independently of the action of the Grand Lodge;
+but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion is a penalty,
+affecting the general relations of the punished party with the whole
+fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with propriety, be
+intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a subordinate
+lodge. Accordingly, the general practice of the fraternity is opposed to
+it; and therefore all expulsions are reported to the Grand Lodge, not
+merely as matters of information, but that they may be confirmed by that
+body. The English Constitutions are explicit on this subject. "In the
+Grand Lodge alone," they declare, "resides the power of erasing lodges and
+expelling Brethren from the craft, a power which it ought not to delegate
+to any subordinate authority in England." They allow, however, a
+subordinate lodge to _exclude_ a member from the lodge; in which case he
+is furnished with a certificate of the circumstances of his exclusion, and
+then may join any other lodge that will accept him, after being made
+acquainted with the fact of his exclusion, and its cause. This usage has
+not been adopted in this country.
+
+A lodge has a right to levy such annual contribution for membership as the
+majority of the Brethren see fit. This is entirely a matter of contract,
+with which the Grand Lodge, or the craft in general, have nothing to do.
+It is, indeed, a modern usage, unknown to the fraternity of former times,
+and was instituted for the convenience and support of the private lodges.
+
+A lodge is entitled to select a name for itself, to be, however, approved
+by the Grand Lodge.[46] But the Grand Lodge alone has the power of
+designating the number by which the lodge shall be distinguished. By its
+number alone is every lodge recognized in the register of the Grand Lodge,
+and according to their numbers is the precedence of the lodges regulated.
+
+Finally, a lodge has certain rights in relation to its Warrant of
+Constitution. This instrument having been granted by the Grand Lodge, can
+be revoked by no other authority. The Grand Master, therefore, has no
+power, as he has in the case of a lodge under dispensation, to withdraw
+its Warrant, except temporarily, until the next meeting of the Grand
+Lodge. Nor is it in the power of even the majority of the lodge, by any
+act of their own, to resign the Warrant. For it has been laid down as a
+law, that if the majority of the lodge should determine to quit the lodge,
+or to resign their warrant, such action would be of no efficacy, because
+the Warrant of Constitution, and the power of assembling, would remain
+with the rest of the members, who adhere to their allegiance.[47] But if
+all the members withdraw themselves, their Warrant ceases and becomes
+extinct. If the conduct of a lodge has been such as clearly to forfeit its
+charter, the Grand Lodge alone can decide that question and pronounce the
+forfeiture.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Duties of a Lodge._
+
+
+So far in relation to the rights and privileges of subordinate lodges. But
+there are certain duties and obligations equally binding upon these
+bodies, and certain powers, in the exercise of which they are restricted.
+These will next engage our attention.
+
+The first great duty, not only of every lodge, but of every Mason, is to
+see that the landmarks of the Order shall never be impaired. The General
+Regulations of Masonry--to which every Master, at his installation, is
+bound to acknowledge his submission--declare that "it is not in the power
+of any man, or body of men, to make innovations in the body of Masonry."
+And, hence, no lodge, without violating all the implied and express
+obligations into which it has entered, can, in any manner, alter or amend
+the work, lectures, and ceremonies of the institution. As its members
+have received the ritual from their predecessors, so are they bound to
+transmit it, unchanged, in the slightest degree, to their successors. In
+the Grand Lodge, alone, resides the power of enacting new regulations;
+but, even _it_ must be careful that, in every such regulation, the
+landmarks are preserved. When, therefore, we hear young and inexperienced
+Masters speak of making improvements (as they arrogantly call them) upon
+the old lectures or ceremonies, we may be sure that such Masters either
+know nothing of the duties they owe to the craft, or are willfully
+forgetful of the solemn obligation which they have contracted. Some may
+suppose that the ancient ritual of the Order is imperfect, and requires
+amendment. One may think that the ceremonies are too simple, and wish to
+increase them; another, that they are too complicated, and desire to
+simplify them; one may be displeased with the antiquated language;
+another, with the character of the traditions; a third, with something
+else. But, the rule is imperative and absolute, that no change can or must
+be made to gratify individual taste. As the Barons of England, once, with
+unanimous voice, exclaimed, "Nolumus leges Angliae mutare!" so do all good
+Masons respond to every attempt at innovation, "We are unwilling to alter
+the customs of Freemasonry."
+
+In relation to the election of officers, a subordinate lodge is allowed to
+exercise no discretion. The names and duties of these officers are
+prescribed, partly by the landmarks or the ancient constitutions, and
+partly by the regulations of various Grand Lodges. While the landmarks are
+preserved, a Grand Lodge may add to the list of officers as it pleases;
+and whatever may be its regulation, the subordinate lodges are bound to
+obey it; nor can any such lodge create new offices nor abolish old ones
+without the consent of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Lodges are also bound to elect their officers at a time which is always
+determined; not by the subordinate, but by the Grand Lodge. Nor can a
+lodge anticipate or postpone it unless by a dispensation from the Grand
+Master.
+
+No lodge can, at an extra meeting, alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular meeting. If such were not the rule, an unworthy Master might, by
+stealth, convoke an extra meeting of a part of his lodge, and, by
+expunging or altering the proceedings of the previous regular meeting, or
+any particular part of them, annul any measures or resolutions that were
+not consonant with his peculiar views.
+
+No lodge can interfere with the work or business of any other lodge,
+without its permission. This is an old regulation, founded on those
+principles of comity and brotherly love that should exist among all
+Masons. It is declared in the manuscript charges, written in the reign of
+James II., and in the possession of the Lodge of Antiquity, at London,
+that "no Master or Fellow shall supplant others of their work; that is to
+say, that, if he hath taken a work, or else stand Master of any work, that
+he shall not put him out, unless he be unable of cunning to make an end of
+his work." And, hence, no lodge can pass or raise a candidate who was
+initiated, or initiate one who was rejected, in another lodge. "It would
+be highly improper," says the Ahiman Rezon, "in any lodge, to confer a
+degree on a Brother who is not of their house-hold; for, every lodge
+ought to be competent to manage their own business, and are the best
+judges of the qualifications of their own members."
+
+I do not intend, at the present time, to investigate the qualifications of
+candidates--as that subject will, in itself, afford ample materials for a
+future investigation; but, it is necessary that I should say something of
+the restrictions under which every lodge labors in respect to the
+admission of persons applying for degrees.
+
+In the first place, no lodge can initiate a candidate, "without previous
+notice, and due examination into his character; and not unless his
+petition has been read at one regular meeting and acted on at another."
+This is in accordance with the ancient regulations; but, an exception to
+it is allowed in the case of an emergency, when the lodge may read the
+petition for admission, and, if the applicant is well recommended, may
+proceed at once to elect and initiate him. In some jurisdictions, the
+nature of the emergency must be stated to the Grand Master, who, if he
+approves, will grant a dispensation; but, in others, the Master, or Master
+and Wardens, are permitted to be competent judges, and may proceed to
+elect and initiate, without such dispensation. The Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina adheres to the former custom, and that of England to the latter.
+
+Another regulation is, that no lodge can confer more than two degrees, at
+one communication, on the same candidate. The Grand Lodge of England is
+still more stringent on this subject, and declares that "no candidate
+shall be permitted to receive more than one degree, on the same day; nor
+shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother at a less
+interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree, nor until
+he has passed an examination, in open lodge, in that degree." This rule is
+also in force in South Carolina and several other of the American
+jurisdictions. But, the law which forbids the whole three degrees of
+Ancient Craft Masonry to be conferred, at the same communication, on one
+candidate, is universal in its application, and, as such, may be deemed
+one of the ancient landmarks of the Order.
+
+There is another rule, which seems to be of universal extent, and is,
+indeed, contained in the General Regulations of 1767, to the following
+effect: "No lodge shall make more than five new Brothers at one and the
+same time, without an urgent necessity."
+
+All lodges are bound to hold their meetings at least once in every
+calendar month; and every lodge neglecting so to do for one year, thereby
+forfeits its warrant of constitution.
+
+The subject of the removal of lodges is the last thing that shall engage
+our attention. Here the ancient regulations of the craft have adopted many
+guards to prevent the capricious or improper removal of a lodge from its
+regular place of meeting. In the first place, no lodge can be removed from
+the town in which it is situated, to any other place, without the consent
+of the Grand Lodge. But, a lodge may remove from one part of the town to
+another, with the consent of the members, under the following
+restrictions: The removal cannot be made without the Master's knowledge;
+nor can any motion, for that purpose, be presented in his absence. When
+such a motion is made, and properly seconded, the Master will order
+summonses to every member, specifying the business, and appointing a day
+for considering and determining the affair. And if then a majority of the
+lodge, with the Master, or two-thirds, without him, consent to the
+removal, it shall take place; but notice thereof must be sent, at once, to
+the Grand Lodge. The General Regulations of 1767 further declare, that
+such removal must be approved by the Grand Master. I suppose that where
+the removal of the lodge was only a matter of convenience to the members,
+the Grand Lodge would hardly interfere, but leave the whole subject to
+their discretion; but, where the removal would be calculated to affect the
+interests of the lodge, or of the fraternity--as in the case of a removal
+to a house of bad reputation, or to a place of evident insecurity--I have
+no doubt that the Grand Lodge, as the conservator of the character and
+safety of the institution, would have a right to interpose its authority,
+and prevent the improper removal.
+
+I have thus treated, as concisely as the important nature of the subjects
+would permit, of the powers, privileges, duties, and obligations of
+lodges, and have endeavored to embrace, within the limits of the
+discussion, all those prominent principles of the Order, which, as they
+affect the character and operations of the craft in their primary
+assemblies, may properly be referred to the Law of Subordinate Lodges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Officers of a Subordinate Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Officers in General._
+
+
+Four officers, at least, the ancient customs of the craft require in every
+lodge; and they are consequently found throughout the globe. These are the
+Master, the two Wardens, and the Tiler. Almost equally universal are the
+offices of Treasurer, Secretary, and two Deacons. But, besides these,
+there may be additional officers appointed by different Grand Lodges. The
+Grand Lodge of England, for instance, requires the appointment of an
+officer, called the "Inner Guard." The Grand Orient of France has
+prescribed a variety of officers, which are unknown to English and
+American Masonry. The Grand Lodges of England and South Carolina direct
+that two Stewards shall be appointed, while some other Grand Lodges make
+no such requisition. Ancient usage seems to have recognized the following
+officers of a subordinate lodge: the Master, two Wardens, Treasurer,
+Secretary, two Deacons, two Stewards, and Tiler; and I shall therefore
+treat of the duties and powers of these officers only, in the course of
+the present chapter.
+
+The officers of a lodge are elected annually. In this country, the
+election takes place on the festival of St. John the Evangelist, or at the
+meeting immediately previous; but, in this latter case, the duties of the
+offices do not commence until St. John's day, which may, therefore, be
+considered as the beginning of the masonic year.
+
+Dalcho lays down the rule, that "no Freemason chosen into any office can
+refuse to serve (unless he has before filled the same office), without
+incurring the penalties established by the bye-laws." Undoubtedly a lodge
+may enact such a regulation, and affix any reasonable penalty; but I am
+not aware of any ancient regulation which makes it incumbent on
+subordinate lodges to do so.
+
+If any of the subordinate officers, except the Master and Wardens, die, or
+be removed from office, during the year, the lodge may, under the
+authority of a dispensation from the Grand Master, enter into an election
+to supply the vacancy. But in the case of the death or removal of the
+Master or either of the Wardens, no election can be held to supply the
+vacancy, even by dispensation, for reasons which will appear when I come
+to treat of those offices.
+
+No officer can resign his office after he has been installed. Every
+officer is elected for twelve months, and at his installation solemnly
+promises to perform the duties of that office until the next regular day
+of election; and hence the lodge cannot permit him, by a resignation, to
+violate his obligation of office.
+
+Another rule is, that every officer holds on to his office until his
+successor has been installed. It is the installation, and not the
+election, which puts an officer into possession; and the faithful
+management of the affairs of Masonry requires, that between the election
+and installation of his successor, the predecessor shall not vacate the
+office, but continue to discharge its duties.
+
+An office can be vacated only by death, permanent removal from the
+jurisdiction, or expulsion. Suspension does not vacate, but only suspends
+the performance of the duties of the office, which must then be
+temporarily discharged by some other person, to be appointed from time to
+time; for, as soon as the suspended officer is restored, he resumes the
+dignities and duties of his office.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Worshipful Master._
+
+
+This is probably the most important office in the whole system of Masonry,
+as, upon the intelligence, skill, and fidelity of the Masters of our
+lodges, the entire institution is dependent for its prosperity. It is an
+office which is charged with heavy responsibilities, and, as a just
+consequence, is accompanied by the investiture of many important powers.
+
+A necessary qualification of the Master of a lodge is, that he must have
+previously served in the office of a Warden.[48] This qualification is
+sometimes dispensed with in the case of new lodges, or where no member of
+an old lodge, who has served as a Warden, will accept the office of
+Master. But it is not necessary that he should have served as a Warden in
+the lodge of which he is proposed to be elected Master. The discharge of
+the duties of a Warden, by regular election and installation in any other
+lodge, and at any former period, will be a sufficient qualification.
+
+One of the most important duties of the Master of a lodge is, to see that
+the edicts and regulations of the Grand Lodge are obeyed by his Brethren,
+and that his officers faithfully discharge their duties.
+
+The Master has particularly in charge the warrant of Constitution, which
+must always be present in his lodge, when opened.
+
+The Master has a right to call a special meeting of his lodge whenever he
+pleases, and is the sole judge of any emergency which may require such
+special communication.
+
+He has, also, the right of closing his lodge at any hour that he may deem
+expedient, notwithstanding the whole business of the evening may not have
+been transacted. This regulation arises from the unwritten law of Masonry.
+As the Master is responsible to the Grand Lodge for the fidelity of the
+work done in his lodge, and as the whole of the labor is, therefore,
+performed under his superintendence, it follows that, to enable him to
+discharge this responsibility, he must be invested with the power of
+commencing, of continuing, or of suspending labor at such time as he may,
+in his wisdom, deem to be the most advantageous to the edifice of Masonry.
+
+It follows from this rule that a question of adjournment cannot be
+entertained in a lodge. The adoption of a resolution to adjourn, would
+involve the necessity of the Master to obey it. The power, therefore, of
+controlling the work, would be taken out of his hands and placed in those
+of the members, which would be in direct conflict with the duties imposed
+upon him by the ritual. The doctrine that a lodge cannot adjourn, but must
+be closed or called off at the pleasure of the Master, appears now to me
+to be very generally admitted.
+
+The Master and his two Wardens constitute the representatives of the lodge
+in the Grand Lodge, and it is his duty to attend the communications of
+that body "on all convenient occasions."[49] When there, he is faithfully
+to represent his lodge, and on all questions discussed, to obey its
+instructions, voting in every case rather against his own convictions than
+against the expressed wish of his lodge.
+
+The Master presides not only over the symbolic work of the lodge, but
+also over its business deliberations, and in either case his decisions are
+reversible only by the Grand Lodge. There can be no appeal from his
+decision, on any question, to the lodge. He is supreme in his lodge, so
+far as the lodge is concerned, being amenable for his conduct in the
+government of it, not to its members, but to the Grrand Lodge alone. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. If a member is aggrieved by the
+conduct or decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the
+Grrand Lodge, which will, of course, see that the Master does not rule his
+lodge "in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal
+from the Master of the lodge to its members is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This may, at first sight, appear to be giving too despotic power to the
+Master. But a slight reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but little danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as a
+Master is, by the sacred obligations of his office, and the supervision of
+the Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful,
+and at times, and with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of
+immediate appeal, would necessarily tend to impair the energies and
+lessen the dignity of the Master, while it would be subversive of that
+spirit of discipline which pervades every part of the institution, and to
+which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+The ancient charges rehearsed at the installation of a Master, prescribe
+the various moral qualifications which are required in the aspirant for
+that elevated and responsible office. He is to be a good man, and
+peaceable citizen or subject, a respecter of the laws, and a lover of his
+Brethren--cultivating the social virtues and promoting the general good of
+society as well as of his own Order.
+
+Within the last few years, the standard of intellectual qualifications has
+been greatly elevated. And it is now admitted that the Master of a lodge,
+to do justice to the exalted office which he holds, to the craft over whom
+he presides, and to the candidates whom he is to instruct, should be not
+only a man of irreproachable moral character, but also of expanded
+intellect and liberal education. Still, as there is no express law upon
+this subject, the selection of a Master and the determination of his
+qualifications must be left to the judgment and good sense of the
+members.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Wardens._
+
+
+The Senior and Junior Warden are the assistants of the Master in the
+government of the lodge. They are selected from among the members on the
+floor, the possession of a previous office not being, as in the case of
+the Master, a necessary qualification for election. In England they are
+appointed by the Master, but in this country they are universally elected
+by the lodge.
+
+During the temporary absence of the Master the Senior Warden has the right
+of presiding, though he may, and often does by courtesy, invite a Past
+Master to assume the chair. In like manner, in the absence of both Master
+and Senior Warden, the Junior Warden will preside, and competent Brethren
+will by him be appointed to fill the vacant seats of the Wardens. But if
+the Master and Junior Warden be present, and the Senior Warden be absent,
+the Junior Warden does not occupy the West, but retains his own station,
+the Master appointing some Brother to occupy the station of the Senior
+Warden. For the Junior Warden succeeds by law only to the office of
+Master, and, unless that office be vacant, he is bound to fulfill the
+duties of the office to which he has been obligated.
+
+In case of the death, removal from the jurisdiction, or expulsion of the
+Master, by the Grand Lodge, no election can be held until the
+constitutional period. The Senior Warden will take the Master's place and
+preside over the lodge, while his seat will be temporarily filled from
+time to time by appointment. The Senior Warden being in fact still in
+existence, and only discharging one of the highest duties of his office,
+that of presiding in the absence of the Master, his office cannot be
+declared vacant and there can be no election for it. In such case, the
+Junior Warden, for the reason already assigned, will continue at his own
+station in the South.
+
+In case of the death, removal, or expulsion of both Master and Senior
+Warden, the Junior Warden will discharge the duties of the Mastership and
+make temporary appointments of both Wardens. It must always be remembered
+that the Wardens succeed according to seniority to the office of Master
+when vacant, but that neither can legally discharge the duties of the
+other. It must also be remembered that when a Warden succeeds to the
+government of the lodge, he does not become the Master; he is still only
+a Warden discharging the functions of a higher vacated station, as one of
+the expressed duties of his own office. A recollection of these
+distinctions will enable us to avoid much embarrassment in the
+consideration of all the questions incident to this subject. If the Master
+be present, the Wardens assist him in the government of the lodge. The
+Senior Warden presides over the craft while at labor, and the Junior when
+they are in refreshment. Formerly the examination of visitors was
+intrusted to the Junior Warden, but this duty is now more appropriately
+performed by the Stewards or a special committee appointed for that
+purpose.
+
+The Senior Warden has the appointment of the Senior Deacon, and the Junior
+Warden that of the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Treasurer._
+
+
+Of so much importance is this office deemed, that in English Lodges, while
+all the other officers are appointed by the Master, the Treasurer alone is
+elected by the lodge. It is, however, singular, that in the ritual of
+installation, Preston furnishes no address to the Treasurer on his
+investiture. Webb, however, has supplied the omission, and the charge
+given in his work to this officer, on the night of his installation,
+having been universally acknowledged and adopted by the craft in this
+country, will furnish us with the most important points of the law in
+relation to his duties.
+
+It is, then, in the first place, the duty of the Treasurer "to receive all
+moneys from the hands of the Secretary." The Treasurer is only the banker
+of the lodge. All fees for initiation, arrearages of members, and all
+other dues to the lodge, should be first received by the Secretary, and
+paid immediately over to the Treasurer for safe keeping.
+
+The keeping of just and regular accounts is another duty presented to the
+Treasurer. As soon as he has received an amount of money from the
+Secretary, he should transfer the account of it to his books. By this
+means, the Secretary and Treasurer become mutual checks upon each other,
+and the safety of the funds of the lodge is secured.
+
+The Treasurer is not only the banker, but also the disbursing officer of
+the lodge; but he is directed to pay no money except with the consent of
+the lodge and on the order of the Worshipful Master. It seems to me,
+therefore, that every warrant drawn on him should be signed by the Master,
+and the action of the lodge attested by the counter-signature of the
+Secretary.
+
+It is usual, in consequence of the great responsibility of the Treasurer,
+to select some Brother of worldly substance for the office; and still
+further to insure the safety of the funds, by exacting from him a bond,
+with sufficient security. He sometimes receives a per centage, or a fixed
+salary, for his services.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Secretary._
+
+
+It is the duty of the Secretary to record all the proceedings of the
+lodge, "which may be committed to paper;" to conduct the correspondence of
+the lodge, and to receive all moneys due the lodge from any source
+whatsoever. He is, therefore, the recording, corresponding, and receiving
+officer of the lodge. By receiving the moneys due to the lodge in the
+first place, and then paying them over to the Treasurer, he becomes, as I
+have already observed, a check upon that officer.
+
+In view of the many laborious duties which devolve upon him, the
+Secretary, in many lodges, receives a compensation for his services.
+
+Should the Treasurer or Secretary die or be expelled, there is no doubt
+that an election for a successor, to fill the unexpired term, may be held
+by dispensation from the Grand Master. But the incompetency of either of
+these officers to perform his duties, by reason of the infirmity of
+sickness or removal from the seat of the lodge, will not, I think,
+authorize such an election. Because the original officer may recover from
+his infirmity, or return to his residence, and, in either case, having
+been elected and installed for one year, he must remain the Secretary or
+Treasurer until the expiration of the period for which he had been so
+elected and installed, and, therefore, on his recovery or his return, is
+entitled to resume all the prerogatives and functions of his office. The
+case of death, or of expulsion, which is, in fact, masonic death, is
+different, because all the rights possessed during life cease _ex
+necessitate rei_, and forever lapse at the time of the said physical or
+masonic death; and in the latter case, a restoration to all the rights and
+privileges of Masonry would not restore the party to any office which he
+had held at the time of his expulsion.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Deacons._
+
+
+In every lodge there are two of these officers--a Senior and a Junior
+Deacon. They are not elected, but appointed; the former by the Master, and
+the latter by the Senior Warden.
+
+The duties of these officers are many and important; but they are so well
+defined in the ritual as to require no further consideration in this
+place.
+
+The only question that here invites our examination is, whether the
+Deacons, as appointed officers, are removable at the pleasure of the
+officers who appointed them; or, whether they retain their offices, like
+the Master and Wardens, until the expiration of the year. Masonic
+authorities are silent on this subject; but, basing my judgment upon
+analogy, I am inclined to think that they are not removable: all the
+officers of a lodge are chosen to serve for one year, or, from one
+festival of St. John the Evangelist to the succeeding one. This has been
+the invariable usage in all lodges, and neither in the monitorial
+ceremonies of installation, nor in any rules or regulations which I have
+seen, is any exception to this usage made in respect to Deacons. The
+written as well as the oral law of Masonry being silent on this subject,
+we are bound to give them the benefit of this silence, and place them in
+the same favorable position as that occupied by the superior officers,
+who, we know, by express law are entitled to occupy their stations for one
+year. Moreover, the power of removal is too important to be exercised
+except under the sanction of an expressed law, and is contrary to the
+whole spirit of Masonry, which, while it invests a presiding officer with
+the largest extent of prerogative, is equally careful of the rights of the
+youngest member of the fraternity.
+
+From these reasons I am compelled to believe that the Deacons, although
+originally appointed by the Master and Senior Warden, are not removable by
+either, but retain their offices until the expiration of the year.
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Stewards._
+
+
+The Stewards, who are two in number, are appointed by the Junior Warden,
+and sit on the right and left of him in the lodge. Their original duties
+were, "to assist in the collection of dues and subscriptions; to keep an
+account of the lodge expenses; to see that the tables are properly
+furnished at refreshment, and that every Brother is suitably provided
+for." They are also considered as the assistants of the Deacons in the
+discharge of their duties, and, lately, some lodges are beginning to
+confide to them the important trusts of a standing committee for the
+examination of visitors and the preparation of candidates.
+
+What has been said in relation to the removal of the Deacons in the
+preceding section, is equally applicable to the Stewards.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Tiler._
+
+
+This is an office of great importance, and must, from the peculiar nature
+of our institution, have existed from its very beginning. No lodge could
+ever have been opened until a Tiler was appointed, and stationed to guard
+its portals from the approach of "cowans and eavesdroppers." The
+qualifications requisite for the office of a Tiler are, that he must be "a
+worthy Master Mason." An Entered Apprentice, or a Fellow Craft, cannot
+tile a lodge, even though it be opened in his own degree. To none but
+Master Masons can this important duty of guardianship be intrusted. The
+Tiler is not necessarily a member of the lodge which he tiles. There is no
+regulation requiring this qualification. In fact, in large cities, one
+Brother often acts as the Tiler of several lodges. If, however, he is a
+member of the lodge, his office does not deprive him of the rights of
+membership, and in ballotings for candidates, election of officers, or
+other important questions, he is entitled to exercise his privilege of
+voting, in which case the Junior Deacon will temporarily occupy his
+station, while he enters the lodge to deposit his ballot. This appears to
+be the general usage of the craft in this country.
+
+The Tiler is sometimes elected by the lodge, and sometimes appointed by
+the Master. It seems generally to be admitted that he may be removed from
+office for misconduct or neglect of duty, by the lodge, if he has been
+elected, and by the Master, if he has been appointed.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Rules of Order.
+
+
+
+The safety of the minority, the preservation of harmony, and the dispatch
+of business, all require that there should be, in every well-regulated
+society, some rules and forms for the government of their proceedings,
+and, as has been justly observed by an able writer on parliamentary law,
+"whether these forms be in all cases the most rational or not, is really
+not of so great importance; for it is much more material that there should
+be a rule to go by, than what that rule is."[50] By common consent, the
+rules established for the government of Parliament in England, and of
+Congress in the United States, and which are known collectively under the
+name of "Parliamentary Law," have been adopted for the regulation of all
+deliberative bodies, whether of a public or private nature. But lodges of
+Freemasons differ so much in their organization and character from other
+societies, that this law will, in very few cases, be found applicable;
+and, indeed, in many positively inapplicable to them. The rules,
+therefore, for the government of masonic lodges are in general to be
+deduced from the usages of the Order, from traditional or written
+authority, and where both of them are silent, from analogy to the
+character of the institution. To each of these sources, therefore, I shall
+apply, in the course of the present chapter, and in some few instances,
+where the parliamentary law coincides with our own, reference will be made
+to the authority of the best writers on that science.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Order of Business._
+
+
+When the Brethren have been "congregated," or called together by the
+presiding officer, the first thing to be attended to is the ceremony of
+opening the lodge. The consideration of this subject, as it is
+sufficiently detailed in our ritual, will form no part of the present
+work.
+
+The lodge having been opened, the next thing to be attended to is the
+reading of the minutes of the last communication. The minutes having been
+read, the presiding officer will put the question on their confirmation,
+having first inquired of the Senior and Junior Wardens, and lastly of the
+Brethren "around the lodge," whether they have any alterations to propose.
+It must be borne in mind, that the question of confirmation is simply a
+question whether the Secretary has faithfully and correctly recorded the
+transactions of the lodge. If, therefore, it can be satisfactorily shown
+by any one that there is a mis-entry, or the omission of an entry, this is
+the time to correct it; and where the matter is of sufficient importance,
+and the recording officer, or any member disputes the charge of error, the
+vote of the lodge will be taken on the subject, and the journal will be
+amended or remain as written, according to the opinion so expressed by the
+majority of the members. As this is, however, a mere question of memory,
+it must be apparent that those members only who were present at the
+previous communication, the records of which are under examination, are
+qualified to express a fair opinion. All others should ask and be
+permitted to be excused from voting.
+
+As no special communication can alter or amend the proceedings of a
+regular one, it is not deemed necessary to present the records of the
+latter to the inspection of the former. This preliminary reading of the
+minutes is, therefore, always omitted at special communications.
+
+After the reading of the minutes, unfinished business, such as motions
+previously submitted and reports of committees previously appointed, will
+take the preference of all other matters. Special communications being
+called for the consideration of some special subject, that subject must of
+course claim the priority of consideration over all others.
+
+In like manner, where any business has been specially and specifically
+postponed to another communication, it constitutes at that communication
+what is called, in parliamentary law, "the order of the day," and may at
+any time in the course of the evening be called up, to the exclusion of
+all other business.
+
+The lodge may, however, at its discretion, refuse to take up the
+consideration of such order; for the same body which determined at one
+time to consider a question, may at another time refuse to do so. This is
+one of those instances in which parliamentary usage is applicable to the
+government of a lodge. Jefferson says: "Where an order is made, that any
+particular matter be taken up on any particular day, there a question is
+to be put, when it is called for, Whether the house will now proceed to
+that matter?" In a lodge, however, it is not the usage to propose such a
+question, but the matter being called up, is discussed and acted on,
+unless some Brother moves its postponement, when the question of
+postponement is put.
+
+But with these exceptions, the unfinished business must first be disposed
+of, to avoid its accumulation and its possible subsequent neglect.[51]
+
+New business will then be taken up in such order as the local bye-laws
+prescribe, or the wisdom of the Worshipful Master may suggest.
+
+In a discussion, when any member wishes to speak, he must stand up in his
+place, and address himself not to the lodge, nor to any particular
+Brother, but to the presiding officer, styling him "Worshipful."
+
+When two or more members rise nearly together, the presiding officer
+determines who is entitled to speak, and calls him by his name, whereupon
+he proceeds, unless he voluntarily sits down, and gives way to the other.
+The ordinary rules of courtesy, which should govern a masonic body above
+all other societies, as well as the general usage of deliberative bodies,
+require that the one first up should be entitled to the floor. But the
+decision of this fact is left entirely to the Master, or presiding
+officer.
+
+Whether a member be entitled to speak once or twice to the same question,
+is left to the regulation of the local bye-laws of every lodge. But, under
+all circumstances, it seems to be conceded, that a member may rise at any
+time with the permission of the presiding officer, or for the purpose of
+explanation.
+
+A member may be called to order by any other while speaking, for the use
+of any indecorous remark, personal allusion, or irrelevant matter; but
+this must be done in a courteous and conciliatory manner, and the question
+of order will at once be decided by the presiding officer.
+
+No Brother is to be interrupted while speaking, except for the purpose of
+calling him to order, or to make a necessary explanation; nor are any
+separate conversations, or, as they are called in our ancient charges,
+"private committees," to be allowed.
+
+Every member of the Order is, in the course of the debate as well as at
+all other times in the lodge, to be addressed by the title of "Brother,"
+and no secular or worldly titles are ever to be used.
+
+In accordance with the principles of justice, the parliamentary usage is
+adopted, which permits the mover of a resolution to make the concluding
+speech, that he may reply to all those who have spoken against it, and sum
+up the arguments in its favor. And it would be a breach of order as well
+as of courtesy for any of his opponents to respond to this final argument
+of the mover.
+
+It is within the discretion of the Master, at any time in the course of
+the evening, to suspend the business of the lodge for the purpose of
+proceeding to the ceremony of initiation, for the "work" of Masonry, as it
+is technically called, takes precedence of all other business.
+
+When all business, both old and new, and the initiation of candidates, if
+there be any, has been disposed of, the presiding officer inquires of the
+officers and members if there be anything more to be proposed before
+closing. Custom has prescribed a formulary for making this inquiry, which
+is in the following words.
+
+The Worshipful Master, addressing the Senior and Junior Wardens and then
+the Brethren, successively, says: "Brother Senior, have you anything to
+offer in the West for the good of Masonry in general or of this lodge in
+particular? Anything in the South, Brother Junior? Around the lodge,
+Brethren?" The answers to these inquiries being in the negative on the
+part of the Wardens, and silence on that of the craft, the Master proceeds
+to close the lodge in the manner prescribed in the ritual.
+
+The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
+suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the
+closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed
+with by the members.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair._
+
+
+Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal
+to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is
+supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable
+for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but
+to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver
+matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an
+appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of
+discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the
+Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because,
+as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have
+wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by _courtesy_, "is
+established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed _the right
+to take_ appeals."[52] If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the
+decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand
+Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge
+"in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal from the
+Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry.
+
+This, at first view, may appear to be giving too despotic a power to the
+Master. But a little reflection will convince any one that there can be
+but slight danger of oppression from one so guarded and controlled as the
+Master is by the obligations of his office and the superintendence of the
+Grand Lodge, while the placing in the hands of the craft so powerful, and,
+with bad spirits, so annoying a privilege as that of immediate appeal,
+would necessarily tend to impair the energies and lessen the dignity of
+the Master, at the same time that it would be totally subversive of that
+spirit of strict discipline which pervades every part of the institution,
+and to which it is mainly indebted for its prosperity and perpetuity.
+
+In every case where a member supposes himself to be aggrieved by the
+decision of the Master, he should make his appeal to the Grand Lodge.
+
+It is scarcely necessary to add, that a Warden or Past Master, presiding
+in the absence of the Master, assumes for the time all the rights and
+prerogatives of the Master.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Mode of Taking the Question._
+
+
+The question in Masonry is not taken _viva voce_ or by "aye" and "nay."
+This should always be done by "a show of hands." The regulation on this
+subject was adopted not later than the year 1754, at which time the Book
+of Constitutions was revised, "and the necessary alterations and additions
+made, consistent with the laws and rules of Masonry," and accordingly, in
+the edition published in the following year, the regulation is laid down
+in these words--"The opinions or votes of the members are always to be
+signified by each holding up one of his hands: which uplifted hands the
+Grand Wardens are to count; unless the number of hands be so unequal as to
+render the counting useless. Nor should any other kind of division be ever
+admitted among Masons."[53]
+
+Calling for the yeas and nays has been almost universally condemned as an
+unmasonic practice, nor should any Master allow it to be resorted to in
+his lodge.
+
+Moving the "previous question," a parliamentary invention for stopping all
+discussion, is still more at variance with the liberal and harmonious
+spirit which should distinguish masonic debates, and is, therefore, never
+to be permitted in a lodge.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Adjournments._
+
+
+Adjournment is a term not recognized in Masonry. There are but two ways in
+which the communication of a lodge can be terminated; and these are either
+by _closing_ the lodge, or by _calling from labor to refreshment_. In the
+former case the business of the communication is finally disposed of until
+the next communication; in the latter the lodge is still supposed to be
+open and may resume its labors at any time indicated by the Master.
+
+But both the time of closing the lodge and of calling it from labor to
+refreshment is to be determined by the absolute will and the free judgment
+of the Worshipful Master, to whom alone is intrusted the care of "setting
+the craft to work, and giving them wholesome instruction for labor." He
+alone is responsible to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge, that his
+lodge shall be opened, continued, and closed in harmony; and as it is by
+his "will and pleasure" only that it is opened, so is it by his "will and
+pleasure" only that it can be closed. Any attempt, therefore, on the part
+of the lodge to entertain a motion for adjournment would be an
+infringement of this prerogative of the Master. Such a motion is,
+therefore, always out of order, and cannot be; and cannot be acted on.
+
+The rule that a lodge cannot adjourn, but remain in session until closed
+by the Master, derives an authoritative sanction also from the following
+clause in the fifth of the Old Charges.
+
+"All Masons employed shall meekly receive their wages without murmuring or
+mutiny, _and not desert the Master till the work is finished_."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Appointment of Committees._
+
+
+It is the prerogative of the Master to appoint all Committees, unless by a
+special resolution provision has been made that a committee shall
+otherwise be appointed.
+
+The Master is also, _ex officio_, chairman of every committee which he
+chooses to attend, although he may not originally have been named a member
+of such committee. But he may, if he chooses, waive this privilege; yet he
+may, at any time during the session of the committee, reassume his
+inherent prerogative of governing the craft at all times when in his
+presence, and therefore take the chair.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Mode of Keeping the Minutes._
+
+
+Masonry is preeminently an institution of forms, and hence, as was to be
+expected, there is a particular form provided for recording the
+proceedings of a lodge. Perhaps the best method of communicating this form
+to the reader will be, to record the proceedings of a supposititious
+meeting or communication.
+
+The following form, therefore, embraces the most important transactions
+that usually occur during the session of a lodge, and it may serve as an
+exemplar, for the use of secretaries.
+
+"A regular communication of ---- Lodge, NO. ----, was holden at ----; on
+----, the ---- day of ----A.: L.: 58--.
+
+ Present.
+
+ Bro.: A. B----, W.: Master.
+ " B. C----, S.: Warden.
+ " C. D----, J.: Warden.
+ " D. E----, Treasurer.
+ " E. F----, Secretary.
+ " F. G----, S.: Deacon.
+ " G. H----, J.: Deacon.
+ " H. I----, } Stewards.
+ " I. K----, }
+ " K. L----, Tiler.
+
+ _Members._
+ Bro.: L. M----
+ M. N----
+ N. O----
+ O. P----
+
+ _Visitors._
+ P. Q----
+ Q. R----
+ R. S----
+ S. T----
+
+The Lodge was opened in due form on the third degree of Masonry.
+
+"The minutes of the regular communication of ---- were read and
+confirmed.[54]
+
+"The committee on the petition of Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation,
+reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for and duly elected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. D. C., a candidate for
+initiation, reported favorably, whereupon he was balloted for, and the box
+appearing foul he was rejected.
+
+"The committee on the application of Mr. E. D., a candidate for initiation,
+having reported unfavorably, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"The petition of Mr. F. E., a candidate for initiation, having been
+withdrawn by his friends, he was declared rejected without a ballot.
+
+"A petition for initiation from Mr. G.F., inclosing the usual amount and
+recommended by Bros. C. D.---- and H. I.----, was referred to a committee
+of investigation consisting of Bros. G. H.----, L. M.----, and O. P.----.
+
+"Bro. S.R., an Entered Apprentice, having applied for advancement, was
+duly elected to take the second degree; and Bro. W.Y., a Fellow Craft,
+was, on his application for advancement, duly elected to take the third
+degree.
+
+"A letter was read from Mrs. T. V.----, the widow of a Master Mason, when
+the sum of twenty dollars was voted for her relief.
+
+"The amendment to article 10, section 5 of the bye-laws, proposed by Bro.
+M. N. ---- at the communication of ----, was read a third time, adopted by
+a constitutional majority and ordered to be sent to the Grand Lodge for
+approval and confirmation.
+
+"The Lodge of Master Masons was then closed, and a lodge of Entered
+Apprentices opened in due form.
+
+"Mr. C. B., a candidate for initiation, being in waiting, was duly
+prepared, brought forward and initiated as an Entered Apprentice, he
+paying the usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Entered Apprentices was then closed, and a Lodge of Fellow
+Crafts opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. S. R., an Entered Apprentice, being in waiting, was duly prepared,
+brought forward and passed to the degree of a Fellow Craft, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+"The Lodge of Fellow Crafts was then closed, and a lodge of Master Masons
+opened in due form.
+
+"Bro. W. Y., a Fellow Craft, being in waiting, was duly prepared, brought
+forward and raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, he paying the
+usual fee.
+
+Amount received this evening, as follows:
+
+ Petition of Mr. G. F., $5
+ Fee of Bro. C. B., 5
+ do. of Bro. S. R., 5
+ do. of Bro. W. Y., 5--Total, $20
+
+all of which was paid over to the Treasurer.
+
+There being no further business, the lodge was closed in due form and
+harmony.
+
+E. F----,
+
+_Secretary._
+
+Such is the form which has been adopted as the most convenient mode of
+recording the transactions of a lodge. These minutes must be read, at the
+close of the meeting, that the Brethren may suggest any necessary
+alterations or additions, and then at the beginning of the next regular
+meeting, that they may be confirmed, after which they should be
+transcribed from the rough Minute Book in which they were first entered
+into the permanent Record Book of the lodge.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Third.
+
+The Law Of Individuals.
+
+
+
+Passing from the consideration of the law, which refers to Masons in their
+congregated masses, as the constituents of Grand and Subordinate Lodges, I
+next approach the discussion of the law which governs, them in their
+individual capacity, whether in the inception of their masonic life, as
+candidates for initiation, or in their gradual progress through each of
+the three degrees, for it will be found that a Mason, as he assumes new
+and additional obligations, and is presented with increased light,
+contracts new duties, and is invested with new prerogatives and
+privileges.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of the Qualifications of Candidates.
+
+
+
+The qualifications of a candidate for initiation into the mysteries of
+Freemasonry, are four-fold in their character--moral, physical,
+intellectual and political.
+
+The moral character is intended to secure the respectability of the Order,
+because, by the worthiness of its candidates, their virtuous deportment,
+and good reputation, will the character of the institution be judged,
+while the admission of irreligious libertines and contemners of the moral
+law would necessarily impair its dignity and honor.
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate contribute to the utility of
+the Order, because he who is deficient in any of his limbs or members, and
+who is not in the possession of all his natural senses and endowments, is
+unable to perform, with pleasure to himself or credit to the fraternity,
+those peculiar labors in which all should take an equal part. He thus
+becomes a drone in the hive, and so far impairs the usefulness of the
+lodge, as "a place where Freemasons assemble to work, and to instruct and
+improve themselves in the mysteries of their ancient science."
+
+The intellectual qualifications refer to the security of the Order;
+because they require that its mysteries shall be confided only to those
+whose mental developments are such as to enable them properly to
+appreciate, and faithfully to preserve from imposition, the secrets thus
+entrusted to them. It is evident, for instance, that an idiot could
+neither understand the hidden doctrines that might be communicated to him,
+nor could he so secure such portions as he might remember, in the
+"depositary of his heart," as to prevent the designing knave from worming
+them out of him; for, as the wise Solomon has said, "a fool's mouth is his
+destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul."
+
+The political qualifications are intended to maintain the independence of
+the Order; because its obligations and privileges are thus confided only
+to those who, from their position in society, are capable of obeying the
+one, and of exercising the other without the danger of let or hindrance
+from superior authority.
+
+Of the moral, physical and political qualifications of a candidate there
+can be no doubt, as they are distinctly laid down in the ancient charges
+and constitutions. The intellectual are not so readily decided.
+
+These four-fold qualifications may be briefly summed up in the following
+axioms.
+
+_Morally_, the candidate must be a man of irreproachable conduct, a
+believer in the existence of God, and living "under the tongue of good
+report."
+
+_Physically_, he must be a man of at least twenty-one years of age,
+upright in body, with the senses of a man, not deformed or dismembered,
+but with hale and entire limbs as a _man_ ought to be.
+
+_Intellectually_, he must be a man in the full possession of his
+intellects, not so young that his mind shall not have been formed, nor so
+old that it shall have fallen into dotage; neither a fool, an idiot, nor a
+madman; and with so much education as to enable him to avail himself of
+the teachings of Masonry, and to cultivate at his leisure a knowledge of
+the principles and doctrines of our royal art.
+
+_Politically_, he must be in the unrestrained enjoyment of his civil and
+personal liberty, and this, too, by the birthright of inheritance, and not
+by its subsequent acquisition, in consequence of his release from
+hereditary bondage.
+
+The lodge which strictly demands these qualifications of its candidates
+may have fewer members than one less strict, but it will undoubtedly have
+better ones.
+
+But the importance of the subject demands for each class of the
+qualifications a separate section, and a more extended consideration.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Moral Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The old charges state, that "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the
+moral law." It is scarcely necessary to say, that the phrase, "moral law,"
+is a technical expression of theology, and refers to the Ten Commandments,
+which are so called, because they define the regulations necessary for the
+government of the morals and manners of men. The habitual violation of any
+one of these commands would seem, according to the spirit of the Ancient
+Constitutions, to disqualify a candidate for Masonry.
+
+The same charges go on to say, in relation to the religious character of a
+Mason, that he should not be "a stupid atheist, nor an irreligious
+libertine." A denier of the existence of a Supreme Architect of the
+Universe cannot, of course, be obligated as a Mason, and, accordingly,
+there is no landmark more certain than that which excludes every atheist
+from the Order.
+
+The word "libertine" has, at this day, a meaning very different from what
+it bore when the old charges were compiled. It then signified what we now
+call a "free-thinker," or disbeliever in the divine revelation of the
+Scriptures. This rule would therefore greatly abridge the universality and
+tolerance of the Institution, were it not for the following qualifying
+clause in the same instrument:--
+
+"Though in ancient times Masons were charged in every country to be of the
+religion of that country or nation, whatever it was, yet it is now thought
+more expedient only to oblige them to that religion in which all men
+agree, leaving their particular opinions to themselves; that is, to be
+good men and true, or men of honor and honesty, by whatever denominations
+or persuasions they may be distinguished."
+
+The construction now given universally to the religious qualification of a
+candidate, is simply that he shall have a belief in the existence and
+superintending control of a Supreme Being.
+
+These old charges from which we derive the whole of our doctrine as to the
+moral qualifications of a candidate, further prescribe as to the political
+relations of a Mason, that he is to be "a peaceable subject to the civil
+powers, wherever he resides or works, and is never to be concerned in
+plots and conspiracies against the peace and welfare of the nation, nor to
+behave himself undutifully to inferior magistrates. He is cheerfully to
+conform to every lawful authority; to uphold on every occasion the
+interest of the community, and zealously promote the prosperity of his own
+country."
+
+Such being the characteristics of a true Mason, the candidate who desires
+to obtain that title, must show his claim to the possession of these
+virtues; and hence the same charges declare, in reference to these moral
+qualifications, that "The persons made Masons, or admitted members of a
+lodge, must be good and true men--no immoral or scandalous men, but of
+good report."
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Physical Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The physical qualifications of a candidate refer to his sex, his age, and
+the condition of his limbs.
+
+The first and most important requisite of a candidate is, that he shall be
+"_a man_." No woman can be made a Mason. This landmark is so indisputable,
+that it would be wholly superfluous to adduce any arguments or authority
+in its support.
+
+As to age, the old charges prescribe the rule, that the candidate must be
+"of mature and discreet age." But what is the precise period when one is
+supposed to have arrived at this maturity and discretion, cannot be
+inferred from any uniform practice of the craft in different countries.
+The provisions of the civil law, which make twenty-one the age of
+maturity, have, however, been generally followed. In this country the
+regulation is general, that the candidate must be twenty-one years of age.
+Such, too, was the regulation adopted by the General Assembly, which met
+on the 27th Dec., 1663, and which prescribed that "no person shall be
+accepted unless he be twenty-one years old or more."[55] In Prussia, the
+candidate is required to be twenty-five; in England, twenty-one,[56]
+"unless by dispensation from the Grand Master, or Provincial Grand
+Master;" in Ireland, twenty-one, except "by dispensation from the Grand
+Master, or the Grand Lodge;" in France, twenty-one, unless the candidate
+be the son of a Mason who has rendered important service to the craft,
+with the consent of his parent or guardian, or a young man who has served
+six months with his corps in the army--such persons may be initiated at
+eighteen; in Switzerland, the age of qualification is fixed at twenty-one,
+and in Frankfort-on-Mayn, at twenty. In this country, as I have already
+observed, the regulation of 1663 is rigidly enforced, and no candidate,
+who has not arrived at the age of twenty-one, can be initiated.
+
+Our ritual excludes "an old man in his dotage" equally with a "young man
+under age." But as dotage signifies imbecility of mind, this subject will
+be more properly considered under the head of intellectual qualifications.
+
+The physical qualifications, which refer to the condition of the
+candidate's body and limbs, have given rise, within a few years past, to
+a great amount of discussion and much variety of opinion. The regulation
+contained in the old charges of 1721, which requires the candidate to be
+"a perfect youth," has in some jurisdictions been rigidly enforced to the
+very letter of the law, while in others it has been so completely
+explained away as to mean anything or nothing. Thus, in South Carolina,
+where the rule is rigid, the candidate is required to be neither deformed
+nor dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be, while
+in Maine, a deformed person may be admitted, provided "the deformity is
+not such as to prevent him from being instructed in the arts and mysteries
+of Freemasonry."
+
+The first written law which we find on this subject is that which was
+enacted by the General Assembly held in 1663, under the Grand Mastership
+of the Earl of St. Albans, and which declares "that no person shall
+hereafter be accepted a Freemason but such as are of _able_ body."[57]
+
+Twenty years after, in the reign of James II., or about the year 1683, it
+seems to have been found necessary, more exactly to define the meaning of
+this expression, "of able body," and accordingly we find, among the
+charges ordered to be read to a Master on his installation, the following
+regulation:
+
+"Thirdly, that he that be made be able in all degrees; that is, free-born,
+of a good kindred, true, and no bondsman, and that _he have his right
+limbs as a man ought to have."_[58]
+
+The old charges, published in the original Book of Constitutions in 1723,
+contain the following regulation:
+
+"No Master should take an Apprentice, unless he be a perfect youth having
+no maim or defect that may render him uncapable of learning the art."
+
+Notwithstanding the positive demand for _perfection_, and the positive and
+explicit declaration that he must have _no maim or defect_, the remainder
+of the sentence has, within a few years past, by some Grand Lodges, been
+considered as a qualifying clause, which would permit the admission of
+candidates whose physical defects did not exceed a particular point. But,
+in perfection, there can be no degrees of comparison, and he who is
+required to be perfect, is required to be so without modification or
+diminution. That which is _perfect_ is complete in all its parts, and, by
+a deficiency in any portion of its constituent materials, it becomes not
+less perfect, (which expression would be a solecism in grammar,) but at
+once by the deficiency ceases to be perfect at all--it then becomes
+imperfect. In the interpretation of a law, "words," says Blackstone, "are
+generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification,"
+and then "perfect" would mean, "complete, entire, neither defective nor
+redundant." But another source of interpretation is, the "comparison of a
+law with other laws, that are made by the same legislator, that have some
+affinity with the subject, or that expressly relate to the same
+point."[59] Applying this law of the jurists, we shall have no difficulty
+in arriving at the true signification of the word "perfect," if we refer
+to the regulation of 1683, of which the clause in question appears to have
+been an exposition. Now, the regulation of 1683 says, in explicit terms,
+that the candidate must "_have his right limbs as a man ought to have_."
+Comparing the one law with the other, there can be no doubt that the
+requisition of Masonry is and always has been, that admission could only
+be granted to him who was neither deformed nor dismembered, but of hale
+and entire limbs as a man should be.
+
+But another, and, as Blackstone terms it, "the most universal and
+effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law" is, to consider
+"the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which moved the legislator to
+enact it." Now, we must look for the origin of the law requiring physical
+perfection, not to the formerly operative character of the institution,
+(for there never was a time when it was not speculative as well as
+operative,) but to its symbolic nature. In the ancient temple, every stone
+was required to be _perfect_, for a perfect stone was the symbol of truth.
+In our mystic association, every Mason represents a stone in that
+spiritual temple, "that house not made with hands, eternal in the
+heavens," of which the temple of Solomon was the type. Hence it is
+required that he should present himself, like the perfect stone in the
+material temple, a perfect man in the spiritual building. "The symbolic
+relation of each member of the Order to its mystic temple, forbids the
+idea," says Bro. W.S. Rockwell, of Georgia,[60] "that its constituent
+portions, its living stones, should be less perfect or less a type of
+their great original, than the immaculate material which formed the
+earthly dwelling place of the God of their adoration." If, then, as I
+presume it will be readily conceded, by all except those who erroneously
+suppose the institution to have been once wholly operative and afterwards
+wholly speculative, perfection is required in a candidate, not for the
+physical reason that he may be enabled to give the necessary signs of
+recognition, but because the defect would destroy the symbolism of that
+perfect stone which every Mason is supposed to represent in the spiritual
+temple, we thus arrive at a knowledge of the causes which moved the
+legislators of Masonry to enact the law, and we see at once, and without
+doubt, that the words _perfect youth_ are to be taken in an unqualified
+sense, as signifying one who has "his right limbs as a man ought to
+have."[61]
+
+It is, however, but fair to state that the remaining clause of the old
+charge, which asserts that the candidate must have no maim or defect that
+may render him incapable of learning the art, has been supposed to intend
+a modification of the word "perfect," and to permit the admission of one
+whose maim or defect was not of such a nature as to prevent his learning
+the art of Masonry. But I would respectfully suggest that a criticism of
+this kind is based upon a mistaken view of the import of the words. The
+sentence is not that the candidate must have no such maim or defect as
+might, by possibility, prevent him from learning the art; though this is
+the interpretation given by those who are in favor of admitting slightly
+maimed candidates. It is, on the contrary, so worded as to give a
+consequential meaning to the word "_that_." He must have no maim or defect
+_that_ may render him incapable; that is, _because_, by having such maim
+or defect, he would be rendered incapable of acquiring our art.
+
+In the Ahiman Rezon published by Laurence Dermott in 1764, and adopted for
+the government of the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons in England, and
+many of the Provincial Grand and subordinate lodges of America, the
+regulation is laid down that candidates must be "men of good report,
+free-born, of mature age, not deformed nor dismembered at the time of
+their making, and no woman or eunuch." It is true that at the present day
+this book possesses no legal authority among the craft; but I quote it, to
+show what was the interpretation given to the ancient law by a large
+portion, perhaps a majority, of the English and American Masons in the
+middle of the eighteenth century.
+
+A similar interpretation seems at all times to have been given by the
+Grand Lodges of the United States, with the exception of some, who, within
+a few years past, have begun to adopt a more latitudinarian construction.
+
+In Pennsylvania it was declared, in 1783, that candidates are not to be
+"deformed or dismembered at the time of their making."
+
+In South Carolina the book of Constitutions, first published in 1807,
+requires that "every person desiring admission must be upright in body,
+not deformed or dismembered at the time of making, but of hale and entire
+limbs, as a man ought to be."
+
+In the "Ahiman Rezon and Masonic Ritual," published by order of the Grand
+Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee, in the year 1805, candidates are
+required to be "hale and sound, not deformed or dismembered at the time of
+their making."[62]
+
+Maryland, in 1826, sanctioned the Ahiman Rezon of Cole, which declares
+the law in precisely the words of South Carolina, already quoted.
+
+In 1823, the Grand Lodge of Missouri unanimously adopted a report, which
+declared that all were to be refused admission who were not "sound in mind
+and _all their members_," and she adopted a resolution asserting that "the
+Grand Lodge cannot grant a letter or dispensation to a subordinate lodge
+working under its jurisdiction, to initiate any person maimed, disabled,
+or wanting the qualifications establishing by ancient usage."[63]
+
+But it is unnecessary to multiply instances. There never seems to have
+been any deviation from the principle that required absolute physical
+perfection, until, within a few years, the spirit of expediency[64] has
+induced some Grand Lodges to propose a modified construction of the law,
+and to admit those whose maims or deformities were not such as to prevent
+them from complying with the ceremonial of initiation. Still, a large
+number of the Grand Lodges have stood fast by the ancient landmark, and it
+is yet to be hoped that all will return to their first allegiance. The
+subject is an important one, and, therefore, a few of the more recent
+authorities, in behalf of the old law may with advantage be cited.
+
+"We have examined carefully the arguments 'pro and con,' that have
+accompanied the proceedings of the several Grand Lodges, submitted to us,
+and the conviction has been forced upon our minds, even against our wills,
+that we depart from the ancient landmarks and usages of Masonry, whenever
+we admit an individual wanting in one of the human senses, or who is in
+any particular maimed or deformed."--_Committee of Correspondence G. Lodge
+of Georgia_, 1848, _page_ 36.
+
+"The rationale of the law, excluding persons physically imperfect and
+deformed, lies deeper and is more ancient than the source ascribed to
+it.[65] It is grounded on a principle recognized in the earliest ages of
+the world; and will be found identical with that which obtained among the
+ancient Jews. In this respect the Levitical law was the same as the
+masonic, which would not allow any 'to go in unto the vail' who had a
+blemish--a blind man, or a lame, or a man that was broken-footed, or
+broken-handed, or a dwarf, &c....
+
+"The learned and studious Freemasonic antiquary can satisfactorily explain
+the metaphysics of this requisition in our Book of Constitutions. For the
+true and faithful Brother it sufficeth to know that such a requisition
+exists. He will prize it the more because of its antiquity.... No man can
+in perfection be 'made a Brother,' no man can truly 'learn our mysteries,'
+and practice them, or 'do the work of a Freemason,' if he is not a _man_
+with body free from maim, defect and deformity."--_Report of a Special
+Committee of the Grand Lodge of New York, in_ 1848.[66]
+
+"The records of this Grand Lodge may be confidently appealed to, for
+proofs of her repeated refusal to permit maimed persons to be initiated,
+and not simply on the ground that ancient usage forbids it, but because
+the fundamental constitution of the Order--the ancient charges--forbid
+it."--_Committee of Correspondence of New York, for 1848, p. 70._
+
+"The lodges subordinate to this Grand Lodge are hereby required, in the
+initiation of applicants for Masonry, to adhere to the ancient law (as
+laid down in our printed books), which says he shall be of _entire
+limbs_"--_Resolution of the G.L. of Maryland, November, 1848._
+
+"I received from the lodge at Ashley a petition to initiate into our Order
+a gentleman of high respectability, who, unfortunately, has been maimed. I
+refused my assent.... I have also refused a similar request from the lodge
+of which I am a member. The fact that the most distinguished masonic body
+on earth has recently removed one of the landmarks, should teach _us_ to
+be careful how we touch those ancient boundaries."--_Address of the Grand
+Master of New Jersey in 1849._
+
+"The Grand Lodge of Florida adopted such a provision in her constitution,
+[the qualifying clause permitting the initiation of a maimed person, if
+his deformity was not such as to prevent his instruction], but more
+mature reflection, and more light reflected from our sister Grand Lodges,
+caused it to be stricken from our constitution."--_Address of Gov. Tho.
+Brown, Grand Master of Florida in_ 1849.
+
+"As to the physical qualifications, the Ahiman Rezon leaves no doubt on
+the subject, but expressly declares, that every applicant for initiation
+must be a man, free-born, of lawful age, in the perfect enjoyment of his
+senses, hale, and sound, and not deformed or dismembered; this is one of
+the ancient landmarks of the Order, which it is in the power of no body of
+men to change. A man having but one arm, or one leg, or who is in anyway
+deprived of his due proportion of limbs and members, is as incapable of
+initiation as a woman."--_Encyclical Letter of the Grand Lodge of South
+Carolina to its subordinates in_ 1849.
+
+Impressed, then, by the weight of these authorities, which it would be
+easy, but is unnecessary, to multiply--guided by a reference to the
+symbolic and speculative (not operative) reason of the law--and governed
+by the express words of the regulation of 1683--I am constrained to
+believe that the spirit as well as the letter of our ancient landmarks
+require that a candidate for admission should be perfect in all his
+parts, that is, neither redundant nor deficient, neither deformed nor
+dismembered, but of hale and entire limbs, as a man ought to be.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Intellectual Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Old Charges and Ancient Constitutions are not as explicit in relation
+to the intellectual as to the moral and physical qualifications of
+candidates, and, therefore, in coming to a decision on this subject, we
+are compelled to draw our conclusions from analogy, from common sense, and
+from the peculiar character of the institution. The question that here
+suggests itself on this subject is, what particular amount of human
+learning is required as a constitutional qualification for initiation?
+
+During a careful examination of every ancient document to which I have had
+access, I have met with no positive enactment forbidding the admission of
+uneducated persons, even of those who can neither read nor write. The
+unwritten, as well as the written laws of the Order, require that the
+candidate shall be neither a _fool_ nor an _idiot_, but that he shall
+possess a discreet judgment, and be in the enjoyment of all the senses of
+a man. But one who is unable to subscribe his name, or to read it when
+written, might still very easily prove himself to be within the
+requirements of this regulation. The Constitutions of England, formed
+since the union of the two Grand Lodges in 1813, are certainly explicit
+enough on this subject. They require even more than a bare knowledge of
+reading and writing, for, in describing the qualifications of a candidate,
+they say:
+
+"He should be a lover of the liberal arts and sciences, and have made some
+progress in one or other of them; and he must, previous to his initiation,
+subscribe his name at full length, to a declaration of the following
+import," etc. And in a note to this regulation, it is said, "Any
+individual who cannot write is, consequently, ineligible to be admitted
+into the Order." If this authority were universal in its character, there
+would be no necessity for a further discussion of the subject. But the
+modern constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England are only of force
+within its own jurisdiction, and we are therefore again compelled to
+resort to a mode of reasoning for the proper deduction of our conclusions
+on this subject.
+
+It is undoubtedly true that in the early period of the world, when
+Freemasonry took its origin, the arts of reading and writing were not so
+generally disseminated among all classes of the community as they now are,
+when the blessings of a common education can be readily and cheaply
+obtained. And it may, therefore, be supposed that among our ancient
+Brethren there were many who could neither read nor write. But after all,
+this is a mere assumption, which, although it may be based on probability,
+has no direct evidence for its support. And, on the other hand, we see
+throughout all our ancient regulations, that a marked distinction was made
+by our rulers between the Freemason and the Mason who was not free; as,
+for instance, in the conclusion of the fifth chapter of the Ancient
+Charges, where it is said: "No laborer shall be employed in the common
+work of Masonry, nor shall Freemasons work with those who are not free,
+without an urgent necessity." And this would seem to indicate a higher
+estimation by the fraternity of their own character, which might be
+derived from their greater attainments in knowledge. That in those days
+the ordinary operative masons could neither read nor write, is a fact
+established by history. But it does not follow that the Freemasons, who
+were a separate society of craftsmen, were in the same unhappy category;
+it is even probable, that the fact that they were not so, but that they
+were, in comparison with the unaccepted masons, educated men, may have
+been the reason of the distinction made between these two classes of
+workmen.
+
+But further, all the teachings of Freemasonry are delivered on the
+assumption that the recipients are men of some education, with the means
+of improving their minds and increasing their knowledge. Even the Entered
+Apprentice is reminded, by the rough and perfect ashlars, of the
+importance and necessity of a virtuous education, in fitting him for the
+discharge of his duties. To the Fellow Craft, the study of the liberal
+arts and sciences is earnestly recommended; and indeed, that sacred
+hieroglyphic, the knowledge of whose occult signification constitutes the
+most solemn part of his instruction, presupposes an acquaintance at least
+with the art of reading. And the Master Mason is expressly told in the
+explanation of the forty-seventh problem of Euclid, as one of the symbols
+of the third degree, that it was introduced into Masonry to teach the
+Brethren the value of the arts and sciences, and that the Mason, like the
+discoverer of the problem, our ancient Brother Pythagoras, should be a
+diligent cultivator of learning. Our lectures, too, abound in allusions
+which none but a person of some cultivation of mind could understand or
+appreciate, and to address them, or any portion of our charges which refer
+to the improvement of the intellect and the augmentation of knowledge, to
+persons who can neither read nor write, would be, it seems to us, a
+mockery unworthy of the sacred character of our institution.
+
+From these facts and this method of reasoning, I deduce the conclusion
+that the framers of Masonry, in its present organization as a speculative
+institution, must have intended to admit none into its fraternity whose
+minds had not received some preliminary cultivation, and I am, therefore,
+clearly of opinion, that a person who cannot read and write is not legally
+qualified for admission.
+
+As to the inexpediency of receiving such candidates, there can be no
+question or doubt. If Masonry be, as its disciples claim for it, a
+scientific institution, whose great object is to improve the understanding
+and to enlarge and adorn the mind, whose character cannot be appreciated,
+and whose lessons of symbolic wisdom cannot be acquired, without much
+studious application, how preposterous would it be to place, among its
+disciples, one who had lived to adult years, without having known the
+necessity or felt the ambition for a knowledge of the alphabet of his
+mother tongue? Such a man could make no advancement in the art of Masonry;
+and while he would confer no substantial advantage on the institution, he
+would, by his manifest incapacity and ignorance, detract, in the eyes of
+strangers, from its honor and dignity as an intellectual society.
+
+Idiots and madmen are excluded from admission into the Order, for the
+evident reason that the former from an absence, and the latter from a
+perversion of the intellectual faculties, are incapable of comprehending
+the objects, or of assuming the responsibilities and obligations of the
+institution.
+
+A question here suggests itself whether a person of present sound mind,
+but who had formerly been deranged, can legally be initiated. The answer
+to this question turns on the fact of his having perfectly recovered. If
+the present sanity of the applicant is merely a lucid interval, which
+physicians know to be sometimes vouched to lunatics, with the absolute
+certainty, or at best, the strong probability, of an eventual return to a
+state of mental derangement, he is not, of course, qualified for
+initiation. But if there has been a real and durable recovery (of which a
+physician will be a competent judge), then there can be no possible
+objection to his admission, if otherwise eligible. We are not to look to
+what the candidate once was, but to what he now is.
+
+Dotage, or the mental imbecility produced by excessive old age, is also a
+disqualification for admission. Distinguished as it is by puerile desires
+and pursuits, by a failure of the memory, a deficiency of the judgment,
+and a general obliteration of the mental powers, its external signs are
+easily appreciated, and furnish at once abundant reason why, like idiots
+and madmen, the superannuated dotard is unfit to be the recipient of our
+mystic instructions.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of the Political Qualifications of Candidates._
+
+
+The Constitutions of Masonry require, as the only qualification referring
+to the political condition of the candidate, or his position in society,
+that he shall be _free-born_. The slave, or even the man born in
+servitude--though he may, subsequently, have obtained his liberty--is
+excluded by the ancient regulations from initiation. The non-admission of
+a slave seems to have been founded upon the best of reasons; because, as
+Freemasonry involves a solemn contract, no one can legally bind himself to
+its performance who is not a free agent and the master of his own actions.
+That the restriction is extended to those who were originally in a servile
+condition, but who may have since acquired their liberty, seems to depend
+on the principle that birth, in a servile condition, is accompanied by a
+degradation of mind and abasement of spirit, which no subsequent
+disenthralment can so completely efface as to render the party qualified
+to perform his duties, as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency, and
+zeal," which are said to have distinguished our ancient Brethren.
+"Children," says Oliver, "cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except
+they be born of a free woman."
+
+The same usage existed in the spurious Freemasonry or the Mysteries of the
+ancient world. There, no slave, or men born in slavery, could be
+initiated; because, the prerequisites imperatively demanded that the
+candidate should not only be a man of irreproachable manners, but also a
+free-born denizen of the country in which the mysteries were celebrated.
+
+Some masonic writers have thought that, in this regulation in relation to
+free birth, some allusion is intended, both in the Mysteries and in
+Freemasonry, to the relative conditions and characters of Isaac and
+Ishmael. The former--the accepted one, to whom the promise was given--was
+the son of a free woman, and the latter, who was cast forth to have "his
+hand against every man, and every man's hand against him," was the child
+of a slave. Wherefore, we read that Sarah demanded of Abraham, "Cast out
+this bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
+with my son." Dr. Oliver, in speaking of the grand festival with which
+Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, says, that he "had not paid the
+same compliment at the weaning of Ishmael, because he was the son of a
+bondwoman, and, consequently, could not be admitted to participate in the
+Freemasonry of his father, which could only be conferred on free men born
+of free women." The ancient Greeks were of the same opinion; for they used
+the word [Greek: douloprepeia] or, "slave manners," to designate any very
+great impropriety of manners.
+
+The Grand Lodge of England extends this doctrine, that Masons should be
+free in all their thoughts and actions, so far, that it will not permit
+the initiation of a candidate who is only temporarily deprived of his
+liberty, or even in a place of confinement. In the year 1782, the Master
+of the Royal Military Lodge, at Woolwich, being confined, most probably
+for debt, in the King's Bench prison, at London, the lodge, which was
+itinerant in its character, and allowed to move from place to place with
+its regiment, adjourned, with its warrant of constitution, to the Master
+in prison, where several Masons were made. The Grand Lodge, being informed
+of the circumstances, immediately summoned the Master and Wardens of the
+lodge "to answer for their conduct in making Masons in the King's Bench
+prison," and, at the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming that "it
+is inconsistent with the principles of Freemasonry for any Freemason's
+lodge to be held, for the purposes of making, passing, or raising Masons,
+in any prison or place of confinement."
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Petition of Candidates for Admission, and the Action thereon_.
+
+
+The application of a candidate to a lodge, for initiation, is called a
+"petition." This petition should always be in writing, and generally
+contains a statement of the petitioner's age, occupation, and place of
+residence, and a declaration of the motives which have prompted the
+application, which ought to be "a favorable opinion conceived of the
+institution and a desire of knowledge."[67] This petition must be
+recommended by at least two members of the lodge.
+
+The petition must be read at a stated or regular communication of the
+lodge, and referred to a committee of three members for an investigation
+of the qualifications and character of the candidate. The committee having
+made the necessary inquiries, will report the result at the next regular
+communication and not sooner.
+
+The authority for this deliberate mode of proceeding is to be found in the
+fifth of the 39 General Regulations, which is in these words:
+
+"No man can be made or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without
+previous notice one month before given to the said lodge, in order to make
+due inquiry into the reputation and capacity of the candidate; unless by
+dispensation aforesaid."
+
+The last clause in this article provides for the only way in which this
+probation of a month can be avoided, and that is when the Grand Master,
+for reasons satisfactory to himself, being such as will constitute what is
+called (sometimes improperly) a case of emergency, shall issue a
+dispensation permitting the lodge to proceed forthwith to the election.
+
+But where this dispensation has not been issued, the committee should
+proceed diligently and faithfully to the discharge of their responsible
+duty. They must inquire into the moral, physical, intellectual and
+political qualifications of the candidate, and make their report in
+accordance with the result of their investigations.
+
+The report cannot be made at a special communication, but must always be
+presented at a regular one. The necessity of such a rule is obvious. As
+the Master can at any time within his discretion convene a special meeting
+of his lodge, it is evident that a presiding officer, if actuated by an
+improper desire to intrude an unworthy and unpopular applicant upon the
+craft, might easily avail himself for that purpose of an occasion when the
+lodge being called for some other purpose, the attendance of the members
+was small, and causing a ballot to be taken, succeed in electing a
+candidate, who would, at a regular meeting, have been blackballed by some
+of those who were absent from the special communication.
+
+This regulation is promulgated by the Grand Lodge of England, in the
+following words: "No person shall be made a Mason without a regular
+proposition at one lodge and a ballot at the next regular stated lodge;"
+it appears to have been almost universally adopted in similar language by
+the Grand Lodges of this country; and, if the exact words of the law are
+wanting in any of the Constitutions, the general usage of the craft has
+furnished an equivalent authority for the regulation.
+
+If the report of the committee is unfavorable, the candidate should be
+considered as rejected, without any reference to a ballot. This rule is
+also founded in reason. If the committee, after a due inquiry into the
+character of the applicant, find the result so disadvantageous to him as
+to induce them to make an unfavorable report on his application, it is to
+be presumed that on a ballot they would vote against his admission, and as
+their votes alone would be sufficient to reject him, it is held
+unnecessary to resort in such a case to the supererogatory ordeal of the
+ballot. It would, indeed, be an anomalous proceeding, and one which would
+reflect great discredit on the motives and conduct of a committee of
+inquiry, were its members first to report against the reception of a
+candidate, and then, immediately afterwards, to vote in favor of his
+petition. The lodges will not suppose, for the honor of their committees,
+that such a proceeding will take place, and accordingly the unfavorable
+report of the committee is always to be considered as a rejection.
+
+Another reason for this regulation seems to be this. The fifth General
+Regulation declares that no Lodge should ever make a Mason without "due
+inquiry" into his character, and as the duty of making this inquiry is
+entrusted to a competent committee, when that committee has reported that
+the applicant is unworthy to be made a Mason, it would certainly appear to
+militate against the spirit, if not the letter, of the regulation, for the
+lodge, notwithstanding this report, to enter into a ballot on the
+petition.
+
+But should the committee of investigation report favorably, the lodge will
+then proceed to a ballot for the candidate; but, as this forms a separate
+and important step in the process of "making Masons," I shall make it the
+subject of a distinct section.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates._
+
+
+The Thirty-nine Regulations do not explicitly prescribe the ballot-box as
+the proper mode of testing the opinion of the lodge on the merits of a
+petition for initiation. The sixth regulation simply says that the consent
+of the members is to be "formally asked by the Master; and they are to
+signify their assent or dissent _in their own prudent way_ either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." Almost universal usage has,
+however, sanctioned the ballot box and the use of black and white balls as
+the proper mode of obtaining the opinion of the members.
+
+From the responsibility of expressing this opinion, and of admitting a
+candidate into the fraternity or of repulsing him from it, no Mason is
+permitted to shrink. In balloting on a petition, therefore, every member
+of the Lodge is expected to vote; nor can he be excused from the discharge
+of this important duty, except by the unanimous consent of his Brethren.
+All the members must, therefore, come up to the performance of this trust
+with firmness, candor, and a full determination to do what is right--to
+allow no personal timidity to forbid the deposit of a black ball, if the
+applicant is unworthy, and no illiberal prejudices to prevent the
+deposition of a white one, if the character and qualifications of the
+candidate are unobjectionable. And in all cases where a member himself has
+no personal or acquired knowledge of these qualifications, he should rely
+upon and be governed by the recommendation of his Brethren of the
+Committee of Investigation, who he has no right to suppose would make a
+favorable report on the petition of an unworthy applicant.[68]
+
+The great object of the ballot is, to secure the independence of the
+voter; and, for this purpose, its secrecy should be inviolate. And this
+secrecy of the ballot gives rise to a particular rule which necessarily
+flows out of it.
+
+No Mason can be called to an account for the vote which he has deposited.
+The very secrecy of the ballot is intended to secure the independence and
+irresponsibility to the lodge of the voter. And, although it is
+undoubtedly a crime for a member to vote against the petition of an
+applicant on account of private pique or personal prejudice, still the
+lodge has no right to judge that such motives alone actuated him. The
+motives of men, unless divulged by themselves, can be known only to God;
+"and if," as Wayland says, "from any circumstances we are led to entertain
+any doubts of the motives of men, we are bound to retain these doubts
+within our own bosoms." Hence, no judicial notice can be or ought to be
+taken by a lodge of a vote cast by a member, on the ground of his having
+been influenced by improper motives, because it is impossible for the
+lodge legally to arrive at the knowledge; in the first place, of the vote
+that he has given, and secondly, of the motives by which he has been
+controlled.
+
+And even if a member voluntarily should divulge the nature of his vote and
+of his motives, it is still exceedingly questionable whether the lodge
+should take any notice of the act, because by so doing the independence of
+the ballot might be impaired. It is through a similar mode of reasoning
+that the Constitution of the United States provides, that the members of
+Congress shall not be questioned, in any other place, for any speech or
+debate in either House. As in this way the freedom of debate is preserved
+in legislative bodies, so in like manner should the freedom of the ballot
+be insured in lodges.
+
+The sixth General Regulation requires unanimity in the ballot. Its
+language is: "but no man can be entered a Brother in any particular lodge,
+or admitted to be a member thereof, without the _unanimous consent of all
+the members of that lodge_ then present when the candidate is proposed."
+This regulation, it will be remembered, was adopted in 1721. But in the
+"New Regulations," adopted in 1754, and which are declared to have been
+enacted "only for amending or explaining the Old Regulations for the good
+of Masonry, without breaking in upon the ancient rules of the fraternity,
+still preserving the old landmarks," it is said: "but it was found
+inconvenient to insist upon unanimity in several cases; and, therefore,
+the Grand Masters have allowed the lodges to admit a member, if not above
+three black balls are against him; though some lodges desire no such
+allowance."[69]
+
+The Grand Lodge of England still acts under this new regulation, and
+extends the number of black balls which will reject to three, though it
+permits its subordinates, if they desire it, to require unanimity. But
+nearly all the Grand Lodges of this country have adhered to the old
+regulation, which is undoubtedly the better one, and by special enactment
+have made the unanimous consent of all the Brethren present necessary to
+the election of a candidate.
+
+Another question here suggests itself. Can a member, who by the bye-laws
+of his lodge is disqualified from the exercise of his other franchises as
+a member, in consequence of being in arrears beyond a certain amount, be
+prevented from depositing his ballot on the application of a candidate?
+That by such a bye-law he may be disfranchised of his vote in electing
+officers, or of the right to hold office, will be freely admitted. But the
+words of the old regulation seem expressly, and without equivocation, to
+require that _every member present_ shall vote. The candidate shall only
+be admitted "by the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge
+then present when the candidate is proposed." This right of the members to
+elect or reject their candidates is subsequently called "an inherent
+privilege," which is not subject to a dispensation. The words are
+explicit, and the right appears to be one guaranteed to every member so
+long as he continues a member, and of which no bye-law can divest him as
+long as the paramount authority of the Thirty-nine General Regulations is
+admitted. I should say, then, that every member of a lodge present at
+balloting for a candidate has a right to deposit his vote; and not only a
+right, but a duty which he is to be compelled to perform; since, without
+the unanimous consent of all present, there can be no election.
+
+Our written laws are altogether silent as to the peculiar ceremonies which
+are to accompany the act of balloting, which has therefore been generally
+directed by the local usage of different jurisdictions. Uniformity,
+however, in this, as in all other ritual observances, is to be commended,
+and I shall accordingly here describe the method which I have myself
+preferred and practised in balloting for candidates, and which is the
+custom adopted in the jurisdiction of South Carolina.[70]
+
+The committee of investigation having reported favorably, the Master of
+the lodge directs the Senior Deacon to prepare the ballot box. The mode in
+which this is accomplished is as follows:--The Senior Deacon takes the
+ballot box, and, opening it, places all the white and black balls
+indiscriminately in one compartment, leaving the other entirely empty. He
+then proceeds with the box to the Junior and Senior Wardens, who satisfy
+themselves by an inspection that no ball has been left in the compartment
+in which the votes are to be deposited. I remark here, in passing, that
+the box, in this and the other instance to be referred to hereafter, is
+presented to the inferior officer first, and then to his superior, that
+the examination and decision of the former may be substantiated and
+confirmed by the higher authority of the latter. Let it, indeed, be
+remembered, that in all such cases the usage of masonic _circumambulation_
+is to be observed, and that, therefore, we must first pass the Junior's
+station before we can get to that of the Senior Warden.
+
+These officers having thus satisfied themselves that the box is in a
+proper condition for the reception of the ballots, it is then placed upon
+the altar by the Senior Deacon, who retires to his seat. The Master then
+directs the Secretary to call the roll, which is done by commencing with
+the Worshipful Master, and proceeding through all the officers down to the
+youngest member. As a matter of convenience, the Secretary generally votes
+the last of those in the room, and then, if the Tiler is a member of the
+lodge, he is called in, while the Junior Deacon tiles for him, and the
+name of the applicant having been told him, he is directed to deposit his
+ballot, which he does, and then retires.
+
+As the name of each officer and member is called he approaches the altar,
+and having made the proper masonic salutation to the Chair, he deposits
+his ballot and retires to his seat. The roll should be called slowly, so
+that at no time should there be more than one person present at the box;
+for, the great object of the ballot being secrecy, no Brother should be
+permitted so near the member voting as to distinguish the color of the
+ball he deposits.
+
+The box is placed on the altar, and the ballot is deposited with the
+solemnity of a masonic salutation, that the voters may be duly impressed
+with the sacred and responsible nature of the duty they are called on to
+discharge. The system of voting thus described, is, therefore, far better
+on this account than the one sometimes adopted in lodges, of handing round
+the box for the members to deposit their ballots from their seats
+
+The Master having inquired of the Wardens if all have voted, then orders
+the Senior Deacon to "take charge of the ballot box." That officer
+accordingly repairs to the altar, and taking possession of the box,
+carries it, as before, to the Junior Warden, who examines the ballot, and
+reports, if all the balls are white, that "the box is clear in the South,"
+or, if there is one or more black balls, that "the box is foul in the
+South." The Deacon then carries it to the Senior Warden, and afterwards to
+the Master, who, of course, make the same report, according to the
+circumstances, with the necessary verbal variation of "West" and "East."
+
+If the box is _clear_--that is, if all the ballots are white--the Master
+then announces that the applicant has been duly elected, and the Secretary
+makes a record of the fact.
+
+But if the box is declared to be _foul_, the Master inspects the number
+of black balls; if he finds two, he declares the candidate to be rejected;
+if only one, he so states the fact to the lodge, and orders the Senior
+Deacon again to prepare the ballot box, and a second ballot is taken in
+the same way. This is done lest a black ball might have been inadvertently
+voted on the first ballot. If, on the second scrutiny, one black ball is
+again found, the fact is announced by the Master, who orders the election
+to lie over until the next stated meeting, and requests the Brother who
+deposited the black ball to call upon him and state his reasons. At the
+next stated meeting the Master announces these reasons to the lodge, if
+any have been made known to him, concealing, of course, the name of the
+objecting Brother. At this time the validity or truth of the objections
+may be discussed, and the friends of the applicant will have an
+opportunity of offering any defense or explanation. The ballot is then
+taken a third time, and the result, whatever it may be, is final. As I
+have already observed, in most of the lodges of this country, a
+reappearance of the one black ball will amount to a rejection. In those
+lodges which do not require unanimity, it will, of course, be necessary
+that the requisite number of black balls must be deposited on this third
+ballot to insure a rejection. But if, on inspection, the box is found to
+be "clear," or without a black ball, the candidate is, of course, declared
+to be elected. In any case, the result of the third ballot is final, nor
+can it be set aside or reversed by the action of the Grand Master or Grand
+Lodge; because, by the sixth General Regulation, already so frequently
+cited, the members of every particular lodge are the best judges of the
+qualifications of their candidates; and, to use the language of the
+Regulation, "if a fractious member should be imposed on them, it might
+spoil their harmony, or hinder their freedom, or even break and disperse
+the lodge."
+
+
+
+Section VII.
+
+_Of the Reconsideration of the Ballot._
+
+
+There are, unfortunately, some men in our Order, governed, not by
+essentially bad motives, but by frail judgments and by total ignorance of
+the true object and design of Freemasonry, who never, under any
+circumstances, have recourse to the black ball, that great bulwark of
+Masonry, and are always more or less incensed when any more judicious
+Brother exercises his privilege of excluding those whom he thinks unworthy
+of participation in our mysteries.
+
+I have said, that these men are not governed by motives essentially bad.
+This is the fact. They honestly desire the prosperity of the institution,
+and they would not willfully do one act which would impede that
+prosperity. But their judgments are weak, and their zeal is without
+knowledge. They do not at all understand in what the true prosperity of
+the Order consists, but really and conscientiously believing that its
+actual strength will be promoted by the increase of the number of its
+disciples; they look rather to the _quantity_ than to the _quality_ of the
+applicants who knock at the doors of our lodges.
+
+Now a great difference in respect to the mode in which the ballot is
+conducted, will be found in those lodges which are free from the presence
+of such injudicious brethren, and others into which they have gained
+admittance.
+
+In a lodge in which every member has a correct notion of the proper moral
+qualifications of the candidates for Masonry, and where there is a general
+disposition to work well with a few, rather than to work badly with many,
+when a ballot is ordered, each Brother, having deposited his vote,
+quietly and calmly waits to hear the decision of the ballot box announced
+by the Chair. If it is "clear," all are pleased that another citizen has
+been found worthy to receive a portion of the illuminating rays of
+Masonry. If it is "foul," each one is satisfied with the adjudication, and
+rejoices that, although knowing nothing himself against the candidate,
+some one has been present whom a more intimate acquaintance with the
+character of the applicant has enabled to interpose his veto, and prevent
+the purity of the Order from being sullied by the admission of an unworthy
+candidate. Here the matter ends, and the lodge proceeds to other business.
+
+But in a lodge where one of these injudicious and over-zealous Brethren is
+present, how different is the scene. If the candidate is elected, he, too,
+rejoices; but his joy is, that the lodge has gained one more member whose
+annual dues and whose initiation fee will augment the amount of its
+revenues. If he is rejected, he is indignant that the lodge has been
+deprived of this pecuniary accession, and forthwith he sets to work to
+reverse, if possible, the decision of the ballot box, and by a volunteer
+defense of the rejected candidate, and violent denunciations of those who
+opposed him, he seeks to alarm the timid and disgust the intelligent, so
+that, on a _reconsideration_, they may be induced to withdraw their
+opposition.
+
+The _motion for reconsideration_ is, then, the means generally adopted, by
+such seekers after quantity, to insure the success of their efforts to
+bring all into our fold who seek admission, irrespective of worth or
+qualification. In other words, we may say, that _the motion for
+reconsideration is the great antagonist of the purity and security of the
+ballot box_. The importance, then, of the position which it thus assumes,
+demands a brief discussion of the time and mode in which a ballot may be
+reconsidered.
+
+In the beginning of the discussion, it may be asserted, that it is
+competent for any brother to move a reconsideration of a ballot, or for a
+lodge to vote on such a motion. The ballot is a part of the work of
+initiating a candidate. It is the preparatory step, and is just as
+necessary to his legal making as the obligation or the investiture. As
+such, then, it is clearly entirely under the control of the Master. The
+Constitutions of Masonry and the Rules and Regulations of every Grand and
+Subordinate lodge prescribe the mode in which the ballot shall be
+conducted, so that the sense of the members may be taken. The Grand Lodge
+also requires that the Master of the lodge shall see that that exact mode
+of ballot shall be pursued and no other, and it will hold him responsible
+that there shall be no violation of the rule. If, then, the Master is
+satisfied that the ballot has been regularly and correctly conducted, and
+that no possible good, but some probable evil, would arise from its
+reconsideration, it is not only competent for him, but it is his solemn
+duty to refuse to permit any such reconsideration. A motion to that
+effect, it may be observed, will always be out of order, although any
+Brother may respectfully request the Worshipful Master to order such a
+reconsideration, or suggest to him its propriety or expediency.
+
+If, however, the Master is not satisfied that the ballot is a true
+indication of the sense of the lodge, he may, in his own discretion, order
+a reconsideration. Thus there may be but one black ball;--now a single
+black ball may sometimes be inadvertently cast--the member voting it may
+have been favorably disposed towards the candidate, and yet, from the
+hurry and confusion of voting, or from the dimness of the light or the
+infirmity of his own eyes, or from some other equally natural cause, he
+may have selected a black ball, when he intended to have taken a white
+one. It is, therefore, a matter of prudence and necessary caution, that,
+when only one black ball appears, the Master should order a new ballot. On
+this second ballot, it is to be presumed that more care and vigilance will
+be used, and the reappearance of the black ball will then show that it was
+deposited designedly.
+
+But where two or three or more black balls appear on the first ballot,
+such a course of reasoning is not authorized, and the Master will then be
+right to refuse a reconsideration. The ballot has then been regularly
+taken--the lodge has emphatically decided for a rejection, and any order
+to renew the ballot would only be an insult to those who opposed the
+admission of the applicant, and an indirect attempt to thrust an unwelcome
+intruder upon the lodge.
+
+But although it is in the power of the Master, under the circumstances
+which we have described, to order a reconsideration, yet this prerogative
+is accompanied with certain restrictions, which it may be well to notice.
+
+In the first place, the Master cannot order a reconsideration on any other
+night than that on which the original ballot was taken.[71] After the
+lodge is closed, the decision of the ballot is final, and there is no
+human authority that can reverse it. The reason of this rule is evident.
+If it were otherwise, an unworthy Master (for, unfortunately, all Masters
+are not worthy) might on any subsequent evening avail himself of the
+absence of those who had voted black balls, to order a reconsideration,
+and thus succeed in introducing an unfit and rejected candidate into the
+lodge, contrary to the wishes of a portion of its members.
+
+Neither can he order a reconsideration on the same night, if any of the
+Brethren who voted have retired. All who expressed their opinion on the
+first ballot, must be present to express it on the second. The reasons for
+this restriction are as evident as for the former, and are of the same
+character.
+
+It must be understood, that I do not here refer to those reconsiderations
+of the ballot which are necessary to a full understanding of the opinion
+of the lodge, and which have been detailed in the ceremonial of the mode
+of balloting, as it was described in the preceding Section.
+
+It may be asked whether the Grand Master cannot, by his dispensations,
+permit a reconsideration. I answer emphatically, NO. The Grand Master
+possesses no such prerogative. There is no law in the whole jurisprudence
+of the institution clearer than this--that neither the Grand Lodge nor the
+Grand Master can interfere with the decision of the ballot box. In
+Anderson's Constitutions, the law is laid down, under the head of "Duty of
+Members" (edition of 1755, p. 312), that in the election of candidates the
+Brethren "are to give their consent in their own prudent way, either
+virtually or in form, but with unanimity." And the regulation goes on to
+say: "Nor is this inherent privilege _subject to a dispensation_, because
+the members of a lodge are the best judges of it; and because, if a
+turbulent member should be imposed upon them, it might spoil their
+harmony, or hinder the freedom of their communications, or even break and
+disperse the lodge." This settles the question. A dispensation to
+reconsider a ballot would be an interference with the right of the members
+"to give their consent in their own prudent way;" it would be an
+infringement of an "inherent privilege," and neither the Grand Lodge nor
+the Grand Master can issue a dispensation for such a purpose. Every lodge
+must be left to manage its own elections of candidates in its own prudent
+way.
+
+I conclude this section by a summary of the principles which have been
+discussed, and which I have endeavored to enforce by a process of
+reasoning which I trust may be deemed sufficiently convincing. They are
+briefly these:
+
+1. It is never in order for a member to move for the reconsideration of a
+ballot on the petition of a candidate for initiation, nor for a lodge to
+entertain such a motion.
+
+2. The Master alone can, for reasons satisfactory to himself, order such a
+reconsideration.
+
+3. The Master cannot order a reconsideration on any subsequent night, nor
+on the same night, after any member, who was present and voted, has
+departed.
+
+4. The Grand Master cannot grant a dispensation for a reconsideration, nor
+in any other way interfere with the ballot. The same restriction applies
+to the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section VIII.
+
+_Of the Renewal of Applications by Rejected Candidates._
+
+
+As it is apparent from the last section that there can be no
+reconsideration by a lodge of a rejected petition, the question will
+naturally arise, how an error committed by a lodge, in the rejection of a
+worthy applicant, is to be corrected, or how such a candidate, when once
+rejected, is ever to make a second trial, for it is, of course, admitted,
+that circumstances may occur in which a candidate who had been once
+blackballed might, on a renewal of his petition, be found worthy of
+admission. He may have since reformed and abandoned the vicious habits
+which caused his first rejection, or it may have been since discovered
+that that rejection was unjust. How, then, is such a candidate to make a
+new application?
+
+It is a rule of universal application in Masonry, that no candidate,
+having been once rejected, can apply to any other lodge for admission,
+except to the one which rejected him. Under this regulation the course of
+a second application is as follows:
+
+Some Grand Lodges have prescribed that, when a candidate has been
+rejected, it shall not be competent for him to apply within a year, six
+months, or some other definite period. This is altogether a local
+regulation--there is no such law in the Ancient Constitutions--and
+therefore, where the regulations of the Grand Lodge of the jurisdiction
+are silent upon the subject, general principles direct the following as
+the proper course for a rejected candidate to pursue on a second
+application. He must send in a new letter, recommended and vouched for as
+before, either by the same or other Brethren--it must be again referred to
+a committee--lie over for a month--and the ballot be then taken as is
+usual in other cases. It must be treated in all respects as an entirely
+new petition, altogether irrespective of the fact that the same person had
+ever before made an application. In this way due notice will be given to
+the Brethren, and all possibility of an unfair election will be avoided.
+
+If the local regulations are silent upon the subject, the second
+application may be made at any time after the rejection of the first, all
+that is necessary being, that the second application should pass through
+the same ordeal and be governed by the same rules that prevail in relation
+to an original application.
+
+
+
+Section IX.
+
+_Of the necessary Probation and due Proficiency of Candidates before
+Advancement_.
+
+
+There is, perhaps, no part of the jurisprudence of Masonry which it is
+more necessary strictly to observe than that which relates to the
+advancement of candidates through the several degrees. The method which is
+adopted in passing Apprentices and raising Fellow Crafts--the probation
+which they are required to serve in each degree before advancing to a
+higher--and the instructions which they receive in their progress, often
+materially affect the estimation which is entertained of the institution
+by its initiates. The candidate who long remains at the porch of the
+temple, and lingers in the middle chamber, noting everything worthy of
+observation in his passage to the holy of holies, while he better
+understands the nature of the profession upon which he has entered, will
+have a more exalted opinion of its beauties and excellencies than he who
+has advanced, with all the rapidity that dispensations can furnish, from
+the lowest to the highest grades of the Order. In the former case, the
+design, the symbolism, the history, and the moral and philosophical
+bearing of each degree will be indelibly impressed upon the mind, and the
+appositeness of what has gone before to what is to succeed will be readily
+appreciated; but, in the latter, the lessons of one hour will be
+obliterated by those of the succeeding one; that which has been learned in
+one degree, will be forgotten in the next; and when all is completed, and
+the last instructions have been imparted, the dissatisfied neophyte will
+find his mind, in all that relates to Masonry, in a state of chaotic
+confusion. Like Cassio, he will remember "a mass of things, but nothing
+distinctly."
+
+An hundred years ago it was said that "Masonry was a progressive science,
+and not to be attained in any degree of perfection, but by time, patience,
+and a considerable degree of application and industry."[72] And it is
+because that due proportion of time, patience and application, has not
+been observed, that we so often see Masons indifferent to the claims of
+the institution, and totally unable to discern its true character. The
+arcana of the craft, as Dr. Harris remarks, should be gradually imparted
+to its members, according to their improvement.
+
+There is no regulation of our Order more frequently repeated in our
+constitutions, nor one which should be more rigidly observed, than that
+which requires of every candidate a "suitable proficiency" in one degree,
+before he is permitted to pass to another. But as this regulation is too
+often neglected, to the manifest injury of the whole Order, as well as of
+the particular lodge which violates it, by the introduction of ignorant
+and unskillful workmen into the temple, it may be worth the labor we shall
+spend upon the subject, to investigate some of the authorities which
+support us in the declaration, that no candidate should be promoted,
+until, by a due probation, he has made "suitable proficiency in the
+preceding degree."
+
+In one of the earliest series of regulations that have been
+preserved--made in the reign of Edward III., it was ordained, "that such
+as were to be admitted Master Masons, or Masters of work, should be
+examined whether they be able of cunning to serve their respective Lords,
+as well the lowest as the highest, to the honor and worship of the
+aforesaid art, and to the profit of their Lords."
+
+Here, then, we may see the origin of that usage, which is still practiced
+in every well governed lodge, not only of demanding a proper degree of
+proficiency in the candidate, but also of testing that proficiency by an
+examination.
+
+This cautious and honest fear of the fraternity, lest any Brother should
+assume the duties of a position which he could not faithfully discharge,
+and which is, in our time, tantamount to a candidate's advancing to a
+degree for which he is not prepared, is again exhibited in the charges
+enacted in the reign of James II., the manuscript of which was preserved
+in the archives of the Lodge of Antiquity in London. In these charges it
+is required, "that no Mason take on no lord's worke, nor any other man's,
+unless he know himselfe well able to perform the worke, so that the craft
+have no slander." In the same charges, it is prescribed that "no master,
+or fellow, shall take no apprentice for less than seven years."
+
+In another series of charges, whose exact date is not ascertained, but
+whose language and orthography indicate their antiquity, it is said: "Ye
+shall ordain the wisest to be Master of the work; and neither for love nor
+lineage, riches nor favor, set one over the work[73] who hath but little
+knowledge, whereby the Master would be evil served, and ye ashamed."
+
+These charges clearly show the great stress that was placed by our ancient
+Brethren upon the necessity of skill and proficiency, and they have
+furnished the precedents upon which are based all the similar regulations
+that have been subsequently applied to Speculative Masonry.
+
+In the year 1722, the Grand Lodge of England ordered the "Old Charges of
+the Free and Accepted Masons" to be collected from the ancient records,
+and, having approved of them, they became a part of the Constitutions of
+Speculative Freemasonry. In these Charges, it is ordained that "a younger
+Brother shall be instructed in working, to prevent spoiling the materials
+for want of judgment, and for increasing and continuing of brotherly
+love."
+
+Subsequently, in 1767, it was declared by the Grand Lodge, that "no lodge
+shall be permitted to make and raise the same Brother, at one and the same
+meeting, without a dispensation from the Grand Master, or his Deputy;"
+and, lest too frequent advantage should be taken of this power of
+dispensation, to hurry candidates through the degrees, it is added that
+the dispensation, "_on very particular occasions only_, may be
+requested."
+
+The Grand Lodge of England afterwards found it necessary to be more
+explicit on this subject, and the regulation of that body is now contained
+in the following language:
+
+"No candidate shall be permitted to receive more than one degree on the
+same day, nor shall a higher degree in Masonry be conferred on any Brother
+at a less interval than four weeks from his receiving a previous degree,
+nor until he has passed an examination in open lodge in that degree."[74]
+
+This seems to be the recognized principle on which the fraternity are, at
+this day, acting in this country. The rule is, perhaps, sometimes, and in
+some places, in abeyance. A few lodges, from an impolitic desire to
+increase their numerical strength, or rapidly to advance men of worldly
+wealth or influence to high stations in the Order, may infringe it, and
+neglect to demand of their candidates that suitable proficiency which
+ought to be, in Masonry, an essential recommendation to promotion; but the
+great doctrine that each degree should be well studied, and the candidate
+prove his proficiency in it by an examination, has been uniformly set
+forth by the Grand Lodge of the United States, whenever they have
+expressed an opinion on the subject.
+
+Thus, for instance, in 1845, the late Bro. A.A. Robertson, Grand Master of
+New York, gave utterance to the following opinion, in his annual address
+to the intelligent body over which he presided:
+
+"The practice of examining candidates in the prior degrees, before
+admission to the higher, in order to ascertain their proficiency, is
+gaining the favorable notice of Masters of lodges, and cannot be too
+highly valued, nor too strongly recommended to all lodges in this
+jurisdiction. It necessarily requires the novitiate to reflect upon the
+bearing of all that has been so far taught him, and consequently to
+impress upon his mind the beauty and utility of those sublime truths,
+which have been illustrated in the course of the ceremonies he has
+witnessed in his progress in the mystic art. In a word, it will be the
+means of making competent overseers of the work--and no candidate should
+be advanced, until he has satisfied the lodge, by such examination, that
+he has made the necessary proficiency in the lower degrees."[75]
+
+In 1845, the Grand Lodge of Iowa issued a circular to her subordinates,
+in which she gave the following admonition:
+
+"To guard against hasty and improper work, she prohibits a candidate from
+being advanced till he has made satisfactory proficiency in the preceding
+degrees, by informing himself of the lectures pertaining thereto; and to
+suffer a candidate to proceed who is ignorant in this essential
+particular, is calculated in a high degree to injure the institution and
+retard its usefulness."
+
+The Grand Lodge of Illinois has practically declared its adhesion to the
+ancient regulation; for, in the year 1843, the dispensation of Nauvoo
+Lodge, one of its subordinates, was revoked principally on the ground that
+she was guilty "of pushing the candidate through the second and third
+degrees, before he could possibly be skilled in the preceding degree." And
+the committee who recommended the revocation, very justly remarked that
+they were not sure that any length of probation would in all cases insure
+skill, but they were certain that the ancient landmarks of the Order
+required that the lodge should know that the candidate is well skilled in
+one degree before being admitted to another.
+
+The Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and South Carolina have adopted, almost
+in the precise words, the regulation of the Grand Lodge of England,
+already cited, which requires an interval of one month to elapse between
+the conferring of degrees. The Grand Lodge of New Hampshire requires a
+greater probation for its candidates; its constitution prescribes the
+following regulation: "All Entered Apprentices must work five months as
+such, before they can be admitted to the degree of Fellow Craft. All
+Fellow Crafts must work in a lodge of Fellow Crafts three months, before
+they can be raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason. Provided,
+nevertheless, that if any Entered Apprentice, or Fellow Craft, shall make
+himself thoroughly acquainted with all the information belonging to his
+degree, he may be advanced at an earlier period, at the discretion of the
+lodge."
+
+But, perhaps, the most stringent rule upon this subject, is that which
+exists in the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Hanover, which is in the
+following words:
+
+"No Brother can be elected an officer of a lodge until he has been three
+years a Master Mason. A Fellow Craft must work at least one year in that
+degree, before he can be admitted to the third degree. An Entered
+Apprentice must remain at least two years in that degree."
+
+It seems unnecessary to extend these citations. The existence of the
+regulation, which requires a necessary probation in candidates, until due
+proficiency is obtained, is universally admitted. The ancient
+constitutions repeatedly assert it, and it has received the subsequent
+sanction of innumerable Masonic authorities. But, unfortunately, the
+practice is not always in accordance with the rule. And, hence, the object
+of this article is not so much to demonstrate the existence of the law, as
+to urge upon our readers the necessity of a strict adherence to it. There
+is no greater injury which can be inflicted on the Masonic Order (the
+admission of immoral persons excepted), than that of hurrying candidates
+through the several degrees. Injustice is done to the institution, whose
+peculiar principles and excellencies are never properly presented--and
+irreparable injury to the candidate, who, acquiring no fair appreciation
+of the ceremonies through which he rapidly passes, or of the instructions
+which he scarcely hears, is filled either with an indifference that never
+afterwards can be warmed into zeal, or with a disgust that can never be
+changed into esteem. Masonry is betrayed in such an instance by its
+friends, and often loses the influence of an intelligent member, who, if
+he had been properly instructed, might have become one of its warmest and
+most steadfast advocates.
+
+This subject is so important, that I will not hesitate to add to the
+influence of these opinions the great sanction of Preston's authority.
+
+"Many persons," says that able philosopher of Masonry, "are deluded by the
+vague supposition that our mysteries are merely nominal; that the
+practices established among us are frivolous, and that our ceremonies may
+be adopted, or waived at pleasure. On this false foundation, we find them
+hurrying through all the degrees of the Order, without adverting to the
+propriety of one step they pursue, or possessing a single qualification
+requisite for advancement. Passing through the usual formalities, they
+consider themselves entitled to rank as masters of the art, solicit and
+accept offices, and assume the government of the lodge, equally
+unacquainted with the rules of the institution they pretend to support, or
+the nature of the trust they engage to perform. The consequence is
+obvious; anarchy and confusion ensue, and the substance is lost in the
+shadow. Hence men eminent for ability, rank, and fortune, are often led to
+view the honors of Masonry with such indifference, that when their
+patronage is solicited, they either accept offices with reluctance, or
+reject them with disdain."[76]
+
+Let, then, no lodge which values its own usefulness, or the character of
+our institution, admit any candidate to a higher degree, until he has made
+suitable proficiency in the preceding one, to be always tested by a strict
+examination in open lodge. Nor can it do so, without a palpable violation
+of the laws of Masonry.
+
+
+
+Section X.
+
+_Of Balloting for Candidates in each Degree._
+
+
+Although there is no law, in the Ancient Constitutions, which in express
+words requires a ballot for candidates in each degree, yet the whole tenor
+and spirit of these constitutions seem to indicate that there should be
+recourse to such a ballot. The constant reference, in the numerous
+passages which were cited in the preceding Section, to the necessity of
+an examination into the proficiency of those who sought advancement, would
+necessarily appear to imply that a vote of the lodge must be taken on the
+question of this proficiency. Accordingly, modern Grand Lodges have
+generally, by special enactment, required a ballot to be taken on the
+application of an Apprentice or Fellow Craft for advancement, and where no
+such regulation has been explicitly laid down, the almost constant usage
+of the craft has been in favor of such ballot.
+
+The Ancient Constitutions having been silent on the subject of the letter
+of the law, local usage or regulations must necessarily supply the
+specific rule.
+
+Where not otherwise provided by the Constitutions of a Grand Lodge or the
+bye-laws of a subordinate lodge, analogy would instruct us that the
+ballot, on the application of Apprentices or Fellow Crafts for
+advancement, should be governed by the same principles that regulate the
+ballot on petitions for initiation.
+
+Of course, then, the vote should be unanimous: for I see no reason why a
+lodge of Fellow Crafts should be less guarded in its admission of
+Apprentices, than a lodge of Apprentices is in its admission of profanes.
+
+Again, the ballot should take place at a stated meeting, so that every
+member may have "due and timely notice," and be prepared to exercise his
+"inherent privilege" of granting or withholding his consent; for it must
+be remembered that the man who was worthy or supposed to be so, when
+initiated as an Entered Apprentice, may prove to be unworthy when he
+applies to pass as a Fellow Graft, and every member should, therefore,
+have the means and opportunity of passing his judgment on that worthiness
+or unworthiness.
+
+If the candidate for advancement has been rejected once, he may again
+apply, if there is no local regulation to the contrary. But, in such a
+case, due notice should be given to all the members, which is best done by
+making the application at one regular meeting, and voting for it on the
+next. This, however, I suppose to be only necessary in the case of a
+renewed application after a rejection. An Entered Apprentice or a Fellow
+Craft is entitled after due probation to make his application for
+advancement; and his first application may be balloted for on the same
+evening, provided it be a regular meeting of the lodge. The members are
+supposed to know what work is before them to do, and should be there to
+do it.
+
+But the case is otherwise whenever a candidate for advancement has been
+rejected. He has now been set aside by the lodge, and no time is laid down
+in the regulations or usages of the craft for his making a second
+application. He may never do so, or he may in three months, in a year, or
+in five years. The members are, therefore, no more prepared to expect this
+renewed application at any particular meeting of the lodge, than they are
+to anticipate any entirely new petition of a profane. If, therefore, the
+second application is not made at one regular meeting and laid over to the
+next, the possibility is that the lodge may be taken by surprise, and in
+the words of the old Regulation, "a turbulent member may be imposed on
+it."
+
+The inexpediency of any other course may be readily seen, from a
+suppositions case. We will assume that in a certain lodge, A, who is a
+Fellow Craft, applies regularly for advancement to the third degree. On
+this occasion, for good and sufficient reasons, two of the members, B and
+C, express their dissent by depositing black balls. His application to be
+raised is consequently rejected, and he remains a Fellow Graft. Two or
+three meetings of the lodge pass over, and at each, B and C are present;
+but, at the fourth meeting, circumstances compel their absence, and the
+friends of A, taking advantage of that occurrence, again propose him for
+advancement; the ballot is forthwith taken, and he is elected and raised
+on the same evening. The injustice of this course to B and C, and the evil
+to the lodge and the whole fraternity, in this imposition of one who is
+probably an unworthy person, will be apparent to every intelligent and
+right-minded Mason.
+
+I do not, however, believe that a candidate should be rejected, on his
+application for advancement, in consequence of objections to his moral
+worth and character. In such a case, the proper course would be to prefer
+charges, to try him as an Apprentice or Fellow Craft; and, if found
+guilty, to suspend, expel, or otherwise appropriately punish him. The
+applicant as well as the Order is, in such a case, entitled to a fair
+trial. Want of proficiency, or a mental or physical disqualification
+acquired since the reception of the preceding degree, is alone a
+legitimate cause for an estoppal of advancement by the ballot. But this
+subject will be treated of further in the chapter on the rights of Entered
+Apprentices.
+
+
+
+Section XI.
+
+_Of the Number to be Initiated at one Communication._
+
+
+The fourth General Regulation decrees that "no Lodge shall make more than
+five new Brothers at one time." This regulation has been universally
+interpreted (and with great propriety) to mean that not more than five
+degrees can be conferred at the same communication.
+
+This regulation is, however, subject to dispensation by the Grand Master,
+or Presiding Grand Officer, in which case the number to be initiated,
+passed, or raised, will be restricted only by the words of the
+dispensation.
+
+The following, or fifth General Regulation, says that "no man can be made
+or admitted a member of a particular lodge, without previous notice, one
+month before, given to the same lodge."
+
+Now, as a profane cannot be admitted an Entered Apprentice, or in other
+words, a member of an Entered Apprentices' lodge, unless after one month's
+notice, so it follows that an Apprentice cannot be admitted a member of a
+Fellow Crafts' lodge, nor a Fellow Craft of a Masters', without the like
+probation. For the words of the regulation which apply to one, will
+equally apply to the others. And hence we derive the law, that a month at
+least must always intervene between the reception of one degree and the
+advancement to another. But this rule is also subject to a dispensation.
+
+
+
+Section XII.
+
+_Of Finishing the Candidates of one Lodge in another._
+
+
+It is an ancient and universal regulation, that no lodge shall interfere
+with the work of another by initiating its candidates, or passing or
+raising its Apprentices and Fellow Crafts. Every lodge is supposed to be
+competent to manage its own business, and ought to be the best judge of
+the qualifications of its own members, and hence it would be highly
+improper in any lodge to confer a degree on a Brother who is not of its
+household.
+
+This regulation is derived from a provision in the Ancient Charges, which
+have very properly been supposed to contain the fundamental law of
+Masonry, and which prescribes the principle of the rule in the following
+symbolical language:
+
+"None shall discover envy at the prosperity of a Brother, nor supplant him
+or put him out of his work, if he be capable to finish the same; for no
+man can finish another's work, so much to the Lord's profit, unless he be
+thoroughly acquainted with the designs and draughts of him that began it."
+
+There is, however, a case in which one lodge may, by consent, legally
+finish the work of another. Let us suppose that a candidate has been
+initiated in a lodge at A----, and, before he receives his second degree,
+removes to B----, and that being, by the urgency of his business, unable
+either to postpone his departure from A----, until he has been passed and
+raised, or to return for the purpose of his receiving his second and third
+degrees, then it is competent for the lodge at A---- to grant permission
+to the lodge at B---- to confer them on the candidate.
+
+But how shall this permission be given--by a unanimous vote, or merely by
+a vote of the majority of the members at A----? Here it seems to me that,
+so far as regards the lodge at A----, the reasons for unanimity no longer
+exist. There is here no danger that a "fractious member will be imposed on
+them," as the candidate, when finished, will become a member of the lodge
+at B----. The question of consent is simply in the nature of a
+resolution, and may be determined by the assenting votes of a majority of
+the members at A---. It is, however, to be understood, that if any Brother
+believes that the candidate is unworthy, from character, of further
+advancement, he may suspend the question of consent, by preferring charges
+against him. If this is not done, and the consent of the lodge is
+obtained, that the candidate may apply to the lodge at B---, then when his
+petition is read in that lodge, it must, of course, pass through the usual
+ordeal of a month's probation, and a unanimous vote; for here the old
+reasons for unanimity once more prevail.
+
+I know of no ancient written law upon this subject, but it seems to me
+that the course I have described is the only one that could be suggested
+by analogy and common sense.
+
+
+
+Section XIII.
+
+_Of the Initiation of Non-residents._
+
+
+The subject of this section is naturally divided into two
+branches:--First, as to the initiation by a lodge of a candidate, who,
+residing in the same State or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, is still not an
+inhabitant of the town in which the lodge to which he applies is
+situated, but resides nearer to some other lodge; and, secondly, as to the
+initiation of a stranger, whose residence is in another State, or under
+the jurisdiction of another Grand Lodge.
+
+1. The first of these divisions presents a question which is easily
+answered. Although I can find no ancient regulation on this subject,
+still, by the concurrent authority of all Grand Lodges in this country, at
+least, (for the Grand Lodge of England has no such provision in its
+Constitution,) every lodge is forbidden to initiate any person whose
+residence is nearer to any other lodge. If, however, such an initiation
+should take place, although the lodge would be censurable for its
+violation of the regulations of its superior, yet there has never been any
+doubt that the initiation would be good and the candidate so admitted
+regularly made. The punishment must fall upon the lodge and not upon the
+newly-made Brother.
+
+2. The second division presents a more embarrassing inquiry, on account of
+the diversity of opinions which have been entertained on the subject. Can
+a lodge in one State, or Grand Lodge jurisdiction, initiate the resident
+of another State, and would such initiation be lawful, and the person so
+initiated a regular Mason, or, to use the technical language of the Order,
+a Mason made "in due form," and entitled to all the rights and privileges
+of the Order?
+
+The question is one of considerable difficulty; it has given occasion to
+much controversy, and has been warmly discussed within the last few years
+by several of the Grand Lodges of the United States.
+
+In 1847, the Grand Lodge of Alabama adopted the following regulation,
+which had been previously enacted by the Grand Lodge of Tennessee:
+
+"Any person residing within the jurisdiction of this Grand Lodge, who has
+already, or shall hereafter, travel into any foreign jurisdiction, and
+there receive the degrees of Masonry, such person shall not be entitled to
+the rights, benefits, and privileges of Masonry within this jurisdiction,
+until he shall have been regularly admitted a member of the subordinate
+lodge under this Grand Lodge, nearest which he at the time resides, in the
+manner provided by the Constitution of this Grand Lodge for the admission
+of members."
+
+The rule adopted by the Grand Lodge of Maryland is still more stringent.
+It declares, "that if any individual, from selfish motives, from distrust
+of his acceptance, or other causes originating in himself, knowingly and
+willfully travel into another jurisdiction, and there receive the masonic
+degrees, he shall be considered and held as a clandestine made Mason."
+
+The Grand Lodge of New York, especially, has opposed these regulations,
+inflicting a penalty on the initiate, and assigns its reasons for the
+opposition in the following language:
+
+"Before a man becomes a Mason, he is subject to no law which any Grand
+Lodge can enact. No Grand Lodge has a right to make a law to compel any
+citizen, who desires, to be initiated in a particular lodge, or in the
+town or State of his residence; neither can any Grand Lodge forbid a
+citizen to go where he pleases to seek acceptance into fellowship with the
+craft; and where there is no right to compel or to forbid, there can be no
+right to punish; but it will be observed, that the laws referred to were
+enacted to punish the citizens of Maryland and Alabama, as Masons and
+Brethren, for doing something before they were Masons and Brethren, which
+they had a perfect right to do as citizens and freemen; and it must
+certainly be regarded as an act of deception and treachery by a young
+Mason, on returning home, to be told, that he is 'a clandestine Mason,'
+that he 'ought to be expelled,' or, that he cannot be recognized as a
+Brother till he 'joins a lodge where his residence is,' because he was
+initiated in New York, in England, or in France, after having heard all
+his life of the universality and oneness of the institution."[77]
+
+It seems to us that the Grand Lodge of New York has taken the proper view
+of the subject; although we confess that we are not satisfied with the
+whole course of reasoning by which it has arrived at the conclusion.
+Whatever we may be inclined to think of the inexpediency of making
+transient persons (and we certainly do believe that it would be better
+that the character and qualifications of every candidate should be
+submitted to the inspection of his neighbors rather than to that of
+strangers), however much we may condemn the carelessness and facility of a
+lodge which is thus willing to initiate a stranger, without that due
+examination of his character, which, of course, in the case of
+non-residents, can seldom be obtained, we are obliged to admit that such
+makings are legal--the person thus made cannot be called a clandestine
+Mason, because he has been made in a legally constituted lodge--and as he
+is a regular Mason, we know of no principle by which he can be refused
+admission as a visitor into any lodge to which he applies.
+
+Masonry is universal in its character, and knows no distinction of nation
+or of religion. Although each state or kingdom has its distinct Grand
+Lodge, this is simply for purposes of convenience in carrying out the
+principles of uniformity and subordination, which should prevail
+throughout the masonic system. The jurisdiction of these bodies is
+entirely of a masonic character, and is exercised only over the members of
+the Order who have voluntarily contracted their allegiance. It cannot
+affect the profane, who are, of course, beyond its pale. It is true, that
+as soon as a candidate applies to a lodge for initiation, he begins to
+come within the scope of masonic law. He has to submit to a prescribed
+formula of application and entrance, long before he becomes a member of
+the Order. But as this formula is universal in its operation, affecting
+candidates who are to receive it and lodges which are to enforce it in all
+places, it must have been derived from some universal authority. The
+manner, therefore, in which a candidate is to be admitted, and the
+preliminary qualifications which are requisite, are prescribed by the
+landmarks, the general usage, and the ancient constitutions of the Order.
+And as they have directed the _mode how_, they might also have prescribed
+the _place where_, a man should be made a Mason. But they have done no
+such thing. We cannot, after the most diligent search, find any
+constitutional regulation of the craft, which refers to the initiation of
+non-residents. The subject has been left untouched; and as the ancient and
+universally acknowledged authorities of Masonry have neglected to
+legislate on the subject, it is now too late for any modern and local
+authority, like that of a Grand Lodge, to do so.
+
+A Grand Lodge may, it is true, forbid--as Missouri, South Carolina,
+Georgia, and several other Grand Lodges have done--the initiation of
+non-residents, within its own jurisdiction, because this is a local law
+enacted by a local authority; but it cannot travel beyond its own
+territory, and prescribe the same rule to another Grand Lodge, which may
+not, in fact, be willing to adopt it.
+
+The conclusions, then, at which we arrive no this subject are these: The
+ancient constitutions have prescribed no regulation on the subject of the
+initiation of non-residents; it is, therefore, optional with every Grand
+Lodge, whether it will or will not suffer such candidates to be made
+within its own jurisdiction; the making, where it is permitted, is legal,
+and the candidate so made becomes a regular Mason, and is entitled to the
+right of visitation.
+
+What, then, is the remedy, where a person of bad character, and having, in
+the language of the Grand Lodge of Maryland, "a distrust of his
+acceptance" at home, goes abroad and receives the degrees of Masonry? No
+one will deny that such a state of things is productive of great evil to
+the craft. Fortunately, the remedy is simple and easily applied. Let the
+lodge, into whose jurisdiction he has returned, exercise its power of
+discipline, and if his character and conduct deserve the punishment, let
+him be expelled from the Order. If he is unworthy of remaining in the
+Order, he should be removed from it at once; but if he is worthy of
+continuing in it, there certainly can be no objection to his making use of
+his right to visit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of the Rights of Entered Apprentices.
+
+
+
+In an inquiry into the rights of Entered Apprentices, we shall not be much
+assisted by the Ancient Constitutions, which, leaving the subject in the
+position in which usage had established it, are silent in relation to what
+is the rule. In all such cases, we must, as I have frequently remarked
+before, in settling the law, have recourse to analogy, to the general
+principles of equity, and the dictates of common sense, and, with these
+three as our guides, we shall find but little difficulty in coming to a
+right conclusion.
+
+At present, an Entered Apprentice is not considered a member of the Lodge,
+which privilege is only extended to Master Masons. This was not formerly
+the case. Then the Master's degree was not as indiscriminately conferred
+as it is now. A longer probation and greater mental or moral
+qualifications were required to entitle a candidate to this sublime
+dignity. None were called Master Masons but such as had presided over
+their Lodges, and the office of Wardens was filled by Fellow Crafts.
+Entered Apprentices, as well as Fellow Crafts, were permitted to attend
+the communications of the Grand Lodge, and express their opinions; and, in
+1718, it was enacted that every new regulation, proposed in the Grand
+Lodge, should be submitted to the consideration of even the youngest
+Entered Apprentice. Brethren of this degree composed, in fact, at that
+time, the great body of the craft. But, all these things have, since, by
+the gradual improvement of our organization, undergone many alterations;
+and Entered Apprentices seem now, by universal consent, to be restricted
+to a very few rights. They have the right of sitting in all lodges of
+their degree, of receiving all the instructions which appertain to it, but
+not of speaking or voting, and, lastly, of offering themselves as
+candidates for advancement, without the preparatory necessity of a formal
+written petition.
+
+These being admitted to be the rights of an Entered Apprentice, few and
+unimportant as they may be, they are as dear to him as those of a Master
+Mason are to one who has been advanced to that degree; and he is, and
+ought to be, as firmly secured in their possession. Therefore, as no Mason
+can be deprived of his rights and privileges, except after a fair and
+impartial trial, and the verdict of his peers, it is clear that the
+Entered Apprentice cannot be divested of these rights without just such a
+trial and verdict.
+
+But, in the next place, we are to inquire whether the privilege of being
+passed as a Fellow Craft is to be enumerated among these rights? And, we
+clearly answer, No. The Entered Apprentice has the right of making the
+application. Herein he differs from a profane, who has no such right of
+application until he has qualified himself for making it, by becoming an
+Entered Apprentice. But, if the application is granted, it is _ex gratia_,
+or, by the favour of the lodge, which may withhold it, if it pleases. If
+such were not the case, the lodge would possess no free will on the
+subject of advancing candidates; and the rule requiring a probation and an
+examination, before passing, would be useless and absurd--because, the
+neglect of improvement or the want of competency would be attended with no
+penalty.
+
+It seems to me, then, that, when an Apprentice applies for his second
+degree, the lodge may, if it thinks proper, refuse to grant it; and that
+it may express that refusal by a ballot. No trial is necessary, because no
+rights of the candidate are affected. He is, by a rejection of his
+request, left in the same position that he formerly occupied. He is still
+an Entered Apprentice, in good standing; and the lodge may, at any time it
+thinks proper, reverse its decision and proceed to pass him.
+
+If, however, he is specifically charged with any offense against the laws
+of Masonry, it would then be necessary to give him a trial. Witnesses
+should be heard, both for and against him, and he should be permitted to
+make his defense. The opinion of the lodge should be taken, as in all
+other cases of trial, and, according to the verdict, he should be
+suspended, expelled, or otherwise punished.
+
+The effect of these two methods of proceeding is very different. When, by
+a ballot, the lodge refuses to advance an Entered Apprentice, there is
+not, necessarily, any stigma on his moral character. It may be, that the
+refusal is based on the ground that he has not made sufficient proficiency
+to entitle him to pass. Consequently, his standing as an Entered
+Apprentice is not at all affected. His rights remain the same. He may
+still sit in the lodge when it is opened in his degree; he may still
+receive instructions in that degree; converse with Masons on masonic
+subjects which are not beyond his standing; and again apply to the lodge
+for permission to pass as a Fellow Craft.
+
+But, if he be tried on a specific charge, and be suspended or expelled,
+his moral character is affected. His masonic rights are forfeited; and he
+can no longer be considered as an Entered Apprentice in good standing. He
+will not be permitted to sit in his lodge, to receive masonic instruction,
+or to converse with Masons on masonic subjects; nor can he again apply for
+advancement until the suspension or expulsion is removed by the
+spontaneous action of the lodge.
+
+These two proceedings work differently in another respect. The Grand Lodge
+will not interfere with a subordinate lodge in compelling it to pass an
+Entered Apprentice; because every lodge is supposed to be competent to
+finish, in its own time, and its own way, the work that it has begun. But,
+as the old regulations, as well as the general consent of the craft, admit
+that the Grand Lodge alone can expel from the rights and privileges of
+Masonry, and that an expulsion by a subordinate lodge is inoperative until
+it is confirmed by the Grand Lodge, it follows that the expulsion of the
+Apprentice must be confirmed by that body; and that, therefore, he has a
+right to appeal to it for a reversal of the sentence, if it was unjustly
+pronounced.
+
+Let it not be said that this would be placing an Apprentice on too great
+an equality with Master Masons. His rights are dear to him; he has paid
+for them. No man would become an Apprentice unless he expected, in time,
+to be made a Fellow Craft, and then a Master. He is, therefore, morally
+and legally wronged when he is deprived, without sufficient cause, of the
+capacity of fulfilling that expectation. It is the duty of the Grand Lodge
+to see that not even the humblest member of the craft shall have his
+rights unjustly invaded; and it is therefore bound, as the conservator of
+the rights of all, to inquire into the truth, and administer equity.
+Whenever, therefore, even an Entered Apprentice complains that he has met
+with injustice and oppression, his complaint should be investigated and
+justice administered.
+
+The question next occurs--What number of black balls should prevent an
+Apprentice from passing to the second degree? I answer, the same number
+that would reject the application of a profane for initiation into the
+Order. And why should this not be so? Are the qualifications which would
+be required of one applying, for the first time, for admission to the
+degree of an Apprentice more than would subsequently be required of the
+same person on his applying for a greater favor and a higher honor--that
+of being advanced to the second degree? Or do the requisitions, which
+exist in the earlier stages of Masonry, become less and less with every
+step of the aspirant's progress? Viewing the question in this light--and,
+indeed, I know of no other in which to view it--it seems to me to be
+perfectly evident that the peculiar constitution and principles of our
+Order will require unanimity in the election of a profane for initiation,
+of an Apprentice for a Fellow Craft, and of a Fellow Craft for a Master
+Mason; and that, while no Entered Apprentice can be expelled from the
+Order, except by due course of trial, it is competent for the lodge, at
+any time, on a ballot, to refuse to advance him to the second degree. But,
+let it be remembered that the lodge which refuses to pass an Apprentice,
+on account of any objections to his moral character, or doubts of his
+worthiness, is bound to give him the advantage of a trial, and at once to
+expel him, if guilty, or, if innocent, to advance him when otherwise
+qualified.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of the Rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+In ancient times there were undoubtedly many rights attached to the second
+degree which have now become obsolete or been repealed; for formerly the
+great body of the fraternity were Fellow Crafts, and according to the old
+charges, even the Grand Master might be elected from among them. The
+Master and Wardens of Subordinate Lodges always were. Thus we are told
+that no Brother can be Grand Master, "unless he has been a Fellow Craft
+before his election," and in the ancient manner of constituting a lodge,
+contained in the Book of Constitutions,[78] it is said that "the
+candidates, or the new Master and Wardens, being yet among the Fellow
+Crafts, the Grand Master shall ask his Deputy if he has examined them,"
+etc. But now that the great body of the Fraternity consists of Master
+Masons, the prerogatives of Fellow Crafts are circumscribed within limits
+nearly as narrow as those of Entered Apprentices. While, however,
+Apprentices are not permitted to speak or vote, in ancient times, and up,
+indeed, to a very late date. Fellow Crafts were entitled to take a part in
+any discussion in which the lodge, while open in the first or second
+degree, might engage, but not to vote. This privilege is expressly stated
+by Preston, as appertaining to a Fellow Craft, in his charge to a
+candidate, receiving that degree.
+
+"As a Craftsman, in our private assemblies you may offer your sentiments
+and opinions on such subjects as are regularly introduced in the Lecture,
+under the superintendence of an experienced Master, who will guard the
+landmark against encroachment."[79]
+
+This privilege is not now, however, granted in this country to Fellow
+Crafts. All, therefore, that has been said in the preceding chapter, of
+the rights of Entered Apprentices, will equally apply, _mutatis mutandis_,
+to the rights of Fellow Crafts.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Rights of Master Masons.
+
+
+
+When a Mason has reached the third degree, he becomes entitled to all the
+rights and privileges of Ancient Craft Masonry. These rights are extensive
+and complicated; and, like his duties, which are equally as extensive,
+require a careful examination, thoroughly to comprehend them. Four of
+them, at least, are of so much importance as to demand a distinct
+consideration. These are the rights of membership, of visitation, of
+relief, and of burial. To each I shall devote a separate section.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Right of Membership._
+
+
+The whole spirit and tenor of the General Regulations, as well as the
+uniform usage of the craft, sustain the doctrine, that when a Mason is
+initiated in a lodge, he has the right, by signing the bye-laws, to
+become a member without the necessity of submitting to another ballot. In
+the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of New York, this principle is
+asserted to be one of the ancient landmarks, and is announced in the
+following words: "Initiation makes a man a Mason; but he must receive the
+Master's degree, and sign the bye-laws before he becomes a member of the
+lodge."[80] If the doctrine be not exactly a landmark (which I confess I
+am not quite prepared to admit), it comes to us almost clothed with the
+authority of one, from the sanction of universal and uninterrupted usage.
+
+How long before he loses this right by a _non-user_, or neglect to avail
+himself of it, is, I presume, a question to be settled by local authority.
+A lodge, or a Grand Lodge, may affix the period according to its
+discretion; but the general custom is, to require a signature of the
+bye-laws, and a consequent enrollment in the lodge, within three months
+after receiving the third degree. Should a Mason neglect to avail himself
+of his privilege, he forfeits it (unless, upon sufficient cause, he is
+excused by the lodge), and must submit to a ballot.
+
+The reason for such a law is evident. If a Mason does not at once unite
+himself with the lodge in which he was raised, but permits an extended
+period of time to elapse, there is no certainty that his character or
+habits may not have changed, and that he may not have become, since his
+initiation, unworthy of affiliation. Under the general law, it is,
+therefore, necessary that he should in such case submit to the usual
+probation of one month, and an investigation of his qualifications by a
+committee, as well as a ballot by the members.
+
+But there are other privileges also connected with this right of
+membership. A profane is required to apply for initiation to the lodge
+nearest his place of residence, and, if there rejected, can never in
+future apply to any other lodge. But the rule is different with respect to
+the application of a Master Mason for membership.
+
+A Master Mason is not restricted in his privilege of application for
+membership within any geographical limits. All that is required of him is,
+that he should be an affiliated Mason; that is, that he should be a
+contributing member of a lodge, without any reference to its peculiar
+locality, whether near to or distant from his place of residence. The Old
+Charges simply prescribe, that every Mason ought to belong to a lodge. A
+Mason, therefore, strictly complies with this regulation, when he unites
+himself with any lodge, thus contributing to the support of the
+institution, and is then entitled to all the privileges of an affiliated
+Mason.
+
+A rejection of the application of a Master Mason for membership by a lodge
+does not deprive him of the right of applying to another. A Mason is in
+"good standing" until deprived of that character by the action of some
+competent masonic authority; and that action can only be by suspension or
+expulsion. Rejection does not, therefore, affect the "good standing" of
+the applicant; for in a rejection there is no legal form of trial, and
+consequently the rejected Brother remains in the same position after as
+before his rejection. He possesses the same rights as before, unimpaired
+and undiminished; and among these rights is that of applying for
+membership to any lodge that he may select.
+
+If, then, a Mason may be a member of a lodge distant from his place of
+residence, and, perhaps, even situated in a different jurisdiction, the
+question then arises whether the lodge within whose precincts he resides,
+but of which he is not a member, can exercise its discipline over him
+should he commit any offense requiring masonic punishment. On this subject
+there is, among masonic writers, a difference of opinion. I, however,
+agree with Brother Pike, the able Chairman of the Committee of
+Correspondence of Arkansas, that the lodge can exercise such discipline. I
+contend that a Mason is amenable for his conduct not only to the lodge of
+which he may be a member, but also to any one within whose jurisdiction he
+permanently resides. A lodge is the conservator of the purity and the
+protector of the integrity of the Order within its precincts. The unworthy
+conduct of a Mason, living as it were immediately under its government, is
+calculated most injuriously to affect that purity and integrity. A lodge,
+therefore, should not be deprived of the power of coercing such unworthy
+Mason, and, by salutary punishment, of vindicating the character of the
+institution. Let us suppose, by way of example, that a Mason living in San
+Francisco, California, but retaining his membership in New York, behaves
+in such an immoral and indecorous manner as to bring the greatest
+discredit upon the Order, and to materially injure it in the estimation of
+the uninitiated community. Will it be, for a moment, contended that a
+lodge in San Francisco cannot arrest the evil by bringing the unworthy
+Mason under discipline, and even ejecting him from the fraternity, if
+severity like that is necessary for the protection of the institution? Or
+will it be contended that redress can only be sought through the delay and
+uncertainty of an appeal to his lodge in New York? Even if the words of
+the ancient laws are silent on this subject, reason and justice would seem
+to maintain the propriety and expediency of the doctrine that the lodge at
+San Francisco is amply competent to extend its jurisdiction and exercise
+its discipline over the culprit.
+
+In respect to the number of votes necessary to admit a Master Mason
+applying by petition for membership in a lodge, there can be no doubt that
+he must submit to precisely the same conditions as those prescribed to a
+profane on his petition for initiation. There is no room for argument
+here, for the General Regulations are express on this subject.
+
+"No man can be made or _admitted a member_ of a particular lodge," says
+the fifth regulation, "without previous notice one month before given to
+the said lodge."
+
+And the sixth regulation adds, that "no man can be entered a Brother in
+any particular lodge, or _admitted to be a member_ thereof, without the
+unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge then present."
+
+So that it may be considered as settled law, so far as the General
+Regulations can settle a law of Masonry, that a Master Mason can only be
+admitted a member of a lodge when applying by petition, after a month's
+probation, after due inquiry into his character, and after a unanimous
+ballot in his favor.
+
+But there are other rights of Master Masons consequent upon membership,
+which remain to be considered. In uniting with a lodge, a Master Mason
+becomes a participant of all its interests, and is entitled to speak and
+vote upon all subjects that come before the lodge for investigation. He is
+also entitled, if duly elected by his fellows, to hold any office in the
+lodge, except that of Master, for which he must be qualified by previously
+having occupied the post of a Warden.
+
+A Master has the right in all cases of an appeal from the decision of the
+Master or of the lodge.
+
+A Master Mason, in good standing, has a right at any time to demand from
+his lodge a certificate to that effect.
+
+Whatever other rights may appertain to Master Masons will be the subjects
+of separate sections.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Right of Visit._
+
+
+Every Master Mason, who is an affiliated member of a lodge, has the right
+to visit any other lodge as often as he may desire to do so. This right is
+secured to him by the ancient regulations, and is, therefore,
+irreversible. In the "Ancient Charges at the Constitution of a Lodge,"
+formerly contained in a MS. of the Lodge of Antiquity in London, and whose
+date is not later than 1688,[81]it is directed "that every Mason receive
+and cherish strange fellows when they come over the country, and set them
+on work, if they will work as the manner is; that is to say, if the Mason
+have any mould stone in his place, he shall give him a mould stone, and
+set him on work; and if he have none, the Mason shall refresh him with
+money unto the next lodge."
+
+This regulation is explicit. It not only infers the right of visit, but
+it declares that the strange Brother shall be welcomed, "received, and
+cherished," and "set on work," that is, permitted to participate in the
+work of your lodge. Its provisions are equally applicable to Brethren
+residing in the place where the lodge is situated as to transient
+Brethren, provided that they are affiliated Masons.
+
+In the year 1819, the law was in England authoritatively settled by a
+decree of the Grand Lodge. A complaint had been preferred against a lodge
+in London, for having refused admission to some Brethren who were well
+known to them, alleging that as the lodge was about to initiate a
+candidate, no visitor could be admitted until that ceremony was concluded.
+It was then declared, "that it is the undoubted right of every Mason who
+is well known, or properly vouched, to visit any lodge during the time it
+is opened for general masonic business, observing the proper forms to be
+attended to on such occasions, and so that the Master may not be
+interrupted in the performance of his duty."[82]
+
+A lodge, when not opened for "general masonic business," but when engaged
+in the consideration of matters which interest the lodge alone, and which
+it would be inexpedient or indelicate to make public, may refuse to admit
+a visitor. Lodges engaged in this way, in private business, from which
+visitors are excluded, are said by the French Masons to be opened "_en
+famille_."
+
+To entitle him to this right of visit, a Mason must be affiliated, that
+is, he must be a contributing member of some lodge. This doctrine is thus
+laid down in the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England:
+
+"A Brother who is not a subscribing member to some lodge, shall not be
+permitted to visit any one lodge in the town or place in which he resides,
+more than once during his secession from the craft."
+
+A non-subscribing or unaffiliated Mason is permitted to visit each lodge
+once, and once only, because it is supposed that this visit is made for
+the purpose of enabling him to make a selection of the one with which he
+may prefer permanently to unite. But, afterwards, he loses this right of
+visit, to discountenance those Brethren who wish to continue members of
+the Order, and to partake of its pleasures and advantages, without
+contributing to its support.
+
+A Master Mason is not entitled to visit a lodge, unless he previously
+submits to an examination, or is personally vouched for by a competent
+Brother present; but this is a subject of so much importance as to claim
+consideration in a distinct section.
+
+Another regulation is, that a strange Brother shall furnish the lodge he
+intends to visit with a certificate of his good standing in the lodge from
+which he last hailed. This regulation has, in late years, given rise to
+much discussion. Many of the Grand Lodges of this country, and several
+masonic writers, strenuously contend for its antiquity and necessity,
+while others as positively assert that it is a modern innovation upon
+ancient usage.
+
+There can, however, I think, be no doubt of the antiquity of certificates.
+That the system requiring them was in force nearly two hundred years ago,
+at least, will be evident from the third of the Regulations made in
+General Assembly, December 27, 1663, under the Grand Mastership of the
+Earl of St. Albans,[83] and which is in the following words:
+
+"3. That no person hereafter who shall be accepted a Freemason, shall be
+admitted into any lodge or assembly, until he has brought a certificate
+of the time and place of his acceptation, from the lodge that accepted
+him, unto the Master of that limit or division where such a lodge is
+kept." This regulation has been reiterated on several occasions, by the
+Grand Lodge of England in 1772, and at subsequent periods by several Grand
+Lodges of this and other countries. It is not, however, in force in many
+of the American jurisdictions.
+
+Another right connected with the right of visitation is, that of demanding
+a sight of the Warrant of Constitution. This instrument it is, indeed, not
+only the right but the duty of every strange visitor carefully to inspect,
+before he enters a lodge, that he may thus satisfy himself of the legality
+and regularity of its character and authority. On such a demand being made
+by a visitor for a sight of its Warrant, every lodge is bound to comply
+with the requisition, and produce the instrument. The same rule, of
+course, applies to lodges under dispensation, whose Warrant of
+Dispensation supplies the place of a Warrant of Constitution.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of the Examination of Visitors._
+
+
+It has already been stated, in the preceding section, that a Master Mason
+is not permitted to visit a lodge unless he previously submits to an
+examination, or is personally vouched for by some competent Brother
+present. The prerogative of vouching for a Brother is an important one,
+and will constitute the subject of the succeeding section. At present let
+us confine ourselves to the consideration of the mode of examining a
+visitor.
+
+Every visitor, who offers himself to the appointed committee of the lodge
+for examination, is expected, as a preliminary step, to submit to the
+Tiler's Obligation; so called, because it is administered in the Tiler's
+room. As this obligation forms no part of the secret ritual of the Order,
+but is administered to every person before any lawful knowledge of his
+being a Mason has been received, there can be nothing objectionable in
+inserting it here, and in fact, it will be advantageous to have the
+precise words of so important a declaration placed beyond the possibility
+of change or omission by inexperienced Brethren.
+
+The oath, then, which is administered to the visitor, and which he may, if
+he chooses, require every one present to take with him, is in the
+following words
+
+"I, A. B., do hereby and hereon solemnly and sincerely swear, that I have
+been regularly initiated, passed, and raised, to the sublime degree of a
+Master Mason, in a just and legally constituted lodge of such, that I do
+not now stand suspended or expelled, and know of no reason why I should
+not hold masonic communication with my Brethren.
+
+This declaration having been given in the most solemn manner, the
+examination must then be conducted with the necessary forms. The good old
+rule of "commencing at the beginning" should be observed. Every question
+is to be asked and every answer demanded which is necessary to convince
+the examiner that the party examined is acquainted with what he ought to
+know, to entitle him to the appellation of a Brother. Nothing is to be
+taken for granted--categorical answers must be required to all that it is
+deemed important to be asked. No forgetfulness is to be excused, nor is
+the want of memory to be accepted as a valid excuse for the want of
+knowledge. The Mason, who is so unmindful of his duties as to have
+forgotten the instructions he has received, must pay the penalty of his
+carelessness, and be deprived of his contemplated visit to that society
+whose secret modes of recognition he has so little valued as not to have
+treasured them in his memory. While there are some things which may be
+safely passed over in the examination of one who confesses himself to be
+"rusty," or but recently initiated, because they are details which require
+much study to acquire, and constant practice to retain, there are still
+other things of great importance which must be rigidly demanded, and with
+the knowledge of which the examiner cannot, under any circumstances,
+dispense.
+
+Should suspicions of imposture arise, let no expression of these
+suspicions be made until the final decree for rejection is pronounced. And
+let that decree be uttered in general terms, such as: "I am not
+satisfied," or, "I do not recognize you," and not in more specific terms,
+such as, "You did not answer this inquiry," or, "You are ignorant on that
+point." The visitor is only entitled to know, generally, that he has not
+complied with the requisitions of his examiner. To descend to particulars
+is always improper and often dangerous.
+
+Above all, the examiner should never ask what are called "leading
+questions," or such as include in themselves an indication of what the
+answer is to be; nor should he in any manner aid the memory of the party
+examined by the slightest hint. If he has it in him, it will come out
+without assistance, and if he has it not, he is clearly entitled to no
+aid.
+
+Lastly, never should an unjustifiable delicacy weaken the rigor of these
+rules. Let it be remembered, that for the wisest and most evident reasons,
+the merciful maxim of the law, which says, that it is better that
+ninety-nine guilty men should escape than that one innocent man should be
+punished, is with us reversed, and that in Masonry _it is better that
+ninety and nine true men should be turned away from the door of a lodge
+than that one cowan should be admitted_.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Vouching for a Brother._
+
+
+An examination may sometimes be omitted when any competent Brother present
+will vouch for the visitor's masonic standing and qualifications. This
+prerogative of vouching is an important one which every Master Mason is
+entitled, under certain restrictions, to exercise; but it is also one
+which may so materially affect the well-being of the whole
+fraternity--since by its injudicious use impostors might be introduced
+among the faithful--that it should be controlled by the most stringent
+regulations.
+
+To vouch for one, is to bear witness for him; and, in witnessing to truth,
+every caution should be observed, lest falsehood should cunningly assume
+its garb. The Brother who vouches should, therefore, know to a certainty
+that the one for whom he vouches is really what he claims to be. He should
+know this not from a casual conversation, nor a loose and careless
+inquiry, but, as the unwritten law of the Order expresses it, from
+"_strict trial, due examination, or lawful information_."
+
+Of strict trial and due examination I have already treated in the
+preceding section; and it only remains to say, that when the vouching is
+founded on the knowledge obtained in this way, it is absolutely necessary
+that the Brother so vouching shall be _competent_ to conduct such an
+examination, and that his general intelligence and shrewdness and his
+knowledge of Masonry shall be such as to place him above the probability
+of being imposed upon. The important and indispensable qualification of a
+voucher is, therefore, that he shall be competent. The Master of a lodge
+has no right to accept, without further inquiry, the avouchment of a
+young and inexperienced, or even of an old, if ignorant, Mason.
+
+Lawful information, which is the remaining ground for an avouchment, may
+be derived either from the declaration of another Brother, or from having
+met the party vouched for in a lodge on some previous occasion.
+
+If the information is derived from another Brother, who states that he has
+examined the party, then all that has already been said of the competency
+of the one giving the information is equally applicable. The Brother,
+giving the original information, must be competent to make a rigid
+examination. Again, the person giving the information, the one receiving
+it, and the one of whom it is given, should be all present at the time;
+for otherwise there would be no certainty of identity. Information,
+therefore, given by letter or through a third party, is highly irregular.
+The information must also be positive, not founded on belief or opinion,
+but derived from a legitimate source. And, lastly, it must not have been
+received casually, but for the very purpose of being used for masonic
+purposes. For one to say to another in the course of a desultory
+conversation: "A.B. is a Mason," is not sufficient. He may not be
+speaking with due caution, under the expectation that his words will be
+considered of weight. He must say something to this effect: "I know this
+man to be a Master Mason," for such or such reasons, and you may safely
+recognize him as such. This alone will insure the necessary care and
+proper observance of prudence.
+
+If the information given is on the ground that the person, vouched has
+been seen sitting in a lodge by the voucher, care must be taken to inquire
+if it was a "Lodge of Master Masons." A person may forget, from the lapse
+of time, and vouch for a stranger as a Master Mason, when the lodge in
+which he saw him was only opened in the first or second degree.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of the Right of Claiming Relief._
+
+
+One of the great objects of our institution is, to afford relief to a
+worthy, distressed Brother. In his want and destitution, the claim of a
+Mason upon his Brethren is much greater than that of a profane. This is a
+Christian as well as a masonic doctrine. "As we have therefore
+opportunity," says St. Paul, "let us do good unto all men, especially
+unto them who are of the household of faith."
+
+This claim for relief he may present either to a lodge or to a Brother
+Mason. The rule, as well as the principles by which it is to be regulated,
+is laid down in that fundamental law of Masonry, the Old Charges, in the
+following explicit words, under the head of "Behavior towards a strange
+Brother:"
+
+"You are cautiously to examine him, in such a method as prudence shall
+direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false
+pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware
+of giving him any hints of knowledge.
+
+"But if you discover him to be a true and genuine Brother, you are to
+respect him accordingly; and if he is in want, you must relieve him if you
+can, or else direct him how he may be relieved. You must employ him some
+days, or else recommend him to be employed. But you are not charged to do
+beyond your ability, only to prefer a poor Brother, that is a good man and
+true, before any other people in the same circumstances."
+
+This law thus laid down, includes, it will be perceived, as two important
+prerequisites, on which to found a claim for relief, that the person
+applying shall be in distress, and that he shall be worthy of assistance.
+
+He must be in distress. Ours is not an insurance company, a joint stock
+association, in which, for a certain premium paid, an equivalent may be
+demanded. No Mason, or no lodge, is bound to give pecuniary or other aid
+to a Brother, unless he really needs. The word " benefit," as usually used
+in the modern friendly societies, has no place in the vocabulary of
+Freemasonry. If a wealthy Brother is afflicted with sorrow or sickness, we
+are to strive to comfort him with our sympathy, our kindness, and our
+attention, but we are to bestow our eleemosynary aid only on the indigent
+or the destitute.
+
+He must also be worthy. There is no obligation on a Mason to relieve the
+distresses, however real they may be, of an unworthy Brother. The claimant
+must be, in the language of the Charge, "true and genuine." True here is
+used in its good old Saxon meaning, of "faithful" or "trusty." A true
+Mason is one who is mindful of his obligations, and who faithfully
+observes and practices all his duties. Such a man, alone, can rightfully
+claim the assistance of his Brethren.
+
+But a third provision is made in the fundamental law; namely, that the
+assistance is not to be beyond the ability of the giver. One of the most
+important landmarks, contained in our unwritten law, more definitely
+announces this provision, by the words, that the aid and assistance shall
+be without injury to oneself or his family. Masonry does not require that
+we shall sacrifice our own welfare to that of a Brother; but that with
+prudent liberality, and a just regard to our own worldly means, we shall
+give of the means with which Providence may have blessed us for the relief
+of our distressed Brethren.
+
+It is hardly necessary to say, that the claim for relief of a worthy
+distressed Mason extends also to his immediate family.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of the Right of Masonic Burial._
+
+
+After a very careful examination, I can find nothing in the old charges or
+General Regulations, nor in any other part of the fundamental law, in
+relation to masonic burial of deceased Brethren. It is probable that, at
+an early period, when the great body of the craft consisted of Entered
+Apprentices, the usage permitted the burial of members, of the first or
+second degree, with the honors of Masonry. As far back as 1754,
+processions for the purpose of burying Masons seemed to have been
+conducted by some of the lodges with either too much frequency, or some
+other irregularity; for, in November of that year, the Grand Lodge adopted
+a regulation, forbidding them, under a heavy penalty, unless by permission
+of the Grand Master, or his Deputy.[84] As there were, comparatively
+speaking, few Master Masons at that period, it seems a natural inference
+that most of the funeral processions were for the burial of Apprentices,
+or, at least, of Fellow Crafts.
+
+But the usage since then, has been greatly changed; and by universal
+consent, the law, as first committed to writing, by Preston, who was the
+author of our present funeral service, is now adopted.
+
+The Regulation, as laid down by Preston, is so explicit, that I prefer
+giving it in his own words.[85]
+
+"No Mason can be interred with the formalities of the Order, unless it be
+at his own special request, communicated to the Master of the Lodge of
+which he died a member--foreigners and sojourners excepted; nor unless he
+has been advanced to the third degree of Masonry, from which restriction
+there can be no exception. Fellow Crafts or Apprentices are not entitled
+to the funeral obsequies."
+
+This rule has been embodied in the modern Constitutions of the Grand Lodge
+of England; and, as I have already observed, appears by universal consent
+to have been adopted as the general usage.
+
+The necessity for a dispensation, which is also required by the modern
+English Constitutions, does not seem to have met with the same general
+approval, and in this country, dispensations for funeral processions are
+not usually, if at all, required. Indeed, Preston himself, in explaining
+the law, says that it was not intended to restrict the privileges of the
+regular lodges, but that, "by the universal practice of Masons, every
+regular lodge is authorized by the Constitution to act on such occasions
+when limited to its own members."[86] It is only when members of other
+lodges, not under the control of the Master, are convened, that a
+dispensation is required. But in America, Grand Lodges or Grand Masters
+have not generally interfered with the rights of the lodges to bury the
+dead; the Master being of course amenable to the constituted authorities
+for any indecorum or impropriety.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of the Rights of Past Masters.
+
+
+
+I have already discussed the right of Past Masters to become members of a
+Grand Lodge, in a preceding part of this work,[87] and have there arrived
+at the conclusion that no such inherent right exists, and that a Grand
+Lodge may or may not admit them to membership, according to its own notion
+of expediency. Still the fact, that they are competent by their masonic
+rank of accepting such a courtesy when extended, in itself constitutes a
+prerogative; for none but Masters, Wardens, or Past Masters, can under any
+circumstances become members of a Grand Lodge.
+
+Past Masters possess a few other positive rights.
+
+In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and at
+all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the ceremony
+of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it
+necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that it
+involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been warmly
+mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being present
+at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,
+made in Royal Arch Chapters.
+
+In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of possessors
+of the same degree, the Grand Lodge of England has long since
+distinguished them as "virtual" and as "actual" Past Masters. The terms
+are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to avoid
+circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.
+
+An _actual Past Master_ is one who has been regularly installed to preside
+over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand Lodge. A _virtual
+Past Master_ is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the
+purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.
+
+Now the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be
+permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?
+
+The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the
+doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally install
+the Master of a Symbolic Lodge; but that there is no rule forbidding his
+being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by several
+Grand Lodges, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a virtual
+Past Master at the installation-service.
+
+In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past
+Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.
+
+In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is
+asserted, that "it is the bounden duty of all Grand Lodges to prevent the
+possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function
+appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a
+lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to
+the order of Past Masters."[88]
+
+Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled to
+the most respectful consideration, has announced a similar doctrine in one
+of his elaborate reports to the Grand Chapter of Arkansas. He does not
+consider "that the Past Master's degree, conferred in a chapter, invests
+the recipient with any rank or authority, except within the chapter
+itself; that it no ways qualifies or authorizes him to preside in the
+chair of a lodge: that a lodge has no legal means of knowing that he has
+received the degree in a chapter: for it is not supposed to know anything
+that takes place there any more than it knows what takes place in a Lodge
+of Perfection, or a Chapter of Knights of the Rose Croix;" and, of course,
+if the Past Masters of a lodge have no such "legal means" of recognition
+of Chapter Masters, they cannot permit them to be present at an
+installation.
+
+This is, in fact, no new doctrine. Preston, in his description of the
+installation ceremony, says: "The new Master is then conducted to an
+adjacent room, where he is regularly installed, and bound to his trust in
+ancient form, in the presence of at least _three installed Masters_"[89]
+And Dr. Oliver, in commenting on this passage, says, "this part of the
+ceremony can only be orally communicated, nor can any but _installed_
+Masters be present."[90]
+
+And this rule appears to be founded on the principles of reason. There can
+be no doubt, if we carefully examine the history of Masonry in this
+country and in England, that the degree of Past Master was originally
+conferred by Symbolic Lodges as an honorarium or reward bestowed upon
+those Brethren who had been found worthy to occupy the Oriental Chair. In
+so far it was only a degree of office, and could be obtained only from the
+Lodge in which the office had been conferred. At a later period it was
+deemed an essential prerequisite to exaltation in the degree of Royal
+Arch, and was, for that purpose, conferred on candidates for that
+position, while the Royal Arch degree was under the control of the
+symbolic Lodges, but still only conferred by the Past Masters of the
+Lodge. But subsequently, when the system of Royal Arch Masonry was greatly
+enlarged and extended in this country, and chapters were organized
+independent of the Grand and symbolic Lodges, these Chapters took with
+them the Past Master's degree, and assumed the right of conferring it on
+their candidates. Hence arose the anomaly which now exists in American
+Masonry, of two degrees bearing the same name, and said to be almost
+identical in character, conferred by two different bodies under entirely
+different qualifications and for totally different purposes. As was to be
+expected, when time had in some degree obliterated the details of history,
+each party began to claim for itself the sovereign virtue of legitimacy.
+The Past Masters of the Chapters denied the right of the Symbolic Lodges
+to confer the degree, and the latter, in their turn, asserted that the
+degree, as conferred in the Chapter, was an innovation.
+
+The prevalence of the former doctrine would, of course, tend to deprive
+the Symbolic Lodges of a vested right held by them from the most ancient
+times--that, namely, of conferring an honorarium on their Masters elect.
+
+On the whole, then, from this view of the surreptitious character of the
+Chapter Degree, and supported by the high authority whom I have cited, as
+well as by the best usage, I am constrained to believe that the true rule
+is, to deny the Chapter, or Virtual Past Masters, the right to install, or
+to be present at the installation of the Master of a Symbolic Lodge. A
+Past Master may preside over a lodge in the absence of the Master,
+provided he is invited to do so by the Senior Warden present. The Second
+General Regulation gave the power of presiding, during the absence of the
+Master, to the last Past Master present, after the lodge had been
+congregated by the Senior Warden; but two years afterwards, the rule was
+repealed, and the power of presiding in such cases was vested in the
+Senior Warden. And accordingly, in this country, it has always been held,
+that in the absence of the Master, his authority descends to the Senior
+Warden, who may, however, by courtesy, offer the chair to a Past Master
+present, after the lodge has been congregated. Some jurisdictions have
+permitted a Past Master to preside in the absence of the Master and both
+Wardens, provided he was a member of that lodge. But I confess that I can
+find no warrant for this rule in any portion of our fundamental laws. The
+power of congregating the lodge in the absence of the Master has always
+been confined to the Wardens; and it therefore seems to me, that when both
+the Master and Wardens are absent, although a Past Master may be present,
+the lodge cannot be opened.
+
+A Past Master is eligible for election to the chair, without again passing
+through the office of a Warden.
+
+He is also entitled to a seat in the East, and to wear a jewel and collar
+peculiar to his dignity.
+
+By an ancient regulation, contained in the Old Charges, Past Masters alone
+were eligible to the office of Grand Warden. The Deputy Grand Master was
+also to be selected from among the Masters, or Past Masters of Lodges. No
+such regulation was in existence as to the office of Grand Master, who
+might be selected from the mass of the fraternity. At the present time, in
+this country, it is usual to select the Grand officers from among the Past
+Masters of the jurisdiction, though I know of no ancient law making such a
+regulation obligatory, except in respect to the affairs of Grand Wardens
+and Deputy Grand Master.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Affiliation.
+
+
+
+Affiliation is defined to be the act by which a lodge receives a Mason
+among its members. A profane is said to be "initiated," but a Mason is
+"affiliated."[91]
+
+Now the mode in which a Mason becomes affiliated with a lodge, in some
+respects differs from, and in others resembles, the mode in which a
+profane is initiated.
+
+A Mason, desiring to be affiliated with a lodge, must apply by petition;
+this petition must be referred to a committee for investigation of
+character, he must remain in a state of probation for one month, and must
+then submit to a ballot, in which unanimity will be required for his
+admission. In all these respects, there is no difference in the modes of
+regulating applications for initiation and affiliation. The Fifth and
+Sixth General Regulations, upon which these usages are founded, draw no
+distinction between the act of making a Mason and admitting a member. The
+two processes are disjunctively connected in the language of both
+regulations. "No man can be made, _or admitted a member_ * * * * without
+previous notice one month before;" are the words of the Fifth Regulation.
+And in a similar spirit the Sixth adds: "But no man can be entered a
+Brother in any particular lodge, _or admitted to be a member_ thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members of that lodge."
+
+None but Master Masons are permitted to apply for affiliation; and every
+Brother so applying must bring to the lodge to which he applies a
+certificate of his regular dismission from the lodge of which he was last
+a member. This document is now usually styled a "demit," and should
+specify the good standing of the bearer at the time of his resignation or
+demission.
+
+Under the regulations of the various Grand Lodges of this country, a
+profane cannot, as has been already observed, apply for initiation in any
+other lodge than the one nearest to his residence. No such regulation,
+however, exists in relation to the application of a Mason for
+affiliation. Having once been admitted into the Order, he has a right to
+select the lodge with which he may desire to unite himself. He is not even
+bound to affiliate with the lodge in which he was initiated, but after
+being raised, may leave it, without signing the bye-laws, and attach
+himself to another.
+
+A profane, having been rejected by a lodge, can never apply to any other
+for initiation. But a Mason, having been rejected, on his application for
+affiliation, by a lodge, is not thereby debarred from subsequently making
+a similar application to any other.
+
+In some few jurisdictions a local regulation has of late years been
+enacted, that no Mason shall belong to more than one lodge. It is, I
+presume, competent for a Grand Lodge to enact such a regulation; but where
+such enactment has not taken place, we must be governed by the ancient and
+general principle.
+
+The General Regulations, adopted in 1721, contain no reference to this
+case; but in a new regulation, adopted on the 19th February, 1723, it was
+declared that "no Brother shall belong to more than one lodge within the
+bills of mortality." This rule was, therefore, confined to the lodges in
+the city of London, and did not affect the country lodges. Still,
+restricted as it was in its operation, Anderson remarks, "this regulation
+is neglected for several reasons, and now obsolete."[92] Custom now in
+England and in other parts of Europe, as well as in some few portions of
+this country, is adverse to the regulation; and where no local law exists
+in a particular jurisdiction, I know of no principle of masonic
+jurisprudence which forbids a Mason to affiliate himself with more than
+one lodge.
+
+The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order, but
+by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are
+thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all
+this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for
+others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is
+affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject to
+the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried in
+each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by
+that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his
+suspension or expulsion in all the others.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VII.
+
+Of Demitting.
+
+
+
+To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion a
+certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to the
+applicant, which is technically called a _demit_.
+
+The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been
+denied. In 1853, the Grand Lodge of Connecticut adopted a regulation "that
+no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the
+purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be
+considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually become
+a member of another." Similar regulations have been either adopted or
+proposed by a few other Grand Lodges, but I much doubt both their
+expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping Masons,
+after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the
+voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of
+making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is also
+highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors "of
+his own free will and accord," and surely we should desire to keep none
+among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar with
+the Hudibrastic adage, that
+
+ "A man convinced against his will,
+ Is of the same opinion still,"
+
+and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the institution
+which would generate a wish to continue his membership, could scarcely
+have his slumbering zeal awakened, or his coldness warmed by the bolts and
+bars of a regulation that should keep him a reluctant prisoner within the
+walls from which he would gladly escape. Masons with such dispositions we
+can gladly spare from our ranks.
+
+The Ancient Charges, while they assert that every Mason should belong to a
+lodge, affix no penalty for disobedience. No man can be compelled to
+continue his union with a society, whether it be religious, political, or
+social, any longer than will suit his own inclinations or sense of duty.
+To interfere with this inalienable prerogative of a freeman would be an
+infringement on private rights. A Mason's initiation was voluntary, and
+his continuance in the Order must be equally so.
+
+But no man is entitled to a demit, unless at the time of demanding it he
+be in good standing and free from all charges. If under charges for crime,
+he must remain and abide his trial, or if in arrears, must pay up his
+dues.
+
+There is, however, one case of demission for which a special law has been
+enacted. That is, when several Brethren at the same time request demits
+from a lodge. As this action is sometimes the result of pique or anger,
+and as the withdrawal of several members at once might seriously impair
+the prosperity, or perhaps even endanger the very existence of the lodge,
+it has been expressly forbidden by the General Regulations, unless the
+lodge has become too numerous for convenient working; and not even then is
+permitted except by a Dispensation. The words of this law are to be found
+in the Eighth General Regulation, as follows:
+
+"No set or number of Brethren shall withdraw or separate themselves from
+the lodge in which they were made Brethren, or were afterwards admitted
+members, unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even then, without a
+dispensation from the Grand Master or his Deputy; and when they are thus
+separated, they must either immediately join themselves to such other
+lodge as they shall like best, with the unanimous consent of that other
+lodge to which they go, or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
+warrant to join in forming a new lodge."
+
+It seems, therefore, that, although a lodge cannot deny the right of a
+single member to demit, when a sort of conspiracy may be supposed to be
+formed, and several Brethren present their petitions for demits at one and
+the same time, the lodge may not only refuse, but is bound to do so,
+unless under a dispensation, which dispensation can only be given in the
+case of an over-populous lodge.
+
+With these restrictions and qualifications, it cannot be doubted that
+every Master Mason has a right to demit from his lodge at his own
+pleasure. What will be the result upon himself, in his future relations to
+the Order, of such demission, will constitute the subject of the
+succeeding chapter.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VIII.
+
+Of Unaffiliated Masons.
+
+
+
+An unaffiliated Mason is one who is not connected by membership with any
+lodge. There can be no doubt that such a position is contrary to the
+spirit of our institution, and that affiliation is a duty obligatory on
+every Mason. The Old Charges, which have been so often cited as the
+fundamental law of Masonry, say on this subject: "every Brother ought to
+belong to a lodge and to be subject to its bye-laws and the General
+Regulations."
+
+Explicitly as this doctrine has been announced, it has been too little
+observed, in consequence of no precise penalty having been annexed to its
+violation. In all times, unaffiliated Masons have existed--Masons who have
+withdrawn from all active participation in the duties and responsibilities
+of the Order, and who, when in the hour of danger or distress, have not
+hesitated to claim its protection or assistance, while they have refused
+in the day of their prosperity to add anything to its wealth, its power,
+or its influence. In this country, the anti-masonic persecutions of 1828,
+and a few years subsequently, by causing the cessation of many lodges,
+threw a vast number of Brethren out of all direct connection with the
+institution; on the restoration of peace, and the renewal of labor by the
+lodges, too many of these Brethren neglected to reunite themselves with
+the craft, and thus remained unaffiliated. The habit, thus introduced, was
+followed by others, until the sin of unaffiliation has at length arrived
+at such a point of excess, as to have become a serious evil, and to have
+attracted the attention and received the condemnation of almost every
+Grand Lodge.
+
+A few Grand Lodges have denied the right of a Mason permanently to demit
+from the Order. Texas, for instance, has declared that "it does not
+recognize the right of a Mason to demit or separate himself from the lodge
+in which he was made, or may afterwards be admitted, except for the
+purpose of joining another lodge, or when he may be about to remove
+without the jurisdiction of the lodge of which he may be a member."[93] A
+few other Grand Lodges have adopted a similar regulation; but the
+prevailing opinion of the authorities appears to be, that it is competent
+to interfere with the right to demit, certain rights and prerogatives
+being, however, lost by such demission.
+
+Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and one or two other Grand Lodges, while not
+positively denying the right of demission, have at various times levied a
+tax or contribution on the demitted or unaffiliated Masons within their
+respective jurisdictions. This principle, however, has also failed to
+obtain the general concurrence of other Grand Lodges, and some of them, as
+Maryland, have openly denounced it. After a careful examination of the
+authorities, I cannot deny to any man the _right_ of withdrawing,
+whensoever he pleases, from a voluntary association--the laws of the land
+would not sustain us in the enforcement of such a regulation; and our own
+self-respect should prevent us from attempting it. If, then, he has a
+right to withdraw, it clearly follows that we have no right to tax him,
+which is only one mode of inflicting a fine or penalty for an act, the
+right to do which we have acceded. In the strong language of the Committee
+of Correspondence of Maryland:[94] "The object of Masonry never was to
+extort, _nolens volens,_ money from its votaries. Such are not its
+principles or teaching. The advocating such doctrines cannot advance the
+interest or reputation of the institution; but will, as your committee
+fear, do much to destroy its usefulness. Compulsive membership deprives it
+of the title, _Free_ and Accepted."
+
+But as it is an undoubted precept of the Order that every Mason should
+belong to a lodge, and contribute, so far as his means will allow, to the
+support of the institution, and as, by his demission, for other than
+temporary purposes, he violates the principles and disobeys the precepts
+of the Order, it naturally follows that his withdrawal must place him in a
+different position from that which he would occupy as an affiliated Mason.
+It is now time for us to inquire what that new position is.
+
+We may say, then, that, whenever a Mason permanently withdraws his
+membership, he at once, and while he continues unaffiliated, dissevers all
+connection between himself and the _Lodge organization_ of the Order. He,
+by this act, divests himself of all the rights and privileges which belong
+to him as a member of that organization. Among these rights and privileges
+are those of visitation, of pecuniary aid, and of masonic burial.
+Whenever he approaches the door of a lodge, asking to enter or seeking for
+assistance, he is to be met in the light of a profane. He may knock, but
+the door must not be opened--he may ask, but he is not to receive. The
+work of the lodge is not to be shared by those who have thrown aside their
+aprons and their implements, and abandoned the labors of the Temple--the
+funds of the lodge are to be distributed only among these who are aiding,
+by their individual contributions, to the formation of similar funds in
+other lodges.
+
+But from the well-known and universally-admitted maxim of "once a Mason,
+and always a Mason," it follows that a demitted Brother cannot by such
+demission divest himself of all his masonic responsibilities to his
+Brethren, nor be deprived of their correlative responsibility to him. An
+unaffiliated Mason is still bound by certain obligations, of which he
+cannot, under any circumstances, divest himself, and by similar
+obligations are the fraternity bound to him. These relate to the duties of
+secrecy and of aid in the imminent hour of peril. Of the first of these
+there can be no doubt; and as to the last, the words of the precept
+directing it leaves us no option; nor is it a time when the G.H.S. of D.
+is thrown out to inquire into the condition of the party.
+
+Speaking on this subject, Brother Albert Pike, in his report to the Grand
+Lodge of Arkansas, says "if a person appeals to us as a Mason in imminent
+peril, or such pressing need that we have not time to inquire into his
+worthiness, then, lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy
+Brother, we must not stop to inquire _as to anything_." But I do not think
+that the learned Brother has put the case in the strongest light. It is
+not alone "lest we might refuse to relieve and aid a worthy Brother," that
+we are in cases of "imminent peril" to make no pause for deliberation. But
+it is because we are bound by our highest obligations at all times, and to
+all Masons, to give that aid when _duly_ called for.
+
+I may, then, after this somewhat protracted discussion, briefly
+recapitulate the position, the rights and the responsibilities of an
+unaffiliated Mason as follows:
+
+1. An unaffiliated Mason is still bound by all his masonic duties and
+obligations, excepting those connected with the organization of the lodge.
+
+2. He has a right to aid in imminent peril when _he asks for that aid in
+the_ proper _and conventional way_.
+
+3. He loses the right to receive pecuniary relief.
+
+4. He loses the general right to visit[95] lodges, or to walk in masonic
+processions.
+
+5. He loses the right of masonic burial.
+
+6. He still remains subject to the government of the Order, and may be
+tried and punished for any offense as an affiliated Mason would be, by the
+lodge within whose geographical jurisdiction he resides.
+
+
+
+
+
+Book Fourth.
+
+Of Masonic Crimes and Punishments.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter I.
+
+Of What Are Masonic Crimes.
+
+
+
+The division of wrongs, by the writers on municipal law, into private and
+public, or civil injuries and crimes and misdemeanors, does not apply to
+the jurisprudence of Freemasonry. Here all wrongs are crimes, because they
+are a violation of the precepts of the institution; and an offense against
+an individual is punished, not so much because it is a breach of his
+private rights, as because it affects the well-being of the whole masonic
+community.
+
+In replying to the question, "what are masonic crimes?" by which is meant
+what crimes are punishable by the constituted authorities, our safest
+guide will be that fundamental law which is contained in the Old Charges.
+These give a concise, but succinct summary of the duties of a Mason, and,
+of course, whatever is a violation of any one of these duties will
+constitute a masonic crime, and the perpetrator will be amenable to
+masonic punishment.
+
+But before entering on the consideration of these penal offenses, it will
+be well that we should relieve the labor of the task, by inquiring what
+crimes or offenses are not supposed to come within the purview of masonic
+jurisprudence.
+
+Religion and politics are subjects which it is well known are stringently
+forbidden to be introduced into Masonry. And hence arises the doctrine,
+that Masonry will not take congnizance of religious or political offenses.
+
+Heresy, for instance, is not a masonic crime. Masons are obliged to use
+the words of the Old Charges, "to that religion in which all men agree,
+leaving their particular opinions to themselves;" and, therefore, as long
+as a Mason acknowledges his belief in the existence of one God, a lodge
+can take no action on his peculiar opinions, however heterodox they may
+be.
+
+In like manner, although all the most ancient and universally-received
+precepts of the institution inculcate obedience to the civil powers, and
+strictly forbid any mingling in plots or conspiracies against the peace
+and welfare of the nation, yet no offense against the state, which is
+simply political in its character, can be noticed by a lodge. On this
+important subject, the Old Charges are remarkably explicit. They say,
+putting perhaps the strongest case by way of exemplifying the principle,
+"that if a Brother should be a rebel against the State, he is not to be
+countenanced in his rebellion, however he may be pitied as an unhappy man;
+and, if convicted of no other crime, though the loyal Brotherhood must and
+ought to disown his rebellion, and give no umbrage or ground of political
+jealousy to the government for the time being, _they cannot expel him from
+the lodge, and his relation to it remains indefeasible_"
+
+The lodge can, therefore, take no cognizance of religious or political
+offenses.
+
+The first charge says: "a Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral
+law." Now, although, in a theological sense, the ten commandments are said
+to embrace and constitute the moral law, because they are its best
+exponent, yet jurists have given to the term a more general latitude, in
+defining the moral laws to be "the eternal, immutable laws of good and
+evil, to which the Creator himself, in all dispensations, conforms, and
+which he has enabled human reason to discover, so far as they are
+necessary for the conduct of human actions."[96] Perhaps the well known
+summary of Justinian will give the best idea of what this law is, namely,
+that we "should live honestly, (that is to say, without reproach,)[97]
+should injure nobody, and render to every one his just due."
+
+If such, then, be the meaning of the moral law, and if every Mason is by
+his tenure obliged to obey it, it follows, that all such crimes as profane
+swearing or great impiety in any form, neglect of social and domestic
+duties, murder and its concomitant vices of cruelty and hatred, adultery,
+dishonesty in any shape, perjury or malevolence, and habitual falsehood,
+inordinate covetousness, and in short, all those ramifications of these
+leading vices which injuriously affect the relations of man to God, his
+neighbor, and himself, are proper subjects of lodge jurisdiction. Whatever
+moral defects constitute the bad man, make also the bad Mason, and
+consequently come under the category of masonic offenses. The principle is
+so plain and comprehensible as to need no further exemplification. It is
+sufficient to say that, whenever an act done by a Mason is contrary to or
+subsersive of the three great duties which he owes to God, his neighbor,
+and himself, it becomes at once a subject of masonic investigation, and of
+masonic punishment.
+
+But besides these offenses against the universal moral law, there are many
+others arising from the peculiar nature of our institution. Among these we
+may mention, and in their order, those that are enumerated in the several
+sections of the Sixth Chapter of the Old Charges. These are, unseemly and
+irreverent conduct in the lodge, all excesses of every kind, private
+piques or quarrels brought into the lodge; imprudent conversation in
+relation to Masonry in the presence of uninitiated strangers; refusal to
+relieve a worthy distressed Brother, if in your power; and all "wrangling,
+quarreling, back-biting, and slander."
+
+The lectures in the various degrees, and the Ancient Charges read on the
+installation of the Master of a lodge, furnish us with other criteria for
+deciding what are peculiarly masonic offenses. All of them need not be
+detailed; but among them may be particularly mentioned the following: All
+improper revelations, undue solicitations for candidates, angry and
+over-zealous arguments in favor of Masonry with its enemies, every act
+which tends to impair the unsullied purity of the Order, want of
+reverence for and obedience to masonic superiors, the expression of a
+contemptuous opinion of the original rulers and patrons of Masonry, or of
+the institution itself; all countenance of impostors; and lastly, holding
+masonic communion with clandestine Masons, or visiting irregular lodges.
+
+From this list, which, extended as it is, might easily have been enlarged,
+it will be readily seen, that the sphere of masonic penal jurisdiction is
+by no means limited. It should, therefore, be the object of every Mason,
+to avoid the censure or reproach of his Brethren, by strictly confining
+himself as a point within that circle of duty which, at his first
+initiation, was presented to him as an object worthy of his consideration.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter II.
+
+Of Masonic Punishments.
+
+
+
+Having occupied the last chapter in a consideration of what constitute
+masonic crimes, it is next in order to inquire how these offenses are to
+be punished; and accordingly I propose in the following sections to treat
+of the various modes in which masonic law is vindicated, commencing with
+the slightest mode of punishment, which is censure, and proceeding to the
+highest, or expulsion from all the rights and privileges of the Order.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of Censure._
+
+
+A censure is the mildest form of punishment that can be inflicted by a
+lodge; and as it is simply the expression of an opinion by the members of
+the lodge, that they do not approve of the conduct of the person
+implicated, in a particular point of view, and as it does not in any
+degree affect the masonic standing of the one censured, nor for a moment
+suspend or abridge his rights and benefits, I have no doubt that it may be
+done on a mere motion, without previous notice, and adopted, as any other
+resolution, by a bare majority of the members present.
+
+Masonic courtesy would, however, dictate that notice should be given to
+the Brother, if absent, that such a motion of censure is about to be
+proposed or considered, to enable him to show cause, if any he have, why
+he should not be censured. But such notice is not, as I have said,
+necessary to the legality of the vote of censure.
+
+A vote of censure will sometimes, however, be the result of a trial, and
+in that case its adoption must be governed by the rules of masonic trials,
+which are hereafter to be laid down.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of Reprimand._
+
+
+A reprimand is the next mildest form of masonic punishment. It should
+never be adopted on a mere motion, but should always be the result of a
+regular trial, in which the party may have the opportunity of defense.
+
+A reprimand may be either private or public. If to be given in private,
+none should be present but the Master and the offender; or, if given by
+letter, no copy of that letter should be preserved.
+
+If given in public, the lodge is the proper place, and the reprimand
+should be given by the Master from his appropriate station.
+
+The Master is always the executive officer of the lodge, and in carrying
+out the sentence he must exercise his own prudent discretion as to the
+mode of delivery and form of words.
+
+A reprimand, whether private or public, does not affect the masonic
+standing of the offender.
+
+
+
+Section III.
+
+_Of Exclusion from the Lodge._
+
+
+Exclusion from a lodge may be of various degrees.
+
+1. A member may for indecorous or unmasonic conduct be excluded from a
+single meeting of the lodge. This may be done by the Master, under a
+provision of the bye-laws giving him the authority, or on his own
+responsibility, in which case he is amenable to the Grand Lodge for the
+correctness of his decision. Exclusion in this way does not affect the
+masonic standing of the person excluded, and does not require a previous
+trial.
+
+I cannot entertain any doubt that the Master of a lodge has the right to
+exclude temporarily any member or Mason, when he thinks that either his
+admission, if outside, or his continuance within, if present, will impair
+the peace and harmony of the lodge. It is a prerogative necessary to the
+faithful performance of his duties, and inalienable from his great
+responsibility to the Grand Lodge for the proper government of the Craft
+intrusted to his care. If, as it is described in the ancient manner of
+constituting a lodge, the Master is charged "to preserve the cement of the
+Lodge," it would be folly to give him such a charge, unless he were
+invested with the power to exclude an unruly or disorderly member. But as
+Masters are enjoined not to rule their lodges in an unjust or arbitrary
+manner, and as every Mason is clearly entitled to redress for any wrong
+that has been done to him, it follows that the Master is responsible to
+the Grand Lodge for the manner in which he has executed the vast power
+intrusted to him, and he may be tried and punished by that body, for
+excluding a member, when the motives of the act and the other
+circumstances of the exclusion were not such as to warrant the exercise of
+his prerogative.
+
+2. A member may be excluded from his lodge for a definite or indefinite
+period, on account of the non-payment of arrears. This punishment may be
+inflicted in different modes, and under different names. It is sometimes
+called, _suspension from the lodge,_ and sometimes _erasure from the
+roll_. Both of these punishments, though differing in their effect, are
+pronounced, not after a trial, but by a provision of the bye-laws of the
+lodge. For this reason alone, if there were no other, I should contend,
+that they do not affect the standing of the member suspended, or erased,
+with relation to the craft in general. No Mason can be deprived of his
+masonic rights, except after a trial, with the opportunity of defense, and
+a verdict of his peers.
+
+But before coming to a definite conclusion on this subject, it is
+necessary that we should view the subject in another point of view, in
+which it will be seen that a suspension from the rights and benefits of
+Masonry, for the non-payment of dues, is entirely at variance with the
+true principles of the Order.
+
+The system of payment of lodge-dues does not by any means belong to the
+ancient usages of the fraternity. It is a modern custom, established for
+purposes of convenience, and arising out of other modifications, in the
+organization of the Order. It is not an obligation on the part of a Mason,
+to the institution at large, but is in reality a special contract, in
+which the only parties are a particular lodge and its members, of which
+the fraternity, as a mass, are to know nothing. It is not presented by any
+general masonic law, nor any universal masonic precept. No Grand Lodge has
+ever yet attempted to control or regulate it, and it is thus tacitly
+admitted to form no part of the general regulations of the Order. Even in
+that Old Charge in which a lodge is described, and the necessity of
+membership in is enforced, not a word is said of the payment of arrears to
+it, or of the duty of contributing to its support. Hence the non-payment
+of arrears is a violation of a special and voluntary contract with a
+lodge, and not of any general duty to the craft at large. The corollary
+from all this is, evidently, that the punishment inflicted in such a case
+should be one affecting the relations of the delinquent with the
+particular lodge whose bye-laws he has infringed, and not a general one,
+affecting his relations with the whole Order. After a consideration of
+all these circumstances, I am constrained to think that suspension from
+alodge, for non-payment of arrears, should only suspend the rights of the
+member as to his own lodge, but should not affect his right of visiting
+other lodges, nor any of the other privileges inherent in him as a Mason.
+Such is not, I confess, the general opinion, or usage of the craft in this
+country, but yet I cannot but believe that it is the doctrine most
+consonant with the true spirit of the institution. It is the practice
+pursued by the Grand Lodge of England, from which most of our Grand Lodges
+derive, directly or indirectly, their existence. It is also the regulation
+of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. The Grand Lodge of South Carolina
+expressly forbids suspension from the rights and benefits of Masonry for
+non-payment of dues, and the Grand Lodge of New York has a similar
+provision in its Constitution.
+
+Of the two modes of exclusion from a lodge for non-payment of dues,
+namely, suspension and erasure, the effects are very different. Suspension
+does not abrogate the connection between the member and his lodge, and
+places his rights in abeyance only. Upon the payment of the debt, he is
+at once restored without other action of the lodge. But erasure from the
+roll terminates all connection between the delinquent and the lodge, and
+he ceases to be a member of it. Payment of the dues, simply, will not
+restore him; for it is necessary that he should again be elected by the
+Brethren, upon formal application.
+
+The word exclusion has a meaning in England differing from that in which
+it has been used in the present section. There the prerogative of
+expulsion is, as I think very rightly, exercised only by the Grand Lodge.
+The term "expelled" is therefore used only when a Brother is removed from
+the craft, by the Grand Lodge. The removal by a District Grand Lodge, or a
+subordinate lodge, is called "exclusion." The effect, however, of the
+punishment of exclusion, is similar to that which has been here advocated.
+
+
+
+Section IV.
+
+_Of Definite Suspension._
+
+
+Suspension is a punishment by which a party is temporarily deprived of his
+rights and privileges as a Mason. It does not terminate his connection
+with the craft, but only places it in abeyance, and it may again be
+resumed in a mode hereafter to be indicated.
+
+Suspension may be, in relation to time, either definite or indefinite. And
+as the effects produced upon the delinquent, especially in reference to
+the manner of his restoration, are different, it is proper that each
+should be separately considered.
+
+In a case of definite suspension, the time for which the delinquent is to
+be suspended, whether for one month, for three, or six months, or for a
+longer or shorter period, is always mentioned in the sentence.
+
+At its termination, the party suspended is at once restored without
+further action of the lodge. But as this is a point upon which there has
+been some difference of opinion, the argument will be fully discussed in
+the chapter on the subject of _Restoration._
+
+By a definite suspension, the delinquent is for a time placed beyond the
+pale of Masonry. He is deprived of all his rights as a Master Mason--is
+not permitted to visit any lodge, or hold masonic communication with his
+Brethren--is not entitled to masonic relief, and should he die during his
+suspension, is not entitled to masonic burial. In short, the amount of
+punishment differs from that of indefinite suspension or expulsion only
+in the period of time for which it is inflicted.
+
+The punishment of definite suspension is the lightest that can be
+inflicted of those which affect the relations of a Mason with the
+fraternity at large. It must always be preceded by a trial, and the
+prevalent opinion is, that it may be inflicted by a two-thirds vote of the
+lodge.
+
+
+
+Section V.
+
+_Of Indefinite Suspension._
+
+
+Indefinite suspension is a punishment by which the person suspended is
+deprived of all his rights and privileges as a Mason, until such time as
+the lodge which has suspended him shall see fit, by a special action, to
+restore him.
+
+All that has been said of definite suspension in the preceding section,
+will equally apply to indefinite suspension, except that in the former
+case the suspended person is at once restored by the termination of the
+period for which he was suspended; while in the latter, as no period of
+termination had been affixed, a special resolution of the lodge will be
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+By suspension the connection of the party with his lodge and with the
+institution is not severed; he still remains a member of his lodge,
+although his rights as such are placed in abeyance. In this respect it
+materially differs from expulsion, and, as an inferior grade of
+punishment, is inflicted for offenses of a lighter character than those
+for which expulsion is prescribed.
+
+The question here arises, whether the dues of a suspended member to his
+lodge continue to accrue during his suspension? I think they do not. Dues
+or arrears are payments made to a lodge for certain rights and
+benefits--the exercise and enjoyment of which are guaranteed to the
+member, in consideration of the dues thus paid. But as by suspension,
+whether definite or indefinite, he is for the time deprived of these
+rights and benefits, it would seem unjust to require from him a payment
+for that which he does not enjoy. I hold, therefore, that suspension from
+the rights and benefits of Masonry, includes also a suspension from the
+payment of arrears.
+
+No one can be indefinitely suspended, unless after a due form of trial,
+and upon the vote of at least two-thirds of the members present.
+
+
+
+Section VI.
+
+_Of Expulsion._[98]
+
+
+Expulsion is the very highest penalty that can be inflicted upon a
+delinquent Mason. It deprives the party expelled of all the masonic rights
+and privileges that he ever enjoyed, not only as a member of the lodge
+from which he has been ejected, but also of all those which were inherent
+in him as a member of the fraternity at large. He is at once as completely
+divested of his masonic character as though he had never been admitted
+into the institution. He can no longer demand the aid of his Brethren, nor
+require from them the performance of any of the duties to which he was
+formerly entitled, nor visit any lodge, nor unite in any of the public or
+private ceremonies of the Order. No conversation on masonic subjects can
+be held with him, and he is to be considered as being completely without
+the pale of the institution, and to be looked upon in the same light as a
+profane, in relation to the communication of any masonic information.
+
+It is a custom too generally adopted in this country, for subordinate
+lodges to inflict this punishment, and hence it is supposed by many, that
+the power of inflicting it is vested in the subordinate lodges. But the
+fact is, that the only proper tribunal to impose this heavy penalty is a
+Grand Lodge. A subordinate may, indeed, try its delinquent member, and if
+guilty declare him expelled. But the sentence is of no force until the
+Grand Lodge, under whose jurisdiction it is working, has confirmed it. And
+it is optional with the Grand Lodge to do so, or, as is frequently done,
+to reverse the decision and reinstate the Brother. Some of the lodges in
+this country claim the right to expel independently of the action of the
+Grand Lodge, but the claim is not valid. The very fact that an expulsion
+is a penalty, affecting the general relations of the punished party with
+the whole fraternity, proves that its exercise never could, with
+propriety, be intrusted to a body so circumscribed in its authority as a
+subordinate lodge. Besides, the general practice of the fraternity is
+against it. The English Constitutions vest the power to expel exclusively
+in the Grand Lodge.[99]
+
+The severity of the punishment will at once indicate the propriety of
+inflicting it only for the most serious offenses, such, for instance, as
+immoral conduct, that would subject a candidate for initiation to
+rejection.
+
+As the punishment is general, affecting the relation of the one expelled
+with the whole fraternity, it should not be lightly imposed, for the
+violation of any masonic act not general in its character. The commission
+of a grossly immoral act is a violation of the contract entered into
+between each Mason and his Order. If sanctioned by silence or impunity, it
+would bring discredit on the institution, and tend to impair its
+usefulness. A Mason who is a bad man, is to the fraternity what a
+mortified limb is to the body, and should be treated with the same mode of
+cure--he should be cut off, lest his example spread, and disease be
+propagated through the constitution.
+
+The punishment of expulsion can only be inflicted after a due course of
+trial, and upon the votes of at least two-thirds of the members present,
+and should always be submitted for approval and confirmation to the Grand
+Lodge.
+
+One question here arises, in respect not only to expulsion but to the
+other masonic punishments, of which I have treated in the preceding
+sections:--Does suspension or expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch
+Masons, an Encampment of Knights Templar, or any other of what are called
+the higher degrees of Masonry, affect the relations of the expelled party
+to Symbolic or Ancient Craft Masonry? I answer, unhesitatingly, that it
+does not, and for reasons which, years ago, I advanced, in the following
+language, and which appear to have met with the approval of the most of my
+contemporaries:--
+
+"A chapter of Royal Arch Masons, for instance, is not, and cannot be,
+recognized as a masonic body, by a lodge of Master Masons. 'They hear them
+so to be, but they do not know them so to be,' by any of the modes of
+recognition known to Masonry. The acts, therefore, of a Chapter cannot be
+recognized by a Master Masons' lodge, any more than the acts of a literary
+or charitable society wholly unconnected with the Order. Again: By the
+present organization of Freemasonry, Grand Lodges are the supreme masonic
+tribunals. If, therefore, expulsion from a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
+involved expulsion from a Blue Lodge, the right of the Grand Lodge to hear
+and determine causes, and to regulate the internal concerns of the
+institution, would be interfered with by another body beyond its control.
+But the converse of this proposition does not hold good. Expulsion from a
+Blue Lodge involves expulsion from all the higher degrees; because, as
+they are composed of Blue Masons, the members could not of right sit and
+hold communications on masonic subjects with one who was an expelled
+Mason."[100]
+
+
+
+
+Chapter III.
+
+Of Masonic Trials.
+
+
+
+Having thus discussed the penalties which are affixed to masonic offenses,
+we are next to inquire into the process of trial by which a lodge
+determines on the guilt or innocence of the accused. This subject will be
+the most conveniently considered by a division into two sections; first,
+as to the form of trial; and secondly, as to the character of the
+evidence.
+
+
+
+Section I.
+
+_Of the Form of Trial._
+
+
+Although the authority for submitting masonic offenses to trials by lodges
+is derived from the Old Charges, none of the ancient regulations of the
+Order have prescribed the details by which these trials are to be
+governed. The form of trial must, therefore, be obtained from the customs
+and usages of the craft, and from the regulations which have been adopted
+by various Grand Lodges. The present section will, therefore, furnish a
+summary of these regulations as they are generally observed in this
+country.
+
+A charge or statement of the offense imputed to the party is always a
+preliminary step to every trial.
+
+This charge must be made in writing, signed by the accuser, and delivered
+to the Secretary, who reads it at the next regular communication of the
+lodge. A time and place are then appointed by the lodge for the trial.
+
+The accused is entitled to a copy of the charge, and must be informed of
+the time and place that have been appointed for his trial.
+
+Although it is necessary that the accusation should be preferred at a
+stated communication, so that no one may be taken at a disadvantage, the
+trial may take place at a special communication. But ample time and
+opportunity should always be given to the accused to prepare his defense.
+
+It is not essential that the accuser should be a Mason. A charge of
+immoral conduct can be preferred by a profane; and if the offense is
+properly stated, and if it comes within the jurisdiction of the Order or
+the lodge, it must be investigated. It is not the accuser but the accused
+that Is to be put on trial, and the lodge is to look only to the nature of
+the accusation, and not to the individual who prefers it. The motives of
+the accuser, but not his character, may be examined.
+
+If the accused is living beyond the jurisdiction of the lodge--that is to
+say, if he be a member and have removed to some other place without
+withdrawing his membership, not being a member, or if, after committing
+the offense, he has left the jurisdiction, the charge must be transmitted
+to his present place of residence, by mail or otherwise, and a reasonable
+time be allowed for his answer before the lodge proceeds to trial.
+
+The lodge should be opened in the highest degree to which the accused has
+attained; and the examinations should take place in the presence of the
+accused and the accuser (if the latter be a Mason); but the final decision
+should always be made in the third degree.
+
+The accused and the accuser have a right to be present at all examinations
+of witnesses, whether those examinations are taken in open lodge or in a
+committee, and to propose such relevant questions as they desire.
+
+When the trial is concluded, the accused and accuser should retire, and
+the Master or presiding officer must then put the question of guilty or
+not guilty to the lodge. Of course, if there are several charges or
+specifications, the question must be taken on each separately. For the
+purposes of security and independence in the expression of opinion, it
+seems generally conceded, that this question should be decided by ballot;
+and the usage has also obtained, of requiring two-thirds of the votes
+given to be black, to secure a conviction. A white ball, of course, is
+equivalent to acquittal, and a black one to conviction.
+
+Every member present is bound to vote, unless excused by unanimous
+consent.
+
+If, on a scrutiny, it is found that the verdict is guilty, the Master or
+presiding officer must then put the question as to the amount and nature
+of the punishment to be inflicted.
+
+He will commence with the highest penalty, or expulsion, and, if
+necessary, by that punishment being negatived, proceed to propose
+indefinite and then definite suspension, exclusion, public or private
+reprimand, and censure.
+
+For expulsion or either kind of suspension, two-thirds of the votes
+present are necessary. For either of the other and lighter penalties, a
+bare majority will be sufficient.
+
+The votes on the nature of the punishment should be taken by a show of
+hands.
+
+If the residence of the accused is not known, or if, upon due summons, he
+refuses or neglects to attend, the lodge may, nevertheless, proceed to
+trial without his presence.
+
+In trials conducted by Grand Lodges, it is usual to take the preliminary
+testimony in a committee; but the final decision must always be made in
+the Grand Lodge.
+
+
+
+Section II.
+
+_Of the Evidence in Masonic Trials._
+
+
+In the consideration of the nature of the evidence that is to be given in
+masonic trials, it is proper that we should first inquire what classes of
+persons are to be deemed incompetent as witnesses.
+
+The law of the land, which, in this instance, is the same as the law of
+Masonry, has declared the following classes of person to be incompetent to
+give evidence.
+
+1. Persons who have not the use of reason, are, from the infirmity of
+their nature, considered to be utterly incapable of giving evidence.[101]
+This class includes idiots, madmen, and children too young to be sensible
+of the obligations of an oath, and to distinguish between good and evil.
+
+2. Persons who are entirely devoid of any such religious principle or
+belief as would bind their consciences to speak the truth, are incompetent
+as witnesses. Hence, the testimony of an atheist must be rejected;
+because, as it has been well said, such a person cannot be subject to that
+sanction which is deemed an indispensable test of truth. But as Masonry
+does not demand of its candidates any other religious declaration than
+that of a belief in God, it cannot require of the witnesses in its trials
+any profession of a more explicit faith. But even here it seems to concur
+with the law of the land; for it has been decided by Chief Baron Willes,
+that "an infidel who believes in a God, and that He will reward and punish
+him in this world, but does not believe in a future state, may be examined
+upon oath."
+
+3. Persons who have been rendered infamous by their conviction of great
+crimes, are deemed incompetent to give evidence. This rule has been
+adopted, because the commission of an infamous crime implies, as Sir
+William Scott has observed, "such a dereliction of moral principle on the
+part of the witness, as carries with it the conclusion that he would
+entirely disregard the obligation of an oath." Of such a witness it has
+been said, by another eminent judge,[102] that "the credit of his oath is
+over-balanced by the stain of his iniquity."
+
+4. Persons interested in the result of the trial are considered
+incompetent to give evidence. From the nature of human actions and
+passions, and from the fact that all persons, even the most virtuous, are
+unconsciously swayed by motives of interest, the testimony of such persons
+is rather to be distrusted than believed. This rule will, perhaps, be
+generally of difficult application in masonic trials, although in a civil
+suit at law it is easy to define what is the interest of a party
+sufficient to render his evidence incompetent. But whenever it is clearly
+apparent that the interests of a witness would be greatly benefited by
+either the acquittal or the conviction of the accused, his testimony must
+be entirely rejected, or, if admitted, its value must be weighed with the
+most scrupulous caution.
+
+Such are the rules that the wisdom of successive generations of men,
+learned in the law, have adopted for the establishment of the competency
+or incompetency of witnesses. There is nothing in them which conflicts
+with the principles of justice, or with the Constitutions of Freemasonry;
+and hence they may, very properly, be considered as a part of our own
+code. In determining, therefore, the rule for the admission of witnesses
+in masonic trials, we are to be governed by the simple proposition that
+has been enunciated by Mr. Justice Lawrence in the following language:
+
+"I find no rule less comprehensive than this, that all persons are
+admissible witnesses who have the use of their reason, and such religious
+belief as to feel the obligation of an oath, who have not been convicted
+of any infamous crime, and who are not influenced by interest."
+
+The peculiar, isolated character of our institution, here suggests as an
+important question, whether it is admissible to take the testimony of a
+profane, or person who is not a Freemason, in the trial of a Mason before
+his lodge.
+
+To this question I feel compelled to reply, that such testimony is
+generally admissible; but, as there are special cases in which it is not,
+it seems proper to qualify that reply by a brief inquiry into the grounds
+and reasons of this admissibility, and the mode and manner in which such
+testimony is to be taken.
+
+The great object of every trial, in Masonry, as elsewhere, is to elicit
+truth; and, in the spirit of truth, to administer justice. From whatever
+source, therefore, this truth can be obtained, it is not only competent
+there to seek it, but it is obligatory on us so to do. This is the
+principle of law as well as of common sense. Mr. Phillips, in the
+beginning of his great "Treatise on the Law of Evidence," says: "In
+inquiries upon this subject, the great end and object ought always to be,
+the ascertaining of the most convenient and surest means for the
+attainment of truth; the rules laid down are the means used for the
+attainment of that end."
+
+Now, if A, who is a Freemason, shall have committed an offense, of which B
+and C alone were cognizant as witnesses, shall it be said that A must be
+acquitted for want of proof, because B and C are not members of the Order?
+We apprehend that in this instance the ends of justice would be defeated,
+rather than subserved. If the veracity and honesty of B and C are
+unimpeached, their testimony as to the fact cannot lawfully be rejected on
+any ground, except that they may be interested in the result of the trial,
+and might be benefited by the conviction or the acquittal of the
+defendant. But this is an objection that would hold against the evidence
+of a Mason, as well as a profane.
+
+Any other rule would be often attended with injurious consequences to our
+institution. We may readily suppose a case by way of illustration. A, who
+is a member of a lodge, is accused of habitual intemperance, a vice
+eminently unmasonic in its character, and one which will always reflect a
+great portion of the degradation of the offender upon the society which
+shall sustain and defend him in its perpetration. But it may happen--and
+this is a very conceivable case--that in consequence of the remoteness of
+his dwelling, or from some other supposable cause, his Brethren have no
+opportunity of seeing him, except at distant intervals. There is,
+therefore, no Mason, to testify to the truth of the charge, while his
+neighbors and associates, who are daily and hourly in his company, are all
+aware of his habit of intoxication.
+
+If, then, a dozen or more men, all of reputation and veracity, should
+come, or be brought before the lodge, ready and willing to testify to this
+fact, by what process of reason or justice, or under what maxim of masonic
+jurisprudence, could their testimony be rejected, simply because they were
+not Masons? And if rejected--if the accused with this weight of evidence
+against him, with this infamy clearly and satisfactorily proved by these
+reputable witnesses, were to be acquitted, and sent forth purged of the
+charge, upon a mere technical ground, and thus triumphantly be sustained
+in the continuation of his vice, and that in the face of the very
+community which was cognizant of his degradation of life and manners, who
+could estimate the disastrous consequences to the lodge and the Order
+which should thus support and uphold him in his guilty course? The world
+would not, and could not appreciate the causes that led to the rejection
+of such clear and unimpeachable testimony, and it would visit with its
+just reprobation the institution which could thus extend its fraternal
+affections to the support of undoubted guilt.
+
+But, moreover, this is not a question of mere theory; the principle of
+accepting the testimony of non-masonic witnesses has been repeatedly acted
+on. If a Mason has been tried by the courts of his country on an
+indictment for larceny, or any other infamous crime, and been convicted by
+the verdict of a jury, although neither the judge nor the jury, nor the
+witnesses were Masons, no lodge after such conviction would permit him to
+retain his membership, but, on the contrary, it would promptly and
+indignantly expel him from the Brotherhood. If, however, the lodge should
+refuse to expel him, on the ground that his conviction before the court
+was based on the testimony of non-masonic witnesses, and should grant him
+a lodge trial for the same offense, then, on the principle against which
+we are contending, the evidence of these witnesses as "profanes" would be
+rejected, and the party be acquitted for want of proof; and thus the
+anomalous and disgraceful spectacle would present itself--of a felon
+condemned and punished by the laws of his country for an infamous crime,
+acquitted and sustained by a lodge of Freemasons.
+
+But we will be impressed with the inexpediency and injustice of this
+principle, when we look at its operation from another point of view. It is
+said to be a bad rule that will not work both ways; and, therefore, if the
+testimony of non-masonic witnesses against the accused is rejected on the
+ground of inadmissibility, it must also be rejected when given in his
+favor. Now, if we suppose a case, in which a Mason was accused before his
+lodge of having committed an offense, at a certain time and place, and, by
+the testimony of one or two disinterested persons, he could establish what
+the law calls an _alibi_, that is, that at that very time he was at a
+far-distant place, and could not, therefore, have committed the offense
+charged against him, we ask with what show of justice or reason could such
+testimony be rejected, simply because the parties giving it were not
+Masons? But if the evidence of a "profane" is admitted in favor of the
+accused, rebutting testimony of the same kind cannot with consistency be
+rejected; and hence the rule is determined that in the trial of Masons, it
+is competent to receive the evidence of persons who are not Masons, but
+whose competency, in other respects, is not denied.
+
+It must, however, be noted, that the testimony of persons who are not
+Masons is not to be given as that of Masons is, within the precincts of
+the lodge. They are not to be present at the trial; and whatever testimony
+they have to adduce, must be taken by a committee, to be afterwards
+accurately reported to the lodge. But in all cases, the accused has a
+right to be present, and to interrogate the witnesses.
+
+The only remaining topic to be discussed is the method of taking the
+testimony, and this can be easily disposed of.
+
+The testimony of Masons is to be taken either in lodge or in committee,
+and under the sanction of their obligations.
+
+The testimony of profanes is always to be taken by a committee, and on
+oath administered by a competent legal officer--the most convenient way of
+taking such testimony is by affidavit.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter IV.
+
+Of the Penal Jurisdiction of a Lodge.
+
+
+
+The penal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which it is
+authorized to exercise for the trial of masonic offenses, and the
+infliction of masonic punishment. It may be considered as either
+geographical or personal.
+
+The geographical jurisdiction of a lodge extends in every direction, half
+way to the nearest lodge. Thus, if two lodges be situated at the distance
+of sixteen miles from each other, then the penal jurisdiction of each will
+extend for the space of eight miles in the direction of the other.
+
+The personal jurisdiction of a lodge is that jurisdiction which a lodge
+may exercise over certain individuals, respective or irrespective of
+geographical jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is more complicated than the
+other, and requires a more detailed enumeration of the classes over whom
+it is to be exercised.
+
+1. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all its members, no matter
+where they may reside. A removal from the geographical jurisdiction will
+not, in this case, release the individual from personal jurisdiction. The
+allegiance of a member to his lodge is indefeasible.
+
+2. A lodge exercises penal jurisdiction over all unaffiliated Masons,
+living within its geographical jurisdiction. An unaffiliated Mason cannot
+release himself from his responsibilities to the Order. And if, by immoral
+or disgraceful conduct, he violates the regulations of the Order, or tends
+to injure its reputation in the estimation of the community, he is
+amenable to the lodge nearest to his place of residence, whether this
+residence be temporary or permanent, and may be reprimanded, suspended, or
+expelled.
+
+This doctrine is founded on the wholesome reason, that as a lodge is the
+guardian of the purity and safety of the institution, within its own
+jurisdiction, it must, to exercise this guardianship with success, be
+invested with the power of correcting every evil that occurs within its
+precincts. And if unaffiliated Masons were exempted from this control, the
+institution might be seriously affected in the eyes of the community, by
+their bad conduct.
+
+3. The personal jurisdiction of a lodge, for the same good reason,
+extends over all Masons living in its vicinity. A Master Mason belonging
+to a distant lodge, but residing within the geographical jurisdiction of
+another lodge, becomes amenable for his conduct to the latter, as well as
+to the former lodge. But if his own lodge is within a reasonable distance,
+courtesy requires that the lodge near which he resides should rather make
+a complaint to his lodge than itself institute proceedings against him.
+But the reputation of the Order must not be permitted to be endangered,
+and a case might occur, in which it would be inexpedient to extend this
+courtesy, and where the lodge would feel compelled to proceed to the trial
+and punishment of the offender, without appealing to his lodge. The
+geographical jurisdiction will, in all cases, legalize the proceedings.
+
+4. But a lodge situated near the confines of a State cannot extend its
+jurisdiction over Masons residing in a neighboring State, and not being
+its members, however near they may reside to it: for no lodge can exercise
+jurisdiction over the members of another Grand Lodge jurisdiction. Its
+geographical, as well as personal jurisdiction, can extend no further than
+that of its own Grand Lodge.
+
+5. Lastly, no lodge can exercise penal jurisdiction over its own Master,
+for he is alone responsible for his conduct to the Grand Lodge. But it may
+act as his accuser before that body, and impeach him for any offense that
+he may have committed. Neither can a lodge exercise penal jurisdiction
+over the Grand Master, although under other circumstances it might have
+both geographical and personal jurisdiction over him, from his residence
+and membership.
+
+
+
+
+Chapter V.
+
+Of Appeals.
+
+
+
+Every Mason, who has been tried and convicted by a lodge, has an
+inalienable right to appeal from that conviction, and from the sentence
+accompanying it, to the Grand Lodge.
+
+As an appeal always supposes the necessity of a review of the whole case,
+the lodge is bound to furnish the Grand Lodge with an attested copy of its
+proceedings on the trial, and such other testimony in its possession as
+the appellant may deem necessary for his defense.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, upon investigation, confirm the verdict of its
+subordinate. In this case, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence goes
+into immediate operation without any further proceedings on the part of
+the lodge.
+
+The Grand Lodge may, however, only approve in part, and may reduce the
+penalty inflicted, as for instance, from expulsion to suspension. In this
+case, the original sentence of the lodge becomes void, and the milder
+sentence of the Grand Lodge is to be put in force. The same process would
+take place, were the Grand Lodge to increase instead of diminishing the
+amount of punishment, as from suspension to expulsion. For it is competent
+for the Grand Lodge, on an appeal, to augment, reduce or wholly abrogate
+the penalty inflicted by its subordinate.
+
+But the Grand Lodge may take no direct action on the penalty inflicted,
+but may simply refer the case back to the subordinate for a new trial. In
+this case, the proceedings on the trial will be commenced _de novo_, if
+the reference has been made on the ground of any informality or illegality
+in the previous trial. But if the case is referred back, not for a new
+trial, but for further consideration, on the ground that the punishment
+was inadequate--either too severe, or not sufficiently so--in this case,
+it is not necessary to repeat the trial. The discussion on the nature of
+the penalty to be inflicted should, however, be reviewed, and any new
+evidence calculated to throw light on the nature of the punishment which
+is most appropriate, may be received.
+
+Lastly, the Grand Lodge may entirely reverse the decision of its
+subordinate, and decree a restoration of the appellant to all his rights
+and privileges, on the ground of his innocence of the charges which had
+been preferred against him. But, as this action is often highly important
+in its results, and places the appellant and the lodge in an entirely
+different relative position, I have deemed its consideration worthy of a
+distinct chapter.
+
+During the pendency of an appeal, the sentence of the subordinate lodge is
+held in abeyance, and cannot; be enforced. The appellant in this case
+remains in the position of a Mason "under charges."
+
+
+
+
+Chapter VI.
+
+Of Restoration.
+
+
+
+The penalties of suspension and expulsion are terminated by restoration,
+which may take place either by the action of the lodge which inflicted
+them, or by that of the Grand Lodge.
+
+Restoration from definite suspension is terminated without any special
+action of the lodge, but simply by the termination of the period for which
+the party was suspended. He then at once reenters into the possession of
+all the rights, benefits, and functions, from which he had been
+temporarily suspended.
+
+I have myself no doubt of the correctness of this principle; but, as it
+has been denied by some writers, although a very large majority of the
+authorities are in its favor, it may be well, briefly, to discuss its
+merits.
+
+Let us suppose that on the 1st of January A.B. had been suspended for
+three months, that is, until the 1st day of April. At the end of the three
+months, that is to say, on the first of April, A.B. would no longer be a
+suspended member--for the punishment decreed will have been endured; and
+as the sentence of the lodge had expressly declared that his suspension
+was to last until the 1st of April, the said sentence, if it means
+anything, must mean that the suspension was, on the said 1st of April, to
+cease and determine. If he were, therefore, to wait until the 1st of May
+for the action of the lodge, declaring his restoration, he would suffer a
+punishment of four months' suspension, which was not decreed by his lodge
+upon his trial, and which would, therefore, be manifestly unjust and
+illegal.
+
+Again: if the offense which he had committed was, upon his trial, found to
+be so slight as to demand only a dismissal for one night from the lodge,
+will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to his
+sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding communication,
+unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of
+dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night he
+reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so after
+a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six or
+twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the same.
+
+But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite
+suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete
+restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For, if
+the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up
+the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended for
+three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be
+restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of
+their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may think
+just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are, to
+vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.
+They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of
+the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and no
+more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say that
+A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months, _shall
+not_ be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,
+then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same offense,
+and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his conviction,
+was supposed to be a competent punishment--and without a trial, and
+without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and
+his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months changed
+into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most
+arbitrary government in the world--the history of the most despotic tyrant
+that ever lived--could not show an instance of more unprincipled violation
+of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of
+the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can be
+restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of
+suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to restore
+him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment
+upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.
+
+On the 1st of January, for instance, A.B., having been put upon his trial,
+witnesses having been examined, his defense having been heard, was found
+guilty by his lodge of some offense, the enormity of which, whatever it
+might be, seemed to require a suspension from Masonry for just three
+months, neither more nor less. If the lodge had thought the crime still
+greater, it would, of course, we presume, have decreed a suspension of
+six, nine, or twelve months. But considering, after a fair, impartial, and
+competent investigation of the merits of the case (for all this is to be
+presumed), that the offended law would be satisfied with a suspension of
+three months, that punishment is decreed. The court is adjourned _sine
+die_; for it has done all that is required--the prisoner undergoes his
+sentence with becoming contrition, and the time having expired, the bond
+having been paid, and the debt satisfied, he is told that he must again
+undergo the ordeal of another trial, before another court, before he can
+reassume what was only taken from him for a definite period; and that it
+is still doubtful, whether the sentence of the former court may not even
+now, after its accomplishment, be reversed, and a new and more severe one
+be inflicted.
+
+The analogy of a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
+certain period, and who, on the expiration of that period, is at once
+released, has been referred to, as apposite to the case of a definite
+suspension. Still more appropriately may we refer to the case of a person
+transported for a term of years, and who cannot return until that term
+expires, but who is at liberty at once to do so when it has expired.
+"Another capital offense against public justice," says Blackstone, "is
+the returning from transportation, or being seen at large in Great Britain
+_before the expiration of the term for which the offender was sentenced to
+be transported." _ Mark these qualifying words: "before the expiration of
+the term:" they include, from the very force of language, the proposition
+that it is no offense to return _after_ the expiration of the term. And so
+changing certain words to meet the change of circumstances, but leaving
+the principle unchanged, we may lay down the law in relation to
+restorations from definite suspensions, as follows:
+
+_It is an offense against the masonic code to claim the privileges of
+Masonry, or to attempt to visit a lodge after having been suspended,
+before the expiration of the term for which the offender was suspended_.
+
+Of course, it is no crime to resume these privileges after the term has
+expired; for surely he must have strange notions of the powers of
+language, who supposes that suspension for three months, and no more, does
+not mean, that when the three months are over the suspension ceases. And,
+if the suspension ceases, the person is no longer suspended; and, if no
+longer suspended he is in good standing, and requires no further action to
+restore him to good moral and masonic health.
+
+But it is said that, although originally only suspended for three months,
+at the expiration of that period, his conduct might continue to be such as
+to render his restoration a cause of public reproach. What is to be done
+in such a case? It seems strange that the question should be asked. The
+remedy is only too apparent. Let new charges be preferred, and let a new
+trial take place for his derelictions of duty during the term of his
+suspension. Then, the lodge may again suspend him for a still longer
+period, or altogether expel him, if it finds him deserving such
+punishment. But in the name of justice, law, and common sense, do not
+insiduously and unmanfully continue a sentence for one and a former
+offense, as a punishment for another and a later one, and that, too,
+without the due forms of trial.
+
+Let us, in this case, go again for an analogy to the laws of the land.
+Suppose an offender had been sentenced to an imprisonment of six months
+for a larceny, and that while in prison he had committed some new crime.
+When the six months of his sentence had expired, would the Sheriff feel
+justified, or even the Judge who had sentenced him, in saying: "I will not
+release you; you have guilty of another offense during your
+incarceration, and therefore, I shall keep you confined six months
+longer?" Certainly not. The Sheriff or the Judge who should do so
+high-handed a measure, would soon find himself made responsible for the
+violation of private rights. But the course to be pursued would be, to
+arrest him for the new offense, give him a fair trial, and, if convicted
+again, imprison or otherwise punish him, according to his new sentence,
+or, if acquitted, discharge him.
+
+The same course should be pursued with a Mason whose conduct during the
+period of his suspension has been liable to reproach or suspicion. Masons
+have rights as well as citizens--every one is to be considered innocent
+until he is proved guilty--and no one should suffer punishment, even of
+the lightest kind, except after an impartial trial by his peers.
+
+But the case of an indefinite suspension is different. Here no particular
+time has been appointed for the termination of the punishment. It may be
+continued during life, unless the court which has pronounced it think
+proper to give a determinate period to what was before indeterminate, and
+to declare that on such a day the suspension shall cease, and the offender
+be restored. In a case of this kind, action on the part of the lodge is
+necessary to effect a restoration.
+
+Such a sentence being intended to last indefinitely--that is to say,
+during the pleasure of the lodge--may, I conceive, be reversed at any
+legal time, and the individual restored by a mere majority vote the of
+lodge. Some authorities think a vote of two-thirds necessary; but I see no
+reason why a lodge may not, in this as in other cases, reverse its
+decision by a vote of a simple majority. The Ancient Constitutions are
+completely silent on this and all its kindred points; and, therefore,
+where a Grand Lodge has made no local regulation on the subject, we must
+be guided by the principles of reason and analogy, both of which direct us
+to the conclusion that a lodge may express its will, in matters
+unregulated by the Constitutions, through the vote of a majority.
+
+But the restoration of an expelled Mason requires a different action. By
+expulsion, as I have already said, all connection with the Order is
+completely severed. The individual expelled ceases to be a Mason, so far
+as respects the exercise of any masonic rights or privileges. His
+restoration to the Order is, therefore, equivalent to the admission of a
+profane. Having ceased on his expulsion to be a member of the lodge which
+had expelled him, his restoration would be the admission of a new member.
+The expelled Mason and the uninitiated candidate are to be placed on the
+same footing--both are equally unconnected with the institution--the one
+having never been in it, and the other having been completely discharged
+from it.
+
+The rule for the admission of new members, as laid down in the Thirty-nine
+Regulations, seems to me, therefore, to be applicable in this case; and
+hence, I conceive that to reverse a sentence of expulsion and to restore
+an expelled Mason will require as unanimous a vote as that which is
+necessary on a ballot for initiation.
+
+Every action taken by a lodge for restoration must be done at a stated
+communication and after due notice, that if any member should have good
+and sufficient reasons to urge against the restoration, he may have an
+opportunity to present them.
+
+In conclusion, the Grand Lodge may restore a suspended or expelled Mason,
+contrary to the wishes of the lodge.
+
+In such case, if the party has been suspended only, he, at once, resumes
+his place and functions in the lodge, from which, indeed, he had only been
+temporarily dissevered.
+
+But in the case of the restoration of an expelled Mason to the rights and
+privileges of Masonry, by a Grand Lodge, does such restoration restore him
+to membership in his lodge? This question is an important one, and has
+very generally been decided in the negative by the Grand Lodges of this
+country. But as I unfortunately differ from these high authorities, I
+cannot refrain, as an apology for this difference of opinion, from
+presenting the considerations which have led me to the conclusion which I
+have adopted. I cannot, it is true, in the face of the mass of opposing
+authority, offer this conclusion as masonic law. But I would fain hope
+that the time is not far distant when it will become so, by the change on
+the part of Grand Lodges of the contrary decisions which they have made.
+
+The general opinion in this country is, that when a Mason has been
+expelled by his lodge, the Grand Lodge may restore him to the rights and
+privileges, but cannot restore him to membership in his lodge. My own
+opinion, in contradiction to this, is, that when a Grand Lodge restores an
+expelled Mason, on the ground that the punishment of expulsion from the
+rights and privileges of Masonry was too severe and disproportioned to the
+offense, it may or may not restore him to membership in his lodge. It
+might, for instance, refuse to restore his membership on the ground that
+exclusion from his lodge is an appropriate punishment; but where the
+decision of the lodge as to the guilt of the individual is reversed, and
+the Grand Lodge declares him to be innocent, or that the charge against
+him has not been proved, then I hold, that it is compelled by a just
+regard to the rights of the expelled member to restore him not only to the
+rights and privileges of Masonry, but also to membership in his lodge.
+
+I cannot conceive how a Brother, whose innocence has been declared by the
+verdict of his Grand Lodge, can be deprived of his vested rights as the
+member of a particular lodge, without a violation of the principles of
+justice. If guilty, let his expulsion stand; but, if innocent, let him be
+placed in the same position in which he was before the passage of the
+unjust sentence of the lodge which has been reversed.
+
+The whole error, for such I conceive it to be, in relation to this
+question of restoration to membership, arises, I suppose, from a
+misapprehension of an ancient regulation, which says that "no man can be
+entered a Brother in any particular lodge, or admitted a member thereof,
+without the unanimous consent of all the members"--which inherent
+privilege is said not to be subject to dispensation, "lest a turbulent
+member should thus be imposed upon them, which might spoil their harmony,
+or hinder the freedom of their communication, or even break and disperse
+the Lodge." But it should be remembered that this regulation altogether
+refers to the admission of new members, and not to the restoration of old
+ones--to the granting of a favor which the candidate solicits, and which
+the lodge may or may not, in its own good pleasure, see fit to confer, and
+not to the resumption of a vested and already acquired right, which, if it
+be a right, no lodge can withhold. The practical working of this system of
+incomplete restoration, in a by no means extreme case, will readily show
+its absurdity and injustice. A member having appealed from expulsion by
+his lodge to the Grand Lodge, that body calmly and fairly investigates the
+case. It finds that the appellant has been falsely accused of an offense
+which he has never committed; that he has been unfairly tried, and
+unjustly convicted. It declares him innocent--clearly and undoubtedly
+innocent, and far freer from any sort of condemnation than the prejudiced
+jurors who convicted him. Under these circumstances, it becomes
+obligatory that the Grand Lodge should restore him to the place he
+formerly occupied, and reinvest him with the rights of which he has been
+unjustly despoiled. But that it cannot do. It may restore him to the
+privileges of Masonry in general; but, innocent though he be, the Grand
+Lodge, in deference to the prejudices of his Brethren, must perpetuate a
+wrong, and punish this innocent person by expulsion from his lodge. I
+cannot, I dare not, while I remember the eternal principles of justice,
+subscribe to so monstrous an exercise of wrong--so flagrant an outrage
+upon private rights.
+
+
+
+
+Index.
+
+
+
+A.
+
+
+Accused, to what he is entitled
+Act passed in the reign of Henry VI., anno 1425
+ " " " it was never enforced
+Actual Past Master, term defined
+Adjournment, a term not recognized in Masonry
+ " motion for, cannot be entertained
+Affiliated Masons only, can visit lodges
+Affiliation, what it is
+ " mode of
+ " requires unanimity
+ " Master Masons only entitled to it
+ " rejected application for, may be renewed in other lodges
+ " may be made with more than one lodge
+Age, qualifications of candidates as to
+Appeal from Grand Master not permitted
+ " not to be entertained in a lodge
+ " cannot be taken from the chair
+ " doctrine of, discussed
+ " from the Master, must be to the Grand Lodge
+ " every Mason has a right to one, to the Grand Lodge
+ " pending one, the sentence is in abeyance
+Apprentices, rights of _(see Entered Apprentice_)
+Arrears, non-payment of
+ " to lodges, history of their origin
+ " do not accrue during suspension
+Assembly, general-one held in 287 by St. Alban
+ " " " in 926 at York
+ " " governed the craft for nearly 800 years
+ " " how organized
+Atheist cannot be a Mason
+Authorities for masonic law
+
+
+
+B.
+
+
+Balloting for candidates
+ every member must take a part in it
+ secrecy of, inviolable
+ must be unanimous
+ Mason irresponsible for it to the lodge
+ not disfranchised of it by non-payment of arrears
+ mode of
+Balloting in each degree
+ not actually prescribed in the ancient constitutions, but implied
+ must be unanimous
+Ballot, reconsideration of
+ motion for, out of order
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Black ball is the bulwark of Masonry
+Brother, a title to be always used in lodge
+Burial, masonic, right of
+ must be requested except for strangers
+ Master Masons only entitled to it
+ dispensation for, not usually required
+Business, order of
+ may be suspended at any time by the Master
+By-laws must be approved and confirmed by Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+C.
+
+
+Calling from labor to refreshment
+Censure, a masonic punishment
+Certificates, masonic
+Chaplain, Grand (_see Grand Chaplain_)
+Charges of accusation, how to be made
+Closing lodge is at the discretion of the Master
+Committee of investigation on character of candidates
+Committees to be appointed by the Master
+ Master is chairman of, when present
+Communication of a lodge, how terminated
+Consecration of a lodge how performed
+ meaning of
+Constituting a lodge, ceremony of
+ meaning of
+Constitutions, how to be altered
+" Gothic, adopted in 926,
+Corn, wine, and oil, masonic elements of consecration,
+" " " why elements,
+Crimes, masonic,
+" " definition of,
+" " enumeration of
+
+
+
+D.
+
+
+Deacons,
+" two in each lodge,
+" are appointed officers,
+" not removable by Master or Senior Warden
+" Grand _(see Grand Deacons_)
+Dedication of a lodge, how performed
+" to whom, and why,
+" meaning of
+Definite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Degrees, no candidate can receive more than two at one communication
+Demitting
+" right of, not denied until recently,
+" regulations concerning
+" of many at one time may be refused
+Deputy Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+" " office of, not very ancient
+" " exercises prerogatives of Grand Master in his absence
+"" cannot be more than one
+"" originally appointed by Grand Master
+Discussions, how to be conducted in lodge,
+Dispensation what and where to be granted
+"for a lodge
+"" " tenure of its duration
+"" " difference from a Warrant
+District Deputy Grand Master, a modern invention
+Dotage a disqualification of candidates
+" meaning of the term
+Dues to lodges, a modern usage
+" non-payment of, does not disqualify from voting for candidates
+
+
+
+E.
+
+
+Emergency, rule upon the subject
+Entered Apprentice, rights of
+ formerly a member of his lodge
+ formerly permitted to attend the Grand Communications
+ may sit in a lodge of his degree
+ cannot speak or vote
+ cannot be deprived of his rights without trial
+ after trial may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+Erasure from lodge, a masonic punishment
+Evidence in masonic trials
+Examination of visitors
+ how to be conducted
+Exclusion, a masonic punishment
+Executive powers of a Grand Lodge
+Expulsion is masonic death
+Expulsion, a masonic punishment
+ should be inflicted by Grand Lodge or with its approval
+ from higher degrees, its effect
+ restoration from
+Extinct lodges, funds of, revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+F.
+
+
+Family distressed, of a Mason, entitled to relief
+Fellow Craft, rights of
+ they formerly constituted the great body of the Fraternity
+ formerly permitted to speak, but not vote
+Finishing candidates of one lodge in another
+Fool cannot be a Mason
+Free, a candidate must be, at the time of making
+Free-born, a Mason must be
+ reason for the rule
+Funds of extinct lodges revert to the Grand Lodge
+
+
+
+G.
+
+
+General Assembly. (_See Assembly, General._)
+God, belief in, a qualification of a candidate
+Gothic constitutions adopted in 926
+Grand Chaplain,
+ office established in 1775
+ duties of
+Grand Deacons
+ office more ancient than Oliver supposes
+ duties of
+ how appointed
+Grand Lodge held in 1717
+ mode of organizing one
+ three lodges necessary to organize one
+ dormant may be revived if a Grand Officer remains,
+ all the Craft formerly members of
+ Masters and Wardens of lodges are members
+ Grand Officers are also members
+ Past Masters are not members by inherent right
+ its powers and prerogatives
+ may make new regulations
+ must observe the landmarks
+Grand Lodges, historical sketch of
+ are comparatively modern institutions
+Grand Marshal
+ appointed by the Grand Master
+ duties of
+Grand Master, duties and prerogatives of
+ office of has existed since the origin of Masonry
+ an elective officer
+ by whom to be installed
+ prerogatives of, derived from two sources
+ no appeal from his decision
+ may convene Grand Lodge when he chooses
+ entitled to two votes
+ how to be punished
+ may grant dispensations
+Grand Master may make Masons at sight
+ may constitute new lodges
+ cannot dispense with requisite forms in making Masons
+ his own lodge cannot exercise jurisdiction over him
+Grand Pursuivant
+Grand Secretary
+ office of established in 1723
+ duties of
+Grand Secretary, may appoint an assistant
+Grand Stewards
+ " " first mentioned in 1721
+ " " duties of
+ " " appointed by Junior Grand Warden
+Grand Stewards' Lodge
+Grand Sword-Bearer
+ " " duties of
+ " " office of, constituted in 1731
+Grand Tiler
+" " office of, must have existed from the earliest times
+" " must not be a member of the Grand Lodge
+" " sometimes appointed, and sometimes elected
+Grand Treasurer
+" " office of, established in 1724
+" " duties of
+" " has always been elected
+Grand Wardens
+" " originally appointed by the Grand Master
+" " succeed the Grand Master and Deputy
+
+
+
+H.
+
+
+Heresy not a masonic crime
+Higher degrees, effect of expulsion from
+Historical sketch
+
+
+
+I.
+
+
+Idiot cannot be made a Mason
+Impostor, how to be treated in examination
+Incompetent witnesses, who they are
+Indefinite suspension
+" " restoration from
+Innovations cannot be made in the body of Masonry
+Insanity, if perfectly cured, no disqualification of a candidate
+Installation
+ " whence the term derived
+ " necessary to legal existence of an officer
+ " of a Master of a lodge
+ " of the Grand Master
+Instruction of representatives, right of, is vested in a lodge
+Investigation of character must be by a committee
+Irreligious libertine cannot be a Mason
+ " " definition of the term
+
+
+
+J.
+
+
+Judicial powers of a Grand Lodge,
+Junior Grand Warden
+Junior Warden,
+ " " presides in absence of Master and Senior Warden,
+ " " does not take the West in absence of Senior Warden,
+ " " presides over the craft during refreshment
+ " " appoints the stewards
+Jurisdiction of a lodge
+ " geographical or personal
+ " is over all its members
+ " " " unaffiliated Masons in its vicinity
+ " cannot extend beyond State lines,
+ " none over its Master
+
+
+
+K.
+
+
+Knowledge of reading and writing necessary to a Mason
+
+
+
+L.
+
+
+Labor, calling from, to refreshment
+Landmarks, what they are,
+ " ritual and legislative
+ " must be observed by the Grand Lodge
+Law of Grand Lodges
+ " subordinate lodges
+ " individuals
+Lawful information, what it is
+Laws, how to be interpreted
+ " of Masonry are of two kinds--written and unwritten
+ " written, whence derived
+ " unwritten, whence derived
+ " " same as ancient usage
+Legislative powers of a Grand Lodge
+Libertine, irreligious, cannot be a Mason
+ meaning of the term
+Lodge, subordinate
+ definition of
+ how organized
+ must have been congregated by some superior authority
+Lodge, under dispensation
+ definition of
+ generally precedes a warranted lodge
+ how formed
+ cannot make by-laws
+ cannot elect officers
+ cannot install officers
+ cannot elect members
+Lodge, warranted
+ its powers and rights
+ must be consecrated
+ must be dedicated
+ must be constituted
+ its officers must be installed
+ ceremony of installation in
+ its powers are inherent in it
+ its reserved rights are secured by the regulations
+ an assembly of the craft in their primary capacity
+ may select its own members
+ elects its own officers
+ what officers of, are elected in England
+ may install its officers
+ Master of, must be installed by a past Master
+ may be represented in the Grand Lodge
+ representatives of
+ may instruct its representatives
+ may frame by-laws
+ may suspend or exclude a member
+ may declare a member expelled, the sentence to be approved by the Grand Lodge
+ may levy annual contributions
+ may select its name
+ cannot select its number
+ duties of
+ cannot alter the ritual
+ must elect officers at a particular time
+Lodge, warranted, cannot interfere with business of another lodge
+ " " cannot initiate without previous notice
+ " " cannot confer more than two degrees on the same candidate at one time
+ " " cannot make more than five new Brothers at the same time
+ " " must meet once a month
+ " " neglecting to meet forfeits its warrant
+ " " cannot remove from the town, without the consent of the Grand Lodge
+ " " may remove from one part of the town to another, under restrictions
+ " " officers of
+
+
+
+M.
+
+
+Madmen cannot be Masons
+Maims, how far disqualifying candidates
+ " reason for the rule relating to
+Mass meeting of the craft cannot organize a Grand Lodge
+Master, Grand. _(See Grand Master_.)
+Master Mason, rights of
+ " " becomes a member by signing the by-laws
+ " " how this right is forfeited
+ " " may apply to any lodge for membership
+ " " to whom subject for discipline
+ " " may speak and vote on all questions
+ " " may hold any office to which elected
+ " " but to serve as Master must have been a Warden
+ " " may appeal to the Grand Lodge
+ " " may visit any lodge, after examination
+Master of a lodge
+ " " " must have previously served as Warden
+ " " " must see Grand Lodge regulations enforced
+ " " " must be installed by a Past Master
+ " " " has the warrant in charge
+ " " " may call special meetings of his lodge
+ " " " may close his lodge at any time
+ " " " presides over business as well as labor
+ " " " is supreme in his lodge
+Master of a lodge, no appeal from his decision except to Grand
+Lodge
+ moral qualifications of
+ intellectual qualifications of
+ who is to judge of them
+ is a member of the Grand Lodge
+ may exclude a member temporarily
+Membership, right of
+Members of Grand Lodge are Masters and Wardens with the Grand Officers
+Minutes, when to be read
+ how to be amended
+ not to be read at special communications
+ formula for keeping
+Moral law, what it is
+ a Mason must obey it
+Motions, when to be entertained
+
+
+
+N.
+
+
+Name of a lodge to be selected by itself
+Non-residents, initiation of
+Number of a lodge regulates its precedency
+ of candidates to be initiated at one communication
+
+
+
+O.
+
+
+Office, can be vacated only by death, removal, or expulsion
+ not vacated by suspension
+Officers of a Grand Lodge
+ subordinate lodge
+ warranted lodge must be installed
+ how to be installed
+ time of election determined by Grand Lodge
+ elected annually
+ vacancies in, how to be supplied
+ cannot resign
+Order, rules of
+ whence derived
+
+
+
+P.
+
+
+Parliamentary law not applicable to Masonry
+Past Masters
+ rights of
+ not members of the Grand Lodge by inherent right
+ may install their successors
+ of two kinds--actual and virtual
+ may preside in a lodge
+ eligible to election to the chair
+ entitled to a seat in the East
+ eligible to be elected Deputy Grand Master, or Grand Warden
+ virtual, cannot be present at installing a Master
+Penal jurisdiction of a lodge
+Perfect youth, meaning of the term
+Perfection, physical, why required of a candidate
+Petition of candidate
+ must be read at a regular communication
+ referred to a committee of three
+ reported on at next regular communication
+ report on, cannot be made at a special communication
+ renewal of, in case of rejection
+ how to be renewed, if rejected
+ for advancement to a higher degree
+ if rejected, how to be renewed
+Petitioners, not less than seven to form a lodge
+ what they must set forth
+ must be recommended by nearest lodge
+Political offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Political qualifications of candidates
+Postponed business, when to be called up
+Precedency of lodges, regulated by their numbers
+Presiding in a lodge, who has the right of
+ officer, has the prerogatives of the Master, for the time
+Previous question, unknown in Masonry
+Probation of candidates
+ for initiation
+ for advancement
+Proceedings of a regular communication cannot be amended at a special one
+Profanes, testimony of, how to be taken in trials
+Proficiency of candidates
+Proficiency of candidates, must be suitable
+Punishments, masonic
+Pursuivant, a title equivalent to Sword-Bearer
+
+
+
+Q.
+
+
+Qualifications of a Master of a lodge
+ of candidates,
+ moral
+ religious
+ physical
+ intellectual
+ political, 184
+Quarterly communications of Grand Lodge, ordered in 1717
+Question, how to be taken on a motion
+
+
+
+R.
+
+
+Reading, a qualification of candidates
+Recommendation of nearest lodge, necessary to form a new one
+ of candidate, must be by two members
+Reconsideration of ballot
+ motion for, is out of order,
+ cannot be granted by dispensation
+Rejected candidate cannot apply to any other lodge
+ renewed petition of, when to be made,
+Relief, right of claiming it
+ unworthy Masons not entitled to it
+Religion of a Mason, what it is required to be
+Religious offenses not cognizable by a lodge
+Removal of a lodge, rule on the subject of
+Representatives of a lodge, who they are
+Reprimand, a masonic punishment
+Restoration
+ from definite suspension
+ indefinite supension
+ expulsion
+ must be at a stated communication
+ may be by Grand Lodge
+ requires a unanimous vote
+ to membership discussed
+
+
+
+S.
+
+
+Secretary, Grand. (_See Grand Secretary._)
+ of a lodge
+ his duty
+ is a recording, corresponding, and receiving officer
+ is a check upon the treasurer
+ often receives compensation
+ in case of death, or expulsion, a successor may be elected
+ but not in case of removal, or sickness
+Senior Grand Warden. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+Senior Warden
+ presides in absence of Master
+ may invite a Past Master to preside
+ presides over the craft during labor
+ appoints the Junior Deacon
+Sentence in trials, how to be obtained
+ ---- is in abeyance pending an appeal
+Stewards, Grand. (_See Grand Stewards._)
+ of a lodge
+ appointed by Junior Warden
+ duties of
+ not removable by Junior Warden
+Stranger, initiation of
+Suspension
+ definite
+ indefinite
+Sword Bearer, Grand. (_See Grand Sword Bearer._)
+
+
+
+T.
+
+
+Testimony, how to be taken on masonic trials
+Tiler, Grand. (_See Grand Tiler._)
+ of a lodge
+ office existed from beginning of the institution
+ no lodge can be without one
+ must be a worthy Master Mason
+ if a member, the office does not disfranchise him
+ when voting, Junior Deacon takes his place
+ may be removed for misconduct
+Tiler's obligation, form of it
+Transient persons, initiation of
+Treasurer, Grand. _(See Grand Treasurer_.)
+ " " of a lodge
+ " " duties of
+ " " is the only banker of the lodge
+ " " is a disbursing officer
+ " " a Brother of worldly substance usually selected
+ " " in case of death, a successor may be elected
+ " " but not in case of sickness, or removal
+Trials, masonic
+ " " form of
+ " " evidence in
+
+
+U.
+
+
+Unaffiliated Masons
+ " " tax sometimes levied on
+ " " position, rights, and duties of
+Unaffiliation, contrary to the spirit of Masonry
+ " effect of, on a Mason
+Unanimity in the ballot required by the ancient constitutions
+Uneducated candidates not forbidden by positive enactment
+ " " their admission opposed to the spirit of the institution
+
+
+V.
+
+
+Virtual Past Masters, who they are
+Visit, right of
+ " only affiliated Mason entitled to it
+ " must be preceded by an examination
+ " requires a certificate to insure it
+Visitors, examination of, described
+ " must take the Tiler's obligation
+Voting must always be by a show of hands
+Voting in trials, obligatory on all members present
+Voucher must be a competent Mason
+Vouching for a visitor
+
+
+
+W.
+
+
+Wardens, Grand. (_See Grand Wardens._)
+ of a lodge are assistants of the Master
+ entitled to membership in Grand Lodge
+Warden, Senior. (_See Senior Warden._)
+Warden, Junior. (_See Junior Warden._)
+Warrant of constitution
+ what it is
+ its difference from a dispensation
+ can be revoked only by the Grand Lodge
+ confers powers of installation and succession
+ not necessary before 1717
+ cannot be resigned by a majority of the lodge
+Warranted lodges. (_See Lodges, Warranted._)
+Witnesses in masonic trials, qualifications of
+ definition of incompetent ones
+Woman cannot be made a Mason
+Writing, a qualification of candidates
+
+
+
+Y.
+
+
+Yeas and nays, calling for, unmasonic
+Young man under age cannot be made a Mason
+Youth, perfect, meaning of the term
+
+
+
+
+Footnotes
+
+
+
+[1] They will be found in Oliver's edition of Preston, p. 71, note,
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 58), or in the American edition by Richards,
+Appendix i., note 5.
+
+[2] Found in Ol. Preston, n. 3 (p. 162. U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 134).
+
+[3] In all references to, or citations from, Anderson's Constitutions, I
+have used, unless otherwise stated, the first edition printed at London in
+1723--a fac simile of which has recently been published by Bro. John W.
+Leonard, of New York. I have, however, in my possession the subsequent
+editions of 1738, 1755, and 1767, and have sometimes collated them
+together.
+
+[4] The Gothic Constitutions are that code of laws which was adopted by
+the General Assembly at York, in the year 926. They are no longer extant,
+but portions of them have been preserved by Anderson, Preston, and other
+writers.
+
+[5] Preston, book iv., sec, 2., p. 132, n. (U.M.L.,vol. iii., p. 109).
+
+[6] General Regulations, art. xxxix.
+
+[7] Chancellor Walworth, in his profound argument on the New York
+difficulties, asserted that this fact "does not distinctly appear,
+although it is, pretty evident that all voted."--p. 33. The language of
+Anderson does not, however, admit of a shadow of a doubt. "The Brethren,"
+he says, "by a majority of hands, elected," &c.
+
+[8] Opinion of Chancellor Walworth upon the questions connected with the
+late masonic difficulties in the State of New York, p. 37. There is much
+historical learning displayed in this little pamphlet.
+
+[9] Preston, p. 131, n., Oliver's Edit. (U.M.L., vol. iii.,p. 109).
+
+[10] Of the thirty-six Grand Masters who have presided over the craft in
+England since the revival of Masonry in 1717, thirty have been noblemen,
+and three princes of the reigning family.
+
+[11] Article xxxiv.
+
+[12] His most important prerogatives are inherent or derived from ancient
+usage.
+
+[13] Proceedings G.L. Maryland, 1849, p. 25.
+
+[14] Art. xxxix.
+
+[15] The word "time" has been interpreted to mean _communication_.
+
+[16] And this is not because such past officer has an inherent right to
+the mastership, but because as long as such an one is present and willing
+to serve, there does not exist such an emergency as would authorize a
+dispensation of the law.
+
+[17] What further concerns a lodge under dispensation is referred to a
+special chapter in a subsequent part of the work.
+
+[18] It is well known, although it cannot be quoted as authority, that the
+Athol Constitutions expressly acknowledged the existence of this
+prerogative. See Dermott's Ahiman Rezon.
+
+[19] Book of Constitutions, edit. 1767, p. 222.
+
+[20] Book of Const., p. 233.
+
+[21] Book of Const., p. 313.
+
+[22] Book of Constitutions, p. 319.
+
+[23] Preston, p. 237, ed. 1802, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 223).
+
+[24] Book of Constitutions, p. 247
+
+[25] The existence of this prerogative is denied by the Grand Lodges of
+Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Massachusetts, while it is admitted by
+those of New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin,
+Vermont, Mississippi, Ohio, New Hampshire, Maryland, Indiana, Texas and
+Florida; in the last two, however, subject to limitation.
+
+[26] That is, the one who has longest been a Freemason.
+
+[27] Book of the Lodge, p. 115 (U.M.L., vol. i., book 2, p. 78).
+
+[28] It was abolished in New York in 1854.
+
+[29] This is a small chest or coffer, representing the ark of the
+covenant, and containing the three great lights of Masonry.
+
+[30] "What man is there that hath a new house and hath not dedicated it?
+Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another
+man dedicate it." Deut. xx. 5.
+
+[31] De Syned. Vet. Ebraeor., 1. iii., c. xiv., Sec. 1.
+
+[32] Cicero, Brut. i.
+
+[33] See such a form of Dispensation in Cole's Masonic Library, p. 91.
+
+[34] Preston, Append., n. 4 (U.M.L., vol. iii., pp. 150, 151).
+
+[35] Book of Constitutions, orig. ed, p., 70 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p.
+70).
+
+[36] General Regulations of 1722. A subsequent regulation permitted the
+election of a candidate, if there were not more than three black balls
+against him, provided the lodge desired such a relaxation of the rule. The
+lodges of this country, however, very generally, and, as I think, with
+propriety, require unanimity. The subject will be hereafter discussed.
+
+[37] Every lodge shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot.
+Such Master having been regularly appointed and having served as Warden of
+a warranted lodge for one year. _Constitutions of the Ancient Fraternity
+of Free and Accepted Masons, published by authority of the United Grand
+Lodge of England_, 1847, _p_. 58 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[38] The Wardens, or officers, of a lodge cannot be removed, unless for a
+cause which appears to the lodge to be sufficient; but the Master, if he
+be dissatisfied with the conduct of any of his officers, may lay the cause
+of complaint before the lodge; and, if it shall appear to the majority of
+the Brethren present that the complaint be well founded, he shall have
+power to displace such officer, and to nominate another. _English
+Constitutions, as above, p._ 80 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[39] It is not necessary that he should be a Past Master of the lodge.
+
+[40] No master shall assume the Master's chair, until he shall have been
+regularly installed, though he may in the interim rule the lodge. _English
+Constitutions_ (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[41] Every Warranted Lodge is a constituent part of the Grand Lodge, in
+which assembly all the power of the fraternity resides. _English
+Constitutions, p_. 70 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[42] We shall not here discuss the question whether Past Masters are
+members of the Grand Lodge, by inherent right, as that subject will be
+more appropriately investigated when we come to speak of the Law of Grand
+Lodges, in a future chapter. They are, however clearly, not the
+representatives of their lodge.
+
+[43] Preston, p. 167 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 151).
+
+[44] General Regulations. Of the duty of members, Art. X, (U.M.L., vol.
+xv., book 1, p. 61).
+
+[45] English Constitutions, p. 59 (U.M.L., vol. ix., book 1).
+
+[46] In selecting the name, the modern Constitutions of England make the
+approbation of the Grand Master or Provincial Grand Master necessary.
+
+[47] Such is the doctrine of the modern English Constitutions.
+
+[48] "No Brother can be a Warden until he has passed the part of a Fellow
+Craft; nor a Master until he has acted as a Warden."--_Old Charges_, IV.
+(U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 52).
+
+[49] Regulations on Installation of a Master, No. III. Preston, p. 74
+(U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 61).
+
+[50] Hats. quoted in Jefferson, p. 14.
+
+[51] One of the ancient charges, which Preston tells us that it was the
+constant practice of our Ancient Brethren to rehearse at the opening and
+closing of the lodge, seems to refer to this rule, when it says, "the
+Master, Wardens, and Brethren are just and faithful, and _carefully finish
+the work they begin_."--Oliver's Preston, p. 27, _note_ (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 22).
+
+[52] Proceedings of G.L. of Tennessee, 1850. Appendix A, p. 8.
+
+[53] Book of Constitutions, edition of 1755, p. 282.
+
+[54] If it is an extra communication, this item of the transaction is, of
+course, omitted, for minutes are only to be confirmed at regular
+communications.
+
+[55] Oliver's Preston, p. 163, note (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135).
+
+[56] Such is the provision in the modern constitutions of England, but the
+4th of the 39 Regulations required the candidate to be at least
+twenty-five.
+
+[57] See these regulations in Preston, p. 162, Oliver's ed. (U.M.L., vol.
+iii., p. 135).
+
+[58] Oliver's Preston, p. 72, (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 59).
+
+[59] Blackstone, Com. I., Introd., Sec. 2.
+
+[60] In an able report on this subject, in the proceedings of the Grand
+Lodge of Georgia for 1852. In accordance with the views there expressed,
+Bro. Rockwell decided officially, as District Deputy Grand Master, in
+1851, that a man who had lost one eye was not admissible.
+
+[61] Potter, 184.
+
+[62] Page 18. In December, 1851, the Committee of Correspondence of North
+Carolina, unregardful of the rigid rule of their predecessors, decided
+that maimed candidates might be initiated, "provided their loss or
+infirmity will not prevent them from making full proficiency in Masonry."
+
+[63] Proceedings of the G.L. of Mo. for 1823, p. 5. The report and
+resolution were on the petitions of two candidates to be initiated, one
+with only one arm, and the other much deformed in his legs.
+
+[64] When the spirit of expediency once begins, we know not where it will
+stop. Thus a blind man has been initiated in Mississippi, and a one-armed
+one in Kentucky; and in France a few years since, the degrees were
+conferred by sign-language on a deaf mute!
+
+[65] Namely, the incorrectly presumed operative origin of the Order. The
+whole of this report, which is from the venerable Giles F. Yates, contains
+an able and unanswerable defense of the ancient law in opposition to any
+qualification.
+
+[66] See proceedings of New York, 1848, pp. 36, 37.
+
+[67] Such is the formula prescribed by the Constitutions of England as
+well as all the Monitors in this country.
+
+[68] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art, _Ballot_.
+
+[69] Book of Constitutions. Edit. 1755, p. 312.
+
+[70] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, 3d Edit., art. _Ballot_
+
+[71] Except when there is but one black ball, in which case the matter
+lies over until the next stated meeting. See preceding Section.
+
+[72] Masonry founded on Scripture, a Sermon preached in 1752, by the Rev.
+W. Williams.
+
+[73] That is, advance him, from the subordinate position of a serving man
+or Apprentice, to that of a Fellow Craft or journeyman.
+
+[74] This is also the regulation of the Grand Lodge of South Carolina.
+
+[75] Proceedings of Grand Lodge of New York, for 1845. He excepts, of
+course, from the operation of the rule, those made by dispensation; but
+this exception does not affect the strength of the principle.
+
+[76] Preston, edition of Oliver, p. 12 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 10).
+
+[77] Transactions of the G.L. of New York, anno 1848, p. 73.
+
+[78] Edition of 1723, page 71 (U.M.L., vol. xv., book 1, p. 71).
+
+[79] Preston, p. 48 (U.M.L., vol, iii., p. 40).
+
+[80] Const. New York, 1854, p. 13. The Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of
+England (p. 64) have a similar provision; but they require the Brother to
+express his wish for membership on the day of his initiation.
+
+[81] Preston, Oliver's Ed., p. 71, _note_ (U.L.M., vol. iii., p. 60).
+
+[82] See Oliver, note in Preston, p. 75 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 61).
+
+[83] Oliver's Preston, p. 162 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 135.)
+
+[84] See Anderson's Const., 3d Edit., 1755, page 303.
+
+[85] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 89 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 72).
+
+[86] Preston, Oliver's Edit" p. 90 (U.M.L., vol. iii., p. 73).
+
+[87] Book I., chap. iii.
+
+[88] Proceedings of Louisiana, an. 1852.
+
+[89] Preston, Oliver's Edit., p. 76 (U.M.L., vol. iii, p. 62).
+
+[90] Ibid
+
+[91] See Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry, _in voce_.
+
+[92] Constitutions, Second Edition of 1738, p. 154.
+
+[93] Proceedings for 1853.
+
+[94] Proceedings for 1847.
+
+[95] The right to visit is restricted to once, by many Grand Lodges to
+enable him to become acquainted with the character of the lodge before he
+applies for membership.
+
+[96] Blackstone, Introd., Sec. i.
+
+[97] For so we should interpret the word "honeste."
+
+[98] I have treated this subject of expulsion so fully in my "Lexicon of
+Freemasonry," and find so little more to say on the subject, that I have
+not at all varied from the course of argument, and very little from the
+phraseology of the article in that work.
+
+[99] In England, ejection from a membership by a subordinate lodge is
+called "exclusion," and it does not deprive the party of his general
+rights as a member of the fraternity.
+
+[100] Lexicon of Freemasonry.
+
+[101] Phillips, on Evidence, p. 3.
+
+[102] Chief Baron Gilbert.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Principles of Masonic Law, by Albert G. Mackey
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRINCIPLES OF MASONIC LAW ***
+
+***** This file should be named 12186.txt or 12186.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/2/1/8/12186/
+
+Produced by Distributed Proofreaders
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
+
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
+VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
+new filenames and etext numbers.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
+are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
+download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
+search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
+download by the etext year.
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06
+
+ (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,
+ 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
+
+EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
+filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
+of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
+identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
+digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
+example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234
+
+or filename 24689 would be found at:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689
+
+An alternative method of locating eBooks:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL
+
+
diff --git a/old/12186.zip b/old/12186.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f7166ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/12186.zip
Binary files differ