diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:34:36 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 04:34:36 -0700 |
| commit | 2279b95681ff744d5422a428cd476a468ad5de69 (patch) | |
| tree | 42b4d7b0e7df47e7c71dbcc8db670aa9511f0f24 | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 10482-0.txt | 7609 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 10482-h/10482-h.htm | 7667 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482-8.txt | 8028 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482-8.zip | bin | 0 -> 162307 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 165690 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482-h/10482-h.htm | 8113 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482.txt | 8028 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/10482.zip | bin | 0 -> 162280 bytes |
11 files changed, 39461 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/10482-0.txt b/10482-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..119b673 --- /dev/null +++ b/10482-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,7609 @@ +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 10482 *** + +THE YOUNG MOTHER, OR + +MANAGEMENT OF CHILDREN IN REGARD TO HEALTH. + +BY WM. A. ALCOTT + + +1836 + + + +ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. + +The present edition has been much enlarged. The author has added a +section on the conduct and management of the mother herself, besides +several other important amendments and additions. The whole has also +been carefully revised, and we cannot but indulge the hope that no +popular work of the kind will be found more perfect, or more worthy of +the public confidence. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + +CHAPTER I. THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +CHAPTER II. TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +CHAPTER III. VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air arising from lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +CHAPTER IV. THE CHILD'S DRESS. + +General principles--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us from cold; 3. from +injury. + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon's remarks. Transforming children into mummies. Use of a belly-band. +Evils produced by having it too tight. Cripples sometimes made. Absurdity +of confining the arms. Infants should be made happy. + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +Curious suggestion of a London writer. Advantages of his plan. Killing +with kindness. Dr. Buchan's opinion. Conformity to fashion. Tight-lacing +the chest. Its effects--dangerous. Physiology of the chest. Its motions. +An attempt to make the subject intelligible. Serious mistakes of some +writers. Appeal to facts. Color of females. Their breathing. Their +diseases. Customs of Tunis. Our own customs little less ridiculous. + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +Flannel in cold weather. Its use--1. As a kind +of flesh brush; 2. As a protection against taking cold; 3. As means of +equalizing the temperature. Clothing should be kept clean--often +changed--color--lightness--softness. Cotton apt to take fire. Silk +expensive. Linen not warm enough. Flannel under-clothes. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The power of habit, in this respect. Opinion that no clothing is +necessary. Anecdote of Alexander and the Scythian. Argument from +analogy. Begin right, in early life. We generally use too much +clothing. Should clothing be often varied?--objections to it. Avoid +dampness. + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +How caps produce disease. Nature's head-dress. Miserable apology for +caps. What diseases are avoided by going with the head bare. Judicious +remarks of a foreign writer. Covering the "open of the head." Wetting +the head with spirits. + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +Hats usually too warm. No covering needed in the house; and but little +in the sun or rain. Is it dangerous to go with the head always bare? + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The feet should be well covered. Why. Rule of medical men. No garters. +Objections to covering the feet considered. Shoes useful. Not too thick. +Thick soles. Mr. Locke's opinion. + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +These ought not to be used. Why. Substitutes. Practice of Dr. Dewees. +Needles--their danger. Shocking anecdote. + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +Changing wet clothing. Monstrous error--its evils. Clean as well as dry. +A lame excuse for negligence. No excuse sufficient but poverty. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Every restraint of body or limb injurious. Tight jackets. Stiff stocks +and thick cravats. Boots. Evils of having them too tight. A painful +sight. + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +Clothing should be loose for girls or boys. Girls to be kept warmer than +boys. Few girls comfortable, at home or abroad. Going out of warm rooms +into the night air. How it promotes disease. + + +CHAPTER V. CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +CHAPTER VI. BATHING. + +Practice of savage nations. Rather dangerous. Mistake of Rousseau. +Plunging into cold water at birth may produce immediate death. Hundreds +injured where one is benefited. Spirits added to the water. First +washings of the child--should be thorough. Rules in regard to the +temperature of both the water and the air. Washing an introduction to +bathing. Hour for bathing changes with age. Temperature of the water. +Size of a bathing vessel. Unreasonable fears of the warm bath. How they +arose. A list of common whims. Apology for opposing cold baths. Dr +Dewees' eight objections to them. Does cold water harden? Cold bath +sometimes useful under the care of a skilful physician. Its danger in other +cases. Rules for using the cold bath, if used at all. Securing a glow after +it. General management. Proper hour. Coming out of the bath. Dressing. +Singing. Bathing after a meal. Local bathing. Tea-spoonful of water in the +mouth. Its use. The shower bath. Vapor bath. Medicated bath. Sponging. +Conveniences for bathing indispensable to every family. General neglect +of bathing. Attention of the Romans to this subject. We treat domestic +animals better than children. + + +CHAPTER VII. FOOD. + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk the only appropriate food of infants. Unreasonableness +of some mothers. The tendency to ape foreign fashions. Nursing does not +weaken the mother. + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Much depends on the mother. Opinions of medical societies. Mothers +sometimes make children drunkards. The general fondness for excitements. +Hints to those whom it concerns. Caution to mothers. Opinions of Dr. +Dewees. Slavery of mothers to strong drink and exciting food. Opinions +of the Charleston Board of Health. + +SEC. 3. _Nursing, how often._ + +Children should never be nursed to quiet them. Stomach must have time +for rest. Regular seasons for nursing. Once in three hours. Difference +of constitution. Indulgence does not strengthen. Feeble children require +the strictest management. Nothing should be given between meals. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +Errors. Repetition of aliment. Variety. Children over-fed. Appetite not +a safe guide. Training to gluttony. Illustrations of the principle. +Mankind eat twice as much as is necessary. + +SEC. 5. _How long should Milk be the only Food?_ + +First change in diet. Objections of mothers. Choice bits. Ignorance of +the nature of digestion. What digestion is. Food which the author of +nature assigned. + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +When feeding before teething is necessary. Diet of mothers. Substitute +for the mother's milk. How prepared. Variety not necessary to the +infant. Milk best from the same cow. Vessels in which it is used should +be clean. Sweet milk not heated too much. Not frozen. Disgusting +practices. Pure water. If not pure, boil it. Best of sugar. Is sugar +injurious? When the state of the mother's health forbids nursing. Use of +sucking-bottles. Feeding should in all cases be slow. Jolting children +after eating. Tossing. Sucking-bottle as a plaything. Evils of using it +as such. Dirty vessels. Poisonous ones. Character of nurses. Nursing at +both breasts. Age of the nurse. Parents should have the oversight, even +of a nurse. + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +Proper age for weaning. Cullen's opinion. Proper season of the year. +When the teeth have fairly protruded. First food given. New forms of +food. Animal broth. + +SEC. 8. _During the Process of Weaning._ + +The spring the best time for weaning. Should not be too sudden. The +process--how managed. Exciting an aversion to the breast. What solid +food should first be given. Buchan's opinion. Health of the mother. She +should--if possible--avoid medicine. + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +Views of Dr. Cadogan. Half the children that come into the world go out +of it before they are good for anything. Why? Owing chiefly to errors in +nursing, feeding, and clothing. Simplicity of children's food. Picture +of a modern table. Every dish tortured till it is spoiled. Plain, simple +food, generally despised. How bread is now regarded. How it ought to be. +Mr. Locke's opinion in favor of bread for young children, and against +the use of animal food. Does not differ materially from that of most +medical writers. Vegetable food generally preferred to animal. What is +true of youth, in this respect, is true of every age, with slight +exceptions. Who require most food. Mere bread and water not best. Bread +the staple article of diet. Best kind of bread. Objections to it. How +groundless they are. Fondness, for hot, new bread not natural. Fondness +of change. What it indicates. How it is caused. Train up a child in the +way he should go. We can like what food we please. Second best kind of +bread. Other kinds. Plain puddings. Indian cakes. Salt may be used, in +moderate quantity, but no other condiments. Of butter, cheese, milk, &c. +Potatoes, turnips, onions, beets, and other roots. Beans, peas, and +asparagus. No fat or gravies should be used. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +Diversity of opinion. The cholera. Fruits useful. Seven plain rules in +regard to them. Other rules. A mistake corrected. Fruit before +breakfast. Four arguments in its favor. Particular fruits. Apples. Why +fruits brought to market are generally unfit to be eaten. Are good, ripe +fruits difficult of digestion? Cooking the apple? A man who lives +entirely on apples. Cutting down orchards. Pears, peaches, melons, +grapes. Mixing improper substances with summer fruits. + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +Confectionary sometimes poisonous. Case in New York. All, or nearly +all confectionaries injurious. Physical evils attending their use. +Intellectual evils. Moral evils. The last most to be dreaded. Slaves +to confectionary are on the road to gluttony, drunkenness, or +debauchery--perhaps all three. + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris's opinion of pastry. Various forms of it. Hot flour bread a +species of it. Produces, among other evils, eruptions on the face. +Appeal to mothers. + +SEC. 13. _Crude, or Raw Substances._ + +Salads, herbs, &c.--raw--cooked. Nuts, spices, mustard, horseradish, +onions, cucumbers, pickles, &c. None of these should be used, except as +medicine. + + +CHAPTER VIII. DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk +and water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad +food and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischiefs they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +CHAPTER IX. GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +CHAPTER X. EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +Objections to the use of cradles. Under what circumstances they are +least objectionable. + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +Carrying in the arms a suitable exercise for the first two months of +life. Danger of too early sitting up. Improper position in the arms. +Mothers must see to this themselves. Motion in the arms should be +gentle. No tossing, running, or jumping. Infants should not always be +carried on the same arm. + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +Creeping useful to health. Why. Go-carts and leading strings prohibited. +The longer children creep, the better. Their progress in learning to +stand. Let it be slow and natural. Let it be, as much as possible, by +their own voluntary efforts. + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +Walking in the nursery. Walking abroad. Hoisting children into carriages. +Walks should not become fatiguing. + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +Carriages useful before children can walk. Their construction. Should be +drawn steadily. Position of the child in them: Falling asleep. How long +this exercise should be continued. + +SEC. 6 _Riding on Horseback._ + +Never safe for infants. Riding schools. Objections to riding on +horseback, while very young. Tends to cruelty and tyranny. + + +CHAPTER XI. AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +CHAPTER XII. CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +CHAPTER XIII. LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +CHAPTER XIV. SLEEP. + +General remarks. A prevalent mistake. A hint to fathers. Few Catos. +Everything left to mothers. + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Night the season of repose, generally. Infants require all hours. +Sleeping in dark rooms. Excess of caution. Habit of sleeping amid noise. + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +Where the infant should sleep. Why alone. Poisoning by impure air. +Illustration. Proofs. Friedlander. Dr. Dewees. Destruction of children +by mothers. Anecdote. Moral reasons for having children sleep alone. +Sleeping with the aged. Sleeping with cats and dogs. + +SEC. 3 _Purity of the Air._ + +Nurseries. Windows open during the night. Lowering them from the top. +Habit of Dr. Gregory. Going abroad in the open air. + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +No feathers should be used. They are too warm. Their effluvia +oppressive. Other objections to their use. Mattresses. Air beds. Beds of +cut straw. Soft beds. Testimony of physicians. The pillow. Dampness. +Curtains. Warming the bed. Beds recently occupied by the sick. + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +Light covering. Mistakes of some mothers. Covering the head with bed +clothes. + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +As little dress during sleep as possible. No caps. No stockings. Loose +night shirt. No tight articles of nightdress. Frequent exchanging of +clothes. + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +Sleeping on the back--on the sides. Position of the head. The infant's +bedstead. Sir Charles Bell. Darkening the room. + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +Mental quiet favorable to sleep. Crying to sleep. A good father. All +anxiety should be avoided. + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +Soundness of our sleep. Nightmare. How produced. Late reading. Late +suppers. Influence of religion on sleep. Different opinions about sleep. +Truth midway between extremes. Effect of silence and darkness on our +sleep. Of sleep before midnight. Light unfavorable to sleep. + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +Infants need to sleep nearly the whole time. Number of hours required +for sleep. Opinions of eminent men. The author's own opinion. Statements +of Macnish. Estimates on the loss of time by over-sleeping. Hint to +young mothers. + + +CHAPTER XV. EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. Burning them up. "Lecturing" them. What is an early +hour? + + +CHAPTER XVI. HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +CHAPTER XVII. SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society. Early diffidence. +Selecting companions. Moral effects of society on the young. Parents +should play with their children. + + +CHAPTER XVIII. EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Disliking domestic employments. Miserable housewives--not +to be wondered at. Mistake of one class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +CHAPTER XIX. EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Extent to which the senses can be improved. Case of the blind. The +Indians. Julia Brace. Tailors, painters, &c. + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +Injury done by caps. Syringing the ears. Anecdote of deafness from +neglect. Means of improving the hearing. + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +Importance of seeing. Near-sighted people--why so common. Heat of our +rooms. Very fine print. Spectacles. Reading when tired. Rubbing the +eyes. Cold water to the eyes. + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +Benumbing the senses. How this has often been done. The teeth. How to +preserve them. + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness. Sense of touch. The blind--how taught to +read. Hint to parents. The hand. Neglecting the left hand. Physiology of +the hand and arm. Evils of being able to use but one hand. Both should +be educated. + + +CHAPTER XX. ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + + * * * * * + + +PREFACE. + +There is a prejudice abroad, to some extent, against agitating the +questions--"What shall we eat? What shall we drink? and Wherewithal +shall we be clothed?"--not so much because the Scriptures have charged +us not to be over "anxious" on the subject, as because those who pay the +least attention to what they eat and drink, are supposed to be, after +all, the most healthy. + +It is not difficult to ascertain how this opinion originated. There are +a few individuals who are perpetually thinking and talking on this +subject, and who would fain comply with appropriate rules, if they knew +what they were, and if a certain definite course, pursued a few days +only, would change their whole condition, and completely restore a +shattered or ruined constitution. But their ignorance of the laws which +govern the human frame, both in sickness and in health, and their +indisposition to pursue any proposed plan for their improvement long +enough to receive much permanent benefit from it, keep them, +notwithstanding all they say or do, always deteriorating. + +Then, on the other hand, there are a few who, in consequence of +possessing by nature very strong constitutions, and laboring at some +active and peculiarly healthy employment, are able for a few, and +perhaps even for many years, to set all the rules of health at defiance. + +Now, strange as it may seem, these cases, though they are only +exceptions (and those more apparent than real) to the general rule, are +always dwelt upon, by those who are determined to live as they please, +and to put no restraint either upon themselves or their appetites. For +nothing can be plainer--so it seems to me--than that, taking mankind by +families, or what is still better, by larger portions, they are most +free from pain and disease, as well as most healthy and happy, who pay +the most attention to the laws of human health, that is, those laws or +rules by whose observance alone, that health can be certainly and +permanently secured. + +But these families and communities are most healthy and happy, not +because they live in a proper manner, by fits and starts, but because +they have, from some cause or other, adopted and persevered in HABITS +which, compared with the habits of other families, or other communities, +are preferable; that is, more in obedience to the laws which govern the +human constitution. Not that even _they_ are "without sin" or error on +this subject--gross error too--but because their errors are fewer or +less destructive than those of their neighbors. + +Now is it possible that any intelligent father or mother of a family, +whose diet, clothing, exercise, &c. are thus comparatively well +regulated, would derive no benefit from the perusal of works which treat +candidly, rationally, and dispassionately, on these points? Is there a +mother in the community who is so destitute of reason and common sense +as not to desire the light of a broader experience in regard to the +tendency of things than she has had, or possibly can have, in her own +family? Is there one who will not be aided by understanding not only +that a certain thing or course is better than another, but also WHY it +is so? + +It is by no means the object of this little work to set people to +watching their stomachs from meal to meal, in regard to the effects of +food, drink, &c.; for nothing in the world is better calculated to make +dyspeptics than this. It is true, indeed, that some things may be +obviously and greatly injurious, taken only once; and when they are so, +they should be avoided. But in general, it is the effect of a habitual +use of certain things for a long time together--and the longer the +experiment the better--which we are to observe. + +A book to guide mothers in the formation of early good habits in their +offspring, should be the result of long observation and much experiment +on these points, but more especially of a thorough understanding of +human physiology. It should not consist so much of the conceits of a +single brain--perhaps half turned--as of the logical deductions of +severe science, and facts gleaned from the world's history. + +Here is a nation, or tribe of men, bringing up children to certain +habits, from generation to generation--and such and such is their +character. Here, again, is another large portion of our race, who, under +similar circumstances of climate, &c. &c., have, for several hundred +years, educated their children very differently, and with different +results. A comparison of things on a large scale, together with a close +attention to the constitution and relations of the human system, affords +ground for drawing conclusions which are or may be useful. If this book +shall not afford light derived from such sources, it were far better +that it had never been written. If it only sets people to watching over +the effects of things taken or used only for a single day, instead of +leading them from early infancy to form in their children such habits as +will preclude, in a great measure, the necessity of watching ourselves +daily, then let the day perish from the memory of the writer, in which +the plan of bringing it forth to the world was conceived. But he is +confident of better things. He does not believe that a work which, to +such an extent, GIVES THE REASON WHY, will be productive of more evil +than good. On the contrary, it must, if read, have the opposite effect. + +I do not deny that even after the formation of the best habits, there +will be a necessity of paying some attention to what we eat and what we +drink, from day to day, and from hour to hour; but only that the +tendency of this work is not to increase this necessity, but on the +contrary, to diminish it. In my own view; these occasions of inquiry in +regard to what is right, _physically_ as well as _morally_, are one part +of our trials in this world--one means of forming our characters. We are +constantly tempted to excess and to error, in spite of the most firm +habits of self-denial which can be formed. If we resist temptation, our +characters are improved. And it is by self-denial and self-government in +these smaller matters, that we are to hope for nearly all the progress +we can ever make in the great work of self-education. Great trials of +character come but seldom; and when they come, we are often armed +against them; but these little trials and temptations, coming upon us +every hour--these it is, after all, that give shape to our characters, +and make us constantly growing either better or worse, both in the sight +of God and man. But, as I have repeatedly said, the object of this work +is to diminish rather than to increase the frequency of these trials, +useful though they may be, if duly improved, in the formation of +virtuous, and even of holy character. + +There is a sense in which every infant may be said to be born healthy, +so that we may not only adopt the language of the poet, Bowring, and +say + + --"a child is born; + Take it, and make it a bud of _moral_ beauty," + +but we may also add--Take it and make it beautiful _physically_. For +though a hereditary predisposition undoubtedly renders some individuals +more susceptible than others to particular diseases, yet when the bodily +organization of an infant is complete, and the degree of vitality which +nature gives it is sufficient to propel the machinery of the frame, it +can scarcely be regarded as in any other state than that of health. + +Now if it be the intention of divine Providence (and who will doubt that +it is?) that the animal body should be capable of resisting with +impunity the impressions of heat, cold, light, air, and the various +external influences to which, at birth, it is subjected, it may be +properly asked why this primitive state of health cannot be maintained, +and diseases, and medicines, and even PREVENTIVES wholly avoided. + +But the reason is obvious. Civilized society has placed the human race +in artificial circumstances. Instead of listening to the dictates of +reason, making ourselves acquainted with the nature of the human +constitution, and studying to preserve it in health and vigor, we yield +to the government of ignorance and presumption. The first moment, even, +in which we draw breath, sees us placed under the control of individuals +who are totally inadequate to the important charge of preserving the +infant constitution in its original state, and aiding its progress to +maturity. And thus it is that though infants, as a general rule, may be +said to be born healthy, few actually remain so. Seldom, indeed, do we +find a person who has arrived at maturity wholly free from disease, even +in those parts of our country which are reckoned to have the most +healthy climate. + +It is indeed commonly said, that a large proportion, both of children +and adults, among the agricultural portion of our population, are +healthy. But it is not so. There is room for doubt whether, on the +whole, the farmers of this country are healthier than the mechanics, or +much more so than the manufacturers; or the whole mass of the country +population healthier than that of the crowded city. The causes of +disease are sufficiently numerous, in all places and conditions; and +this will continue to be the fact, not merely until parents and teachers +shall become more enlightened, but until many generations have been +trained under their enlightened influence. + +If the children and adults among our agricultural population derive from +their employments in the open air a more ruddy appearance than those +either of the city or country who are confined more to their rooms; or +to a vitiated atmosphere, and to numerous other sources of disease, and +if they _appear_ more favored with health, I have learned, by accurate +observation, that these appearances are somewhat deceptive. Their active +sports and employments in the open air give them a stronger appetite +than any other class of people; and the indulgence of this appetite, not +only with articles which are heating or indigestible in their nature, +but with an unreasonable quantity even of those which are considered +highly proper, is almost in an exact proportion. And it is hence +scarcely possible for the causes of disease and premature death to be +more operative in factories and in cities than in farm houses and the +country. Indeed it may be questioned whether the abuses of the ANIMAL +part of man--more common in some of their forms in country than in +city--though they may be less conspicuous, are not more certainly and +even more immediately destructive than those abuses which, in city life, +and bustle, and competition, affect more the MORAL nature. + +Be that as it may, however--for this is not the place for the grave +discussion of so broad a question--one thing, to my mind, is perfectly +clear, namely, that until physical education shall receive more +attention from all those who hold the sacred office of instructors of +the young, humanity can neither be much elevated nor improved. Mothers +and schoolmasters especially--they who, as Dr. Rush says, plant the +seeds of nearly all the good or evil in the world--must understand, most +deeply and thoroughly, the laws which regulate the various provinces of +the little world in which the soul resides, and which, like so many +states of a great confederacy, have not only their separate interests +and rights, but certain common and general ones; as well as those laws +by which the human constitution is related to and connected with the +objects which everywhere surround, and influence, and limit, and extend +it. + +This book contains little, if anything, new to those who are already +familiar with anatomy and physiology. Indeed, whatever may be its +claims, its merits or its demerits, it disclaims novelty. It is, indeed, +in one point of view, _original_;--I mean in its form, manner, and +arrangement. What I have written is chiefly from my own resources--the +results of patient study and observation, and careful reflection; but +that study and observation of human nature, and this reflection, have +been greatly aided by reading the writings of others. + +In the prosecution of the task which I had assigned myself, no work has +been of more service to me than an octavo volume of 548 pages, by Dr. +Wm. P. Dewees, of Philadelphia, entitled, "A Treatise on the Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children." It is one of the most valuable works +on Physical Education in the English language, as is evident from the +fact that notwithstanding its expense--three or four dollars--it has, in +nine years, gone through five editions. If it were written in such a +style, and published at such a price as would bring it within reach of +the minds and purses of the mass of the community, its sale would have +been, I think, much greater still; and the good which it has +accomplished would have been increased ten-fold. + +If the "YOUNG MOTHER" should be favorably received by the American +community, and prove extensively useful, it will undoubtedly be owing to +the fact that it presents so large a collection of facts and principles +on the great subject of physical education, in a manner so practical, +and at a price which is very low. To accomplish an object so desirable +is by no means an easy task. It was once said by the author of a huge +volume, that he wrote so large a work because he had not time to prepare +a smaller one. And however unaccountable it may be to those who have not +made the trial, it may be safely asserted, that to present, within +limits so small, anything like a system of Physical Education for the +guidance of young mothers, requires much more time, and labor, and +patience, than to prepare a work on the same subject twice as large. + +Nor is it to be expected, after all, that the work is, in all respects, +perfect. I have indeed done what I could to render it so; but am +conscious that future inquiries may lead to the discovery of errors. +Should such discoveries be made, they will be cheerfully acknowledged +and corrected; truth being, as it should be, the leading object. + + + * * * * * + + +THE YOUNG MOTHER. + + + +CHAPTER I. + +THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +It is far from being in the power of every young mother to procure a +suitable room for a nursery. In the present state of society, the +majority must be contented with such places as they can get. Still there +are various reasons for saying what a nursery should be. 1. It may be of +service to those who _have_ the power of selection. 2. Information +cannot injure those who _have not_. 3. It may lead those who have wealth +to extend the hand of charity in this important direction; for there +are not a few who have little sympathy with the wants and distresses of +the adult poor, who will yet open their hearts and unfold their hands +for the relief of suffering _infancy_. + +Among those who have what is called a nursery, few select for this +purpose the most appropriate part of the building. It is not +unfrequently the one that can best be spared, is most retired, or most +convenient. Whether it is most favorable to the health and happiness of +its occupants, is usually at best a secondary consideration. + +But this ought not so to be. A nursery should never, for example, be on +a ground floor, or in a shaded situation, or in any circumstances which +expose it to dampness, or hinder the occasional approach of the light of +the sun. It should be spacious, with dry walls, high ceiling, and tight +windows. The latter should always be so constructed that the upper sash +can be lowered when we wish to admit or exclude air. It should have a +chimney, if possible; but if not, there should be suitable holes in the +ceiling, for the purposes of ventilation. + +The windows should have shutters, so that the room, when necessary, can +be darkened--and green curtains. Some writers say that the windows +should have cross bars before them; but if they do not descend within +three feet of the floor, such an arrangement can hardly be required. + +It is highly desirable that every nursery should consist of two rooms, +opening into each other; or what is still better, of one large room, +with a sliding or swinging partition in the middle. The use of this is, +that the mother and child may retire to one, while the other is being +swept or ventilated. They would thus avoid damp air, currents, and dust. +Such an arrangement would also give the occupants a room, fresh, clean +and sweet, in the morning, (which is a very great advantage,) after +having rendered the air of the other foul by sleeping in it. + +In winter, and while there is an infant in the nursery, just beginning +to walk, it is recommended by many to cover the floor with a carpet. The +only advantage which they mention is, that it secures the child from +injury if it falls. But I have seldom seen lasting injury inflicted by +simple falls on the hard floor; and there are so many objections to +carpeting a nursery, since it favors an accumulation of dust, bad air, +damp, grease, and other impurities, that it seems to me preferable to +omit it. Many physicians, I must own, recommend carpets during winter, +though not in summer; and in no case, unless they are well shaken and +aired, at least once a week. + +No furniture should be admissible, except the beds for the mother and +child, a table, and a few chairs. With the best writers and highest +authorities on the subject, I am decidedly of opinion that all feather +beds ought effectually and forever to be excluded from nurseries. The +reasons for this prohibition will appear hereafter. + +Every nursery should, if possible, be free from holes or crevices; +otherwise the occupants will be exposed to currents of air, and their +sometimes terrible and always injurious consequences. The room may, in +this way, be kept at a lower medium temperature--a point of very great +importance. + +Cats and dogs, I believe, are usually excluded from the nursery; if not, +they ought to be. For though the apprehension of cats "sucking the +child's breath," is wholly groundless, yet they may be provoked by the +rude attacks of a child to inflict upon it a lasting injury. Besides, +they assist, by respiration, in contaminating the air, like all other +animals. + +If there are, in the nursery, objects which, from the vivacity or +brilliancy of their colors, attract the attention of the child, they +should never be presented to them sideways, or immediately over their +heads. The reason for this caution is, that children seek, and pursue +almost instinctively, bright objects; and are thus liable to contract a +habit of moving their eyes in an oblique direction, which _may_ +terminate in squinting. + +Many parents seem to take great pleasure in indulging the young infant +in looking at these bright objects; especially a lamp or a candle. If +the child is naturally strong and vigorous, no immediate perceptible +injury may arise; but I am confident in the opinion that the result is +often quite otherwise. For many weeks, if not many months of their early +existence, they should not be permitted to sit or lie and gaze at any +bright object, be it ever so weak or distant, unless placed exactly +before their eyes; and even in the latter case, it were better to avoid +it. + +Heat is also injurious to the eyes of all, and of course not less so to +children than to adults. But when a strong light and heat are conjoined, +as is the case of sitting around a large blazing fire--the former custom +of New England--it is no wonder if the infantile eyes become early +injured. No wonder that the generation now on the stage, early subjected +to these abuses, should be found almost universally in the use of +spectacles. + +This may be the most proper place for observing that great care ought to +be taken, at the birth of the child, to prevent a too sudden exposure of +the tender organ of vision to the light. We believe this caution is +generally omitted by the American physician, though it is one which +accords with the plainest dictates of common sense. Who of us has not +experienced the pain of emerging suddenly from the darkness of a cellar +to the ordinary light of day? The strongest eyes of the adult are +scarcely able to bear the transition. How much more painful to the +tender organs of the new-born infant must be the change to which it is +so frequently subjected? And how easy it is to prevent the pain and +danger of the change, by more effectually darkening the room into which +it is introduced! + +But we have testimony on this point. A distinguished German physician +states that he has known many cases of permanent blindness from this +very cause to which we have referred. The Principal of the Institution +for the Blind, at Vienna, says he is confident that most children who +appear to be born blind, are actually made blind by neglecting this same +precaution. + + + + +CHAPTER II. + +TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +There is one general principle, on this subject, which is alike +applicable to all persons and circumstances. It is, to keep a little too +cool, rather than in the slightest degree too warm. In other words, the +lowest temperature which is compatible with comfort, is, in all cases, +best adapted to health; and a slight degree of coldness, provided it +amount not to a chill, and is not long continued, is more safe than the +smallest unnecessary degree of warmth. + +But the application of this rule to those over whom we have control, is +not without its difficulties. Our own sensations are so variable, +independently of external and obvious causes, that we cannot at all +times judge for others, especially for infants. The absolute and real +state of temperature in a room can only be ascertained by the aid of a +thermometer; and no nursery should ever be without one. It should be +placed, however, in such a situation as to indicate the real temperature +of the atmosphere, and not where it will give a false result. + +No mother should forget that the infant, at birth, has not the power of +generating heat, internally, to the extent which it possesses afterward. +The lungs have as yet but a feeble, inefficient action. The purification +of the blood, through their agency, is not only incomplete, but the heat +evolved is as yet inconsiderable. In the absence of internal heat, then, +there is an increased demand externally. If 60º be deemed suitable for +most other persons, the new-born infant may, for a few days, require 65º +or even 70º. + +Much may and should be done in preserving the child in a proper +temperature by means of its clothing. On this point I shall speak at +length, in another part of this work. My present purpose is simply to +treat of the temperature of the nursery. + +The best way of warming a nursery--or indeed any other room, where MERE +warmth is demanded--is by means of air heated in other apartments, and +admitted through openings in the floor or fire-place. The air is not +only thus made more pure, but every possibility of accidents, such as +having the clothes take fire, is precluded. This last consideration is +one of very great importance, and I hope will not be much longer +overlooked in infantile education. + +Next to that, in point of usefulness and safety, is a stove, placed near +or IN the fire-place, and defended by an iron railing. Most people +prefer an open stove; and on some accounts it is indeed preferable, +especially where it is desirable to burn coal. Still I think that the +direct rays of the heat, and the glare of light from open stoves and +fire-places, particularly for the young, form a very serious objection +to their use. + +One of the strongest objections to open stoves and fire-places in the +nursery is, the increased exposure to accidents. I know it is said that +this evil may be avoided by laying aside the use of cotton, and wearing +nothing but worsted or flannel. This is indeed true; but I do not like +the idea of being compelled to dress children in flannel or worsted, at +all times when the least particle of fire is demanded; for this would be +to wear this stimulating kind of clothing, in our climate, the greater +part of the year. + +Besides, I write for many mothers who are compelled to use cotton, on +account of the expense of flannel. And if the stove be a close one, and +well defended by a railing, cotton will seldom expose to danger. Still, +as has been already said, the introduction of heated air from another +apartment, whenever it can possibly be afforded, is incomparably better +than either stoves or fire-places. + +Dr. Dewees is fully persuaded that the excessive heat of nurseries has +occasioned a great mortality among very young children. "In the first +place," he says, "it over-stimulates them; and in the second, it renders +them so susceptible of cold, that any draught of cold air endangers +their lives. They are in a constant perspiration, which is frequently +checked by an exposure to even an atmosphere of moderate temperature." +If this is but to repeat what has been already said, the importance of +the subject seems to be a sufficient apology. + + + + +CHAPTER III. + +VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air by means of lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +Few people take sufficient pains to preserve the air in any of their +apartments pure; for few know what the constitution of our atmosphere +is, and in how many ways and with what ease it is rendered impure. + +It is not my purpose to go into a learned, scientific account in this +place, or even in this work, of the constitution of the atmosphere. A +few plain statements are all that are indispensable. The atmosphere +which we breathe is composed of two different airs or gases. One of +these is called oxygen, [Footnote: Oxygen gas is the chief supporter of +combustion, as well as of respiration. It is the vital part, as it were, +of the air. No animal or vegetable could long exist without it. And yet +if alone, unmixed, it is too pure and too refined for animals to +breathe. Nitrogen gas, on the contrary, while alone, will not support +either respiration or combustion; mixed, however, with oxygen, it +dilutes it, and in the most happy manner fits it for reception into the +lungs.] and the other nitrogen. There is another gas usually found with +these two, in smaller quantity, called carbonic acid gas; but whether it +is necessary, in a very small quantity, to health, chemists, I believe, +are not agreed. One thing, however, is certain--that if any portion of +it is healthful, it must be very little--not more, certainly, than +one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of the whole mass. + +It is by means of the oxygen it contains, that air sustains life and +combustion. Were it not for this, neither fires nor candles would burn, +and no animal could breathe a single moment. Breathing consumes this +oxygen of the air very rapidly. When the oxygen is present in about a +certain proportion, combustion and respiration go on well, but when its +natural proportion is diminished, the fire does not burn so well, +neither does the candle; and no one can breathe so freely. + +Not only are breathing and combustion impeded or disturbed by the +diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere, but just in proportion as oxygen +is diminished by these two processes, or either of them, carbonic acid +is formed, which is not only bad for combustion, but much worse for +health. If any considerable quantity of it is inhaled, it appears to be +an absolute poison to the human system; and if in _very large quantity_, +will often cause immediate death. + +It is this gas, accumulated in large quantities, that destroys so many +people in close rooms, where there is no chimney, nor any other place +for the bad air to escape. But it not only kills people outright--it +partly kills, that is, it poisons, more or less, hundreds of thousands. + +In a nursery there is the mother and child, and perhaps the nurse, to +render the air impure by breathing, the fire and the lamp or candle to +contribute to the same result, besides several other causes not yet +mentioned. One of these is nearly related to the former. I allude to the +fact that our skins, by perspiration and by other means, are a source of +much impurity to the atmosphere; a fact which will be more fully +explained and illustrated in the chapter on Bathing and Cleanliness. It +is only necessary to say, in this place, that it is not the matter of +perspiration alone which, issuing from the skin, renders the air +impure; there are other exhalations more or less constantly going off +from every living body, especially from the lungs; and carbonic acid gas +is even formed all over the surface of the skin, as well as by means of +the lungs. + +One needs no better proof that carbonic acid is formed on the surface of +the body, than the fact that after the body has been closely covered all +night, if you introduce a candle under the bed-clothes into this +confined air, it will be quickly extinguished, because there is too +much carbonic acid gas there, and too little oxygen. + +We may hence see at once the evil of covering the heads of infants when +they lie down--a very common practice. The air, when pure, contains a +little more than 20 parts of oxygen, and a little less than 80 of +nitrogen. Breathing this air, as I have already shown, consumes the +oxygen, which is so necessary to life and health, and leaves in its +place an increase of nitrogen and carbonic acid gas, which are not +necessary to health, and the latter of which is even positively +injurious. But when the oxygen, instead of forming 20 or more parts in +100 of the atmosphere of the nursery, is reduced to 15 or 18 parts only, +and the carbonic acid gas is increased from 1 or 2 parts in 100, to 5, +6, 8 or 10--when to this is added the other noxious exhalations from the +body, and from the lamp or candle, fire-place, feather bed, stagnant +fluids in the room, &c., &c.--is it any wonder that children, in the +end, become sickly? What else could be expected but that the seeds of +disease, thus early sown, should in due time spring up, and produce +their appropriate fruits? + +It is sometimes said that fire in a room purifies it. It undoubtedly +does so, to a certain extent, if fresh air be often admitted; but not +otherwise. + +I have classed feather beds among the common causes of impurity. Dr. +Dewees also condemns them, most decidedly; and gives substantial reasons +for "driving them out of the nursery." + +In speaking of the structure of the room used for a nursery, I have +adverted to the importance of having a large or double room, with +sliding doors between, in order that the occupants may go into one of +them, while the other is being ventilated. But whatever may be the +structure of the room, the circumstances of the occupants, or the state +of the weather, every nursery ought to be most thoroughly ventilated, +once a day, at least; and when the weather is tolerable, twice a day. If +there is but one apartment, and fear is entertained of the dampness of +the fresh air introduced, or of currents, and if the mother and babe +cannot retire, there is a last resort, which is for them to get into +bed, and cover themselves a short time with the clothing. For though I +have prohibited the covering of the face with the bed-clothes for any +considerable length of time together, yet to do so for some fifteen or +twenty minutes is an evil of far less magnitude than to suffer an +apartment to remain without being ventilated, for twenty-four hours +together--a very common occurrence. + +When a lamp is kept burning in a nursery during the night, it should +always be placed at the door of the stove, or in the chimney place, that +its smoke, and the bad airs or gases which are formed, may escape. But +it is better, in general, to avoid burning lamps or candles during the +night. By means of common matches, a light may be produced, when +necessary, almost instantly; especially if you have a spirit lamp in the +nursery, or what is still better, one of spirit gas--that is, a mixture +of alcohol and turpentine. + +It is highly desirable that all washing, ironing, and cooking should be +avoided in the nursery. They load the air with noxious effluvia or +vapor, or with particles of dust; none of which ought ever to enter the +delicate lungs of an infant. + +Fumigations with camphor, vinegar, and other similar substances, have +long been in reputation as a means of purifying the air in sick-rooms +and nurseries; but they are of very little consequence. Fresh air, if it +can be had, is always better. + + + + +CHAPTER IV. + +THE CHILD'S DRESS + +General principles. SEC. 1. Swathing the body--its numerous evils.--SEC. +2. Form of the dress. Fashion. Tight lacing--its dangers. Structure and +motion of the chest. Diseases from tight lacing.--SEC. 3. Material of +dress. Flannel--its uses. Cleanliness. Cotton--silk--linen.--SEC. 4. +Quantity of dress. Power of habit. Anecdote. Begin right. Change. +Dampness.--SEC. 5. Caps--their evils. Going bare-headed.--SEC. 6. Hats +and bonnets.--SEC. 7. Covering for the feet. Stockings. Garters. +Shoes--thick soles.--SEC. 8. Pins--their danger. Shocking +anecdote.--SEC. 9. Remaining wet.--SEC. 10. Dress of boys. Tight +jackets. Stocks and cravats. Boots.--SEC. 11. Dress of girls--should be +loose. Temperature. Exposure to the night air. + + +Dress serves three important purposes:--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us +against cold; 3. To defend our bodies and limbs from injury. There is +one more purpose of dress; in case of deformity, it seems to improve the +appearance. + +In all our arrangements in regard to dress, whether of children or of +adults, we should ever keep in mind the above principles. The form, +fashion, material, application, and quantity of all clothing, +especially for infants, ought to be regulated by these three or four +rules. + +The subject of this chapter is one of so much importance, and embraces +such a variety of items, that it will be more convenient, both to the +reader and myself, to consider it under several minor heads. + + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon, in his "Natural History," says that in France, an infant has +hardly enjoyed the liberty of moving and stretching its limbs, before it +is put into confinement. "It is swathed," says he, "its head is fixed, +its legs are stretched out at full length, and its arms placed straight +down by the side of its body. In this manner it is bound tight with +cloths and bandages, so that it cannot stir a limb; indeed it is +fortunate that the poor thing is not muffled up so as to be unable to +breathe." + +All swathing, except with a single bandage around the abdomen, is +decidedly unreasonable, injurious and cruel. I do not pretend that the +remarks of M. Buffon are fully applicable to the condition of infants in +the United States. The good sense of the community nowhere permits us to +transform a beautiful babe quite into an Egyptian mummy. Still there +are many considerable errors on the subject of infantile dress, which, +in the progress of my remarks, I shall find it necessary to expose. + +The use of a simple band cannot be objected to. It affords a general +support to the abdomen, and a particular one to the _umbilicus_. The +last point is one of great importance, where there is any tendency to a +rupture at this part of the body--a tendency which very often exists in +feeble children. And without some support of this kind, crying, +coughing, sneezing, and straining in any way, might greatly aggravate +the evil, if not produce serious consequences. + +But, in order to afford a support to the abdomen in the best manner, it +is by no means necessary that the bandage should be drawn very tight. +Two thirds of the nurses in this country greatly err in this respect, +and suppose that the more tightly a bandage is drawn, the better. It +should be firm, but yet gently yielding; and therefore a piece of +flannel cut "bias," as it is termed, or, obliquely with respect to the +threads of which it is composed, is the most appropriate material. + +If the attention of the mother were necessary nowhere else, it would be +indispensable in the application of this article. If she do not take +special pains to prevent it, the erring though well meaning nurse may +so compress the body with the bandage as to produce pain and uneasiness, +and sometimes severe colic. Nay, worse evils than even this have been +known to arise. When a child sneezes, or coughs, or cries, the abdomen +should naturally yield gently; but if it is so confined that it cannot +yield where the band is applied, it will yield in an unnatural +proportion below, to the great danger of producing a species of rupture, +no less troublesome than the one which such tight swathing is designed +to prevent. + +But besides the bandage already mentioned, no other restraint of the +body and limbs of a child is at all admissible. The Creator has kindly +ordained that the human body and limbs, and especially its muscles, or +moving powers, shall be developed by exercise. Confine an arm or a leg, +even in a child of ten years of age, and the limb will not increase +either in strength or size as it otherwise would, because its muscles +are not exercised; and the fact is still more obvious in infancy. + +There is a still deeper evil. On all the limbs are fixed two sets of +muscles; one to extend, the other to draw up or bend the limb. If you +keep a limb extended for a considerable time, you weaken the one set of +muscles; if you keep it bent, you weaken the other. This weakness may +become so great that the limb will be rendered useless. There are cases +on record--well authenticated--where children, by being obliged to sit +in one place on a hard floor, have been made cripples for life. Hundreds +of others are injured, though they may not become absolutely crippled. + +I repeat it, therefore, their dress should be so free and loose that +they may use their little limbs, their neck and their bodies, as much as +they please; and in every desired direction. The practices of confining +their arms while they lie down, for fear they should scratch themselves +with their nails, and of pinning the clothes round their feet, are +therefore highly reprehensible. Better that they should even +occasionally scratch themselves with their nails, than that they should +be made the victims of injurious restraint. Who would think of tying up +or muffling the young lamb or kid? And even the young plant--what think +you would be the effect, if its leaves and branches could not move +gently with the soft breezes? Would the fluids circulate, and health be +promoted: or would they stagnate, and a morbid, sickly and dwarfish +state be the consequence? + +Those whose object is to make infancy, as well as any other period of +existence, a season of happiness, will not fail to find an additional +motive for giving the little stranger entire freedom in the land +whither he has so recently arrived, especially when he seems to enjoy +it so much. Who can be so hardened as to confine him, unless compelled +by the most pressing necessity? + + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +On this subject a writer in the London Literary Gazette of some eight or +ten years ago, lays down the following general directions, to which, in +cold weather, there can be but one possible objection, which is, they +are not _alamode_, and are not, therefore, likely to be followed. + +"All that a child requires, so far as regards clothing, in the first +month of its existence, is a simple covering for the trunk and +extremities of the body, made of a material soft and agreeable to the +skin, and which can retain, in an equable degree, the animal +temperature. These qualities are to be found in perfection in fine +flannel; and I recommend that the only clothing, for the first month or +six weeks, be a square piece of flannel, large enough to involve fully +and overlap the whole of the babe, with the exception of the head, which +should be left totally uncovered. This wrapper should be fixed by a +button near the breast, and left so loose as to permit the arms and legs +to be freely stretched, and moved in every direction. It should be +succeeded by a loose flannel gown with sleeves, which should be worn +till the end of the second month; after which it may be changed to the +common clothing used by children of this age." + +The advantages of such a dress are, that the movements of the infant +will be, as we have already seen, free and unrestrained, and we shall +escape the misery of hearing the screams which now so frequently +accompany the dressing and undressing of almost every child. No chafings +from friction, moreover, can occur; and as the insensible perspiration +is in this way promoted over the whole surface of the body, the sympathy +between the stomach and skin is happily maintained. A healthy sympathy +of this kind, duly kept up, does much towards preserving the stomach in +a good state, and the skin from eruptions and sores. + +But as I apprehend that christianity is not yet very deeply rooted in +the minds and hearts of parents, I have already expressed my doubts +whether they are prepared to receive and profit by advice at once +rational and physiological. Still I cannot help hoping that I shall +succeed in persuading mothers to have every part of a child's dress +perfectly loose, except the band already referred to; and that should be +but moderately tight. + +Common humanity ought to teach us better than to put the body of a +helpless infant into a _vise_, and press it to death, as the first mark +of our attention. Who has not been struck with a strange inconsistency +in the conduct of mothers and nurses, who, while they are so exceedingly +tender towards the infant in some points as to injure it by their +kindness, are yet almost insensible to its cries of distress while +dressing it? So far, indeed, are they from feeling emotions of pity, +that they often make light of its cries, regarding them as signs of +health and vigor. + +There can be no doubt, I confess, that the first cries of an infant, if +strong, both indicate and promote a healthy state of the lungs, to a +certain extent; but there will always be unavoidable occasions enough +for crying to promote health, even after we have done all we can in the +way of avoiding pain. They who only draw the child's dress the tighter, +the more it cries, are guilty of a crime of little less enormity than +murder. + +"Think," says Dr. Buchan, "of the immense number of children that die of +convulsions soon after birth; and be assured that these (its cries) are +much oftener owing to galling pressure, or some external injury, than to +any inward cause." This same writer adds, that he has known a child +which was "seized with convulsion fits" soon after being "swaddled," +immediately relieved by taking off the rollers and bandages; and he says +that a loose dress prevented the return of the disease. + +I think it is obvious that the utmost extent to which we ought to go, in +yielding to the fashion, as it regards form, is to use three pieces of +clothing--the shirt, the petticoat and the frock; all of which must be +as loose as possible; and before the infant begins to crawl about much, +the latter should be long, for the salve of covering the feet and legs. +At four or five years of age, loose trowsers, with boys, may be +substituted for the petticoat; but it is a question whether something +like the frock might not, with every individual, be usefully retained +through life. + +I wish it were unnecessary, in a book like this, to join in the general +complaint against tight lacing any part of the body, but especially the +chest. But as this work of torture is sometimes begun almost from the +cradle, and as prevention is better than cure, the hope of preventing +that for which no cure appears yet to have been found, leads me to make +a few remarks on the subject. + +As it has long been my opinion that one reason why mothers continue to +overlook the subject is, that they do not understand the structure and +motion of the chest, I have attempted the following explanation and +illustration. + +I have already said, that if we bandage tightly, for a considerable +time, any part of the human frame, it is apt to become weaker. The more +a portion of the frame which is furnished with muscles, those curious +instruments of motion, is used, provided it is not _over_-exerted, the +more vigorous it is. Bind up an arm, or a hand, or a foot, and keep it +bound for twelve hours of the day for many years, and think you it will +be as strong as it otherwise would have been? Facts prove the contrary. +The Chinese swathe the feet of their infant females; and they are not +only small, but weak. + +I have said their feet are smaller for being bandaged. So is a hand or +an arm. Action--healthy, constant action--is indispensable to the +perfect development of the body and limbs. Why it is so, is another +thing. But so it is; and it is a principle or law of the great Creator +which cannot be evaded. More than this; if you bind some parts of the +body tightly, so as to compress them as much as you can without +producing actual pain, you will find that the part not only ceases to +grow, but actually dwindles away. I have seen this tried again and +again. Even the solid parts perish under pressure. When a person first +wears a false head of hair, the clasp which rests upon the head, at the +upper part of the forehead, being new and elastic, and pressing rather +closely, will, in a few months, often make quite an indentation in the +cranium or bone of the head. + +Now is it probable--nay, is it possible--that the lungs, especially +those of young persons, can expand and come to their full and natural +size under pressure, even though the pressure should be slight? Must +they not be weakened? And if the pressure be strong, as it sometimes is, +must they not dwindle away? + +We know, too, from the nature and structure of the lungs themselves, +that tight lacing must injure them. Many mothers have very imperfect +notions of what physicians mean, when they say that corsets impede the +circulation, by preventing the full and undisturbed action of the lungs. +They get no higher ideas of the _motion_ of the _chest_, than what is +connected with bending the body forward and backward, from right to +left, &c. They know that, if dressed too tightly, _this_ motion is not +so free as it otherwise would be; but if they are not so closely laced +as to prevent that free bending of the body of which I have been +speaking, they think there can be no danger; or at least, none of +consequence. + +Now it happens that this sort of motion is not that to which physicians +refer, when they complain of corsets. Strictly speaking, this bending of +the whole body is performed by the muscles of the back, and not those +of the chest. The latter have very little to do with it. It is true, +that even _this_ motion ought not to be hindered; but if it is, the evil +is one of little comparative magnitude. + +Every time we breathe naturally, all the ribs, together with the breast +bone, have motion. The ribs rise, and spread a little outward, +especially towards the fore part. The breast bone not only rises, but +swings forward a little, like a pendulum. But the moment the chest is +swathed or bandaged, this motion must be hindered; and the more, in +proportion to the tightness. + +On this point, those persons make a sad mistake, who say that "a busk +not too wide nor too rigid seems to correspond to the supporting spine, +and to assist, rather than impede the efforts of nature, to keep the +body erect." + +Can we seriously compare the offices of the spine with those of the +ribs, and suppose that because the former is fixed like a post, at the +back part of the lungs, therefore an artificial post in front would be +useful? Why, we might just as well argue in favor of hanging weights to +a door, or a clog to a pendulum, in order to make it swing backwards and +forwards more easily. We might almost as well say that the elbow ought +to be made firm, to correspond with the shoulders, and thus become +advocates for letting the stays or bandages enclose the arm above the +elbow, and fasten it firmly to the side. Indeed, the consequences in the +latter case, aside from a little inconvenience, would not be half so +destructive to health as in the former. The ribs, where they join to the +back bone, form hinges; and hinges are made for motion. But if you +fasten them to a post in front, of what value are the hinges? + +If mothers ask, of what use this motion of the lungs is, it is only +necessary to refer them to the chapter on Ventilation, in which I trust +the subject is made intelligible, and a satisfactory answer afforded. + +But I might appeal to facts. Let us look at females around us generally. +Do their countenances indicate that they enjoy as good health as they +did when dress was worn more loosely? Have they not oftener a leaden +hue, as if the blood in them was darker? Are they not oftener +short-breathed than formerly? As they advance in life, have they not +more chronic diseases? Are not their chests smaller and weaker? And as +the doctrine that if one member suffers, all the other members suffer +with it, is not less true in physiology than in morals, do we not find +other organs besides the lungs weakened? Surgeons and physicians, who, +like faithful sentinels, have watched at their post half a century, +tell us, moreover, that if these foolish and injurious practices to +which I refer are tolerated two centuries longer, every female will be +deformed, and the whole race greatly degenerated, physically and +morally. + +Those with whom no arguments will avail, are recommended to read the +following remarks from the first volume of the Library of Health, p. +119: + +"It is related, on the authority of Macgill, that in Tunis, after a girl +is engaged, or betrothed, she is then _fattened_. For this purpose, she +is cooped up in a small room, and shackles of gold and silver are placed +upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married +to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the +shackles which the former wife wore are put on the new bride's limbs, +and she is fed till they are filled up to a proper thickness. The food +used for this custom worthy of the barbarians is called _drough_, which +is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering +the milk of the nurse rich and abundant. With this and their national +dish, _cuscasoo_, the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die +under the spoon." + +We laugh at all this, and well we may; but there are customs not very +far from home, no less ridiculous. + +"There is a country four or five thousand miles westward of Tunis, +where the females, to a very great extent, are emaciated for marriage, +instead being fattened. This process is begun, in part, by shackles--not +of gold and silver, perhaps, but of wood--but instead of being put on +loosely, and causing the body or limbs to fill them, they are made to +compress the body in the outset; and as the size of the latter +diminishes, the shackles are contracted or tightened. As with the +eastern, so with the western females, many of them die under the +process; though a far greater number die at a remote period, as the +consequence of it." + + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +I have already committed myself to the reader as favoring the use of +soft flannel in cold weather, especially for children who are not yet +able to run about freely in the open air. The advantages of an early use +of this material, at least for under-clothes, are numerous. The +following are a few of them. + +1. Flannel, next to the skin, is a pleasant flesh brush; keeping up a +gentle and equable irritation, and promoting perspiration and every +other function which it is the office of the skin to perform, or assist +in performing. + +2. It guards the body against the cooling effects of evaporation, when +in a state of profuse perspiration. + +3. By preventing the heat of the body from escaping too rapidly, it +keeps up a steadier temperature on the surface than any other known +substance. The importance of the last consideration is greater, in a +climate like our own, than elsewhere. + +But there are limits to the use of this article of clothing. Whenever +the temperature of the atmosphere is so great, even without artificial +heat, that we no longer wish to retain the heat of the body by the +clothing, then all flannel should be removed at once, and linen should +be substituted; taking care to replace the flannel whenever the +temperature of the atmosphere, as indicated by the thermometer, or by +the child's feelings, may seem to require it. + +It should also be kept clean. There is a very general mistake abroad on +this subject. Many suppose that flannel can be worn longer without +washing than other kinds of cloth. On the contrary, it should be changed +oftener than cotton, or even linen, because it will absorb a great deal +of fluid, especially the matter of perspiration, which, if long +retained, is believed to ferment, and produce unhealthy, if not +poisonous gases. For this reason, too, flannel for children's clothing +should be white, that it may show dirt the more readily, and obtain the +more frequent washing; although it is for this very reason--its +liability to exhibit the least particles of dirt--that it is commonly +rejected. + +One caution more in regard to the use of flannel may be necessary. With +some children, owing to a peculiarity of constitution, flannel will +produce eruptions on the skin, which are very troublesome. Whenever this +is the case, the flannel should be immediately laid aside; upon which +the eruptions usually disappear. + +If parents would take proper pains to get the lighter, softer kinds of +flannel for this purpose, and be particular about its looseness and +quantity, I should prefer, as I have already intimated, to have very +young children, in our climate, wear this material the greater part of +the year, excepting perhaps July and August. + +My reasons for this course would be, first, that I like the stimulus of +soft flannel on the skin, if changed sufficiently often, better than +that of any other kind of clothing. Secondly, cotton is so liable to +take fire, that its use in the nursery and among little children seems +very hazardous. Thirdly, silk is not quite the appropriate material, as +a general thing, besides being too expensive; and fourthly, linen is +not warm enough, except in mid-summer. + +Except, therefore, in July and August, and in cases of idiosyncracy, +such as have just been alluded to, I would use flannel for the +under-clothes of young children, throughout the year. But whenever they +acquire sufficient strength to walk and run, and play much in the open +air, I would gradually lay aside the use of all flannel, even in winter. +Great attention, however, must be paid to the _quantity_. The parent +who, guided by this rule, should keep on her child the same amount of +flannel, and of the same thickness, from January to June 30th, and then, +on the first of July, should suddenly exchange it for thin linen, in +moderate quantity, might find trouble from it. It is better to make the +changes more gradually; otherwise, whatever may be the material of the +dress, the child will be likely to suffer. + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The quantity of clothing used by different individuals of the same age, +in the same climate, possessing constitutions nearly alike, and +following similar occupations, is so different as to strike us with +surprise when we first observe the fact. + +One will wear nothing but a coarse linen or cotton shirt, coarse coat, +waistcoat, and pantaloons, and boots, in the coldest weather. He never, +unless it be on the Sabbath, puts on even a cravat, and never in any +case stockings or mittens. + +Another, in similar circumstances in all respects, constantly wears his +thick stockings, flannel wrapper and drawers, and cravat; and seldom +goes out, in cold weather, without mittens and an overcoat. He is not a +whit warmer: indeed he often suffers more from the cold, than his +neighbor who dresses in the manner just described. + +Why all this difference? It is no doubt the result of habit. Any +individual may accustom himself to much or little clothing. And the +earlier the habit is begun, the greater is its influence. + +Some persons, observing how little clothing one may accustom himself to +use and yet be comfortable, have told us, that so far as mere +temperature is concerned, we need no clothing at all. They relate the +story of the Scythian and Alexander. Alexander asked the former how he +could go without clothes in such a cold climate. He replied, by asking +Alexander how he could go with his face naked. "Habit reconciles us to +this;" was the reply. "Think me, then, _all_ face," said the Scythian. + +But admitting that certain individuals, and even a few rude tribes, +have gone without clothing; did they therefore follow, in this respect, +the intentions of nature? The greatest stickler for adhering to nature's +plan, cannot prove this. Analogy is against it. Most of the other +animals, even in hot climates, are furnished with a hairy covering from +the first; and in cold climates, the Author of their being has even +provided them with an increase of clothing for the winter. Their fur, on +the approach of cold weather, not only becomes whiter, and therefore +conducts the heat away from the body more slowly, but, as every dealer +in furs well understands, it becomes softer and thicker. And yet the +blood of the furred animals of cold countries is as warm as ours, if not +warmer. + +The inferences which it seems to me we ought to make from this are, that +if other animals require clothing, and even a change of clothing, so +does man; and that as the Creator has left him to provide, by his own +ingenuity, for a great many of his wants, instead of furnishing him with +instinct to direct him, so in relation to dress. And even if it could be +proved that dress were naturally unnecessary, with reference to +temperature, I should still defend its use on other principles. The few +speculative minds, therefore, that in the vagaries of their fancy, but +never in their practice, reject it, are not to be regarded. + +The principle laid down in the commencement of the chapter on +Temperature, is the great principle which should guide us in regard to +dress. But although we should always keep a little too cool rather than +a little too warm, it is by no means desirable to be cold. Any degree of +chilliness, long continued, interrupts the functions which the skin +ought to perform, and thus produces mischief. + +The same rules, in this respect, apply to eating, as well as to dress. +It is better to eat a little less than nature requires, than a little +more. It is a generally received opinion, however, that mankind +frequently, at least in this country, eat about twice as much as health +requires. This is owing to habit; and perhaps the power of the latter is +as great in this respect as in regard to dress. + +The great point in regard to food or dress is, to _begin_ right, and, +observing what nature requires--studying at the same time the testimony +of others--to endeavor to keep within the bounds she has assigned. It +has already been more than intimated, that if the nursery be kept in a +proper temperature, a single loose piece of dress is, for some time, all +that is required. In pursuance of this principle, through life, I +believe few persons would be found who would need more at one time than +a single suit of woollen clothes, even in the severest winters of our +northern climate. + +I have always observed that they who wear the greatest amount of +clothing, are most subject to colds. There are obvious reasons why it +should be so. This, then, if a fact, is one of the strongest reasons in +favor of acquiring a habit of going as thinly clad as we possibly can, +and not at the same time feel any inconvenience. + +But after all, whether it be winter or summer, we must vary our clothing +with the variations of the weather, as indicated by the thermometer, and +our own feelings. Sometimes, in our ever-changing and ever-changeable +climate, it may be necessary to vary our dress three or four times a +day. Some cry out against this practice as dangerous, but I have never +found it so. I have known persons who made it a constant practice; and I +never found that they sustained any injury from it, except the loss of a +little time; and the increase of comfort was more than enough to +compensate for that. There is one thing to be avoided, however, whether +we change our clothing--our linen especially--twice a day, or only twice +a week--which is, _dampness_. + + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +The practice of putting caps on infants is happily going by; and perhaps +it may be thought unnecessary for me to dwell a single moment on the +subject. But as the practice still prevails in some parts of the +country, it may be well to bestow upon it a few passing remarks. + +Many mothers have not considered that the circulation of the blood in +young infants is peculiarly active; that a large amount of blood is at +that period carried to the head; that in consequence of this, the head +is proportionably hotter than in adults; and that from this source +arises the tendency of very young children to brain-fever, dropsy in the +head, and other diseases of this part of the system. But these are most +undoubted facts. + +Hence one reason why the heads of infants should be kept as cool as +possible; and though a thin cap confines less heat than a thick head of +hair does when they are older, yet they are less able to bear it. The +truth is, that nature furnishes a covering for the head, just about as +fast as a covering is required, and the child's safety will permit. + +At the present day, few persons will probably be found, who will defend +the utility of caps, any longer than till the hair is grown. The +general apology for their use after this period, and indeed in most +instances before, is, that they look pretty. "What would people say to +see my darling without a cap?" + +But when the head is kept, from the first, totally uncovered, the hair +grows more rapidly, dandruff and other scurfy diseases rarely attack the +scalp; catarrh, snuffles, and other similar complaints, and above all, +dropsy in the head, seldom show themselves; and the period of cutting +teeth, that most dangerous period in the life of an infant, is passed +over with much more safety. + +"Nothing but custom," says a foreign writer, "can reconcile us to the +cap, with all its lace and trumpery ornaments, on the beautiful head of +a child; and I would ask any one to say candidly, whether he thinks the +children in the pictures of Titian and Raffaelle would be improved by +having their heads covered with caps, instead of the silken curls--the +adornment of nature--which cluster round their smiling faces. If there +were no other reason for disusing caps for infants, but the improvement +which it produces in the _appearance_ of the child, I would maintain +that this is a sufficient inducement." And I concur with him fully. + +As to the notion--now I hope nearly exploded--that it is necessary to +cover up the "open of the head," as it is called, nothing can be more +idle. This part of the head requires no more covering than any other +part; and if it did, all the dress in the world could not affect it in +the least, except to retard the growth of the bones, which, in due time, +ought to close up the space; and this effect, anything which keeps the +head too hot might help to produce. Of the folly of wetting the head +with spirits, or any other medicated lotions, and of making daily +efforts to bring it into shape, it is unnecessary to speak in the +present chapter. + + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +The hats worn in this country are almost universally too warm. But if it +is a great mistake in adults to wear thick, heavy hats, it is much more +so in the case of children. + +The infant in the nursery, as we have already seen, needs no covering of +the kind. It is absolutely necessary that the head should be kept as +cool as possible; and absolutely dangerous to cover it too warmly. At a +later period, however, the danger greatly diminishes, because the +circulation of the blood becomes more equal, and does not tend so much +towards the brain. + +Still, however, the head is hotter than the limbs, especially the hands +and feet; and I cannot help thinking that the hair is the only covering +which is perfectly safe, either in childhood or age; except in the +sunshine or in the storm. There may be--there probably is--some danger +in going without hat or bonnet in the hot sun; though I have known many +children, and some grown persons, who were constantly exposed in this +way, and yet appeared not to suffer from it. + +But this may be the proper place to state that we are ever in great +danger of deceiving ourselves on this subject. If the individuals who +follow practices usually regarded as pernicious, while their habits in +other respects are just like those of other persons around them who have +similar strength, &c. of constitution,--if these individuals, I say, +were wholly to escape disease, through life, or if they were to be so +much more free from it, and live to an age so much greater than others +as to constitute a striking and obvious difference in their favor, we +might then safely argue that the practices which they follow are at +least without dangers, if not of obvious advantage. But when we see them +beset with ills, like other people, it is not safe to pronounce their +habits favorable to health, since it is impossible to know whether some +of the ills which they suffer are not produced by them. + +These remarks are applicable to the disuse of any covering for the head +in the sun and in the rain. For you will find those who adopt this +practice from early infancy,[Footnote: I say, from early infancy; +because we may adopt the best habits in mature years, after our +constitutions have been broken up by error and vice, without effecting +anything more than to keep us from actually sinking at once. Indeed, in +most cases we ought not to expect more.] subject to as many diseases as +those around them with similar constitutions, but with habits somewhat +different; and as our diseases are generally the consequences of our +errors in one way or another, it is impossible to say with certainty +that some of them might not have arisen from exposure of the head. + +I should not hesitate, therefore, to advise all mothers to put a light +hat or bonnet on the heads of their children, whenever they are to be +exposed to the direct rays of the summer sun, or to the rain. And as we +cannot always foresee when and where these exposures will arise, and as +it is believed that these coverings, if light, will never be productive +of much injury while we are abroad in the open air, it will follow that +it is better to wear than to omit them. + +But while I contend for their use as consistent with health and sound +philosophy, I must not be understood as admitting the use of such hats +as are worn at present, even by children. They are, as I have said +before, too hot. What should be substituted, I am unable to determine; +but until something can be supplied, which would not be half so +oppressive as our common wool hats, I should regard it as the lesser +evil to omit them entirely. The danger of going bare-headed, if the +practice is commenced early, we know from the customs of some savage +nations, can never be very great. + + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The same reason for avoiding the use of any covering for the head, in +early infancy, is a sufficient reason for covering the feet well. For +just in proportion as the blood is sent to the head in superabundance, +and keeps up in it an undue degree of heat, just in the same proportion +is it sent to the feet in too _small_ a quantity, leaving these parts +liable to cold. Now it is a fundamental law with medical men, that the +feet ought to be kept warmer than the head, if possible; especially +while the child is very young, and exposed to brain diseases. + +So long, therefore, as children are young, and unable to exercise their +feet, stockings ought to be used, both in summer and winter; but I +prefer to have them short, unless long ones can be used without garters. +Everything in the shape of a garter or ligature round the limbs, body, +or neck of a child, except a single body-band, already mentioned in +another chapter, ought forever to be banished. + +It has often been objected, I know, that stockings will make the feet +tender. But as no child was ever hardened by _continued_ and severe cold +applied to any part of the body, but the contrary, so no one was ever +made more tender by being kept moderately warm. Excess of heat, like +excess of cold, will alike weaken either children or adults; but there +is little danger of heating the feet and legs of infants too much during +the first year of infancy. + +It is also said that stockings are apt to receive and retain wet. But as +I shall show in another place that wet clothes should be frequently +changed, this objection would be equally strong against wearing coats +and diapers. + +As to shoes, there is some variety of opinion among medical men. A few +hold that they cramp the feet, and prevent children from learning to +walk as early as they otherwise would. If it were best for children +that they should learn to walk as early as possible, the last objection +might have weight. But it seems to me not at all desirable to be in +haste about their walking. Indeed, I greatly prefer to retard their +progress, in this respect, rather than to hasten it. + +As to the first objection, that shoes cramp the feet too much, nearly +its whole force turns upon the question whether they are made of proper +materials or not. There is no need of making them of cow-hide, or any +other thick leather. The soles are the most important part. These will +defend the feet against pins, needles, and such other sharp substances +as are usually found on the floor; and the upper part of the shoe, so +long as the wearer remains in the nursery, may be made of the softest +and most yielding material--even of cloth. Infants' shoes should always +be made on two lasts, one for each foot. + +The philosopher Locke held, that in order to harden the young, their +shoes ought to be "so that they might leak and let in water, whenever +they came near it." There may be and probably is, no harm in having a +child wet his feet occasionally, provided he is soon supplied with dry +stockings again; but it is hazardous for either children or adults to go +too long in wet stockings, and especially to sit long in them, after +they have been using much active exercise. I am in favor of good, +substantial shoes and stockings for people of all ages and conditions, +and at all seasons; and believe it entirely in accordance with sound +economy and the laws of the human constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +The custom of using ten or a dozen pins in the dressing of children, +ought by all means to be set aside. They not only often wound the skin, +but they have occasionally been known to penetrate the body and the +joints of the limbs. So many of these dreadful accidents occur, and +where no accident happens, so much pain is occasionally given by their +sharp points to the little sufferer, who cannot tell what the matter is, +that it is quite time the practice were abolished. + +Do you ask what can be substituted?--The following mode is adopted by +Dr. Dewees in his own family, as mentioned in his work on the "Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children," at page 86. + +"The belly-band and the petticoat have strings; and not a single pin is +used in their adjustment. The little shirt, which is always made much +larger than the infant's body, is folded on the back and bosom, and +these folds kept in their places by properly adjusting the body of the +petticoat: so far not a pin is used. The diaper requires one, but this +should be of a large size, and made to serve the double purpose of +holding the folds of this article, as well as keeping the belly-band in +its proper place; the latter having a small tag of double linen +depending from its lower margin, by which it is secured to the diaper, +by the same pin. + +"Should an extraordinary display of best 'bib and tucker' be required +upon any special occasion, a third pin may be admitted to ensure the +well-sitting of the 'frock' waist in front;--this last pin, however, is +applied externally; so that the risk of its getting into the child's +body is very small, even if it should become displaced." + +The writer from whom the last two paragraphs are taken, says be has seen +needles substituted for pins; and relates a long story of a child whose +life was well nigh destroyed in this manner. It underwent months of ill +health, and many moments of excruciating agony, before the cause of its +trouble was suspected. Sometimes its distress was so great that nothing +but large doses of laudanum, sufficient to stupify it, could afford the +least relief. At last a tumor was discovered by the attending physician, +near one of the bones on which we sit, and a needle was extracted two +inches long. The needle had been put in its clothes, and, by slipping +into the folds of the skin, had insinuated itself, unperceived, into the +child's body. It is pleasing to add, that, although the little sufferer +had now been ill seven or eight months, and had endured almost +everything but death,--fever, diarrhoea, and the most excruciating +pain,--it soon recovered. + +This shocking circumstance is enough, one would think, to deter every +mother or nurse, who becomes acquainted with it, from using needles in +infants' clothes. Happy would it be, if, in banishing needles, they +would contrive to banish pins also, and adopt either the plan of Dr. +Dewees, or one still more rational. + + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +On the subject of changing the wet clothing of a child, there is a +strange and monstrous error abroad; which is, that by suffering them to +remain wet and cold, we harden the constitution. The filthiness of this +practice is enough to condemn it, were there nothing else to be said +against it. + +It is insisted on by many, I know, that as water which is salt, when it +is applied to the skin, and suffered to remain long, while it secures +the point of hardening the child, prevents all possibility of its taking +cold, it hence follows, that wet diapers are not injurious. But this is +a mistake. Every time an infant is allowed to remain wet, we not only +endanger its taking cold, but expose it to excoriations of the skin, if +not to serious and dangerous inflammation. In short, if frequent changes +are not made, whatever some mothers and nurses may think, they may rest +assured, that the health of the child must sooner or later suffer as the +consequence. + +Nor is it enough to hang up a diaper by the fire, and, as soon as it is +dry, apply it again. It should be clean, as well as dry. Let us not be +told, that it is troublesome to wash so often. Everything is in a +certain sense troublesome. Everything in this world, which is worth +having, is the result of toil. Nothing but absolute poverty affords the +shadow of an excuse for neglecting anything which will promote the +health, or even the comfort of the tender infant. + +Of the impropriety and danger of suffering wet clothes to dry upon us, I +shall speak elsewhere; as well as of the evil of suffering children to +remain dirty,--their skins or their clothing. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Whatever tends to disturb the growth of the body, or hinder the free +exercise of the limbs, during the infancy and childhood of both sexes +is injurious. And as every mother has the control of these things, I +have thought it desirable to append to this chapter a few thoughts on +the particular dress of each sex. I begin with that of boys. + +"Nothing can be more injurious to health," says a foreign writer, "than +the tight jacket, buttoned up to the throat, the well-fitted boots, and +the stiff stock." And his remarks are nearly as applicable to this +country as to England. The consequences of this preposterous method of +dressing boys, are diminutive manhood, deformity of person, and a +constitution either already imbued with disease, or highly susceptible +of its impression. + +No part of the modern dress of boys is more absurd, than the stiff +stock, or thick cravat. It is not only injurious by pressing on the +_jugular_ veins, and preventing the blood from freely passing out of the +head, but, by constantly pressing on the numerous and complex muscles of +the neck, at this period of life, it prevents their development; because +whatever hinders the action of the muscular parts, hinders their growth, +and makes them even appear as if wasted. + +It would be a great improvement, if this part of dress were wholly +discarded; and when is there so appropriate a time for setting it aside, +as _before we began to use it_; or rather while we are under the more +immediate care of our mothers? + +The use of jackets buttoned up to the throat, except in cold weather, is +objectionable; but this is very fortunately going out of fashion. + +Boots, if used at all, should fit well; to this there can be no possible +objection. What the writer, whom I have quoted, referred to, was +probably the tight boot, worn to prevent the foot from being large and +unseemly; but producing, as tight boots inevitably do, an injurious +effect upon the muscles, a constrained walk, and corns. + +What can be more painful, than to see little boys--yes, _little_ +boys--boys neither fifteen, nor twenty, nor twenty-five, walk as if they +were fettered and trussed up for the spit; unable to look down, or turn +their heads, on account of a thick stock, or two or three cravats piled +on the top of each other--and only capable of using their arms to dangle +a cane, or carry an umbrella, as they hobble along, perhaps on a hot +sun-shiny day in July or August? + +But this evil, you who are mothers, have it very generally in your power +to prevent, if you are only wise enough to secure that ascendancy over +your children's minds which the Author of their nature designed. At the +least, you can prevent it for a time--the most important period, too--by +your own authority. This you will not need any urging to induce you to +do, if you ever become thoroughly convinced of its pre-eminent folly. + + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +The same general principles which should guide the young mother in +regard to the dress of boys, are equally important and applicable in the +management of girls. The whole dress should, as much as possible, hang +loosely from the shoulders, without pressing on the body, or any part of +it. This, I say, is the grand point to be aimed at; and this is the only +great principle, whatever some mothers may think, which will lead to +true beauty of person, and gracefulness of gesture. + +There is, however, a slight difference to be made between the dress of +girls and that of boys. The greater delicacy of the female frame +requires that the surface of the body should be kept rather warmer, as +well as better protected from the vicissitudes of the atmosphere. + +But is this the fact? Is not the contrary true? While boys in the winter +are clad in warm woollen vestments, covering every part of their trunk, +many portions of the female frame, and especially many parts of their +limbs, are left so much exposed, that in cold weather you scarcely find +a girl abroad, who appears to be comfortable. + +Nay, they are not only uncomfortable abroad, but at home; and if I were +to present to mothers in detail, a tenth of the evils which their +daughters suffer from not adopting a warmer method of clothing, I should +probably be stared at by some, and laughed at by others. All this, too, +without speaking of going out of warm concert rooms, theatres, ball +rooms and lecture rooms, into the night air, or out of school rooms and +churches, to walk home with measured and stiffened pace, lest the sin +unpardonable of walking swiftly or RUNNING,--that active exercise which +health requires, which youthful feeling prompts, and which duty ought to +inspire,--should unwarily be committed. + +The tremendous evils of confining the lungs have been adverted to at +sufficient length. In reference to that general subject, I need only +add, that if the chest be not duly exercised and expanded, the liver, +the lungs, the stomach, digestion, absorption, circulation and +perspiration, are all hindered. And even so far as the various internal +organs of the body _are_ active, they act at a great disadvantage. The +blood which they "work up," is bad blood, and must be so, as long as the +lungs do not have free play. Hence may and do arise all sorts of +diseases; especially diseases of OBSTRUCTION; and such as are often very +difficult of removal. + +What can be a more pitiable sight than some modern girls going home from +school or church in winter? Thinly clad, the blood is all driven from +the surface upon the internal organs, and what remains is so loaded with +carbon, which the lungs ought but cannot discharge, that her skin has a +leaden hue; her teeth chatter; her very heart is chilled in her panting, +frozen bosom; she cannot run, and if she could, she must not, for it +would be vulgar! Every mother should shrink from the sight of such a +picture. + + + + +CHAPTER V. + +CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +No mother will ever pay that attention to cleanliness which its +importance to health and happiness demands, till she perceives its +necessity. And she will never perceive that necessity till she has +studied attentively the machinery of the human frame--and especially its +wonderful covering. + +The skin is pierced with little openings or _pores_, so numerous that +some have reckoned them at a million to every square inch. At all +events, they are so small that the naked eye can neither distinguish nor +count them; and so numerous, that we cannot pierce the skin with the +finest needle without hitting one or more of them. + +When we are in perfect health, and the skin clean, a gentle moisture or +mist continually oozes through these pores. This process is called +_perspiration_; and the moisture which thus escapes, the _matter_ of +perspiration. + +Perspiration may be checked in two ways. 1. by filth on the skin; 2. by +what is commonly called taking cold--for taking cold essentially +consists in chilling the skin to such a degree as to stop, for some +time, the escape of this moisture. Most persons have doubtless observed, +that in the first stages of a cold, they frequently have a very dry +skin. Whereas, when we are in health, the skin usually feels moist. + +Our health is not only endangered, and a foundation laid for fevers, +rheumatisms, and consumptions, by stopping the pores of the skin with +dirt, or anything else, but there is also danger from another and a very +different source. + +The blood, in its circulation through the body, is constantly becoming +impure; and as it thus comes back impure to the heart, is as constantly +sent to the lungs, where it comes in close contact with the air which we +breathe, and is purified. But this same purifying process which goes on +in the lungs, goes on, too, if the skin is in a pure, free, healthy +condition, all over the surface of the body. If it is not--if the skin +cannot do this part of the work--an additional burden is thus laid on +the lungs, which in this way soon become so overworked, that they +cannot perform their own proportion of the labor. And whenever this +happens, the health must soon suffer. + +The strange belief, that "dirt is healthy," has much influence on the +daily practice of thousands of those who are ignorant of the human +structure, and the laws which govern and regulate the animal economy. It +has probably originated in the well-known fact, that those children who +are allowed to play in the dirt, are often as healthy--and even _more_ +healthy--than those who are confined to the nursery or the parlor. + +Now, while it is admitted that this is a very common case, it is yet +believed that the former class of children would be still more vigorous +than they now are, if they were kept more cleanly, or were at least +frequently washed. It is not the dirt which promotes their health, but +their active exercise in the open air; the advantages of which are more +than sufficient to compensate for the injury which they sustain from the +dirt. That is to say, they retain, in spite of the dirt, better health +than those who are denied the blessings of pure air and abundant +exercise, and subjected to the opposite extreme of almost constant +confinement. + +There is something deceitful, after all, in the ruddy, blooming +appearance of those children who are left by the busy parent to play in +the road or field, without attention to cleanliness. If this were not +so, how comes it to pass that they suffer much more, not only from +chronic, but from acute diseases, than children whose parents are in +better circumstances? + +I am the more solicitous to combat a belief in the salutary tendency of +an unclean skin, because I know it prevails to some extent; and because +I know also, both from reason and from fact, that it is a gross error. + +It is, however, true, that years sometimes intervene, before the evil +consequences of dirtiness appear. The office of the vessels of the skin +being interrupted, an increase of action is imposed on other parts, +especially on those internal organs commonly called glands, which action +is apt to settle into obstinate disease. Hence, at least when aided by +other causes, often arise, in later life, after the source of the evil +is forgotten, if it were ever suspected, rheumatism, scrofula, jaundice, +and even consumption. + +There is a strange notion abroad, that the _smell_ of the earth is +beneficial, especially to consumptive persons. I honestly believe, +however, that it is more likely to create consumption than to cure it. +Besides, in what does this smell consist? Do the silex, the alumine, and +the other earths, with their compounds, emit any odor? Rarely, I +believe, unless when mixed with vegetable matter. But no gases +necessary to health are evolved during the decomposition of vegetable +matter; on the contrary, it is well known that many of them tend to +induce disease. + +I am thoroughly persuaded that too much attention cannot be paid to +cleanliness; and the demand for such attention is equally imperious in +the case of those who cultivate the earth, or labor in it, or on stone, +during the intervals of their useful avocations, as in the case of those +individuals who follow other employments. + +I must also protest against the doctrine, that the smell or taste of the +earth, much less a coat of it spread over the surface, and closing up, +for hours and days together, thousands and millions of those little +pores with which the Author of this "wondrous frame" has pierced the +skin, can have a salutary tendency. + +The opinion has been even maintained, that uncleanly habits are not only +unfavorable to health, but to morality. There can be no doubt that he +who neglects his person and dress will be found lower in the scale of +morals, other things being equal, than he who pays a due regard to +cleanliness. + +Some have supposed that a disposition to neglect personal cleanliness +was indicative of genius. But this opinion is grossly erroneous, and +has well nigh ruined many a young man. + +I am far from recommending any degree of fastidiousness on this subject. +Truth and correct practice usually lie between extremes. But I do and +must insist, that the connection between cleanliness of body and purity +of moral character, is much more close and direct than has usually been +supposed. + +But to return to the more immediate effects of cleanliness on health. +There is one class of diseases in particular which, in an eminent +degree, owe their origin to a neglect of cleanliness. I refer to the +bowel complaints so common among children during summer and autumn. +Except in case of teething, the use of unripe fruits, or the _abuse_ of +those which are in themselves excellent, it is probable that more than +half of the bowel complaints of the young are either produced or greatly +aggravated by a foul skin. + +The importance of washing the whole body in water will be insisted on in +the chapter on Bathing; it is therefore unnecessary to say anything +farther on that subject in this place, except to observe that whether +the washings of the body be partial or general, they should be thorough, +so far as they are carried. There are thousands of children who, in +pretending to wash their hands and face, will do little more than wet +the inside of their hands, and the tips of their noses and ears unless +great care is taken. + +Few things are more important than suitable changes of dress. There are +those, who, from principle, never wear the same under-garment but one +day without washing, either in summer or winter; and there are others +who, though they may wear an article without washing two or three +successive days, take care to change their dress at night--never +sleeping in a garment which they have worn during the day. + +It is a very common objection to suggestions like these, that they will +do very well for those who have wealth, but not for the poor;--that +_they_ have neither the time nor the means of attending to them. How can +they change their clothes every day? we are asked. And how can they +afford to have a separate dress for the night? + +There must be retrenchment in some other matters, it is admitted. In +order to find time for more washing, or money to pay others for the +labor, the poor must deny themselves a few things which they now +suppose, if they have ever thought at all on the subject, are conducive +to their happiness--but which are in reality either useless or +injurious. Something may be saved by a reasonable dress, as I have +already shown. Other items of expense, which might be spared with great +advantage to health and happiness, and applied to the purpose in +question, will be mentioned in the chapter on Food and Drink. + + + + +CHAPTER VI. + +ON BATHING. + +Danger of savage practices. Rousseau. Cold water at birth. First washing +of the child. Rules. Temperature. Bathing vessels. Unreasonable fears. +Whims. Views of Dr. Dewees. Hardening. Rules for the cold bath. Securing +a glow. Coming out of the bath. Local baths. Shower bath. Vapor bath. +Sponging. Neglect of bathing. The Romans. Treatment of children compared +with that of domestic animals. + + +Some of the hardy nations of antiquity, as well as a few savage tribes +of modern times, have been accustomed to plunge their new-born infants +into cold water. This is done for the two-fold purpose of washing and +hardening them. + +To all who reason but for a moment on this subject, the danger of such a +practice must be obvious. So sudden a change from a temperature of +nearly 100º of Fahrenheit to one quite low, perhaps scarcely 40º, must +and does have a powerful effect on the nervous system even of an adult; +but how much more on that of a tender infant? We may form some idea of +this, by the suddenness and violence of its cries, by the sudden +contractions and relaxations of its limbs and body, and by its +palpitating heart and difficult breathing. + +Every one's experience may also remind him, that what produces at best a +momentary pain to himself, cannot otherwise than be painful to the +infant. In making a comparison between adults and infants, however, in +this respect, we should remember that the lungs of the infant do not get +into full and vigorous action until some time after birth; and that, on +this account, the hold they have on life is so feeble, that any powerful +shock, and especially that given by the cold bath, is ten times more +dangerous to them than to adults, or even to infants themselves, after a +few months have elapsed. + +It is surprising to me that so sensible a writer as Rousseau generally +is on education, should have encouraged this dangerous practice; and +still more so that many fathers even now, blinded by theory, should +persist in it, notwithstanding the pleadings of the mother or the nurse, +and the plainest dictates of common sense and common prudence.[Footnote: +Nothing is intended to be said here, which shall encourage unthinking +nurses or mothers in setting themselves against measures which have been +prescribed by higher authority,--I mean the physician. There are cases +of this kind, where it requires all the resolution which a father, +uninterrupted, can summon to his aid, to administer a dose or perform a +task, on which he knows the existence of his child may be depending: but +when the thoughtless entreaties of the mother or nurse are interposed, +it makes his condition most distressing. Mothers, in such cases, ought +to encourage rather than remonstrate. They who _do not_, are guilty of +cruelty, and--perhaps--of infanticide.] + +A child plunged into cold water at birth, by those whose theories carry +them so far as to do it even in the coldest weather, has sometimes been +twenty-four hours in recovering, notwithstanding the most active and +judicious efforts to restore it. In other instances the results have +been still more distressing. Dr. Dewees is persuaded that he has "known +death itself to follow the use of cold water," in this way--I believe he +means _immediate_ death--and adds, with great confidence, that he has +"repeatedly seen it require the lapse of several hours before reaction +could establish itself; during which time the pale and sunken cheeks and +livid lips declared the almost exhausted state" of the infant's +excitability.[Footnote: "Dewees on children" p. 72.] + +We need not hesitate to put very great confidence in the opinion here +expressed; for besides being a close and just observer of human nature, +Dr. D. has had the direction and management, in a greater or less +degree, of several thousands of new-born infants. + +Nothing, indeed, in the whole range of physical education, seems better +proved, than that while some few infants, whose constitutions are +naturally very strong, are invigorated by the practice in question, +others, in the proportion of hundreds for one, who are _less_ robust, +are injured for life; some of them seriously. + +Nor will spirits added to the water make any material difference. I am +aware that there is a very general notion abroad, that the injurious +effects of cold water, in its application both internally and +externally, are greatly diminished by the addition of a little spirit; +but it is not so. Does the addition of such a small quantity of spirit +as is generally used in these cases, materially alter the temperature? +Is it not the application of a cold liquid to a heated surface, still? +Can we make anything else of it, either more or less? + +I do not undertake to say, that the cold bath may not be so managed in +the progress of infancy, as to make it beneficial, especially to strong +constitutions. It is its indiscriminate application to all new-born +children, without regard to strength of constitution, or any other +circumstances, that I most strenuously oppose. Of its occasional use, +under the eye of a physician, and by parents who will discriminate, I +shall say more presently. + +Our first duty on receiving a new inhabitant of the world is, to see +that it is gently but thoroughly washed, in moderately warm soft water, +with fine soap. Special attention should be paid to the folds of the +joints, the neck, the arm pits, &c. For rubbing the body, in order to +disengage anything which might obstruct the pores, or irritate or fret +the skin, nothing can be preferable to a piece of soft sponge or +flannel. Though the operation should be thorough, and also as rapid as +the nature of circumstances will permit, all harshness should be +avoided. When finished, the child should be wiped perfectly dry with +soft flannel. + +While the washing is performed, the temperature of the room should be +but a few degrees lower than that of the water; and the child should not +be exposed to currents of cold air. If the weather is severe, or if +currents of air in the room cannot otherwise be avoided, the dressing, +undressing, washing, &c., may be done near the fire. And I repeat the +rule, it should always be done with as much rapidity as is compatible +with safety. + +Here will be seen one great advantage of simplicity in the form of +dress. If the more rational suggestions of our chapter on that subject +are attended to, it will greatly facilitate the process of washing, and +the subsequent daily process of bathing, which I am about to recommend +to my readers. + +This washing process is also an introduction to bathing. For it should +be repeated every day; but with less and less attention to the washing, +and more and more reference to the bathing. How long the child should +stay in the bath, must be left to experience. If he is quiet, fifteen +minutes can never be too long; and I should not object to twenty. If +otherwise, and you are obliged to remove him in five minutes, or even in +three, still the bathing will be of too much service to be dispensed +with. + +Nothing should be mixed with the water, if the infant is healthy, except +a little soap, as already mentioned. Some are fond of using salt; but it +is by no means necessary, and may do harm. + +The proper hour for bathing is the early part of the day, or about the +middle of the forenoon. This season is selected, because the process, +manage it as carefully as we may, is at first a little exhausting. As +the child grows older, however, and not only becomes stronger, but +appears to be actually refreshed and invigorated by the bath, it will be +advisable to defer it to a later and later hour. By the time the babe is +three months old, particularly in the warm season, the hour of bathing +may be at sunset. + +The degree of heat must be determined, in part, by observing its effect +on the child; and in part by a thermometer. For this, and for other +purposes, a thermometer, as I have already more than hinted, is +indispensable in every nursery. Our own sensations are often at best a +very unsafe guide. There is one rule which should always be +observed--never to have the temperature of the bath below that of the +air of the room. If the thermometer show the latter to be 70º, the bath +should be something like 80º; perhaps with feeble children, rather more. + +Great care ought always to be taken to proportion the air of the room +and the water of the bath to each other. If, for example, the +temperature of the room have been, for some time, unusually warm, that +of the water must not be so low as if it had been otherwise. On the +contrary, if the room have been, for a considerable time, rather cool, +the bath may be made several degrees cooler than in other circumstances. +But in no case and in no circumstances must a _warm_ bath--intended as +such, simply--be so warm or so cold, as to make the child uncomfortable; +whether the temperature be 70º, 80º, or 90º. + +It is hardly necessary to add, that in bathing a young child, the vessel +used for the purpose should be large enough to give free scope to all +the motions of its extremities. Most children are delighted to play and +scramble about in the water. I know, indeed, that the contrary sometimes +happens; but when it does, it is usually--I do not say _always_--because +the countenances of those who are around express fear or apprehension; +for it is surprising how early these little beings learn to decipher our +feelings by our very countenances. + +Some of our readers may be surprised at the intimation that there are +mothers and nurses who have fears or apprehensions in regard to the +effects of the warm bath; but others--and it is for such that I write +this paragraph--will fully understand me. I have been often surprised at +the fact, but it is undoubted, that there is a strong prejudice against +warm bathing, in many parts of the country. In endeavoring to trace the +cause, I have usually found that it arose from having seen or heard of +some child who died soon after its application. I have had many a parent +remonstrate with me on the danger of the warm bath; and this, too, in +circumstances when it appeared to me, that the child's existence +depended, under God, on that very measure. Perhaps it is useless in such +cases, however, to reason with parents on the subject. The medical +practitioner must do his duty boldly and fearlessly, and risk the +consequences. + +But as I am writing, not for persons under immediate excitement, but for +those that may be reasoned with, it is proper to say, that in medicine, +the warm bath is so often used in extreme cases, and as a last resort, +even when death has already grasped, or is about to fix his grasp on the +sufferer, that it would be very strange if many persons _did not_ die, +just after bathing. But that the bathing itself ever produced this +result, in one case in a thousand, there is not the slightest reason for +believing. [Footnote: Let me not be understood as intimating that, the +general neglect of bathing, of which I complain so loudly, is _chiefly_ +owing to this unreasonable prejudice, though this no doubt has its sway. +On the contrary, I believe it is much oftener owing to ignorance, +indolence, and parsimony.] + +There are many more whims connected with bathing, as with almost +everything else, which it were equally desirable to remove. Some nurses +and mothers think that if the child's skin is wiped dry after bathing, +it will impair, if not destroy, the good effects of the operation. +Others still, shocking to relate, will even put it to bed in its wet +clothes; this, too, from principle. Not unlike this, is the belief, very +common among adults, that if we get our clothes wet--even our +stockings--we must, by all means, suffer them to dry on us; a belief +which, in its results, has sent thousands to a premature grave--and, +what is still worse, made invalids, for life, of a still greater number. + +I am aware, that in rejecting the indiscriminate cold bathing of +infants, I am treading on ground which is rather unpopular, even with +medical men; a large proportion of whom seem to believe that the +practice may be useful. But I am not _wholly_ alone. Dr. Dewees--of +whose large experience I have already spoken--and some others, do not +hesitate to avow similar sentiments. + +The objections of Dr. Dewees to cold bathing are the following. 1. There +often exists a predisposition to disease, which cold bathing is sure to +rouse to action. Or if the disease have already begun to affect the +system, the bath is sure to aggravate it. 2. Some children have such +feeble constitutions that they are sure to be permanently weakened by +it, rather than invigorated. 3. To those in whom there is the tendency +of a large quantity of blood to the head, lungs, liver, &c., it is +injurious. 4. In some, the shock produces a species of syncope, or +catalepsy. 5. The _reaction_, as shown by the heat which follows the +cold bath, is, in some cases, so great as to produce a degree of fever, +and consequent debility. 6. It never answers the purposes of +cleanliness--one great object of bathing--so well as the warm bath. 7. +It is always unpleasant or painful to the child; especially at first. 8. +It sometimes produces severe pain in the bowels. + +This is a very formidable list of objections; and certainly deserves +consideration. There is one statement made by Dr. D. in the progress of +his remarks on this subject, in which I do not concur. He says--"The +object of all bathing is to remove impurities arising from dust, +perspiration, &c., from the surface; that the skin may not be obstructed +in the performance of its proper offices." + +But the object of cold bathing, with many, is to _harden_; consequently +it is not true that cleanliness is the _only object_. If he means, even, +that cleanliness is the only _legitimate_ object of all bathing, I shall +still be compelled to dissent. + +If the cold bath could be used, always, by and with the direction of a +skilful physician, I believe its occasional use might be rendered +salutary. And although as it is now commonly used, I believe its effects +are almost anything but salutary, I do not deny that if its use were +cautiously and gradually begun, and judiciously conducted, it might be +the means of making children who are already robust, still more hardy +and healthy than before, and better able to resist those sudden changes +of temperature so common in our climate, and so apt to produce cold, +fever, and consumption. + +Cold bathing, in the hands of those who are ignorant of the laws of the +human frame--and such unfortunately and unaccountably most fathers and +mothers are--I cannot help regarding as a highly dangerous weapon; and +therefore it is, that in view of the whole subject, I cannot recommend +its general and indiscriminate use. + +If there are individuals, however, who are determined to employ it, in +the case of their more vigorous children, and without the advice or +direction of their family physician, I beg them to attend to the +following rules or principles, expressed as briefly as possible. + +In no ordinary case whatever, is the cold bath useful, unless it is +succeeded by that degree of warmth on the surface of the body which is +usually called a _glow_. This is a leading and important principle. The +contrary, that is, the injurious effects of cold bathing--its +_immediate_ bad effects, I mean--are shown by the skin remaining pale +and shrivelled after coming out of the bath, by its blue appearance, and +by its coldness, as well as by a sunken state of the eyes, and much +general languor. + +To secure this point--I mean the GLOW--it is indispensably important to +begin the use of cold water gradually; that is, to use it at first of +so high a temperature as to produce only a slight sensation of cold, and +to take special care that the skin be immediately wiped very dry, and +the temperature of the room be quite as high as usual. Afterward the +water may be cooled gradually, from week to week, though never more than +a degree or two at once. + +It will probably be unsafe to commence this practice of cold +bathing--even in the case of the most robust children--until they are at +least six months of age. + +The appropriate season will be the middle of the forenoon, the hour when +the system is usually the most vigorous, and at which we shall be most +likely to secure a reaction. At first, twice or three times a week are +as often as it will be safe to repeat it. Some writers recommend it +twice a day; but once is enough, under any ordinary circumstances. + +The method at first is, to give the infant a single plunge. Afterward, +when he becomes older, and more inured to it, he may be plunged several +times in succession. + +On taking him out of the bath, the skin should be wiped perfectly dry, +as in the case of the warm bath, and with the same or an increased +degree of attention to other circumstances--the temperature of the +room, the avoiding currents of air, &c. He should next be put in a soft, +warm blanket, and be kept for some time in a state of gentle motion; and +after a little time, should be dressed. + +I have already mentioned the importance of avoiding the manifestation of +fear, when we bathe a child; and the caution is particularly necessary +in the administration of the cold bath. Some writers even recommend, +that during the whole process of undressing, bathing, exercising, and +dressing, singing should be employed. There is philosophy in this +advice, and it is easily tried; but I cannot speak of it from +experience. + +There is one thing which may serve to calm our apprehensions--if we have +any--of danger; which is, that though the child's lungs are feeble at +first, from their not having been, like the heart, accustomed to +previous action, yet when they get fairly into motion and action, and +the child is a few months old, they are probably as strong, if not +stronger, in proportion, than those of adults. + +Bathing in cold water should never be performed immediately after a full +meal. Neither is it desirable to go to the contrary extreme, and bathe +when the stomach has been long empty; nor when the child's mental or +bodily powers are more than usually exhausted by fatigue. + +Although I have given these rules for those who are determined to use +the cold bath with their children, yet, for fear I shall be +misunderstood, I must be suffered to repeat, in this place, that, +uninformed as people generally are in regard to physiology, I cannot +advise even its moderate use. On the contrary, I would gladly dissuade +from it, as most likely, in the way it would inevitably be used, to do +more harm than good. + +There is no sort of objection to what might be called local bathing with +cold water. If the child's head is hot at any time, the temples, and +indeed the whole upper part of the head, may be very properly wet with +moderately cold water--taking care to avoid wetting the clothes. But +avoid, by all means, the common but foolish practice of putting spirits +in the water. + +A tea-spoonful of cold water cannot be too early put into the mouth of +the infant. The object is to cleanse or rinse the mouth; and the process +may be aided by wiping it out with a piece of soft linen rag. If a part +or all of the water should be swallowed, no harm will be done. This +practice, commenced almost as soon as children are born, has saved many +a sore mouth. + +There are other forms of bathing besides those already mentioned; among +which are the shower bath, the vapor bath, and the medicated bath. The +shower bath--for which purpose the water is commonly used cold--is but +poorly adapted to the wants of infants. The shock is much greater than +the common cold bath, and more apt to frighten; and fear is unfavorable +to reaction, or the production of a genial glow. + +The vapor bath is much better; and probably has quite as good an effect +as the common warm bath. The trouble and expense of procuring the +necessary apparatus is somewhat greater, however, as a mere bathing tub +costs but little, and can be made by every father who possesses common +ingenuity. But whatever may be the expense, it is indispensable in every +family; and whenever the pores of the skin are obstructed, a vapor +bathing apparatus is equally desirable. + +The medicated vapor bath is sometimes used; but I am not now treating of +infants who are sick, but of those who are in a state of health. + +The common warm bath is sometimes medicated by putting in salt. This, of +course, renders the water more stimulating to the skin; but except when +the perspiration is checked, or the skin peculiarly inactive from some +other cause--in other words, unless we are sick--it is seldom expedient +to use it. + +There is one substitute for the bathing tub, in the case of the cold +bath. I refer to the use of a wet cloth or sponge, applied rapidly to +the whole surface of the body. When this is done, the skin should be +wiped thoroughly dry immediately afterwards, as in the case of complete +immersion. + +The application of either a cloth or a sponge, filled with warm water, +to the skin, in this manner, even if continued for several minutes +together, is less efficacious than a continuous immersion. I repeat +it--no family ought to be without conveniences for bathing in warm water +daily. I speak now of every member of the family, young and old, as well +as the infant; and I refer particularly to the summer season: though I +do not think the practice ought to be wholly discontinued during the +winter. + +It will still be objected that this care of, and attention to the young, +in reference to health--this provision for bathing daily, and care to +see that it is performed--can never be afforded by the laboring portion +of the community. But I shall as strenuously insist on the contrary; and +trust I shall, in the sequel, produce reasons which will be +satisfactory. + +The great difficulty is, to convince parents that these things are +vastly more productive of health and happiness to their children--more +truly necessaries--than a great many things for which they now expend +their time and money. There is, and always has been--except, perhaps, +among the Jews, in the earliest periods of the history of that wonderful +nation--a strange disposition to overlook the happiness of the young. It +is not necessary to represent this dereliction as peculiar to modern +times, for we find traces of the same thing thousands of years ago. + +The Roman emperors--Dioclesian in particular--could make provision for +bathing, to an extent which now astonishes us; but for whom? For whom, I +repeat it, was incurred the enormous expense of fitting up and keeping +in repair accommodations for bathing at once 18,000 people? For adults; +and for adults alone. I do not say that children were not admitted, in +any case; but I say they were not contemplated in these arrangements. +Nothing was done--not a single thing--that would not have been done, had +there been no child under ten years of age in the whole empire. + +And what better than this do WE, now? We make provision for the +happiness of the adult. The most indigent person will find time and +money to spend for the gratification of his own senses, his pride, or +his curiosity; but his children--they may be overlooked! Or, if he has +an eye to the future happiness of his child, he conceives that he is +promoting it in the best possible degree, by endeavoring to lay up a few +dollars for his use, after his character is formed--at a period, as it +too often happens, when money will do him little good, since it can +neither purchase health, peace of mind, nor reputation. + +Far be it from me to say, that the poor--ground into the dust as they +are, by the force of circumstances operating with their own concurrence, +to make them ignorant, vicious, or miserable--can do for their children +all that is desirable. By no means. But they have it in their power to +do much more than they are at present doing. They have it in their +power, at least, to use the same good sense in the management of the +human being that they do in that of a pig, a calf, or a colt, or even a +young vegetable. No parent, let him be ever so poor, is found in the +habit of neglecting either of these in proportion to its infancy, and of +exerting himself only in proportion as it grows older. Common sense +tells him that the contrary is the true course; that however poor he may +be, he will be still poorer, if he do not take special pains with the +young animal, to rear it and with the young vegetable, to give it the +right direction, by keeping down the weeds, and pruning and watering it. +And I say again, that however deserving of censure the wealthy of a +Christian community may be in not directing the ignorant and vicious +into the right path, and in not expending more of their wealth on those +who are poor, in elevating their minds and their manners, and promoting +their health, still the latter are inexcusable for their present neglect +of their infant offspring, while they would not think of neglecting, on +the same principle, the offspring of their domestic animals. + + + + +CHAPTER VII. + +FOOD. + +SEC. 1. General principles.--SEC. 2. Conduct of the mother.--SEC. 3. +Nursing--rules in regard to it.--SEC. 4. Quantity of food. Errors. +Over-feeding. Gluttony.--SEC. 5. How long should milk be the child's +only food?--SEC. 6 Feeding before teething. Cow's milk. Sucking bottles. +Cleanliness. Nurses.--SEC. 7. Treatment from teething to weaning.--SEC. +8. Process of weaning-rules in regard to it.--SEC. 9. First food to be +used after weaning. Importance of good bread. Other kinds of food.--SEC. +10. Remarks on fruit.--SEC. 11. Evils and dangers of confectionary.--SEC. +12. Mischiefs of pastry.--SEC. 13. Crude and raw substances. + + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk, in suitable quantity, and under suitable regulations, +is so obviously the appropriate food of an infant during the first +months of its existence, that it seems almost unnecessary to repeat the +fact. And yet the violations of this rule are so numerous and constant, +as to require a few passing remarks. + +There are some mothers who seem to have a perfect hatred of children; +and if they can find any plausible apology for neglecting to nurse them, +they will. Few, indeed, will publicly acknowledge a state of feeling so +unnatural; but there are some even of such. On the latter, all argument +would, I fear, be utterly lost. Of the former, there may, be hope. + +They tell us--and they are often sustained by those around them--that it +is very inconvenient to be so confined to a child that they cannot leave +home for a little while. Can it be their duty--for in these days, when +virtue and religion, and everything good, are so highly complimented, no +people are more ready to talk of _duty_ than they who have the least +regard to it--can it be their duty, they ask, to exclude themselves from +the pleasures and comforts of social life for half or two thirds of +their most active and happy years? Ought they not to go abroad, at least +occasionally? But if so, and their children have no other source of +dependence, must they not suffer? Is it not better, therefore, that they +should be early accustomed to other food, for a part of the time? +Besides, they may be sick; and then the child must rely on others; and +will it not be useful to accustom it early to do so? + +Perhaps few mothers are conscious that this train of reasoning passes +through their minds. But that something like it is often made the +occasion of substituting food which is less proper, for that furnished +by Divine Providence, there cannot be a doubt. And the mischief is, that +she who has gone so far, will not scruple, ere long, to go farther. And, +strange and unnatural as it may seem, that mothers should turn over +their children to be nursed wholly by others, in order to get rid of the +inconvenience of nursing them at their own bosoms, it is only carrying +out to its fullest extent, and reducing to practice, the train of +reasoning mentioned above. + +Nor is it necessary that I should stop here to denounce a course of +conduct so unchristian and savage. I know it is very common in some +countries; and those American mothers who ape the other eastern +fashions, or countenance their sons and daughters in doing it, will not +be slow to imitate this also--especially as it is a very _convenient_ +fashion. And I question whether I shall succeed in reasoning them out of +it. Habit, both of thought and action, is exceedingly powerful. I will, +therefore, confine myself chiefly to those efforts at prevention, from +which much more is to be hoped, in the present state of society, than +from direct attempts at cure. + +It will be soon enough to leave a child with another person, when the +mother is actually sick, or unavoidably absent; or when some other +adequate cause is known to exist. We are to be governed, in these and +similar cases, by general rules, and not by exceptions. The general +rule, in the present case, is, that mothers can nurse their own +children; and, if they have the proper disposition, that they can do it +uninterruptedly. + +But those who are so ready to become counsellors on these occasions, +will tell us, perhaps, that the child must be "fed to spare the mother." +That is to say, nursing weakens the mother, and the child must be taken +away, a part of the time, to save her strength. + +Now it may safely be doubted whether the process of nursing, in itself +considered, does weaken, at all. The Author of nature has made provision +for the secretion (formation) of the milk, whether the child receives it +or not. If it is not taken by the child, or drawn off in some other way, +one of two things must follow;--either it must be taken up by what are +called absorbent vessels, and carried into the circulation, and chiefly +thrown out of the system as waste matter, or it will prove a source of +irritation, if not of inflammation, to the organs themselves which +secrete it. In both cases, the strength of the mother is quite as likely +to be taxed, as if the child received the milk in the way that nature +intended. + +Besides, on this very principle, the plan of saving a mother's strength +by requiring another to nurse for her, is but saying that we will weaken +one person to save another. Or if we feed the child, to "spare its +mother," what is this, in practice, but to say that the works of the +Creator are very imperfect; and that he has thrown upon the mass of +mankind a task to which they are not equal? For the mass of mankind are +poor; and the poor, having neither the means nor the time to escape the +duties in question, must submit to them, while their more wealthy +neighbors escape. + +But it is idle to defend customs so monstrous. They admit of no defence +that has the slightest claim to solidity. The general rule then is, that +mothers should nurse their own children. + + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Originally it was not my intention to give directions, in this volume, +in regard to the food, drink, &c., of the mother while nursing; but +repeated solicitations on this point, have led me to the conclusion that +a few general principles may be very properly introduced. + +The future health, and even the moral well-being of the child, depend +much more on the proper management of the mother herself than is usually +supposed. How, indeed, can it be other wise? How can the mother's blood +be constantly irritated with improper food and drink, without rendering +the milk so? And how can a child draw, daily and hourly, from this +feverish fountain, without being affected, not only in his physical +frame, but in his very temper and feelings? + +It is not enough that we adopt the principles already insisted on by +some of our wisest medical men, and even by one or two medical +societies,[Footnote: Those of Connecticut and New Hampshire.] that +children in this way often acquire a propensity for exciting drinks, +that may end in their downright intemperance. What if it should not, in +every case, proceed quite so far as to make the child a drunkard? If it +but lays the foundation of a constitutional fondness for _excitements_, +it tends to disease. Indeed that, in itself, is a disease; and one, too, +which is destroying more persons every year than the cholera, or even +the consumption. Consumption has at most only slain her tens of +thousands [Footnote: About 40,000 a year, in the United States, as nearly +as it can be estimated.] a year; but a fondness for exciting food and +drink--innocent and harmless as it is often supposed to be, and +therefore only the more dangerous a foe--does not fail to slay every +year, directly or indirectly, its hundreds of thousands. At least this +is my own opinion. + +Why, where can you find the individual who is not a slave to this +perpetual rage within--this perpetual cry, "Who will show us any" +physical "good"? Who, in this land of abundance, will eat or drink plain +things? Who will eat simple bread, meat, potatoes, rice, pudding, +apples, &c. or drink simple water? A few instances may be found, of +late, in which people confine themselves to simple water for drink; but +they are rather rare. And no wonder. They _must_ be rare so long as an +unnatural thirst is kept up everywhere by the most exciting and most +strange mixtures of food. Where, I again ask, is the person who will eat +and relish plain bread, plain meat, plain puddings, &c.? Certainly not +in the nursery. No young mother--scarcely one I mean--will, for a single +meal, confine herself to a piece of bread, the sweetest and best food in +the whole world, unless it is hot, or toasted, or soaked, or buttered. A +natural, healthy appetite, is as rare a thing on our planet, almost, as +an inhabitant of the sun or moon. + +I have seen more than one mother made sick by using, while nursing, +improper food and drink. I have known milk punch, taken by +stealth--(because how could the mother, it was said, ever have a supply +of food for her poor child without it!)--to kindle a fever that came +very near burning up the mother and child both. And yet, if I have once +or twice succeeded in convincing the mother that she was only suffering +the natural punishment of her own transgressions, I have never, so far +as I now recollect, succeeded in making her believe that her iniquities +were visited upon her unoffending infant. + +There is everywhere the most painful apathy on this most painful +subject. We see little children of all ages, everywhere, the victims of +debility, and pain, and suffering, and disease and death, and yet we +very seldom seem to search for one moment for the causes of this +premature destruction. In fact most parents--even many intelligent +mothers--at once stare, if you attempt to inquire into the causes of +their child's death, as if it was either a kind of sacrilege, or an +impeachment of their own parental affection. Diseases, even at this day, +with the sun of science blazing in meridian splendor, they seem to +regard as the judgments of heaven; and to think of tracing out the +causes of the early death of half our race, is, in their estimation, not +only idle, but wicked. + +Yet this is obviously one of the first steps, every, where, which +philanthropy demands; to say nothing of the demands of christianity. It +is the first step for the physician, the first step for the educator, +the first step for the parent, and above all, the mother. Nay; more--we +must not suppress so great and important a truth--it is the first step +for the legislator and the minister. What sense is there in continuing, +century after century, and age after age, to expend all our efforts in +merely _mending_ the diseased half of mankind, when those same efforts +are amply sufficient, if early and properly applied, not only to +continue the lives of the whole, but to make them _whole beings_, +instead of passing through life mere _fragments_ of humanity? + +But I must not forget that this is merely a small manual, not intended +for those who make it their profession to teach the laws of God and man, +but simply for young mothers. For the sake of erring humanity, would +that I could, but for one moment, divest myself of the idea, that in +writing for the young mother I am not writing for legislators and +ministers! Would that I could banish from my mind the deep conviction +that the mother is everywhere far more the law-giver to her infant--far +more the arbiter of the present and eternal destiny of her child--than +he who is more commonly regarded as such. + +Every mother owes it, not only to herself--for on this part she is not +_wholly_ forgetful--but to her offspring, to abstain, during the period +of nursing at least, from all causes which tend to produce a feverish +state of her fluids. Among these are every form of premature exertion, +whether in sitting up, laboring, conversing, or even thinking. It is of +very great importance that both the body and the mind should be kept +quiet; and the more so, the better. + +Among the particular causes of fever to the young mother, Dr. Dewees +enumerates spirits, wine, and other fermented liquors, a room too much +heated, closed curtains, confined air, too much exposure, and too much +company; and during the early period of confinement, broths and animal +food. + +There is nothing which he insists on more strongly, than the importance +of fresh air. Indeed, the practice of confining a nursing woman in a +space scarcely six feet square, and excluding the air surrounding her by +curtains and closed windows, and subjecting her to the necessity of +breathing twenty times the air that has already been as often +discharged, filled with poison, from her lungs, is not too strongly +reprobated by Dr. Dewees, or anybody else. But I have spoken of these +things in the chapter which treats on "The Nursery." I would only +observe, on this point, that if I were asked what one thing is most +indispensable to the health of the nursing woman, I would reply, Fresh +air; and if asked what were the second and third most important things, +I would still repeat--in imitation of the orator of old, in regard to +another subject--Fresh air, Fresh air. + +This important ingredient in human happiness, and especially in the +happiness of the young mother and her tender infant, can usually be had +within doors, if pains enough be taken. But if the weather is fine and +in every respect favorable, a woman who is in tolerable health may +venture abroad a little in about three weeks after her confinement, and +sometimes even in two. Whether her exercise be without or within doors, +however, she should be effectually protected against chills, and against +the influence of currents of cold air. + +It has been incidentally stated, that Dr. Dewees objects to the mother's +use, during her early period of nursing, of broths and animal food. This +is about as much as we could reasonably expect from one who belongs to a +profession whose members are, almost without exception, enslaved to the +practice of flesh-eating. But even this advice of his, if duly followed, +would be a great advance upon the practice which generally prevails. +There is so universal a belief among females that they demand, at this +period of their existence, not only a larger quantity of food than +usual, but also that which is more stimulating in its quality, as almost +to forbid the hopes of making much impression upon their minds. Many +young mothers seem to consider themselves as licensed, during a part of +their lives, not only to eat immoderately, and even to gluttony, but +also to swallow almost every species of vile trash which a vile world +affords. + +How long will it be, ere the mother can be induced to take as much pains +to select the most appropriate and most healthy aliment for herself and +her child, as she now does that which is demanded by a capricious +appetite, without the smallest reference to fitness or digestibility! +How long will it be ere the mother can be brought to believe and feel +that, in every step she takes, she is forming the habitation of an +immortal spirit--a spirit, too, whose character and destiny, both +present and eternal, must depend, in no small degree, upon the character +of the dwelling it occupies while passing through this stage of earthly +existence! How long will it be, before mothers can be made to believe +even these two simple truths, that the nourishment, which the human +being actually receives, is not always in exact proportion to the +quantity of nutritious food which he throws into his stomach, and that +the diet is always best for both mother and child, which is least +exciting. + +The Charleston Board of Health, during the existence of cholera in that +city in 1836, publicly announced that the "best food is the least +exciting," and this great truth is just as true in all other places and +circumstances on the globe as it was then in South Carolina. And though +I am far from believing that health depends more on food and drink than +on all other things put together, as many seem to suppose, yet I am +entirely of opinion that he who should devote himself successfully to +the work of applying this truth, in all its bearings, to the dietetic +practice of all mankind, would do more for their reformation--yes, and +their salvation too--than has yet been done by any merely _human_ being, +since the first day of the creation. + + +SEC. 3. _Nursing--how often._ + +Many lay it down, as an invariable rule, that no system can be pursued +with a child till it is six months old; and it must be admitted by all, +that for several months after birth there are serious difficulties in +the way of determining, with any degree of precision, how often a child +should be nursed or fed. Still, there are a few rules of universal +application; some of which are here presented. + +1. A child should never be nursed, merely to quiet it; for if this be +done, it will soon learn to cry, whenever it feels the slightest +uneasiness, not only from hunger, but from other causes; merely to be +gratified with nursing. Besides, if its cries should happen to be from +illness, it is ten to one but the reception of anything into the stomach +will do harm instead of good. + +2. The stomach, like every other organ in the body which is muscular, +must have time for rest; and this in the case of children as well as +adults. But to nurse them too frequently is in opposition to this rule, +and therefore of evil tendency. + +3. For reasons which may be seen by the last rule, there should be +regular seasons for nursing, and these should be adhered to, especially +by night. When very young, once in three hours may not be too frequent; +I believe that it is seldom proper to nurse a child more frequently than +this. But whenever three hours becomes a suitable period by day, once in +four hours will be often enough by night. I will not undertake to say at +what precise age children should be nursed at intervals of three and +four hours each; because some children are older, _constitutionally_, at +three months, than others are at four. + +There is one grand mistake, however, against which I must caution young +mothers; which is, not to indulge the vain expectation that feeble +infants will become robust, in proportion to their indulgence. On the +contrary, it is the more necessary to be strict with feeble children, +_because_ they are feeble. To keep them hanging at the breast to +invigorate them, is the very way to counteract our own intentions, and +defeat our own purpose. Seasons of entire rest are even more important +to their stomachs than to those of other persons. + +4. But in order to secure intervals of rest, both to the strong and the +feeble, we must avoid the pernicious habit of giving infants pap, and +other delicacies, "between meals." Many a child's health is ruined by +this practice. Nothing should be put into their stomachs for many +months--if they are in health--but the mother's milk. + +"This," says Dr. Dunglison, "is the sole food of the infant, and is +consequently sufficiently nutrient to maintain life, and to minister to +the growth, during the earliest periods of existence." [Footnote: +Elements of Hygiene, page 271.] In another place, he says, "Milk is an +appropriate nourishment at all ages, and is more so the nearer to +birth." + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +"We all know," says Dr. Dewees, "how easily the stomach may be made to +demand more food than is absolutely required; first, by the repetition +of aliment, and secondly, by its variety;--therefore both of these +causes must be avoided. The stomach, like every other part, can, and +unfortunately does, acquire habits highly injurious to itself; and that +of demanding an unnecessary quantity of aliment is not one of the least. +It should, therefore, be constantly borne in mind, that it is not the +quantity of food taken into the stomach, that is available to the proper +purposes of the system; but the quantity which can be digested, and +converted into nourishment fit to be applied to such purposes." + +There is a great deal of truth in these remarks; and especially in the +closing one, that not all which is taken into the stomach is digested. +It is highly probable, that the least quantity which is usually given to +an infant is more than sufficient for the purposes of digestion; and +that nearly every child in the arms of its mother, is over-fed. + +I know it has been said, by some physicians--and by those who are +sensible men, in other respects, too--that the child's stomach is a +pretty correct guide in regard to quantity. If we give it too much, say +they, it will reject it;--as if that were an end of the matter. + +But it is not so. It is by no means harmless to fill the child's stomach +as full as is possible without overflowing. Such a process, though it +should not create disease directly, would produce a gluttonous habit. +The stomach, being muscular, may be increased in size by use, like all +other muscular organs. The hands, the arms, the legs, the feet, the +fleshy portions of the face, even, may be disproportionally enlarged by +constant use. Thus a sailor, who uses his hands and arms much more than +his legs and feet, has the former unusually large; one who is much +accustomed to walking, has large feet; and in a tailor, who from +childhood uses his lower limbs comparatively little, they are both small +and slender. On the same principle, the stomach, by inordinate use, and +by carrying unreasonable loads, may be made nearly twice as large as +nature intended, and may demand twice as much food. And I have no doubt +that the bulk of mankind, young and old, eat about twice as much as +nature, unperverted, would require. + +If the suggestions of our last section are duly attended to, one of the +causes which lead the stomach to demand an unreasonable quantity of food +will be avoided--I mean the too frequent "repetition of aliment." And if +we never depart from the general rule, already laid down, not to give +the infant anything but its mother's milk, we shall escape the evils +incident to variety. + + +SEC. 5. _How long should milk be the only food._ + +On this point, there is a great diversity of opinion. Perhaps the most +approved role, of universal application, is, that the first change +should be made in the child's diet, when the teeth begin to appear. + +This period, it is well known, cannot be fixed to any particular age, +but varies from the fifth to the twelfth month. + +Some mothers, who have borne with me patiently to this place, will +probably here object. "What child," they will ask, "would ever have any +strength, brought up so?" Not only a little pap and gruel is, in their +estimation, necessary, long before this period, but even many choice +bits of meat. + +Now I am very sure, that these choice bits--whatever they may be--given +to a child before it has teeth, not only do no good, but actually do +mischief. Indeed, that which does no good in the stomach must do harm, +of course; since it is not only in the way, but acts like a foreign body +there, producing more or less of irritation. + +I ought to state, in this place, that many people--mothers among the +rest--have very inadequate ideas of digestion. They appear to have no +farther notion of the digestive process than that it consists in +reducing to a pulp the substances which are swallowed; and hence, +whatever is reduced to a pulp, they regard as being digested. Whereas +nothing is better known to the anatomist and physiologist, than that +this--the formation of _chyme_ in the stomach--constitutes only a very +small part of the digestive process. The chyme must pass into the +duodenum and other portions of intestine beyond the stomach, and be +retained there for some time, before it will form perfect chyle. + +This is a more important part of the work of digestion than even the +former. For, suppose the chyme to be perfect, though even this may be +mere pulp, rather than chyme, and suppose it pass quietly along into the +duodenum and other small intestines. All this process, thus far, may go +on naturally enough, and yet the chyle may not be well formed, and the +chymous mass may find its way out of the system without answering any of +the purposes of nutrition. For no matter how well the food is dissolved +in the stomach, if it do not become good and proper chyle, the blood +which is formed will not be good and perfect blood; or, lastly, if it +_seem_ to make good blood, it may still be faulty, so that the +particles which should be applied to build up or repair the system, are +either not used, or if used, answer the purpose but imperfectly. + +We hence see how little prepared a large proportion of the community, +are, to judge of the digestibility or fitness of a substance for +infants, by their own observation and experience merely; and how much +more wisely they act, in contenting themselves with giving them--at +least until they have teeth--such food only as the Author of nature +seems to have assigned them; especially when thus course, is precisely +that which is recommended or sanctioned by nearly every judicious +physician, as well as by almost all our writers on health. + + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +Having laid down the general rule, that until the appearance of teeth, +the sole food of an infant should be the milk of its own mother, I +proceed to speak of some of the more common exceptions to it. + +EXCEPTION 1.--The first of these is when the supply furnished by the +mother is scanty. There may be two causes of the scantiness of this +supply; 1st, the want of suitable nourishment by the mother; and, 2dly, +a feeble constitution, or bad health. In the former case, it should be +her first object, as it undoubtedly will be that of her physician, to +improve the quality of her diet; and in the latter, to restore her +health, or at least invigorate her constitution. + +In regard to the proper diet of a _mother_, as such, as well as the +general management which her case requires, a volume might be written +without exhausting the subject. But I have already said as much on this +subject, in another place, as my limits will permit. + +But we cannot wait for the mother's health to improve, and allow the +infant to suffer, in the mean time, for a due supply of food. The +appropriate question now is, How shall such a supply be furnished? + +This should be done by means of an article resembling in its properties, +as closely as possible, the mother's milk. For this purpose, we have +only to mix with a suitable quantity of new cow's milk, one third of +water, and sweeten it a little with loaf sugar. This is to be given to +the child, at suitable intervals, and in proper quantities, by means of +a common sucking bottle. It is, indeed, sometimes given with the spoon; +but the bottle is better. + +To the question, whether the child should be confined to this, till the +period of weaning, Dr. Dewees answers, No. I am surprised at this; and +my surprise is increased, when I find him, almost in the very next +breath, urging with all his might, numerous reasons against the very +common notion, that children in early life require a variety of food. He +even insists on the importance of confining the child to a single +article of food when it is practicable. Yet he has not given us so much +as one reason why it is not practicable in the case before us; but has +gone on to speak of barley water, gum arabic water, rice water, +arrowroot, &c. I venture, therefore, to dissent from him, and to answer +the foregoing question in the affirmative. When one good and substantial +reason can be given for _change_, the decision will, however, be +reconsidered. + +I have already stated the general rule for preparing this substitute for +the mother's milk. But there are several minor directions, which may be +useful to those who are wholly without experience on the subject. + +If possible, the milk used should not only be just taken from the cow, +but should always be from the _same_ cow; for it is well known, that the +quality of milk often differs very materially, even among cows feeding +in the same pasture, or from the same pile of hay; and the stomach +becomes most easily reconciled to the mixture when it is uniform in its +qualities. Great care should also be taken to see that the cow whose +milk is used is young and healthy. + +The mixture should not be prepared any faster than it is wanted, and +should always be prepared in vessels perfectly clean and sweet, and +given as soon as possible after it is prepared, to prevent any degree of +fermentation. It is never so well to heat it by the fire. If taken from +the cow just before it is used, and if the water to be added is warm +enough, the temperature will hardly need to be raised any higher. + +When it is impracticable, in all cases, to take milk for this purpose +immediately from the cow, it should be kept, in winter, where it will +not freeze; and in summer, where there will be no tendency to acidity. + +Some mothers and nurses are addicted to the practice of passing the food +through their own mouths, before they give it to the child--with a view, +no doubt, to see that it is at a proper temperature. This practice is +not only wholly unnecessary, but altogether disgusting, and even +ridiculous. A thermometer would answer every purpose; and save even the +trouble of another disgusting practice--that of blowing it with the +breath. + +The most proper season for giving the child this preparation, is +immediately after it has been nursing. It is better for both mother and +child, that the latter should nurse just as often as though the supply +of food was adequate to his wants. And when his first supply is +exhausted, then let him make up his meal from the sucking bottle. The +great advantage of this plan is, that he will not be so likely in this +way to be over-fed. If he is really needy, he will accept the bottle, +even if he do not like it quite so well; if he refuse it, let him go +without till he is hungry enough to receive it. + +In regard to the water used in the preparation, only one thing needs to +be said; which is, that it should be pure. If it is not, it should by +all means be boiled. The sugar used should be of the very best kind; and +the quantity not large; since if the preparation be too sweet, it +readily becomes acid in the stomach. + +There has been, and still is, a controversy going on among medical men, +whether sugar is or is not hurtful to the young. "Who shall decide, when +doctors disagree?" has often been asked. Without undertaking the task +myself, I may perhaps be permitted to say, that I cannot see any reason +why a substance so pure, and so highly nutritious as sugar--if given in +very small quantity only--should prove injurious: though I do not regard +the reasoning of Dr. Dewees as very conclusive on the subject, when, in +reply to Dr. Cadogan, he has the following language--"If sugar be +improper, why does it so largely enter into the composition of the early +food of all animals? It is in vain that physicians declaim against this +article, since it forms between seven and eight per cent of the mother's +milk."--Now with me, the fact that milk and almost all other kinds of +food are furnished with a measure of this substance, is the strongest +reason I am acquainted with for making no additions. I believe, however, +that they may sometimes be made, but not for these reasons. + +EXCEPTION 2.--The second striking exception to the general rule that has +been laid down, is when the mother is unable to nurse her own child from +positive ill health, or when circumstances exist which render it +obviously improper that she should do it. The following are some of the +circumstances which render such a departure from nature indispensable. + +1. When the mother is affected strongly with a hereditary disease, such +as consumption or scrofula; or when her constitution is tainted, as it +were, with venereal disease, or other permanent affections. + +2. When nursing produces, uniformly, some very troublesome or dangerous +disease in the mother; as cough, colic, &c. + +3. There are a few instances in which the milk of the mother, owing to +an unknown cause, has been found by experience to disagree with the +child. In these circumstances, it is the unquestionable duty of the +mother to resort wholly to feeding. + +4. Sometimes the milk, at first abundant, fails suddenly, owing to some +accidental or constitutional defect; and this failure becomes habitual. +In all these circumstances, the proper resort is to a sucking bottle, or +a hired nurse. I generally prefer the latter. The cases which seem to me +to admit of the former, will be pointed out in the next section. + +"When the bottle is used," says Dr. Dewees, "much care is requisite to +preserve it sweet and free from all impurities, or the remains of the +former food, by which the present may be rendered impure or sour; for +which purpose a great deal of caution must be observed." + +The business of feeding a child, whether by the bottle or the spoon, +should never be hurried: the slower it is, the better. We should stop +from time to time, during the process. Nor should the nourishment be +given while lying down; it is much more pleasant, as well as more safe, +to sit up. + +A few thoughts more on the character and condition of the milk which we +give to the young, will conclude the second division of this section. + +Some are fond of boiling milk for infants; but to this I am decidedly +opposed, so long as they are in health. Boiling takes away, or appears +to take away, some of the best properties of the milk. + +It is true that milk which is boiled does not turn sour so readily in +hot weather; but it is quite unnecessary to boil milk in the common +manner in order to present its changing, since such a result can be +prevented by another process. You have only to put your milk in a +kettle, cover it closely, and heat it quickly to the boiling point, and +then remove and cool it as speedily as possible. This plan prevents the +rising to the surface of that coat or pellicle which contains some of +the most valuable properties of the milk. + +I have already said that it was as necessary that the stomach should +have rest as any other muscular organ. Some writers say that the infant +should be kept perfectly quiet, at least half an hour, after each meal. +This is certainly necessary with feeble children, but I question its +necessity in the case of those who are strong and robust. I would not +recommend, however, nor even tolerate, for one moment, the absurd +practice of _jolting_, so common with a few ignorant nurses and, +mothers, as if they could jolt down the food in the stomach with just as +much safety as they can shake down the contents of a farmer's bag of +produce. Such mothers as these should go and reside among the native +tribes of Indians in Guiana, in South America, where they make it a +point not only to stuff their children's stomachs as long as they will +hold, but actually to shake it down. + +Little less absurd than jolting is the custom of tossing a child high, +in quick succession, which is practised not only after meals, but at +other times. But on this point, I have treated elsewhere. + +Some give the sucking bottle to children as a plaything. This is just +about as wise a practice as that of giving them books as playthings. +Both are done, usually, to save the time and trouble of those whose +office it is to devote their time to the very purpose of managing and +educating their offspring. The evil, however, of suffering the child to +have the bottle when it pleases is, that he will thus be tasting food so +often as to interfere with and disturb the process of digestion, to his +great and lasting injury. For in this way, a part of the food will pass +from the stomach into the bowels unchanged, or at least but imperfectly +digested, where it is liable to become sour, and cause disease. It is +not to be doubted that many diarrhoeas, as well as, other bowel +affections, are produced in this way. Children that are always eating +are seldom healthy; and we may hence see the reason. + +In speaking of the importance of keeping the bottle, from which a child +takes his food, perfectly clean and sweet, I ought to have extended the +injunction much farther. There is a degree of slovenliness sometimes +observable in those who manage children, both when they are sick and +when they are in health, which even common sense cannot and ought not to +tolerate. Every vessel which is used in preparing or administering +anything for children, ought, after we have used it, to be immediately +and effectually cleansed. How shocking is it to see dirty vessels +standing in the nursery from hour to hour, becoming sour or impure! How +much more so still, to see food in copper vessels, or in the red earthen +ones, glazed with a poisonous oxyd! I speak now more particularly of +vessels in which food is given; for with the administration of medicine, +and nursing the sick, I do not intend in this volume to interfere. + +EXCEPTION 3.--We come now to the consideration of those cases--for such +it will not be doubted there are--where a hired nurse is to be preferred +to feeding by the hand. + +Before proceeding farther, however, it is important to say, that if a +nurse could always be procured whose health, and temper, and habits were +good, who had no infant of her own, and who would do as well for the +infant, in every respect, as his own mother, it would be preferable to +have no feeding by the hand at all. + +But such nurses are very scarce. Their temper, or habits, or general +health, will often be such as no genuine parent would desire, and such +as they ought to be sorry to see engrafted, in any degree, on the child. +For even admitting what is claimed by some, that the temper of the nurse +does _not_ affect the properties of the milk, and thus injure the child +both physically and morally, still much injury may and inevitably will +result from the influence of her constant presence and example. + +Others have infants of their own, in which case either their own child +or the adopted one will suffer; and in a majority of cases, it can +scarcely be doubted _which_ it will be. And I doubt the morality of +requiring a nurse, in these cases, to give up her own child wholly. If +_one_ must be fed, why not our own, as well as that of another? + +The only cases, then, which seem to me to justify the employment of a +nurse, are where she possesses at least the qualifications above +mentioned; and as these are rare, not many nurses, of course, would on +this principle be employed. But when employed, it is highly desirable +that the following rules should be observed: + +1: The nurse should suckle the child at both breasts; otherwise he is +liable to acquire a degree of crookedness in his form. There is another +evil which sometimes results from the too common neglect of this rule, +which is, that it endangers the deterioration of the quality of the +milk. + +2. The milk which is thus substituted for that of the mother, should be +as nearly as possible of the same age as the child who is to receive it. +It should be remembered, however, that the milk is not so good after the +twelfth or thirteenth month, nor _quite_ so good under the third. + +3. When the parent or some trusty and confidential friend can, without +the aid of interested spies and emissaries, have an eye to the general +treatment, and especially to the moral management, it should be done; +for even the best nurses may so differ in their principles, manners and +habits from the parent, that the latter would deem it preferable to +withdraw the child, and resort at once to feeding. + + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +This period will, of course, be longer or shorter according as the teeth +begin to appear earlier or later, and according to the time when it is +thought proper to wean. + +On few points, perhaps, has there existed a greater diversity of opinion +than in regard to the age most proper for weaning. The limits of this +work do not permit a thorough discussion of the question; and I shall +therefore be very brief in my remarks on the subject. + +Dr. Cullen, whose opinion on topics of this kind is certainly entitled +to much respect, thought that less than seven, or more than eleven +months of nursing was injurious. Yet in some countries, and even in some +parts of our own, the period is extended by the mother, from choice, to +two years. And although the milk is not so good after the thirteenth or +fourteenth month, I have never either known or heard that any evil +consequences followed from the practice. + +Dr. Loudon, a recent writer, observes, that the period of nursing has a +great influence over the numbers of mankind in various countries, as is +evinced by numerous facts. He adduces proofs of this, position. Thus, he +says, in China, where the population is excessive, and the inhuman +practice of infanticide is common, they wean a child as soon as it can +put its hand to its mouth. On the other hand, the Indians of North +America do not wean their children until they are old and strong enough +to run about: generally they are suckled for a period of more than two +years. + +He then enters into a physiological inquiry why it is that British +mothers do not usually suckle their children longer than ten months. He +seems--though he does not give us his precise opinion--to think that, in +all ordinary cases, the period of nursing ought to be protracted to two +or three years, and that perhaps it would be better still to extend it +to four or five. His remarks are so excellent, and withal so curious, +and their tendency so humane, that we venture to insert one or two of +his paragraphs entire. + +"Certain it is, that the milk does not diminish particularly at that +time, (ten months,) so far as regards quantity; and from the health of +children reared without spoon-meat beyond this time, it as certainly +undergoes no change in its quality. Children are sometimes so old before +weaning, as to be able to ask for the breast; and it has not been +remarked that the health of mothers, thus suckling, was in any way worse +than that of their neighbors. Altogether, then, it may be asserted, that +a mother is likely to enjoy better health, and to be less liable to +sickness and death during lactation, than during pregnancy. + +"Many women believe, or affect to believe, that the weakness they labor +under arises from some latent moral or physical cause; but this weakness +is not attributed to lactation in the earlier months of suckling, +because the mother then considers herself fulfilling a necessary duty, +which her constitution, for so long, is well able to bear. So soon, +however, as the period of lactation has passed over, as it is +established by custom or fashion, she imagines she is exceeding the +intentions of nature, and she forthwith concludes that the continuance +of suckling is the cause of her uncomfortable sensations. This whim +being entertained, the child is weaned, and too often becomes the victim +of a most reprehensible delusion. + +"Since nature has furnished the mother with milk for a longer period +than custom demands, it is evident that some good purpose for the mother +and child was intended in this arrangement. Had it been otherwise, the +secretion of milk would stop at a definite time, in like manner as the +period of gestation is definite. That a child, in comparison with the +young of the lower animals, is so long unable to provide for itself, +strongly tends to corroborate the proofs already advanced--that nature +originally had in view a more protracted period for lactation than is +now allowed. + +"Some writers, following the laws of nature, as they interpreted them, +fixed the period of weaning at fifteen months, when the infant has got +its eight incisors and four canine teeth. There are well-authenticated +instances of mothers having suckled their children for three, four, +five, and even seven consecutive years; we ourselves have known cases +of lactation being prolonged far three and for four years, with the +happiest results." + +It appears to me better, therefore, that the child should be nursed, in +all ordinary cases, from twelve to fifteen months; and when there are no +special objections, about two years. As the change, whenever it is made, +and however gradual it may be, is an important one, in its effects on +the stomach and bowels, it is better to wean a little earlier or a +little later, than to do so just at the close of summer or beginning of +autumn, at which season bowel complaints are most common, most severe, +and most dangerous. It is sufficiently unfortunate that teething should +commence just at this period; but when we add another cause of irregular +action, which we can control, to one which we _cannot_, we act very +unwisely. + +I have already observed that we may begin to feed children when the +teeth begin to appear. By this is not meant that we should do so while +the system is under the irritation to which teething usually, or at +least often, subjects it. But when this is over, and a few teeth have +appeared, it is usually a proper time to commence our operations. + +The first food given should be precisely of the kind which has been +recommended for those children who are fed by the hand. The rules and +restrictions by which we are to be guided, are the same, except in one +point, which is, that in the case we are now considering, the child +should be fed _between nursing_. + +Let not parents be anxious about their healthy children under two years, +who have a supply of good milk, either from the mother or from the cow. +For those that are feeble, a physician may and ought to prescribe--not +medicine, but appropriate food, drink, &c. + +When the grinding teeth have cut through, if we have any doubts in +regard to the nutritive qualities of the food we are giving, we may +improve it by adding, instead of the one third of pure water, a similar +quantity of gum arabic water, barley water, or rice water. Some use a +little weak animal broth; but this is unnecessary, and I think, on the +whole, injurious, except for purposes strictly medicinal. + +This course is so simple, and so far removed from that which is +generally adopted, that few mothers will probably be willing to pursue +it with perseverance, especially when the teeth appear very late. Those +who are, however, will be richly rewarded, in the end, in the +advantages; which will accrue to the child's health, and the vigor it +will ensure to his constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _During the process of Weaning._ + +It has already been shown that, in weaning, some regard should be had to +the season of the year; and that the end of summer and beginning of fall +are of all periods the most unfavorable. The best time, on every +account, is in the spring--in March, April, May, or June; and the next +best is during the months of October and November. But December, January +and February are better than July, August and September. + +Weaning should never be sudden. We may safely and properly call upon +those who are addicted to snuff or opium taking, tobacco chewing, rum +drinking, and other habits which are purely artificial, to break +off--_to wean themselves_--suddenly; since _they_ can do so with +considerable safety, and will seldom have the courage or the +perseverance to do it otherwise. But with the child, in regard to his +food, such a course will not be advisable. If we regard his future +health or happiness, he must be weaned gradually. + +The first proper step will be to give the child a little larger quantity +of the cow's milk and gum arabic mixture, between nursings, at the same +time increasing very gradually the intervals of nursing. When the +intervals become six hours distant from each other, it will be best to +add a little good bread to the milk with which it is fed, about two or +three times a day. Arrowroot jelly, if he can be made to relish it, will +be highly useful; but if not, some boiled rice, into which a little +arrowroot has been sprinkled while boiling, may be added to his milk. + +It may be worth the attempt to excite an aversion in the child to +nursing his mother, so that be will refuse to nurse, if possible, of his +own accord. This aversion may be excited by such an application of +aloes, or some other offensive substance, as will cause him to withdraw +himself from the breast as soon as he tastes it. + +A serious mistake is often made, in connection with weaning, in giving +the child not only too much food, but that which is too solid, or too +rich. This mistake has undoubtedly grown out of the belief that his +feeble condition _requires_ it; whereas the truth is, that he neither +needs food at this period, nor is capable of digesting it. For let us be +as judicious in the process of weaning as we may, the tone of the +child's stomach will be somewhat reduced, or in other words, its powers +of digestion will be weakened by it; and to give it strong food, or +overload it with that which is weaker, is not only unreasonable and +unphilosophical, but cruel. And if there should be a tendency in the +child's constitution to rickets, scrofula, consumption, and other +wasting diseases, such a course would be likely to bring them on, and +destroy life. + +"When milk will agree," says Dr. Dewees, "there is no food so proper. It +may be employed in any of its combinations, with good wheaten bread, +rice, sago, &c., only remembering that when either of these articles is +found to agree, it should be continued perseveringly, until it may +become offensive. In this case, some new combination may be required." I +do not see the necessity of continuing one kind of food till it +_offends_. Besides, I do not believe that these simple articles of food +are apt to become offensive to stomachs that have not already been +spoiled. But whether a single dish should or should not come to be +offensive, I greatly prefer an occasional change. + +Buchan, in his Advice to Mothers, has recommended it to them to boil +bread for their infants, in water. It should not, for this purpose--nor +indeed for any other--be new; it is best at one or two days, old. It may +be boiled in a small quantity of water, or what is still better, of +milk; or it may be steamed till it becomes soft and light, almost like +new bread, but without any of the objectionable properties of that which +is wholly new. To bread, thus prepared, is to be added a suitable +quantity of milk, fresh from the cow, and a little diluted with water, +but not boiled. + +But as there may be, here and there, at any age, a stomach with which +milk, with bread, or rice, or sago, will not agree--though I think they +must be very rare cases--we may be allowed to substitute for it a +solution of "gum arabic, in the proportion of an ounce to a pint of +water," to which may be added a little sugar; and if the child is old +enough to observe the color, just milk enough to change the appearance. +Another preparation for the same purpose consists of rennet whey, a +little sweetened, and "disguised, if necessary, as just stated." + +The health of the mother, too, during the period of weaning, often needs +great attention. Let her avoid medicine, however, if possible. A due +regard to food, drink, exercise, and rest of body and mind, &c., will +usually be found more effective, as well as more permanently +efficacious. + + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +You will allow me to introduce in this place, some of the sentiments of +Dr. Cadogan, an English physician, from a little work on the management +of children. [Footnote: Though Dr. C.'s remarks will apply more closely +to England in 1750, they are by no means inapplicable to the United +States in 1837.] I do it with the more pleasure because, though he wrote +almost a century ago, he urges the same general principles on which I +have all along been insisting: hence it will be seen that mine are no +new-fangled notions. His remarks refer to the young of every age, but +chiefly to early infancy and childhood. It will be found necessary, in +some instances, to abridge, but I shall endeavor not to misrepresent the +Doctor's views. + + * * * * * + +"Look over the bills of mortality. Almost half of those who fill up that +black list, die under five years of age; so that half the people that +come into the world go out of it again, before they become of the least +use to it or to themselves. To me, this seems to deserve serious +consideration. + +"It is ridiculous to charge it upon nature, and to suppose that infants +are more subject to disease and death than grown persons; on the +contrary, they bear pain and disease much better--fevers especially; and +for the same reason that a twig is less hurt by a storm than an oak. + +"In all the other productions of nature, we see the greatest vigor and +luxuriancy of health, the nearer they are to the egg or bud. When was +there a lamb, a bird, or a tree, that died because it was young? These +are under the immediate nursing of unerring nature; and they thrive +accordingly. + +"Ought it not, therefore, to be the care of every nurse and every +parent, not only to protect their nurslings from injury, but to be well +assured that their own officious services be not the greatest evils the +helpless creatures can suffer? + +"In the lower class of mankind, especially in the country, disease and +mortality are not so frequent, either among adults or their children. +Health and posterity are the portion of the poor--I mean the laborious. +The want of superfluity confines them more within the limits of nature; +hence they enjoy the blessings they feel not, and are ignorant of their +cause. + +"In the course of my practice, I have had frequent occasion to be fully +satisfied of this; and have often heard a mother anxiously say, 'the +child has not been well ever since it has done puking and crying.' + +"These complaints, though not attended to, point very plainly to the +cause. Is it not very evident that when a child rids its stomach of its +contents several times a day, it has been overloaded? While the natural +strength lasts, (for every child is born with more health and strength +than is generally imagined,) it cries at or rejects the superfluous +load, and _thrives apace_; that is, grows very fat, bloated, and +distended beyond measure, like a house lamb. + +"But in time, the same oppressive cause continuing, the natural powers +are overcome, being no longer able to throw off the unequal weight. The +child, now unable to cry any more, languishes and is quiet. + +"The misfortune is, that these complaints are not understood. The child +is swaddled and crammed on, till, after gripes, purging, &c., it sinks +under both burdens into a convulsion fit, and escapes farther torture. +This would be the case with the lamb, were it not killed, when full fat. + +"That the present mode of nursing is wrong, one would think needed no +other proof than the frequent miscarriages attending it, the death of +many, and the ill health of those that survive. But what I am going to +complain of is, that children, in general, are over-clothed and +over-fed, and fed and clothed improperly. To these causes I attribute +almost all their diseases. + +"But the feeding of children is much more important to them than their +clothing. Let us consider what nature directs in the case. If we follow +nature, instead of leading or driving her, we cannot err. In the +business of nursing, as well as physic, art, if it do not exactly copy +this original, is ever destructive. + +"If I could prevail, no child should ever be crammed with any unnatural +mixture, till the provision of nature was ready for it; nor afterwards +fed with any ungenial diet whatever, at least for the _first three +months_; for it is not well able to digest and assimilate other elements +sooner. + +"I have seen very healthy children that never ate or drank anything +whatever but their mother's milk, for the first ten or twelve months. +Nature seems to direct to this, by giving them no teeth till about that +time. The call of nature should be waited for to feed them with anything +more substantial; and the appetite ought ever to precede the food--not +only with regard to the daily meals, but those changes of diet which +opening, increasing life requires. But this is never done, in either +case; which is one of the greatest mistakes of all nurses. + +"When the child requires more solid sustenance, we are to inquire what +and how much is most proper to give it. We may be well assured there is +a great mistake either in the quantity or quality of children's food, or +both, as it is usually given them, because they are made sick by it; for +to this mistake I cannot help imputing nine in ten of all their +diseases. + +"As to quantity, there is a most ridiculous error in the common +practice; for it is generally supposed that whenever a child cries, it +wants victuals: it is accordingly fed ten or twelve or more times in a +day and night. This is so obvious a misapprehension, that I am surprised +it should ever prevail. + +"If a child's wants and motions be diligently and judiciously attended +to, it will be found that it never cries, but from pain. Now the first +sensations of hunger are not attended with pain; accordingly, a very +young child that is hungry will make a hundred other signs of its want, +before it will cry for food. If it be healthy, and quite easy in its +dress, it will hardly ever cry at all. Indeed, these signs and motions I +speak of are but rarely observed, because it seldom happens that +children are ever suffered to be hungry.[Footnote: That which we +commonly observe in them, in such cases, and call by the name of hunger, +the Doctor, I suppose would regard as morbid or unnatural feeling, +wholly unworthy of the name of HUNGER.] + +"In a few, very few, whom I have had the pleasure to see reasonably +nursed, that were not fed above two or three times in twenty-four hours, +and yet were perfectly healthy, active, and happy, I have seen these +signals, which were as intelligible as if they had spoken. + +"There are many faults in the quality of children's food. + +"1. It is not simple enough. Their paps, panadas, gruels, &c. are +generally enriched with sugar, spices, and other nice things, and +sometimes a drop of wine--none of which they ought ever to take. Our +bodies never want them; they are what luxury only has introduced, to the +destruction of the health of mankind. + +"2. It is not enough that their food should be simple; it should also be +light. Many people, I find, are mistaken in their notions of what is +light, and fancy that most kinds of pastry, puddings, custards, &c. are +light; that is, light of digestion. But there is nothing heavier, in +this sense, than unfermented flour and eggs, boiled hard, which are the +chief ingredients in some of these preparations. + +"What I mean by light food--to give the best idea I can of it--is, any +substance that is easily separated, and soluble in warm water. Good +bread is the lightest thing I know, and the fittest food for young +children. Cows' milk is also simple and light, and very good for them; +but it is often injudiciously prepared. It should never be boiled; for +boiling alters the taste and properties of it, destroys its sweetness, +and makes it thicker, heavier, and less fit to mix and assimilate with +the blood." + + * * * * * + +It is hardly necessary for me to repeat, that in these general views of +Dr. C., with a few exceptions, I entirely concur; indeed some of them +have already been presented. But I have expressed my doubts of the +soundness of his conclusion in regard to sugar. Used with food, in very +small quantity, by persons whose stomachs are already in a good +condition, both sugar and molasses, especially the former, appear to me +not only harmless, but wholesome and useful. + +On the subject of simplicity in children's food, I should be glad to +enlarge. There is nothing more important in diet than simplicity, and +yet I think there is nothing more rare. To suit the fashion, everything +must be mixed and varied. I have no objection to variety at different +meals, both for children and adults; indeed I am disposed to recommend +it, as will be seen hereafter. But I am utterly opposed to any +considerable variety at the same meal; and above all, in a single dish. +The simpler a dish can be, the better. + +But let us look, for a moment, at the dishes of food which are often +presented, even at what are called plain tables. + +Meats cannot be eaten--so many persons think--without being covered +with mustard, or pepper, or gravy--or soaked in vinegar; and not a few +regard them as insipid, unless several of these are combined. Few people +think a piece of plain boiled or broiled muscle (lean flesh) with +nothing on it but a little salt, is fit to be eaten. Everything, it is +thought, must be rendered more stimulating, or acrid; or must be +swimming in gravy, or melted fat or butter. + +Bread, though proverbially the staff of life, can scarcely be eaten in +its simple state. It must be buttered, or honied, or toasted, or soaked +in milk, or dipped in gravy. Puddings must have cherries or fruits of +some sort, or spices in them, and must be sweetened largely. Or +perhaps--more ridiculous still--they must have suet in them. And after +all this is done, who can eat them without the addition of sauce, or +butter, or molasses, or cream? Potatoes, boiled, steamed or roasted, +delightful as they are to an unperverted appetite, are yet thought by +many people hardly palatable till they are mashed, and buttered or +gravied; or perhaps soaked in vinegar. In short, the plainest and +simplest article for the table is deemed nearly unfit for the stomach, +till it has been buttered, and peppered, and spiced, and perhaps +_pearlashed_. Even bread and milk must be filled with berries or fruits. +Where can you find many adults who would relish a meal which should +consist entirely of plain bread, without any addition; of plain +potatoes, without anything on them except a little salt; of a plain rice +pudding, and nothing with it; or of plain baked or boiled apples or +pears? And _could_ such persons be found, how many of them would bring +up their children to live on such plain dishes? + +It need not be wondered at, that a palate which has been so long tickled +by variety, and by so many stimulating mixtures of food, should come to +regard cold water for drink as insipid; and should feel dissatisfied +with it, and desirous of boiling some narcotic or poisonous herb in it, +or brewing it with something which will impart to it more or less of +alcohol. The wonder is, not that some of our epicures become drunkards, +but that all of them do not. + +Dr. Cadogan alludes to a sad mistake everywhere made about _light_ food; +and condemns, very justly, hard-boiled custards, pastry, &c. It is very +strange that these substances--for these are among the injurious +articles which I call mixtures--should ever have obtained currency in +the world, to the exclusion of bread, which, as the same writer justly +says, is among the lightest articles of food which are known. + +It is strange, in particular, what views people have about bread. +Judging from what I see, I am compelled to believe that there are few +who regard it in any other light than as a kind of necessary evil. They +appear to eat it, not because they are fond of it, by itself, but +because they _must_ eat it; or rather, because it is a fashionable +article; and not to make believe they eat it, at the least, would be +unfashionable. They will get rid of it, however, when they can. And when +they must eat it, they soak it, or cover it with butter or milk, or +something else which will render it tolerable--or toast it. And use it +as they may, it must be hot from the oven. After it is once cold, very +few will eat it. The idea, above all, of making a full meal of simple +cold bread, twenty-four hours old, would be rejected by ninety-nine +persons in a hundred; and by some with abhorrence. + +People not only dislike bread, but regard it as unnutritious. I have +heard many a fond parent say to the child who ate no meat, and seemed to +depend almost wholly on bread--"Why, my dear child, you will starve if +you eat no meat. Do at least put some butter on your bread or your +potatoes." A thousand times have I been admonished, when eating my +vegetable dinner during the hot and fatiguing days of summer--for I was +bred to the farm, and ate little or no meat till I was fourteen years +of age--to eat more butter, or cheese, or something that would give me +strength; for I could not work, they said, without something more +nourishing than bread and the other vegetables. And yet few if any boys +of my age did more work, or performed it better, or with more ease, than +myself. And I early observed the same thing in other vegetable eaters. + +The truth is, there is nothing in the world better adapted to the daily +wants of the human stomach than good bread; and few things more +nutritious. There may be a little more nutriment in eggs or jelly; but +if the former are hard-boiled, the stomach cannot digest them; and fat +meat of any kind is digested with great difficulty. Indeed it is +doubtful whether stomachs in temperate climates digest fat at all. They +may dissolve it, but that is not making good chyle of it. They may even +reduce it to chyle; _but chyle is not blood_. Fat may slip through the +system without much of it _adhering_; and I think it pretty evident that +it usually does so. + +The muscle--the lean part of animals--may be nearly as nutritious as +good bread, and is more easily digested. But it is very far from being +proved that, for the healthy, those things are always best which are +most easily digested. Nobody will pretend that potatoes are better for +us than bread; and yet the experiments of Dr. Beaumont seem to prove +that boiled or roasted potatoes are much more quick and easy of +digestion than bread of the first and best quality. Even over-boiled +eggs and raw cabbage, bad as they are, are dissolved in the stomach, and +appear to be digested as quick, if not quicker, than good wheat bread. +But nobody in the world will pretend they form more wholesome food. +Neither is meat--even _lean_ meat--necessarily more wholesome, or better +calculated to give strength than bread, simply be cause it is more +quickly and easily digested. It would be nearer the truth to say, that +those substances which digest slowest (provided they do not irritate) +are best adapted to the wants of the human stomach. + +The philosopher LOCKE--perhaps from his knowledge of medicine--gives +some excellent directions on this subject. "Great care should be used," +be says, that the child "eat bread plentifully, both alone and with +everything else; and whatever he eats that is solid, make him chew it +well." This writer, by the way, supposed that the teeth were made to be +used in beating our food; and that we ought neither to swallow it +without chewing, as is customary in our busy New England, nor to mash or +soak it in order to save the labor of mastication--a practice almost +equally universal. But let us hear his own words. + +"As for his diet, it ought to be very plain and simple; and if I might +advise, flesh should be forborne, at least till he is two or three years +old. But of whatever advantage this may be to his future health and +strength, I fear it will hardly be consented to by parents, misled by +the custom of eating too much flesh themselves, who will be apt to think +their children--as they do themselves--in danger to be starved; if they +have not flesh at least twice a day. This I am sure, children would +breed their teeth with much less danger, be freer from diseases while +they were little, and lay the foundations of a healthy and strong +constitution much surer, if they were not crammed so much as they are, +by fond mothers and foolish servants, and were kept wholly from flesh +the first three or four years of their lives." + +Were Locke still living, I should like to interrogate him at this +place. He first speaks of giving children no meat till they are two or +three years old; and then afterwards extends the period to three or +four. The question I would put is this: If the child is healthier +without meat till he is three or four years old, why not till he is +thirteen or fourteen; or even till thirty, or forty, or seventy? And is +not Professor Stuart, of Andover--a meat eater himself, and an advocate +for its moderate use by those who have already been trained to the use +of it--is not the Professor, I say, more than half right when he +asserts, as I have heard him, that it may be well to train all children, +from the first, to the exclusive use of vegetable food? + +I have a few more extracts from Locke, particularly on the subject of +bread. + +"I should think that a good piece of well made and well baked brown +bread would be often the best breakfast for my young master. I am sure +it is as wholesome, and will make him as strong a man, as greater +delicacies; and if he be used to it, it will be as pleasant to him. + +"If he, at any time, call for victuals between meals, use him to nothing +but dry bread. If he be hungry more than wanton, bread will go down; and +if he be not hungry, it is not fit that he should eat. By this you will +obtain two good effects. First, that by custom he will come to be in +love with bread; for, as I said, our palates and stomachs, too, are +pleased with the things we are used to. Another good you will gain +hereby is, that you will not teach him to eat more nor oftener than +nature requires. + +"I do not think that all people's appetites are alike; some have +naturally stronger and some weaker stomachs. But this I think, that +many are made gormands and gluttons by custom, that were not so by +nature. And I see, in some countries, men as lusty and strong, that eat +but two meals a day, as those that have set their stomachs, by a +constant usage, to call on them for four or five. + +"The Romans usually fasted till supper, the only set meal, even of those +who ate more than once in a day; and those who used breakfasts, as some +did at eight, same at ten, others at twelve of the clock, and some +later, neither ate flesh nor had anything made ready for them. + +"Augustus, when the greatest monarch on the earth, tells us he took a +piece of dry bread in his chariot; and Seneca, in his 83d epistle, +giving an account how be managed himself when he was old, and his age +permitted indulgence, says that he used to eat a piece of dry bread for +his dinner, without the formality of sitting to it. Yet Seneca, as it is +well known, was wealthy. + +"The masters of the world were brought up with this spare diet, and the +young gentlemen of Rome felt no want of strength or spirit because they +ate but once a day. Or if it happened by chance that any one could not +fast so long as till supper, their only set meal, he took nothing but a +bit of dry bread, or at most a few raisins or some such slight thing +with it, to stay his stomach. And more than one set meal a day was +thought so monstrous that it was a reproach, as low as Caesar's time, to +make an entertainment, or sit down to a table, till towards sunset. +Therefore I judge it most convenient that my young master should have +nothing but bread for breakfast. I impute a great part of our diseases +in England to our eating too much flesh, and too little bread. Dry +bread, though the best nourishment, has the least temptation." + +I shall not undertake to defend all the sentiments of Mr. Locke in these +extracts; but in regard to the main point--the nutritive properties and +wholesome tendency of bread, and the importance of making it a principal +article of diet for children--I think his views are just. In short, they +do not differ, substantially, from those of a large proportion of the +best writers on this subject in every country, during the last three +hundred years. As if with one voice, they dissuade from the use of too +much animal food for the young, and encourage the use of a larger +proportion of vegetable food--bread, plain puddings, rice, potatoes, +turnips, beets, apples, pears, &c., and milk. + +Yet they all, or nearly all, seem to write just as if they did not +expect to be believed; or if believed, to be followed. They seem to +regard mankind as so inveterately attached to old habits, and so much +addicted to flesh eating, that there is little hope of reclaiming them. + +Now, though my opinions are no more entitled to respect than many of +theirs, I hope for greater success than they appear to do. I expect that +many young mothers who read this work, will be led to think and inquire +further on the subject; and if they find that the views here advanced +are in accordance with reason, and common sense, and higher authority, I +am not without hope that they will reform, and do what they can to +reform their neighbors. + +I have dwelt the longer, in this section, on the _general_ principles of +diet, because I am of opinion that whatever is true, on this subject, in +regard to the diet of children, soon after weaning, is equally, or +nearly equally applicable to the whole of childhood, youth, manhood and +age. It is not true that one period of life, and one mode of employment, +demands a diet essentially different from that which is demanded at +another period, and in other circumstances; provided always, that the +individual is in health. Occasional instances of the kind, there may be; +but they are not numerous. + +The digestive powers of the young are more nearly as strong as those of +the adult than is usually admitted, and they are much more active. They +require a less quantity of food, undoubtedly; and they should be fed at +shorter intervals. But as a general rule, what is best for them, as +regards its quality, at three years old, is best for them at thirty; or, +should they live so long, at ninety. I repeat it; there is very little +difference in the nature of the food required ever after teething. + +Let me not be understood as saying that the strong, and the robust, and +the active cannot digest food which the weak, and enervated, and +indolent cannot. Undoubtedly they can. But this does not prove that they +_ought_ to do it. It does not prove that their strength and vigor were +not given them for other purposes than to be expended on the poorer +substances for food, when they might have better. Nor is it true, as +often pretended, that the hard laborer needs either more food, or that +which is of a stronger quality, just in proportion to the severity of +his labor. The man or the child who labors moderately, just sufficient +for the purposes of health, and labors with his hands in the open air, +needs rather _more_ food than the indolent or the sedentary, or those +who labor to excess; but not that which is of a stronger quality. It is +he who labors to excess--if any difference of quality were required at +all--who should eat milder food, as well as less in quantity. + +Some physicians there are who tell us that all mankind would live +longer, as well as be more healthful, if they ate nothing but bread, and +drank nothing but water. It may be so, but I do not believe it. Water, +as I shall show hereafter, is indeed the only appropriate drink; but I +do not believe that bread, even after the second year, is in all cases +and circumstances the best food. Besides that the experiments of +Majendie and other physiologists go a little way--though not far, I +confess--to prove that animals generally, (and if so, why not man, as +well as the rest?) thrive best with some degree of variety in their +food, it seems to me more in accordance with the general intentions of +the Creator, so far as we can discover what they are. + +While, therefore, I deny that either milk or bread is better, in all +cases, for human sustenance, than any other articles of food, I must, at +the same time, be permitted to regard them as among the best, and as +deserving more general attention. Every infant, after leaving the +breast, should, as it seems to me, make bread, in some of its forms, a +chief article of food. + +This article, so justly and emphatically called the staff of life, may +be found in almost every country. Common sense seems to have dictated +the propriety of its use; though fashion has often led us to overlook +or despise it--like air, and fire, and water, and nearly every other +common but indispensable blessing. + +The best kind of bread is made from wheat, the worst from bark, +saw-dust, &c. Wood and bark afford so little nutriment, that it is only +in such countries as Norway, Sweden, Lapland. Iceland, Greenland, and +Siberia, that the inhabitants can be induced to make use of them. Here +they are often useful; either because people cannot get food which is +better, or to blend with their fat or oily animal food. For it should +never be forgotten, that healthy digestion requires a large proportion +of innutritious matter along with the pure nutriment. In order to make +bread from wheat, the meal should not be bolted. If it seems to contain +particles which are too coarse, it may be well to pass it through a +coarse family sieve; but the best bread I have ever eaten, as well as +the cleanest and neatest, was not sifted at all. + +I know there is an almost universal prejudice against this sort of +bread. Some complain that it scratches their throats; others, that it is +tasteless; and others still, that it does not agree with them. With +others there is another objection--which is that bread of this sort has +sometimes been called _dyspepsia_ bread; and with others still, that it +has been called _Graham_ bread. Either of these appellations seems +sufficient to condemn it. + +Now as to the harshness, this is owing to its being made of bad +materials, or to its being baked too hard, or kept too long. Much of +what they call dyspepsia bread, in our cities, is evidently made by +mixing the bran and flour of wheat after they have been once separated; +besides which, in not a few cases, the finest of the flour appears to be +taken away. Now bread made of such materials thus combined, will always +be darker colored, as well as harsher, than when made from the wheat, +simply ground without any bolting, and wet up in the usual manner. Such +bread is best two or three days old. After four days, it becomes dry and +somewhat harsh. + +They who complain that such bread is insipid, are persons whose +appetites have been injured by food which is high-seasoned; and who, if +they eat bread at all, must eat it hot, or soaked in butter. No wonder +such persons do not like plain bread, and say it is tasteless. But it +must not be denied that bakers often suffer this kind of bread to be +over-risen, in order to make it sufficiently light and porous. This +renders it less tasteful, and from the saleratus they use, less +wholesome. + +No child who has been accustomed, from the first, to good wheaten bread, +made of unbolted meal, and not less than one day old, will ever prefer +any other, until he has been rendered capricious on this subject, and +wishes to change for the sake of changing, or until he has been misled +by surrounding example. I speak from observation when I say that +infants, whose habits have not been depraved, will not prefer hot bread +of any kind. "It is hot, mother," I have heard them say, as an apology +for refusing a piece of bread; but never, "It is cold," or "It is too +old." + +It is the epicurean--it is he with whom it is a sufficient objection to +any kind of food whatever, that he has used it for several successive +meals or days--that is most ready to complain of good bread. He whose +habits are correct, and who is the more unwilling to change any of his +articles of diet, the longer he has been in the use of them, and who +only changes them, or uses variety, from principle--he, I say, will +never complain of harshness or want of taste in good wheat bread; nor +will it be an objection of weight with him that _Mr. Graham_ has +recommended it, or that it has either prevented or cured _dyspepsia_. + +Nor will the epicurean himself complain that bread is insipid, after +being confined to it for a month or six weeks. He will then find a +sweetness in it, for which he had long sought in vain in the more +delicate and costly viands of a luxurious, and expensive, and +unchristian modern table. + +It is they only who observe simplicity, and confine themselves to very +plain food, who truly enjoy pleasure in eating. The bulk of mankind +benumb their sense of taste by their high-seasoned, over-stimulating +food and drink, and by such constant variety and strange mixtures; and +thus, in their eager cry, "Who will show us any good?" they actually +enjoy less than he who eats plain food, and is contented with it. + +Bread of all kinds is greatly improved in whiteness and pleasantness by +being wet with milk; though even when wet with nothing but water, there +is a solid and rational sweetness to it, of which the despisers of +bread, and devourers of much flesh and condiments never dreamed, and +never will dream, till they reform their habits. + +If children are furnished with good bread, on the plan of Mr. Locke, +there is no doubt that they will relish it most keenly; that their +attachment to it will strengthen, and that unless we give them other +food occasionally, from principle, or seduce them by depraving their +tastes, they will continue it through life. "Train up a child in the way +he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it," is a +general rule, and has as few exceptions, when applied to the diet of a +child, as when it is applied to his moral tastes and preferences. + +With those parents who, though convinced of the justness of the views +here advanced, have already trained their children in the way they +should _not_ go, but are anxious to retrace their steps as far as +possible, there will here be a difficulty. "Our children," they will +say, "do not, at present, _relish_ the kind of bread you speak of; and +how shall we bring them to do so? or is the thing indeed possible?" + +The answer to these inquiries is easy. Such parents have only to confine +their children to the kinds of food which they deem proper for them, a +few weeks or a few months, and they will soon relish them. If those who +are old enough to be convinced can be brought to unite heartily in the +change, and to endeavor to be pleased with it, the work of reformation +will be more pleasant and probably more speedy. I have never found any +difficulty of bringing myself to relish in a very short time an article +of food for which I had no relish before, and to which I had even a +dislike, provided I was thoroughly convinced it was best for me, and was +earnest in the desire of change--except sweet oil, to which I was about +six months in becoming reconciled. + +It is with physical, as with moral habits, in their formation. We +should fix on what we believe, from experience, observation, and divine +and human testimony, is best for us, and habit will soon render it +agreeable. It is important, even to health, that food should be +agreeable; but as I have already said, what we know to be best for us +will soon become agreeable, if we confine ourselves to it; and to our +children also, if we confine them to it, in like manner. + +Next to bread made of wheat--when that cannot be procured--is a mixture +of wheat and Indian meal; but the proportion of the latter should be the +smallest. Wheat, rye, and Indian, in the proportion of one third of +each, make excellent bread, sometimes called _third_ bread. Rye and +Indian make a tolerable bread. Rye alone is not so good. The want, in +the latter, of the vegetable principle called gluten, makes its general +use of very questionable propriety. + +Indian meal alone, baked in cakes by the fire, if eaten only in small +quantities, is a very nutritious and by no means unwholesome bread. But +its sweetness, and the general fondness which people who are accustomed +to its use have for it, lead them to eat it in too large proportions, if +they use it while it is warm. In these circumstances, it proves itself +too active for the stomach and bowels. If warm, six ounces is as much +as a hearty adult ought to eat of it at once; and children should of +course take much less. It is less active on the bowels, and scarcely +less agreeable, as soon as we become accustomed to it, if eaten when it +is cold--even if baked in loaves, in the oven. + +Potatoes, added to unbolted wheat flour, make excellent bread; and so, +as I am informed, does rice. Of the latter, however, I have never eaten. +Oats and barley, and many other grains and substances, will make bread; +but it is of an inferior kind. + +The question may again recur, after this extended series of remarks, +whether I intend to confine the young almost exclusively to bread, in +one or another of its forms. We shall see how this is, presently. + +While bread, therefore, should constitute a part, at least, and +sometimes the whole of a meal, a great variety of other articles are not +only admissible, but desirable. Among these may be mentioned plain +puddings. + +One of the most wholesome puddings is made of Indian meal, enclosed in a +bag and boiled. Nearly allied to this is the common hasty pudding; but +the last is less wholesome, because it requires less chewing; and it +ought to have been observed, before now, that after weaning, any food +is digested better which has undergone the process of thorough +mastication. + +Boiled rice, though hardly to be regarded as a pudding, is very +nutritious, and very easy of digestion. I am not without doubts, +however, in regard to the utility of a large proportion of rice, as +food. A dinner of it, two or three times a week, I believe to be +wholesome; but used too frequently, it seems to me not active enough for +the stomach and bowels; having in this respect precisely a contrary +effect to that of warm Indian cakes. The common notion that rice has a +tendency to make people blind, is entirely unfounded. Its worst effect +is when eaten without being boiled through. In such cases, I have known +it to do mischief; perhaps because it was swallowed without much +chewing. Some grind it, and use the flour; but I cannot recommend it to +be used in this manner. + +The best pudding in the world is a loaf of bread, (What!--you will +say--bread again?) three or four or five days old, boiled, or rather +_steamed_, in milk. All kinds of bread are excellent for this purpose, +but wheat and Indian are the best. They are excellent even without +milk--that is, simply steamed. + +Puddings made of the flour of wheat, rye, buckwheat, &c., are less +wholesome than those which have been already mentioned. And all sorts +of puddings are less wholesome, when eaten as hot as our unreasonable +fashions require, than when their temperature is quite below that of our +bodies. I would not have them so cold as to chill us, for this would be +to go to the other, though less dangerous extreme; but they ought to be +cool. Too much heat is an unnatural stimulus, likely to leave more or +less debility behind it. In addition to this, those who eat hot food are +more exposed to take cold, in consequence of it. + +With none of these puddings ought we to mix any fruits, green or +dried--not even raisins. Some of the more important properties of nearly +every kind of fruit or berry are lost by boiling, unless we eat the +water in which they are boiled, and save the vapor which would otherwise +escape. I am not in favor of boiled fruit generally, especially if +boiled in puddings. + +Puddings, like most other kinds of food--even bread--may be slightly +salted: not that this is indispensable, but because the balance of human +testimony is in its favor. The argument that we evidently need salt +because the other animals require it, is without much weight. The other +animals do not _generally_ require or use it.[Footnote: Some +considerable savage nations use no salt, and a few have a strong +aversion to it.] The cases so often triumphantly mentioned, where +animals appear to thrive better from the use of it, are only exceptions +to the general rule, nor are they very numerous in comparison with the +whole race of animals. Still I have no objections to its moderate use. +It may be useful in preventing worms; though there are doubts even of +that. In large quantities, it is unquestionably hurtful. + +But neither fruits nor berries--permit me to repeat the sentiment--no, +nor any such thing as cinnamon or spices, nor even sugar or molasses in +any considerable quantity, should go into the composition of any sort of +pudding. If the puddings are not sweet enough without, it is better to +add a little sugar or molasses on your plate. Nor should sauces, or +cream, or butter, or suet be used in or upon them; though of all these +substances, cream is least injurious. Nutmegs, grated cheese, &c., are +unnecessary and hurtful. Cheese should never be eaten, in any way. + +There is one thing, however, which may be eaten in moderate quantity +with all sorts of puddings and with bread; I mean milk. I say eaten +_with_, for it is better never to put these substances, nor indeed any +other, _into_ the milk. The bread, pudding, &c., should be eaten by +itself, and the milk by itself, also. In this way we shall not be liable +to cheat the teeth out of what is justly their due, and then make the +deranged stomach and general system pay for it. + +Potatoes are a good article of diet--to be used once a day--though they +are not very nutritious. They are best either steamed or roasted in the +ashes. They are also excellent when boiled. Turnips are also good. +Onions are not so useful as is generally supposed, except for the +purposes of medicine. + +Beets; in small quantity, and carrots and asparagus, and above all, +beans and peas--but not their pods--are tolerable food once a day, +during most of the year, except it be the middle of the winter. But +neither these, nor potatoes, nor any other vegetables, ought to be +cooked in any way with fat, or fat meat, or butter; or be mashed after +they are cooked, or eaten with oil or butter. + +If there be an exception to this general rule--which may seem to be +rather sweeping--it should be in favor of a little sweet oil on rice, or +on bread puddings. But the common practice, founded upon the apparent +belief that we can scarcely eat anything until it is well covered with +lard or butter, is quite objectionable--nay, it is even disgusting. No +pure stomach would ever prefer oily bread, or pudding, or beans, or +peas; and most people would abhor the sight of such a strange +combination, were not habit, in its power to change our very nature, +almost omnipotent. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +There is a very great diversity of opinion on the subject of fruit. Some +maintain that all fruit, even in the most ripe and perfect state, is of +doubtful utility, especially for children. Others say none is hurtful, +if ripe, and eaten in moderate quantity. Some require care in making a +proper selection; but here again, in regard to what constitutes a proper +selection, there is a difference of opinion. Some consider fruits easy +of digestion; others believe they are digested only with very great +difficulty. + +When the cholera prevailed in the large cities of the United States, a +majority of the physicians believed all fruits, even those which were +ripe, to be injurious in their tendency. But it was insisted by the +minority--I think very justly--that whenever fruit appeared to be +injurious, it was accidental--that is, the disease, being prepared to +make its attack just at that time, happened to do so immediately after +the use of fruit, rather than something else, and especially in the +_season_ of fruits--or on account of excess; or (which was certainly +the case in some instances) because the quality of the fruit was bad. + +At present, the _weight_ of testimony on this subject--estimating +according to talent, and not according to numbers--is in favor of good +fruit, used with moderation--even in the face of the cholera. Dr. +Dunglison--one of the last to adopt such an opinion--appears to be in +its favor. + +On several points, in regard to fruit, I believe that among medical men +there is no essential difference of opinion. As I always prefer, in +controversies, to see in how many things antagonists agree, before +proceeding to the points in which they differ, I will here endeavor to +enumerate them. + +1. All unripe fruits, especially, if eaten raw and uncooked--let the +season, or prevalent disease, or individual, be what or who it may--are +unwholesome. + +2. Excess, in the use of the most wholesome fruits, under any +circumstances, is also injurious. + +3. Fruits, eaten immediately after a full meal, when the stomach is in +an improper condition for receiving anything more, contribute to +overtask the digestive powers, and must hence produce more or less of +injury. + +4. The skins and kernels of the larger fruits are unwholesome, because +indigestible. The skins of fruits, if beaten or masticated finely; may +appear to be digested, because dissolved; but I have already endeavored +to show that solution is not always digestion. + +5. Fruits of all kinds are most wholesome in their own country, and in +their own appropriate season. + +6. Dried fruits are less wholesome than fresh. + +7. Fruit of all kinds should be withheld from infants, until they have +teeth. + +Thus far, as I have already said, all agree; at least so far as I know. +There are several other points on which medical men are generally +agreed, though not universally. One of these is, that fruits, if eaten +at all, should usually form a part of a regular meal. Another is, that +it is better not to eat them immediately before going to bed. + +There are contradictory opinions among the mass of the community, +physicians as well as others, on the general intention of our summer +fruits. From the fact that children's diseases prevail more at the +season of the year when fruits are more abundant, many think the fruits +are the immediate cause of them. Others, and with better reason, suppose +that the latter are intended by the Author of nature to check or prevent +the bowel diseases of summer. + +Nothing, certainly, is more unnatural than to suppose that at the very +season of the year when so many other influences combine to awaken a +tendency to disease in the human system, the Creator should place before +our eyes an abundance of fruits, inviting us by all their cooling and +tempting properties, only to do us mischief. On the contrary, it seems +to me much more probable that many of them were designed for our +moderate use. In what quantity, under what circumstances, and which are +best, it is left to human experience to determine. + +Some say that fruit should never be eaten in the morning, before +breakfast. Now everything I know of the human constitution, together +with what I have learned from experience and observation, has been for +years leading me to the contrary opinion. Indeed, I am most fully +convinced, that of all periods for eating fruit, whether we use it alone +or make it a part of our regular meals, the morning, soon after we rise, +is the most favorable. [Footnote: I ought to remark, that as the morning +is the best time for eating _good_ fruit, so it is the very worst time +for eating it if _not_ good; and as a large proportion of that which is +eaten is unripe, or otherwise bad, this may account for the general +prejudice against eating it at this period.] My reasons are as follows: + +1. The rest and sleep of the preceding night has restored our general +vigor, and consequently has invigorated the stomach, so that digestion +will be more easily and perfectly accomplished. + +2. We have been, at our rising, so long without food on our stomachs, +that they are not likely to be oppressed by a moderate quantity of good, +ripe, wholesome fruit. In the course of our waking hours, meals follow +each other in such quick succession, and there is so much variety, even +at the plainest tables, to tempt us to excess, that there is more danger +of injury from the addition of fruit than at our first rising. + +3. I have never known any one to receive injury from the use of fruit in +this way, provided no other circumstance in relation to quantity, +quality, &c. had been disregarded. In my own case, the practice has, on +the contrary, seemed beneficial. + +4. There is one reason in favor of this practice which perhaps would +have less weight, if people rose as early in the morning as they ought; +or, in the language of Dr. Franklin to the inhabitants of Paris, if they +knew that the sun gives light as soon as he rises. I allude to the +demand which I conceive that the stomach makes for something, after so +long fasting, and the pernicious custom of late breakfasts. I am +persuaded that it is advisable to eat something nearly as soon as we +rise, be it never so early; and if we can get nothing else for +breakfast, and have not accustomed ourselves to relish a piece of good +bread, or some other simple thing, which requires no labor of +preparation, I think it perfectly proper to eat a small quantity of +fruit. + +We come now to the particular consideration of some of those fruits +which universal experience has shown to be the most salutary. + +Of all these, none is more wholesome than the apple. There is indeed a +great diversity in the quality even of this single article. Sweet apples +are the most nutritious; but perhaps those which are gently acid, and at +the same time mealy, are rather more cooling, and when eaten raw, and in +the heat of summer, not less wholesome. + +Apples which come to maturity very early in the season appear, as a +general rule, to be less rich, and even less perfect, than those which +ripen later. In view of this fact, some writers have endeavored to +dissuade us from their use; and among others, Mr. Locke. We may judge a +little what his opinions were, from his concluding remarks on the +subject:--"I never knew apples hurt anybody," says he, "after October." + +But although neither apples nor any other fruits which ripen uncommonly +early are quite so good as those which come in a little later, yet I do +not think they are to be wholly rejected, unless they have been raised +in hot houses. Fruits, and indeed vegetables in general, whose maturity +is hastened by artificial processes, must be less wholesome than when +brought to perfection in nature's own appropriate time and manner. I +ought to say, however, very distinctly, that of the fruits of any +particular tree, those which first ripen are always the worst; for they +are usually wormy, or otherwise defective. + +Most of the fruit, as well as other vegetables, brought to our city +markets in this country, is utterly unfit to be eaten. Sometimes it is +immature; sometimes it has a hot house maturity; sometimes it has been +picked so long that it has begun to decay. Many fruits--berries +especially--are in perfection for a very short period only. Mulberries, +for example--one kind especially--are not in perfection long enough to +carry to the market house, even though the distance were very small. +Luckily, however, very few mulberries are eaten. But the raspberry and +strawberry, if perfect when gathered, have usually begun to decay, +before they are purchased. That this appears to be rather unfrequent, is +because they are gathered before they are ripe. + +Dr. Dewees regards most fruits as difficult of digestion. I do not think +they are so, if perfect and ripe. The experiments of Dr. Beaumont, so +far as they prove any general principle, show conclusively that mellow +sweet apples are more quickly digested than any kind of vegetable food +whatever, except rice and sago. But even admitting they were slow of +digestion, I do not think--as I have already shown in another +place--that they ought on that account to be excluded. Besides, my +opinion differs from that of Dr. D. in regard to the strength of the +digestive powers of children. After teething, they seem to me to be able +to digest any substances which adults can; and with as little +difficulty. + +But to return:--No fruit is in perfection longer than the apple. +Besides, no fruit appears to be less injured in its nature and +properties by picking it a little before it is ripe, and preserving it +during the winter. It is on this account, more perhaps than any other, +that I value it more highly than all other fruits united. + +Apples may be used either raw or cooked. In either case, the skins and +seeds should be avoided, as has been before suggested. I am not ignorant +that WILLICH, in his "Lectures on Diet and Regimen"--an excellent work, +in the main--says that the seeds ought to be eaten; but I believe few +physiologists would comply with his injunction, especially when it is +considered that he recommends, in the same connection, that we swallow +the stones of cherries and plums. Strange how far our theories will +sometimes carry us! + +The apple is excellent when roasted or baked, especially the sweet +apple. It is very common, in some places, to eat baked sweet apples with +milk; and the practice is by no means a bad one. Indeed, baked or raw +apples might be advantageously made a part of at least one of our meals +every day. There is said to be a miserly farmer--a single gentleman--in +the western part of the state of Massachusetts, who has lived on nothing +but apples for his food, and water for his drink, about forty years. And +yet he is said to enjoy the most perfect health. I do not propose this +as an example worthy of imitation; but it shows that apples maybe made +to subserve an important purpose in diet. And though I have more than +once expressed an opinion highly unfavorable to the exclusive use of any +one article of diet, yet if I were to confine myself to any one thing, I +know of nothing except bread that I should prefer to good apples. Still, +however, I prefer a variety--sweet, sour, early, late, &c.; and I should +use them raw, roasted, baked, made into sauce with new or unfermented +cider, and boiled. Good apples, eaten raw, with bread, form not only a +very wholesome, but, to an unperverted appetite, a most delicious +dinner. + +Much has been said about cutting down orchards; but the whole seems to +me idle--for if the fruit is of a good quality, it may be used as food, +either for man or beast. And if not good, the trees ought either to be +destroyed or replaced by those that will produce fruit which is +better--even if the object were to make it into cider. I have said that +apples may be used both by man and beast. It is well known that most +domestic animals thrive well on good apples, especially sweet ones. Very +tolerable molasses is also sometimes made from sweet apples. + +Nearly everything which has been said above in regard to apples, will +apply to pears. The best varieties of this excellent fruit are quite as +nutritious and as wholesome as the apple; and as much improved for the +table by baking. I believe, however, that no cheap process has yet been +devised for keeping them as long in the winter. They may be preserved in +the form of sauce, prepared in the same way with common apple sauce. The +skins, of many kinds of pears are less injurious than those of apples; +but even the skins of pears need not be eaten. + +Some kinds of peaches are tolerably wholesome; but the stringy character +of their pulp appears to me to render them less so than apples and +pears, though I am not confident on this point. But if used at all, they +should be used in less quantity at one time. Tempting as their flavor +is, I seldom eat them, when I can get apples and pears; holding myself +in duty bound to use the _best_, even of the fruits. + +"Fruit," says Mr. Locke, "makes one of the most difficult chapters in +the government of health, especially that of children. Our first parents +ventured Paradise for it; and it is no wonder our children cannot stand +the temptation, though it cost them their health. The regulation of this +cannot come under any one general rule; for I am by no means of their +mind who would keep children wholly from fruit, as a thing totally +unwholesome for them, by which strict way they make them but the more +ravenous after it, to eat good or bad, ripe or unripe, all that they can +get, whenever they come at it. + +"Melons, peaches, most sorts of plums, and all sorts of grapes, in +_England_, I think children should be wholly kept from, as having a very +tempting taste, in a very unwholesome juice, so that if it were +possible, they should never so much as see them, or know that there was +any such thing. But strawberries, cherries, gooseberries and currants, +when thoroughly ripe, I think may be pretty safely allowed them." + +Excellent as these remarks are, in general, I do not like his entire +interdiction of the use of melons, peaches, plums, and grapes, even in +England. Peaches, to be sure, as they come at a season when apples or +pears, or both of them--which are more wholesome than peaches--are +abundant, may be better omitted, delicious as they are to the taste; and +I do not think very highly of plums. But melons, in very moderate +quantity, and grapes, if we eat nothing but the ripe pulp, rejecting +both the husk and the interior hard part, including the seeds, are, I +think, useful and wholesome. On the other hand, I should never place +cherries and gooseberries in the same list with strawberries; for the +latter are, if I may use the expression, infinitely the most wholesome. + +Many seem to think that not to eat all sorts of fruits is to despise, or +at least to treat with neglect the gifts of God, intended for our +reception; by which they mean, if they mean anything, that the use of +all sorts of fruits is already found out, even in the present +comparative infancy of the world. Now I do not suppose that God has made +anything in vain--absolutely so--though I do not think we have found out +the true uses of half the things which he has made and given us. And +among those things of which we are yet ignorant, are some of the fruits. +I do not believe it follows, necessarily, that because fruits are +created, we are obliged to use them all. + +Besides, if this is a rule, it is one which nobody follows. Every one +uses more of some sorts, and fewer of others; and a large proportion of +the community entirely reject some kinds. Now if the statement commonly +made, that all fruits are the gifts of God, and ought therefore to be +used by all persons, is correct, those who make the statement ought to +conform to it as a rule of their lives, and to eat all kinds of fruit +which the season and country affords; and not only eat all kinds, but +see that the whole of every kind is consumed; since to waste any portion +is to slight the good gifts of God. + +The result then is, that we cannot obey such a rule; but are driven back +to the mode which common sense dictates, which is, to make a selection, +using some, and rejecting others. And the value of studying the nature +of these fruits, by examining the experience of mankind in regard to +them, consists in the aid thus afforded us in making our selection +wisely. + +There is one very common error in the use of the smaller summer fruits, +such as strawberries, whortleberries, currants, &c., which is that of +mixing cream, wine, spices, sugar, &c., with them. We are thus tempted +to eat too great a quantity at once. Besides--which is a worse evil--we +change the proportions of the saccharine parts, and thus do all in our +power, by increasing a similarity in all fruits, to destroy that +agreeable variety which God has established, and which is probably +salutary. + + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +By confectionary we here mean the substances usually sold at those shops +in our cities distinguished by the general name of confectionaries, and +which consist either wholly of sugar, or of sugar and some other +substances combined. + +As to the use of a moderate quantity of pure sugar at our meals, whether +it is procured at a confectioner's shop or elsewhere, I do not know that +there is any strong objection to it; though I believe that it cannot be +regarded as indispensable to health--for were that the fact, it seems to +me to imply something short of infinite wisdom in the creation of +articles destined for our sustenance. But I have spoken on this subject +elsewhere. + +A part, however, of the contents of the confectionary shop are actually +poisonous. I refer to those things which are either frosted, as it is +called, or colored. The substances applied to the sugar for this purpose +are usually some mineral or vegetable poison; although the fact of its +being a poison may not always be known to the manufacturer. The most +unhappy consequences have occasionally followed the use of +confectionary, when poisoned in this manner. A family of four persons, +in New York, were made sick in this way in March of year before last, +and some of them came very near losing their lives. The "frosting" which +caused the mischief was pronounced by eminent chemists to be one fifth +rank poison.[Footnote: It is to be remembered that those who eat +confectionary so slightly poisoned that it does not make them sick at +once, may nevertheless be as much injured in their constitutions as they +who are poisoned outright. In the latter case, the poison is in part +thrown out of the body; in the former, it remains in it much longer--and +therefore more surely, though more slowly, accomplishes the work of +destruction.] The coloring substances used are sometimes poisonous, as +well as the frosting. + +Some of the articles sold at these shops consist of sugar mixed with +paste. Others are called sweetmeats; that is, fruits, or rinds of +fruits, preserved in sugar. All these substances, I believe, without +exception, are injurious. + +The great evils of confectionary yet remain to be mentioned. These are +of three kinds, physical, mental and moral. + +Some of the _physical_ evils have, it is true, just been mentioned; but +there is another evil of still greater magnitude. Young people who eat +confectionary, commonly eat it between meals. This produces mischief in +two ways. First, it keeps the stomach at work when it ought to rest; for +this, like every other muscular organ, requires its seasons of repose. +Secondly, it destroys gradually the appetite; so that when the regular +meal arrives, the accustomed keenness of appetite does not come with it. +And the consequence is, not so much that we do not eat enough, as that +we are fastidious, and eat a little of this, then a little of that; and +usually select the worst things. We are not hungry enough to make a meal +of a single article of plain food. And this evil goes on increasing, as +long as we have access to the confectionary shop. These statements +describe the case of thousands of pupils, of both sexes, at our schools +and seminaries. + +The _intellectual_ evil resulting from the use of confectionary consists +in the fondness for excitement which is produced. You will seldom find a +person who depends daily and almost hourly on some excitement to his +appetite and stomach, and is not satisfied with plain food, who will +content himself to _study_ without unnatural excitements of the mind. +Duty to himself or to others will not move him. He must have before him +the hope of reward, or the fear of punishment. He must be moved by +emulation or ambition, or some other questionable or wicked motive or +passion. + +But the _moral_ results, to the young, of using confectionary, are still +more dreadful. I do not here refer to the danger of meeting with bad +company at the shops themselves, or of going from these places of +pollution _directly_ to the grog-shop, the gambling-house, or the +brothel; though there is danger enough, even here. But I allude to the +tendency which a habit of not resting satisfied with plain food, but of +depending on exciting things, has, to make us dissatisfied with plain +moral enjoyments--the society of friends, and the quiet discharge of our +duty to God and our neighbor. Just in proportion as we gratify our +propensity for excitement at the confectioner's shop, just in the same +proportion do we expose ourselves to the, danger of yielding to +temptation, should other gratifications present themselves. The young of +both sexes who are in the use of confectionary, are on the high road to +gluttony, drunkenness, or debauchery; perhaps to all three. I do not say +they will certainly arrive there, for circumstances not quite miraculous +may pluck them as "brands from the burning;" but I do not hesitate to +say that such is the inevitable tendency; and I call on every mother and +teacher who reads this section, to beware of confectionaries, and see, +if possible, that the young never set foot in them. They are a road +through which thousands pass to the chamber of death--death to the +immortal spirit, as well as to the body, its vehicle. + +More might be added--for this is an important subject--but I trust I +have said enough. Those who have read and believe what I have written, +if they remain wholly unaffected and unmoved, would not be roused to +effort were anything to be added. + + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris, a distinguished British writer on diet, says that all pastry +is "an abomination." And yet, go where we will, we find it often on the +table. Hardly any one, whether old or young, attempts to do without it. + +There are indeed some, who will not eat pie-crust, or high-seasoned +cakes formed of paste; but yet will not hesitate to eat hot bread, or +rolls, or biscuits made of wheat flour, bolted. Now what is this but +paste? If we could see the contents of the stomach, an hour after the +mass is swallowed, we should find it to be paste, and _mere_ paste. + +And yet the evil is increasing everywhere. So generally is this true, +that a person who refuses to eat hot bread, or cake, or biscuit, is +deemed singular. He who ventures to lift his voice against it is deemed +an ascetic or a visionary. But such a voice must be raised, and heard, +too, whether its monitions are or are not regarded. + +Pastry is less objectionable, however, when used in the form of hot +bread, &c., than when butter or fat is mixed with it. Then it becomes +one of the most indigestible substances in the world. Besides, it not +only tries the patience of the stomach, but according to Willich, whose +authority ranks high, it tends to produce diseases of the skin, +especially a disease which he calls "copper in the face," and which he +pronounces incurable. + +I know not whether the eruptions so common on the faces of young people +in this country, and especially of young men, are in every instance +either produced or aggravated by pastry; but I am very sure of one +thing, viz., that those who are in the use of pastry, and have eruptions +of the skin of any kind, will not be apt to get well, as long as they +continue the use of this objectionable substance. + +Physicians are often consulted about eruptions on the face. When they +assign the real cause, which is undoubtedly connected with the improper +gratification of some of the appetites, in one way or another, it is +seldom that the patient has self-command enough to follow his +prescription of temperance or abstinence. Mothers, it is yours to +prevent this mischief;--first, by establishing correct physical habits; +secondly, by teaching your children the great duty of self-denial--not +only by precept, but by your own good example. + + +SEC. 13. _Crude or Raw Substances._ + +I have reserved this section for remarks on certain articles used at our +fashionable modern tables, of which I could not well find it convenient +to speak elsewhere. And first, of SALADS, and HERBS used in cooking; +such as asparagus, artichokes, spinage, plantain, cabbage, dock, +lettuce, water-cresses, chives, &c. + +Several of these substances are often eaten raw, in which state they are +exceedingly indigestible, at the best; and they are rendered still more +beyond the reach of the powers of the stomach, by the oil or vinegar +which is added to them. Boiled, they are more tolerable; especially +asparagus. In the midst, however, of such an abundance of excellent food +as this country affords, it is most surprising that anybody should ever +take it into their heads to eat such crude substances; and above all, +that they should fill children's stomachs with them. What child, with an +unperverted appetite, would not prefer a good ripe apple, or peach, or +pear, to the most approved raw salads?--and a good baked one, to the +best boiled asparagus? + +NUTS, in general, are probably made for other animals rather than man; +though of this we cannot in the present infancy of human knowledge be +quite certain. But if any of them were intended, by the Creator, for +man, it is the chesnut; and this should be boiled. Boiled chesnuts are +used as food, in many parts of southern Europe; and to a very +considerable extent. + +SPICES, as they are sometimes called, such as nutmeg, mace, pepper, +pimento; cubebs, cardamoms, juniper berries, ginger, calamus, cloves, +cinnamon, caraway, coriander, fennel, parsley, dill, sage, marjoram, +thyme, pennyroyal, lavender, hyssop, peppermint, &c., are unfit for the +human stomach--above all in infancy--except as medicines. + +There are several other vegetables equally objectionable with the last, +though they cannot be classed under the same head. Such are mustard, +horseradish, raw onions, garlic, cucumbers, and pickles. No appetite +which has not been accustomed to these substances in early infancy, will +ever require them. Not that they may not sometimes be useful in enabling +the stomach--at every age--to get rid of certain substances with which +it has been improperly or unreasonably loaded;--this is undoubtedly the +fact; ardent spirits would do the same. And it is with a view to some +such effect, generally, that medical writers have spoken in their favor. +Some of them stimulate the stomach to get rid of a load of _green_ +fruit; others, of a load of _fat_ or _salt_ food; others, again, +of too large a _quantity_ of food which is naturally wholesome. + +But in all these cases, they should be considered, not as food, but as +medicine; and we ought to call them by their right name. And if we +withhold the cause of the disease, there will be no need of the +medicine. + + + + +CHAPTER VIII. + +DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk and +water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad food +and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischief they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +Children need little if any drink, so long as their food is nothing but +milk; nor indeed for some time afterward, unless they are indulged in +the use of animal food. Adults, even, very seldom drink merely to quench +natural thirst. In the summer, people usually drink either to cool +themselves, or to gratify a thirst which is wholly artificial. Tea, +coffee, beer, cider, and most other common drinks, when not used for the +sake of their coolness, are drank, both in winter and summer, for this +purpose. + +That this is the fact, we have the most abundant and unequivocal +evidence. I know that much is said of the demand which a profuse +perspiration creates among hard laborers in the summer. Such a sudden +abstraction of a large amount of fluid requires, it is said, a +proportional supply, or life would soon become extinct. Yet there are +many old men who have perspired profusely at their labor all their days, +and yet have drank nothing at all, except their tea, morning and +evening; and perhaps have eaten, for one or two of their meals daily, in +summer, a bowl of bread and milk. And some of them are among the most +remarkable instances of longevity which the country affords. + +How the system acquires a sufficient supply of moisture to keep up good +health, in these cases, I do not pretend to determine: perhaps it is +through the medium of the lungs. But at any rate, it can obtain it +without our drinking for that sole purpose, to the great danger of +exciting liver complaints, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, colds, rheumatisms, and +fevers. + +But if adults who perspire freely do not require much drink, children +certainly do not; and above all, young children. And if they do require +any thing, it is only simple water. The following remarks of Dr. Oliver, +of Hanover, N.H., are extracted from Dr. Mussey's late Prize Essay on +Ardent Spirits: + +"Who has not observed the extreme satisfaction which children derive +from quenching their thirst with pure water? And who that has perverted +his appetite for drink, by stimulating his palate with bitter beer, sour +cider, rum and water, and other beverages of human invention, but would +be a gainer, even on the score of mere animal gratification, without any +reference to health, if he could bring back his vitiated taste to the +simple relish of nature? + +"Children drink because they are dry. Grown people drink, whether dry or +not, because they have discovered a way of making drink pleasant. +Children drink water because this is a beverage of nature's own brewing, +which she has made for the purpose of quenching a natural thirst. Grown +people drink anything but water, because this fluid is intended to +quench only a natural thirst; and natural thirst is a thing which they +seldom feel." + +There is a great deal of truth, as well as of sound philosophy, in these +two paragraphs, and little less of truth in the following paragraph from +Dr. Dewees: + +"We have witnessed very often, with sorrow, parents giving to their +young children wine, or other stimulating liquors. Nature never intended +anything stronger than water to be the drink for children. This they +enjoy greatly; and much advantage is occasionally experienced from its +use, especially after they have commenced the use of animal food." + +Two things are to be observed in the last remarks, which are, that +children demand drink of any kind but seldom, and that even this +occasional demand is often the special result of the use of animal food. +Here comes out an important secret. It is the use of animal food, to a +very great degree, in adults and children both, that creates so much of +that unnatural thirst which prevails in the community. When we shall +come to lay aside animal food, in childhood, youth, manhood and age, +much that is now _called_ thirst will be banished; and much of the +intemperance and other kinds of sensuality which follow in its train. + +It has been sometimes said that there is but one kind of drink in the +world--and that is water. This is strictly, or rather _physiologically_ +true. For, though many mixtures are _called_ drinks, it is only the +water which they contain that answers any of the legitimate purposes for +which drink was intended by the Creator. + +The object of drink, besides quenching our thirst, or rather _while_ it +quenches it, is, not to be digested, like food, but to pass directly +from the stomach into the blood-vessels, and dilute and temper the +blood, rendering it more fit to answer the great purpose of sustaining +life and health. Now, there is nothing that can do this but water. +Alcohol cannot do it, nor can turpentine, oil, quicksilver, melted lead, +or any other liquid. + +Tea, coffee, chocolate, small beer, soda water, lemonade, &c., which are +nearly all water, quench the thirst very well, it is true; but not quite +so well as water alone would. The narcotic principle of the first two, +the alcoholic principle of the fourth, and the mucilage, nutriment, +acid, and alkali of the rest, are in the way; for thirst would be +quenched still better without them, even when it is of an unnatural +kind. + +Indeed, the same or similar remarks may be made in regard to all other +mixtures which are usually proposed as drinks. Even milk and water, +molasses and water, &c., in favor of which so much is said, are +objectionable, as mere drinks. Not that they contain anything poisonous, +but they evidently contain nutriment; and even this, except as a part or +the whole of a regular meal, does harm; for it sets the stomach at work +when it needs repose. Mere drink, as I have already said, is never +digested. + +But if the drinks above mentioned, and even milk and water, are +objectionable, what shall we say of cider, wine, and ardent +spirits?--substances which contain, the latter one half, and the two +former from one twentieth to one fourth alcohol. Surely, nobody will +deny that these substances ought, at all events, to be banished from the +nursery. And yet we occasionally find them there, not only for the use +of the mother, to the ruin of the child, indirectly--but also, in some +of their smoother forms, for the use of the child itself. + +I would not lay too much stress on food and drink; for, as I have +already observed, more than once, the causes of infantile ill health and +mortality are numerous. Still I must insist that, of all the sources of +disease, these are the most prolific. Much is done towards ruining the +health of children by the improper food and drink of the mother. But +when, in addition to all this, the children themselves are early fed +with animal food, and with stimulating drinks--punch, coffee, tea, +&c.--and an artificial thirst is early excited and rendered habitual, +their destruction, for time and eternity, is almost inevitable. + +Very few children relish any drink but water, or sweetened water, at +first; and where they do, it is probably hereditary. I have been struck +with their tastes and preferences; nor less with the folly of those +around them, in endeavoring to change them, by requiring them--almost +always against their will--to sip a little coffee, or a little tea, or +a little lemonade; or, it may be, a little toddy. Such children _may_ +escape the death of the drunkard or the debauchee; but if they do, it +will not be through the instrumentality of the parents. + +I am very much opposed to giving children hot drinks of any kind. If +they are to drink substances which are injurious, as tea or coffee, let +them be cool. I do not say _cold_, for that would be going to the other +extreme. But no drink, in any ordinary case, should be above the heat of +our bodies; that is, about 98 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer. Yet +the precautions of this paragraph will be almost unnecessary, if +children are confined--as they ought to be, and would be, did we not go +out of our way to teach them otherwise--to water, as their only drink. +Cold water is almost always preferred. Not one child in a thousand would +ever prefer it hot, until his taste had been perverted. No writer has +inveighed more against hot drinks of every kind, than the late William +Cobbett--and, as I think, with more justice. + +But, in avoiding one rock, we must not, as has already been intimated, +make shipwreck on another. Hot drinks, though they injure the powers of +the stomach, and by that means and through that medium, are one +principal cause of the almost universal early decay of teeth, are yet +less injurious, or at least less dangerous, immediately, than cold ones. +Mr. Locke, in speaking of the sports of a child, in the open air, has +the following quaint, but judicious remarks: + +"Playing in the open air has but this one danger in it, that I know; and +that is, that when he is hot with running up and down, he should sit or +lie down on the cold or moist earth. This, I grant, and drinking cold +drink, when they are hot with labor or exercise, brings more people to +the grave, or to the brink of it, by fevers and other diseases, than +anything I know. These mischiefs are easily enough prevented when he is +little, being then seldom out of sight. And if, during his childhood, he +be constantly and rigorously kept from sitting on the ground, or +drinking any cold liquor, while he is hot, the custom of forbearing, +grown into _habit_, will help much to preserve him, when he is no longer +under his maid's or tutor's eye. + +"More fevers and surfeits are got by people's drinking when they are +hot, than by any one thing I know. If he (the child) be very hot, he +should by no means _drink_; at least a good piece of bread, first to be +eaten, will gain time to warm his drink _blood hot_, which then he may +drink safely. If he be very dry, it will go down so warmed, and quench +his thirst better; and if he will not drink it so warmed, abstaining +will not hurt him. Besides, this will teach him to forbear, which is a +habit of the greatest use for health of mind and body too." + +The last remarks are full of wisdom. Mothers may depend upon it, that +every indulgence to which they accustom their children paves the way for +_habitual_ indulgence; and has a tendency to lead, indirectly, to +indulgence in other matters; and, on the contrary, every self-denial +which they can lead children to exercise, voluntarily--even in these +every-day matters of food, drink, exercise, &c. is so much gained in the +great work of self-denial and the resisting of temptation in matters of +higher importance. But I must not moralize too long; having dwelt on +this same point under the head Confectionary. I proceed, therefore, to +make a few more extracts from Mr. Locke: + +"Not being permitted to _drink_ without eating, will prevent the custom +of having the cup often at his nose; a dangerous beginning." + +"Men often bring habitual hunger and thirst on themselves by custom." + +"You may, if you please, bring any one to be thirsty every hour." + +"I once lived in a house, where, to appease a froward child, they gave +him _drink_ as often as he cried, so that he was constantly bibbing. +And though he could not speak, yet he drank more in twenty-four hours +than I did." + +"It is convenient, for health and sobriety, to drink no more than +natural thirst requires; and he that eats not salt meats, nor drinks +strong drink, will seldom thirst between meals." + +Great mischief is often done to their health by children at school; and +one instance of this is, in getting violently heated with exercise, and +then pouring down large quantities of cold water to cool themselves. I +once made it a habitual rule for pupils, that they must drink water, if +they drank it at all, on leaving their seats to go to their plays, but +not afterwards: and I was so situated that I could prevent the law from +being broken, as there was no spring or well to which they could have +access, privately. And though they thought the rule rather severe, I +have no doubt it saved them from much injury, and perhaps sometimes from +sickness. + + + + +CHAPTER IX. + +GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +So much error prevails in regard to the medical management of the young, +that a volume might be written without exhausting the subject.[Footnote: +Such a volume is in preparation. It is intended as a companion to the +present.] My present limits and plan allow of only a few remarks, and +those must be general. + +That "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," has so long ago +become a proverb, that it seems almost idle to repeat the sentiment. And +yet it is to be feared that very few receive it as a practical truth, in +the management of children. Now nothing is more certain than that it is +easier, as well as more humane, to prevent diseases than to cure them. + +I have elsewhere mentioned the opinion of a very eminent physician, +that nine in ten of children's diseases may be imputed to error with +regard to the quantity or the quality of their food. For myself, I am by +no means certain that nine out of ten is the exact proportion, though I +think the number is, at all events, very large. Few children, or even +grown persons, are seized with disease suddenly. Their progress towards +it is always gradual, and sometimes imperceptible. To a physician of any +tolerable degree of skill, however, there is no difficulty in observing +and pointing out the first steps towards illness; in those whose habits +of life are well known to him; and of foretelling the consequence. + +But since parents and nurses are not so well qualified as physicians to +make these observations, I will endeavor to point out a few certain +signs and symptoms by which they may know a child's health to be +declining, even before be appears to be sick.--For if these are +neglected, the evil increases, goes on from bad to worse, and more +violent and apparent complaints will follow, and perhaps end in +incurable diseases, which a timely remedy, or a slight change in the +diet and manner of life, would have infallibly prevented. + +"The first tendency to disease," says Dr. Cadogan, "may be observed in a +child's breath. It is not enough that the breath is not offensive; it +should be sweet and fragrant, like a nosegay of fresh flowers, or a pail +of new milk from a young cow that feeds upon the sweetest grass of the +spring; and this as well at first waking in the morning, as all day +long." [Footnote: Buchan's "Advice to Mothers," pages 337, 388] + +There is much of truth in these remarks; but if they are wholly true, +then very few children are perfectly healthy. For no child that eats +much animal food of any sort, or, what amounts to nearly the same thing, +much butter or gravy, will long retain the fragrant breath here alluded +to. Who has not observed the difference in this respect, between animals +in general which feed on flesh, and those which feed on grass? And +whether it is the character of their respective food that makes the +difference or not, it is also true that there is nearly as much +difference of breath between _men_ who use animal food and those who do +not, as between other animals. The breath of some of our enormous meat +eaters would almost remind one of a slaughter house. + +Nor is it the quality of food alone, that will induce a foul breath, +either in adults or infants. He who swallows such enormous quantities, +even of plain food, as by overloading and fatiguing the stomach, tend +gradually to debilitate it, will produce the same effect. The enormous +feeders of this full feeding country, whether they are young or old, +whether they inhabit the mountain or the vale, and whether they feed on +animal food or not, have generally a bad breath; and if they seldom +offend, it is because few feed otherwise. And it is not too much--in my +own opinion--to say of this whole class of gormandizers, no less than of +the flesh eaters, that they have laid for themselves the foundation of +future disease. + +One general rule may here be distinctly laid down. As a child's breath +becomes hot and feverish, or strong, or acid, we may be certain that +"digestion and surfeit have fouled and disturbed the blood; and now is +the time to apply a proper remedy, and prevent a train of impending +evils. Let the child be restrained in its food. Let it eat less, live +upon milk or thin broth for a day or two, and be carried (or walk if it +is able) a little more than usual in the open air." [Footnote: Advice to +Mothers, page 338] + +This rule is the more important, because, if duly persevered in, it will +generally prevent disease, and save the trouble and evil consequences of +taking medicine at all. Meanwhile it will be advisable to call in a +physician--not to give drugs, but to prevent the necessity of giving +them. There is a foolish fear abroad that physicians, if called before a +person is violently sick, will dose him with their drugs, as a matter of +course, till they _make_ him sick. But this, no judicious physician will +ever do. It may _have been_ done, though I believe it has been seldom. +The more general course is to defer calling for medical advice, till it +is too late to use preventive means; and medicine is then resorted to by +the physician as a sort of necessary evil. + +A judicious physician, seasonably called in, would in many instances +save a severe fit of sickness, besides a great deal of expense, both of +time and money. + +But if the first symptoms of approaching disease are overlooked--if the +child is fed, or rather crammed; with solid food as much as ever--and if +no medical advice is sought, his sleep will soon become disturbed; he +will be talking, starting, and tumbling about, and will have frightful +dreams; or he will at other times be found smiling and laughing. To +these, in the end, may be added, loss of appetite, paleness, emaciation, +weakness, cough, and consumption; or colics, worms, and convulsions. + +I do not undertake to say that the most judicious parental management, +aided by the greatest medical skill, will always prevent disease; far +from it. The child may and undoubtedly sometimes does inherit a tendency +to a particular disease; or he may be made sick by error in regard to +dress, exercise, &c. But so long as nine tenths of the disease and early +mortality of the young might be prevented by due attention to all these +means combined, so long will it be necessary to reiterate the sentiments +of the present section. + + + + +CHAPTER X + +EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. Objections to the use of cradles.--SEC. 2. Carrying in the +arms--its uses and abuses.--SEC. 3. Creeping--why useful--to be +encouraged.--SEC. 4. Walking--general directions about it.--SEC. 5. +Riding abroad in carriages.--SEC. 6. Riding on horseback--objections. +Riding schools. + + +This subject may be considered under the following heads: ROCKING IN THE +CRADLE; CARRYING IN THE ARMS; CREEPING; WALKING; RIDING IN A CARRIAGE; +AND RIDING ON HORSEBACK. These I shall consider in their order. + + + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +There are two opinions in regard to the use of the cradle in the +nursery. Some condemn it altogether; others think its occasional use +highly proper. Those who condemn it, do it chiefly on the ground that it +produces a whirling motion of the brain, which, while it inclines to +giddiness and lulls to sleep, disturbs, in some degree, the process of +digestion. + +It seems to me that there is weight to this objection; and although the +cradle has been extensively used without producing any obviously evil +effects, I should greatly prefer to have it universally laid aside. As +far as mere amusement is demanded, it is quite unnecessary, since there +are so many amusements which are far better. As a means of inducing +sleep, I am still more strongly opposed to it; for if a child be +rationally treated in every other respect, it will never need artificial +means to induce it to sleep. Nature will then be the most appropriate +directress in this matter. + +If there is a cradle in a nursery, it is almost always full of clothes +loaded with air more or less impure, and the child is buried in it more +than is compatible with health, even in the judgment of the mother or +the nurse; for so convenient is its use, and so great the temptation to +keep the child in it, that he will often be found soaking there a large +proportion of his time. Every one knows that the air has not so free +access to a child in the cradle as elsewhere, especially if it have a +kind of covering or hood to it, as we often see. Besides, the cradle is +a piece of furniture which takes up a great deal of space in the +nursery; and every one who has made the trial effectually, will, it +seems to me, greatly prefer its room to its company. + +If any cradle is to be used, those are best which are suspended by +cords, and are swung, rather than rocked. And this swinging should be in +a line with the body of the child as much as possible; as this motion is +less likely to produce injury than its opposite. + + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +This is the most appropriate exercise for the first two months of +existence; and indeed, one of the best for some time afterward. + +Although a healthy, thriving child ought to sleep, for some time after +birth, from two thirds to three fourths of his time, yet it should never +be forgotten that the demand for proper exercise during the rest of the +time, is not the less imperious on this account; but probably the more +so. + +I have already mentioned the importance of bathing, which is one form of +exercise, and of gentle motion in the arms, immediately afterward. The +same gentle motion should be often repeated during the day; care being +taken to hold the child in such a position as will be easy to him, and +favorable to the free exercise of all his limbs and muscles. + +There are many mothers and nurses, who not only rejoice that the infant +inclines to sleep a great deal, since it gives them more liberty, but +who take pains to prolong these hours beyond what nature requires, by +artificial means. I refer not only to the use of the cradle, but to +means still more artificial--the use of cordials and opiates, to which I +have already adverted. But whatever the means used may be, they defeat +the purposes of nature, and are in the highest degree reprehensible. +Nothing but the most chilling poverty should prevent the mother from +having the child--for a few weeks of its first existence at least--in +her own arms, nearly all the time which is not absolutely demanded for +repose. She should even invite it to wakefulness, rather than encourage +sleep. + +Attention to exercise ought to be commenced before the child is more +than ten days old. For this purpose he should be placed on his back, on +a pillow, in order that the body may rest at as many points as possible. +In this position he has the opportunity to move his limbs with the most +perfect freedom, and to exercise his numerous muscles. There is nothing +more important to the infant--not even sleep itself--than the action of +all his muscles; and nothing contributes more to his rapid growth. + +At first, the body should be kept, while on the arm, in nearly a +horizontal position, with the head perhaps a very little elevated; but +after a few weeks, it will be proper to change the position for a small +part of the time; placing the body so that it may form an angle of a few +degrees with the horizon. When this is done, however, it should always +be by placing the hand against the shoulders and head, in such a manner +as to support well the back; for it is extremely injurious to suffer the +feeble spine to sustain, at this early period, any considerable weight. + +Still more erroneous is the practice of some careless nurses, of +carrying the child quite upright a part of the time, almost without any +support at all. There can be no doubt that the spinal column of many a +child is injured for life in this way. There can be no apology for such +things. + +But it is not sufficient to denounce, merely, the custom of holding the +infant's body in an erect position. Every inquiring mother--and it is +for such, and no other, that I write--will naturally and properly ask +the reason why. + +The child is not born with all its bones solid. Some are mere cartilage +for a considerable time. This is the case with the bones of the back. +Now every person must see that the weight of the child's head and +shoulders, resting for a considerable time on the slender cartilaginous +spinal column, may easily bend it. And a curvature, thus given, may, and +often does, deform children for life. + +Dr. Dewees mentions a nurse who, from a foolish fondness for displaying +them, made the children consigned to her charge sit perfectly upright +before they were a month old. It is truly ludicrous, he says, to see the +little creatures sitting as straight as if they were stiffened by a back +board. It is truly _horrible_, I should say, rather than ludicrous. +Crooked spines must be the inevitable consequence, if nothing worse. + +The practice of bracing children, as it is called, by straps, back +boards, corsets, &c., where it has produced any effect at all, has +always had a tendency to crook the spine. This may be seen first, by +observing one shoulder to be lower than the other, and next by a +projection of the part of the shoulder blades next to the spine. +Whenever these changes begin to appear, it is time to send for a +physician, though it may often be too late to effect a cure. But on the +general subject of bracing and corseting, I have treated at sufficient +length elsewhere. + +There is another error committed in carrying children in the arms. The +head of the infant is often permitted either to hang constantly on one +side, or to roll about loosely; as if it hardly belonged to the body. +In the former case there is danger of producing a habit of holding the +head upon one side, which it will be very difficult to overcome; in the +latter, the spinal marrow itself may be injured--which would produce +alarming and perhaps fatal consequences. + +But all these evils, as has already been said, may be prevented, if the +hand is placed so as to support the head and shoulders. Let not the +mother, however, who reads this work, trust the matter wholly to a +nurse; she must see to it herself; else she incurs a most fearful +responsibility. The suggestions I have made are the more important in +the case of children either very fleshy or very feeble, and of those +disposed to rickets or scrofula; but they are important to all. + +I have said that the motion of the child, on the arm, should be gentle. +Many are in the habit of tossing infants about. There can be no +objection to a slight and slow movement up and down, for a minute or so +at a time; indeed, it is rather to be recommended, as likely to give +strength and vigor no less than pleasure to the child. But when such +movements are carried to excess, so as to frighten the child, they are +highly reprehensible. The shock thus produced to the nervous system has +sometimes been so great as to produce sudden death. Nor is it safe to +run, jump, or descend stairs hastily or violently, with a child in our +arms; and for similar reasons. + +Infants should not be carried always on the same arm, for there is +danger of contracting a habit of leaning to one side, and thus of +becoming crooked. On this account, the arm on which they rest should be +often changed. Nor should they be grasped too firmly. A skilful mother +will hold a child quite loosely, with the most perfect safety; while an +inexperienced one will grasp him so hard as to expose the soft bones to +be bent out of their place, and yet be quite as liable to let him fall +as she who handles him with more ease and freedom. + + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +"Mankind must creep before they can walk," is an old adage often used to +remind us of that patient application which is so indispensable to +secure any highly important or valuable end. But it is as true +literally, as it is figuratively. The act of creeping exercises in a +remarkable degree nearly all the muscles of the body; and this, too, +without much fatigue. + +Some mothers there indeed are, who think it a happy circumstance if a +child can be taught to walk without this intermediate step. But such +mothers must have strange ideas of the animal economy. They must never +have thought of the pleasure which creeping affords the mind, or of the +vigor it imparts to the body. + +Children are wonderfully pleased with their own voluntary efforts. What +they can do themselves, yields them ten-fold greater pleasure than if +done by the mother or the nurse. Yet the latter are exceedingly prone to +forget or overlook all this--and to say, at least practically, that the +only proper efforts are those to which themselves give direction. + +They are moreover exceedingly fond of display. Some mothers seem to +act--in all they do with and for children--as if all the latter were +good for, was display and amusement. They feed them, indeed, and strive +to prolong their existence; but it appears to be for similar reasons to +those which would lead them to take kind care of a pet lamb. + +It is on this account that they dress them out in the manner they do, +strive to make them sit up straight, and prohibit their creeping. It is +on this account too, as much perhaps as any other, that go-carts and +leading strings are put in such early requisition. The contrary would be +far the safer extreme; and the parent who keeps his child scrambling +about upon the back as long as possible, and when he cannot prevent +longer an inversion of this position, retains him at creeping as long +as is in his power, is as much wiser, in comparison with him who urges +him forward to make a prodigy of him, as he is who, instead of making +his child a prodigy in mind or morals at premature age, holds him back, +and endeavors to have his mental and moral nature developed no faster +than his physical frame. + +I wish young mothers would settle it in their minds at once, that the +longer their children creep the better. They need have no fears that the +force of habit will retain them on their knees after nature has given +them strength to rise and walk; for their incessant activity and +incontrollable restlessness will be sure to rouse them as early as it +ought. Least of all ought the difficulty of keeping them clean, to move +them from the path of duty. + +Children who are allowed to crawl, will soon be anxious to do more. We +shall presently see them taking hold of a chair or a table, and +endeavoring to raise themselves up by it. If they fail in a dozen +attempts, they do not give up the point; but persevere till their +efforts are crowned with success. + +Having succeeded in raising themselves from the floor, they soon learn +to stand, by holding to the object by which they have raised themselves. +Soon, they acquire the art of standing without holding; [Footnote: The +art of standing, which consists in balancing one's self, by means of the +muscles of the body and lower limb--simple as it may seem to those who +have never reflected on the subject--is really an important acquisition +for a child of twelve or fifteen months. No wonder they feel a conscious +pride, when they find themselves able to stand erect, like the world +around them.] ere long they venture to put forward one foot--they then +repeat the effort and walk a little, holding at the same time by a +chair; and lastly they acquire, with joy to them inexpressible and to us +inconceivable, the art of "trudging" alone. + +When children learn to walk in nature's own way, it is seldom indeed +that we find them with curved legs, or crooked or clubbed feet. These +deformities are almost universally owing either to the mother or the +nurse. + +Let me be distinctly understood as utterly opposed, not only to +go-carts, leading strings, and every other _mechanical_ contrivance, to +induce children to walk before their legs are fit for it, but to efforts +of every kind, whose main object is the same. Teaching them to walk by +taking hold of one of their hands, is in some respects quite as bad as +any other mode; for if the child should fall while we have hold of his +hand, there is some danger of dislocating or otherwise injuring the +limb. + +Falls we must expect; but if a child is left to his own voluntary +efforts as much as possible, these falls will be fewer, and probably +less serious, than under any other circumstances. + + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +"The way to learn how to write without ruled lines, is _to rule_," was +the frequent saying of an old schoolmaster whom I once knew; and I may +say with as much confidence and with more truth, that "the way for a +child to learn to walk alone, is to hold by things." + +I have anticipated, in previous pages, much of what might have otherwise +been contained in this section. A few additional remarks are all that +will be necessary. + +At first, the nursery will be quite large enough for our young +pedestrian. Much time should elapse before he is permitted to go abroad, +upon the green grass;--not lest the air should reach him, or the sun +shine upon his face and hands, but because the surface of the ground is +so much less firm and regular than the floor, that he ought to be quite +familiar with walking on the latter, in the first place. + +But when he can walk well in the play ground, garden, fields, and +roads, it is highly desirable that he should go out more or less every +day, when the weather will possibly admit; nor would I be so fearful as +many are of a drop of rain or dew, or a breath of wind. For say what +they will in favor of riding, sailing, and other modes of exercise, +there is none equal to walking, as soon as a child is able;--none so +natural--none, in ordinary cases, so salutary. I know it is unpopular, +and therefore our young master or young miss must be hoisted into a +carriage, or upon the back of a horse, to the manifest danger of health +or limbs, or both. + +Who of us ever knew a herdsman or a shepherd who found it for the health +and well-being of the young calf or lamb to hoist it into a carriage, +and carry it through the streets, instead of suffering it to walk? Such +a thing would excite astonishment; and the man who should do it would be +deemed insane. The health and growth of our young domestic animals is +best promoted by suffering them to walk, run, and skip in their own way. +They ask no artificial legs, or horses, or carriages. But would it not +be difficult to find arguments in favor of carrying children about, when +they are able to walk, which would not be equally strong in favor of +carrying about lambs and calves and pigs. + +This is the more remarkable from the consideration, elsewhere urged, +that in general we take more rational pains about the physical +well-being of domestic animals, than of children. However, it will be +seen, on a little reflection, that the number of those who carry +children about, is, after all, very inconsiderable. The greater portion +of the community regard it as too troublesome or costly; and if poverty +brought with it no other evils than a permit to children to walk on the +legs which the Creator gave them, it could hardly be deemed a +misfortune. + +It is scarcely necessary to add that there will be nothing gained to the +young--or to persons of any age--from walks which are very long and +fatiguing. Walking should refresh and invigorate: when it is carried +beyond this, especially with the young child, we have passed the line of +safety. + + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +It will be seen by the foregoing section, that I am not very friendly to +the use of carriages for the young, after they can walk. Before this +period, however, I think they may be often serviceable; and there are +occasional instances which may render them useful afterward. On this +account, I have thought it might be well to give the following general +directions. + +Carriages for children should be so constructed as not to be liable to +overset. To this end, the wheels must be low, and the axle unusually +extended. The body should be long enough to allow the child to lie down +when necessary; and so deep that he may not be likely to fall out. +Everything should be made secure and firm, to avoid, if possible, the +danger of accidents. + +The carriage should be drawn steadily and slowly; not violently, or with +a jerking motion. Such a place should be selected as will secure the +child--if necessary--from the full blaze of a hot sun. This point might +indeed be secured by having the carriage covered; but I am opposed to +covered carriages, for children or adults, unless we are compelled to +ride in the rain. + +While the child is unable to sit up without injury, and even for some +months afterwards, he ought by all means to lie down in a carriage, +because it requires more strength to sit in a seat which is moving, than +in a place where he is stationary. In assuming the horizontal position, +in a carriage, a pillow is needed, and such other arrangements as will +prevent too much rolling. + +After the child's strength will fairly permit, he may sit up in the +carriage, but he ought still to be secured against too much motion. As +his strength increases, however, the latter direction will be less and +less necessary. I need not repeat in this place, (had I not witnessed so +many accidents from neglect,) the caution recently given, that great +care should be taken to prevent the child from falling out of the +carriage. + +While children are riding abroad in cold weather, much pains should be +taken to see that they are suitably clothed. It is well to keep them in +motion, while they are in the carriage, and especially to guard against +their falling asleep in the open air, until they have become very much +accustomed to being out in it. + +It has been said by some writers, that a ride ought never to exceed the +length of half an hour; but no positive rule can be given, except to +avoid over-fatigue. + + +SEC. 6. _Riding on Horseback._ + +While children are very young, I think it both improper and unsafe to +take them abroad on horseback; I mean so long as they are in health. In +case of disease, this mode of exercise is sometimes one of the most +salutary in the world. But after boys are six or seven years old, and +girls ten, if they are ever to practise horsemanship, it is time for +them to begin; both because they are less apt to be unreasonably timid +at this age, and because they learn much more rapidly. + +So few parents are good horsemen, that if there is a riding school at +hand, I should prefer placing a child in it at once. But I wish to be +distinctly understood, that I do not consider it a matter of importance, +especially to females, that they should ever learn to ride at all. + +Some of the principal objections to riding on horseback, by boys, as an +ordinary exercise, are the following: + +1. Walking, as I have already intimated, is one of the most HEALTHY +modes of exercise in the world. It is nature's exercise; and was +unquestionably in exclusive use long before universal dominion was given +to man, if not for many centuries afterward; and I believe it would be +very difficult to prove that it interfered at all with human longevity; +for the first of our race lived almost a thousand years. + +2. Young children, in riding on horseback, are rather apt to acquire, +rapidly, the habit of domineering over animals. It seems almost needless +to say how easy the transition is, in such cases, should opportunity +offer, from tyranny over the brute slave, to tyranny over the human +being. There are slave-holders in the family and in the school, as well +as elsewhere. It is the SPIRIT of a person which makes him either a +tyrant or slave-holder. And let us beware how we foster this spirit in +the children whom God has given us. + + + + +CHAPTER XI. + +AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +However heterodox the concession may be, I am one of those who believe +amusements of some sort or other to be universally necessary. Indeed I +cannot possibly conceive of an individual in health, whatever may be the +age, sex, condition, or employment, who does not need them, in a greater +or less degree. + +Now if by the term amusement, I merely meant employment, nobody would +probably differ from me--at least in theory. Every one is ready to admit +the importance of being constantly employed. A mind unemployed is a +VACANT mind. And a vacant or idle mind is "the devil's work-shop;" so +says the proverb. + +By amusement, however, I mean something more than mere employment; for +the more constantly an adult individual is employed, the greater, +generally, is his demand for amusement. Indolent persons have less need +of being amused than others; but perhaps there are few if any persons to +be found, who are so indolent as not to think continually, on one +subject or another. And it is this constant thinking, more than anything +else, that creates the necessity of which I am speaking. The mere +drudge, whether biped or quadruped--he, I mean, whose thinking powers +are scarcely alive--has little need of the relief which is afforded by +amusement. + +The young of all animals--man among the rest--appear to have such an +instinctive fondness for amusement, that so long as they are +unrestrained, they seldom need any urging on this point. In regard to +_quality_, the case is somewhat different. In this respect, most +children require attention and restraint; and some of them a great deal +of it. + +But what is the nature of the amusement which adults--nay, mankind +generally--require? I answer, it is relief from the employment of +thinking. For it is not that mankind do not really think at all, that +moralists complain so loudly. When they tell us that men will not +think, they mean that they will not think as rational beings. They +think, indeed; and so do the ox, and the horse, and the dog, and the +elephant--but not as rational men ought to do; and this it is that +constitutes the burden of complaint. But you will probably find few +persons belonging to the human species who do not think constantly, at +least while awake; and whose mental powers do not become fatigued, and +demand relief in amusement. + +Children's minds are so soon wearied by a continuous train of thinking, +even on topics which are pleasing to them, that they can seldom he +brought to give their attention to a single subject long at once. They +require almost incessant change; both for the sake of relief, and to +amuse for the _sake_ of amusement. And it is, to my own mind, one of +the most striking proofs of Infinite Wisdom in the creation of the human +mind, that it has, during infancy, such an irresistible tendency to +amusement. + +How greatly do they err, who grudge children, especially very young +children, the time which, in obedience to the dictates of their nature, +they are so fond of spending in sports and gambols! How much more +rational would it be to encourage and direct them in their amusements! +And how exceedingly unwise is the practice, whenever and wherever it +exists, of confining them to school rooms and benches, not only for +hours, but for whole half days at once. + +If individuals and circumstances were everywhere combined, with the +special purpose to oppose the intentions of nature respecting the human +being, at every step of his progress from the cradle to maturity, and +from maturity to the grave, I hardly know how they could contrive to +accomplish such a purpose more effectually than it is at present +accomplished. But it is proper that I should here explain a little. + +All our family arrangements tend to repress amusement. Everything is +contrived to facilitate business--especially the business or employments +of adults. The child is hardly regarded as a human being,--certainly not +as a _perfect_ being. He is considered as a mere fragment; or to change +the figure, as a plant too young to be of any real service to mankind, +because too young to bear any of its appropriate fruits. Whereas, in my +opinion, both infancy and childhood, at every stage, should bring forth +their appropriate fruits. In other words, the child of the most tender +years should be regarded as a whole, and not as the mere fragment of a +being; as a perfect member of a family--occupying a full and complete, +only a more limited sphere than older members: and all the rules and +regulations and arrangements of the family should have a reference to +this point. So long as a child is reckoned to be a mere cipher in +creation, or at most, as of no more practical importance, till the +arrival of his twenty-first birth day, or some other equally arbitrary +period, than our domestic animals--that is, of just sufficient +consequence to be fed, and caressed, and fondled, and made a pet of--so +long will our arrangements be made with reference to the comfort and +happiness of adults. There may indeed be here and there a child's chair, +or a child's carriage, or newspaper, or book; but there will seldom be, +except by stealth, any free juvenile conversation at the table or the +fireside. Here the child must sit as a blank or cypher, to ruminate on +the past, or to receive half formed and passive impressions from the +present. + +The arrangements of the infant school, also, seem designed for the same +purpose--to repress as much as possible the infantile desire for +amusement. Not that this was their original, nor that it now is their +legitimate intention. Their legitimate object is, or should be, not to +develope the intellect by over-working the tender brain, but to promote +cheerfulness and health and love and happiness, by well contrived +amusements, conducted as much as possible in the open air; and by +unremitting efforts to elicit and direct the affections. + +Infant schools should repress rather than encourage the hard study of +books. Lessons at this age should be drawn chiefly from objects in the +garden, the field, and the grove; from the flower, the plant, the tree, +the brook, the bird, the beast, the worm, the fly, the human body--the +sun, or the visible heavens. These lessons, whether given by the parent, +as constituting a part of the family arrangements, or by the infant or +primary school teacher, should, it is true, be regarded for the time +being as study, but they should never be long; and they should be +frequently relieved by the most free and unrestrained pastimes and +gambols of the young on the green grass, or beside the rippling stream, +uninfluenced, or at least unrepressed, by those who are set over them. + +The public or common school, overlooking as it does any direct attempts +to make provision for the amusement of the pupils, even during the +scanty recess that is afforded them once in three hours, would appear to +a stranger on this planet, at first sight, to be designed as much as +possible to defeat every intention of nature with reference to the +growth of the human frame. For we may often travel many hundred miles +and not see so much as an enclosed play ground; and never perhaps any +direct provision for particular and more favorable amusements. + +I might speak of other schools and places of resort for children, and +proceed to show how all our arrangements appear to be the offspring of a +species of utilitarianism which rejects every sport whose value cannot +be estimated in dollars and cents. I might even refer to those schools +of our country where these ultra utilitarian notions are carried to an +extent which excludes amusing conversation or reading even during +meal-time; and devotes the hours which were formerly spent in +recreation, to manual labor of some productive kind or other.--But I +forbear. Enough has been said to illustrate the position I have taken, +that there is in vogue a system which bears the marks of having been +contrived, if not by the enemies of our race, either openly or covertly, +at least by those whom ignorance renders scarcely less at war with the +general happiness. + +Now I would not deny nor attempt to deny that change of occupation of +body or mind is of itself an amusement, and one too of great value. +Undoubtedly it is so. To some children, studies of every kind are an +amusement; and there are few indeed to whom none are so. Labor, with +many, when alternated with study, is amusing. And yet, after all, unless +such labors are performed in company, where light and cheerful +conversation is sure to keep the mind away from the subjects about +which it has just been engaged, I am afraid that the purposes for which +amusements were designed, are very far from being _all_ secured. + +But perhaps I am dwelling too long on the general principle that people +of every age, and children in particular, need, and must have +amusements, whether they are of a productive kind or not; and that it is +very far from being sufficient, were it either practicable or desirable, +to turn all study and labor into amusement. [Footnote: I will even say, +more distinctly than I have already done, that however popular the +contrary opinion may be, neither study nor work ought to be regarded as +mere amusement. I would, it is true, take every possible pains to render +both work and study agreeable; but I would at the same time have it +distinctly understood, that one of them is by no means the other; that, +on the contrary, work is _work_--study, _study_--and amusement, +_amusement_.] My business is with those who direct the first dawnings +of affection and intellect. Principles are by no means of less importance +on this account; but the limits of a work for young mothers do not admit +of anything more than a brief discussion of their importance. + +I will now proceed to speak of some of the more common amusements of the +nursery. + +I have seen very young children sit on the floor and amuse themselves +for nearly half an hour together, with piling up and taking down small +wooden cubes, of different sizes. Some of them, instead of being cubes, +however, may be of the shape of bricks. Their ingenuity, while they are +scarcely a year or two old, in erecting houses, temples, churches, &c., +is sometimes surprising. Girls as well as boys seem to be greatly amused +with this form of exercise; and both seem to be little less gratified in +destroying than in rearing their lilliputian edifices. + +Next to the latter kind of amusement, is the viewing of pictures. It is +surprising at what an early age children may be taught to notice +miniature representations of objects; living objects especially. +Representations of the works of art should come in a little later than +those of things in nature. I know a father who prepares volumes of +pictures, solely for this purpose; though he usually regards them not +only as a source of amusement to children, but as a medium of +instruction. + +Battledoor or shuttlecock may be taught to children of both sexes very +early; and it affords a healthy and almost untiring source of amusement. +It gives activity as well as strength to the muscles or moving powers, +and has many other important advantages. There is some danger, according +to Dr. Pierson [Footnote: See his Lecture before the American Institute +of Instruction] of distorting the spine by playing at shuttlecock too +frequently and too long; but this will seldom be the case with little +children in the nursery. Neither shuttlecock nor any other amusement +will secure their attention long enough to injure them very much. + +Perhaps this exercise comes nearer to my ideas of a perfect amusement +than almost any which could be named. The mind is agreeably occupied, +without being fatigued; and if the amusements are proportioned to the +age and strength of the child, there is very little fatigue of the body. +It gives, moreover, great practical accuracy to the eye and to the hand. + +A rocking-horse is much recommended for the nursery. I have had no +opportunity for observing the effects of this kind of amusement; but if +it is one half as valuable as some suppose, I should be inclined to +recommend it. But I am opposed to fostering in the rider lessons of +cruelty, by arming him with whips and spurs. If the young are ever to +learn to ride, on a living horse, the exercises of the rocking-horse +will, most certainly, be a sort of preparation for the purpose. + +Tops and marbles afford a great deal of rational amusement to the young; +and of a very useful kind, too. Spinning a top is second to no exercise +which I have yet mentioned, unless it is playing at shuttlecock. + +Dr. Dewees recommends a small backgammon table, with men, but without +dice. He says, also, that "children, as soon as they are capable of +comprehending the subject, should be taught draughts or checkers. This +game is not only highly amusing, but also very instructive." In another +place he heaps additional encomiums upon the game of checkers. "It +becomes a source of endless amusement," he says, "as it never tires, but +always instructs." Of exercises which instruct, however, as well as +amuse, I shall speak presently. + +The amusements called "morrice," "fox and geese," &c., with which some +of the children of almost every neighborhood are more or less +acquainted, are of the same general character and tendency as checkers. +So is a play, sometimes, but very improperly, called dice, in which two +parties play with a small bundle of wooden pins, not unlike knitting +pins in shape, but shorter. + +The writer to whom I have referred above recommends nine-pins and balls +of proper size, as highly useful both for diversion and exercise. If +they can be used without leading to bad habits and bad associations, I +think they may be useful. + +For girls, who demand a great deal more of exercise, both within doors +and without, skipping the rope is an excellent amusement. So also is +swinging. Both of these exercises may be used either out of doors, or +in the nursery. + +Trundling a hoop I have always regarded as an amusing out-of-door +exercise; and I am not sorry when I sometimes see girls, as well as +boys, engaged in it, under the eye of their mothers and teachers. + +Playing ball, of which there are many different games, and flying kites, +employ a large proportion if not all of the muscles of the body, in such +a manner as is likely to confirm the strength, and greatly improve the +health. The same may be said of skating in the winter, and swimming in +the summer. But these last are exercises over which the mother cannot, +ordinarily, have very much control. + +Under the head of amusements, it only remains for me to speak of a few +juvenile employments of a mixed nature. Of these I shall treat very +briefly, as they are a branch of the subject which does not necessarily +come within the compass of my present plan. They are exercises, too, +which should more properly come under the head of Infantile Instruction. + +Dissected maps afford children of every age a great fund of amusement; +but much caution is necessary, with those that are very young, not to +discourage or confound them by showing them too many at once. Thus if +we cut in pieces the map of one of the smaller United States, at the +county lines, or the whole United States, at the state lines, it is +quite as many divisions as they can manage. Cut up as large a state, +even, as Pennsylvania or New York is, into counties, and try to lead +them to amuse themselves by putting together so large a number, many of +which must inevitably very closely resemble each other, and it is ten to +one but you bewilder, and even perplex and discourage them. The same +results would follow from cutting up even the whole of a large county, +or a small state, into towns. I have usually begun with little children, +by requiring them to put together the eight counties of the small state +of Connecticut. In this case the counties are not only few, but there is +a very striking difference in their shape. + +A black board and a piece of chalk, along with a little ingenuity on the +part of the mother, will furnish the child with an almost endless +variety of amusement. Let him attempt to imitate almost any object which +interests him, whether among the works of nature or art. However rude +his pictures may be, do not laugh at, but on the contrary, endeavor to +encourage him. He may also be permitted to imitate letters and figures. +The elements of letters, too, both printed and written, may be given +him, and he may be required to put them together. Dissected pictures, as +well as dissected maps and letters, are useful, and to most children, +very acceptable. + +In short, the devices of an ingenious, thinking mother, for the +amusement of her very young children, are almost endless; and the great +danger is, that when a mother once enters deeply into the spirit of +these exercises, she will substitute them for those much more healthy +ones which have been already mentioned, such as require muscular +activity, or may be performed in the open air. + + + + +CHAPTER XII. + +CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +"Crying," says Dr. Dewees, "should be looked upon as an exercise of much +importance;" and he is sustained in this view by many eminent medical +writers. + +But people generally think otherwise. Nothing is more common than the +idea that to cry is unbecoming; and children are everywhere taught, when +they suffer pain, to brave it out, and _not cry_. Such a direction--to +say nothing of its tendency to encourage hypocrisy--is wholly +unphilosophical. The following anecdote may serve in part to illustrate +my meaning. It is said to have been related by Dr. Rush. + +A gentleman in South Carolina was about to undergo a very painful +surgical operation. He had imbibed the idea that it was beneath the +dignity of a man ever to say or do anything expressive of pain. He +therefore refused to submit to the usual precaution of securing the +hands and feet by bandages, declaring to his surgeon that he had nothing +to fear from his being untied, for he would not move a muscle of his +body. He kept his word, it is true; but he died instantly after the +operation, from apoplexy. + +There is very little doubt, in the mind of any physiologist, in regard +to the cause of apoplexy in this case; and that it might have been +prevented by the relief which is always afforded by groans and tears. + +It is, I believe, very generally known, that in the profoundest grief, +people do not, and cannot shed tears; and that when the _latter_ begin +to flow, it affords immediate relief. + +I do not undertake to argue from this, that crying is so important, +either to the young or the old, that it is ever worth while to excite or +continue it by artificial means; or that a habit of crying, so easily +and readily acquired by the young, is not to be guarded against as a +serious, evil. My object was first to show the folly of those who +denounce all crying, and secondly, to point out some of its +advantages--in the hope of preventing parents from going to that extreme +which borders upon stoicism. + +One of the most intelligent men I ever knew, frequently made it his +boast that he neither laughed nor cried on any occasion; and on being +told that both laughing and crying were physiologically useful, he only +ridiculed the sentiment. + +Crying is useful to very young infants, because it favors the passage of +blood in their lungs, where it had not before been accustomed to travel, +and where its motion is now indispensable. And it not only promotes the +circulation of the blood, but expands the air-cells of the lungs, and +thus helps forward that great change, by which the dark-colored impure +blood of the veins is changed at once into pure blood, and thus rendered +fit to nourish the system, and sustain life. + +But this is not all. Crying strengthens the lungs themselves. It does +this by expanding the little air-cells of which I have just spoken, and +not only accustoms them to being stretched, at a period, of all others, +the most favorable for this purpose, but frees them at the same time +from mucus, and other injurious accumulations. + +They, therefore, who oppose an infant's crying, know not what they do. +So far is it from being hurtful to the child, that its occasional +recurrence is, as we have already seen, positively useful. Some +practitioners of medicine, in some of the more trying situations in +which human nature can be placed, even encourage their patients to +suffer tears to flow, as a means of relief. + +Infants, it should also be recollected, have no other language by which +to express their wants and feelings, than sighs and tears. Crying is not +always an expression of positive pain; it sometimes indicates hunger and +thirst, and sometimes the want of a change of posture. This last +consideration deserves great attention, and all the inconveniences of +crying ought to be borne cheerfully, for the sake of having the little +sufferer remind us when nature demands a change of position. No child +ought to be permitted to remain in one position longer than two hours, +even while sleeping; nor half that time, while awake; and if nurses and +mothers will overlook this matter, as they often do, it is a favorable +circumstance that the child should remind them of it. + +Crying has been called the "waste gate" of the human system; the door of +escape to that excess of excitability which sometimes prevails, +especially among children and nervous adults. To all such persons it is +healthy--most undoubtedly so; nor do I know that its occasional +recurrence is injurious to any adult--a fastidious public sentiment to +the contrary notwithstanding. + +Some have supposed, that what is here said will be construed by the +young mother into a license to suffer her child to cry unnecessarily. +Perhaps, say they, she is a laboring woman, and wishes to be at work. +Well, she lays down her child in the cradle, or on the bed, and goes to +her work. Presently the child, becoming wet perhaps, begins to cry, as +well he might. But, instead of going to him and taking care of him, she +continues at her employment; and when one remonstrates against her +conduct as cruelty, she pleads the authority of the author of the "Young +Mother." + +All this may happen; but if it should, I am not answerable for it. I +have insisted strongly on guarding the child against wet clothing, and +on watching him with the utmost care to prevent all real suffering. +Mothers, like the specimen here given, if they happen to have a little +sensibility to suffering, and not much love of their offspring, +generally know of a shorter way to quiet their infants and procure time +to work, than that which is here mentioned. They have nothing to do but +to give them some cordial or elixir, whose basis is opium. Startle not, +reader, at the statement;--this abominable practice is followed by many +a female who claims the sacred name of mother. And many a wretch has +thus, in her ignorance, indolence or avarice, slowly destroyed her +children! + +I repeat, therefore, that I do not think my remarks on crying are +necessarily liable to abuse; though I am not sure that there are not a +few individuals to be found who may apply them in the manner above +mentioned--an application, however, which is as far removed from the +original intention of the author, as can possibly be conceived. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII. + +LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +Laughing, like crying, has a good effect on the infantile lungs; nor is +it less salutary in other respects. "Laugh and be fat," an old adage, +has its meaning, and also its philosophy. + +There is an excess, however, to which laughing, no less than crying, may +be carried, and which we cannot too carefully avoid. But how little to +be envied--how much to be pitied--are they who consider it a weakness +and a sin to laugh, and in the plenitude of their wisdom, tell us that +_the Saviour of mankind never laughed_. When I hear this last assertion, +I am always ready to ask, whether the individual who makes it has read a +new revelation or a new gospel; for certainly none of the sacred books +which I have seen give us any such information. + +But I will not dwell here. The common notion on this subject, if not +ridiculous, is certainly strange. I will only add, that, come into vogue +as it might have done, there is no opinion more unfounded than the very +general one among adults, that children should be uniformly grave; and +that just in proportion as they laugh and appear frolicsome, just in the +same proportion are they out of the way, and deserving of reprehension. + +It is strange that it should be so, but I have seen many parents who +were miserable because their children were sportive and joyful. Oh, when +will the days of monkish sadness and austerity be over; and the public +sentiment in the christian world get right on this subject! + + + + +CHAPTER XIV + +SLEEP. + +General remarks. Hints to fathers.--SEC. 1. Proper hours for repose. +Dark rooms. Noise.--SEC. 2. Place for sleeping. Sleeping +alone--reasons.--SEC. 3. Purity of the air in sleeping rooms.--SEC. 4. +The bed. Objections to feathers. Other materials.--SEC. 5. The covering +of beds. Covering the head.--SEC. 6. Night Dresses. Robes.--SEC. 7. +Posture of the body in sleep.--SEC. 8. State of the mind.--SEC. 9. +Quality of sleep.--SEC. 10. Quantity of sleep. + + +Not a few persons consider all rules relative to sleep as utterly +futile. They regard it as so much of a natural or animal process, that +if we are let alone we shall seldom err, at any age, respecting it. +Rules on the subject, above all, they regard as wholly misplaced. + +Those who entertain such views, would do well, in order to be +consistent, to go a little farther; and as breathing and eating and +drinking--nay, even _thinking_--are natural processes, deny the utility +of all rules respecting _them_ also. Perhaps they would do well, +moreover, to deny that rules of any sort are valuable. But would not +this have the effect to bar the door perpetually against all human +improvement? Would it not be equivalent to saying, to a half-civilized, +because only half-christianized community--Go on with your barbarous +customs, and your uncleanly and unthinking habits, forever? + +But I have not so learned human nature. I regard man as susceptible of +endless progression. And I know of no way in which more rapid progress +can be made, than by enlightening young mothers on subjects which +pertain to our physical nature, and the means of physical improvement. +Not for the _sake_ of that perishable part of man, the frame, but +because it is nearly in vain to attempt to improve the mind and heart, +without due attention to the frame-work, to which mind and heart, for +the present, are appended, and most intimately related. + +Let it be left to fathers to study the improvement of hounds and horses +and cattle, and at the same time to think themselves above the concerns +of the nursery. We may, indeed, read of a Cato once in three thousand +years, who was in the habit of quitting all other business in order to +be present when the nurse washed and rubbed his child. But our passion +for gain, in the present age, is so much more absorbing and +soul-destroying than the passion for military glory, that we cannot +expect many Catos. Oh no. All, or nearly all, must devolve on the +mother. The father has no time to attend to his children! What belongs +to the mother, if she can be duly awakened, may be at least _half_ done; +what belongs to the father, must, I fear, be left undone. + +I am accustomed to regard every day--even of the infant--as a miniature +life. I am, moreover, accustomed to consider mental and bodily vigor, +not only for each separate day, but for life's whole day, as greatly +influenced by the circumstances of sleep; the HOUR, PLACE, PURITY OF THE +AIR, THE BED, THE COVERING, DRESS, POSTURE, STATE OF THE MIND, QUALITY, +QUANTITY, AND DURATION. + + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Generally speaking, the night is the appropriate season for repose; but +in early infancy, it is _every_ hour. I have already spoken of the vast +amount of sleep which the new-born infant requires, as well as of many +other circumstances connected with it, requiring our attention. Suffer +me, however, to enlarge, at the risk of a little repetition. + +What time the infant is awake, should be during the day. It is of very +great importance, in the formation of good habits, that he should be +undressed and put to bed, at evening, with as much regularity as if be +had not slept during the day for a single moment. It is also important +that he be permitted to sleep during the whole night, as uninterruptedly +as possible; and that when he is aroused, to have his position or +diapers changed, or to receive food, it should be done with little +parade and noise, and with as little light as possible. All persons, old +as well as young, sleep more quietly in a dark room, than in one where a +light is burning. + +I am well aware that the course here recommended, may be carried to an +excess which will utterly defeat the object intended, since there are +children to be found, who are so trained in this respect, that the +lightest tread upon the floor will awake, and perhaps frighten them. But +this is an excess which is not required. All that is necessary during +the night, is a reasonable degree of silence, in order to induce the +habit of continued rest, if possible. In the day time, on the contrary, +fatigue will impel a child to sleep occasionally, even in the midst of +noise. I am not sure that the habit of sleeping in the midst of noise is +not worth a little pains on the part of the mother. Nor is it improbable +that a habit of this kind, once acquired by the infant, might ultimately +be extended to the night, so that over-caution, even in regard to that +season, might gradually be laid aside. + +Dr. North, a distinguished medical practitioner in Hartford, Conn., +confirms the foregoing sentiments; and adds, that he deems it an +imperious duty of those parents who wish well to their infants, to form +in them the habit of sleeping when fatigued, whether the room be quiet +or noisy. With his children, no cradles or opiates are needed or used. + + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +For some time after its birth, the infant should sleep near its mother, +though not in the same bed. The bedstead should be of the usual height +of bedsteads, and should be enclosed with a railing sufficient to secure +the infant from falling out, but not of such a structure as to hinder, +in any degree, a free circulation of the air. + +The reasons why a child ought to sleep alone, and not with the mother or +nurse, are numerous; but the following are the principal; + +1. The heat accumulated by the bodies of the mother and child both, is +often too great for health. + +2. The air is too impure. I have already spoken of the change in the +purity of the air which is produced by breathing in it. It is bad +enough for two adults to sleep in the same bed, breathing over and over +again the impure air, as they must do more or less, even if the bed is +very large;--but it is still worse for infants. Their lungs demand +atmospheric air in its utmost purity; and if denied it, they must +eventually suffer. + +3. But besides the change of the air by breathing, the surface of the +body is perpetually changing it in the same manner, as was stated in the +chapter on Ventilation. Now a child will almost inevitably breathe a +stream of this bad air, as it issues from the bed; and what is still +worse, it is very apt, in spite of every precaution, to get its head +covered up with the clothes, where it can hardly breathe anything else. +This, if frequently repeated, is slow but certain death;--as much so as +if the child were to drink poison in moderate quantities. + +Let me not be told that this is an exaggeration; that thousands of +mothers make it a point to cover up the beads of their infants; and that +notwithstanding this, they are as healthy as the infants of their +neighbors. I have not said that they would droop and die while infants. +The fumes of lead, which is a certain poison, may be inhaled, and yet +the child or adult who inhales them may live on, in tolerable health, +for many years. But suffer he must, in the end, in spite of every effort +and every hope. So must the child, whose head is covered habitually +with the bed clothing, where it is compelled to breathe not only the air +spoiled by its own skin, but also that which is spoiled by the much +larger surface of body of the mother or nurse. + +But I have proof on this subject. Friedlander, in his "Physical +Education," says expressly, that in Great Britain alone, between the +years 1686 and 1800, no less than 40,000 children died in consequence of +this practice of allowing them to sleep near their nurses. I was at +first disposed to doubt the accuracy of this most remarkable statement. +But when I consider the respectability of the authority from which it +emanated, and that it is only about 350 a year for that great empire, I +cannot doubt that the estimate is substantially correct. What a +sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and folly! + +It should be added, in this place, both to confirm the foregoing +sentiment, and to show that British mothers and nurses are not alone, +that Dr. Dewees has witnessed, in the circle of his practice, four +deaths from the same cause. If every physician in the United States has +met with as many cases of the kind, in proportion to his practice, as +Dr. D., the evil is about as great in this country as Dr. F. says it is +in Great Britain. + +If a child sleeps alone, it cannot of course be liable to as much +suffering of this kind as if it slept with another person; though much +precaution will still be necessary to keep its head uncovered, and +prevent its inhaling air spoiled by its own lungs and skin. + +4. There is one more evil which will be avoided by having a child sleep +alone. Many a mother has seriously injured her child by pressure. I do +not here allude to those monsters in human nature, whose besotted habits +have been the frequent cause of the suffocation and death of their +offspring, but to the more careful and tender mother, who would sooner +injure herself than her own child. Such mothers, even, have been known +to dislocate or fracture a limb![Footnote: There may be instances where +the debility of an infant will be so great that the mother or a nurse +must sleep with it, to keep it warm. But such cases of disease are very +rare.] + +To cap the climax of error in this matter, some mothers allow their +infants to lie on their arm, as a pillow. This practice not only exposes +them to all or nearly all the evils which have been mentioned, but to +one more; viz. the danger of being thrown from the bed. + +A young mother, with whom I was well acquainted, was sleeping one night +with her infant on her arm, when she made a sudden and rather violent +effort to turn in the bed, in doing which she threw the child upon the +floor with such violence as to fracture its little skull, and cause its +death. + +Enough, I trust, has now been said to convince every reasonable young +mother, where absolute poverty does not preclude comfort and health, +that her child ought never to be permitted to sleep in the same bed with +her; but that it should be placed on a bedstead by itself at a short +distance from her, and properly guarded from accidents--and above all, +from inhaling impure air. + +At a suitable age, a child may be removed from the nursery to a separate +chamber. Here, if the circumstances permit, it should still sleep by +itself; and if the bedstead be somewhat lower than ordinary, and the +room be not too small, it will need no watching. + +Perhaps this may be the proper place to say that there are more reasons +than one--and some of them are of a moral nature, too--why a child +should continue to sleep alone, after it leaves the nursery. Nor is it +sufficient to prohibit its sleeping with younger persons, and yet crowd +it into the bed with an aged grandfather or grandmother, or with both. +There is no excuse for a course like this, except the iron hand of +necessity. And even then, I should prefer to have a child of mine sleep +on the hard floor, at least during the summer season, rather than with +an aged person. + +Let it not be supposed I have imbibed the fashionable idea that it is +_peculiarly_ unhealthy for the young to sleep with the old. I know this +doctrine has many learned advocates. And yet I doubt its correctness. I +believe that the manners and habits of the old may injure the young who +sleep with them, and I know that they render the air impure, like other +people. But I cannot see why the mere circumstance of their being _old_ +should be a source of unhealthiness to their younger bed-fellows. Still +I say, that there are reasons enough against the practice I am opposing, +without this. + +Some parents allow dogs and cats to sleep with children. Others have a +prejudice against cats, but not against dogs. The truth is, that they +both contaminate the air by respiration and perspiration, in the same +manner that adults do. And aside from the fact that they are often +infested by lice and other insects, and addicted to uncleanly habits, +they ought always to be excluded, and with iron bars and bolts, if +necessary, from the beds of children. But of this, too, I have treated +elsewhere. + + +SEC. 3. _Purity of the Air._ + +The general importance of pure air has been mentioned. I have spoken of +the elements of the atmosphere in which we live, of the manner in +which it may be vitiated, and the consequences to health. I have +shown--perhaps at sufficient length--the impropriety of washing, drying, +and ironing clothes in the room where a child is kept; of cooking in the +room, especially on a stove; of suffering the floor or clothes, +particularly those of the child, to remain long wet, in the room; of +smoking tobacco, using spirits, burning oil with too long a wick, &c. + +All which has thus been said of the purity of the air of the nursery +generally, is applicable to that of all sleeping rooms. It is an +important point gained, when we can secure a nursery with folding doors +in the centre, so as, when we please, to make two rooms of it. In that +case, the division in which the bed is, can be completely ventilated a +little before night, and thus be comparatively pure for the reception of +both the mother and the child. + +Shall the windows and doors where a child sleeps, be kept closed; or +shall they be suffered to remain open a part or the whole of the night? +This must be determined by circumstances. If there are no doors but +such as communicate with apartments whose air is equally impure with +that in which the child is, it is preferable to keep them closed. If the +windows cannot be opened without exposing the child to a current of air, +it is perhaps the less of two evils, not to open them. + +But we are not usually driven to such extremities. In some instances, +windows are constructed--and all of them ought to be--so that they can +be lowered from the top. When this is not the case, something can be +placed before the window to break the current, so that it need not fall +directly upon the child. Closing the blinds will partially effect this, +where blinds exist. + +I have known many an individual who was in the habit of sleeping with +his windows open during the whole year, and without any obvious evil +consequences. Dr. Gregory was of this habit. But if adults--not trained +to it--can acquire such a habit with impunity, with how much more safety +could children be trained to it from the very first year. Macnish says, +"there can be no doubt that a gentle current pervading our sleeping +apartments, is in the highest degree ESSENTIAL TO HEALTH." + +This consideration--I mean the impurity of sleeping rooms, even after +every precaution has been used to keep them ventilated--affords one +of the strongest inducements to going abroad early in the morning +(especially when there is no other room which either adults or children +can occupy) while the nursery or chamber is aired and ventilated. The +utility of _rising_ early, I hope no one can doubt; but some have doubts +of the propriety of going abroad, till the dew has "passed away." Such +should be reminded, by the foregoing train of remarks, that early +walking may be a choice of evils; and that if it _is_ on the whole +advantageous to adults, it cannot be less so to children. And as soon as +the sun has chased away the vapors of the night, if the weather is +tolerable, most children should be carried abroad. + + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +This should never be of feathers. There are many reasons for this +prohibition, especially to the feeble. + +1. They are too warm. Infants should by all means be kept warm enough, +as I have all along insisted. But excess of heat excites or stimulates +the skin, causing an unnatural degree of perspiration, and thus inducing +weakness or debility. + +2. When we first enter a room in which there is a feather bed which has +been occupied during the night, we are struck with the offensive smell +of the air. This is owing to a variety of causes; one of which probably +is, that beds of this kind are better adapted to absorb and retain the +effluvia of our bodies. But let the causes be what they may, the effects +ought, if possible, to be avoided; for both experience and authority +combine to pronounce them very injurious. + +3. Feather beds--if used in the nursery--will inevitably discharge more +or less of dust and down; both of which are injurious to the tender +lungs of the infant. + +Mattresses are better for persons of every age, than soft feather beds. +They may be made of horse hair or moss; but hair is the best. If the +mattress does not appear to be warm enough for the very young infant, a +blanket may be spread over it. Dr. Dewees says that in case mattresses +cannot be had, "the sacking bottom" may be substituted, or "even the +floor;" at least in warm weather: "for almost anything," he adds, "is +preferable to feathers." + +Macnish, in his "Philosophy of Sleep," objects strongly to air beds, and +says that he can assert "from experience," that they are the very worst +that can possibly be employed. My theories--for I have had no experience +on the subject--would lead me to a similar conclusion. A British +writer of eminence assures us that the higher classes in Ireland, to a +considerable extent, accustom themselves and their infants to sleep on +bags of cut straw, overspread with blankets and a light coverlid; and +that the custom is rapidly finding favor. I have slept on straw, both in +winter and summer, for many years, yet I am always warm; and those who +know my habits say I use less _covering_ on my bed than almost any +individual whom they have ever known. + +I have no hostility to soft beds, especially for young children and feeble +adults, could softness be secured without much heat and relaxation +of the system. On the contrary, it is certainly desirable, in itself, +to have the bed so soft that as large a proportion of the surface of +the body may rest on it as possible. But I consider hardness as a +much smaller evil than feathers. + +It is worthy of remark how generally physicians, for the last hundred +years, have recommended hard beds, especially straw beds or hair +mattresses, to their more feeble and delicate patients. This fact might +at least quiet our apprehensions in regard to their tendency on those +who are accustomed to them in early infancy. + +Some writers on these subjects appear to doubt whether, after all that +they say, they shall have much influence on mothers in inducing them to +give up feather beds for their infants. But they need not be so +faithless. Multitudes have already been reformed by their writings; and +multitudes larger still would be so, could they gain access to them. It +is a most serious evil that they are often so written and published that +comparatively few mothers will ever possess them. + +The pillow, as well as the bed, should be rather hard; and its thickness +should be much less than is usual, or we shall do mischief by bending +the neck, and thus compressing the vessels, and obstructing the +circulation of the blood. But on this subject I will say more, when I +come to treat on "Posture." + +The child's bed should not be placed near the wall, on account of +dampness. There is also, during the summer, another reason. Should +lightning strike the house, it will be much more apt to injure those who +are near the wall than other persons; as it seldom leaves the wall to +pass over the central part of the room. + +Curtains are not only useless, but injurious. They prevent a free +circulation of the air. Everything which has this tendency must be +studiously guarded against, in the management of infants. + +Nothing is more injurious to the old or the young than damp beds and +damp covering. It behoves, especially, all those who have the care of +infants, to see that everything about their beds is thoroughly dry. The +walls and clothes should also be dry; and wet clothes should never be +hung up in the room. By neglecting these precautions, colds, +rheumatisms, inflammations, fevers, consumptions, and death, may ensue. +Many a person loses his health, and not a few their lives, in this way. +The author of this work was once thrown into a fever from such a cause. + +Warming the bed is, in all cases, a bad practice. While in the nursery, +if the air be kept at a proper temperature, there will be no need of it; +after the child is assigned to a separate chamber, its enervating +tendency would result in more evil than good. It is better to let the +bed became gradually heated by the body, in a natural and healthy way. + +No person, and above all, no infant, should be suffered to sleep in a +bed that has been recently occupied by the sick. The bed and all the +clothes should first be thoroughly aired. Could we see with our eyes at +once, how rapidly these bodies of ours fill the air, and even the beds +we sleep in, with carbonic acid and other hurtful gases and impurities, +even while in health, but much more so in sickness, we should be +cautious of exposing the lungs of the tender infant, in such an +atmosphere, until everything had been properly cleansed, and the +apartments properly ventilated. + + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +The covering of the bed should be sufficiently warm, but never any +warmer than is absolutely necessary to protect the child from +chilliness. The lightest covering which will secure this object is the +best. Perhaps there is nothing in use that, with so little weight, +secures so much heat as what are called "comfortables." + +The clothes should not be "tucked up" at the sides and foot of the bed +with too much care and exactness. For when the bed is once warmed +thoroughly with the child's body, the admission of a little fresh air +into it, when he elevates or otherwise moves his limbs, can do no harm, +but _may_ do much of good, in the way of ventilation. I deem it +important, moreover, to inure children very early to little partial +exposures of this kind. + +Those mothers who, from over-tenderness, and want of correct information +on the subject, pursue a contrary course, and consider it as almost +certain death to have a particle of fresh air reach the bodies of their +infants during their slumbers, are generally sure to outwit themselves, +and defeat their very intentions. For by being thus tender of their +children, it often turns out that whenever the mother is ill, or when on +any other account she ceases to watch over them--and such times must, +in general, sooner or later come--they are much more liable to take cold +or sustain other injury, should they be exposed, than if they had been +treated more rationally. + +I knew a mother who would not trust her children to take care of their +own beds on retiring to rest, as long as they remained in her house, +even though they were twenty or thirty years old. But they had no better +or firmer constitutions than the other children of the same +neighborhood. + +Hardly anything can be more injurious than covering the head with the +bed clothes; and yet some mothers and nurses cover, in this way, not +only their own heads, but those of their children. I have elsewhere +shown how impure the air is, which is imprisoned under the bed clothes. +I hope those mothers who are willing to destroy _themselves_ by covering +up their heads while they sleep, will at least have mercy on their +unoffending infants. + + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +The grand rule on this point is, to wear as little dress during sleep as +possible. Some mothers not only suffer their infants to sleep in the +same shirt, cap, and stockings that they have worn during the day, but +add a night gown to the rest. No cap should be worn during the night, +any more than in the day time. Or if the foolish practice has been +adopted for the day, it should be discontinued at night. It is enough +for those adults whose long hair would otherwise be dishevelled, to wear +night caps, and subject themselves, as they inevitably do, to catarrh +and periodical headache. Children's heads should have nothing on them by +night; nor even by day, except to defend them from the rain or the hot +rays of the sun. + +The stockings, too, should be wholly laid aside at night, unless in the +case of those who are feeble, apt to have their feet cold, or +particularly liable to bowel complaints. Such may be allowed to sleep in +their stockings, but not in those which have been worn all the day. + +Indeed, neither children nor adults should ever wear a single garment in +the night which they have worn during the day. The reason is, that there +are too many causes of impurity in operation while we sleep, without our +wearing the clothes in which we have been perspiring during the +day-time--and which must be already more or less filled with the +effluvia of our bodies. + +It is a very easy thing to have a loose night gown to supply the place +of the shirt we have worn during the day; and if nothing else is +convenient, a spare shirt will answer. But both a night gown and shirt +should never be admitted, especially in warm weather. The garment to +supply the place of the shirt during the night, may be of calico in the +summer, and of flannel in the winter. + +The collar and wristbands of this night dress should be loose; and the +whole garment should be large and long. No article of dress should ever +press upon our bodies, so as in the least to impede the circulation; and +for this reason it is, that writers on physical education have inveighed +so much against cravats, straps, garters, &c. This caution, so important +to all, is doubly so to young mothers, on whom devolves the management +of the tender infant. + +When the child has been perspiring freely during the evening, just +before he is undressed, or when he has just been subjected to the warm +bath, it may be well to use a little care in undressing and exchanging +clothes, to prevent taking cold;--though it should ever be remembered, +that those children who are managed on a rational system will bear +slight exposures with far more safety, than they who have been managed +at random--sometimes, indeed, with great tenderness, but at others, +wholly neglected. + + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +In early infancy, children who are not stuffed rather than fed, may +occasionally be permitted to sleep on their backs, especially if they +incline to do so. But it will be well to encourage them to sleep on one +side, as soon as you can without great inconvenience. + +The right side, as a general rule, is preferable; because the stomach, +which lies towards the left side, is thus left uncompressed, and +digestion undisturbed. I would not, however, require a child to lie +always on the right side, but would occasionally change his position, +lest he should become unable to sleep at all, except in a particular +manner. + +I have said elsewhere, that the head ought to be a little raised, +especially if the child is liable to diseases of the brain. But this +remark, rather hastily thrown out, requires explanation. + +There is so much blood sent by the heart to the head and upper parts of +the system of infants, as to predispose those parts, especially the +brain, to disease. In a horizontal position of the body, there is more +blood sent to the brain than when the body is erect. This will show the +reader, at once, that if the infant is peculiarly exposed to diseases +of the brain--and it certainly is so--he ought to remain in a horizontal +posture as little as possible, except during sleep; and that even then +it is desirable to make his bed in such a manner as to elevate the head +and shoulders as much as we can without compressing the lungs, or +obstructing the circulation in the neck. + +I recommend, therefore, to raise the head of an infant's bedstead a +little higher than the foot; though not so much as to incline him to +slide downwards into the bed, for that would be to produce one evil in +curing another. + +Sir Charles Bell thinks that the common disease of infants called +_diabetes_, arises from their being permitted to sleep on their backs; +and that by breaking up the habit of lying in this position, and +accustoming them to lie on their sides, we shall prevent it. I doubt +whether the effect here referred to, is ever the result of such a cause. +Still I am as much opposed to the _habit_ of sleeping on the back, as +Sir Charles Bell. It is quite injurious to free respiration. + +Closely allied to the subject of bodily position in general, is the +state of particular organs; especially the stomach and the senses. I +have already intimated that in order to have an infant sleep quietly, it +is desirable to darken the room. This is the more necessary, where +infants are unnaturally wakeful. In such cases, not only light should +be excluded from the eye, but sounds from the ear, odors from the +nostrils, &c. A remarkably full stomach is in the way of going quietly +to sleep, whether the person be old or young. Neither infants nor adults +ought to take food for some time previous to their going to sleep for +the night. Great bodily heat, as well as too great cold, is also +unfavorable. If too hot, the temperature of the infant should be +somewhat reduced by exposure to the air; if too cold, it should be +raised in a natural, healthy, and appropriate manner. + + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +In giving directions how to procure pleasant dreams, Dr. Franklin +mentions as a highly important requisition, the possession of a quiet +conscience. A wise prescription, no doubt. + +But infants, as well as adults, in order to sleep quietly, should have +their minds and feelings in a state of tranquillity. The youngest child +has its "troubles;" and it is highly important, if not indispensable, to +_healthy_ sleep, that the mother take all reasonable pains to remove +them before sleep is induced. + +We sometimes hear about children crying themselves to sleep, as if it +were a matter of no consequence; and sometimes, as if it were, on the +contrary, rather desirable. But is the sleep of an adult satisfying, who +goes to bed in trouble, and only sleeps because nature is so exhausted +that she cannot bear the protracted watchfulness any longer? Why then +should we expect it, in the case of the infant? + +I know an excellent father who is so far from believing this doctrine, +that he silences the cries of his child by the word of command--and +believes that in so doing, he promotes both his health and his +happiness. He would no more let him cry himself to sleep than he would +let him cough himself to sleep; though both crying and coughing, in +their places, may be and undoubtedly are salutary. + +Whatever may be the age and circumstances of an individual, he ought to +retire for rest with a cheerful mind. All anxiety about the future, all +regret about the past, all plans even, in regard to the business or +amusement of the morrow, should be kept wholly out of the mind. We +should yield ourselves up to the arms of sleep with the same quietude as +if life were finished, and we had nothing more to do or think of. + + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +The soundness, as well as other qualities, of sleep, differs greatly in +different individuals; and even in the same night, with the same +individual in different circumstances. The first four or five hours of +sleep are usually more sound than the remainder. Hardly anything will +interrupt the repose of some persons during the early part of the night, +while they awake afterwards at the slightest noise or movement--the +chirping of a cricket, or the playing of a kitten. + +In profound sleep, we probably dream very little, if at all; but in +other circumstances, we are constantly disturbed by dreaming, and +sometimes start and wake in the greatest anxiety or horror. + +Nightmare is generally accompanied by dreams of the most distressing +kind. We imagine a wild beast, or a serpent in pursuit of us; or a rock +is detached from some neighboring cliff, and is about to roll upon and +crush us; and yet all our efforts to fly are unavailing. We seem chained +to the spot; but while in the very jaws of destruction, perhaps we +awake, trembling, and palpitating, and weary, as if something of a +serious nature had really happened. + +In the case of nightmare, it is more than probable that we fall asleep +with our stomachs too heavily loaded with food, or with a smaller +quantity of that which is highly indigestible. Or it may sometimes arise +from an improper position of the body, such as disturbs the action of +the stomach or lungs, or of both these organs. Lying on the back, when +we first go to sleep, is very apt to produce nightmare. + +But distressing dreams often follow an evening of anxious cares, +especially if those cares preyed upon us for the last half hour; and +also after late suppers, even if they are light--and late reading. Hence +the injunctions of the last section. Hence, too, the importance of +taking our last meal two or three hours before sleep, and of engaging, +during these hours, in cheerful conversation, and in the social and +private duties of religion. Family and private worship, in the evening, +are enjoined no less by philosophy than they are by christianity; and +every young mother will do well to understand this matter, and train her +offspring accordingly. + +"That sleep from which we are easily roused, is the healthiest," says +Macnish. "Very profound slumber partakes of the nature of apoplexy." I +should say, rather, that a medium between the two extremes is +healthiest. Profound apoplectic sleep, I am sure, is injurious; but +that from which we are too easily roused cannot, it seems to me, +be less so. Thus, I have often gone to sleep with a resolution +to wake at a certain hour, or at the striking of the clock; +and have found myself able to wake at the proposed time, almost +without one failure in twenty instances where I have made the trial. But +my sleep was obviously unsound, and certainly unsatisfying. The desire +to awake at a certain moment or period, seemed to buoy me above the +usual state of healthy sleep, and render me liable to awake at the +slightest disturbance. Were it not for sacrificing the ease of others, +it would be far better, in such cases, to rely upon some person to wake +us, instead of charging our own minds with it. + +The quality of our sleep will be greatly affected by the quantity. But +this thought, if extended, would anticipate the subject of our next +section; so easily does one thing, especially in physical education, run +into or involve another. I will therefore, for the present, only say +that if we confine ourselves to a smaller number of hours than is really +required, our sleep becomes too sound to be quite healthy, as if nature +endeavored to make up in quality, for want of due quantity. On the +contrary, if we attempt to sleep longer than is really necessary to +restore us, the quality of our sleep is not what it ought to be; for we +do not sleep soundly enough. + +The silence and darkness of the night tend to induce sleep of a better +quality than the noise and activity of day. It is unquestionably +desirable that children should be able to sleep, at least occasionally, +without absolute quiet. And yet such sleep cannot be sufficiently sound +to answer the purposes of health, if frequently repeated. + +Hence it is, perhaps--at least in part--that the maxim has obtained +currency, that one hour of sleep before midnight is worth two afterward. +The comparison has probably been made between the quiet and darksome +hours of evening and those which followed daybreak, when light, and +music, and bustle conspire, as they should, to make us wakeful. No +person can sleep as soundly and as effectually, when light reaches his +closed eyes, and sounds strike his ears, as in darkness and silence. He +may sleep, indeed, under almost any circumstances, when fatigue and +exhaustion demand it; but never so profoundly as when in absolute +abstraction of light, and complete quiet. + + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +On this point much might be said, without exhausting the subject. But I +have already observed that infants, when first born, require to sleep +nearly their whole time. As they advance in years, the necessity for +sleep; however, diminishes, until they come to maturity, when it remains +for many years nearly stationary. In advanced age, the necessity for +sleep again increases, till we reach the extremest old age, or what is +usually called second childhood, when we again sometimes sleep nearly +the whole time. + +I have already remarked that much might be said on this subject; but I +do not think that the present occasion requires it. If the suggestions +which are made in the chapter on "Early Rising" should receive the +attention I flatter myself they merit, I do not believe children would +often sleep too long. If, on the contrary, they are suffered to lie late +in the morning, and then sit up late in the evening, all healthful +habits and tendencies will he so deranged or broken up, that nature, in +her indications, will by no means prove the unerring guide which she is +wont to do in other circumstances. + +A few thoughts here, on the quantity of sleep required by the young +after they approach maturity, may not be misplaced. + +Jeremy Taylor thought that for a healthy adult, three hours in +twenty-four were enough for all the purposes of sleep. Baxter thought +four hours about a reasonable time; Wesley, six; Lord Coke and Sir Wm. +Jones, seven; and Sir John Sinclair, eight. These were the _theories_ of +men who were all eminent for their learning, and most of them for their +piety. How far their _practice_ corresponded with their theories, we are +not, in every instance, told. + +But to come to the practice of several persons who have been +distinguished in the world. General Elliot, one of the most vigorous men +of his age, though living for his whole life on nothing but vegetables +and water, and who at sixty-four had scarcely begun to feel the +infirmities of old age, slept but four hours in twenty-four. Frederick +the Great of Prussia, and the illustrious British surgeon, John Hunter, +slept but five hours a day. Napoleon Bonaparte, for a great part of his +life, slept only four hours; and Lord Brougham is said to require no +more. Others, in numerous instances, require but six hours. But there +are others still, who consume eight. + +The conclusion--in my own mind--is, that with a good constitution and +active habits, men may habituate themselves to very different quantities +of sleep. Still I think that six hours are little enough for most +persons; and if a child, on arriving at maturity, is not inclined to +sleep much longer than that, I should not regard him as wasting time. +Most persons, it appears to me, require six hours of sound sleep in +twenty-four;--I mean between the ages of twenty and seventy. + +Macnish is the most liberal modern writer I am acquainted with, in his +allowance of time for sleep. Speaking of the wants of adults he +says--"No person who passes only eight hours in bed can be said to waste +his time in sleep." Yet he obviously contradicts himself on the very +same page; for he says expressly, that when a person is young, strong +and healthy, an hour or two less may be sufficient. But an hour or two +less than eight hours reduces the amount to seven or six hours. And +taking the whole period of life, to which he probably refers--say from +eighteen to forty--into consideration, there is a very considerable +difference between six hours and eight hours a day. If six hours are +"sufficient," it cannot be right to sleep eight hours. + +Let us here make a few estimates. If six hours are sufficient for sleep +between the ages of eighteen and forty, he who sleeps eight hours a day, +actually loses 16,060 hours--equal to nearly two whole years of life, or +about two years and three quarters of time in which we are usually +awake. This, in the meridian of life, is not a small waste. Permit it to +every person now in the United States, and the sum total of wasted time +to a single generation, would be 25,649,098 years--equal to the average +duration of the lives of 854,970 persons. The value of this time, as a +commodity in the market, at a low estimate--only forty dollars a +year--would be over A THOUSAND MILLIONS of DOLLARS! And its value, for +the purposes of mental and moral improvement, cannot be estimated except +in ETERNITY! + +Every young mother must derive from these considerations a motive to +discourage all unnecessary waste of time in sleep; while no one, as I +trust, will forget that to sleep too little is also dangerous to health, +and prejudicial to the general happiness. + + + + +CHAPTER XV. + +EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. How many are burnt up by parental neglect. +"Lecturing" them. What is an early hour? + + +Some writer--I do not recollect who--has said that all children are +naturally early risers. And I cannot help coming to the same conclusion. +That they are not so, is no more proved from the fact that as things now +are they are generally found addicted to the contrary habit, than the +very general neglect of milk among the higher classes of our citizens, +proves that they have not a natural relish for it--when every one knows +that at our first setting out in life, milk is, almost without +exception, the sole article of human sustenance. + +One of the great difficulties in the way of early rising, as I have +already had occasion to say, is late sitting up. If children are not +accustomed to retire till nine or ten o'clock, nor then until they have +been subjected to all the excitements pertaining to fashionable +life--company, heated and impure air, stimulating drink, fruits, +high-seasoned food, and perhaps music--and are become actually feverish, +no one but an ignorant person or a brute ought to expect them to rise +early. Indeed, whatever may have been the cause, and whether it have +operated on high or low life, late retiring will inevitably result in +late rising. The current may be turned out of its course a little while, +it is true, but not always. It will ere long return to its accustomed +channel; perhaps to renew its course with increased pertinacity. + +Everything, in the morning, naturally invites to early rising. The +pleasant light, the music, at certain seasons, of some of the animated +tribes, and the joy which we feel in activity, and in the society of +those whom we love, all conspire to rouse us. If we have retired late, +however, and especially in a feverish condition, so that when we wake we +feel wretched, and, as sometimes happens, more fatigued than when we lay +down, other collateral motives may be needed. + +I have said that everything invites us, in the morning, to rise early; +but it was upon the presumption that our parents, and brothers, and +sisters set us a good example. If parents and other friends lie in bed +late themselves, can anything else be, expected of children? Admitting, +even, that they rise early themselves, if they never speak of early +rising as a pleasure, and connect along with it, in their children's +minds, pleasant associations, they would be unreasonable to expect +otherwise than that their children should cling to the morning couch, +till they are fairly compelled to rise as a relief from pain and +uneasiness. + +But when parents go farther than this, and actually discourage their +children from rising early, and use every means in their power short of +actual punishment--and sometimes even that--to make them lie still till +breakfast, in order that they may be out of the way, what shall we say? +And what is to be expected as the result? + +There is hope, however, under the last circumstances. People sometimes +carry things to an extreme that defeats their very purposes. Thus it +occasionally is, in the case before us. This forbidding children to rise +early, and threatening them if they do, sometimes excites their +curiosity, and leads them to the forbidden course of conduct, simply +_because_ it is forbidden. Not a few persons among us possess the +disposition to be governed by what has sometimes been called the "rule +of contrary." + +I might stop here to show that there is nothing so well calculated to +develope and improve the mind and heart, even of parents themselves, as +the society of those whom God gives them to train for Him and their +country. I might show that not a few of those traits of character which +render the company of many old persons rather irksome, especially to the +young, have their origin in their neglect of the young, and of keeping +up, as long as circumstances will possibly admit, juvenile feelings, +actions, and habits. + +And yet what do we too often witness in life? Is not every effort made +to induce the young to lie in bed late that they may be out of the way? +Are they not placed, as soon as possible after they are up, with the +servants--if unfortunately there are any in the family--that they may be +out of the way? Are they not required to breakfast, and dine, and sup +elsewhere, if possible, that they may be out of the way? Do we not send +them to school, even the Sabbath school, to get them out of the way? Do +not some mothers even dose their infants with stupifying medicines to +lull them to sleep, in order to have them out of the way? And to crown +all, though they are quite too often permitted to sit up late in the +evening, to enjoy that society which they are denied so great a part of +the day-time, are they not occasionally put to bed early that they may +be out of the way, and that the parents may attend late parties, to +indulge in immoral or unhealthy habits? + +In the last instance, they are indeed sometimes put out of the way, in +the result--and with a vengeance. Many a child, nay, many thousands of +children, are burnt up yearly, while their parents are gone abroad in +the evening in quest of that enjoyment which ought to be found in the +bosom of their families. "In Westminster, a part of London, containing +less than two hundred thousand inhabitants, one hundred children were +thus destroyed, during a single year." And the moral results which +occasionally happen are a thousand times worse than burning. But enough +of this. + +The common practice of lecturing the young on the importance of early +rising, may have a good effect on a few; but in general, it is believed +to produce the contrary result. It is, in short, to sum up the whole +matter, the influence of parental example, and the speaking often of the +happiness which early rising affords, with perhaps the occasional +indulgence of the child in a pleasant morning walk, which, if he retires +early enough, are almost certain to produce in him the valuable habit of +early rising. + +But what is an early hour? Some call it early, when the sun is one hour +high; some at sunrise; others, when they hear of an early riser, +suppose he must be one who rises at least by daybreak. + +Midnight is, of course, as near the middle of the night as any hour; and +he who goes to bed four or five hours before midnight, will never +complain of those who insist that _he_ is not an early riser who is not +up by four or five o'clock. In summer, no adult ought to lie in bed +after four o'clock, and no child, except the mere infant, after five. + +Much is said by a few writers, especially Macnish, of the danger of +rising before the sun has attained a sufficient height above the horizon +to chase away the vapors, and remove the dampness. But I must insist +upon earlier rising than this, though we should not choose to venture +abroad. Invigorated and restored as we are by sleep, I cannot think that +the dampness of the morning air is more injurious than the foul air of +some of our sleeping rooms. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI. + +HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +While I have been very particular in enjoining on my readers the +importance of thoroughly ventilating their dwellings, I have also +insisted upon the necessity of taking children abroad, as much as +possible. Not, however, to harden them, so much as to give them a more +free access to air and light than they can have at home; and also--when +they are old enough--to cultivate the faculties of attention, +comparison, &c. + +The practice of attempting to harden children by frequent exposure to +air much colder than that to which they have been accustomed, without +sufficient additional clothing, is open to the same objections which +have been brought against cold bathing. Under the management of a +judicious medical practitioner, it may do great good to a few +constitutions; but its indiscriminate use would injure a thousand +infants for one who was benefited. + +True it is that if the child is protected against cold, no harm, but on +the contrary much good may result, from carrying him abroad into the +fresh air, even in very cold weather. But what can be more painful than +to see the little sufferers carried along when their limbs are purple, +or benumbed with cold? And how idle it is to hope that such exposure +hardens or improves the constitution! + +It is on the same mistaken principle that many adults go thinly clad, +late in the fall. I have seen men in November and December beating and +rubbing their hands, who, on being asked why they did not wear mittens, +replied, that if they should wear one pair of mittens so early in the +season, they should want two in the winter. + +Now I cheerfully admit that to put on additional clothing before the +severity of the weather demands it, actually produces the effect here +supposed; but to endure severe cold, on the contrary, never hardens +anybody. Nay, more, it enfeebles. Cold, when combined with the evils of +_poverty_, produces more mischief and destroys more lives than any one +disease in the whole catalogue of human maladies. + +Adam Smith says that it is not uncommon for mothers in the Highlands of +Scotland, who have borne twenty children, to have only two of them +alive. + +It may be difficult to say whether children are oftener destroyed by +over-tenderness than by neglect, and the evils incident to poverty. Both +extremes are common; while the happy medium--that of conducting a +child's education upon the principles of physiology, is rarely known, +and still more rarely followed. + +I have been much amused, and not a little instructed, by the following +anecdote on this point, from Dr. Dewees: + +We were speaking with a lady who had lost three or four children with +"croup," who informed us she was convinced, from absolute experiment, +that there was nothing like exposure to all kinds of weather to protect +and harden the system. By her first plan of managing her children, which +was by keeping them very warmly clad, she said she lost several by the +croup; but since she had adopted the opposite scheme, her children had +been perfectly healthy, and never had betrayed the slightest disposition +to that terrible disease which had robbed her of her children. + +Perhaps, madam, we observed, you did not, in making your first +experiments, attend to a number of details which might be thought +essential to the plan. You did not probably take the proper precautions +when you sent them into the cold air, or observe what was important for +them when they returned from it. + +"Oh, yes," she replied, "I took every possible care when they, were +going out. I always made them wear a very warm great coat, well lined +with baize, and a fur cape or collar. I always made them wear a +'comfortable' round their necks, made of soft woollen yarn. And as for +their feet, they were always protected by socks or over-shoes lined with +wool or fur, as the weather might be wet or dry." + +Do you believe, madam, they were kept at a proper degree of warmth by +these means? + +"Oh, certainly. Indeed, rather too warm; for they would often be in a +state of perspiration, they told me, when in the open air; especially if +they ran, slid, or skated." + +And what was done when they were thus heated? + +"Oh, they got cool enough before they reached home." + +And would they receive no injury in passing from this state of +perspiration to that of chill? + +"Not at all; for when this happened, I always made them take a little +warm brandy, or wine and water, and made them toast their feet well by +the fire." [Footnote: This absurd custom is a fruitful source of that +distressing condition of the hands and feet, in winter, called +"chilblains."] + +Did they sleep in a cold or warm room? + +"In a warm room. A good fire was always made in the stove before they +went to bed, which kept them quite warm all night." + +Would they never complain of being cold towards morning, when the stove +had become cold? + +"Yes, certainly; but then there were always at hand additional +bed-clothes, with which they could cover themselves." + +And did they always do it? + +"Oh, I suppose so." + +Well, madam, how did you carry your second plan into execution, which +you say was attended with such happy results? + +"I began by not letting them put on their great coats, except when the +weather was so cold as to require this additional covering, and did not +permit them to wear a 'comfortable' or fur round their necks. I took +away their over-shoes, and if their feet chanced to get wet, (for they +were always provided with good sound shoes,) the shoes were immediately +changed, if they were at home. If the weather was wet, or unusually +cold, they were permitted to wear their great coats, but not without. +If they came home very cold, they were not allowed to approach the fire +too soon. I gave them no warm, heating drinks, and accustomed them to +sleep in rooms without fire." + +Who does not recognize, in this second plan for the enjoyment of air and +exercise, as judicious a plan of physical education, so far as it goes, +as can well be pointed out? We were so successful as to convince this +lady, in a very short time, that our own plan of exposing the body was +precisely the one she had pursued with so much success. + +We also inquired of her what plan she pursued with her children, when +too young to be submitted to the rules just mentioned. She informed us +that it was the same system throughout, only the details varied as +circumstances of age, &c. made it necessary. That is, she sent her +children into the open air at very early periods of their lives, +provided in summer it was neither too wet nor too warm; in winter, when +the air was mild, dry and clear--but always carefully wrapped up, that +their little extremities might not suffer from cold. She never suffered +them to sleep in the open air, if it could be avoided; to prevent which, +as much as possible, she constantly charged the nurse to bring the +children home, as soon as she found them disposed to sleep, unless it +was when they were very young, at which time it was impossible to guard +against it. + +And when her children were sufficiently old to walk, she took care to +prepare them properly for it, whether it might be in warm, cold, or +moderate weather. She never sent them abroad for pleasure at the risk of +encountering a storm of any kind; nor permitted them to walk at the +hazard of getting wet or very muddy feet. + +Were the constitutions of your children pretty much the same? we +demanded of this lady. + +"No; one of my boys was extremely feeble, from his very birth." + +Did you treat him precisely as you did the others? + +"Yes, as far as regarded principles; that is, I permitted him to bear as +much of cold, heat or wet as his constitution would endure without pain +or injury. The degrees, however, were very different from those his +brothers bore, had they been determined by the measurement of the +thermometer, but precisely the same in effect, as far as could be +ascertained by consequences. Thus, if he were exposed to the same +temperature as his brothers, he experienced no more inconvenience from +it, when it was very low, than they, because he had additional covering +to protect him." + + + + +CHAPTER XVII. + +SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society illustrated. Early +diffidence. Selecting companions for children. Moral effects of society +on the young. Parents should play with their children. + + +Every mother is unquestionably as much bound to have an eye to the +society of her child, as to his food, drink or clothing. And if the +quality, amount and general character of the latter are important, those +of the former are by no means less so. + +It is indeed true that many a child has been happy, in a degree, in the +society of its mother alone, where the father was seldom seen, and the +brothers and sisters never. And it is equally true; that a few children +have so far preferred the society of their parents alone, as to become +disinclined to other society. But cases of this kind are only as +exceptions to the general rule; and are probably monstrous formations +of character. I cannot believe that any child, rightly educated, would +prefer the society of none but its parents, or even its parents and +brothers and sisters. + +A French author has written a considerable volume on the importance of +what he calls _gaiety_, but which he should prefer to call cheerfulness. +Among the rest, he maintains that it is indispensable to the best +health. But if so--and I do not doubt it--then it ought to be encouraged +in children, and the earlier the better. Now there is no way to +encourage cheerfulness in the young so effectually as by indulging them +with considerable society. + +That the thing may be carried to excess, I have no doubt. I have seen +mothers who permitted their children to play with their mates till they +became excited, and were thus led to continue their sports, not only +farther than cheerfulness and health demanded, but until they were +excessively fatigued, and almost made sick. And I believe that the +excitement of numbers, in infant and other schools, may be so great as +to be injurious, rather than salutary. Still I think these are rare +cases. + +Truth usually lies somewhere between extremes. To keep a child, +especially a boy, always in the nursery, or even in the parlor with his +mother, is one extreme; and to let him go abroad continually, till his +home and its smaller circle become insipid, is the other. A child +properly trained will _usually_ prefer home, and only desire to go +abroad occasionally. He will rather need urging in the matter than +require restraint. + +But he must, at any rate, be taught to be sociable, not only for the +salve of cheerfulness and the consequent health, but for the sake of his +manners, his mind, and his morals. + +If it is a matter of indifference, in the formation of human character, +whether we mix in society or not, then, for anything I can see, an +improvement might be proposed in the construction of the material +universe. Instead of forming the planets so large--and this earth among +the rest--each might have been divided into hundreds of millions; and +every human being might have had a little planet, and an immortality, +exclusively his own. Such an arrangement would certainly prevent a great +many evils; and, among the rest, a great deal of quarrelling and +bloodshed. + +But divine wisdom is higher than human wisdom, and one world to hundreds +of millions of human beings has been made, instead of giving to each +individual of the universe a little world of his own, in which he might +have reigned sole monarch, and only wept, with Alexander, because none +of the other worlds were within his grasp. Where a family is already +large, other society will be unnecessary for some time; but where it +consists of a mother only, although her society is always to be +considered of the _first_ importance, I cannot but think she ought to +take great pains to introduce her child occasionally to the company of +other children. + +That diffidence, which almost destroys the influence and the happiness +of many individuals, is often cherished, if not created, by too much +seclusion. Where there is a natural constitution which predisposes the +child to timidity and diffidence, the danger is greatly increased; and +parents should take unwearied pains to guard against it. + +It is hardly necessary for me to say, that great care should also be +used in selecting the companions of children. Their character will be +greatly influenced for life by their earlier associates. Friendships +between children are sometimes formed, while playing together, which are +interrupted only by death. Those parents who are so fond of controlling +the choice of their sons and daughters in regard to a companion for +life, at a period when control is generally resisted, would do well to +take a hint from what has here been suggested. There is no doubt but +they might often--very often--give such a direction to the embryo +affections of their infants and children, as would terminate only with +their existence. + +It is still less necessary to advert, in a work like this, to the effect +which much observation and experience shows good society to have on +purity, both physical and moral. Every one must have observed its +tendency to form habits of cleanliness, not to say neatness. There may +be excess, even in this. Young persons, of both sexes, often spend too +much time in preparing their dress for the reception or the visiting of +their friends. Still this is only the abuse of a good thing. Nor is it +less true, though it may be less obvious, that moral purity is more +likely to be secured where children and youth of both sexes associate a +great deal, from the earliest infancy. [Footnote: If this principle be +correct, what is the tendency of our numerous schools, which are +exclusively for one sex? Must there not be latent evil to counterbalance +some of the seeming good? For myself, I doubt whether moral character +can ever be formed in due proportion and harmony, where this separation +long exists.] There are tremendous cases of declension on record, which +establish this point beyond the possibility of debate. + +To say that the mother--and indeed both parents--ought to form a part of +the playing circle of the youngest children, in order to watch their +opening dispositions, to check what may be improper, and encourage what +ought to be encouraged, would be only to repeat what has often been +recommended by the best writers on education--but which must be +repeated, again and again, till it leaves an impression, especially on +CHRISTIAN parents. It is strange that many regard this matter as they +do, and appear not only ashamed to be seen sporting with their children, +but almost ashamed to have their children thus occupied. They might as +well be ashamed of the gambols of the kitten or the lamb; or of the +grave mother, as she turns aside occasionally to join in its frolics. +When will parents be willing to take lessons in education from that +brute world which they have been so long accustomed to overlook or +despise? + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII. + +EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Why young ladies, now-a-days, dislike domestic +employments. Miserable housewives--not to be wondered at. Mistake of one +class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +One important and never-to-be-forgotten employment of the young is the +cultivation of their minds; and another, that of their morals. But my +present purpose is only to speak of those employments denominated +manual, or physical. + +It is obvious, at the first glance, that the influence of the mother, in +our own country, at least, will be less over boys than over girls. We +leave it to savages and semi-savages to employ their females, and even +their mothers, in hard manual labor. Here, in America, what I should say +on the employment of boys would be more properly addressed to the YOUNG +FATHER. + +There are some exceptions to the general truth contained in the last +paragraph. Many a mother has--unconsciously at the time, but with no +less certainty than if she had done it intentionally--given a direction +to the whole current of her son's life; and this, too, at a very early +period. The mother of Benjamin West, the painter, if she did not give +the first tendency to his favorite pursuit, while he was yet a mere +child, at the least greatly confirmed him in it, by the manner of +expressing her surprise at one of his early performances. "My mother's +kiss," on that occasion, said he, "made me a painter." Nor are facts of +the same general character by any means uncommon. + +I know a poor mother who, in the absence of her husband at his weekly +or monthly labors, used to detain her eldest boy, then almost an +infant, from going to bed in the evening till her day's work was +finished--because, in her loneliness, she wanted his company--by telling +stories of eminent men, and especially of distinguished philanthropists, +until she had unconsciously kindled in him a philanthropic spirit, which +will not cease to burn till his death. + +But it is in forming the predilections of daughters for their destined +employments, that mothers are especially influential. Not so much by +their set lessons or lectures, however, as by the force of continued +example. No mother who sends her child away to be nursed, and +subsequently to her return seizes on every possible opportunity to keep +her out of the way and out of her sight, will be likely to give her any +choice of employment, or indeed any fondness for employment at all. + +Nor is it sufficient that she keep her daughter constantly under her +eye, with a view to qualify her for the duties of a housewife, if the +daughter see as plainly as in the light of mid-day, that the mother +dislikes the employment herself. She must love what she would have her +daughter love, and even what she would have her understand. Nor is it +sufficient that she _affect_ a fondness for the employment; her love for +it must be real. Little girls have keener eyes and better judgments than +some mothers seem willing to believe or to admit. + +Many persons seem greatly surprised that the young ladies of modern days +have so little fondness for domestic life and domestic duties. How few, +it is often said, will do their own housework, if they can possibly get +a train of domestics around them; even though the care and oversight of +the domestics themselves gear them out more rapidly than bodily labor +would. + +But there is a reason for this hostility to domestic employments. It is +because mothers, almost universally, consider their occupations as mere +drudgery, and bring up their children in the same spirit. And what else +could be expected as the result? It would be an anomaly in the history, +of human nature, if the female members of families were to grow up in +love with ordinary domestic avocations, when they have been accustomed +to see their mothers, and nurses, and elder sisters complaining and +fretting while engaged in them; and showing by their actions, no less +than by their words, that they regarded themselves as miserable and +wretched. + +No wonder so many girls, of the present day, make miserable housewives. +No wonder a factory, a book-bindery, or a shoemaker's shop, is +considered preferable to the kitchen. No wonder the world degenerates, +because females, no longer healthfully employed, become pale and sickly, +spreading gloom and misery all around them, and transmitting the same +ills which themselves suffer to those who come after them. + +It is true, the guilt of this dereliction must not be charged wholly on +mothers; though they ought, unquestionably, to bear a large share of it. +Those who have, and ought to have, much influence in society, +erroneously, and I suppose thoughtlessly, help mothers along in their +evil ways. If there were a universal combination between certain classes +of mankind and the whole race of mothers, to ruin, rather than be +instrumental of reforming mankind, and of saving their deathless souls, +I hardly know how they could invent a much better, or at least a much +more certain plan, than that now in operation. So long as those who take +the lead in society, and govern the fashion in this matter, as others +govern it in the matter of dress, refuse, as a general rule, to form +alliances for life, except with those who practically despise house-hold +concerns--and so long as our houses are filled with domestics, whose +object is to aid these spoiled mothers, but whose real effect is to +complete their ruin, and accelerate the ruin of mankind--just so long +will human progress towards perfection be retarded. + +If mothers were in love with their occupations, and their daughters knew +it, then to the influence of a good example they could add many lessons +of instruction. These might be given in the way of natural, unstudied +conversation, and thus be not only heard with attention, but sink deep. +If the world is ever to be reformed, says Mr. Flint, in his Western +Review, woman, sensible, enlightened, well educated and principled, must +be the original mover in the great work. Every one who has considered +well the extent and nature of female influence, will concur in the +sentiment; and if he have one remaining particle of devotion to the +Father of spirits, he will send up the most fervent petitions to his +throne of mercy in behalf of this often depressed or enslaved half of +the human race, that they may speedily be emancipated, and become as +conspicuous in human redemption, as they have sometimes been in human +condemnation. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX. + +EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Improving the senses. Examples of improvement. SEC. 1. Hearing--how +injured--how improved.--SEC. 2. Seeing--how injured.--SEC. 3. Tasting +and smelling--how benumbed--how preserved.--SEC. 4. Feeling. The blind. +Hints to parents. Education of both hands. + + +Man is much less useful and happy in this world than he would be, if +more pains were taken by parents and teachers, as well as by himself, to +cultivate his senses--hearing, seeing, feeling; tasting, and +smelling--and to preserve their rectitude. + +The extent to which the senses can be improved or exalted, can best be +understood by observing how perfect they become when we are compelled to +cultivate them. Thus the blind, who are obliged to cultivate hearing, +feeling, and smelling, often astonish us by the keenness of these +senses. They will distinguish sounds--especially voices--which others +cannot; and with so much accuracy, as to remember for several years the +voice of a person in a large company, which they hear but once. They +will also distinguish small pieces of money, different fabrics and +qualities of cloth, &c.; and, in walking, often ascertain, by the +feeling of the air, or by other sensations, when they approach a +building, or any other considerable body. So the North American Indian, +whose habits of life seem to require it, can hear the footsteps of an +approaching enemy at distances which astonish us. So also the deaf and +dumb are very keen-sighted, and generally make very accurate +observations. Any reader who is sceptical in regard to the cultivation +of the senses, would do well to consult the account of Julia Brace, the +deaf and dumb and blind girl, as published in some of the early volumes +of the "Annals of Education." + +But it is hardly necessary to resort to the blind, or to savages, or to +the deaf and dumb, in order to prove man's susceptibility in this +respect. We may be reminded of the same fact by observing with what +accuracy the merchant tailor can distinguish, by feeling, the quality of +his goods; how quick a painter, an engraver, or a printer, will discover +errors in painting or printing, which wholly escape ordinary readers or +observers; and how quick the ear of a good musician will discover the +existence and origin of a discordant sound in his choir. + +Now I do not undertake to say or prove, that mankind would be better or +happier for having their senses all cultivated in the highest possible +degree; though I am not sure that this would not be the case. But so +long as a large proportion of our ideas enter our minds through the +medium of the five senses, it is desirable that something should be done +to perfect them, instead of overlooking the whole subject. What mothers +ought to do in this matter, deserves, therefore, a brief consideration. + + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +The suggestion, in another place, to keep away caps from the child's +head, if duly attended to, is one means of perfecting, or at least of +preserving, the sense of hearing. For caps, by the heat they produce to +a part which cannot safely endure an increase of temperature, greatly +expose children to catarrhal affections; and many a catarrh has laid the +foundation for dulness of hearing, if not of actual deafness. + +The ears should be kept clean. If washed sufficiently often, and +syringed once a week with warm milk and water, or with very weak +soap-suds, gently warmed, the cerumen or ear wax will hardly be found +accumulated in such masses as to produce deafness. And yet such +accumulations, with such consequences, are by no means uncommon. It is +not long since a young man with whom I am acquainted, applied to an +eminent surgeon of Boston, on account of deafness in one ear, which had +become quite troublesome, and as it was feared, incurable. Syringing +with a large and strong syringe disengaged a large mass of cerumen, and +hearing was immediately restored. + +Children should be taught to distinguish sounds with closed eyes, or +blindfolded. We may strike on various objects, and ask them to tell what +we struck, &c. This will lead them to _observe_ sounds; and will perfect +their hearing in a remarkable degree. + +There are also advantages to be derived from accustoming a child to a +great variety of sounds; both as regards their strength and character. +But this must only be occasional; for if the ear be constantly +accustomed to sounds of any kind, and more especially those which are +harsh or loud, the organ of hearing is liable to sustain injury. Music, +as it is now beginning to be taught to children in our schools, will do +much, I think, to improve the faculty of hearing. + + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +The sight, says Addison, is the most perfect of all our senses; and this +is unquestionably true. But it is more or less perfect, in different +individuals, according to the early education they have received. +Sometimes, it is true, we are born near-or dim-sighted; but such cases +are comparatively rare. + +The question is sometimes asked why there are so many persons, +now-a-days, who lose their sight, become near-sighted, &c. very young. +It may be difficult to answer this question fully; yet I cannot help +thinking that the following are some of the causes. + +1. The great heat of our apartments, which, together with late hours and +much lamp light, affects the eyes unpleasantly, is believed to be among +the more prominent causes of early decay of sight. Formerly, our +apartments were neither so steadily nor so generally heated; and we rose +earlier, and consequently went to bed earlier. + +2. The fine print of a large proportion of our books, especially our +school books, has done immense injury. I do not believe that reading +fine print, occasionally, for a few moments at a time, or reading by a +very strong or very weak light in the same way, does harm. On the +contrary, I think it may strengthen and improve the sight. It is the +long continuance of these things that does the mischief; and the +mischief thus done is immense. I rejoice that printers and publishers +are beginning of late to use much larger type than they have done for +some years past. + +3. The early use of spectacles does mischief--I mean before they are +needed. After they begin to be needed, there is no advantage in delaying +to use them, as some do, for fear they shall wear them too soon. This is +about as wise as the practice of going cold to harden ourselves. + +4. Reading when we are fatigued, or ill, or have a very full stomach, is +another way to injure the sight. + +5. Rubbing the eyes with the fingers, or with anything else, does +inevitable mischief. The Germans have a proverb which says--"Never touch +your eye, except with your elbow." There is much of good sense in it. + +In short, there are a thousand ways in which that delicate organ, the +human eye, may sustain injury; and nearly as many in which it may be +strengthened, cultivated, and improved. But my limits merely permit me +to add, that the frequent but gentle application of water to the eye, +several times a day, at such a temperature as is most agreeable--but +cold, when it can be borne--is one of the best preservatives of sight +which the world affords. + +Connected alike with physical and intellectual education, is the +practice of measuring by the eye heights, distances, superfices, +weights, and solids. It is not difficult to train the eye to an accuracy +in this matter which would astonish the uninstructed. + + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +I do not know that it is worth our while to take pains, by any direct +methods, to cultivate the organs of taste or smell; but I think it +proper, at the least, to preserve their original rectitude. + +Many, I know, undertake to say, that were it not for our errors in +regard to food and drink, and were it not, in particular, for the +multitude of strange mixtures which tend to benumb those two senses, we +might determine the qualities of food and drink--whether they are +favorable or adverse--by means of taste and smell, like the animals. But +I do not believe this. The Creator has substituted reason, in us, for +instinct in the brute animals. It is not necessary that we should +possess the latter, when the former is so manifestly superior to it; and +accordingly I do not believe that it is given us, or any of that +acuteness of sensation which exists in the dog, the tiger, the vulture, +&c.--and which so closely resembles it. + +There can be no doubt--no reasonable doubt, certainly--that the wretched +customs of modern cookery benumb the senses of taste and smell, more or +less, and that high-seasoned food, condiments, and stimulating drinks do +the same; and should for this reason, were it for no other, be +studiously avoided. + +Closely connected with the organ of taste are the TEETH. A volume might +profitably be written on these--as on the eye. But I will only say that +they should be kept perfectly clean, either by rinsing or brushing, or +both, especially after eating; that they should be permitted to chew all +our food, instead of merely standing by as silent spectators to the +passage of that which is mashed, soaked, chopped, &c.; that they should +not be picked or cleaned with pins, or other equally hard instruments; +that they should not be used to crack nuts or other hard, indigestible +substances; and that the stomach, with which they are apt to sympathize +very strongly, should also be kept in a good and healthy condition. + + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness are generally among the more prolific +sources of a want of acuteness in feeling. The first is a disease, and +may be avoided by a proper diet, and by active mental and bodily +employment. Slovenliness we may of course avoid, whenever there is a +wish to do so, and an abundance of water. + +But the sense of feeling, or especially that accumulation of it which we +call TOUCH, and which seems to be specially located in the balls of the +fingers and on the palm of the hand, is susceptible of a degree of +improvement far beyond what would be the natural result of cleanliness, +and freedom from plethora or corpulence. + +I have already alluded, in my general remarks at the head of this +chapter, to the acuteness of this sense in the blind, as well as in the +dealer in cloths. I might add many more illustrations, but a single one, +in relation to the blind, which was accidentally omitted in that place, +will be sufficient. + +The blind at the Institution in this city, as well as in other similar +institutions, are now taught to read and write with considerable +facility. But how? Most of my readers may have heard how they read, but +I will describe the process as well as I can. A description of their +method of writing is more difficult. + +The letters are formed by pressing the paper, while quite moist, upon +rather large type, which raises a ridge in the line of every letter, and +which remains prominent after the paper is dry. In order to read, the +pupil has to feel out these ridges. A circular ridge on the paper he is +told is O; a perpendicular one, I; a crooked one, S; &c. They read music +and arithmetic printed in a similar manner. A few months of practice, in +this way, will enable an ingenious youth to read with considerable ease +and despatch. + +Now if nothing is wanting but a little training to render the touch so +accurate, would it not be useful to train every child to judge +frequently of the properties of bodies by this sense? And cannot every +one recall to his mind a thousand situations in which a greater accuracy +of this sense would have saved him much inconvenience, as well as +afforded him no little pleasure? + +I shall conclude this section with a few remarks on the HAND. The custom +of neglecting, or almost neglecting the left hand, though nearly +universal, in this country at least, appears to me to be +wrong--decidedly so. For although more blood may be sent to the right +arm than to the left, as physiologists say, yet the difference is not as +great at birth as it is afterward; so that education either weakens the +one or strengthens the other. + +Besides this, we occasionally find a person who is left-handed, as it is +called; that is, his left hand and arm are as much larger and stronger +than the right, as the right is usually stronger than the left. How is +this? Do we find a corresponding change in the internal structure? But +suppose it could be ascertained that such a change did exist, which I +believe has never been done, the question would still arise whether the +difference was the same at birth, or whether the more frequent use of +the left hand has not, in part, produced it. + +I do not mean, here, to intimate that a more frequent use of the left +hand than the right would make new blood-vessels grow where there were +none before. But it would certainly do one thing; it would make the same +vessels carry more blood than they did before, which is, in effect, +nearly the same thing:--for the more blood in the limb, as a general +rule, the more strength--provided the limb is in due health and +exercise. + +The inference which I wish the reader to make from all this is, that +since the left hand and arm, by due cultivation, and without essential +difference or change of structure to begin with, can occasionally be +made stronger than the right, it is fair to conclude that it may, if +found desirable, be always rendered more nearly equal to it than, in +adult years, we usually find it. + +The question is now fairly before us--Is such a result desirable? I +maintain that it is; and shall endeavor to show my reasons. + +How often is one hand injured by an accident, or rendered nearly useless +by disease? But if it should be the right, how helpless it makes us! The +man who is accustomed to shave himself, must now resort to a barber. If +he is a barber himself, or almost any other mechanic, his business must +be discontinued. Or if he is a clerk, he cannot use his left hand, and +must consequently lose his time. Or if amputation chances to be +performed on a favorite arm, how entirely useless to society we are, +till we have learned to use the other! It not only takes up a great deal +of valuable time to acquire a facility of using it, but if we are +already arrived at maturity, we can never use it so well as the other, +during our whole lives; because it is too late in life to increase its +size and strength much by constant exercise. Whereas in youth, it might +have been done easily. + +Is it not then important--for these and many more reasons--to teach a +child to use with nearly equal readiness, both of his hands? But if so, +who can do it better than the mother? And when can it be better done +than in the earliest infancy? When is the time which would be devoted to +it worth less than at this period? + + + + +CHAPTER XX. + +ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + +It is difficult to determine, in regard to many things which concern the +management of the young, whether they belong most properly to moral or +physical education; so close is the connection between the two, and so +decidedly does everything, or nearly everything which relates to the +management of the body, have a bearing upon the formation of moral +character. This work might be extended very much farther, did it comport +with my original plan. But I hasten to close the volume, with a few +thoughts on certain abuses of the body, which prevail to a greater or +less extent in families and schools; and to which I have not adverted +elsewhere. + +The seats of children are usually bad, both at table and elsewhere. It +seems not enough that we condemn them to the use of knives, forks, +spoons, &c., of the same size with those of adults. We go farther; and +give them chairs of the same height and proportion with our own. There +are a few exceptions to the truth of this remark. Here and there we see +a child's chair, it is true--but not often. + +But how unreasonable is it to seat a child in a chair so high that his +feet cannot reach the floor; and so constructed that there is no outer +place on which the feet can rest. What adult would be willing to sit in +so painful a posture, with his legs dangling? No wonder children dislike +to sit much, in such circumstances. And it is a great blessing to both +parent and child that they do. No wonder children hate the Sabbath, +especially in those families where they are compelled to keep the day +holy by sitting motionless! Sabbath schools, though they bring with them +some evil along with a great deal of good, are a relief to the young in +this particular--especially if their seats are more comfortable +elsewhere than at home. They consider it much more tolerable to spend +the morning and intermission of the day in going and returning from +Sabbath school, than in constant and close confinement. They prefer +variety, and the occasional light and air of heaven, to monotony and +seclusion and silence. + +It happens, however, that the seats at the Sabbath school and at church, +are not always what they should be; nor, so far as church is concerned, +do I see that this evil can be wholly avoided. Children usually sit with +their parents, in the sanctuary--and they ought to do so: and the height +of the seats cannot, of course, accommodate both. If there is a building +erected solely for the use of the Sabbath school, the seats may be +constructed accordingly, without seriously incommoding anybody; but in +the church, I do not see, as I have once before observed, how the evil +can be remedied. + +The greatest trouble in regard to seats, however, is at the day school; +especially in our district or common schools. There, it is usual for +children to be confined six hours a day--and sometimes two in +succession--to hard, narrow, plank seats, a large proportion of which +are without backs, and raised so high that the feet of most of the +pupils cannot possibly touch the floor. There, "suspended," as I have +said in another work, [Footnote: See a "Prize Essay," on School Houses, +page 7.] "between the heavens and the earth, they are compelled to +remain motionless for an hour or an hour and a half together." + +I have also shown, in the same essay, that in regard to the desks, and +indeed many other things which pertain to, or are connected with the +school, very little pains is taken to provide for the physical welfare +or even comfort of the pupils; and that a thorough reform on the subject +appears to be indispensable. + +When I speak of hard plank seats, let me not be understood as hinting at +the necessity of cushions. When I wrote the essay above mentioned, I did +indeed believe that they were desirable. But I am now opposed to their +use, either by children or adults, even where a laborious employment +would seem to demand a long confinement to this awkward and unnatural +position. If our seats are cushioned, we shall sit too easily. I believe +that our health requires a hard seat; because its very hardness inclines +us to change, frequently, our position. + +But if we must sit, be it ever so short a time, our seats should always +have backs; and those which are designed for children, should not be so +high as to render them uncomfortable. Nor should the backs of seats be +so high as they usually are, either for children or adults. They should +never come much higher than the middle of the body. If they reach the +shoulders, they either favor a crouching forward, or interfere with the +free action of the lungs. + +This might be deemed a proper place for saying something on the position +of children in manufactories. But here a world of abuse opens upon my +view, the full development of which demands a large volume. How many +crooked spines, emaciated bodies, decaying lungs, as well as scrofulas, +fevers, and consumptions, are either induced or accelerated by these +unnatural employments! I mean they are unnatural for the _young_. As to +employing adults in them, I have nothing at present to say. But when I +think of the cruel custom of placing children in these places, whose +bodies--and were this the place, I might add, _minds_--are immature, and +especially girls, I am compelled, by the voice of conscience, and, as I +trust, by a regard to those laws which God has established in our +physical frames, but which are yet so strangely violated, to protest +against it. Better that no factories should exist, than that children +should be ruined in them as they now are. Better by far that we should +return, were it possible, to the primitive habits of New England--to +those by-gone days when mothers and daughters made the wearing apparel +of themselves and their families--when, if there was less of +intellectual cultivation, and less money expended for luxuries and +extravagances, there was much more of health and happiness. + +There is one more species of abuse to which, in closing, I wish to +direct maternal attention. I allude to injudicious modes of inflicting +corporal punishment. + +Let me not be understood to appear, in this place, as the advocate of +bodily punishments of any kind; for if they are even admissible under +some circumstances, I am fully convinced that in the way in which they +are commonly administered, they do much more harm than good. + +But leaving the question of their utility, in the abstract, wholly +untouched, and taking it for granted, for the present, that they are--as +is undoubtedly the fact--sometimes employed, and will continue to be so +for a great while to come, I proceed to speak of their more flagrant +abuses. + +Among these, none are more reprehensible than blows of any kind on the +head. Even the rod is objectionable for this purpose, since it exposes +the eyes. But the hand--in boxing the ears or striking in any way--is +more so. The bones of the head, in young children, are not yet firmly +knit together, and these concussions may injure the tender brain. I +know of whole families, whose mental faculties are dull, as the +consequence--I believe--of a perpetual boxing and striking of the head. +Some individuals are made almost idiots, in this very manner.--But the +worst is not yet told. Many teachers are in the habit of striking their +pupils' heads with thick heavy books; and with wooden rules. I have seen +one of the latter, of considerable size and thickness, broken in two +across the head of a very small boy; and this, too--such is the public +mind--in the presence of a mother who was paying a visit to the school. +I have seen parents and masters strike the heads of their children with +pieces of wood, of much larger size;--in one instance with a common +sized tailor's press-board; in another with the heavy end of a wooden +whip-handle, about an inch in diameter. + +Children are sometimes severely beaten across the middle of the +body--the region where lie the vital organs--the lungs, the heart, the +liver, &c. They are sometimes beaten too, across the joints, or in any +place that the excited, perhaps passionate teacher or parent can reach. +Rules and books are thrown with violence at pupils in school. There is a +story in the "Annals of Education," Vol. IV. at page 28, of a teacher +who threw a rule at a little boy, six years old, which struck him with +great force, within an inch of one of his eyes. Had it struck a little +nearer to his nose, it would, in all probability, have destroyed his +left eye. + + * * * * * + +But without extending these remarks any farther, every intelligent +mother who reads what I have already written, will see, as I trust, the +necessity of properly informing herself on the great subject of physical +education; and of being better prepared than she has hitherto been for +acquitting herself, with satisfaction, of those high and sacred +responsibilities which, in the wise arrangements of Nature and +Providence, devolve upon her. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 10482 *** diff --git a/10482-h/10482-h.htm b/10482-h/10482-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc7723d --- /dev/null +++ b/10482-h/10482-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,7667 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content= + "text/html; charset=UTF-8"> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of THE YOUNG MOTHER, by WM. A. ALCOTT. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + <!-- + * { font-family: Times;} + P { text-indent: 1em; + margin-top: .75em; + margin-left: 2em; + margin-right: 2em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; } + P.sec { margin-top: .75em; + margin-left: 1em; + margin-right: 2em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; } + + blockquote { margin-left: 4em; + margin-right: 4em; } + blockquote.small { font-size: 90%; + margin-left: 4em; + margin-right: 4em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; } + H4.ind { text-align: left; + margin-left: 1em; } + HR { width: 65%; } + hr.chapterEnd { width: 65%; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;} + + --> + </style> + + </head> + <body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 10482 ***</div> + +<H1>THE YOUNG MOTHER</H1> + +<h2>or</h2> + +<h1>Management of Children in Regard to Health.</H1> + +<H2>BY WM. A. ALCOTT</H2> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<center>1836.</center> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + + + +<h5>ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION.</h5> + +<p>The present edition has been much enlarged. The author has added a +section on the conduct and management of the mother herself, besides +several other important amendments and additions. The whole has also +been carefully revised, and we cannot but indulge the hope that no +popular work of the kind will be found more perfect, or more worthy of +the public confidence.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<h3>CONTENTS.</h3> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_I.">CHAPTER I. THE NURSERY.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Importance of a Nursery—generally overlooked. Its +walls—ceiling—windows—chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_II."> +CHAPTER II. TEMPERATURE.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General principle—"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove—railing around it. Excess of heat—its dangers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_III."> +CHAPTER III. VENTILATION.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air arising from lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping—its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation—camphor, vinegar.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV."> +CHAPTER IV. THE CHILD'S DRESS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General principles—1. To cover us; 2. To defend us from cold; 3. from +injury.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Swathing the Body.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Buffon's remarks. Transforming children into mummies. Use of a belly-band. +Evils produced by having it too tight. Cripples sometimes made. Absurdity +of confining the arms. Infants should be made happy.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Form of the Dress.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Curious suggestion of a London writer. Advantages of his plan. Killing +with kindness. Dr. Buchan's opinion. Conformity to fashion. Tight-lacing +the chest. Its effects—dangerous. Physiology of the chest. Its motions. +An attempt to make the subject intelligible. Serious mistakes of some +writers. Appeal to facts. Color of females. Their breathing. Their +diseases. Customs of Tunis. Our own customs little less ridiculous.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Material.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Flannel in cold weather. Its use—1. As a kind +of flesh brush; 2. As a protection against taking cold; 3. As means of +equalizing the temperature. Clothing should be kept clean—often +changed—color—lightness—softness. Cotton apt to take fire. Silk +expensive. Linen not warm enough. Flannel under-clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Quantity.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The power of habit, in this respect. Opinion that no clothing is +necessary. Anecdote of Alexander and the Scythian. Argument from +analogy. Begin right, in early life. We generally use too much +clothing. Should clothing be often varied?—objections to it. Avoid +dampness.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>Caps.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">How caps produce disease. Nature's head-dress. Miserable apology for +caps. What diseases are avoided by going with the head bare. Judicious +remarks of a foreign writer. Covering the "open of the head." Wetting +the head with spirits.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Hats and Bonnets.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Hats usually too warm. No covering needed in the house; and but little +in the sun or rain. Is it dangerous to go with the head always bare?</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>Covering for the Feet.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The feet should be well covered. Why. Rule of medical men. No garters. +Objections to covering the feet considered. Shoes useful. Not too thick. +Thick soles. Mr. Locke's opinion.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>Pins.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">These ought not to be used. Why. Substitutes. Practice of Dr. Dewees. +Needles—their danger. Shocking anecdote.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Remaining Wet.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Changing wet clothing. Monstrous error—its evils. Clean as well as dry. +A lame excuse for negligence. No excuse sufficient but poverty.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on the Dress of Boys.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Every restraint of body or limb injurious. Tight jackets. Stiff stocks +and thick cravats. Boots. Evils of having them too tight. A painful +sight.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 11. <i>On the Dress of Girls.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Clothing should be loose for girls or boys. Girls to be kept warmer than +boys. Few girls comfortable, at home or abroad. Going out of warm rooms +into the night air. How it promotes disease.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_V."> +CHAPTER V. CLEANLINESS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI."> +CHAPTER VI. BATHING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Practice of savage nations. Rather dangerous. Mistake of Rousseau. +Plunging into cold water at birth may produce immediate death. Hundreds +injured where one is benefited. Spirits added to the water. First +washings of the child—should be thorough. Rules in regard to the +temperature of both the water and the air. Washing an introduction to +bathing. Hour for bathing changes with age. Temperature of the water. +Size of a bathing vessel. Unreasonable fears of the warm bath. How they +arose. A list of common whims. Apology for opposing cold baths. Dr +Dewees' eight objections to them. Does cold water harden? Cold bath +sometimes useful under the care of a skilful physician. Its danger in other +cases. Rules for using the cold bath, if used at all. Securing a glow after +it. General management. Proper hour. Coming out of the bath. Dressing. +Singing. Bathing after a meal. Local bathing. Tea-spoonful of water in the +mouth. Its use. The shower bath. Vapor bath. Medicated bath. Sponging. +Conveniences for bathing indispensable to every family. General neglect +of bathing. Attention of the Romans to this subject. We treat domestic +animals better than children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII."> +CHAPTER VII. FOOD.</a></h4> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>General Principles.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The mother's milk the only appropriate food of infants. Unreasonableness +of some mothers. The tendency to ape foreign fashions. Nursing does not +weaken the mother.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Conduct of the Mother.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Much depends on the mother. Opinions of medical societies. Mothers +sometimes make children drunkards. The general fondness for excitements. +Hints to those whom it concerns. Caution to mothers. Opinions of Dr. +Dewees. Slavery of mothers to strong drink and exciting food. Opinions +of the Charleston Board of Health.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Nursing, how often.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Children should never be nursed to quiet them. Stomach must have time +for rest. Regular seasons for nursing. Once in three hours. Difference +of constitution. Indulgence does not strengthen. Feeble children require +the strictest management. Nothing should be given between meals.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Quantity of Food.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Errors. Repetition of aliment. Variety. Children over-fed. Appetite not +a safe guide. Training to gluttony. Illustrations of the principle. +Mankind eat twice as much as is necessary.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>How long should Milk be the only Food?</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">First change in diet. Objections of mothers. Choice bits. Ignorance of +the nature of digestion. What digestion is. Food which the author of +nature assigned.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>On Feeding before Teething.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">When feeding before teething is necessary. Diet of mothers. Substitute +for the mother's milk. How prepared. Variety not necessary to the +infant. Milk best from the same cow. Vessels in which it is used should +be clean. Sweet milk not heated too much. Not frozen. Disgusting +practices. Pure water. If not pure, boil it. Best of sugar. Is sugar +injurious? When the state of the mother's health forbids nursing. Use of +sucking-bottles. Feeding should in all cases be slow. Jolting children +after eating. Tossing. Sucking-bottle as a plaything. Evils of using it +as such. Dirty vessels. Poisonous ones. Character of nurses. Nursing at +both breasts. Age of the nurse. Parents should have the oversight, even +of a nurse.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>From Teething to Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Proper age for weaning. Cullen's opinion. Proper season of the year. +When the teeth have fairly protruded. First food given. New forms of +food. Animal broth.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>During the Process of Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The spring the best time for weaning. Should not be too sudden. The +process—how managed. Exciting an aversion to the breast. What solid +food should first be given. Buchan's opinion. Health of the mother. She +should—if possible—avoid medicine.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Food subsequently to Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Views of Dr. Cadogan. Half the children that come into the world go out +of it before they are good for anything. Why? Owing chiefly to errors in +nursing, feeding, and clothing. Simplicity of children's food. Picture +of a modern table. Every dish tortured till it is spoiled. Plain, simple +food, generally despised. How bread is now regarded. How it ought to be. +Mr. Locke's opinion in favor of bread for young children, and against +the use of animal food. Does not differ materially from that of most +medical writers. Vegetable food generally preferred to animal. What is +true of youth, in this respect, is true of every age, with slight +exceptions. Who require most food. Mere bread and water not best. Bread +the staple article of diet. Best kind of bread. Objections to it. How +groundless they are. Fondness, for hot, new bread not natural. Fondness +of change. What it indicates. How it is caused. Train up a child in the +way he should go. We can like what food we please. Second best kind of +bread. Other kinds. Plain puddings. Indian cakes. Salt may be used, in +moderate quantity, but no other condiments. Of butter, cheese, milk, &c. +Potatoes, turnips, onions, beets, and other roots. Beans, peas, and +asparagus. No fat or gravies should be used.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on Fruit.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Diversity of opinion. The cholera. Fruits useful. Seven plain rules in +regard to them. Other rules. A mistake corrected. Fruit before +breakfast. Four arguments in its favor. Particular fruits. Apples. Why +fruits brought to market are generally unfit to be eaten. Are good, ripe +fruits difficult of digestion? Cooking the apple? A man who lives +entirely on apples. Cutting down orchards. Pears, peaches, melons, +grapes. Mixing improper substances with summer fruits.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 11. <i>Confectionary.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Confectionary sometimes poisonous. Case in New York. All, or nearly +all confectionaries injurious. Physical evils attending their use. +Intellectual evils. Moral evils. The last most to be dreaded. Slaves +to confectionary are on the road to gluttony, drunkenness, or +debauchery—perhaps all three.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 12. <i>Pastry.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Dr. Paris's opinion of pastry. Various forms of it. Hot flour bread a +species of it. Produces, among other evils, eruptions on the face. +Appeal to mothers.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 13. <i>Crude, or Raw Substances.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Salads, herbs, &c.—raw—cooked. Nuts, spices, mustard, horseradish, +onions, cucumbers, pickles, &c. None of these should be used, except as +medicine.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII."> +CHAPTER VIII. DRINKS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk +and water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad +food and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischiefs they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_IX."> +CHAPTER IX. GIVING MEDICINE.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_X."> +CHAPTER X. EXERCISE.</a></h4> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Rocking in the Cradle.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Objections to the use of cradles. Under what circumstances they are +least objectionable.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Carrying in the Arms.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Carrying in the arms a suitable exercise for the first two months of +life. Danger of too early sitting up. Improper position in the arms. +Mothers must see to this themselves. Motion in the arms should be +gentle. No tossing, running, or jumping. Infants should not always be +carried on the same arm.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Creeping.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Creeping useful to health. Why. Go-carts and leading strings prohibited. +The longer children creep, the better. Their progress in learning to +stand. Let it be slow and natural. Let it be, as much as possible, by +their own voluntary efforts.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Walking.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Walking in the nursery. Walking abroad. Hoisting children into carriages. +Walks should not become fatiguing.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>Riding in Carriages.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Carriages useful before children can walk. Their construction. Should be +drawn steadily. Position of the child in them: Falling asleep. How long +this exercise should be continued.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Riding on Horseback.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Never safe for infants. Riding schools. Objections to riding on +horseback, while very young. Tends to cruelty and tyranny.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XI."> +CHAPTER XI. AMUSEMENTS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes—pictures—shuttlecock—the rocking horse—tops and +marbles—backgammon—checkers—morrice—dice—nine-pins—skipping the +rope—trundling the hoop—playing at ball—kites—skating and +swimming—dissected maps—black boards—elements of letters—dissected +pictures.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XII."> +CHAPTER XII. CRYING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIII."> +CHAPTER XIII. LAUGHING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIV."> +CHAPTER XIV. SLEEP.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. A prevalent mistake. A hint to fathers. Few Catos. +Everything left to mothers.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Hour for Repose.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Night the season of repose, generally. Infants require all hours. +Sleeping in dark rooms. Excess of caution. Habit of sleeping amid noise.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Place.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Where the infant should sleep. Why alone. Poisoning by impure air. +Illustration. Proofs. Friedlander. Dr. Dewees. Destruction of children +by mothers. Anecdote. Moral reasons for having children sleep alone. +Sleeping with the aged. Sleeping with cats and dogs.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3 <i>Purity of the Air.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Nurseries. Windows open during the night. Lowering them from the top. +Habit of Dr. Gregory. Going abroad in the open air.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>The Bed.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">No feathers should be used. They are too warm. Their effluvia +oppressive. Other objections to their use. Mattresses. Air beds. Beds of +cut straw. Soft beds. Testimony of physicians. The pillow. Dampness. +Curtains. Warming the bed. Beds recently occupied by the sick.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>The Covering.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Light covering. Mistakes of some mothers. Covering the head with bed +clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Night Dresses.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">As little dress during sleep as possible. No caps. No stockings. Loose +night shirt. No tight articles of nightdress. Frequent exchanging of +clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>Posture of the Body.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Sleeping on the back—on the sides. Position of the head. The infant's +bedstead. Sir Charles Bell. Darkening the room.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>State of the Mind.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Mental quiet favorable to sleep. Crying to sleep. A good father. All +anxiety should be avoided.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Quality of Sleep.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Soundness of our sleep. Nightmare. How produced. Late reading. Late +suppers. Influence of religion on sleep. Different opinions about sleep. +Truth midway between extremes. Effect of silence and darkness on our +sleep. Of sleep before midnight. Light unfavorable to sleep.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Quantity.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need to sleep nearly the whole time. Number of hours required +for sleep. Opinions of eminent men. The author's own opinion. Statements +of Macnish. Estimates on the loss of time by over-sleeping. Hint to +young mothers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XV."> +CHAPTER XV. EARLY RISING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. Burning them up. "Lecturing" them. What is an early +hour?</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVI."> +CHAPTER XVI. HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal—over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVII."> +CHAPTER XVII. SOCIETY.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society. Early diffidence. +Selecting companions. Moral effects of society on the young. Parents +should play with their children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVIII."> +CHAPTER XVIII. EMPLOYMENTS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Disliking domestic employments. Miserable housewives—not +to be wondered at. Mistake of one class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIX."> +CHAPTER XIX. EDUCATION OF THE SENSES.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Extent to which the senses can be improved. Case of the blind. The +Indians. Julia Brace. Tailors, painters, &c.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Hearing.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Injury done by caps. Syringing the ears. Anecdote of deafness from +neglect. Means of improving the hearing.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Seeing.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Importance of seeing. Near-sighted people—why so common. Heat of our +rooms. Very fine print. Spectacles. Reading when tired. Rubbing the +eyes. Cold water to the eyes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Tasting and Smelling.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Benumbing the senses. How this has often been done. The teeth. How to +preserve them.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Feeling.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Corpulence and slovenliness. Sense of touch. The blind—how taught to +read. Hint to parents. The hand. Neglecting the left hand. Physiology of +the hand and arm. Evils of being able to use but one hand. Both should +be educated.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XX."> +CHAPTER XX. ABUSES.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school—at church—at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers.</blockquote> + + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> +<br> + +<h3>PREFACE.</h3> + +<p>There is a prejudice abroad, to some extent, against agitating the +questions—"What shall we eat? What shall we drink? and Wherewithal +shall we be clothed?"—not so much because the Scriptures have charged +us not to be over "anxious" on the subject, as because those who pay the +least attention to what they eat and drink, are supposed to be, after +all, the most healthy.</p> + +<p>It is not difficult to ascertain how this opinion originated. There are +a few individuals who are perpetually thinking and talking on this +subject, and who would fain comply with appropriate rules, if they knew +what they were, and if a certain definite course, pursued a few days +only, would change their whole condition, and completely restore a +shattered or ruined constitution. But their ignorance of the laws which +govern the human frame, both in sickness and in health, and their +indisposition to pursue any proposed plan for their improvement long +enough to receive much permanent benefit from it, keep them, +notwithstanding all they say or do, always deteriorating.</p> + +<p>Then, on the other hand, there are a few who, in consequence of +possessing by nature very strong constitutions, and laboring at some +active and peculiarly healthy employment, are able for a few, and +perhaps even for many years, to set all the rules of health at defiance.</p> + +<p>Now, strange as it may seem, these cases, though they are only +exceptions (and those more apparent than real) to the general rule, are +always dwelt upon, by those who are determined to live as they please, +and to put no restraint either upon themselves or their appetites. For +nothing can be plainer—so it seems to me—than that, taking mankind by +families, or what is still better, by larger portions, they are most +free from pain and disease, as well as most healthy and happy, who pay +the most attention to the laws of human health, that is, those laws or +rules by whose observance alone, that health can be certainly and +permanently secured.</p> + +<p>But these families and communities are most healthy and happy, not +because they live in a proper manner, by fits and starts, but because +they have, from some cause or other, adopted and persevered in HABITS +which, compared with the habits of other families, or other communities, +are preferable; that is, more in obedience to the laws which govern the +human constitution. Not that even <i>they</i> are "without sin" or error on +this subject—gross error too—but because their errors are fewer or +less destructive than those of their neighbors.</p> + +<p>Now is it possible that any intelligent father or mother of a family, +whose diet, clothing, exercise, &c. are thus comparatively well +regulated, would derive no benefit from the perusal of works which treat +candidly, rationally, and dispassionately, on these points? Is there a +mother in the community who is so destitute of reason and common sense +as not to desire the light of a broader experience in regard to the +tendency of things than she has had, or possibly can have, in her own +family? Is there one who will not be aided by understanding not only +that a certain thing or course is better than another, but also WHY it +is so?</p> + +<p>It is by no means the object of this little work to set people to +watching their stomachs from meal to meal, in regard to the effects of +food, drink, &c.; for nothing in the world is better calculated to make +dyspeptics than this. It is true, indeed, that some things may be +obviously and greatly injurious, taken only once; and when they are so, +they should be avoided. But in general, it is the effect of a habitual +use of certain things for a long time together—and the longer the +experiment the better—which we are to observe.</p> + +<p>A book to guide mothers in the formation of early good habits in their +offspring, should be the result of long observation and much experiment +on these points, but more especially of a thorough understanding of +human physiology. It should not consist so much of the conceits of a +single brain—perhaps half turned—as of the logical deductions of +severe science, and facts gleaned from the world's history.</p> + +<p>Here is a nation, or tribe of men, bringing up children to certain +habits, from generation to generation—and such and such is their +character. Here, again, is another large portion of our race, who, under +similar circumstances of climate, &c. &c., have, for several hundred +years, educated their children very differently, and with different +results. A comparison of things on a large scale, together with a close +attention to the constitution and relations of the human system, affords +ground for drawing conclusions which are or may be useful. If this book +shall not afford light derived from such sources, it were far better +that it had never been written. If it only sets people to watching over +the effects of things taken or used only for a single day, instead of +leading them from early infancy to form in their children such habits as +will preclude, in a great measure, the necessity of watching ourselves +daily, then let the day perish from the memory of the writer, in which +the plan of bringing it forth to the world was conceived. But he is +confident of better things. He does not believe that a work which, to +such an extent, GIVES THE REASON WHY, will be productive of more evil +than good. On the contrary, it must, if read, have the opposite effect.</p> + +<p>I do not deny that even after the formation of the best habits, there +will be a necessity of paying some attention to what we eat and what we +drink, from day to day, and from hour to hour; but only that the +tendency of this work is not to increase this necessity, but on the +contrary, to diminish it. In my own view; these occasions of inquiry in +regard to what is right, <i>physically</i> as well as <i>morally</i>, are one part +of our trials in this world—one means of forming our characters. We are +constantly tempted to excess and to error, in spite of the most firm +habits of self-denial which can be formed. If we resist temptation, our +characters are improved. And it is by self-denial and self-government in +these smaller matters, that we are to hope for nearly all the progress +we can ever make in the great work of self-education. Great trials of +character come but seldom; and when they come, we are often armed +against them; but these little trials and temptations, coming upon us +every hour—these it is, after all, that give shape to our characters, +and make us constantly growing either better or worse, both in the sight +of God and man. But, as I have repeatedly said, the object of this work +is to diminish rather than to increase the frequency of these trials, +useful though they may be, if duly improved, in the formation of +virtuous, and even of holy character.</p> + +<p>There is a sense in which every infant may be said to be born healthy, +so that we may not only adopt the language of the poet, Bowring, and +say</p> + +<span style="layout-flow: horizontal; margin-left: 8em;">—"a child is born;</span><br> +<span style="layout-flow: horizontal; margin-left: 6em;">Take it, and make it a bud of <i>moral</i> beauty,"</span><br> + +<p>but we may also add—Take it and make it beautiful <i>physically</i>. For +though a hereditary predisposition undoubtedly renders some individuals +more susceptible than others to particular diseases, yet when the bodily +organization of an infant is complete, and the degree of vitality which +nature gives it is sufficient to propel the machinery of the frame, it +can scarcely be regarded as in any other state than that of health.</p> + +<p>Now if it be the intention of divine Providence (and who will doubt that +it is?) that the animal body should be capable of resisting with +impunity the impressions of heat, cold, light, air, and the various +external influences to which, at birth, it is subjected, it may be +properly asked why this primitive state of health cannot be maintained, +and diseases, and medicines, and even PREVENTIVES wholly avoided.</p> + +<p>But the reason is obvious. Civilized society has placed the human race +in artificial circumstances. Instead of listening to the dictates of +reason, making ourselves acquainted with the nature of the human +constitution, and studying to preserve it in health and vigor, we yield +to the government of ignorance and presumption. The first moment, even, +in which we draw breath, sees us placed under the control of individuals +who are totally inadequate to the important charge of preserving the +infant constitution in its original state, and aiding its progress to +maturity. And thus it is that though infants, as a general rule, may be +said to be born healthy, few actually remain so. Seldom, indeed, do we +find a person who has arrived at maturity wholly free from disease, even +in those parts of our country which are reckoned to have the most +healthy climate.</p> + +<p>It is indeed commonly said, that a large proportion, both of children +and adults, among the agricultural portion of our population, are +healthy. But it is not so. There is room for doubt whether, on the +whole, the farmers of this country are healthier than the mechanics, or +much more so than the manufacturers; or the whole mass of the country +population healthier than that of the crowded city. The causes of +disease are sufficiently numerous, in all places and conditions; and +this will continue to be the fact, not merely until parents and teachers +shall become more enlightened, but until many generations have been +trained under their enlightened influence.</p> + +<p>If the children and adults among our agricultural population derive from +their employments in the open air a more ruddy appearance than those +either of the city or country who are confined more to their rooms; or +to a vitiated atmosphere, and to numerous other sources of disease, and +if they <i>appear</i> more favored with health, I have learned, by accurate +observation, that these appearances are somewhat deceptive. Their active +sports and employments in the open air give them a stronger appetite +than any other class of people; and the indulgence of this appetite, not +only with articles which are heating or indigestible in their nature, +but with an unreasonable quantity even of those which are considered +highly proper, is almost in an exact proportion. And it is hence +scarcely possible for the causes of disease and premature death to be +more operative in factories and in cities than in farm houses and the +country. Indeed it may be questioned whether the abuses of the ANIMAL +part of man—more common in some of their forms in country than in +city—though they may be less conspicuous, are not more certainly and +even more immediately destructive than those abuses which, in city life, +and bustle, and competition, affect more the MORAL nature.</p> + +<p>Be that as it may, however—for this is not the place for the grave +discussion of so broad a question—one thing, to my mind, is perfectly +clear, namely, that until physical education shall receive more +attention from all those who hold the sacred office of instructors of +the young, humanity can neither be much elevated nor improved. Mothers +and schoolmasters especially—they who, as Dr. Rush says, plant the +seeds of nearly all the good or evil in the world—must understand, most +deeply and thoroughly, the laws which regulate the various provinces of +the little world in which the soul resides, and which, like so many +states of a great confederacy, have not only their separate interests +and rights, but certain common and general ones; as well as those laws +by which the human constitution is related to and connected with the +objects which everywhere surround, and influence, and limit, and extend +it.</p> + +<p>This book contains little, if anything, new to those who are already +familiar with anatomy and physiology. Indeed, whatever may be its +claims, its merits or its demerits, it disclaims novelty. It is, indeed, +in one point of view, <i>original</i>;—I mean in its form, manner, and +arrangement. What I have written is chiefly from my own resources—the +results of patient study and observation, and careful reflection; but +that study and observation of human nature, and this reflection, have +been greatly aided by reading the writings of others.</p> + +<p>In the prosecution of the task which I had assigned myself, no work has +been of more service to me than an octavo volume of 548 pages, by Dr. +Wm. P. Dewees, of Philadelphia, entitled, "A Treatise on the Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children." It is one of the most valuable works +on Physical Education in the English language, as is evident from the +fact that notwithstanding its expense—three or four dollars—it has, in +nine years, gone through five editions. If it were written in such a +style, and published at such a price as would bring it within reach of +the minds and purses of the mass of the community, its sale would have +been, I think, much greater still; and the good which it has +accomplished would have been increased ten-fold.</p> + +<p>If the "YOUNG MOTHER" should be favorably received by the American +community, and prove extensively useful, it will undoubtedly be owing to +the fact that it presents so large a collection of facts and principles +on the great subject of physical education, in a manner so practical, +and at a price which is very low. To accomplish an object so desirable +is by no means an easy task. It was once said by the author of a huge +volume, that he wrote so large a work because he had not time to prepare +a smaller one. And however unaccountable it may be to those who have not +made the trial, it may be safely asserted, that to present, within +limits so small, anything like a system of Physical Education for the +guidance of young mothers, requires much more time, and labor, and +patience, than to prepare a work on the same subject twice as large.</p> + +<p>Nor is it to be expected, after all, that the work is, in all respects, +perfect. I have indeed done what I could to render it so; but am +conscious that future inquiries may lead to the discovery of errors. +Should such discoveries be made, they will be cheerfully acknowledged +and corrected; truth being, as it should be, the leading object.</p> + + +<br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br> +<br> + +<h2>THE YOUNG MOTHER.</h2> + +<hr class="chapterEnd" /> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I.">CHAPTER I.</a></h2> + +<h3>THE NURSERY.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Importance of a Nursery—generally overlooked. Its +walls—ceiling—windows—chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>It is far from being in the power of every young mother to procure a +suitable room for a nursery. In the present state of society, the +majority must be contented with such places as they can get. Still there +are various reasons for saying what a nursery should be. 1. It may be of +service to those who <i>have</i> the power of selection. 2. Information +cannot injure those who <i>have not</i>. 3. It may lead those who have wealth +to extend the hand of charity in this important direction; for there +are not a few who have little sympathy with the wants and distresses of +the adult poor, who will yet open their hearts and unfold their hands +for the relief of suffering <i>infancy</i>.</p> + +<p>Among those who have what is called a nursery, few select for this +purpose the most appropriate part of the building. It is not +unfrequently the one that can best be spared, is most retired, or most +convenient. Whether it is most favorable to the health and happiness of +its occupants, is usually at best a secondary consideration.</p> + +<p>But this ought not so to be. A nursery should never, for example, be on +a ground floor, or in a shaded situation, or in any circumstances which +expose it to dampness, or hinder the occasional approach of the light of +the sun. It should be spacious, with dry walls, high ceiling, and tight +windows. The latter should always be so constructed that the upper sash +can be lowered when we wish to admit or exclude air. It should have a +chimney, if possible; but if not, there should be suitable holes in the +ceiling, for the purposes of ventilation.</p> + +<p>The windows should have shutters, so that the room, when necessary, can +be darkened—and green curtains. Some writers say that the windows +should have cross bars before them; but if they do not descend within +three feet of the floor, such an arrangement can hardly be required.</p> + +<p>It is highly desirable that every nursery should consist of two rooms, +opening into each other; or what is still better, of one large room, +with a sliding or swinging partition in the middle. The use of this is, +that the mother and child may retire to one, while the other is being +swept or ventilated. They would thus avoid damp air, currents, and dust. +Such an arrangement would also give the occupants a room, fresh, clean +and sweet, in the morning, (which is a very great advantage,) after +having rendered the air of the other foul by sleeping in it.</p> + +<p>In winter, and while there is an infant in the nursery, just beginning +to walk, it is recommended by many to cover the floor with a carpet. The +only advantage which they mention is, that it secures the child from +injury if it falls. But I have seldom seen lasting injury inflicted by +simple falls on the hard floor; and there are so many objections to +carpeting a nursery, since it favors an accumulation of dust, bad air, +damp, grease, and other impurities, that it seems to me preferable to +omit it. Many physicians, I must own, recommend carpets during winter, +though not in summer; and in no case, unless they are well shaken and +aired, at least once a week.</p> + +<p>No furniture should be admissible, except the beds for the mother and +child, a table, and a few chairs. With the best writers and highest +authorities on the subject, I am decidedly of opinion that all feather +beds ought effectually and forever to be excluded from nurseries. The +reasons for this prohibition will appear hereafter.</p> + +<p>Every nursery should, if possible, be free from holes or crevices; +otherwise the occupants will be exposed to currents of air, and their +sometimes terrible and always injurious consequences. The room may, in +this way, be kept at a lower medium temperature—a point of very great +importance.</p> + +<p>Cats and dogs, I believe, are usually excluded from the nursery; if not, +they ought to be. For though the apprehension of cats "sucking the +child's breath," is wholly groundless, yet they may be provoked by the +rude attacks of a child to inflict upon it a lasting injury. Besides, +they assist, by respiration, in contaminating the air, like all other +animals.</p> + +<p>If there are, in the nursery, objects which, from the vivacity or +brilliancy of their colors, attract the attention of the child, they +should never be presented to them sideways, or immediately over their +heads. The reason for this caution is, that children seek, and pursue +almost instinctively, bright objects; and are thus liable to contract a +habit of moving their eyes in an oblique direction, which <i>may</i> +terminate in squinting.</p> + +<p>Many parents seem to take great pleasure in indulging the young infant +in looking at these bright objects; especially a lamp or a candle. If +the child is naturally strong and vigorous, no immediate perceptible +injury may arise; but I am confident in the opinion that the result is +often quite otherwise. For many weeks, if not many months of their early +existence, they should not be permitted to sit or lie and gaze at any +bright object, be it ever so weak or distant, unless placed exactly +before their eyes; and even in the latter case, it were better to avoid +it.</p> + +<p>Heat is also injurious to the eyes of all, and of course not less so to +children than to adults. But when a strong light and heat are conjoined, +as is the case of sitting around a large blazing fire—the former custom +of New England—it is no wonder if the infantile eyes become early +injured. No wonder that the generation now on the stage, early subjected +to these abuses, should be found almost universally in the use of +spectacles.</p> + +<p>This may be the most proper place for observing that great care ought to +be taken, at the birth of the child, to prevent a too sudden exposure of +the tender organ of vision to the light. We believe this caution is +generally omitted by the American physician, though it is one which +accords with the plainest dictates of common sense. Who of us has not +experienced the pain of emerging suddenly from the darkness of a cellar +to the ordinary light of day? The strongest eyes of the adult are +scarcely able to bear the transition. How much more painful to the +tender organs of the new-born infant must be the change to which it is +so frequently subjected? And how easy it is to prevent the pain and +danger of the change, by more effectually darkening the room into which +it is introduced!</p> + +<p>But we have testimony on this point. A distinguished German physician +states that he has known many cases of permanent blindness from this +very cause to which we have referred. The Principal of the Institution +for the Blind, at Vienna, says he is confident that most children who +appear to be born blind, are actually made blind by neglecting this same +precaution.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II.">CHAPTER II.</a></h2> + +<h3>TEMPERATURE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General principle—"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove—railing around it. Excess of heat—its dangers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>There is one general principle, on this subject, which is alike +applicable to all persons and circumstances. It is, to keep a little too +cool, rather than in the slightest degree too warm. In other words, the +lowest temperature which is compatible with comfort, is, in all cases, +best adapted to health; and a slight degree of coldness, provided it +amount not to a chill, and is not long continued, is more safe than the +smallest unnecessary degree of warmth.</p> + +<p>But the application of this rule to those over whom we have control, is +not without its difficulties. Our own sensations are so variable, +independently of external and obvious causes, that we cannot at all +times judge for others, especially for infants. The absolute and real +state of temperature in a room can only be ascertained by the aid of a +thermometer; and no nursery should ever be without one. It should be +placed, however, in such a situation as to indicate the real temperature +of the atmosphere, and not where it will give a false result.</p> + +<p>No mother should forget that the infant, at birth, has not the power of +generating heat, internally, to the extent which it possesses afterward. +The lungs have as yet but a feeble, inefficient action. The purification +of the blood, through their agency, is not only incomplete, but the heat +evolved is as yet inconsiderable. In the absence of internal heat, then, +there is an increased demand externally. If 60° be deemed suitable for +most other persons, the new-born infant may, for a few days, require 65° +or even 70°.</p> + +<p>Much may and should be done in preserving the child in a proper +temperature by means of its clothing. On this point I shall speak at +length, in another part of this work. My present purpose is simply to +treat of the temperature of the nursery.</p> + +<p>The best way of warming a nursery—or indeed any other room, where MERE +warmth is demanded—is by means of air heated in other apartments, and +admitted through openings in the floor or fire-place. The air is not +only thus made more pure, but every possibility of accidents, such as +having the clothes take fire, is precluded. This last consideration is +one of very great importance, and I hope will not be much longer +overlooked in infantile education.</p> + +<p>Next to that, in point of usefulness and safety, is a stove, placed near +or IN the fire-place, and defended by an iron railing. Most people +prefer an open stove; and on some accounts it is indeed preferable, +especially where it is desirable to burn coal. Still I think that the +direct rays of the heat, and the glare of light from open stoves and +fire-places, particularly for the young, form a very serious objection +to their use.</p> + +<p>One of the strongest objections to open stoves and fire-places in the +nursery is, the increased exposure to accidents. I know it is said that +this evil may be avoided by laying aside the use of cotton, and wearing +nothing but worsted or flannel. This is indeed true; but I do not like +the idea of being compelled to dress children in flannel or worsted, at +all times when the least particle of fire is demanded; for this would be +to wear this stimulating kind of clothing, in our climate, the greater +part of the year.</p> + +<p>Besides, I write for many mothers who are compelled to use cotton, on +account of the expense of flannel. And if the stove be a close one, and +well defended by a railing, cotton will seldom expose to danger. Still, +as has been already said, the introduction of heated air from another +apartment, whenever it can possibly be afforded, is incomparably better +than either stoves or fire-places.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees is fully persuaded that the excessive heat of nurseries has +occasioned a great mortality among very young children. "In the first +place," he says, "it over-stimulates them; and in the second, it renders +them so susceptible of cold, that any draught of cold air endangers +their lives. They are in a constant perspiration, which is frequently +checked by an exposure to even an atmosphere of moderate temperature." +If this is but to repeat what has been already said, the importance of +the subject seems to be a sufficient apology.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III.">CHAPTER III.</a></h2> + +<h3>VENTILATION.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air by means of lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping—its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation—camphor, vinegar.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Few people take sufficient pains to preserve the air in any of their +apartments pure; for few know what the constitution of our atmosphere +is, and in how many ways and with what ease it is rendered impure.</p> + +<p>It is not my purpose to go into a learned, scientific account in this +place, or even in this work, of the constitution of the atmosphere. A +few plain statements are all that are indispensable. The atmosphere +which we breathe is composed of two different airs or gases. One of +these is called oxygen, [Footnote: Oxygen gas is the chief supporter of +combustion, as well as of respiration. It is the vital part, as it were, +of the air. No animal or vegetable could long exist without it. And yet +if alone, unmixed, it is too pure and too refined for animals to +breathe. Nitrogen gas, on the contrary, while alone, will not support +either respiration or combustion; mixed, however, with oxygen, it +dilutes it, and in the most happy manner fits it for reception into the +lungs.] and the other nitrogen. There is another gas usually found with +these two, in smaller quantity, called carbonic acid gas; but whether it +is necessary, in a very small quantity, to health, chemists, I believe, +are not agreed. One thing, however, is certain—that if any portion of +it is healthful, it must be very little—not more, certainly, than +one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of the whole mass.</p> + +<p>It is by means of the oxygen it contains, that air sustains life and +combustion. Were it not for this, neither fires nor candles would burn, +and no animal could breathe a single moment. Breathing consumes this +oxygen of the air very rapidly. When the oxygen is present in about a +certain proportion, combustion and respiration go on well, but when its +natural proportion is diminished, the fire does not burn so well, +neither does the candle; and no one can breathe so freely.</p> + +<p>Not only are breathing and combustion impeded or disturbed by the +diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere, but just in proportion as oxygen +is diminished by these two processes, or either of them, carbonic acid +is formed, which is not only bad for combustion, but much worse for +health. If any considerable quantity of it is inhaled, it appears to be +an absolute poison to the human system; and if in <i>very large quantity</i>, +will often cause immediate death.</p> + +<p>It is this gas, accumulated in large quantities, that destroys so many +people in close rooms, where there is no chimney, nor any other place +for the bad air to escape. But it not only kills people outright—it +partly kills, that is, it poisons, more or less, hundreds of thousands.</p> + +<p>In a nursery there is the mother and child, and perhaps the nurse, to +render the air impure by breathing, the fire and the lamp or candle to +contribute to the same result, besides several other causes not yet +mentioned. One of these is nearly related to the former. I allude to the +fact that our skins, by perspiration and by other means, are a source of +much impurity to the atmosphere; a fact which will be more fully +explained and illustrated in the chapter on Bathing and Cleanliness. It +is only necessary to say, in this place, that it is not the matter of +perspiration alone which, issuing from the skin, renders the air +impure; there are other exhalations more or less constantly going off +from every living body, especially from the lungs; and carbonic acid gas +is even formed all over the surface of the skin, as well as by means of +the lungs.</p> + +<p>One needs no better proof that carbonic acid is formed on the surface of +the body, than the fact that after the body has been closely covered all +night, if you introduce a candle under the bed-clothes into this +confined air, it will be quickly extinguished, because there is too +much carbonic acid gas there, and too little oxygen.</p> + +<p>We may hence see at once the evil of covering the heads of infants when +they lie down—a very common practice. The air, when pure, contains a +little more than 20 parts of oxygen, and a little less than 80 of +nitrogen. Breathing this air, as I have already shown, consumes the +oxygen, which is so necessary to life and health, and leaves in its +place an increase of nitrogen and carbonic acid gas, which are not +necessary to health, and the latter of which is even positively +injurious. But when the oxygen, instead of forming 20 or more parts in +100 of the atmosphere of the nursery, is reduced to 15 or 18 parts only, +and the carbonic acid gas is increased from 1 or 2 parts in 100, to 5, +6, 8 or 10—when to this is added the other noxious exhalations from the +body, and from the lamp or candle, fire-place, feather bed, stagnant +fluids in the room, &c., &c.—is it any wonder that children, in the +end, become sickly? What else could be expected but that the seeds of +disease, thus early sown, should in due time spring up, and produce +their appropriate fruits?</p> + +<p>It is sometimes said that fire in a room purifies it. It undoubtedly +does so, to a certain extent, if fresh air be often admitted; but not +otherwise.</p> + +<p>I have classed feather beds among the common causes of impurity. Dr. +Dewees also condemns them, most decidedly; and gives substantial reasons +for "driving them out of the nursery."</p> + +<p>In speaking of the structure of the room used for a nursery, I have +adverted to the importance of having a large or double room, with +sliding doors between, in order that the occupants may go into one of +them, while the other is being ventilated. But whatever may be the +structure of the room, the circumstances of the occupants, or the state +of the weather, every nursery ought to be most thoroughly ventilated, +once a day, at least; and when the weather is tolerable, twice a day. If +there is but one apartment, and fear is entertained of the dampness of +the fresh air introduced, or of currents, and if the mother and babe +cannot retire, there is a last resort, which is for them to get into +bed, and cover themselves a short time with the clothing. For though I +have prohibited the covering of the face with the bed-clothes for any +considerable length of time together, yet to do so for some fifteen or +twenty minutes is an evil of far less magnitude than to suffer an +apartment to remain without being ventilated, for twenty-four hours +together—a very common occurrence.</p> + +<p>When a lamp is kept burning in a nursery during the night, it should +always be placed at the door of the stove, or in the chimney place, that +its smoke, and the bad airs or gases which are formed, may escape. But +it is better, in general, to avoid burning lamps or candles during the +night. By means of common matches, a light may be produced, when +necessary, almost instantly; especially if you have a spirit lamp in the +nursery, or what is still better, one of spirit gas—that is, a mixture +of alcohol and turpentine.</p> + +<p>It is highly desirable that all washing, ironing, and cooking should be +avoided in the nursery. They load the air with noxious effluvia or +vapor, or with particles of dust; none of which ought ever to enter the +delicate lungs of an infant.</p> + +<p>Fumigations with camphor, vinegar, and other similar substances, have +long been in reputation as a means of purifying the air in sick-rooms +and nurseries; but they are of very little consequence. Fresh air, if it +can be had, is always better.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV."></a>CHAPTER IV.</h2> + +<h3>THE CHILD'S DRESS</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General principles. SEC. 1. Swathing the body—its numerous evils.—SEC. +2. Form of the dress. Fashion. Tight lacing—its dangers. Structure and +motion of the chest. Diseases from tight lacing.—SEC. 3. Material of +dress. Flannel—its uses. Cleanliness. Cotton—silk—linen.—SEC. 4. +Quantity of dress. Power of habit. Anecdote. Begin right. Change. +Dampness.—SEC. 5. Caps—their evils. Going bare-headed.—SEC. 6. Hats +and bonnets.—SEC. 7. Covering for the feet. Stockings. Garters. +Shoes—thick soles.—SEC. 8. Pins—their danger. Shocking +anecdote.—SEC. 9. Remaining wet.—SEC. 10. Dress of boys. Tight +jackets. Stocks and cravats. Boots.—SEC. 11. Dress of girls—should be +loose. Temperature. Exposure to the night air.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Dress serves three important purposes:—1. To cover us; 2. To defend us +against cold; 3. To defend our bodies and limbs from injury. There is +one more purpose of dress; in case of deformity, it seems to improve the +appearance.</p> + +<p>In all our arrangements in regard to dress, whether of children or of +adults, we should ever keep in mind the above principles. The form, +fashion, material, application, and quantity of all clothing, +especially for infants, ought to be regulated by these three or four +rules.</p> + +<p>The subject of this chapter is one of so much importance, and embraces +such a variety of items, that it will be more convenient, both to the +reader and myself, to consider it under several minor heads.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Swathing the Body.</i></h4> + +<p>Buffon, in his "Natural History," says that in France, an infant has +hardly enjoyed the liberty of moving and stretching its limbs, before it +is put into confinement. "It is swathed," says he, "its head is fixed, +its legs are stretched out at full length, and its arms placed straight +down by the side of its body. In this manner it is bound tight with +cloths and bandages, so that it cannot stir a limb; indeed it is +fortunate that the poor thing is not muffled up so as to be unable to +breathe."</p> + +<p>All swathing, except with a single bandage around the abdomen, is +decidedly unreasonable, injurious and cruel. I do not pretend that the +remarks of M. Buffon are fully applicable to the condition of infants in +the United States. The good sense of the community nowhere permits us to +transform a beautiful babe quite into an Egyptian mummy. Still there +are many considerable errors on the subject of infantile dress, which, +in the progress of my remarks, I shall find it necessary to expose.</p> + +<p>The use of a simple band cannot be objected to. It affords a general +support to the abdomen, and a particular one to the <i>umbilicus</i>. The +last point is one of great importance, where there is any tendency to a +rupture at this part of the body—a tendency which very often exists in +feeble children. And without some support of this kind, crying, +coughing, sneezing, and straining in any way, might greatly aggravate +the evil, if not produce serious consequences.</p> + +<p>But, in order to afford a support to the abdomen in the best manner, it +is by no means necessary that the bandage should be drawn very tight. +Two thirds of the nurses in this country greatly err in this respect, +and suppose that the more tightly a bandage is drawn, the better. It +should be firm, but yet gently yielding; and therefore a piece of +flannel cut "bias," as it is termed, or, obliquely with respect to the +threads of which it is composed, is the most appropriate material.</p> + +<p>If the attention of the mother were necessary nowhere else, it would be +indispensable in the application of this article. If she do not take +special pains to prevent it, the erring though well meaning nurse may +so compress the body with the bandage as to produce pain and uneasiness, +and sometimes severe colic. Nay, worse evils than even this have been +known to arise. When a child sneezes, or coughs, or cries, the abdomen +should naturally yield gently; but if it is so confined that it cannot +yield where the band is applied, it will yield in an unnatural +proportion below, to the great danger of producing a species of rupture, +no less troublesome than the one which such tight swathing is designed +to prevent.</p> + +<p>But besides the bandage already mentioned, no other restraint of the +body and limbs of a child is at all admissible. The Creator has kindly +ordained that the human body and limbs, and especially its muscles, or +moving powers, shall be developed by exercise. Confine an arm or a leg, +even in a child of ten years of age, and the limb will not increase +either in strength or size as it otherwise would, because its muscles +are not exercised; and the fact is still more obvious in infancy.</p> + +<p>There is a still deeper evil. On all the limbs are fixed two sets of +muscles; one to extend, the other to draw up or bend the limb. If you +keep a limb extended for a considerable time, you weaken the one set of +muscles; if you keep it bent, you weaken the other. This weakness may +become so great that the limb will be rendered useless. There are cases +on record—well authenticated—where children, by being obliged to sit +in one place on a hard floor, have been made cripples for life. Hundreds +of others are injured, though they may not become absolutely crippled.</p> + +<p>I repeat it, therefore, their dress should be so free and loose that +they may use their little limbs, their neck and their bodies, as much as +they please; and in every desired direction. The practices of confining +their arms while they lie down, for fear they should scratch themselves +with their nails, and of pinning the clothes round their feet, are +therefore highly reprehensible. Better that they should even +occasionally scratch themselves with their nails, than that they should +be made the victims of injurious restraint. Who would think of tying up +or muffling the young lamb or kid? And even the young plant—what think +you would be the effect, if its leaves and branches could not move +gently with the soft breezes? Would the fluids circulate, and health be +promoted: or would they stagnate, and a morbid, sickly and dwarfish +state be the consequence?</p> + +<p>Those whose object is to make infancy, as well as any other period of +existence, a season of happiness, will not fail to find an additional +motive for giving the little stranger entire freedom in the land +whither he has so recently arrived, especially when he seems to enjoy +it so much. Who can be so hardened as to confine him, unless compelled +by the most pressing necessity?</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Form of the Dress.</i></h4> + +<p>On this subject a writer in the London Literary Gazette of some eight or +ten years ago, lays down the following general directions, to which, in +cold weather, there can be but one possible objection, which is, they +are not <i>alamode</i>, and are not, therefore, likely to be followed.</p> + +<p>"All that a child requires, so far as regards clothing, in the first +month of its existence, is a simple covering for the trunk and +extremities of the body, made of a material soft and agreeable to the +skin, and which can retain, in an equable degree, the animal +temperature. These qualities are to be found in perfection in fine +flannel; and I recommend that the only clothing, for the first month or +six weeks, be a square piece of flannel, large enough to involve fully +and overlap the whole of the babe, with the exception of the head, which +should be left totally uncovered. This wrapper should be fixed by a +button near the breast, and left so loose as to permit the arms and legs +to be freely stretched, and moved in every direction. It should be +succeeded by a loose flannel gown with sleeves, which should be worn +till the end of the second month; after which it may be changed to the +common clothing used by children of this age."</p> + +<p>The advantages of such a dress are, that the movements of the infant +will be, as we have already seen, free and unrestrained, and we shall +escape the misery of hearing the screams which now so frequently +accompany the dressing and undressing of almost every child. No chafings +from friction, moreover, can occur; and as the insensible perspiration +is in this way promoted over the whole surface of the body, the sympathy +between the stomach and skin is happily maintained. A healthy sympathy +of this kind, duly kept up, does much towards preserving the stomach in +a good state, and the skin from eruptions and sores.</p> + +<p>But as I apprehend that christianity is not yet very deeply rooted in +the minds and hearts of parents, I have already expressed my doubts +whether they are prepared to receive and profit by advice at once +rational and physiological. Still I cannot help hoping that I shall +succeed in persuading mothers to have every part of a child's dress +perfectly loose, except the band already referred to; and that should be +but moderately tight.</p> + +<p>Common humanity ought to teach us better than to put the body of a +helpless infant into a <i>vise</i>, and press it to death, as the first mark +of our attention. Who has not been struck with a strange inconsistency +in the conduct of mothers and nurses, who, while they are so exceedingly +tender towards the infant in some points as to injure it by their +kindness, are yet almost insensible to its cries of distress while +dressing it? So far, indeed, are they from feeling emotions of pity, +that they often make light of its cries, regarding them as signs of +health and vigor.</p> + +<p>There can be no doubt, I confess, that the first cries of an infant, if +strong, both indicate and promote a healthy state of the lungs, to a +certain extent; but there will always be unavoidable occasions enough +for crying to promote health, even after we have done all we can in the +way of avoiding pain. They who only draw the child's dress the tighter, +the more it cries, are guilty of a crime of little less enormity than +murder.</p> + +<p>"Think," says Dr. Buchan, "of the immense number of children that die of +convulsions soon after birth; and be assured that these (its cries) are +much oftener owing to galling pressure, or some external injury, than to +any inward cause." This same writer adds, that he has known a child +which was "seized with convulsion fits" soon after being "swaddled," +immediately relieved by taking off the rollers and bandages; and he says +that a loose dress prevented the return of the disease.</p> + +<p>I think it is obvious that the utmost extent to which we ought to go, in +yielding to the fashion, as it regards form, is to use three pieces of +clothing—the shirt, the petticoat and the frock; all of which must be +as loose as possible; and before the infant begins to crawl about much, +the latter should be long, for the salve of covering the feet and legs. +At four or five years of age, loose trowsers, with boys, may be +substituted for the petticoat; but it is a question whether something +like the frock might not, with every individual, be usefully retained +through life.</p> + +<p>I wish it were unnecessary, in a book like this, to join in the general +complaint against tight lacing any part of the body, but especially the +chest. But as this work of torture is sometimes begun almost from the +cradle, and as prevention is better than cure, the hope of preventing +that for which no cure appears yet to have been found, leads me to make +a few remarks on the subject.</p> + +<p>As it has long been my opinion that one reason why mothers continue to +overlook the subject is, that they do not understand the structure and +motion of the chest, I have attempted the following explanation and +illustration.</p> + +<p>I have already said, that if we bandage tightly, for a considerable +time, any part of the human frame, it is apt to become weaker. The more +a portion of the frame which is furnished with muscles, those curious +instruments of motion, is used, provided it is not <i>over</i>-exerted, the +more vigorous it is. Bind up an arm, or a hand, or a foot, and keep it +bound for twelve hours of the day for many years, and think you it will +be as strong as it otherwise would have been? Facts prove the contrary. +The Chinese swathe the feet of their infant females; and they are not +only small, but weak.</p> + +<p>I have said their feet are smaller for being bandaged. So is a hand or +an arm. Action—healthy, constant action—is indispensable to the +perfect development of the body and limbs. Why it is so, is another +thing. But so it is; and it is a principle or law of the great Creator +which cannot be evaded. More than this; if you bind some parts of the +body tightly, so as to compress them as much as you can without +producing actual pain, you will find that the part not only ceases to +grow, but actually dwindles away. I have seen this tried again and +again. Even the solid parts perish under pressure. When a person first +wears a false head of hair, the clasp which rests upon the head, at the +upper part of the forehead, being new and elastic, and pressing rather +closely, will, in a few months, often make quite an indentation in the +cranium or bone of the head.</p> + +<p>Now is it probable—nay, is it possible—that the lungs, especially +those of young persons, can expand and come to their full and natural +size under pressure, even though the pressure should be slight? Must +they not be weakened? And if the pressure be strong, as it sometimes is, +must they not dwindle away?</p> + +<p>We know, too, from the nature and structure of the lungs themselves, +that tight lacing must injure them. Many mothers have very imperfect +notions of what physicians mean, when they say that corsets impede the +circulation, by preventing the full and undisturbed action of the lungs. +They get no higher ideas of the <i>motion</i> of the <i>chest</i>, than what is +connected with bending the body forward and backward, from right to +left, &c. They know that, if dressed too tightly, <i>this</i> motion is not +so free as it otherwise would be; but if they are not so closely laced +as to prevent that free bending of the body of which I have been +speaking, they think there can be no danger; or at least, none of +consequence.</p> + +<p>Now it happens that this sort of motion is not that to which physicians +refer, when they complain of corsets. Strictly speaking, this bending of +the whole body is performed by the muscles of the back, and not those +of the chest. The latter have very little to do with it. It is true, +that even <i>this</i> motion ought not to be hindered; but if it is, the evil +is one of little comparative magnitude.</p> + +<p>Every time we breathe naturally, all the ribs, together with the breast +bone, have motion. The ribs rise, and spread a little outward, +especially towards the fore part. The breast bone not only rises, but +swings forward a little, like a pendulum. But the moment the chest is +swathed or bandaged, this motion must be hindered; and the more, in +proportion to the tightness.</p> + +<p>On this point, those persons make a sad mistake, who say that "a busk +not too wide nor too rigid seems to correspond to the supporting spine, +and to assist, rather than impede the efforts of nature, to keep the +body erect."</p> + +<p>Can we seriously compare the offices of the spine with those of the +ribs, and suppose that because the former is fixed like a post, at the +back part of the lungs, therefore an artificial post in front would be +useful? Why, we might just as well argue in favor of hanging weights to +a door, or a clog to a pendulum, in order to make it swing backwards and +forwards more easily. We might almost as well say that the elbow ought +to be made firm, to correspond with the shoulders, and thus become +advocates for letting the stays or bandages enclose the arm above the +elbow, and fasten it firmly to the side. Indeed, the consequences in the +latter case, aside from a little inconvenience, would not be half so +destructive to health as in the former. The ribs, where they join to the +back bone, form hinges; and hinges are made for motion. But if you +fasten them to a post in front, of what value are the hinges?</p> + +<p>If mothers ask, of what use this motion of the lungs is, it is only +necessary to refer them to the chapter on Ventilation, in which I trust +the subject is made intelligible, and a satisfactory answer afforded.</p> + +<p>But I might appeal to facts. Let us look at females around us generally. +Do their countenances indicate that they enjoy as good health as they +did when dress was worn more loosely? Have they not oftener a leaden +hue, as if the blood in them was darker? Are they not oftener +short-breathed than formerly? As they advance in life, have they not +more chronic diseases? Are not their chests smaller and weaker? And as +the doctrine that if one member suffers, all the other members suffer +with it, is not less true in physiology than in morals, do we not find +other organs besides the lungs weakened? Surgeons and physicians, who, +like faithful sentinels, have watched at their post half a century, +tell us, moreover, that if these foolish and injurious practices to +which I refer are tolerated two centuries longer, every female will be +deformed, and the whole race greatly degenerated, physically and +morally.</p> + +<p>Those with whom no arguments will avail, are recommended to read the +following remarks from the first volume of the Library of Health, p. +119:</p> + +<p>"It is related, on the authority of Macgill, that in Tunis, after a girl +is engaged, or betrothed, she is then <i>fattened</i>. For this purpose, she +is cooped up in a small room, and shackles of gold and silver are placed +upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married +to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the +shackles which the former wife wore are put on the new bride's limbs, +and she is fed till they are filled up to a proper thickness. The food +used for this custom worthy of the barbarians is called <i>drough</i>, which +is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering +the milk of the nurse rich and abundant. With this and their national +dish, <i>cuscasoo</i>, the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die +under the spoon."</p> + +<p>We laugh at all this, and well we may; but there are customs not very +far from home, no less ridiculous.</p> + +<p>"There is a country four or five thousand miles westward of Tunis, +where the females, to a very great extent, are emaciated for marriage, +instead being fattened. This process is begun, in part, by shackles—not +of gold and silver, perhaps, but of wood—but instead of being put on +loosely, and causing the body or limbs to fill them, they are made to +compress the body in the outset; and as the size of the latter +diminishes, the shackles are contracted or tightened. As with the +eastern, so with the western females, many of them die under the +process; though a far greater number die at a remote period, as the +consequence of it."</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Material.</i></h4> + +<p>I have already committed myself to the reader as favoring the use of +soft flannel in cold weather, especially for children who are not yet +able to run about freely in the open air. The advantages of an early use +of this material, at least for under-clothes, are numerous. The +following are a few of them.</p> + +<p>1. Flannel, next to the skin, is a pleasant flesh brush; keeping up a +gentle and equable irritation, and promoting perspiration and every +other function which it is the office of the skin to perform, or assist +in performing.</p> + +<p>2. It guards the body against the cooling effects of evaporation, when +in a state of profuse perspiration.</p> + +<p>3. By preventing the heat of the body from escaping too rapidly, it +keeps up a steadier temperature on the surface than any other known +substance. The importance of the last consideration is greater, in a +climate like our own, than elsewhere.</p> + +<p>But there are limits to the use of this article of clothing. Whenever +the temperature of the atmosphere is so great, even without artificial +heat, that we no longer wish to retain the heat of the body by the +clothing, then all flannel should be removed at once, and linen should +be substituted; taking care to replace the flannel whenever the +temperature of the atmosphere, as indicated by the thermometer, or by +the child's feelings, may seem to require it.</p> + +<p>It should also be kept clean. There is a very general mistake abroad on +this subject. Many suppose that flannel can be worn longer without +washing than other kinds of cloth. On the contrary, it should be changed +oftener than cotton, or even linen, because it will absorb a great deal +of fluid, especially the matter of perspiration, which, if long +retained, is believed to ferment, and produce unhealthy, if not +poisonous gases. For this reason, too, flannel for children's clothing +should be white, that it may show dirt the more readily, and obtain the +more frequent washing; although it is for this very reason—its +liability to exhibit the least particles of dirt—that it is commonly +rejected.</p> + +<p>One caution more in regard to the use of flannel may be necessary. With +some children, owing to a peculiarity of constitution, flannel will +produce eruptions on the skin, which are very troublesome. Whenever this +is the case, the flannel should be immediately laid aside; upon which +the eruptions usually disappear.</p> + +<p>If parents would take proper pains to get the lighter, softer kinds of +flannel for this purpose, and be particular about its looseness and +quantity, I should prefer, as I have already intimated, to have very +young children, in our climate, wear this material the greater part of +the year, excepting perhaps July and August.</p> + +<p>My reasons for this course would be, first, that I like the stimulus of +soft flannel on the skin, if changed sufficiently often, better than +that of any other kind of clothing. Secondly, cotton is so liable to +take fire, that its use in the nursery and among little children seems +very hazardous. Thirdly, silk is not quite the appropriate material, as +a general thing, besides being too expensive; and fourthly, linen is +not warm enough, except in mid-summer.</p> + +<p>Except, therefore, in July and August, and in cases of idiosyncracy, +such as have just been alluded to, I would use flannel for the +under-clothes of young children, throughout the year. But whenever they +acquire sufficient strength to walk and run, and play much in the open +air, I would gradually lay aside the use of all flannel, even in winter. +Great attention, however, must be paid to the <i>quantity</i>. The parent +who, guided by this rule, should keep on her child the same amount of +flannel, and of the same thickness, from January to June 30th, and then, +on the first of July, should suddenly exchange it for thin linen, in +moderate quantity, might find trouble from it. It is better to make the +changes more gradually; otherwise, whatever may be the material of the +dress, the child will be likely to suffer.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Quantity.</i></h4> + +<p>The quantity of clothing used by different individuals of the same age, +in the same climate, possessing constitutions nearly alike, and +following similar occupations, is so different as to strike us with +surprise when we first observe the fact.</p> + +<p>One will wear nothing but a coarse linen or cotton shirt, coarse coat, +waistcoat, and pantaloons, and boots, in the coldest weather. He never, +unless it be on the Sabbath, puts on even a cravat, and never in any +case stockings or mittens.</p> + +<p>Another, in similar circumstances in all respects, constantly wears his +thick stockings, flannel wrapper and drawers, and cravat; and seldom +goes out, in cold weather, without mittens and an overcoat. He is not a +whit warmer: indeed he often suffers more from the cold, than his +neighbor who dresses in the manner just described.</p> + +<p>Why all this difference? It is no doubt the result of habit. Any +individual may accustom himself to much or little clothing. And the +earlier the habit is begun, the greater is its influence.</p> + +<p>Some persons, observing how little clothing one may accustom himself to +use and yet be comfortable, have told us, that so far as mere +temperature is concerned, we need no clothing at all. They relate the +story of the Scythian and Alexander. Alexander asked the former how he +could go without clothes in such a cold climate. He replied, by asking +Alexander how he could go with his face naked. "Habit reconciles us to +this;" was the reply. "Think me, then, <i>all</i> face," said the Scythian.</p> + +<p>But admitting that certain individuals, and even a few rude tribes, +have gone without clothing; did they therefore follow, in this respect, +the intentions of nature? The greatest stickler for adhering to nature's +plan, cannot prove this. Analogy is against it. Most of the other +animals, even in hot climates, are furnished with a hairy covering from +the first; and in cold climates, the Author of their being has even +provided them with an increase of clothing for the winter. Their fur, on +the approach of cold weather, not only becomes whiter, and therefore +conducts the heat away from the body more slowly, but, as every dealer +in furs well understands, it becomes softer and thicker. And yet the +blood of the furred animals of cold countries is as warm as ours, if not +warmer.</p> + +<p>The inferences which it seems to me we ought to make from this are, that +if other animals require clothing, and even a change of clothing, so +does man; and that as the Creator has left him to provide, by his own +ingenuity, for a great many of his wants, instead of furnishing him with +instinct to direct him, so in relation to dress. And even if it could be +proved that dress were naturally unnecessary, with reference to +temperature, I should still defend its use on other principles. The few +speculative minds, therefore, that in the vagaries of their fancy, but +never in their practice, reject it, are not to be regarded.</p> + +<p>The principle laid down in the commencement of the chapter on +Temperature, is the great principle which should guide us in regard to +dress. But although we should always keep a little too cool rather than +a little too warm, it is by no means desirable to be cold. Any degree of +chilliness, long continued, interrupts the functions which the skin +ought to perform, and thus produces mischief.</p> + +<p>The same rules, in this respect, apply to eating, as well as to dress. +It is better to eat a little less than nature requires, than a little +more. It is a generally received opinion, however, that mankind +frequently, at least in this country, eat about twice as much as health +requires. This is owing to habit; and perhaps the power of the latter is +as great in this respect as in regard to dress.</p> + +<p>The great point in regard to food or dress is, to <i>begin</i> right, and, +observing what nature requires—studying at the same time the testimony +of others—to endeavor to keep within the bounds she has assigned. It +has already been more than intimated, that if the nursery be kept in a +proper temperature, a single loose piece of dress is, for some time, all +that is required. In pursuance of this principle, through life, I +believe few persons would be found who would need more at one time than +a single suit of woollen clothes, even in the severest winters of our +northern climate.</p> + +<p>I have always observed that they who wear the greatest amount of +clothing, are most subject to colds. There are obvious reasons why it +should be so. This, then, if a fact, is one of the strongest reasons in +favor of acquiring a habit of going as thinly clad as we possibly can, +and not at the same time feel any inconvenience.</p> + +<p>But after all, whether it be winter or summer, we must vary our clothing +with the variations of the weather, as indicated by the thermometer, and +our own feelings. Sometimes, in our ever-changing and ever-changeable +climate, it may be necessary to vary our dress three or four times a +day. Some cry out against this practice as dangerous, but I have never +found it so. I have known persons who made it a constant practice; and I +never found that they sustained any injury from it, except the loss of a +little time; and the increase of comfort was more than enough to +compensate for that. There is one thing to be avoided, however, whether +we change our clothing—our linen especially—twice a day, or only twice +a week—which is, <i>dampness</i>.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>Caps.</i></h4> + +<p>The practice of putting caps on infants is happily going by; and perhaps +it may be thought unnecessary for me to dwell a single moment on the +subject. But as the practice still prevails in some parts of the +country, it may be well to bestow upon it a few passing remarks.</p> + +<p>Many mothers have not considered that the circulation of the blood in +young infants is peculiarly active; that a large amount of blood is at +that period carried to the head; that in consequence of this, the head +is proportionably hotter than in adults; and that from this source +arises the tendency of very young children to brain-fever, dropsy in the +head, and other diseases of this part of the system. But these are most +undoubted facts.</p> + +<p>Hence one reason why the heads of infants should be kept as cool as +possible; and though a thin cap confines less heat than a thick head of +hair does when they are older, yet they are less able to bear it. The +truth is, that nature furnishes a covering for the head, just about as +fast as a covering is required, and the child's safety will permit.</p> + +<p>At the present day, few persons will probably be found, who will defend +the utility of caps, any longer than till the hair is grown. The +general apology for their use after this period, and indeed in most +instances before, is, that they look pretty. "What would people say to +see my darling without a cap?"</p> + +<p>But when the head is kept, from the first, totally uncovered, the hair +grows more rapidly, dandruff and other scurfy diseases rarely attack the +scalp; catarrh, snuffles, and other similar complaints, and above all, +dropsy in the head, seldom show themselves; and the period of cutting +teeth, that most dangerous period in the life of an infant, is passed +over with much more safety.</p> + +<p>"Nothing but custom," says a foreign writer, "can reconcile us to the +cap, with all its lace and trumpery ornaments, on the beautiful head of +a child; and I would ask any one to say candidly, whether he thinks the +children in the pictures of Titian and Raffaelle would be improved by +having their heads covered with caps, instead of the silken curls—the +adornment of nature—which cluster round their smiling faces. If there +were no other reason for disusing caps for infants, but the improvement +which it produces in the <i>appearance</i> of the child, I would maintain +that this is a sufficient inducement." And I concur with him fully.</p> + +<p>As to the notion—now I hope nearly exploded—that it is necessary to +cover up the "open of the head," as it is called, nothing can be more +idle. This part of the head requires no more covering than any other +part; and if it did, all the dress in the world could not affect it in +the least, except to retard the growth of the bones, which, in due time, +ought to close up the space; and this effect, anything which keeps the +head too hot might help to produce. Of the folly of wetting the head +with spirits, or any other medicated lotions, and of making daily +efforts to bring it into shape, it is unnecessary to speak in the +present chapter.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Hats and Bonnets.</i></h4> + +<p>The hats worn in this country are almost universally too warm. But if it +is a great mistake in adults to wear thick, heavy hats, it is much more +so in the case of children.</p> + +<p>The infant in the nursery, as we have already seen, needs no covering of +the kind. It is absolutely necessary that the head should be kept as +cool as possible; and absolutely dangerous to cover it too warmly. At a +later period, however, the danger greatly diminishes, because the +circulation of the blood becomes more equal, and does not tend so much +towards the brain.</p> + +<p>Still, however, the head is hotter than the limbs, especially the hands +and feet; and I cannot help thinking that the hair is the only covering +which is perfectly safe, either in childhood or age; except in the +sunshine or in the storm. There may be—there probably is—some danger +in going without hat or bonnet in the hot sun; though I have known many +children, and some grown persons, who were constantly exposed in this +way, and yet appeared not to suffer from it.</p> + +<p>But this may be the proper place to state that we are ever in great +danger of deceiving ourselves on this subject. If the individuals who +follow practices usually regarded as pernicious, while their habits in +other respects are just like those of other persons around them who have +similar strength, &c. of constitution,—if these individuals, I say, +were wholly to escape disease, through life, or if they were to be so +much more free from it, and live to an age so much greater than others +as to constitute a striking and obvious difference in their favor, we +might then safely argue that the practices which they follow are at +least without dangers, if not of obvious advantage. But when we see them +beset with ills, like other people, it is not safe to pronounce their +habits favorable to health, since it is impossible to know whether some +of the ills which they suffer are not produced by them.</p> + +<p>These remarks are applicable to the disuse of any covering for the head +in the sun and in the rain. For you will find those who adopt this +practice from early infancy,[Footnote: I say, from early infancy; +because we may adopt the best habits in mature years, after our +constitutions have been broken up by error and vice, without effecting +anything more than to keep us from actually sinking at once. Indeed, in +most cases we ought not to expect more.] subject to as many diseases as +those around them with similar constitutions, but with habits somewhat +different; and as our diseases are generally the consequences of our +errors in one way or another, it is impossible to say with certainty +that some of them might not have arisen from exposure of the head.</p> + +<p>I should not hesitate, therefore, to advise all mothers to put a light +hat or bonnet on the heads of their children, whenever they are to be +exposed to the direct rays of the summer sun, or to the rain. And as we +cannot always foresee when and where these exposures will arise, and as +it is believed that these coverings, if light, will never be productive +of much injury while we are abroad in the open air, it will follow that +it is better to wear than to omit them.</p> + +<p>But while I contend for their use as consistent with health and sound +philosophy, I must not be understood as admitting the use of such hats +as are worn at present, even by children. They are, as I have said +before, too hot. What should be substituted, I am unable to determine; +but until something can be supplied, which would not be half so +oppressive as our common wool hats, I should regard it as the lesser +evil to omit them entirely. The danger of going bare-headed, if the +practice is commenced early, we know from the customs of some savage +nations, can never be very great.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>Covering for the Feet.</i></h4> + +<p>The same reason for avoiding the use of any covering for the head, in +early infancy, is a sufficient reason for covering the feet well. For +just in proportion as the blood is sent to the head in superabundance, +and keeps up in it an undue degree of heat, just in the same proportion +is it sent to the feet in too <i>small</i> a quantity, leaving these parts +liable to cold. Now it is a fundamental law with medical men, that the +feet ought to be kept warmer than the head, if possible; especially +while the child is very young, and exposed to brain diseases.</p> + +<p>So long, therefore, as children are young, and unable to exercise their +feet, stockings ought to be used, both in summer and winter; but I +prefer to have them short, unless long ones can be used without garters. +Everything in the shape of a garter or ligature round the limbs, body, +or neck of a child, except a single body-band, already mentioned in +another chapter, ought forever to be banished.</p> + +<p>It has often been objected, I know, that stockings will make the feet +tender. But as no child was ever hardened by <i>continued</i> and severe cold +applied to any part of the body, but the contrary, so no one was ever +made more tender by being kept moderately warm. Excess of heat, like +excess of cold, will alike weaken either children or adults; but there +is little danger of heating the feet and legs of infants too much during +the first year of infancy.</p> + +<p>It is also said that stockings are apt to receive and retain wet. But as +I shall show in another place that wet clothes should be frequently +changed, this objection would be equally strong against wearing coats +and diapers.</p> + +<p>As to shoes, there is some variety of opinion among medical men. A few +hold that they cramp the feet, and prevent children from learning to +walk as early as they otherwise would. If it were best for children +that they should learn to walk as early as possible, the last objection +might have weight. But it seems to me not at all desirable to be in +haste about their walking. Indeed, I greatly prefer to retard their +progress, in this respect, rather than to hasten it.</p> + +<p>As to the first objection, that shoes cramp the feet too much, nearly +its whole force turns upon the question whether they are made of proper +materials or not. There is no need of making them of cow-hide, or any +other thick leather. The soles are the most important part. These will +defend the feet against pins, needles, and such other sharp substances +as are usually found on the floor; and the upper part of the shoe, so +long as the wearer remains in the nursery, may be made of the softest +and most yielding material—even of cloth. Infants' shoes should always +be made on two lasts, one for each foot.</p> + +<p>The philosopher Locke held, that in order to harden the young, their +shoes ought to be "so that they might leak and let in water, whenever +they came near it." There may be and probably is, no harm in having a +child wet his feet occasionally, provided he is soon supplied with dry +stockings again; but it is hazardous for either children or adults to go +too long in wet stockings, and especially to sit long in them, after +they have been using much active exercise. I am in favor of good, +substantial shoes and stockings for people of all ages and conditions, +and at all seasons; and believe it entirely in accordance with sound +economy and the laws of the human constitution.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>Pins.</i></h4> + +<p>The custom of using ten or a dozen pins in the dressing of children, +ought by all means to be set aside. They not only often wound the skin, +but they have occasionally been known to penetrate the body and the +joints of the limbs. So many of these dreadful accidents occur, and +where no accident happens, so much pain is occasionally given by their +sharp points to the little sufferer, who cannot tell what the matter is, +that it is quite time the practice were abolished.</p> + +<p>Do you ask what can be substituted?—The following mode is adopted by +Dr. Dewees in his own family, as mentioned in his work on the "Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children," at page 86.</p> + +<p>"The belly-band and the petticoat have strings; and not a single pin is +used in their adjustment. The little shirt, which is always made much +larger than the infant's body, is folded on the back and bosom, and +these folds kept in their places by properly adjusting the body of the +petticoat: so far not a pin is used. The diaper requires one, but this +should be of a large size, and made to serve the double purpose of +holding the folds of this article, as well as keeping the belly-band in +its proper place; the latter having a small tag of double linen +depending from its lower margin, by which it is secured to the diaper, +by the same pin.</p> + +<p>"Should an extraordinary display of best 'bib and tucker' be required +upon any special occasion, a third pin may be admitted to ensure the +well-sitting of the 'frock' waist in front;—this last pin, however, is +applied externally; so that the risk of its getting into the child's +body is very small, even if it should become displaced."</p> + +<p>The writer from whom the last two paragraphs are taken, says be has seen +needles substituted for pins; and relates a long story of a child whose +life was well nigh destroyed in this manner. It underwent months of ill +health, and many moments of excruciating agony, before the cause of its +trouble was suspected. Sometimes its distress was so great that nothing +but large doses of laudanum, sufficient to stupify it, could afford the +least relief. At last a tumor was discovered by the attending physician, +near one of the bones on which we sit, and a needle was extracted two +inches long. The needle had been put in its clothes, and, by slipping +into the folds of the skin, had insinuated itself, unperceived, into the +child's body. It is pleasing to add, that, although the little sufferer +had now been ill seven or eight months, and had endured almost +everything but death,—fever, diarrhoea, and the most excruciating +pain,—it soon recovered.</p> + +<p>This shocking circumstance is enough, one would think, to deter every +mother or nurse, who becomes acquainted with it, from using needles in +infants' clothes. Happy would it be, if, in banishing needles, they +would contrive to banish pins also, and adopt either the plan of Dr. +Dewees, or one still more rational.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Remaining Wet.</i></h4> + +<p>On the subject of changing the wet clothing of a child, there is a +strange and monstrous error abroad; which is, that by suffering them to +remain wet and cold, we harden the constitution. The filthiness of this +practice is enough to condemn it, were there nothing else to be said +against it.</p> + +<p>It is insisted on by many, I know, that as water which is salt, when it +is applied to the skin, and suffered to remain long, while it secures +the point of hardening the child, prevents all possibility of its taking +cold, it hence follows, that wet diapers are not injurious. But this is +a mistake. Every time an infant is allowed to remain wet, we not only +endanger its taking cold, but expose it to excoriations of the skin, if +not to serious and dangerous inflammation. In short, if frequent changes +are not made, whatever some mothers and nurses may think, they may rest +assured, that the health of the child must sooner or later suffer as the +consequence.</p> + +<p>Nor is it enough to hang up a diaper by the fire, and, as soon as it is +dry, apply it again. It should be clean, as well as dry. Let us not be +told, that it is troublesome to wash so often. Everything is in a +certain sense troublesome. Everything in this world, which is worth +having, is the result of toil. Nothing but absolute poverty affords the +shadow of an excuse for neglecting anything which will promote the +health, or even the comfort of the tender infant.</p> + +<p>Of the impropriety and danger of suffering wet clothes to dry upon us, I +shall speak elsewhere; as well as of the evil of suffering children to +remain dirty,—their skins or their clothing.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on the Dress of Boys.</i></h4> + +<p>Whatever tends to disturb the growth of the body, or hinder the free +exercise of the limbs, during the infancy and childhood of both sexes +is injurious. And as every mother has the control of these things, I +have thought it desirable to append to this chapter a few thoughts on +the particular dress of each sex. I begin with that of boys.</p> + +<p>"Nothing can be more injurious to health," says a foreign writer, "than +the tight jacket, buttoned up to the throat, the well-fitted boots, and +the stiff stock." And his remarks are nearly as applicable to this +country as to England. The consequences of this preposterous method of +dressing boys, are diminutive manhood, deformity of person, and a +constitution either already imbued with disease, or highly susceptible +of its impression.</p> + +<p>No part of the modern dress of boys is more absurd, than the stiff +stock, or thick cravat. It is not only injurious by pressing on the +<i>jugular</i> veins, and preventing the blood from freely passing out of the +head, but, by constantly pressing on the numerous and complex muscles of +the neck, at this period of life, it prevents their development; because +whatever hinders the action of the muscular parts, hinders their growth, +and makes them even appear as if wasted.</p> + +<p>It would be a great improvement, if this part of dress were wholly +discarded; and when is there so appropriate a time for setting it aside, +as <i>before we began to use it</i>; or rather while we are under the more +immediate care of our mothers?</p> + +<p>The use of jackets buttoned up to the throat, except in cold weather, is +objectionable; but this is very fortunately going out of fashion.</p> + +<p>Boots, if used at all, should fit well; to this there can be no possible +objection. What the writer, whom I have quoted, referred to, was +probably the tight boot, worn to prevent the foot from being large and +unseemly; but producing, as tight boots inevitably do, an injurious +effect upon the muscles, a constrained walk, and corns.</p> + +<p>What can be more painful, than to see little boys—yes, <i>little</i> +boys—boys neither fifteen, nor twenty, nor twenty-five, walk as if they +were fettered and trussed up for the spit; unable to look down, or turn +their heads, on account of a thick stock, or two or three cravats piled +on the top of each other—and only capable of using their arms to dangle +a cane, or carry an umbrella, as they hobble along, perhaps on a hot +sun-shiny day in July or August?</p> + +<p>But this evil, you who are mothers, have it very generally in your power +to prevent, if you are only wise enough to secure that ascendancy over +your children's minds which the Author of their nature designed. At the +least, you can prevent it for a time—the most important period, too—by +your own authority. This you will not need any urging to induce you to +do, if you ever become thoroughly convinced of its pre-eminent folly.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 11. <i>On the Dress of Girls.</i></h4> + +<p>The same general principles which should guide the young mother in +regard to the dress of boys, are equally important and applicable in the +management of girls. The whole dress should, as much as possible, hang +loosely from the shoulders, without pressing on the body, or any part of +it. This, I say, is the grand point to be aimed at; and this is the only +great principle, whatever some mothers may think, which will lead to +true beauty of person, and gracefulness of gesture.</p> + +<p>There is, however, a slight difference to be made between the dress of +girls and that of boys. The greater delicacy of the female frame +requires that the surface of the body should be kept rather warmer, as +well as better protected from the vicissitudes of the atmosphere.</p> + +<p>But is this the fact? Is not the contrary true? While boys in the winter +are clad in warm woollen vestments, covering every part of their trunk, +many portions of the female frame, and especially many parts of their +limbs, are left so much exposed, that in cold weather you scarcely find +a girl abroad, who appears to be comfortable.</p> + +<p>Nay, they are not only uncomfortable abroad, but at home; and if I were +to present to mothers in detail, a tenth of the evils which their +daughters suffer from not adopting a warmer method of clothing, I should +probably be stared at by some, and laughed at by others. All this, too, +without speaking of going out of warm concert rooms, theatres, ball +rooms and lecture rooms, into the night air, or out of school rooms and +churches, to walk home with measured and stiffened pace, lest the sin +unpardonable of walking swiftly or RUNNING,—that active exercise which +health requires, which youthful feeling prompts, and which duty ought to +inspire,—should unwarily be committed.</p> + +<p>The tremendous evils of confining the lungs have been adverted to at +sufficient length. In reference to that general subject, I need only +add, that if the chest be not duly exercised and expanded, the liver, +the lungs, the stomach, digestion, absorption, circulation and +perspiration, are all hindered. And even so far as the various internal +organs of the body <i>are</i> active, they act at a great disadvantage. The +blood which they "work up," is bad blood, and must be so, as long as the +lungs do not have free play. Hence may and do arise all sorts of +diseases; especially diseases of OBSTRUCTION; and such as are often very +difficult of removal.</p> + +<p>What can be a more pitiable sight than some modern girls going home from +school or church in winter? Thinly clad, the blood is all driven from +the surface upon the internal organs, and what remains is so loaded with +carbon, which the lungs ought but cannot discharge, that her skin has a +leaden hue; her teeth chatter; her very heart is chilled in her panting, +frozen bosom; she cannot run, and if she could, she must not, for it +would be vulgar! Every mother should shrink from the sight of such a +picture.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_V."></a><h2>CHAPTER V.</h2> + +<h3>CLEANLINESS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>No mother will ever pay that attention to cleanliness which its +importance to health and happiness demands, till she perceives its +necessity. And she will never perceive that necessity till she has +studied attentively the machinery of the human frame—and especially its +wonderful covering.</p> + +<p>The skin is pierced with little openings or <i>pores</i>, so numerous that +some have reckoned them at a million to every square inch. At all +events, they are so small that the naked eye can neither distinguish nor +count them; and so numerous, that we cannot pierce the skin with the +finest needle without hitting one or more of them.</p> + +<p>When we are in perfect health, and the skin clean, a gentle moisture or +mist continually oozes through these pores. This process is called +<i>perspiration</i>; and the moisture which thus escapes, the <i>matter</i> of +perspiration.</p> + +<p>Perspiration may be checked in two ways. 1. by filth on the skin; 2. by +what is commonly called taking cold—for taking cold essentially +consists in chilling the skin to such a degree as to stop, for some +time, the escape of this moisture. Most persons have doubtless observed, +that in the first stages of a cold, they frequently have a very dry +skin. Whereas, when we are in health, the skin usually feels moist.</p> + +<p>Our health is not only endangered, and a foundation laid for fevers, +rheumatisms, and consumptions, by stopping the pores of the skin with +dirt, or anything else, but there is also danger from another and a very +different source.</p> + +<p>The blood, in its circulation through the body, is constantly becoming +impure; and as it thus comes back impure to the heart, is as constantly +sent to the lungs, where it comes in close contact with the air which we +breathe, and is purified. But this same purifying process which goes on +in the lungs, goes on, too, if the skin is in a pure, free, healthy +condition, all over the surface of the body. If it is not—if the skin +cannot do this part of the work—an additional burden is thus laid on +the lungs, which in this way soon become so overworked, that they +cannot perform their own proportion of the labor. And whenever this +happens, the health must soon suffer.</p> + +<p>The strange belief, that "dirt is healthy," has much influence on the +daily practice of thousands of those who are ignorant of the human +structure, and the laws which govern and regulate the animal economy. It +has probably originated in the well-known fact, that those children who +are allowed to play in the dirt, are often as healthy—and even <i>more</i> +healthy—than those who are confined to the nursery or the parlor.</p> + +<p>Now, while it is admitted that this is a very common case, it is yet +believed that the former class of children would be still more vigorous +than they now are, if they were kept more cleanly, or were at least +frequently washed. It is not the dirt which promotes their health, but +their active exercise in the open air; the advantages of which are more +than sufficient to compensate for the injury which they sustain from the +dirt. That is to say, they retain, in spite of the dirt, better health +than those who are denied the blessings of pure air and abundant +exercise, and subjected to the opposite extreme of almost constant +confinement.</p> + +<p>There is something deceitful, after all, in the ruddy, blooming +appearance of those children who are left by the busy parent to play in +the road or field, without attention to cleanliness. If this were not +so, how comes it to pass that they suffer much more, not only from +chronic, but from acute diseases, than children whose parents are in +better circumstances?</p> + +<p>I am the more solicitous to combat a belief in the salutary tendency of +an unclean skin, because I know it prevails to some extent; and because +I know also, both from reason and from fact, that it is a gross error.</p> + +<p>It is, however, true, that years sometimes intervene, before the evil +consequences of dirtiness appear. The office of the vessels of the skin +being interrupted, an increase of action is imposed on other parts, +especially on those internal organs commonly called glands, which action +is apt to settle into obstinate disease. Hence, at least when aided by +other causes, often arise, in later life, after the source of the evil +is forgotten, if it were ever suspected, rheumatism, scrofula, jaundice, +and even consumption.</p> + +<p>There is a strange notion abroad, that the <i>smell</i> of the earth is +beneficial, especially to consumptive persons. I honestly believe, +however, that it is more likely to create consumption than to cure it. +Besides, in what does this smell consist? Do the silex, the alumine, and +the other earths, with their compounds, emit any odor? Rarely, I +believe, unless when mixed with vegetable matter. But no gases +necessary to health are evolved during the decomposition of vegetable +matter; on the contrary, it is well known that many of them tend to +induce disease.</p> + +<p>I am thoroughly persuaded that too much attention cannot be paid to +cleanliness; and the demand for such attention is equally imperious in +the case of those who cultivate the earth, or labor in it, or on stone, +during the intervals of their useful avocations, as in the case of those +individuals who follow other employments.</p> + +<p>I must also protest against the doctrine, that the smell or taste of the +earth, much less a coat of it spread over the surface, and closing up, +for hours and days together, thousands and millions of those little +pores with which the Author of this "wondrous frame" has pierced the +skin, can have a salutary tendency.</p> + +<p>The opinion has been even maintained, that uncleanly habits are not only +unfavorable to health, but to morality. There can be no doubt that he +who neglects his person and dress will be found lower in the scale of +morals, other things being equal, than he who pays a due regard to +cleanliness.</p> + +<p>Some have supposed that a disposition to neglect personal cleanliness +was indicative of genius. But this opinion is grossly erroneous, and +has well nigh ruined many a young man.</p> + +<p>I am far from recommending any degree of fastidiousness on this subject. +Truth and correct practice usually lie between extremes. But I do and +must insist, that the connection between cleanliness of body and purity +of moral character, is much more close and direct than has usually been +supposed.</p> + +<p>But to return to the more immediate effects of cleanliness on health. +There is one class of diseases in particular which, in an eminent +degree, owe their origin to a neglect of cleanliness. I refer to the +bowel complaints so common among children during summer and autumn. +Except in case of teething, the use of unripe fruits, or the <i>abuse</i> of +those which are in themselves excellent, it is probable that more than +half of the bowel complaints of the young are either produced or greatly +aggravated by a foul skin.</p> + +<p>The importance of washing the whole body in water will be insisted on in +the chapter on Bathing; it is therefore unnecessary to say anything +farther on that subject in this place, except to observe that whether +the washings of the body be partial or general, they should be thorough, +so far as they are carried. There are thousands of children who, in +pretending to wash their hands and face, will do little more than wet +the inside of their hands, and the tips of their noses and ears unless +great care is taken.</p> + +<p>Few things are more important than suitable changes of dress. There are +those, who, from principle, never wear the same under-garment but one +day without washing, either in summer or winter; and there are others +who, though they may wear an article without washing two or three +successive days, take care to change their dress at night—never +sleeping in a garment which they have worn during the day.</p> + +<p>It is a very common objection to suggestions like these, that they will +do very well for those who have wealth, but not for the poor;—that +<i>they</i> have neither the time nor the means of attending to them. How can +they change their clothes every day? we are asked. And how can they +afford to have a separate dress for the night?</p> + +<p>There must be retrenchment in some other matters, it is admitted. In +order to find time for more washing, or money to pay others for the +labor, the poor must deny themselves a few things which they now +suppose, if they have ever thought at all on the subject, are conducive +to their happiness—but which are in reality either useless or +injurious. Something may be saved by a reasonable dress, as I have +already shown. Other items of expense, which might be spared with great +advantage to health and happiness, and applied to the purpose in +question, will be mentioned in the chapter on Food and Drink.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VI."></a><h2>CHAPTER VI.</h2> + +<h3>ON BATHING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Danger of savage practices. Rousseau. Cold water at birth. First washing +of the child. Rules. Temperature. Bathing vessels. Unreasonable fears. +Whims. Views of Dr. Dewees. Hardening. Rules for the cold bath. Securing +a glow. Coming out of the bath. Local baths. Shower bath. Vapor bath. +Sponging. Neglect of bathing. The Romans. Treatment of children compared +with that of domestic animals.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Some of the hardy nations of antiquity, as well as a few savage tribes +of modern times, have been accustomed to plunge their new-born infants +into cold water. This is done for the two-fold purpose of washing and +hardening them.</p> + +<p>To all who reason but for a moment on this subject, the danger of such a +practice must be obvious. So sudden a change from a temperature of +nearly 100° of Fahrenheit to one quite low, perhaps scarcely 40°, must +and does have a powerful effect on the nervous system even of an adult; +but how much more on that of a tender infant? We may form some idea of +this, by the suddenness and violence of its cries, by the sudden +contractions and relaxations of its limbs and body, and by its +palpitating heart and difficult breathing.</p> + +<p>Every one's experience may also remind him, that what produces at best a +momentary pain to himself, cannot otherwise than be painful to the +infant. In making a comparison between adults and infants, however, in +this respect, we should remember that the lungs of the infant do not get +into full and vigorous action until some time after birth; and that, on +this account, the hold they have on life is so feeble, that any powerful +shock, and especially that given by the cold bath, is ten times more +dangerous to them than to adults, or even to infants themselves, after a +few months have elapsed.</p> + +<p>It is surprising to me that so sensible a writer as Rousseau generally +is on education, should have encouraged this dangerous practice; and +still more so that many fathers even now, blinded by theory, should +persist in it, notwithstanding the pleadings of the mother or the nurse, +and the plainest dictates of common sense and common prudence.[Footnote: +Nothing is intended to be said here, which shall encourage unthinking +nurses or mothers in setting themselves against measures which have been +prescribed by higher authority,—I mean the physician. There are cases +of this kind, where it requires all the resolution which a father, +uninterrupted, can summon to his aid, to administer a dose or perform a +task, on which he knows the existence of his child may be depending: but +when the thoughtless entreaties of the mother or nurse are interposed, +it makes his condition most distressing. Mothers, in such cases, ought +to encourage rather than remonstrate. They who <i>do not</i>, are guilty of +cruelty, and—perhaps—of infanticide.]</p> + +<p>A child plunged into cold water at birth, by those whose theories carry +them so far as to do it even in the coldest weather, has sometimes been +twenty-four hours in recovering, notwithstanding the most active and +judicious efforts to restore it. In other instances the results have +been still more distressing. Dr. Dewees is persuaded that he has "known +death itself to follow the use of cold water," in this way—I believe he +means <i>immediate</i> death—and adds, with great confidence, that he has +"repeatedly seen it require the lapse of several hours before reaction +could establish itself; during which time the pale and sunken cheeks and +livid lips declared the almost exhausted state" of the infant's +excitability.[Footnote: "Dewees on children" p. 72.]</p> + +<p>We need not hesitate to put very great confidence in the opinion here +expressed; for besides being a close and just observer of human nature, +Dr. D. has had the direction and management, in a greater or less +degree, of several thousands of new-born infants.</p> + +<p>Nothing, indeed, in the whole range of physical education, seems better +proved, than that while some few infants, whose constitutions are +naturally very strong, are invigorated by the practice in question, +others, in the proportion of hundreds for one, who are <i>less</i> robust, +are injured for life; some of them seriously.</p> + +<p>Nor will spirits added to the water make any material difference. I am +aware that there is a very general notion abroad, that the injurious +effects of cold water, in its application both internally and +externally, are greatly diminished by the addition of a little spirit; +but it is not so. Does the addition of such a small quantity of spirit +as is generally used in these cases, materially alter the temperature? +Is it not the application of a cold liquid to a heated surface, still? +Can we make anything else of it, either more or less?</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to say, that the cold bath may not be so managed in +the progress of infancy, as to make it beneficial, especially to strong +constitutions. It is its indiscriminate application to all new-born +children, without regard to strength of constitution, or any other +circumstances, that I most strenuously oppose. Of its occasional use, +under the eye of a physician, and by parents who will discriminate, I +shall say more presently.</p> + +<p>Our first duty on receiving a new inhabitant of the world is, to see +that it is gently but thoroughly washed, in moderately warm soft water, +with fine soap. Special attention should be paid to the folds of the +joints, the neck, the arm pits, &c. For rubbing the body, in order to +disengage anything which might obstruct the pores, or irritate or fret +the skin, nothing can be preferable to a piece of soft sponge or +flannel. Though the operation should be thorough, and also as rapid as +the nature of circumstances will permit, all harshness should be +avoided. When finished, the child should be wiped perfectly dry with +soft flannel.</p> + +<p>While the washing is performed, the temperature of the room should be +but a few degrees lower than that of the water; and the child should not +be exposed to currents of cold air. If the weather is severe, or if +currents of air in the room cannot otherwise be avoided, the dressing, +undressing, washing, &c., may be done near the fire. And I repeat the +rule, it should always be done with as much rapidity as is compatible +with safety.</p> + +<p>Here will be seen one great advantage of simplicity in the form of +dress. If the more rational suggestions of our chapter on that subject +are attended to, it will greatly facilitate the process of washing, and +the subsequent daily process of bathing, which I am about to recommend +to my readers.</p> + +<p>This washing process is also an introduction to bathing. For it should +be repeated every day; but with less and less attention to the washing, +and more and more reference to the bathing. How long the child should +stay in the bath, must be left to experience. If he is quiet, fifteen +minutes can never be too long; and I should not object to twenty. If +otherwise, and you are obliged to remove him in five minutes, or even in +three, still the bathing will be of too much service to be dispensed +with.</p> + +<p>Nothing should be mixed with the water, if the infant is healthy, except +a little soap, as already mentioned. Some are fond of using salt; but it +is by no means necessary, and may do harm.</p> + +<p>The proper hour for bathing is the early part of the day, or about the +middle of the forenoon. This season is selected, because the process, +manage it as carefully as we may, is at first a little exhausting. As +the child grows older, however, and not only becomes stronger, but +appears to be actually refreshed and invigorated by the bath, it will be +advisable to defer it to a later and later hour. By the time the babe is +three months old, particularly in the warm season, the hour of bathing +may be at sunset.</p> + +<p>The degree of heat must be determined, in part, by observing its effect +on the child; and in part by a thermometer. For this, and for other +purposes, a thermometer, as I have already more than hinted, is +indispensable in every nursery. Our own sensations are often at best a +very unsafe guide. There is one rule which should always be +observed—never to have the temperature of the bath below that of the +air of the room. If the thermometer show the latter to be 70°, the bath +should be something like 80° perhaps with feeble children, rather more.</p> + +<p>Great care ought always to be taken to proportion the air of the room +and the water of the bath to each other. If, for example, the +temperature of the room have been, for some time, unusually warm, that +of the water must not be so low as if it had been otherwise. On the +contrary, if the room have been, for a considerable time, rather cool, +the bath may be made several degrees cooler than in other circumstances. +But in no case and in no circumstances must a <i>warm</i> bath—intended as +such, simply—be so warm or so cold, as to make the child uncomfortable; +whether the temperature be 70°, 80°, or 90°.</p> + +<p>It is hardly necessary to add, that in bathing a young child, the vessel +used for the purpose should be large enough to give free scope to all +the motions of its extremities. Most children are delighted to play and +scramble about in the water. I know, indeed, that the contrary sometimes +happens; but when it does, it is usually—I do not say <i>always</i>—because +the countenances of those who are around express fear or apprehension; +for it is surprising how early these little beings learn to decipher our +feelings by our very countenances.</p> + +<p>Some of our readers may be surprised at the intimation that there are +mothers and nurses who have fears or apprehensions in regard to the +effects of the warm bath; but others—and it is for such that I write +this paragraph—will fully understand me. I have been often surprised at +the fact, but it is undoubted, that there is a strong prejudice against +warm bathing, in many parts of the country. In endeavoring to trace the +cause, I have usually found that it arose from having seen or heard of +some child who died soon after its application. I have had many a parent +remonstrate with me on the danger of the warm bath; and this, too, in +circumstances when it appeared to me, that the child's existence +depended, under God, on that very measure. Perhaps it is useless in such +cases, however, to reason with parents on the subject. The medical +practitioner must do his duty boldly and fearlessly, and risk the +consequences.</p> + +<p>But as I am writing, not for persons under immediate excitement, but for +those that may be reasoned with, it is proper to say, that in medicine, +the warm bath is so often used in extreme cases, and as a last resort, +even when death has already grasped, or is about to fix his grasp on the +sufferer, that it would be very strange if many persons <i>did not</i> die, +just after bathing. But that the bathing itself ever produced this +result, in one case in a thousand, there is not the slightest reason for +believing. [Footnote: Let me not be understood as intimating that, the +general neglect of bathing, of which I complain so loudly, is <i>chiefly</i> +owing to this unreasonable prejudice, though this no doubt has its sway. +On the contrary, I believe it is much oftener owing to ignorance, +indolence, and parsimony.]</p> + +<p>There are many more whims connected with bathing, as with almost +everything else, which it were equally desirable to remove. Some nurses +and mothers think that if the child's skin is wiped dry after bathing, +it will impair, if not destroy, the good effects of the operation. +Others still, shocking to relate, will even put it to bed in its wet +clothes; this, too, from principle. Not unlike this, is the belief, very +common among adults, that if we get our clothes wet—even our +stockings—we must, by all means, suffer them to dry on us; a belief +which, in its results, has sent thousands to a premature grave—and, +what is still worse, made invalids, for life, of a still greater number.</p> + +<p>I am aware, that in rejecting the indiscriminate cold bathing of +infants, I am treading on ground which is rather unpopular, even with +medical men; a large proportion of whom seem to believe that the +practice may be useful. But I am not <i>wholly</i> alone. Dr. Dewees—of +whose large experience I have already spoken—and some others, do not +hesitate to avow similar sentiments.</p> + +<p>The objections of Dr. Dewees to cold bathing are the following. 1. There +often exists a predisposition to disease, which cold bathing is sure to +rouse to action. Or if the disease have already begun to affect the +system, the bath is sure to aggravate it. 2. Some children have such +feeble constitutions that they are sure to be permanently weakened by +it, rather than invigorated. 3. To those in whom there is the tendency +of a large quantity of blood to the head, lungs, liver, &c., it is +injurious. 4. In some, the shock produces a species of syncope, or +catalepsy. 5. The <i>reaction</i>, as shown by the heat which follows the +cold bath, is, in some cases, so great as to produce a degree of fever, +and consequent debility. 6. It never answers the purposes of +cleanliness—one great object of bathing—so well as the warm bath. 7. +It is always unpleasant or painful to the child; especially at first. 8. +It sometimes produces severe pain in the bowels.</p> + +<p>This is a very formidable list of objections; and certainly deserves +consideration. There is one statement made by Dr. D. in the progress of +his remarks on this subject, in which I do not concur. He says—"The +object of all bathing is to remove impurities arising from dust, +perspiration, &c., from the surface; that the skin may not be obstructed +in the performance of its proper offices."</p> + +<p>But the object of cold bathing, with many, is to <i>harden</i>; consequently +it is not true that cleanliness is the <i>only object</i>. If he means, even, +that cleanliness is the only <i>legitimate</i> object of all bathing, I shall +still be compelled to dissent.</p> + +<p>If the cold bath could be used, always, by and with the direction of a +skilful physician, I believe its occasional use might be rendered +salutary. And although as it is now commonly used, I believe its effects +are almost anything but salutary, I do not deny that if its use were +cautiously and gradually begun, and judiciously conducted, it might be +the means of making children who are already robust, still more hardy +and healthy than before, and better able to resist those sudden changes +of temperature so common in our climate, and so apt to produce cold, +fever, and consumption.</p> + +<p>Cold bathing, in the hands of those who are ignorant of the laws of the +human frame—and such unfortunately and unaccountably most fathers and +mothers are—I cannot help regarding as a highly dangerous weapon; and +therefore it is, that in view of the whole subject, I cannot recommend +its general and indiscriminate use.</p> + +<p>If there are individuals, however, who are determined to employ it, in +the case of their more vigorous children, and without the advice or +direction of their family physician, I beg them to attend to the +following rules or principles, expressed as briefly as possible.</p> + +<p>In no ordinary case whatever, is the cold bath useful, unless it is +succeeded by that degree of warmth on the surface of the body which is +usually called a <i>glow</i>. This is a leading and important principle. The +contrary, that is, the injurious effects of cold bathing—its +<i>immediate</i> bad effects, I mean—are shown by the skin remaining pale +and shrivelled after coming out of the bath, by its blue appearance, and +by its coldness, as well as by a sunken state of the eyes, and much +general languor.</p> + +<p>To secure this point—I mean the GLOW—it is indispensably important to +begin the use of cold water gradually; that is, to use it at first of +so high a temperature as to produce only a slight sensation of cold, and +to take special care that the skin be immediately wiped very dry, and +the temperature of the room be quite as high as usual. Afterward the +water may be cooled gradually, from week to week, though never more than +a degree or two at once.</p> + +<p>It will probably be unsafe to commence this practice of cold +bathing—even in the case of the most robust children—until they are at +least six months of age.</p> + +<p>The appropriate season will be the middle of the forenoon, the hour when +the system is usually the most vigorous, and at which we shall be most +likely to secure a reaction. At first, twice or three times a week are +as often as it will be safe to repeat it. Some writers recommend it +twice a day; but once is enough, under any ordinary circumstances.</p> + +<p>The method at first is, to give the infant a single plunge. Afterward, +when he becomes older, and more inured to it, he may be plunged several +times in succession.</p> + +<p>On taking him out of the bath, the skin should be wiped perfectly dry, +as in the case of the warm bath, and with the same or an increased +degree of attention to other circumstances—the temperature of the +room, the avoiding currents of air, &c. He should next be put in a soft, +warm blanket, and be kept for some time in a state of gentle motion; and +after a little time, should be dressed.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned the importance of avoiding the manifestation of +fear, when we bathe a child; and the caution is particularly necessary +in the administration of the cold bath. Some writers even recommend, +that during the whole process of undressing, bathing, exercising, and +dressing, singing should be employed. There is philosophy in this +advice, and it is easily tried; but I cannot speak of it from +experience.</p> + +<p>There is one thing which may serve to calm our apprehensions—if we have +any—of danger; which is, that though the child's lungs are feeble at +first, from their not having been, like the heart, accustomed to +previous action, yet when they get fairly into motion and action, and +the child is a few months old, they are probably as strong, if not +stronger, in proportion, than those of adults.</p> + +<p>Bathing in cold water should never be performed immediately after a full +meal. Neither is it desirable to go to the contrary extreme, and bathe +when the stomach has been long empty; nor when the child's mental or +bodily powers are more than usually exhausted by fatigue.</p> + +<p>Although I have given these rules for those who are determined to use +the cold bath with their children, yet, for fear I shall be +misunderstood, I must be suffered to repeat, in this place, that, +uninformed as people generally are in regard to physiology, I cannot +advise even its moderate use. On the contrary, I would gladly dissuade +from it, as most likely, in the way it would inevitably be used, to do +more harm than good.</p> + +<p>There is no sort of objection to what might be called local bathing with +cold water. If the child's head is hot at any time, the temples, and +indeed the whole upper part of the head, may be very properly wet with +moderately cold water—taking care to avoid wetting the clothes. But +avoid, by all means, the common but foolish practice of putting spirits +in the water.</p> + +<p>A tea-spoonful of cold water cannot be too early put into the mouth of +the infant. The object is to cleanse or rinse the mouth; and the process +may be aided by wiping it out with a piece of soft linen rag. If a part +or all of the water should be swallowed, no harm will be done. This +practice, commenced almost as soon as children are born, has saved many +a sore mouth.</p> + +<p>There are other forms of bathing besides those already mentioned; among +which are the shower bath, the vapor bath, and the medicated bath. The +shower bath—for which purpose the water is commonly used cold—is but +poorly adapted to the wants of infants. The shock is much greater than +the common cold bath, and more apt to frighten; and fear is unfavorable +to reaction, or the production of a genial glow.</p> + +<p>The vapor bath is much better; and probably has quite as good an effect +as the common warm bath. The trouble and expense of procuring the +necessary apparatus is somewhat greater, however, as a mere bathing tub +costs but little, and can be made by every father who possesses common +ingenuity. But whatever may be the expense, it is indispensable in every +family; and whenever the pores of the skin are obstructed, a vapor +bathing apparatus is equally desirable.</p> + +<p>The medicated vapor bath is sometimes used; but I am not now treating of +infants who are sick, but of those who are in a state of health.</p> + +<p>The common warm bath is sometimes medicated by putting in salt. This, of +course, renders the water more stimulating to the skin; but except when +the perspiration is checked, or the skin peculiarly inactive from some +other cause—in other words, unless we are sick—it is seldom expedient +to use it.</p> + +<p>There is one substitute for the bathing tub, in the case of the cold +bath. I refer to the use of a wet cloth or sponge, applied rapidly to +the whole surface of the body. When this is done, the skin should be +wiped thoroughly dry immediately afterwards, as in the case of complete +immersion.</p> + +<p>The application of either a cloth or a sponge, filled with warm water, +to the skin, in this manner, even if continued for several minutes +together, is less efficacious than a continuous immersion. I repeat +it—no family ought to be without conveniences for bathing in warm water +daily. I speak now of every member of the family, young and old, as well +as the infant; and I refer particularly to the summer season: though I +do not think the practice ought to be wholly discontinued during the +winter.</p> + +<p>It will still be objected that this care of, and attention to the young, +in reference to health—this provision for bathing daily, and care to +see that it is performed—can never be afforded by the laboring portion +of the community. But I shall as strenuously insist on the contrary; and +trust I shall, in the sequel, produce reasons which will be +satisfactory.</p> + +<p>The great difficulty is, to convince parents that these things are +vastly more productive of health and happiness to their children—more +truly necessaries—than a great many things for which they now expend +their time and money. There is, and always has been—except, perhaps, +among the Jews, in the earliest periods of the history of that wonderful +nation—a strange disposition to overlook the happiness of the young. It +is not necessary to represent this dereliction as peculiar to modern +times, for we find traces of the same thing thousands of years ago.</p> + +<p>The Roman emperors—Dioclesian in particular—could make provision for +bathing, to an extent which now astonishes us; but for whom? For whom, I +repeat it, was incurred the enormous expense of fitting up and keeping +in repair accommodations for bathing at once 18,000 people? For adults; +and for adults alone. I do not say that children were not admitted, in +any case; but I say they were not contemplated in these arrangements. +Nothing was done—not a single thing—that would not have been done, had +there been no child under ten years of age in the whole empire.</p> + +<p>And what better than this do WE, now? We make provision for the +happiness of the adult. The most indigent person will find time and +money to spend for the gratification of his own senses, his pride, or +his curiosity; but his children—they may be overlooked! Or, if he has +an eye to the future happiness of his child, he conceives that he is +promoting it in the best possible degree, by endeavoring to lay up a few +dollars for his use, after his character is formed—at a period, as it +too often happens, when money will do him little good, since it can +neither purchase health, peace of mind, nor reputation.</p> + +<p>Far be it from me to say, that the poor—ground into the dust as they +are, by the force of circumstances operating with their own concurrence, +to make them ignorant, vicious, or miserable—can do for their children +all that is desirable. By no means. But they have it in their power to +do much more than they are at present doing. They have it in their +power, at least, to use the same good sense in the management of the +human being that they do in that of a pig, a calf, or a colt, or even a +young vegetable. No parent, let him be ever so poor, is found in the +habit of neglecting either of these in proportion to its infancy, and of +exerting himself only in proportion as it grows older. Common sense +tells him that the contrary is the true course; that however poor he may +be, he will be still poorer, if he do not take special pains with the +young animal, to rear it and with the young vegetable, to give it the +right direction, by keeping down the weeds, and pruning and watering it. +And I say again, that however deserving of censure the wealthy of a +Christian community may be in not directing the ignorant and vicious +into the right path, and in not expending more of their wealth on those +who are poor, in elevating their minds and their manners, and promoting +their health, still the latter are inexcusable for their present neglect +of their infant offspring, while they would not think of neglecting, on +the same principle, the offspring of their domestic animals.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VII."></a><h2>CHAPTER VII.</h2> + +<h3>FOOD.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">SEC. 1. General principles.—SEC. 2. Conduct of the mother.—SEC. 3. +Nursing—rules in regard to it.—SEC. 4. Quantity of food. Errors. +Over-feeding. Gluttony.—SEC. 5. How long should milk be the child's +only food?—SEC. 6 Feeding before teething. Cow's milk. Sucking bottles. +Cleanliness. Nurses.—SEC. 7. Treatment from teething to weaning.—SEC. +8. Process of weaning-rules in regard to it.—SEC. 9. First food to be +used after weaning. Importance of good bread. Other kinds of food.—SEC. +10. Remarks on fruit.—SEC. 11. Evils and dangers of confectionary.—SEC. +12. Mischiefs of pastry.—SEC. 13. Crude and raw substances.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>General Principles.</i></h4> + +<p>The mother's milk, in suitable quantity, and under suitable regulations, +is so obviously the appropriate food of an infant during the first +months of its existence, that it seems almost unnecessary to repeat the +fact. And yet the violations of this rule are so numerous and constant, +as to require a few passing remarks.</p> + +<p>There are some mothers who seem to have a perfect hatred of children; +and if they can find any plausible apology for neglecting to nurse them, +they will. Few, indeed, will publicly acknowledge a state of feeling so +unnatural; but there are some even of such. On the latter, all argument +would, I fear, be utterly lost. Of the former, there may, be hope.</p> + +<p>They tell us—and they are often sustained by those around them—that it +is very inconvenient to be so confined to a child that they cannot leave +home for a little while. Can it be their duty—for in these days, when +virtue and religion, and everything good, are so highly complimented, no +people are more ready to talk of <i>duty</i> than they who have the least +regard to it—can it be their duty, they ask, to exclude themselves from +the pleasures and comforts of social life for half or two thirds of +their most active and happy years? Ought they not to go abroad, at least +occasionally? But if so, and their children have no other source of +dependence, must they not suffer? Is it not better, therefore, that they +should be early accustomed to other food, for a part of the time? +Besides, they may be sick; and then the child must rely on others; and +will it not be useful to accustom it early to do so?</p> + +<p>Perhaps few mothers are conscious that this train of reasoning passes +through their minds. But that something like it is often made the +occasion of substituting food which is less proper, for that furnished +by Divine Providence, there cannot be a doubt. And the mischief is, that +she who has gone so far, will not scruple, ere long, to go farther. And, +strange and unnatural as it may seem, that mothers should turn over +their children to be nursed wholly by others, in order to get rid of the +inconvenience of nursing them at their own bosoms, it is only carrying +out to its fullest extent, and reducing to practice, the train of +reasoning mentioned above.</p> + +<p>Nor is it necessary that I should stop here to denounce a course of +conduct so unchristian and savage. I know it is very common in some +countries; and those American mothers who ape the other eastern +fashions, or countenance their sons and daughters in doing it, will not +be slow to imitate this also—especially as it is a very <i>convenient</i> +fashion. And I question whether I shall succeed in reasoning them out of +it. Habit, both of thought and action, is exceedingly powerful. I will, +therefore, confine myself chiefly to those efforts at prevention, from +which much more is to be hoped, in the present state of society, than +from direct attempts at cure.</p> + +<p>It will be soon enough to leave a child with another person, when the +mother is actually sick, or unavoidably absent; or when some other +adequate cause is known to exist. We are to be governed, in these and +similar cases, by general rules, and not by exceptions. The general +rule, in the present case, is, that mothers can nurse their own +children; and, if they have the proper disposition, that they can do it +uninterruptedly.</p> + +<p>But those who are so ready to become counsellors on these occasions, +will tell us, perhaps, that the child must be "fed to spare the mother." +That is to say, nursing weakens the mother, and the child must be taken +away, a part of the time, to save her strength.</p> + +<p>Now it may safely be doubted whether the process of nursing, in itself +considered, does weaken, at all. The Author of nature has made provision +for the secretion (formation) of the milk, whether the child receives it +or not. If it is not taken by the child, or drawn off in some other way, +one of two things must follow;—either it must be taken up by what are +called absorbent vessels, and carried into the circulation, and chiefly +thrown out of the system as waste matter, or it will prove a source of +irritation, if not of inflammation, to the organs themselves which +secrete it. In both cases, the strength of the mother is quite as likely +to be taxed, as if the child received the milk in the way that nature +intended.</p> + +<p>Besides, on this very principle, the plan of saving a mother's strength +by requiring another to nurse for her, is but saying that we will weaken +one person to save another. Or if we feed the child, to "spare its +mother," what is this, in practice, but to say that the works of the +Creator are very imperfect; and that he has thrown upon the mass of +mankind a task to which they are not equal? For the mass of mankind are +poor; and the poor, having neither the means nor the time to escape the +duties in question, must submit to them, while their more wealthy +neighbors escape.</p> + +<p>But it is idle to defend customs so monstrous. They admit of no defence +that has the slightest claim to solidity. The general rule then is, that +mothers should nurse their own children.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Conduct of the Mother.</i></h4> + +<p>Originally it was not my intention to give directions, in this volume, +in regard to the food, drink, &c., of the mother while nursing; but +repeated solicitations on this point, have led me to the conclusion that +a few general principles may be very properly introduced.</p> + +<p>The future health, and even the moral well-being of the child, depend +much more on the proper management of the mother herself than is usually +supposed. How, indeed, can it be other wise? How can the mother's blood +be constantly irritated with improper food and drink, without rendering +the milk so? And how can a child draw, daily and hourly, from this +feverish fountain, without being affected, not only in his physical +frame, but in his very temper and feelings?</p> + +<p>It is not enough that we adopt the principles already insisted on by +some of our wisest medical men, and even by one or two medical +societies,[Footnote: Those of Connecticut and New Hampshire.] that +children in this way often acquire a propensity for exciting drinks, +that may end in their downright intemperance. What if it should not, in +every case, proceed quite so far as to make the child a drunkard? If it +but lays the foundation of a constitutional fondness for <i>excitements</i>, +it tends to disease. Indeed that, in itself, is a disease; and one, too, +which is destroying more persons every year than the cholera, or even +the consumption. Consumption has at most only slain her tens of +thousands [Footnote: About 40,000 a year, in the United States, as nearly +as it can be estimated.] a year; but a fondness for exciting food and +drink—innocent and harmless as it is often supposed to be, and +therefore only the more dangerous a foe—does not fail to slay every +year, directly or indirectly, its hundreds of thousands. At least this +is my own opinion.</p> + +<p>Why, where can you find the individual who is not a slave to this +perpetual rage within—this perpetual cry, "Who will show us any" +physical "good"? Who, in this land of abundance, will eat or drink plain +things? Who will eat simple bread, meat, potatoes, rice, pudding, +apples, &c. or drink simple water? A few instances may be found, of +late, in which people confine themselves to simple water for drink; but +they are rather rare. And no wonder. They <i>must</i> be rare so long as an +unnatural thirst is kept up everywhere by the most exciting and most +strange mixtures of food. Where, I again ask, is the person who will eat +and relish plain bread, plain meat, plain puddings, &c.? Certainly not +in the nursery. No young mother—scarcely one I mean—will, for a single +meal, confine herself to a piece of bread, the sweetest and best food in +the whole world, unless it is hot, or toasted, or soaked, or buttered. A +natural, healthy appetite, is as rare a thing on our planet, almost, as +an inhabitant of the sun or moon.</p> + +<p>I have seen more than one mother made sick by using, while nursing, +improper food and drink. I have known milk punch, taken by +stealth—(because how could the mother, it was said, ever have a supply +of food for her poor child without it!)—to kindle a fever that came +very near burning up the mother and child both. And yet, if I have once +or twice succeeded in convincing the mother that she was only suffering +the natural punishment of her own transgressions, I have never, so far +as I now recollect, succeeded in making her believe that her iniquities +were visited upon her unoffending infant.</p> + +<p>There is everywhere the most painful apathy on this most painful +subject. We see little children of all ages, everywhere, the victims of +debility, and pain, and suffering, and disease and death, and yet we +very seldom seem to search for one moment for the causes of this +premature destruction. In fact most parents—even many intelligent +mothers—at once stare, if you attempt to inquire into the causes of +their child's death, as if it was either a kind of sacrilege, or an +impeachment of their own parental affection. Diseases, even at this day, +with the sun of science blazing in meridian splendor, they seem to +regard as the judgments of heaven; and to think of tracing out the +causes of the early death of half our race, is, in their estimation, not +only idle, but wicked.</p> + +<p>Yet this is obviously one of the first steps, every, where, which +philanthropy demands; to say nothing of the demands of christianity. It +is the first step for the physician, the first step for the educator, +the first step for the parent, and above all, the mother. Nay; more—we +must not suppress so great and important a truth—it is the first step +for the legislator and the minister. What sense is there in continuing, +century after century, and age after age, to expend all our efforts in +merely <i>mending</i> the diseased half of mankind, when those same efforts +are amply sufficient, if early and properly applied, not only to +continue the lives of the whole, but to make them <i>whole beings</i>, +instead of passing through life mere <i>fragments</i> of humanity?</p> + +<p>But I must not forget that this is merely a small manual, not intended +for those who make it their profession to teach the laws of God and man, +but simply for young mothers. For the sake of erring humanity, would +that I could, but for one moment, divest myself of the idea, that in +writing for the young mother I am not writing for legislators and +ministers! Would that I could banish from my mind the deep conviction +that the mother is everywhere far more the law-giver to her infant—far +more the arbiter of the present and eternal destiny of her child—than +he who is more commonly regarded as such.</p> + +<p>Every mother owes it, not only to herself—for on this part she is not +<i>wholly</i> forgetful—but to her offspring, to abstain, during the period +of nursing at least, from all causes which tend to produce a feverish +state of her fluids. Among these are every form of premature exertion, +whether in sitting up, laboring, conversing, or even thinking. It is of +very great importance that both the body and the mind should be kept +quiet; and the more so, the better.</p> + +<p>Among the particular causes of fever to the young mother, Dr. Dewees +enumerates spirits, wine, and other fermented liquors, a room too much +heated, closed curtains, confined air, too much exposure, and too much +company; and during the early period of confinement, broths and animal +food.</p> + +<p>There is nothing which he insists on more strongly, than the importance +of fresh air. Indeed, the practice of confining a nursing woman in a +space scarcely six feet square, and excluding the air surrounding her by +curtains and closed windows, and subjecting her to the necessity of +breathing twenty times the air that has already been as often +discharged, filled with poison, from her lungs, is not too strongly +reprobated by Dr. Dewees, or anybody else. But I have spoken of these +things in the chapter which treats on "The Nursery." I would only +observe, on this point, that if I were asked what one thing is most +indispensable to the health of the nursing woman, I would reply, Fresh +air; and if asked what were the second and third most important things, +I would still repeat—in imitation of the orator of old, in regard to +another subject—Fresh air, Fresh air.</p> + +<p>This important ingredient in human happiness, and especially in the +happiness of the young mother and her tender infant, can usually be had +within doors, if pains enough be taken. But if the weather is fine and +in every respect favorable, a woman who is in tolerable health may +venture abroad a little in about three weeks after her confinement, and +sometimes even in two. Whether her exercise be without or within doors, +however, she should be effectually protected against chills, and against +the influence of currents of cold air.</p> + +<p>It has been incidentally stated, that Dr. Dewees objects to the mother's +use, during her early period of nursing, of broths and animal food. This +is about as much as we could reasonably expect from one who belongs to a +profession whose members are, almost without exception, enslaved to the +practice of flesh-eating. But even this advice of his, if duly followed, +would be a great advance upon the practice which generally prevails. +There is so universal a belief among females that they demand, at this +period of their existence, not only a larger quantity of food than +usual, but also that which is more stimulating in its quality, as almost +to forbid the hopes of making much impression upon their minds. Many +young mothers seem to consider themselves as licensed, during a part of +their lives, not only to eat immoderately, and even to gluttony, but +also to swallow almost every species of vile trash which a vile world +affords.</p> + +<p>How long will it be, ere the mother can be induced to take as much pains +to select the most appropriate and most healthy aliment for herself and +her child, as she now does that which is demanded by a capricious +appetite, without the smallest reference to fitness or digestibility! +How long will it be ere the mother can be brought to believe and feel +that, in every step she takes, she is forming the habitation of an +immortal spirit—a spirit, too, whose character and destiny, both +present and eternal, must depend, in no small degree, upon the character +of the dwelling it occupies while passing through this stage of earthly +existence! How long will it be, before mothers can be made to believe +even these two simple truths, that the nourishment, which the human +being actually receives, is not always in exact proportion to the +quantity of nutritious food which he throws into his stomach, and that +the diet is always best for both mother and child, which is least +exciting.</p> + +<p>The Charleston Board of Health, during the existence of cholera in that +city in 1836, publicly announced that the "best food is the least +exciting," and this great truth is just as true in all other places and +circumstances on the globe as it was then in South Carolina. And though +I am far from believing that health depends more on food and drink than +on all other things put together, as many seem to suppose, yet I am +entirely of opinion that he who should devote himself successfully to +the work of applying this truth, in all its bearings, to the dietetic +practice of all mankind, would do more for their reformation—yes, and +their salvation too—than has yet been done by any merely <i>human</i> being, +since the first day of the creation.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Nursing—how often.</i></h4> + +<p>Many lay it down, as an invariable rule, that no system can be pursued +with a child till it is six months old; and it must be admitted by all, +that for several months after birth there are serious difficulties in +the way of determining, with any degree of precision, how often a child +should be nursed or fed. Still, there are a few rules of universal +application; some of which are here presented.</p> + +<p>1. A child should never be nursed, merely to quiet it; for if this be +done, it will soon learn to cry, whenever it feels the slightest +uneasiness, not only from hunger, but from other causes; merely to be +gratified with nursing. Besides, if its cries should happen to be from +illness, it is ten to one but the reception of anything into the stomach +will do harm instead of good.</p> + +<p>2. The stomach, like every other organ in the body which is muscular, +must have time for rest; and this in the case of children as well as +adults. But to nurse them too frequently is in opposition to this rule, +and therefore of evil tendency.</p> + +<p>3. For reasons which may be seen by the last rule, there should be +regular seasons for nursing, and these should be adhered to, especially +by night. When very young, once in three hours may not be too frequent; +I believe that it is seldom proper to nurse a child more frequently than +this. But whenever three hours becomes a suitable period by day, once in +four hours will be often enough by night. I will not undertake to say at +what precise age children should be nursed at intervals of three and +four hours each; because some children are older, <i>constitutionally</i>, at +three months, than others are at four.</p> + +<p>There is one grand mistake, however, against which I must caution young +mothers; which is, not to indulge the vain expectation that feeble +infants will become robust, in proportion to their indulgence. On the +contrary, it is the more necessary to be strict with feeble children, +<i>because</i> they are feeble. To keep them hanging at the breast to +invigorate them, is the very way to counteract our own intentions, and +defeat our own purpose. Seasons of entire rest are even more important +to their stomachs than to those of other persons.</p> + +<p>4. But in order to secure intervals of rest, both to the strong and the +feeble, we must avoid the pernicious habit of giving infants pap, and +other delicacies, "between meals." Many a child's health is ruined by +this practice. Nothing should be put into their stomachs for many +months—if they are in health—but the mother's milk.</p> + +<p>"This," says Dr. Dunglison, "is the sole food of the infant, and is +consequently sufficiently nutrient to maintain life, and to minister to +the growth, during the earliest periods of existence." [Footnote: +Elements of Hygiene, page 271.] In another place, he says, "Milk is an +appropriate nourishment at all ages, and is more so the nearer to +birth."</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Quantity of Food.</i></h4> + +<p>"We all know," says Dr. Dewees, "how easily the stomach may be made to +demand more food than is absolutely required; first, by the repetition +of aliment, and secondly, by its variety;—therefore both of these +causes must be avoided. The stomach, like every other part, can, and +unfortunately does, acquire habits highly injurious to itself; and that +of demanding an unnecessary quantity of aliment is not one of the least. +It should, therefore, be constantly borne in mind, that it is not the +quantity of food taken into the stomach, that is available to the proper +purposes of the system; but the quantity which can be digested, and +converted into nourishment fit to be applied to such purposes."</p> + +<p>There is a great deal of truth in these remarks; and especially in the +closing one, that not all which is taken into the stomach is digested. +It is highly probable, that the least quantity which is usually given to +an infant is more than sufficient for the purposes of digestion; and +that nearly every child in the arms of its mother, is over-fed.</p> + +<p>I know it has been said, by some physicians—and by those who are +sensible men, in other respects, too—that the child's stomach is a +pretty correct guide in regard to quantity. If we give it too much, say +they, it will reject it;—as if that were an end of the matter.</p> + +<p>But it is not so. It is by no means harmless to fill the child's stomach +as full as is possible without overflowing. Such a process, though it +should not create disease directly, would produce a gluttonous habit. +The stomach, being muscular, may be increased in size by use, like all +other muscular organs. The hands, the arms, the legs, the feet, the +fleshy portions of the face, even, may be disproportionally enlarged by +constant use. Thus a sailor, who uses his hands and arms much more than +his legs and feet, has the former unusually large; one who is much +accustomed to walking, has large feet; and in a tailor, who from +childhood uses his lower limbs comparatively little, they are both small +and slender. On the same principle, the stomach, by inordinate use, and +by carrying unreasonable loads, may be made nearly twice as large as +nature intended, and may demand twice as much food. And I have no doubt +that the bulk of mankind, young and old, eat about twice as much as +nature, unperverted, would require.</p> + +<p>If the suggestions of our last section are duly attended to, one of the +causes which lead the stomach to demand an unreasonable quantity of food +will be avoided—I mean the too frequent "repetition of aliment." And if +we never depart from the general rule, already laid down, not to give +the infant anything but its mother's milk, we shall escape the evils +incident to variety.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>How long should milk be the only food.</i></h4> + +<p>On this point, there is a great diversity of opinion. Perhaps the most +approved role, of universal application, is, that the first change +should be made in the child's diet, when the teeth begin to appear.</p> + +<p>This period, it is well known, cannot be fixed to any particular age, +but varies from the fifth to the twelfth month.</p> + +<p>Some mothers, who have borne with me patiently to this place, will +probably here object. "What child," they will ask, "would ever have any +strength, brought up so?" Not only a little pap and gruel is, in their +estimation, necessary, long before this period, but even many choice +bits of meat.</p> + +<p>Now I am very sure, that these choice bits—whatever they may be—given +to a child before it has teeth, not only do no good, but actually do +mischief. Indeed, that which does no good in the stomach must do harm, +of course; since it is not only in the way, but acts like a foreign body +there, producing more or less of irritation.</p> + +<p>I ought to state, in this place, that many people—mothers among the +rest—have very inadequate ideas of digestion. They appear to have no +farther notion of the digestive process than that it consists in +reducing to a pulp the substances which are swallowed; and hence, +whatever is reduced to a pulp, they regard as being digested. Whereas +nothing is better known to the anatomist and physiologist, than that +this—the formation of <i>chyme</i> in the stomach—constitutes only a very +small part of the digestive process. The chyme must pass into the +duodenum and other portions of intestine beyond the stomach, and be +retained there for some time, before it will form perfect chyle.</p> + +<p>This is a more important part of the work of digestion than even the +former. For, suppose the chyme to be perfect, though even this may be +mere pulp, rather than chyme, and suppose it pass quietly along into the +duodenum and other small intestines. All this process, thus far, may go +on naturally enough, and yet the chyle may not be well formed, and the +chymous mass may find its way out of the system without answering any of +the purposes of nutrition. For no matter how well the food is dissolved +in the stomach, if it do not become good and proper chyle, the blood +which is formed will not be good and perfect blood; or, lastly, if it +<i>seem</i> to make good blood, it may still be faulty, so that the +particles which should be applied to build up or repair the system, are +either not used, or if used, answer the purpose but imperfectly.</p> + +<p>We hence see how little prepared a large proportion of the community, +are, to judge of the digestibility or fitness of a substance for +infants, by their own observation and experience merely; and how much +more wisely they act, in contenting themselves with giving them—at +least until they have teeth—such food only as the Author of nature +seems to have assigned them; especially when thus course, is precisely +that which is recommended or sanctioned by nearly every judicious +physician, as well as by almost all our writers on health.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>On Feeding before Teething.</i></h4> + +<p>Having laid down the general rule, that until the appearance of teeth, +the sole food of an infant should be the milk of its own mother, I +proceed to speak of some of the more common exceptions to it.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 1.—The first of these is when the supply furnished by the +mother is scanty. There may be two causes of the scantiness of this +supply; 1st, the want of suitable nourishment by the mother; and, 2dly, +a feeble constitution, or bad health. In the former case, it should be +her first object, as it undoubtedly will be that of her physician, to +improve the quality of her diet; and in the latter, to restore her +health, or at least invigorate her constitution.</p> + +<p>In regard to the proper diet of a <i>mother</i>, as such, as well as the +general management which her case requires, a volume might be written +without exhausting the subject. But I have already said as much on this +subject, in another place, as my limits will permit.</p> + +<p>But we cannot wait for the mother's health to improve, and allow the +infant to suffer, in the mean time, for a due supply of food. The +appropriate question now is, How shall such a supply be furnished?</p> + +<p>This should be done by means of an article resembling in its properties, +as closely as possible, the mother's milk. For this purpose, we have +only to mix with a suitable quantity of new cow's milk, one third of +water, and sweeten it a little with loaf sugar. This is to be given to +the child, at suitable intervals, and in proper quantities, by means of +a common sucking bottle. It is, indeed, sometimes given with the spoon; +but the bottle is better.</p> + +<p>To the question, whether the child should be confined to this, till the +period of weaning, Dr. Dewees answers, No. I am surprised at this; and +my surprise is increased, when I find him, almost in the very next +breath, urging with all his might, numerous reasons against the very +common notion, that children in early life require a variety of food. He +even insists on the importance of confining the child to a single +article of food when it is practicable. Yet he has not given us so much +as one reason why it is not practicable in the case before us; but has +gone on to speak of barley water, gum arabic water, rice water, +arrowroot, &c. I venture, therefore, to dissent from him, and to answer +the foregoing question in the affirmative. When one good and substantial +reason can be given for <i>change</i>, the decision will, however, be +reconsidered.</p> + +<p>I have already stated the general rule for preparing this substitute for +the mother's milk. But there are several minor directions, which may be +useful to those who are wholly without experience on the subject.</p> + +<p>If possible, the milk used should not only be just taken from the cow, +but should always be from the <i>same</i> cow; for it is well known, that the +quality of milk often differs very materially, even among cows feeding +in the same pasture, or from the same pile of hay; and the stomach +becomes most easily reconciled to the mixture when it is uniform in its +qualities. Great care should also be taken to see that the cow whose +milk is used is young and healthy.</p> + +<p>The mixture should not be prepared any faster than it is wanted, and +should always be prepared in vessels perfectly clean and sweet, and +given as soon as possible after it is prepared, to prevent any degree of +fermentation. It is never so well to heat it by the fire. If taken from +the cow just before it is used, and if the water to be added is warm +enough, the temperature will hardly need to be raised any higher.</p> + +<p>When it is impracticable, in all cases, to take milk for this purpose +immediately from the cow, it should be kept, in winter, where it will +not freeze; and in summer, where there will be no tendency to acidity.</p> + +<p>Some mothers and nurses are addicted to the practice of passing the food +through their own mouths, before they give it to the child—with a view, +no doubt, to see that it is at a proper temperature. This practice is +not only wholly unnecessary, but altogether disgusting, and even +ridiculous. A thermometer would answer every purpose; and save even the +trouble of another disgusting practice—that of blowing it with the +breath.</p> + +<p>The most proper season for giving the child this preparation, is +immediately after it has been nursing. It is better for both mother and +child, that the latter should nurse just as often as though the supply +of food was adequate to his wants. And when his first supply is +exhausted, then let him make up his meal from the sucking bottle. The +great advantage of this plan is, that he will not be so likely in this +way to be over-fed. If he is really needy, he will accept the bottle, +even if he do not like it quite so well; if he refuse it, let him go +without till he is hungry enough to receive it.</p> + +<p>In regard to the water used in the preparation, only one thing needs to +be said; which is, that it should be pure. If it is not, it should by +all means be boiled. The sugar used should be of the very best kind; and +the quantity not large; since if the preparation be too sweet, it +readily becomes acid in the stomach.</p> + +<p>There has been, and still is, a controversy going on among medical men, +whether sugar is or is not hurtful to the young. "Who shall decide, when +doctors disagree?" has often been asked. Without undertaking the task +myself, I may perhaps be permitted to say, that I cannot see any reason +why a substance so pure, and so highly nutritious as sugar—if given in +very small quantity only—should prove injurious: though I do not regard +the reasoning of Dr. Dewees as very conclusive on the subject, when, in +reply to Dr. Cadogan, he has the following language—"If sugar be +improper, why does it so largely enter into the composition of the early +food of all animals? It is in vain that physicians declaim against this +article, since it forms between seven and eight per cent of the mother's +milk."—Now with me, the fact that milk and almost all other kinds of +food are furnished with a measure of this substance, is the strongest +reason I am acquainted with for making no additions. I believe, however, +that they may sometimes be made, but not for these reasons.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 2.—The second striking exception to the general rule that has +been laid down, is when the mother is unable to nurse her own child from +positive ill health, or when circumstances exist which render it +obviously improper that she should do it. The following are some of the +circumstances which render such a departure from nature indispensable.</p> + +<p>1. When the mother is affected strongly with a hereditary disease, such +as consumption or scrofula; or when her constitution is tainted, as it +were, with venereal disease, or other permanent affections.</p> + +<p>2. When nursing produces, uniformly, some very troublesome or dangerous +disease in the mother; as cough, colic, &c.</p> + +<p>3. There are a few instances in which the milk of the mother, owing to +an unknown cause, has been found by experience to disagree with the +child. In these circumstances, it is the unquestionable duty of the +mother to resort wholly to feeding.</p> + +<p>4. Sometimes the milk, at first abundant, fails suddenly, owing to some +accidental or constitutional defect; and this failure becomes habitual. +In all these circumstances, the proper resort is to a sucking bottle, or +a hired nurse. I generally prefer the latter. The cases which seem to me +to admit of the former, will be pointed out in the next section.</p> + +<p>"When the bottle is used," says Dr. Dewees, "much care is requisite to +preserve it sweet and free from all impurities, or the remains of the +former food, by which the present may be rendered impure or sour; for +which purpose a great deal of caution must be observed."</p> + +<p>The business of feeding a child, whether by the bottle or the spoon, +should never be hurried: the slower it is, the better. We should stop +from time to time, during the process. Nor should the nourishment be +given while lying down; it is much more pleasant, as well as more safe, +to sit up.</p> + +<p>A few thoughts more on the character and condition of the milk which we +give to the young, will conclude the second division of this section.</p> + +<p>Some are fond of boiling milk for infants; but to this I am decidedly +opposed, so long as they are in health. Boiling takes away, or appears +to take away, some of the best properties of the milk.</p> + +<p>It is true that milk which is boiled does not turn sour so readily in +hot weather; but it is quite unnecessary to boil milk in the common +manner in order to present its changing, since such a result can be +prevented by another process. You have only to put your milk in a +kettle, cover it closely, and heat it quickly to the boiling point, and +then remove and cool it as speedily as possible. This plan prevents the +rising to the surface of that coat or pellicle which contains some of +the most valuable properties of the milk.</p> + +<p>I have already said that it was as necessary that the stomach should +have rest as any other muscular organ. Some writers say that the infant +should be kept perfectly quiet, at least half an hour, after each meal. +This is certainly necessary with feeble children, but I question its +necessity in the case of those who are strong and robust. I would not +recommend, however, nor even tolerate, for one moment, the absurd +practice of <i>jolting</i>, so common with a few ignorant nurses and, +mothers, as if they could jolt down the food in the stomach with just as +much safety as they can shake down the contents of a farmer's bag of +produce. Such mothers as these should go and reside among the native +tribes of Indians in Guiana, in South America, where they make it a +point not only to stuff their children's stomachs as long as they will +hold, but actually to shake it down.</p> + +<p>Little less absurd than jolting is the custom of tossing a child high, +in quick succession, which is practised not only after meals, but at +other times. But on this point, I have treated elsewhere.</p> + +<p>Some give the sucking bottle to children as a plaything. This is just +about as wise a practice as that of giving them books as playthings. +Both are done, usually, to save the time and trouble of those whose +office it is to devote their time to the very purpose of managing and +educating their offspring. The evil, however, of suffering the child to +have the bottle when it pleases is, that he will thus be tasting food so +often as to interfere with and disturb the process of digestion, to his +great and lasting injury. For in this way, a part of the food will pass +from the stomach into the bowels unchanged, or at least but imperfectly +digested, where it is liable to become sour, and cause disease. It is +not to be doubted that many diarrhoeas, as well as, other bowel +affections, are produced in this way. Children that are always eating +are seldom healthy; and we may hence see the reason.</p> + +<p>In speaking of the importance of keeping the bottle, from which a child +takes his food, perfectly clean and sweet, I ought to have extended the +injunction much farther. There is a degree of slovenliness sometimes +observable in those who manage children, both when they are sick and +when they are in health, which even common sense cannot and ought not to +tolerate. Every vessel which is used in preparing or administering +anything for children, ought, after we have used it, to be immediately +and effectually cleansed. How shocking is it to see dirty vessels +standing in the nursery from hour to hour, becoming sour or impure! How +much more so still, to see food in copper vessels, or in the red earthen +ones, glazed with a poisonous oxyd! I speak now more particularly of +vessels in which food is given; for with the administration of medicine, +and nursing the sick, I do not intend in this volume to interfere.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 3.—We come now to the consideration of those cases—for such +it will not be doubted there are—where a hired nurse is to be preferred +to feeding by the hand.</p> + +<p>Before proceeding farther, however, it is important to say, that if a +nurse could always be procured whose health, and temper, and habits were +good, who had no infant of her own, and who would do as well for the +infant, in every respect, as his own mother, it would be preferable to +have no feeding by the hand at all.</p> + +<p>But such nurses are very scarce. Their temper, or habits, or general +health, will often be such as no genuine parent would desire, and such +as they ought to be sorry to see engrafted, in any degree, on the child. +For even admitting what is claimed by some, that the temper of the nurse +does <i>not</i> affect the properties of the milk, and thus injure the child +both physically and morally, still much injury may and inevitably will +result from the influence of her constant presence and example.</p> + +<p>Others have infants of their own, in which case either their own child +or the adopted one will suffer; and in a majority of cases, it can +scarcely be doubted <i>which</i> it will be. And I doubt the morality of +requiring a nurse, in these cases, to give up her own child wholly. If +<i>one</i> must be fed, why not our own, as well as that of another?</p> + +<p>The only cases, then, which seem to me to justify the employment of a +nurse, are where she possesses at least the qualifications above +mentioned; and as these are rare, not many nurses, of course, would on +this principle be employed. But when employed, it is highly desirable +that the following rules should be observed:</p> + +<p>1: The nurse should suckle the child at both breasts; otherwise he is +liable to acquire a degree of crookedness in his form. There is another +evil which sometimes results from the too common neglect of this rule, +which is, that it endangers the deterioration of the quality of the +milk.</p> + +<p>2. The milk which is thus substituted for that of the mother, should be +as nearly as possible of the same age as the child who is to receive it. +It should be remembered, however, that the milk is not so good after the +twelfth or thirteenth month, nor <i>quite</i> so good under the third.</p> + +<p>3. When the parent or some trusty and confidential friend can, without +the aid of interested spies and emissaries, have an eye to the general +treatment, and especially to the moral management, it should be done; +for even the best nurses may so differ in their principles, manners and +habits from the parent, that the latter would deem it preferable to +withdraw the child, and resort at once to feeding.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>From Teething to Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>This period will, of course, be longer or shorter according as the teeth +begin to appear earlier or later, and according to the time when it is +thought proper to wean.</p> + +<p>On few points, perhaps, has there existed a greater diversity of opinion +than in regard to the age most proper for weaning. The limits of this +work do not permit a thorough discussion of the question; and I shall +therefore be very brief in my remarks on the subject.</p> + +<p>Dr. Cullen, whose opinion on topics of this kind is certainly entitled +to much respect, thought that less than seven, or more than eleven +months of nursing was injurious. Yet in some countries, and even in some +parts of our own, the period is extended by the mother, from choice, to +two years. And although the milk is not so good after the thirteenth or +fourteenth month, I have never either known or heard that any evil +consequences followed from the practice.</p> + +<p>Dr. Loudon, a recent writer, observes, that the period of nursing has a +great influence over the numbers of mankind in various countries, as is +evinced by numerous facts. He adduces proofs of this, position. Thus, he +says, in China, where the population is excessive, and the inhuman +practice of infanticide is common, they wean a child as soon as it can +put its hand to its mouth. On the other hand, the Indians of North +America do not wean their children until they are old and strong enough +to run about: generally they are suckled for a period of more than two +years.</p> + +<p>He then enters into a physiological inquiry why it is that British +mothers do not usually suckle their children longer than ten months. He +seems—though he does not give us his precise opinion—to think that, in +all ordinary cases, the period of nursing ought to be protracted to two +or three years, and that perhaps it would be better still to extend it +to four or five. His remarks are so excellent, and withal so curious, +and their tendency so humane, that we venture to insert one or two of +his paragraphs entire.</p> + +<p>"Certain it is, that the milk does not diminish particularly at that +time, (ten months,) so far as regards quantity; and from the health of +children reared without spoon-meat beyond this time, it as certainly +undergoes no change in its quality. Children are sometimes so old before +weaning, as to be able to ask for the breast; and it has not been +remarked that the health of mothers, thus suckling, was in any way worse +than that of their neighbors. Altogether, then, it may be asserted, that +a mother is likely to enjoy better health, and to be less liable to +sickness and death during lactation, than during pregnancy.</p> + +<p>"Many women believe, or affect to believe, that the weakness they labor +under arises from some latent moral or physical cause; but this weakness +is not attributed to lactation in the earlier months of suckling, +because the mother then considers herself fulfilling a necessary duty, +which her constitution, for so long, is well able to bear. So soon, +however, as the period of lactation has passed over, as it is +established by custom or fashion, she imagines she is exceeding the +intentions of nature, and she forthwith concludes that the continuance +of suckling is the cause of her uncomfortable sensations. This whim +being entertained, the child is weaned, and too often becomes the victim +of a most reprehensible delusion.</p> + +<p>"Since nature has furnished the mother with milk for a longer period +than custom demands, it is evident that some good purpose for the mother +and child was intended in this arrangement. Had it been otherwise, the +secretion of milk would stop at a definite time, in like manner as the +period of gestation is definite. That a child, in comparison with the +young of the lower animals, is so long unable to provide for itself, +strongly tends to corroborate the proofs already advanced—that nature +originally had in view a more protracted period for lactation than is +now allowed.</p> + +<p>"Some writers, following the laws of nature, as they interpreted them, +fixed the period of weaning at fifteen months, when the infant has got +its eight incisors and four canine teeth. There are well-authenticated +instances of mothers having suckled their children for three, four, +five, and even seven consecutive years; we ourselves have known cases +of lactation being prolonged far three and for four years, with the +happiest results."</p> + +<p>It appears to me better, therefore, that the child should be nursed, in +all ordinary cases, from twelve to fifteen months; and when there are no +special objections, about two years. As the change, whenever it is made, +and however gradual it may be, is an important one, in its effects on +the stomach and bowels, it is better to wean a little earlier or a +little later, than to do so just at the close of summer or beginning of +autumn, at which season bowel complaints are most common, most severe, +and most dangerous. It is sufficiently unfortunate that teething should +commence just at this period; but when we add another cause of irregular +action, which we can control, to one which we <i>cannot</i>, we act very +unwisely.</p> + +<p>I have already observed that we may begin to feed children when the +teeth begin to appear. By this is not meant that we should do so while +the system is under the irritation to which teething usually, or at +least often, subjects it. But when this is over, and a few teeth have +appeared, it is usually a proper time to commence our operations.</p> + +<p>The first food given should be precisely of the kind which has been +recommended for those children who are fed by the hand. The rules and +restrictions by which we are to be guided, are the same, except in one +point, which is, that in the case we are now considering, the child +should be fed <i>between nursing</i>.</p> + +<p>Let not parents be anxious about their healthy children under two years, +who have a supply of good milk, either from the mother or from the cow. +For those that are feeble, a physician may and ought to prescribe—not +medicine, but appropriate food, drink, &c.</p> + +<p>When the grinding teeth have cut through, if we have any doubts in +regard to the nutritive qualities of the food we are giving, we may +improve it by adding, instead of the one third of pure water, a similar +quantity of gum arabic water, barley water, or rice water. Some use a +little weak animal broth; but this is unnecessary, and I think, on the +whole, injurious, except for purposes strictly medicinal.</p> + +<p>This course is so simple, and so far removed from that which is +generally adopted, that few mothers will probably be willing to pursue +it with perseverance, especially when the teeth appear very late. Those +who are, however, will be richly rewarded, in the end, in the +advantages; which will accrue to the child's health, and the vigor it +will ensure to his constitution.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>During the process of Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>It has already been shown that, in weaning, some regard should be had to +the season of the year; and that the end of summer and beginning of fall +are of all periods the most unfavorable. The best time, on every +account, is in the spring—in March, April, May, or June; and the next +best is during the months of October and November. But December, January +and February are better than July, August and September.</p> + +<p>Weaning should never be sudden. We may safely and properly call upon +those who are addicted to snuff or opium taking, tobacco chewing, rum +drinking, and other habits which are purely artificial, to break +off—<i>to wean themselves</i>—suddenly; since <i>they</i> can do so with +considerable safety, and will seldom have the courage or the +perseverance to do it otherwise. But with the child, in regard to his +food, such a course will not be advisable. If we regard his future +health or happiness, he must be weaned gradually.</p> + +<p>The first proper step will be to give the child a little larger quantity +of the cow's milk and gum arabic mixture, between nursings, at the same +time increasing very gradually the intervals of nursing. When the +intervals become six hours distant from each other, it will be best to +add a little good bread to the milk with which it is fed, about two or +three times a day. Arrowroot jelly, if he can be made to relish it, will +be highly useful; but if not, some boiled rice, into which a little +arrowroot has been sprinkled while boiling, may be added to his milk.</p> + +<p>It may be worth the attempt to excite an aversion in the child to +nursing his mother, so that be will refuse to nurse, if possible, of his +own accord. This aversion may be excited by such an application of +aloes, or some other offensive substance, as will cause him to withdraw +himself from the breast as soon as he tastes it.</p> + +<p>A serious mistake is often made, in connection with weaning, in giving +the child not only too much food, but that which is too solid, or too +rich. This mistake has undoubtedly grown out of the belief that his +feeble condition <i>requires</i> it; whereas the truth is, that he neither +needs food at this period, nor is capable of digesting it. For let us be +as judicious in the process of weaning as we may, the tone of the +child's stomach will be somewhat reduced, or in other words, its powers +of digestion will be weakened by it; and to give it strong food, or +overload it with that which is weaker, is not only unreasonable and +unphilosophical, but cruel. And if there should be a tendency in the +child's constitution to rickets, scrofula, consumption, and other +wasting diseases, such a course would be likely to bring them on, and +destroy life.</p> + +<p>"When milk will agree," says Dr. Dewees, "there is no food so proper. It +may be employed in any of its combinations, with good wheaten bread, +rice, sago, &c., only remembering that when either of these articles is +found to agree, it should be continued perseveringly, until it may +become offensive. In this case, some new combination may be required." I +do not see the necessity of continuing one kind of food till it +<i>offends</i>. Besides, I do not believe that these simple articles of food +are apt to become offensive to stomachs that have not already been +spoiled. But whether a single dish should or should not come to be +offensive, I greatly prefer an occasional change.</p> + +<p>Buchan, in his Advice to Mothers, has recommended it to them to boil +bread for their infants, in water. It should not, for this purpose—nor +indeed for any other—be new; it is best at one or two days, old. It may +be boiled in a small quantity of water, or what is still better, of +milk; or it may be steamed till it becomes soft and light, almost like +new bread, but without any of the objectionable properties of that which +is wholly new. To bread, thus prepared, is to be added a suitable +quantity of milk, fresh from the cow, and a little diluted with water, +but not boiled.</p> + +<p>But as there may be, here and there, at any age, a stomach with which +milk, with bread, or rice, or sago, will not agree—though I think they +must be very rare cases—we may be allowed to substitute for it a +solution of "gum arabic, in the proportion of an ounce to a pint of +water," to which may be added a little sugar; and if the child is old +enough to observe the color, just milk enough to change the appearance. +Another preparation for the same purpose consists of rennet whey, a +little sweetened, and "disguised, if necessary, as just stated."</p> + +<p>The health of the mother, too, during the period of weaning, often needs +great attention. Let her avoid medicine, however, if possible. A due +regard to food, drink, exercise, and rest of body and mind, &c., will +usually be found more effective, as well as more permanently +efficacious.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Food subsequently to Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>You will allow me to introduce in this place, some of the sentiments of +Dr. Cadogan, an English physician, from a little work on the management +of children. [Footnote: Though Dr. C.'s remarks will apply more closely +to England in 1750, they are by no means inapplicable to the United +States in 1837.] I do it with the more pleasure because, though he wrote +almost a century ago, he urges the same general principles on which I +have all along been insisting: hence it will be seen that mine are no +new-fangled notions. His remarks refer to the young of every age, but +chiefly to early infancy and childhood. It will be found necessary, in +some instances, to abridge, but I shall endeavor not to misrepresent the +Doctor's views.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>"Look over the bills of mortality. Almost half of those who fill up that +black list, die under five years of age; so that half the people that +come into the world go out of it again, before they become of the least +use to it or to themselves. To me, this seems to deserve serious +consideration.</p> + +<p>"It is ridiculous to charge it upon nature, and to suppose that infants +are more subject to disease and death than grown persons; on the +contrary, they bear pain and disease much better—fevers especially; and +for the same reason that a twig is less hurt by a storm than an oak.</p> + +<p>"In all the other productions of nature, we see the greatest vigor and +luxuriancy of health, the nearer they are to the egg or bud. When was +there a lamb, a bird, or a tree, that died because it was young? These +are under the immediate nursing of unerring nature; and they thrive +accordingly.</p> + +<p>"Ought it not, therefore, to be the care of every nurse and every +parent, not only to protect their nurslings from injury, but to be well +assured that their own officious services be not the greatest evils the +helpless creatures can suffer?</p> + +<p>"In the lower class of mankind, especially in the country, disease and +mortality are not so frequent, either among adults or their children. +Health and posterity are the portion of the poor—I mean the laborious. +The want of superfluity confines them more within the limits of nature; +hence they enjoy the blessings they feel not, and are ignorant of their +cause.</p> + +<p>"In the course of my practice, I have had frequent occasion to be fully +satisfied of this; and have often heard a mother anxiously say, 'the +child has not been well ever since it has done puking and crying.'</p> + +<p>"These complaints, though not attended to, point very plainly to the +cause. Is it not very evident that when a child rids its stomach of its +contents several times a day, it has been overloaded? While the natural +strength lasts, (for every child is born with more health and strength +than is generally imagined,) it cries at or rejects the superfluous +load, and <i>thrives apace</i>; that is, grows very fat, bloated, and +distended beyond measure, like a house lamb.</p> + +<p>"But in time, the same oppressive cause continuing, the natural powers +are overcome, being no longer able to throw off the unequal weight. The +child, now unable to cry any more, languishes and is quiet.</p> + +<p>"The misfortune is, that these complaints are not understood. The child +is swaddled and crammed on, till, after gripes, purging, &c., it sinks +under both burdens into a convulsion fit, and escapes farther torture. +This would be the case with the lamb, were it not killed, when full fat.</p> + +<p>"That the present mode of nursing is wrong, one would think needed no +other proof than the frequent miscarriages attending it, the death of +many, and the ill health of those that survive. But what I am going to +complain of is, that children, in general, are over-clothed and +over-fed, and fed and clothed improperly. To these causes I attribute +almost all their diseases.</p> + +<p>"But the feeding of children is much more important to them than their +clothing. Let us consider what nature directs in the case. If we follow +nature, instead of leading or driving her, we cannot err. In the +business of nursing, as well as physic, art, if it do not exactly copy +this original, is ever destructive.</p> + +<p>"If I could prevail, no child should ever be crammed with any unnatural +mixture, till the provision of nature was ready for it; nor afterwards +fed with any ungenial diet whatever, at least for the <i>first three +months</i>; for it is not well able to digest and assimilate other elements +sooner.</p> + +<p>"I have seen very healthy children that never ate or drank anything +whatever but their mother's milk, for the first ten or twelve months. +Nature seems to direct to this, by giving them no teeth till about that +time. The call of nature should be waited for to feed them with anything +more substantial; and the appetite ought ever to precede the food—not +only with regard to the daily meals, but those changes of diet which +opening, increasing life requires. But this is never done, in either +case; which is one of the greatest mistakes of all nurses.</p> + +<p>"When the child requires more solid sustenance, we are to inquire what +and how much is most proper to give it. We may be well assured there is +a great mistake either in the quantity or quality of children's food, or +both, as it is usually given them, because they are made sick by it; for +to this mistake I cannot help imputing nine in ten of all their +diseases.</p> + +<p>"As to quantity, there is a most ridiculous error in the common +practice; for it is generally supposed that whenever a child cries, it +wants victuals: it is accordingly fed ten or twelve or more times in a +day and night. This is so obvious a misapprehension, that I am surprised +it should ever prevail.</p> + +<p>"If a child's wants and motions be diligently and judiciously attended +to, it will be found that it never cries, but from pain. Now the first +sensations of hunger are not attended with pain; accordingly, a very +young child that is hungry will make a hundred other signs of its want, +before it will cry for food. If it be healthy, and quite easy in its +dress, it will hardly ever cry at all. Indeed, these signs and motions I +speak of are but rarely observed, because it seldom happens that +children are ever suffered to be hungry.[Footnote: That which we +commonly observe in them, in such cases, and call by the name of hunger, +the Doctor, I suppose would regard as morbid or unnatural feeling, +wholly unworthy of the name of HUNGER.]</p> + +<p>"In a few, very few, whom I have had the pleasure to see reasonably +nursed, that were not fed above two or three times in twenty-four hours, +and yet were perfectly healthy, active, and happy, I have seen these +signals, which were as intelligible as if they had spoken.</p> + +<p>"There are many faults in the quality of children's food.</p> + +<p>"1. It is not simple enough. Their paps, panadas, gruels, &c. are +generally enriched with sugar, spices, and other nice things, and +sometimes a drop of wine—none of which they ought ever to take. Our +bodies never want them; they are what luxury only has introduced, to the +destruction of the health of mankind.</p> + +<p>"2. It is not enough that their food should be simple; it should also be +light. Many people, I find, are mistaken in their notions of what is +light, and fancy that most kinds of pastry, puddings, custards, &c. are +light; that is, light of digestion. But there is nothing heavier, in +this sense, than unfermented flour and eggs, boiled hard, which are the +chief ingredients in some of these preparations.</p> + +<p>"What I mean by light food—to give the best idea I can of it—is, any +substance that is easily separated, and soluble in warm water. Good +bread is the lightest thing I know, and the fittest food for young +children. Cows' milk is also simple and light, and very good for them; +but it is often injudiciously prepared. It should never be boiled; for +boiling alters the taste and properties of it, destroys its sweetness, +and makes it thicker, heavier, and less fit to mix and assimilate with +the blood."</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>It is hardly necessary for me to repeat, that in these general views of +Dr. C., with a few exceptions, I entirely concur; indeed some of them +have already been presented. But I have expressed my doubts of the +soundness of his conclusion in regard to sugar. Used with food, in very +small quantity, by persons whose stomachs are already in a good +condition, both sugar and molasses, especially the former, appear to me +not only harmless, but wholesome and useful.</p> + +<p>On the subject of simplicity in children's food, I should be glad to +enlarge. There is nothing more important in diet than simplicity, and +yet I think there is nothing more rare. To suit the fashion, everything +must be mixed and varied. I have no objection to variety at different +meals, both for children and adults; indeed I am disposed to recommend +it, as will be seen hereafter. But I am utterly opposed to any +considerable variety at the same meal; and above all, in a single dish. +The simpler a dish can be, the better.</p> + +<p>But let us look, for a moment, at the dishes of food which are often +presented, even at what are called plain tables.</p> + +<p>Meats cannot be eaten—so many persons think—without being covered +with mustard, or pepper, or gravy—or soaked in vinegar; and not a few +regard them as insipid, unless several of these are combined. Few people +think a piece of plain boiled or broiled muscle (lean flesh) with +nothing on it but a little salt, is fit to be eaten. Everything, it is +thought, must be rendered more stimulating, or acrid; or must be +swimming in gravy, or melted fat or butter.</p> + +<p>Bread, though proverbially the staff of life, can scarcely be eaten in +its simple state. It must be buttered, or honied, or toasted, or soaked +in milk, or dipped in gravy. Puddings must have cherries or fruits of +some sort, or spices in them, and must be sweetened largely. Or +perhaps—more ridiculous still—they must have suet in them. And after +all this is done, who can eat them without the addition of sauce, or +butter, or molasses, or cream? Potatoes, boiled, steamed or roasted, +delightful as they are to an unperverted appetite, are yet thought by +many people hardly palatable till they are mashed, and buttered or +gravied; or perhaps soaked in vinegar. In short, the plainest and +simplest article for the table is deemed nearly unfit for the stomach, +till it has been buttered, and peppered, and spiced, and perhaps +<i>pearlashed</i>. Even bread and milk must be filled with berries or fruits. +Where can you find many adults who would relish a meal which should +consist entirely of plain bread, without any addition; of plain +potatoes, without anything on them except a little salt; of a plain rice +pudding, and nothing with it; or of plain baked or boiled apples or +pears? And <i>could</i> such persons be found, how many of them would bring +up their children to live on such plain dishes?</p> + +<p>It need not be wondered at, that a palate which has been so long tickled +by variety, and by so many stimulating mixtures of food, should come to +regard cold water for drink as insipid; and should feel dissatisfied +with it, and desirous of boiling some narcotic or poisonous herb in it, +or brewing it with something which will impart to it more or less of +alcohol. The wonder is, not that some of our epicures become drunkards, +but that all of them do not.</p> + +<p>Dr. Cadogan alludes to a sad mistake everywhere made about <i>light</i> food; +and condemns, very justly, hard-boiled custards, pastry, &c. It is very +strange that these substances—for these are among the injurious +articles which I call mixtures—should ever have obtained currency in +the world, to the exclusion of bread, which, as the same writer justly +says, is among the lightest articles of food which are known.</p> + +<p>It is strange, in particular, what views people have about bread. +Judging from what I see, I am compelled to believe that there are few +who regard it in any other light than as a kind of necessary evil. They +appear to eat it, not because they are fond of it, by itself, but +because they <i>must</i> eat it; or rather, because it is a fashionable +article; and not to make believe they eat it, at the least, would be +unfashionable. They will get rid of it, however, when they can. And when +they must eat it, they soak it, or cover it with butter or milk, or +something else which will render it tolerable—or toast it. And use it +as they may, it must be hot from the oven. After it is once cold, very +few will eat it. The idea, above all, of making a full meal of simple +cold bread, twenty-four hours old, would be rejected by ninety-nine +persons in a hundred; and by some with abhorrence.</p> + +<p>People not only dislike bread, but regard it as unnutritious. I have +heard many a fond parent say to the child who ate no meat, and seemed to +depend almost wholly on bread—"Why, my dear child, you will starve if +you eat no meat. Do at least put some butter on your bread or your +potatoes." A thousand times have I been admonished, when eating my +vegetable dinner during the hot and fatiguing days of summer—for I was +bred to the farm, and ate little or no meat till I was fourteen years +of age—to eat more butter, or cheese, or something that would give me +strength; for I could not work, they said, without something more +nourishing than bread and the other vegetables. And yet few if any boys +of my age did more work, or performed it better, or with more ease, than +myself. And I early observed the same thing in other vegetable eaters.</p> + +<p>The truth is, there is nothing in the world better adapted to the daily +wants of the human stomach than good bread; and few things more +nutritious. There may be a little more nutriment in eggs or jelly; but +if the former are hard-boiled, the stomach cannot digest them; and fat +meat of any kind is digested with great difficulty. Indeed it is +doubtful whether stomachs in temperate climates digest fat at all. They +may dissolve it, but that is not making good chyle of it. They may even +reduce it to chyle; <i>but chyle is not blood</i>. Fat may slip through the +system without much of it <i>adhering</i>; and I think it pretty evident that +it usually does so.</p> + +<p>The muscle—the lean part of animals—may be nearly as nutritious as +good bread, and is more easily digested. But it is very far from being +proved that, for the healthy, those things are always best which are +most easily digested. Nobody will pretend that potatoes are better for +us than bread; and yet the experiments of Dr. Beaumont seem to prove +that boiled or roasted potatoes are much more quick and easy of +digestion than bread of the first and best quality. Even over-boiled +eggs and raw cabbage, bad as they are, are dissolved in the stomach, and +appear to be digested as quick, if not quicker, than good wheat bread. +But nobody in the world will pretend they form more wholesome food. +Neither is meat—even <i>lean</i> meat—necessarily more wholesome, or better +calculated to give strength than bread, simply be cause it is more +quickly and easily digested. It would be nearer the truth to say, that +those substances which digest slowest (provided they do not irritate) +are best adapted to the wants of the human stomach.</p> + +<p>The philosopher LOCKE—perhaps from his knowledge of medicine—gives +some excellent directions on this subject. "Great care should be used," +be says, that the child "eat bread plentifully, both alone and with +everything else; and whatever he eats that is solid, make him chew it +well." This writer, by the way, supposed that the teeth were made to be +used in beating our food; and that we ought neither to swallow it +without chewing, as is customary in our busy New England, nor to mash or +soak it in order to save the labor of mastication—a practice almost +equally universal. But let us hear his own words.</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"As for his diet, it ought to be very plain and simple; and if I might +advise, flesh should be forborne, at least till he is two or three years +old. But of whatever advantage this may be to his future health and +strength, I fear it will hardly be consented to by parents, misled by +the custom of eating too much flesh themselves, who will be apt to think +their children—as they do themselves—in danger to be starved; if they +have not flesh at least twice a day. This I am sure, children would +breed their teeth with much less danger, be freer from diseases while +they were little, and lay the foundations of a healthy and strong +constitution much surer, if they were not crammed so much as they are, +by fond mothers and foolish servants, and were kept wholly from flesh +the first three or four years of their lives."</blockquote> + +<p>Were Locke still living, I should like to interrogate him at this +place. He first speaks of giving children no meat till they are two or +three years old; and then afterwards extends the period to three or +four. The question I would put is this: If the child is healthier +without meat till he is three or four years old, why not till he is +thirteen or fourteen; or even till thirty, or forty, or seventy? And is +not Professor Stuart, of Andover—a meat eater himself, and an advocate +for its moderate use by those who have already been trained to the use +of it—is not the Professor, I say, more than half right when he +asserts, as I have heard him, that it may be well to train all children, +from the first, to the exclusive use of vegetable food?</p> + +<p>I have a few more extracts from Locke, particularly on the subject of +bread.</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"I should think that a good piece of well made and well baked brown +bread would be often the best breakfast for my young master. I am sure +it is as wholesome, and will make him as strong a man, as greater +delicacies; and if he be used to it, it will be as pleasant to him.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"If he, at any time, call for victuals between meals, use him to nothing +but dry bread. If he be hungry more than wanton, bread will go down; and +if he be not hungry, it is not fit that he should eat. By this you will +obtain two good effects. First, that by custom he will come to be in +love with bread; for, as I said, our palates and stomachs, too, are +pleased with the things we are used to. Another good you will gain +hereby is, that you will not teach him to eat more nor oftener than +nature requires.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"I do not think that all people's appetites are alike; some have +naturally stronger and some weaker stomachs. But this I think, that +many are made gormands and gluttons by custom, that were not so by +nature. And I see, in some countries, men as lusty and strong, that eat +but two meals a day, as those that have set their stomachs, by a +constant usage, to call on them for four or five.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"The Romans usually fasted till supper, the only set meal, even of those +who ate more than once in a day; and those who used breakfasts, as some +did at eight, same at ten, others at twelve of the clock, and some +later, neither ate flesh nor had anything made ready for them.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Augustus, when the greatest monarch on the earth, tells us he took a +piece of dry bread in his chariot; and Seneca, in his 83d epistle, +giving an account how be managed himself when he was old, and his age +permitted indulgence, says that he used to eat a piece of dry bread for +his dinner, without the formality of sitting to it. Yet Seneca, as it is +well known, was wealthy.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"The masters of the world were brought up with this spare diet, and the +young gentlemen of Rome felt no want of strength or spirit because they +ate but once a day. Or if it happened by chance that any one could not +fast so long as till supper, their only set meal, he took nothing but a +bit of dry bread, or at most a few raisins or some such slight thing +with it, to stay his stomach. And more than one set meal a day was +thought so monstrous that it was a reproach, as low as Caesar's time, to +make an entertainment, or sit down to a table, till towards sunset. +Therefore I judge it most convenient that my young master should have +nothing but bread for breakfast. I impute a great part of our diseases +in England to our eating too much flesh, and too little bread. Dry +bread, though the best nourishment, has the least temptation."</blockquote> + +<p>I shall not undertake to defend all the sentiments of Mr. Locke in these +extracts; but in regard to the main point—the nutritive properties and +wholesome tendency of bread, and the importance of making it a principal +article of diet for children—I think his views are just. In short, they +do not differ, substantially, from those of a large proportion of the +best writers on this subject in every country, during the last three +hundred years. As if with one voice, they dissuade from the use of too +much animal food for the young, and encourage the use of a larger +proportion of vegetable food—bread, plain puddings, rice, potatoes, +turnips, beets, apples, pears, &c., and milk.</p> + +<p>Yet they all, or nearly all, seem to write just as if they did not +expect to be believed; or if believed, to be followed. They seem to +regard mankind as so inveterately attached to old habits, and so much +addicted to flesh eating, that there is little hope of reclaiming them.</p> + +<p>Now, though my opinions are no more entitled to respect than many of +theirs, I hope for greater success than they appear to do. I expect that +many young mothers who read this work, will be led to think and inquire +further on the subject; and if they find that the views here advanced +are in accordance with reason, and common sense, and higher authority, I +am not without hope that they will reform, and do what they can to +reform their neighbors.</p> + +<p>I have dwelt the longer, in this section, on the <i>general</i> principles of +diet, because I am of opinion that whatever is true, on this subject, in +regard to the diet of children, soon after weaning, is equally, or +nearly equally applicable to the whole of childhood, youth, manhood and +age. It is not true that one period of life, and one mode of employment, +demands a diet essentially different from that which is demanded at +another period, and in other circumstances; provided always, that the +individual is in health. Occasional instances of the kind, there may be; +but they are not numerous.</p> + +<p>The digestive powers of the young are more nearly as strong as those of +the adult than is usually admitted, and they are much more active. They +require a less quantity of food, undoubtedly; and they should be fed at +shorter intervals. But as a general rule, what is best for them, as +regards its quality, at three years old, is best for them at thirty; or, +should they live so long, at ninety. I repeat it; there is very little +difference in the nature of the food required ever after teething.</p> + +<p>Let me not be understood as saying that the strong, and the robust, and +the active cannot digest food which the weak, and enervated, and +indolent cannot. Undoubtedly they can. But this does not prove that they +<i>ought</i> to do it. It does not prove that their strength and vigor were +not given them for other purposes than to be expended on the poorer +substances for food, when they might have better. Nor is it true, as +often pretended, that the hard laborer needs either more food, or that +which is of a stronger quality, just in proportion to the severity of +his labor. The man or the child who labors moderately, just sufficient +for the purposes of health, and labors with his hands in the open air, +needs rather <i>more</i> food than the indolent or the sedentary, or those +who labor to excess; but not that which is of a stronger quality. It is +he who labors to excess—if any difference of quality were required at +all—who should eat milder food, as well as less in quantity.</p> + +<p>Some physicians there are who tell us that all mankind would live +longer, as well as be more healthful, if they ate nothing but bread, and +drank nothing but water. It may be so, but I do not believe it. Water, +as I shall show hereafter, is indeed the only appropriate drink; but I +do not believe that bread, even after the second year, is in all cases +and circumstances the best food. Besides that the experiments of +Majendie and other physiologists go a little way—though not far, I +confess—to prove that animals generally, (and if so, why not man, as +well as the rest?) thrive best with some degree of variety in their +food, it seems to me more in accordance with the general intentions of +the Creator, so far as we can discover what they are.</p> + +<p>While, therefore, I deny that either milk or bread is better, in all +cases, for human sustenance, than any other articles of food, I must, at +the same time, be permitted to regard them as among the best, and as +deserving more general attention. Every infant, after leaving the +breast, should, as it seems to me, make bread, in some of its forms, a +chief article of food.</p> + +<p>This article, so justly and emphatically called the staff of life, may +be found in almost every country. Common sense seems to have dictated +the propriety of its use; though fashion has often led us to overlook +or despise it—like air, and fire, and water, and nearly every other +common but indispensable blessing.</p> + +<p>The best kind of bread is made from wheat, the worst from bark, +saw-dust, &c. Wood and bark afford so little nutriment, that it is only +in such countries as Norway, Sweden, Lapland. Iceland, Greenland, and +Siberia, that the inhabitants can be induced to make use of them. Here +they are often useful; either because people cannot get food which is +better, or to blend with their fat or oily animal food. For it should +never be forgotten, that healthy digestion requires a large proportion +of innutritious matter along with the pure nutriment. In order to make +bread from wheat, the meal should not be bolted. If it seems to contain +particles which are too coarse, it may be well to pass it through a +coarse family sieve; but the best bread I have ever eaten, as well as +the cleanest and neatest, was not sifted at all.</p> + +<p>I know there is an almost universal prejudice against this sort of +bread. Some complain that it scratches their throats; others, that it is +tasteless; and others still, that it does not agree with them. With +others there is another objection—which is that bread of this sort has +sometimes been called <i>dyspepsia</i> bread; and with others still, that it +has been called <i>Graham</i> bread. Either of these appellations seems +sufficient to condemn it.</p> + +<p>Now as to the harshness, this is owing to its being made of bad +materials, or to its being baked too hard, or kept too long. Much of +what they call dyspepsia bread, in our cities, is evidently made by +mixing the bran and flour of wheat after they have been once separated; +besides which, in not a few cases, the finest of the flour appears to be +taken away. Now bread made of such materials thus combined, will always +be darker colored, as well as harsher, than when made from the wheat, +simply ground without any bolting, and wet up in the usual manner. Such +bread is best two or three days old. After four days, it becomes dry and +somewhat harsh.</p> + +<p>They who complain that such bread is insipid, are persons whose +appetites have been injured by food which is high-seasoned; and who, if +they eat bread at all, must eat it hot, or soaked in butter. No wonder +such persons do not like plain bread, and say it is tasteless. But it +must not be denied that bakers often suffer this kind of bread to be +over-risen, in order to make it sufficiently light and porous. This +renders it less tasteful, and from the saleratus they use, less +wholesome.</p> + +<p>No child who has been accustomed, from the first, to good wheaten bread, +made of unbolted meal, and not less than one day old, will ever prefer +any other, until he has been rendered capricious on this subject, and +wishes to change for the sake of changing, or until he has been misled +by surrounding example. I speak from observation when I say that +infants, whose habits have not been depraved, will not prefer hot bread +of any kind. "It is hot, mother," I have heard them say, as an apology +for refusing a piece of bread; but never, "It is cold," or "It is too +old."</p> + +<p>It is the epicurean—it is he with whom it is a sufficient objection to +any kind of food whatever, that he has used it for several successive +meals or days—that is most ready to complain of good bread. He whose +habits are correct, and who is the more unwilling to change any of his +articles of diet, the longer he has been in the use of them, and who +only changes them, or uses variety, from principle—he, I say, will +never complain of harshness or want of taste in good wheat bread; nor +will it be an objection of weight with him that <i>Mr. Graham</i> has +recommended it, or that it has either prevented or cured <i>dyspepsia</i>.</p> + +<p>Nor will the epicurean himself complain that bread is insipid, after +being confined to it for a month or six weeks. He will then find a +sweetness in it, for which he had long sought in vain in the more +delicate and costly viands of a luxurious, and expensive, and +unchristian modern table.</p> + +<p>It is they only who observe simplicity, and confine themselves to very +plain food, who truly enjoy pleasure in eating. The bulk of mankind +benumb their sense of taste by their high-seasoned, over-stimulating +food and drink, and by such constant variety and strange mixtures; and +thus, in their eager cry, "Who will show us any good?" they actually +enjoy less than he who eats plain food, and is contented with it.</p> + +<p>Bread of all kinds is greatly improved in whiteness and pleasantness by +being wet with milk; though even when wet with nothing but water, there +is a solid and rational sweetness to it, of which the despisers of +bread, and devourers of much flesh and condiments never dreamed, and +never will dream, till they reform their habits.</p> + +<p>If children are furnished with good bread, on the plan of Mr. Locke, +there is no doubt that they will relish it most keenly; that their +attachment to it will strengthen, and that unless we give them other +food occasionally, from principle, or seduce them by depraving their +tastes, they will continue it through life. "Train up a child in the way +he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it," is a +general rule, and has as few exceptions, when applied to the diet of a +child, as when it is applied to his moral tastes and preferences.</p> + +<p>With those parents who, though convinced of the justness of the views +here advanced, have already trained their children in the way they +should <i>not</i> go, but are anxious to retrace their steps as far as +possible, there will here be a difficulty. "Our children," they will +say, "do not, at present, <i>relish</i> the kind of bread you speak of; and +how shall we bring them to do so? or is the thing indeed possible?"</p> + +<p>The answer to these inquiries is easy. Such parents have only to confine +their children to the kinds of food which they deem proper for them, a +few weeks or a few months, and they will soon relish them. If those who +are old enough to be convinced can be brought to unite heartily in the +change, and to endeavor to be pleased with it, the work of reformation +will be more pleasant and probably more speedy. I have never found any +difficulty of bringing myself to relish in a very short time an article +of food for which I had no relish before, and to which I had even a +dislike, provided I was thoroughly convinced it was best for me, and was +earnest in the desire of change—except sweet oil, to which I was about +six months in becoming reconciled.</p> + +<p>It is with physical, as with moral habits, in their formation. We +should fix on what we believe, from experience, observation, and divine +and human testimony, is best for us, and habit will soon render it +agreeable. It is important, even to health, that food should be +agreeable; but as I have already said, what we know to be best for us +will soon become agreeable, if we confine ourselves to it; and to our +children also, if we confine them to it, in like manner.</p> + +<p>Next to bread made of wheat—when that cannot be procured—is a mixture +of wheat and Indian meal; but the proportion of the latter should be the +smallest. Wheat, rye, and Indian, in the proportion of one third of +each, make excellent bread, sometimes called <i>third</i> bread. Rye and +Indian make a tolerable bread. Rye alone is not so good. The want, in +the latter, of the vegetable principle called gluten, makes its general +use of very questionable propriety.</p> + +<p>Indian meal alone, baked in cakes by the fire, if eaten only in small +quantities, is a very nutritious and by no means unwholesome bread. But +its sweetness, and the general fondness which people who are accustomed +to its use have for it, lead them to eat it in too large proportions, if +they use it while it is warm. In these circumstances, it proves itself +too active for the stomach and bowels. If warm, six ounces is as much +as a hearty adult ought to eat of it at once; and children should of +course take much less. It is less active on the bowels, and scarcely +less agreeable, as soon as we become accustomed to it, if eaten when it +is cold—even if baked in loaves, in the oven.</p> + +<p>Potatoes, added to unbolted wheat flour, make excellent bread; and so, +as I am informed, does rice. Of the latter, however, I have never eaten. +Oats and barley, and many other grains and substances, will make bread; +but it is of an inferior kind.</p> + +<p>The question may again recur, after this extended series of remarks, +whether I intend to confine the young almost exclusively to bread, in +one or another of its forms. We shall see how this is, presently.</p> + +<p>While bread, therefore, should constitute a part, at least, and +sometimes the whole of a meal, a great variety of other articles are not +only admissible, but desirable. Among these may be mentioned plain +puddings.</p> + +<p>One of the most wholesome puddings is made of Indian meal, enclosed in a +bag and boiled. Nearly allied to this is the common hasty pudding; but +the last is less wholesome, because it requires less chewing; and it +ought to have been observed, before now, that after weaning, any food +is digested better which has undergone the process of thorough +mastication.</p> + +<p>Boiled rice, though hardly to be regarded as a pudding, is very +nutritious, and very easy of digestion. I am not without doubts, +however, in regard to the utility of a large proportion of rice, as +food. A dinner of it, two or three times a week, I believe to be +wholesome; but used too frequently, it seems to me not active enough for +the stomach and bowels; having in this respect precisely a contrary +effect to that of warm Indian cakes. The common notion that rice has a +tendency to make people blind, is entirely unfounded. Its worst effect +is when eaten without being boiled through. In such cases, I have known +it to do mischief; perhaps because it was swallowed without much +chewing. Some grind it, and use the flour; but I cannot recommend it to +be used in this manner.</p> + +<p>The best pudding in the world is a loaf of bread, (What!—you will +say—bread again?) three or four or five days old, boiled, or rather +<i>steamed</i>, in milk. All kinds of bread are excellent for this purpose, +but wheat and Indian are the best. They are excellent even without +milk—that is, simply steamed.</p> + +<p>Puddings made of the flour of wheat, rye, buckwheat, &c., are less +wholesome than those which have been already mentioned. And all sorts +of puddings are less wholesome, when eaten as hot as our unreasonable +fashions require, than when their temperature is quite below that of our +bodies. I would not have them so cold as to chill us, for this would be +to go to the other, though less dangerous extreme; but they ought to be +cool. Too much heat is an unnatural stimulus, likely to leave more or +less debility behind it. In addition to this, those who eat hot food are +more exposed to take cold, in consequence of it.</p> + +<p>With none of these puddings ought we to mix any fruits, green or +dried—not even raisins. Some of the more important properties of nearly +every kind of fruit or berry are lost by boiling, unless we eat the +water in which they are boiled, and save the vapor which would otherwise +escape. I am not in favor of boiled fruit generally, especially if +boiled in puddings.</p> + +<p>Puddings, like most other kinds of food—even bread—may be slightly +salted: not that this is indispensable, but because the balance of human +testimony is in its favor. The argument that we evidently need salt +because the other animals require it, is without much weight. The other +animals do not <i>generally</i> require or use it.[Footnote: Some +considerable savage nations use no salt, and a few have a strong +aversion to it.] The cases so often triumphantly mentioned, where +animals appear to thrive better from the use of it, are only exceptions +to the general rule, nor are they very numerous in comparison with the +whole race of animals. Still I have no objections to its moderate use. +It may be useful in preventing worms; though there are doubts even of +that. In large quantities, it is unquestionably hurtful.</p> + +<p>But neither fruits nor berries—permit me to repeat the sentiment—no, +nor any such thing as cinnamon or spices, nor even sugar or molasses in +any considerable quantity, should go into the composition of any sort of +pudding. If the puddings are not sweet enough without, it is better to +add a little sugar or molasses on your plate. Nor should sauces, or +cream, or butter, or suet be used in or upon them; though of all these +substances, cream is least injurious. Nutmegs, grated cheese, &c., are +unnecessary and hurtful. Cheese should never be eaten, in any way.</p> + +<p>There is one thing, however, which may be eaten in moderate quantity +with all sorts of puddings and with bread; I mean milk. I say eaten +<i>with</i>, for it is better never to put these substances, nor indeed any +other, <i>into</i> the milk. The bread, pudding, &c., should be eaten by +itself, and the milk by itself, also. In this way we shall not be liable +to cheat the teeth out of what is justly their due, and then make the +deranged stomach and general system pay for it.</p> + +<p>Potatoes are a good article of diet—to be used once a day—though they +are not very nutritious. They are best either steamed or roasted in the +ashes. They are also excellent when boiled. Turnips are also good. +Onions are not so useful as is generally supposed, except for the +purposes of medicine.</p> + +<p>Beets; in small quantity, and carrots and asparagus, and above all, +beans and peas—but not their pods—are tolerable food once a day, +during most of the year, except it be the middle of the winter. But +neither these, nor potatoes, nor any other vegetables, ought to be +cooked in any way with fat, or fat meat, or butter; or be mashed after +they are cooked, or eaten with oil or butter.</p> + +<p>If there be an exception to this general rule—which may seem to be +rather sweeping—it should be in favor of a little sweet oil on rice, or +on bread puddings. But the common practice, founded upon the apparent +belief that we can scarcely eat anything until it is well covered with +lard or butter, is quite objectionable—nay, it is even disgusting. No +pure stomach would ever prefer oily bread, or pudding, or beans, or +peas; and most people would abhor the sight of such a strange +combination, were not habit, in its power to change our very nature, +almost omnipotent.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on Fruit.</i></h4> + +<p>There is a very great diversity of opinion on the subject of fruit. Some +maintain that all fruit, even in the most ripe and perfect state, is of +doubtful utility, especially for children. Others say none is hurtful, +if ripe, and eaten in moderate quantity. Some require care in making a +proper selection; but here again, in regard to what constitutes a proper +selection, there is a difference of opinion. Some consider fruits easy +of digestion; others believe they are digested only with very great +difficulty.</p> + +<p>When the cholera prevailed in the large cities of the United States, a +majority of the physicians believed all fruits, even those which were +ripe, to be injurious in their tendency. But it was insisted by the +minority—I think very justly—that whenever fruit appeared to be +injurious, it was accidental—that is, the disease, being prepared to +make its attack just at that time, happened to do so immediately after +the use of fruit, rather than something else, and especially in the +<i>season</i> of fruits—or on account of excess; or (which was certainly +the case in some instances) because the quality of the fruit was bad.</p> + +<p>At present, the <i>weight</i> of testimony on this subject—estimating +according to talent, and not according to numbers—is in favor of good +fruit, used with moderation—even in the face of the cholera. Dr. +Dunglison—one of the last to adopt such an opinion—appears to be in +its favor.</p> + +<p>On several points, in regard to fruit, I believe that among medical men +there is no essential difference of opinion. As I always prefer, in +controversies, to see in how many things antagonists agree, before +proceeding to the points in which they differ, I will here endeavor to +enumerate them.</p> + +<p>1. All unripe fruits, especially, if eaten raw and uncooked—let the +season, or prevalent disease, or individual, be what or who it may—are +unwholesome.</p> + +<p>2. Excess, in the use of the most wholesome fruits, under any +circumstances, is also injurious.</p> + +<p>3. Fruits, eaten immediately after a full meal, when the stomach is in +an improper condition for receiving anything more, contribute to +overtask the digestive powers, and must hence produce more or less of +injury.</p> + +<p>4. The skins and kernels of the larger fruits are unwholesome, because +indigestible. The skins of fruits, if beaten or masticated finely; may +appear to be digested, because dissolved; but I have already endeavored +to show that solution is not always digestion.</p> + +<p>5. Fruits of all kinds are most wholesome in their own country, and in +their own appropriate season.</p> + +<p>6. Dried fruits are less wholesome than fresh.</p> + +<p>7. Fruit of all kinds should be withheld from infants, until they have +teeth.</p> + +<p>Thus far, as I have already said, all agree; at least so far as I know. +There are several other points on which medical men are generally +agreed, though not universally. One of these is, that fruits, if eaten +at all, should usually form a part of a regular meal. Another is, that +it is better not to eat them immediately before going to bed.</p> + +<p>There are contradictory opinions among the mass of the community, +physicians as well as others, on the general intention of our summer +fruits. From the fact that children's diseases prevail more at the +season of the year when fruits are more abundant, many think the fruits +are the immediate cause of them. Others, and with better reason, suppose +that the latter are intended by the Author of nature to check or prevent +the bowel diseases of summer.</p> + +<p>Nothing, certainly, is more unnatural than to suppose that at the very +season of the year when so many other influences combine to awaken a +tendency to disease in the human system, the Creator should place before +our eyes an abundance of fruits, inviting us by all their cooling and +tempting properties, only to do us mischief. On the contrary, it seems +to me much more probable that many of them were designed for our +moderate use. In what quantity, under what circumstances, and which are +best, it is left to human experience to determine.</p> + +<p>Some say that fruit should never be eaten in the morning, before +breakfast. Now everything I know of the human constitution, together +with what I have learned from experience and observation, has been for +years leading me to the contrary opinion. Indeed, I am most fully +convinced, that of all periods for eating fruit, whether we use it alone +or make it a part of our regular meals, the morning, soon after we rise, +is the most favorable. [Footnote: I ought to remark, that as the morning +is the best time for eating <i>good</i> fruit, so it is the very worst time +for eating it if <i>not</i> good; and as a large proportion of that which is +eaten is unripe, or otherwise bad, this may account for the general +prejudice against eating it at this period.] My reasons are as follows:</p> + +<p>1. The rest and sleep of the preceding night has restored our general +vigor, and consequently has invigorated the stomach, so that digestion +will be more easily and perfectly accomplished.</p> + +<p>2. We have been, at our rising, so long without food on our stomachs, +that they are not likely to be oppressed by a moderate quantity of good, +ripe, wholesome fruit. In the course of our waking hours, meals follow +each other in such quick succession, and there is so much variety, even +at the plainest tables, to tempt us to excess, that there is more danger +of injury from the addition of fruit than at our first rising.</p> + +<p>3. I have never known any one to receive injury from the use of fruit in +this way, provided no other circumstance in relation to quantity, +quality, &c. had been disregarded. In my own case, the practice has, on +the contrary, seemed beneficial.</p> + +<p>4. There is one reason in favor of this practice which perhaps would +have less weight, if people rose as early in the morning as they ought; +or, in the language of Dr. Franklin to the inhabitants of Paris, if they +knew that the sun gives light as soon as he rises. I allude to the +demand which I conceive that the stomach makes for something, after so +long fasting, and the pernicious custom of late breakfasts. I am +persuaded that it is advisable to eat something nearly as soon as we +rise, be it never so early; and if we can get nothing else for +breakfast, and have not accustomed ourselves to relish a piece of good +bread, or some other simple thing, which requires no labor of +preparation, I think it perfectly proper to eat a small quantity of +fruit.</p> + +<p>We come now to the particular consideration of some of those fruits +which universal experience has shown to be the most salutary.</p> + +<p>Of all these, none is more wholesome than the apple. There is indeed a +great diversity in the quality even of this single article. Sweet apples +are the most nutritious; but perhaps those which are gently acid, and at +the same time mealy, are rather more cooling, and when eaten raw, and in +the heat of summer, not less wholesome.</p> + +<p>Apples which come to maturity very early in the season appear, as a +general rule, to be less rich, and even less perfect, than those which +ripen later. In view of this fact, some writers have endeavored to +dissuade us from their use; and among others, Mr. Locke. We may judge a +little what his opinions were, from his concluding remarks on the +subject:—"I never knew apples hurt anybody," says he, "after October."</p> + +<p>But although neither apples nor any other fruits which ripen uncommonly +early are quite so good as those which come in a little later, yet I do +not think they are to be wholly rejected, unless they have been raised +in hot houses. Fruits, and indeed vegetables in general, whose maturity +is hastened by artificial processes, must be less wholesome than when +brought to perfection in nature's own appropriate time and manner. I +ought to say, however, very distinctly, that of the fruits of any +particular tree, those which first ripen are always the worst; for they +are usually wormy, or otherwise defective.</p> + +<p>Most of the fruit, as well as other vegetables, brought to our city +markets in this country, is utterly unfit to be eaten. Sometimes it is +immature; sometimes it has a hot house maturity; sometimes it has been +picked so long that it has begun to decay. Many fruits—berries +especially—are in perfection for a very short period only. Mulberries, +for example—one kind especially—are not in perfection long enough to +carry to the market house, even though the distance were very small. +Luckily, however, very few mulberries are eaten. But the raspberry and +strawberry, if perfect when gathered, have usually begun to decay, +before they are purchased. That this appears to be rather unfrequent, is +because they are gathered before they are ripe.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees regards most fruits as difficult of digestion. I do not think +they are so, if perfect and ripe. The experiments of Dr. Beaumont, so +far as they prove any general principle, show conclusively that mellow +sweet apples are more quickly digested than any kind of vegetable food +whatever, except rice and sago. But even admitting they were slow of +digestion, I do not think—as I have already shown in another +place—that they ought on that account to be excluded. Besides, my +opinion differs from that of Dr. D. in regard to the strength of the +digestive powers of children. After teething, they seem to me to be able +to digest any substances which adults can; and with as little +difficulty.</p> + +<p>But to return:—No fruit is in perfection longer than the apple. +Besides, no fruit appears to be less injured in its nature and +properties by picking it a little before it is ripe, and preserving it +during the winter. It is on this account, more perhaps than any other, +that I value it more highly than all other fruits united.</p> + +<p>Apples may be used either raw or cooked. In either case, the skins and +seeds should be avoided, as has been before suggested. I am not ignorant +that WILLICH, in his "Lectures on Diet and Regimen"—an excellent work, +in the main—says that the seeds ought to be eaten; but I believe few +physiologists would comply with his injunction, especially when it is +considered that he recommends, in the same connection, that we swallow +the stones of cherries and plums. Strange how far our theories will +sometimes carry us!</p> + +<p>The apple is excellent when roasted or baked, especially the sweet +apple. It is very common, in some places, to eat baked sweet apples with +milk; and the practice is by no means a bad one. Indeed, baked or raw +apples might be advantageously made a part of at least one of our meals +every day. There is said to be a miserly farmer—a single gentleman—in +the western part of the state of Massachusetts, who has lived on nothing +but apples for his food, and water for his drink, about forty years. And +yet he is said to enjoy the most perfect health. I do not propose this +as an example worthy of imitation; but it shows that apples maybe made +to subserve an important purpose in diet. And though I have more than +once expressed an opinion highly unfavorable to the exclusive use of any +one article of diet, yet if I were to confine myself to any one thing, I +know of nothing except bread that I should prefer to good apples. Still, +however, I prefer a variety—sweet, sour, early, late, &c.; and I should +use them raw, roasted, baked, made into sauce with new or unfermented +cider, and boiled. Good apples, eaten raw, with bread, form not only a +very wholesome, but, to an unperverted appetite, a most delicious +dinner.</p> + +<p>Much has been said about cutting down orchards; but the whole seems to +me idle—for if the fruit is of a good quality, it may be used as food, +either for man or beast. And if not good, the trees ought either to be +destroyed or replaced by those that will produce fruit which is +better—even if the object were to make it into cider. I have said that +apples may be used both by man and beast. It is well known that most +domestic animals thrive well on good apples, especially sweet ones. Very +tolerable molasses is also sometimes made from sweet apples.</p> + +<p>Nearly everything which has been said above in regard to apples, will +apply to pears. The best varieties of this excellent fruit are quite as +nutritious and as wholesome as the apple; and as much improved for the +table by baking. I believe, however, that no cheap process has yet been +devised for keeping them as long in the winter. They may be preserved in +the form of sauce, prepared in the same way with common apple sauce. The +skins, of many kinds of pears are less injurious than those of apples; +but even the skins of pears need not be eaten.</p> + +<p>Some kinds of peaches are tolerably wholesome; but the stringy character +of their pulp appears to me to render them less so than apples and +pears, though I am not confident on this point. But if used at all, they +should be used in less quantity at one time. Tempting as their flavor +is, I seldom eat them, when I can get apples and pears; holding myself +in duty bound to use the <i>best</i>, even of the fruits.</p> + +<p>"Fruit," says Mr. Locke, "makes one of the most difficult chapters in +the government of health, especially that of children. Our first parents +ventured Paradise for it; and it is no wonder our children cannot stand +the temptation, though it cost them their health. The regulation of this +cannot come under any one general rule; for I am by no means of their +mind who would keep children wholly from fruit, as a thing totally +unwholesome for them, by which strict way they make them but the more +ravenous after it, to eat good or bad, ripe or unripe, all that they can +get, whenever they come at it.</p> + +<p>"Melons, peaches, most sorts of plums, and all sorts of grapes, in +<i>England</i>, I think children should be wholly kept from, as having a very +tempting taste, in a very unwholesome juice, so that if it were +possible, they should never so much as see them, or know that there was +any such thing. But strawberries, cherries, gooseberries and currants, +when thoroughly ripe, I think may be pretty safely allowed them."</p> + +<p>Excellent as these remarks are, in general, I do not like his entire +interdiction of the use of melons, peaches, plums, and grapes, even in +England. Peaches, to be sure, as they come at a season when apples or +pears, or both of them—which are more wholesome than peaches—are +abundant, may be better omitted, delicious as they are to the taste; and +I do not think very highly of plums. But melons, in very moderate +quantity, and grapes, if we eat nothing but the ripe pulp, rejecting +both the husk and the interior hard part, including the seeds, are, I +think, useful and wholesome. On the other hand, I should never place +cherries and gooseberries in the same list with strawberries; for the +latter are, if I may use the expression, infinitely the most wholesome.</p> + +<p>Many seem to think that not to eat all sorts of fruits is to despise, or +at least to treat with neglect the gifts of God, intended for our +reception; by which they mean, if they mean anything, that the use of +all sorts of fruits is already found out, even in the present +comparative infancy of the world. Now I do not suppose that God has made +anything in vain—absolutely so—though I do not think we have found out +the true uses of half the things which he has made and given us. And +among those things of which we are yet ignorant, are some of the fruits. +I do not believe it follows, necessarily, that because fruits are +created, we are obliged to use them all.</p> + +<p>Besides, if this is a rule, it is one which nobody follows. Every one +uses more of some sorts, and fewer of others; and a large proportion of +the community entirely reject some kinds. Now if the statement commonly +made, that all fruits are the gifts of God, and ought therefore to be +used by all persons, is correct, those who make the statement ought to +conform to it as a rule of their lives, and to eat all kinds of fruit +which the season and country affords; and not only eat all kinds, but +see that the whole of every kind is consumed; since to waste any portion +is to slight the good gifts of God.</p> + +<p>The result then is, that we cannot obey such a rule; but are driven back +to the mode which common sense dictates, which is, to make a selection, +using some, and rejecting others. And the value of studying the nature +of these fruits, by examining the experience of mankind in regard to +them, consists in the aid thus afforded us in making our selection +wisely.</p> + +<p>There is one very common error in the use of the smaller summer fruits, +such as strawberries, whortleberries, currants, &c., which is that of +mixing cream, wine, spices, sugar, &c., with them. We are thus tempted +to eat too great a quantity at once. Besides—which is a worse evil—we +change the proportions of the saccharine parts, and thus do all in our +power, by increasing a similarity in all fruits, to destroy that +agreeable variety which God has established, and which is probably +salutary.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 11. <i>Confectionary.</i></h4> + +<p>By confectionary we here mean the substances usually sold at those shops +in our cities distinguished by the general name of confectionaries, and +which consist either wholly of sugar, or of sugar and some other +substances combined.</p> + +<p>As to the use of a moderate quantity of pure sugar at our meals, whether +it is procured at a confectioner's shop or elsewhere, I do not know that +there is any strong objection to it; though I believe that it cannot be +regarded as indispensable to health—for were that the fact, it seems to +me to imply something short of infinite wisdom in the creation of +articles destined for our sustenance. But I have spoken on this subject +elsewhere.</p> + +<p>A part, however, of the contents of the confectionary shop are actually +poisonous. I refer to those things which are either frosted, as it is +called, or colored. The substances applied to the sugar for this purpose +are usually some mineral or vegetable poison; although the fact of its +being a poison may not always be known to the manufacturer. The most +unhappy consequences have occasionally followed the use of +confectionary, when poisoned in this manner. A family of four persons, +in New York, were made sick in this way in March of year before last, +and some of them came very near losing their lives. The "frosting" which +caused the mischief was pronounced by eminent chemists to be one fifth +rank poison.[Footnote: It is to be remembered that those who eat +confectionary so slightly poisoned that it does not make them sick at +once, may nevertheless be as much injured in their constitutions as they +who are poisoned outright. In the latter case, the poison is in part +thrown out of the body; in the former, it remains in it much longer—and +therefore more surely, though more slowly, accomplishes the work of +destruction.] The coloring substances used are sometimes poisonous, as +well as the frosting.</p> + +<p>Some of the articles sold at these shops consist of sugar mixed with +paste. Others are called sweetmeats; that is, fruits, or rinds of +fruits, preserved in sugar. All these substances, I believe, without +exception, are injurious.</p> + +<p>The great evils of confectionary yet remain to be mentioned. These are +of three kinds, physical, mental and moral.</p> + +<p>Some of the <i>physical</i> evils have, it is true, just been mentioned; but +there is another evil of still greater magnitude. Young people who eat +confectionary, commonly eat it between meals. This produces mischief in +two ways. First, it keeps the stomach at work when it ought to rest; for +this, like every other muscular organ, requires its seasons of repose. +Secondly, it destroys gradually the appetite; so that when the regular +meal arrives, the accustomed keenness of appetite does not come with it. +And the consequence is, not so much that we do not eat enough, as that +we are fastidious, and eat a little of this, then a little of that; and +usually select the worst things. We are not hungry enough to make a meal +of a single article of plain food. And this evil goes on increasing, as +long as we have access to the confectionary shop. These statements +describe the case of thousands of pupils, of both sexes, at our schools +and seminaries.</p> + +<p>The <i>intellectual</i> evil resulting from the use of confectionary consists +in the fondness for excitement which is produced. You will seldom find a +person who depends daily and almost hourly on some excitement to his +appetite and stomach, and is not satisfied with plain food, who will +content himself to <i>study</i> without unnatural excitements of the mind. +Duty to himself or to others will not move him. He must have before him +the hope of reward, or the fear of punishment. He must be moved by +emulation or ambition, or some other questionable or wicked motive or +passion.</p> + +<p>But the <i>moral</i> results, to the young, of using confectionary, are still +more dreadful. I do not here refer to the danger of meeting with bad +company at the shops themselves, or of going from these places of +pollution <i>directly</i> to the grog-shop, the gambling-house, or the +brothel; though there is danger enough, even here. But I allude to the +tendency which a habit of not resting satisfied with plain food, but of +depending on exciting things, has, to make us dissatisfied with plain +moral enjoyments—the society of friends, and the quiet discharge of our +duty to God and our neighbor. Just in proportion as we gratify our +propensity for excitement at the confectioner's shop, just in the same +proportion do we expose ourselves to the, danger of yielding to +temptation, should other gratifications present themselves. The young of +both sexes who are in the use of confectionary, are on the high road to +gluttony, drunkenness, or debauchery; perhaps to all three. I do not say +they will certainly arrive there, for circumstances not quite miraculous +may pluck them as "brands from the burning;" but I do not hesitate to +say that such is the inevitable tendency; and I call on every mother and +teacher who reads this section, to beware of confectionaries, and see, +if possible, that the young never set foot in them. They are a road +through which thousands pass to the chamber of death—death to the +immortal spirit, as well as to the body, its vehicle.</p> + +<p>More might be added—for this is an important subject—but I trust I +have said enough. Those who have read and believe what I have written, +if they remain wholly unaffected and unmoved, would not be roused to +effort were anything to be added.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 12. <i>Pastry.</i></h4> + +<p>Dr. Paris, a distinguished British writer on diet, says that all pastry +is "an abomination." And yet, go where we will, we find it often on the +table. Hardly any one, whether old or young, attempts to do without it.</p> + +<p>There are indeed some, who will not eat pie-crust, or high-seasoned +cakes formed of paste; but yet will not hesitate to eat hot bread, or +rolls, or biscuits made of wheat flour, bolted. Now what is this but +paste? If we could see the contents of the stomach, an hour after the +mass is swallowed, we should find it to be paste, and <i>mere</i> paste.</p> + +<p>And yet the evil is increasing everywhere. So generally is this true, +that a person who refuses to eat hot bread, or cake, or biscuit, is +deemed singular. He who ventures to lift his voice against it is deemed +an ascetic or a visionary. But such a voice must be raised, and heard, +too, whether its monitions are or are not regarded.</p> + +<p>Pastry is less objectionable, however, when used in the form of hot +bread, &c., than when butter or fat is mixed with it. Then it becomes +one of the most indigestible substances in the world. Besides, it not +only tries the patience of the stomach, but according to Willich, whose +authority ranks high, it tends to produce diseases of the skin, +especially a disease which he calls "copper in the face," and which he +pronounces incurable.</p> + +<p>I know not whether the eruptions so common on the faces of young people +in this country, and especially of young men, are in every instance +either produced or aggravated by pastry; but I am very sure of one +thing, viz., that those who are in the use of pastry, and have eruptions +of the skin of any kind, will not be apt to get well, as long as they +continue the use of this objectionable substance.</p> + +<p>Physicians are often consulted about eruptions on the face. When they +assign the real cause, which is undoubtedly connected with the improper +gratification of some of the appetites, in one way or another, it is +seldom that the patient has self-command enough to follow his +prescription of temperance or abstinence. Mothers, it is yours to +prevent this mischief;—first, by establishing correct physical habits; +secondly, by teaching your children the great duty of self-denial—not +only by precept, but by your own good example.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 13. <i>Crude or Raw Substances.</i></h4> + +<p>I have reserved this section for remarks on certain articles used at our +fashionable modern tables, of which I could not well find it convenient +to speak elsewhere. And first, of SALADS, and HERBS used in cooking; +such as asparagus, artichokes, spinage, plantain, cabbage, dock, +lettuce, water-cresses, chives, &c.</p> + +<p>Several of these substances are often eaten raw, in which state they are +exceedingly indigestible, at the best; and they are rendered still more +beyond the reach of the powers of the stomach, by the oil or vinegar +which is added to them. Boiled, they are more tolerable; especially +asparagus. In the midst, however, of such an abundance of excellent food +as this country affords, it is most surprising that anybody should ever +take it into their heads to eat such crude substances; and above all, +that they should fill children's stomachs with them. What child, with an +unperverted appetite, would not prefer a good ripe apple, or peach, or +pear, to the most approved raw salads?—and a good baked one, to the +best boiled asparagus?</p> + +<p>NUTS, in general, are probably made for other animals rather than man; +though of this we cannot in the present infancy of human knowledge be +quite certain. But if any of them were intended, by the Creator, for +man, it is the chesnut; and this should be boiled. Boiled chesnuts are +used as food, in many parts of southern Europe; and to a very +considerable extent.</p> + +<p>SPICES, as they are sometimes called, such as nutmeg, mace, pepper, +pimento; cubebs, cardamoms, juniper berries, ginger, calamus, cloves, +cinnamon, caraway, coriander, fennel, parsley, dill, sage, marjoram, +thyme, pennyroyal, lavender, hyssop, peppermint, &c., are unfit for the +human stomach—above all in infancy—except as medicines.</p> + +<p>There are several other vegetables equally objectionable with the last, +though they cannot be classed under the same head. Such are mustard, +horseradish, raw onions, garlic, cucumbers, and pickles. No appetite +which has not been accustomed to these substances in early infancy, will +ever require them. Not that they may not sometimes be useful in enabling +the stomach—at every age—to get rid of certain substances with which +it has been improperly or unreasonably loaded;—this is undoubtedly the +fact; ardent spirits would do the same. And it is with a view to some +such effect, generally, that medical writers have spoken in their favor. +Some of them stimulate the stomach to get rid of a load of <i>green</i> +fruit; others, of a load of <i>fat</i> or <i>salt</i> food; others, again, +of too large a <i>quantity</i> of food which is naturally wholesome.</p> + +<p>But in all these cases, they should be considered, not as food, but as +medicine; and we ought to call them by their right name. And if we +withhold the cause of the disease, there will be no need of the +medicine.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER VIII.</h2> + +<h3>DRINKS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk and +water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad food +and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischief they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Children need little if any drink, so long as their food is nothing but +milk; nor indeed for some time afterward, unless they are indulged in +the use of animal food. Adults, even, very seldom drink merely to quench +natural thirst. In the summer, people usually drink either to cool +themselves, or to gratify a thirst which is wholly artificial. Tea, +coffee, beer, cider, and most other common drinks, when not used for the +sake of their coolness, are drank, both in winter and summer, for this +purpose.</p> + +<p>That this is the fact, we have the most abundant and unequivocal +evidence. I know that much is said of the demand which a profuse +perspiration creates among hard laborers in the summer. Such a sudden +abstraction of a large amount of fluid requires, it is said, a +proportional supply, or life would soon become extinct. Yet there are +many old men who have perspired profusely at their labor all their days, +and yet have drank nothing at all, except their tea, morning and +evening; and perhaps have eaten, for one or two of their meals daily, in +summer, a bowl of bread and milk. And some of them are among the most +remarkable instances of longevity which the country affords.</p> + +<p>How the system acquires a sufficient supply of moisture to keep up good +health, in these cases, I do not pretend to determine: perhaps it is +through the medium of the lungs. But at any rate, it can obtain it +without our drinking for that sole purpose, to the great danger of +exciting liver complaints, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, colds, rheumatisms, and +fevers.</p> + +<p>But if adults who perspire freely do not require much drink, children +certainly do not; and above all, young children. And if they do require +any thing, it is only simple water. The following remarks of Dr. Oliver, +of Hanover, N.H., are extracted from Dr. Mussey's late Prize Essay on +Ardent Spirits:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Who has not observed the extreme satisfaction which children derive +from quenching their thirst with pure water? And who that has perverted +his appetite for drink, by stimulating his palate with bitter beer, sour +cider, rum and water, and other beverages of human invention, but would +be a gainer, even on the score of mere animal gratification, without any +reference to health, if he could bring back his vitiated taste to the +simple relish of nature?</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Children drink because they are dry. Grown people drink, whether dry or +not, because they have discovered a way of making drink pleasant. +Children drink water because this is a beverage of nature's own brewing, +which she has made for the purpose of quenching a natural thirst. Grown +people drink anything but water, because this fluid is intended to +quench only a natural thirst; and natural thirst is a thing which they +seldom feel."</blockquote> + +<p>There is a great deal of truth, as well as of sound philosophy, in these +two paragraphs, and little less of truth in the following paragraph from +Dr. Dewees:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"We have witnessed very often, with sorrow, parents giving to their +young children wine, or other stimulating liquors. Nature never intended +anything stronger than water to be the drink for children. This they +enjoy greatly; and much advantage is occasionally experienced from its +use, especially after they have commenced the use of animal food."</blockquote> + +<p>Two things are to be observed in the last remarks, which are, that +children demand drink of any kind but seldom, and that even this +occasional demand is often the special result of the use of animal food. +Here comes out an important secret. It is the use of animal food, to a +very great degree, in adults and children both, that creates so much of +that unnatural thirst which prevails in the community. When we shall +come to lay aside animal food, in childhood, youth, manhood and age, +much that is now <i>called</i> thirst will be banished; and much of the +intemperance and other kinds of sensuality which follow in its train.</p> + +<p>It has been sometimes said that there is but one kind of drink in the +world—and that is water. This is strictly, or rather <i>physiologically</i> +true. For, though many mixtures are <i>called</i> drinks, it is only the +water which they contain that answers any of the legitimate purposes for +which drink was intended by the Creator.</p> + +<p>The object of drink, besides quenching our thirst, or rather <i>while</i> it +quenches it, is, not to be digested, like food, but to pass directly +from the stomach into the blood-vessels, and dilute and temper the +blood, rendering it more fit to answer the great purpose of sustaining +life and health. Now, there is nothing that can do this but water. +Alcohol cannot do it, nor can turpentine, oil, quicksilver, melted lead, +or any other liquid.</p> + +<p>Tea, coffee, chocolate, small beer, soda water, lemonade, &c., which are +nearly all water, quench the thirst very well, it is true; but not quite +so well as water alone would. The narcotic principle of the first two, +the alcoholic principle of the fourth, and the mucilage, nutriment, +acid, and alkali of the rest, are in the way; for thirst would be +quenched still better without them, even when it is of an unnatural +kind.</p> + +<p>Indeed, the same or similar remarks may be made in regard to all other +mixtures which are usually proposed as drinks. Even milk and water, +molasses and water, &c., in favor of which so much is said, are +objectionable, as mere drinks. Not that they contain anything poisonous, +but they evidently contain nutriment; and even this, except as a part or +the whole of a regular meal, does harm; for it sets the stomach at work +when it needs repose. Mere drink, as I have already said, is never +digested.</p> + +<p>But if the drinks above mentioned, and even milk and water, are +objectionable, what shall we say of cider, wine, and ardent +spirits?—substances which contain, the latter one half, and the two +former from one twentieth to one fourth alcohol. Surely, nobody will +deny that these substances ought, at all events, to be banished from the +nursery. And yet we occasionally find them there, not only for the use +of the mother, to the ruin of the child, indirectly—but also, in some +of their smoother forms, for the use of the child itself.</p> + +<p>I would not lay too much stress on food and drink; for, as I have +already observed, more than once, the causes of infantile ill health and +mortality are numerous. Still I must insist that, of all the sources of +disease, these are the most prolific. Much is done towards ruining the +health of children by the improper food and drink of the mother. But +when, in addition to all this, the children themselves are early fed +with animal food, and with stimulating drinks—punch, coffee, tea, +&c.—and an artificial thirst is early excited and rendered habitual, +their destruction, for time and eternity, is almost inevitable.</p> + +<p>Very few children relish any drink but water, or sweetened water, at +first; and where they do, it is probably hereditary. I have been struck +with their tastes and preferences; nor less with the folly of those +around them, in endeavoring to change them, by requiring them—almost +always against their will—to sip a little coffee, or a little tea, or +a little lemonade; or, it may be, a little toddy. Such children <i>may</i> +escape the death of the drunkard or the debauchee; but if they do, it +will not be through the instrumentality of the parents.</p> + +<p>I am very much opposed to giving children hot drinks of any kind. If +they are to drink substances which are injurious, as tea or coffee, let +them be cool. I do not say <i>cold</i>, for that would be going to the other +extreme. But no drink, in any ordinary case, should be above the heat of +our bodies; that is, about 98 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer. Yet +the precautions of this paragraph will be almost unnecessary, if +children are confined—as they ought to be, and would be, did we not go +out of our way to teach them otherwise—to water, as their only drink. +Cold water is almost always preferred. Not one child in a thousand would +ever prefer it hot, until his taste had been perverted. No writer has +inveighed more against hot drinks of every kind, than the late William +Cobbett—and, as I think, with more justice.</p> + +<p>But, in avoiding one rock, we must not, as has already been intimated, +make shipwreck on another. Hot drinks, though they injure the powers of +the stomach, and by that means and through that medium, are one +principal cause of the almost universal early decay of teeth, are yet +less injurious, or at least less dangerous, immediately, than cold ones. +Mr. Locke, in speaking of the sports of a child, in the open air, has +the following quaint, but judicious remarks:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Playing in the open air has but this one danger in it, that I know; and +that is, that when he is hot with running up and down, he should sit or +lie down on the cold or moist earth. This, I grant, and drinking cold +drink, when they are hot with labor or exercise, brings more people to +the grave, or to the brink of it, by fevers and other diseases, than +anything I know. These mischiefs are easily enough prevented when he is +little, being then seldom out of sight. And if, during his childhood, he +be constantly and rigorously kept from sitting on the ground, or +drinking any cold liquor, while he is hot, the custom of forbearing, +grown into <i>habit</i>, will help much to preserve him, when he is no longer +under his maid's or tutor's eye.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"More fevers and surfeits are got by people's drinking when they are +hot, than by any one thing I know. If he (the child) be very hot, he +should by no means <i>drink</i>; at least a good piece of bread, first to be +eaten, will gain time to warm his drink <i>blood hot</i>, which then he may +drink safely. If he be very dry, it will go down so warmed, and quench +his thirst better; and if he will not drink it so warmed, abstaining +will not hurt him. Besides, this will teach him to forbear, which is a +habit of the greatest use for health of mind and body too."</blockquote> + +<p>The last remarks are full of wisdom. Mothers may depend upon it, that +every indulgence to which they accustom their children paves the way for +<i>habitual</i> indulgence; and has a tendency to lead, indirectly, to +indulgence in other matters; and, on the contrary, every self-denial +which they can lead children to exercise, voluntarily—even in these +every-day matters of food, drink, exercise, &c. is so much gained in the +great work of self-denial and the resisting of temptation in matters of +higher importance. But I must not moralize too long; having dwelt on +this same point under the head Confectionary. I proceed, therefore, to +make a few more extracts from Mr. Locke:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Not being permitted to <i>drink</i> without eating, will prevent the custom +of having the cup often at his nose; a dangerous beginning."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Men often bring habitual hunger and thirst on themselves by custom."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"You may, if you please, bring any one to be thirsty every hour."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"I once lived in a house, where, to appease a froward child, they gave +him <i>drink</i> as often as he cried, so that he was constantly bibbing. +And though he could not speak, yet he drank more in twenty-four hours +than I did."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"It is convenient, for health and sobriety, to drink no more than +natural thirst requires; and he that eats not salt meats, nor drinks +strong drink, will seldom thirst between meals."</blockquote> + +<p>Great mischief is often done to their health by children at school; and +one instance of this is, in getting violently heated with exercise, and +then pouring down large quantities of cold water to cool themselves. I +once made it a habitual rule for pupils, that they must drink water, if +they drank it at all, on leaving their seats to go to their plays, but +not afterwards: and I was so situated that I could prevent the law from +being broken, as there was no spring or well to which they could have +access, privately. And though they thought the rule rather severe, I +have no doubt it saved them from much injury, and perhaps sometimes from +sickness.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_IX."></a><h2>CHAPTER IX.</h2> + +<h3>GIVING MEDICINE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>So much error prevails in regard to the medical management of the young, +that a volume might be written without exhausting the subject.[Footnote: +Such a volume is in preparation. It is intended as a companion to the +present.] My present limits and plan allow of only a few remarks, and +those must be general.</p> + +<p>That "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," has so long ago +become a proverb, that it seems almost idle to repeat the sentiment. And +yet it is to be feared that very few receive it as a practical truth, in +the management of children. Now nothing is more certain than that it is +easier, as well as more humane, to prevent diseases than to cure them.</p> + +<p>I have elsewhere mentioned the opinion of a very eminent physician, +that nine in ten of children's diseases may be imputed to error with +regard to the quantity or the quality of their food. For myself, I am by +no means certain that nine out of ten is the exact proportion, though I +think the number is, at all events, very large. Few children, or even +grown persons, are seized with disease suddenly. Their progress towards +it is always gradual, and sometimes imperceptible. To a physician of any +tolerable degree of skill, however, there is no difficulty in observing +and pointing out the first steps towards illness; in those whose habits +of life are well known to him; and of foretelling the consequence.</p> + +<p>But since parents and nurses are not so well qualified as physicians to +make these observations, I will endeavor to point out a few certain +signs and symptoms by which they may know a child's health to be +declining, even before be appears to be sick.—For if these are +neglected, the evil increases, goes on from bad to worse, and more +violent and apparent complaints will follow, and perhaps end in +incurable diseases, which a timely remedy, or a slight change in the +diet and manner of life, would have infallibly prevented.</p> + +<p>"The first tendency to disease," says Dr. Cadogan, "may be observed in a +child's breath. It is not enough that the breath is not offensive; it +should be sweet and fragrant, like a nosegay of fresh flowers, or a pail +of new milk from a young cow that feeds upon the sweetest grass of the +spring; and this as well at first waking in the morning, as all day +long." [Footnote: Buchan's "Advice to Mothers," pages 337, 388]</p> + +<p>There is much of truth in these remarks; but if they are wholly true, +then very few children are perfectly healthy. For no child that eats +much animal food of any sort, or, what amounts to nearly the same thing, +much butter or gravy, will long retain the fragrant breath here alluded +to. Who has not observed the difference in this respect, between animals +in general which feed on flesh, and those which feed on grass? And +whether it is the character of their respective food that makes the +difference or not, it is also true that there is nearly as much +difference of breath between <i>men</i> who use animal food and those who do +not, as between other animals. The breath of some of our enormous meat +eaters would almost remind one of a slaughter house.</p> + +<p>Nor is it the quality of food alone, that will induce a foul breath, +either in adults or infants. He who swallows such enormous quantities, +even of plain food, as by overloading and fatiguing the stomach, tend +gradually to debilitate it, will produce the same effect. The enormous +feeders of this full feeding country, whether they are young or old, +whether they inhabit the mountain or the vale, and whether they feed on +animal food or not, have generally a bad breath; and if they seldom +offend, it is because few feed otherwise. And it is not too much—in my +own opinion—to say of this whole class of gormandizers, no less than of +the flesh eaters, that they have laid for themselves the foundation of +future disease.</p> + +<p>One general rule may here be distinctly laid down. As a child's breath +becomes hot and feverish, or strong, or acid, we may be certain that +"digestion and surfeit have fouled and disturbed the blood; and now is +the time to apply a proper remedy, and prevent a train of impending +evils. Let the child be restrained in its food. Let it eat less, live +upon milk or thin broth for a day or two, and be carried (or walk if it +is able) a little more than usual in the open air." [Footnote: Advice to +Mothers, page 338]</p> + +<p>This rule is the more important, because, if duly persevered in, it will +generally prevent disease, and save the trouble and evil consequences of +taking medicine at all. Meanwhile it will be advisable to call in a +physician—not to give drugs, but to prevent the necessity of giving +them. There is a foolish fear abroad that physicians, if called before a +person is violently sick, will dose him with their drugs, as a matter of +course, till they <i>make</i> him sick. But this, no judicious physician will +ever do. It may <i>have been</i> done, though I believe it has been seldom. +The more general course is to defer calling for medical advice, till it +is too late to use preventive means; and medicine is then resorted to by +the physician as a sort of necessary evil.</p> + +<p>A judicious physician, seasonably called in, would in many instances +save a severe fit of sickness, besides a great deal of expense, both of +time and money.</p> + +<p>But if the first symptoms of approaching disease are overlooked—if the +child is fed, or rather crammed; with solid food as much as ever—and if +no medical advice is sought, his sleep will soon become disturbed; he +will be talking, starting, and tumbling about, and will have frightful +dreams; or he will at other times be found smiling and laughing. To +these, in the end, may be added, loss of appetite, paleness, emaciation, +weakness, cough, and consumption; or colics, worms, and convulsions.</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to say that the most judicious parental management, +aided by the greatest medical skill, will always prevent disease; far +from it. The child may and undoubtedly sometimes does inherit a tendency +to a particular disease; or he may be made sick by error in regard to +dress, exercise, &c. But so long as nine tenths of the disease and early +mortality of the young might be prevented by due attention to all these +means combined, so long will it be necessary to reiterate the sentiments +of the present section.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_X."></a><h2>CHAPTER X.</h2> + +<h3>EXERCISE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">SEC. 1. Objections to the use of cradles.—SEC. 2. Carrying in the +arms—its uses and abuses.—SEC. 3. Creeping—why useful—to be +encouraged.—SEC. 4. Walking—general directions about it.—SEC. 5. +Riding abroad in carriages.—SEC. 6. Riding on horseback—objections. +Riding schools.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>This subject may be considered under the following heads: ROCKING IN THE +CRADLE; CARRYING IN THE ARMS; CREEPING; WALKING; RIDING IN A CARRIAGE; +AND RIDING ON HORSEBACK. These I shall consider in their order.</p> + + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Rocking in the Cradle.</i></h4> + +<p>There are two opinions in regard to the use of the cradle in the +nursery. Some condemn it altogether; others think its occasional use +highly proper. Those who condemn it, do it chiefly on the ground that it +produces a whirling motion of the brain, which, while it inclines to +giddiness and lulls to sleep, disturbs, in some degree, the process of +digestion.</p> + +<p>It seems to me that there is weight to this objection; and although the +cradle has been extensively used without producing any obviously evil +effects, I should greatly prefer to have it universally laid aside. As +far as mere amusement is demanded, it is quite unnecessary, since there +are so many amusements which are far better. As a means of inducing +sleep, I am still more strongly opposed to it; for if a child be +rationally treated in every other respect, it will never need artificial +means to induce it to sleep. Nature will then be the most appropriate +directress in this matter.</p> + +<p>If there is a cradle in a nursery, it is almost always full of clothes +loaded with air more or less impure, and the child is buried in it more +than is compatible with health, even in the judgment of the mother or +the nurse; for so convenient is its use, and so great the temptation to +keep the child in it, that he will often be found soaking there a large +proportion of his time. Every one knows that the air has not so free +access to a child in the cradle as elsewhere, especially if it have a +kind of covering or hood to it, as we often see. Besides, the cradle is +a piece of furniture which takes up a great deal of space in the +nursery; and every one who has made the trial effectually, will, it +seems to me, greatly prefer its room to its company.</p> + +<p>If any cradle is to be used, those are best which are suspended by +cords, and are swung, rather than rocked. And this swinging should be in +a line with the body of the child as much as possible; as this motion is +less likely to produce injury than its opposite.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Carrying in the Arms.</i></h4> + +<p>This is the most appropriate exercise for the first two months of +existence; and indeed, one of the best for some time afterward.</p> + +<p>Although a healthy, thriving child ought to sleep, for some time after +birth, from two thirds to three fourths of his time, yet it should never +be forgotten that the demand for proper exercise during the rest of the +time, is not the less imperious on this account; but probably the more +so.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned the importance of bathing, which is one form of +exercise, and of gentle motion in the arms, immediately afterward. The +same gentle motion should be often repeated during the day; care being +taken to hold the child in such a position as will be easy to him, and +favorable to the free exercise of all his limbs and muscles.</p> + +<p>There are many mothers and nurses, who not only rejoice that the infant +inclines to sleep a great deal, since it gives them more liberty, but +who take pains to prolong these hours beyond what nature requires, by +artificial means. I refer not only to the use of the cradle, but to +means still more artificial—the use of cordials and opiates, to which I +have already adverted. But whatever the means used may be, they defeat +the purposes of nature, and are in the highest degree reprehensible. +Nothing but the most chilling poverty should prevent the mother from +having the child—for a few weeks of its first existence at least—in +her own arms, nearly all the time which is not absolutely demanded for +repose. She should even invite it to wakefulness, rather than encourage +sleep.</p> + +<p>Attention to exercise ought to be commenced before the child is more +than ten days old. For this purpose he should be placed on his back, on +a pillow, in order that the body may rest at as many points as possible. +In this position he has the opportunity to move his limbs with the most +perfect freedom, and to exercise his numerous muscles. There is nothing +more important to the infant—not even sleep itself—than the action of +all his muscles; and nothing contributes more to his rapid growth.</p> + +<p>At first, the body should be kept, while on the arm, in nearly a +horizontal position, with the head perhaps a very little elevated; but +after a few weeks, it will be proper to change the position for a small +part of the time; placing the body so that it may form an angle of a few +degrees with the horizon. When this is done, however, it should always +be by placing the hand against the shoulders and head, in such a manner +as to support well the back; for it is extremely injurious to suffer the +feeble spine to sustain, at this early period, any considerable weight.</p> + +<p>Still more erroneous is the practice of some careless nurses, of +carrying the child quite upright a part of the time, almost without any +support at all. There can be no doubt that the spinal column of many a +child is injured for life in this way. There can be no apology for such +things.</p> + +<p>But it is not sufficient to denounce, merely, the custom of holding the +infant's body in an erect position. Every inquiring mother—and it is +for such, and no other, that I write—will naturally and properly ask +the reason why.</p> + +<p>The child is not born with all its bones solid. Some are mere cartilage +for a considerable time. This is the case with the bones of the back. +Now every person must see that the weight of the child's head and +shoulders, resting for a considerable time on the slender cartilaginous +spinal column, may easily bend it. And a curvature, thus given, may, and +often does, deform children for life.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees mentions a nurse who, from a foolish fondness for displaying +them, made the children consigned to her charge sit perfectly upright +before they were a month old. It is truly ludicrous, he says, to see the +little creatures sitting as straight as if they were stiffened by a back +board. It is truly <i>horrible</i>, I should say, rather than ludicrous. +Crooked spines must be the inevitable consequence, if nothing worse.</p> + +<p>The practice of bracing children, as it is called, by straps, back +boards, corsets, &c., where it has produced any effect at all, has +always had a tendency to crook the spine. This may be seen first, by +observing one shoulder to be lower than the other, and next by a +projection of the part of the shoulder blades next to the spine. +Whenever these changes begin to appear, it is time to send for a +physician, though it may often be too late to effect a cure. But on the +general subject of bracing and corseting, I have treated at sufficient +length elsewhere.</p> + +<p>There is another error committed in carrying children in the arms. The +head of the infant is often permitted either to hang constantly on one +side, or to roll about loosely; as if it hardly belonged to the body. +In the former case there is danger of producing a habit of holding the +head upon one side, which it will be very difficult to overcome; in the +latter, the spinal marrow itself may be injured—which would produce +alarming and perhaps fatal consequences.</p> + +<p>But all these evils, as has already been said, may be prevented, if the +hand is placed so as to support the head and shoulders. Let not the +mother, however, who reads this work, trust the matter wholly to a +nurse; she must see to it herself; else she incurs a most fearful +responsibility. The suggestions I have made are the more important in +the case of children either very fleshy or very feeble, and of those +disposed to rickets or scrofula; but they are important to all.</p> + +<p>I have said that the motion of the child, on the arm, should be gentle. +Many are in the habit of tossing infants about. There can be no +objection to a slight and slow movement up and down, for a minute or so +at a time; indeed, it is rather to be recommended, as likely to give +strength and vigor no less than pleasure to the child. But when such +movements are carried to excess, so as to frighten the child, they are +highly reprehensible. The shock thus produced to the nervous system has +sometimes been so great as to produce sudden death. Nor is it safe to +run, jump, or descend stairs hastily or violently, with a child in our +arms; and for similar reasons.</p> + +<p>Infants should not be carried always on the same arm, for there is +danger of contracting a habit of leaning to one side, and thus of +becoming crooked. On this account, the arm on which they rest should be +often changed. Nor should they be grasped too firmly. A skilful mother +will hold a child quite loosely, with the most perfect safety; while an +inexperienced one will grasp him so hard as to expose the soft bones to +be bent out of their place, and yet be quite as liable to let him fall +as she who handles him with more ease and freedom.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Creeping.</i></h4> + +<p>"Mankind must creep before they can walk," is an old adage often used to +remind us of that patient application which is so indispensable to +secure any highly important or valuable end. But it is as true +literally, as it is figuratively. The act of creeping exercises in a +remarkable degree nearly all the muscles of the body; and this, too, +without much fatigue.</p> + +<p>Some mothers there indeed are, who think it a happy circumstance if a +child can be taught to walk without this intermediate step. But such +mothers must have strange ideas of the animal economy. They must never +have thought of the pleasure which creeping affords the mind, or of the +vigor it imparts to the body.</p> + +<p>Children are wonderfully pleased with their own voluntary efforts. What +they can do themselves, yields them ten-fold greater pleasure than if +done by the mother or the nurse. Yet the latter are exceedingly prone to +forget or overlook all this—and to say, at least practically, that the +only proper efforts are those to which themselves give direction.</p> + +<p>They are moreover exceedingly fond of display. Some mothers seem to +act—in all they do with and for children—as if all the latter were +good for, was display and amusement. They feed them, indeed, and strive +to prolong their existence; but it appears to be for similar reasons to +those which would lead them to take kind care of a pet lamb.</p> + +<p>It is on this account that they dress them out in the manner they do, +strive to make them sit up straight, and prohibit their creeping. It is +on this account too, as much perhaps as any other, that go-carts and +leading strings are put in such early requisition. The contrary would be +far the safer extreme; and the parent who keeps his child scrambling +about upon the back as long as possible, and when he cannot prevent +longer an inversion of this position, retains him at creeping as long +as is in his power, is as much wiser, in comparison with him who urges +him forward to make a prodigy of him, as he is who, instead of making +his child a prodigy in mind or morals at premature age, holds him back, +and endeavors to have his mental and moral nature developed no faster +than his physical frame.</p> + +<p>I wish young mothers would settle it in their minds at once, that the +longer their children creep the better. They need have no fears that the +force of habit will retain them on their knees after nature has given +them strength to rise and walk; for their incessant activity and +incontrollable restlessness will be sure to rouse them as early as it +ought. Least of all ought the difficulty of keeping them clean, to move +them from the path of duty.</p> + +<p>Children who are allowed to crawl, will soon be anxious to do more. We +shall presently see them taking hold of a chair or a table, and +endeavoring to raise themselves up by it. If they fail in a dozen +attempts, they do not give up the point; but persevere till their +efforts are crowned with success.</p> + +<p>Having succeeded in raising themselves from the floor, they soon learn +to stand, by holding to the object by which they have raised themselves. +Soon, they acquire the art of standing without holding; [Footnote: The +art of standing, which consists in balancing one's self, by means of the +muscles of the body and lower limb—simple as it may seem to those who +have never reflected on the subject—is really an important acquisition +for a child of twelve or fifteen months. No wonder they feel a conscious +pride, when they find themselves able to stand erect, like the world +around them.] ere long they venture to put forward one foot—they then +repeat the effort and walk a little, holding at the same time by a +chair; and lastly they acquire, with joy to them inexpressible and to us +inconceivable, the art of "trudging" alone.</p> + +<p>When children learn to walk in nature's own way, it is seldom indeed +that we find them with curved legs, or crooked or clubbed feet. These +deformities are almost universally owing either to the mother or the +nurse.</p> + +<p>Let me be distinctly understood as utterly opposed, not only to +go-carts, leading strings, and every other <i>mechanical</i> contrivance, to +induce children to walk before their legs are fit for it, but to efforts +of every kind, whose main object is the same. Teaching them to walk by +taking hold of one of their hands, is in some respects quite as bad as +any other mode; for if the child should fall while we have hold of his +hand, there is some danger of dislocating or otherwise injuring the +limb.</p> + +<p>Falls we must expect; but if a child is left to his own voluntary +efforts as much as possible, these falls will be fewer, and probably +less serious, than under any other circumstances.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Walking.</i></h4> + +<p>"The way to learn how to write without ruled lines, is <i>to rule</i>," was +the frequent saying of an old schoolmaster whom I once knew; and I may +say with as much confidence and with more truth, that "the way for a +child to learn to walk alone, is to hold by things."</p> + +<p>I have anticipated, in previous pages, much of what might have otherwise +been contained in this section. A few additional remarks are all that +will be necessary.</p> + +<p>At first, the nursery will be quite large enough for our young +pedestrian. Much time should elapse before he is permitted to go abroad, +upon the green grass;—not lest the air should reach him, or the sun +shine upon his face and hands, but because the surface of the ground is +so much less firm and regular than the floor, that he ought to be quite +familiar with walking on the latter, in the first place.</p> + +<p>But when he can walk well in the play ground, garden, fields, and +roads, it is highly desirable that he should go out more or less every +day, when the weather will possibly admit; nor would I be so fearful as +many are of a drop of rain or dew, or a breath of wind. For say what +they will in favor of riding, sailing, and other modes of exercise, +there is none equal to walking, as soon as a child is able;—none so +natural—none, in ordinary cases, so salutary. I know it is unpopular, +and therefore our young master or young miss must be hoisted into a +carriage, or upon the back of a horse, to the manifest danger of health +or limbs, or both.</p> + +<p>Who of us ever knew a herdsman or a shepherd who found it for the health +and well-being of the young calf or lamb to hoist it into a carriage, +and carry it through the streets, instead of suffering it to walk? Such +a thing would excite astonishment; and the man who should do it would be +deemed insane. The health and growth of our young domestic animals is +best promoted by suffering them to walk, run, and skip in their own way. +They ask no artificial legs, or horses, or carriages. But would it not +be difficult to find arguments in favor of carrying children about, when +they are able to walk, which would not be equally strong in favor of +carrying about lambs and calves and pigs.</p> + +<p>This is the more remarkable from the consideration, elsewhere urged, +that in general we take more rational pains about the physical +well-being of domestic animals, than of children. However, it will be +seen, on a little reflection, that the number of those who carry +children about, is, after all, very inconsiderable. The greater portion +of the community regard it as too troublesome or costly; and if poverty +brought with it no other evils than a permit to children to walk on the +legs which the Creator gave them, it could hardly be deemed a +misfortune.</p> + +<p>It is scarcely necessary to add that there will be nothing gained to the +young—or to persons of any age—from walks which are very long and +fatiguing. Walking should refresh and invigorate: when it is carried +beyond this, especially with the young child, we have passed the line of +safety.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>Riding in Carriages.</i></h4> + +<p>It will be seen by the foregoing section, that I am not very friendly to +the use of carriages for the young, after they can walk. Before this +period, however, I think they may be often serviceable; and there are +occasional instances which may render them useful afterward. On this +account, I have thought it might be well to give the following general +directions.</p> + +<p>Carriages for children should be so constructed as not to be liable to +overset. To this end, the wheels must be low, and the axle unusually +extended. The body should be long enough to allow the child to lie down +when necessary; and so deep that he may not be likely to fall out. +Everything should be made secure and firm, to avoid, if possible, the +danger of accidents.</p> + +<p>The carriage should be drawn steadily and slowly; not violently, or with +a jerking motion. Such a place should be selected as will secure the +child—if necessary—from the full blaze of a hot sun. This point might +indeed be secured by having the carriage covered; but I am opposed to +covered carriages, for children or adults, unless we are compelled to +ride in the rain.</p> + +<p>While the child is unable to sit up without injury, and even for some +months afterwards, he ought by all means to lie down in a carriage, +because it requires more strength to sit in a seat which is moving, than +in a place where he is stationary. In assuming the horizontal position, +in a carriage, a pillow is needed, and such other arrangements as will +prevent too much rolling.</p> + +<p>After the child's strength will fairly permit, he may sit up in the +carriage, but he ought still to be secured against too much motion. As +his strength increases, however, the latter direction will be less and +less necessary. I need not repeat in this place, (had I not witnessed so +many accidents from neglect,) the caution recently given, that great +care should be taken to prevent the child from falling out of the +carriage.</p> + +<p>While children are riding abroad in cold weather, much pains should be +taken to see that they are suitably clothed. It is well to keep them in +motion, while they are in the carriage, and especially to guard against +their falling asleep in the open air, until they have become very much +accustomed to being out in it.</p> + +<p>It has been said by some writers, that a ride ought never to exceed the +length of half an hour; but no positive rule can be given, except to +avoid over-fatigue.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Riding on Horseback.</i></h4> + +<p>While children are very young, I think it both improper and unsafe to +take them abroad on horseback; I mean so long as they are in health. In +case of disease, this mode of exercise is sometimes one of the most +salutary in the world. But after boys are six or seven years old, and +girls ten, if they are ever to practise horsemanship, it is time for +them to begin; both because they are less apt to be unreasonably timid +at this age, and because they learn much more rapidly.</p> + +<p>So few parents are good horsemen, that if there is a riding school at +hand, I should prefer placing a child in it at once. But I wish to be +distinctly understood, that I do not consider it a matter of importance, +especially to females, that they should ever learn to ride at all.</p> + +<p>Some of the principal objections to riding on horseback, by boys, as an +ordinary exercise, are the following:</p> + +<p>1. Walking, as I have already intimated, is one of the most HEALTHY +modes of exercise in the world. It is nature's exercise; and was +unquestionably in exclusive use long before universal dominion was given +to man, if not for many centuries afterward; and I believe it would be +very difficult to prove that it interfered at all with human longevity; +for the first of our race lived almost a thousand years.</p> + +<p>2. Young children, in riding on horseback, are rather apt to acquire, +rapidly, the habit of domineering over animals. It seems almost needless +to say how easy the transition is, in such cases, should opportunity +offer, from tyranny over the brute slave, to tyranny over the human +being. There are slave-holders in the family and in the school, as well +as elsewhere. It is the SPIRIT of a person which makes him either a +tyrant or slave-holder. And let us beware how we foster this spirit in +the children whom God has given us.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XI."></a><h2>CHAPTER XI.</h2> + +<h3>AMUSEMENTS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes—pictures—shuttlecock—the rocking horse—tops and +marbles—backgammon—checkers—morrice—dice—nine-pins—skipping the +rope—trundling the hoop—playing at ball—kites—skating and +swimming—dissected maps—black boards—elements of letters—dissected +pictures.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>However heterodox the concession may be, I am one of those who believe +amusements of some sort or other to be universally necessary. Indeed I +cannot possibly conceive of an individual in health, whatever may be the +age, sex, condition, or employment, who does not need them, in a greater +or less degree.</p> + +<p>Now if by the term amusement, I merely meant employment, nobody would +probably differ from me—at least in theory. Every one is ready to admit +the importance of being constantly employed. A mind unemployed is a +VACANT mind. And a vacant or idle mind is "the devil's work-shop;" so +says the proverb.</p> + +<p>By amusement, however, I mean something more than mere employment; for +the more constantly an adult individual is employed, the greater, +generally, is his demand for amusement. Indolent persons have less need +of being amused than others; but perhaps there are few if any persons to +be found, who are so indolent as not to think continually, on one +subject or another. And it is this constant thinking, more than anything +else, that creates the necessity of which I am speaking. The mere +drudge, whether biped or quadruped—he, I mean, whose thinking powers +are scarcely alive—has little need of the relief which is afforded by +amusement.</p> + +<p>The young of all animals—man among the rest—appear to have such an +instinctive fondness for amusement, that so long as they are +unrestrained, they seldom need any urging on this point. In regard to +<i>quality</i>, the case is somewhat different. In this respect, most +children require attention and restraint; and some of them a great deal +of it.</p> + +<p>But what is the nature of the amusement which adults—nay, mankind +generally—require? I answer, it is relief from the employment of +thinking. For it is not that mankind do not really think at all, that +moralists complain so loudly. When they tell us that men will not +think, they mean that they will not think as rational beings. They +think, indeed; and so do the ox, and the horse, and the dog, and the +elephant—but not as rational men ought to do; and this it is that +constitutes the burden of complaint. But you will probably find few +persons belonging to the human species who do not think constantly, at +least while awake; and whose mental powers do not become fatigued, and +demand relief in amusement.</p> + +<p>Children's minds are so soon wearied by a continuous train of thinking, +even on topics which are pleasing to them, that they can seldom he +brought to give their attention to a single subject long at once. They +require almost incessant change; both for the sake of relief, and to +amuse for the <i>sake</i> of amusement. And it is, to my own mind, one of +the most striking proofs of Infinite Wisdom in the creation of the human +mind, that it has, during infancy, such an irresistible tendency to +amusement.</p> + +<p>How greatly do they err, who grudge children, especially very young +children, the time which, in obedience to the dictates of their nature, +they are so fond of spending in sports and gambols! How much more +rational would it be to encourage and direct them in their amusements! +And how exceedingly unwise is the practice, whenever and wherever it +exists, of confining them to school rooms and benches, not only for +hours, but for whole half days at once.</p> + +<p>If individuals and circumstances were everywhere combined, with the +special purpose to oppose the intentions of nature respecting the human +being, at every step of his progress from the cradle to maturity, and +from maturity to the grave, I hardly know how they could contrive to +accomplish such a purpose more effectually than it is at present +accomplished. But it is proper that I should here explain a little.</p> + +<p>All our family arrangements tend to repress amusement. Everything is +contrived to facilitate business—especially the business or employments +of adults. The child is hardly regarded as a human being,—certainly not +as a <i>perfect</i> being. He is considered as a mere fragment; or to change +the figure, as a plant too young to be of any real service to mankind, +because too young to bear any of its appropriate fruits. Whereas, in my +opinion, both infancy and childhood, at every stage, should bring forth +their appropriate fruits. In other words, the child of the most tender +years should be regarded as a whole, and not as the mere fragment of a +being; as a perfect member of a family—occupying a full and complete, +only a more limited sphere than older members: and all the rules and +regulations and arrangements of the family should have a reference to +this point. So long as a child is reckoned to be a mere cipher in +creation, or at most, as of no more practical importance, till the +arrival of his twenty-first birth day, or some other equally arbitrary +period, than our domestic animals—that is, of just sufficient +consequence to be fed, and caressed, and fondled, and made a pet of—so +long will our arrangements be made with reference to the comfort and +happiness of adults. There may indeed be here and there a child's chair, +or a child's carriage, or newspaper, or book; but there will seldom be, +except by stealth, any free juvenile conversation at the table or the +fireside. Here the child must sit as a blank or cypher, to ruminate on +the past, or to receive half formed and passive impressions from the +present.</p> + +<p>The arrangements of the infant school, also, seem designed for the same +purpose—to repress as much as possible the infantile desire for +amusement. Not that this was their original, nor that it now is their +legitimate intention. Their legitimate object is, or should be, not to +develope the intellect by over-working the tender brain, but to promote +cheerfulness and health and love and happiness, by well contrived +amusements, conducted as much as possible in the open air; and by +unremitting efforts to elicit and direct the affections.</p> + +<p>Infant schools should repress rather than encourage the hard study of +books. Lessons at this age should be drawn chiefly from objects in the +garden, the field, and the grove; from the flower, the plant, the tree, +the brook, the bird, the beast, the worm, the fly, the human body—the +sun, or the visible heavens. These lessons, whether given by the parent, +as constituting a part of the family arrangements, or by the infant or +primary school teacher, should, it is true, be regarded for the time +being as study, but they should never be long; and they should be +frequently relieved by the most free and unrestrained pastimes and +gambols of the young on the green grass, or beside the rippling stream, +uninfluenced, or at least unrepressed, by those who are set over them.</p> + +<p>The public or common school, overlooking as it does any direct attempts +to make provision for the amusement of the pupils, even during the +scanty recess that is afforded them once in three hours, would appear to +a stranger on this planet, at first sight, to be designed as much as +possible to defeat every intention of nature with reference to the +growth of the human frame. For we may often travel many hundred miles +and not see so much as an enclosed play ground; and never perhaps any +direct provision for particular and more favorable amusements.</p> + +<p>I might speak of other schools and places of resort for children, and +proceed to show how all our arrangements appear to be the offspring of a +species of utilitarianism which rejects every sport whose value cannot +be estimated in dollars and cents. I might even refer to those schools +of our country where these ultra utilitarian notions are carried to an +extent which excludes amusing conversation or reading even during +meal-time; and devotes the hours which were formerly spent in +recreation, to manual labor of some productive kind or other.—But I +forbear. Enough has been said to illustrate the position I have taken, +that there is in vogue a system which bears the marks of having been +contrived, if not by the enemies of our race, either openly or covertly, +at least by those whom ignorance renders scarcely less at war with the +general happiness.</p> + +<p>Now I would not deny nor attempt to deny that change of occupation of +body or mind is of itself an amusement, and one too of great value. +Undoubtedly it is so. To some children, studies of every kind are an +amusement; and there are few indeed to whom none are so. Labor, with +many, when alternated with study, is amusing. And yet, after all, unless +such labors are performed in company, where light and cheerful +conversation is sure to keep the mind away from the subjects about +which it has just been engaged, I am afraid that the purposes for which +amusements were designed, are very far from being <i>all</i> secured.</p> + +<p>But perhaps I am dwelling too long on the general principle that people +of every age, and children in particular, need, and must have +amusements, whether they are of a productive kind or not; and that it is +very far from being sufficient, were it either practicable or desirable, +to turn all study and labor into amusement. [Footnote: I will even say, +more distinctly than I have already done, that however popular the +contrary opinion may be, neither study nor work ought to be regarded as +mere amusement. I would, it is true, take every possible pains to render +both work and study agreeable; but I would at the same time have it +distinctly understood, that one of them is by no means the other; that, +on the contrary, work is <i>work</i>—study, <i>study</i>—and amusement, +<i>amusement</i>.] My business is with those who direct the first dawnings +of affection and intellect. Principles are by no means of less importance +on this account; but the limits of a work for young mothers do not admit +of anything more than a brief discussion of their importance.</p> + +<p>I will now proceed to speak of some of the more common amusements of the +nursery.</p> + +<p>I have seen very young children sit on the floor and amuse themselves +for nearly half an hour together, with piling up and taking down small +wooden cubes, of different sizes. Some of them, instead of being cubes, +however, may be of the shape of bricks. Their ingenuity, while they are +scarcely a year or two old, in erecting houses, temples, churches, &c., +is sometimes surprising. Girls as well as boys seem to be greatly amused +with this form of exercise; and both seem to be little less gratified in +destroying than in rearing their lilliputian edifices.</p> + +<p>Next to the latter kind of amusement, is the viewing of pictures. It is +surprising at what an early age children may be taught to notice +miniature representations of objects; living objects especially. +Representations of the works of art should come in a little later than +those of things in nature. I know a father who prepares volumes of +pictures, solely for this purpose; though he usually regards them not +only as a source of amusement to children, but as a medium of +instruction.</p> + +<p>Battledoor or shuttlecock may be taught to children of both sexes very +early; and it affords a healthy and almost untiring source of amusement. +It gives activity as well as strength to the muscles or moving powers, +and has many other important advantages. There is some danger, according +to Dr. Pierson [Footnote: See his Lecture before the American Institute +of Instruction] of distorting the spine by playing at shuttlecock too +frequently and too long; but this will seldom be the case with little +children in the nursery. Neither shuttlecock nor any other amusement +will secure their attention long enough to injure them very much.</p> + +<p>Perhaps this exercise comes nearer to my ideas of a perfect amusement +than almost any which could be named. The mind is agreeably occupied, +without being fatigued; and if the amusements are proportioned to the +age and strength of the child, there is very little fatigue of the body. +It gives, moreover, great practical accuracy to the eye and to the hand.</p> + +<p>A rocking-horse is much recommended for the nursery. I have had no +opportunity for observing the effects of this kind of amusement; but if +it is one half as valuable as some suppose, I should be inclined to +recommend it. But I am opposed to fostering in the rider lessons of +cruelty, by arming him with whips and spurs. If the young are ever to +learn to ride, on a living horse, the exercises of the rocking-horse +will, most certainly, be a sort of preparation for the purpose.</p> + +<p>Tops and marbles afford a great deal of rational amusement to the young; +and of a very useful kind, too. Spinning a top is second to no exercise +which I have yet mentioned, unless it is playing at shuttlecock.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees recommends a small backgammon table, with men, but without +dice. He says, also, that "children, as soon as they are capable of +comprehending the subject, should be taught draughts or checkers. This +game is not only highly amusing, but also very instructive." In another +place he heaps additional encomiums upon the game of checkers. "It +becomes a source of endless amusement," he says, "as it never tires, but +always instructs." Of exercises which instruct, however, as well as +amuse, I shall speak presently.</p> + +<p>The amusements called "morrice," "fox and geese," &c., with which some +of the children of almost every neighborhood are more or less +acquainted, are of the same general character and tendency as checkers. +So is a play, sometimes, but very improperly, called dice, in which two +parties play with a small bundle of wooden pins, not unlike knitting +pins in shape, but shorter.</p> + +<p>The writer to whom I have referred above recommends nine-pins and balls +of proper size, as highly useful both for diversion and exercise. If +they can be used without leading to bad habits and bad associations, I +think they may be useful.</p> + +<p>For girls, who demand a great deal more of exercise, both within doors +and without, skipping the rope is an excellent amusement. So also is +swinging. Both of these exercises may be used either out of doors, or +in the nursery.</p> + +<p>Trundling a hoop I have always regarded as an amusing out-of-door +exercise; and I am not sorry when I sometimes see girls, as well as +boys, engaged in it, under the eye of their mothers and teachers.</p> + +<p>Playing ball, of which there are many different games, and flying kites, +employ a large proportion if not all of the muscles of the body, in such +a manner as is likely to confirm the strength, and greatly improve the +health. The same may be said of skating in the winter, and swimming in +the summer. But these last are exercises over which the mother cannot, +ordinarily, have very much control.</p> + +<p>Under the head of amusements, it only remains for me to speak of a few +juvenile employments of a mixed nature. Of these I shall treat very +briefly, as they are a branch of the subject which does not necessarily +come within the compass of my present plan. They are exercises, too, +which should more properly come under the head of Infantile Instruction.</p> + +<p>Dissected maps afford children of every age a great fund of amusement; +but much caution is necessary, with those that are very young, not to +discourage or confound them by showing them too many at once. Thus if +we cut in pieces the map of one of the smaller United States, at the +county lines, or the whole United States, at the state lines, it is +quite as many divisions as they can manage. Cut up as large a state, +even, as Pennsylvania or New York is, into counties, and try to lead +them to amuse themselves by putting together so large a number, many of +which must inevitably very closely resemble each other, and it is ten to +one but you bewilder, and even perplex and discourage them. The same +results would follow from cutting up even the whole of a large county, +or a small state, into towns. I have usually begun with little children, +by requiring them to put together the eight counties of the small state +of Connecticut. In this case the counties are not only few, but there is +a very striking difference in their shape.</p> + +<p>A black board and a piece of chalk, along with a little ingenuity on the +part of the mother, will furnish the child with an almost endless +variety of amusement. Let him attempt to imitate almost any object which +interests him, whether among the works of nature or art. However rude +his pictures may be, do not laugh at, but on the contrary, endeavor to +encourage him. He may also be permitted to imitate letters and figures. +The elements of letters, too, both printed and written, may be given +him, and he may be required to put them together. Dissected pictures, as +well as dissected maps and letters, are useful, and to most children, +very acceptable.</p> + +<p>In short, the devices of an ingenious, thinking mother, for the +amusement of her very young children, are almost endless; and the great +danger is, that when a mother once enters deeply into the spirit of +these exercises, she will substitute them for those much more healthy +ones which have been already mentioned, such as require muscular +activity, or may be performed in the open air.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XII.</h2> + +<h3>CRYING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>"Crying," says Dr. Dewees, "should be looked upon as an exercise of much +importance;" and he is sustained in this view by many eminent medical +writers.</p> + +<p>But people generally think otherwise. Nothing is more common than the +idea that to cry is unbecoming; and children are everywhere taught, when +they suffer pain, to brave it out, and <i>not cry</i>. Such a direction—to +say nothing of its tendency to encourage hypocrisy—is wholly +unphilosophical. The following anecdote may serve in part to illustrate +my meaning. It is said to have been related by Dr. Rush.</p> + +<p>A gentleman in South Carolina was about to undergo a very painful +surgical operation. He had imbibed the idea that it was beneath the +dignity of a man ever to say or do anything expressive of pain. He +therefore refused to submit to the usual precaution of securing the +hands and feet by bandages, declaring to his surgeon that he had nothing +to fear from his being untied, for he would not move a muscle of his +body. He kept his word, it is true; but he died instantly after the +operation, from apoplexy.</p> + +<p>There is very little doubt, in the mind of any physiologist, in regard +to the cause of apoplexy in this case; and that it might have been +prevented by the relief which is always afforded by groans and tears.</p> + +<p>It is, I believe, very generally known, that in the profoundest grief, +people do not, and cannot shed tears; and that when the <i>latter</i> begin +to flow, it affords immediate relief.</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to argue from this, that crying is so important, +either to the young or the old, that it is ever worth while to excite or +continue it by artificial means; or that a habit of crying, so easily +and readily acquired by the young, is not to be guarded against as a +serious, evil. My object was first to show the folly of those who +denounce all crying, and secondly, to point out some of its +advantages—in the hope of preventing parents from going to that extreme +which borders upon stoicism.</p> + +<p>One of the most intelligent men I ever knew, frequently made it his +boast that he neither laughed nor cried on any occasion; and on being +told that both laughing and crying were physiologically useful, he only +ridiculed the sentiment.</p> + +<p>Crying is useful to very young infants, because it favors the passage of +blood in their lungs, where it had not before been accustomed to travel, +and where its motion is now indispensable. And it not only promotes the +circulation of the blood, but expands the air-cells of the lungs, and +thus helps forward that great change, by which the dark-colored impure +blood of the veins is changed at once into pure blood, and thus rendered +fit to nourish the system, and sustain life.</p> + +<p>But this is not all. Crying strengthens the lungs themselves. It does +this by expanding the little air-cells of which I have just spoken, and +not only accustoms them to being stretched, at a period, of all others, +the most favorable for this purpose, but frees them at the same time +from mucus, and other injurious accumulations.</p> + +<p>They, therefore, who oppose an infant's crying, know not what they do. +So far is it from being hurtful to the child, that its occasional +recurrence is, as we have already seen, positively useful. Some +practitioners of medicine, in some of the more trying situations in +which human nature can be placed, even encourage their patients to +suffer tears to flow, as a means of relief.</p> + +<p>Infants, it should also be recollected, have no other language by which +to express their wants and feelings, than sighs and tears. Crying is not +always an expression of positive pain; it sometimes indicates hunger and +thirst, and sometimes the want of a change of posture. This last +consideration deserves great attention, and all the inconveniences of +crying ought to be borne cheerfully, for the sake of having the little +sufferer remind us when nature demands a change of position. No child +ought to be permitted to remain in one position longer than two hours, +even while sleeping; nor half that time, while awake; and if nurses and +mothers will overlook this matter, as they often do, it is a favorable +circumstance that the child should remind them of it.</p> + +<p>Crying has been called the "waste gate" of the human system; the door of +escape to that excess of excitability which sometimes prevails, +especially among children and nervous adults. To all such persons it is +healthy—most undoubtedly so; nor do I know that its occasional +recurrence is injurious to any adult—a fastidious public sentiment to +the contrary notwithstanding.</p> + +<p>Some have supposed, that what is here said will be construed by the +young mother into a license to suffer her child to cry unnecessarily. +Perhaps, say they, she is a laboring woman, and wishes to be at work. +Well, she lays down her child in the cradle, or on the bed, and goes to +her work. Presently the child, becoming wet perhaps, begins to cry, as +well he might. But, instead of going to him and taking care of him, she +continues at her employment; and when one remonstrates against her +conduct as cruelty, she pleads the authority of the author of the "Young +Mother."</p> + +<p>All this may happen; but if it should, I am not answerable for it. I +have insisted strongly on guarding the child against wet clothing, and +on watching him with the utmost care to prevent all real suffering. +Mothers, like the specimen here given, if they happen to have a little +sensibility to suffering, and not much love of their offspring, +generally know of a shorter way to quiet their infants and procure time +to work, than that which is here mentioned. They have nothing to do but +to give them some cordial or elixir, whose basis is opium. Startle not, +reader, at the statement;—this abominable practice is followed by many +a female who claims the sacred name of mother. And many a wretch has +thus, in her ignorance, indolence or avarice, slowly destroyed her +children!</p> + +<p>I repeat, therefore, that I do not think my remarks on crying are +necessarily liable to abuse; though I am not sure that there are not a +few individuals to be found who may apply them in the manner above +mentioned—an application, however, which is as far removed from the +original intention of the author, as can possibly be conceived.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIII.</h2> + +<h3>LAUGHING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Laughing, like crying, has a good effect on the infantile lungs; nor is +it less salutary in other respects. "Laugh and be fat," an old adage, +has its meaning, and also its philosophy.</p> + +<p>There is an excess, however, to which laughing, no less than crying, may +be carried, and which we cannot too carefully avoid. But how little to +be envied—how much to be pitied—are they who consider it a weakness +and a sin to laugh, and in the plenitude of their wisdom, tell us that +<i>the Saviour of mankind never laughed</i>. When I hear this last assertion, +I am always ready to ask, whether the individual who makes it has read a +new revelation or a new gospel; for certainly none of the sacred books +which I have seen give us any such information.</p> + +<p>But I will not dwell here. The common notion on this subject, if not +ridiculous, is certainly strange. I will only add, that, come into vogue +as it might have done, there is no opinion more unfounded than the very +general one among adults, that children should be uniformly grave; and +that just in proportion as they laugh and appear frolicsome, just in the +same proportion are they out of the way, and deserving of reprehension.</p> + +<p>It is strange that it should be so, but I have seen many parents who +were miserable because their children were sportive and joyful. Oh, when +will the days of monkish sadness and austerity be over; and the public +sentiment in the christian world get right on this subject!</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIV."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIV.</h2> + +<h3>SLEEP.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Hints to fathers.—SEC. 1. Proper hours for repose. +Dark rooms. Noise.—SEC. 2. Place for sleeping. Sleeping +alone—reasons.—SEC. 3. Purity of the air in sleeping rooms.—SEC. 4. +The bed. Objections to feathers. Other materials.—SEC. 5. The covering +of beds. Covering the head.—SEC. 6. Night Dresses. Robes.—SEC. 7. +Posture of the body in sleep.—SEC. 8. State of the mind.—SEC. 9. +Quality of sleep.—SEC. 10. Quantity of sleep.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Not a few persons consider all rules relative to sleep as utterly +futile. They regard it as so much of a natural or animal process, that +if we are let alone we shall seldom err, at any age, respecting it. +Rules on the subject, above all, they regard as wholly misplaced.</p> + +<p>Those who entertain such views, would do well, in order to be +consistent, to go a little farther; and as breathing and eating and +drinking—nay, even <i>thinking</i>—are natural processes, deny the utility +of all rules respecting <i>them</i> also. Perhaps they would do well, +moreover, to deny that rules of any sort are valuable. But would not +this have the effect to bar the door perpetually against all human +improvement? Would it not be equivalent to saying, to a half-civilized, +because only half-christianized community—Go on with your barbarous +customs, and your uncleanly and unthinking habits, forever?</p> + +<p>But I have not so learned human nature. I regard man as susceptible of +endless progression. And I know of no way in which more rapid progress +can be made, than by enlightening young mothers on subjects which +pertain to our physical nature, and the means of physical improvement. +Not for the <i>sake</i> of that perishable part of man, the frame, but +because it is nearly in vain to attempt to improve the mind and heart, +without due attention to the frame-work, to which mind and heart, for +the present, are appended, and most intimately related.</p> + +<p>Let it be left to fathers to study the improvement of hounds and horses +and cattle, and at the same time to think themselves above the concerns +of the nursery. We may, indeed, read of a Cato once in three thousand +years, who was in the habit of quitting all other business in order to +be present when the nurse washed and rubbed his child. But our passion +for gain, in the present age, is so much more absorbing and +soul-destroying than the passion for military glory, that we cannot +expect many Catos. Oh no. All, or nearly all, must devolve on the +mother. The father has no time to attend to his children! What belongs +to the mother, if she can be duly awakened, may be at least <i>half</i> done; +what belongs to the father, must, I fear, be left undone.</p> + +<p>I am accustomed to regard every day—even of the infant—as a miniature +life. I am, moreover, accustomed to consider mental and bodily vigor, +not only for each separate day, but for life's whole day, as greatly +influenced by the circumstances of sleep; the HOUR, PLACE, PURITY OF THE +AIR, THE BED, THE COVERING, DRESS, POSTURE, STATE OF THE MIND, QUALITY, +QUANTITY, AND DURATION.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Hour for Repose.</i></h4> + +<p>Generally speaking, the night is the appropriate season for repose; but +in early infancy, it is <i>every</i> hour. I have already spoken of the vast +amount of sleep which the new-born infant requires, as well as of many +other circumstances connected with it, requiring our attention. Suffer +me, however, to enlarge, at the risk of a little repetition.</p> + +<p>What time the infant is awake, should be during the day. It is of very +great importance, in the formation of good habits, that he should be +undressed and put to bed, at evening, with as much regularity as if be +had not slept during the day for a single moment. It is also important +that he be permitted to sleep during the whole night, as uninterruptedly +as possible; and that when he is aroused, to have his position or +diapers changed, or to receive food, it should be done with little +parade and noise, and with as little light as possible. All persons, old +as well as young, sleep more quietly in a dark room, than in one where a +light is burning.</p> + +<p>I am well aware that the course here recommended, may be carried to an +excess which will utterly defeat the object intended, since there are +children to be found, who are so trained in this respect, that the +lightest tread upon the floor will awake, and perhaps frighten them. But +this is an excess which is not required. All that is necessary during +the night, is a reasonable degree of silence, in order to induce the +habit of continued rest, if possible. In the day time, on the contrary, +fatigue will impel a child to sleep occasionally, even in the midst of +noise. I am not sure that the habit of sleeping in the midst of noise is +not worth a little pains on the part of the mother. Nor is it improbable +that a habit of this kind, once acquired by the infant, might ultimately +be extended to the night, so that over-caution, even in regard to that +season, might gradually be laid aside.</p> + +<p>Dr. North, a distinguished medical practitioner in Hartford, Conn., +confirms the foregoing sentiments; and adds, that he deems it an +imperious duty of those parents who wish well to their infants, to form +in them the habit of sleeping when fatigued, whether the room be quiet +or noisy. With his children, no cradles or opiates are needed or used.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Place.</i></h4> + +<p>For some time after its birth, the infant should sleep near its mother, +though not in the same bed. The bedstead should be of the usual height +of bedsteads, and should be enclosed with a railing sufficient to secure +the infant from falling out, but not of such a structure as to hinder, +in any degree, a free circulation of the air.</p> + +<p>The reasons why a child ought to sleep alone, and not with the mother or +nurse, are numerous; but the following are the principal;</p> + +<p>1. The heat accumulated by the bodies of the mother and child both, is +often too great for health.</p> + +<p>2. The air is too impure. I have already spoken of the change in the +purity of the air which is produced by breathing in it. It is bad +enough for two adults to sleep in the same bed, breathing over and over +again the impure air, as they must do more or less, even if the bed is +very large;—but it is still worse for infants. Their lungs demand +atmospheric air in its utmost purity; and if denied it, they must +eventually suffer.</p> + +<p>3. But besides the change of the air by breathing, the surface of the +body is perpetually changing it in the same manner, as was stated in the +chapter on Ventilation. Now a child will almost inevitably breathe a +stream of this bad air, as it issues from the bed; and what is still +worse, it is very apt, in spite of every precaution, to get its head +covered up with the clothes, where it can hardly breathe anything else. +This, if frequently repeated, is slow but certain death;—as much so as +if the child were to drink poison in moderate quantities.</p> + +<p>Let me not be told that this is an exaggeration; that thousands of +mothers make it a point to cover up the beads of their infants; and that +notwithstanding this, they are as healthy as the infants of their +neighbors. I have not said that they would droop and die while infants. +The fumes of lead, which is a certain poison, may be inhaled, and yet +the child or adult who inhales them may live on, in tolerable health, +for many years. But suffer he must, in the end, in spite of every effort +and every hope. So must the child, whose head is covered habitually +with the bed clothing, where it is compelled to breathe not only the air +spoiled by its own skin, but also that which is spoiled by the much +larger surface of body of the mother or nurse.</p> + +<p>But I have proof on this subject. Friedlander, in his "Physical +Education," says expressly, that in Great Britain alone, between the +years 1686 and 1800, no less than 40,000 children died in consequence of +this practice of allowing them to sleep near their nurses. I was at +first disposed to doubt the accuracy of this most remarkable statement. +But when I consider the respectability of the authority from which it +emanated, and that it is only about 350 a year for that great empire, I +cannot doubt that the estimate is substantially correct. What a +sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and folly!</p> + +<p>It should be added, in this place, both to confirm the foregoing +sentiment, and to show that British mothers and nurses are not alone, +that Dr. Dewees has witnessed, in the circle of his practice, four +deaths from the same cause. If every physician in the United States has +met with as many cases of the kind, in proportion to his practice, as +Dr. D., the evil is about as great in this country as Dr. F. says it is +in Great Britain.</p> + +<p>If a child sleeps alone, it cannot of course be liable to as much +suffering of this kind as if it slept with another person; though much +precaution will still be necessary to keep its head uncovered, and +prevent its inhaling air spoiled by its own lungs and skin.</p> + +<p>4. There is one more evil which will be avoided by having a child sleep +alone. Many a mother has seriously injured her child by pressure. I do +not here allude to those monsters in human nature, whose besotted habits +have been the frequent cause of the suffocation and death of their +offspring, but to the more careful and tender mother, who would sooner +injure herself than her own child. Such mothers, even, have been known +to dislocate or fracture a limb![Footnote: There may be instances where +the debility of an infant will be so great that the mother or a nurse +must sleep with it, to keep it warm. But such cases of disease are very +rare.]</p> + +<p>To cap the climax of error in this matter, some mothers allow their +infants to lie on their arm, as a pillow. This practice not only exposes +them to all or nearly all the evils which have been mentioned, but to +one more; viz. the danger of being thrown from the bed.</p> + +<p>A young mother, with whom I was well acquainted, was sleeping one night +with her infant on her arm, when she made a sudden and rather violent +effort to turn in the bed, in doing which she threw the child upon the +floor with such violence as to fracture its little skull, and cause its +death.</p> + +<p>Enough, I trust, has now been said to convince every reasonable young +mother, where absolute poverty does not preclude comfort and health, +that her child ought never to be permitted to sleep in the same bed with +her; but that it should be placed on a bedstead by itself at a short +distance from her, and properly guarded from accidents—and above all, +from inhaling impure air.</p> + +<p>At a suitable age, a child may be removed from the nursery to a separate +chamber. Here, if the circumstances permit, it should still sleep by +itself; and if the bedstead be somewhat lower than ordinary, and the +room be not too small, it will need no watching.</p> + +<p>Perhaps this may be the proper place to say that there are more reasons +than one—and some of them are of a moral nature, too—why a child +should continue to sleep alone, after it leaves the nursery. Nor is it +sufficient to prohibit its sleeping with younger persons, and yet crowd +it into the bed with an aged grandfather or grandmother, or with both. +There is no excuse for a course like this, except the iron hand of +necessity. And even then, I should prefer to have a child of mine sleep +on the hard floor, at least during the summer season, rather than with +an aged person.</p> + +<p>Let it not be supposed I have imbibed the fashionable idea that it is +<i>peculiarly</i> unhealthy for the young to sleep with the old. I know this +doctrine has many learned advocates. And yet I doubt its correctness. I +believe that the manners and habits of the old may injure the young who +sleep with them, and I know that they render the air impure, like other +people. But I cannot see why the mere circumstance of their being <i>old</i> +should be a source of unhealthiness to their younger bed-fellows. Still +I say, that there are reasons enough against the practice I am opposing, +without this.</p> + +<p>Some parents allow dogs and cats to sleep with children. Others have a +prejudice against cats, but not against dogs. The truth is, that they +both contaminate the air by respiration and perspiration, in the same +manner that adults do. And aside from the fact that they are often +infested by lice and other insects, and addicted to uncleanly habits, +they ought always to be excluded, and with iron bars and bolts, if +necessary, from the beds of children. But of this, too, I have treated +elsewhere.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Purity of the Air.</i></h4> + +<p>The general importance of pure air has been mentioned. I have spoken of +the elements of the atmosphere in which we live, of the manner in +which it may be vitiated, and the consequences to health. I have +shown—perhaps at sufficient length—the impropriety of washing, drying, +and ironing clothes in the room where a child is kept; of cooking in the +room, especially on a stove; of suffering the floor or clothes, +particularly those of the child, to remain long wet, in the room; of +smoking tobacco, using spirits, burning oil with too long a wick, &c.</p> + +<p>All which has thus been said of the purity of the air of the nursery +generally, is applicable to that of all sleeping rooms. It is an +important point gained, when we can secure a nursery with folding doors +in the centre, so as, when we please, to make two rooms of it. In that +case, the division in which the bed is, can be completely ventilated a +little before night, and thus be comparatively pure for the reception of +both the mother and the child.</p> + +<p>Shall the windows and doors where a child sleeps, be kept closed; or +shall they be suffered to remain open a part or the whole of the night? +This must be determined by circumstances. If there are no doors but +such as communicate with apartments whose air is equally impure with +that in which the child is, it is preferable to keep them closed. If the +windows cannot be opened without exposing the child to a current of air, +it is perhaps the less of two evils, not to open them.</p> + +<p>But we are not usually driven to such extremities. In some instances, +windows are constructed—and all of them ought to be—so that they can +be lowered from the top. When this is not the case, something can be +placed before the window to break the current, so that it need not fall +directly upon the child. Closing the blinds will partially effect this, +where blinds exist.</p> + +<p>I have known many an individual who was in the habit of sleeping with +his windows open during the whole year, and without any obvious evil +consequences. Dr. Gregory was of this habit. But if adults—not trained +to it—can acquire such a habit with impunity, with how much more safety +could children be trained to it from the very first year. Macnish says, +"there can be no doubt that a gentle current pervading our sleeping +apartments, is in the highest degree ESSENTIAL TO HEALTH."</p> + +<p>This consideration—I mean the impurity of sleeping rooms, even after +every precaution has been used to keep them ventilated—affords one +of the strongest inducements to going abroad early in the morning +(especially when there is no other room which either adults or children +can occupy) while the nursery or chamber is aired and ventilated. The +utility of <i>rising</i> early, I hope no one can doubt; but some have doubts +of the propriety of going abroad, till the dew has "passed away." Such +should be reminded, by the foregoing train of remarks, that early +walking may be a choice of evils; and that if it <i>is</i> on the whole +advantageous to adults, it cannot be less so to children. And as soon as +the sun has chased away the vapors of the night, if the weather is +tolerable, most children should be carried abroad.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>The Bed.</i></h4> + +<p>This should never be of feathers. There are many reasons for this +prohibition, especially to the feeble.</p> + +<p>1. They are too warm. Infants should by all means be kept warm enough, +as I have all along insisted. But excess of heat excites or stimulates +the skin, causing an unnatural degree of perspiration, and thus inducing +weakness or debility.</p> + +<p>2. When we first enter a room in which there is a feather bed which has +been occupied during the night, we are struck with the offensive smell +of the air. This is owing to a variety of causes; one of which probably +is, that beds of this kind are better adapted to absorb and retain the +effluvia of our bodies. But let the causes be what they may, the effects +ought, if possible, to be avoided; for both experience and authority +combine to pronounce them very injurious.</p> + +<p>3. Feather beds—if used in the nursery—will inevitably discharge more +or less of dust and down; both of which are injurious to the tender +lungs of the infant.</p> + +<p>Mattresses are better for persons of every age, than soft feather beds. +They may be made of horse hair or moss; but hair is the best. If the +mattress does not appear to be warm enough for the very young infant, a +blanket may be spread over it. Dr. Dewees says that in case mattresses +cannot be had, "the sacking bottom" may be substituted, or "even the +floor;" at least in warm weather: "for almost anything," he adds, "is +preferable to feathers."</p> + +<p>Macnish, in his "Philosophy of Sleep," objects strongly to air beds, and +says that he can assert "from experience," that they are the very worst +that can possibly be employed. My theories—for I have had no experience +on the subject—would lead me to a similar conclusion. A British +writer of eminence assures us that the higher classes in Ireland, to a +considerable extent, accustom themselves and their infants to sleep on +bags of cut straw, overspread with blankets and a light coverlid; and +that the custom is rapidly finding favor. I have slept on straw, both in +winter and summer, for many years, yet I am always warm; and those who +know my habits say I use less <i>covering</i> on my bed than almost any +individual whom they have ever known.</p> + +<p>I have no hostility to soft beds, especially for young children and feeble +adults, could softness be secured without much heat and relaxation +of the system. On the contrary, it is certainly desirable, in itself, +to have the bed so soft that as large a proportion of the surface of +the body may rest on it as possible. But I consider hardness as a +much smaller evil than feathers.</p> + +<p>It is worthy of remark how generally physicians, for the last hundred +years, have recommended hard beds, especially straw beds or hair +mattresses, to their more feeble and delicate patients. This fact might +at least quiet our apprehensions in regard to their tendency on those +who are accustomed to them in early infancy.</p> + +<p>Some writers on these subjects appear to doubt whether, after all that +they say, they shall have much influence on mothers in inducing them to +give up feather beds for their infants. But they need not be so +faithless. Multitudes have already been reformed by their writings; and +multitudes larger still would be so, could they gain access to them. It +is a most serious evil that they are often so written and published that +comparatively few mothers will ever possess them.</p> + +<p>The pillow, as well as the bed, should be rather hard; and its thickness +should be much less than is usual, or we shall do mischief by bending +the neck, and thus compressing the vessels, and obstructing the +circulation of the blood. But on this subject I will say more, when I +come to treat on "Posture."</p> + +<p>The child's bed should not be placed near the wall, on account of +dampness. There is also, during the summer, another reason. Should +lightning strike the house, it will be much more apt to injure those who +are near the wall than other persons; as it seldom leaves the wall to +pass over the central part of the room.</p> + +<p>Curtains are not only useless, but injurious. They prevent a free +circulation of the air. Everything which has this tendency must be +studiously guarded against, in the management of infants.</p> + +<p>Nothing is more injurious to the old or the young than damp beds and +damp covering. It behoves, especially, all those who have the care of +infants, to see that everything about their beds is thoroughly dry. The +walls and clothes should also be dry; and wet clothes should never be +hung up in the room. By neglecting these precautions, colds, +rheumatisms, inflammations, fevers, consumptions, and death, may ensue. +Many a person loses his health, and not a few their lives, in this way. +The author of this work was once thrown into a fever from such a cause.</p> + +<p>Warming the bed is, in all cases, a bad practice. While in the nursery, +if the air be kept at a proper temperature, there will be no need of it; +after the child is assigned to a separate chamber, its enervating +tendency would result in more evil than good. It is better to let the +bed became gradually heated by the body, in a natural and healthy way.</p> + +<p>No person, and above all, no infant, should be suffered to sleep in a +bed that has been recently occupied by the sick. The bed and all the +clothes should first be thoroughly aired. Could we see with our eyes at +once, how rapidly these bodies of ours fill the air, and even the beds +we sleep in, with carbonic acid and other hurtful gases and impurities, +even while in health, but much more so in sickness, we should be +cautious of exposing the lungs of the tender infant, in such an +atmosphere, until everything had been properly cleansed, and the +apartments properly ventilated.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>The Covering.</i></h4> + +<p>The covering of the bed should be sufficiently warm, but never any +warmer than is absolutely necessary to protect the child from +chilliness. The lightest covering which will secure this object is the +best. Perhaps there is nothing in use that, with so little weight, +secures so much heat as what are called "comfortables."</p> + +<p>The clothes should not be "tucked up" at the sides and foot of the bed +with too much care and exactness. For when the bed is once warmed +thoroughly with the child's body, the admission of a little fresh air +into it, when he elevates or otherwise moves his limbs, can do no harm, +but <i>may</i> do much of good, in the way of ventilation. I deem it +important, moreover, to inure children very early to little partial +exposures of this kind.</p> + +<p>Those mothers who, from over-tenderness, and want of correct information +on the subject, pursue a contrary course, and consider it as almost +certain death to have a particle of fresh air reach the bodies of their +infants during their slumbers, are generally sure to outwit themselves, +and defeat their very intentions. For by being thus tender of their +children, it often turns out that whenever the mother is ill, or when on +any other account she ceases to watch over them—and such times must, +in general, sooner or later come—they are much more liable to take cold +or sustain other injury, should they be exposed, than if they had been +treated more rationally.</p> + +<p>I knew a mother who would not trust her children to take care of their +own beds on retiring to rest, as long as they remained in her house, +even though they were twenty or thirty years old. But they had no better +or firmer constitutions than the other children of the same +neighborhood.</p> + +<p>Hardly anything can be more injurious than covering the head with the +bed clothes; and yet some mothers and nurses cover, in this way, not +only their own heads, but those of their children. I have elsewhere +shown how impure the air is, which is imprisoned under the bed clothes. +I hope those mothers who are willing to destroy <i>themselves</i> by covering +up their heads while they sleep, will at least have mercy on their +unoffending infants.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Night Dresses.</i></h4> + +<p>The grand rule on this point is, to wear as little dress during sleep as +possible. Some mothers not only suffer their infants to sleep in the +same shirt, cap, and stockings that they have worn during the day, but +add a night gown to the rest. No cap should be worn during the night, +any more than in the day time. Or if the foolish practice has been +adopted for the day, it should be discontinued at night. It is enough +for those adults whose long hair would otherwise be dishevelled, to wear +night caps, and subject themselves, as they inevitably do, to catarrh +and periodical headache. Children's heads should have nothing on them by +night; nor even by day, except to defend them from the rain or the hot +rays of the sun.</p> + +<p>The stockings, too, should be wholly laid aside at night, unless in the +case of those who are feeble, apt to have their feet cold, or +particularly liable to bowel complaints. Such may be allowed to sleep in +their stockings, but not in those which have been worn all the day.</p> + +<p>Indeed, neither children nor adults should ever wear a single garment in +the night which they have worn during the day. The reason is, that there +are too many causes of impurity in operation while we sleep, without our +wearing the clothes in which we have been perspiring during the +day-time—and which must be already more or less filled with the +effluvia of our bodies.</p> + +<p>It is a very easy thing to have a loose night gown to supply the place +of the shirt we have worn during the day; and if nothing else is +convenient, a spare shirt will answer. But both a night gown and shirt +should never be admitted, especially in warm weather. The garment to +supply the place of the shirt during the night, may be of calico in the +summer, and of flannel in the winter.</p> + +<p>The collar and wristbands of this night dress should be loose; and the +whole garment should be large and long. No article of dress should ever +press upon our bodies, so as in the least to impede the circulation; and +for this reason it is, that writers on physical education have inveighed +so much against cravats, straps, garters, &c. This caution, so important +to all, is doubly so to young mothers, on whom devolves the management +of the tender infant.</p> + +<p>When the child has been perspiring freely during the evening, just +before he is undressed, or when he has just been subjected to the warm +bath, it may be well to use a little care in undressing and exchanging +clothes, to prevent taking cold;—though it should ever be remembered, +that those children who are managed on a rational system will bear +slight exposures with far more safety, than they who have been managed +at random—sometimes, indeed, with great tenderness, but at others, +wholly neglected.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>Posture of the Body.</i></h4> + +<p>In early infancy, children who are not stuffed rather than fed, may +occasionally be permitted to sleep on their backs, especially if they +incline to do so. But it will be well to encourage them to sleep on one +side, as soon as you can without great inconvenience.</p> + +<p>The right side, as a general rule, is preferable; because the stomach, +which lies towards the left side, is thus left uncompressed, and +digestion undisturbed. I would not, however, require a child to lie +always on the right side, but would occasionally change his position, +lest he should become unable to sleep at all, except in a particular +manner.</p> + +<p>I have said elsewhere, that the head ought to be a little raised, +especially if the child is liable to diseases of the brain. But this +remark, rather hastily thrown out, requires explanation.</p> + +<p>There is so much blood sent by the heart to the head and upper parts of +the system of infants, as to predispose those parts, especially the +brain, to disease. In a horizontal position of the body, there is more +blood sent to the brain than when the body is erect. This will show the +reader, at once, that if the infant is peculiarly exposed to diseases +of the brain—and it certainly is so—he ought to remain in a horizontal +posture as little as possible, except during sleep; and that even then +it is desirable to make his bed in such a manner as to elevate the head +and shoulders as much as we can without compressing the lungs, or +obstructing the circulation in the neck.</p> + +<p>I recommend, therefore, to raise the head of an infant's bedstead a +little higher than the foot; though not so much as to incline him to +slide downwards into the bed, for that would be to produce one evil in +curing another.</p> + +<p>Sir Charles Bell thinks that the common disease of infants called +<i>diabetes</i>, arises from their being permitted to sleep on their backs; +and that by breaking up the habit of lying in this position, and +accustoming them to lie on their sides, we shall prevent it. I doubt +whether the effect here referred to, is ever the result of such a cause. +Still I am as much opposed to the <i>habit</i> of sleeping on the back, as +Sir Charles Bell. It is quite injurious to free respiration.</p> + +<p>Closely allied to the subject of bodily position in general, is the +state of particular organs; especially the stomach and the senses. I +have already intimated that in order to have an infant sleep quietly, it +is desirable to darken the room. This is the more necessary, where +infants are unnaturally wakeful. In such cases, not only light should +be excluded from the eye, but sounds from the ear, odors from the +nostrils, &c. A remarkably full stomach is in the way of going quietly +to sleep, whether the person be old or young. Neither infants nor adults +ought to take food for some time previous to their going to sleep for +the night. Great bodily heat, as well as too great cold, is also +unfavorable. If too hot, the temperature of the infant should be +somewhat reduced by exposure to the air; if too cold, it should be +raised in a natural, healthy, and appropriate manner.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>State of the Mind.</i></h4> + +<p>In giving directions how to procure pleasant dreams, Dr. Franklin +mentions as a highly important requisition, the possession of a quiet +conscience. A wise prescription, no doubt.</p> + +<p>But infants, as well as adults, in order to sleep quietly, should have +their minds and feelings in a state of tranquillity. The youngest child +has its "troubles;" and it is highly important, if not indispensable, to +<i>healthy</i> sleep, that the mother take all reasonable pains to remove +them before sleep is induced.</p> + +<p>We sometimes hear about children crying themselves to sleep, as if it +were a matter of no consequence; and sometimes, as if it were, on the +contrary, rather desirable. But is the sleep of an adult satisfying, who +goes to bed in trouble, and only sleeps because nature is so exhausted +that she cannot bear the protracted watchfulness any longer? Why then +should we expect it, in the case of the infant?</p> + +<p>I know an excellent father who is so far from believing this doctrine, +that he silences the cries of his child by the word of command—and +believes that in so doing, he promotes both his health and his +happiness. He would no more let him cry himself to sleep than he would +let him cough himself to sleep; though both crying and coughing, in +their places, may be and undoubtedly are salutary.</p> + +<p>Whatever may be the age and circumstances of an individual, he ought to +retire for rest with a cheerful mind. All anxiety about the future, all +regret about the past, all plans even, in regard to the business or +amusement of the morrow, should be kept wholly out of the mind. We +should yield ourselves up to the arms of sleep with the same quietude as +if life were finished, and we had nothing more to do or think of.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Quality of Sleep.</i></h4> + +<p>The soundness, as well as other qualities, of sleep, differs greatly in +different individuals; and even in the same night, with the same +individual in different circumstances. The first four or five hours of +sleep are usually more sound than the remainder. Hardly anything will +interrupt the repose of some persons during the early part of the night, +while they awake afterwards at the slightest noise or movement—the +chirping of a cricket, or the playing of a kitten.</p> + +<p>In profound sleep, we probably dream very little, if at all; but in +other circumstances, we are constantly disturbed by dreaming, and +sometimes start and wake in the greatest anxiety or horror.</p> + +<p>Nightmare is generally accompanied by dreams of the most distressing +kind. We imagine a wild beast, or a serpent in pursuit of us; or a rock +is detached from some neighboring cliff, and is about to roll upon and +crush us; and yet all our efforts to fly are unavailing. We seem chained +to the spot; but while in the very jaws of destruction, perhaps we +awake, trembling, and palpitating, and weary, as if something of a +serious nature had really happened.</p> + +<p>In the case of nightmare, it is more than probable that we fall asleep +with our stomachs too heavily loaded with food, or with a smaller +quantity of that which is highly indigestible. Or it may sometimes arise +from an improper position of the body, such as disturbs the action of +the stomach or lungs, or of both these organs. Lying on the back, when +we first go to sleep, is very apt to produce nightmare.</p> + +<p>But distressing dreams often follow an evening of anxious cares, +especially if those cares preyed upon us for the last half hour; and +also after late suppers, even if they are light—and late reading. Hence +the injunctions of the last section. Hence, too, the importance of +taking our last meal two or three hours before sleep, and of engaging, +during these hours, in cheerful conversation, and in the social and +private duties of religion. Family and private worship, in the evening, +are enjoined no less by philosophy than they are by christianity; and +every young mother will do well to understand this matter, and train her +offspring accordingly.</p> + +<p>"That sleep from which we are easily roused, is the healthiest," says +Macnish. "Very profound slumber partakes of the nature of apoplexy." I +should say, rather, that a medium between the two extremes is +healthiest. Profound apoplectic sleep, +I am sure, is injurious; but that from which we are too easily roused +cannot, it seems to me, be less so. Thus, I have often gone to sleep +with a resolution to wake at a certain hour, or at the striking of the +clock; and have found myself able to wake at the proposed time, almost +without one failure in twenty instances where I have made the trial. But +my sleep was obviously unsound, and certainly unsatisfying. The desire +to awake at a certain moment or period, seemed to buoy me above the +usual state of healthy sleep, and render me liable to awake at the +slightest disturbance. Were it not for sacrificing the ease of others, +it would be far better, in such cases, to rely upon some person to wake +us, instead of charging our own minds with it.</p> + +<p>The quality of our sleep will be greatly affected by the quantity. But +this thought, if extended, would anticipate the subject of our next +section; so easily does one thing, especially in physical education, run +into or involve another. I will therefore, for the present, only say +that if we confine ourselves to a smaller number of hours than is really +required, our sleep becomes too sound to be quite healthy, as if nature +endeavored to make up in quality, for want of due quantity. On the +contrary, if we attempt to sleep longer than is really necessary to +restore us, the quality of our sleep is not what it ought to be; for we +do not sleep soundly enough.</p> + +<p>The silence and darkness of the night tend to induce sleep of a better +quality than the noise and activity of day. It is unquestionably +desirable that children should be able to sleep, at least occasionally, +without absolute quiet. And yet such sleep cannot be sufficiently sound +to answer the purposes of health, if frequently repeated.</p> + +<p>Hence it is, perhaps—at least in part—that the maxim has obtained +currency, that one hour of sleep before midnight is worth two afterward. +The comparison has probably been made between the quiet and darksome +hours of evening and those which followed daybreak, when light, and +music, and bustle conspire, as they should, to make us wakeful. No +person can sleep as soundly and as effectually, when light reaches his +closed eyes, and sounds strike his ears, as in darkness and silence. He +may sleep, indeed, under almost any circumstances, when fatigue and +exhaustion demand it; but never so profoundly as when in absolute +abstraction of light, and complete quiet.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Quantity.</i></h4> + +<p>On this point much might be said, without exhausting the subject. But I +have already observed that infants, when first born, require to sleep +nearly their whole time. As they advance in years, the necessity for +sleep; however, diminishes, until they come to maturity, when it remains +for many years nearly stationary. In advanced age, the necessity for +sleep again increases, till we reach the extremest old age, or what is +usually called second childhood, when we again sometimes sleep nearly +the whole time.</p> + +<p>I have already remarked that much might be said on this subject; but I +do not think that the present occasion requires it. If the suggestions +which are made in the chapter on "Early Rising" should receive the +attention I flatter myself they merit, I do not believe children would +often sleep too long. If, on the contrary, they are suffered to lie late +in the morning, and then sit up late in the evening, all healthful +habits and tendencies will he so deranged or broken up, that nature, in +her indications, will by no means prove the unerring guide which she is +wont to do in other circumstances.</p> + +<p>A few thoughts here, on the quantity of sleep required by the young +after they approach maturity, may not be misplaced.</p> + +<p>Jeremy Taylor thought that for a healthy adult, three hours in +twenty-four were enough for all the purposes of sleep. Baxter thought +four hours about a reasonable time; Wesley, six; Lord Coke and Sir Wm. +Jones, seven; and Sir John Sinclair, eight. These were the <i>theories</i> of +men who were all eminent for their learning, and most of them for their +piety. How far their <i>practice</i> corresponded with their theories, we are +not, in every instance, told.</p> + +<p>But to come to the practice of several persons who have been +distinguished in the world. General Elliot, one of the most vigorous men +of his age, though living for his whole life on nothing but vegetables +and water, and who at sixty-four had scarcely begun to feel the +infirmities of old age, slept but four hours in twenty-four. Frederick +the Great of Prussia, and the illustrious British surgeon, John Hunter, +slept but five hours a day. Napoleon Bonaparte, for a great part of his +life, slept only four hours; and Lord Brougham is said to require no +more. Others, in numerous instances, require but six hours. But there +are others still, who consume eight.</p> + +<p>The conclusion—in my own mind—is, that with a good constitution and +active habits, men may habituate themselves to very different quantities +of sleep. Still I think that six hours are little enough for most +persons; and if a child, on arriving at maturity, is not inclined to +sleep much longer than that, I should not regard him as wasting time. +Most persons, it appears to me, require six hours of sound sleep in +twenty-four;—I mean between the ages of twenty and seventy.</p> + +<p>Macnish is the most liberal modern writer I am acquainted with, in his +allowance of time for sleep. Speaking of the wants of adults he +says—"No person who passes only eight hours in bed can be said to waste +his time in sleep." Yet he obviously contradicts himself on the very +same page; for he says expressly, that when a person is young, strong +and healthy, an hour or two less may be sufficient. But an hour or two +less than eight hours reduces the amount to seven or six hours. And +taking the whole period of life, to which he probably refers—say from +eighteen to forty—into consideration, there is a very considerable +difference between six hours and eight hours a day. If six hours are +"sufficient," it cannot be right to sleep eight hours.</p> + +<p>Let us here make a few estimates. If six hours are sufficient for sleep +between the ages of eighteen and forty, he who sleeps eight hours a day, +actually loses 16,060 hours—equal to nearly two whole years of life, or +about two years and three quarters of time in which we are usually +awake. This, in the meridian of life, is not a small waste. Permit it to +every person now in the United States, and the sum total of wasted time +to a single generation, would be 25,649,098 years—equal to the average +duration of the lives of 854,970 persons. The value of this time, as a +commodity in the market, at a low estimate—only forty dollars a +year—would be over A THOUSAND MILLIONS of DOLLARS! And its value, for +the purposes of mental and moral improvement, cannot be estimated except +in ETERNITY!</p> + +<p>Every young mother must derive from these considerations a motive to +discourage all unnecessary waste of time in sleep; while no one, as I +trust, will forget that to sleep too little is also dangerous to health, +and prejudicial to the general happiness.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XV."></a><h2>CHAPTER XV.</h2> + +<h3>EARLY RISING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. How many are burnt up by parental neglect. +"Lecturing" them. What is an early hour?</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Some writer—I do not recollect who—has said that all children are +naturally early risers. And I cannot help coming to the same conclusion. +That they are not so, is no more proved from the fact that as things now +are they are generally found addicted to the contrary habit, than the +very general neglect of milk among the higher classes of our citizens, +proves that they have not a natural relish for it—when every one knows +that at our first setting out in life, milk is, almost without +exception, the sole article of human sustenance.</p> + +<p>One of the great difficulties in the way of early rising, as I have +already had occasion to say, is late sitting up. If children are not +accustomed to retire till nine or ten o'clock, nor then until they have +been subjected to all the excitements pertaining to fashionable +life—company, heated and impure air, stimulating drink, fruits, +high-seasoned food, and perhaps music—and are become actually feverish, +no one but an ignorant person or a brute ought to expect them to rise +early. Indeed, whatever may have been the cause, and whether it have +operated on high or low life, late retiring will inevitably result in +late rising. The current may be turned out of its course a little while, +it is true, but not always. It will ere long return to its accustomed +channel; perhaps to renew its course with increased pertinacity.</p> + +<p>Everything, in the morning, naturally invites to early rising. The +pleasant light, the music, at certain seasons, of some of the animated +tribes, and the joy which we feel in activity, and in the society of +those whom we love, all conspire to rouse us. If we have retired late, +however, and especially in a feverish condition, so that when we wake we +feel wretched, and, as sometimes happens, more fatigued than when we lay +down, other collateral motives may be needed.</p> + +<p>I have said that everything invites us, in the morning, to rise early; +but it was upon the presumption that our parents, and brothers, and +sisters set us a good example. If parents and other friends lie in bed +late themselves, can anything else be, expected of children? Admitting, +even, that they rise early themselves, if they never speak of early +rising as a pleasure, and connect along with it, in their children's +minds, pleasant associations, they would be unreasonable to expect +otherwise than that their children should cling to the morning couch, +till they are fairly compelled to rise as a relief from pain and +uneasiness.</p> + +<p>But when parents go farther than this, and actually discourage their +children from rising early, and use every means in their power short of +actual punishment—and sometimes even that—to make them lie still till +breakfast, in order that they may be out of the way, what shall we say? +And what is to be expected as the result?</p> + +<p>There is hope, however, under the last circumstances. People sometimes +carry things to an extreme that defeats their very purposes. Thus it +occasionally is, in the case before us. This forbidding children to rise +early, and threatening them if they do, sometimes excites their +curiosity, and leads them to the forbidden course of conduct, simply +<i>because</i> it is forbidden. Not a few persons among us possess the +disposition to be governed by what has sometimes been called the "rule +of contrary."</p> + +<p>I might stop here to show that there is nothing so well calculated to +develope and improve the mind and heart, even of parents themselves, as +the society of those whom God gives them to train for Him and their +country. I might show that not a few of those traits of character which +render the company of many old persons rather irksome, especially to the +young, have their origin in their neglect of the young, and of keeping +up, as long as circumstances will possibly admit, juvenile feelings, +actions, and habits.</p> + +<p>And yet what do we too often witness in life? Is not every effort made +to induce the young to lie in bed late that they may be out of the way? +Are they not placed, as soon as possible after they are up, with the +servants—if unfortunately there are any in the family—that they may be +out of the way? Are they not required to breakfast, and dine, and sup +elsewhere, if possible, that they may be out of the way? Do we not send +them to school, even the Sabbath school, to get them out of the way? Do +not some mothers even dose their infants with stupifying medicines to +lull them to sleep, in order to have them out of the way? And to crown +all, though they are quite too often permitted to sit up late in the +evening, to enjoy that society which they are denied so great a part of +the day-time, are they not occasionally put to bed early that they may +be out of the way, and that the parents may attend late parties, to +indulge in immoral or unhealthy habits?</p> + +<p>In the last instance, they are indeed sometimes put out of the way, in +the result—and with a vengeance. Many a child, nay, many thousands of +children, are burnt up yearly, while their parents are gone abroad in +the evening in quest of that enjoyment which ought to be found in the +bosom of their families. "In Westminster, a part of London, containing +less than two hundred thousand inhabitants, one hundred children were +thus destroyed, during a single year." And the moral results which +occasionally happen are a thousand times worse than burning. But enough +of this.</p> + +<p>The common practice of lecturing the young on the importance of early +rising, may have a good effect on a few; but in general, it is believed +to produce the contrary result. It is, in short, to sum up the whole +matter, the influence of parental example, and the speaking often of the +happiness which early rising affords, with perhaps the occasional +indulgence of the child in a pleasant morning walk, which, if he retires +early enough, are almost certain to produce in him the valuable habit of +early rising.</p> + +<p>But what is an early hour? Some call it early, when the sun is one hour +high; some at sunrise; others, when they hear of an early riser, +suppose he must be one who rises at least by daybreak.</p> + +<p>Midnight is, of course, as near the middle of the night as any hour; and +he who goes to bed four or five hours before midnight, will never +complain of those who insist that <i>he</i> is not an early riser who is not +up by four or five o'clock. In summer, no adult ought to lie in bed +after four o'clock, and no child, except the mere infant, after five.</p> + +<p>Much is said by a few writers, especially Macnish, of the danger of +rising before the sun has attained a sufficient height above the horizon +to chase away the vapors, and remove the dampness. But I must insist +upon earlier rising than this, though we should not choose to venture +abroad. Invigorated and restored as we are by sleep, I cannot think that +the dampness of the morning air is more injurious than the foul air of +some of our sleeping rooms.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVI."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVI.</h2> + +<h3>HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal—over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>While I have been very particular in enjoining on my readers the +importance of thoroughly ventilating their dwellings, I have also +insisted upon the necessity of taking children abroad, as much as +possible. Not, however, to harden them, so much as to give them a more +free access to air and light than they can have at home; and also—when +they are old enough—to cultivate the faculties of attention, +comparison, &c.</p> + +<p>The practice of attempting to harden children by frequent exposure to +air much colder than that to which they have been accustomed, without +sufficient additional clothing, is open to the same objections which +have been brought against cold bathing. Under the management of a +judicious medical practitioner, it may do great good to a few +constitutions; but its indiscriminate use would injure a thousand +infants for one who was benefited.</p> + +<p>True it is that if the child is protected against cold, no harm, but on +the contrary much good may result, from carrying him abroad into the +fresh air, even in very cold weather. But what can be more painful than +to see the little sufferers carried along when their limbs are purple, +or benumbed with cold? And how idle it is to hope that such exposure +hardens or improves the constitution!</p> + +<p>It is on the same mistaken principle that many adults go thinly clad, +late in the fall. I have seen men in November and December beating and +rubbing their hands, who, on being asked why they did not wear mittens, +replied, that if they should wear one pair of mittens so early in the +season, they should want two in the winter.</p> + +<p>Now I cheerfully admit that to put on additional clothing before the +severity of the weather demands it, actually produces the effect here +supposed; but to endure severe cold, on the contrary, never hardens +anybody. Nay, more, it enfeebles. Cold, when combined with the evils of +<i>poverty</i>, produces more mischief and destroys more lives than any one +disease in the whole catalogue of human maladies.</p> + +<p>Adam Smith says that it is not uncommon for mothers in the Highlands of +Scotland, who have borne twenty children, to have only two of them +alive.</p> + +<p>It may be difficult to say whether children are oftener destroyed by +over-tenderness than by neglect, and the evils incident to poverty. Both +extremes are common; while the happy medium—that of conducting a +child's education upon the principles of physiology, is rarely known, +and still more rarely followed.</p> + +<p>I have been much amused, and not a little instructed, by the following +anecdote on this point, from Dr. Dewees:</p> + +<p>We were speaking with a lady who had lost three or four children with +"croup," who informed us she was convinced, from absolute experiment, +that there was nothing like exposure to all kinds of weather to protect +and harden the system. By her first plan of managing her children, which +was by keeping them very warmly clad, she said she lost several by the +croup; but since she had adopted the opposite scheme, her children had +been perfectly healthy, and never had betrayed the slightest disposition +to that terrible disease which had robbed her of her children.</p> + +<p>Perhaps, madam, we observed, you did not, in making your first +experiments, attend to a number of details which might be thought +essential to the plan. You did not probably take the proper precautions +when you sent them into the cold air, or observe what was important for +them when they returned from it.</p> + +<p>"Oh, yes," she replied, "I took every possible care when they, were +going out. I always made them wear a very warm great coat, well lined +with baize, and a fur cape or collar. I always made them wear a +'comfortable' round their necks, made of soft woollen yarn. And as for +their feet, they were always protected by socks or over-shoes lined with +wool or fur, as the weather might be wet or dry."</p> + +<p>Do you believe, madam, they were kept at a proper degree of warmth by +these means?</p> + +<p>"Oh, certainly. Indeed, rather too warm; for they would often be in a +state of perspiration, they told me, when in the open air; especially if +they ran, slid, or skated."</p> + +<p>And what was done when they were thus heated?</p> + +<p>"Oh, they got cool enough before they reached home."</p> + +<p>And would they receive no injury in passing from this state of +perspiration to that of chill?</p> + +<p>"Not at all; for when this happened, I always made them take a little +warm brandy, or wine and water, and made them toast their feet well by +the fire." [Footnote: This absurd custom is a fruitful source of that +distressing condition of the hands and feet, in winter, called +"chilblains."]</p> + +<p>Did they sleep in a cold or warm room?</p> + +<p>"In a warm room. A good fire was always made in the stove before they +went to bed, which kept them quite warm all night."</p> + +<p>Would they never complain of being cold towards morning, when the stove +had become cold?</p> + +<p>"Yes, certainly; but then there were always at hand additional +bed-clothes, with which they could cover themselves."</p> + +<p>And did they always do it?</p> + +<p>"Oh, I suppose so."</p> + +<p>Well, madam, how did you carry your second plan into execution, which +you say was attended with such happy results?</p> + +<p>"I began by not letting them put on their great coats, except when the +weather was so cold as to require this additional covering, and did not +permit them to wear a 'comfortable' or fur round their necks. I took +away their over-shoes, and if their feet chanced to get wet, (for they +were always provided with good sound shoes,) the shoes were immediately +changed, if they were at home. If the weather was wet, or unusually +cold, they were permitted to wear their great coats, but not without. +If they came home very cold, they were not allowed to approach the fire +too soon. I gave them no warm, heating drinks, and accustomed them to +sleep in rooms without fire."</p> + +<p>Who does not recognize, in this second plan for the enjoyment of air and +exercise, as judicious a plan of physical education, so far as it goes, +as can well be pointed out? We were so successful as to convince this +lady, in a very short time, that our own plan of exposing the body was +precisely the one she had pursued with so much success.</p> + +<p>We also inquired of her what plan she pursued with her children, when +too young to be submitted to the rules just mentioned. She informed us +that it was the same system throughout, only the details varied as +circumstances of age, &c. made it necessary. That is, she sent her +children into the open air at very early periods of their lives, +provided in summer it was neither too wet nor too warm; in winter, when +the air was mild, dry and clear—but always carefully wrapped up, that +their little extremities might not suffer from cold. She never suffered +them to sleep in the open air, if it could be avoided; to prevent which, +as much as possible, she constantly charged the nurse to bring the +children home, as soon as she found them disposed to sleep, unless it +was when they were very young, at which time it was impossible to guard +against it.</p> + +<p>And when her children were sufficiently old to walk, she took care to +prepare them properly for it, whether it might be in warm, cold, or +moderate weather. She never sent them abroad for pleasure at the risk of +encountering a storm of any kind; nor permitted them to walk at the +hazard of getting wet or very muddy feet.</p> + +<p>Were the constitutions of your children pretty much the same? we +demanded of this lady.</p> + +<p>"No; one of my boys was extremely feeble, from his very birth."</p> + +<p>Did you treat him precisely as you did the others?</p> + +<p>"Yes, as far as regarded principles; that is, I permitted him to bear as +much of cold, heat or wet as his constitution would endure without pain +or injury. The degrees, however, were very different from those his +brothers bore, had they been determined by the measurement of the +thermometer, but precisely the same in effect, as far as could be +ascertained by consequences. Thus, if he were exposed to the same +temperature as his brothers, he experienced no more inconvenience from +it, when it was very low, than they, because he had additional covering +to protect him."</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVII.</h2> + +<h3>SOCIETY.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society illustrated. Early +diffidence. Selecting companions for children. Moral effects of society +on the young. Parents should play with their children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Every mother is unquestionably as much bound to have an eye to the +society of her child, as to his food, drink or clothing. And if the +quality, amount and general character of the latter are important, those +of the former are by no means less so.</p> + +<p>It is indeed true that many a child has been happy, in a degree, in the +society of its mother alone, where the father was seldom seen, and the +brothers and sisters never. And it is equally true; that a few children +have so far preferred the society of their parents alone, as to become +disinclined to other society. But cases of this kind are only as +exceptions to the general rule; and are probably monstrous formations +of character. I cannot believe that any child, rightly educated, would +prefer the society of none but its parents, or even its parents and +brothers and sisters.</p> + +<p>A French author has written a considerable volume on the importance of +what he calls <i>gaiety</i>, but which he should prefer to call cheerfulness. +Among the rest, he maintains that it is indispensable to the best +health. But if so—and I do not doubt it—then it ought to be encouraged +in children, and the earlier the better. Now there is no way to +encourage cheerfulness in the young so effectually as by indulging them +with considerable society.</p> + +<p>That the thing may be carried to excess, I have no doubt. I have seen +mothers who permitted their children to play with their mates till they +became excited, and were thus led to continue their sports, not only +farther than cheerfulness and health demanded, but until they were +excessively fatigued, and almost made sick. And I believe that the +excitement of numbers, in infant and other schools, may be so great as +to be injurious, rather than salutary. Still I think these are rare +cases.</p> + +<p>Truth usually lies somewhere between extremes. To keep a child, +especially a boy, always in the nursery, or even in the parlor with his +mother, is one extreme; and to let him go abroad continually, till his +home and its smaller circle become insipid, is the other. A child +properly trained will <i>usually</i> prefer home, and only desire to go +abroad occasionally. He will rather need urging in the matter than +require restraint.</p> + +<p>But he must, at any rate, be taught to be sociable, not only for the +salve of cheerfulness and the consequent health, but for the sake of his +manners, his mind, and his morals.</p> + +<p>If it is a matter of indifference, in the formation of human character, +whether we mix in society or not, then, for anything I can see, an +improvement might be proposed in the construction of the material +universe. Instead of forming the planets so large—and this earth among +the rest—each might have been divided into hundreds of millions; and +every human being might have had a little planet, and an immortality, +exclusively his own. Such an arrangement would certainly prevent a great +many evils; and, among the rest, a great deal of quarrelling and +bloodshed.</p> + +<p>But divine wisdom is higher than human wisdom, and one world to hundreds +of millions of human beings has been made, instead of giving to each +individual of the universe a little world of his own, in which he might +have reigned sole monarch, and only wept, with Alexander, because none +of the other worlds were within his grasp. Where a family is already +large, other society will be unnecessary for some time; but where it +consists of a mother only, although her society is always to be +considered of the <i>first</i> importance, I cannot but think she ought to +take great pains to introduce her child occasionally to the company of +other children.</p> + +<p>That diffidence, which almost destroys the influence and the happiness +of many individuals, is often cherished, if not created, by too much +seclusion. Where there is a natural constitution which predisposes the +child to timidity and diffidence, the danger is greatly increased; and +parents should take unwearied pains to guard against it.</p> + +<p>It is hardly necessary for me to say, that great care should also be +used in selecting the companions of children. Their character will be +greatly influenced for life by their earlier associates. Friendships +between children are sometimes formed, while playing together, which are +interrupted only by death. Those parents who are so fond of controlling +the choice of their sons and daughters in regard to a companion for +life, at a period when control is generally resisted, would do well to +take a hint from what has here been suggested. There is no doubt but +they might often—very often—give such a direction to the embryo +affections of their infants and children, as would terminate only with +their existence.</p> + +<p>It is still less necessary to advert, in a work like this, to the effect +which much observation and experience shows good society to have on +purity, both physical and moral. Every one must have observed its +tendency to form habits of cleanliness, not to say neatness. There may +be excess, even in this. Young persons, of both sexes, often spend too +much time in preparing their dress for the reception or the visiting of +their friends. Still this is only the abuse of a good thing. Nor is it +less true, though it may be less obvious, that moral purity is more +likely to be secured where children and youth of both sexes associate a +great deal, from the earliest infancy. [Footnote: If this principle be +correct, what is the tendency of our numerous schools, which are +exclusively for one sex? Must there not be latent evil to counterbalance +some of the seeming good? For myself, I doubt whether moral character +can ever be formed in due proportion and harmony, where this separation +long exists.] There are tremendous cases of declension on record, which +establish this point beyond the possibility of debate.</p> + +<p>To say that the mother—and indeed both parents—ought to form a part of +the playing circle of the youngest children, in order to watch their +opening dispositions, to check what may be improper, and encourage what +ought to be encouraged, would be only to repeat what has often been +recommended by the best writers on education—but which must be +repeated, again and again, till it leaves an impression, especially on +CHRISTIAN parents. It is strange that many regard this matter as they +do, and appear not only ashamed to be seen sporting with their children, +but almost ashamed to have their children thus occupied. They might as +well be ashamed of the gambols of the kitten or the lamb; or of the +grave mother, as she turns aside occasionally to join in its frolics. +When will parents be willing to take lessons in education from that +brute world which they have been so long accustomed to overlook or +despise?</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVIII.</h2> + +<h3>EMPLOYMENTS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Why young ladies, now-a-days, dislike domestic +employments. Miserable housewives—not to be wondered at. Mistake of one +class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>One important and never-to-be-forgotten employment of the young is the +cultivation of their minds; and another, that of their morals. But my +present purpose is only to speak of those employments denominated +manual, or physical.</p> + +<p>It is obvious, at the first glance, that the influence of the mother, in +our own country, at least, will be less over boys than over girls. We +leave it to savages and semi-savages to employ their females, and even +their mothers, in hard manual labor. Here, in America, what I should say +on the employment of boys would be more properly addressed to the YOUNG +FATHER.</p> + +<p>There are some exceptions to the general truth contained in the last +paragraph. Many a mother has—unconsciously at the time, but with no +less certainty than if she had done it intentionally—given a direction +to the whole current of her son's life; and this, too, at a very early +period. The mother of Benjamin West, the painter, if she did not give +the first tendency to his favorite pursuit, while he was yet a mere +child, at the least greatly confirmed him in it, by the manner of +expressing her surprise at one of his early performances. "My mother's +kiss," on that occasion, said he, "made me a painter." Nor are facts of +the same general character by any means uncommon.</p> + +<p>I know a poor mother who, in the absence of her husband at his weekly +or monthly labors, used to detain her eldest boy, then almost an +infant, from going to bed in the evening till her day's work was +finished—because, in her loneliness, she wanted his company—by telling +stories of eminent men, and especially of distinguished philanthropists, +until she had unconsciously kindled in him a philanthropic spirit, which +will not cease to burn till his death.</p> + +<p>But it is in forming the predilections of daughters for their destined +employments, that mothers are especially influential. Not so much by +their set lessons or lectures, however, as by the force of continued +example. No mother who sends her child away to be nursed, and +subsequently to her return seizes on every possible opportunity to keep +her out of the way and out of her sight, will be likely to give her any +choice of employment, or indeed any fondness for employment at all.</p> + +<p>Nor is it sufficient that she keep her daughter constantly under her +eye, with a view to qualify her for the duties of a housewife, if the +daughter see as plainly as in the light of mid-day, that the mother +dislikes the employment herself. She must love what she would have her +daughter love, and even what she would have her understand. Nor is it +sufficient that she <i>affect</i> a fondness for the employment; her love for +it must be real. Little girls have keener eyes and better judgments than +some mothers seem willing to believe or to admit.</p> + +<p>Many persons seem greatly surprised that the young ladies of modern days +have so little fondness for domestic life and domestic duties. How few, +it is often said, will do their own housework, if they can possibly get +a train of domestics around them; even though the care and oversight of +the domestics themselves gear them out more rapidly than bodily labor +would.</p> + +<p>But there is a reason for this hostility to domestic employments. It is +because mothers, almost universally, consider their occupations as mere +drudgery, and bring up their children in the same spirit. And what else +could be expected as the result? It would be an anomaly in the history, +of human nature, if the female members of families were to grow up in +love with ordinary domestic avocations, when they have been accustomed +to see their mothers, and nurses, and elder sisters complaining and +fretting while engaged in them; and showing by their actions, no less +than by their words, that they regarded themselves as miserable and +wretched.</p> + +<p>No wonder so many girls, of the present day, make miserable housewives. +No wonder a factory, a book-bindery, or a shoemaker's shop, is +considered preferable to the kitchen. No wonder the world degenerates, +because females, no longer healthfully employed, become pale and sickly, +spreading gloom and misery all around them, and transmitting the same +ills which themselves suffer to those who come after them.</p> + +<p>It is true, the guilt of this dereliction must not be charged wholly on +mothers; though they ought, unquestionably, to bear a large share of it. +Those who have, and ought to have, much influence in society, +erroneously, and I suppose thoughtlessly, help mothers along in their +evil ways. If there were a universal combination between certain classes +of mankind and the whole race of mothers, to ruin, rather than be +instrumental of reforming mankind, and of saving their deathless souls, +I hardly know how they could invent a much better, or at least a much +more certain plan, than that now in operation. So long as those who take +the lead in society, and govern the fashion in this matter, as others +govern it in the matter of dress, refuse, as a general rule, to form +alliances for life, except with those who practically despise house-hold +concerns—and so long as our houses are filled with domestics, whose +object is to aid these spoiled mothers, but whose real effect is to +complete their ruin, and accelerate the ruin of mankind—just so long +will human progress towards perfection be retarded.</p> + +<p>If mothers were in love with their occupations, and their daughters knew +it, then to the influence of a good example they could add many lessons +of instruction. These might be given in the way of natural, unstudied +conversation, and thus be not only heard with attention, but sink deep. +If the world is ever to be reformed, says Mr. Flint, in his Western +Review, woman, sensible, enlightened, well educated and principled, must +be the original mover in the great work. Every one who has considered +well the extent and nature of female influence, will concur in the +sentiment; and if he have one remaining particle of devotion to the +Father of spirits, he will send up the most fervent petitions to his +throne of mercy in behalf of this often depressed or enslaved half of +the human race, that they may speedily be emancipated, and become as +conspicuous in human redemption, as they have sometimes been in human +condemnation.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIX."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIX.</h2> + +<h3>EDUCATION OF THE SENSES.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Improving the senses. Examples of improvement. SEC. 1. Hearing—how +injured—how improved.—SEC. 2. Seeing—how injured.—SEC. 3. Tasting +and smelling—how benumbed—how preserved.—SEC. 4. Feeling. The blind. +Hints to parents. Education of both hands.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Man is much less useful and happy in this world than he would be, if +more pains were taken by parents and teachers, as well as by himself, to +cultivate his senses—hearing, seeing, feeling; tasting, and +smelling—and to preserve their rectitude.</p> + +<p>The extent to which the senses can be improved or exalted, can best be +understood by observing how perfect they become when we are compelled to +cultivate them. Thus the blind, who are obliged to cultivate hearing, +feeling, and smelling, often astonish us by the keenness of these +senses. They will distinguish sounds—especially voices—which others +cannot; and with so much accuracy, as to remember for several years the +voice of a person in a large company, which they hear but once. They +will also distinguish small pieces of money, different fabrics and +qualities of cloth, &c.; and, in walking, often ascertain, by the +feeling of the air, or by other sensations, when they approach a +building, or any other considerable body. So the North American Indian, +whose habits of life seem to require it, can hear the footsteps of an +approaching enemy at distances which astonish us. So also the deaf and +dumb are very keen-sighted, and generally make very accurate +observations. Any reader who is sceptical in regard to the cultivation +of the senses, would do well to consult the account of Julia Brace, the +deaf and dumb and blind girl, as published in some of the early volumes +of the "Annals of Education."</p> + +<p>But it is hardly necessary to resort to the blind, or to savages, or to +the deaf and dumb, in order to prove man's susceptibility in this +respect. We may be reminded of the same fact by observing with what +accuracy the merchant tailor can distinguish, by feeling, the quality of +his goods; how quick a painter, an engraver, or a printer, will discover +errors in painting or printing, which wholly escape ordinary readers or +observers; and how quick the ear of a good musician will discover the +existence and origin of a discordant sound in his choir.</p> + +<p>Now I do not undertake to say or prove, that mankind would be better or +happier for having their senses all cultivated in the highest possible +degree; though I am not sure that this would not be the case. But so +long as a large proportion of our ideas enter our minds through the +medium of the five senses, it is desirable that something should be done +to perfect them, instead of overlooking the whole subject. What mothers +ought to do in this matter, deserves, therefore, a brief consideration.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Hearing.</i></h4> + +<p>The suggestion, in another place, to keep away caps from the child's +head, if duly attended to, is one means of perfecting, or at least of +preserving, the sense of hearing. For caps, by the heat they produce to +a part which cannot safely endure an increase of temperature, greatly +expose children to catarrhal affections; and many a catarrh has laid the +foundation for dulness of hearing, if not of actual deafness.</p> + +<p>The ears should be kept clean. If washed sufficiently often, and +syringed once a week with warm milk and water, or with very weak +soap-suds, gently warmed, the cerumen or ear wax will hardly be found +accumulated in such masses as to produce deafness. And yet such +accumulations, with such consequences, are by no means uncommon. It is +not long since a young man with whom I am acquainted, applied to an +eminent surgeon of Boston, on account of deafness in one ear, which had +become quite troublesome, and as it was feared, incurable. Syringing +with a large and strong syringe disengaged a large mass of cerumen, and +hearing was immediately restored.</p> + +<p>Children should be taught to distinguish sounds with closed eyes, or +blindfolded. We may strike on various objects, and ask them to tell what +we struck, &c. This will lead them to <i>observe</i> sounds; and will perfect +their hearing in a remarkable degree.</p> + +<p>There are also advantages to be derived from accustoming a child to a +great variety of sounds; both as regards their strength and character. +But this must only be occasional; for if the ear be constantly +accustomed to sounds of any kind, and more especially those which are +harsh or loud, the organ of hearing is liable to sustain injury. Music, +as it is now beginning to be taught to children in our schools, will do +much, I think, to improve the faculty of hearing.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Seeing.</i></h4> + +<p>The sight, says Addison, is the most perfect of all our senses; and this +is unquestionably true. But it is more or less perfect, in different +individuals, according to the early education they have received. +Sometimes, it is true, we are born near-or dim-sighted; but such cases +are comparatively rare.</p> + +<p>The question is sometimes asked why there are so many persons, +now-a-days, who lose their sight, become near-sighted, &c. very young. +It may be difficult to answer this question fully; yet I cannot help +thinking that the following are some of the causes.</p> + +<p>1. The great heat of our apartments, which, together with late hours and +much lamp light, affects the eyes unpleasantly, is believed to be among +the more prominent causes of early decay of sight. Formerly, our +apartments were neither so steadily nor so generally heated; and we rose +earlier, and consequently went to bed earlier.</p> + +<p>2. The fine print of a large proportion of our books, especially our +school books, has done immense injury. I do not believe that reading +fine print, occasionally, for a few moments at a time, or reading by a +very strong or very weak light in the same way, does harm. On the +contrary, I think it may strengthen and improve the sight. It is the +long continuance of these things that does the mischief; and the +mischief thus done is immense. I rejoice that printers and publishers +are beginning of late to use much larger type than they have done for +some years past.</p> + +<p>3. The early use of spectacles does mischief—I mean before they are +needed. After they begin to be needed, there is no advantage in delaying +to use them, as some do, for fear they shall wear them too soon. This is +about as wise as the practice of going cold to harden ourselves.</p> + +<p>4. Reading when we are fatigued, or ill, or have a very full stomach, is +another way to injure the sight.</p> + +<p>5. Rubbing the eyes with the fingers, or with anything else, does +inevitable mischief. The Germans have a proverb which says—"Never touch +your eye, except with your elbow." There is much of good sense in it.</p> + +<p>In short, there are a thousand ways in which that delicate organ, the +human eye, may sustain injury; and nearly as many in which it may be +strengthened, cultivated, and improved. But my limits merely permit me +to add, that the frequent but gentle application of water to the eye, +several times a day, at such a temperature as is most agreeable—but +cold, when it can be borne—is one of the best preservatives of sight +which the world affords.</p> + +<p>Connected alike with physical and intellectual education, is the +practice of measuring by the eye heights, distances, superfices, +weights, and solids. It is not difficult to train the eye to an accuracy +in this matter which would astonish the uninstructed.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Tasting and Smelling.</i></h4> + +<p>I do not know that it is worth our while to take pains, by any direct +methods, to cultivate the organs of taste or smell; but I think it +proper, at the least, to preserve their original rectitude.</p> + +<p>Many, I know, undertake to say, that were it not for our errors in +regard to food and drink, and were it not, in particular, for the +multitude of strange mixtures which tend to benumb those two senses, we +might determine the qualities of food and drink—whether they are +favorable or adverse—by means of taste and smell, like the animals. But +I do not believe this. The Creator has substituted reason, in us, for +instinct in the brute animals. It is not necessary that we should +possess the latter, when the former is so manifestly superior to it; and +accordingly I do not believe that it is given us, or any of that +acuteness of sensation which exists in the dog, the tiger, the vulture, +&c.—and which so closely resembles it.</p> + +<p>There can be no doubt—no reasonable doubt, certainly—that the wretched +customs of modern cookery benumb the senses of taste and smell, more or +less, and that high-seasoned food, condiments, and stimulating drinks do +the same; and should for this reason, were it for no other, be +studiously avoided.</p> + +<p>Closely connected with the organ of taste are the TEETH. A volume might +profitably be written on these—as on the eye. But I will only say that +they should be kept perfectly clean, either by rinsing or brushing, or +both, especially after eating; that they should be permitted to chew all +our food, instead of merely standing by as silent spectators to the +passage of that which is mashed, soaked, chopped, &c.; that they should +not be picked or cleaned with pins, or other equally hard instruments; +that they should not be used to crack nuts or other hard, indigestible +substances; and that the stomach, with which they are apt to sympathize +very strongly, should also be kept in a good and healthy condition.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Feeling.</i></h4> + +<p>Corpulence and slovenliness are generally among the more prolific +sources of a want of acuteness in feeling. The first is a disease, and +may be avoided by a proper diet, and by active mental and bodily +employment. Slovenliness we may of course avoid, whenever there is a +wish to do so, and an abundance of water.</p> + +<p>But the sense of feeling, or especially that accumulation of it which we +call TOUCH, and which seems to be specially located in the balls of the +fingers and on the palm of the hand, is susceptible of a degree of +improvement far beyond what would be the natural result of cleanliness, +and freedom from plethora or corpulence.</p> + +<p>I have already alluded, in my general remarks at the head of this +chapter, to the acuteness of this sense in the blind, as well as in the +dealer in cloths. I might add many more illustrations, but a single one, +in relation to the blind, which was accidentally omitted in that place, +will be sufficient.</p> + +<p>The blind at the Institution in this city, as well as in other similar +institutions, are now taught to read and write with considerable +facility. But how? Most of my readers may have heard how they read, but +I will describe the process as well as I can. A description of their +method of writing is more difficult.</p> + +<p>The letters are formed by pressing the paper, while quite moist, upon +rather large type, which raises a ridge in the line of every letter, and +which remains prominent after the paper is dry. In order to read, the +pupil has to feel out these ridges. A circular ridge on the paper he is +told is O; a perpendicular one, I; a crooked one, S; &c. They read music +and arithmetic printed in a similar manner. A few months of practice, in +this way, will enable an ingenious youth to read with considerable ease +and despatch.</p> + +<p>Now if nothing is wanting but a little training to render the touch so +accurate, would it not be useful to train every child to judge +frequently of the properties of bodies by this sense? And cannot every +one recall to his mind a thousand situations in which a greater accuracy +of this sense would have saved him much inconvenience, as well as +afforded him no little pleasure?</p> + +<p>I shall conclude this section with a few remarks on the HAND. The custom +of neglecting, or almost neglecting the left hand, though nearly +universal, in this country at least, appears to me to be +wrong—decidedly so. For although more blood may be sent to the right +arm than to the left, as physiologists say, yet the difference is not as +great at birth as it is afterward; so that education either weakens the +one or strengthens the other.</p> + +<p>Besides this, we occasionally find a person who is left-handed, as it is +called; that is, his left hand and arm are as much larger and stronger +than the right, as the right is usually stronger than the left. How is +this? Do we find a corresponding change in the internal structure? But +suppose it could be ascertained that such a change did exist, which I +believe has never been done, the question would still arise whether the +difference was the same at birth, or whether the more frequent use of +the left hand has not, in part, produced it.</p> + +<p>I do not mean, here, to intimate that a more frequent use of the left +hand than the right would make new blood-vessels grow where there were +none before. But it would certainly do one thing; it would make the same +vessels carry more blood than they did before, which is, in effect, +nearly the same thing:—for the more blood in the limb, as a general +rule, the more strength—provided the limb is in due health and +exercise.</p> + +<p>The inference which I wish the reader to make from all this is, that +since the left hand and arm, by due cultivation, and without essential +difference or change of structure to begin with, can occasionally be +made stronger than the right, it is fair to conclude that it may, if +found desirable, be always rendered more nearly equal to it than, in +adult years, we usually find it.</p> + +<p>The question is now fairly before us—Is such a result desirable? I +maintain that it is; and shall endeavor to show my reasons.</p> + +<p>How often is one hand injured by an accident, or rendered nearly useless +by disease? But if it should be the right, how helpless it makes us! The +man who is accustomed to shave himself, must now resort to a barber. If +he is a barber himself, or almost any other mechanic, his business must +be discontinued. Or if he is a clerk, he cannot use his left hand, and +must consequently lose his time. Or if amputation chances to be +performed on a favorite arm, how entirely useless to society we are, +till we have learned to use the other! It not only takes up a great deal +of valuable time to acquire a facility of using it, but if we are +already arrived at maturity, we can never use it so well as the other, +during our whole lives; because it is too late in life to increase its +size and strength much by constant exercise. Whereas in youth, it might +have been done easily.</p> + +<p>Is it not then important—for these and many more reasons—to teach a +child to use with nearly equal readiness, both of his hands? But if so, +who can do it better than the mother? And when can it be better done +than in the earliest infancy? When is the time which would be devoted to +it worth less than at this period?</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XX."></a><h2>CHAPTER XX.</h2> + +<h3>ABUSES.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school—at church—at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>It is difficult to determine, in regard to many things which concern the +management of the young, whether they belong most properly to moral or +physical education; so close is the connection between the two, and so +decidedly does everything, or nearly everything which relates to the +management of the body, have a bearing upon the formation of moral +character. This work might be extended very much farther, did it comport +with my original plan. But I hasten to close the volume, with a few +thoughts on certain abuses of the body, which prevail to a greater or +less extent in families and schools; and to which I have not adverted +elsewhere.</p> + +<p>The seats of children are usually bad, both at table and elsewhere. It +seems not enough that we condemn them to the use of knives, forks, +spoons, &c., of the same size with those of adults. We go farther; and +give them chairs of the same height and proportion with our own. There +are a few exceptions to the truth of this remark. Here and there we see +a child's chair, it is true—but not often.</p> + +<p>But how unreasonable is it to seat a child in a chair so high that his +feet cannot reach the floor; and so constructed that there is no outer +place on which the feet can rest. What adult would be willing to sit in +so painful a posture, with his legs dangling? No wonder children dislike +to sit much, in such circumstances. And it is a great blessing to both +parent and child that they do. No wonder children hate the Sabbath, +especially in those families where they are compelled to keep the day +holy by sitting motionless! Sabbath schools, though they bring with them +some evil along with a great deal of good, are a relief to the young in +this particular—especially if their seats are more comfortable +elsewhere than at home. They consider it much more tolerable to spend +the morning and intermission of the day in going and returning from +Sabbath school, than in constant and close confinement. They prefer +variety, and the occasional light and air of heaven, to monotony and +seclusion and silence.</p> + +<p>It happens, however, that the seats at the Sabbath school and at church, +are not always what they should be; nor, so far as church is concerned, +do I see that this evil can be wholly avoided. Children usually sit with +their parents, in the sanctuary—and they ought to do so: and the height +of the seats cannot, of course, accommodate both. If there is a building +erected solely for the use of the Sabbath school, the seats may be +constructed accordingly, without seriously incommoding anybody; but in +the church, I do not see, as I have once before observed, how the evil +can be remedied.</p> + +<p>The greatest trouble in regard to seats, however, is at the day school; +especially in our district or common schools. There, it is usual for +children to be confined six hours a day—and sometimes two in +succession—to hard, narrow, plank seats, a large proportion of which +are without backs, and raised so high that the feet of most of the +pupils cannot possibly touch the floor. There, "suspended," as I have +said in another work, [Footnote: See a "Prize Essay," on School Houses, +page 7.] "between the heavens and the earth, they are compelled to +remain motionless for an hour or an hour and a half together."</p> + +<p>I have also shown, in the same essay, that in regard to the desks, and +indeed many other things which pertain to, or are connected with the +school, very little pains is taken to provide for the physical welfare +or even comfort of the pupils; and that a thorough reform on the subject +appears to be indispensable.</p> + +<p>When I speak of hard plank seats, let me not be understood as hinting at +the necessity of cushions. When I wrote the essay above mentioned, I did +indeed believe that they were desirable. But I am now opposed to their +use, either by children or adults, even where a laborious employment +would seem to demand a long confinement to this awkward and unnatural +position. If our seats are cushioned, we shall sit too easily. I believe +that our health requires a hard seat; because its very hardness inclines +us to change, frequently, our position.</p> + +<p>But if we must sit, be it ever so short a time, our seats should always +have backs; and those which are designed for children, should not be so +high as to render them uncomfortable. Nor should the backs of seats be +so high as they usually are, either for children or adults. They should +never come much higher than the middle of the body. If they reach the +shoulders, they either favor a crouching forward, or interfere with the +free action of the lungs.</p> + +<p>This might be deemed a proper place for saying something on the position +of children in manufactories. But here a world of abuse opens upon my +view, the full development of which demands a large volume. How many +crooked spines, emaciated bodies, decaying lungs, as well as scrofulas, +fevers, and consumptions, are either induced or accelerated by these +unnatural employments! I mean they are unnatural for the <i>young</i>. As to +employing adults in them, I have nothing at present to say. But when I +think of the cruel custom of placing children in these places, whose +bodies—and were this the place, I might add, <i>minds</i>—are immature, and +especially girls, I am compelled, by the voice of conscience, and, as I +trust, by a regard to those laws which God has established in our +physical frames, but which are yet so strangely violated, to protest +against it. Better that no factories should exist, than that children +should be ruined in them as they now are. Better by far that we should +return, were it possible, to the primitive habits of New England—to +those by-gone days when mothers and daughters made the wearing apparel +of themselves and their families—when, if there was less of +intellectual cultivation, and less money expended for luxuries and +extravagances, there was much more of health and happiness.</p> + +<p>There is one more species of abuse to which, in closing, I wish to +direct maternal attention. I allude to injudicious modes of inflicting +corporal punishment.</p> + +<p>Let me not be understood to appear, in this place, as the advocate of +bodily punishments of any kind; for if they are even admissible under +some circumstances, I am fully convinced that in the way in which they +are commonly administered, they do much more harm than good.</p> + +<p>But leaving the question of their utility, in the abstract, wholly +untouched, and taking it for granted, for the present, that they are—as +is undoubtedly the fact—sometimes employed, and will continue to be so +for a great while to come, I proceed to speak of their more flagrant +abuses.</p> + +<p>Among these, none are more reprehensible than blows of any kind on the +head. Even the rod is objectionable for this purpose, since it exposes +the eyes. But the hand—in boxing the ears or striking in any way—is +more so. The bones of the head, in young children, are not yet firmly +knit together, and these concussions may injure the tender brain. I +know of whole families, whose mental faculties are dull, as the +consequence—I believe—of a perpetual boxing and striking of the head. +Some individuals are made almost idiots, in this very manner.—But the +worst is not yet told. Many teachers are in the habit of striking their +pupils' heads with thick heavy books; and with wooden rules. I have seen +one of the latter, of considerable size and thickness, broken in two +across the head of a very small boy; and this, too—such is the public +mind—in the presence of a mother who was paying a visit to the school. +I have seen parents and masters strike the heads of their children with +pieces of wood, of much larger size;—in one instance with a common +sized tailor's press-board; in another with the heavy end of a wooden +whip-handle, about an inch in diameter.</p> + +<p>Children are sometimes severely beaten across the middle of the +body—the region where lie the vital organs—the lungs, the heart, the +liver, &c. They are sometimes beaten too, across the joints, or in any +place that the excited, perhaps passionate teacher or parent can reach. +Rules and books are thrown with violence at pupils in school. There is a +story in the "Annals of Education," Vol. IV. at page 28, of a teacher +who threw a rule at a little boy, six years old, which struck him with +great force, within an inch of one of his eyes. Had it struck a little +nearer to his nose, it would, in all probability, have destroyed his +left eye.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>But without extending these remarks any farther, every intelligent +mother who reads what I have already written, will see, as I trust, the +necessity of properly informing herself on the great subject of physical +education; and of being better prepared than she has hitherto been for +acquitting herself, with satisfaction, of those high and sacred +responsibilities which, in the wise arrangements of Nature and +Providence, devolve upon her.</p> +<br> + +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 10482 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..505fb8e --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #10482 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10482) diff --git a/old/10482-8.txt b/old/10482-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..01634fe --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8028 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Young Mother + Management of Children in Regard to Health + +Author: William A. Alcott + +Release Date: December 17, 2003 [EBook #10482] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + + + + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + + + + +THE YOUNG MOTHER, OR + +MANAGEMENT OF CHILDREN IN REGARD TO HEALTH. + +BY WM. A. ALCOTT + + +1836 + + + +ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. + +The present edition has been much enlarged. The author has added a +section on the conduct and management of the mother herself, besides +several other important amendments and additions. The whole has also +been carefully revised, and we cannot but indulge the hope that no +popular work of the kind will be found more perfect, or more worthy of +the public confidence. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + +CHAPTER I. THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +CHAPTER II. TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +CHAPTER III. VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air arising from lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +CHAPTER IV. THE CHILD'S DRESS. + +General principles--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us from cold; 3. from +injury. + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon's remarks. Transforming children into mummies. Use of a belly-band. +Evils produced by having it too tight. Cripples sometimes made. Absurdity +of confining the arms. Infants should be made happy. + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +Curious suggestion of a London writer. Advantages of his plan. Killing +with kindness. Dr. Buchan's opinion. Conformity to fashion. Tight-lacing +the chest. Its effects--dangerous. Physiology of the chest. Its motions. +An attempt to make the subject intelligible. Serious mistakes of some +writers. Appeal to facts. Color of females. Their breathing. Their +diseases. Customs of Tunis. Our own customs little less ridiculous. + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +Flannel in cold weather. Its use--1. As a kind +of flesh brush; 2. As a protection against taking cold; 3. As means of +equalizing the temperature. Clothing should be kept clean--often +changed--color--lightness--softness. Cotton apt to take fire. Silk +expensive. Linen not warm enough. Flannel under-clothes. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The power of habit, in this respect. Opinion that no clothing is +necessary. Anecdote of Alexander and the Scythian. Argument from +analogy. Begin right, in early life. We generally use too much +clothing. Should clothing be often varied?--objections to it. Avoid +dampness. + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +How caps produce disease. Nature's head-dress. Miserable apology for +caps. What diseases are avoided by going with the head bare. Judicious +remarks of a foreign writer. Covering the "open of the head." Wetting +the head with spirits. + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +Hats usually too warm. No covering needed in the house; and but little +in the sun or rain. Is it dangerous to go with the head always bare? + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The feet should be well covered. Why. Rule of medical men. No garters. +Objections to covering the feet considered. Shoes useful. Not too thick. +Thick soles. Mr. Locke's opinion. + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +These ought not to be used. Why. Substitutes. Practice of Dr. Dewees. +Needles--their danger. Shocking anecdote. + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +Changing wet clothing. Monstrous error--its evils. Clean as well as dry. +A lame excuse for negligence. No excuse sufficient but poverty. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Every restraint of body or limb injurious. Tight jackets. Stiff stocks +and thick cravats. Boots. Evils of having them too tight. A painful +sight. + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +Clothing should be loose for girls or boys. Girls to be kept warmer than +boys. Few girls comfortable, at home or abroad. Going out of warm rooms +into the night air. How it promotes disease. + + +CHAPTER V. CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +CHAPTER VI. BATHING. + +Practice of savage nations. Rather dangerous. Mistake of Rousseau. +Plunging into cold water at birth may produce immediate death. Hundreds +injured where one is benefited. Spirits added to the water. First +washings of the child--should be thorough. Rules in regard to the +temperature of both the water and the air. Washing an introduction to +bathing. Hour for bathing changes with age. Temperature of the water. +Size of a bathing vessel. Unreasonable fears of the warm bath. How they +arose. A list of common whims. Apology for opposing cold baths. Dr +Dewees' eight objections to them. Does cold water harden? Cold bath +sometimes useful under the care of a skilful physician. Its danger in other +cases. Rules for using the cold bath, if used at all. Securing a glow after +it. General management. Proper hour. Coming out of the bath. Dressing. +Singing. Bathing after a meal. Local bathing. Tea-spoonful of water in the +mouth. Its use. The shower bath. Vapor bath. Medicated bath. Sponging. +Conveniences for bathing indispensable to every family. General neglect +of bathing. Attention of the Romans to this subject. We treat domestic +animals better than children. + + +CHAPTER VII. FOOD. + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk the only appropriate food of infants. Unreasonableness +of some mothers. The tendency to ape foreign fashions. Nursing does not +weaken the mother. + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Much depends on the mother. Opinions of medical societies. Mothers +sometimes make children drunkards. The general fondness for excitements. +Hints to those whom it concerns. Caution to mothers. Opinions of Dr. +Dewees. Slavery of mothers to strong drink and exciting food. Opinions +of the Charleston Board of Health. + +SEC. 3. _Nursing, how often._ + +Children should never be nursed to quiet them. Stomach must have time +for rest. Regular seasons for nursing. Once in three hours. Difference +of constitution. Indulgence does not strengthen. Feeble children require +the strictest management. Nothing should be given between meals. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +Errors. Repetition of aliment. Variety. Children over-fed. Appetite not +a safe guide. Training to gluttony. Illustrations of the principle. +Mankind eat twice as much as is necessary. + +SEC. 5. _How long should Milk be the only Food?_ + +First change in diet. Objections of mothers. Choice bits. Ignorance of +the nature of digestion. What digestion is. Food which the author of +nature assigned. + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +When feeding before teething is necessary. Diet of mothers. Substitute +for the mother's milk. How prepared. Variety not necessary to the +infant. Milk best from the same cow. Vessels in which it is used should +be clean. Sweet milk not heated too much. Not frozen. Disgusting +practices. Pure water. If not pure, boil it. Best of sugar. Is sugar +injurious? When the state of the mother's health forbids nursing. Use of +sucking-bottles. Feeding should in all cases be slow. Jolting children +after eating. Tossing. Sucking-bottle as a plaything. Evils of using it +as such. Dirty vessels. Poisonous ones. Character of nurses. Nursing at +both breasts. Age of the nurse. Parents should have the oversight, even +of a nurse. + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +Proper age for weaning. Cullen's opinion. Proper season of the year. +When the teeth have fairly protruded. First food given. New forms of +food. Animal broth. + +SEC. 8. _During the Process of Weaning._ + +The spring the best time for weaning. Should not be too sudden. The +process--how managed. Exciting an aversion to the breast. What solid +food should first be given. Buchan's opinion. Health of the mother. She +should--if possible--avoid medicine. + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +Views of Dr. Cadogan. Half the children that come into the world go out +of it before they are good for anything. Why? Owing chiefly to errors in +nursing, feeding, and clothing. Simplicity of children's food. Picture +of a modern table. Every dish tortured till it is spoiled. Plain, simple +food, generally despised. How bread is now regarded. How it ought to be. +Mr. Locke's opinion in favor of bread for young children, and against +the use of animal food. Does not differ materially from that of most +medical writers. Vegetable food generally preferred to animal. What is +true of youth, in this respect, is true of every age, with slight +exceptions. Who require most food. Mere bread and water not best. Bread +the staple article of diet. Best kind of bread. Objections to it. How +groundless they are. Fondness, for hot, new bread not natural. Fondness +of change. What it indicates. How it is caused. Train up a child in the +way he should go. We can like what food we please. Second best kind of +bread. Other kinds. Plain puddings. Indian cakes. Salt may be used, in +moderate quantity, but no other condiments. Of butter, cheese, milk, &c. +Potatoes, turnips, onions, beets, and other roots. Beans, peas, and +asparagus. No fat or gravies should be used. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +Diversity of opinion. The cholera. Fruits useful. Seven plain rules in +regard to them. Other rules. A mistake corrected. Fruit before +breakfast. Four arguments in its favor. Particular fruits. Apples. Why +fruits brought to market are generally unfit to be eaten. Are good, ripe +fruits difficult of digestion? Cooking the apple? A man who lives +entirely on apples. Cutting down orchards. Pears, peaches, melons, +grapes. Mixing improper substances with summer fruits. + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +Confectionary sometimes poisonous. Case in New York. All, or nearly +all confectionaries injurious. Physical evils attending their use. +Intellectual evils. Moral evils. The last most to be dreaded. Slaves +to confectionary are on the road to gluttony, drunkenness, or +debauchery--perhaps all three. + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris's opinion of pastry. Various forms of it. Hot flour bread a +species of it. Produces, among other evils, eruptions on the face. +Appeal to mothers. + +SEC. 13. _Crude, or Raw Substances._ + +Salads, herbs, &c.--raw--cooked. Nuts, spices, mustard, horseradish, +onions, cucumbers, pickles, &c. None of these should be used, except as +medicine. + + +CHAPTER VIII. DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk +and water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad +food and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischiefs they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +CHAPTER IX. GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +CHAPTER X. EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +Objections to the use of cradles. Under what circumstances they are +least objectionable. + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +Carrying in the arms a suitable exercise for the first two months of +life. Danger of too early sitting up. Improper position in the arms. +Mothers must see to this themselves. Motion in the arms should be +gentle. No tossing, running, or jumping. Infants should not always be +carried on the same arm. + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +Creeping useful to health. Why. Go-carts and leading strings prohibited. +The longer children creep, the better. Their progress in learning to +stand. Let it be slow and natural. Let it be, as much as possible, by +their own voluntary efforts. + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +Walking in the nursery. Walking abroad. Hoisting children into carriages. +Walks should not become fatiguing. + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +Carriages useful before children can walk. Their construction. Should be +drawn steadily. Position of the child in them: Falling asleep. How long +this exercise should be continued. + +SEC. 6 _Riding on Horseback._ + +Never safe for infants. Riding schools. Objections to riding on +horseback, while very young. Tends to cruelty and tyranny. + + +CHAPTER XI. AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +CHAPTER XII. CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +CHAPTER XIII. LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +CHAPTER XIV. SLEEP. + +General remarks. A prevalent mistake. A hint to fathers. Few Catos. +Everything left to mothers. + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Night the season of repose, generally. Infants require all hours. +Sleeping in dark rooms. Excess of caution. Habit of sleeping amid noise. + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +Where the infant should sleep. Why alone. Poisoning by impure air. +Illustration. Proofs. Friedlander. Dr. Dewees. Destruction of children +by mothers. Anecdote. Moral reasons for having children sleep alone. +Sleeping with the aged. Sleeping with cats and dogs. + +SEC. 3 _Purity of the Air._ + +Nurseries. Windows open during the night. Lowering them from the top. +Habit of Dr. Gregory. Going abroad in the open air. + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +No feathers should be used. They are too warm. Their effluvia +oppressive. Other objections to their use. Mattresses. Air beds. Beds of +cut straw. Soft beds. Testimony of physicians. The pillow. Dampness. +Curtains. Warming the bed. Beds recently occupied by the sick. + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +Light covering. Mistakes of some mothers. Covering the head with bed +clothes. + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +As little dress during sleep as possible. No caps. No stockings. Loose +night shirt. No tight articles of nightdress. Frequent exchanging of +clothes. + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +Sleeping on the back--on the sides. Position of the head. The infant's +bedstead. Sir Charles Bell. Darkening the room. + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +Mental quiet favorable to sleep. Crying to sleep. A good father. All +anxiety should be avoided. + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +Soundness of our sleep. Nightmare. How produced. Late reading. Late +suppers. Influence of religion on sleep. Different opinions about sleep. +Truth midway between extremes. Effect of silence and darkness on our +sleep. Of sleep before midnight. Light unfavorable to sleep. + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +Infants need to sleep nearly the whole time. Number of hours required +for sleep. Opinions of eminent men. The author's own opinion. Statements +of Macnish. Estimates on the loss of time by over-sleeping. Hint to +young mothers. + + +CHAPTER XV. EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. Burning them up. "Lecturing" them. What is an early +hour? + + +CHAPTER XVI. HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +CHAPTER XVII. SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society. Early diffidence. +Selecting companions. Moral effects of society on the young. Parents +should play with their children. + + +CHAPTER XVIII. EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Disliking domestic employments. Miserable housewives--not +to be wondered at. Mistake of one class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +CHAPTER XIX. EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Extent to which the senses can be improved. Case of the blind. The +Indians. Julia Brace. Tailors, painters, &c. + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +Injury done by caps. Syringing the ears. Anecdote of deafness from +neglect. Means of improving the hearing. + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +Importance of seeing. Near-sighted people--why so common. Heat of our +rooms. Very fine print. Spectacles. Reading when tired. Rubbing the +eyes. Cold water to the eyes. + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +Benumbing the senses. How this has often been done. The teeth. How to +preserve them. + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness. Sense of touch. The blind--how taught to +read. Hint to parents. The hand. Neglecting the left hand. Physiology of +the hand and arm. Evils of being able to use but one hand. Both should +be educated. + + +CHAPTER XX. ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + + * * * * * + + +PREFACE. + +There is a prejudice abroad, to some extent, against agitating the +questions--"What shall we eat? What shall we drink? and Wherewithal +shall we be clothed?"--not so much because the Scriptures have charged +us not to be over "anxious" on the subject, as because those who pay the +least attention to what they eat and drink, are supposed to be, after +all, the most healthy. + +It is not difficult to ascertain how this opinion originated. There are +a few individuals who are perpetually thinking and talking on this +subject, and who would fain comply with appropriate rules, if they knew +what they were, and if a certain definite course, pursued a few days +only, would change their whole condition, and completely restore a +shattered or ruined constitution. But their ignorance of the laws which +govern the human frame, both in sickness and in health, and their +indisposition to pursue any proposed plan for their improvement long +enough to receive much permanent benefit from it, keep them, +notwithstanding all they say or do, always deteriorating. + +Then, on the other hand, there are a few who, in consequence of +possessing by nature very strong constitutions, and laboring at some +active and peculiarly healthy employment, are able for a few, and +perhaps even for many years, to set all the rules of health at defiance. + +Now, strange as it may seem, these cases, though they are only +exceptions (and those more apparent than real) to the general rule, are +always dwelt upon, by those who are determined to live as they please, +and to put no restraint either upon themselves or their appetites. For +nothing can be plainer--so it seems to me--than that, taking mankind by +families, or what is still better, by larger portions, they are most +free from pain and disease, as well as most healthy and happy, who pay +the most attention to the laws of human health, that is, those laws or +rules by whose observance alone, that health can be certainly and +permanently secured. + +But these families and communities are most healthy and happy, not +because they live in a proper manner, by fits and starts, but because +they have, from some cause or other, adopted and persevered in HABITS +which, compared with the habits of other families, or other communities, +are preferable; that is, more in obedience to the laws which govern the +human constitution. Not that even _they_ are "without sin" or error on +this subject--gross error too--but because their errors are fewer or +less destructive than those of their neighbors. + +Now is it possible that any intelligent father or mother of a family, +whose diet, clothing, exercise, &c. are thus comparatively well +regulated, would derive no benefit from the perusal of works which treat +candidly, rationally, and dispassionately, on these points? Is there a +mother in the community who is so destitute of reason and common sense +as not to desire the light of a broader experience in regard to the +tendency of things than she has had, or possibly can have, in her own +family? Is there one who will not be aided by understanding not only +that a certain thing or course is better than another, but also WHY it +is so? + +It is by no means the object of this little work to set people to +watching their stomachs from meal to meal, in regard to the effects of +food, drink, &c.; for nothing in the world is better calculated to make +dyspeptics than this. It is true, indeed, that some things may be +obviously and greatly injurious, taken only once; and when they are so, +they should be avoided. But in general, it is the effect of a habitual +use of certain things for a long time together--and the longer the +experiment the better--which we are to observe. + +A book to guide mothers in the formation of early good habits in their +offspring, should be the result of long observation and much experiment +on these points, but more especially of a thorough understanding of +human physiology. It should not consist so much of the conceits of a +single brain--perhaps half turned--as of the logical deductions of +severe science, and facts gleaned from the world's history. + +Here is a nation, or tribe of men, bringing up children to certain +habits, from generation to generation--and such and such is their +character. Here, again, is another large portion of our race, who, under +similar circumstances of climate, &c. &c., have, for several hundred +years, educated their children very differently, and with different +results. A comparison of things on a large scale, together with a close +attention to the constitution and relations of the human system, affords +ground for drawing conclusions which are or may be useful. If this book +shall not afford light derived from such sources, it were far better +that it had never been written. If it only sets people to watching over +the effects of things taken or used only for a single day, instead of +leading them from early infancy to form in their children such habits as +will preclude, in a great measure, the necessity of watching ourselves +daily, then let the day perish from the memory of the writer, in which +the plan of bringing it forth to the world was conceived. But he is +confident of better things. He does not believe that a work which, to +such an extent, GIVES THE REASON WHY, will be productive of more evil +than good. On the contrary, it must, if read, have the opposite effect. + +I do not deny that even after the formation of the best habits, there +will be a necessity of paying some attention to what we eat and what we +drink, from day to day, and from hour to hour; but only that the +tendency of this work is not to increase this necessity, but on the +contrary, to diminish it. In my own view; these occasions of inquiry in +regard to what is right, _physically_ as well as _morally_, are one part +of our trials in this world--one means of forming our characters. We are +constantly tempted to excess and to error, in spite of the most firm +habits of self-denial which can be formed. If we resist temptation, our +characters are improved. And it is by self-denial and self-government in +these smaller matters, that we are to hope for nearly all the progress +we can ever make in the great work of self-education. Great trials of +character come but seldom; and when they come, we are often armed +against them; but these little trials and temptations, coming upon us +every hour--these it is, after all, that give shape to our characters, +and make us constantly growing either better or worse, both in the sight +of God and man. But, as I have repeatedly said, the object of this work +is to diminish rather than to increase the frequency of these trials, +useful though they may be, if duly improved, in the formation of +virtuous, and even of holy character. + +There is a sense in which every infant may be said to be born healthy, +so that we may not only adopt the language of the poet, Bowring, and +say + + --"a child is born; + Take it, and make it a bud of _moral_ beauty," + +but we may also add--Take it and make it beautiful _physically_. For +though a hereditary predisposition undoubtedly renders some individuals +more susceptible than others to particular diseases, yet when the bodily +organization of an infant is complete, and the degree of vitality which +nature gives it is sufficient to propel the machinery of the frame, it +can scarcely be regarded as in any other state than that of health. + +Now if it be the intention of divine Providence (and who will doubt that +it is?) that the animal body should be capable of resisting with +impunity the impressions of heat, cold, light, air, and the various +external influences to which, at birth, it is subjected, it may be +properly asked why this primitive state of health cannot be maintained, +and diseases, and medicines, and even PREVENTIVES wholly avoided. + +But the reason is obvious. Civilized society has placed the human race +in artificial circumstances. Instead of listening to the dictates of +reason, making ourselves acquainted with the nature of the human +constitution, and studying to preserve it in health and vigor, we yield +to the government of ignorance and presumption. The first moment, even, +in which we draw breath, sees us placed under the control of individuals +who are totally inadequate to the important charge of preserving the +infant constitution in its original state, and aiding its progress to +maturity. And thus it is that though infants, as a general rule, may be +said to be born healthy, few actually remain so. Seldom, indeed, do we +find a person who has arrived at maturity wholly free from disease, even +in those parts of our country which are reckoned to have the most +healthy climate. + +It is indeed commonly said, that a large proportion, both of children +and adults, among the agricultural portion of our population, are +healthy. But it is not so. There is room for doubt whether, on the +whole, the farmers of this country are healthier than the mechanics, or +much more so than the manufacturers; or the whole mass of the country +population healthier than that of the crowded city. The causes of +disease are sufficiently numerous, in all places and conditions; and +this will continue to be the fact, not merely until parents and teachers +shall become more enlightened, but until many generations have been +trained under their enlightened influence. + +If the children and adults among our agricultural population derive from +their employments in the open air a more ruddy appearance than those +either of the city or country who are confined more to their rooms; or +to a vitiated atmosphere, and to numerous other sources of disease, and +if they _appear_ more favored with health, I have learned, by accurate +observation, that these appearances are somewhat deceptive. Their active +sports and employments in the open air give them a stronger appetite +than any other class of people; and the indulgence of this appetite, not +only with articles which are heating or indigestible in their nature, +but with an unreasonable quantity even of those which are considered +highly proper, is almost in an exact proportion. And it is hence +scarcely possible for the causes of disease and premature death to be +more operative in factories and in cities than in farm houses and the +country. Indeed it may be questioned whether the abuses of the ANIMAL +part of man--more common in some of their forms in country than in +city--though they may be less conspicuous, are not more certainly and +even more immediately destructive than those abuses which, in city life, +and bustle, and competition, affect more the MORAL nature. + +Be that as it may, however--for this is not the place for the grave +discussion of so broad a question--one thing, to my mind, is perfectly +clear, namely, that until physical education shall receive more +attention from all those who hold the sacred office of instructors of +the young, humanity can neither be much elevated nor improved. Mothers +and schoolmasters especially--they who, as Dr. Rush says, plant the +seeds of nearly all the good or evil in the world--must understand, most +deeply and thoroughly, the laws which regulate the various provinces of +the little world in which the soul resides, and which, like so many +states of a great confederacy, have not only their separate interests +and rights, but certain common and general ones; as well as those laws +by which the human constitution is related to and connected with the +objects which everywhere surround, and influence, and limit, and extend +it. + +This book contains little, if anything, new to those who are already +familiar with anatomy and physiology. Indeed, whatever may be its +claims, its merits or its demerits, it disclaims novelty. It is, indeed, +in one point of view, _original_;--I mean in its form, manner, and +arrangement. What I have written is chiefly from my own resources--the +results of patient study and observation, and careful reflection; but +that study and observation of human nature, and this reflection, have +been greatly aided by reading the writings of others. + +In the prosecution of the task which I had assigned myself, no work has +been of more service to me than an octavo volume of 548 pages, by Dr. +Wm. P. Dewees, of Philadelphia, entitled, "A Treatise on the Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children." It is one of the most valuable works +on Physical Education in the English language, as is evident from the +fact that notwithstanding its expense--three or four dollars--it has, in +nine years, gone through five editions. If it were written in such a +style, and published at such a price as would bring it within reach of +the minds and purses of the mass of the community, its sale would have +been, I think, much greater still; and the good which it has +accomplished would have been increased ten-fold. + +If the "YOUNG MOTHER" should be favorably received by the American +community, and prove extensively useful, it will undoubtedly be owing to +the fact that it presents so large a collection of facts and principles +on the great subject of physical education, in a manner so practical, +and at a price which is very low. To accomplish an object so desirable +is by no means an easy task. It was once said by the author of a huge +volume, that he wrote so large a work because he had not time to prepare +a smaller one. And however unaccountable it may be to those who have not +made the trial, it may be safely asserted, that to present, within +limits so small, anything like a system of Physical Education for the +guidance of young mothers, requires much more time, and labor, and +patience, than to prepare a work on the same subject twice as large. + +Nor is it to be expected, after all, that the work is, in all respects, +perfect. I have indeed done what I could to render it so; but am +conscious that future inquiries may lead to the discovery of errors. +Should such discoveries be made, they will be cheerfully acknowledged +and corrected; truth being, as it should be, the leading object. + + + * * * * * + + +THE YOUNG MOTHER. + + + +CHAPTER I. + +THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +It is far from being in the power of every young mother to procure a +suitable room for a nursery. In the present state of society, the +majority must be contented with such places as they can get. Still there +are various reasons for saying what a nursery should be. 1. It may be of +service to those who _have_ the power of selection. 2. Information +cannot injure those who _have not_. 3. It may lead those who have wealth +to extend the hand of charity in this important direction; for there +are not a few who have little sympathy with the wants and distresses of +the adult poor, who will yet open their hearts and unfold their hands +for the relief of suffering _infancy_. + +Among those who have what is called a nursery, few select for this +purpose the most appropriate part of the building. It is not +unfrequently the one that can best be spared, is most retired, or most +convenient. Whether it is most favorable to the health and happiness of +its occupants, is usually at best a secondary consideration. + +But this ought not so to be. A nursery should never, for example, be on +a ground floor, or in a shaded situation, or in any circumstances which +expose it to dampness, or hinder the occasional approach of the light of +the sun. It should be spacious, with dry walls, high ceiling, and tight +windows. The latter should always be so constructed that the upper sash +can be lowered when we wish to admit or exclude air. It should have a +chimney, if possible; but if not, there should be suitable holes in the +ceiling, for the purposes of ventilation. + +The windows should have shutters, so that the room, when necessary, can +be darkened--and green curtains. Some writers say that the windows +should have cross bars before them; but if they do not descend within +three feet of the floor, such an arrangement can hardly be required. + +It is highly desirable that every nursery should consist of two rooms, +opening into each other; or what is still better, of one large room, +with a sliding or swinging partition in the middle. The use of this is, +that the mother and child may retire to one, while the other is being +swept or ventilated. They would thus avoid damp air, currents, and dust. +Such an arrangement would also give the occupants a room, fresh, clean +and sweet, in the morning, (which is a very great advantage,) after +having rendered the air of the other foul by sleeping in it. + +In winter, and while there is an infant in the nursery, just beginning +to walk, it is recommended by many to cover the floor with a carpet. The +only advantage which they mention is, that it secures the child from +injury if it falls. But I have seldom seen lasting injury inflicted by +simple falls on the hard floor; and there are so many objections to +carpeting a nursery, since it favors an accumulation of dust, bad air, +damp, grease, and other impurities, that it seems to me preferable to +omit it. Many physicians, I must own, recommend carpets during winter, +though not in summer; and in no case, unless they are well shaken and +aired, at least once a week. + +No furniture should be admissible, except the beds for the mother and +child, a table, and a few chairs. With the best writers and highest +authorities on the subject, I am decidedly of opinion that all feather +beds ought effectually and forever to be excluded from nurseries. The +reasons for this prohibition will appear hereafter. + +Every nursery should, if possible, be free from holes or crevices; +otherwise the occupants will be exposed to currents of air, and their +sometimes terrible and always injurious consequences. The room may, in +this way, be kept at a lower medium temperature--a point of very great +importance. + +Cats and dogs, I believe, are usually excluded from the nursery; if not, +they ought to be. For though the apprehension of cats "sucking the +child's breath," is wholly groundless, yet they may be provoked by the +rude attacks of a child to inflict upon it a lasting injury. Besides, +they assist, by respiration, in contaminating the air, like all other +animals. + +If there are, in the nursery, objects which, from the vivacity or +brilliancy of their colors, attract the attention of the child, they +should never be presented to them sideways, or immediately over their +heads. The reason for this caution is, that children seek, and pursue +almost instinctively, bright objects; and are thus liable to contract a +habit of moving their eyes in an oblique direction, which _may_ +terminate in squinting. + +Many parents seem to take great pleasure in indulging the young infant +in looking at these bright objects; especially a lamp or a candle. If +the child is naturally strong and vigorous, no immediate perceptible +injury may arise; but I am confident in the opinion that the result is +often quite otherwise. For many weeks, if not many months of their early +existence, they should not be permitted to sit or lie and gaze at any +bright object, be it ever so weak or distant, unless placed exactly +before their eyes; and even in the latter case, it were better to avoid +it. + +Heat is also injurious to the eyes of all, and of course not less so to +children than to adults. But when a strong light and heat are conjoined, +as is the case of sitting around a large blazing fire--the former custom +of New England--it is no wonder if the infantile eyes become early +injured. No wonder that the generation now on the stage, early subjected +to these abuses, should be found almost universally in the use of +spectacles. + +This may be the most proper place for observing that great care ought to +be taken, at the birth of the child, to prevent a too sudden exposure of +the tender organ of vision to the light. We believe this caution is +generally omitted by the American physician, though it is one which +accords with the plainest dictates of common sense. Who of us has not +experienced the pain of emerging suddenly from the darkness of a cellar +to the ordinary light of day? The strongest eyes of the adult are +scarcely able to bear the transition. How much more painful to the +tender organs of the new-born infant must be the change to which it is +so frequently subjected? And how easy it is to prevent the pain and +danger of the change, by more effectually darkening the room into which +it is introduced! + +But we have testimony on this point. A distinguished German physician +states that he has known many cases of permanent blindness from this +very cause to which we have referred. The Principal of the Institution +for the Blind, at Vienna, says he is confident that most children who +appear to be born blind, are actually made blind by neglecting this same +precaution. + + + + +CHAPTER II. + +TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +There is one general principle, on this subject, which is alike +applicable to all persons and circumstances. It is, to keep a little too +cool, rather than in the slightest degree too warm. In other words, the +lowest temperature which is compatible with comfort, is, in all cases, +best adapted to health; and a slight degree of coldness, provided it +amount not to a chill, and is not long continued, is more safe than the +smallest unnecessary degree of warmth. + +But the application of this rule to those over whom we have control, is +not without its difficulties. Our own sensations are so variable, +independently of external and obvious causes, that we cannot at all +times judge for others, especially for infants. The absolute and real +state of temperature in a room can only be ascertained by the aid of a +thermometer; and no nursery should ever be without one. It should be +placed, however, in such a situation as to indicate the real temperature +of the atmosphere, and not where it will give a false result. + +No mother should forget that the infant, at birth, has not the power of +generating heat, internally, to the extent which it possesses afterward. +The lungs have as yet but a feeble, inefficient action. The purification +of the blood, through their agency, is not only incomplete, but the heat +evolved is as yet inconsiderable. In the absence of internal heat, then, +there is an increased demand externally. If 60º be deemed suitable for +most other persons, the new-born infant may, for a few days, require 65º +or even 70º. + +Much may and should be done in preserving the child in a proper +temperature by means of its clothing. On this point I shall speak at +length, in another part of this work. My present purpose is simply to +treat of the temperature of the nursery. + +The best way of warming a nursery--or indeed any other room, where MERE +warmth is demanded--is by means of air heated in other apartments, and +admitted through openings in the floor or fire-place. The air is not +only thus made more pure, but every possibility of accidents, such as +having the clothes take fire, is precluded. This last consideration is +one of very great importance, and I hope will not be much longer +overlooked in infantile education. + +Next to that, in point of usefulness and safety, is a stove, placed near +or IN the fire-place, and defended by an iron railing. Most people +prefer an open stove; and on some accounts it is indeed preferable, +especially where it is desirable to burn coal. Still I think that the +direct rays of the heat, and the glare of light from open stoves and +fire-places, particularly for the young, form a very serious objection +to their use. + +One of the strongest objections to open stoves and fire-places in the +nursery is, the increased exposure to accidents. I know it is said that +this evil may be avoided by laying aside the use of cotton, and wearing +nothing but worsted or flannel. This is indeed true; but I do not like +the idea of being compelled to dress children in flannel or worsted, at +all times when the least particle of fire is demanded; for this would be +to wear this stimulating kind of clothing, in our climate, the greater +part of the year. + +Besides, I write for many mothers who are compelled to use cotton, on +account of the expense of flannel. And if the stove be a close one, and +well defended by a railing, cotton will seldom expose to danger. Still, +as has been already said, the introduction of heated air from another +apartment, whenever it can possibly be afforded, is incomparably better +than either stoves or fire-places. + +Dr. Dewees is fully persuaded that the excessive heat of nurseries has +occasioned a great mortality among very young children. "In the first +place," he says, "it over-stimulates them; and in the second, it renders +them so susceptible of cold, that any draught of cold air endangers +their lives. They are in a constant perspiration, which is frequently +checked by an exposure to even an atmosphere of moderate temperature." +If this is but to repeat what has been already said, the importance of +the subject seems to be a sufficient apology. + + + + +CHAPTER III. + +VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air by means of lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +Few people take sufficient pains to preserve the air in any of their +apartments pure; for few know what the constitution of our atmosphere +is, and in how many ways and with what ease it is rendered impure. + +It is not my purpose to go into a learned, scientific account in this +place, or even in this work, of the constitution of the atmosphere. A +few plain statements are all that are indispensable. The atmosphere +which we breathe is composed of two different airs or gases. One of +these is called oxygen, [Footnote: Oxygen gas is the chief supporter of +combustion, as well as of respiration. It is the vital part, as it were, +of the air. No animal or vegetable could long exist without it. And yet +if alone, unmixed, it is too pure and too refined for animals to +breathe. Nitrogen gas, on the contrary, while alone, will not support +either respiration or combustion; mixed, however, with oxygen, it +dilutes it, and in the most happy manner fits it for reception into the +lungs.] and the other nitrogen. There is another gas usually found with +these two, in smaller quantity, called carbonic acid gas; but whether it +is necessary, in a very small quantity, to health, chemists, I believe, +are not agreed. One thing, however, is certain--that if any portion of +it is healthful, it must be very little--not more, certainly, than +one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of the whole mass. + +It is by means of the oxygen it contains, that air sustains life and +combustion. Were it not for this, neither fires nor candles would burn, +and no animal could breathe a single moment. Breathing consumes this +oxygen of the air very rapidly. When the oxygen is present in about a +certain proportion, combustion and respiration go on well, but when its +natural proportion is diminished, the fire does not burn so well, +neither does the candle; and no one can breathe so freely. + +Not only are breathing and combustion impeded or disturbed by the +diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere, but just in proportion as oxygen +is diminished by these two processes, or either of them, carbonic acid +is formed, which is not only bad for combustion, but much worse for +health. If any considerable quantity of it is inhaled, it appears to be +an absolute poison to the human system; and if in _very large quantity_, +will often cause immediate death. + +It is this gas, accumulated in large quantities, that destroys so many +people in close rooms, where there is no chimney, nor any other place +for the bad air to escape. But it not only kills people outright--it +partly kills, that is, it poisons, more or less, hundreds of thousands. + +In a nursery there is the mother and child, and perhaps the nurse, to +render the air impure by breathing, the fire and the lamp or candle to +contribute to the same result, besides several other causes not yet +mentioned. One of these is nearly related to the former. I allude to the +fact that our skins, by perspiration and by other means, are a source of +much impurity to the atmosphere; a fact which will be more fully +explained and illustrated in the chapter on Bathing and Cleanliness. It +is only necessary to say, in this place, that it is not the matter of +perspiration alone which, issuing from the skin, renders the air +impure; there are other exhalations more or less constantly going off +from every living body, especially from the lungs; and carbonic acid gas +is even formed all over the surface of the skin, as well as by means of +the lungs. + +One needs no better proof that carbonic acid is formed on the surface of +the body, than the fact that after the body has been closely covered all +night, if you introduce a candle under the bed-clothes into this +confined air, it will be quickly extinguished, because there is too +much carbonic acid gas there, and too little oxygen. + +We may hence see at once the evil of covering the heads of infants when +they lie down--a very common practice. The air, when pure, contains a +little more than 20 parts of oxygen, and a little less than 80 of +nitrogen. Breathing this air, as I have already shown, consumes the +oxygen, which is so necessary to life and health, and leaves in its +place an increase of nitrogen and carbonic acid gas, which are not +necessary to health, and the latter of which is even positively +injurious. But when the oxygen, instead of forming 20 or more parts in +100 of the atmosphere of the nursery, is reduced to 15 or 18 parts only, +and the carbonic acid gas is increased from 1 or 2 parts in 100, to 5, +6, 8 or 10--when to this is added the other noxious exhalations from the +body, and from the lamp or candle, fire-place, feather bed, stagnant +fluids in the room, &c., &c.--is it any wonder that children, in the +end, become sickly? What else could be expected but that the seeds of +disease, thus early sown, should in due time spring up, and produce +their appropriate fruits? + +It is sometimes said that fire in a room purifies it. It undoubtedly +does so, to a certain extent, if fresh air be often admitted; but not +otherwise. + +I have classed feather beds among the common causes of impurity. Dr. +Dewees also condemns them, most decidedly; and gives substantial reasons +for "driving them out of the nursery." + +In speaking of the structure of the room used for a nursery, I have +adverted to the importance of having a large or double room, with +sliding doors between, in order that the occupants may go into one of +them, while the other is being ventilated. But whatever may be the +structure of the room, the circumstances of the occupants, or the state +of the weather, every nursery ought to be most thoroughly ventilated, +once a day, at least; and when the weather is tolerable, twice a day. If +there is but one apartment, and fear is entertained of the dampness of +the fresh air introduced, or of currents, and if the mother and babe +cannot retire, there is a last resort, which is for them to get into +bed, and cover themselves a short time with the clothing. For though I +have prohibited the covering of the face with the bed-clothes for any +considerable length of time together, yet to do so for some fifteen or +twenty minutes is an evil of far less magnitude than to suffer an +apartment to remain without being ventilated, for twenty-four hours +together--a very common occurrence. + +When a lamp is kept burning in a nursery during the night, it should +always be placed at the door of the stove, or in the chimney place, that +its smoke, and the bad airs or gases which are formed, may escape. But +it is better, in general, to avoid burning lamps or candles during the +night. By means of common matches, a light may be produced, when +necessary, almost instantly; especially if you have a spirit lamp in the +nursery, or what is still better, one of spirit gas--that is, a mixture +of alcohol and turpentine. + +It is highly desirable that all washing, ironing, and cooking should be +avoided in the nursery. They load the air with noxious effluvia or +vapor, or with particles of dust; none of which ought ever to enter the +delicate lungs of an infant. + +Fumigations with camphor, vinegar, and other similar substances, have +long been in reputation as a means of purifying the air in sick-rooms +and nurseries; but they are of very little consequence. Fresh air, if it +can be had, is always better. + + + + +CHAPTER IV. + +THE CHILD'S DRESS + +General principles. SEC. 1. Swathing the body--its numerous evils.--SEC. +2. Form of the dress. Fashion. Tight lacing--its dangers. Structure and +motion of the chest. Diseases from tight lacing.--SEC. 3. Material of +dress. Flannel--its uses. Cleanliness. Cotton--silk--linen.--SEC. 4. +Quantity of dress. Power of habit. Anecdote. Begin right. Change. +Dampness.--SEC. 5. Caps--their evils. Going bare-headed.--SEC. 6. Hats +and bonnets.--SEC. 7. Covering for the feet. Stockings. Garters. +Shoes--thick soles.--SEC. 8. Pins--their danger. Shocking +anecdote.--SEC. 9. Remaining wet.--SEC. 10. Dress of boys. Tight +jackets. Stocks and cravats. Boots.--SEC. 11. Dress of girls--should be +loose. Temperature. Exposure to the night air. + + +Dress serves three important purposes:--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us +against cold; 3. To defend our bodies and limbs from injury. There is +one more purpose of dress; in case of deformity, it seems to improve the +appearance. + +In all our arrangements in regard to dress, whether of children or of +adults, we should ever keep in mind the above principles. The form, +fashion, material, application, and quantity of all clothing, +especially for infants, ought to be regulated by these three or four +rules. + +The subject of this chapter is one of so much importance, and embraces +such a variety of items, that it will be more convenient, both to the +reader and myself, to consider it under several minor heads. + + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon, in his "Natural History," says that in France, an infant has +hardly enjoyed the liberty of moving and stretching its limbs, before it +is put into confinement. "It is swathed," says he, "its head is fixed, +its legs are stretched out at full length, and its arms placed straight +down by the side of its body. In this manner it is bound tight with +cloths and bandages, so that it cannot stir a limb; indeed it is +fortunate that the poor thing is not muffled up so as to be unable to +breathe." + +All swathing, except with a single bandage around the abdomen, is +decidedly unreasonable, injurious and cruel. I do not pretend that the +remarks of M. Buffon are fully applicable to the condition of infants in +the United States. The good sense of the community nowhere permits us to +transform a beautiful babe quite into an Egyptian mummy. Still there +are many considerable errors on the subject of infantile dress, which, +in the progress of my remarks, I shall find it necessary to expose. + +The use of a simple band cannot be objected to. It affords a general +support to the abdomen, and a particular one to the _umbilicus_. The +last point is one of great importance, where there is any tendency to a +rupture at this part of the body--a tendency which very often exists in +feeble children. And without some support of this kind, crying, +coughing, sneezing, and straining in any way, might greatly aggravate +the evil, if not produce serious consequences. + +But, in order to afford a support to the abdomen in the best manner, it +is by no means necessary that the bandage should be drawn very tight. +Two thirds of the nurses in this country greatly err in this respect, +and suppose that the more tightly a bandage is drawn, the better. It +should be firm, but yet gently yielding; and therefore a piece of +flannel cut "bias," as it is termed, or, obliquely with respect to the +threads of which it is composed, is the most appropriate material. + +If the attention of the mother were necessary nowhere else, it would be +indispensable in the application of this article. If she do not take +special pains to prevent it, the erring though well meaning nurse may +so compress the body with the bandage as to produce pain and uneasiness, +and sometimes severe colic. Nay, worse evils than even this have been +known to arise. When a child sneezes, or coughs, or cries, the abdomen +should naturally yield gently; but if it is so confined that it cannot +yield where the band is applied, it will yield in an unnatural +proportion below, to the great danger of producing a species of rupture, +no less troublesome than the one which such tight swathing is designed +to prevent. + +But besides the bandage already mentioned, no other restraint of the +body and limbs of a child is at all admissible. The Creator has kindly +ordained that the human body and limbs, and especially its muscles, or +moving powers, shall be developed by exercise. Confine an arm or a leg, +even in a child of ten years of age, and the limb will not increase +either in strength or size as it otherwise would, because its muscles +are not exercised; and the fact is still more obvious in infancy. + +There is a still deeper evil. On all the limbs are fixed two sets of +muscles; one to extend, the other to draw up or bend the limb. If you +keep a limb extended for a considerable time, you weaken the one set of +muscles; if you keep it bent, you weaken the other. This weakness may +become so great that the limb will be rendered useless. There are cases +on record--well authenticated--where children, by being obliged to sit +in one place on a hard floor, have been made cripples for life. Hundreds +of others are injured, though they may not become absolutely crippled. + +I repeat it, therefore, their dress should be so free and loose that +they may use their little limbs, their neck and their bodies, as much as +they please; and in every desired direction. The practices of confining +their arms while they lie down, for fear they should scratch themselves +with their nails, and of pinning the clothes round their feet, are +therefore highly reprehensible. Better that they should even +occasionally scratch themselves with their nails, than that they should +be made the victims of injurious restraint. Who would think of tying up +or muffling the young lamb or kid? And even the young plant--what think +you would be the effect, if its leaves and branches could not move +gently with the soft breezes? Would the fluids circulate, and health be +promoted: or would they stagnate, and a morbid, sickly and dwarfish +state be the consequence? + +Those whose object is to make infancy, as well as any other period of +existence, a season of happiness, will not fail to find an additional +motive for giving the little stranger entire freedom in the land +whither he has so recently arrived, especially when he seems to enjoy +it so much. Who can be so hardened as to confine him, unless compelled +by the most pressing necessity? + + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +On this subject a writer in the London Literary Gazette of some eight or +ten years ago, lays down the following general directions, to which, in +cold weather, there can be but one possible objection, which is, they +are not _alamode_, and are not, therefore, likely to be followed. + +"All that a child requires, so far as regards clothing, in the first +month of its existence, is a simple covering for the trunk and +extremities of the body, made of a material soft and agreeable to the +skin, and which can retain, in an equable degree, the animal +temperature. These qualities are to be found in perfection in fine +flannel; and I recommend that the only clothing, for the first month or +six weeks, be a square piece of flannel, large enough to involve fully +and overlap the whole of the babe, with the exception of the head, which +should be left totally uncovered. This wrapper should be fixed by a +button near the breast, and left so loose as to permit the arms and legs +to be freely stretched, and moved in every direction. It should be +succeeded by a loose flannel gown with sleeves, which should be worn +till the end of the second month; after which it may be changed to the +common clothing used by children of this age." + +The advantages of such a dress are, that the movements of the infant +will be, as we have already seen, free and unrestrained, and we shall +escape the misery of hearing the screams which now so frequently +accompany the dressing and undressing of almost every child. No chafings +from friction, moreover, can occur; and as the insensible perspiration +is in this way promoted over the whole surface of the body, the sympathy +between the stomach and skin is happily maintained. A healthy sympathy +of this kind, duly kept up, does much towards preserving the stomach in +a good state, and the skin from eruptions and sores. + +But as I apprehend that christianity is not yet very deeply rooted in +the minds and hearts of parents, I have already expressed my doubts +whether they are prepared to receive and profit by advice at once +rational and physiological. Still I cannot help hoping that I shall +succeed in persuading mothers to have every part of a child's dress +perfectly loose, except the band already referred to; and that should be +but moderately tight. + +Common humanity ought to teach us better than to put the body of a +helpless infant into a _vise_, and press it to death, as the first mark +of our attention. Who has not been struck with a strange inconsistency +in the conduct of mothers and nurses, who, while they are so exceedingly +tender towards the infant in some points as to injure it by their +kindness, are yet almost insensible to its cries of distress while +dressing it? So far, indeed, are they from feeling emotions of pity, +that they often make light of its cries, regarding them as signs of +health and vigor. + +There can be no doubt, I confess, that the first cries of an infant, if +strong, both indicate and promote a healthy state of the lungs, to a +certain extent; but there will always be unavoidable occasions enough +for crying to promote health, even after we have done all we can in the +way of avoiding pain. They who only draw the child's dress the tighter, +the more it cries, are guilty of a crime of little less enormity than +murder. + +"Think," says Dr. Buchan, "of the immense number of children that die of +convulsions soon after birth; and be assured that these (its cries) are +much oftener owing to galling pressure, or some external injury, than to +any inward cause." This same writer adds, that he has known a child +which was "seized with convulsion fits" soon after being "swaddled," +immediately relieved by taking off the rollers and bandages; and he says +that a loose dress prevented the return of the disease. + +I think it is obvious that the utmost extent to which we ought to go, in +yielding to the fashion, as it regards form, is to use three pieces of +clothing--the shirt, the petticoat and the frock; all of which must be +as loose as possible; and before the infant begins to crawl about much, +the latter should be long, for the salve of covering the feet and legs. +At four or five years of age, loose trowsers, with boys, may be +substituted for the petticoat; but it is a question whether something +like the frock might not, with every individual, be usefully retained +through life. + +I wish it were unnecessary, in a book like this, to join in the general +complaint against tight lacing any part of the body, but especially the +chest. But as this work of torture is sometimes begun almost from the +cradle, and as prevention is better than cure, the hope of preventing +that for which no cure appears yet to have been found, leads me to make +a few remarks on the subject. + +As it has long been my opinion that one reason why mothers continue to +overlook the subject is, that they do not understand the structure and +motion of the chest, I have attempted the following explanation and +illustration. + +I have already said, that if we bandage tightly, for a considerable +time, any part of the human frame, it is apt to become weaker. The more +a portion of the frame which is furnished with muscles, those curious +instruments of motion, is used, provided it is not _over_-exerted, the +more vigorous it is. Bind up an arm, or a hand, or a foot, and keep it +bound for twelve hours of the day for many years, and think you it will +be as strong as it otherwise would have been? Facts prove the contrary. +The Chinese swathe the feet of their infant females; and they are not +only small, but weak. + +I have said their feet are smaller for being bandaged. So is a hand or +an arm. Action--healthy, constant action--is indispensable to the +perfect development of the body and limbs. Why it is so, is another +thing. But so it is; and it is a principle or law of the great Creator +which cannot be evaded. More than this; if you bind some parts of the +body tightly, so as to compress them as much as you can without +producing actual pain, you will find that the part not only ceases to +grow, but actually dwindles away. I have seen this tried again and +again. Even the solid parts perish under pressure. When a person first +wears a false head of hair, the clasp which rests upon the head, at the +upper part of the forehead, being new and elastic, and pressing rather +closely, will, in a few months, often make quite an indentation in the +cranium or bone of the head. + +Now is it probable--nay, is it possible--that the lungs, especially +those of young persons, can expand and come to their full and natural +size under pressure, even though the pressure should be slight? Must +they not be weakened? And if the pressure be strong, as it sometimes is, +must they not dwindle away? + +We know, too, from the nature and structure of the lungs themselves, +that tight lacing must injure them. Many mothers have very imperfect +notions of what physicians mean, when they say that corsets impede the +circulation, by preventing the full and undisturbed action of the lungs. +They get no higher ideas of the _motion_ of the _chest_, than what is +connected with bending the body forward and backward, from right to +left, &c. They know that, if dressed too tightly, _this_ motion is not +so free as it otherwise would be; but if they are not so closely laced +as to prevent that free bending of the body of which I have been +speaking, they think there can be no danger; or at least, none of +consequence. + +Now it happens that this sort of motion is not that to which physicians +refer, when they complain of corsets. Strictly speaking, this bending of +the whole body is performed by the muscles of the back, and not those +of the chest. The latter have very little to do with it. It is true, +that even _this_ motion ought not to be hindered; but if it is, the evil +is one of little comparative magnitude. + +Every time we breathe naturally, all the ribs, together with the breast +bone, have motion. The ribs rise, and spread a little outward, +especially towards the fore part. The breast bone not only rises, but +swings forward a little, like a pendulum. But the moment the chest is +swathed or bandaged, this motion must be hindered; and the more, in +proportion to the tightness. + +On this point, those persons make a sad mistake, who say that "a busk +not too wide nor too rigid seems to correspond to the supporting spine, +and to assist, rather than impede the efforts of nature, to keep the +body erect." + +Can we seriously compare the offices of the spine with those of the +ribs, and suppose that because the former is fixed like a post, at the +back part of the lungs, therefore an artificial post in front would be +useful? Why, we might just as well argue in favor of hanging weights to +a door, or a clog to a pendulum, in order to make it swing backwards and +forwards more easily. We might almost as well say that the elbow ought +to be made firm, to correspond with the shoulders, and thus become +advocates for letting the stays or bandages enclose the arm above the +elbow, and fasten it firmly to the side. Indeed, the consequences in the +latter case, aside from a little inconvenience, would not be half so +destructive to health as in the former. The ribs, where they join to the +back bone, form hinges; and hinges are made for motion. But if you +fasten them to a post in front, of what value are the hinges? + +If mothers ask, of what use this motion of the lungs is, it is only +necessary to refer them to the chapter on Ventilation, in which I trust +the subject is made intelligible, and a satisfactory answer afforded. + +But I might appeal to facts. Let us look at females around us generally. +Do their countenances indicate that they enjoy as good health as they +did when dress was worn more loosely? Have they not oftener a leaden +hue, as if the blood in them was darker? Are they not oftener +short-breathed than formerly? As they advance in life, have they not +more chronic diseases? Are not their chests smaller and weaker? And as +the doctrine that if one member suffers, all the other members suffer +with it, is not less true in physiology than in morals, do we not find +other organs besides the lungs weakened? Surgeons and physicians, who, +like faithful sentinels, have watched at their post half a century, +tell us, moreover, that if these foolish and injurious practices to +which I refer are tolerated two centuries longer, every female will be +deformed, and the whole race greatly degenerated, physically and +morally. + +Those with whom no arguments will avail, are recommended to read the +following remarks from the first volume of the Library of Health, p. +119: + +"It is related, on the authority of Macgill, that in Tunis, after a girl +is engaged, or betrothed, she is then _fattened_. For this purpose, she +is cooped up in a small room, and shackles of gold and silver are placed +upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married +to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the +shackles which the former wife wore are put on the new bride's limbs, +and she is fed till they are filled up to a proper thickness. The food +used for this custom worthy of the barbarians is called _drough_, which +is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering +the milk of the nurse rich and abundant. With this and their national +dish, _cuscasoo_, the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die +under the spoon." + +We laugh at all this, and well we may; but there are customs not very +far from home, no less ridiculous. + +"There is a country four or five thousand miles westward of Tunis, +where the females, to a very great extent, are emaciated for marriage, +instead being fattened. This process is begun, in part, by shackles--not +of gold and silver, perhaps, but of wood--but instead of being put on +loosely, and causing the body or limbs to fill them, they are made to +compress the body in the outset; and as the size of the latter +diminishes, the shackles are contracted or tightened. As with the +eastern, so with the western females, many of them die under the +process; though a far greater number die at a remote period, as the +consequence of it." + + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +I have already committed myself to the reader as favoring the use of +soft flannel in cold weather, especially for children who are not yet +able to run about freely in the open air. The advantages of an early use +of this material, at least for under-clothes, are numerous. The +following are a few of them. + +1. Flannel, next to the skin, is a pleasant flesh brush; keeping up a +gentle and equable irritation, and promoting perspiration and every +other function which it is the office of the skin to perform, or assist +in performing. + +2. It guards the body against the cooling effects of evaporation, when +in a state of profuse perspiration. + +3. By preventing the heat of the body from escaping too rapidly, it +keeps up a steadier temperature on the surface than any other known +substance. The importance of the last consideration is greater, in a +climate like our own, than elsewhere. + +But there are limits to the use of this article of clothing. Whenever +the temperature of the atmosphere is so great, even without artificial +heat, that we no longer wish to retain the heat of the body by the +clothing, then all flannel should be removed at once, and linen should +be substituted; taking care to replace the flannel whenever the +temperature of the atmosphere, as indicated by the thermometer, or by +the child's feelings, may seem to require it. + +It should also be kept clean. There is a very general mistake abroad on +this subject. Many suppose that flannel can be worn longer without +washing than other kinds of cloth. On the contrary, it should be changed +oftener than cotton, or even linen, because it will absorb a great deal +of fluid, especially the matter of perspiration, which, if long +retained, is believed to ferment, and produce unhealthy, if not +poisonous gases. For this reason, too, flannel for children's clothing +should be white, that it may show dirt the more readily, and obtain the +more frequent washing; although it is for this very reason--its +liability to exhibit the least particles of dirt--that it is commonly +rejected. + +One caution more in regard to the use of flannel may be necessary. With +some children, owing to a peculiarity of constitution, flannel will +produce eruptions on the skin, which are very troublesome. Whenever this +is the case, the flannel should be immediately laid aside; upon which +the eruptions usually disappear. + +If parents would take proper pains to get the lighter, softer kinds of +flannel for this purpose, and be particular about its looseness and +quantity, I should prefer, as I have already intimated, to have very +young children, in our climate, wear this material the greater part of +the year, excepting perhaps July and August. + +My reasons for this course would be, first, that I like the stimulus of +soft flannel on the skin, if changed sufficiently often, better than +that of any other kind of clothing. Secondly, cotton is so liable to +take fire, that its use in the nursery and among little children seems +very hazardous. Thirdly, silk is not quite the appropriate material, as +a general thing, besides being too expensive; and fourthly, linen is +not warm enough, except in mid-summer. + +Except, therefore, in July and August, and in cases of idiosyncracy, +such as have just been alluded to, I would use flannel for the +under-clothes of young children, throughout the year. But whenever they +acquire sufficient strength to walk and run, and play much in the open +air, I would gradually lay aside the use of all flannel, even in winter. +Great attention, however, must be paid to the _quantity_. The parent +who, guided by this rule, should keep on her child the same amount of +flannel, and of the same thickness, from January to June 30th, and then, +on the first of July, should suddenly exchange it for thin linen, in +moderate quantity, might find trouble from it. It is better to make the +changes more gradually; otherwise, whatever may be the material of the +dress, the child will be likely to suffer. + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The quantity of clothing used by different individuals of the same age, +in the same climate, possessing constitutions nearly alike, and +following similar occupations, is so different as to strike us with +surprise when we first observe the fact. + +One will wear nothing but a coarse linen or cotton shirt, coarse coat, +waistcoat, and pantaloons, and boots, in the coldest weather. He never, +unless it be on the Sabbath, puts on even a cravat, and never in any +case stockings or mittens. + +Another, in similar circumstances in all respects, constantly wears his +thick stockings, flannel wrapper and drawers, and cravat; and seldom +goes out, in cold weather, without mittens and an overcoat. He is not a +whit warmer: indeed he often suffers more from the cold, than his +neighbor who dresses in the manner just described. + +Why all this difference? It is no doubt the result of habit. Any +individual may accustom himself to much or little clothing. And the +earlier the habit is begun, the greater is its influence. + +Some persons, observing how little clothing one may accustom himself to +use and yet be comfortable, have told us, that so far as mere +temperature is concerned, we need no clothing at all. They relate the +story of the Scythian and Alexander. Alexander asked the former how he +could go without clothes in such a cold climate. He replied, by asking +Alexander how he could go with his face naked. "Habit reconciles us to +this;" was the reply. "Think me, then, _all_ face," said the Scythian. + +But admitting that certain individuals, and even a few rude tribes, +have gone without clothing; did they therefore follow, in this respect, +the intentions of nature? The greatest stickler for adhering to nature's +plan, cannot prove this. Analogy is against it. Most of the other +animals, even in hot climates, are furnished with a hairy covering from +the first; and in cold climates, the Author of their being has even +provided them with an increase of clothing for the winter. Their fur, on +the approach of cold weather, not only becomes whiter, and therefore +conducts the heat away from the body more slowly, but, as every dealer +in furs well understands, it becomes softer and thicker. And yet the +blood of the furred animals of cold countries is as warm as ours, if not +warmer. + +The inferences which it seems to me we ought to make from this are, that +if other animals require clothing, and even a change of clothing, so +does man; and that as the Creator has left him to provide, by his own +ingenuity, for a great many of his wants, instead of furnishing him with +instinct to direct him, so in relation to dress. And even if it could be +proved that dress were naturally unnecessary, with reference to +temperature, I should still defend its use on other principles. The few +speculative minds, therefore, that in the vagaries of their fancy, but +never in their practice, reject it, are not to be regarded. + +The principle laid down in the commencement of the chapter on +Temperature, is the great principle which should guide us in regard to +dress. But although we should always keep a little too cool rather than +a little too warm, it is by no means desirable to be cold. Any degree of +chilliness, long continued, interrupts the functions which the skin +ought to perform, and thus produces mischief. + +The same rules, in this respect, apply to eating, as well as to dress. +It is better to eat a little less than nature requires, than a little +more. It is a generally received opinion, however, that mankind +frequently, at least in this country, eat about twice as much as health +requires. This is owing to habit; and perhaps the power of the latter is +as great in this respect as in regard to dress. + +The great point in regard to food or dress is, to _begin_ right, and, +observing what nature requires--studying at the same time the testimony +of others--to endeavor to keep within the bounds she has assigned. It +has already been more than intimated, that if the nursery be kept in a +proper temperature, a single loose piece of dress is, for some time, all +that is required. In pursuance of this principle, through life, I +believe few persons would be found who would need more at one time than +a single suit of woollen clothes, even in the severest winters of our +northern climate. + +I have always observed that they who wear the greatest amount of +clothing, are most subject to colds. There are obvious reasons why it +should be so. This, then, if a fact, is one of the strongest reasons in +favor of acquiring a habit of going as thinly clad as we possibly can, +and not at the same time feel any inconvenience. + +But after all, whether it be winter or summer, we must vary our clothing +with the variations of the weather, as indicated by the thermometer, and +our own feelings. Sometimes, in our ever-changing and ever-changeable +climate, it may be necessary to vary our dress three or four times a +day. Some cry out against this practice as dangerous, but I have never +found it so. I have known persons who made it a constant practice; and I +never found that they sustained any injury from it, except the loss of a +little time; and the increase of comfort was more than enough to +compensate for that. There is one thing to be avoided, however, whether +we change our clothing--our linen especially--twice a day, or only twice +a week--which is, _dampness_. + + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +The practice of putting caps on infants is happily going by; and perhaps +it may be thought unnecessary for me to dwell a single moment on the +subject. But as the practice still prevails in some parts of the +country, it may be well to bestow upon it a few passing remarks. + +Many mothers have not considered that the circulation of the blood in +young infants is peculiarly active; that a large amount of blood is at +that period carried to the head; that in consequence of this, the head +is proportionably hotter than in adults; and that from this source +arises the tendency of very young children to brain-fever, dropsy in the +head, and other diseases of this part of the system. But these are most +undoubted facts. + +Hence one reason why the heads of infants should be kept as cool as +possible; and though a thin cap confines less heat than a thick head of +hair does when they are older, yet they are less able to bear it. The +truth is, that nature furnishes a covering for the head, just about as +fast as a covering is required, and the child's safety will permit. + +At the present day, few persons will probably be found, who will defend +the utility of caps, any longer than till the hair is grown. The +general apology for their use after this period, and indeed in most +instances before, is, that they look pretty. "What would people say to +see my darling without a cap?" + +But when the head is kept, from the first, totally uncovered, the hair +grows more rapidly, dandruff and other scurfy diseases rarely attack the +scalp; catarrh, snuffles, and other similar complaints, and above all, +dropsy in the head, seldom show themselves; and the period of cutting +teeth, that most dangerous period in the life of an infant, is passed +over with much more safety. + +"Nothing but custom," says a foreign writer, "can reconcile us to the +cap, with all its lace and trumpery ornaments, on the beautiful head of +a child; and I would ask any one to say candidly, whether he thinks the +children in the pictures of Titian and Raffaelle would be improved by +having their heads covered with caps, instead of the silken curls--the +adornment of nature--which cluster round their smiling faces. If there +were no other reason for disusing caps for infants, but the improvement +which it produces in the _appearance_ of the child, I would maintain +that this is a sufficient inducement." And I concur with him fully. + +As to the notion--now I hope nearly exploded--that it is necessary to +cover up the "open of the head," as it is called, nothing can be more +idle. This part of the head requires no more covering than any other +part; and if it did, all the dress in the world could not affect it in +the least, except to retard the growth of the bones, which, in due time, +ought to close up the space; and this effect, anything which keeps the +head too hot might help to produce. Of the folly of wetting the head +with spirits, or any other medicated lotions, and of making daily +efforts to bring it into shape, it is unnecessary to speak in the +present chapter. + + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +The hats worn in this country are almost universally too warm. But if it +is a great mistake in adults to wear thick, heavy hats, it is much more +so in the case of children. + +The infant in the nursery, as we have already seen, needs no covering of +the kind. It is absolutely necessary that the head should be kept as +cool as possible; and absolutely dangerous to cover it too warmly. At a +later period, however, the danger greatly diminishes, because the +circulation of the blood becomes more equal, and does not tend so much +towards the brain. + +Still, however, the head is hotter than the limbs, especially the hands +and feet; and I cannot help thinking that the hair is the only covering +which is perfectly safe, either in childhood or age; except in the +sunshine or in the storm. There may be--there probably is--some danger +in going without hat or bonnet in the hot sun; though I have known many +children, and some grown persons, who were constantly exposed in this +way, and yet appeared not to suffer from it. + +But this may be the proper place to state that we are ever in great +danger of deceiving ourselves on this subject. If the individuals who +follow practices usually regarded as pernicious, while their habits in +other respects are just like those of other persons around them who have +similar strength, &c. of constitution,--if these individuals, I say, +were wholly to escape disease, through life, or if they were to be so +much more free from it, and live to an age so much greater than others +as to constitute a striking and obvious difference in their favor, we +might then safely argue that the practices which they follow are at +least without dangers, if not of obvious advantage. But when we see them +beset with ills, like other people, it is not safe to pronounce their +habits favorable to health, since it is impossible to know whether some +of the ills which they suffer are not produced by them. + +These remarks are applicable to the disuse of any covering for the head +in the sun and in the rain. For you will find those who adopt this +practice from early infancy,[Footnote: I say, from early infancy; +because we may adopt the best habits in mature years, after our +constitutions have been broken up by error and vice, without effecting +anything more than to keep us from actually sinking at once. Indeed, in +most cases we ought not to expect more.] subject to as many diseases as +those around them with similar constitutions, but with habits somewhat +different; and as our diseases are generally the consequences of our +errors in one way or another, it is impossible to say with certainty +that some of them might not have arisen from exposure of the head. + +I should not hesitate, therefore, to advise all mothers to put a light +hat or bonnet on the heads of their children, whenever they are to be +exposed to the direct rays of the summer sun, or to the rain. And as we +cannot always foresee when and where these exposures will arise, and as +it is believed that these coverings, if light, will never be productive +of much injury while we are abroad in the open air, it will follow that +it is better to wear than to omit them. + +But while I contend for their use as consistent with health and sound +philosophy, I must not be understood as admitting the use of such hats +as are worn at present, even by children. They are, as I have said +before, too hot. What should be substituted, I am unable to determine; +but until something can be supplied, which would not be half so +oppressive as our common wool hats, I should regard it as the lesser +evil to omit them entirely. The danger of going bare-headed, if the +practice is commenced early, we know from the customs of some savage +nations, can never be very great. + + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The same reason for avoiding the use of any covering for the head, in +early infancy, is a sufficient reason for covering the feet well. For +just in proportion as the blood is sent to the head in superabundance, +and keeps up in it an undue degree of heat, just in the same proportion +is it sent to the feet in too _small_ a quantity, leaving these parts +liable to cold. Now it is a fundamental law with medical men, that the +feet ought to be kept warmer than the head, if possible; especially +while the child is very young, and exposed to brain diseases. + +So long, therefore, as children are young, and unable to exercise their +feet, stockings ought to be used, both in summer and winter; but I +prefer to have them short, unless long ones can be used without garters. +Everything in the shape of a garter or ligature round the limbs, body, +or neck of a child, except a single body-band, already mentioned in +another chapter, ought forever to be banished. + +It has often been objected, I know, that stockings will make the feet +tender. But as no child was ever hardened by _continued_ and severe cold +applied to any part of the body, but the contrary, so no one was ever +made more tender by being kept moderately warm. Excess of heat, like +excess of cold, will alike weaken either children or adults; but there +is little danger of heating the feet and legs of infants too much during +the first year of infancy. + +It is also said that stockings are apt to receive and retain wet. But as +I shall show in another place that wet clothes should be frequently +changed, this objection would be equally strong against wearing coats +and diapers. + +As to shoes, there is some variety of opinion among medical men. A few +hold that they cramp the feet, and prevent children from learning to +walk as early as they otherwise would. If it were best for children +that they should learn to walk as early as possible, the last objection +might have weight. But it seems to me not at all desirable to be in +haste about their walking. Indeed, I greatly prefer to retard their +progress, in this respect, rather than to hasten it. + +As to the first objection, that shoes cramp the feet too much, nearly +its whole force turns upon the question whether they are made of proper +materials or not. There is no need of making them of cow-hide, or any +other thick leather. The soles are the most important part. These will +defend the feet against pins, needles, and such other sharp substances +as are usually found on the floor; and the upper part of the shoe, so +long as the wearer remains in the nursery, may be made of the softest +and most yielding material--even of cloth. Infants' shoes should always +be made on two lasts, one for each foot. + +The philosopher Locke held, that in order to harden the young, their +shoes ought to be "so that they might leak and let in water, whenever +they came near it." There may be and probably is, no harm in having a +child wet his feet occasionally, provided he is soon supplied with dry +stockings again; but it is hazardous for either children or adults to go +too long in wet stockings, and especially to sit long in them, after +they have been using much active exercise. I am in favor of good, +substantial shoes and stockings for people of all ages and conditions, +and at all seasons; and believe it entirely in accordance with sound +economy and the laws of the human constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +The custom of using ten or a dozen pins in the dressing of children, +ought by all means to be set aside. They not only often wound the skin, +but they have occasionally been known to penetrate the body and the +joints of the limbs. So many of these dreadful accidents occur, and +where no accident happens, so much pain is occasionally given by their +sharp points to the little sufferer, who cannot tell what the matter is, +that it is quite time the practice were abolished. + +Do you ask what can be substituted?--The following mode is adopted by +Dr. Dewees in his own family, as mentioned in his work on the "Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children," at page 86. + +"The belly-band and the petticoat have strings; and not a single pin is +used in their adjustment. The little shirt, which is always made much +larger than the infant's body, is folded on the back and bosom, and +these folds kept in their places by properly adjusting the body of the +petticoat: so far not a pin is used. The diaper requires one, but this +should be of a large size, and made to serve the double purpose of +holding the folds of this article, as well as keeping the belly-band in +its proper place; the latter having a small tag of double linen +depending from its lower margin, by which it is secured to the diaper, +by the same pin. + +"Should an extraordinary display of best 'bib and tucker' be required +upon any special occasion, a third pin may be admitted to ensure the +well-sitting of the 'frock' waist in front;--this last pin, however, is +applied externally; so that the risk of its getting into the child's +body is very small, even if it should become displaced." + +The writer from whom the last two paragraphs are taken, says be has seen +needles substituted for pins; and relates a long story of a child whose +life was well nigh destroyed in this manner. It underwent months of ill +health, and many moments of excruciating agony, before the cause of its +trouble was suspected. Sometimes its distress was so great that nothing +but large doses of laudanum, sufficient to stupify it, could afford the +least relief. At last a tumor was discovered by the attending physician, +near one of the bones on which we sit, and a needle was extracted two +inches long. The needle had been put in its clothes, and, by slipping +into the folds of the skin, had insinuated itself, unperceived, into the +child's body. It is pleasing to add, that, although the little sufferer +had now been ill seven or eight months, and had endured almost +everything but death,--fever, diarrhoea, and the most excruciating +pain,--it soon recovered. + +This shocking circumstance is enough, one would think, to deter every +mother or nurse, who becomes acquainted with it, from using needles in +infants' clothes. Happy would it be, if, in banishing needles, they +would contrive to banish pins also, and adopt either the plan of Dr. +Dewees, or one still more rational. + + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +On the subject of changing the wet clothing of a child, there is a +strange and monstrous error abroad; which is, that by suffering them to +remain wet and cold, we harden the constitution. The filthiness of this +practice is enough to condemn it, were there nothing else to be said +against it. + +It is insisted on by many, I know, that as water which is salt, when it +is applied to the skin, and suffered to remain long, while it secures +the point of hardening the child, prevents all possibility of its taking +cold, it hence follows, that wet diapers are not injurious. But this is +a mistake. Every time an infant is allowed to remain wet, we not only +endanger its taking cold, but expose it to excoriations of the skin, if +not to serious and dangerous inflammation. In short, if frequent changes +are not made, whatever some mothers and nurses may think, they may rest +assured, that the health of the child must sooner or later suffer as the +consequence. + +Nor is it enough to hang up a diaper by the fire, and, as soon as it is +dry, apply it again. It should be clean, as well as dry. Let us not be +told, that it is troublesome to wash so often. Everything is in a +certain sense troublesome. Everything in this world, which is worth +having, is the result of toil. Nothing but absolute poverty affords the +shadow of an excuse for neglecting anything which will promote the +health, or even the comfort of the tender infant. + +Of the impropriety and danger of suffering wet clothes to dry upon us, I +shall speak elsewhere; as well as of the evil of suffering children to +remain dirty,--their skins or their clothing. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Whatever tends to disturb the growth of the body, or hinder the free +exercise of the limbs, during the infancy and childhood of both sexes +is injurious. And as every mother has the control of these things, I +have thought it desirable to append to this chapter a few thoughts on +the particular dress of each sex. I begin with that of boys. + +"Nothing can be more injurious to health," says a foreign writer, "than +the tight jacket, buttoned up to the throat, the well-fitted boots, and +the stiff stock." And his remarks are nearly as applicable to this +country as to England. The consequences of this preposterous method of +dressing boys, are diminutive manhood, deformity of person, and a +constitution either already imbued with disease, or highly susceptible +of its impression. + +No part of the modern dress of boys is more absurd, than the stiff +stock, or thick cravat. It is not only injurious by pressing on the +_jugular_ veins, and preventing the blood from freely passing out of the +head, but, by constantly pressing on the numerous and complex muscles of +the neck, at this period of life, it prevents their development; because +whatever hinders the action of the muscular parts, hinders their growth, +and makes them even appear as if wasted. + +It would be a great improvement, if this part of dress were wholly +discarded; and when is there so appropriate a time for setting it aside, +as _before we began to use it_; or rather while we are under the more +immediate care of our mothers? + +The use of jackets buttoned up to the throat, except in cold weather, is +objectionable; but this is very fortunately going out of fashion. + +Boots, if used at all, should fit well; to this there can be no possible +objection. What the writer, whom I have quoted, referred to, was +probably the tight boot, worn to prevent the foot from being large and +unseemly; but producing, as tight boots inevitably do, an injurious +effect upon the muscles, a constrained walk, and corns. + +What can be more painful, than to see little boys--yes, _little_ +boys--boys neither fifteen, nor twenty, nor twenty-five, walk as if they +were fettered and trussed up for the spit; unable to look down, or turn +their heads, on account of a thick stock, or two or three cravats piled +on the top of each other--and only capable of using their arms to dangle +a cane, or carry an umbrella, as they hobble along, perhaps on a hot +sun-shiny day in July or August? + +But this evil, you who are mothers, have it very generally in your power +to prevent, if you are only wise enough to secure that ascendancy over +your children's minds which the Author of their nature designed. At the +least, you can prevent it for a time--the most important period, too--by +your own authority. This you will not need any urging to induce you to +do, if you ever become thoroughly convinced of its pre-eminent folly. + + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +The same general principles which should guide the young mother in +regard to the dress of boys, are equally important and applicable in the +management of girls. The whole dress should, as much as possible, hang +loosely from the shoulders, without pressing on the body, or any part of +it. This, I say, is the grand point to be aimed at; and this is the only +great principle, whatever some mothers may think, which will lead to +true beauty of person, and gracefulness of gesture. + +There is, however, a slight difference to be made between the dress of +girls and that of boys. The greater delicacy of the female frame +requires that the surface of the body should be kept rather warmer, as +well as better protected from the vicissitudes of the atmosphere. + +But is this the fact? Is not the contrary true? While boys in the winter +are clad in warm woollen vestments, covering every part of their trunk, +many portions of the female frame, and especially many parts of their +limbs, are left so much exposed, that in cold weather you scarcely find +a girl abroad, who appears to be comfortable. + +Nay, they are not only uncomfortable abroad, but at home; and if I were +to present to mothers in detail, a tenth of the evils which their +daughters suffer from not adopting a warmer method of clothing, I should +probably be stared at by some, and laughed at by others. All this, too, +without speaking of going out of warm concert rooms, theatres, ball +rooms and lecture rooms, into the night air, or out of school rooms and +churches, to walk home with measured and stiffened pace, lest the sin +unpardonable of walking swiftly or RUNNING,--that active exercise which +health requires, which youthful feeling prompts, and which duty ought to +inspire,--should unwarily be committed. + +The tremendous evils of confining the lungs have been adverted to at +sufficient length. In reference to that general subject, I need only +add, that if the chest be not duly exercised and expanded, the liver, +the lungs, the stomach, digestion, absorption, circulation and +perspiration, are all hindered. And even so far as the various internal +organs of the body _are_ active, they act at a great disadvantage. The +blood which they "work up," is bad blood, and must be so, as long as the +lungs do not have free play. Hence may and do arise all sorts of +diseases; especially diseases of OBSTRUCTION; and such as are often very +difficult of removal. + +What can be a more pitiable sight than some modern girls going home from +school or church in winter? Thinly clad, the blood is all driven from +the surface upon the internal organs, and what remains is so loaded with +carbon, which the lungs ought but cannot discharge, that her skin has a +leaden hue; her teeth chatter; her very heart is chilled in her panting, +frozen bosom; she cannot run, and if she could, she must not, for it +would be vulgar! Every mother should shrink from the sight of such a +picture. + + + + +CHAPTER V. + +CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +No mother will ever pay that attention to cleanliness which its +importance to health and happiness demands, till she perceives its +necessity. And she will never perceive that necessity till she has +studied attentively the machinery of the human frame--and especially its +wonderful covering. + +The skin is pierced with little openings or _pores_, so numerous that +some have reckoned them at a million to every square inch. At all +events, they are so small that the naked eye can neither distinguish nor +count them; and so numerous, that we cannot pierce the skin with the +finest needle without hitting one or more of them. + +When we are in perfect health, and the skin clean, a gentle moisture or +mist continually oozes through these pores. This process is called +_perspiration_; and the moisture which thus escapes, the _matter_ of +perspiration. + +Perspiration may be checked in two ways. 1. by filth on the skin; 2. by +what is commonly called taking cold--for taking cold essentially +consists in chilling the skin to such a degree as to stop, for some +time, the escape of this moisture. Most persons have doubtless observed, +that in the first stages of a cold, they frequently have a very dry +skin. Whereas, when we are in health, the skin usually feels moist. + +Our health is not only endangered, and a foundation laid for fevers, +rheumatisms, and consumptions, by stopping the pores of the skin with +dirt, or anything else, but there is also danger from another and a very +different source. + +The blood, in its circulation through the body, is constantly becoming +impure; and as it thus comes back impure to the heart, is as constantly +sent to the lungs, where it comes in close contact with the air which we +breathe, and is purified. But this same purifying process which goes on +in the lungs, goes on, too, if the skin is in a pure, free, healthy +condition, all over the surface of the body. If it is not--if the skin +cannot do this part of the work--an additional burden is thus laid on +the lungs, which in this way soon become so overworked, that they +cannot perform their own proportion of the labor. And whenever this +happens, the health must soon suffer. + +The strange belief, that "dirt is healthy," has much influence on the +daily practice of thousands of those who are ignorant of the human +structure, and the laws which govern and regulate the animal economy. It +has probably originated in the well-known fact, that those children who +are allowed to play in the dirt, are often as healthy--and even _more_ +healthy--than those who are confined to the nursery or the parlor. + +Now, while it is admitted that this is a very common case, it is yet +believed that the former class of children would be still more vigorous +than they now are, if they were kept more cleanly, or were at least +frequently washed. It is not the dirt which promotes their health, but +their active exercise in the open air; the advantages of which are more +than sufficient to compensate for the injury which they sustain from the +dirt. That is to say, they retain, in spite of the dirt, better health +than those who are denied the blessings of pure air and abundant +exercise, and subjected to the opposite extreme of almost constant +confinement. + +There is something deceitful, after all, in the ruddy, blooming +appearance of those children who are left by the busy parent to play in +the road or field, without attention to cleanliness. If this were not +so, how comes it to pass that they suffer much more, not only from +chronic, but from acute diseases, than children whose parents are in +better circumstances? + +I am the more solicitous to combat a belief in the salutary tendency of +an unclean skin, because I know it prevails to some extent; and because +I know also, both from reason and from fact, that it is a gross error. + +It is, however, true, that years sometimes intervene, before the evil +consequences of dirtiness appear. The office of the vessels of the skin +being interrupted, an increase of action is imposed on other parts, +especially on those internal organs commonly called glands, which action +is apt to settle into obstinate disease. Hence, at least when aided by +other causes, often arise, in later life, after the source of the evil +is forgotten, if it were ever suspected, rheumatism, scrofula, jaundice, +and even consumption. + +There is a strange notion abroad, that the _smell_ of the earth is +beneficial, especially to consumptive persons. I honestly believe, +however, that it is more likely to create consumption than to cure it. +Besides, in what does this smell consist? Do the silex, the alumine, and +the other earths, with their compounds, emit any odor? Rarely, I +believe, unless when mixed with vegetable matter. But no gases +necessary to health are evolved during the decomposition of vegetable +matter; on the contrary, it is well known that many of them tend to +induce disease. + +I am thoroughly persuaded that too much attention cannot be paid to +cleanliness; and the demand for such attention is equally imperious in +the case of those who cultivate the earth, or labor in it, or on stone, +during the intervals of their useful avocations, as in the case of those +individuals who follow other employments. + +I must also protest against the doctrine, that the smell or taste of the +earth, much less a coat of it spread over the surface, and closing up, +for hours and days together, thousands and millions of those little +pores with which the Author of this "wondrous frame" has pierced the +skin, can have a salutary tendency. + +The opinion has been even maintained, that uncleanly habits are not only +unfavorable to health, but to morality. There can be no doubt that he +who neglects his person and dress will be found lower in the scale of +morals, other things being equal, than he who pays a due regard to +cleanliness. + +Some have supposed that a disposition to neglect personal cleanliness +was indicative of genius. But this opinion is grossly erroneous, and +has well nigh ruined many a young man. + +I am far from recommending any degree of fastidiousness on this subject. +Truth and correct practice usually lie between extremes. But I do and +must insist, that the connection between cleanliness of body and purity +of moral character, is much more close and direct than has usually been +supposed. + +But to return to the more immediate effects of cleanliness on health. +There is one class of diseases in particular which, in an eminent +degree, owe their origin to a neglect of cleanliness. I refer to the +bowel complaints so common among children during summer and autumn. +Except in case of teething, the use of unripe fruits, or the _abuse_ of +those which are in themselves excellent, it is probable that more than +half of the bowel complaints of the young are either produced or greatly +aggravated by a foul skin. + +The importance of washing the whole body in water will be insisted on in +the chapter on Bathing; it is therefore unnecessary to say anything +farther on that subject in this place, except to observe that whether +the washings of the body be partial or general, they should be thorough, +so far as they are carried. There are thousands of children who, in +pretending to wash their hands and face, will do little more than wet +the inside of their hands, and the tips of their noses and ears unless +great care is taken. + +Few things are more important than suitable changes of dress. There are +those, who, from principle, never wear the same under-garment but one +day without washing, either in summer or winter; and there are others +who, though they may wear an article without washing two or three +successive days, take care to change their dress at night--never +sleeping in a garment which they have worn during the day. + +It is a very common objection to suggestions like these, that they will +do very well for those who have wealth, but not for the poor;--that +_they_ have neither the time nor the means of attending to them. How can +they change their clothes every day? we are asked. And how can they +afford to have a separate dress for the night? + +There must be retrenchment in some other matters, it is admitted. In +order to find time for more washing, or money to pay others for the +labor, the poor must deny themselves a few things which they now +suppose, if they have ever thought at all on the subject, are conducive +to their happiness--but which are in reality either useless or +injurious. Something may be saved by a reasonable dress, as I have +already shown. Other items of expense, which might be spared with great +advantage to health and happiness, and applied to the purpose in +question, will be mentioned in the chapter on Food and Drink. + + + + +CHAPTER VI. + +ON BATHING. + +Danger of savage practices. Rousseau. Cold water at birth. First washing +of the child. Rules. Temperature. Bathing vessels. Unreasonable fears. +Whims. Views of Dr. Dewees. Hardening. Rules for the cold bath. Securing +a glow. Coming out of the bath. Local baths. Shower bath. Vapor bath. +Sponging. Neglect of bathing. The Romans. Treatment of children compared +with that of domestic animals. + + +Some of the hardy nations of antiquity, as well as a few savage tribes +of modern times, have been accustomed to plunge their new-born infants +into cold water. This is done for the two-fold purpose of washing and +hardening them. + +To all who reason but for a moment on this subject, the danger of such a +practice must be obvious. So sudden a change from a temperature of +nearly 100º of Fahrenheit to one quite low, perhaps scarcely 40º, must +and does have a powerful effect on the nervous system even of an adult; +but how much more on that of a tender infant? We may form some idea of +this, by the suddenness and violence of its cries, by the sudden +contractions and relaxations of its limbs and body, and by its +palpitating heart and difficult breathing. + +Every one's experience may also remind him, that what produces at best a +momentary pain to himself, cannot otherwise than be painful to the +infant. In making a comparison between adults and infants, however, in +this respect, we should remember that the lungs of the infant do not get +into full and vigorous action until some time after birth; and that, on +this account, the hold they have on life is so feeble, that any powerful +shock, and especially that given by the cold bath, is ten times more +dangerous to them than to adults, or even to infants themselves, after a +few months have elapsed. + +It is surprising to me that so sensible a writer as Rousseau generally +is on education, should have encouraged this dangerous practice; and +still more so that many fathers even now, blinded by theory, should +persist in it, notwithstanding the pleadings of the mother or the nurse, +and the plainest dictates of common sense and common prudence.[Footnote: +Nothing is intended to be said here, which shall encourage unthinking +nurses or mothers in setting themselves against measures which have been +prescribed by higher authority,--I mean the physician. There are cases +of this kind, where it requires all the resolution which a father, +uninterrupted, can summon to his aid, to administer a dose or perform a +task, on which he knows the existence of his child may be depending: but +when the thoughtless entreaties of the mother or nurse are interposed, +it makes his condition most distressing. Mothers, in such cases, ought +to encourage rather than remonstrate. They who _do not_, are guilty of +cruelty, and--perhaps--of infanticide.] + +A child plunged into cold water at birth, by those whose theories carry +them so far as to do it even in the coldest weather, has sometimes been +twenty-four hours in recovering, notwithstanding the most active and +judicious efforts to restore it. In other instances the results have +been still more distressing. Dr. Dewees is persuaded that he has "known +death itself to follow the use of cold water," in this way--I believe he +means _immediate_ death--and adds, with great confidence, that he has +"repeatedly seen it require the lapse of several hours before reaction +could establish itself; during which time the pale and sunken cheeks and +livid lips declared the almost exhausted state" of the infant's +excitability.[Footnote: "Dewees on children" p. 72.] + +We need not hesitate to put very great confidence in the opinion here +expressed; for besides being a close and just observer of human nature, +Dr. D. has had the direction and management, in a greater or less +degree, of several thousands of new-born infants. + +Nothing, indeed, in the whole range of physical education, seems better +proved, than that while some few infants, whose constitutions are +naturally very strong, are invigorated by the practice in question, +others, in the proportion of hundreds for one, who are _less_ robust, +are injured for life; some of them seriously. + +Nor will spirits added to the water make any material difference. I am +aware that there is a very general notion abroad, that the injurious +effects of cold water, in its application both internally and +externally, are greatly diminished by the addition of a little spirit; +but it is not so. Does the addition of such a small quantity of spirit +as is generally used in these cases, materially alter the temperature? +Is it not the application of a cold liquid to a heated surface, still? +Can we make anything else of it, either more or less? + +I do not undertake to say, that the cold bath may not be so managed in +the progress of infancy, as to make it beneficial, especially to strong +constitutions. It is its indiscriminate application to all new-born +children, without regard to strength of constitution, or any other +circumstances, that I most strenuously oppose. Of its occasional use, +under the eye of a physician, and by parents who will discriminate, I +shall say more presently. + +Our first duty on receiving a new inhabitant of the world is, to see +that it is gently but thoroughly washed, in moderately warm soft water, +with fine soap. Special attention should be paid to the folds of the +joints, the neck, the arm pits, &c. For rubbing the body, in order to +disengage anything which might obstruct the pores, or irritate or fret +the skin, nothing can be preferable to a piece of soft sponge or +flannel. Though the operation should be thorough, and also as rapid as +the nature of circumstances will permit, all harshness should be +avoided. When finished, the child should be wiped perfectly dry with +soft flannel. + +While the washing is performed, the temperature of the room should be +but a few degrees lower than that of the water; and the child should not +be exposed to currents of cold air. If the weather is severe, or if +currents of air in the room cannot otherwise be avoided, the dressing, +undressing, washing, &c., may be done near the fire. And I repeat the +rule, it should always be done with as much rapidity as is compatible +with safety. + +Here will be seen one great advantage of simplicity in the form of +dress. If the more rational suggestions of our chapter on that subject +are attended to, it will greatly facilitate the process of washing, and +the subsequent daily process of bathing, which I am about to recommend +to my readers. + +This washing process is also an introduction to bathing. For it should +be repeated every day; but with less and less attention to the washing, +and more and more reference to the bathing. How long the child should +stay in the bath, must be left to experience. If he is quiet, fifteen +minutes can never be too long; and I should not object to twenty. If +otherwise, and you are obliged to remove him in five minutes, or even in +three, still the bathing will be of too much service to be dispensed +with. + +Nothing should be mixed with the water, if the infant is healthy, except +a little soap, as already mentioned. Some are fond of using salt; but it +is by no means necessary, and may do harm. + +The proper hour for bathing is the early part of the day, or about the +middle of the forenoon. This season is selected, because the process, +manage it as carefully as we may, is at first a little exhausting. As +the child grows older, however, and not only becomes stronger, but +appears to be actually refreshed and invigorated by the bath, it will be +advisable to defer it to a later and later hour. By the time the babe is +three months old, particularly in the warm season, the hour of bathing +may be at sunset. + +The degree of heat must be determined, in part, by observing its effect +on the child; and in part by a thermometer. For this, and for other +purposes, a thermometer, as I have already more than hinted, is +indispensable in every nursery. Our own sensations are often at best a +very unsafe guide. There is one rule which should always be +observed--never to have the temperature of the bath below that of the +air of the room. If the thermometer show the latter to be 70º, the bath +should be something like 80º; perhaps with feeble children, rather more. + +Great care ought always to be taken to proportion the air of the room +and the water of the bath to each other. If, for example, the +temperature of the room have been, for some time, unusually warm, that +of the water must not be so low as if it had been otherwise. On the +contrary, if the room have been, for a considerable time, rather cool, +the bath may be made several degrees cooler than in other circumstances. +But in no case and in no circumstances must a _warm_ bath--intended as +such, simply--be so warm or so cold, as to make the child uncomfortable; +whether the temperature be 70º, 80º, or 90º. + +It is hardly necessary to add, that in bathing a young child, the vessel +used for the purpose should be large enough to give free scope to all +the motions of its extremities. Most children are delighted to play and +scramble about in the water. I know, indeed, that the contrary sometimes +happens; but when it does, it is usually--I do not say _always_--because +the countenances of those who are around express fear or apprehension; +for it is surprising how early these little beings learn to decipher our +feelings by our very countenances. + +Some of our readers may be surprised at the intimation that there are +mothers and nurses who have fears or apprehensions in regard to the +effects of the warm bath; but others--and it is for such that I write +this paragraph--will fully understand me. I have been often surprised at +the fact, but it is undoubted, that there is a strong prejudice against +warm bathing, in many parts of the country. In endeavoring to trace the +cause, I have usually found that it arose from having seen or heard of +some child who died soon after its application. I have had many a parent +remonstrate with me on the danger of the warm bath; and this, too, in +circumstances when it appeared to me, that the child's existence +depended, under God, on that very measure. Perhaps it is useless in such +cases, however, to reason with parents on the subject. The medical +practitioner must do his duty boldly and fearlessly, and risk the +consequences. + +But as I am writing, not for persons under immediate excitement, but for +those that may be reasoned with, it is proper to say, that in medicine, +the warm bath is so often used in extreme cases, and as a last resort, +even when death has already grasped, or is about to fix his grasp on the +sufferer, that it would be very strange if many persons _did not_ die, +just after bathing. But that the bathing itself ever produced this +result, in one case in a thousand, there is not the slightest reason for +believing. [Footnote: Let me not be understood as intimating that, the +general neglect of bathing, of which I complain so loudly, is _chiefly_ +owing to this unreasonable prejudice, though this no doubt has its sway. +On the contrary, I believe it is much oftener owing to ignorance, +indolence, and parsimony.] + +There are many more whims connected with bathing, as with almost +everything else, which it were equally desirable to remove. Some nurses +and mothers think that if the child's skin is wiped dry after bathing, +it will impair, if not destroy, the good effects of the operation. +Others still, shocking to relate, will even put it to bed in its wet +clothes; this, too, from principle. Not unlike this, is the belief, very +common among adults, that if we get our clothes wet--even our +stockings--we must, by all means, suffer them to dry on us; a belief +which, in its results, has sent thousands to a premature grave--and, +what is still worse, made invalids, for life, of a still greater number. + +I am aware, that in rejecting the indiscriminate cold bathing of +infants, I am treading on ground which is rather unpopular, even with +medical men; a large proportion of whom seem to believe that the +practice may be useful. But I am not _wholly_ alone. Dr. Dewees--of +whose large experience I have already spoken--and some others, do not +hesitate to avow similar sentiments. + +The objections of Dr. Dewees to cold bathing are the following. 1. There +often exists a predisposition to disease, which cold bathing is sure to +rouse to action. Or if the disease have already begun to affect the +system, the bath is sure to aggravate it. 2. Some children have such +feeble constitutions that they are sure to be permanently weakened by +it, rather than invigorated. 3. To those in whom there is the tendency +of a large quantity of blood to the head, lungs, liver, &c., it is +injurious. 4. In some, the shock produces a species of syncope, or +catalepsy. 5. The _reaction_, as shown by the heat which follows the +cold bath, is, in some cases, so great as to produce a degree of fever, +and consequent debility. 6. It never answers the purposes of +cleanliness--one great object of bathing--so well as the warm bath. 7. +It is always unpleasant or painful to the child; especially at first. 8. +It sometimes produces severe pain in the bowels. + +This is a very formidable list of objections; and certainly deserves +consideration. There is one statement made by Dr. D. in the progress of +his remarks on this subject, in which I do not concur. He says--"The +object of all bathing is to remove impurities arising from dust, +perspiration, &c., from the surface; that the skin may not be obstructed +in the performance of its proper offices." + +But the object of cold bathing, with many, is to _harden_; consequently +it is not true that cleanliness is the _only object_. If he means, even, +that cleanliness is the only _legitimate_ object of all bathing, I shall +still be compelled to dissent. + +If the cold bath could be used, always, by and with the direction of a +skilful physician, I believe its occasional use might be rendered +salutary. And although as it is now commonly used, I believe its effects +are almost anything but salutary, I do not deny that if its use were +cautiously and gradually begun, and judiciously conducted, it might be +the means of making children who are already robust, still more hardy +and healthy than before, and better able to resist those sudden changes +of temperature so common in our climate, and so apt to produce cold, +fever, and consumption. + +Cold bathing, in the hands of those who are ignorant of the laws of the +human frame--and such unfortunately and unaccountably most fathers and +mothers are--I cannot help regarding as a highly dangerous weapon; and +therefore it is, that in view of the whole subject, I cannot recommend +its general and indiscriminate use. + +If there are individuals, however, who are determined to employ it, in +the case of their more vigorous children, and without the advice or +direction of their family physician, I beg them to attend to the +following rules or principles, expressed as briefly as possible. + +In no ordinary case whatever, is the cold bath useful, unless it is +succeeded by that degree of warmth on the surface of the body which is +usually called a _glow_. This is a leading and important principle. The +contrary, that is, the injurious effects of cold bathing--its +_immediate_ bad effects, I mean--are shown by the skin remaining pale +and shrivelled after coming out of the bath, by its blue appearance, and +by its coldness, as well as by a sunken state of the eyes, and much +general languor. + +To secure this point--I mean the GLOW--it is indispensably important to +begin the use of cold water gradually; that is, to use it at first of +so high a temperature as to produce only a slight sensation of cold, and +to take special care that the skin be immediately wiped very dry, and +the temperature of the room be quite as high as usual. Afterward the +water may be cooled gradually, from week to week, though never more than +a degree or two at once. + +It will probably be unsafe to commence this practice of cold +bathing--even in the case of the most robust children--until they are at +least six months of age. + +The appropriate season will be the middle of the forenoon, the hour when +the system is usually the most vigorous, and at which we shall be most +likely to secure a reaction. At first, twice or three times a week are +as often as it will be safe to repeat it. Some writers recommend it +twice a day; but once is enough, under any ordinary circumstances. + +The method at first is, to give the infant a single plunge. Afterward, +when he becomes older, and more inured to it, he may be plunged several +times in succession. + +On taking him out of the bath, the skin should be wiped perfectly dry, +as in the case of the warm bath, and with the same or an increased +degree of attention to other circumstances--the temperature of the +room, the avoiding currents of air, &c. He should next be put in a soft, +warm blanket, and be kept for some time in a state of gentle motion; and +after a little time, should be dressed. + +I have already mentioned the importance of avoiding the manifestation of +fear, when we bathe a child; and the caution is particularly necessary +in the administration of the cold bath. Some writers even recommend, +that during the whole process of undressing, bathing, exercising, and +dressing, singing should be employed. There is philosophy in this +advice, and it is easily tried; but I cannot speak of it from +experience. + +There is one thing which may serve to calm our apprehensions--if we have +any--of danger; which is, that though the child's lungs are feeble at +first, from their not having been, like the heart, accustomed to +previous action, yet when they get fairly into motion and action, and +the child is a few months old, they are probably as strong, if not +stronger, in proportion, than those of adults. + +Bathing in cold water should never be performed immediately after a full +meal. Neither is it desirable to go to the contrary extreme, and bathe +when the stomach has been long empty; nor when the child's mental or +bodily powers are more than usually exhausted by fatigue. + +Although I have given these rules for those who are determined to use +the cold bath with their children, yet, for fear I shall be +misunderstood, I must be suffered to repeat, in this place, that, +uninformed as people generally are in regard to physiology, I cannot +advise even its moderate use. On the contrary, I would gladly dissuade +from it, as most likely, in the way it would inevitably be used, to do +more harm than good. + +There is no sort of objection to what might be called local bathing with +cold water. If the child's head is hot at any time, the temples, and +indeed the whole upper part of the head, may be very properly wet with +moderately cold water--taking care to avoid wetting the clothes. But +avoid, by all means, the common but foolish practice of putting spirits +in the water. + +A tea-spoonful of cold water cannot be too early put into the mouth of +the infant. The object is to cleanse or rinse the mouth; and the process +may be aided by wiping it out with a piece of soft linen rag. If a part +or all of the water should be swallowed, no harm will be done. This +practice, commenced almost as soon as children are born, has saved many +a sore mouth. + +There are other forms of bathing besides those already mentioned; among +which are the shower bath, the vapor bath, and the medicated bath. The +shower bath--for which purpose the water is commonly used cold--is but +poorly adapted to the wants of infants. The shock is much greater than +the common cold bath, and more apt to frighten; and fear is unfavorable +to reaction, or the production of a genial glow. + +The vapor bath is much better; and probably has quite as good an effect +as the common warm bath. The trouble and expense of procuring the +necessary apparatus is somewhat greater, however, as a mere bathing tub +costs but little, and can be made by every father who possesses common +ingenuity. But whatever may be the expense, it is indispensable in every +family; and whenever the pores of the skin are obstructed, a vapor +bathing apparatus is equally desirable. + +The medicated vapor bath is sometimes used; but I am not now treating of +infants who are sick, but of those who are in a state of health. + +The common warm bath is sometimes medicated by putting in salt. This, of +course, renders the water more stimulating to the skin; but except when +the perspiration is checked, or the skin peculiarly inactive from some +other cause--in other words, unless we are sick--it is seldom expedient +to use it. + +There is one substitute for the bathing tub, in the case of the cold +bath. I refer to the use of a wet cloth or sponge, applied rapidly to +the whole surface of the body. When this is done, the skin should be +wiped thoroughly dry immediately afterwards, as in the case of complete +immersion. + +The application of either a cloth or a sponge, filled with warm water, +to the skin, in this manner, even if continued for several minutes +together, is less efficacious than a continuous immersion. I repeat +it--no family ought to be without conveniences for bathing in warm water +daily. I speak now of every member of the family, young and old, as well +as the infant; and I refer particularly to the summer season: though I +do not think the practice ought to be wholly discontinued during the +winter. + +It will still be objected that this care of, and attention to the young, +in reference to health--this provision for bathing daily, and care to +see that it is performed--can never be afforded by the laboring portion +of the community. But I shall as strenuously insist on the contrary; and +trust I shall, in the sequel, produce reasons which will be +satisfactory. + +The great difficulty is, to convince parents that these things are +vastly more productive of health and happiness to their children--more +truly necessaries--than a great many things for which they now expend +their time and money. There is, and always has been--except, perhaps, +among the Jews, in the earliest periods of the history of that wonderful +nation--a strange disposition to overlook the happiness of the young. It +is not necessary to represent this dereliction as peculiar to modern +times, for we find traces of the same thing thousands of years ago. + +The Roman emperors--Dioclesian in particular--could make provision for +bathing, to an extent which now astonishes us; but for whom? For whom, I +repeat it, was incurred the enormous expense of fitting up and keeping +in repair accommodations for bathing at once 18,000 people? For adults; +and for adults alone. I do not say that children were not admitted, in +any case; but I say they were not contemplated in these arrangements. +Nothing was done--not a single thing--that would not have been done, had +there been no child under ten years of age in the whole empire. + +And what better than this do WE, now? We make provision for the +happiness of the adult. The most indigent person will find time and +money to spend for the gratification of his own senses, his pride, or +his curiosity; but his children--they may be overlooked! Or, if he has +an eye to the future happiness of his child, he conceives that he is +promoting it in the best possible degree, by endeavoring to lay up a few +dollars for his use, after his character is formed--at a period, as it +too often happens, when money will do him little good, since it can +neither purchase health, peace of mind, nor reputation. + +Far be it from me to say, that the poor--ground into the dust as they +are, by the force of circumstances operating with their own concurrence, +to make them ignorant, vicious, or miserable--can do for their children +all that is desirable. By no means. But they have it in their power to +do much more than they are at present doing. They have it in their +power, at least, to use the same good sense in the management of the +human being that they do in that of a pig, a calf, or a colt, or even a +young vegetable. No parent, let him be ever so poor, is found in the +habit of neglecting either of these in proportion to its infancy, and of +exerting himself only in proportion as it grows older. Common sense +tells him that the contrary is the true course; that however poor he may +be, he will be still poorer, if he do not take special pains with the +young animal, to rear it and with the young vegetable, to give it the +right direction, by keeping down the weeds, and pruning and watering it. +And I say again, that however deserving of censure the wealthy of a +Christian community may be in not directing the ignorant and vicious +into the right path, and in not expending more of their wealth on those +who are poor, in elevating their minds and their manners, and promoting +their health, still the latter are inexcusable for their present neglect +of their infant offspring, while they would not think of neglecting, on +the same principle, the offspring of their domestic animals. + + + + +CHAPTER VII. + +FOOD. + +SEC. 1. General principles.--SEC. 2. Conduct of the mother.--SEC. 3. +Nursing--rules in regard to it.--SEC. 4. Quantity of food. Errors. +Over-feeding. Gluttony.--SEC. 5. How long should milk be the child's +only food?--SEC. 6 Feeding before teething. Cow's milk. Sucking bottles. +Cleanliness. Nurses.--SEC. 7. Treatment from teething to weaning.--SEC. +8. Process of weaning-rules in regard to it.--SEC. 9. First food to be +used after weaning. Importance of good bread. Other kinds of food.--SEC. +10. Remarks on fruit.--SEC. 11. Evils and dangers of confectionary.--SEC. +12. Mischiefs of pastry.--SEC. 13. Crude and raw substances. + + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk, in suitable quantity, and under suitable regulations, +is so obviously the appropriate food of an infant during the first +months of its existence, that it seems almost unnecessary to repeat the +fact. And yet the violations of this rule are so numerous and constant, +as to require a few passing remarks. + +There are some mothers who seem to have a perfect hatred of children; +and if they can find any plausible apology for neglecting to nurse them, +they will. Few, indeed, will publicly acknowledge a state of feeling so +unnatural; but there are some even of such. On the latter, all argument +would, I fear, be utterly lost. Of the former, there may, be hope. + +They tell us--and they are often sustained by those around them--that it +is very inconvenient to be so confined to a child that they cannot leave +home for a little while. Can it be their duty--for in these days, when +virtue and religion, and everything good, are so highly complimented, no +people are more ready to talk of _duty_ than they who have the least +regard to it--can it be their duty, they ask, to exclude themselves from +the pleasures and comforts of social life for half or two thirds of +their most active and happy years? Ought they not to go abroad, at least +occasionally? But if so, and their children have no other source of +dependence, must they not suffer? Is it not better, therefore, that they +should be early accustomed to other food, for a part of the time? +Besides, they may be sick; and then the child must rely on others; and +will it not be useful to accustom it early to do so? + +Perhaps few mothers are conscious that this train of reasoning passes +through their minds. But that something like it is often made the +occasion of substituting food which is less proper, for that furnished +by Divine Providence, there cannot be a doubt. And the mischief is, that +she who has gone so far, will not scruple, ere long, to go farther. And, +strange and unnatural as it may seem, that mothers should turn over +their children to be nursed wholly by others, in order to get rid of the +inconvenience of nursing them at their own bosoms, it is only carrying +out to its fullest extent, and reducing to practice, the train of +reasoning mentioned above. + +Nor is it necessary that I should stop here to denounce a course of +conduct so unchristian and savage. I know it is very common in some +countries; and those American mothers who ape the other eastern +fashions, or countenance their sons and daughters in doing it, will not +be slow to imitate this also--especially as it is a very _convenient_ +fashion. And I question whether I shall succeed in reasoning them out of +it. Habit, both of thought and action, is exceedingly powerful. I will, +therefore, confine myself chiefly to those efforts at prevention, from +which much more is to be hoped, in the present state of society, than +from direct attempts at cure. + +It will be soon enough to leave a child with another person, when the +mother is actually sick, or unavoidably absent; or when some other +adequate cause is known to exist. We are to be governed, in these and +similar cases, by general rules, and not by exceptions. The general +rule, in the present case, is, that mothers can nurse their own +children; and, if they have the proper disposition, that they can do it +uninterruptedly. + +But those who are so ready to become counsellors on these occasions, +will tell us, perhaps, that the child must be "fed to spare the mother." +That is to say, nursing weakens the mother, and the child must be taken +away, a part of the time, to save her strength. + +Now it may safely be doubted whether the process of nursing, in itself +considered, does weaken, at all. The Author of nature has made provision +for the secretion (formation) of the milk, whether the child receives it +or not. If it is not taken by the child, or drawn off in some other way, +one of two things must follow;--either it must be taken up by what are +called absorbent vessels, and carried into the circulation, and chiefly +thrown out of the system as waste matter, or it will prove a source of +irritation, if not of inflammation, to the organs themselves which +secrete it. In both cases, the strength of the mother is quite as likely +to be taxed, as if the child received the milk in the way that nature +intended. + +Besides, on this very principle, the plan of saving a mother's strength +by requiring another to nurse for her, is but saying that we will weaken +one person to save another. Or if we feed the child, to "spare its +mother," what is this, in practice, but to say that the works of the +Creator are very imperfect; and that he has thrown upon the mass of +mankind a task to which they are not equal? For the mass of mankind are +poor; and the poor, having neither the means nor the time to escape the +duties in question, must submit to them, while their more wealthy +neighbors escape. + +But it is idle to defend customs so monstrous. They admit of no defence +that has the slightest claim to solidity. The general rule then is, that +mothers should nurse their own children. + + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Originally it was not my intention to give directions, in this volume, +in regard to the food, drink, &c., of the mother while nursing; but +repeated solicitations on this point, have led me to the conclusion that +a few general principles may be very properly introduced. + +The future health, and even the moral well-being of the child, depend +much more on the proper management of the mother herself than is usually +supposed. How, indeed, can it be other wise? How can the mother's blood +be constantly irritated with improper food and drink, without rendering +the milk so? And how can a child draw, daily and hourly, from this +feverish fountain, without being affected, not only in his physical +frame, but in his very temper and feelings? + +It is not enough that we adopt the principles already insisted on by +some of our wisest medical men, and even by one or two medical +societies,[Footnote: Those of Connecticut and New Hampshire.] that +children in this way often acquire a propensity for exciting drinks, +that may end in their downright intemperance. What if it should not, in +every case, proceed quite so far as to make the child a drunkard? If it +but lays the foundation of a constitutional fondness for _excitements_, +it tends to disease. Indeed that, in itself, is a disease; and one, too, +which is destroying more persons every year than the cholera, or even +the consumption. Consumption has at most only slain her tens of +thousands [Footnote: About 40,000 a year, in the United States, as nearly +as it can be estimated.] a year; but a fondness for exciting food and +drink--innocent and harmless as it is often supposed to be, and +therefore only the more dangerous a foe--does not fail to slay every +year, directly or indirectly, its hundreds of thousands. At least this +is my own opinion. + +Why, where can you find the individual who is not a slave to this +perpetual rage within--this perpetual cry, "Who will show us any" +physical "good"? Who, in this land of abundance, will eat or drink plain +things? Who will eat simple bread, meat, potatoes, rice, pudding, +apples, &c. or drink simple water? A few instances may be found, of +late, in which people confine themselves to simple water for drink; but +they are rather rare. And no wonder. They _must_ be rare so long as an +unnatural thirst is kept up everywhere by the most exciting and most +strange mixtures of food. Where, I again ask, is the person who will eat +and relish plain bread, plain meat, plain puddings, &c.? Certainly not +in the nursery. No young mother--scarcely one I mean--will, for a single +meal, confine herself to a piece of bread, the sweetest and best food in +the whole world, unless it is hot, or toasted, or soaked, or buttered. A +natural, healthy appetite, is as rare a thing on our planet, almost, as +an inhabitant of the sun or moon. + +I have seen more than one mother made sick by using, while nursing, +improper food and drink. I have known milk punch, taken by +stealth--(because how could the mother, it was said, ever have a supply +of food for her poor child without it!)--to kindle a fever that came +very near burning up the mother and child both. And yet, if I have once +or twice succeeded in convincing the mother that she was only suffering +the natural punishment of her own transgressions, I have never, so far +as I now recollect, succeeded in making her believe that her iniquities +were visited upon her unoffending infant. + +There is everywhere the most painful apathy on this most painful +subject. We see little children of all ages, everywhere, the victims of +debility, and pain, and suffering, and disease and death, and yet we +very seldom seem to search for one moment for the causes of this +premature destruction. In fact most parents--even many intelligent +mothers--at once stare, if you attempt to inquire into the causes of +their child's death, as if it was either a kind of sacrilege, or an +impeachment of their own parental affection. Diseases, even at this day, +with the sun of science blazing in meridian splendor, they seem to +regard as the judgments of heaven; and to think of tracing out the +causes of the early death of half our race, is, in their estimation, not +only idle, but wicked. + +Yet this is obviously one of the first steps, every, where, which +philanthropy demands; to say nothing of the demands of christianity. It +is the first step for the physician, the first step for the educator, +the first step for the parent, and above all, the mother. Nay; more--we +must not suppress so great and important a truth--it is the first step +for the legislator and the minister. What sense is there in continuing, +century after century, and age after age, to expend all our efforts in +merely _mending_ the diseased half of mankind, when those same efforts +are amply sufficient, if early and properly applied, not only to +continue the lives of the whole, but to make them _whole beings_, +instead of passing through life mere _fragments_ of humanity? + +But I must not forget that this is merely a small manual, not intended +for those who make it their profession to teach the laws of God and man, +but simply for young mothers. For the sake of erring humanity, would +that I could, but for one moment, divest myself of the idea, that in +writing for the young mother I am not writing for legislators and +ministers! Would that I could banish from my mind the deep conviction +that the mother is everywhere far more the law-giver to her infant--far +more the arbiter of the present and eternal destiny of her child--than +he who is more commonly regarded as such. + +Every mother owes it, not only to herself--for on this part she is not +_wholly_ forgetful--but to her offspring, to abstain, during the period +of nursing at least, from all causes which tend to produce a feverish +state of her fluids. Among these are every form of premature exertion, +whether in sitting up, laboring, conversing, or even thinking. It is of +very great importance that both the body and the mind should be kept +quiet; and the more so, the better. + +Among the particular causes of fever to the young mother, Dr. Dewees +enumerates spirits, wine, and other fermented liquors, a room too much +heated, closed curtains, confined air, too much exposure, and too much +company; and during the early period of confinement, broths and animal +food. + +There is nothing which he insists on more strongly, than the importance +of fresh air. Indeed, the practice of confining a nursing woman in a +space scarcely six feet square, and excluding the air surrounding her by +curtains and closed windows, and subjecting her to the necessity of +breathing twenty times the air that has already been as often +discharged, filled with poison, from her lungs, is not too strongly +reprobated by Dr. Dewees, or anybody else. But I have spoken of these +things in the chapter which treats on "The Nursery." I would only +observe, on this point, that if I were asked what one thing is most +indispensable to the health of the nursing woman, I would reply, Fresh +air; and if asked what were the second and third most important things, +I would still repeat--in imitation of the orator of old, in regard to +another subject--Fresh air, Fresh air. + +This important ingredient in human happiness, and especially in the +happiness of the young mother and her tender infant, can usually be had +within doors, if pains enough be taken. But if the weather is fine and +in every respect favorable, a woman who is in tolerable health may +venture abroad a little in about three weeks after her confinement, and +sometimes even in two. Whether her exercise be without or within doors, +however, she should be effectually protected against chills, and against +the influence of currents of cold air. + +It has been incidentally stated, that Dr. Dewees objects to the mother's +use, during her early period of nursing, of broths and animal food. This +is about as much as we could reasonably expect from one who belongs to a +profession whose members are, almost without exception, enslaved to the +practice of flesh-eating. But even this advice of his, if duly followed, +would be a great advance upon the practice which generally prevails. +There is so universal a belief among females that they demand, at this +period of their existence, not only a larger quantity of food than +usual, but also that which is more stimulating in its quality, as almost +to forbid the hopes of making much impression upon their minds. Many +young mothers seem to consider themselves as licensed, during a part of +their lives, not only to eat immoderately, and even to gluttony, but +also to swallow almost every species of vile trash which a vile world +affords. + +How long will it be, ere the mother can be induced to take as much pains +to select the most appropriate and most healthy aliment for herself and +her child, as she now does that which is demanded by a capricious +appetite, without the smallest reference to fitness or digestibility! +How long will it be ere the mother can be brought to believe and feel +that, in every step she takes, she is forming the habitation of an +immortal spirit--a spirit, too, whose character and destiny, both +present and eternal, must depend, in no small degree, upon the character +of the dwelling it occupies while passing through this stage of earthly +existence! How long will it be, before mothers can be made to believe +even these two simple truths, that the nourishment, which the human +being actually receives, is not always in exact proportion to the +quantity of nutritious food which he throws into his stomach, and that +the diet is always best for both mother and child, which is least +exciting. + +The Charleston Board of Health, during the existence of cholera in that +city in 1836, publicly announced that the "best food is the least +exciting," and this great truth is just as true in all other places and +circumstances on the globe as it was then in South Carolina. And though +I am far from believing that health depends more on food and drink than +on all other things put together, as many seem to suppose, yet I am +entirely of opinion that he who should devote himself successfully to +the work of applying this truth, in all its bearings, to the dietetic +practice of all mankind, would do more for their reformation--yes, and +their salvation too--than has yet been done by any merely _human_ being, +since the first day of the creation. + + +SEC. 3. _Nursing--how often._ + +Many lay it down, as an invariable rule, that no system can be pursued +with a child till it is six months old; and it must be admitted by all, +that for several months after birth there are serious difficulties in +the way of determining, with any degree of precision, how often a child +should be nursed or fed. Still, there are a few rules of universal +application; some of which are here presented. + +1. A child should never be nursed, merely to quiet it; for if this be +done, it will soon learn to cry, whenever it feels the slightest +uneasiness, not only from hunger, but from other causes; merely to be +gratified with nursing. Besides, if its cries should happen to be from +illness, it is ten to one but the reception of anything into the stomach +will do harm instead of good. + +2. The stomach, like every other organ in the body which is muscular, +must have time for rest; and this in the case of children as well as +adults. But to nurse them too frequently is in opposition to this rule, +and therefore of evil tendency. + +3. For reasons which may be seen by the last rule, there should be +regular seasons for nursing, and these should be adhered to, especially +by night. When very young, once in three hours may not be too frequent; +I believe that it is seldom proper to nurse a child more frequently than +this. But whenever three hours becomes a suitable period by day, once in +four hours will be often enough by night. I will not undertake to say at +what precise age children should be nursed at intervals of three and +four hours each; because some children are older, _constitutionally_, at +three months, than others are at four. + +There is one grand mistake, however, against which I must caution young +mothers; which is, not to indulge the vain expectation that feeble +infants will become robust, in proportion to their indulgence. On the +contrary, it is the more necessary to be strict with feeble children, +_because_ they are feeble. To keep them hanging at the breast to +invigorate them, is the very way to counteract our own intentions, and +defeat our own purpose. Seasons of entire rest are even more important +to their stomachs than to those of other persons. + +4. But in order to secure intervals of rest, both to the strong and the +feeble, we must avoid the pernicious habit of giving infants pap, and +other delicacies, "between meals." Many a child's health is ruined by +this practice. Nothing should be put into their stomachs for many +months--if they are in health--but the mother's milk. + +"This," says Dr. Dunglison, "is the sole food of the infant, and is +consequently sufficiently nutrient to maintain life, and to minister to +the growth, during the earliest periods of existence." [Footnote: +Elements of Hygiene, page 271.] In another place, he says, "Milk is an +appropriate nourishment at all ages, and is more so the nearer to +birth." + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +"We all know," says Dr. Dewees, "how easily the stomach may be made to +demand more food than is absolutely required; first, by the repetition +of aliment, and secondly, by its variety;--therefore both of these +causes must be avoided. The stomach, like every other part, can, and +unfortunately does, acquire habits highly injurious to itself; and that +of demanding an unnecessary quantity of aliment is not one of the least. +It should, therefore, be constantly borne in mind, that it is not the +quantity of food taken into the stomach, that is available to the proper +purposes of the system; but the quantity which can be digested, and +converted into nourishment fit to be applied to such purposes." + +There is a great deal of truth in these remarks; and especially in the +closing one, that not all which is taken into the stomach is digested. +It is highly probable, that the least quantity which is usually given to +an infant is more than sufficient for the purposes of digestion; and +that nearly every child in the arms of its mother, is over-fed. + +I know it has been said, by some physicians--and by those who are +sensible men, in other respects, too--that the child's stomach is a +pretty correct guide in regard to quantity. If we give it too much, say +they, it will reject it;--as if that were an end of the matter. + +But it is not so. It is by no means harmless to fill the child's stomach +as full as is possible without overflowing. Such a process, though it +should not create disease directly, would produce a gluttonous habit. +The stomach, being muscular, may be increased in size by use, like all +other muscular organs. The hands, the arms, the legs, the feet, the +fleshy portions of the face, even, may be disproportionally enlarged by +constant use. Thus a sailor, who uses his hands and arms much more than +his legs and feet, has the former unusually large; one who is much +accustomed to walking, has large feet; and in a tailor, who from +childhood uses his lower limbs comparatively little, they are both small +and slender. On the same principle, the stomach, by inordinate use, and +by carrying unreasonable loads, may be made nearly twice as large as +nature intended, and may demand twice as much food. And I have no doubt +that the bulk of mankind, young and old, eat about twice as much as +nature, unperverted, would require. + +If the suggestions of our last section are duly attended to, one of the +causes which lead the stomach to demand an unreasonable quantity of food +will be avoided--I mean the too frequent "repetition of aliment." And if +we never depart from the general rule, already laid down, not to give +the infant anything but its mother's milk, we shall escape the evils +incident to variety. + + +SEC. 5. _How long should milk be the only food._ + +On this point, there is a great diversity of opinion. Perhaps the most +approved role, of universal application, is, that the first change +should be made in the child's diet, when the teeth begin to appear. + +This period, it is well known, cannot be fixed to any particular age, +but varies from the fifth to the twelfth month. + +Some mothers, who have borne with me patiently to this place, will +probably here object. "What child," they will ask, "would ever have any +strength, brought up so?" Not only a little pap and gruel is, in their +estimation, necessary, long before this period, but even many choice +bits of meat. + +Now I am very sure, that these choice bits--whatever they may be--given +to a child before it has teeth, not only do no good, but actually do +mischief. Indeed, that which does no good in the stomach must do harm, +of course; since it is not only in the way, but acts like a foreign body +there, producing more or less of irritation. + +I ought to state, in this place, that many people--mothers among the +rest--have very inadequate ideas of digestion. They appear to have no +farther notion of the digestive process than that it consists in +reducing to a pulp the substances which are swallowed; and hence, +whatever is reduced to a pulp, they regard as being digested. Whereas +nothing is better known to the anatomist and physiologist, than that +this--the formation of _chyme_ in the stomach--constitutes only a very +small part of the digestive process. The chyme must pass into the +duodenum and other portions of intestine beyond the stomach, and be +retained there for some time, before it will form perfect chyle. + +This is a more important part of the work of digestion than even the +former. For, suppose the chyme to be perfect, though even this may be +mere pulp, rather than chyme, and suppose it pass quietly along into the +duodenum and other small intestines. All this process, thus far, may go +on naturally enough, and yet the chyle may not be well formed, and the +chymous mass may find its way out of the system without answering any of +the purposes of nutrition. For no matter how well the food is dissolved +in the stomach, if it do not become good and proper chyle, the blood +which is formed will not be good and perfect blood; or, lastly, if it +_seem_ to make good blood, it may still be faulty, so that the +particles which should be applied to build up or repair the system, are +either not used, or if used, answer the purpose but imperfectly. + +We hence see how little prepared a large proportion of the community, +are, to judge of the digestibility or fitness of a substance for +infants, by their own observation and experience merely; and how much +more wisely they act, in contenting themselves with giving them--at +least until they have teeth--such food only as the Author of nature +seems to have assigned them; especially when thus course, is precisely +that which is recommended or sanctioned by nearly every judicious +physician, as well as by almost all our writers on health. + + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +Having laid down the general rule, that until the appearance of teeth, +the sole food of an infant should be the milk of its own mother, I +proceed to speak of some of the more common exceptions to it. + +EXCEPTION 1.--The first of these is when the supply furnished by the +mother is scanty. There may be two causes of the scantiness of this +supply; 1st, the want of suitable nourishment by the mother; and, 2dly, +a feeble constitution, or bad health. In the former case, it should be +her first object, as it undoubtedly will be that of her physician, to +improve the quality of her diet; and in the latter, to restore her +health, or at least invigorate her constitution. + +In regard to the proper diet of a _mother_, as such, as well as the +general management which her case requires, a volume might be written +without exhausting the subject. But I have already said as much on this +subject, in another place, as my limits will permit. + +But we cannot wait for the mother's health to improve, and allow the +infant to suffer, in the mean time, for a due supply of food. The +appropriate question now is, How shall such a supply be furnished? + +This should be done by means of an article resembling in its properties, +as closely as possible, the mother's milk. For this purpose, we have +only to mix with a suitable quantity of new cow's milk, one third of +water, and sweeten it a little with loaf sugar. This is to be given to +the child, at suitable intervals, and in proper quantities, by means of +a common sucking bottle. It is, indeed, sometimes given with the spoon; +but the bottle is better. + +To the question, whether the child should be confined to this, till the +period of weaning, Dr. Dewees answers, No. I am surprised at this; and +my surprise is increased, when I find him, almost in the very next +breath, urging with all his might, numerous reasons against the very +common notion, that children in early life require a variety of food. He +even insists on the importance of confining the child to a single +article of food when it is practicable. Yet he has not given us so much +as one reason why it is not practicable in the case before us; but has +gone on to speak of barley water, gum arabic water, rice water, +arrowroot, &c. I venture, therefore, to dissent from him, and to answer +the foregoing question in the affirmative. When one good and substantial +reason can be given for _change_, the decision will, however, be +reconsidered. + +I have already stated the general rule for preparing this substitute for +the mother's milk. But there are several minor directions, which may be +useful to those who are wholly without experience on the subject. + +If possible, the milk used should not only be just taken from the cow, +but should always be from the _same_ cow; for it is well known, that the +quality of milk often differs very materially, even among cows feeding +in the same pasture, or from the same pile of hay; and the stomach +becomes most easily reconciled to the mixture when it is uniform in its +qualities. Great care should also be taken to see that the cow whose +milk is used is young and healthy. + +The mixture should not be prepared any faster than it is wanted, and +should always be prepared in vessels perfectly clean and sweet, and +given as soon as possible after it is prepared, to prevent any degree of +fermentation. It is never so well to heat it by the fire. If taken from +the cow just before it is used, and if the water to be added is warm +enough, the temperature will hardly need to be raised any higher. + +When it is impracticable, in all cases, to take milk for this purpose +immediately from the cow, it should be kept, in winter, where it will +not freeze; and in summer, where there will be no tendency to acidity. + +Some mothers and nurses are addicted to the practice of passing the food +through their own mouths, before they give it to the child--with a view, +no doubt, to see that it is at a proper temperature. This practice is +not only wholly unnecessary, but altogether disgusting, and even +ridiculous. A thermometer would answer every purpose; and save even the +trouble of another disgusting practice--that of blowing it with the +breath. + +The most proper season for giving the child this preparation, is +immediately after it has been nursing. It is better for both mother and +child, that the latter should nurse just as often as though the supply +of food was adequate to his wants. And when his first supply is +exhausted, then let him make up his meal from the sucking bottle. The +great advantage of this plan is, that he will not be so likely in this +way to be over-fed. If he is really needy, he will accept the bottle, +even if he do not like it quite so well; if he refuse it, let him go +without till he is hungry enough to receive it. + +In regard to the water used in the preparation, only one thing needs to +be said; which is, that it should be pure. If it is not, it should by +all means be boiled. The sugar used should be of the very best kind; and +the quantity not large; since if the preparation be too sweet, it +readily becomes acid in the stomach. + +There has been, and still is, a controversy going on among medical men, +whether sugar is or is not hurtful to the young. "Who shall decide, when +doctors disagree?" has often been asked. Without undertaking the task +myself, I may perhaps be permitted to say, that I cannot see any reason +why a substance so pure, and so highly nutritious as sugar--if given in +very small quantity only--should prove injurious: though I do not regard +the reasoning of Dr. Dewees as very conclusive on the subject, when, in +reply to Dr. Cadogan, he has the following language--"If sugar be +improper, why does it so largely enter into the composition of the early +food of all animals? It is in vain that physicians declaim against this +article, since it forms between seven and eight per cent of the mother's +milk."--Now with me, the fact that milk and almost all other kinds of +food are furnished with a measure of this substance, is the strongest +reason I am acquainted with for making no additions. I believe, however, +that they may sometimes be made, but not for these reasons. + +EXCEPTION 2.--The second striking exception to the general rule that has +been laid down, is when the mother is unable to nurse her own child from +positive ill health, or when circumstances exist which render it +obviously improper that she should do it. The following are some of the +circumstances which render such a departure from nature indispensable. + +1. When the mother is affected strongly with a hereditary disease, such +as consumption or scrofula; or when her constitution is tainted, as it +were, with venereal disease, or other permanent affections. + +2. When nursing produces, uniformly, some very troublesome or dangerous +disease in the mother; as cough, colic, &c. + +3. There are a few instances in which the milk of the mother, owing to +an unknown cause, has been found by experience to disagree with the +child. In these circumstances, it is the unquestionable duty of the +mother to resort wholly to feeding. + +4. Sometimes the milk, at first abundant, fails suddenly, owing to some +accidental or constitutional defect; and this failure becomes habitual. +In all these circumstances, the proper resort is to a sucking bottle, or +a hired nurse. I generally prefer the latter. The cases which seem to me +to admit of the former, will be pointed out in the next section. + +"When the bottle is used," says Dr. Dewees, "much care is requisite to +preserve it sweet and free from all impurities, or the remains of the +former food, by which the present may be rendered impure or sour; for +which purpose a great deal of caution must be observed." + +The business of feeding a child, whether by the bottle or the spoon, +should never be hurried: the slower it is, the better. We should stop +from time to time, during the process. Nor should the nourishment be +given while lying down; it is much more pleasant, as well as more safe, +to sit up. + +A few thoughts more on the character and condition of the milk which we +give to the young, will conclude the second division of this section. + +Some are fond of boiling milk for infants; but to this I am decidedly +opposed, so long as they are in health. Boiling takes away, or appears +to take away, some of the best properties of the milk. + +It is true that milk which is boiled does not turn sour so readily in +hot weather; but it is quite unnecessary to boil milk in the common +manner in order to present its changing, since such a result can be +prevented by another process. You have only to put your milk in a +kettle, cover it closely, and heat it quickly to the boiling point, and +then remove and cool it as speedily as possible. This plan prevents the +rising to the surface of that coat or pellicle which contains some of +the most valuable properties of the milk. + +I have already said that it was as necessary that the stomach should +have rest as any other muscular organ. Some writers say that the infant +should be kept perfectly quiet, at least half an hour, after each meal. +This is certainly necessary with feeble children, but I question its +necessity in the case of those who are strong and robust. I would not +recommend, however, nor even tolerate, for one moment, the absurd +practice of _jolting_, so common with a few ignorant nurses and, +mothers, as if they could jolt down the food in the stomach with just as +much safety as they can shake down the contents of a farmer's bag of +produce. Such mothers as these should go and reside among the native +tribes of Indians in Guiana, in South America, where they make it a +point not only to stuff their children's stomachs as long as they will +hold, but actually to shake it down. + +Little less absurd than jolting is the custom of tossing a child high, +in quick succession, which is practised not only after meals, but at +other times. But on this point, I have treated elsewhere. + +Some give the sucking bottle to children as a plaything. This is just +about as wise a practice as that of giving them books as playthings. +Both are done, usually, to save the time and trouble of those whose +office it is to devote their time to the very purpose of managing and +educating their offspring. The evil, however, of suffering the child to +have the bottle when it pleases is, that he will thus be tasting food so +often as to interfere with and disturb the process of digestion, to his +great and lasting injury. For in this way, a part of the food will pass +from the stomach into the bowels unchanged, or at least but imperfectly +digested, where it is liable to become sour, and cause disease. It is +not to be doubted that many diarrhoeas, as well as, other bowel +affections, are produced in this way. Children that are always eating +are seldom healthy; and we may hence see the reason. + +In speaking of the importance of keeping the bottle, from which a child +takes his food, perfectly clean and sweet, I ought to have extended the +injunction much farther. There is a degree of slovenliness sometimes +observable in those who manage children, both when they are sick and +when they are in health, which even common sense cannot and ought not to +tolerate. Every vessel which is used in preparing or administering +anything for children, ought, after we have used it, to be immediately +and effectually cleansed. How shocking is it to see dirty vessels +standing in the nursery from hour to hour, becoming sour or impure! How +much more so still, to see food in copper vessels, or in the red earthen +ones, glazed with a poisonous oxyd! I speak now more particularly of +vessels in which food is given; for with the administration of medicine, +and nursing the sick, I do not intend in this volume to interfere. + +EXCEPTION 3.--We come now to the consideration of those cases--for such +it will not be doubted there are--where a hired nurse is to be preferred +to feeding by the hand. + +Before proceeding farther, however, it is important to say, that if a +nurse could always be procured whose health, and temper, and habits were +good, who had no infant of her own, and who would do as well for the +infant, in every respect, as his own mother, it would be preferable to +have no feeding by the hand at all. + +But such nurses are very scarce. Their temper, or habits, or general +health, will often be such as no genuine parent would desire, and such +as they ought to be sorry to see engrafted, in any degree, on the child. +For even admitting what is claimed by some, that the temper of the nurse +does _not_ affect the properties of the milk, and thus injure the child +both physically and morally, still much injury may and inevitably will +result from the influence of her constant presence and example. + +Others have infants of their own, in which case either their own child +or the adopted one will suffer; and in a majority of cases, it can +scarcely be doubted _which_ it will be. And I doubt the morality of +requiring a nurse, in these cases, to give up her own child wholly. If +_one_ must be fed, why not our own, as well as that of another? + +The only cases, then, which seem to me to justify the employment of a +nurse, are where she possesses at least the qualifications above +mentioned; and as these are rare, not many nurses, of course, would on +this principle be employed. But when employed, it is highly desirable +that the following rules should be observed: + +1: The nurse should suckle the child at both breasts; otherwise he is +liable to acquire a degree of crookedness in his form. There is another +evil which sometimes results from the too common neglect of this rule, +which is, that it endangers the deterioration of the quality of the +milk. + +2. The milk which is thus substituted for that of the mother, should be +as nearly as possible of the same age as the child who is to receive it. +It should be remembered, however, that the milk is not so good after the +twelfth or thirteenth month, nor _quite_ so good under the third. + +3. When the parent or some trusty and confidential friend can, without +the aid of interested spies and emissaries, have an eye to the general +treatment, and especially to the moral management, it should be done; +for even the best nurses may so differ in their principles, manners and +habits from the parent, that the latter would deem it preferable to +withdraw the child, and resort at once to feeding. + + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +This period will, of course, be longer or shorter according as the teeth +begin to appear earlier or later, and according to the time when it is +thought proper to wean. + +On few points, perhaps, has there existed a greater diversity of opinion +than in regard to the age most proper for weaning. The limits of this +work do not permit a thorough discussion of the question; and I shall +therefore be very brief in my remarks on the subject. + +Dr. Cullen, whose opinion on topics of this kind is certainly entitled +to much respect, thought that less than seven, or more than eleven +months of nursing was injurious. Yet in some countries, and even in some +parts of our own, the period is extended by the mother, from choice, to +two years. And although the milk is not so good after the thirteenth or +fourteenth month, I have never either known or heard that any evil +consequences followed from the practice. + +Dr. Loudon, a recent writer, observes, that the period of nursing has a +great influence over the numbers of mankind in various countries, as is +evinced by numerous facts. He adduces proofs of this, position. Thus, he +says, in China, where the population is excessive, and the inhuman +practice of infanticide is common, they wean a child as soon as it can +put its hand to its mouth. On the other hand, the Indians of North +America do not wean their children until they are old and strong enough +to run about: generally they are suckled for a period of more than two +years. + +He then enters into a physiological inquiry why it is that British +mothers do not usually suckle their children longer than ten months. He +seems--though he does not give us his precise opinion--to think that, in +all ordinary cases, the period of nursing ought to be protracted to two +or three years, and that perhaps it would be better still to extend it +to four or five. His remarks are so excellent, and withal so curious, +and their tendency so humane, that we venture to insert one or two of +his paragraphs entire. + +"Certain it is, that the milk does not diminish particularly at that +time, (ten months,) so far as regards quantity; and from the health of +children reared without spoon-meat beyond this time, it as certainly +undergoes no change in its quality. Children are sometimes so old before +weaning, as to be able to ask for the breast; and it has not been +remarked that the health of mothers, thus suckling, was in any way worse +than that of their neighbors. Altogether, then, it may be asserted, that +a mother is likely to enjoy better health, and to be less liable to +sickness and death during lactation, than during pregnancy. + +"Many women believe, or affect to believe, that the weakness they labor +under arises from some latent moral or physical cause; but this weakness +is not attributed to lactation in the earlier months of suckling, +because the mother then considers herself fulfilling a necessary duty, +which her constitution, for so long, is well able to bear. So soon, +however, as the period of lactation has passed over, as it is +established by custom or fashion, she imagines she is exceeding the +intentions of nature, and she forthwith concludes that the continuance +of suckling is the cause of her uncomfortable sensations. This whim +being entertained, the child is weaned, and too often becomes the victim +of a most reprehensible delusion. + +"Since nature has furnished the mother with milk for a longer period +than custom demands, it is evident that some good purpose for the mother +and child was intended in this arrangement. Had it been otherwise, the +secretion of milk would stop at a definite time, in like manner as the +period of gestation is definite. That a child, in comparison with the +young of the lower animals, is so long unable to provide for itself, +strongly tends to corroborate the proofs already advanced--that nature +originally had in view a more protracted period for lactation than is +now allowed. + +"Some writers, following the laws of nature, as they interpreted them, +fixed the period of weaning at fifteen months, when the infant has got +its eight incisors and four canine teeth. There are well-authenticated +instances of mothers having suckled their children for three, four, +five, and even seven consecutive years; we ourselves have known cases +of lactation being prolonged far three and for four years, with the +happiest results." + +It appears to me better, therefore, that the child should be nursed, in +all ordinary cases, from twelve to fifteen months; and when there are no +special objections, about two years. As the change, whenever it is made, +and however gradual it may be, is an important one, in its effects on +the stomach and bowels, it is better to wean a little earlier or a +little later, than to do so just at the close of summer or beginning of +autumn, at which season bowel complaints are most common, most severe, +and most dangerous. It is sufficiently unfortunate that teething should +commence just at this period; but when we add another cause of irregular +action, which we can control, to one which we _cannot_, we act very +unwisely. + +I have already observed that we may begin to feed children when the +teeth begin to appear. By this is not meant that we should do so while +the system is under the irritation to which teething usually, or at +least often, subjects it. But when this is over, and a few teeth have +appeared, it is usually a proper time to commence our operations. + +The first food given should be precisely of the kind which has been +recommended for those children who are fed by the hand. The rules and +restrictions by which we are to be guided, are the same, except in one +point, which is, that in the case we are now considering, the child +should be fed _between nursing_. + +Let not parents be anxious about their healthy children under two years, +who have a supply of good milk, either from the mother or from the cow. +For those that are feeble, a physician may and ought to prescribe--not +medicine, but appropriate food, drink, &c. + +When the grinding teeth have cut through, if we have any doubts in +regard to the nutritive qualities of the food we are giving, we may +improve it by adding, instead of the one third of pure water, a similar +quantity of gum arabic water, barley water, or rice water. Some use a +little weak animal broth; but this is unnecessary, and I think, on the +whole, injurious, except for purposes strictly medicinal. + +This course is so simple, and so far removed from that which is +generally adopted, that few mothers will probably be willing to pursue +it with perseverance, especially when the teeth appear very late. Those +who are, however, will be richly rewarded, in the end, in the +advantages; which will accrue to the child's health, and the vigor it +will ensure to his constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _During the process of Weaning._ + +It has already been shown that, in weaning, some regard should be had to +the season of the year; and that the end of summer and beginning of fall +are of all periods the most unfavorable. The best time, on every +account, is in the spring--in March, April, May, or June; and the next +best is during the months of October and November. But December, January +and February are better than July, August and September. + +Weaning should never be sudden. We may safely and properly call upon +those who are addicted to snuff or opium taking, tobacco chewing, rum +drinking, and other habits which are purely artificial, to break +off--_to wean themselves_--suddenly; since _they_ can do so with +considerable safety, and will seldom have the courage or the +perseverance to do it otherwise. But with the child, in regard to his +food, such a course will not be advisable. If we regard his future +health or happiness, he must be weaned gradually. + +The first proper step will be to give the child a little larger quantity +of the cow's milk and gum arabic mixture, between nursings, at the same +time increasing very gradually the intervals of nursing. When the +intervals become six hours distant from each other, it will be best to +add a little good bread to the milk with which it is fed, about two or +three times a day. Arrowroot jelly, if he can be made to relish it, will +be highly useful; but if not, some boiled rice, into which a little +arrowroot has been sprinkled while boiling, may be added to his milk. + +It may be worth the attempt to excite an aversion in the child to +nursing his mother, so that be will refuse to nurse, if possible, of his +own accord. This aversion may be excited by such an application of +aloes, or some other offensive substance, as will cause him to withdraw +himself from the breast as soon as he tastes it. + +A serious mistake is often made, in connection with weaning, in giving +the child not only too much food, but that which is too solid, or too +rich. This mistake has undoubtedly grown out of the belief that his +feeble condition _requires_ it; whereas the truth is, that he neither +needs food at this period, nor is capable of digesting it. For let us be +as judicious in the process of weaning as we may, the tone of the +child's stomach will be somewhat reduced, or in other words, its powers +of digestion will be weakened by it; and to give it strong food, or +overload it with that which is weaker, is not only unreasonable and +unphilosophical, but cruel. And if there should be a tendency in the +child's constitution to rickets, scrofula, consumption, and other +wasting diseases, such a course would be likely to bring them on, and +destroy life. + +"When milk will agree," says Dr. Dewees, "there is no food so proper. It +may be employed in any of its combinations, with good wheaten bread, +rice, sago, &c., only remembering that when either of these articles is +found to agree, it should be continued perseveringly, until it may +become offensive. In this case, some new combination may be required." I +do not see the necessity of continuing one kind of food till it +_offends_. Besides, I do not believe that these simple articles of food +are apt to become offensive to stomachs that have not already been +spoiled. But whether a single dish should or should not come to be +offensive, I greatly prefer an occasional change. + +Buchan, in his Advice to Mothers, has recommended it to them to boil +bread for their infants, in water. It should not, for this purpose--nor +indeed for any other--be new; it is best at one or two days, old. It may +be boiled in a small quantity of water, or what is still better, of +milk; or it may be steamed till it becomes soft and light, almost like +new bread, but without any of the objectionable properties of that which +is wholly new. To bread, thus prepared, is to be added a suitable +quantity of milk, fresh from the cow, and a little diluted with water, +but not boiled. + +But as there may be, here and there, at any age, a stomach with which +milk, with bread, or rice, or sago, will not agree--though I think they +must be very rare cases--we may be allowed to substitute for it a +solution of "gum arabic, in the proportion of an ounce to a pint of +water," to which may be added a little sugar; and if the child is old +enough to observe the color, just milk enough to change the appearance. +Another preparation for the same purpose consists of rennet whey, a +little sweetened, and "disguised, if necessary, as just stated." + +The health of the mother, too, during the period of weaning, often needs +great attention. Let her avoid medicine, however, if possible. A due +regard to food, drink, exercise, and rest of body and mind, &c., will +usually be found more effective, as well as more permanently +efficacious. + + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +You will allow me to introduce in this place, some of the sentiments of +Dr. Cadogan, an English physician, from a little work on the management +of children. [Footnote: Though Dr. C.'s remarks will apply more closely +to England in 1750, they are by no means inapplicable to the United +States in 1837.] I do it with the more pleasure because, though he wrote +almost a century ago, he urges the same general principles on which I +have all along been insisting: hence it will be seen that mine are no +new-fangled notions. His remarks refer to the young of every age, but +chiefly to early infancy and childhood. It will be found necessary, in +some instances, to abridge, but I shall endeavor not to misrepresent the +Doctor's views. + + * * * * * + +"Look over the bills of mortality. Almost half of those who fill up that +black list, die under five years of age; so that half the people that +come into the world go out of it again, before they become of the least +use to it or to themselves. To me, this seems to deserve serious +consideration. + +"It is ridiculous to charge it upon nature, and to suppose that infants +are more subject to disease and death than grown persons; on the +contrary, they bear pain and disease much better--fevers especially; and +for the same reason that a twig is less hurt by a storm than an oak. + +"In all the other productions of nature, we see the greatest vigor and +luxuriancy of health, the nearer they are to the egg or bud. When was +there a lamb, a bird, or a tree, that died because it was young? These +are under the immediate nursing of unerring nature; and they thrive +accordingly. + +"Ought it not, therefore, to be the care of every nurse and every +parent, not only to protect their nurslings from injury, but to be well +assured that their own officious services be not the greatest evils the +helpless creatures can suffer? + +"In the lower class of mankind, especially in the country, disease and +mortality are not so frequent, either among adults or their children. +Health and posterity are the portion of the poor--I mean the laborious. +The want of superfluity confines them more within the limits of nature; +hence they enjoy the blessings they feel not, and are ignorant of their +cause. + +"In the course of my practice, I have had frequent occasion to be fully +satisfied of this; and have often heard a mother anxiously say, 'the +child has not been well ever since it has done puking and crying.' + +"These complaints, though not attended to, point very plainly to the +cause. Is it not very evident that when a child rids its stomach of its +contents several times a day, it has been overloaded? While the natural +strength lasts, (for every child is born with more health and strength +than is generally imagined,) it cries at or rejects the superfluous +load, and _thrives apace_; that is, grows very fat, bloated, and +distended beyond measure, like a house lamb. + +"But in time, the same oppressive cause continuing, the natural powers +are overcome, being no longer able to throw off the unequal weight. The +child, now unable to cry any more, languishes and is quiet. + +"The misfortune is, that these complaints are not understood. The child +is swaddled and crammed on, till, after gripes, purging, &c., it sinks +under both burdens into a convulsion fit, and escapes farther torture. +This would be the case with the lamb, were it not killed, when full fat. + +"That the present mode of nursing is wrong, one would think needed no +other proof than the frequent miscarriages attending it, the death of +many, and the ill health of those that survive. But what I am going to +complain of is, that children, in general, are over-clothed and +over-fed, and fed and clothed improperly. To these causes I attribute +almost all their diseases. + +"But the feeding of children is much more important to them than their +clothing. Let us consider what nature directs in the case. If we follow +nature, instead of leading or driving her, we cannot err. In the +business of nursing, as well as physic, art, if it do not exactly copy +this original, is ever destructive. + +"If I could prevail, no child should ever be crammed with any unnatural +mixture, till the provision of nature was ready for it; nor afterwards +fed with any ungenial diet whatever, at least for the _first three +months_; for it is not well able to digest and assimilate other elements +sooner. + +"I have seen very healthy children that never ate or drank anything +whatever but their mother's milk, for the first ten or twelve months. +Nature seems to direct to this, by giving them no teeth till about that +time. The call of nature should be waited for to feed them with anything +more substantial; and the appetite ought ever to precede the food--not +only with regard to the daily meals, but those changes of diet which +opening, increasing life requires. But this is never done, in either +case; which is one of the greatest mistakes of all nurses. + +"When the child requires more solid sustenance, we are to inquire what +and how much is most proper to give it. We may be well assured there is +a great mistake either in the quantity or quality of children's food, or +both, as it is usually given them, because they are made sick by it; for +to this mistake I cannot help imputing nine in ten of all their +diseases. + +"As to quantity, there is a most ridiculous error in the common +practice; for it is generally supposed that whenever a child cries, it +wants victuals: it is accordingly fed ten or twelve or more times in a +day and night. This is so obvious a misapprehension, that I am surprised +it should ever prevail. + +"If a child's wants and motions be diligently and judiciously attended +to, it will be found that it never cries, but from pain. Now the first +sensations of hunger are not attended with pain; accordingly, a very +young child that is hungry will make a hundred other signs of its want, +before it will cry for food. If it be healthy, and quite easy in its +dress, it will hardly ever cry at all. Indeed, these signs and motions I +speak of are but rarely observed, because it seldom happens that +children are ever suffered to be hungry.[Footnote: That which we +commonly observe in them, in such cases, and call by the name of hunger, +the Doctor, I suppose would regard as morbid or unnatural feeling, +wholly unworthy of the name of HUNGER.] + +"In a few, very few, whom I have had the pleasure to see reasonably +nursed, that were not fed above two or three times in twenty-four hours, +and yet were perfectly healthy, active, and happy, I have seen these +signals, which were as intelligible as if they had spoken. + +"There are many faults in the quality of children's food. + +"1. It is not simple enough. Their paps, panadas, gruels, &c. are +generally enriched with sugar, spices, and other nice things, and +sometimes a drop of wine--none of which they ought ever to take. Our +bodies never want them; they are what luxury only has introduced, to the +destruction of the health of mankind. + +"2. It is not enough that their food should be simple; it should also be +light. Many people, I find, are mistaken in their notions of what is +light, and fancy that most kinds of pastry, puddings, custards, &c. are +light; that is, light of digestion. But there is nothing heavier, in +this sense, than unfermented flour and eggs, boiled hard, which are the +chief ingredients in some of these preparations. + +"What I mean by light food--to give the best idea I can of it--is, any +substance that is easily separated, and soluble in warm water. Good +bread is the lightest thing I know, and the fittest food for young +children. Cows' milk is also simple and light, and very good for them; +but it is often injudiciously prepared. It should never be boiled; for +boiling alters the taste and properties of it, destroys its sweetness, +and makes it thicker, heavier, and less fit to mix and assimilate with +the blood." + + * * * * * + +It is hardly necessary for me to repeat, that in these general views of +Dr. C., with a few exceptions, I entirely concur; indeed some of them +have already been presented. But I have expressed my doubts of the +soundness of his conclusion in regard to sugar. Used with food, in very +small quantity, by persons whose stomachs are already in a good +condition, both sugar and molasses, especially the former, appear to me +not only harmless, but wholesome and useful. + +On the subject of simplicity in children's food, I should be glad to +enlarge. There is nothing more important in diet than simplicity, and +yet I think there is nothing more rare. To suit the fashion, everything +must be mixed and varied. I have no objection to variety at different +meals, both for children and adults; indeed I am disposed to recommend +it, as will be seen hereafter. But I am utterly opposed to any +considerable variety at the same meal; and above all, in a single dish. +The simpler a dish can be, the better. + +But let us look, for a moment, at the dishes of food which are often +presented, even at what are called plain tables. + +Meats cannot be eaten--so many persons think--without being covered +with mustard, or pepper, or gravy--or soaked in vinegar; and not a few +regard them as insipid, unless several of these are combined. Few people +think a piece of plain boiled or broiled muscle (lean flesh) with +nothing on it but a little salt, is fit to be eaten. Everything, it is +thought, must be rendered more stimulating, or acrid; or must be +swimming in gravy, or melted fat or butter. + +Bread, though proverbially the staff of life, can scarcely be eaten in +its simple state. It must be buttered, or honied, or toasted, or soaked +in milk, or dipped in gravy. Puddings must have cherries or fruits of +some sort, or spices in them, and must be sweetened largely. Or +perhaps--more ridiculous still--they must have suet in them. And after +all this is done, who can eat them without the addition of sauce, or +butter, or molasses, or cream? Potatoes, boiled, steamed or roasted, +delightful as they are to an unperverted appetite, are yet thought by +many people hardly palatable till they are mashed, and buttered or +gravied; or perhaps soaked in vinegar. In short, the plainest and +simplest article for the table is deemed nearly unfit for the stomach, +till it has been buttered, and peppered, and spiced, and perhaps +_pearlashed_. Even bread and milk must be filled with berries or fruits. +Where can you find many adults who would relish a meal which should +consist entirely of plain bread, without any addition; of plain +potatoes, without anything on them except a little salt; of a plain rice +pudding, and nothing with it; or of plain baked or boiled apples or +pears? And _could_ such persons be found, how many of them would bring +up their children to live on such plain dishes? + +It need not be wondered at, that a palate which has been so long tickled +by variety, and by so many stimulating mixtures of food, should come to +regard cold water for drink as insipid; and should feel dissatisfied +with it, and desirous of boiling some narcotic or poisonous herb in it, +or brewing it with something which will impart to it more or less of +alcohol. The wonder is, not that some of our epicures become drunkards, +but that all of them do not. + +Dr. Cadogan alludes to a sad mistake everywhere made about _light_ food; +and condemns, very justly, hard-boiled custards, pastry, &c. It is very +strange that these substances--for these are among the injurious +articles which I call mixtures--should ever have obtained currency in +the world, to the exclusion of bread, which, as the same writer justly +says, is among the lightest articles of food which are known. + +It is strange, in particular, what views people have about bread. +Judging from what I see, I am compelled to believe that there are few +who regard it in any other light than as a kind of necessary evil. They +appear to eat it, not because they are fond of it, by itself, but +because they _must_ eat it; or rather, because it is a fashionable +article; and not to make believe they eat it, at the least, would be +unfashionable. They will get rid of it, however, when they can. And when +they must eat it, they soak it, or cover it with butter or milk, or +something else which will render it tolerable--or toast it. And use it +as they may, it must be hot from the oven. After it is once cold, very +few will eat it. The idea, above all, of making a full meal of simple +cold bread, twenty-four hours old, would be rejected by ninety-nine +persons in a hundred; and by some with abhorrence. + +People not only dislike bread, but regard it as unnutritious. I have +heard many a fond parent say to the child who ate no meat, and seemed to +depend almost wholly on bread--"Why, my dear child, you will starve if +you eat no meat. Do at least put some butter on your bread or your +potatoes." A thousand times have I been admonished, when eating my +vegetable dinner during the hot and fatiguing days of summer--for I was +bred to the farm, and ate little or no meat till I was fourteen years +of age--to eat more butter, or cheese, or something that would give me +strength; for I could not work, they said, without something more +nourishing than bread and the other vegetables. And yet few if any boys +of my age did more work, or performed it better, or with more ease, than +myself. And I early observed the same thing in other vegetable eaters. + +The truth is, there is nothing in the world better adapted to the daily +wants of the human stomach than good bread; and few things more +nutritious. There may be a little more nutriment in eggs or jelly; but +if the former are hard-boiled, the stomach cannot digest them; and fat +meat of any kind is digested with great difficulty. Indeed it is +doubtful whether stomachs in temperate climates digest fat at all. They +may dissolve it, but that is not making good chyle of it. They may even +reduce it to chyle; _but chyle is not blood_. Fat may slip through the +system without much of it _adhering_; and I think it pretty evident that +it usually does so. + +The muscle--the lean part of animals--may be nearly as nutritious as +good bread, and is more easily digested. But it is very far from being +proved that, for the healthy, those things are always best which are +most easily digested. Nobody will pretend that potatoes are better for +us than bread; and yet the experiments of Dr. Beaumont seem to prove +that boiled or roasted potatoes are much more quick and easy of +digestion than bread of the first and best quality. Even over-boiled +eggs and raw cabbage, bad as they are, are dissolved in the stomach, and +appear to be digested as quick, if not quicker, than good wheat bread. +But nobody in the world will pretend they form more wholesome food. +Neither is meat--even _lean_ meat--necessarily more wholesome, or better +calculated to give strength than bread, simply be cause it is more +quickly and easily digested. It would be nearer the truth to say, that +those substances which digest slowest (provided they do not irritate) +are best adapted to the wants of the human stomach. + +The philosopher LOCKE--perhaps from his knowledge of medicine--gives +some excellent directions on this subject. "Great care should be used," +be says, that the child "eat bread plentifully, both alone and with +everything else; and whatever he eats that is solid, make him chew it +well." This writer, by the way, supposed that the teeth were made to be +used in beating our food; and that we ought neither to swallow it +without chewing, as is customary in our busy New England, nor to mash or +soak it in order to save the labor of mastication--a practice almost +equally universal. But let us hear his own words. + +"As for his diet, it ought to be very plain and simple; and if I might +advise, flesh should be forborne, at least till he is two or three years +old. But of whatever advantage this may be to his future health and +strength, I fear it will hardly be consented to by parents, misled by +the custom of eating too much flesh themselves, who will be apt to think +their children--as they do themselves--in danger to be starved; if they +have not flesh at least twice a day. This I am sure, children would +breed their teeth with much less danger, be freer from diseases while +they were little, and lay the foundations of a healthy and strong +constitution much surer, if they were not crammed so much as they are, +by fond mothers and foolish servants, and were kept wholly from flesh +the first three or four years of their lives." + +Were Locke still living, I should like to interrogate him at this +place. He first speaks of giving children no meat till they are two or +three years old; and then afterwards extends the period to three or +four. The question I would put is this: If the child is healthier +without meat till he is three or four years old, why not till he is +thirteen or fourteen; or even till thirty, or forty, or seventy? And is +not Professor Stuart, of Andover--a meat eater himself, and an advocate +for its moderate use by those who have already been trained to the use +of it--is not the Professor, I say, more than half right when he +asserts, as I have heard him, that it may be well to train all children, +from the first, to the exclusive use of vegetable food? + +I have a few more extracts from Locke, particularly on the subject of +bread. + +"I should think that a good piece of well made and well baked brown +bread would be often the best breakfast for my young master. I am sure +it is as wholesome, and will make him as strong a man, as greater +delicacies; and if he be used to it, it will be as pleasant to him. + +"If he, at any time, call for victuals between meals, use him to nothing +but dry bread. If he be hungry more than wanton, bread will go down; and +if he be not hungry, it is not fit that he should eat. By this you will +obtain two good effects. First, that by custom he will come to be in +love with bread; for, as I said, our palates and stomachs, too, are +pleased with the things we are used to. Another good you will gain +hereby is, that you will not teach him to eat more nor oftener than +nature requires. + +"I do not think that all people's appetites are alike; some have +naturally stronger and some weaker stomachs. But this I think, that +many are made gormands and gluttons by custom, that were not so by +nature. And I see, in some countries, men as lusty and strong, that eat +but two meals a day, as those that have set their stomachs, by a +constant usage, to call on them for four or five. + +"The Romans usually fasted till supper, the only set meal, even of those +who ate more than once in a day; and those who used breakfasts, as some +did at eight, same at ten, others at twelve of the clock, and some +later, neither ate flesh nor had anything made ready for them. + +"Augustus, when the greatest monarch on the earth, tells us he took a +piece of dry bread in his chariot; and Seneca, in his 83d epistle, +giving an account how be managed himself when he was old, and his age +permitted indulgence, says that he used to eat a piece of dry bread for +his dinner, without the formality of sitting to it. Yet Seneca, as it is +well known, was wealthy. + +"The masters of the world were brought up with this spare diet, and the +young gentlemen of Rome felt no want of strength or spirit because they +ate but once a day. Or if it happened by chance that any one could not +fast so long as till supper, their only set meal, he took nothing but a +bit of dry bread, or at most a few raisins or some such slight thing +with it, to stay his stomach. And more than one set meal a day was +thought so monstrous that it was a reproach, as low as Caesar's time, to +make an entertainment, or sit down to a table, till towards sunset. +Therefore I judge it most convenient that my young master should have +nothing but bread for breakfast. I impute a great part of our diseases +in England to our eating too much flesh, and too little bread. Dry +bread, though the best nourishment, has the least temptation." + +I shall not undertake to defend all the sentiments of Mr. Locke in these +extracts; but in regard to the main point--the nutritive properties and +wholesome tendency of bread, and the importance of making it a principal +article of diet for children--I think his views are just. In short, they +do not differ, substantially, from those of a large proportion of the +best writers on this subject in every country, during the last three +hundred years. As if with one voice, they dissuade from the use of too +much animal food for the young, and encourage the use of a larger +proportion of vegetable food--bread, plain puddings, rice, potatoes, +turnips, beets, apples, pears, &c., and milk. + +Yet they all, or nearly all, seem to write just as if they did not +expect to be believed; or if believed, to be followed. They seem to +regard mankind as so inveterately attached to old habits, and so much +addicted to flesh eating, that there is little hope of reclaiming them. + +Now, though my opinions are no more entitled to respect than many of +theirs, I hope for greater success than they appear to do. I expect that +many young mothers who read this work, will be led to think and inquire +further on the subject; and if they find that the views here advanced +are in accordance with reason, and common sense, and higher authority, I +am not without hope that they will reform, and do what they can to +reform their neighbors. + +I have dwelt the longer, in this section, on the _general_ principles of +diet, because I am of opinion that whatever is true, on this subject, in +regard to the diet of children, soon after weaning, is equally, or +nearly equally applicable to the whole of childhood, youth, manhood and +age. It is not true that one period of life, and one mode of employment, +demands a diet essentially different from that which is demanded at +another period, and in other circumstances; provided always, that the +individual is in health. Occasional instances of the kind, there may be; +but they are not numerous. + +The digestive powers of the young are more nearly as strong as those of +the adult than is usually admitted, and they are much more active. They +require a less quantity of food, undoubtedly; and they should be fed at +shorter intervals. But as a general rule, what is best for them, as +regards its quality, at three years old, is best for them at thirty; or, +should they live so long, at ninety. I repeat it; there is very little +difference in the nature of the food required ever after teething. + +Let me not be understood as saying that the strong, and the robust, and +the active cannot digest food which the weak, and enervated, and +indolent cannot. Undoubtedly they can. But this does not prove that they +_ought_ to do it. It does not prove that their strength and vigor were +not given them for other purposes than to be expended on the poorer +substances for food, when they might have better. Nor is it true, as +often pretended, that the hard laborer needs either more food, or that +which is of a stronger quality, just in proportion to the severity of +his labor. The man or the child who labors moderately, just sufficient +for the purposes of health, and labors with his hands in the open air, +needs rather _more_ food than the indolent or the sedentary, or those +who labor to excess; but not that which is of a stronger quality. It is +he who labors to excess--if any difference of quality were required at +all--who should eat milder food, as well as less in quantity. + +Some physicians there are who tell us that all mankind would live +longer, as well as be more healthful, if they ate nothing but bread, and +drank nothing but water. It may be so, but I do not believe it. Water, +as I shall show hereafter, is indeed the only appropriate drink; but I +do not believe that bread, even after the second year, is in all cases +and circumstances the best food. Besides that the experiments of +Majendie and other physiologists go a little way--though not far, I +confess--to prove that animals generally, (and if so, why not man, as +well as the rest?) thrive best with some degree of variety in their +food, it seems to me more in accordance with the general intentions of +the Creator, so far as we can discover what they are. + +While, therefore, I deny that either milk or bread is better, in all +cases, for human sustenance, than any other articles of food, I must, at +the same time, be permitted to regard them as among the best, and as +deserving more general attention. Every infant, after leaving the +breast, should, as it seems to me, make bread, in some of its forms, a +chief article of food. + +This article, so justly and emphatically called the staff of life, may +be found in almost every country. Common sense seems to have dictated +the propriety of its use; though fashion has often led us to overlook +or despise it--like air, and fire, and water, and nearly every other +common but indispensable blessing. + +The best kind of bread is made from wheat, the worst from bark, +saw-dust, &c. Wood and bark afford so little nutriment, that it is only +in such countries as Norway, Sweden, Lapland. Iceland, Greenland, and +Siberia, that the inhabitants can be induced to make use of them. Here +they are often useful; either because people cannot get food which is +better, or to blend with their fat or oily animal food. For it should +never be forgotten, that healthy digestion requires a large proportion +of innutritious matter along with the pure nutriment. In order to make +bread from wheat, the meal should not be bolted. If it seems to contain +particles which are too coarse, it may be well to pass it through a +coarse family sieve; but the best bread I have ever eaten, as well as +the cleanest and neatest, was not sifted at all. + +I know there is an almost universal prejudice against this sort of +bread. Some complain that it scratches their throats; others, that it is +tasteless; and others still, that it does not agree with them. With +others there is another objection--which is that bread of this sort has +sometimes been called _dyspepsia_ bread; and with others still, that it +has been called _Graham_ bread. Either of these appellations seems +sufficient to condemn it. + +Now as to the harshness, this is owing to its being made of bad +materials, or to its being baked too hard, or kept too long. Much of +what they call dyspepsia bread, in our cities, is evidently made by +mixing the bran and flour of wheat after they have been once separated; +besides which, in not a few cases, the finest of the flour appears to be +taken away. Now bread made of such materials thus combined, will always +be darker colored, as well as harsher, than when made from the wheat, +simply ground without any bolting, and wet up in the usual manner. Such +bread is best two or three days old. After four days, it becomes dry and +somewhat harsh. + +They who complain that such bread is insipid, are persons whose +appetites have been injured by food which is high-seasoned; and who, if +they eat bread at all, must eat it hot, or soaked in butter. No wonder +such persons do not like plain bread, and say it is tasteless. But it +must not be denied that bakers often suffer this kind of bread to be +over-risen, in order to make it sufficiently light and porous. This +renders it less tasteful, and from the saleratus they use, less +wholesome. + +No child who has been accustomed, from the first, to good wheaten bread, +made of unbolted meal, and not less than one day old, will ever prefer +any other, until he has been rendered capricious on this subject, and +wishes to change for the sake of changing, or until he has been misled +by surrounding example. I speak from observation when I say that +infants, whose habits have not been depraved, will not prefer hot bread +of any kind. "It is hot, mother," I have heard them say, as an apology +for refusing a piece of bread; but never, "It is cold," or "It is too +old." + +It is the epicurean--it is he with whom it is a sufficient objection to +any kind of food whatever, that he has used it for several successive +meals or days--that is most ready to complain of good bread. He whose +habits are correct, and who is the more unwilling to change any of his +articles of diet, the longer he has been in the use of them, and who +only changes them, or uses variety, from principle--he, I say, will +never complain of harshness or want of taste in good wheat bread; nor +will it be an objection of weight with him that _Mr. Graham_ has +recommended it, or that it has either prevented or cured _dyspepsia_. + +Nor will the epicurean himself complain that bread is insipid, after +being confined to it for a month or six weeks. He will then find a +sweetness in it, for which he had long sought in vain in the more +delicate and costly viands of a luxurious, and expensive, and +unchristian modern table. + +It is they only who observe simplicity, and confine themselves to very +plain food, who truly enjoy pleasure in eating. The bulk of mankind +benumb their sense of taste by their high-seasoned, over-stimulating +food and drink, and by such constant variety and strange mixtures; and +thus, in their eager cry, "Who will show us any good?" they actually +enjoy less than he who eats plain food, and is contented with it. + +Bread of all kinds is greatly improved in whiteness and pleasantness by +being wet with milk; though even when wet with nothing but water, there +is a solid and rational sweetness to it, of which the despisers of +bread, and devourers of much flesh and condiments never dreamed, and +never will dream, till they reform their habits. + +If children are furnished with good bread, on the plan of Mr. Locke, +there is no doubt that they will relish it most keenly; that their +attachment to it will strengthen, and that unless we give them other +food occasionally, from principle, or seduce them by depraving their +tastes, they will continue it through life. "Train up a child in the way +he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it," is a +general rule, and has as few exceptions, when applied to the diet of a +child, as when it is applied to his moral tastes and preferences. + +With those parents who, though convinced of the justness of the views +here advanced, have already trained their children in the way they +should _not_ go, but are anxious to retrace their steps as far as +possible, there will here be a difficulty. "Our children," they will +say, "do not, at present, _relish_ the kind of bread you speak of; and +how shall we bring them to do so? or is the thing indeed possible?" + +The answer to these inquiries is easy. Such parents have only to confine +their children to the kinds of food which they deem proper for them, a +few weeks or a few months, and they will soon relish them. If those who +are old enough to be convinced can be brought to unite heartily in the +change, and to endeavor to be pleased with it, the work of reformation +will be more pleasant and probably more speedy. I have never found any +difficulty of bringing myself to relish in a very short time an article +of food for which I had no relish before, and to which I had even a +dislike, provided I was thoroughly convinced it was best for me, and was +earnest in the desire of change--except sweet oil, to which I was about +six months in becoming reconciled. + +It is with physical, as with moral habits, in their formation. We +should fix on what we believe, from experience, observation, and divine +and human testimony, is best for us, and habit will soon render it +agreeable. It is important, even to health, that food should be +agreeable; but as I have already said, what we know to be best for us +will soon become agreeable, if we confine ourselves to it; and to our +children also, if we confine them to it, in like manner. + +Next to bread made of wheat--when that cannot be procured--is a mixture +of wheat and Indian meal; but the proportion of the latter should be the +smallest. Wheat, rye, and Indian, in the proportion of one third of +each, make excellent bread, sometimes called _third_ bread. Rye and +Indian make a tolerable bread. Rye alone is not so good. The want, in +the latter, of the vegetable principle called gluten, makes its general +use of very questionable propriety. + +Indian meal alone, baked in cakes by the fire, if eaten only in small +quantities, is a very nutritious and by no means unwholesome bread. But +its sweetness, and the general fondness which people who are accustomed +to its use have for it, lead them to eat it in too large proportions, if +they use it while it is warm. In these circumstances, it proves itself +too active for the stomach and bowels. If warm, six ounces is as much +as a hearty adult ought to eat of it at once; and children should of +course take much less. It is less active on the bowels, and scarcely +less agreeable, as soon as we become accustomed to it, if eaten when it +is cold--even if baked in loaves, in the oven. + +Potatoes, added to unbolted wheat flour, make excellent bread; and so, +as I am informed, does rice. Of the latter, however, I have never eaten. +Oats and barley, and many other grains and substances, will make bread; +but it is of an inferior kind. + +The question may again recur, after this extended series of remarks, +whether I intend to confine the young almost exclusively to bread, in +one or another of its forms. We shall see how this is, presently. + +While bread, therefore, should constitute a part, at least, and +sometimes the whole of a meal, a great variety of other articles are not +only admissible, but desirable. Among these may be mentioned plain +puddings. + +One of the most wholesome puddings is made of Indian meal, enclosed in a +bag and boiled. Nearly allied to this is the common hasty pudding; but +the last is less wholesome, because it requires less chewing; and it +ought to have been observed, before now, that after weaning, any food +is digested better which has undergone the process of thorough +mastication. + +Boiled rice, though hardly to be regarded as a pudding, is very +nutritious, and very easy of digestion. I am not without doubts, +however, in regard to the utility of a large proportion of rice, as +food. A dinner of it, two or three times a week, I believe to be +wholesome; but used too frequently, it seems to me not active enough for +the stomach and bowels; having in this respect precisely a contrary +effect to that of warm Indian cakes. The common notion that rice has a +tendency to make people blind, is entirely unfounded. Its worst effect +is when eaten without being boiled through. In such cases, I have known +it to do mischief; perhaps because it was swallowed without much +chewing. Some grind it, and use the flour; but I cannot recommend it to +be used in this manner. + +The best pudding in the world is a loaf of bread, (What!--you will +say--bread again?) three or four or five days old, boiled, or rather +_steamed_, in milk. All kinds of bread are excellent for this purpose, +but wheat and Indian are the best. They are excellent even without +milk--that is, simply steamed. + +Puddings made of the flour of wheat, rye, buckwheat, &c., are less +wholesome than those which have been already mentioned. And all sorts +of puddings are less wholesome, when eaten as hot as our unreasonable +fashions require, than when their temperature is quite below that of our +bodies. I would not have them so cold as to chill us, for this would be +to go to the other, though less dangerous extreme; but they ought to be +cool. Too much heat is an unnatural stimulus, likely to leave more or +less debility behind it. In addition to this, those who eat hot food are +more exposed to take cold, in consequence of it. + +With none of these puddings ought we to mix any fruits, green or +dried--not even raisins. Some of the more important properties of nearly +every kind of fruit or berry are lost by boiling, unless we eat the +water in which they are boiled, and save the vapor which would otherwise +escape. I am not in favor of boiled fruit generally, especially if +boiled in puddings. + +Puddings, like most other kinds of food--even bread--may be slightly +salted: not that this is indispensable, but because the balance of human +testimony is in its favor. The argument that we evidently need salt +because the other animals require it, is without much weight. The other +animals do not _generally_ require or use it.[Footnote: Some +considerable savage nations use no salt, and a few have a strong +aversion to it.] The cases so often triumphantly mentioned, where +animals appear to thrive better from the use of it, are only exceptions +to the general rule, nor are they very numerous in comparison with the +whole race of animals. Still I have no objections to its moderate use. +It may be useful in preventing worms; though there are doubts even of +that. In large quantities, it is unquestionably hurtful. + +But neither fruits nor berries--permit me to repeat the sentiment--no, +nor any such thing as cinnamon or spices, nor even sugar or molasses in +any considerable quantity, should go into the composition of any sort of +pudding. If the puddings are not sweet enough without, it is better to +add a little sugar or molasses on your plate. Nor should sauces, or +cream, or butter, or suet be used in or upon them; though of all these +substances, cream is least injurious. Nutmegs, grated cheese, &c., are +unnecessary and hurtful. Cheese should never be eaten, in any way. + +There is one thing, however, which may be eaten in moderate quantity +with all sorts of puddings and with bread; I mean milk. I say eaten +_with_, for it is better never to put these substances, nor indeed any +other, _into_ the milk. The bread, pudding, &c., should be eaten by +itself, and the milk by itself, also. In this way we shall not be liable +to cheat the teeth out of what is justly their due, and then make the +deranged stomach and general system pay for it. + +Potatoes are a good article of diet--to be used once a day--though they +are not very nutritious. They are best either steamed or roasted in the +ashes. They are also excellent when boiled. Turnips are also good. +Onions are not so useful as is generally supposed, except for the +purposes of medicine. + +Beets; in small quantity, and carrots and asparagus, and above all, +beans and peas--but not their pods--are tolerable food once a day, +during most of the year, except it be the middle of the winter. But +neither these, nor potatoes, nor any other vegetables, ought to be +cooked in any way with fat, or fat meat, or butter; or be mashed after +they are cooked, or eaten with oil or butter. + +If there be an exception to this general rule--which may seem to be +rather sweeping--it should be in favor of a little sweet oil on rice, or +on bread puddings. But the common practice, founded upon the apparent +belief that we can scarcely eat anything until it is well covered with +lard or butter, is quite objectionable--nay, it is even disgusting. No +pure stomach would ever prefer oily bread, or pudding, or beans, or +peas; and most people would abhor the sight of such a strange +combination, were not habit, in its power to change our very nature, +almost omnipotent. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +There is a very great diversity of opinion on the subject of fruit. Some +maintain that all fruit, even in the most ripe and perfect state, is of +doubtful utility, especially for children. Others say none is hurtful, +if ripe, and eaten in moderate quantity. Some require care in making a +proper selection; but here again, in regard to what constitutes a proper +selection, there is a difference of opinion. Some consider fruits easy +of digestion; others believe they are digested only with very great +difficulty. + +When the cholera prevailed in the large cities of the United States, a +majority of the physicians believed all fruits, even those which were +ripe, to be injurious in their tendency. But it was insisted by the +minority--I think very justly--that whenever fruit appeared to be +injurious, it was accidental--that is, the disease, being prepared to +make its attack just at that time, happened to do so immediately after +the use of fruit, rather than something else, and especially in the +_season_ of fruits--or on account of excess; or (which was certainly +the case in some instances) because the quality of the fruit was bad. + +At present, the _weight_ of testimony on this subject--estimating +according to talent, and not according to numbers--is in favor of good +fruit, used with moderation--even in the face of the cholera. Dr. +Dunglison--one of the last to adopt such an opinion--appears to be in +its favor. + +On several points, in regard to fruit, I believe that among medical men +there is no essential difference of opinion. As I always prefer, in +controversies, to see in how many things antagonists agree, before +proceeding to the points in which they differ, I will here endeavor to +enumerate them. + +1. All unripe fruits, especially, if eaten raw and uncooked--let the +season, or prevalent disease, or individual, be what or who it may--are +unwholesome. + +2. Excess, in the use of the most wholesome fruits, under any +circumstances, is also injurious. + +3. Fruits, eaten immediately after a full meal, when the stomach is in +an improper condition for receiving anything more, contribute to +overtask the digestive powers, and must hence produce more or less of +injury. + +4. The skins and kernels of the larger fruits are unwholesome, because +indigestible. The skins of fruits, if beaten or masticated finely; may +appear to be digested, because dissolved; but I have already endeavored +to show that solution is not always digestion. + +5. Fruits of all kinds are most wholesome in their own country, and in +their own appropriate season. + +6. Dried fruits are less wholesome than fresh. + +7. Fruit of all kinds should be withheld from infants, until they have +teeth. + +Thus far, as I have already said, all agree; at least so far as I know. +There are several other points on which medical men are generally +agreed, though not universally. One of these is, that fruits, if eaten +at all, should usually form a part of a regular meal. Another is, that +it is better not to eat them immediately before going to bed. + +There are contradictory opinions among the mass of the community, +physicians as well as others, on the general intention of our summer +fruits. From the fact that children's diseases prevail more at the +season of the year when fruits are more abundant, many think the fruits +are the immediate cause of them. Others, and with better reason, suppose +that the latter are intended by the Author of nature to check or prevent +the bowel diseases of summer. + +Nothing, certainly, is more unnatural than to suppose that at the very +season of the year when so many other influences combine to awaken a +tendency to disease in the human system, the Creator should place before +our eyes an abundance of fruits, inviting us by all their cooling and +tempting properties, only to do us mischief. On the contrary, it seems +to me much more probable that many of them were designed for our +moderate use. In what quantity, under what circumstances, and which are +best, it is left to human experience to determine. + +Some say that fruit should never be eaten in the morning, before +breakfast. Now everything I know of the human constitution, together +with what I have learned from experience and observation, has been for +years leading me to the contrary opinion. Indeed, I am most fully +convinced, that of all periods for eating fruit, whether we use it alone +or make it a part of our regular meals, the morning, soon after we rise, +is the most favorable. [Footnote: I ought to remark, that as the morning +is the best time for eating _good_ fruit, so it is the very worst time +for eating it if _not_ good; and as a large proportion of that which is +eaten is unripe, or otherwise bad, this may account for the general +prejudice against eating it at this period.] My reasons are as follows: + +1. The rest and sleep of the preceding night has restored our general +vigor, and consequently has invigorated the stomach, so that digestion +will be more easily and perfectly accomplished. + +2. We have been, at our rising, so long without food on our stomachs, +that they are not likely to be oppressed by a moderate quantity of good, +ripe, wholesome fruit. In the course of our waking hours, meals follow +each other in such quick succession, and there is so much variety, even +at the plainest tables, to tempt us to excess, that there is more danger +of injury from the addition of fruit than at our first rising. + +3. I have never known any one to receive injury from the use of fruit in +this way, provided no other circumstance in relation to quantity, +quality, &c. had been disregarded. In my own case, the practice has, on +the contrary, seemed beneficial. + +4. There is one reason in favor of this practice which perhaps would +have less weight, if people rose as early in the morning as they ought; +or, in the language of Dr. Franklin to the inhabitants of Paris, if they +knew that the sun gives light as soon as he rises. I allude to the +demand which I conceive that the stomach makes for something, after so +long fasting, and the pernicious custom of late breakfasts. I am +persuaded that it is advisable to eat something nearly as soon as we +rise, be it never so early; and if we can get nothing else for +breakfast, and have not accustomed ourselves to relish a piece of good +bread, or some other simple thing, which requires no labor of +preparation, I think it perfectly proper to eat a small quantity of +fruit. + +We come now to the particular consideration of some of those fruits +which universal experience has shown to be the most salutary. + +Of all these, none is more wholesome than the apple. There is indeed a +great diversity in the quality even of this single article. Sweet apples +are the most nutritious; but perhaps those which are gently acid, and at +the same time mealy, are rather more cooling, and when eaten raw, and in +the heat of summer, not less wholesome. + +Apples which come to maturity very early in the season appear, as a +general rule, to be less rich, and even less perfect, than those which +ripen later. In view of this fact, some writers have endeavored to +dissuade us from their use; and among others, Mr. Locke. We may judge a +little what his opinions were, from his concluding remarks on the +subject:--"I never knew apples hurt anybody," says he, "after October." + +But although neither apples nor any other fruits which ripen uncommonly +early are quite so good as those which come in a little later, yet I do +not think they are to be wholly rejected, unless they have been raised +in hot houses. Fruits, and indeed vegetables in general, whose maturity +is hastened by artificial processes, must be less wholesome than when +brought to perfection in nature's own appropriate time and manner. I +ought to say, however, very distinctly, that of the fruits of any +particular tree, those which first ripen are always the worst; for they +are usually wormy, or otherwise defective. + +Most of the fruit, as well as other vegetables, brought to our city +markets in this country, is utterly unfit to be eaten. Sometimes it is +immature; sometimes it has a hot house maturity; sometimes it has been +picked so long that it has begun to decay. Many fruits--berries +especially--are in perfection for a very short period only. Mulberries, +for example--one kind especially--are not in perfection long enough to +carry to the market house, even though the distance were very small. +Luckily, however, very few mulberries are eaten. But the raspberry and +strawberry, if perfect when gathered, have usually begun to decay, +before they are purchased. That this appears to be rather unfrequent, is +because they are gathered before they are ripe. + +Dr. Dewees regards most fruits as difficult of digestion. I do not think +they are so, if perfect and ripe. The experiments of Dr. Beaumont, so +far as they prove any general principle, show conclusively that mellow +sweet apples are more quickly digested than any kind of vegetable food +whatever, except rice and sago. But even admitting they were slow of +digestion, I do not think--as I have already shown in another +place--that they ought on that account to be excluded. Besides, my +opinion differs from that of Dr. D. in regard to the strength of the +digestive powers of children. After teething, they seem to me to be able +to digest any substances which adults can; and with as little +difficulty. + +But to return:--No fruit is in perfection longer than the apple. +Besides, no fruit appears to be less injured in its nature and +properties by picking it a little before it is ripe, and preserving it +during the winter. It is on this account, more perhaps than any other, +that I value it more highly than all other fruits united. + +Apples may be used either raw or cooked. In either case, the skins and +seeds should be avoided, as has been before suggested. I am not ignorant +that WILLICH, in his "Lectures on Diet and Regimen"--an excellent work, +in the main--says that the seeds ought to be eaten; but I believe few +physiologists would comply with his injunction, especially when it is +considered that he recommends, in the same connection, that we swallow +the stones of cherries and plums. Strange how far our theories will +sometimes carry us! + +The apple is excellent when roasted or baked, especially the sweet +apple. It is very common, in some places, to eat baked sweet apples with +milk; and the practice is by no means a bad one. Indeed, baked or raw +apples might be advantageously made a part of at least one of our meals +every day. There is said to be a miserly farmer--a single gentleman--in +the western part of the state of Massachusetts, who has lived on nothing +but apples for his food, and water for his drink, about forty years. And +yet he is said to enjoy the most perfect health. I do not propose this +as an example worthy of imitation; but it shows that apples maybe made +to subserve an important purpose in diet. And though I have more than +once expressed an opinion highly unfavorable to the exclusive use of any +one article of diet, yet if I were to confine myself to any one thing, I +know of nothing except bread that I should prefer to good apples. Still, +however, I prefer a variety--sweet, sour, early, late, &c.; and I should +use them raw, roasted, baked, made into sauce with new or unfermented +cider, and boiled. Good apples, eaten raw, with bread, form not only a +very wholesome, but, to an unperverted appetite, a most delicious +dinner. + +Much has been said about cutting down orchards; but the whole seems to +me idle--for if the fruit is of a good quality, it may be used as food, +either for man or beast. And if not good, the trees ought either to be +destroyed or replaced by those that will produce fruit which is +better--even if the object were to make it into cider. I have said that +apples may be used both by man and beast. It is well known that most +domestic animals thrive well on good apples, especially sweet ones. Very +tolerable molasses is also sometimes made from sweet apples. + +Nearly everything which has been said above in regard to apples, will +apply to pears. The best varieties of this excellent fruit are quite as +nutritious and as wholesome as the apple; and as much improved for the +table by baking. I believe, however, that no cheap process has yet been +devised for keeping them as long in the winter. They may be preserved in +the form of sauce, prepared in the same way with common apple sauce. The +skins, of many kinds of pears are less injurious than those of apples; +but even the skins of pears need not be eaten. + +Some kinds of peaches are tolerably wholesome; but the stringy character +of their pulp appears to me to render them less so than apples and +pears, though I am not confident on this point. But if used at all, they +should be used in less quantity at one time. Tempting as their flavor +is, I seldom eat them, when I can get apples and pears; holding myself +in duty bound to use the _best_, even of the fruits. + +"Fruit," says Mr. Locke, "makes one of the most difficult chapters in +the government of health, especially that of children. Our first parents +ventured Paradise for it; and it is no wonder our children cannot stand +the temptation, though it cost them their health. The regulation of this +cannot come under any one general rule; for I am by no means of their +mind who would keep children wholly from fruit, as a thing totally +unwholesome for them, by which strict way they make them but the more +ravenous after it, to eat good or bad, ripe or unripe, all that they can +get, whenever they come at it. + +"Melons, peaches, most sorts of plums, and all sorts of grapes, in +_England_, I think children should be wholly kept from, as having a very +tempting taste, in a very unwholesome juice, so that if it were +possible, they should never so much as see them, or know that there was +any such thing. But strawberries, cherries, gooseberries and currants, +when thoroughly ripe, I think may be pretty safely allowed them." + +Excellent as these remarks are, in general, I do not like his entire +interdiction of the use of melons, peaches, plums, and grapes, even in +England. Peaches, to be sure, as they come at a season when apples or +pears, or both of them--which are more wholesome than peaches--are +abundant, may be better omitted, delicious as they are to the taste; and +I do not think very highly of plums. But melons, in very moderate +quantity, and grapes, if we eat nothing but the ripe pulp, rejecting +both the husk and the interior hard part, including the seeds, are, I +think, useful and wholesome. On the other hand, I should never place +cherries and gooseberries in the same list with strawberries; for the +latter are, if I may use the expression, infinitely the most wholesome. + +Many seem to think that not to eat all sorts of fruits is to despise, or +at least to treat with neglect the gifts of God, intended for our +reception; by which they mean, if they mean anything, that the use of +all sorts of fruits is already found out, even in the present +comparative infancy of the world. Now I do not suppose that God has made +anything in vain--absolutely so--though I do not think we have found out +the true uses of half the things which he has made and given us. And +among those things of which we are yet ignorant, are some of the fruits. +I do not believe it follows, necessarily, that because fruits are +created, we are obliged to use them all. + +Besides, if this is a rule, it is one which nobody follows. Every one +uses more of some sorts, and fewer of others; and a large proportion of +the community entirely reject some kinds. Now if the statement commonly +made, that all fruits are the gifts of God, and ought therefore to be +used by all persons, is correct, those who make the statement ought to +conform to it as a rule of their lives, and to eat all kinds of fruit +which the season and country affords; and not only eat all kinds, but +see that the whole of every kind is consumed; since to waste any portion +is to slight the good gifts of God. + +The result then is, that we cannot obey such a rule; but are driven back +to the mode which common sense dictates, which is, to make a selection, +using some, and rejecting others. And the value of studying the nature +of these fruits, by examining the experience of mankind in regard to +them, consists in the aid thus afforded us in making our selection +wisely. + +There is one very common error in the use of the smaller summer fruits, +such as strawberries, whortleberries, currants, &c., which is that of +mixing cream, wine, spices, sugar, &c., with them. We are thus tempted +to eat too great a quantity at once. Besides--which is a worse evil--we +change the proportions of the saccharine parts, and thus do all in our +power, by increasing a similarity in all fruits, to destroy that +agreeable variety which God has established, and which is probably +salutary. + + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +By confectionary we here mean the substances usually sold at those shops +in our cities distinguished by the general name of confectionaries, and +which consist either wholly of sugar, or of sugar and some other +substances combined. + +As to the use of a moderate quantity of pure sugar at our meals, whether +it is procured at a confectioner's shop or elsewhere, I do not know that +there is any strong objection to it; though I believe that it cannot be +regarded as indispensable to health--for were that the fact, it seems to +me to imply something short of infinite wisdom in the creation of +articles destined for our sustenance. But I have spoken on this subject +elsewhere. + +A part, however, of the contents of the confectionary shop are actually +poisonous. I refer to those things which are either frosted, as it is +called, or colored. The substances applied to the sugar for this purpose +are usually some mineral or vegetable poison; although the fact of its +being a poison may not always be known to the manufacturer. The most +unhappy consequences have occasionally followed the use of +confectionary, when poisoned in this manner. A family of four persons, +in New York, were made sick in this way in March of year before last, +and some of them came very near losing their lives. The "frosting" which +caused the mischief was pronounced by eminent chemists to be one fifth +rank poison.[Footnote: It is to be remembered that those who eat +confectionary so slightly poisoned that it does not make them sick at +once, may nevertheless be as much injured in their constitutions as they +who are poisoned outright. In the latter case, the poison is in part +thrown out of the body; in the former, it remains in it much longer--and +therefore more surely, though more slowly, accomplishes the work of +destruction.] The coloring substances used are sometimes poisonous, as +well as the frosting. + +Some of the articles sold at these shops consist of sugar mixed with +paste. Others are called sweetmeats; that is, fruits, or rinds of +fruits, preserved in sugar. All these substances, I believe, without +exception, are injurious. + +The great evils of confectionary yet remain to be mentioned. These are +of three kinds, physical, mental and moral. + +Some of the _physical_ evils have, it is true, just been mentioned; but +there is another evil of still greater magnitude. Young people who eat +confectionary, commonly eat it between meals. This produces mischief in +two ways. First, it keeps the stomach at work when it ought to rest; for +this, like every other muscular organ, requires its seasons of repose. +Secondly, it destroys gradually the appetite; so that when the regular +meal arrives, the accustomed keenness of appetite does not come with it. +And the consequence is, not so much that we do not eat enough, as that +we are fastidious, and eat a little of this, then a little of that; and +usually select the worst things. We are not hungry enough to make a meal +of a single article of plain food. And this evil goes on increasing, as +long as we have access to the confectionary shop. These statements +describe the case of thousands of pupils, of both sexes, at our schools +and seminaries. + +The _intellectual_ evil resulting from the use of confectionary consists +in the fondness for excitement which is produced. You will seldom find a +person who depends daily and almost hourly on some excitement to his +appetite and stomach, and is not satisfied with plain food, who will +content himself to _study_ without unnatural excitements of the mind. +Duty to himself or to others will not move him. He must have before him +the hope of reward, or the fear of punishment. He must be moved by +emulation or ambition, or some other questionable or wicked motive or +passion. + +But the _moral_ results, to the young, of using confectionary, are still +more dreadful. I do not here refer to the danger of meeting with bad +company at the shops themselves, or of going from these places of +pollution _directly_ to the grog-shop, the gambling-house, or the +brothel; though there is danger enough, even here. But I allude to the +tendency which a habit of not resting satisfied with plain food, but of +depending on exciting things, has, to make us dissatisfied with plain +moral enjoyments--the society of friends, and the quiet discharge of our +duty to God and our neighbor. Just in proportion as we gratify our +propensity for excitement at the confectioner's shop, just in the same +proportion do we expose ourselves to the, danger of yielding to +temptation, should other gratifications present themselves. The young of +both sexes who are in the use of confectionary, are on the high road to +gluttony, drunkenness, or debauchery; perhaps to all three. I do not say +they will certainly arrive there, for circumstances not quite miraculous +may pluck them as "brands from the burning;" but I do not hesitate to +say that such is the inevitable tendency; and I call on every mother and +teacher who reads this section, to beware of confectionaries, and see, +if possible, that the young never set foot in them. They are a road +through which thousands pass to the chamber of death--death to the +immortal spirit, as well as to the body, its vehicle. + +More might be added--for this is an important subject--but I trust I +have said enough. Those who have read and believe what I have written, +if they remain wholly unaffected and unmoved, would not be roused to +effort were anything to be added. + + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris, a distinguished British writer on diet, says that all pastry +is "an abomination." And yet, go where we will, we find it often on the +table. Hardly any one, whether old or young, attempts to do without it. + +There are indeed some, who will not eat pie-crust, or high-seasoned +cakes formed of paste; but yet will not hesitate to eat hot bread, or +rolls, or biscuits made of wheat flour, bolted. Now what is this but +paste? If we could see the contents of the stomach, an hour after the +mass is swallowed, we should find it to be paste, and _mere_ paste. + +And yet the evil is increasing everywhere. So generally is this true, +that a person who refuses to eat hot bread, or cake, or biscuit, is +deemed singular. He who ventures to lift his voice against it is deemed +an ascetic or a visionary. But such a voice must be raised, and heard, +too, whether its monitions are or are not regarded. + +Pastry is less objectionable, however, when used in the form of hot +bread, &c., than when butter or fat is mixed with it. Then it becomes +one of the most indigestible substances in the world. Besides, it not +only tries the patience of the stomach, but according to Willich, whose +authority ranks high, it tends to produce diseases of the skin, +especially a disease which he calls "copper in the face," and which he +pronounces incurable. + +I know not whether the eruptions so common on the faces of young people +in this country, and especially of young men, are in every instance +either produced or aggravated by pastry; but I am very sure of one +thing, viz., that those who are in the use of pastry, and have eruptions +of the skin of any kind, will not be apt to get well, as long as they +continue the use of this objectionable substance. + +Physicians are often consulted about eruptions on the face. When they +assign the real cause, which is undoubtedly connected with the improper +gratification of some of the appetites, in one way or another, it is +seldom that the patient has self-command enough to follow his +prescription of temperance or abstinence. Mothers, it is yours to +prevent this mischief;--first, by establishing correct physical habits; +secondly, by teaching your children the great duty of self-denial--not +only by precept, but by your own good example. + + +SEC. 13. _Crude or Raw Substances._ + +I have reserved this section for remarks on certain articles used at our +fashionable modern tables, of which I could not well find it convenient +to speak elsewhere. And first, of SALADS, and HERBS used in cooking; +such as asparagus, artichokes, spinage, plantain, cabbage, dock, +lettuce, water-cresses, chives, &c. + +Several of these substances are often eaten raw, in which state they are +exceedingly indigestible, at the best; and they are rendered still more +beyond the reach of the powers of the stomach, by the oil or vinegar +which is added to them. Boiled, they are more tolerable; especially +asparagus. In the midst, however, of such an abundance of excellent food +as this country affords, it is most surprising that anybody should ever +take it into their heads to eat such crude substances; and above all, +that they should fill children's stomachs with them. What child, with an +unperverted appetite, would not prefer a good ripe apple, or peach, or +pear, to the most approved raw salads?--and a good baked one, to the +best boiled asparagus? + +NUTS, in general, are probably made for other animals rather than man; +though of this we cannot in the present infancy of human knowledge be +quite certain. But if any of them were intended, by the Creator, for +man, it is the chesnut; and this should be boiled. Boiled chesnuts are +used as food, in many parts of southern Europe; and to a very +considerable extent. + +SPICES, as they are sometimes called, such as nutmeg, mace, pepper, +pimento; cubebs, cardamoms, juniper berries, ginger, calamus, cloves, +cinnamon, caraway, coriander, fennel, parsley, dill, sage, marjoram, +thyme, pennyroyal, lavender, hyssop, peppermint, &c., are unfit for the +human stomach--above all in infancy--except as medicines. + +There are several other vegetables equally objectionable with the last, +though they cannot be classed under the same head. Such are mustard, +horseradish, raw onions, garlic, cucumbers, and pickles. No appetite +which has not been accustomed to these substances in early infancy, will +ever require them. Not that they may not sometimes be useful in enabling +the stomach--at every age--to get rid of certain substances with which +it has been improperly or unreasonably loaded;--this is undoubtedly the +fact; ardent spirits would do the same. And it is with a view to some +such effect, generally, that medical writers have spoken in their favor. +Some of them stimulate the stomach to get rid of a load of _green_ +fruit; others, of a load of _fat_ or _salt_ food; others, again, +of too large a _quantity_ of food which is naturally wholesome. + +But in all these cases, they should be considered, not as food, but as +medicine; and we ought to call them by their right name. And if we +withhold the cause of the disease, there will be no need of the +medicine. + + + + +CHAPTER VIII. + +DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk and +water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad food +and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischief they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +Children need little if any drink, so long as their food is nothing but +milk; nor indeed for some time afterward, unless they are indulged in +the use of animal food. Adults, even, very seldom drink merely to quench +natural thirst. In the summer, people usually drink either to cool +themselves, or to gratify a thirst which is wholly artificial. Tea, +coffee, beer, cider, and most other common drinks, when not used for the +sake of their coolness, are drank, both in winter and summer, for this +purpose. + +That this is the fact, we have the most abundant and unequivocal +evidence. I know that much is said of the demand which a profuse +perspiration creates among hard laborers in the summer. Such a sudden +abstraction of a large amount of fluid requires, it is said, a +proportional supply, or life would soon become extinct. Yet there are +many old men who have perspired profusely at their labor all their days, +and yet have drank nothing at all, except their tea, morning and +evening; and perhaps have eaten, for one or two of their meals daily, in +summer, a bowl of bread and milk. And some of them are among the most +remarkable instances of longevity which the country affords. + +How the system acquires a sufficient supply of moisture to keep up good +health, in these cases, I do not pretend to determine: perhaps it is +through the medium of the lungs. But at any rate, it can obtain it +without our drinking for that sole purpose, to the great danger of +exciting liver complaints, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, colds, rheumatisms, and +fevers. + +But if adults who perspire freely do not require much drink, children +certainly do not; and above all, young children. And if they do require +any thing, it is only simple water. The following remarks of Dr. Oliver, +of Hanover, N.H., are extracted from Dr. Mussey's late Prize Essay on +Ardent Spirits: + +"Who has not observed the extreme satisfaction which children derive +from quenching their thirst with pure water? And who that has perverted +his appetite for drink, by stimulating his palate with bitter beer, sour +cider, rum and water, and other beverages of human invention, but would +be a gainer, even on the score of mere animal gratification, without any +reference to health, if he could bring back his vitiated taste to the +simple relish of nature? + +"Children drink because they are dry. Grown people drink, whether dry or +not, because they have discovered a way of making drink pleasant. +Children drink water because this is a beverage of nature's own brewing, +which she has made for the purpose of quenching a natural thirst. Grown +people drink anything but water, because this fluid is intended to +quench only a natural thirst; and natural thirst is a thing which they +seldom feel." + +There is a great deal of truth, as well as of sound philosophy, in these +two paragraphs, and little less of truth in the following paragraph from +Dr. Dewees: + +"We have witnessed very often, with sorrow, parents giving to their +young children wine, or other stimulating liquors. Nature never intended +anything stronger than water to be the drink for children. This they +enjoy greatly; and much advantage is occasionally experienced from its +use, especially after they have commenced the use of animal food." + +Two things are to be observed in the last remarks, which are, that +children demand drink of any kind but seldom, and that even this +occasional demand is often the special result of the use of animal food. +Here comes out an important secret. It is the use of animal food, to a +very great degree, in adults and children both, that creates so much of +that unnatural thirst which prevails in the community. When we shall +come to lay aside animal food, in childhood, youth, manhood and age, +much that is now _called_ thirst will be banished; and much of the +intemperance and other kinds of sensuality which follow in its train. + +It has been sometimes said that there is but one kind of drink in the +world--and that is water. This is strictly, or rather _physiologically_ +true. For, though many mixtures are _called_ drinks, it is only the +water which they contain that answers any of the legitimate purposes for +which drink was intended by the Creator. + +The object of drink, besides quenching our thirst, or rather _while_ it +quenches it, is, not to be digested, like food, but to pass directly +from the stomach into the blood-vessels, and dilute and temper the +blood, rendering it more fit to answer the great purpose of sustaining +life and health. Now, there is nothing that can do this but water. +Alcohol cannot do it, nor can turpentine, oil, quicksilver, melted lead, +or any other liquid. + +Tea, coffee, chocolate, small beer, soda water, lemonade, &c., which are +nearly all water, quench the thirst very well, it is true; but not quite +so well as water alone would. The narcotic principle of the first two, +the alcoholic principle of the fourth, and the mucilage, nutriment, +acid, and alkali of the rest, are in the way; for thirst would be +quenched still better without them, even when it is of an unnatural +kind. + +Indeed, the same or similar remarks may be made in regard to all other +mixtures which are usually proposed as drinks. Even milk and water, +molasses and water, &c., in favor of which so much is said, are +objectionable, as mere drinks. Not that they contain anything poisonous, +but they evidently contain nutriment; and even this, except as a part or +the whole of a regular meal, does harm; for it sets the stomach at work +when it needs repose. Mere drink, as I have already said, is never +digested. + +But if the drinks above mentioned, and even milk and water, are +objectionable, what shall we say of cider, wine, and ardent +spirits?--substances which contain, the latter one half, and the two +former from one twentieth to one fourth alcohol. Surely, nobody will +deny that these substances ought, at all events, to be banished from the +nursery. And yet we occasionally find them there, not only for the use +of the mother, to the ruin of the child, indirectly--but also, in some +of their smoother forms, for the use of the child itself. + +I would not lay too much stress on food and drink; for, as I have +already observed, more than once, the causes of infantile ill health and +mortality are numerous. Still I must insist that, of all the sources of +disease, these are the most prolific. Much is done towards ruining the +health of children by the improper food and drink of the mother. But +when, in addition to all this, the children themselves are early fed +with animal food, and with stimulating drinks--punch, coffee, tea, +&c.--and an artificial thirst is early excited and rendered habitual, +their destruction, for time and eternity, is almost inevitable. + +Very few children relish any drink but water, or sweetened water, at +first; and where they do, it is probably hereditary. I have been struck +with their tastes and preferences; nor less with the folly of those +around them, in endeavoring to change them, by requiring them--almost +always against their will--to sip a little coffee, or a little tea, or +a little lemonade; or, it may be, a little toddy. Such children _may_ +escape the death of the drunkard or the debauchee; but if they do, it +will not be through the instrumentality of the parents. + +I am very much opposed to giving children hot drinks of any kind. If +they are to drink substances which are injurious, as tea or coffee, let +them be cool. I do not say _cold_, for that would be going to the other +extreme. But no drink, in any ordinary case, should be above the heat of +our bodies; that is, about 98 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer. Yet +the precautions of this paragraph will be almost unnecessary, if +children are confined--as they ought to be, and would be, did we not go +out of our way to teach them otherwise--to water, as their only drink. +Cold water is almost always preferred. Not one child in a thousand would +ever prefer it hot, until his taste had been perverted. No writer has +inveighed more against hot drinks of every kind, than the late William +Cobbett--and, as I think, with more justice. + +But, in avoiding one rock, we must not, as has already been intimated, +make shipwreck on another. Hot drinks, though they injure the powers of +the stomach, and by that means and through that medium, are one +principal cause of the almost universal early decay of teeth, are yet +less injurious, or at least less dangerous, immediately, than cold ones. +Mr. Locke, in speaking of the sports of a child, in the open air, has +the following quaint, but judicious remarks: + +"Playing in the open air has but this one danger in it, that I know; and +that is, that when he is hot with running up and down, he should sit or +lie down on the cold or moist earth. This, I grant, and drinking cold +drink, when they are hot with labor or exercise, brings more people to +the grave, or to the brink of it, by fevers and other diseases, than +anything I know. These mischiefs are easily enough prevented when he is +little, being then seldom out of sight. And if, during his childhood, he +be constantly and rigorously kept from sitting on the ground, or +drinking any cold liquor, while he is hot, the custom of forbearing, +grown into _habit_, will help much to preserve him, when he is no longer +under his maid's or tutor's eye. + +"More fevers and surfeits are got by people's drinking when they are +hot, than by any one thing I know. If he (the child) be very hot, he +should by no means _drink_; at least a good piece of bread, first to be +eaten, will gain time to warm his drink _blood hot_, which then he may +drink safely. If he be very dry, it will go down so warmed, and quench +his thirst better; and if he will not drink it so warmed, abstaining +will not hurt him. Besides, this will teach him to forbear, which is a +habit of the greatest use for health of mind and body too." + +The last remarks are full of wisdom. Mothers may depend upon it, that +every indulgence to which they accustom their children paves the way for +_habitual_ indulgence; and has a tendency to lead, indirectly, to +indulgence in other matters; and, on the contrary, every self-denial +which they can lead children to exercise, voluntarily--even in these +every-day matters of food, drink, exercise, &c. is so much gained in the +great work of self-denial and the resisting of temptation in matters of +higher importance. But I must not moralize too long; having dwelt on +this same point under the head Confectionary. I proceed, therefore, to +make a few more extracts from Mr. Locke: + +"Not being permitted to _drink_ without eating, will prevent the custom +of having the cup often at his nose; a dangerous beginning." + +"Men often bring habitual hunger and thirst on themselves by custom." + +"You may, if you please, bring any one to be thirsty every hour." + +"I once lived in a house, where, to appease a froward child, they gave +him _drink_ as often as he cried, so that he was constantly bibbing. +And though he could not speak, yet he drank more in twenty-four hours +than I did." + +"It is convenient, for health and sobriety, to drink no more than +natural thirst requires; and he that eats not salt meats, nor drinks +strong drink, will seldom thirst between meals." + +Great mischief is often done to their health by children at school; and +one instance of this is, in getting violently heated with exercise, and +then pouring down large quantities of cold water to cool themselves. I +once made it a habitual rule for pupils, that they must drink water, if +they drank it at all, on leaving their seats to go to their plays, but +not afterwards: and I was so situated that I could prevent the law from +being broken, as there was no spring or well to which they could have +access, privately. And though they thought the rule rather severe, I +have no doubt it saved them from much injury, and perhaps sometimes from +sickness. + + + + +CHAPTER IX. + +GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +So much error prevails in regard to the medical management of the young, +that a volume might be written without exhausting the subject.[Footnote: +Such a volume is in preparation. It is intended as a companion to the +present.] My present limits and plan allow of only a few remarks, and +those must be general. + +That "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," has so long ago +become a proverb, that it seems almost idle to repeat the sentiment. And +yet it is to be feared that very few receive it as a practical truth, in +the management of children. Now nothing is more certain than that it is +easier, as well as more humane, to prevent diseases than to cure them. + +I have elsewhere mentioned the opinion of a very eminent physician, +that nine in ten of children's diseases may be imputed to error with +regard to the quantity or the quality of their food. For myself, I am by +no means certain that nine out of ten is the exact proportion, though I +think the number is, at all events, very large. Few children, or even +grown persons, are seized with disease suddenly. Their progress towards +it is always gradual, and sometimes imperceptible. To a physician of any +tolerable degree of skill, however, there is no difficulty in observing +and pointing out the first steps towards illness; in those whose habits +of life are well known to him; and of foretelling the consequence. + +But since parents and nurses are not so well qualified as physicians to +make these observations, I will endeavor to point out a few certain +signs and symptoms by which they may know a child's health to be +declining, even before be appears to be sick.--For if these are +neglected, the evil increases, goes on from bad to worse, and more +violent and apparent complaints will follow, and perhaps end in +incurable diseases, which a timely remedy, or a slight change in the +diet and manner of life, would have infallibly prevented. + +"The first tendency to disease," says Dr. Cadogan, "may be observed in a +child's breath. It is not enough that the breath is not offensive; it +should be sweet and fragrant, like a nosegay of fresh flowers, or a pail +of new milk from a young cow that feeds upon the sweetest grass of the +spring; and this as well at first waking in the morning, as all day +long." [Footnote: Buchan's "Advice to Mothers," pages 337, 388] + +There is much of truth in these remarks; but if they are wholly true, +then very few children are perfectly healthy. For no child that eats +much animal food of any sort, or, what amounts to nearly the same thing, +much butter or gravy, will long retain the fragrant breath here alluded +to. Who has not observed the difference in this respect, between animals +in general which feed on flesh, and those which feed on grass? And +whether it is the character of their respective food that makes the +difference or not, it is also true that there is nearly as much +difference of breath between _men_ who use animal food and those who do +not, as between other animals. The breath of some of our enormous meat +eaters would almost remind one of a slaughter house. + +Nor is it the quality of food alone, that will induce a foul breath, +either in adults or infants. He who swallows such enormous quantities, +even of plain food, as by overloading and fatiguing the stomach, tend +gradually to debilitate it, will produce the same effect. The enormous +feeders of this full feeding country, whether they are young or old, +whether they inhabit the mountain or the vale, and whether they feed on +animal food or not, have generally a bad breath; and if they seldom +offend, it is because few feed otherwise. And it is not too much--in my +own opinion--to say of this whole class of gormandizers, no less than of +the flesh eaters, that they have laid for themselves the foundation of +future disease. + +One general rule may here be distinctly laid down. As a child's breath +becomes hot and feverish, or strong, or acid, we may be certain that +"digestion and surfeit have fouled and disturbed the blood; and now is +the time to apply a proper remedy, and prevent a train of impending +evils. Let the child be restrained in its food. Let it eat less, live +upon milk or thin broth for a day or two, and be carried (or walk if it +is able) a little more than usual in the open air." [Footnote: Advice to +Mothers, page 338] + +This rule is the more important, because, if duly persevered in, it will +generally prevent disease, and save the trouble and evil consequences of +taking medicine at all. Meanwhile it will be advisable to call in a +physician--not to give drugs, but to prevent the necessity of giving +them. There is a foolish fear abroad that physicians, if called before a +person is violently sick, will dose him with their drugs, as a matter of +course, till they _make_ him sick. But this, no judicious physician will +ever do. It may _have been_ done, though I believe it has been seldom. +The more general course is to defer calling for medical advice, till it +is too late to use preventive means; and medicine is then resorted to by +the physician as a sort of necessary evil. + +A judicious physician, seasonably called in, would in many instances +save a severe fit of sickness, besides a great deal of expense, both of +time and money. + +But if the first symptoms of approaching disease are overlooked--if the +child is fed, or rather crammed; with solid food as much as ever--and if +no medical advice is sought, his sleep will soon become disturbed; he +will be talking, starting, and tumbling about, and will have frightful +dreams; or he will at other times be found smiling and laughing. To +these, in the end, may be added, loss of appetite, paleness, emaciation, +weakness, cough, and consumption; or colics, worms, and convulsions. + +I do not undertake to say that the most judicious parental management, +aided by the greatest medical skill, will always prevent disease; far +from it. The child may and undoubtedly sometimes does inherit a tendency +to a particular disease; or he may be made sick by error in regard to +dress, exercise, &c. But so long as nine tenths of the disease and early +mortality of the young might be prevented by due attention to all these +means combined, so long will it be necessary to reiterate the sentiments +of the present section. + + + + +CHAPTER X + +EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. Objections to the use of cradles.--SEC. 2. Carrying in the +arms--its uses and abuses.--SEC. 3. Creeping--why useful--to be +encouraged.--SEC. 4. Walking--general directions about it.--SEC. 5. +Riding abroad in carriages.--SEC. 6. Riding on horseback--objections. +Riding schools. + + +This subject may be considered under the following heads: ROCKING IN THE +CRADLE; CARRYING IN THE ARMS; CREEPING; WALKING; RIDING IN A CARRIAGE; +AND RIDING ON HORSEBACK. These I shall consider in their order. + + + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +There are two opinions in regard to the use of the cradle in the +nursery. Some condemn it altogether; others think its occasional use +highly proper. Those who condemn it, do it chiefly on the ground that it +produces a whirling motion of the brain, which, while it inclines to +giddiness and lulls to sleep, disturbs, in some degree, the process of +digestion. + +It seems to me that there is weight to this objection; and although the +cradle has been extensively used without producing any obviously evil +effects, I should greatly prefer to have it universally laid aside. As +far as mere amusement is demanded, it is quite unnecessary, since there +are so many amusements which are far better. As a means of inducing +sleep, I am still more strongly opposed to it; for if a child be +rationally treated in every other respect, it will never need artificial +means to induce it to sleep. Nature will then be the most appropriate +directress in this matter. + +If there is a cradle in a nursery, it is almost always full of clothes +loaded with air more or less impure, and the child is buried in it more +than is compatible with health, even in the judgment of the mother or +the nurse; for so convenient is its use, and so great the temptation to +keep the child in it, that he will often be found soaking there a large +proportion of his time. Every one knows that the air has not so free +access to a child in the cradle as elsewhere, especially if it have a +kind of covering or hood to it, as we often see. Besides, the cradle is +a piece of furniture which takes up a great deal of space in the +nursery; and every one who has made the trial effectually, will, it +seems to me, greatly prefer its room to its company. + +If any cradle is to be used, those are best which are suspended by +cords, and are swung, rather than rocked. And this swinging should be in +a line with the body of the child as much as possible; as this motion is +less likely to produce injury than its opposite. + + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +This is the most appropriate exercise for the first two months of +existence; and indeed, one of the best for some time afterward. + +Although a healthy, thriving child ought to sleep, for some time after +birth, from two thirds to three fourths of his time, yet it should never +be forgotten that the demand for proper exercise during the rest of the +time, is not the less imperious on this account; but probably the more +so. + +I have already mentioned the importance of bathing, which is one form of +exercise, and of gentle motion in the arms, immediately afterward. The +same gentle motion should be often repeated during the day; care being +taken to hold the child in such a position as will be easy to him, and +favorable to the free exercise of all his limbs and muscles. + +There are many mothers and nurses, who not only rejoice that the infant +inclines to sleep a great deal, since it gives them more liberty, but +who take pains to prolong these hours beyond what nature requires, by +artificial means. I refer not only to the use of the cradle, but to +means still more artificial--the use of cordials and opiates, to which I +have already adverted. But whatever the means used may be, they defeat +the purposes of nature, and are in the highest degree reprehensible. +Nothing but the most chilling poverty should prevent the mother from +having the child--for a few weeks of its first existence at least--in +her own arms, nearly all the time which is not absolutely demanded for +repose. She should even invite it to wakefulness, rather than encourage +sleep. + +Attention to exercise ought to be commenced before the child is more +than ten days old. For this purpose he should be placed on his back, on +a pillow, in order that the body may rest at as many points as possible. +In this position he has the opportunity to move his limbs with the most +perfect freedom, and to exercise his numerous muscles. There is nothing +more important to the infant--not even sleep itself--than the action of +all his muscles; and nothing contributes more to his rapid growth. + +At first, the body should be kept, while on the arm, in nearly a +horizontal position, with the head perhaps a very little elevated; but +after a few weeks, it will be proper to change the position for a small +part of the time; placing the body so that it may form an angle of a few +degrees with the horizon. When this is done, however, it should always +be by placing the hand against the shoulders and head, in such a manner +as to support well the back; for it is extremely injurious to suffer the +feeble spine to sustain, at this early period, any considerable weight. + +Still more erroneous is the practice of some careless nurses, of +carrying the child quite upright a part of the time, almost without any +support at all. There can be no doubt that the spinal column of many a +child is injured for life in this way. There can be no apology for such +things. + +But it is not sufficient to denounce, merely, the custom of holding the +infant's body in an erect position. Every inquiring mother--and it is +for such, and no other, that I write--will naturally and properly ask +the reason why. + +The child is not born with all its bones solid. Some are mere cartilage +for a considerable time. This is the case with the bones of the back. +Now every person must see that the weight of the child's head and +shoulders, resting for a considerable time on the slender cartilaginous +spinal column, may easily bend it. And a curvature, thus given, may, and +often does, deform children for life. + +Dr. Dewees mentions a nurse who, from a foolish fondness for displaying +them, made the children consigned to her charge sit perfectly upright +before they were a month old. It is truly ludicrous, he says, to see the +little creatures sitting as straight as if they were stiffened by a back +board. It is truly _horrible_, I should say, rather than ludicrous. +Crooked spines must be the inevitable consequence, if nothing worse. + +The practice of bracing children, as it is called, by straps, back +boards, corsets, &c., where it has produced any effect at all, has +always had a tendency to crook the spine. This may be seen first, by +observing one shoulder to be lower than the other, and next by a +projection of the part of the shoulder blades next to the spine. +Whenever these changes begin to appear, it is time to send for a +physician, though it may often be too late to effect a cure. But on the +general subject of bracing and corseting, I have treated at sufficient +length elsewhere. + +There is another error committed in carrying children in the arms. The +head of the infant is often permitted either to hang constantly on one +side, or to roll about loosely; as if it hardly belonged to the body. +In the former case there is danger of producing a habit of holding the +head upon one side, which it will be very difficult to overcome; in the +latter, the spinal marrow itself may be injured--which would produce +alarming and perhaps fatal consequences. + +But all these evils, as has already been said, may be prevented, if the +hand is placed so as to support the head and shoulders. Let not the +mother, however, who reads this work, trust the matter wholly to a +nurse; she must see to it herself; else she incurs a most fearful +responsibility. The suggestions I have made are the more important in +the case of children either very fleshy or very feeble, and of those +disposed to rickets or scrofula; but they are important to all. + +I have said that the motion of the child, on the arm, should be gentle. +Many are in the habit of tossing infants about. There can be no +objection to a slight and slow movement up and down, for a minute or so +at a time; indeed, it is rather to be recommended, as likely to give +strength and vigor no less than pleasure to the child. But when such +movements are carried to excess, so as to frighten the child, they are +highly reprehensible. The shock thus produced to the nervous system has +sometimes been so great as to produce sudden death. Nor is it safe to +run, jump, or descend stairs hastily or violently, with a child in our +arms; and for similar reasons. + +Infants should not be carried always on the same arm, for there is +danger of contracting a habit of leaning to one side, and thus of +becoming crooked. On this account, the arm on which they rest should be +often changed. Nor should they be grasped too firmly. A skilful mother +will hold a child quite loosely, with the most perfect safety; while an +inexperienced one will grasp him so hard as to expose the soft bones to +be bent out of their place, and yet be quite as liable to let him fall +as she who handles him with more ease and freedom. + + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +"Mankind must creep before they can walk," is an old adage often used to +remind us of that patient application which is so indispensable to +secure any highly important or valuable end. But it is as true +literally, as it is figuratively. The act of creeping exercises in a +remarkable degree nearly all the muscles of the body; and this, too, +without much fatigue. + +Some mothers there indeed are, who think it a happy circumstance if a +child can be taught to walk without this intermediate step. But such +mothers must have strange ideas of the animal economy. They must never +have thought of the pleasure which creeping affords the mind, or of the +vigor it imparts to the body. + +Children are wonderfully pleased with their own voluntary efforts. What +they can do themselves, yields them ten-fold greater pleasure than if +done by the mother or the nurse. Yet the latter are exceedingly prone to +forget or overlook all this--and to say, at least practically, that the +only proper efforts are those to which themselves give direction. + +They are moreover exceedingly fond of display. Some mothers seem to +act--in all they do with and for children--as if all the latter were +good for, was display and amusement. They feed them, indeed, and strive +to prolong their existence; but it appears to be for similar reasons to +those which would lead them to take kind care of a pet lamb. + +It is on this account that they dress them out in the manner they do, +strive to make them sit up straight, and prohibit their creeping. It is +on this account too, as much perhaps as any other, that go-carts and +leading strings are put in such early requisition. The contrary would be +far the safer extreme; and the parent who keeps his child scrambling +about upon the back as long as possible, and when he cannot prevent +longer an inversion of this position, retains him at creeping as long +as is in his power, is as much wiser, in comparison with him who urges +him forward to make a prodigy of him, as he is who, instead of making +his child a prodigy in mind or morals at premature age, holds him back, +and endeavors to have his mental and moral nature developed no faster +than his physical frame. + +I wish young mothers would settle it in their minds at once, that the +longer their children creep the better. They need have no fears that the +force of habit will retain them on their knees after nature has given +them strength to rise and walk; for their incessant activity and +incontrollable restlessness will be sure to rouse them as early as it +ought. Least of all ought the difficulty of keeping them clean, to move +them from the path of duty. + +Children who are allowed to crawl, will soon be anxious to do more. We +shall presently see them taking hold of a chair or a table, and +endeavoring to raise themselves up by it. If they fail in a dozen +attempts, they do not give up the point; but persevere till their +efforts are crowned with success. + +Having succeeded in raising themselves from the floor, they soon learn +to stand, by holding to the object by which they have raised themselves. +Soon, they acquire the art of standing without holding; [Footnote: The +art of standing, which consists in balancing one's self, by means of the +muscles of the body and lower limb--simple as it may seem to those who +have never reflected on the subject--is really an important acquisition +for a child of twelve or fifteen months. No wonder they feel a conscious +pride, when they find themselves able to stand erect, like the world +around them.] ere long they venture to put forward one foot--they then +repeat the effort and walk a little, holding at the same time by a +chair; and lastly they acquire, with joy to them inexpressible and to us +inconceivable, the art of "trudging" alone. + +When children learn to walk in nature's own way, it is seldom indeed +that we find them with curved legs, or crooked or clubbed feet. These +deformities are almost universally owing either to the mother or the +nurse. + +Let me be distinctly understood as utterly opposed, not only to +go-carts, leading strings, and every other _mechanical_ contrivance, to +induce children to walk before their legs are fit for it, but to efforts +of every kind, whose main object is the same. Teaching them to walk by +taking hold of one of their hands, is in some respects quite as bad as +any other mode; for if the child should fall while we have hold of his +hand, there is some danger of dislocating or otherwise injuring the +limb. + +Falls we must expect; but if a child is left to his own voluntary +efforts as much as possible, these falls will be fewer, and probably +less serious, than under any other circumstances. + + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +"The way to learn how to write without ruled lines, is _to rule_," was +the frequent saying of an old schoolmaster whom I once knew; and I may +say with as much confidence and with more truth, that "the way for a +child to learn to walk alone, is to hold by things." + +I have anticipated, in previous pages, much of what might have otherwise +been contained in this section. A few additional remarks are all that +will be necessary. + +At first, the nursery will be quite large enough for our young +pedestrian. Much time should elapse before he is permitted to go abroad, +upon the green grass;--not lest the air should reach him, or the sun +shine upon his face and hands, but because the surface of the ground is +so much less firm and regular than the floor, that he ought to be quite +familiar with walking on the latter, in the first place. + +But when he can walk well in the play ground, garden, fields, and +roads, it is highly desirable that he should go out more or less every +day, when the weather will possibly admit; nor would I be so fearful as +many are of a drop of rain or dew, or a breath of wind. For say what +they will in favor of riding, sailing, and other modes of exercise, +there is none equal to walking, as soon as a child is able;--none so +natural--none, in ordinary cases, so salutary. I know it is unpopular, +and therefore our young master or young miss must be hoisted into a +carriage, or upon the back of a horse, to the manifest danger of health +or limbs, or both. + +Who of us ever knew a herdsman or a shepherd who found it for the health +and well-being of the young calf or lamb to hoist it into a carriage, +and carry it through the streets, instead of suffering it to walk? Such +a thing would excite astonishment; and the man who should do it would be +deemed insane. The health and growth of our young domestic animals is +best promoted by suffering them to walk, run, and skip in their own way. +They ask no artificial legs, or horses, or carriages. But would it not +be difficult to find arguments in favor of carrying children about, when +they are able to walk, which would not be equally strong in favor of +carrying about lambs and calves and pigs. + +This is the more remarkable from the consideration, elsewhere urged, +that in general we take more rational pains about the physical +well-being of domestic animals, than of children. However, it will be +seen, on a little reflection, that the number of those who carry +children about, is, after all, very inconsiderable. The greater portion +of the community regard it as too troublesome or costly; and if poverty +brought with it no other evils than a permit to children to walk on the +legs which the Creator gave them, it could hardly be deemed a +misfortune. + +It is scarcely necessary to add that there will be nothing gained to the +young--or to persons of any age--from walks which are very long and +fatiguing. Walking should refresh and invigorate: when it is carried +beyond this, especially with the young child, we have passed the line of +safety. + + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +It will be seen by the foregoing section, that I am not very friendly to +the use of carriages for the young, after they can walk. Before this +period, however, I think they may be often serviceable; and there are +occasional instances which may render them useful afterward. On this +account, I have thought it might be well to give the following general +directions. + +Carriages for children should be so constructed as not to be liable to +overset. To this end, the wheels must be low, and the axle unusually +extended. The body should be long enough to allow the child to lie down +when necessary; and so deep that he may not be likely to fall out. +Everything should be made secure and firm, to avoid, if possible, the +danger of accidents. + +The carriage should be drawn steadily and slowly; not violently, or with +a jerking motion. Such a place should be selected as will secure the +child--if necessary--from the full blaze of a hot sun. This point might +indeed be secured by having the carriage covered; but I am opposed to +covered carriages, for children or adults, unless we are compelled to +ride in the rain. + +While the child is unable to sit up without injury, and even for some +months afterwards, he ought by all means to lie down in a carriage, +because it requires more strength to sit in a seat which is moving, than +in a place where he is stationary. In assuming the horizontal position, +in a carriage, a pillow is needed, and such other arrangements as will +prevent too much rolling. + +After the child's strength will fairly permit, he may sit up in the +carriage, but he ought still to be secured against too much motion. As +his strength increases, however, the latter direction will be less and +less necessary. I need not repeat in this place, (had I not witnessed so +many accidents from neglect,) the caution recently given, that great +care should be taken to prevent the child from falling out of the +carriage. + +While children are riding abroad in cold weather, much pains should be +taken to see that they are suitably clothed. It is well to keep them in +motion, while they are in the carriage, and especially to guard against +their falling asleep in the open air, until they have become very much +accustomed to being out in it. + +It has been said by some writers, that a ride ought never to exceed the +length of half an hour; but no positive rule can be given, except to +avoid over-fatigue. + + +SEC. 6. _Riding on Horseback._ + +While children are very young, I think it both improper and unsafe to +take them abroad on horseback; I mean so long as they are in health. In +case of disease, this mode of exercise is sometimes one of the most +salutary in the world. But after boys are six or seven years old, and +girls ten, if they are ever to practise horsemanship, it is time for +them to begin; both because they are less apt to be unreasonably timid +at this age, and because they learn much more rapidly. + +So few parents are good horsemen, that if there is a riding school at +hand, I should prefer placing a child in it at once. But I wish to be +distinctly understood, that I do not consider it a matter of importance, +especially to females, that they should ever learn to ride at all. + +Some of the principal objections to riding on horseback, by boys, as an +ordinary exercise, are the following: + +1. Walking, as I have already intimated, is one of the most HEALTHY +modes of exercise in the world. It is nature's exercise; and was +unquestionably in exclusive use long before universal dominion was given +to man, if not for many centuries afterward; and I believe it would be +very difficult to prove that it interfered at all with human longevity; +for the first of our race lived almost a thousand years. + +2. Young children, in riding on horseback, are rather apt to acquire, +rapidly, the habit of domineering over animals. It seems almost needless +to say how easy the transition is, in such cases, should opportunity +offer, from tyranny over the brute slave, to tyranny over the human +being. There are slave-holders in the family and in the school, as well +as elsewhere. It is the SPIRIT of a person which makes him either a +tyrant or slave-holder. And let us beware how we foster this spirit in +the children whom God has given us. + + + + +CHAPTER XI. + +AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +However heterodox the concession may be, I am one of those who believe +amusements of some sort or other to be universally necessary. Indeed I +cannot possibly conceive of an individual in health, whatever may be the +age, sex, condition, or employment, who does not need them, in a greater +or less degree. + +Now if by the term amusement, I merely meant employment, nobody would +probably differ from me--at least in theory. Every one is ready to admit +the importance of being constantly employed. A mind unemployed is a +VACANT mind. And a vacant or idle mind is "the devil's work-shop;" so +says the proverb. + +By amusement, however, I mean something more than mere employment; for +the more constantly an adult individual is employed, the greater, +generally, is his demand for amusement. Indolent persons have less need +of being amused than others; but perhaps there are few if any persons to +be found, who are so indolent as not to think continually, on one +subject or another. And it is this constant thinking, more than anything +else, that creates the necessity of which I am speaking. The mere +drudge, whether biped or quadruped--he, I mean, whose thinking powers +are scarcely alive--has little need of the relief which is afforded by +amusement. + +The young of all animals--man among the rest--appear to have such an +instinctive fondness for amusement, that so long as they are +unrestrained, they seldom need any urging on this point. In regard to +_quality_, the case is somewhat different. In this respect, most +children require attention and restraint; and some of them a great deal +of it. + +But what is the nature of the amusement which adults--nay, mankind +generally--require? I answer, it is relief from the employment of +thinking. For it is not that mankind do not really think at all, that +moralists complain so loudly. When they tell us that men will not +think, they mean that they will not think as rational beings. They +think, indeed; and so do the ox, and the horse, and the dog, and the +elephant--but not as rational men ought to do; and this it is that +constitutes the burden of complaint. But you will probably find few +persons belonging to the human species who do not think constantly, at +least while awake; and whose mental powers do not become fatigued, and +demand relief in amusement. + +Children's minds are so soon wearied by a continuous train of thinking, +even on topics which are pleasing to them, that they can seldom he +brought to give their attention to a single subject long at once. They +require almost incessant change; both for the sake of relief, and to +amuse for the _sake_ of amusement. And it is, to my own mind, one of +the most striking proofs of Infinite Wisdom in the creation of the human +mind, that it has, during infancy, such an irresistible tendency to +amusement. + +How greatly do they err, who grudge children, especially very young +children, the time which, in obedience to the dictates of their nature, +they are so fond of spending in sports and gambols! How much more +rational would it be to encourage and direct them in their amusements! +And how exceedingly unwise is the practice, whenever and wherever it +exists, of confining them to school rooms and benches, not only for +hours, but for whole half days at once. + +If individuals and circumstances were everywhere combined, with the +special purpose to oppose the intentions of nature respecting the human +being, at every step of his progress from the cradle to maturity, and +from maturity to the grave, I hardly know how they could contrive to +accomplish such a purpose more effectually than it is at present +accomplished. But it is proper that I should here explain a little. + +All our family arrangements tend to repress amusement. Everything is +contrived to facilitate business--especially the business or employments +of adults. The child is hardly regarded as a human being,--certainly not +as a _perfect_ being. He is considered as a mere fragment; or to change +the figure, as a plant too young to be of any real service to mankind, +because too young to bear any of its appropriate fruits. Whereas, in my +opinion, both infancy and childhood, at every stage, should bring forth +their appropriate fruits. In other words, the child of the most tender +years should be regarded as a whole, and not as the mere fragment of a +being; as a perfect member of a family--occupying a full and complete, +only a more limited sphere than older members: and all the rules and +regulations and arrangements of the family should have a reference to +this point. So long as a child is reckoned to be a mere cipher in +creation, or at most, as of no more practical importance, till the +arrival of his twenty-first birth day, or some other equally arbitrary +period, than our domestic animals--that is, of just sufficient +consequence to be fed, and caressed, and fondled, and made a pet of--so +long will our arrangements be made with reference to the comfort and +happiness of adults. There may indeed be here and there a child's chair, +or a child's carriage, or newspaper, or book; but there will seldom be, +except by stealth, any free juvenile conversation at the table or the +fireside. Here the child must sit as a blank or cypher, to ruminate on +the past, or to receive half formed and passive impressions from the +present. + +The arrangements of the infant school, also, seem designed for the same +purpose--to repress as much as possible the infantile desire for +amusement. Not that this was their original, nor that it now is their +legitimate intention. Their legitimate object is, or should be, not to +develope the intellect by over-working the tender brain, but to promote +cheerfulness and health and love and happiness, by well contrived +amusements, conducted as much as possible in the open air; and by +unremitting efforts to elicit and direct the affections. + +Infant schools should repress rather than encourage the hard study of +books. Lessons at this age should be drawn chiefly from objects in the +garden, the field, and the grove; from the flower, the plant, the tree, +the brook, the bird, the beast, the worm, the fly, the human body--the +sun, or the visible heavens. These lessons, whether given by the parent, +as constituting a part of the family arrangements, or by the infant or +primary school teacher, should, it is true, be regarded for the time +being as study, but they should never be long; and they should be +frequently relieved by the most free and unrestrained pastimes and +gambols of the young on the green grass, or beside the rippling stream, +uninfluenced, or at least unrepressed, by those who are set over them. + +The public or common school, overlooking as it does any direct attempts +to make provision for the amusement of the pupils, even during the +scanty recess that is afforded them once in three hours, would appear to +a stranger on this planet, at first sight, to be designed as much as +possible to defeat every intention of nature with reference to the +growth of the human frame. For we may often travel many hundred miles +and not see so much as an enclosed play ground; and never perhaps any +direct provision for particular and more favorable amusements. + +I might speak of other schools and places of resort for children, and +proceed to show how all our arrangements appear to be the offspring of a +species of utilitarianism which rejects every sport whose value cannot +be estimated in dollars and cents. I might even refer to those schools +of our country where these ultra utilitarian notions are carried to an +extent which excludes amusing conversation or reading even during +meal-time; and devotes the hours which were formerly spent in +recreation, to manual labor of some productive kind or other.--But I +forbear. Enough has been said to illustrate the position I have taken, +that there is in vogue a system which bears the marks of having been +contrived, if not by the enemies of our race, either openly or covertly, +at least by those whom ignorance renders scarcely less at war with the +general happiness. + +Now I would not deny nor attempt to deny that change of occupation of +body or mind is of itself an amusement, and one too of great value. +Undoubtedly it is so. To some children, studies of every kind are an +amusement; and there are few indeed to whom none are so. Labor, with +many, when alternated with study, is amusing. And yet, after all, unless +such labors are performed in company, where light and cheerful +conversation is sure to keep the mind away from the subjects about +which it has just been engaged, I am afraid that the purposes for which +amusements were designed, are very far from being _all_ secured. + +But perhaps I am dwelling too long on the general principle that people +of every age, and children in particular, need, and must have +amusements, whether they are of a productive kind or not; and that it is +very far from being sufficient, were it either practicable or desirable, +to turn all study and labor into amusement. [Footnote: I will even say, +more distinctly than I have already done, that however popular the +contrary opinion may be, neither study nor work ought to be regarded as +mere amusement. I would, it is true, take every possible pains to render +both work and study agreeable; but I would at the same time have it +distinctly understood, that one of them is by no means the other; that, +on the contrary, work is _work_--study, _study_--and amusement, +_amusement_.] My business is with those who direct the first dawnings +of affection and intellect. Principles are by no means of less importance +on this account; but the limits of a work for young mothers do not admit +of anything more than a brief discussion of their importance. + +I will now proceed to speak of some of the more common amusements of the +nursery. + +I have seen very young children sit on the floor and amuse themselves +for nearly half an hour together, with piling up and taking down small +wooden cubes, of different sizes. Some of them, instead of being cubes, +however, may be of the shape of bricks. Their ingenuity, while they are +scarcely a year or two old, in erecting houses, temples, churches, &c., +is sometimes surprising. Girls as well as boys seem to be greatly amused +with this form of exercise; and both seem to be little less gratified in +destroying than in rearing their lilliputian edifices. + +Next to the latter kind of amusement, is the viewing of pictures. It is +surprising at what an early age children may be taught to notice +miniature representations of objects; living objects especially. +Representations of the works of art should come in a little later than +those of things in nature. I know a father who prepares volumes of +pictures, solely for this purpose; though he usually regards them not +only as a source of amusement to children, but as a medium of +instruction. + +Battledoor or shuttlecock may be taught to children of both sexes very +early; and it affords a healthy and almost untiring source of amusement. +It gives activity as well as strength to the muscles or moving powers, +and has many other important advantages. There is some danger, according +to Dr. Pierson [Footnote: See his Lecture before the American Institute +of Instruction] of distorting the spine by playing at shuttlecock too +frequently and too long; but this will seldom be the case with little +children in the nursery. Neither shuttlecock nor any other amusement +will secure their attention long enough to injure them very much. + +Perhaps this exercise comes nearer to my ideas of a perfect amusement +than almost any which could be named. The mind is agreeably occupied, +without being fatigued; and if the amusements are proportioned to the +age and strength of the child, there is very little fatigue of the body. +It gives, moreover, great practical accuracy to the eye and to the hand. + +A rocking-horse is much recommended for the nursery. I have had no +opportunity for observing the effects of this kind of amusement; but if +it is one half as valuable as some suppose, I should be inclined to +recommend it. But I am opposed to fostering in the rider lessons of +cruelty, by arming him with whips and spurs. If the young are ever to +learn to ride, on a living horse, the exercises of the rocking-horse +will, most certainly, be a sort of preparation for the purpose. + +Tops and marbles afford a great deal of rational amusement to the young; +and of a very useful kind, too. Spinning a top is second to no exercise +which I have yet mentioned, unless it is playing at shuttlecock. + +Dr. Dewees recommends a small backgammon table, with men, but without +dice. He says, also, that "children, as soon as they are capable of +comprehending the subject, should be taught draughts or checkers. This +game is not only highly amusing, but also very instructive." In another +place he heaps additional encomiums upon the game of checkers. "It +becomes a source of endless amusement," he says, "as it never tires, but +always instructs." Of exercises which instruct, however, as well as +amuse, I shall speak presently. + +The amusements called "morrice," "fox and geese," &c., with which some +of the children of almost every neighborhood are more or less +acquainted, are of the same general character and tendency as checkers. +So is a play, sometimes, but very improperly, called dice, in which two +parties play with a small bundle of wooden pins, not unlike knitting +pins in shape, but shorter. + +The writer to whom I have referred above recommends nine-pins and balls +of proper size, as highly useful both for diversion and exercise. If +they can be used without leading to bad habits and bad associations, I +think they may be useful. + +For girls, who demand a great deal more of exercise, both within doors +and without, skipping the rope is an excellent amusement. So also is +swinging. Both of these exercises may be used either out of doors, or +in the nursery. + +Trundling a hoop I have always regarded as an amusing out-of-door +exercise; and I am not sorry when I sometimes see girls, as well as +boys, engaged in it, under the eye of their mothers and teachers. + +Playing ball, of which there are many different games, and flying kites, +employ a large proportion if not all of the muscles of the body, in such +a manner as is likely to confirm the strength, and greatly improve the +health. The same may be said of skating in the winter, and swimming in +the summer. But these last are exercises over which the mother cannot, +ordinarily, have very much control. + +Under the head of amusements, it only remains for me to speak of a few +juvenile employments of a mixed nature. Of these I shall treat very +briefly, as they are a branch of the subject which does not necessarily +come within the compass of my present plan. They are exercises, too, +which should more properly come under the head of Infantile Instruction. + +Dissected maps afford children of every age a great fund of amusement; +but much caution is necessary, with those that are very young, not to +discourage or confound them by showing them too many at once. Thus if +we cut in pieces the map of one of the smaller United States, at the +county lines, or the whole United States, at the state lines, it is +quite as many divisions as they can manage. Cut up as large a state, +even, as Pennsylvania or New York is, into counties, and try to lead +them to amuse themselves by putting together so large a number, many of +which must inevitably very closely resemble each other, and it is ten to +one but you bewilder, and even perplex and discourage them. The same +results would follow from cutting up even the whole of a large county, +or a small state, into towns. I have usually begun with little children, +by requiring them to put together the eight counties of the small state +of Connecticut. In this case the counties are not only few, but there is +a very striking difference in their shape. + +A black board and a piece of chalk, along with a little ingenuity on the +part of the mother, will furnish the child with an almost endless +variety of amusement. Let him attempt to imitate almost any object which +interests him, whether among the works of nature or art. However rude +his pictures may be, do not laugh at, but on the contrary, endeavor to +encourage him. He may also be permitted to imitate letters and figures. +The elements of letters, too, both printed and written, may be given +him, and he may be required to put them together. Dissected pictures, as +well as dissected maps and letters, are useful, and to most children, +very acceptable. + +In short, the devices of an ingenious, thinking mother, for the +amusement of her very young children, are almost endless; and the great +danger is, that when a mother once enters deeply into the spirit of +these exercises, she will substitute them for those much more healthy +ones which have been already mentioned, such as require muscular +activity, or may be performed in the open air. + + + + +CHAPTER XII. + +CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +"Crying," says Dr. Dewees, "should be looked upon as an exercise of much +importance;" and he is sustained in this view by many eminent medical +writers. + +But people generally think otherwise. Nothing is more common than the +idea that to cry is unbecoming; and children are everywhere taught, when +they suffer pain, to brave it out, and _not cry_. Such a direction--to +say nothing of its tendency to encourage hypocrisy--is wholly +unphilosophical. The following anecdote may serve in part to illustrate +my meaning. It is said to have been related by Dr. Rush. + +A gentleman in South Carolina was about to undergo a very painful +surgical operation. He had imbibed the idea that it was beneath the +dignity of a man ever to say or do anything expressive of pain. He +therefore refused to submit to the usual precaution of securing the +hands and feet by bandages, declaring to his surgeon that he had nothing +to fear from his being untied, for he would not move a muscle of his +body. He kept his word, it is true; but he died instantly after the +operation, from apoplexy. + +There is very little doubt, in the mind of any physiologist, in regard +to the cause of apoplexy in this case; and that it might have been +prevented by the relief which is always afforded by groans and tears. + +It is, I believe, very generally known, that in the profoundest grief, +people do not, and cannot shed tears; and that when the _latter_ begin +to flow, it affords immediate relief. + +I do not undertake to argue from this, that crying is so important, +either to the young or the old, that it is ever worth while to excite or +continue it by artificial means; or that a habit of crying, so easily +and readily acquired by the young, is not to be guarded against as a +serious, evil. My object was first to show the folly of those who +denounce all crying, and secondly, to point out some of its +advantages--in the hope of preventing parents from going to that extreme +which borders upon stoicism. + +One of the most intelligent men I ever knew, frequently made it his +boast that he neither laughed nor cried on any occasion; and on being +told that both laughing and crying were physiologically useful, he only +ridiculed the sentiment. + +Crying is useful to very young infants, because it favors the passage of +blood in their lungs, where it had not before been accustomed to travel, +and where its motion is now indispensable. And it not only promotes the +circulation of the blood, but expands the air-cells of the lungs, and +thus helps forward that great change, by which the dark-colored impure +blood of the veins is changed at once into pure blood, and thus rendered +fit to nourish the system, and sustain life. + +But this is not all. Crying strengthens the lungs themselves. It does +this by expanding the little air-cells of which I have just spoken, and +not only accustoms them to being stretched, at a period, of all others, +the most favorable for this purpose, but frees them at the same time +from mucus, and other injurious accumulations. + +They, therefore, who oppose an infant's crying, know not what they do. +So far is it from being hurtful to the child, that its occasional +recurrence is, as we have already seen, positively useful. Some +practitioners of medicine, in some of the more trying situations in +which human nature can be placed, even encourage their patients to +suffer tears to flow, as a means of relief. + +Infants, it should also be recollected, have no other language by which +to express their wants and feelings, than sighs and tears. Crying is not +always an expression of positive pain; it sometimes indicates hunger and +thirst, and sometimes the want of a change of posture. This last +consideration deserves great attention, and all the inconveniences of +crying ought to be borne cheerfully, for the sake of having the little +sufferer remind us when nature demands a change of position. No child +ought to be permitted to remain in one position longer than two hours, +even while sleeping; nor half that time, while awake; and if nurses and +mothers will overlook this matter, as they often do, it is a favorable +circumstance that the child should remind them of it. + +Crying has been called the "waste gate" of the human system; the door of +escape to that excess of excitability which sometimes prevails, +especially among children and nervous adults. To all such persons it is +healthy--most undoubtedly so; nor do I know that its occasional +recurrence is injurious to any adult--a fastidious public sentiment to +the contrary notwithstanding. + +Some have supposed, that what is here said will be construed by the +young mother into a license to suffer her child to cry unnecessarily. +Perhaps, say they, she is a laboring woman, and wishes to be at work. +Well, she lays down her child in the cradle, or on the bed, and goes to +her work. Presently the child, becoming wet perhaps, begins to cry, as +well he might. But, instead of going to him and taking care of him, she +continues at her employment; and when one remonstrates against her +conduct as cruelty, she pleads the authority of the author of the "Young +Mother." + +All this may happen; but if it should, I am not answerable for it. I +have insisted strongly on guarding the child against wet clothing, and +on watching him with the utmost care to prevent all real suffering. +Mothers, like the specimen here given, if they happen to have a little +sensibility to suffering, and not much love of their offspring, +generally know of a shorter way to quiet their infants and procure time +to work, than that which is here mentioned. They have nothing to do but +to give them some cordial or elixir, whose basis is opium. Startle not, +reader, at the statement;--this abominable practice is followed by many +a female who claims the sacred name of mother. And many a wretch has +thus, in her ignorance, indolence or avarice, slowly destroyed her +children! + +I repeat, therefore, that I do not think my remarks on crying are +necessarily liable to abuse; though I am not sure that there are not a +few individuals to be found who may apply them in the manner above +mentioned--an application, however, which is as far removed from the +original intention of the author, as can possibly be conceived. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII. + +LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +Laughing, like crying, has a good effect on the infantile lungs; nor is +it less salutary in other respects. "Laugh and be fat," an old adage, +has its meaning, and also its philosophy. + +There is an excess, however, to which laughing, no less than crying, may +be carried, and which we cannot too carefully avoid. But how little to +be envied--how much to be pitied--are they who consider it a weakness +and a sin to laugh, and in the plenitude of their wisdom, tell us that +_the Saviour of mankind never laughed_. When I hear this last assertion, +I am always ready to ask, whether the individual who makes it has read a +new revelation or a new gospel; for certainly none of the sacred books +which I have seen give us any such information. + +But I will not dwell here. The common notion on this subject, if not +ridiculous, is certainly strange. I will only add, that, come into vogue +as it might have done, there is no opinion more unfounded than the very +general one among adults, that children should be uniformly grave; and +that just in proportion as they laugh and appear frolicsome, just in the +same proportion are they out of the way, and deserving of reprehension. + +It is strange that it should be so, but I have seen many parents who +were miserable because their children were sportive and joyful. Oh, when +will the days of monkish sadness and austerity be over; and the public +sentiment in the christian world get right on this subject! + + + + +CHAPTER XIV + +SLEEP. + +General remarks. Hints to fathers.--SEC. 1. Proper hours for repose. +Dark rooms. Noise.--SEC. 2. Place for sleeping. Sleeping +alone--reasons.--SEC. 3. Purity of the air in sleeping rooms.--SEC. 4. +The bed. Objections to feathers. Other materials.--SEC. 5. The covering +of beds. Covering the head.--SEC. 6. Night Dresses. Robes.--SEC. 7. +Posture of the body in sleep.--SEC. 8. State of the mind.--SEC. 9. +Quality of sleep.--SEC. 10. Quantity of sleep. + + +Not a few persons consider all rules relative to sleep as utterly +futile. They regard it as so much of a natural or animal process, that +if we are let alone we shall seldom err, at any age, respecting it. +Rules on the subject, above all, they regard as wholly misplaced. + +Those who entertain such views, would do well, in order to be +consistent, to go a little farther; and as breathing and eating and +drinking--nay, even _thinking_--are natural processes, deny the utility +of all rules respecting _them_ also. Perhaps they would do well, +moreover, to deny that rules of any sort are valuable. But would not +this have the effect to bar the door perpetually against all human +improvement? Would it not be equivalent to saying, to a half-civilized, +because only half-christianized community--Go on with your barbarous +customs, and your uncleanly and unthinking habits, forever? + +But I have not so learned human nature. I regard man as susceptible of +endless progression. And I know of no way in which more rapid progress +can be made, than by enlightening young mothers on subjects which +pertain to our physical nature, and the means of physical improvement. +Not for the _sake_ of that perishable part of man, the frame, but +because it is nearly in vain to attempt to improve the mind and heart, +without due attention to the frame-work, to which mind and heart, for +the present, are appended, and most intimately related. + +Let it be left to fathers to study the improvement of hounds and horses +and cattle, and at the same time to think themselves above the concerns +of the nursery. We may, indeed, read of a Cato once in three thousand +years, who was in the habit of quitting all other business in order to +be present when the nurse washed and rubbed his child. But our passion +for gain, in the present age, is so much more absorbing and +soul-destroying than the passion for military glory, that we cannot +expect many Catos. Oh no. All, or nearly all, must devolve on the +mother. The father has no time to attend to his children! What belongs +to the mother, if she can be duly awakened, may be at least _half_ done; +what belongs to the father, must, I fear, be left undone. + +I am accustomed to regard every day--even of the infant--as a miniature +life. I am, moreover, accustomed to consider mental and bodily vigor, +not only for each separate day, but for life's whole day, as greatly +influenced by the circumstances of sleep; the HOUR, PLACE, PURITY OF THE +AIR, THE BED, THE COVERING, DRESS, POSTURE, STATE OF THE MIND, QUALITY, +QUANTITY, AND DURATION. + + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Generally speaking, the night is the appropriate season for repose; but +in early infancy, it is _every_ hour. I have already spoken of the vast +amount of sleep which the new-born infant requires, as well as of many +other circumstances connected with it, requiring our attention. Suffer +me, however, to enlarge, at the risk of a little repetition. + +What time the infant is awake, should be during the day. It is of very +great importance, in the formation of good habits, that he should be +undressed and put to bed, at evening, with as much regularity as if be +had not slept during the day for a single moment. It is also important +that he be permitted to sleep during the whole night, as uninterruptedly +as possible; and that when he is aroused, to have his position or +diapers changed, or to receive food, it should be done with little +parade and noise, and with as little light as possible. All persons, old +as well as young, sleep more quietly in a dark room, than in one where a +light is burning. + +I am well aware that the course here recommended, may be carried to an +excess which will utterly defeat the object intended, since there are +children to be found, who are so trained in this respect, that the +lightest tread upon the floor will awake, and perhaps frighten them. But +this is an excess which is not required. All that is necessary during +the night, is a reasonable degree of silence, in order to induce the +habit of continued rest, if possible. In the day time, on the contrary, +fatigue will impel a child to sleep occasionally, even in the midst of +noise. I am not sure that the habit of sleeping in the midst of noise is +not worth a little pains on the part of the mother. Nor is it improbable +that a habit of this kind, once acquired by the infant, might ultimately +be extended to the night, so that over-caution, even in regard to that +season, might gradually be laid aside. + +Dr. North, a distinguished medical practitioner in Hartford, Conn., +confirms the foregoing sentiments; and adds, that he deems it an +imperious duty of those parents who wish well to their infants, to form +in them the habit of sleeping when fatigued, whether the room be quiet +or noisy. With his children, no cradles or opiates are needed or used. + + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +For some time after its birth, the infant should sleep near its mother, +though not in the same bed. The bedstead should be of the usual height +of bedsteads, and should be enclosed with a railing sufficient to secure +the infant from falling out, but not of such a structure as to hinder, +in any degree, a free circulation of the air. + +The reasons why a child ought to sleep alone, and not with the mother or +nurse, are numerous; but the following are the principal; + +1. The heat accumulated by the bodies of the mother and child both, is +often too great for health. + +2. The air is too impure. I have already spoken of the change in the +purity of the air which is produced by breathing in it. It is bad +enough for two adults to sleep in the same bed, breathing over and over +again the impure air, as they must do more or less, even if the bed is +very large;--but it is still worse for infants. Their lungs demand +atmospheric air in its utmost purity; and if denied it, they must +eventually suffer. + +3. But besides the change of the air by breathing, the surface of the +body is perpetually changing it in the same manner, as was stated in the +chapter on Ventilation. Now a child will almost inevitably breathe a +stream of this bad air, as it issues from the bed; and what is still +worse, it is very apt, in spite of every precaution, to get its head +covered up with the clothes, where it can hardly breathe anything else. +This, if frequently repeated, is slow but certain death;--as much so as +if the child were to drink poison in moderate quantities. + +Let me not be told that this is an exaggeration; that thousands of +mothers make it a point to cover up the beads of their infants; and that +notwithstanding this, they are as healthy as the infants of their +neighbors. I have not said that they would droop and die while infants. +The fumes of lead, which is a certain poison, may be inhaled, and yet +the child or adult who inhales them may live on, in tolerable health, +for many years. But suffer he must, in the end, in spite of every effort +and every hope. So must the child, whose head is covered habitually +with the bed clothing, where it is compelled to breathe not only the air +spoiled by its own skin, but also that which is spoiled by the much +larger surface of body of the mother or nurse. + +But I have proof on this subject. Friedlander, in his "Physical +Education," says expressly, that in Great Britain alone, between the +years 1686 and 1800, no less than 40,000 children died in consequence of +this practice of allowing them to sleep near their nurses. I was at +first disposed to doubt the accuracy of this most remarkable statement. +But when I consider the respectability of the authority from which it +emanated, and that it is only about 350 a year for that great empire, I +cannot doubt that the estimate is substantially correct. What a +sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and folly! + +It should be added, in this place, both to confirm the foregoing +sentiment, and to show that British mothers and nurses are not alone, +that Dr. Dewees has witnessed, in the circle of his practice, four +deaths from the same cause. If every physician in the United States has +met with as many cases of the kind, in proportion to his practice, as +Dr. D., the evil is about as great in this country as Dr. F. says it is +in Great Britain. + +If a child sleeps alone, it cannot of course be liable to as much +suffering of this kind as if it slept with another person; though much +precaution will still be necessary to keep its head uncovered, and +prevent its inhaling air spoiled by its own lungs and skin. + +4. There is one more evil which will be avoided by having a child sleep +alone. Many a mother has seriously injured her child by pressure. I do +not here allude to those monsters in human nature, whose besotted habits +have been the frequent cause of the suffocation and death of their +offspring, but to the more careful and tender mother, who would sooner +injure herself than her own child. Such mothers, even, have been known +to dislocate or fracture a limb![Footnote: There may be instances where +the debility of an infant will be so great that the mother or a nurse +must sleep with it, to keep it warm. But such cases of disease are very +rare.] + +To cap the climax of error in this matter, some mothers allow their +infants to lie on their arm, as a pillow. This practice not only exposes +them to all or nearly all the evils which have been mentioned, but to +one more; viz. the danger of being thrown from the bed. + +A young mother, with whom I was well acquainted, was sleeping one night +with her infant on her arm, when she made a sudden and rather violent +effort to turn in the bed, in doing which she threw the child upon the +floor with such violence as to fracture its little skull, and cause its +death. + +Enough, I trust, has now been said to convince every reasonable young +mother, where absolute poverty does not preclude comfort and health, +that her child ought never to be permitted to sleep in the same bed with +her; but that it should be placed on a bedstead by itself at a short +distance from her, and properly guarded from accidents--and above all, +from inhaling impure air. + +At a suitable age, a child may be removed from the nursery to a separate +chamber. Here, if the circumstances permit, it should still sleep by +itself; and if the bedstead be somewhat lower than ordinary, and the +room be not too small, it will need no watching. + +Perhaps this may be the proper place to say that there are more reasons +than one--and some of them are of a moral nature, too--why a child +should continue to sleep alone, after it leaves the nursery. Nor is it +sufficient to prohibit its sleeping with younger persons, and yet crowd +it into the bed with an aged grandfather or grandmother, or with both. +There is no excuse for a course like this, except the iron hand of +necessity. And even then, I should prefer to have a child of mine sleep +on the hard floor, at least during the summer season, rather than with +an aged person. + +Let it not be supposed I have imbibed the fashionable idea that it is +_peculiarly_ unhealthy for the young to sleep with the old. I know this +doctrine has many learned advocates. And yet I doubt its correctness. I +believe that the manners and habits of the old may injure the young who +sleep with them, and I know that they render the air impure, like other +people. But I cannot see why the mere circumstance of their being _old_ +should be a source of unhealthiness to their younger bed-fellows. Still +I say, that there are reasons enough against the practice I am opposing, +without this. + +Some parents allow dogs and cats to sleep with children. Others have a +prejudice against cats, but not against dogs. The truth is, that they +both contaminate the air by respiration and perspiration, in the same +manner that adults do. And aside from the fact that they are often +infested by lice and other insects, and addicted to uncleanly habits, +they ought always to be excluded, and with iron bars and bolts, if +necessary, from the beds of children. But of this, too, I have treated +elsewhere. + + +SEC. 3. _Purity of the Air._ + +The general importance of pure air has been mentioned. I have spoken of +the elements of the atmosphere in which we live, of the manner in +which it may be vitiated, and the consequences to health. I have +shown--perhaps at sufficient length--the impropriety of washing, drying, +and ironing clothes in the room where a child is kept; of cooking in the +room, especially on a stove; of suffering the floor or clothes, +particularly those of the child, to remain long wet, in the room; of +smoking tobacco, using spirits, burning oil with too long a wick, &c. + +All which has thus been said of the purity of the air of the nursery +generally, is applicable to that of all sleeping rooms. It is an +important point gained, when we can secure a nursery with folding doors +in the centre, so as, when we please, to make two rooms of it. In that +case, the division in which the bed is, can be completely ventilated a +little before night, and thus be comparatively pure for the reception of +both the mother and the child. + +Shall the windows and doors where a child sleeps, be kept closed; or +shall they be suffered to remain open a part or the whole of the night? +This must be determined by circumstances. If there are no doors but +such as communicate with apartments whose air is equally impure with +that in which the child is, it is preferable to keep them closed. If the +windows cannot be opened without exposing the child to a current of air, +it is perhaps the less of two evils, not to open them. + +But we are not usually driven to such extremities. In some instances, +windows are constructed--and all of them ought to be--so that they can +be lowered from the top. When this is not the case, something can be +placed before the window to break the current, so that it need not fall +directly upon the child. Closing the blinds will partially effect this, +where blinds exist. + +I have known many an individual who was in the habit of sleeping with +his windows open during the whole year, and without any obvious evil +consequences. Dr. Gregory was of this habit. But if adults--not trained +to it--can acquire such a habit with impunity, with how much more safety +could children be trained to it from the very first year. Macnish says, +"there can be no doubt that a gentle current pervading our sleeping +apartments, is in the highest degree ESSENTIAL TO HEALTH." + +This consideration--I mean the impurity of sleeping rooms, even after +every precaution has been used to keep them ventilated--affords one +of the strongest inducements to going abroad early in the morning +(especially when there is no other room which either adults or children +can occupy) while the nursery or chamber is aired and ventilated. The +utility of _rising_ early, I hope no one can doubt; but some have doubts +of the propriety of going abroad, till the dew has "passed away." Such +should be reminded, by the foregoing train of remarks, that early +walking may be a choice of evils; and that if it _is_ on the whole +advantageous to adults, it cannot be less so to children. And as soon as +the sun has chased away the vapors of the night, if the weather is +tolerable, most children should be carried abroad. + + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +This should never be of feathers. There are many reasons for this +prohibition, especially to the feeble. + +1. They are too warm. Infants should by all means be kept warm enough, +as I have all along insisted. But excess of heat excites or stimulates +the skin, causing an unnatural degree of perspiration, and thus inducing +weakness or debility. + +2. When we first enter a room in which there is a feather bed which has +been occupied during the night, we are struck with the offensive smell +of the air. This is owing to a variety of causes; one of which probably +is, that beds of this kind are better adapted to absorb and retain the +effluvia of our bodies. But let the causes be what they may, the effects +ought, if possible, to be avoided; for both experience and authority +combine to pronounce them very injurious. + +3. Feather beds--if used in the nursery--will inevitably discharge more +or less of dust and down; both of which are injurious to the tender +lungs of the infant. + +Mattresses are better for persons of every age, than soft feather beds. +They may be made of horse hair or moss; but hair is the best. If the +mattress does not appear to be warm enough for the very young infant, a +blanket may be spread over it. Dr. Dewees says that in case mattresses +cannot be had, "the sacking bottom" may be substituted, or "even the +floor;" at least in warm weather: "for almost anything," he adds, "is +preferable to feathers." + +Macnish, in his "Philosophy of Sleep," objects strongly to air beds, and +says that he can assert "from experience," that they are the very worst +that can possibly be employed. My theories--for I have had no experience +on the subject--would lead me to a similar conclusion. A British +writer of eminence assures us that the higher classes in Ireland, to a +considerable extent, accustom themselves and their infants to sleep on +bags of cut straw, overspread with blankets and a light coverlid; and +that the custom is rapidly finding favor. I have slept on straw, both in +winter and summer, for many years, yet I am always warm; and those who +know my habits say I use less _covering_ on my bed than almost any +individual whom they have ever known. + +I have no hostility to soft beds, especially for young children and feeble +adults, could softness be secured without much heat and relaxation +of the system. On the contrary, it is certainly desirable, in itself, +to have the bed so soft that as large a proportion of the surface of +the body may rest on it as possible. But I consider hardness as a +much smaller evil than feathers. + +It is worthy of remark how generally physicians, for the last hundred +years, have recommended hard beds, especially straw beds or hair +mattresses, to their more feeble and delicate patients. This fact might +at least quiet our apprehensions in regard to their tendency on those +who are accustomed to them in early infancy. + +Some writers on these subjects appear to doubt whether, after all that +they say, they shall have much influence on mothers in inducing them to +give up feather beds for their infants. But they need not be so +faithless. Multitudes have already been reformed by their writings; and +multitudes larger still would be so, could they gain access to them. It +is a most serious evil that they are often so written and published that +comparatively few mothers will ever possess them. + +The pillow, as well as the bed, should be rather hard; and its thickness +should be much less than is usual, or we shall do mischief by bending +the neck, and thus compressing the vessels, and obstructing the +circulation of the blood. But on this subject I will say more, when I +come to treat on "Posture." + +The child's bed should not be placed near the wall, on account of +dampness. There is also, during the summer, another reason. Should +lightning strike the house, it will be much more apt to injure those who +are near the wall than other persons; as it seldom leaves the wall to +pass over the central part of the room. + +Curtains are not only useless, but injurious. They prevent a free +circulation of the air. Everything which has this tendency must be +studiously guarded against, in the management of infants. + +Nothing is more injurious to the old or the young than damp beds and +damp covering. It behoves, especially, all those who have the care of +infants, to see that everything about their beds is thoroughly dry. The +walls and clothes should also be dry; and wet clothes should never be +hung up in the room. By neglecting these precautions, colds, +rheumatisms, inflammations, fevers, consumptions, and death, may ensue. +Many a person loses his health, and not a few their lives, in this way. +The author of this work was once thrown into a fever from such a cause. + +Warming the bed is, in all cases, a bad practice. While in the nursery, +if the air be kept at a proper temperature, there will be no need of it; +after the child is assigned to a separate chamber, its enervating +tendency would result in more evil than good. It is better to let the +bed became gradually heated by the body, in a natural and healthy way. + +No person, and above all, no infant, should be suffered to sleep in a +bed that has been recently occupied by the sick. The bed and all the +clothes should first be thoroughly aired. Could we see with our eyes at +once, how rapidly these bodies of ours fill the air, and even the beds +we sleep in, with carbonic acid and other hurtful gases and impurities, +even while in health, but much more so in sickness, we should be +cautious of exposing the lungs of the tender infant, in such an +atmosphere, until everything had been properly cleansed, and the +apartments properly ventilated. + + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +The covering of the bed should be sufficiently warm, but never any +warmer than is absolutely necessary to protect the child from +chilliness. The lightest covering which will secure this object is the +best. Perhaps there is nothing in use that, with so little weight, +secures so much heat as what are called "comfortables." + +The clothes should not be "tucked up" at the sides and foot of the bed +with too much care and exactness. For when the bed is once warmed +thoroughly with the child's body, the admission of a little fresh air +into it, when he elevates or otherwise moves his limbs, can do no harm, +but _may_ do much of good, in the way of ventilation. I deem it +important, moreover, to inure children very early to little partial +exposures of this kind. + +Those mothers who, from over-tenderness, and want of correct information +on the subject, pursue a contrary course, and consider it as almost +certain death to have a particle of fresh air reach the bodies of their +infants during their slumbers, are generally sure to outwit themselves, +and defeat their very intentions. For by being thus tender of their +children, it often turns out that whenever the mother is ill, or when on +any other account she ceases to watch over them--and such times must, +in general, sooner or later come--they are much more liable to take cold +or sustain other injury, should they be exposed, than if they had been +treated more rationally. + +I knew a mother who would not trust her children to take care of their +own beds on retiring to rest, as long as they remained in her house, +even though they were twenty or thirty years old. But they had no better +or firmer constitutions than the other children of the same +neighborhood. + +Hardly anything can be more injurious than covering the head with the +bed clothes; and yet some mothers and nurses cover, in this way, not +only their own heads, but those of their children. I have elsewhere +shown how impure the air is, which is imprisoned under the bed clothes. +I hope those mothers who are willing to destroy _themselves_ by covering +up their heads while they sleep, will at least have mercy on their +unoffending infants. + + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +The grand rule on this point is, to wear as little dress during sleep as +possible. Some mothers not only suffer their infants to sleep in the +same shirt, cap, and stockings that they have worn during the day, but +add a night gown to the rest. No cap should be worn during the night, +any more than in the day time. Or if the foolish practice has been +adopted for the day, it should be discontinued at night. It is enough +for those adults whose long hair would otherwise be dishevelled, to wear +night caps, and subject themselves, as they inevitably do, to catarrh +and periodical headache. Children's heads should have nothing on them by +night; nor even by day, except to defend them from the rain or the hot +rays of the sun. + +The stockings, too, should be wholly laid aside at night, unless in the +case of those who are feeble, apt to have their feet cold, or +particularly liable to bowel complaints. Such may be allowed to sleep in +their stockings, but not in those which have been worn all the day. + +Indeed, neither children nor adults should ever wear a single garment in +the night which they have worn during the day. The reason is, that there +are too many causes of impurity in operation while we sleep, without our +wearing the clothes in which we have been perspiring during the +day-time--and which must be already more or less filled with the +effluvia of our bodies. + +It is a very easy thing to have a loose night gown to supply the place +of the shirt we have worn during the day; and if nothing else is +convenient, a spare shirt will answer. But both a night gown and shirt +should never be admitted, especially in warm weather. The garment to +supply the place of the shirt during the night, may be of calico in the +summer, and of flannel in the winter. + +The collar and wristbands of this night dress should be loose; and the +whole garment should be large and long. No article of dress should ever +press upon our bodies, so as in the least to impede the circulation; and +for this reason it is, that writers on physical education have inveighed +so much against cravats, straps, garters, &c. This caution, so important +to all, is doubly so to young mothers, on whom devolves the management +of the tender infant. + +When the child has been perspiring freely during the evening, just +before he is undressed, or when he has just been subjected to the warm +bath, it may be well to use a little care in undressing and exchanging +clothes, to prevent taking cold;--though it should ever be remembered, +that those children who are managed on a rational system will bear +slight exposures with far more safety, than they who have been managed +at random--sometimes, indeed, with great tenderness, but at others, +wholly neglected. + + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +In early infancy, children who are not stuffed rather than fed, may +occasionally be permitted to sleep on their backs, especially if they +incline to do so. But it will be well to encourage them to sleep on one +side, as soon as you can without great inconvenience. + +The right side, as a general rule, is preferable; because the stomach, +which lies towards the left side, is thus left uncompressed, and +digestion undisturbed. I would not, however, require a child to lie +always on the right side, but would occasionally change his position, +lest he should become unable to sleep at all, except in a particular +manner. + +I have said elsewhere, that the head ought to be a little raised, +especially if the child is liable to diseases of the brain. But this +remark, rather hastily thrown out, requires explanation. + +There is so much blood sent by the heart to the head and upper parts of +the system of infants, as to predispose those parts, especially the +brain, to disease. In a horizontal position of the body, there is more +blood sent to the brain than when the body is erect. This will show the +reader, at once, that if the infant is peculiarly exposed to diseases +of the brain--and it certainly is so--he ought to remain in a horizontal +posture as little as possible, except during sleep; and that even then +it is desirable to make his bed in such a manner as to elevate the head +and shoulders as much as we can without compressing the lungs, or +obstructing the circulation in the neck. + +I recommend, therefore, to raise the head of an infant's bedstead a +little higher than the foot; though not so much as to incline him to +slide downwards into the bed, for that would be to produce one evil in +curing another. + +Sir Charles Bell thinks that the common disease of infants called +_diabetes_, arises from their being permitted to sleep on their backs; +and that by breaking up the habit of lying in this position, and +accustoming them to lie on their sides, we shall prevent it. I doubt +whether the effect here referred to, is ever the result of such a cause. +Still I am as much opposed to the _habit_ of sleeping on the back, as +Sir Charles Bell. It is quite injurious to free respiration. + +Closely allied to the subject of bodily position in general, is the +state of particular organs; especially the stomach and the senses. I +have already intimated that in order to have an infant sleep quietly, it +is desirable to darken the room. This is the more necessary, where +infants are unnaturally wakeful. In such cases, not only light should +be excluded from the eye, but sounds from the ear, odors from the +nostrils, &c. A remarkably full stomach is in the way of going quietly +to sleep, whether the person be old or young. Neither infants nor adults +ought to take food for some time previous to their going to sleep for +the night. Great bodily heat, as well as too great cold, is also +unfavorable. If too hot, the temperature of the infant should be +somewhat reduced by exposure to the air; if too cold, it should be +raised in a natural, healthy, and appropriate manner. + + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +In giving directions how to procure pleasant dreams, Dr. Franklin +mentions as a highly important requisition, the possession of a quiet +conscience. A wise prescription, no doubt. + +But infants, as well as adults, in order to sleep quietly, should have +their minds and feelings in a state of tranquillity. The youngest child +has its "troubles;" and it is highly important, if not indispensable, to +_healthy_ sleep, that the mother take all reasonable pains to remove +them before sleep is induced. + +We sometimes hear about children crying themselves to sleep, as if it +were a matter of no consequence; and sometimes, as if it were, on the +contrary, rather desirable. But is the sleep of an adult satisfying, who +goes to bed in trouble, and only sleeps because nature is so exhausted +that she cannot bear the protracted watchfulness any longer? Why then +should we expect it, in the case of the infant? + +I know an excellent father who is so far from believing this doctrine, +that he silences the cries of his child by the word of command--and +believes that in so doing, he promotes both his health and his +happiness. He would no more let him cry himself to sleep than he would +let him cough himself to sleep; though both crying and coughing, in +their places, may be and undoubtedly are salutary. + +Whatever may be the age and circumstances of an individual, he ought to +retire for rest with a cheerful mind. All anxiety about the future, all +regret about the past, all plans even, in regard to the business or +amusement of the morrow, should be kept wholly out of the mind. We +should yield ourselves up to the arms of sleep with the same quietude as +if life were finished, and we had nothing more to do or think of. + + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +The soundness, as well as other qualities, of sleep, differs greatly in +different individuals; and even in the same night, with the same +individual in different circumstances. The first four or five hours of +sleep are usually more sound than the remainder. Hardly anything will +interrupt the repose of some persons during the early part of the night, +while they awake afterwards at the slightest noise or movement--the +chirping of a cricket, or the playing of a kitten. + +In profound sleep, we probably dream very little, if at all; but in +other circumstances, we are constantly disturbed by dreaming, and +sometimes start and wake in the greatest anxiety or horror. + +Nightmare is generally accompanied by dreams of the most distressing +kind. We imagine a wild beast, or a serpent in pursuit of us; or a rock +is detached from some neighboring cliff, and is about to roll upon and +crush us; and yet all our efforts to fly are unavailing. We seem chained +to the spot; but while in the very jaws of destruction, perhaps we +awake, trembling, and palpitating, and weary, as if something of a +serious nature had really happened. + +In the case of nightmare, it is more than probable that we fall asleep +with our stomachs too heavily loaded with food, or with a smaller +quantity of that which is highly indigestible. Or it may sometimes arise +from an improper position of the body, such as disturbs the action of +the stomach or lungs, or of both these organs. Lying on the back, when +we first go to sleep, is very apt to produce nightmare. + +But distressing dreams often follow an evening of anxious cares, +especially if those cares preyed upon us for the last half hour; and +also after late suppers, even if they are light--and late reading. Hence +the injunctions of the last section. Hence, too, the importance of +taking our last meal two or three hours before sleep, and of engaging, +during these hours, in cheerful conversation, and in the social and +private duties of religion. Family and private worship, in the evening, +are enjoined no less by philosophy than they are by christianity; and +every young mother will do well to understand this matter, and train her +offspring accordingly. + +"That sleep from which we are easily roused, is the healthiest," says +Macnish. "Very profound slumber partakes of the nature of apoplexy." I +should say, rather, that a medium between the two extremes is +healthiest. Profound apoplectic sleep, I am sure, is injurious; but +that from which we are too easily roused cannot, it seems to me, +be less so. Thus, I have often gone to sleep with a resolution +to wake at a certain hour, or at the striking of the clock; +and have found myself able to wake at the proposed time, almost +without one failure in twenty instances where I have made the trial. But +my sleep was obviously unsound, and certainly unsatisfying. The desire +to awake at a certain moment or period, seemed to buoy me above the +usual state of healthy sleep, and render me liable to awake at the +slightest disturbance. Were it not for sacrificing the ease of others, +it would be far better, in such cases, to rely upon some person to wake +us, instead of charging our own minds with it. + +The quality of our sleep will be greatly affected by the quantity. But +this thought, if extended, would anticipate the subject of our next +section; so easily does one thing, especially in physical education, run +into or involve another. I will therefore, for the present, only say +that if we confine ourselves to a smaller number of hours than is really +required, our sleep becomes too sound to be quite healthy, as if nature +endeavored to make up in quality, for want of due quantity. On the +contrary, if we attempt to sleep longer than is really necessary to +restore us, the quality of our sleep is not what it ought to be; for we +do not sleep soundly enough. + +The silence and darkness of the night tend to induce sleep of a better +quality than the noise and activity of day. It is unquestionably +desirable that children should be able to sleep, at least occasionally, +without absolute quiet. And yet such sleep cannot be sufficiently sound +to answer the purposes of health, if frequently repeated. + +Hence it is, perhaps--at least in part--that the maxim has obtained +currency, that one hour of sleep before midnight is worth two afterward. +The comparison has probably been made between the quiet and darksome +hours of evening and those which followed daybreak, when light, and +music, and bustle conspire, as they should, to make us wakeful. No +person can sleep as soundly and as effectually, when light reaches his +closed eyes, and sounds strike his ears, as in darkness and silence. He +may sleep, indeed, under almost any circumstances, when fatigue and +exhaustion demand it; but never so profoundly as when in absolute +abstraction of light, and complete quiet. + + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +On this point much might be said, without exhausting the subject. But I +have already observed that infants, when first born, require to sleep +nearly their whole time. As they advance in years, the necessity for +sleep; however, diminishes, until they come to maturity, when it remains +for many years nearly stationary. In advanced age, the necessity for +sleep again increases, till we reach the extremest old age, or what is +usually called second childhood, when we again sometimes sleep nearly +the whole time. + +I have already remarked that much might be said on this subject; but I +do not think that the present occasion requires it. If the suggestions +which are made in the chapter on "Early Rising" should receive the +attention I flatter myself they merit, I do not believe children would +often sleep too long. If, on the contrary, they are suffered to lie late +in the morning, and then sit up late in the evening, all healthful +habits and tendencies will he so deranged or broken up, that nature, in +her indications, will by no means prove the unerring guide which she is +wont to do in other circumstances. + +A few thoughts here, on the quantity of sleep required by the young +after they approach maturity, may not be misplaced. + +Jeremy Taylor thought that for a healthy adult, three hours in +twenty-four were enough for all the purposes of sleep. Baxter thought +four hours about a reasonable time; Wesley, six; Lord Coke and Sir Wm. +Jones, seven; and Sir John Sinclair, eight. These were the _theories_ of +men who were all eminent for their learning, and most of them for their +piety. How far their _practice_ corresponded with their theories, we are +not, in every instance, told. + +But to come to the practice of several persons who have been +distinguished in the world. General Elliot, one of the most vigorous men +of his age, though living for his whole life on nothing but vegetables +and water, and who at sixty-four had scarcely begun to feel the +infirmities of old age, slept but four hours in twenty-four. Frederick +the Great of Prussia, and the illustrious British surgeon, John Hunter, +slept but five hours a day. Napoleon Bonaparte, for a great part of his +life, slept only four hours; and Lord Brougham is said to require no +more. Others, in numerous instances, require but six hours. But there +are others still, who consume eight. + +The conclusion--in my own mind--is, that with a good constitution and +active habits, men may habituate themselves to very different quantities +of sleep. Still I think that six hours are little enough for most +persons; and if a child, on arriving at maturity, is not inclined to +sleep much longer than that, I should not regard him as wasting time. +Most persons, it appears to me, require six hours of sound sleep in +twenty-four;--I mean between the ages of twenty and seventy. + +Macnish is the most liberal modern writer I am acquainted with, in his +allowance of time for sleep. Speaking of the wants of adults he +says--"No person who passes only eight hours in bed can be said to waste +his time in sleep." Yet he obviously contradicts himself on the very +same page; for he says expressly, that when a person is young, strong +and healthy, an hour or two less may be sufficient. But an hour or two +less than eight hours reduces the amount to seven or six hours. And +taking the whole period of life, to which he probably refers--say from +eighteen to forty--into consideration, there is a very considerable +difference between six hours and eight hours a day. If six hours are +"sufficient," it cannot be right to sleep eight hours. + +Let us here make a few estimates. If six hours are sufficient for sleep +between the ages of eighteen and forty, he who sleeps eight hours a day, +actually loses 16,060 hours--equal to nearly two whole years of life, or +about two years and three quarters of time in which we are usually +awake. This, in the meridian of life, is not a small waste. Permit it to +every person now in the United States, and the sum total of wasted time +to a single generation, would be 25,649,098 years--equal to the average +duration of the lives of 854,970 persons. The value of this time, as a +commodity in the market, at a low estimate--only forty dollars a +year--would be over A THOUSAND MILLIONS of DOLLARS! And its value, for +the purposes of mental and moral improvement, cannot be estimated except +in ETERNITY! + +Every young mother must derive from these considerations a motive to +discourage all unnecessary waste of time in sleep; while no one, as I +trust, will forget that to sleep too little is also dangerous to health, +and prejudicial to the general happiness. + + + + +CHAPTER XV. + +EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. How many are burnt up by parental neglect. +"Lecturing" them. What is an early hour? + + +Some writer--I do not recollect who--has said that all children are +naturally early risers. And I cannot help coming to the same conclusion. +That they are not so, is no more proved from the fact that as things now +are they are generally found addicted to the contrary habit, than the +very general neglect of milk among the higher classes of our citizens, +proves that they have not a natural relish for it--when every one knows +that at our first setting out in life, milk is, almost without +exception, the sole article of human sustenance. + +One of the great difficulties in the way of early rising, as I have +already had occasion to say, is late sitting up. If children are not +accustomed to retire till nine or ten o'clock, nor then until they have +been subjected to all the excitements pertaining to fashionable +life--company, heated and impure air, stimulating drink, fruits, +high-seasoned food, and perhaps music--and are become actually feverish, +no one but an ignorant person or a brute ought to expect them to rise +early. Indeed, whatever may have been the cause, and whether it have +operated on high or low life, late retiring will inevitably result in +late rising. The current may be turned out of its course a little while, +it is true, but not always. It will ere long return to its accustomed +channel; perhaps to renew its course with increased pertinacity. + +Everything, in the morning, naturally invites to early rising. The +pleasant light, the music, at certain seasons, of some of the animated +tribes, and the joy which we feel in activity, and in the society of +those whom we love, all conspire to rouse us. If we have retired late, +however, and especially in a feverish condition, so that when we wake we +feel wretched, and, as sometimes happens, more fatigued than when we lay +down, other collateral motives may be needed. + +I have said that everything invites us, in the morning, to rise early; +but it was upon the presumption that our parents, and brothers, and +sisters set us a good example. If parents and other friends lie in bed +late themselves, can anything else be, expected of children? Admitting, +even, that they rise early themselves, if they never speak of early +rising as a pleasure, and connect along with it, in their children's +minds, pleasant associations, they would be unreasonable to expect +otherwise than that their children should cling to the morning couch, +till they are fairly compelled to rise as a relief from pain and +uneasiness. + +But when parents go farther than this, and actually discourage their +children from rising early, and use every means in their power short of +actual punishment--and sometimes even that--to make them lie still till +breakfast, in order that they may be out of the way, what shall we say? +And what is to be expected as the result? + +There is hope, however, under the last circumstances. People sometimes +carry things to an extreme that defeats their very purposes. Thus it +occasionally is, in the case before us. This forbidding children to rise +early, and threatening them if they do, sometimes excites their +curiosity, and leads them to the forbidden course of conduct, simply +_because_ it is forbidden. Not a few persons among us possess the +disposition to be governed by what has sometimes been called the "rule +of contrary." + +I might stop here to show that there is nothing so well calculated to +develope and improve the mind and heart, even of parents themselves, as +the society of those whom God gives them to train for Him and their +country. I might show that not a few of those traits of character which +render the company of many old persons rather irksome, especially to the +young, have their origin in their neglect of the young, and of keeping +up, as long as circumstances will possibly admit, juvenile feelings, +actions, and habits. + +And yet what do we too often witness in life? Is not every effort made +to induce the young to lie in bed late that they may be out of the way? +Are they not placed, as soon as possible after they are up, with the +servants--if unfortunately there are any in the family--that they may be +out of the way? Are they not required to breakfast, and dine, and sup +elsewhere, if possible, that they may be out of the way? Do we not send +them to school, even the Sabbath school, to get them out of the way? Do +not some mothers even dose their infants with stupifying medicines to +lull them to sleep, in order to have them out of the way? And to crown +all, though they are quite too often permitted to sit up late in the +evening, to enjoy that society which they are denied so great a part of +the day-time, are they not occasionally put to bed early that they may +be out of the way, and that the parents may attend late parties, to +indulge in immoral or unhealthy habits? + +In the last instance, they are indeed sometimes put out of the way, in +the result--and with a vengeance. Many a child, nay, many thousands of +children, are burnt up yearly, while their parents are gone abroad in +the evening in quest of that enjoyment which ought to be found in the +bosom of their families. "In Westminster, a part of London, containing +less than two hundred thousand inhabitants, one hundred children were +thus destroyed, during a single year." And the moral results which +occasionally happen are a thousand times worse than burning. But enough +of this. + +The common practice of lecturing the young on the importance of early +rising, may have a good effect on a few; but in general, it is believed +to produce the contrary result. It is, in short, to sum up the whole +matter, the influence of parental example, and the speaking often of the +happiness which early rising affords, with perhaps the occasional +indulgence of the child in a pleasant morning walk, which, if he retires +early enough, are almost certain to produce in him the valuable habit of +early rising. + +But what is an early hour? Some call it early, when the sun is one hour +high; some at sunrise; others, when they hear of an early riser, +suppose he must be one who rises at least by daybreak. + +Midnight is, of course, as near the middle of the night as any hour; and +he who goes to bed four or five hours before midnight, will never +complain of those who insist that _he_ is not an early riser who is not +up by four or five o'clock. In summer, no adult ought to lie in bed +after four o'clock, and no child, except the mere infant, after five. + +Much is said by a few writers, especially Macnish, of the danger of +rising before the sun has attained a sufficient height above the horizon +to chase away the vapors, and remove the dampness. But I must insist +upon earlier rising than this, though we should not choose to venture +abroad. Invigorated and restored as we are by sleep, I cannot think that +the dampness of the morning air is more injurious than the foul air of +some of our sleeping rooms. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI. + +HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +While I have been very particular in enjoining on my readers the +importance of thoroughly ventilating their dwellings, I have also +insisted upon the necessity of taking children abroad, as much as +possible. Not, however, to harden them, so much as to give them a more +free access to air and light than they can have at home; and also--when +they are old enough--to cultivate the faculties of attention, +comparison, &c. + +The practice of attempting to harden children by frequent exposure to +air much colder than that to which they have been accustomed, without +sufficient additional clothing, is open to the same objections which +have been brought against cold bathing. Under the management of a +judicious medical practitioner, it may do great good to a few +constitutions; but its indiscriminate use would injure a thousand +infants for one who was benefited. + +True it is that if the child is protected against cold, no harm, but on +the contrary much good may result, from carrying him abroad into the +fresh air, even in very cold weather. But what can be more painful than +to see the little sufferers carried along when their limbs are purple, +or benumbed with cold? And how idle it is to hope that such exposure +hardens or improves the constitution! + +It is on the same mistaken principle that many adults go thinly clad, +late in the fall. I have seen men in November and December beating and +rubbing their hands, who, on being asked why they did not wear mittens, +replied, that if they should wear one pair of mittens so early in the +season, they should want two in the winter. + +Now I cheerfully admit that to put on additional clothing before the +severity of the weather demands it, actually produces the effect here +supposed; but to endure severe cold, on the contrary, never hardens +anybody. Nay, more, it enfeebles. Cold, when combined with the evils of +_poverty_, produces more mischief and destroys more lives than any one +disease in the whole catalogue of human maladies. + +Adam Smith says that it is not uncommon for mothers in the Highlands of +Scotland, who have borne twenty children, to have only two of them +alive. + +It may be difficult to say whether children are oftener destroyed by +over-tenderness than by neglect, and the evils incident to poverty. Both +extremes are common; while the happy medium--that of conducting a +child's education upon the principles of physiology, is rarely known, +and still more rarely followed. + +I have been much amused, and not a little instructed, by the following +anecdote on this point, from Dr. Dewees: + +We were speaking with a lady who had lost three or four children with +"croup," who informed us she was convinced, from absolute experiment, +that there was nothing like exposure to all kinds of weather to protect +and harden the system. By her first plan of managing her children, which +was by keeping them very warmly clad, she said she lost several by the +croup; but since she had adopted the opposite scheme, her children had +been perfectly healthy, and never had betrayed the slightest disposition +to that terrible disease which had robbed her of her children. + +Perhaps, madam, we observed, you did not, in making your first +experiments, attend to a number of details which might be thought +essential to the plan. You did not probably take the proper precautions +when you sent them into the cold air, or observe what was important for +them when they returned from it. + +"Oh, yes," she replied, "I took every possible care when they, were +going out. I always made them wear a very warm great coat, well lined +with baize, and a fur cape or collar. I always made them wear a +'comfortable' round their necks, made of soft woollen yarn. And as for +their feet, they were always protected by socks or over-shoes lined with +wool or fur, as the weather might be wet or dry." + +Do you believe, madam, they were kept at a proper degree of warmth by +these means? + +"Oh, certainly. Indeed, rather too warm; for they would often be in a +state of perspiration, they told me, when in the open air; especially if +they ran, slid, or skated." + +And what was done when they were thus heated? + +"Oh, they got cool enough before they reached home." + +And would they receive no injury in passing from this state of +perspiration to that of chill? + +"Not at all; for when this happened, I always made them take a little +warm brandy, or wine and water, and made them toast their feet well by +the fire." [Footnote: This absurd custom is a fruitful source of that +distressing condition of the hands and feet, in winter, called +"chilblains."] + +Did they sleep in a cold or warm room? + +"In a warm room. A good fire was always made in the stove before they +went to bed, which kept them quite warm all night." + +Would they never complain of being cold towards morning, when the stove +had become cold? + +"Yes, certainly; but then there were always at hand additional +bed-clothes, with which they could cover themselves." + +And did they always do it? + +"Oh, I suppose so." + +Well, madam, how did you carry your second plan into execution, which +you say was attended with such happy results? + +"I began by not letting them put on their great coats, except when the +weather was so cold as to require this additional covering, and did not +permit them to wear a 'comfortable' or fur round their necks. I took +away their over-shoes, and if their feet chanced to get wet, (for they +were always provided with good sound shoes,) the shoes were immediately +changed, if they were at home. If the weather was wet, or unusually +cold, they were permitted to wear their great coats, but not without. +If they came home very cold, they were not allowed to approach the fire +too soon. I gave them no warm, heating drinks, and accustomed them to +sleep in rooms without fire." + +Who does not recognize, in this second plan for the enjoyment of air and +exercise, as judicious a plan of physical education, so far as it goes, +as can well be pointed out? We were so successful as to convince this +lady, in a very short time, that our own plan of exposing the body was +precisely the one she had pursued with so much success. + +We also inquired of her what plan she pursued with her children, when +too young to be submitted to the rules just mentioned. She informed us +that it was the same system throughout, only the details varied as +circumstances of age, &c. made it necessary. That is, she sent her +children into the open air at very early periods of their lives, +provided in summer it was neither too wet nor too warm; in winter, when +the air was mild, dry and clear--but always carefully wrapped up, that +their little extremities might not suffer from cold. She never suffered +them to sleep in the open air, if it could be avoided; to prevent which, +as much as possible, she constantly charged the nurse to bring the +children home, as soon as she found them disposed to sleep, unless it +was when they were very young, at which time it was impossible to guard +against it. + +And when her children were sufficiently old to walk, she took care to +prepare them properly for it, whether it might be in warm, cold, or +moderate weather. She never sent them abroad for pleasure at the risk of +encountering a storm of any kind; nor permitted them to walk at the +hazard of getting wet or very muddy feet. + +Were the constitutions of your children pretty much the same? we +demanded of this lady. + +"No; one of my boys was extremely feeble, from his very birth." + +Did you treat him precisely as you did the others? + +"Yes, as far as regarded principles; that is, I permitted him to bear as +much of cold, heat or wet as his constitution would endure without pain +or injury. The degrees, however, were very different from those his +brothers bore, had they been determined by the measurement of the +thermometer, but precisely the same in effect, as far as could be +ascertained by consequences. Thus, if he were exposed to the same +temperature as his brothers, he experienced no more inconvenience from +it, when it was very low, than they, because he had additional covering +to protect him." + + + + +CHAPTER XVII. + +SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society illustrated. Early +diffidence. Selecting companions for children. Moral effects of society +on the young. Parents should play with their children. + + +Every mother is unquestionably as much bound to have an eye to the +society of her child, as to his food, drink or clothing. And if the +quality, amount and general character of the latter are important, those +of the former are by no means less so. + +It is indeed true that many a child has been happy, in a degree, in the +society of its mother alone, where the father was seldom seen, and the +brothers and sisters never. And it is equally true; that a few children +have so far preferred the society of their parents alone, as to become +disinclined to other society. But cases of this kind are only as +exceptions to the general rule; and are probably monstrous formations +of character. I cannot believe that any child, rightly educated, would +prefer the society of none but its parents, or even its parents and +brothers and sisters. + +A French author has written a considerable volume on the importance of +what he calls _gaiety_, but which he should prefer to call cheerfulness. +Among the rest, he maintains that it is indispensable to the best +health. But if so--and I do not doubt it--then it ought to be encouraged +in children, and the earlier the better. Now there is no way to +encourage cheerfulness in the young so effectually as by indulging them +with considerable society. + +That the thing may be carried to excess, I have no doubt. I have seen +mothers who permitted their children to play with their mates till they +became excited, and were thus led to continue their sports, not only +farther than cheerfulness and health demanded, but until they were +excessively fatigued, and almost made sick. And I believe that the +excitement of numbers, in infant and other schools, may be so great as +to be injurious, rather than salutary. Still I think these are rare +cases. + +Truth usually lies somewhere between extremes. To keep a child, +especially a boy, always in the nursery, or even in the parlor with his +mother, is one extreme; and to let him go abroad continually, till his +home and its smaller circle become insipid, is the other. A child +properly trained will _usually_ prefer home, and only desire to go +abroad occasionally. He will rather need urging in the matter than +require restraint. + +But he must, at any rate, be taught to be sociable, not only for the +salve of cheerfulness and the consequent health, but for the sake of his +manners, his mind, and his morals. + +If it is a matter of indifference, in the formation of human character, +whether we mix in society or not, then, for anything I can see, an +improvement might be proposed in the construction of the material +universe. Instead of forming the planets so large--and this earth among +the rest--each might have been divided into hundreds of millions; and +every human being might have had a little planet, and an immortality, +exclusively his own. Such an arrangement would certainly prevent a great +many evils; and, among the rest, a great deal of quarrelling and +bloodshed. + +But divine wisdom is higher than human wisdom, and one world to hundreds +of millions of human beings has been made, instead of giving to each +individual of the universe a little world of his own, in which he might +have reigned sole monarch, and only wept, with Alexander, because none +of the other worlds were within his grasp. Where a family is already +large, other society will be unnecessary for some time; but where it +consists of a mother only, although her society is always to be +considered of the _first_ importance, I cannot but think she ought to +take great pains to introduce her child occasionally to the company of +other children. + +That diffidence, which almost destroys the influence and the happiness +of many individuals, is often cherished, if not created, by too much +seclusion. Where there is a natural constitution which predisposes the +child to timidity and diffidence, the danger is greatly increased; and +parents should take unwearied pains to guard against it. + +It is hardly necessary for me to say, that great care should also be +used in selecting the companions of children. Their character will be +greatly influenced for life by their earlier associates. Friendships +between children are sometimes formed, while playing together, which are +interrupted only by death. Those parents who are so fond of controlling +the choice of their sons and daughters in regard to a companion for +life, at a period when control is generally resisted, would do well to +take a hint from what has here been suggested. There is no doubt but +they might often--very often--give such a direction to the embryo +affections of their infants and children, as would terminate only with +their existence. + +It is still less necessary to advert, in a work like this, to the effect +which much observation and experience shows good society to have on +purity, both physical and moral. Every one must have observed its +tendency to form habits of cleanliness, not to say neatness. There may +be excess, even in this. Young persons, of both sexes, often spend too +much time in preparing their dress for the reception or the visiting of +their friends. Still this is only the abuse of a good thing. Nor is it +less true, though it may be less obvious, that moral purity is more +likely to be secured where children and youth of both sexes associate a +great deal, from the earliest infancy. [Footnote: If this principle be +correct, what is the tendency of our numerous schools, which are +exclusively for one sex? Must there not be latent evil to counterbalance +some of the seeming good? For myself, I doubt whether moral character +can ever be formed in due proportion and harmony, where this separation +long exists.] There are tremendous cases of declension on record, which +establish this point beyond the possibility of debate. + +To say that the mother--and indeed both parents--ought to form a part of +the playing circle of the youngest children, in order to watch their +opening dispositions, to check what may be improper, and encourage what +ought to be encouraged, would be only to repeat what has often been +recommended by the best writers on education--but which must be +repeated, again and again, till it leaves an impression, especially on +CHRISTIAN parents. It is strange that many regard this matter as they +do, and appear not only ashamed to be seen sporting with their children, +but almost ashamed to have their children thus occupied. They might as +well be ashamed of the gambols of the kitten or the lamb; or of the +grave mother, as she turns aside occasionally to join in its frolics. +When will parents be willing to take lessons in education from that +brute world which they have been so long accustomed to overlook or +despise? + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII. + +EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Why young ladies, now-a-days, dislike domestic +employments. Miserable housewives--not to be wondered at. Mistake of one +class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +One important and never-to-be-forgotten employment of the young is the +cultivation of their minds; and another, that of their morals. But my +present purpose is only to speak of those employments denominated +manual, or physical. + +It is obvious, at the first glance, that the influence of the mother, in +our own country, at least, will be less over boys than over girls. We +leave it to savages and semi-savages to employ their females, and even +their mothers, in hard manual labor. Here, in America, what I should say +on the employment of boys would be more properly addressed to the YOUNG +FATHER. + +There are some exceptions to the general truth contained in the last +paragraph. Many a mother has--unconsciously at the time, but with no +less certainty than if she had done it intentionally--given a direction +to the whole current of her son's life; and this, too, at a very early +period. The mother of Benjamin West, the painter, if she did not give +the first tendency to his favorite pursuit, while he was yet a mere +child, at the least greatly confirmed him in it, by the manner of +expressing her surprise at one of his early performances. "My mother's +kiss," on that occasion, said he, "made me a painter." Nor are facts of +the same general character by any means uncommon. + +I know a poor mother who, in the absence of her husband at his weekly +or monthly labors, used to detain her eldest boy, then almost an +infant, from going to bed in the evening till her day's work was +finished--because, in her loneliness, she wanted his company--by telling +stories of eminent men, and especially of distinguished philanthropists, +until she had unconsciously kindled in him a philanthropic spirit, which +will not cease to burn till his death. + +But it is in forming the predilections of daughters for their destined +employments, that mothers are especially influential. Not so much by +their set lessons or lectures, however, as by the force of continued +example. No mother who sends her child away to be nursed, and +subsequently to her return seizes on every possible opportunity to keep +her out of the way and out of her sight, will be likely to give her any +choice of employment, or indeed any fondness for employment at all. + +Nor is it sufficient that she keep her daughter constantly under her +eye, with a view to qualify her for the duties of a housewife, if the +daughter see as plainly as in the light of mid-day, that the mother +dislikes the employment herself. She must love what she would have her +daughter love, and even what she would have her understand. Nor is it +sufficient that she _affect_ a fondness for the employment; her love for +it must be real. Little girls have keener eyes and better judgments than +some mothers seem willing to believe or to admit. + +Many persons seem greatly surprised that the young ladies of modern days +have so little fondness for domestic life and domestic duties. How few, +it is often said, will do their own housework, if they can possibly get +a train of domestics around them; even though the care and oversight of +the domestics themselves gear them out more rapidly than bodily labor +would. + +But there is a reason for this hostility to domestic employments. It is +because mothers, almost universally, consider their occupations as mere +drudgery, and bring up their children in the same spirit. And what else +could be expected as the result? It would be an anomaly in the history, +of human nature, if the female members of families were to grow up in +love with ordinary domestic avocations, when they have been accustomed +to see their mothers, and nurses, and elder sisters complaining and +fretting while engaged in them; and showing by their actions, no less +than by their words, that they regarded themselves as miserable and +wretched. + +No wonder so many girls, of the present day, make miserable housewives. +No wonder a factory, a book-bindery, or a shoemaker's shop, is +considered preferable to the kitchen. No wonder the world degenerates, +because females, no longer healthfully employed, become pale and sickly, +spreading gloom and misery all around them, and transmitting the same +ills which themselves suffer to those who come after them. + +It is true, the guilt of this dereliction must not be charged wholly on +mothers; though they ought, unquestionably, to bear a large share of it. +Those who have, and ought to have, much influence in society, +erroneously, and I suppose thoughtlessly, help mothers along in their +evil ways. If there were a universal combination between certain classes +of mankind and the whole race of mothers, to ruin, rather than be +instrumental of reforming mankind, and of saving their deathless souls, +I hardly know how they could invent a much better, or at least a much +more certain plan, than that now in operation. So long as those who take +the lead in society, and govern the fashion in this matter, as others +govern it in the matter of dress, refuse, as a general rule, to form +alliances for life, except with those who practically despise house-hold +concerns--and so long as our houses are filled with domestics, whose +object is to aid these spoiled mothers, but whose real effect is to +complete their ruin, and accelerate the ruin of mankind--just so long +will human progress towards perfection be retarded. + +If mothers were in love with their occupations, and their daughters knew +it, then to the influence of a good example they could add many lessons +of instruction. These might be given in the way of natural, unstudied +conversation, and thus be not only heard with attention, but sink deep. +If the world is ever to be reformed, says Mr. Flint, in his Western +Review, woman, sensible, enlightened, well educated and principled, must +be the original mover in the great work. Every one who has considered +well the extent and nature of female influence, will concur in the +sentiment; and if he have one remaining particle of devotion to the +Father of spirits, he will send up the most fervent petitions to his +throne of mercy in behalf of this often depressed or enslaved half of +the human race, that they may speedily be emancipated, and become as +conspicuous in human redemption, as they have sometimes been in human +condemnation. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX. + +EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Improving the senses. Examples of improvement. SEC. 1. Hearing--how +injured--how improved.--SEC. 2. Seeing--how injured.--SEC. 3. Tasting +and smelling--how benumbed--how preserved.--SEC. 4. Feeling. The blind. +Hints to parents. Education of both hands. + + +Man is much less useful and happy in this world than he would be, if +more pains were taken by parents and teachers, as well as by himself, to +cultivate his senses--hearing, seeing, feeling; tasting, and +smelling--and to preserve their rectitude. + +The extent to which the senses can be improved or exalted, can best be +understood by observing how perfect they become when we are compelled to +cultivate them. Thus the blind, who are obliged to cultivate hearing, +feeling, and smelling, often astonish us by the keenness of these +senses. They will distinguish sounds--especially voices--which others +cannot; and with so much accuracy, as to remember for several years the +voice of a person in a large company, which they hear but once. They +will also distinguish small pieces of money, different fabrics and +qualities of cloth, &c.; and, in walking, often ascertain, by the +feeling of the air, or by other sensations, when they approach a +building, or any other considerable body. So the North American Indian, +whose habits of life seem to require it, can hear the footsteps of an +approaching enemy at distances which astonish us. So also the deaf and +dumb are very keen-sighted, and generally make very accurate +observations. Any reader who is sceptical in regard to the cultivation +of the senses, would do well to consult the account of Julia Brace, the +deaf and dumb and blind girl, as published in some of the early volumes +of the "Annals of Education." + +But it is hardly necessary to resort to the blind, or to savages, or to +the deaf and dumb, in order to prove man's susceptibility in this +respect. We may be reminded of the same fact by observing with what +accuracy the merchant tailor can distinguish, by feeling, the quality of +his goods; how quick a painter, an engraver, or a printer, will discover +errors in painting or printing, which wholly escape ordinary readers or +observers; and how quick the ear of a good musician will discover the +existence and origin of a discordant sound in his choir. + +Now I do not undertake to say or prove, that mankind would be better or +happier for having their senses all cultivated in the highest possible +degree; though I am not sure that this would not be the case. But so +long as a large proportion of our ideas enter our minds through the +medium of the five senses, it is desirable that something should be done +to perfect them, instead of overlooking the whole subject. What mothers +ought to do in this matter, deserves, therefore, a brief consideration. + + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +The suggestion, in another place, to keep away caps from the child's +head, if duly attended to, is one means of perfecting, or at least of +preserving, the sense of hearing. For caps, by the heat they produce to +a part which cannot safely endure an increase of temperature, greatly +expose children to catarrhal affections; and many a catarrh has laid the +foundation for dulness of hearing, if not of actual deafness. + +The ears should be kept clean. If washed sufficiently often, and +syringed once a week with warm milk and water, or with very weak +soap-suds, gently warmed, the cerumen or ear wax will hardly be found +accumulated in such masses as to produce deafness. And yet such +accumulations, with such consequences, are by no means uncommon. It is +not long since a young man with whom I am acquainted, applied to an +eminent surgeon of Boston, on account of deafness in one ear, which had +become quite troublesome, and as it was feared, incurable. Syringing +with a large and strong syringe disengaged a large mass of cerumen, and +hearing was immediately restored. + +Children should be taught to distinguish sounds with closed eyes, or +blindfolded. We may strike on various objects, and ask them to tell what +we struck, &c. This will lead them to _observe_ sounds; and will perfect +their hearing in a remarkable degree. + +There are also advantages to be derived from accustoming a child to a +great variety of sounds; both as regards their strength and character. +But this must only be occasional; for if the ear be constantly +accustomed to sounds of any kind, and more especially those which are +harsh or loud, the organ of hearing is liable to sustain injury. Music, +as it is now beginning to be taught to children in our schools, will do +much, I think, to improve the faculty of hearing. + + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +The sight, says Addison, is the most perfect of all our senses; and this +is unquestionably true. But it is more or less perfect, in different +individuals, according to the early education they have received. +Sometimes, it is true, we are born near-or dim-sighted; but such cases +are comparatively rare. + +The question is sometimes asked why there are so many persons, +now-a-days, who lose their sight, become near-sighted, &c. very young. +It may be difficult to answer this question fully; yet I cannot help +thinking that the following are some of the causes. + +1. The great heat of our apartments, which, together with late hours and +much lamp light, affects the eyes unpleasantly, is believed to be among +the more prominent causes of early decay of sight. Formerly, our +apartments were neither so steadily nor so generally heated; and we rose +earlier, and consequently went to bed earlier. + +2. The fine print of a large proportion of our books, especially our +school books, has done immense injury. I do not believe that reading +fine print, occasionally, for a few moments at a time, or reading by a +very strong or very weak light in the same way, does harm. On the +contrary, I think it may strengthen and improve the sight. It is the +long continuance of these things that does the mischief; and the +mischief thus done is immense. I rejoice that printers and publishers +are beginning of late to use much larger type than they have done for +some years past. + +3. The early use of spectacles does mischief--I mean before they are +needed. After they begin to be needed, there is no advantage in delaying +to use them, as some do, for fear they shall wear them too soon. This is +about as wise as the practice of going cold to harden ourselves. + +4. Reading when we are fatigued, or ill, or have a very full stomach, is +another way to injure the sight. + +5. Rubbing the eyes with the fingers, or with anything else, does +inevitable mischief. The Germans have a proverb which says--"Never touch +your eye, except with your elbow." There is much of good sense in it. + +In short, there are a thousand ways in which that delicate organ, the +human eye, may sustain injury; and nearly as many in which it may be +strengthened, cultivated, and improved. But my limits merely permit me +to add, that the frequent but gentle application of water to the eye, +several times a day, at such a temperature as is most agreeable--but +cold, when it can be borne--is one of the best preservatives of sight +which the world affords. + +Connected alike with physical and intellectual education, is the +practice of measuring by the eye heights, distances, superfices, +weights, and solids. It is not difficult to train the eye to an accuracy +in this matter which would astonish the uninstructed. + + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +I do not know that it is worth our while to take pains, by any direct +methods, to cultivate the organs of taste or smell; but I think it +proper, at the least, to preserve their original rectitude. + +Many, I know, undertake to say, that were it not for our errors in +regard to food and drink, and were it not, in particular, for the +multitude of strange mixtures which tend to benumb those two senses, we +might determine the qualities of food and drink--whether they are +favorable or adverse--by means of taste and smell, like the animals. But +I do not believe this. The Creator has substituted reason, in us, for +instinct in the brute animals. It is not necessary that we should +possess the latter, when the former is so manifestly superior to it; and +accordingly I do not believe that it is given us, or any of that +acuteness of sensation which exists in the dog, the tiger, the vulture, +&c.--and which so closely resembles it. + +There can be no doubt--no reasonable doubt, certainly--that the wretched +customs of modern cookery benumb the senses of taste and smell, more or +less, and that high-seasoned food, condiments, and stimulating drinks do +the same; and should for this reason, were it for no other, be +studiously avoided. + +Closely connected with the organ of taste are the TEETH. A volume might +profitably be written on these--as on the eye. But I will only say that +they should be kept perfectly clean, either by rinsing or brushing, or +both, especially after eating; that they should be permitted to chew all +our food, instead of merely standing by as silent spectators to the +passage of that which is mashed, soaked, chopped, &c.; that they should +not be picked or cleaned with pins, or other equally hard instruments; +that they should not be used to crack nuts or other hard, indigestible +substances; and that the stomach, with which they are apt to sympathize +very strongly, should also be kept in a good and healthy condition. + + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness are generally among the more prolific +sources of a want of acuteness in feeling. The first is a disease, and +may be avoided by a proper diet, and by active mental and bodily +employment. Slovenliness we may of course avoid, whenever there is a +wish to do so, and an abundance of water. + +But the sense of feeling, or especially that accumulation of it which we +call TOUCH, and which seems to be specially located in the balls of the +fingers and on the palm of the hand, is susceptible of a degree of +improvement far beyond what would be the natural result of cleanliness, +and freedom from plethora or corpulence. + +I have already alluded, in my general remarks at the head of this +chapter, to the acuteness of this sense in the blind, as well as in the +dealer in cloths. I might add many more illustrations, but a single one, +in relation to the blind, which was accidentally omitted in that place, +will be sufficient. + +The blind at the Institution in this city, as well as in other similar +institutions, are now taught to read and write with considerable +facility. But how? Most of my readers may have heard how they read, but +I will describe the process as well as I can. A description of their +method of writing is more difficult. + +The letters are formed by pressing the paper, while quite moist, upon +rather large type, which raises a ridge in the line of every letter, and +which remains prominent after the paper is dry. In order to read, the +pupil has to feel out these ridges. A circular ridge on the paper he is +told is O; a perpendicular one, I; a crooked one, S; &c. They read music +and arithmetic printed in a similar manner. A few months of practice, in +this way, will enable an ingenious youth to read with considerable ease +and despatch. + +Now if nothing is wanting but a little training to render the touch so +accurate, would it not be useful to train every child to judge +frequently of the properties of bodies by this sense? And cannot every +one recall to his mind a thousand situations in which a greater accuracy +of this sense would have saved him much inconvenience, as well as +afforded him no little pleasure? + +I shall conclude this section with a few remarks on the HAND. The custom +of neglecting, or almost neglecting the left hand, though nearly +universal, in this country at least, appears to me to be +wrong--decidedly so. For although more blood may be sent to the right +arm than to the left, as physiologists say, yet the difference is not as +great at birth as it is afterward; so that education either weakens the +one or strengthens the other. + +Besides this, we occasionally find a person who is left-handed, as it is +called; that is, his left hand and arm are as much larger and stronger +than the right, as the right is usually stronger than the left. How is +this? Do we find a corresponding change in the internal structure? But +suppose it could be ascertained that such a change did exist, which I +believe has never been done, the question would still arise whether the +difference was the same at birth, or whether the more frequent use of +the left hand has not, in part, produced it. + +I do not mean, here, to intimate that a more frequent use of the left +hand than the right would make new blood-vessels grow where there were +none before. But it would certainly do one thing; it would make the same +vessels carry more blood than they did before, which is, in effect, +nearly the same thing:--for the more blood in the limb, as a general +rule, the more strength--provided the limb is in due health and +exercise. + +The inference which I wish the reader to make from all this is, that +since the left hand and arm, by due cultivation, and without essential +difference or change of structure to begin with, can occasionally be +made stronger than the right, it is fair to conclude that it may, if +found desirable, be always rendered more nearly equal to it than, in +adult years, we usually find it. + +The question is now fairly before us--Is such a result desirable? I +maintain that it is; and shall endeavor to show my reasons. + +How often is one hand injured by an accident, or rendered nearly useless +by disease? But if it should be the right, how helpless it makes us! The +man who is accustomed to shave himself, must now resort to a barber. If +he is a barber himself, or almost any other mechanic, his business must +be discontinued. Or if he is a clerk, he cannot use his left hand, and +must consequently lose his time. Or if amputation chances to be +performed on a favorite arm, how entirely useless to society we are, +till we have learned to use the other! It not only takes up a great deal +of valuable time to acquire a facility of using it, but if we are +already arrived at maturity, we can never use it so well as the other, +during our whole lives; because it is too late in life to increase its +size and strength much by constant exercise. Whereas in youth, it might +have been done easily. + +Is it not then important--for these and many more reasons--to teach a +child to use with nearly equal readiness, both of his hands? But if so, +who can do it better than the mother? And when can it be better done +than in the earliest infancy? When is the time which would be devoted to +it worth less than at this period? + + + + +CHAPTER XX. + +ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + +It is difficult to determine, in regard to many things which concern the +management of the young, whether they belong most properly to moral or +physical education; so close is the connection between the two, and so +decidedly does everything, or nearly everything which relates to the +management of the body, have a bearing upon the formation of moral +character. This work might be extended very much farther, did it comport +with my original plan. But I hasten to close the volume, with a few +thoughts on certain abuses of the body, which prevail to a greater or +less extent in families and schools; and to which I have not adverted +elsewhere. + +The seats of children are usually bad, both at table and elsewhere. It +seems not enough that we condemn them to the use of knives, forks, +spoons, &c., of the same size with those of adults. We go farther; and +give them chairs of the same height and proportion with our own. There +are a few exceptions to the truth of this remark. Here and there we see +a child's chair, it is true--but not often. + +But how unreasonable is it to seat a child in a chair so high that his +feet cannot reach the floor; and so constructed that there is no outer +place on which the feet can rest. What adult would be willing to sit in +so painful a posture, with his legs dangling? No wonder children dislike +to sit much, in such circumstances. And it is a great blessing to both +parent and child that they do. No wonder children hate the Sabbath, +especially in those families where they are compelled to keep the day +holy by sitting motionless! Sabbath schools, though they bring with them +some evil along with a great deal of good, are a relief to the young in +this particular--especially if their seats are more comfortable +elsewhere than at home. They consider it much more tolerable to spend +the morning and intermission of the day in going and returning from +Sabbath school, than in constant and close confinement. They prefer +variety, and the occasional light and air of heaven, to monotony and +seclusion and silence. + +It happens, however, that the seats at the Sabbath school and at church, +are not always what they should be; nor, so far as church is concerned, +do I see that this evil can be wholly avoided. Children usually sit with +their parents, in the sanctuary--and they ought to do so: and the height +of the seats cannot, of course, accommodate both. If there is a building +erected solely for the use of the Sabbath school, the seats may be +constructed accordingly, without seriously incommoding anybody; but in +the church, I do not see, as I have once before observed, how the evil +can be remedied. + +The greatest trouble in regard to seats, however, is at the day school; +especially in our district or common schools. There, it is usual for +children to be confined six hours a day--and sometimes two in +succession--to hard, narrow, plank seats, a large proportion of which +are without backs, and raised so high that the feet of most of the +pupils cannot possibly touch the floor. There, "suspended," as I have +said in another work, [Footnote: See a "Prize Essay," on School Houses, +page 7.] "between the heavens and the earth, they are compelled to +remain motionless for an hour or an hour and a half together." + +I have also shown, in the same essay, that in regard to the desks, and +indeed many other things which pertain to, or are connected with the +school, very little pains is taken to provide for the physical welfare +or even comfort of the pupils; and that a thorough reform on the subject +appears to be indispensable. + +When I speak of hard plank seats, let me not be understood as hinting at +the necessity of cushions. When I wrote the essay above mentioned, I did +indeed believe that they were desirable. But I am now opposed to their +use, either by children or adults, even where a laborious employment +would seem to demand a long confinement to this awkward and unnatural +position. If our seats are cushioned, we shall sit too easily. I believe +that our health requires a hard seat; because its very hardness inclines +us to change, frequently, our position. + +But if we must sit, be it ever so short a time, our seats should always +have backs; and those which are designed for children, should not be so +high as to render them uncomfortable. Nor should the backs of seats be +so high as they usually are, either for children or adults. They should +never come much higher than the middle of the body. If they reach the +shoulders, they either favor a crouching forward, or interfere with the +free action of the lungs. + +This might be deemed a proper place for saying something on the position +of children in manufactories. But here a world of abuse opens upon my +view, the full development of which demands a large volume. How many +crooked spines, emaciated bodies, decaying lungs, as well as scrofulas, +fevers, and consumptions, are either induced or accelerated by these +unnatural employments! I mean they are unnatural for the _young_. As to +employing adults in them, I have nothing at present to say. But when I +think of the cruel custom of placing children in these places, whose +bodies--and were this the place, I might add, _minds_--are immature, and +especially girls, I am compelled, by the voice of conscience, and, as I +trust, by a regard to those laws which God has established in our +physical frames, but which are yet so strangely violated, to protest +against it. Better that no factories should exist, than that children +should be ruined in them as they now are. Better by far that we should +return, were it possible, to the primitive habits of New England--to +those by-gone days when mothers and daughters made the wearing apparel +of themselves and their families--when, if there was less of +intellectual cultivation, and less money expended for luxuries and +extravagances, there was much more of health and happiness. + +There is one more species of abuse to which, in closing, I wish to +direct maternal attention. I allude to injudicious modes of inflicting +corporal punishment. + +Let me not be understood to appear, in this place, as the advocate of +bodily punishments of any kind; for if they are even admissible under +some circumstances, I am fully convinced that in the way in which they +are commonly administered, they do much more harm than good. + +But leaving the question of their utility, in the abstract, wholly +untouched, and taking it for granted, for the present, that they are--as +is undoubtedly the fact--sometimes employed, and will continue to be so +for a great while to come, I proceed to speak of their more flagrant +abuses. + +Among these, none are more reprehensible than blows of any kind on the +head. Even the rod is objectionable for this purpose, since it exposes +the eyes. But the hand--in boxing the ears or striking in any way--is +more so. The bones of the head, in young children, are not yet firmly +knit together, and these concussions may injure the tender brain. I +know of whole families, whose mental faculties are dull, as the +consequence--I believe--of a perpetual boxing and striking of the head. +Some individuals are made almost idiots, in this very manner.--But the +worst is not yet told. Many teachers are in the habit of striking their +pupils' heads with thick heavy books; and with wooden rules. I have seen +one of the latter, of considerable size and thickness, broken in two +across the head of a very small boy; and this, too--such is the public +mind--in the presence of a mother who was paying a visit to the school. +I have seen parents and masters strike the heads of their children with +pieces of wood, of much larger size;--in one instance with a common +sized tailor's press-board; in another with the heavy end of a wooden +whip-handle, about an inch in diameter. + +Children are sometimes severely beaten across the middle of the +body--the region where lie the vital organs--the lungs, the heart, the +liver, &c. They are sometimes beaten too, across the joints, or in any +place that the excited, perhaps passionate teacher or parent can reach. +Rules and books are thrown with violence at pupils in school. There is a +story in the "Annals of Education," Vol. IV. at page 28, of a teacher +who threw a rule at a little boy, six years old, which struck him with +great force, within an inch of one of his eyes. Had it struck a little +nearer to his nose, it would, in all probability, have destroyed his +left eye. + + * * * * * + +But without extending these remarks any farther, every intelligent +mother who reads what I have already written, will see, as I trust, the +necessity of properly informing herself on the great subject of physical +education; and of being better prepared than she has hitherto been for +acquitting herself, with satisfaction, of those high and sacred +responsibilities which, in the wise arrangements of Nature and +Providence, devolve upon her. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + +***** This file should be named 10482-8.txt or 10482-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/4/8/10482/ + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS," WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + + https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06 + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: + https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: + https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL + + diff --git a/old/10482-8.zip b/old/10482-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd62ec9 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482-8.zip diff --git a/old/10482-h.zip b/old/10482-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e440d99 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482-h.zip diff --git a/old/10482-h/10482-h.htm b/old/10482-h/10482-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ce0e18f --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482-h/10482-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,8113 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content= + "text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of THE YOUNG MOTHER, by WM. A. ALCOTT. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + <!-- + * { font-family: Times;} + P { text-indent: 1em; + margin-top: .75em; + margin-left: 2em; + margin-right: 2em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; } + P.sec { margin-top: .75em; + margin-left: 1em; + margin-right: 2em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; } + + blockquote { margin-left: 4em; + margin-right: 4em; } + blockquote.small { font-size: 90%; + margin-left: 4em; + margin-right: 4em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; } + H4.ind { text-align: left; + margin-left: 1em; } + HR { width: 65%; } + hr.chapterEnd { width: 65%; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;} + + --> + </style> + + </head> + <body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Young Mother + Management of Children in Regard to Health + +Author: William A. Alcott + +Release Date: December 17, 2003 [EBook #10482] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + + + + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + + + + + +</pre> + + +<H1>THE YOUNG MOTHER</H1> + +<h2>or</h2> + +<h1>Management of Children in Regard to Health.</H1> + +<H2>BY WM. A. ALCOTT</H2> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<center>1836.</center> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + + + +<h5>ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION.</h5> + +<p>The present edition has been much enlarged. The author has added a +section on the conduct and management of the mother herself, besides +several other important amendments and additions. The whole has also +been carefully revised, and we cannot but indulge the hope that no +popular work of the kind will be found more perfect, or more worthy of +the public confidence.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<h3>CONTENTS.</h3> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_I.">CHAPTER I. THE NURSERY.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Importance of a Nursery—generally overlooked. Its +walls—ceiling—windows—chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_II."> +CHAPTER II. TEMPERATURE.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General principle—"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove—railing around it. Excess of heat—its dangers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_III."> +CHAPTER III. VENTILATION.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air arising from lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping—its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation—camphor, vinegar.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV."> +CHAPTER IV. THE CHILD'S DRESS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General principles—1. To cover us; 2. To defend us from cold; 3. from +injury.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Swathing the Body.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Buffon's remarks. Transforming children into mummies. Use of a belly-band. +Evils produced by having it too tight. Cripples sometimes made. Absurdity +of confining the arms. Infants should be made happy.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Form of the Dress.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Curious suggestion of a London writer. Advantages of his plan. Killing +with kindness. Dr. Buchan's opinion. Conformity to fashion. Tight-lacing +the chest. Its effects—dangerous. Physiology of the chest. Its motions. +An attempt to make the subject intelligible. Serious mistakes of some +writers. Appeal to facts. Color of females. Their breathing. Their +diseases. Customs of Tunis. Our own customs little less ridiculous.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Material.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Flannel in cold weather. Its use—1. As a kind +of flesh brush; 2. As a protection against taking cold; 3. As means of +equalizing the temperature. Clothing should be kept clean—often +changed—color—lightness—softness. Cotton apt to take fire. Silk +expensive. Linen not warm enough. Flannel under-clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Quantity.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The power of habit, in this respect. Opinion that no clothing is +necessary. Anecdote of Alexander and the Scythian. Argument from +analogy. Begin right, in early life. We generally use too much +clothing. Should clothing be often varied?—objections to it. Avoid +dampness.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>Caps.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">How caps produce disease. Nature's head-dress. Miserable apology for +caps. What diseases are avoided by going with the head bare. Judicious +remarks of a foreign writer. Covering the "open of the head." Wetting +the head with spirits.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Hats and Bonnets.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Hats usually too warm. No covering needed in the house; and but little +in the sun or rain. Is it dangerous to go with the head always bare?</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>Covering for the Feet.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The feet should be well covered. Why. Rule of medical men. No garters. +Objections to covering the feet considered. Shoes useful. Not too thick. +Thick soles. Mr. Locke's opinion.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>Pins.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">These ought not to be used. Why. Substitutes. Practice of Dr. Dewees. +Needles—their danger. Shocking anecdote.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Remaining Wet.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Changing wet clothing. Monstrous error—its evils. Clean as well as dry. +A lame excuse for negligence. No excuse sufficient but poverty.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on the Dress of Boys.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Every restraint of body or limb injurious. Tight jackets. Stiff stocks +and thick cravats. Boots. Evils of having them too tight. A painful +sight.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 11. <i>On the Dress of Girls.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Clothing should be loose for girls or boys. Girls to be kept warmer than +boys. Few girls comfortable, at home or abroad. Going out of warm rooms +into the night air. How it promotes disease.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_V."> +CHAPTER V. CLEANLINESS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI."> +CHAPTER VI. BATHING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Practice of savage nations. Rather dangerous. Mistake of Rousseau. +Plunging into cold water at birth may produce immediate death. Hundreds +injured where one is benefited. Spirits added to the water. First +washings of the child—should be thorough. Rules in regard to the +temperature of both the water and the air. Washing an introduction to +bathing. Hour for bathing changes with age. Temperature of the water. +Size of a bathing vessel. Unreasonable fears of the warm bath. How they +arose. A list of common whims. Apology for opposing cold baths. Dr +Dewees' eight objections to them. Does cold water harden? Cold bath +sometimes useful under the care of a skilful physician. Its danger in other +cases. Rules for using the cold bath, if used at all. Securing a glow after +it. General management. Proper hour. Coming out of the bath. Dressing. +Singing. Bathing after a meal. Local bathing. Tea-spoonful of water in the +mouth. Its use. The shower bath. Vapor bath. Medicated bath. Sponging. +Conveniences for bathing indispensable to every family. General neglect +of bathing. Attention of the Romans to this subject. We treat domestic +animals better than children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII."> +CHAPTER VII. FOOD.</a></h4> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>General Principles.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The mother's milk the only appropriate food of infants. Unreasonableness +of some mothers. The tendency to ape foreign fashions. Nursing does not +weaken the mother.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Conduct of the Mother.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Much depends on the mother. Opinions of medical societies. Mothers +sometimes make children drunkards. The general fondness for excitements. +Hints to those whom it concerns. Caution to mothers. Opinions of Dr. +Dewees. Slavery of mothers to strong drink and exciting food. Opinions +of the Charleston Board of Health.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Nursing, how often.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Children should never be nursed to quiet them. Stomach must have time +for rest. Regular seasons for nursing. Once in three hours. Difference +of constitution. Indulgence does not strengthen. Feeble children require +the strictest management. Nothing should be given between meals.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Quantity of Food.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Errors. Repetition of aliment. Variety. Children over-fed. Appetite not +a safe guide. Training to gluttony. Illustrations of the principle. +Mankind eat twice as much as is necessary.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>How long should Milk be the only Food?</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">First change in diet. Objections of mothers. Choice bits. Ignorance of +the nature of digestion. What digestion is. Food which the author of +nature assigned.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>On Feeding before Teething.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">When feeding before teething is necessary. Diet of mothers. Substitute +for the mother's milk. How prepared. Variety not necessary to the +infant. Milk best from the same cow. Vessels in which it is used should +be clean. Sweet milk not heated too much. Not frozen. Disgusting +practices. Pure water. If not pure, boil it. Best of sugar. Is sugar +injurious? When the state of the mother's health forbids nursing. Use of +sucking-bottles. Feeding should in all cases be slow. Jolting children +after eating. Tossing. Sucking-bottle as a plaything. Evils of using it +as such. Dirty vessels. Poisonous ones. Character of nurses. Nursing at +both breasts. Age of the nurse. Parents should have the oversight, even +of a nurse.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>From Teething to Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Proper age for weaning. Cullen's opinion. Proper season of the year. +When the teeth have fairly protruded. First food given. New forms of +food. Animal broth.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>During the Process of Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">The spring the best time for weaning. Should not be too sudden. The +process—how managed. Exciting an aversion to the breast. What solid +food should first be given. Buchan's opinion. Health of the mother. She +should—if possible—avoid medicine.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Food subsequently to Weaning.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Views of Dr. Cadogan. Half the children that come into the world go out +of it before they are good for anything. Why? Owing chiefly to errors in +nursing, feeding, and clothing. Simplicity of children's food. Picture +of a modern table. Every dish tortured till it is spoiled. Plain, simple +food, generally despised. How bread is now regarded. How it ought to be. +Mr. Locke's opinion in favor of bread for young children, and against +the use of animal food. Does not differ materially from that of most +medical writers. Vegetable food generally preferred to animal. What is +true of youth, in this respect, is true of every age, with slight +exceptions. Who require most food. Mere bread and water not best. Bread +the staple article of diet. Best kind of bread. Objections to it. How +groundless they are. Fondness, for hot, new bread not natural. Fondness +of change. What it indicates. How it is caused. Train up a child in the +way he should go. We can like what food we please. Second best kind of +bread. Other kinds. Plain puddings. Indian cakes. Salt may be used, in +moderate quantity, but no other condiments. Of butter, cheese, milk, &c. +Potatoes, turnips, onions, beets, and other roots. Beans, peas, and +asparagus. No fat or gravies should be used.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on Fruit.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Diversity of opinion. The cholera. Fruits useful. Seven plain rules in +regard to them. Other rules. A mistake corrected. Fruit before +breakfast. Four arguments in its favor. Particular fruits. Apples. Why +fruits brought to market are generally unfit to be eaten. Are good, ripe +fruits difficult of digestion? Cooking the apple? A man who lives +entirely on apples. Cutting down orchards. Pears, peaches, melons, +grapes. Mixing improper substances with summer fruits.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 11. <i>Confectionary.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Confectionary sometimes poisonous. Case in New York. All, or nearly +all confectionaries injurious. Physical evils attending their use. +Intellectual evils. Moral evils. The last most to be dreaded. Slaves +to confectionary are on the road to gluttony, drunkenness, or +debauchery—perhaps all three.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 12. <i>Pastry.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Dr. Paris's opinion of pastry. Various forms of it. Hot flour bread a +species of it. Produces, among other evils, eruptions on the face. +Appeal to mothers.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 13. <i>Crude, or Raw Substances.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Salads, herbs, &c.—raw—cooked. Nuts, spices, mustard, horseradish, +onions, cucumbers, pickles, &c. None of these should be used, except as +medicine.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII."> +CHAPTER VIII. DRINKS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk +and water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad +food and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischiefs they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_IX."> +CHAPTER IX. GIVING MEDICINE.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_X."> +CHAPTER X. EXERCISE.</a></h4> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Rocking in the Cradle.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Objections to the use of cradles. Under what circumstances they are +least objectionable.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Carrying in the Arms.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Carrying in the arms a suitable exercise for the first two months of +life. Danger of too early sitting up. Improper position in the arms. +Mothers must see to this themselves. Motion in the arms should be +gentle. No tossing, running, or jumping. Infants should not always be +carried on the same arm.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Creeping.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Creeping useful to health. Why. Go-carts and leading strings prohibited. +The longer children creep, the better. Their progress in learning to +stand. Let it be slow and natural. Let it be, as much as possible, by +their own voluntary efforts.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Walking.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Walking in the nursery. Walking abroad. Hoisting children into carriages. +Walks should not become fatiguing.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>Riding in Carriages.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Carriages useful before children can walk. Their construction. Should be +drawn steadily. Position of the child in them: Falling asleep. How long +this exercise should be continued.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Riding on Horseback.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Never safe for infants. Riding schools. Objections to riding on +horseback, while very young. Tends to cruelty and tyranny.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XI."> +CHAPTER XI. AMUSEMENTS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes—pictures—shuttlecock—the rocking horse—tops and +marbles—backgammon—checkers—morrice—dice—nine-pins—skipping the +rope—trundling the hoop—playing at ball—kites—skating and +swimming—dissected maps—black boards—elements of letters—dissected +pictures.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XII."> +CHAPTER XII. CRYING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIII."> +CHAPTER XIII. LAUGHING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIV."> +CHAPTER XIV. SLEEP.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. A prevalent mistake. A hint to fathers. Few Catos. +Everything left to mothers.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Hour for Repose.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Night the season of repose, generally. Infants require all hours. +Sleeping in dark rooms. Excess of caution. Habit of sleeping amid noise.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Place.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Where the infant should sleep. Why alone. Poisoning by impure air. +Illustration. Proofs. Friedlander. Dr. Dewees. Destruction of children +by mothers. Anecdote. Moral reasons for having children sleep alone. +Sleeping with the aged. Sleeping with cats and dogs.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3 <i>Purity of the Air.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Nurseries. Windows open during the night. Lowering them from the top. +Habit of Dr. Gregory. Going abroad in the open air.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>The Bed.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">No feathers should be used. They are too warm. Their effluvia +oppressive. Other objections to their use. Mattresses. Air beds. Beds of +cut straw. Soft beds. Testimony of physicians. The pillow. Dampness. +Curtains. Warming the bed. Beds recently occupied by the sick.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 5. <i>The Covering.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Light covering. Mistakes of some mothers. Covering the head with bed +clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 6. <i>Night Dresses.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">As little dress during sleep as possible. No caps. No stockings. Loose +night shirt. No tight articles of nightdress. Frequent exchanging of +clothes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 7. <i>Posture of the Body.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Sleeping on the back—on the sides. Position of the head. The infant's +bedstead. Sir Charles Bell. Darkening the room.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 8. <i>State of the Mind.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Mental quiet favorable to sleep. Crying to sleep. A good father. All +anxiety should be avoided.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 9. <i>Quality of Sleep.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Soundness of our sleep. Nightmare. How produced. Late reading. Late +suppers. Influence of religion on sleep. Different opinions about sleep. +Truth midway between extremes. Effect of silence and darkness on our +sleep. Of sleep before midnight. Light unfavorable to sleep.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 10. <i>Quantity.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need to sleep nearly the whole time. Number of hours required +for sleep. Opinions of eminent men. The author's own opinion. Statements +of Macnish. Estimates on the loss of time by over-sleeping. Hint to +young mothers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XV."> +CHAPTER XV. EARLY RISING.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. Burning them up. "Lecturing" them. What is an early +hour?</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVI."> +CHAPTER XVI. HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal—over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVII."> +CHAPTER XVII. SOCIETY.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society. Early diffidence. +Selecting companions. Moral effects of society on the young. Parents +should play with their children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVIII."> +CHAPTER XVIII. EMPLOYMENTS.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Disliking domestic employments. Miserable housewives—not +to be wondered at. Mistake of one class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIX."> +CHAPTER XIX. EDUCATION OF THE SENSES.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Extent to which the senses can be improved. Case of the blind. The +Indians. Julia Brace. Tailors, painters, &c.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 1. <i>Hearing.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Injury done by caps. Syringing the ears. Anecdote of deafness from +neglect. Means of improving the hearing.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 2. <i>Seeing.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Importance of seeing. Near-sighted people—why so common. Heat of our +rooms. Very fine print. Spectacles. Reading when tired. Rubbing the +eyes. Cold water to the eyes.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 3. <i>Tasting and Smelling.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Benumbing the senses. How this has often been done. The teeth. How to +preserve them.</blockquote> + +<p class="sec">SEC. 4. <i>Feeling.</i></p> + +<blockquote class="small">Corpulence and slovenliness. Sense of touch. The blind—how taught to +read. Hint to parents. The hand. Neglecting the left hand. Physiology of +the hand and arm. Evils of being able to use but one hand. Both should +be educated.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4 class="ind"><a href="#CHAPTER_XX."> +CHAPTER XX. ABUSES.</a></h4> + +<blockquote class="small">Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school—at church—at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers.</blockquote> + + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> +<br> + +<h3>PREFACE.</h3> + +<p>There is a prejudice abroad, to some extent, against agitating the +questions—"What shall we eat? What shall we drink? and Wherewithal +shall we be clothed?"—not so much because the Scriptures have charged +us not to be over "anxious" on the subject, as because those who pay the +least attention to what they eat and drink, are supposed to be, after +all, the most healthy.</p> + +<p>It is not difficult to ascertain how this opinion originated. There are +a few individuals who are perpetually thinking and talking on this +subject, and who would fain comply with appropriate rules, if they knew +what they were, and if a certain definite course, pursued a few days +only, would change their whole condition, and completely restore a +shattered or ruined constitution. But their ignorance of the laws which +govern the human frame, both in sickness and in health, and their +indisposition to pursue any proposed plan for their improvement long +enough to receive much permanent benefit from it, keep them, +notwithstanding all they say or do, always deteriorating.</p> + +<p>Then, on the other hand, there are a few who, in consequence of +possessing by nature very strong constitutions, and laboring at some +active and peculiarly healthy employment, are able for a few, and +perhaps even for many years, to set all the rules of health at defiance.</p> + +<p>Now, strange as it may seem, these cases, though they are only +exceptions (and those more apparent than real) to the general rule, are +always dwelt upon, by those who are determined to live as they please, +and to put no restraint either upon themselves or their appetites. For +nothing can be plainer—so it seems to me—than that, taking mankind by +families, or what is still better, by larger portions, they are most +free from pain and disease, as well as most healthy and happy, who pay +the most attention to the laws of human health, that is, those laws or +rules by whose observance alone, that health can be certainly and +permanently secured.</p> + +<p>But these families and communities are most healthy and happy, not +because they live in a proper manner, by fits and starts, but because +they have, from some cause or other, adopted and persevered in HABITS +which, compared with the habits of other families, or other communities, +are preferable; that is, more in obedience to the laws which govern the +human constitution. Not that even <i>they</i> are "without sin" or error on +this subject—gross error too—but because their errors are fewer or +less destructive than those of their neighbors.</p> + +<p>Now is it possible that any intelligent father or mother of a family, +whose diet, clothing, exercise, &c. are thus comparatively well +regulated, would derive no benefit from the perusal of works which treat +candidly, rationally, and dispassionately, on these points? Is there a +mother in the community who is so destitute of reason and common sense +as not to desire the light of a broader experience in regard to the +tendency of things than she has had, or possibly can have, in her own +family? Is there one who will not be aided by understanding not only +that a certain thing or course is better than another, but also WHY it +is so?</p> + +<p>It is by no means the object of this little work to set people to +watching their stomachs from meal to meal, in regard to the effects of +food, drink, &c.; for nothing in the world is better calculated to make +dyspeptics than this. It is true, indeed, that some things may be +obviously and greatly injurious, taken only once; and when they are so, +they should be avoided. But in general, it is the effect of a habitual +use of certain things for a long time together—and the longer the +experiment the better—which we are to observe.</p> + +<p>A book to guide mothers in the formation of early good habits in their +offspring, should be the result of long observation and much experiment +on these points, but more especially of a thorough understanding of +human physiology. It should not consist so much of the conceits of a +single brain—perhaps half turned—as of the logical deductions of +severe science, and facts gleaned from the world's history.</p> + +<p>Here is a nation, or tribe of men, bringing up children to certain +habits, from generation to generation—and such and such is their +character. Here, again, is another large portion of our race, who, under +similar circumstances of climate, &c. &c., have, for several hundred +years, educated their children very differently, and with different +results. A comparison of things on a large scale, together with a close +attention to the constitution and relations of the human system, affords +ground for drawing conclusions which are or may be useful. If this book +shall not afford light derived from such sources, it were far better +that it had never been written. If it only sets people to watching over +the effects of things taken or used only for a single day, instead of +leading them from early infancy to form in their children such habits as +will preclude, in a great measure, the necessity of watching ourselves +daily, then let the day perish from the memory of the writer, in which +the plan of bringing it forth to the world was conceived. But he is +confident of better things. He does not believe that a work which, to +such an extent, GIVES THE REASON WHY, will be productive of more evil +than good. On the contrary, it must, if read, have the opposite effect.</p> + +<p>I do not deny that even after the formation of the best habits, there +will be a necessity of paying some attention to what we eat and what we +drink, from day to day, and from hour to hour; but only that the +tendency of this work is not to increase this necessity, but on the +contrary, to diminish it. In my own view; these occasions of inquiry in +regard to what is right, <i>physically</i> as well as <i>morally</i>, are one part +of our trials in this world—one means of forming our characters. We are +constantly tempted to excess and to error, in spite of the most firm +habits of self-denial which can be formed. If we resist temptation, our +characters are improved. And it is by self-denial and self-government in +these smaller matters, that we are to hope for nearly all the progress +we can ever make in the great work of self-education. Great trials of +character come but seldom; and when they come, we are often armed +against them; but these little trials and temptations, coming upon us +every hour—these it is, after all, that give shape to our characters, +and make us constantly growing either better or worse, both in the sight +of God and man. But, as I have repeatedly said, the object of this work +is to diminish rather than to increase the frequency of these trials, +useful though they may be, if duly improved, in the formation of +virtuous, and even of holy character.</p> + +<p>There is a sense in which every infant may be said to be born healthy, +so that we may not only adopt the language of the poet, Bowring, and +say</p> + +<span style="layout-flow: horizontal; margin-left: 8em;">—"a child is born;</span><br> +<span style="layout-flow: horizontal; margin-left: 6em;">Take it, and make it a bud of <i>moral</i> beauty,"</span><br> + +<p>but we may also add—Take it and make it beautiful <i>physically</i>. For +though a hereditary predisposition undoubtedly renders some individuals +more susceptible than others to particular diseases, yet when the bodily +organization of an infant is complete, and the degree of vitality which +nature gives it is sufficient to propel the machinery of the frame, it +can scarcely be regarded as in any other state than that of health.</p> + +<p>Now if it be the intention of divine Providence (and who will doubt that +it is?) that the animal body should be capable of resisting with +impunity the impressions of heat, cold, light, air, and the various +external influences to which, at birth, it is subjected, it may be +properly asked why this primitive state of health cannot be maintained, +and diseases, and medicines, and even PREVENTIVES wholly avoided.</p> + +<p>But the reason is obvious. Civilized society has placed the human race +in artificial circumstances. Instead of listening to the dictates of +reason, making ourselves acquainted with the nature of the human +constitution, and studying to preserve it in health and vigor, we yield +to the government of ignorance and presumption. The first moment, even, +in which we draw breath, sees us placed under the control of individuals +who are totally inadequate to the important charge of preserving the +infant constitution in its original state, and aiding its progress to +maturity. And thus it is that though infants, as a general rule, may be +said to be born healthy, few actually remain so. Seldom, indeed, do we +find a person who has arrived at maturity wholly free from disease, even +in those parts of our country which are reckoned to have the most +healthy climate.</p> + +<p>It is indeed commonly said, that a large proportion, both of children +and adults, among the agricultural portion of our population, are +healthy. But it is not so. There is room for doubt whether, on the +whole, the farmers of this country are healthier than the mechanics, or +much more so than the manufacturers; or the whole mass of the country +population healthier than that of the crowded city. The causes of +disease are sufficiently numerous, in all places and conditions; and +this will continue to be the fact, not merely until parents and teachers +shall become more enlightened, but until many generations have been +trained under their enlightened influence.</p> + +<p>If the children and adults among our agricultural population derive from +their employments in the open air a more ruddy appearance than those +either of the city or country who are confined more to their rooms; or +to a vitiated atmosphere, and to numerous other sources of disease, and +if they <i>appear</i> more favored with health, I have learned, by accurate +observation, that these appearances are somewhat deceptive. Their active +sports and employments in the open air give them a stronger appetite +than any other class of people; and the indulgence of this appetite, not +only with articles which are heating or indigestible in their nature, +but with an unreasonable quantity even of those which are considered +highly proper, is almost in an exact proportion. And it is hence +scarcely possible for the causes of disease and premature death to be +more operative in factories and in cities than in farm houses and the +country. Indeed it may be questioned whether the abuses of the ANIMAL +part of man—more common in some of their forms in country than in +city—though they may be less conspicuous, are not more certainly and +even more immediately destructive than those abuses which, in city life, +and bustle, and competition, affect more the MORAL nature.</p> + +<p>Be that as it may, however—for this is not the place for the grave +discussion of so broad a question—one thing, to my mind, is perfectly +clear, namely, that until physical education shall receive more +attention from all those who hold the sacred office of instructors of +the young, humanity can neither be much elevated nor improved. Mothers +and schoolmasters especially—they who, as Dr. Rush says, plant the +seeds of nearly all the good or evil in the world—must understand, most +deeply and thoroughly, the laws which regulate the various provinces of +the little world in which the soul resides, and which, like so many +states of a great confederacy, have not only their separate interests +and rights, but certain common and general ones; as well as those laws +by which the human constitution is related to and connected with the +objects which everywhere surround, and influence, and limit, and extend +it.</p> + +<p>This book contains little, if anything, new to those who are already +familiar with anatomy and physiology. Indeed, whatever may be its +claims, its merits or its demerits, it disclaims novelty. It is, indeed, +in one point of view, <i>original</i>;—I mean in its form, manner, and +arrangement. What I have written is chiefly from my own resources—the +results of patient study and observation, and careful reflection; but +that study and observation of human nature, and this reflection, have +been greatly aided by reading the writings of others.</p> + +<p>In the prosecution of the task which I had assigned myself, no work has +been of more service to me than an octavo volume of 548 pages, by Dr. +Wm. P. Dewees, of Philadelphia, entitled, "A Treatise on the Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children." It is one of the most valuable works +on Physical Education in the English language, as is evident from the +fact that notwithstanding its expense—three or four dollars—it has, in +nine years, gone through five editions. If it were written in such a +style, and published at such a price as would bring it within reach of +the minds and purses of the mass of the community, its sale would have +been, I think, much greater still; and the good which it has +accomplished would have been increased ten-fold.</p> + +<p>If the "YOUNG MOTHER" should be favorably received by the American +community, and prove extensively useful, it will undoubtedly be owing to +the fact that it presents so large a collection of facts and principles +on the great subject of physical education, in a manner so practical, +and at a price which is very low. To accomplish an object so desirable +is by no means an easy task. It was once said by the author of a huge +volume, that he wrote so large a work because he had not time to prepare +a smaller one. And however unaccountable it may be to those who have not +made the trial, it may be safely asserted, that to present, within +limits so small, anything like a system of Physical Education for the +guidance of young mothers, requires much more time, and labor, and +patience, than to prepare a work on the same subject twice as large.</p> + +<p>Nor is it to be expected, after all, that the work is, in all respects, +perfect. I have indeed done what I could to render it so; but am +conscious that future inquiries may lead to the discovery of errors. +Should such discoveries be made, they will be cheerfully acknowledged +and corrected; truth being, as it should be, the leading object.</p> + + +<br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br> +<br> + +<h2>THE YOUNG MOTHER.</h2> + +<hr class="chapterEnd" /> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I.">CHAPTER I.</a></h2> + +<h3>THE NURSERY.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Importance of a Nursery—generally overlooked. Its +walls—ceiling—windows—chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>It is far from being in the power of every young mother to procure a +suitable room for a nursery. In the present state of society, the +majority must be contented with such places as they can get. Still there +are various reasons for saying what a nursery should be. 1. It may be of +service to those who <i>have</i> the power of selection. 2. Information +cannot injure those who <i>have not</i>. 3. It may lead those who have wealth +to extend the hand of charity in this important direction; for there +are not a few who have little sympathy with the wants and distresses of +the adult poor, who will yet open their hearts and unfold their hands +for the relief of suffering <i>infancy</i>.</p> + +<p>Among those who have what is called a nursery, few select for this +purpose the most appropriate part of the building. It is not +unfrequently the one that can best be spared, is most retired, or most +convenient. Whether it is most favorable to the health and happiness of +its occupants, is usually at best a secondary consideration.</p> + +<p>But this ought not so to be. A nursery should never, for example, be on +a ground floor, or in a shaded situation, or in any circumstances which +expose it to dampness, or hinder the occasional approach of the light of +the sun. It should be spacious, with dry walls, high ceiling, and tight +windows. The latter should always be so constructed that the upper sash +can be lowered when we wish to admit or exclude air. It should have a +chimney, if possible; but if not, there should be suitable holes in the +ceiling, for the purposes of ventilation.</p> + +<p>The windows should have shutters, so that the room, when necessary, can +be darkened—and green curtains. Some writers say that the windows +should have cross bars before them; but if they do not descend within +three feet of the floor, such an arrangement can hardly be required.</p> + +<p>It is highly desirable that every nursery should consist of two rooms, +opening into each other; or what is still better, of one large room, +with a sliding or swinging partition in the middle. The use of this is, +that the mother and child may retire to one, while the other is being +swept or ventilated. They would thus avoid damp air, currents, and dust. +Such an arrangement would also give the occupants a room, fresh, clean +and sweet, in the morning, (which is a very great advantage,) after +having rendered the air of the other foul by sleeping in it.</p> + +<p>In winter, and while there is an infant in the nursery, just beginning +to walk, it is recommended by many to cover the floor with a carpet. The +only advantage which they mention is, that it secures the child from +injury if it falls. But I have seldom seen lasting injury inflicted by +simple falls on the hard floor; and there are so many objections to +carpeting a nursery, since it favors an accumulation of dust, bad air, +damp, grease, and other impurities, that it seems to me preferable to +omit it. Many physicians, I must own, recommend carpets during winter, +though not in summer; and in no case, unless they are well shaken and +aired, at least once a week.</p> + +<p>No furniture should be admissible, except the beds for the mother and +child, a table, and a few chairs. With the best writers and highest +authorities on the subject, I am decidedly of opinion that all feather +beds ought effectually and forever to be excluded from nurseries. The +reasons for this prohibition will appear hereafter.</p> + +<p>Every nursery should, if possible, be free from holes or crevices; +otherwise the occupants will be exposed to currents of air, and their +sometimes terrible and always injurious consequences. The room may, in +this way, be kept at a lower medium temperature—a point of very great +importance.</p> + +<p>Cats and dogs, I believe, are usually excluded from the nursery; if not, +they ought to be. For though the apprehension of cats "sucking the +child's breath," is wholly groundless, yet they may be provoked by the +rude attacks of a child to inflict upon it a lasting injury. Besides, +they assist, by respiration, in contaminating the air, like all other +animals.</p> + +<p>If there are, in the nursery, objects which, from the vivacity or +brilliancy of their colors, attract the attention of the child, they +should never be presented to them sideways, or immediately over their +heads. The reason for this caution is, that children seek, and pursue +almost instinctively, bright objects; and are thus liable to contract a +habit of moving their eyes in an oblique direction, which <i>may</i> +terminate in squinting.</p> + +<p>Many parents seem to take great pleasure in indulging the young infant +in looking at these bright objects; especially a lamp or a candle. If +the child is naturally strong and vigorous, no immediate perceptible +injury may arise; but I am confident in the opinion that the result is +often quite otherwise. For many weeks, if not many months of their early +existence, they should not be permitted to sit or lie and gaze at any +bright object, be it ever so weak or distant, unless placed exactly +before their eyes; and even in the latter case, it were better to avoid +it.</p> + +<p>Heat is also injurious to the eyes of all, and of course not less so to +children than to adults. But when a strong light and heat are conjoined, +as is the case of sitting around a large blazing fire—the former custom +of New England—it is no wonder if the infantile eyes become early +injured. No wonder that the generation now on the stage, early subjected +to these abuses, should be found almost universally in the use of +spectacles.</p> + +<p>This may be the most proper place for observing that great care ought to +be taken, at the birth of the child, to prevent a too sudden exposure of +the tender organ of vision to the light. We believe this caution is +generally omitted by the American physician, though it is one which +accords with the plainest dictates of common sense. Who of us has not +experienced the pain of emerging suddenly from the darkness of a cellar +to the ordinary light of day? The strongest eyes of the adult are +scarcely able to bear the transition. How much more painful to the +tender organs of the new-born infant must be the change to which it is +so frequently subjected? And how easy it is to prevent the pain and +danger of the change, by more effectually darkening the room into which +it is introduced!</p> + +<p>But we have testimony on this point. A distinguished German physician +states that he has known many cases of permanent blindness from this +very cause to which we have referred. The Principal of the Institution +for the Blind, at Vienna, says he is confident that most children who +appear to be born blind, are actually made blind by neglecting this same +precaution.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II.">CHAPTER II.</a></h2> + +<h3>TEMPERATURE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General principle—"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove—railing around it. Excess of heat—its dangers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>There is one general principle, on this subject, which is alike +applicable to all persons and circumstances. It is, to keep a little too +cool, rather than in the slightest degree too warm. In other words, the +lowest temperature which is compatible with comfort, is, in all cases, +best adapted to health; and a slight degree of coldness, provided it +amount not to a chill, and is not long continued, is more safe than the +smallest unnecessary degree of warmth.</p> + +<p>But the application of this rule to those over whom we have control, is +not without its difficulties. Our own sensations are so variable, +independently of external and obvious causes, that we cannot at all +times judge for others, especially for infants. The absolute and real +state of temperature in a room can only be ascertained by the aid of a +thermometer; and no nursery should ever be without one. It should be +placed, however, in such a situation as to indicate the real temperature +of the atmosphere, and not where it will give a false result.</p> + +<p>No mother should forget that the infant, at birth, has not the power of +generating heat, internally, to the extent which it possesses afterward. +The lungs have as yet but a feeble, inefficient action. The purification +of the blood, through their agency, is not only incomplete, but the heat +evolved is as yet inconsiderable. In the absence of internal heat, then, +there is an increased demand externally. If 60° be deemed suitable for +most other persons, the new-born infant may, for a few days, require 65° +or even 70°.</p> + +<p>Much may and should be done in preserving the child in a proper +temperature by means of its clothing. On this point I shall speak at +length, in another part of this work. My present purpose is simply to +treat of the temperature of the nursery.</p> + +<p>The best way of warming a nursery—or indeed any other room, where MERE +warmth is demanded—is by means of air heated in other apartments, and +admitted through openings in the floor or fire-place. The air is not +only thus made more pure, but every possibility of accidents, such as +having the clothes take fire, is precluded. This last consideration is +one of very great importance, and I hope will not be much longer +overlooked in infantile education.</p> + +<p>Next to that, in point of usefulness and safety, is a stove, placed near +or IN the fire-place, and defended by an iron railing. Most people +prefer an open stove; and on some accounts it is indeed preferable, +especially where it is desirable to burn coal. Still I think that the +direct rays of the heat, and the glare of light from open stoves and +fire-places, particularly for the young, form a very serious objection +to their use.</p> + +<p>One of the strongest objections to open stoves and fire-places in the +nursery is, the increased exposure to accidents. I know it is said that +this evil may be avoided by laying aside the use of cotton, and wearing +nothing but worsted or flannel. This is indeed true; but I do not like +the idea of being compelled to dress children in flannel or worsted, at +all times when the least particle of fire is demanded; for this would be +to wear this stimulating kind of clothing, in our climate, the greater +part of the year.</p> + +<p>Besides, I write for many mothers who are compelled to use cotton, on +account of the expense of flannel. And if the stove be a close one, and +well defended by a railing, cotton will seldom expose to danger. Still, +as has been already said, the introduction of heated air from another +apartment, whenever it can possibly be afforded, is incomparably better +than either stoves or fire-places.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees is fully persuaded that the excessive heat of nurseries has +occasioned a great mortality among very young children. "In the first +place," he says, "it over-stimulates them; and in the second, it renders +them so susceptible of cold, that any draught of cold air endangers +their lives. They are in a constant perspiration, which is frequently +checked by an exposure to even an atmosphere of moderate temperature." +If this is but to repeat what has been already said, the importance of +the subject seems to be a sufficient apology.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III.">CHAPTER III.</a></h2> + +<h3>VENTILATION.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air by means of lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping—its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation—camphor, vinegar.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Few people take sufficient pains to preserve the air in any of their +apartments pure; for few know what the constitution of our atmosphere +is, and in how many ways and with what ease it is rendered impure.</p> + +<p>It is not my purpose to go into a learned, scientific account in this +place, or even in this work, of the constitution of the atmosphere. A +few plain statements are all that are indispensable. The atmosphere +which we breathe is composed of two different airs or gases. One of +these is called oxygen, [Footnote: Oxygen gas is the chief supporter of +combustion, as well as of respiration. It is the vital part, as it were, +of the air. No animal or vegetable could long exist without it. And yet +if alone, unmixed, it is too pure and too refined for animals to +breathe. Nitrogen gas, on the contrary, while alone, will not support +either respiration or combustion; mixed, however, with oxygen, it +dilutes it, and in the most happy manner fits it for reception into the +lungs.] and the other nitrogen. There is another gas usually found with +these two, in smaller quantity, called carbonic acid gas; but whether it +is necessary, in a very small quantity, to health, chemists, I believe, +are not agreed. One thing, however, is certain—that if any portion of +it is healthful, it must be very little—not more, certainly, than +one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of the whole mass.</p> + +<p>It is by means of the oxygen it contains, that air sustains life and +combustion. Were it not for this, neither fires nor candles would burn, +and no animal could breathe a single moment. Breathing consumes this +oxygen of the air very rapidly. When the oxygen is present in about a +certain proportion, combustion and respiration go on well, but when its +natural proportion is diminished, the fire does not burn so well, +neither does the candle; and no one can breathe so freely.</p> + +<p>Not only are breathing and combustion impeded or disturbed by the +diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere, but just in proportion as oxygen +is diminished by these two processes, or either of them, carbonic acid +is formed, which is not only bad for combustion, but much worse for +health. If any considerable quantity of it is inhaled, it appears to be +an absolute poison to the human system; and if in <i>very large quantity</i>, +will often cause immediate death.</p> + +<p>It is this gas, accumulated in large quantities, that destroys so many +people in close rooms, where there is no chimney, nor any other place +for the bad air to escape. But it not only kills people outright—it +partly kills, that is, it poisons, more or less, hundreds of thousands.</p> + +<p>In a nursery there is the mother and child, and perhaps the nurse, to +render the air impure by breathing, the fire and the lamp or candle to +contribute to the same result, besides several other causes not yet +mentioned. One of these is nearly related to the former. I allude to the +fact that our skins, by perspiration and by other means, are a source of +much impurity to the atmosphere; a fact which will be more fully +explained and illustrated in the chapter on Bathing and Cleanliness. It +is only necessary to say, in this place, that it is not the matter of +perspiration alone which, issuing from the skin, renders the air +impure; there are other exhalations more or less constantly going off +from every living body, especially from the lungs; and carbonic acid gas +is even formed all over the surface of the skin, as well as by means of +the lungs.</p> + +<p>One needs no better proof that carbonic acid is formed on the surface of +the body, than the fact that after the body has been closely covered all +night, if you introduce a candle under the bed-clothes into this +confined air, it will be quickly extinguished, because there is too +much carbonic acid gas there, and too little oxygen.</p> + +<p>We may hence see at once the evil of covering the heads of infants when +they lie down—a very common practice. The air, when pure, contains a +little more than 20 parts of oxygen, and a little less than 80 of +nitrogen. Breathing this air, as I have already shown, consumes the +oxygen, which is so necessary to life and health, and leaves in its +place an increase of nitrogen and carbonic acid gas, which are not +necessary to health, and the latter of which is even positively +injurious. But when the oxygen, instead of forming 20 or more parts in +100 of the atmosphere of the nursery, is reduced to 15 or 18 parts only, +and the carbonic acid gas is increased from 1 or 2 parts in 100, to 5, +6, 8 or 10—when to this is added the other noxious exhalations from the +body, and from the lamp or candle, fire-place, feather bed, stagnant +fluids in the room, &c., &c.—is it any wonder that children, in the +end, become sickly? What else could be expected but that the seeds of +disease, thus early sown, should in due time spring up, and produce +their appropriate fruits?</p> + +<p>It is sometimes said that fire in a room purifies it. It undoubtedly +does so, to a certain extent, if fresh air be often admitted; but not +otherwise.</p> + +<p>I have classed feather beds among the common causes of impurity. Dr. +Dewees also condemns them, most decidedly; and gives substantial reasons +for "driving them out of the nursery."</p> + +<p>In speaking of the structure of the room used for a nursery, I have +adverted to the importance of having a large or double room, with +sliding doors between, in order that the occupants may go into one of +them, while the other is being ventilated. But whatever may be the +structure of the room, the circumstances of the occupants, or the state +of the weather, every nursery ought to be most thoroughly ventilated, +once a day, at least; and when the weather is tolerable, twice a day. If +there is but one apartment, and fear is entertained of the dampness of +the fresh air introduced, or of currents, and if the mother and babe +cannot retire, there is a last resort, which is for them to get into +bed, and cover themselves a short time with the clothing. For though I +have prohibited the covering of the face with the bed-clothes for any +considerable length of time together, yet to do so for some fifteen or +twenty minutes is an evil of far less magnitude than to suffer an +apartment to remain without being ventilated, for twenty-four hours +together—a very common occurrence.</p> + +<p>When a lamp is kept burning in a nursery during the night, it should +always be placed at the door of the stove, or in the chimney place, that +its smoke, and the bad airs or gases which are formed, may escape. But +it is better, in general, to avoid burning lamps or candles during the +night. By means of common matches, a light may be produced, when +necessary, almost instantly; especially if you have a spirit lamp in the +nursery, or what is still better, one of spirit gas—that is, a mixture +of alcohol and turpentine.</p> + +<p>It is highly desirable that all washing, ironing, and cooking should be +avoided in the nursery. They load the air with noxious effluvia or +vapor, or with particles of dust; none of which ought ever to enter the +delicate lungs of an infant.</p> + +<p>Fumigations with camphor, vinegar, and other similar substances, have +long been in reputation as a means of purifying the air in sick-rooms +and nurseries; but they are of very little consequence. Fresh air, if it +can be had, is always better.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV."></a>CHAPTER IV.</h2> + +<h3>THE CHILD'S DRESS</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General principles. SEC. 1. Swathing the body—its numerous evils.—SEC. +2. Form of the dress. Fashion. Tight lacing—its dangers. Structure and +motion of the chest. Diseases from tight lacing.—SEC. 3. Material of +dress. Flannel—its uses. Cleanliness. Cotton—silk—linen.—SEC. 4. +Quantity of dress. Power of habit. Anecdote. Begin right. Change. +Dampness.—SEC. 5. Caps—their evils. Going bare-headed.—SEC. 6. Hats +and bonnets.—SEC. 7. Covering for the feet. Stockings. Garters. +Shoes—thick soles.—SEC. 8. Pins—their danger. Shocking +anecdote.—SEC. 9. Remaining wet.—SEC. 10. Dress of boys. Tight +jackets. Stocks and cravats. Boots.—SEC. 11. Dress of girls—should be +loose. Temperature. Exposure to the night air.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Dress serves three important purposes:—1. To cover us; 2. To defend us +against cold; 3. To defend our bodies and limbs from injury. There is +one more purpose of dress; in case of deformity, it seems to improve the +appearance.</p> + +<p>In all our arrangements in regard to dress, whether of children or of +adults, we should ever keep in mind the above principles. The form, +fashion, material, application, and quantity of all clothing, +especially for infants, ought to be regulated by these three or four +rules.</p> + +<p>The subject of this chapter is one of so much importance, and embraces +such a variety of items, that it will be more convenient, both to the +reader and myself, to consider it under several minor heads.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Swathing the Body.</i></h4> + +<p>Buffon, in his "Natural History," says that in France, an infant has +hardly enjoyed the liberty of moving and stretching its limbs, before it +is put into confinement. "It is swathed," says he, "its head is fixed, +its legs are stretched out at full length, and its arms placed straight +down by the side of its body. In this manner it is bound tight with +cloths and bandages, so that it cannot stir a limb; indeed it is +fortunate that the poor thing is not muffled up so as to be unable to +breathe."</p> + +<p>All swathing, except with a single bandage around the abdomen, is +decidedly unreasonable, injurious and cruel. I do not pretend that the +remarks of M. Buffon are fully applicable to the condition of infants in +the United States. The good sense of the community nowhere permits us to +transform a beautiful babe quite into an Egyptian mummy. Still there +are many considerable errors on the subject of infantile dress, which, +in the progress of my remarks, I shall find it necessary to expose.</p> + +<p>The use of a simple band cannot be objected to. It affords a general +support to the abdomen, and a particular one to the <i>umbilicus</i>. The +last point is one of great importance, where there is any tendency to a +rupture at this part of the body—a tendency which very often exists in +feeble children. And without some support of this kind, crying, +coughing, sneezing, and straining in any way, might greatly aggravate +the evil, if not produce serious consequences.</p> + +<p>But, in order to afford a support to the abdomen in the best manner, it +is by no means necessary that the bandage should be drawn very tight. +Two thirds of the nurses in this country greatly err in this respect, +and suppose that the more tightly a bandage is drawn, the better. It +should be firm, but yet gently yielding; and therefore a piece of +flannel cut "bias," as it is termed, or, obliquely with respect to the +threads of which it is composed, is the most appropriate material.</p> + +<p>If the attention of the mother were necessary nowhere else, it would be +indispensable in the application of this article. If she do not take +special pains to prevent it, the erring though well meaning nurse may +so compress the body with the bandage as to produce pain and uneasiness, +and sometimes severe colic. Nay, worse evils than even this have been +known to arise. When a child sneezes, or coughs, or cries, the abdomen +should naturally yield gently; but if it is so confined that it cannot +yield where the band is applied, it will yield in an unnatural +proportion below, to the great danger of producing a species of rupture, +no less troublesome than the one which such tight swathing is designed +to prevent.</p> + +<p>But besides the bandage already mentioned, no other restraint of the +body and limbs of a child is at all admissible. The Creator has kindly +ordained that the human body and limbs, and especially its muscles, or +moving powers, shall be developed by exercise. Confine an arm or a leg, +even in a child of ten years of age, and the limb will not increase +either in strength or size as it otherwise would, because its muscles +are not exercised; and the fact is still more obvious in infancy.</p> + +<p>There is a still deeper evil. On all the limbs are fixed two sets of +muscles; one to extend, the other to draw up or bend the limb. If you +keep a limb extended for a considerable time, you weaken the one set of +muscles; if you keep it bent, you weaken the other. This weakness may +become so great that the limb will be rendered useless. There are cases +on record—well authenticated—where children, by being obliged to sit +in one place on a hard floor, have been made cripples for life. Hundreds +of others are injured, though they may not become absolutely crippled.</p> + +<p>I repeat it, therefore, their dress should be so free and loose that +they may use their little limbs, their neck and their bodies, as much as +they please; and in every desired direction. The practices of confining +their arms while they lie down, for fear they should scratch themselves +with their nails, and of pinning the clothes round their feet, are +therefore highly reprehensible. Better that they should even +occasionally scratch themselves with their nails, than that they should +be made the victims of injurious restraint. Who would think of tying up +or muffling the young lamb or kid? And even the young plant—what think +you would be the effect, if its leaves and branches could not move +gently with the soft breezes? Would the fluids circulate, and health be +promoted: or would they stagnate, and a morbid, sickly and dwarfish +state be the consequence?</p> + +<p>Those whose object is to make infancy, as well as any other period of +existence, a season of happiness, will not fail to find an additional +motive for giving the little stranger entire freedom in the land +whither he has so recently arrived, especially when he seems to enjoy +it so much. Who can be so hardened as to confine him, unless compelled +by the most pressing necessity?</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Form of the Dress.</i></h4> + +<p>On this subject a writer in the London Literary Gazette of some eight or +ten years ago, lays down the following general directions, to which, in +cold weather, there can be but one possible objection, which is, they +are not <i>alamode</i>, and are not, therefore, likely to be followed.</p> + +<p>"All that a child requires, so far as regards clothing, in the first +month of its existence, is a simple covering for the trunk and +extremities of the body, made of a material soft and agreeable to the +skin, and which can retain, in an equable degree, the animal +temperature. These qualities are to be found in perfection in fine +flannel; and I recommend that the only clothing, for the first month or +six weeks, be a square piece of flannel, large enough to involve fully +and overlap the whole of the babe, with the exception of the head, which +should be left totally uncovered. This wrapper should be fixed by a +button near the breast, and left so loose as to permit the arms and legs +to be freely stretched, and moved in every direction. It should be +succeeded by a loose flannel gown with sleeves, which should be worn +till the end of the second month; after which it may be changed to the +common clothing used by children of this age."</p> + +<p>The advantages of such a dress are, that the movements of the infant +will be, as we have already seen, free and unrestrained, and we shall +escape the misery of hearing the screams which now so frequently +accompany the dressing and undressing of almost every child. No chafings +from friction, moreover, can occur; and as the insensible perspiration +is in this way promoted over the whole surface of the body, the sympathy +between the stomach and skin is happily maintained. A healthy sympathy +of this kind, duly kept up, does much towards preserving the stomach in +a good state, and the skin from eruptions and sores.</p> + +<p>But as I apprehend that christianity is not yet very deeply rooted in +the minds and hearts of parents, I have already expressed my doubts +whether they are prepared to receive and profit by advice at once +rational and physiological. Still I cannot help hoping that I shall +succeed in persuading mothers to have every part of a child's dress +perfectly loose, except the band already referred to; and that should be +but moderately tight.</p> + +<p>Common humanity ought to teach us better than to put the body of a +helpless infant into a <i>vise</i>, and press it to death, as the first mark +of our attention. Who has not been struck with a strange inconsistency +in the conduct of mothers and nurses, who, while they are so exceedingly +tender towards the infant in some points as to injure it by their +kindness, are yet almost insensible to its cries of distress while +dressing it? So far, indeed, are they from feeling emotions of pity, +that they often make light of its cries, regarding them as signs of +health and vigor.</p> + +<p>There can be no doubt, I confess, that the first cries of an infant, if +strong, both indicate and promote a healthy state of the lungs, to a +certain extent; but there will always be unavoidable occasions enough +for crying to promote health, even after we have done all we can in the +way of avoiding pain. They who only draw the child's dress the tighter, +the more it cries, are guilty of a crime of little less enormity than +murder.</p> + +<p>"Think," says Dr. Buchan, "of the immense number of children that die of +convulsions soon after birth; and be assured that these (its cries) are +much oftener owing to galling pressure, or some external injury, than to +any inward cause." This same writer adds, that he has known a child +which was "seized with convulsion fits" soon after being "swaddled," +immediately relieved by taking off the rollers and bandages; and he says +that a loose dress prevented the return of the disease.</p> + +<p>I think it is obvious that the utmost extent to which we ought to go, in +yielding to the fashion, as it regards form, is to use three pieces of +clothing—the shirt, the petticoat and the frock; all of which must be +as loose as possible; and before the infant begins to crawl about much, +the latter should be long, for the salve of covering the feet and legs. +At four or five years of age, loose trowsers, with boys, may be +substituted for the petticoat; but it is a question whether something +like the frock might not, with every individual, be usefully retained +through life.</p> + +<p>I wish it were unnecessary, in a book like this, to join in the general +complaint against tight lacing any part of the body, but especially the +chest. But as this work of torture is sometimes begun almost from the +cradle, and as prevention is better than cure, the hope of preventing +that for which no cure appears yet to have been found, leads me to make +a few remarks on the subject.</p> + +<p>As it has long been my opinion that one reason why mothers continue to +overlook the subject is, that they do not understand the structure and +motion of the chest, I have attempted the following explanation and +illustration.</p> + +<p>I have already said, that if we bandage tightly, for a considerable +time, any part of the human frame, it is apt to become weaker. The more +a portion of the frame which is furnished with muscles, those curious +instruments of motion, is used, provided it is not <i>over</i>-exerted, the +more vigorous it is. Bind up an arm, or a hand, or a foot, and keep it +bound for twelve hours of the day for many years, and think you it will +be as strong as it otherwise would have been? Facts prove the contrary. +The Chinese swathe the feet of their infant females; and they are not +only small, but weak.</p> + +<p>I have said their feet are smaller for being bandaged. So is a hand or +an arm. Action—healthy, constant action—is indispensable to the +perfect development of the body and limbs. Why it is so, is another +thing. But so it is; and it is a principle or law of the great Creator +which cannot be evaded. More than this; if you bind some parts of the +body tightly, so as to compress them as much as you can without +producing actual pain, you will find that the part not only ceases to +grow, but actually dwindles away. I have seen this tried again and +again. Even the solid parts perish under pressure. When a person first +wears a false head of hair, the clasp which rests upon the head, at the +upper part of the forehead, being new and elastic, and pressing rather +closely, will, in a few months, often make quite an indentation in the +cranium or bone of the head.</p> + +<p>Now is it probable—nay, is it possible—that the lungs, especially +those of young persons, can expand and come to their full and natural +size under pressure, even though the pressure should be slight? Must +they not be weakened? And if the pressure be strong, as it sometimes is, +must they not dwindle away?</p> + +<p>We know, too, from the nature and structure of the lungs themselves, +that tight lacing must injure them. Many mothers have very imperfect +notions of what physicians mean, when they say that corsets impede the +circulation, by preventing the full and undisturbed action of the lungs. +They get no higher ideas of the <i>motion</i> of the <i>chest</i>, than what is +connected with bending the body forward and backward, from right to +left, &c. They know that, if dressed too tightly, <i>this</i> motion is not +so free as it otherwise would be; but if they are not so closely laced +as to prevent that free bending of the body of which I have been +speaking, they think there can be no danger; or at least, none of +consequence.</p> + +<p>Now it happens that this sort of motion is not that to which physicians +refer, when they complain of corsets. Strictly speaking, this bending of +the whole body is performed by the muscles of the back, and not those +of the chest. The latter have very little to do with it. It is true, +that even <i>this</i> motion ought not to be hindered; but if it is, the evil +is one of little comparative magnitude.</p> + +<p>Every time we breathe naturally, all the ribs, together with the breast +bone, have motion. The ribs rise, and spread a little outward, +especially towards the fore part. The breast bone not only rises, but +swings forward a little, like a pendulum. But the moment the chest is +swathed or bandaged, this motion must be hindered; and the more, in +proportion to the tightness.</p> + +<p>On this point, those persons make a sad mistake, who say that "a busk +not too wide nor too rigid seems to correspond to the supporting spine, +and to assist, rather than impede the efforts of nature, to keep the +body erect."</p> + +<p>Can we seriously compare the offices of the spine with those of the +ribs, and suppose that because the former is fixed like a post, at the +back part of the lungs, therefore an artificial post in front would be +useful? Why, we might just as well argue in favor of hanging weights to +a door, or a clog to a pendulum, in order to make it swing backwards and +forwards more easily. We might almost as well say that the elbow ought +to be made firm, to correspond with the shoulders, and thus become +advocates for letting the stays or bandages enclose the arm above the +elbow, and fasten it firmly to the side. Indeed, the consequences in the +latter case, aside from a little inconvenience, would not be half so +destructive to health as in the former. The ribs, where they join to the +back bone, form hinges; and hinges are made for motion. But if you +fasten them to a post in front, of what value are the hinges?</p> + +<p>If mothers ask, of what use this motion of the lungs is, it is only +necessary to refer them to the chapter on Ventilation, in which I trust +the subject is made intelligible, and a satisfactory answer afforded.</p> + +<p>But I might appeal to facts. Let us look at females around us generally. +Do their countenances indicate that they enjoy as good health as they +did when dress was worn more loosely? Have they not oftener a leaden +hue, as if the blood in them was darker? Are they not oftener +short-breathed than formerly? As they advance in life, have they not +more chronic diseases? Are not their chests smaller and weaker? And as +the doctrine that if one member suffers, all the other members suffer +with it, is not less true in physiology than in morals, do we not find +other organs besides the lungs weakened? Surgeons and physicians, who, +like faithful sentinels, have watched at their post half a century, +tell us, moreover, that if these foolish and injurious practices to +which I refer are tolerated two centuries longer, every female will be +deformed, and the whole race greatly degenerated, physically and +morally.</p> + +<p>Those with whom no arguments will avail, are recommended to read the +following remarks from the first volume of the Library of Health, p. +119:</p> + +<p>"It is related, on the authority of Macgill, that in Tunis, after a girl +is engaged, or betrothed, she is then <i>fattened</i>. For this purpose, she +is cooped up in a small room, and shackles of gold and silver are placed +upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married +to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the +shackles which the former wife wore are put on the new bride's limbs, +and she is fed till they are filled up to a proper thickness. The food +used for this custom worthy of the barbarians is called <i>drough</i>, which +is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering +the milk of the nurse rich and abundant. With this and their national +dish, <i>cuscasoo</i>, the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die +under the spoon."</p> + +<p>We laugh at all this, and well we may; but there are customs not very +far from home, no less ridiculous.</p> + +<p>"There is a country four or five thousand miles westward of Tunis, +where the females, to a very great extent, are emaciated for marriage, +instead being fattened. This process is begun, in part, by shackles—not +of gold and silver, perhaps, but of wood—but instead of being put on +loosely, and causing the body or limbs to fill them, they are made to +compress the body in the outset; and as the size of the latter +diminishes, the shackles are contracted or tightened. As with the +eastern, so with the western females, many of them die under the +process; though a far greater number die at a remote period, as the +consequence of it."</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Material.</i></h4> + +<p>I have already committed myself to the reader as favoring the use of +soft flannel in cold weather, especially for children who are not yet +able to run about freely in the open air. The advantages of an early use +of this material, at least for under-clothes, are numerous. The +following are a few of them.</p> + +<p>1. Flannel, next to the skin, is a pleasant flesh brush; keeping up a +gentle and equable irritation, and promoting perspiration and every +other function which it is the office of the skin to perform, or assist +in performing.</p> + +<p>2. It guards the body against the cooling effects of evaporation, when +in a state of profuse perspiration.</p> + +<p>3. By preventing the heat of the body from escaping too rapidly, it +keeps up a steadier temperature on the surface than any other known +substance. The importance of the last consideration is greater, in a +climate like our own, than elsewhere.</p> + +<p>But there are limits to the use of this article of clothing. Whenever +the temperature of the atmosphere is so great, even without artificial +heat, that we no longer wish to retain the heat of the body by the +clothing, then all flannel should be removed at once, and linen should +be substituted; taking care to replace the flannel whenever the +temperature of the atmosphere, as indicated by the thermometer, or by +the child's feelings, may seem to require it.</p> + +<p>It should also be kept clean. There is a very general mistake abroad on +this subject. Many suppose that flannel can be worn longer without +washing than other kinds of cloth. On the contrary, it should be changed +oftener than cotton, or even linen, because it will absorb a great deal +of fluid, especially the matter of perspiration, which, if long +retained, is believed to ferment, and produce unhealthy, if not +poisonous gases. For this reason, too, flannel for children's clothing +should be white, that it may show dirt the more readily, and obtain the +more frequent washing; although it is for this very reason—its +liability to exhibit the least particles of dirt—that it is commonly +rejected.</p> + +<p>One caution more in regard to the use of flannel may be necessary. With +some children, owing to a peculiarity of constitution, flannel will +produce eruptions on the skin, which are very troublesome. Whenever this +is the case, the flannel should be immediately laid aside; upon which +the eruptions usually disappear.</p> + +<p>If parents would take proper pains to get the lighter, softer kinds of +flannel for this purpose, and be particular about its looseness and +quantity, I should prefer, as I have already intimated, to have very +young children, in our climate, wear this material the greater part of +the year, excepting perhaps July and August.</p> + +<p>My reasons for this course would be, first, that I like the stimulus of +soft flannel on the skin, if changed sufficiently often, better than +that of any other kind of clothing. Secondly, cotton is so liable to +take fire, that its use in the nursery and among little children seems +very hazardous. Thirdly, silk is not quite the appropriate material, as +a general thing, besides being too expensive; and fourthly, linen is +not warm enough, except in mid-summer.</p> + +<p>Except, therefore, in July and August, and in cases of idiosyncracy, +such as have just been alluded to, I would use flannel for the +under-clothes of young children, throughout the year. But whenever they +acquire sufficient strength to walk and run, and play much in the open +air, I would gradually lay aside the use of all flannel, even in winter. +Great attention, however, must be paid to the <i>quantity</i>. The parent +who, guided by this rule, should keep on her child the same amount of +flannel, and of the same thickness, from January to June 30th, and then, +on the first of July, should suddenly exchange it for thin linen, in +moderate quantity, might find trouble from it. It is better to make the +changes more gradually; otherwise, whatever may be the material of the +dress, the child will be likely to suffer.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Quantity.</i></h4> + +<p>The quantity of clothing used by different individuals of the same age, +in the same climate, possessing constitutions nearly alike, and +following similar occupations, is so different as to strike us with +surprise when we first observe the fact.</p> + +<p>One will wear nothing but a coarse linen or cotton shirt, coarse coat, +waistcoat, and pantaloons, and boots, in the coldest weather. He never, +unless it be on the Sabbath, puts on even a cravat, and never in any +case stockings or mittens.</p> + +<p>Another, in similar circumstances in all respects, constantly wears his +thick stockings, flannel wrapper and drawers, and cravat; and seldom +goes out, in cold weather, without mittens and an overcoat. He is not a +whit warmer: indeed he often suffers more from the cold, than his +neighbor who dresses in the manner just described.</p> + +<p>Why all this difference? It is no doubt the result of habit. Any +individual may accustom himself to much or little clothing. And the +earlier the habit is begun, the greater is its influence.</p> + +<p>Some persons, observing how little clothing one may accustom himself to +use and yet be comfortable, have told us, that so far as mere +temperature is concerned, we need no clothing at all. They relate the +story of the Scythian and Alexander. Alexander asked the former how he +could go without clothes in such a cold climate. He replied, by asking +Alexander how he could go with his face naked. "Habit reconciles us to +this;" was the reply. "Think me, then, <i>all</i> face," said the Scythian.</p> + +<p>But admitting that certain individuals, and even a few rude tribes, +have gone without clothing; did they therefore follow, in this respect, +the intentions of nature? The greatest stickler for adhering to nature's +plan, cannot prove this. Analogy is against it. Most of the other +animals, even in hot climates, are furnished with a hairy covering from +the first; and in cold climates, the Author of their being has even +provided them with an increase of clothing for the winter. Their fur, on +the approach of cold weather, not only becomes whiter, and therefore +conducts the heat away from the body more slowly, but, as every dealer +in furs well understands, it becomes softer and thicker. And yet the +blood of the furred animals of cold countries is as warm as ours, if not +warmer.</p> + +<p>The inferences which it seems to me we ought to make from this are, that +if other animals require clothing, and even a change of clothing, so +does man; and that as the Creator has left him to provide, by his own +ingenuity, for a great many of his wants, instead of furnishing him with +instinct to direct him, so in relation to dress. And even if it could be +proved that dress were naturally unnecessary, with reference to +temperature, I should still defend its use on other principles. The few +speculative minds, therefore, that in the vagaries of their fancy, but +never in their practice, reject it, are not to be regarded.</p> + +<p>The principle laid down in the commencement of the chapter on +Temperature, is the great principle which should guide us in regard to +dress. But although we should always keep a little too cool rather than +a little too warm, it is by no means desirable to be cold. Any degree of +chilliness, long continued, interrupts the functions which the skin +ought to perform, and thus produces mischief.</p> + +<p>The same rules, in this respect, apply to eating, as well as to dress. +It is better to eat a little less than nature requires, than a little +more. It is a generally received opinion, however, that mankind +frequently, at least in this country, eat about twice as much as health +requires. This is owing to habit; and perhaps the power of the latter is +as great in this respect as in regard to dress.</p> + +<p>The great point in regard to food or dress is, to <i>begin</i> right, and, +observing what nature requires—studying at the same time the testimony +of others—to endeavor to keep within the bounds she has assigned. It +has already been more than intimated, that if the nursery be kept in a +proper temperature, a single loose piece of dress is, for some time, all +that is required. In pursuance of this principle, through life, I +believe few persons would be found who would need more at one time than +a single suit of woollen clothes, even in the severest winters of our +northern climate.</p> + +<p>I have always observed that they who wear the greatest amount of +clothing, are most subject to colds. There are obvious reasons why it +should be so. This, then, if a fact, is one of the strongest reasons in +favor of acquiring a habit of going as thinly clad as we possibly can, +and not at the same time feel any inconvenience.</p> + +<p>But after all, whether it be winter or summer, we must vary our clothing +with the variations of the weather, as indicated by the thermometer, and +our own feelings. Sometimes, in our ever-changing and ever-changeable +climate, it may be necessary to vary our dress three or four times a +day. Some cry out against this practice as dangerous, but I have never +found it so. I have known persons who made it a constant practice; and I +never found that they sustained any injury from it, except the loss of a +little time; and the increase of comfort was more than enough to +compensate for that. There is one thing to be avoided, however, whether +we change our clothing—our linen especially—twice a day, or only twice +a week—which is, <i>dampness</i>.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>Caps.</i></h4> + +<p>The practice of putting caps on infants is happily going by; and perhaps +it may be thought unnecessary for me to dwell a single moment on the +subject. But as the practice still prevails in some parts of the +country, it may be well to bestow upon it a few passing remarks.</p> + +<p>Many mothers have not considered that the circulation of the blood in +young infants is peculiarly active; that a large amount of blood is at +that period carried to the head; that in consequence of this, the head +is proportionably hotter than in adults; and that from this source +arises the tendency of very young children to brain-fever, dropsy in the +head, and other diseases of this part of the system. But these are most +undoubted facts.</p> + +<p>Hence one reason why the heads of infants should be kept as cool as +possible; and though a thin cap confines less heat than a thick head of +hair does when they are older, yet they are less able to bear it. The +truth is, that nature furnishes a covering for the head, just about as +fast as a covering is required, and the child's safety will permit.</p> + +<p>At the present day, few persons will probably be found, who will defend +the utility of caps, any longer than till the hair is grown. The +general apology for their use after this period, and indeed in most +instances before, is, that they look pretty. "What would people say to +see my darling without a cap?"</p> + +<p>But when the head is kept, from the first, totally uncovered, the hair +grows more rapidly, dandruff and other scurfy diseases rarely attack the +scalp; catarrh, snuffles, and other similar complaints, and above all, +dropsy in the head, seldom show themselves; and the period of cutting +teeth, that most dangerous period in the life of an infant, is passed +over with much more safety.</p> + +<p>"Nothing but custom," says a foreign writer, "can reconcile us to the +cap, with all its lace and trumpery ornaments, on the beautiful head of +a child; and I would ask any one to say candidly, whether he thinks the +children in the pictures of Titian and Raffaelle would be improved by +having their heads covered with caps, instead of the silken curls—the +adornment of nature—which cluster round their smiling faces. If there +were no other reason for disusing caps for infants, but the improvement +which it produces in the <i>appearance</i> of the child, I would maintain +that this is a sufficient inducement." And I concur with him fully.</p> + +<p>As to the notion—now I hope nearly exploded—that it is necessary to +cover up the "open of the head," as it is called, nothing can be more +idle. This part of the head requires no more covering than any other +part; and if it did, all the dress in the world could not affect it in +the least, except to retard the growth of the bones, which, in due time, +ought to close up the space; and this effect, anything which keeps the +head too hot might help to produce. Of the folly of wetting the head +with spirits, or any other medicated lotions, and of making daily +efforts to bring it into shape, it is unnecessary to speak in the +present chapter.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Hats and Bonnets.</i></h4> + +<p>The hats worn in this country are almost universally too warm. But if it +is a great mistake in adults to wear thick, heavy hats, it is much more +so in the case of children.</p> + +<p>The infant in the nursery, as we have already seen, needs no covering of +the kind. It is absolutely necessary that the head should be kept as +cool as possible; and absolutely dangerous to cover it too warmly. At a +later period, however, the danger greatly diminishes, because the +circulation of the blood becomes more equal, and does not tend so much +towards the brain.</p> + +<p>Still, however, the head is hotter than the limbs, especially the hands +and feet; and I cannot help thinking that the hair is the only covering +which is perfectly safe, either in childhood or age; except in the +sunshine or in the storm. There may be—there probably is—some danger +in going without hat or bonnet in the hot sun; though I have known many +children, and some grown persons, who were constantly exposed in this +way, and yet appeared not to suffer from it.</p> + +<p>But this may be the proper place to state that we are ever in great +danger of deceiving ourselves on this subject. If the individuals who +follow practices usually regarded as pernicious, while their habits in +other respects are just like those of other persons around them who have +similar strength, &c. of constitution,—if these individuals, I say, +were wholly to escape disease, through life, or if they were to be so +much more free from it, and live to an age so much greater than others +as to constitute a striking and obvious difference in their favor, we +might then safely argue that the practices which they follow are at +least without dangers, if not of obvious advantage. But when we see them +beset with ills, like other people, it is not safe to pronounce their +habits favorable to health, since it is impossible to know whether some +of the ills which they suffer are not produced by them.</p> + +<p>These remarks are applicable to the disuse of any covering for the head +in the sun and in the rain. For you will find those who adopt this +practice from early infancy,[Footnote: I say, from early infancy; +because we may adopt the best habits in mature years, after our +constitutions have been broken up by error and vice, without effecting +anything more than to keep us from actually sinking at once. Indeed, in +most cases we ought not to expect more.] subject to as many diseases as +those around them with similar constitutions, but with habits somewhat +different; and as our diseases are generally the consequences of our +errors in one way or another, it is impossible to say with certainty +that some of them might not have arisen from exposure of the head.</p> + +<p>I should not hesitate, therefore, to advise all mothers to put a light +hat or bonnet on the heads of their children, whenever they are to be +exposed to the direct rays of the summer sun, or to the rain. And as we +cannot always foresee when and where these exposures will arise, and as +it is believed that these coverings, if light, will never be productive +of much injury while we are abroad in the open air, it will follow that +it is better to wear than to omit them.</p> + +<p>But while I contend for their use as consistent with health and sound +philosophy, I must not be understood as admitting the use of such hats +as are worn at present, even by children. They are, as I have said +before, too hot. What should be substituted, I am unable to determine; +but until something can be supplied, which would not be half so +oppressive as our common wool hats, I should regard it as the lesser +evil to omit them entirely. The danger of going bare-headed, if the +practice is commenced early, we know from the customs of some savage +nations, can never be very great.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>Covering for the Feet.</i></h4> + +<p>The same reason for avoiding the use of any covering for the head, in +early infancy, is a sufficient reason for covering the feet well. For +just in proportion as the blood is sent to the head in superabundance, +and keeps up in it an undue degree of heat, just in the same proportion +is it sent to the feet in too <i>small</i> a quantity, leaving these parts +liable to cold. Now it is a fundamental law with medical men, that the +feet ought to be kept warmer than the head, if possible; especially +while the child is very young, and exposed to brain diseases.</p> + +<p>So long, therefore, as children are young, and unable to exercise their +feet, stockings ought to be used, both in summer and winter; but I +prefer to have them short, unless long ones can be used without garters. +Everything in the shape of a garter or ligature round the limbs, body, +or neck of a child, except a single body-band, already mentioned in +another chapter, ought forever to be banished.</p> + +<p>It has often been objected, I know, that stockings will make the feet +tender. But as no child was ever hardened by <i>continued</i> and severe cold +applied to any part of the body, but the contrary, so no one was ever +made more tender by being kept moderately warm. Excess of heat, like +excess of cold, will alike weaken either children or adults; but there +is little danger of heating the feet and legs of infants too much during +the first year of infancy.</p> + +<p>It is also said that stockings are apt to receive and retain wet. But as +I shall show in another place that wet clothes should be frequently +changed, this objection would be equally strong against wearing coats +and diapers.</p> + +<p>As to shoes, there is some variety of opinion among medical men. A few +hold that they cramp the feet, and prevent children from learning to +walk as early as they otherwise would. If it were best for children +that they should learn to walk as early as possible, the last objection +might have weight. But it seems to me not at all desirable to be in +haste about their walking. Indeed, I greatly prefer to retard their +progress, in this respect, rather than to hasten it.</p> + +<p>As to the first objection, that shoes cramp the feet too much, nearly +its whole force turns upon the question whether they are made of proper +materials or not. There is no need of making them of cow-hide, or any +other thick leather. The soles are the most important part. These will +defend the feet against pins, needles, and such other sharp substances +as are usually found on the floor; and the upper part of the shoe, so +long as the wearer remains in the nursery, may be made of the softest +and most yielding material—even of cloth. Infants' shoes should always +be made on two lasts, one for each foot.</p> + +<p>The philosopher Locke held, that in order to harden the young, their +shoes ought to be "so that they might leak and let in water, whenever +they came near it." There may be and probably is, no harm in having a +child wet his feet occasionally, provided he is soon supplied with dry +stockings again; but it is hazardous for either children or adults to go +too long in wet stockings, and especially to sit long in them, after +they have been using much active exercise. I am in favor of good, +substantial shoes and stockings for people of all ages and conditions, +and at all seasons; and believe it entirely in accordance with sound +economy and the laws of the human constitution.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>Pins.</i></h4> + +<p>The custom of using ten or a dozen pins in the dressing of children, +ought by all means to be set aside. They not only often wound the skin, +but they have occasionally been known to penetrate the body and the +joints of the limbs. So many of these dreadful accidents occur, and +where no accident happens, so much pain is occasionally given by their +sharp points to the little sufferer, who cannot tell what the matter is, +that it is quite time the practice were abolished.</p> + +<p>Do you ask what can be substituted?—The following mode is adopted by +Dr. Dewees in his own family, as mentioned in his work on the "Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children," at page 86.</p> + +<p>"The belly-band and the petticoat have strings; and not a single pin is +used in their adjustment. The little shirt, which is always made much +larger than the infant's body, is folded on the back and bosom, and +these folds kept in their places by properly adjusting the body of the +petticoat: so far not a pin is used. The diaper requires one, but this +should be of a large size, and made to serve the double purpose of +holding the folds of this article, as well as keeping the belly-band in +its proper place; the latter having a small tag of double linen +depending from its lower margin, by which it is secured to the diaper, +by the same pin.</p> + +<p>"Should an extraordinary display of best 'bib and tucker' be required +upon any special occasion, a third pin may be admitted to ensure the +well-sitting of the 'frock' waist in front;—this last pin, however, is +applied externally; so that the risk of its getting into the child's +body is very small, even if it should become displaced."</p> + +<p>The writer from whom the last two paragraphs are taken, says be has seen +needles substituted for pins; and relates a long story of a child whose +life was well nigh destroyed in this manner. It underwent months of ill +health, and many moments of excruciating agony, before the cause of its +trouble was suspected. Sometimes its distress was so great that nothing +but large doses of laudanum, sufficient to stupify it, could afford the +least relief. At last a tumor was discovered by the attending physician, +near one of the bones on which we sit, and a needle was extracted two +inches long. The needle had been put in its clothes, and, by slipping +into the folds of the skin, had insinuated itself, unperceived, into the +child's body. It is pleasing to add, that, although the little sufferer +had now been ill seven or eight months, and had endured almost +everything but death,—fever, diarrhoea, and the most excruciating +pain,—it soon recovered.</p> + +<p>This shocking circumstance is enough, one would think, to deter every +mother or nurse, who becomes acquainted with it, from using needles in +infants' clothes. Happy would it be, if, in banishing needles, they +would contrive to banish pins also, and adopt either the plan of Dr. +Dewees, or one still more rational.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Remaining Wet.</i></h4> + +<p>On the subject of changing the wet clothing of a child, there is a +strange and monstrous error abroad; which is, that by suffering them to +remain wet and cold, we harden the constitution. The filthiness of this +practice is enough to condemn it, were there nothing else to be said +against it.</p> + +<p>It is insisted on by many, I know, that as water which is salt, when it +is applied to the skin, and suffered to remain long, while it secures +the point of hardening the child, prevents all possibility of its taking +cold, it hence follows, that wet diapers are not injurious. But this is +a mistake. Every time an infant is allowed to remain wet, we not only +endanger its taking cold, but expose it to excoriations of the skin, if +not to serious and dangerous inflammation. In short, if frequent changes +are not made, whatever some mothers and nurses may think, they may rest +assured, that the health of the child must sooner or later suffer as the +consequence.</p> + +<p>Nor is it enough to hang up a diaper by the fire, and, as soon as it is +dry, apply it again. It should be clean, as well as dry. Let us not be +told, that it is troublesome to wash so often. Everything is in a +certain sense troublesome. Everything in this world, which is worth +having, is the result of toil. Nothing but absolute poverty affords the +shadow of an excuse for neglecting anything which will promote the +health, or even the comfort of the tender infant.</p> + +<p>Of the impropriety and danger of suffering wet clothes to dry upon us, I +shall speak elsewhere; as well as of the evil of suffering children to +remain dirty,—their skins or their clothing.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on the Dress of Boys.</i></h4> + +<p>Whatever tends to disturb the growth of the body, or hinder the free +exercise of the limbs, during the infancy and childhood of both sexes +is injurious. And as every mother has the control of these things, I +have thought it desirable to append to this chapter a few thoughts on +the particular dress of each sex. I begin with that of boys.</p> + +<p>"Nothing can be more injurious to health," says a foreign writer, "than +the tight jacket, buttoned up to the throat, the well-fitted boots, and +the stiff stock." And his remarks are nearly as applicable to this +country as to England. The consequences of this preposterous method of +dressing boys, are diminutive manhood, deformity of person, and a +constitution either already imbued with disease, or highly susceptible +of its impression.</p> + +<p>No part of the modern dress of boys is more absurd, than the stiff +stock, or thick cravat. It is not only injurious by pressing on the +<i>jugular</i> veins, and preventing the blood from freely passing out of the +head, but, by constantly pressing on the numerous and complex muscles of +the neck, at this period of life, it prevents their development; because +whatever hinders the action of the muscular parts, hinders their growth, +and makes them even appear as if wasted.</p> + +<p>It would be a great improvement, if this part of dress were wholly +discarded; and when is there so appropriate a time for setting it aside, +as <i>before we began to use it</i>; or rather while we are under the more +immediate care of our mothers?</p> + +<p>The use of jackets buttoned up to the throat, except in cold weather, is +objectionable; but this is very fortunately going out of fashion.</p> + +<p>Boots, if used at all, should fit well; to this there can be no possible +objection. What the writer, whom I have quoted, referred to, was +probably the tight boot, worn to prevent the foot from being large and +unseemly; but producing, as tight boots inevitably do, an injurious +effect upon the muscles, a constrained walk, and corns.</p> + +<p>What can be more painful, than to see little boys—yes, <i>little</i> +boys—boys neither fifteen, nor twenty, nor twenty-five, walk as if they +were fettered and trussed up for the spit; unable to look down, or turn +their heads, on account of a thick stock, or two or three cravats piled +on the top of each other—and only capable of using their arms to dangle +a cane, or carry an umbrella, as they hobble along, perhaps on a hot +sun-shiny day in July or August?</p> + +<p>But this evil, you who are mothers, have it very generally in your power +to prevent, if you are only wise enough to secure that ascendancy over +your children's minds which the Author of their nature designed. At the +least, you can prevent it for a time—the most important period, too—by +your own authority. This you will not need any urging to induce you to +do, if you ever become thoroughly convinced of its pre-eminent folly.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 11. <i>On the Dress of Girls.</i></h4> + +<p>The same general principles which should guide the young mother in +regard to the dress of boys, are equally important and applicable in the +management of girls. The whole dress should, as much as possible, hang +loosely from the shoulders, without pressing on the body, or any part of +it. This, I say, is the grand point to be aimed at; and this is the only +great principle, whatever some mothers may think, which will lead to +true beauty of person, and gracefulness of gesture.</p> + +<p>There is, however, a slight difference to be made between the dress of +girls and that of boys. The greater delicacy of the female frame +requires that the surface of the body should be kept rather warmer, as +well as better protected from the vicissitudes of the atmosphere.</p> + +<p>But is this the fact? Is not the contrary true? While boys in the winter +are clad in warm woollen vestments, covering every part of their trunk, +many portions of the female frame, and especially many parts of their +limbs, are left so much exposed, that in cold weather you scarcely find +a girl abroad, who appears to be comfortable.</p> + +<p>Nay, they are not only uncomfortable abroad, but at home; and if I were +to present to mothers in detail, a tenth of the evils which their +daughters suffer from not adopting a warmer method of clothing, I should +probably be stared at by some, and laughed at by others. All this, too, +without speaking of going out of warm concert rooms, theatres, ball +rooms and lecture rooms, into the night air, or out of school rooms and +churches, to walk home with measured and stiffened pace, lest the sin +unpardonable of walking swiftly or RUNNING,—that active exercise which +health requires, which youthful feeling prompts, and which duty ought to +inspire,—should unwarily be committed.</p> + +<p>The tremendous evils of confining the lungs have been adverted to at +sufficient length. In reference to that general subject, I need only +add, that if the chest be not duly exercised and expanded, the liver, +the lungs, the stomach, digestion, absorption, circulation and +perspiration, are all hindered. And even so far as the various internal +organs of the body <i>are</i> active, they act at a great disadvantage. The +blood which they "work up," is bad blood, and must be so, as long as the +lungs do not have free play. Hence may and do arise all sorts of +diseases; especially diseases of OBSTRUCTION; and such as are often very +difficult of removal.</p> + +<p>What can be a more pitiable sight than some modern girls going home from +school or church in winter? Thinly clad, the blood is all driven from +the surface upon the internal organs, and what remains is so loaded with +carbon, which the lungs ought but cannot discharge, that her skin has a +leaden hue; her teeth chatter; her very heart is chilled in her panting, +frozen bosom; she cannot run, and if she could, she must not, for it +would be vulgar! Every mother should shrink from the sight of such a +picture.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_V."></a><h2>CHAPTER V.</h2> + +<h3>CLEANLINESS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>No mother will ever pay that attention to cleanliness which its +importance to health and happiness demands, till she perceives its +necessity. And she will never perceive that necessity till she has +studied attentively the machinery of the human frame—and especially its +wonderful covering.</p> + +<p>The skin is pierced with little openings or <i>pores</i>, so numerous that +some have reckoned them at a million to every square inch. At all +events, they are so small that the naked eye can neither distinguish nor +count them; and so numerous, that we cannot pierce the skin with the +finest needle without hitting one or more of them.</p> + +<p>When we are in perfect health, and the skin clean, a gentle moisture or +mist continually oozes through these pores. This process is called +<i>perspiration</i>; and the moisture which thus escapes, the <i>matter</i> of +perspiration.</p> + +<p>Perspiration may be checked in two ways. 1. by filth on the skin; 2. by +what is commonly called taking cold—for taking cold essentially +consists in chilling the skin to such a degree as to stop, for some +time, the escape of this moisture. Most persons have doubtless observed, +that in the first stages of a cold, they frequently have a very dry +skin. Whereas, when we are in health, the skin usually feels moist.</p> + +<p>Our health is not only endangered, and a foundation laid for fevers, +rheumatisms, and consumptions, by stopping the pores of the skin with +dirt, or anything else, but there is also danger from another and a very +different source.</p> + +<p>The blood, in its circulation through the body, is constantly becoming +impure; and as it thus comes back impure to the heart, is as constantly +sent to the lungs, where it comes in close contact with the air which we +breathe, and is purified. But this same purifying process which goes on +in the lungs, goes on, too, if the skin is in a pure, free, healthy +condition, all over the surface of the body. If it is not—if the skin +cannot do this part of the work—an additional burden is thus laid on +the lungs, which in this way soon become so overworked, that they +cannot perform their own proportion of the labor. And whenever this +happens, the health must soon suffer.</p> + +<p>The strange belief, that "dirt is healthy," has much influence on the +daily practice of thousands of those who are ignorant of the human +structure, and the laws which govern and regulate the animal economy. It +has probably originated in the well-known fact, that those children who +are allowed to play in the dirt, are often as healthy—and even <i>more</i> +healthy—than those who are confined to the nursery or the parlor.</p> + +<p>Now, while it is admitted that this is a very common case, it is yet +believed that the former class of children would be still more vigorous +than they now are, if they were kept more cleanly, or were at least +frequently washed. It is not the dirt which promotes their health, but +their active exercise in the open air; the advantages of which are more +than sufficient to compensate for the injury which they sustain from the +dirt. That is to say, they retain, in spite of the dirt, better health +than those who are denied the blessings of pure air and abundant +exercise, and subjected to the opposite extreme of almost constant +confinement.</p> + +<p>There is something deceitful, after all, in the ruddy, blooming +appearance of those children who are left by the busy parent to play in +the road or field, without attention to cleanliness. If this were not +so, how comes it to pass that they suffer much more, not only from +chronic, but from acute diseases, than children whose parents are in +better circumstances?</p> + +<p>I am the more solicitous to combat a belief in the salutary tendency of +an unclean skin, because I know it prevails to some extent; and because +I know also, both from reason and from fact, that it is a gross error.</p> + +<p>It is, however, true, that years sometimes intervene, before the evil +consequences of dirtiness appear. The office of the vessels of the skin +being interrupted, an increase of action is imposed on other parts, +especially on those internal organs commonly called glands, which action +is apt to settle into obstinate disease. Hence, at least when aided by +other causes, often arise, in later life, after the source of the evil +is forgotten, if it were ever suspected, rheumatism, scrofula, jaundice, +and even consumption.</p> + +<p>There is a strange notion abroad, that the <i>smell</i> of the earth is +beneficial, especially to consumptive persons. I honestly believe, +however, that it is more likely to create consumption than to cure it. +Besides, in what does this smell consist? Do the silex, the alumine, and +the other earths, with their compounds, emit any odor? Rarely, I +believe, unless when mixed with vegetable matter. But no gases +necessary to health are evolved during the decomposition of vegetable +matter; on the contrary, it is well known that many of them tend to +induce disease.</p> + +<p>I am thoroughly persuaded that too much attention cannot be paid to +cleanliness; and the demand for such attention is equally imperious in +the case of those who cultivate the earth, or labor in it, or on stone, +during the intervals of their useful avocations, as in the case of those +individuals who follow other employments.</p> + +<p>I must also protest against the doctrine, that the smell or taste of the +earth, much less a coat of it spread over the surface, and closing up, +for hours and days together, thousands and millions of those little +pores with which the Author of this "wondrous frame" has pierced the +skin, can have a salutary tendency.</p> + +<p>The opinion has been even maintained, that uncleanly habits are not only +unfavorable to health, but to morality. There can be no doubt that he +who neglects his person and dress will be found lower in the scale of +morals, other things being equal, than he who pays a due regard to +cleanliness.</p> + +<p>Some have supposed that a disposition to neglect personal cleanliness +was indicative of genius. But this opinion is grossly erroneous, and +has well nigh ruined many a young man.</p> + +<p>I am far from recommending any degree of fastidiousness on this subject. +Truth and correct practice usually lie between extremes. But I do and +must insist, that the connection between cleanliness of body and purity +of moral character, is much more close and direct than has usually been +supposed.</p> + +<p>But to return to the more immediate effects of cleanliness on health. +There is one class of diseases in particular which, in an eminent +degree, owe their origin to a neglect of cleanliness. I refer to the +bowel complaints so common among children during summer and autumn. +Except in case of teething, the use of unripe fruits, or the <i>abuse</i> of +those which are in themselves excellent, it is probable that more than +half of the bowel complaints of the young are either produced or greatly +aggravated by a foul skin.</p> + +<p>The importance of washing the whole body in water will be insisted on in +the chapter on Bathing; it is therefore unnecessary to say anything +farther on that subject in this place, except to observe that whether +the washings of the body be partial or general, they should be thorough, +so far as they are carried. There are thousands of children who, in +pretending to wash their hands and face, will do little more than wet +the inside of their hands, and the tips of their noses and ears unless +great care is taken.</p> + +<p>Few things are more important than suitable changes of dress. There are +those, who, from principle, never wear the same under-garment but one +day without washing, either in summer or winter; and there are others +who, though they may wear an article without washing two or three +successive days, take care to change their dress at night—never +sleeping in a garment which they have worn during the day.</p> + +<p>It is a very common objection to suggestions like these, that they will +do very well for those who have wealth, but not for the poor;—that +<i>they</i> have neither the time nor the means of attending to them. How can +they change their clothes every day? we are asked. And how can they +afford to have a separate dress for the night?</p> + +<p>There must be retrenchment in some other matters, it is admitted. In +order to find time for more washing, or money to pay others for the +labor, the poor must deny themselves a few things which they now +suppose, if they have ever thought at all on the subject, are conducive +to their happiness—but which are in reality either useless or +injurious. Something may be saved by a reasonable dress, as I have +already shown. Other items of expense, which might be spared with great +advantage to health and happiness, and applied to the purpose in +question, will be mentioned in the chapter on Food and Drink.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VI."></a><h2>CHAPTER VI.</h2> + +<h3>ON BATHING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Danger of savage practices. Rousseau. Cold water at birth. First washing +of the child. Rules. Temperature. Bathing vessels. Unreasonable fears. +Whims. Views of Dr. Dewees. Hardening. Rules for the cold bath. Securing +a glow. Coming out of the bath. Local baths. Shower bath. Vapor bath. +Sponging. Neglect of bathing. The Romans. Treatment of children compared +with that of domestic animals.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Some of the hardy nations of antiquity, as well as a few savage tribes +of modern times, have been accustomed to plunge their new-born infants +into cold water. This is done for the two-fold purpose of washing and +hardening them.</p> + +<p>To all who reason but for a moment on this subject, the danger of such a +practice must be obvious. So sudden a change from a temperature of +nearly 100° of Fahrenheit to one quite low, perhaps scarcely 40°, must +and does have a powerful effect on the nervous system even of an adult; +but how much more on that of a tender infant? We may form some idea of +this, by the suddenness and violence of its cries, by the sudden +contractions and relaxations of its limbs and body, and by its +palpitating heart and difficult breathing.</p> + +<p>Every one's experience may also remind him, that what produces at best a +momentary pain to himself, cannot otherwise than be painful to the +infant. In making a comparison between adults and infants, however, in +this respect, we should remember that the lungs of the infant do not get +into full and vigorous action until some time after birth; and that, on +this account, the hold they have on life is so feeble, that any powerful +shock, and especially that given by the cold bath, is ten times more +dangerous to them than to adults, or even to infants themselves, after a +few months have elapsed.</p> + +<p>It is surprising to me that so sensible a writer as Rousseau generally +is on education, should have encouraged this dangerous practice; and +still more so that many fathers even now, blinded by theory, should +persist in it, notwithstanding the pleadings of the mother or the nurse, +and the plainest dictates of common sense and common prudence.[Footnote: +Nothing is intended to be said here, which shall encourage unthinking +nurses or mothers in setting themselves against measures which have been +prescribed by higher authority,—I mean the physician. There are cases +of this kind, where it requires all the resolution which a father, +uninterrupted, can summon to his aid, to administer a dose or perform a +task, on which he knows the existence of his child may be depending: but +when the thoughtless entreaties of the mother or nurse are interposed, +it makes his condition most distressing. Mothers, in such cases, ought +to encourage rather than remonstrate. They who <i>do not</i>, are guilty of +cruelty, and—perhaps—of infanticide.]</p> + +<p>A child plunged into cold water at birth, by those whose theories carry +them so far as to do it even in the coldest weather, has sometimes been +twenty-four hours in recovering, notwithstanding the most active and +judicious efforts to restore it. In other instances the results have +been still more distressing. Dr. Dewees is persuaded that he has "known +death itself to follow the use of cold water," in this way—I believe he +means <i>immediate</i> death—and adds, with great confidence, that he has +"repeatedly seen it require the lapse of several hours before reaction +could establish itself; during which time the pale and sunken cheeks and +livid lips declared the almost exhausted state" of the infant's +excitability.[Footnote: "Dewees on children" p. 72.]</p> + +<p>We need not hesitate to put very great confidence in the opinion here +expressed; for besides being a close and just observer of human nature, +Dr. D. has had the direction and management, in a greater or less +degree, of several thousands of new-born infants.</p> + +<p>Nothing, indeed, in the whole range of physical education, seems better +proved, than that while some few infants, whose constitutions are +naturally very strong, are invigorated by the practice in question, +others, in the proportion of hundreds for one, who are <i>less</i> robust, +are injured for life; some of them seriously.</p> + +<p>Nor will spirits added to the water make any material difference. I am +aware that there is a very general notion abroad, that the injurious +effects of cold water, in its application both internally and +externally, are greatly diminished by the addition of a little spirit; +but it is not so. Does the addition of such a small quantity of spirit +as is generally used in these cases, materially alter the temperature? +Is it not the application of a cold liquid to a heated surface, still? +Can we make anything else of it, either more or less?</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to say, that the cold bath may not be so managed in +the progress of infancy, as to make it beneficial, especially to strong +constitutions. It is its indiscriminate application to all new-born +children, without regard to strength of constitution, or any other +circumstances, that I most strenuously oppose. Of its occasional use, +under the eye of a physician, and by parents who will discriminate, I +shall say more presently.</p> + +<p>Our first duty on receiving a new inhabitant of the world is, to see +that it is gently but thoroughly washed, in moderately warm soft water, +with fine soap. Special attention should be paid to the folds of the +joints, the neck, the arm pits, &c. For rubbing the body, in order to +disengage anything which might obstruct the pores, or irritate or fret +the skin, nothing can be preferable to a piece of soft sponge or +flannel. Though the operation should be thorough, and also as rapid as +the nature of circumstances will permit, all harshness should be +avoided. When finished, the child should be wiped perfectly dry with +soft flannel.</p> + +<p>While the washing is performed, the temperature of the room should be +but a few degrees lower than that of the water; and the child should not +be exposed to currents of cold air. If the weather is severe, or if +currents of air in the room cannot otherwise be avoided, the dressing, +undressing, washing, &c., may be done near the fire. And I repeat the +rule, it should always be done with as much rapidity as is compatible +with safety.</p> + +<p>Here will be seen one great advantage of simplicity in the form of +dress. If the more rational suggestions of our chapter on that subject +are attended to, it will greatly facilitate the process of washing, and +the subsequent daily process of bathing, which I am about to recommend +to my readers.</p> + +<p>This washing process is also an introduction to bathing. For it should +be repeated every day; but with less and less attention to the washing, +and more and more reference to the bathing. How long the child should +stay in the bath, must be left to experience. If he is quiet, fifteen +minutes can never be too long; and I should not object to twenty. If +otherwise, and you are obliged to remove him in five minutes, or even in +three, still the bathing will be of too much service to be dispensed +with.</p> + +<p>Nothing should be mixed with the water, if the infant is healthy, except +a little soap, as already mentioned. Some are fond of using salt; but it +is by no means necessary, and may do harm.</p> + +<p>The proper hour for bathing is the early part of the day, or about the +middle of the forenoon. This season is selected, because the process, +manage it as carefully as we may, is at first a little exhausting. As +the child grows older, however, and not only becomes stronger, but +appears to be actually refreshed and invigorated by the bath, it will be +advisable to defer it to a later and later hour. By the time the babe is +three months old, particularly in the warm season, the hour of bathing +may be at sunset.</p> + +<p>The degree of heat must be determined, in part, by observing its effect +on the child; and in part by a thermometer. For this, and for other +purposes, a thermometer, as I have already more than hinted, is +indispensable in every nursery. Our own sensations are often at best a +very unsafe guide. There is one rule which should always be +observed—never to have the temperature of the bath below that of the +air of the room. If the thermometer show the latter to be 70°, the bath +should be something like 80° perhaps with feeble children, rather more.</p> + +<p>Great care ought always to be taken to proportion the air of the room +and the water of the bath to each other. If, for example, the +temperature of the room have been, for some time, unusually warm, that +of the water must not be so low as if it had been otherwise. On the +contrary, if the room have been, for a considerable time, rather cool, +the bath may be made several degrees cooler than in other circumstances. +But in no case and in no circumstances must a <i>warm</i> bath—intended as +such, simply—be so warm or so cold, as to make the child uncomfortable; +whether the temperature be 70°, 80°, or 90°.</p> + +<p>It is hardly necessary to add, that in bathing a young child, the vessel +used for the purpose should be large enough to give free scope to all +the motions of its extremities. Most children are delighted to play and +scramble about in the water. I know, indeed, that the contrary sometimes +happens; but when it does, it is usually—I do not say <i>always</i>—because +the countenances of those who are around express fear or apprehension; +for it is surprising how early these little beings learn to decipher our +feelings by our very countenances.</p> + +<p>Some of our readers may be surprised at the intimation that there are +mothers and nurses who have fears or apprehensions in regard to the +effects of the warm bath; but others—and it is for such that I write +this paragraph—will fully understand me. I have been often surprised at +the fact, but it is undoubted, that there is a strong prejudice against +warm bathing, in many parts of the country. In endeavoring to trace the +cause, I have usually found that it arose from having seen or heard of +some child who died soon after its application. I have had many a parent +remonstrate with me on the danger of the warm bath; and this, too, in +circumstances when it appeared to me, that the child's existence +depended, under God, on that very measure. Perhaps it is useless in such +cases, however, to reason with parents on the subject. The medical +practitioner must do his duty boldly and fearlessly, and risk the +consequences.</p> + +<p>But as I am writing, not for persons under immediate excitement, but for +those that may be reasoned with, it is proper to say, that in medicine, +the warm bath is so often used in extreme cases, and as a last resort, +even when death has already grasped, or is about to fix his grasp on the +sufferer, that it would be very strange if many persons <i>did not</i> die, +just after bathing. But that the bathing itself ever produced this +result, in one case in a thousand, there is not the slightest reason for +believing. [Footnote: Let me not be understood as intimating that, the +general neglect of bathing, of which I complain so loudly, is <i>chiefly</i> +owing to this unreasonable prejudice, though this no doubt has its sway. +On the contrary, I believe it is much oftener owing to ignorance, +indolence, and parsimony.]</p> + +<p>There are many more whims connected with bathing, as with almost +everything else, which it were equally desirable to remove. Some nurses +and mothers think that if the child's skin is wiped dry after bathing, +it will impair, if not destroy, the good effects of the operation. +Others still, shocking to relate, will even put it to bed in its wet +clothes; this, too, from principle. Not unlike this, is the belief, very +common among adults, that if we get our clothes wet—even our +stockings—we must, by all means, suffer them to dry on us; a belief +which, in its results, has sent thousands to a premature grave—and, +what is still worse, made invalids, for life, of a still greater number.</p> + +<p>I am aware, that in rejecting the indiscriminate cold bathing of +infants, I am treading on ground which is rather unpopular, even with +medical men; a large proportion of whom seem to believe that the +practice may be useful. But I am not <i>wholly</i> alone. Dr. Dewees—of +whose large experience I have already spoken—and some others, do not +hesitate to avow similar sentiments.</p> + +<p>The objections of Dr. Dewees to cold bathing are the following. 1. There +often exists a predisposition to disease, which cold bathing is sure to +rouse to action. Or if the disease have already begun to affect the +system, the bath is sure to aggravate it. 2. Some children have such +feeble constitutions that they are sure to be permanently weakened by +it, rather than invigorated. 3. To those in whom there is the tendency +of a large quantity of blood to the head, lungs, liver, &c., it is +injurious. 4. In some, the shock produces a species of syncope, or +catalepsy. 5. The <i>reaction</i>, as shown by the heat which follows the +cold bath, is, in some cases, so great as to produce a degree of fever, +and consequent debility. 6. It never answers the purposes of +cleanliness—one great object of bathing—so well as the warm bath. 7. +It is always unpleasant or painful to the child; especially at first. 8. +It sometimes produces severe pain in the bowels.</p> + +<p>This is a very formidable list of objections; and certainly deserves +consideration. There is one statement made by Dr. D. in the progress of +his remarks on this subject, in which I do not concur. He says—"The +object of all bathing is to remove impurities arising from dust, +perspiration, &c., from the surface; that the skin may not be obstructed +in the performance of its proper offices."</p> + +<p>But the object of cold bathing, with many, is to <i>harden</i>; consequently +it is not true that cleanliness is the <i>only object</i>. If he means, even, +that cleanliness is the only <i>legitimate</i> object of all bathing, I shall +still be compelled to dissent.</p> + +<p>If the cold bath could be used, always, by and with the direction of a +skilful physician, I believe its occasional use might be rendered +salutary. And although as it is now commonly used, I believe its effects +are almost anything but salutary, I do not deny that if its use were +cautiously and gradually begun, and judiciously conducted, it might be +the means of making children who are already robust, still more hardy +and healthy than before, and better able to resist those sudden changes +of temperature so common in our climate, and so apt to produce cold, +fever, and consumption.</p> + +<p>Cold bathing, in the hands of those who are ignorant of the laws of the +human frame—and such unfortunately and unaccountably most fathers and +mothers are—I cannot help regarding as a highly dangerous weapon; and +therefore it is, that in view of the whole subject, I cannot recommend +its general and indiscriminate use.</p> + +<p>If there are individuals, however, who are determined to employ it, in +the case of their more vigorous children, and without the advice or +direction of their family physician, I beg them to attend to the +following rules or principles, expressed as briefly as possible.</p> + +<p>In no ordinary case whatever, is the cold bath useful, unless it is +succeeded by that degree of warmth on the surface of the body which is +usually called a <i>glow</i>. This is a leading and important principle. The +contrary, that is, the injurious effects of cold bathing—its +<i>immediate</i> bad effects, I mean—are shown by the skin remaining pale +and shrivelled after coming out of the bath, by its blue appearance, and +by its coldness, as well as by a sunken state of the eyes, and much +general languor.</p> + +<p>To secure this point—I mean the GLOW—it is indispensably important to +begin the use of cold water gradually; that is, to use it at first of +so high a temperature as to produce only a slight sensation of cold, and +to take special care that the skin be immediately wiped very dry, and +the temperature of the room be quite as high as usual. Afterward the +water may be cooled gradually, from week to week, though never more than +a degree or two at once.</p> + +<p>It will probably be unsafe to commence this practice of cold +bathing—even in the case of the most robust children—until they are at +least six months of age.</p> + +<p>The appropriate season will be the middle of the forenoon, the hour when +the system is usually the most vigorous, and at which we shall be most +likely to secure a reaction. At first, twice or three times a week are +as often as it will be safe to repeat it. Some writers recommend it +twice a day; but once is enough, under any ordinary circumstances.</p> + +<p>The method at first is, to give the infant a single plunge. Afterward, +when he becomes older, and more inured to it, he may be plunged several +times in succession.</p> + +<p>On taking him out of the bath, the skin should be wiped perfectly dry, +as in the case of the warm bath, and with the same or an increased +degree of attention to other circumstances—the temperature of the +room, the avoiding currents of air, &c. He should next be put in a soft, +warm blanket, and be kept for some time in a state of gentle motion; and +after a little time, should be dressed.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned the importance of avoiding the manifestation of +fear, when we bathe a child; and the caution is particularly necessary +in the administration of the cold bath. Some writers even recommend, +that during the whole process of undressing, bathing, exercising, and +dressing, singing should be employed. There is philosophy in this +advice, and it is easily tried; but I cannot speak of it from +experience.</p> + +<p>There is one thing which may serve to calm our apprehensions—if we have +any—of danger; which is, that though the child's lungs are feeble at +first, from their not having been, like the heart, accustomed to +previous action, yet when they get fairly into motion and action, and +the child is a few months old, they are probably as strong, if not +stronger, in proportion, than those of adults.</p> + +<p>Bathing in cold water should never be performed immediately after a full +meal. Neither is it desirable to go to the contrary extreme, and bathe +when the stomach has been long empty; nor when the child's mental or +bodily powers are more than usually exhausted by fatigue.</p> + +<p>Although I have given these rules for those who are determined to use +the cold bath with their children, yet, for fear I shall be +misunderstood, I must be suffered to repeat, in this place, that, +uninformed as people generally are in regard to physiology, I cannot +advise even its moderate use. On the contrary, I would gladly dissuade +from it, as most likely, in the way it would inevitably be used, to do +more harm than good.</p> + +<p>There is no sort of objection to what might be called local bathing with +cold water. If the child's head is hot at any time, the temples, and +indeed the whole upper part of the head, may be very properly wet with +moderately cold water—taking care to avoid wetting the clothes. But +avoid, by all means, the common but foolish practice of putting spirits +in the water.</p> + +<p>A tea-spoonful of cold water cannot be too early put into the mouth of +the infant. The object is to cleanse or rinse the mouth; and the process +may be aided by wiping it out with a piece of soft linen rag. If a part +or all of the water should be swallowed, no harm will be done. This +practice, commenced almost as soon as children are born, has saved many +a sore mouth.</p> + +<p>There are other forms of bathing besides those already mentioned; among +which are the shower bath, the vapor bath, and the medicated bath. The +shower bath—for which purpose the water is commonly used cold—is but +poorly adapted to the wants of infants. The shock is much greater than +the common cold bath, and more apt to frighten; and fear is unfavorable +to reaction, or the production of a genial glow.</p> + +<p>The vapor bath is much better; and probably has quite as good an effect +as the common warm bath. The trouble and expense of procuring the +necessary apparatus is somewhat greater, however, as a mere bathing tub +costs but little, and can be made by every father who possesses common +ingenuity. But whatever may be the expense, it is indispensable in every +family; and whenever the pores of the skin are obstructed, a vapor +bathing apparatus is equally desirable.</p> + +<p>The medicated vapor bath is sometimes used; but I am not now treating of +infants who are sick, but of those who are in a state of health.</p> + +<p>The common warm bath is sometimes medicated by putting in salt. This, of +course, renders the water more stimulating to the skin; but except when +the perspiration is checked, or the skin peculiarly inactive from some +other cause—in other words, unless we are sick—it is seldom expedient +to use it.</p> + +<p>There is one substitute for the bathing tub, in the case of the cold +bath. I refer to the use of a wet cloth or sponge, applied rapidly to +the whole surface of the body. When this is done, the skin should be +wiped thoroughly dry immediately afterwards, as in the case of complete +immersion.</p> + +<p>The application of either a cloth or a sponge, filled with warm water, +to the skin, in this manner, even if continued for several minutes +together, is less efficacious than a continuous immersion. I repeat +it—no family ought to be without conveniences for bathing in warm water +daily. I speak now of every member of the family, young and old, as well +as the infant; and I refer particularly to the summer season: though I +do not think the practice ought to be wholly discontinued during the +winter.</p> + +<p>It will still be objected that this care of, and attention to the young, +in reference to health—this provision for bathing daily, and care to +see that it is performed—can never be afforded by the laboring portion +of the community. But I shall as strenuously insist on the contrary; and +trust I shall, in the sequel, produce reasons which will be +satisfactory.</p> + +<p>The great difficulty is, to convince parents that these things are +vastly more productive of health and happiness to their children—more +truly necessaries—than a great many things for which they now expend +their time and money. There is, and always has been—except, perhaps, +among the Jews, in the earliest periods of the history of that wonderful +nation—a strange disposition to overlook the happiness of the young. It +is not necessary to represent this dereliction as peculiar to modern +times, for we find traces of the same thing thousands of years ago.</p> + +<p>The Roman emperors—Dioclesian in particular—could make provision for +bathing, to an extent which now astonishes us; but for whom? For whom, I +repeat it, was incurred the enormous expense of fitting up and keeping +in repair accommodations for bathing at once 18,000 people? For adults; +and for adults alone. I do not say that children were not admitted, in +any case; but I say they were not contemplated in these arrangements. +Nothing was done—not a single thing—that would not have been done, had +there been no child under ten years of age in the whole empire.</p> + +<p>And what better than this do WE, now? We make provision for the +happiness of the adult. The most indigent person will find time and +money to spend for the gratification of his own senses, his pride, or +his curiosity; but his children—they may be overlooked! Or, if he has +an eye to the future happiness of his child, he conceives that he is +promoting it in the best possible degree, by endeavoring to lay up a few +dollars for his use, after his character is formed—at a period, as it +too often happens, when money will do him little good, since it can +neither purchase health, peace of mind, nor reputation.</p> + +<p>Far be it from me to say, that the poor—ground into the dust as they +are, by the force of circumstances operating with their own concurrence, +to make them ignorant, vicious, or miserable—can do for their children +all that is desirable. By no means. But they have it in their power to +do much more than they are at present doing. They have it in their +power, at least, to use the same good sense in the management of the +human being that they do in that of a pig, a calf, or a colt, or even a +young vegetable. No parent, let him be ever so poor, is found in the +habit of neglecting either of these in proportion to its infancy, and of +exerting himself only in proportion as it grows older. Common sense +tells him that the contrary is the true course; that however poor he may +be, he will be still poorer, if he do not take special pains with the +young animal, to rear it and with the young vegetable, to give it the +right direction, by keeping down the weeds, and pruning and watering it. +And I say again, that however deserving of censure the wealthy of a +Christian community may be in not directing the ignorant and vicious +into the right path, and in not expending more of their wealth on those +who are poor, in elevating their minds and their manners, and promoting +their health, still the latter are inexcusable for their present neglect +of their infant offspring, while they would not think of neglecting, on +the same principle, the offspring of their domestic animals.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VII."></a><h2>CHAPTER VII.</h2> + +<h3>FOOD.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">SEC. 1. General principles.—SEC. 2. Conduct of the mother.—SEC. 3. +Nursing—rules in regard to it.—SEC. 4. Quantity of food. Errors. +Over-feeding. Gluttony.—SEC. 5. How long should milk be the child's +only food?—SEC. 6 Feeding before teething. Cow's milk. Sucking bottles. +Cleanliness. Nurses.—SEC. 7. Treatment from teething to weaning.—SEC. +8. Process of weaning-rules in regard to it.—SEC. 9. First food to be +used after weaning. Importance of good bread. Other kinds of food.—SEC. +10. Remarks on fruit.—SEC. 11. Evils and dangers of confectionary.—SEC. +12. Mischiefs of pastry.—SEC. 13. Crude and raw substances.</blockquote> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>General Principles.</i></h4> + +<p>The mother's milk, in suitable quantity, and under suitable regulations, +is so obviously the appropriate food of an infant during the first +months of its existence, that it seems almost unnecessary to repeat the +fact. And yet the violations of this rule are so numerous and constant, +as to require a few passing remarks.</p> + +<p>There are some mothers who seem to have a perfect hatred of children; +and if they can find any plausible apology for neglecting to nurse them, +they will. Few, indeed, will publicly acknowledge a state of feeling so +unnatural; but there are some even of such. On the latter, all argument +would, I fear, be utterly lost. Of the former, there may, be hope.</p> + +<p>They tell us—and they are often sustained by those around them—that it +is very inconvenient to be so confined to a child that they cannot leave +home for a little while. Can it be their duty—for in these days, when +virtue and religion, and everything good, are so highly complimented, no +people are more ready to talk of <i>duty</i> than they who have the least +regard to it—can it be their duty, they ask, to exclude themselves from +the pleasures and comforts of social life for half or two thirds of +their most active and happy years? Ought they not to go abroad, at least +occasionally? But if so, and their children have no other source of +dependence, must they not suffer? Is it not better, therefore, that they +should be early accustomed to other food, for a part of the time? +Besides, they may be sick; and then the child must rely on others; and +will it not be useful to accustom it early to do so?</p> + +<p>Perhaps few mothers are conscious that this train of reasoning passes +through their minds. But that something like it is often made the +occasion of substituting food which is less proper, for that furnished +by Divine Providence, there cannot be a doubt. And the mischief is, that +she who has gone so far, will not scruple, ere long, to go farther. And, +strange and unnatural as it may seem, that mothers should turn over +their children to be nursed wholly by others, in order to get rid of the +inconvenience of nursing them at their own bosoms, it is only carrying +out to its fullest extent, and reducing to practice, the train of +reasoning mentioned above.</p> + +<p>Nor is it necessary that I should stop here to denounce a course of +conduct so unchristian and savage. I know it is very common in some +countries; and those American mothers who ape the other eastern +fashions, or countenance their sons and daughters in doing it, will not +be slow to imitate this also—especially as it is a very <i>convenient</i> +fashion. And I question whether I shall succeed in reasoning them out of +it. Habit, both of thought and action, is exceedingly powerful. I will, +therefore, confine myself chiefly to those efforts at prevention, from +which much more is to be hoped, in the present state of society, than +from direct attempts at cure.</p> + +<p>It will be soon enough to leave a child with another person, when the +mother is actually sick, or unavoidably absent; or when some other +adequate cause is known to exist. We are to be governed, in these and +similar cases, by general rules, and not by exceptions. The general +rule, in the present case, is, that mothers can nurse their own +children; and, if they have the proper disposition, that they can do it +uninterruptedly.</p> + +<p>But those who are so ready to become counsellors on these occasions, +will tell us, perhaps, that the child must be "fed to spare the mother." +That is to say, nursing weakens the mother, and the child must be taken +away, a part of the time, to save her strength.</p> + +<p>Now it may safely be doubted whether the process of nursing, in itself +considered, does weaken, at all. The Author of nature has made provision +for the secretion (formation) of the milk, whether the child receives it +or not. If it is not taken by the child, or drawn off in some other way, +one of two things must follow;—either it must be taken up by what are +called absorbent vessels, and carried into the circulation, and chiefly +thrown out of the system as waste matter, or it will prove a source of +irritation, if not of inflammation, to the organs themselves which +secrete it. In both cases, the strength of the mother is quite as likely +to be taxed, as if the child received the milk in the way that nature +intended.</p> + +<p>Besides, on this very principle, the plan of saving a mother's strength +by requiring another to nurse for her, is but saying that we will weaken +one person to save another. Or if we feed the child, to "spare its +mother," what is this, in practice, but to say that the works of the +Creator are very imperfect; and that he has thrown upon the mass of +mankind a task to which they are not equal? For the mass of mankind are +poor; and the poor, having neither the means nor the time to escape the +duties in question, must submit to them, while their more wealthy +neighbors escape.</p> + +<p>But it is idle to defend customs so monstrous. They admit of no defence +that has the slightest claim to solidity. The general rule then is, that +mothers should nurse their own children.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Conduct of the Mother.</i></h4> + +<p>Originally it was not my intention to give directions, in this volume, +in regard to the food, drink, &c., of the mother while nursing; but +repeated solicitations on this point, have led me to the conclusion that +a few general principles may be very properly introduced.</p> + +<p>The future health, and even the moral well-being of the child, depend +much more on the proper management of the mother herself than is usually +supposed. How, indeed, can it be other wise? How can the mother's blood +be constantly irritated with improper food and drink, without rendering +the milk so? And how can a child draw, daily and hourly, from this +feverish fountain, without being affected, not only in his physical +frame, but in his very temper and feelings?</p> + +<p>It is not enough that we adopt the principles already insisted on by +some of our wisest medical men, and even by one or two medical +societies,[Footnote: Those of Connecticut and New Hampshire.] that +children in this way often acquire a propensity for exciting drinks, +that may end in their downright intemperance. What if it should not, in +every case, proceed quite so far as to make the child a drunkard? If it +but lays the foundation of a constitutional fondness for <i>excitements</i>, +it tends to disease. Indeed that, in itself, is a disease; and one, too, +which is destroying more persons every year than the cholera, or even +the consumption. Consumption has at most only slain her tens of +thousands [Footnote: About 40,000 a year, in the United States, as nearly +as it can be estimated.] a year; but a fondness for exciting food and +drink—innocent and harmless as it is often supposed to be, and +therefore only the more dangerous a foe—does not fail to slay every +year, directly or indirectly, its hundreds of thousands. At least this +is my own opinion.</p> + +<p>Why, where can you find the individual who is not a slave to this +perpetual rage within—this perpetual cry, "Who will show us any" +physical "good"? Who, in this land of abundance, will eat or drink plain +things? Who will eat simple bread, meat, potatoes, rice, pudding, +apples, &c. or drink simple water? A few instances may be found, of +late, in which people confine themselves to simple water for drink; but +they are rather rare. And no wonder. They <i>must</i> be rare so long as an +unnatural thirst is kept up everywhere by the most exciting and most +strange mixtures of food. Where, I again ask, is the person who will eat +and relish plain bread, plain meat, plain puddings, &c.? Certainly not +in the nursery. No young mother—scarcely one I mean—will, for a single +meal, confine herself to a piece of bread, the sweetest and best food in +the whole world, unless it is hot, or toasted, or soaked, or buttered. A +natural, healthy appetite, is as rare a thing on our planet, almost, as +an inhabitant of the sun or moon.</p> + +<p>I have seen more than one mother made sick by using, while nursing, +improper food and drink. I have known milk punch, taken by +stealth—(because how could the mother, it was said, ever have a supply +of food for her poor child without it!)—to kindle a fever that came +very near burning up the mother and child both. And yet, if I have once +or twice succeeded in convincing the mother that she was only suffering +the natural punishment of her own transgressions, I have never, so far +as I now recollect, succeeded in making her believe that her iniquities +were visited upon her unoffending infant.</p> + +<p>There is everywhere the most painful apathy on this most painful +subject. We see little children of all ages, everywhere, the victims of +debility, and pain, and suffering, and disease and death, and yet we +very seldom seem to search for one moment for the causes of this +premature destruction. In fact most parents—even many intelligent +mothers—at once stare, if you attempt to inquire into the causes of +their child's death, as if it was either a kind of sacrilege, or an +impeachment of their own parental affection. Diseases, even at this day, +with the sun of science blazing in meridian splendor, they seem to +regard as the judgments of heaven; and to think of tracing out the +causes of the early death of half our race, is, in their estimation, not +only idle, but wicked.</p> + +<p>Yet this is obviously one of the first steps, every, where, which +philanthropy demands; to say nothing of the demands of christianity. It +is the first step for the physician, the first step for the educator, +the first step for the parent, and above all, the mother. Nay; more—we +must not suppress so great and important a truth—it is the first step +for the legislator and the minister. What sense is there in continuing, +century after century, and age after age, to expend all our efforts in +merely <i>mending</i> the diseased half of mankind, when those same efforts +are amply sufficient, if early and properly applied, not only to +continue the lives of the whole, but to make them <i>whole beings</i>, +instead of passing through life mere <i>fragments</i> of humanity?</p> + +<p>But I must not forget that this is merely a small manual, not intended +for those who make it their profession to teach the laws of God and man, +but simply for young mothers. For the sake of erring humanity, would +that I could, but for one moment, divest myself of the idea, that in +writing for the young mother I am not writing for legislators and +ministers! Would that I could banish from my mind the deep conviction +that the mother is everywhere far more the law-giver to her infant—far +more the arbiter of the present and eternal destiny of her child—than +he who is more commonly regarded as such.</p> + +<p>Every mother owes it, not only to herself—for on this part she is not +<i>wholly</i> forgetful—but to her offspring, to abstain, during the period +of nursing at least, from all causes which tend to produce a feverish +state of her fluids. Among these are every form of premature exertion, +whether in sitting up, laboring, conversing, or even thinking. It is of +very great importance that both the body and the mind should be kept +quiet; and the more so, the better.</p> + +<p>Among the particular causes of fever to the young mother, Dr. Dewees +enumerates spirits, wine, and other fermented liquors, a room too much +heated, closed curtains, confined air, too much exposure, and too much +company; and during the early period of confinement, broths and animal +food.</p> + +<p>There is nothing which he insists on more strongly, than the importance +of fresh air. Indeed, the practice of confining a nursing woman in a +space scarcely six feet square, and excluding the air surrounding her by +curtains and closed windows, and subjecting her to the necessity of +breathing twenty times the air that has already been as often +discharged, filled with poison, from her lungs, is not too strongly +reprobated by Dr. Dewees, or anybody else. But I have spoken of these +things in the chapter which treats on "The Nursery." I would only +observe, on this point, that if I were asked what one thing is most +indispensable to the health of the nursing woman, I would reply, Fresh +air; and if asked what were the second and third most important things, +I would still repeat—in imitation of the orator of old, in regard to +another subject—Fresh air, Fresh air.</p> + +<p>This important ingredient in human happiness, and especially in the +happiness of the young mother and her tender infant, can usually be had +within doors, if pains enough be taken. But if the weather is fine and +in every respect favorable, a woman who is in tolerable health may +venture abroad a little in about three weeks after her confinement, and +sometimes even in two. Whether her exercise be without or within doors, +however, she should be effectually protected against chills, and against +the influence of currents of cold air.</p> + +<p>It has been incidentally stated, that Dr. Dewees objects to the mother's +use, during her early period of nursing, of broths and animal food. This +is about as much as we could reasonably expect from one who belongs to a +profession whose members are, almost without exception, enslaved to the +practice of flesh-eating. But even this advice of his, if duly followed, +would be a great advance upon the practice which generally prevails. +There is so universal a belief among females that they demand, at this +period of their existence, not only a larger quantity of food than +usual, but also that which is more stimulating in its quality, as almost +to forbid the hopes of making much impression upon their minds. Many +young mothers seem to consider themselves as licensed, during a part of +their lives, not only to eat immoderately, and even to gluttony, but +also to swallow almost every species of vile trash which a vile world +affords.</p> + +<p>How long will it be, ere the mother can be induced to take as much pains +to select the most appropriate and most healthy aliment for herself and +her child, as she now does that which is demanded by a capricious +appetite, without the smallest reference to fitness or digestibility! +How long will it be ere the mother can be brought to believe and feel +that, in every step she takes, she is forming the habitation of an +immortal spirit—a spirit, too, whose character and destiny, both +present and eternal, must depend, in no small degree, upon the character +of the dwelling it occupies while passing through this stage of earthly +existence! How long will it be, before mothers can be made to believe +even these two simple truths, that the nourishment, which the human +being actually receives, is not always in exact proportion to the +quantity of nutritious food which he throws into his stomach, and that +the diet is always best for both mother and child, which is least +exciting.</p> + +<p>The Charleston Board of Health, during the existence of cholera in that +city in 1836, publicly announced that the "best food is the least +exciting," and this great truth is just as true in all other places and +circumstances on the globe as it was then in South Carolina. And though +I am far from believing that health depends more on food and drink than +on all other things put together, as many seem to suppose, yet I am +entirely of opinion that he who should devote himself successfully to +the work of applying this truth, in all its bearings, to the dietetic +practice of all mankind, would do more for their reformation—yes, and +their salvation too—than has yet been done by any merely <i>human</i> being, +since the first day of the creation.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Nursing—how often.</i></h4> + +<p>Many lay it down, as an invariable rule, that no system can be pursued +with a child till it is six months old; and it must be admitted by all, +that for several months after birth there are serious difficulties in +the way of determining, with any degree of precision, how often a child +should be nursed or fed. Still, there are a few rules of universal +application; some of which are here presented.</p> + +<p>1. A child should never be nursed, merely to quiet it; for if this be +done, it will soon learn to cry, whenever it feels the slightest +uneasiness, not only from hunger, but from other causes; merely to be +gratified with nursing. Besides, if its cries should happen to be from +illness, it is ten to one but the reception of anything into the stomach +will do harm instead of good.</p> + +<p>2. The stomach, like every other organ in the body which is muscular, +must have time for rest; and this in the case of children as well as +adults. But to nurse them too frequently is in opposition to this rule, +and therefore of evil tendency.</p> + +<p>3. For reasons which may be seen by the last rule, there should be +regular seasons for nursing, and these should be adhered to, especially +by night. When very young, once in three hours may not be too frequent; +I believe that it is seldom proper to nurse a child more frequently than +this. But whenever three hours becomes a suitable period by day, once in +four hours will be often enough by night. I will not undertake to say at +what precise age children should be nursed at intervals of three and +four hours each; because some children are older, <i>constitutionally</i>, at +three months, than others are at four.</p> + +<p>There is one grand mistake, however, against which I must caution young +mothers; which is, not to indulge the vain expectation that feeble +infants will become robust, in proportion to their indulgence. On the +contrary, it is the more necessary to be strict with feeble children, +<i>because</i> they are feeble. To keep them hanging at the breast to +invigorate them, is the very way to counteract our own intentions, and +defeat our own purpose. Seasons of entire rest are even more important +to their stomachs than to those of other persons.</p> + +<p>4. But in order to secure intervals of rest, both to the strong and the +feeble, we must avoid the pernicious habit of giving infants pap, and +other delicacies, "between meals." Many a child's health is ruined by +this practice. Nothing should be put into their stomachs for many +months—if they are in health—but the mother's milk.</p> + +<p>"This," says Dr. Dunglison, "is the sole food of the infant, and is +consequently sufficiently nutrient to maintain life, and to minister to +the growth, during the earliest periods of existence." [Footnote: +Elements of Hygiene, page 271.] In another place, he says, "Milk is an +appropriate nourishment at all ages, and is more so the nearer to +birth."</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Quantity of Food.</i></h4> + +<p>"We all know," says Dr. Dewees, "how easily the stomach may be made to +demand more food than is absolutely required; first, by the repetition +of aliment, and secondly, by its variety;—therefore both of these +causes must be avoided. The stomach, like every other part, can, and +unfortunately does, acquire habits highly injurious to itself; and that +of demanding an unnecessary quantity of aliment is not one of the least. +It should, therefore, be constantly borne in mind, that it is not the +quantity of food taken into the stomach, that is available to the proper +purposes of the system; but the quantity which can be digested, and +converted into nourishment fit to be applied to such purposes."</p> + +<p>There is a great deal of truth in these remarks; and especially in the +closing one, that not all which is taken into the stomach is digested. +It is highly probable, that the least quantity which is usually given to +an infant is more than sufficient for the purposes of digestion; and +that nearly every child in the arms of its mother, is over-fed.</p> + +<p>I know it has been said, by some physicians—and by those who are +sensible men, in other respects, too—that the child's stomach is a +pretty correct guide in regard to quantity. If we give it too much, say +they, it will reject it;—as if that were an end of the matter.</p> + +<p>But it is not so. It is by no means harmless to fill the child's stomach +as full as is possible without overflowing. Such a process, though it +should not create disease directly, would produce a gluttonous habit. +The stomach, being muscular, may be increased in size by use, like all +other muscular organs. The hands, the arms, the legs, the feet, the +fleshy portions of the face, even, may be disproportionally enlarged by +constant use. Thus a sailor, who uses his hands and arms much more than +his legs and feet, has the former unusually large; one who is much +accustomed to walking, has large feet; and in a tailor, who from +childhood uses his lower limbs comparatively little, they are both small +and slender. On the same principle, the stomach, by inordinate use, and +by carrying unreasonable loads, may be made nearly twice as large as +nature intended, and may demand twice as much food. And I have no doubt +that the bulk of mankind, young and old, eat about twice as much as +nature, unperverted, would require.</p> + +<p>If the suggestions of our last section are duly attended to, one of the +causes which lead the stomach to demand an unreasonable quantity of food +will be avoided—I mean the too frequent "repetition of aliment." And if +we never depart from the general rule, already laid down, not to give +the infant anything but its mother's milk, we shall escape the evils +incident to variety.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>How long should milk be the only food.</i></h4> + +<p>On this point, there is a great diversity of opinion. Perhaps the most +approved role, of universal application, is, that the first change +should be made in the child's diet, when the teeth begin to appear.</p> + +<p>This period, it is well known, cannot be fixed to any particular age, +but varies from the fifth to the twelfth month.</p> + +<p>Some mothers, who have borne with me patiently to this place, will +probably here object. "What child," they will ask, "would ever have any +strength, brought up so?" Not only a little pap and gruel is, in their +estimation, necessary, long before this period, but even many choice +bits of meat.</p> + +<p>Now I am very sure, that these choice bits—whatever they may be—given +to a child before it has teeth, not only do no good, but actually do +mischief. Indeed, that which does no good in the stomach must do harm, +of course; since it is not only in the way, but acts like a foreign body +there, producing more or less of irritation.</p> + +<p>I ought to state, in this place, that many people—mothers among the +rest—have very inadequate ideas of digestion. They appear to have no +farther notion of the digestive process than that it consists in +reducing to a pulp the substances which are swallowed; and hence, +whatever is reduced to a pulp, they regard as being digested. Whereas +nothing is better known to the anatomist and physiologist, than that +this—the formation of <i>chyme</i> in the stomach—constitutes only a very +small part of the digestive process. The chyme must pass into the +duodenum and other portions of intestine beyond the stomach, and be +retained there for some time, before it will form perfect chyle.</p> + +<p>This is a more important part of the work of digestion than even the +former. For, suppose the chyme to be perfect, though even this may be +mere pulp, rather than chyme, and suppose it pass quietly along into the +duodenum and other small intestines. All this process, thus far, may go +on naturally enough, and yet the chyle may not be well formed, and the +chymous mass may find its way out of the system without answering any of +the purposes of nutrition. For no matter how well the food is dissolved +in the stomach, if it do not become good and proper chyle, the blood +which is formed will not be good and perfect blood; or, lastly, if it +<i>seem</i> to make good blood, it may still be faulty, so that the +particles which should be applied to build up or repair the system, are +either not used, or if used, answer the purpose but imperfectly.</p> + +<p>We hence see how little prepared a large proportion of the community, +are, to judge of the digestibility or fitness of a substance for +infants, by their own observation and experience merely; and how much +more wisely they act, in contenting themselves with giving them—at +least until they have teeth—such food only as the Author of nature +seems to have assigned them; especially when thus course, is precisely +that which is recommended or sanctioned by nearly every judicious +physician, as well as by almost all our writers on health.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>On Feeding before Teething.</i></h4> + +<p>Having laid down the general rule, that until the appearance of teeth, +the sole food of an infant should be the milk of its own mother, I +proceed to speak of some of the more common exceptions to it.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 1.—The first of these is when the supply furnished by the +mother is scanty. There may be two causes of the scantiness of this +supply; 1st, the want of suitable nourishment by the mother; and, 2dly, +a feeble constitution, or bad health. In the former case, it should be +her first object, as it undoubtedly will be that of her physician, to +improve the quality of her diet; and in the latter, to restore her +health, or at least invigorate her constitution.</p> + +<p>In regard to the proper diet of a <i>mother</i>, as such, as well as the +general management which her case requires, a volume might be written +without exhausting the subject. But I have already said as much on this +subject, in another place, as my limits will permit.</p> + +<p>But we cannot wait for the mother's health to improve, and allow the +infant to suffer, in the mean time, for a due supply of food. The +appropriate question now is, How shall such a supply be furnished?</p> + +<p>This should be done by means of an article resembling in its properties, +as closely as possible, the mother's milk. For this purpose, we have +only to mix with a suitable quantity of new cow's milk, one third of +water, and sweeten it a little with loaf sugar. This is to be given to +the child, at suitable intervals, and in proper quantities, by means of +a common sucking bottle. It is, indeed, sometimes given with the spoon; +but the bottle is better.</p> + +<p>To the question, whether the child should be confined to this, till the +period of weaning, Dr. Dewees answers, No. I am surprised at this; and +my surprise is increased, when I find him, almost in the very next +breath, urging with all his might, numerous reasons against the very +common notion, that children in early life require a variety of food. He +even insists on the importance of confining the child to a single +article of food when it is practicable. Yet he has not given us so much +as one reason why it is not practicable in the case before us; but has +gone on to speak of barley water, gum arabic water, rice water, +arrowroot, &c. I venture, therefore, to dissent from him, and to answer +the foregoing question in the affirmative. When one good and substantial +reason can be given for <i>change</i>, the decision will, however, be +reconsidered.</p> + +<p>I have already stated the general rule for preparing this substitute for +the mother's milk. But there are several minor directions, which may be +useful to those who are wholly without experience on the subject.</p> + +<p>If possible, the milk used should not only be just taken from the cow, +but should always be from the <i>same</i> cow; for it is well known, that the +quality of milk often differs very materially, even among cows feeding +in the same pasture, or from the same pile of hay; and the stomach +becomes most easily reconciled to the mixture when it is uniform in its +qualities. Great care should also be taken to see that the cow whose +milk is used is young and healthy.</p> + +<p>The mixture should not be prepared any faster than it is wanted, and +should always be prepared in vessels perfectly clean and sweet, and +given as soon as possible after it is prepared, to prevent any degree of +fermentation. It is never so well to heat it by the fire. If taken from +the cow just before it is used, and if the water to be added is warm +enough, the temperature will hardly need to be raised any higher.</p> + +<p>When it is impracticable, in all cases, to take milk for this purpose +immediately from the cow, it should be kept, in winter, where it will +not freeze; and in summer, where there will be no tendency to acidity.</p> + +<p>Some mothers and nurses are addicted to the practice of passing the food +through their own mouths, before they give it to the child—with a view, +no doubt, to see that it is at a proper temperature. This practice is +not only wholly unnecessary, but altogether disgusting, and even +ridiculous. A thermometer would answer every purpose; and save even the +trouble of another disgusting practice—that of blowing it with the +breath.</p> + +<p>The most proper season for giving the child this preparation, is +immediately after it has been nursing. It is better for both mother and +child, that the latter should nurse just as often as though the supply +of food was adequate to his wants. And when his first supply is +exhausted, then let him make up his meal from the sucking bottle. The +great advantage of this plan is, that he will not be so likely in this +way to be over-fed. If he is really needy, he will accept the bottle, +even if he do not like it quite so well; if he refuse it, let him go +without till he is hungry enough to receive it.</p> + +<p>In regard to the water used in the preparation, only one thing needs to +be said; which is, that it should be pure. If it is not, it should by +all means be boiled. The sugar used should be of the very best kind; and +the quantity not large; since if the preparation be too sweet, it +readily becomes acid in the stomach.</p> + +<p>There has been, and still is, a controversy going on among medical men, +whether sugar is or is not hurtful to the young. "Who shall decide, when +doctors disagree?" has often been asked. Without undertaking the task +myself, I may perhaps be permitted to say, that I cannot see any reason +why a substance so pure, and so highly nutritious as sugar—if given in +very small quantity only—should prove injurious: though I do not regard +the reasoning of Dr. Dewees as very conclusive on the subject, when, in +reply to Dr. Cadogan, he has the following language—"If sugar be +improper, why does it so largely enter into the composition of the early +food of all animals? It is in vain that physicians declaim against this +article, since it forms between seven and eight per cent of the mother's +milk."—Now with me, the fact that milk and almost all other kinds of +food are furnished with a measure of this substance, is the strongest +reason I am acquainted with for making no additions. I believe, however, +that they may sometimes be made, but not for these reasons.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 2.—The second striking exception to the general rule that has +been laid down, is when the mother is unable to nurse her own child from +positive ill health, or when circumstances exist which render it +obviously improper that she should do it. The following are some of the +circumstances which render such a departure from nature indispensable.</p> + +<p>1. When the mother is affected strongly with a hereditary disease, such +as consumption or scrofula; or when her constitution is tainted, as it +were, with venereal disease, or other permanent affections.</p> + +<p>2. When nursing produces, uniformly, some very troublesome or dangerous +disease in the mother; as cough, colic, &c.</p> + +<p>3. There are a few instances in which the milk of the mother, owing to +an unknown cause, has been found by experience to disagree with the +child. In these circumstances, it is the unquestionable duty of the +mother to resort wholly to feeding.</p> + +<p>4. Sometimes the milk, at first abundant, fails suddenly, owing to some +accidental or constitutional defect; and this failure becomes habitual. +In all these circumstances, the proper resort is to a sucking bottle, or +a hired nurse. I generally prefer the latter. The cases which seem to me +to admit of the former, will be pointed out in the next section.</p> + +<p>"When the bottle is used," says Dr. Dewees, "much care is requisite to +preserve it sweet and free from all impurities, or the remains of the +former food, by which the present may be rendered impure or sour; for +which purpose a great deal of caution must be observed."</p> + +<p>The business of feeding a child, whether by the bottle or the spoon, +should never be hurried: the slower it is, the better. We should stop +from time to time, during the process. Nor should the nourishment be +given while lying down; it is much more pleasant, as well as more safe, +to sit up.</p> + +<p>A few thoughts more on the character and condition of the milk which we +give to the young, will conclude the second division of this section.</p> + +<p>Some are fond of boiling milk for infants; but to this I am decidedly +opposed, so long as they are in health. Boiling takes away, or appears +to take away, some of the best properties of the milk.</p> + +<p>It is true that milk which is boiled does not turn sour so readily in +hot weather; but it is quite unnecessary to boil milk in the common +manner in order to present its changing, since such a result can be +prevented by another process. You have only to put your milk in a +kettle, cover it closely, and heat it quickly to the boiling point, and +then remove and cool it as speedily as possible. This plan prevents the +rising to the surface of that coat or pellicle which contains some of +the most valuable properties of the milk.</p> + +<p>I have already said that it was as necessary that the stomach should +have rest as any other muscular organ. Some writers say that the infant +should be kept perfectly quiet, at least half an hour, after each meal. +This is certainly necessary with feeble children, but I question its +necessity in the case of those who are strong and robust. I would not +recommend, however, nor even tolerate, for one moment, the absurd +practice of <i>jolting</i>, so common with a few ignorant nurses and, +mothers, as if they could jolt down the food in the stomach with just as +much safety as they can shake down the contents of a farmer's bag of +produce. Such mothers as these should go and reside among the native +tribes of Indians in Guiana, in South America, where they make it a +point not only to stuff their children's stomachs as long as they will +hold, but actually to shake it down.</p> + +<p>Little less absurd than jolting is the custom of tossing a child high, +in quick succession, which is practised not only after meals, but at +other times. But on this point, I have treated elsewhere.</p> + +<p>Some give the sucking bottle to children as a plaything. This is just +about as wise a practice as that of giving them books as playthings. +Both are done, usually, to save the time and trouble of those whose +office it is to devote their time to the very purpose of managing and +educating their offspring. The evil, however, of suffering the child to +have the bottle when it pleases is, that he will thus be tasting food so +often as to interfere with and disturb the process of digestion, to his +great and lasting injury. For in this way, a part of the food will pass +from the stomach into the bowels unchanged, or at least but imperfectly +digested, where it is liable to become sour, and cause disease. It is +not to be doubted that many diarrhoeas, as well as, other bowel +affections, are produced in this way. Children that are always eating +are seldom healthy; and we may hence see the reason.</p> + +<p>In speaking of the importance of keeping the bottle, from which a child +takes his food, perfectly clean and sweet, I ought to have extended the +injunction much farther. There is a degree of slovenliness sometimes +observable in those who manage children, both when they are sick and +when they are in health, which even common sense cannot and ought not to +tolerate. Every vessel which is used in preparing or administering +anything for children, ought, after we have used it, to be immediately +and effectually cleansed. How shocking is it to see dirty vessels +standing in the nursery from hour to hour, becoming sour or impure! How +much more so still, to see food in copper vessels, or in the red earthen +ones, glazed with a poisonous oxyd! I speak now more particularly of +vessels in which food is given; for with the administration of medicine, +and nursing the sick, I do not intend in this volume to interfere.</p> + +<p>EXCEPTION 3.—We come now to the consideration of those cases—for such +it will not be doubted there are—where a hired nurse is to be preferred +to feeding by the hand.</p> + +<p>Before proceeding farther, however, it is important to say, that if a +nurse could always be procured whose health, and temper, and habits were +good, who had no infant of her own, and who would do as well for the +infant, in every respect, as his own mother, it would be preferable to +have no feeding by the hand at all.</p> + +<p>But such nurses are very scarce. Their temper, or habits, or general +health, will often be such as no genuine parent would desire, and such +as they ought to be sorry to see engrafted, in any degree, on the child. +For even admitting what is claimed by some, that the temper of the nurse +does <i>not</i> affect the properties of the milk, and thus injure the child +both physically and morally, still much injury may and inevitably will +result from the influence of her constant presence and example.</p> + +<p>Others have infants of their own, in which case either their own child +or the adopted one will suffer; and in a majority of cases, it can +scarcely be doubted <i>which</i> it will be. And I doubt the morality of +requiring a nurse, in these cases, to give up her own child wholly. If +<i>one</i> must be fed, why not our own, as well as that of another?</p> + +<p>The only cases, then, which seem to me to justify the employment of a +nurse, are where she possesses at least the qualifications above +mentioned; and as these are rare, not many nurses, of course, would on +this principle be employed. But when employed, it is highly desirable +that the following rules should be observed:</p> + +<p>1: The nurse should suckle the child at both breasts; otherwise he is +liable to acquire a degree of crookedness in his form. There is another +evil which sometimes results from the too common neglect of this rule, +which is, that it endangers the deterioration of the quality of the +milk.</p> + +<p>2. The milk which is thus substituted for that of the mother, should be +as nearly as possible of the same age as the child who is to receive it. +It should be remembered, however, that the milk is not so good after the +twelfth or thirteenth month, nor <i>quite</i> so good under the third.</p> + +<p>3. When the parent or some trusty and confidential friend can, without +the aid of interested spies and emissaries, have an eye to the general +treatment, and especially to the moral management, it should be done; +for even the best nurses may so differ in their principles, manners and +habits from the parent, that the latter would deem it preferable to +withdraw the child, and resort at once to feeding.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>From Teething to Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>This period will, of course, be longer or shorter according as the teeth +begin to appear earlier or later, and according to the time when it is +thought proper to wean.</p> + +<p>On few points, perhaps, has there existed a greater diversity of opinion +than in regard to the age most proper for weaning. The limits of this +work do not permit a thorough discussion of the question; and I shall +therefore be very brief in my remarks on the subject.</p> + +<p>Dr. Cullen, whose opinion on topics of this kind is certainly entitled +to much respect, thought that less than seven, or more than eleven +months of nursing was injurious. Yet in some countries, and even in some +parts of our own, the period is extended by the mother, from choice, to +two years. And although the milk is not so good after the thirteenth or +fourteenth month, I have never either known or heard that any evil +consequences followed from the practice.</p> + +<p>Dr. Loudon, a recent writer, observes, that the period of nursing has a +great influence over the numbers of mankind in various countries, as is +evinced by numerous facts. He adduces proofs of this, position. Thus, he +says, in China, where the population is excessive, and the inhuman +practice of infanticide is common, they wean a child as soon as it can +put its hand to its mouth. On the other hand, the Indians of North +America do not wean their children until they are old and strong enough +to run about: generally they are suckled for a period of more than two +years.</p> + +<p>He then enters into a physiological inquiry why it is that British +mothers do not usually suckle their children longer than ten months. He +seems—though he does not give us his precise opinion—to think that, in +all ordinary cases, the period of nursing ought to be protracted to two +or three years, and that perhaps it would be better still to extend it +to four or five. His remarks are so excellent, and withal so curious, +and their tendency so humane, that we venture to insert one or two of +his paragraphs entire.</p> + +<p>"Certain it is, that the milk does not diminish particularly at that +time, (ten months,) so far as regards quantity; and from the health of +children reared without spoon-meat beyond this time, it as certainly +undergoes no change in its quality. Children are sometimes so old before +weaning, as to be able to ask for the breast; and it has not been +remarked that the health of mothers, thus suckling, was in any way worse +than that of their neighbors. Altogether, then, it may be asserted, that +a mother is likely to enjoy better health, and to be less liable to +sickness and death during lactation, than during pregnancy.</p> + +<p>"Many women believe, or affect to believe, that the weakness they labor +under arises from some latent moral or physical cause; but this weakness +is not attributed to lactation in the earlier months of suckling, +because the mother then considers herself fulfilling a necessary duty, +which her constitution, for so long, is well able to bear. So soon, +however, as the period of lactation has passed over, as it is +established by custom or fashion, she imagines she is exceeding the +intentions of nature, and she forthwith concludes that the continuance +of suckling is the cause of her uncomfortable sensations. This whim +being entertained, the child is weaned, and too often becomes the victim +of a most reprehensible delusion.</p> + +<p>"Since nature has furnished the mother with milk for a longer period +than custom demands, it is evident that some good purpose for the mother +and child was intended in this arrangement. Had it been otherwise, the +secretion of milk would stop at a definite time, in like manner as the +period of gestation is definite. That a child, in comparison with the +young of the lower animals, is so long unable to provide for itself, +strongly tends to corroborate the proofs already advanced—that nature +originally had in view a more protracted period for lactation than is +now allowed.</p> + +<p>"Some writers, following the laws of nature, as they interpreted them, +fixed the period of weaning at fifteen months, when the infant has got +its eight incisors and four canine teeth. There are well-authenticated +instances of mothers having suckled their children for three, four, +five, and even seven consecutive years; we ourselves have known cases +of lactation being prolonged far three and for four years, with the +happiest results."</p> + +<p>It appears to me better, therefore, that the child should be nursed, in +all ordinary cases, from twelve to fifteen months; and when there are no +special objections, about two years. As the change, whenever it is made, +and however gradual it may be, is an important one, in its effects on +the stomach and bowels, it is better to wean a little earlier or a +little later, than to do so just at the close of summer or beginning of +autumn, at which season bowel complaints are most common, most severe, +and most dangerous. It is sufficiently unfortunate that teething should +commence just at this period; but when we add another cause of irregular +action, which we can control, to one which we <i>cannot</i>, we act very +unwisely.</p> + +<p>I have already observed that we may begin to feed children when the +teeth begin to appear. By this is not meant that we should do so while +the system is under the irritation to which teething usually, or at +least often, subjects it. But when this is over, and a few teeth have +appeared, it is usually a proper time to commence our operations.</p> + +<p>The first food given should be precisely of the kind which has been +recommended for those children who are fed by the hand. The rules and +restrictions by which we are to be guided, are the same, except in one +point, which is, that in the case we are now considering, the child +should be fed <i>between nursing</i>.</p> + +<p>Let not parents be anxious about their healthy children under two years, +who have a supply of good milk, either from the mother or from the cow. +For those that are feeble, a physician may and ought to prescribe—not +medicine, but appropriate food, drink, &c.</p> + +<p>When the grinding teeth have cut through, if we have any doubts in +regard to the nutritive qualities of the food we are giving, we may +improve it by adding, instead of the one third of pure water, a similar +quantity of gum arabic water, barley water, or rice water. Some use a +little weak animal broth; but this is unnecessary, and I think, on the +whole, injurious, except for purposes strictly medicinal.</p> + +<p>This course is so simple, and so far removed from that which is +generally adopted, that few mothers will probably be willing to pursue +it with perseverance, especially when the teeth appear very late. Those +who are, however, will be richly rewarded, in the end, in the +advantages; which will accrue to the child's health, and the vigor it +will ensure to his constitution.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>During the process of Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>It has already been shown that, in weaning, some regard should be had to +the season of the year; and that the end of summer and beginning of fall +are of all periods the most unfavorable. The best time, on every +account, is in the spring—in March, April, May, or June; and the next +best is during the months of October and November. But December, January +and February are better than July, August and September.</p> + +<p>Weaning should never be sudden. We may safely and properly call upon +those who are addicted to snuff or opium taking, tobacco chewing, rum +drinking, and other habits which are purely artificial, to break +off—<i>to wean themselves</i>—suddenly; since <i>they</i> can do so with +considerable safety, and will seldom have the courage or the +perseverance to do it otherwise. But with the child, in regard to his +food, such a course will not be advisable. If we regard his future +health or happiness, he must be weaned gradually.</p> + +<p>The first proper step will be to give the child a little larger quantity +of the cow's milk and gum arabic mixture, between nursings, at the same +time increasing very gradually the intervals of nursing. When the +intervals become six hours distant from each other, it will be best to +add a little good bread to the milk with which it is fed, about two or +three times a day. Arrowroot jelly, if he can be made to relish it, will +be highly useful; but if not, some boiled rice, into which a little +arrowroot has been sprinkled while boiling, may be added to his milk.</p> + +<p>It may be worth the attempt to excite an aversion in the child to +nursing his mother, so that be will refuse to nurse, if possible, of his +own accord. This aversion may be excited by such an application of +aloes, or some other offensive substance, as will cause him to withdraw +himself from the breast as soon as he tastes it.</p> + +<p>A serious mistake is often made, in connection with weaning, in giving +the child not only too much food, but that which is too solid, or too +rich. This mistake has undoubtedly grown out of the belief that his +feeble condition <i>requires</i> it; whereas the truth is, that he neither +needs food at this period, nor is capable of digesting it. For let us be +as judicious in the process of weaning as we may, the tone of the +child's stomach will be somewhat reduced, or in other words, its powers +of digestion will be weakened by it; and to give it strong food, or +overload it with that which is weaker, is not only unreasonable and +unphilosophical, but cruel. And if there should be a tendency in the +child's constitution to rickets, scrofula, consumption, and other +wasting diseases, such a course would be likely to bring them on, and +destroy life.</p> + +<p>"When milk will agree," says Dr. Dewees, "there is no food so proper. It +may be employed in any of its combinations, with good wheaten bread, +rice, sago, &c., only remembering that when either of these articles is +found to agree, it should be continued perseveringly, until it may +become offensive. In this case, some new combination may be required." I +do not see the necessity of continuing one kind of food till it +<i>offends</i>. Besides, I do not believe that these simple articles of food +are apt to become offensive to stomachs that have not already been +spoiled. But whether a single dish should or should not come to be +offensive, I greatly prefer an occasional change.</p> + +<p>Buchan, in his Advice to Mothers, has recommended it to them to boil +bread for their infants, in water. It should not, for this purpose—nor +indeed for any other—be new; it is best at one or two days, old. It may +be boiled in a small quantity of water, or what is still better, of +milk; or it may be steamed till it becomes soft and light, almost like +new bread, but without any of the objectionable properties of that which +is wholly new. To bread, thus prepared, is to be added a suitable +quantity of milk, fresh from the cow, and a little diluted with water, +but not boiled.</p> + +<p>But as there may be, here and there, at any age, a stomach with which +milk, with bread, or rice, or sago, will not agree—though I think they +must be very rare cases—we may be allowed to substitute for it a +solution of "gum arabic, in the proportion of an ounce to a pint of +water," to which may be added a little sugar; and if the child is old +enough to observe the color, just milk enough to change the appearance. +Another preparation for the same purpose consists of rennet whey, a +little sweetened, and "disguised, if necessary, as just stated."</p> + +<p>The health of the mother, too, during the period of weaning, often needs +great attention. Let her avoid medicine, however, if possible. A due +regard to food, drink, exercise, and rest of body and mind, &c., will +usually be found more effective, as well as more permanently +efficacious.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Food subsequently to Weaning.</i></h4> + +<p>You will allow me to introduce in this place, some of the sentiments of +Dr. Cadogan, an English physician, from a little work on the management +of children. [Footnote: Though Dr. C.'s remarks will apply more closely +to England in 1750, they are by no means inapplicable to the United +States in 1837.] I do it with the more pleasure because, though he wrote +almost a century ago, he urges the same general principles on which I +have all along been insisting: hence it will be seen that mine are no +new-fangled notions. His remarks refer to the young of every age, but +chiefly to early infancy and childhood. It will be found necessary, in +some instances, to abridge, but I shall endeavor not to misrepresent the +Doctor's views.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>"Look over the bills of mortality. Almost half of those who fill up that +black list, die under five years of age; so that half the people that +come into the world go out of it again, before they become of the least +use to it or to themselves. To me, this seems to deserve serious +consideration.</p> + +<p>"It is ridiculous to charge it upon nature, and to suppose that infants +are more subject to disease and death than grown persons; on the +contrary, they bear pain and disease much better—fevers especially; and +for the same reason that a twig is less hurt by a storm than an oak.</p> + +<p>"In all the other productions of nature, we see the greatest vigor and +luxuriancy of health, the nearer they are to the egg or bud. When was +there a lamb, a bird, or a tree, that died because it was young? These +are under the immediate nursing of unerring nature; and they thrive +accordingly.</p> + +<p>"Ought it not, therefore, to be the care of every nurse and every +parent, not only to protect their nurslings from injury, but to be well +assured that their own officious services be not the greatest evils the +helpless creatures can suffer?</p> + +<p>"In the lower class of mankind, especially in the country, disease and +mortality are not so frequent, either among adults or their children. +Health and posterity are the portion of the poor—I mean the laborious. +The want of superfluity confines them more within the limits of nature; +hence they enjoy the blessings they feel not, and are ignorant of their +cause.</p> + +<p>"In the course of my practice, I have had frequent occasion to be fully +satisfied of this; and have often heard a mother anxiously say, 'the +child has not been well ever since it has done puking and crying.'</p> + +<p>"These complaints, though not attended to, point very plainly to the +cause. Is it not very evident that when a child rids its stomach of its +contents several times a day, it has been overloaded? While the natural +strength lasts, (for every child is born with more health and strength +than is generally imagined,) it cries at or rejects the superfluous +load, and <i>thrives apace</i>; that is, grows very fat, bloated, and +distended beyond measure, like a house lamb.</p> + +<p>"But in time, the same oppressive cause continuing, the natural powers +are overcome, being no longer able to throw off the unequal weight. The +child, now unable to cry any more, languishes and is quiet.</p> + +<p>"The misfortune is, that these complaints are not understood. The child +is swaddled and crammed on, till, after gripes, purging, &c., it sinks +under both burdens into a convulsion fit, and escapes farther torture. +This would be the case with the lamb, were it not killed, when full fat.</p> + +<p>"That the present mode of nursing is wrong, one would think needed no +other proof than the frequent miscarriages attending it, the death of +many, and the ill health of those that survive. But what I am going to +complain of is, that children, in general, are over-clothed and +over-fed, and fed and clothed improperly. To these causes I attribute +almost all their diseases.</p> + +<p>"But the feeding of children is much more important to them than their +clothing. Let us consider what nature directs in the case. If we follow +nature, instead of leading or driving her, we cannot err. In the +business of nursing, as well as physic, art, if it do not exactly copy +this original, is ever destructive.</p> + +<p>"If I could prevail, no child should ever be crammed with any unnatural +mixture, till the provision of nature was ready for it; nor afterwards +fed with any ungenial diet whatever, at least for the <i>first three +months</i>; for it is not well able to digest and assimilate other elements +sooner.</p> + +<p>"I have seen very healthy children that never ate or drank anything +whatever but their mother's milk, for the first ten or twelve months. +Nature seems to direct to this, by giving them no teeth till about that +time. The call of nature should be waited for to feed them with anything +more substantial; and the appetite ought ever to precede the food—not +only with regard to the daily meals, but those changes of diet which +opening, increasing life requires. But this is never done, in either +case; which is one of the greatest mistakes of all nurses.</p> + +<p>"When the child requires more solid sustenance, we are to inquire what +and how much is most proper to give it. We may be well assured there is +a great mistake either in the quantity or quality of children's food, or +both, as it is usually given them, because they are made sick by it; for +to this mistake I cannot help imputing nine in ten of all their +diseases.</p> + +<p>"As to quantity, there is a most ridiculous error in the common +practice; for it is generally supposed that whenever a child cries, it +wants victuals: it is accordingly fed ten or twelve or more times in a +day and night. This is so obvious a misapprehension, that I am surprised +it should ever prevail.</p> + +<p>"If a child's wants and motions be diligently and judiciously attended +to, it will be found that it never cries, but from pain. Now the first +sensations of hunger are not attended with pain; accordingly, a very +young child that is hungry will make a hundred other signs of its want, +before it will cry for food. If it be healthy, and quite easy in its +dress, it will hardly ever cry at all. Indeed, these signs and motions I +speak of are but rarely observed, because it seldom happens that +children are ever suffered to be hungry.[Footnote: That which we +commonly observe in them, in such cases, and call by the name of hunger, +the Doctor, I suppose would regard as morbid or unnatural feeling, +wholly unworthy of the name of HUNGER.]</p> + +<p>"In a few, very few, whom I have had the pleasure to see reasonably +nursed, that were not fed above two or three times in twenty-four hours, +and yet were perfectly healthy, active, and happy, I have seen these +signals, which were as intelligible as if they had spoken.</p> + +<p>"There are many faults in the quality of children's food.</p> + +<p>"1. It is not simple enough. Their paps, panadas, gruels, &c. are +generally enriched with sugar, spices, and other nice things, and +sometimes a drop of wine—none of which they ought ever to take. Our +bodies never want them; they are what luxury only has introduced, to the +destruction of the health of mankind.</p> + +<p>"2. It is not enough that their food should be simple; it should also be +light. Many people, I find, are mistaken in their notions of what is +light, and fancy that most kinds of pastry, puddings, custards, &c. are +light; that is, light of digestion. But there is nothing heavier, in +this sense, than unfermented flour and eggs, boiled hard, which are the +chief ingredients in some of these preparations.</p> + +<p>"What I mean by light food—to give the best idea I can of it—is, any +substance that is easily separated, and soluble in warm water. Good +bread is the lightest thing I know, and the fittest food for young +children. Cows' milk is also simple and light, and very good for them; +but it is often injudiciously prepared. It should never be boiled; for +boiling alters the taste and properties of it, destroys its sweetness, +and makes it thicker, heavier, and less fit to mix and assimilate with +the blood."</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>It is hardly necessary for me to repeat, that in these general views of +Dr. C., with a few exceptions, I entirely concur; indeed some of them +have already been presented. But I have expressed my doubts of the +soundness of his conclusion in regard to sugar. Used with food, in very +small quantity, by persons whose stomachs are already in a good +condition, both sugar and molasses, especially the former, appear to me +not only harmless, but wholesome and useful.</p> + +<p>On the subject of simplicity in children's food, I should be glad to +enlarge. There is nothing more important in diet than simplicity, and +yet I think there is nothing more rare. To suit the fashion, everything +must be mixed and varied. I have no objection to variety at different +meals, both for children and adults; indeed I am disposed to recommend +it, as will be seen hereafter. But I am utterly opposed to any +considerable variety at the same meal; and above all, in a single dish. +The simpler a dish can be, the better.</p> + +<p>But let us look, for a moment, at the dishes of food which are often +presented, even at what are called plain tables.</p> + +<p>Meats cannot be eaten—so many persons think—without being covered +with mustard, or pepper, or gravy—or soaked in vinegar; and not a few +regard them as insipid, unless several of these are combined. Few people +think a piece of plain boiled or broiled muscle (lean flesh) with +nothing on it but a little salt, is fit to be eaten. Everything, it is +thought, must be rendered more stimulating, or acrid; or must be +swimming in gravy, or melted fat or butter.</p> + +<p>Bread, though proverbially the staff of life, can scarcely be eaten in +its simple state. It must be buttered, or honied, or toasted, or soaked +in milk, or dipped in gravy. Puddings must have cherries or fruits of +some sort, or spices in them, and must be sweetened largely. Or +perhaps—more ridiculous still—they must have suet in them. And after +all this is done, who can eat them without the addition of sauce, or +butter, or molasses, or cream? Potatoes, boiled, steamed or roasted, +delightful as they are to an unperverted appetite, are yet thought by +many people hardly palatable till they are mashed, and buttered or +gravied; or perhaps soaked in vinegar. In short, the plainest and +simplest article for the table is deemed nearly unfit for the stomach, +till it has been buttered, and peppered, and spiced, and perhaps +<i>pearlashed</i>. Even bread and milk must be filled with berries or fruits. +Where can you find many adults who would relish a meal which should +consist entirely of plain bread, without any addition; of plain +potatoes, without anything on them except a little salt; of a plain rice +pudding, and nothing with it; or of plain baked or boiled apples or +pears? And <i>could</i> such persons be found, how many of them would bring +up their children to live on such plain dishes?</p> + +<p>It need not be wondered at, that a palate which has been so long tickled +by variety, and by so many stimulating mixtures of food, should come to +regard cold water for drink as insipid; and should feel dissatisfied +with it, and desirous of boiling some narcotic or poisonous herb in it, +or brewing it with something which will impart to it more or less of +alcohol. The wonder is, not that some of our epicures become drunkards, +but that all of them do not.</p> + +<p>Dr. Cadogan alludes to a sad mistake everywhere made about <i>light</i> food; +and condemns, very justly, hard-boiled custards, pastry, &c. It is very +strange that these substances—for these are among the injurious +articles which I call mixtures—should ever have obtained currency in +the world, to the exclusion of bread, which, as the same writer justly +says, is among the lightest articles of food which are known.</p> + +<p>It is strange, in particular, what views people have about bread. +Judging from what I see, I am compelled to believe that there are few +who regard it in any other light than as a kind of necessary evil. They +appear to eat it, not because they are fond of it, by itself, but +because they <i>must</i> eat it; or rather, because it is a fashionable +article; and not to make believe they eat it, at the least, would be +unfashionable. They will get rid of it, however, when they can. And when +they must eat it, they soak it, or cover it with butter or milk, or +something else which will render it tolerable—or toast it. And use it +as they may, it must be hot from the oven. After it is once cold, very +few will eat it. The idea, above all, of making a full meal of simple +cold bread, twenty-four hours old, would be rejected by ninety-nine +persons in a hundred; and by some with abhorrence.</p> + +<p>People not only dislike bread, but regard it as unnutritious. I have +heard many a fond parent say to the child who ate no meat, and seemed to +depend almost wholly on bread—"Why, my dear child, you will starve if +you eat no meat. Do at least put some butter on your bread or your +potatoes." A thousand times have I been admonished, when eating my +vegetable dinner during the hot and fatiguing days of summer—for I was +bred to the farm, and ate little or no meat till I was fourteen years +of age—to eat more butter, or cheese, or something that would give me +strength; for I could not work, they said, without something more +nourishing than bread and the other vegetables. And yet few if any boys +of my age did more work, or performed it better, or with more ease, than +myself. And I early observed the same thing in other vegetable eaters.</p> + +<p>The truth is, there is nothing in the world better adapted to the daily +wants of the human stomach than good bread; and few things more +nutritious. There may be a little more nutriment in eggs or jelly; but +if the former are hard-boiled, the stomach cannot digest them; and fat +meat of any kind is digested with great difficulty. Indeed it is +doubtful whether stomachs in temperate climates digest fat at all. They +may dissolve it, but that is not making good chyle of it. They may even +reduce it to chyle; <i>but chyle is not blood</i>. Fat may slip through the +system without much of it <i>adhering</i>; and I think it pretty evident that +it usually does so.</p> + +<p>The muscle—the lean part of animals—may be nearly as nutritious as +good bread, and is more easily digested. But it is very far from being +proved that, for the healthy, those things are always best which are +most easily digested. Nobody will pretend that potatoes are better for +us than bread; and yet the experiments of Dr. Beaumont seem to prove +that boiled or roasted potatoes are much more quick and easy of +digestion than bread of the first and best quality. Even over-boiled +eggs and raw cabbage, bad as they are, are dissolved in the stomach, and +appear to be digested as quick, if not quicker, than good wheat bread. +But nobody in the world will pretend they form more wholesome food. +Neither is meat—even <i>lean</i> meat—necessarily more wholesome, or better +calculated to give strength than bread, simply be cause it is more +quickly and easily digested. It would be nearer the truth to say, that +those substances which digest slowest (provided they do not irritate) +are best adapted to the wants of the human stomach.</p> + +<p>The philosopher LOCKE—perhaps from his knowledge of medicine—gives +some excellent directions on this subject. "Great care should be used," +be says, that the child "eat bread plentifully, both alone and with +everything else; and whatever he eats that is solid, make him chew it +well." This writer, by the way, supposed that the teeth were made to be +used in beating our food; and that we ought neither to swallow it +without chewing, as is customary in our busy New England, nor to mash or +soak it in order to save the labor of mastication—a practice almost +equally universal. But let us hear his own words.</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"As for his diet, it ought to be very plain and simple; and if I might +advise, flesh should be forborne, at least till he is two or three years +old. But of whatever advantage this may be to his future health and +strength, I fear it will hardly be consented to by parents, misled by +the custom of eating too much flesh themselves, who will be apt to think +their children—as they do themselves—in danger to be starved; if they +have not flesh at least twice a day. This I am sure, children would +breed their teeth with much less danger, be freer from diseases while +they were little, and lay the foundations of a healthy and strong +constitution much surer, if they were not crammed so much as they are, +by fond mothers and foolish servants, and were kept wholly from flesh +the first three or four years of their lives."</blockquote> + +<p>Were Locke still living, I should like to interrogate him at this +place. He first speaks of giving children no meat till they are two or +three years old; and then afterwards extends the period to three or +four. The question I would put is this: If the child is healthier +without meat till he is three or four years old, why not till he is +thirteen or fourteen; or even till thirty, or forty, or seventy? And is +not Professor Stuart, of Andover—a meat eater himself, and an advocate +for its moderate use by those who have already been trained to the use +of it—is not the Professor, I say, more than half right when he +asserts, as I have heard him, that it may be well to train all children, +from the first, to the exclusive use of vegetable food?</p> + +<p>I have a few more extracts from Locke, particularly on the subject of +bread.</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"I should think that a good piece of well made and well baked brown +bread would be often the best breakfast for my young master. I am sure +it is as wholesome, and will make him as strong a man, as greater +delicacies; and if he be used to it, it will be as pleasant to him.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"If he, at any time, call for victuals between meals, use him to nothing +but dry bread. If he be hungry more than wanton, bread will go down; and +if he be not hungry, it is not fit that he should eat. By this you will +obtain two good effects. First, that by custom he will come to be in +love with bread; for, as I said, our palates and stomachs, too, are +pleased with the things we are used to. Another good you will gain +hereby is, that you will not teach him to eat more nor oftener than +nature requires.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"I do not think that all people's appetites are alike; some have +naturally stronger and some weaker stomachs. But this I think, that +many are made gormands and gluttons by custom, that were not so by +nature. And I see, in some countries, men as lusty and strong, that eat +but two meals a day, as those that have set their stomachs, by a +constant usage, to call on them for four or five.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"The Romans usually fasted till supper, the only set meal, even of those +who ate more than once in a day; and those who used breakfasts, as some +did at eight, same at ten, others at twelve of the clock, and some +later, neither ate flesh nor had anything made ready for them.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Augustus, when the greatest monarch on the earth, tells us he took a +piece of dry bread in his chariot; and Seneca, in his 83d epistle, +giving an account how be managed himself when he was old, and his age +permitted indulgence, says that he used to eat a piece of dry bread for +his dinner, without the formality of sitting to it. Yet Seneca, as it is +well known, was wealthy.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"The masters of the world were brought up with this spare diet, and the +young gentlemen of Rome felt no want of strength or spirit because they +ate but once a day. Or if it happened by chance that any one could not +fast so long as till supper, their only set meal, he took nothing but a +bit of dry bread, or at most a few raisins or some such slight thing +with it, to stay his stomach. And more than one set meal a day was +thought so monstrous that it was a reproach, as low as Caesar's time, to +make an entertainment, or sit down to a table, till towards sunset. +Therefore I judge it most convenient that my young master should have +nothing but bread for breakfast. I impute a great part of our diseases +in England to our eating too much flesh, and too little bread. Dry +bread, though the best nourishment, has the least temptation."</blockquote> + +<p>I shall not undertake to defend all the sentiments of Mr. Locke in these +extracts; but in regard to the main point—the nutritive properties and +wholesome tendency of bread, and the importance of making it a principal +article of diet for children—I think his views are just. In short, they +do not differ, substantially, from those of a large proportion of the +best writers on this subject in every country, during the last three +hundred years. As if with one voice, they dissuade from the use of too +much animal food for the young, and encourage the use of a larger +proportion of vegetable food—bread, plain puddings, rice, potatoes, +turnips, beets, apples, pears, &c., and milk.</p> + +<p>Yet they all, or nearly all, seem to write just as if they did not +expect to be believed; or if believed, to be followed. They seem to +regard mankind as so inveterately attached to old habits, and so much +addicted to flesh eating, that there is little hope of reclaiming them.</p> + +<p>Now, though my opinions are no more entitled to respect than many of +theirs, I hope for greater success than they appear to do. I expect that +many young mothers who read this work, will be led to think and inquire +further on the subject; and if they find that the views here advanced +are in accordance with reason, and common sense, and higher authority, I +am not without hope that they will reform, and do what they can to +reform their neighbors.</p> + +<p>I have dwelt the longer, in this section, on the <i>general</i> principles of +diet, because I am of opinion that whatever is true, on this subject, in +regard to the diet of children, soon after weaning, is equally, or +nearly equally applicable to the whole of childhood, youth, manhood and +age. It is not true that one period of life, and one mode of employment, +demands a diet essentially different from that which is demanded at +another period, and in other circumstances; provided always, that the +individual is in health. Occasional instances of the kind, there may be; +but they are not numerous.</p> + +<p>The digestive powers of the young are more nearly as strong as those of +the adult than is usually admitted, and they are much more active. They +require a less quantity of food, undoubtedly; and they should be fed at +shorter intervals. But as a general rule, what is best for them, as +regards its quality, at three years old, is best for them at thirty; or, +should they live so long, at ninety. I repeat it; there is very little +difference in the nature of the food required ever after teething.</p> + +<p>Let me not be understood as saying that the strong, and the robust, and +the active cannot digest food which the weak, and enervated, and +indolent cannot. Undoubtedly they can. But this does not prove that they +<i>ought</i> to do it. It does not prove that their strength and vigor were +not given them for other purposes than to be expended on the poorer +substances for food, when they might have better. Nor is it true, as +often pretended, that the hard laborer needs either more food, or that +which is of a stronger quality, just in proportion to the severity of +his labor. The man or the child who labors moderately, just sufficient +for the purposes of health, and labors with his hands in the open air, +needs rather <i>more</i> food than the indolent or the sedentary, or those +who labor to excess; but not that which is of a stronger quality. It is +he who labors to excess—if any difference of quality were required at +all—who should eat milder food, as well as less in quantity.</p> + +<p>Some physicians there are who tell us that all mankind would live +longer, as well as be more healthful, if they ate nothing but bread, and +drank nothing but water. It may be so, but I do not believe it. Water, +as I shall show hereafter, is indeed the only appropriate drink; but I +do not believe that bread, even after the second year, is in all cases +and circumstances the best food. Besides that the experiments of +Majendie and other physiologists go a little way—though not far, I +confess—to prove that animals generally, (and if so, why not man, as +well as the rest?) thrive best with some degree of variety in their +food, it seems to me more in accordance with the general intentions of +the Creator, so far as we can discover what they are.</p> + +<p>While, therefore, I deny that either milk or bread is better, in all +cases, for human sustenance, than any other articles of food, I must, at +the same time, be permitted to regard them as among the best, and as +deserving more general attention. Every infant, after leaving the +breast, should, as it seems to me, make bread, in some of its forms, a +chief article of food.</p> + +<p>This article, so justly and emphatically called the staff of life, may +be found in almost every country. Common sense seems to have dictated +the propriety of its use; though fashion has often led us to overlook +or despise it—like air, and fire, and water, and nearly every other +common but indispensable blessing.</p> + +<p>The best kind of bread is made from wheat, the worst from bark, +saw-dust, &c. Wood and bark afford so little nutriment, that it is only +in such countries as Norway, Sweden, Lapland. Iceland, Greenland, and +Siberia, that the inhabitants can be induced to make use of them. Here +they are often useful; either because people cannot get food which is +better, or to blend with their fat or oily animal food. For it should +never be forgotten, that healthy digestion requires a large proportion +of innutritious matter along with the pure nutriment. In order to make +bread from wheat, the meal should not be bolted. If it seems to contain +particles which are too coarse, it may be well to pass it through a +coarse family sieve; but the best bread I have ever eaten, as well as +the cleanest and neatest, was not sifted at all.</p> + +<p>I know there is an almost universal prejudice against this sort of +bread. Some complain that it scratches their throats; others, that it is +tasteless; and others still, that it does not agree with them. With +others there is another objection—which is that bread of this sort has +sometimes been called <i>dyspepsia</i> bread; and with others still, that it +has been called <i>Graham</i> bread. Either of these appellations seems +sufficient to condemn it.</p> + +<p>Now as to the harshness, this is owing to its being made of bad +materials, or to its being baked too hard, or kept too long. Much of +what they call dyspepsia bread, in our cities, is evidently made by +mixing the bran and flour of wheat after they have been once separated; +besides which, in not a few cases, the finest of the flour appears to be +taken away. Now bread made of such materials thus combined, will always +be darker colored, as well as harsher, than when made from the wheat, +simply ground without any bolting, and wet up in the usual manner. Such +bread is best two or three days old. After four days, it becomes dry and +somewhat harsh.</p> + +<p>They who complain that such bread is insipid, are persons whose +appetites have been injured by food which is high-seasoned; and who, if +they eat bread at all, must eat it hot, or soaked in butter. No wonder +such persons do not like plain bread, and say it is tasteless. But it +must not be denied that bakers often suffer this kind of bread to be +over-risen, in order to make it sufficiently light and porous. This +renders it less tasteful, and from the saleratus they use, less +wholesome.</p> + +<p>No child who has been accustomed, from the first, to good wheaten bread, +made of unbolted meal, and not less than one day old, will ever prefer +any other, until he has been rendered capricious on this subject, and +wishes to change for the sake of changing, or until he has been misled +by surrounding example. I speak from observation when I say that +infants, whose habits have not been depraved, will not prefer hot bread +of any kind. "It is hot, mother," I have heard them say, as an apology +for refusing a piece of bread; but never, "It is cold," or "It is too +old."</p> + +<p>It is the epicurean—it is he with whom it is a sufficient objection to +any kind of food whatever, that he has used it for several successive +meals or days—that is most ready to complain of good bread. He whose +habits are correct, and who is the more unwilling to change any of his +articles of diet, the longer he has been in the use of them, and who +only changes them, or uses variety, from principle—he, I say, will +never complain of harshness or want of taste in good wheat bread; nor +will it be an objection of weight with him that <i>Mr. Graham</i> has +recommended it, or that it has either prevented or cured <i>dyspepsia</i>.</p> + +<p>Nor will the epicurean himself complain that bread is insipid, after +being confined to it for a month or six weeks. He will then find a +sweetness in it, for which he had long sought in vain in the more +delicate and costly viands of a luxurious, and expensive, and +unchristian modern table.</p> + +<p>It is they only who observe simplicity, and confine themselves to very +plain food, who truly enjoy pleasure in eating. The bulk of mankind +benumb their sense of taste by their high-seasoned, over-stimulating +food and drink, and by such constant variety and strange mixtures; and +thus, in their eager cry, "Who will show us any good?" they actually +enjoy less than he who eats plain food, and is contented with it.</p> + +<p>Bread of all kinds is greatly improved in whiteness and pleasantness by +being wet with milk; though even when wet with nothing but water, there +is a solid and rational sweetness to it, of which the despisers of +bread, and devourers of much flesh and condiments never dreamed, and +never will dream, till they reform their habits.</p> + +<p>If children are furnished with good bread, on the plan of Mr. Locke, +there is no doubt that they will relish it most keenly; that their +attachment to it will strengthen, and that unless we give them other +food occasionally, from principle, or seduce them by depraving their +tastes, they will continue it through life. "Train up a child in the way +he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it," is a +general rule, and has as few exceptions, when applied to the diet of a +child, as when it is applied to his moral tastes and preferences.</p> + +<p>With those parents who, though convinced of the justness of the views +here advanced, have already trained their children in the way they +should <i>not</i> go, but are anxious to retrace their steps as far as +possible, there will here be a difficulty. "Our children," they will +say, "do not, at present, <i>relish</i> the kind of bread you speak of; and +how shall we bring them to do so? or is the thing indeed possible?"</p> + +<p>The answer to these inquiries is easy. Such parents have only to confine +their children to the kinds of food which they deem proper for them, a +few weeks or a few months, and they will soon relish them. If those who +are old enough to be convinced can be brought to unite heartily in the +change, and to endeavor to be pleased with it, the work of reformation +will be more pleasant and probably more speedy. I have never found any +difficulty of bringing myself to relish in a very short time an article +of food for which I had no relish before, and to which I had even a +dislike, provided I was thoroughly convinced it was best for me, and was +earnest in the desire of change—except sweet oil, to which I was about +six months in becoming reconciled.</p> + +<p>It is with physical, as with moral habits, in their formation. We +should fix on what we believe, from experience, observation, and divine +and human testimony, is best for us, and habit will soon render it +agreeable. It is important, even to health, that food should be +agreeable; but as I have already said, what we know to be best for us +will soon become agreeable, if we confine ourselves to it; and to our +children also, if we confine them to it, in like manner.</p> + +<p>Next to bread made of wheat—when that cannot be procured—is a mixture +of wheat and Indian meal; but the proportion of the latter should be the +smallest. Wheat, rye, and Indian, in the proportion of one third of +each, make excellent bread, sometimes called <i>third</i> bread. Rye and +Indian make a tolerable bread. Rye alone is not so good. The want, in +the latter, of the vegetable principle called gluten, makes its general +use of very questionable propriety.</p> + +<p>Indian meal alone, baked in cakes by the fire, if eaten only in small +quantities, is a very nutritious and by no means unwholesome bread. But +its sweetness, and the general fondness which people who are accustomed +to its use have for it, lead them to eat it in too large proportions, if +they use it while it is warm. In these circumstances, it proves itself +too active for the stomach and bowels. If warm, six ounces is as much +as a hearty adult ought to eat of it at once; and children should of +course take much less. It is less active on the bowels, and scarcely +less agreeable, as soon as we become accustomed to it, if eaten when it +is cold—even if baked in loaves, in the oven.</p> + +<p>Potatoes, added to unbolted wheat flour, make excellent bread; and so, +as I am informed, does rice. Of the latter, however, I have never eaten. +Oats and barley, and many other grains and substances, will make bread; +but it is of an inferior kind.</p> + +<p>The question may again recur, after this extended series of remarks, +whether I intend to confine the young almost exclusively to bread, in +one or another of its forms. We shall see how this is, presently.</p> + +<p>While bread, therefore, should constitute a part, at least, and +sometimes the whole of a meal, a great variety of other articles are not +only admissible, but desirable. Among these may be mentioned plain +puddings.</p> + +<p>One of the most wholesome puddings is made of Indian meal, enclosed in a +bag and boiled. Nearly allied to this is the common hasty pudding; but +the last is less wholesome, because it requires less chewing; and it +ought to have been observed, before now, that after weaning, any food +is digested better which has undergone the process of thorough +mastication.</p> + +<p>Boiled rice, though hardly to be regarded as a pudding, is very +nutritious, and very easy of digestion. I am not without doubts, +however, in regard to the utility of a large proportion of rice, as +food. A dinner of it, two or three times a week, I believe to be +wholesome; but used too frequently, it seems to me not active enough for +the stomach and bowels; having in this respect precisely a contrary +effect to that of warm Indian cakes. The common notion that rice has a +tendency to make people blind, is entirely unfounded. Its worst effect +is when eaten without being boiled through. In such cases, I have known +it to do mischief; perhaps because it was swallowed without much +chewing. Some grind it, and use the flour; but I cannot recommend it to +be used in this manner.</p> + +<p>The best pudding in the world is a loaf of bread, (What!—you will +say—bread again?) three or four or five days old, boiled, or rather +<i>steamed</i>, in milk. All kinds of bread are excellent for this purpose, +but wheat and Indian are the best. They are excellent even without +milk—that is, simply steamed.</p> + +<p>Puddings made of the flour of wheat, rye, buckwheat, &c., are less +wholesome than those which have been already mentioned. And all sorts +of puddings are less wholesome, when eaten as hot as our unreasonable +fashions require, than when their temperature is quite below that of our +bodies. I would not have them so cold as to chill us, for this would be +to go to the other, though less dangerous extreme; but they ought to be +cool. Too much heat is an unnatural stimulus, likely to leave more or +less debility behind it. In addition to this, those who eat hot food are +more exposed to take cold, in consequence of it.</p> + +<p>With none of these puddings ought we to mix any fruits, green or +dried—not even raisins. Some of the more important properties of nearly +every kind of fruit or berry are lost by boiling, unless we eat the +water in which they are boiled, and save the vapor which would otherwise +escape. I am not in favor of boiled fruit generally, especially if +boiled in puddings.</p> + +<p>Puddings, like most other kinds of food—even bread—may be slightly +salted: not that this is indispensable, but because the balance of human +testimony is in its favor. The argument that we evidently need salt +because the other animals require it, is without much weight. The other +animals do not <i>generally</i> require or use it.[Footnote: Some +considerable savage nations use no salt, and a few have a strong +aversion to it.] The cases so often triumphantly mentioned, where +animals appear to thrive better from the use of it, are only exceptions +to the general rule, nor are they very numerous in comparison with the +whole race of animals. Still I have no objections to its moderate use. +It may be useful in preventing worms; though there are doubts even of +that. In large quantities, it is unquestionably hurtful.</p> + +<p>But neither fruits nor berries—permit me to repeat the sentiment—no, +nor any such thing as cinnamon or spices, nor even sugar or molasses in +any considerable quantity, should go into the composition of any sort of +pudding. If the puddings are not sweet enough without, it is better to +add a little sugar or molasses on your plate. Nor should sauces, or +cream, or butter, or suet be used in or upon them; though of all these +substances, cream is least injurious. Nutmegs, grated cheese, &c., are +unnecessary and hurtful. Cheese should never be eaten, in any way.</p> + +<p>There is one thing, however, which may be eaten in moderate quantity +with all sorts of puddings and with bread; I mean milk. I say eaten +<i>with</i>, for it is better never to put these substances, nor indeed any +other, <i>into</i> the milk. The bread, pudding, &c., should be eaten by +itself, and the milk by itself, also. In this way we shall not be liable +to cheat the teeth out of what is justly their due, and then make the +deranged stomach and general system pay for it.</p> + +<p>Potatoes are a good article of diet—to be used once a day—though they +are not very nutritious. They are best either steamed or roasted in the +ashes. They are also excellent when boiled. Turnips are also good. +Onions are not so useful as is generally supposed, except for the +purposes of medicine.</p> + +<p>Beets; in small quantity, and carrots and asparagus, and above all, +beans and peas—but not their pods—are tolerable food once a day, +during most of the year, except it be the middle of the winter. But +neither these, nor potatoes, nor any other vegetables, ought to be +cooked in any way with fat, or fat meat, or butter; or be mashed after +they are cooked, or eaten with oil or butter.</p> + +<p>If there be an exception to this general rule—which may seem to be +rather sweeping—it should be in favor of a little sweet oil on rice, or +on bread puddings. But the common practice, founded upon the apparent +belief that we can scarcely eat anything until it is well covered with +lard or butter, is quite objectionable—nay, it is even disgusting. No +pure stomach would ever prefer oily bread, or pudding, or beans, or +peas; and most people would abhor the sight of such a strange +combination, were not habit, in its power to change our very nature, +almost omnipotent.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Remarks on Fruit.</i></h4> + +<p>There is a very great diversity of opinion on the subject of fruit. Some +maintain that all fruit, even in the most ripe and perfect state, is of +doubtful utility, especially for children. Others say none is hurtful, +if ripe, and eaten in moderate quantity. Some require care in making a +proper selection; but here again, in regard to what constitutes a proper +selection, there is a difference of opinion. Some consider fruits easy +of digestion; others believe they are digested only with very great +difficulty.</p> + +<p>When the cholera prevailed in the large cities of the United States, a +majority of the physicians believed all fruits, even those which were +ripe, to be injurious in their tendency. But it was insisted by the +minority—I think very justly—that whenever fruit appeared to be +injurious, it was accidental—that is, the disease, being prepared to +make its attack just at that time, happened to do so immediately after +the use of fruit, rather than something else, and especially in the +<i>season</i> of fruits—or on account of excess; or (which was certainly +the case in some instances) because the quality of the fruit was bad.</p> + +<p>At present, the <i>weight</i> of testimony on this subject—estimating +according to talent, and not according to numbers—is in favor of good +fruit, used with moderation—even in the face of the cholera. Dr. +Dunglison—one of the last to adopt such an opinion—appears to be in +its favor.</p> + +<p>On several points, in regard to fruit, I believe that among medical men +there is no essential difference of opinion. As I always prefer, in +controversies, to see in how many things antagonists agree, before +proceeding to the points in which they differ, I will here endeavor to +enumerate them.</p> + +<p>1. All unripe fruits, especially, if eaten raw and uncooked—let the +season, or prevalent disease, or individual, be what or who it may—are +unwholesome.</p> + +<p>2. Excess, in the use of the most wholesome fruits, under any +circumstances, is also injurious.</p> + +<p>3. Fruits, eaten immediately after a full meal, when the stomach is in +an improper condition for receiving anything more, contribute to +overtask the digestive powers, and must hence produce more or less of +injury.</p> + +<p>4. The skins and kernels of the larger fruits are unwholesome, because +indigestible. The skins of fruits, if beaten or masticated finely; may +appear to be digested, because dissolved; but I have already endeavored +to show that solution is not always digestion.</p> + +<p>5. Fruits of all kinds are most wholesome in their own country, and in +their own appropriate season.</p> + +<p>6. Dried fruits are less wholesome than fresh.</p> + +<p>7. Fruit of all kinds should be withheld from infants, until they have +teeth.</p> + +<p>Thus far, as I have already said, all agree; at least so far as I know. +There are several other points on which medical men are generally +agreed, though not universally. One of these is, that fruits, if eaten +at all, should usually form a part of a regular meal. Another is, that +it is better not to eat them immediately before going to bed.</p> + +<p>There are contradictory opinions among the mass of the community, +physicians as well as others, on the general intention of our summer +fruits. From the fact that children's diseases prevail more at the +season of the year when fruits are more abundant, many think the fruits +are the immediate cause of them. Others, and with better reason, suppose +that the latter are intended by the Author of nature to check or prevent +the bowel diseases of summer.</p> + +<p>Nothing, certainly, is more unnatural than to suppose that at the very +season of the year when so many other influences combine to awaken a +tendency to disease in the human system, the Creator should place before +our eyes an abundance of fruits, inviting us by all their cooling and +tempting properties, only to do us mischief. On the contrary, it seems +to me much more probable that many of them were designed for our +moderate use. In what quantity, under what circumstances, and which are +best, it is left to human experience to determine.</p> + +<p>Some say that fruit should never be eaten in the morning, before +breakfast. Now everything I know of the human constitution, together +with what I have learned from experience and observation, has been for +years leading me to the contrary opinion. Indeed, I am most fully +convinced, that of all periods for eating fruit, whether we use it alone +or make it a part of our regular meals, the morning, soon after we rise, +is the most favorable. [Footnote: I ought to remark, that as the morning +is the best time for eating <i>good</i> fruit, so it is the very worst time +for eating it if <i>not</i> good; and as a large proportion of that which is +eaten is unripe, or otherwise bad, this may account for the general +prejudice against eating it at this period.] My reasons are as follows:</p> + +<p>1. The rest and sleep of the preceding night has restored our general +vigor, and consequently has invigorated the stomach, so that digestion +will be more easily and perfectly accomplished.</p> + +<p>2. We have been, at our rising, so long without food on our stomachs, +that they are not likely to be oppressed by a moderate quantity of good, +ripe, wholesome fruit. In the course of our waking hours, meals follow +each other in such quick succession, and there is so much variety, even +at the plainest tables, to tempt us to excess, that there is more danger +of injury from the addition of fruit than at our first rising.</p> + +<p>3. I have never known any one to receive injury from the use of fruit in +this way, provided no other circumstance in relation to quantity, +quality, &c. had been disregarded. In my own case, the practice has, on +the contrary, seemed beneficial.</p> + +<p>4. There is one reason in favor of this practice which perhaps would +have less weight, if people rose as early in the morning as they ought; +or, in the language of Dr. Franklin to the inhabitants of Paris, if they +knew that the sun gives light as soon as he rises. I allude to the +demand which I conceive that the stomach makes for something, after so +long fasting, and the pernicious custom of late breakfasts. I am +persuaded that it is advisable to eat something nearly as soon as we +rise, be it never so early; and if we can get nothing else for +breakfast, and have not accustomed ourselves to relish a piece of good +bread, or some other simple thing, which requires no labor of +preparation, I think it perfectly proper to eat a small quantity of +fruit.</p> + +<p>We come now to the particular consideration of some of those fruits +which universal experience has shown to be the most salutary.</p> + +<p>Of all these, none is more wholesome than the apple. There is indeed a +great diversity in the quality even of this single article. Sweet apples +are the most nutritious; but perhaps those which are gently acid, and at +the same time mealy, are rather more cooling, and when eaten raw, and in +the heat of summer, not less wholesome.</p> + +<p>Apples which come to maturity very early in the season appear, as a +general rule, to be less rich, and even less perfect, than those which +ripen later. In view of this fact, some writers have endeavored to +dissuade us from their use; and among others, Mr. Locke. We may judge a +little what his opinions were, from his concluding remarks on the +subject:—"I never knew apples hurt anybody," says he, "after October."</p> + +<p>But although neither apples nor any other fruits which ripen uncommonly +early are quite so good as those which come in a little later, yet I do +not think they are to be wholly rejected, unless they have been raised +in hot houses. Fruits, and indeed vegetables in general, whose maturity +is hastened by artificial processes, must be less wholesome than when +brought to perfection in nature's own appropriate time and manner. I +ought to say, however, very distinctly, that of the fruits of any +particular tree, those which first ripen are always the worst; for they +are usually wormy, or otherwise defective.</p> + +<p>Most of the fruit, as well as other vegetables, brought to our city +markets in this country, is utterly unfit to be eaten. Sometimes it is +immature; sometimes it has a hot house maturity; sometimes it has been +picked so long that it has begun to decay. Many fruits—berries +especially—are in perfection for a very short period only. Mulberries, +for example—one kind especially—are not in perfection long enough to +carry to the market house, even though the distance were very small. +Luckily, however, very few mulberries are eaten. But the raspberry and +strawberry, if perfect when gathered, have usually begun to decay, +before they are purchased. That this appears to be rather unfrequent, is +because they are gathered before they are ripe.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees regards most fruits as difficult of digestion. I do not think +they are so, if perfect and ripe. The experiments of Dr. Beaumont, so +far as they prove any general principle, show conclusively that mellow +sweet apples are more quickly digested than any kind of vegetable food +whatever, except rice and sago. But even admitting they were slow of +digestion, I do not think—as I have already shown in another +place—that they ought on that account to be excluded. Besides, my +opinion differs from that of Dr. D. in regard to the strength of the +digestive powers of children. After teething, they seem to me to be able +to digest any substances which adults can; and with as little +difficulty.</p> + +<p>But to return:—No fruit is in perfection longer than the apple. +Besides, no fruit appears to be less injured in its nature and +properties by picking it a little before it is ripe, and preserving it +during the winter. It is on this account, more perhaps than any other, +that I value it more highly than all other fruits united.</p> + +<p>Apples may be used either raw or cooked. In either case, the skins and +seeds should be avoided, as has been before suggested. I am not ignorant +that WILLICH, in his "Lectures on Diet and Regimen"—an excellent work, +in the main—says that the seeds ought to be eaten; but I believe few +physiologists would comply with his injunction, especially when it is +considered that he recommends, in the same connection, that we swallow +the stones of cherries and plums. Strange how far our theories will +sometimes carry us!</p> + +<p>The apple is excellent when roasted or baked, especially the sweet +apple. It is very common, in some places, to eat baked sweet apples with +milk; and the practice is by no means a bad one. Indeed, baked or raw +apples might be advantageously made a part of at least one of our meals +every day. There is said to be a miserly farmer—a single gentleman—in +the western part of the state of Massachusetts, who has lived on nothing +but apples for his food, and water for his drink, about forty years. And +yet he is said to enjoy the most perfect health. I do not propose this +as an example worthy of imitation; but it shows that apples maybe made +to subserve an important purpose in diet. And though I have more than +once expressed an opinion highly unfavorable to the exclusive use of any +one article of diet, yet if I were to confine myself to any one thing, I +know of nothing except bread that I should prefer to good apples. Still, +however, I prefer a variety—sweet, sour, early, late, &c.; and I should +use them raw, roasted, baked, made into sauce with new or unfermented +cider, and boiled. Good apples, eaten raw, with bread, form not only a +very wholesome, but, to an unperverted appetite, a most delicious +dinner.</p> + +<p>Much has been said about cutting down orchards; but the whole seems to +me idle—for if the fruit is of a good quality, it may be used as food, +either for man or beast. And if not good, the trees ought either to be +destroyed or replaced by those that will produce fruit which is +better—even if the object were to make it into cider. I have said that +apples may be used both by man and beast. It is well known that most +domestic animals thrive well on good apples, especially sweet ones. Very +tolerable molasses is also sometimes made from sweet apples.</p> + +<p>Nearly everything which has been said above in regard to apples, will +apply to pears. The best varieties of this excellent fruit are quite as +nutritious and as wholesome as the apple; and as much improved for the +table by baking. I believe, however, that no cheap process has yet been +devised for keeping them as long in the winter. They may be preserved in +the form of sauce, prepared in the same way with common apple sauce. The +skins, of many kinds of pears are less injurious than those of apples; +but even the skins of pears need not be eaten.</p> + +<p>Some kinds of peaches are tolerably wholesome; but the stringy character +of their pulp appears to me to render them less so than apples and +pears, though I am not confident on this point. But if used at all, they +should be used in less quantity at one time. Tempting as their flavor +is, I seldom eat them, when I can get apples and pears; holding myself +in duty bound to use the <i>best</i>, even of the fruits.</p> + +<p>"Fruit," says Mr. Locke, "makes one of the most difficult chapters in +the government of health, especially that of children. Our first parents +ventured Paradise for it; and it is no wonder our children cannot stand +the temptation, though it cost them their health. The regulation of this +cannot come under any one general rule; for I am by no means of their +mind who would keep children wholly from fruit, as a thing totally +unwholesome for them, by which strict way they make them but the more +ravenous after it, to eat good or bad, ripe or unripe, all that they can +get, whenever they come at it.</p> + +<p>"Melons, peaches, most sorts of plums, and all sorts of grapes, in +<i>England</i>, I think children should be wholly kept from, as having a very +tempting taste, in a very unwholesome juice, so that if it were +possible, they should never so much as see them, or know that there was +any such thing. But strawberries, cherries, gooseberries and currants, +when thoroughly ripe, I think may be pretty safely allowed them."</p> + +<p>Excellent as these remarks are, in general, I do not like his entire +interdiction of the use of melons, peaches, plums, and grapes, even in +England. Peaches, to be sure, as they come at a season when apples or +pears, or both of them—which are more wholesome than peaches—are +abundant, may be better omitted, delicious as they are to the taste; and +I do not think very highly of plums. But melons, in very moderate +quantity, and grapes, if we eat nothing but the ripe pulp, rejecting +both the husk and the interior hard part, including the seeds, are, I +think, useful and wholesome. On the other hand, I should never place +cherries and gooseberries in the same list with strawberries; for the +latter are, if I may use the expression, infinitely the most wholesome.</p> + +<p>Many seem to think that not to eat all sorts of fruits is to despise, or +at least to treat with neglect the gifts of God, intended for our +reception; by which they mean, if they mean anything, that the use of +all sorts of fruits is already found out, even in the present +comparative infancy of the world. Now I do not suppose that God has made +anything in vain—absolutely so—though I do not think we have found out +the true uses of half the things which he has made and given us. And +among those things of which we are yet ignorant, are some of the fruits. +I do not believe it follows, necessarily, that because fruits are +created, we are obliged to use them all.</p> + +<p>Besides, if this is a rule, it is one which nobody follows. Every one +uses more of some sorts, and fewer of others; and a large proportion of +the community entirely reject some kinds. Now if the statement commonly +made, that all fruits are the gifts of God, and ought therefore to be +used by all persons, is correct, those who make the statement ought to +conform to it as a rule of their lives, and to eat all kinds of fruit +which the season and country affords; and not only eat all kinds, but +see that the whole of every kind is consumed; since to waste any portion +is to slight the good gifts of God.</p> + +<p>The result then is, that we cannot obey such a rule; but are driven back +to the mode which common sense dictates, which is, to make a selection, +using some, and rejecting others. And the value of studying the nature +of these fruits, by examining the experience of mankind in regard to +them, consists in the aid thus afforded us in making our selection +wisely.</p> + +<p>There is one very common error in the use of the smaller summer fruits, +such as strawberries, whortleberries, currants, &c., which is that of +mixing cream, wine, spices, sugar, &c., with them. We are thus tempted +to eat too great a quantity at once. Besides—which is a worse evil—we +change the proportions of the saccharine parts, and thus do all in our +power, by increasing a similarity in all fruits, to destroy that +agreeable variety which God has established, and which is probably +salutary.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 11. <i>Confectionary.</i></h4> + +<p>By confectionary we here mean the substances usually sold at those shops +in our cities distinguished by the general name of confectionaries, and +which consist either wholly of sugar, or of sugar and some other +substances combined.</p> + +<p>As to the use of a moderate quantity of pure sugar at our meals, whether +it is procured at a confectioner's shop or elsewhere, I do not know that +there is any strong objection to it; though I believe that it cannot be +regarded as indispensable to health—for were that the fact, it seems to +me to imply something short of infinite wisdom in the creation of +articles destined for our sustenance. But I have spoken on this subject +elsewhere.</p> + +<p>A part, however, of the contents of the confectionary shop are actually +poisonous. I refer to those things which are either frosted, as it is +called, or colored. The substances applied to the sugar for this purpose +are usually some mineral or vegetable poison; although the fact of its +being a poison may not always be known to the manufacturer. The most +unhappy consequences have occasionally followed the use of +confectionary, when poisoned in this manner. A family of four persons, +in New York, were made sick in this way in March of year before last, +and some of them came very near losing their lives. The "frosting" which +caused the mischief was pronounced by eminent chemists to be one fifth +rank poison.[Footnote: It is to be remembered that those who eat +confectionary so slightly poisoned that it does not make them sick at +once, may nevertheless be as much injured in their constitutions as they +who are poisoned outright. In the latter case, the poison is in part +thrown out of the body; in the former, it remains in it much longer—and +therefore more surely, though more slowly, accomplishes the work of +destruction.] The coloring substances used are sometimes poisonous, as +well as the frosting.</p> + +<p>Some of the articles sold at these shops consist of sugar mixed with +paste. Others are called sweetmeats; that is, fruits, or rinds of +fruits, preserved in sugar. All these substances, I believe, without +exception, are injurious.</p> + +<p>The great evils of confectionary yet remain to be mentioned. These are +of three kinds, physical, mental and moral.</p> + +<p>Some of the <i>physical</i> evils have, it is true, just been mentioned; but +there is another evil of still greater magnitude. Young people who eat +confectionary, commonly eat it between meals. This produces mischief in +two ways. First, it keeps the stomach at work when it ought to rest; for +this, like every other muscular organ, requires its seasons of repose. +Secondly, it destroys gradually the appetite; so that when the regular +meal arrives, the accustomed keenness of appetite does not come with it. +And the consequence is, not so much that we do not eat enough, as that +we are fastidious, and eat a little of this, then a little of that; and +usually select the worst things. We are not hungry enough to make a meal +of a single article of plain food. And this evil goes on increasing, as +long as we have access to the confectionary shop. These statements +describe the case of thousands of pupils, of both sexes, at our schools +and seminaries.</p> + +<p>The <i>intellectual</i> evil resulting from the use of confectionary consists +in the fondness for excitement which is produced. You will seldom find a +person who depends daily and almost hourly on some excitement to his +appetite and stomach, and is not satisfied with plain food, who will +content himself to <i>study</i> without unnatural excitements of the mind. +Duty to himself or to others will not move him. He must have before him +the hope of reward, or the fear of punishment. He must be moved by +emulation or ambition, or some other questionable or wicked motive or +passion.</p> + +<p>But the <i>moral</i> results, to the young, of using confectionary, are still +more dreadful. I do not here refer to the danger of meeting with bad +company at the shops themselves, or of going from these places of +pollution <i>directly</i> to the grog-shop, the gambling-house, or the +brothel; though there is danger enough, even here. But I allude to the +tendency which a habit of not resting satisfied with plain food, but of +depending on exciting things, has, to make us dissatisfied with plain +moral enjoyments—the society of friends, and the quiet discharge of our +duty to God and our neighbor. Just in proportion as we gratify our +propensity for excitement at the confectioner's shop, just in the same +proportion do we expose ourselves to the, danger of yielding to +temptation, should other gratifications present themselves. The young of +both sexes who are in the use of confectionary, are on the high road to +gluttony, drunkenness, or debauchery; perhaps to all three. I do not say +they will certainly arrive there, for circumstances not quite miraculous +may pluck them as "brands from the burning;" but I do not hesitate to +say that such is the inevitable tendency; and I call on every mother and +teacher who reads this section, to beware of confectionaries, and see, +if possible, that the young never set foot in them. They are a road +through which thousands pass to the chamber of death—death to the +immortal spirit, as well as to the body, its vehicle.</p> + +<p>More might be added—for this is an important subject—but I trust I +have said enough. Those who have read and believe what I have written, +if they remain wholly unaffected and unmoved, would not be roused to +effort were anything to be added.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 12. <i>Pastry.</i></h4> + +<p>Dr. Paris, a distinguished British writer on diet, says that all pastry +is "an abomination." And yet, go where we will, we find it often on the +table. Hardly any one, whether old or young, attempts to do without it.</p> + +<p>There are indeed some, who will not eat pie-crust, or high-seasoned +cakes formed of paste; but yet will not hesitate to eat hot bread, or +rolls, or biscuits made of wheat flour, bolted. Now what is this but +paste? If we could see the contents of the stomach, an hour after the +mass is swallowed, we should find it to be paste, and <i>mere</i> paste.</p> + +<p>And yet the evil is increasing everywhere. So generally is this true, +that a person who refuses to eat hot bread, or cake, or biscuit, is +deemed singular. He who ventures to lift his voice against it is deemed +an ascetic or a visionary. But such a voice must be raised, and heard, +too, whether its monitions are or are not regarded.</p> + +<p>Pastry is less objectionable, however, when used in the form of hot +bread, &c., than when butter or fat is mixed with it. Then it becomes +one of the most indigestible substances in the world. Besides, it not +only tries the patience of the stomach, but according to Willich, whose +authority ranks high, it tends to produce diseases of the skin, +especially a disease which he calls "copper in the face," and which he +pronounces incurable.</p> + +<p>I know not whether the eruptions so common on the faces of young people +in this country, and especially of young men, are in every instance +either produced or aggravated by pastry; but I am very sure of one +thing, viz., that those who are in the use of pastry, and have eruptions +of the skin of any kind, will not be apt to get well, as long as they +continue the use of this objectionable substance.</p> + +<p>Physicians are often consulted about eruptions on the face. When they +assign the real cause, which is undoubtedly connected with the improper +gratification of some of the appetites, in one way or another, it is +seldom that the patient has self-command enough to follow his +prescription of temperance or abstinence. Mothers, it is yours to +prevent this mischief;—first, by establishing correct physical habits; +secondly, by teaching your children the great duty of self-denial—not +only by precept, but by your own good example.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 13. <i>Crude or Raw Substances.</i></h4> + +<p>I have reserved this section for remarks on certain articles used at our +fashionable modern tables, of which I could not well find it convenient +to speak elsewhere. And first, of SALADS, and HERBS used in cooking; +such as asparagus, artichokes, spinage, plantain, cabbage, dock, +lettuce, water-cresses, chives, &c.</p> + +<p>Several of these substances are often eaten raw, in which state they are +exceedingly indigestible, at the best; and they are rendered still more +beyond the reach of the powers of the stomach, by the oil or vinegar +which is added to them. Boiled, they are more tolerable; especially +asparagus. In the midst, however, of such an abundance of excellent food +as this country affords, it is most surprising that anybody should ever +take it into their heads to eat such crude substances; and above all, +that they should fill children's stomachs with them. What child, with an +unperverted appetite, would not prefer a good ripe apple, or peach, or +pear, to the most approved raw salads?—and a good baked one, to the +best boiled asparagus?</p> + +<p>NUTS, in general, are probably made for other animals rather than man; +though of this we cannot in the present infancy of human knowledge be +quite certain. But if any of them were intended, by the Creator, for +man, it is the chesnut; and this should be boiled. Boiled chesnuts are +used as food, in many parts of southern Europe; and to a very +considerable extent.</p> + +<p>SPICES, as they are sometimes called, such as nutmeg, mace, pepper, +pimento; cubebs, cardamoms, juniper berries, ginger, calamus, cloves, +cinnamon, caraway, coriander, fennel, parsley, dill, sage, marjoram, +thyme, pennyroyal, lavender, hyssop, peppermint, &c., are unfit for the +human stomach—above all in infancy—except as medicines.</p> + +<p>There are several other vegetables equally objectionable with the last, +though they cannot be classed under the same head. Such are mustard, +horseradish, raw onions, garlic, cucumbers, and pickles. No appetite +which has not been accustomed to these substances in early infancy, will +ever require them. Not that they may not sometimes be useful in enabling +the stomach—at every age—to get rid of certain substances with which +it has been improperly or unreasonably loaded;—this is undoubtedly the +fact; ardent spirits would do the same. And it is with a view to some +such effect, generally, that medical writers have spoken in their favor. +Some of them stimulate the stomach to get rid of a load of <i>green</i> +fruit; others, of a load of <i>fat</i> or <i>salt</i> food; others, again, +of too large a <i>quantity</i> of food which is naturally wholesome.</p> + +<p>But in all these cases, they should be considered, not as food, but as +medicine; and we ought to call them by their right name. And if we +withhold the cause of the disease, there will be no need of the +medicine.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_VIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER VIII.</h2> + +<h3>DRINKS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk and +water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad food +and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischief they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Children need little if any drink, so long as their food is nothing but +milk; nor indeed for some time afterward, unless they are indulged in +the use of animal food. Adults, even, very seldom drink merely to quench +natural thirst. In the summer, people usually drink either to cool +themselves, or to gratify a thirst which is wholly artificial. Tea, +coffee, beer, cider, and most other common drinks, when not used for the +sake of their coolness, are drank, both in winter and summer, for this +purpose.</p> + +<p>That this is the fact, we have the most abundant and unequivocal +evidence. I know that much is said of the demand which a profuse +perspiration creates among hard laborers in the summer. Such a sudden +abstraction of a large amount of fluid requires, it is said, a +proportional supply, or life would soon become extinct. Yet there are +many old men who have perspired profusely at their labor all their days, +and yet have drank nothing at all, except their tea, morning and +evening; and perhaps have eaten, for one or two of their meals daily, in +summer, a bowl of bread and milk. And some of them are among the most +remarkable instances of longevity which the country affords.</p> + +<p>How the system acquires a sufficient supply of moisture to keep up good +health, in these cases, I do not pretend to determine: perhaps it is +through the medium of the lungs. But at any rate, it can obtain it +without our drinking for that sole purpose, to the great danger of +exciting liver complaints, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, colds, rheumatisms, and +fevers.</p> + +<p>But if adults who perspire freely do not require much drink, children +certainly do not; and above all, young children. And if they do require +any thing, it is only simple water. The following remarks of Dr. Oliver, +of Hanover, N.H., are extracted from Dr. Mussey's late Prize Essay on +Ardent Spirits:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Who has not observed the extreme satisfaction which children derive +from quenching their thirst with pure water? And who that has perverted +his appetite for drink, by stimulating his palate with bitter beer, sour +cider, rum and water, and other beverages of human invention, but would +be a gainer, even on the score of mere animal gratification, without any +reference to health, if he could bring back his vitiated taste to the +simple relish of nature?</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Children drink because they are dry. Grown people drink, whether dry or +not, because they have discovered a way of making drink pleasant. +Children drink water because this is a beverage of nature's own brewing, +which she has made for the purpose of quenching a natural thirst. Grown +people drink anything but water, because this fluid is intended to +quench only a natural thirst; and natural thirst is a thing which they +seldom feel."</blockquote> + +<p>There is a great deal of truth, as well as of sound philosophy, in these +two paragraphs, and little less of truth in the following paragraph from +Dr. Dewees:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"We have witnessed very often, with sorrow, parents giving to their +young children wine, or other stimulating liquors. Nature never intended +anything stronger than water to be the drink for children. This they +enjoy greatly; and much advantage is occasionally experienced from its +use, especially after they have commenced the use of animal food."</blockquote> + +<p>Two things are to be observed in the last remarks, which are, that +children demand drink of any kind but seldom, and that even this +occasional demand is often the special result of the use of animal food. +Here comes out an important secret. It is the use of animal food, to a +very great degree, in adults and children both, that creates so much of +that unnatural thirst which prevails in the community. When we shall +come to lay aside animal food, in childhood, youth, manhood and age, +much that is now <i>called</i> thirst will be banished; and much of the +intemperance and other kinds of sensuality which follow in its train.</p> + +<p>It has been sometimes said that there is but one kind of drink in the +world—and that is water. This is strictly, or rather <i>physiologically</i> +true. For, though many mixtures are <i>called</i> drinks, it is only the +water which they contain that answers any of the legitimate purposes for +which drink was intended by the Creator.</p> + +<p>The object of drink, besides quenching our thirst, or rather <i>while</i> it +quenches it, is, not to be digested, like food, but to pass directly +from the stomach into the blood-vessels, and dilute and temper the +blood, rendering it more fit to answer the great purpose of sustaining +life and health. Now, there is nothing that can do this but water. +Alcohol cannot do it, nor can turpentine, oil, quicksilver, melted lead, +or any other liquid.</p> + +<p>Tea, coffee, chocolate, small beer, soda water, lemonade, &c., which are +nearly all water, quench the thirst very well, it is true; but not quite +so well as water alone would. The narcotic principle of the first two, +the alcoholic principle of the fourth, and the mucilage, nutriment, +acid, and alkali of the rest, are in the way; for thirst would be +quenched still better without them, even when it is of an unnatural +kind.</p> + +<p>Indeed, the same or similar remarks may be made in regard to all other +mixtures which are usually proposed as drinks. Even milk and water, +molasses and water, &c., in favor of which so much is said, are +objectionable, as mere drinks. Not that they contain anything poisonous, +but they evidently contain nutriment; and even this, except as a part or +the whole of a regular meal, does harm; for it sets the stomach at work +when it needs repose. Mere drink, as I have already said, is never +digested.</p> + +<p>But if the drinks above mentioned, and even milk and water, are +objectionable, what shall we say of cider, wine, and ardent +spirits?—substances which contain, the latter one half, and the two +former from one twentieth to one fourth alcohol. Surely, nobody will +deny that these substances ought, at all events, to be banished from the +nursery. And yet we occasionally find them there, not only for the use +of the mother, to the ruin of the child, indirectly—but also, in some +of their smoother forms, for the use of the child itself.</p> + +<p>I would not lay too much stress on food and drink; for, as I have +already observed, more than once, the causes of infantile ill health and +mortality are numerous. Still I must insist that, of all the sources of +disease, these are the most prolific. Much is done towards ruining the +health of children by the improper food and drink of the mother. But +when, in addition to all this, the children themselves are early fed +with animal food, and with stimulating drinks—punch, coffee, tea, +&c.—and an artificial thirst is early excited and rendered habitual, +their destruction, for time and eternity, is almost inevitable.</p> + +<p>Very few children relish any drink but water, or sweetened water, at +first; and where they do, it is probably hereditary. I have been struck +with their tastes and preferences; nor less with the folly of those +around them, in endeavoring to change them, by requiring them—almost +always against their will—to sip a little coffee, or a little tea, or +a little lemonade; or, it may be, a little toddy. Such children <i>may</i> +escape the death of the drunkard or the debauchee; but if they do, it +will not be through the instrumentality of the parents.</p> + +<p>I am very much opposed to giving children hot drinks of any kind. If +they are to drink substances which are injurious, as tea or coffee, let +them be cool. I do not say <i>cold</i>, for that would be going to the other +extreme. But no drink, in any ordinary case, should be above the heat of +our bodies; that is, about 98 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer. Yet +the precautions of this paragraph will be almost unnecessary, if +children are confined—as they ought to be, and would be, did we not go +out of our way to teach them otherwise—to water, as their only drink. +Cold water is almost always preferred. Not one child in a thousand would +ever prefer it hot, until his taste had been perverted. No writer has +inveighed more against hot drinks of every kind, than the late William +Cobbett—and, as I think, with more justice.</p> + +<p>But, in avoiding one rock, we must not, as has already been intimated, +make shipwreck on another. Hot drinks, though they injure the powers of +the stomach, and by that means and through that medium, are one +principal cause of the almost universal early decay of teeth, are yet +less injurious, or at least less dangerous, immediately, than cold ones. +Mr. Locke, in speaking of the sports of a child, in the open air, has +the following quaint, but judicious remarks:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Playing in the open air has but this one danger in it, that I know; and +that is, that when he is hot with running up and down, he should sit or +lie down on the cold or moist earth. This, I grant, and drinking cold +drink, when they are hot with labor or exercise, brings more people to +the grave, or to the brink of it, by fevers and other diseases, than +anything I know. These mischiefs are easily enough prevented when he is +little, being then seldom out of sight. And if, during his childhood, he +be constantly and rigorously kept from sitting on the ground, or +drinking any cold liquor, while he is hot, the custom of forbearing, +grown into <i>habit</i>, will help much to preserve him, when he is no longer +under his maid's or tutor's eye.</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"More fevers and surfeits are got by people's drinking when they are +hot, than by any one thing I know. If he (the child) be very hot, he +should by no means <i>drink</i>; at least a good piece of bread, first to be +eaten, will gain time to warm his drink <i>blood hot</i>, which then he may +drink safely. If he be very dry, it will go down so warmed, and quench +his thirst better; and if he will not drink it so warmed, abstaining +will not hurt him. Besides, this will teach him to forbear, which is a +habit of the greatest use for health of mind and body too."</blockquote> + +<p>The last remarks are full of wisdom. Mothers may depend upon it, that +every indulgence to which they accustom their children paves the way for +<i>habitual</i> indulgence; and has a tendency to lead, indirectly, to +indulgence in other matters; and, on the contrary, every self-denial +which they can lead children to exercise, voluntarily—even in these +every-day matters of food, drink, exercise, &c. is so much gained in the +great work of self-denial and the resisting of temptation in matters of +higher importance. But I must not moralize too long; having dwelt on +this same point under the head Confectionary. I proceed, therefore, to +make a few more extracts from Mr. Locke:</p> + +<blockquote class="small">"Not being permitted to <i>drink</i> without eating, will prevent the custom +of having the cup often at his nose; a dangerous beginning."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"Men often bring habitual hunger and thirst on themselves by custom."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"You may, if you please, bring any one to be thirsty every hour."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"I once lived in a house, where, to appease a froward child, they gave +him <i>drink</i> as often as he cried, so that he was constantly bibbing. +And though he could not speak, yet he drank more in twenty-four hours +than I did."</blockquote> + +<blockquote class="small">"It is convenient, for health and sobriety, to drink no more than +natural thirst requires; and he that eats not salt meats, nor drinks +strong drink, will seldom thirst between meals."</blockquote> + +<p>Great mischief is often done to their health by children at school; and +one instance of this is, in getting violently heated with exercise, and +then pouring down large quantities of cold water to cool themselves. I +once made it a habitual rule for pupils, that they must drink water, if +they drank it at all, on leaving their seats to go to their plays, but +not afterwards: and I was so situated that I could prevent the law from +being broken, as there was no spring or well to which they could have +access, privately. And though they thought the rule rather severe, I +have no doubt it saved them from much injury, and perhaps sometimes from +sickness.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_IX."></a><h2>CHAPTER IX.</h2> + +<h3>GIVING MEDICINE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>So much error prevails in regard to the medical management of the young, +that a volume might be written without exhausting the subject.[Footnote: +Such a volume is in preparation. It is intended as a companion to the +present.] My present limits and plan allow of only a few remarks, and +those must be general.</p> + +<p>That "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," has so long ago +become a proverb, that it seems almost idle to repeat the sentiment. And +yet it is to be feared that very few receive it as a practical truth, in +the management of children. Now nothing is more certain than that it is +easier, as well as more humane, to prevent diseases than to cure them.</p> + +<p>I have elsewhere mentioned the opinion of a very eminent physician, +that nine in ten of children's diseases may be imputed to error with +regard to the quantity or the quality of their food. For myself, I am by +no means certain that nine out of ten is the exact proportion, though I +think the number is, at all events, very large. Few children, or even +grown persons, are seized with disease suddenly. Their progress towards +it is always gradual, and sometimes imperceptible. To a physician of any +tolerable degree of skill, however, there is no difficulty in observing +and pointing out the first steps towards illness; in those whose habits +of life are well known to him; and of foretelling the consequence.</p> + +<p>But since parents and nurses are not so well qualified as physicians to +make these observations, I will endeavor to point out a few certain +signs and symptoms by which they may know a child's health to be +declining, even before be appears to be sick.—For if these are +neglected, the evil increases, goes on from bad to worse, and more +violent and apparent complaints will follow, and perhaps end in +incurable diseases, which a timely remedy, or a slight change in the +diet and manner of life, would have infallibly prevented.</p> + +<p>"The first tendency to disease," says Dr. Cadogan, "may be observed in a +child's breath. It is not enough that the breath is not offensive; it +should be sweet and fragrant, like a nosegay of fresh flowers, or a pail +of new milk from a young cow that feeds upon the sweetest grass of the +spring; and this as well at first waking in the morning, as all day +long." [Footnote: Buchan's "Advice to Mothers," pages 337, 388]</p> + +<p>There is much of truth in these remarks; but if they are wholly true, +then very few children are perfectly healthy. For no child that eats +much animal food of any sort, or, what amounts to nearly the same thing, +much butter or gravy, will long retain the fragrant breath here alluded +to. Who has not observed the difference in this respect, between animals +in general which feed on flesh, and those which feed on grass? And +whether it is the character of their respective food that makes the +difference or not, it is also true that there is nearly as much +difference of breath between <i>men</i> who use animal food and those who do +not, as between other animals. The breath of some of our enormous meat +eaters would almost remind one of a slaughter house.</p> + +<p>Nor is it the quality of food alone, that will induce a foul breath, +either in adults or infants. He who swallows such enormous quantities, +even of plain food, as by overloading and fatiguing the stomach, tend +gradually to debilitate it, will produce the same effect. The enormous +feeders of this full feeding country, whether they are young or old, +whether they inhabit the mountain or the vale, and whether they feed on +animal food or not, have generally a bad breath; and if they seldom +offend, it is because few feed otherwise. And it is not too much—in my +own opinion—to say of this whole class of gormandizers, no less than of +the flesh eaters, that they have laid for themselves the foundation of +future disease.</p> + +<p>One general rule may here be distinctly laid down. As a child's breath +becomes hot and feverish, or strong, or acid, we may be certain that +"digestion and surfeit have fouled and disturbed the blood; and now is +the time to apply a proper remedy, and prevent a train of impending +evils. Let the child be restrained in its food. Let it eat less, live +upon milk or thin broth for a day or two, and be carried (or walk if it +is able) a little more than usual in the open air." [Footnote: Advice to +Mothers, page 338]</p> + +<p>This rule is the more important, because, if duly persevered in, it will +generally prevent disease, and save the trouble and evil consequences of +taking medicine at all. Meanwhile it will be advisable to call in a +physician—not to give drugs, but to prevent the necessity of giving +them. There is a foolish fear abroad that physicians, if called before a +person is violently sick, will dose him with their drugs, as a matter of +course, till they <i>make</i> him sick. But this, no judicious physician will +ever do. It may <i>have been</i> done, though I believe it has been seldom. +The more general course is to defer calling for medical advice, till it +is too late to use preventive means; and medicine is then resorted to by +the physician as a sort of necessary evil.</p> + +<p>A judicious physician, seasonably called in, would in many instances +save a severe fit of sickness, besides a great deal of expense, both of +time and money.</p> + +<p>But if the first symptoms of approaching disease are overlooked—if the +child is fed, or rather crammed; with solid food as much as ever—and if +no medical advice is sought, his sleep will soon become disturbed; he +will be talking, starting, and tumbling about, and will have frightful +dreams; or he will at other times be found smiling and laughing. To +these, in the end, may be added, loss of appetite, paleness, emaciation, +weakness, cough, and consumption; or colics, worms, and convulsions.</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to say that the most judicious parental management, +aided by the greatest medical skill, will always prevent disease; far +from it. The child may and undoubtedly sometimes does inherit a tendency +to a particular disease; or he may be made sick by error in regard to +dress, exercise, &c. But so long as nine tenths of the disease and early +mortality of the young might be prevented by due attention to all these +means combined, so long will it be necessary to reiterate the sentiments +of the present section.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_X."></a><h2>CHAPTER X.</h2> + +<h3>EXERCISE.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">SEC. 1. Objections to the use of cradles.—SEC. 2. Carrying in the +arms—its uses and abuses.—SEC. 3. Creeping—why useful—to be +encouraged.—SEC. 4. Walking—general directions about it.—SEC. 5. +Riding abroad in carriages.—SEC. 6. Riding on horseback—objections. +Riding schools.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>This subject may be considered under the following heads: ROCKING IN THE +CRADLE; CARRYING IN THE ARMS; CREEPING; WALKING; RIDING IN A CARRIAGE; +AND RIDING ON HORSEBACK. These I shall consider in their order.</p> + + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Rocking in the Cradle.</i></h4> + +<p>There are two opinions in regard to the use of the cradle in the +nursery. Some condemn it altogether; others think its occasional use +highly proper. Those who condemn it, do it chiefly on the ground that it +produces a whirling motion of the brain, which, while it inclines to +giddiness and lulls to sleep, disturbs, in some degree, the process of +digestion.</p> + +<p>It seems to me that there is weight to this objection; and although the +cradle has been extensively used without producing any obviously evil +effects, I should greatly prefer to have it universally laid aside. As +far as mere amusement is demanded, it is quite unnecessary, since there +are so many amusements which are far better. As a means of inducing +sleep, I am still more strongly opposed to it; for if a child be +rationally treated in every other respect, it will never need artificial +means to induce it to sleep. Nature will then be the most appropriate +directress in this matter.</p> + +<p>If there is a cradle in a nursery, it is almost always full of clothes +loaded with air more or less impure, and the child is buried in it more +than is compatible with health, even in the judgment of the mother or +the nurse; for so convenient is its use, and so great the temptation to +keep the child in it, that he will often be found soaking there a large +proportion of his time. Every one knows that the air has not so free +access to a child in the cradle as elsewhere, especially if it have a +kind of covering or hood to it, as we often see. Besides, the cradle is +a piece of furniture which takes up a great deal of space in the +nursery; and every one who has made the trial effectually, will, it +seems to me, greatly prefer its room to its company.</p> + +<p>If any cradle is to be used, those are best which are suspended by +cords, and are swung, rather than rocked. And this swinging should be in +a line with the body of the child as much as possible; as this motion is +less likely to produce injury than its opposite.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Carrying in the Arms.</i></h4> + +<p>This is the most appropriate exercise for the first two months of +existence; and indeed, one of the best for some time afterward.</p> + +<p>Although a healthy, thriving child ought to sleep, for some time after +birth, from two thirds to three fourths of his time, yet it should never +be forgotten that the demand for proper exercise during the rest of the +time, is not the less imperious on this account; but probably the more +so.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned the importance of bathing, which is one form of +exercise, and of gentle motion in the arms, immediately afterward. The +same gentle motion should be often repeated during the day; care being +taken to hold the child in such a position as will be easy to him, and +favorable to the free exercise of all his limbs and muscles.</p> + +<p>There are many mothers and nurses, who not only rejoice that the infant +inclines to sleep a great deal, since it gives them more liberty, but +who take pains to prolong these hours beyond what nature requires, by +artificial means. I refer not only to the use of the cradle, but to +means still more artificial—the use of cordials and opiates, to which I +have already adverted. But whatever the means used may be, they defeat +the purposes of nature, and are in the highest degree reprehensible. +Nothing but the most chilling poverty should prevent the mother from +having the child—for a few weeks of its first existence at least—in +her own arms, nearly all the time which is not absolutely demanded for +repose. She should even invite it to wakefulness, rather than encourage +sleep.</p> + +<p>Attention to exercise ought to be commenced before the child is more +than ten days old. For this purpose he should be placed on his back, on +a pillow, in order that the body may rest at as many points as possible. +In this position he has the opportunity to move his limbs with the most +perfect freedom, and to exercise his numerous muscles. There is nothing +more important to the infant—not even sleep itself—than the action of +all his muscles; and nothing contributes more to his rapid growth.</p> + +<p>At first, the body should be kept, while on the arm, in nearly a +horizontal position, with the head perhaps a very little elevated; but +after a few weeks, it will be proper to change the position for a small +part of the time; placing the body so that it may form an angle of a few +degrees with the horizon. When this is done, however, it should always +be by placing the hand against the shoulders and head, in such a manner +as to support well the back; for it is extremely injurious to suffer the +feeble spine to sustain, at this early period, any considerable weight.</p> + +<p>Still more erroneous is the practice of some careless nurses, of +carrying the child quite upright a part of the time, almost without any +support at all. There can be no doubt that the spinal column of many a +child is injured for life in this way. There can be no apology for such +things.</p> + +<p>But it is not sufficient to denounce, merely, the custom of holding the +infant's body in an erect position. Every inquiring mother—and it is +for such, and no other, that I write—will naturally and properly ask +the reason why.</p> + +<p>The child is not born with all its bones solid. Some are mere cartilage +for a considerable time. This is the case with the bones of the back. +Now every person must see that the weight of the child's head and +shoulders, resting for a considerable time on the slender cartilaginous +spinal column, may easily bend it. And a curvature, thus given, may, and +often does, deform children for life.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees mentions a nurse who, from a foolish fondness for displaying +them, made the children consigned to her charge sit perfectly upright +before they were a month old. It is truly ludicrous, he says, to see the +little creatures sitting as straight as if they were stiffened by a back +board. It is truly <i>horrible</i>, I should say, rather than ludicrous. +Crooked spines must be the inevitable consequence, if nothing worse.</p> + +<p>The practice of bracing children, as it is called, by straps, back +boards, corsets, &c., where it has produced any effect at all, has +always had a tendency to crook the spine. This may be seen first, by +observing one shoulder to be lower than the other, and next by a +projection of the part of the shoulder blades next to the spine. +Whenever these changes begin to appear, it is time to send for a +physician, though it may often be too late to effect a cure. But on the +general subject of bracing and corseting, I have treated at sufficient +length elsewhere.</p> + +<p>There is another error committed in carrying children in the arms. The +head of the infant is often permitted either to hang constantly on one +side, or to roll about loosely; as if it hardly belonged to the body. +In the former case there is danger of producing a habit of holding the +head upon one side, which it will be very difficult to overcome; in the +latter, the spinal marrow itself may be injured—which would produce +alarming and perhaps fatal consequences.</p> + +<p>But all these evils, as has already been said, may be prevented, if the +hand is placed so as to support the head and shoulders. Let not the +mother, however, who reads this work, trust the matter wholly to a +nurse; she must see to it herself; else she incurs a most fearful +responsibility. The suggestions I have made are the more important in +the case of children either very fleshy or very feeble, and of those +disposed to rickets or scrofula; but they are important to all.</p> + +<p>I have said that the motion of the child, on the arm, should be gentle. +Many are in the habit of tossing infants about. There can be no +objection to a slight and slow movement up and down, for a minute or so +at a time; indeed, it is rather to be recommended, as likely to give +strength and vigor no less than pleasure to the child. But when such +movements are carried to excess, so as to frighten the child, they are +highly reprehensible. The shock thus produced to the nervous system has +sometimes been so great as to produce sudden death. Nor is it safe to +run, jump, or descend stairs hastily or violently, with a child in our +arms; and for similar reasons.</p> + +<p>Infants should not be carried always on the same arm, for there is +danger of contracting a habit of leaning to one side, and thus of +becoming crooked. On this account, the arm on which they rest should be +often changed. Nor should they be grasped too firmly. A skilful mother +will hold a child quite loosely, with the most perfect safety; while an +inexperienced one will grasp him so hard as to expose the soft bones to +be bent out of their place, and yet be quite as liable to let him fall +as she who handles him with more ease and freedom.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Creeping.</i></h4> + +<p>"Mankind must creep before they can walk," is an old adage often used to +remind us of that patient application which is so indispensable to +secure any highly important or valuable end. But it is as true +literally, as it is figuratively. The act of creeping exercises in a +remarkable degree nearly all the muscles of the body; and this, too, +without much fatigue.</p> + +<p>Some mothers there indeed are, who think it a happy circumstance if a +child can be taught to walk without this intermediate step. But such +mothers must have strange ideas of the animal economy. They must never +have thought of the pleasure which creeping affords the mind, or of the +vigor it imparts to the body.</p> + +<p>Children are wonderfully pleased with their own voluntary efforts. What +they can do themselves, yields them ten-fold greater pleasure than if +done by the mother or the nurse. Yet the latter are exceedingly prone to +forget or overlook all this—and to say, at least practically, that the +only proper efforts are those to which themselves give direction.</p> + +<p>They are moreover exceedingly fond of display. Some mothers seem to +act—in all they do with and for children—as if all the latter were +good for, was display and amusement. They feed them, indeed, and strive +to prolong their existence; but it appears to be for similar reasons to +those which would lead them to take kind care of a pet lamb.</p> + +<p>It is on this account that they dress them out in the manner they do, +strive to make them sit up straight, and prohibit their creeping. It is +on this account too, as much perhaps as any other, that go-carts and +leading strings are put in such early requisition. The contrary would be +far the safer extreme; and the parent who keeps his child scrambling +about upon the back as long as possible, and when he cannot prevent +longer an inversion of this position, retains him at creeping as long +as is in his power, is as much wiser, in comparison with him who urges +him forward to make a prodigy of him, as he is who, instead of making +his child a prodigy in mind or morals at premature age, holds him back, +and endeavors to have his mental and moral nature developed no faster +than his physical frame.</p> + +<p>I wish young mothers would settle it in their minds at once, that the +longer their children creep the better. They need have no fears that the +force of habit will retain them on their knees after nature has given +them strength to rise and walk; for their incessant activity and +incontrollable restlessness will be sure to rouse them as early as it +ought. Least of all ought the difficulty of keeping them clean, to move +them from the path of duty.</p> + +<p>Children who are allowed to crawl, will soon be anxious to do more. We +shall presently see them taking hold of a chair or a table, and +endeavoring to raise themselves up by it. If they fail in a dozen +attempts, they do not give up the point; but persevere till their +efforts are crowned with success.</p> + +<p>Having succeeded in raising themselves from the floor, they soon learn +to stand, by holding to the object by which they have raised themselves. +Soon, they acquire the art of standing without holding; [Footnote: The +art of standing, which consists in balancing one's self, by means of the +muscles of the body and lower limb—simple as it may seem to those who +have never reflected on the subject—is really an important acquisition +for a child of twelve or fifteen months. No wonder they feel a conscious +pride, when they find themselves able to stand erect, like the world +around them.] ere long they venture to put forward one foot—they then +repeat the effort and walk a little, holding at the same time by a +chair; and lastly they acquire, with joy to them inexpressible and to us +inconceivable, the art of "trudging" alone.</p> + +<p>When children learn to walk in nature's own way, it is seldom indeed +that we find them with curved legs, or crooked or clubbed feet. These +deformities are almost universally owing either to the mother or the +nurse.</p> + +<p>Let me be distinctly understood as utterly opposed, not only to +go-carts, leading strings, and every other <i>mechanical</i> contrivance, to +induce children to walk before their legs are fit for it, but to efforts +of every kind, whose main object is the same. Teaching them to walk by +taking hold of one of their hands, is in some respects quite as bad as +any other mode; for if the child should fall while we have hold of his +hand, there is some danger of dislocating or otherwise injuring the +limb.</p> + +<p>Falls we must expect; but if a child is left to his own voluntary +efforts as much as possible, these falls will be fewer, and probably +less serious, than under any other circumstances.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Walking.</i></h4> + +<p>"The way to learn how to write without ruled lines, is <i>to rule</i>," was +the frequent saying of an old schoolmaster whom I once knew; and I may +say with as much confidence and with more truth, that "the way for a +child to learn to walk alone, is to hold by things."</p> + +<p>I have anticipated, in previous pages, much of what might have otherwise +been contained in this section. A few additional remarks are all that +will be necessary.</p> + +<p>At first, the nursery will be quite large enough for our young +pedestrian. Much time should elapse before he is permitted to go abroad, +upon the green grass;—not lest the air should reach him, or the sun +shine upon his face and hands, but because the surface of the ground is +so much less firm and regular than the floor, that he ought to be quite +familiar with walking on the latter, in the first place.</p> + +<p>But when he can walk well in the play ground, garden, fields, and +roads, it is highly desirable that he should go out more or less every +day, when the weather will possibly admit; nor would I be so fearful as +many are of a drop of rain or dew, or a breath of wind. For say what +they will in favor of riding, sailing, and other modes of exercise, +there is none equal to walking, as soon as a child is able;—none so +natural—none, in ordinary cases, so salutary. I know it is unpopular, +and therefore our young master or young miss must be hoisted into a +carriage, or upon the back of a horse, to the manifest danger of health +or limbs, or both.</p> + +<p>Who of us ever knew a herdsman or a shepherd who found it for the health +and well-being of the young calf or lamb to hoist it into a carriage, +and carry it through the streets, instead of suffering it to walk? Such +a thing would excite astonishment; and the man who should do it would be +deemed insane. The health and growth of our young domestic animals is +best promoted by suffering them to walk, run, and skip in their own way. +They ask no artificial legs, or horses, or carriages. But would it not +be difficult to find arguments in favor of carrying children about, when +they are able to walk, which would not be equally strong in favor of +carrying about lambs and calves and pigs.</p> + +<p>This is the more remarkable from the consideration, elsewhere urged, +that in general we take more rational pains about the physical +well-being of domestic animals, than of children. However, it will be +seen, on a little reflection, that the number of those who carry +children about, is, after all, very inconsiderable. The greater portion +of the community regard it as too troublesome or costly; and if poverty +brought with it no other evils than a permit to children to walk on the +legs which the Creator gave them, it could hardly be deemed a +misfortune.</p> + +<p>It is scarcely necessary to add that there will be nothing gained to the +young—or to persons of any age—from walks which are very long and +fatiguing. Walking should refresh and invigorate: when it is carried +beyond this, especially with the young child, we have passed the line of +safety.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>Riding in Carriages.</i></h4> + +<p>It will be seen by the foregoing section, that I am not very friendly to +the use of carriages for the young, after they can walk. Before this +period, however, I think they may be often serviceable; and there are +occasional instances which may render them useful afterward. On this +account, I have thought it might be well to give the following general +directions.</p> + +<p>Carriages for children should be so constructed as not to be liable to +overset. To this end, the wheels must be low, and the axle unusually +extended. The body should be long enough to allow the child to lie down +when necessary; and so deep that he may not be likely to fall out. +Everything should be made secure and firm, to avoid, if possible, the +danger of accidents.</p> + +<p>The carriage should be drawn steadily and slowly; not violently, or with +a jerking motion. Such a place should be selected as will secure the +child—if necessary—from the full blaze of a hot sun. This point might +indeed be secured by having the carriage covered; but I am opposed to +covered carriages, for children or adults, unless we are compelled to +ride in the rain.</p> + +<p>While the child is unable to sit up without injury, and even for some +months afterwards, he ought by all means to lie down in a carriage, +because it requires more strength to sit in a seat which is moving, than +in a place where he is stationary. In assuming the horizontal position, +in a carriage, a pillow is needed, and such other arrangements as will +prevent too much rolling.</p> + +<p>After the child's strength will fairly permit, he may sit up in the +carriage, but he ought still to be secured against too much motion. As +his strength increases, however, the latter direction will be less and +less necessary. I need not repeat in this place, (had I not witnessed so +many accidents from neglect,) the caution recently given, that great +care should be taken to prevent the child from falling out of the +carriage.</p> + +<p>While children are riding abroad in cold weather, much pains should be +taken to see that they are suitably clothed. It is well to keep them in +motion, while they are in the carriage, and especially to guard against +their falling asleep in the open air, until they have become very much +accustomed to being out in it.</p> + +<p>It has been said by some writers, that a ride ought never to exceed the +length of half an hour; but no positive rule can be given, except to +avoid over-fatigue.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Riding on Horseback.</i></h4> + +<p>While children are very young, I think it both improper and unsafe to +take them abroad on horseback; I mean so long as they are in health. In +case of disease, this mode of exercise is sometimes one of the most +salutary in the world. But after boys are six or seven years old, and +girls ten, if they are ever to practise horsemanship, it is time for +them to begin; both because they are less apt to be unreasonably timid +at this age, and because they learn much more rapidly.</p> + +<p>So few parents are good horsemen, that if there is a riding school at +hand, I should prefer placing a child in it at once. But I wish to be +distinctly understood, that I do not consider it a matter of importance, +especially to females, that they should ever learn to ride at all.</p> + +<p>Some of the principal objections to riding on horseback, by boys, as an +ordinary exercise, are the following:</p> + +<p>1. Walking, as I have already intimated, is one of the most HEALTHY +modes of exercise in the world. It is nature's exercise; and was +unquestionably in exclusive use long before universal dominion was given +to man, if not for many centuries afterward; and I believe it would be +very difficult to prove that it interfered at all with human longevity; +for the first of our race lived almost a thousand years.</p> + +<p>2. Young children, in riding on horseback, are rather apt to acquire, +rapidly, the habit of domineering over animals. It seems almost needless +to say how easy the transition is, in such cases, should opportunity +offer, from tyranny over the brute slave, to tyranny over the human +being. There are slave-holders in the family and in the school, as well +as elsewhere. It is the SPIRIT of a person which makes him either a +tyrant or slave-holder. And let us beware how we foster this spirit in +the children whom God has given us.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XI."></a><h2>CHAPTER XI.</h2> + +<h3>AMUSEMENTS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes—pictures—shuttlecock—the rocking horse—tops and +marbles—backgammon—checkers—morrice—dice—nine-pins—skipping the +rope—trundling the hoop—playing at ball—kites—skating and +swimming—dissected maps—black boards—elements of letters—dissected +pictures.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>However heterodox the concession may be, I am one of those who believe +amusements of some sort or other to be universally necessary. Indeed I +cannot possibly conceive of an individual in health, whatever may be the +age, sex, condition, or employment, who does not need them, in a greater +or less degree.</p> + +<p>Now if by the term amusement, I merely meant employment, nobody would +probably differ from me—at least in theory. Every one is ready to admit +the importance of being constantly employed. A mind unemployed is a +VACANT mind. And a vacant or idle mind is "the devil's work-shop;" so +says the proverb.</p> + +<p>By amusement, however, I mean something more than mere employment; for +the more constantly an adult individual is employed, the greater, +generally, is his demand for amusement. Indolent persons have less need +of being amused than others; but perhaps there are few if any persons to +be found, who are so indolent as not to think continually, on one +subject or another. And it is this constant thinking, more than anything +else, that creates the necessity of which I am speaking. The mere +drudge, whether biped or quadruped—he, I mean, whose thinking powers +are scarcely alive—has little need of the relief which is afforded by +amusement.</p> + +<p>The young of all animals—man among the rest—appear to have such an +instinctive fondness for amusement, that so long as they are +unrestrained, they seldom need any urging on this point. In regard to +<i>quality</i>, the case is somewhat different. In this respect, most +children require attention and restraint; and some of them a great deal +of it.</p> + +<p>But what is the nature of the amusement which adults—nay, mankind +generally—require? I answer, it is relief from the employment of +thinking. For it is not that mankind do not really think at all, that +moralists complain so loudly. When they tell us that men will not +think, they mean that they will not think as rational beings. They +think, indeed; and so do the ox, and the horse, and the dog, and the +elephant—but not as rational men ought to do; and this it is that +constitutes the burden of complaint. But you will probably find few +persons belonging to the human species who do not think constantly, at +least while awake; and whose mental powers do not become fatigued, and +demand relief in amusement.</p> + +<p>Children's minds are so soon wearied by a continuous train of thinking, +even on topics which are pleasing to them, that they can seldom he +brought to give their attention to a single subject long at once. They +require almost incessant change; both for the sake of relief, and to +amuse for the <i>sake</i> of amusement. And it is, to my own mind, one of +the most striking proofs of Infinite Wisdom in the creation of the human +mind, that it has, during infancy, such an irresistible tendency to +amusement.</p> + +<p>How greatly do they err, who grudge children, especially very young +children, the time which, in obedience to the dictates of their nature, +they are so fond of spending in sports and gambols! How much more +rational would it be to encourage and direct them in their amusements! +And how exceedingly unwise is the practice, whenever and wherever it +exists, of confining them to school rooms and benches, not only for +hours, but for whole half days at once.</p> + +<p>If individuals and circumstances were everywhere combined, with the +special purpose to oppose the intentions of nature respecting the human +being, at every step of his progress from the cradle to maturity, and +from maturity to the grave, I hardly know how they could contrive to +accomplish such a purpose more effectually than it is at present +accomplished. But it is proper that I should here explain a little.</p> + +<p>All our family arrangements tend to repress amusement. Everything is +contrived to facilitate business—especially the business or employments +of adults. The child is hardly regarded as a human being,—certainly not +as a <i>perfect</i> being. He is considered as a mere fragment; or to change +the figure, as a plant too young to be of any real service to mankind, +because too young to bear any of its appropriate fruits. Whereas, in my +opinion, both infancy and childhood, at every stage, should bring forth +their appropriate fruits. In other words, the child of the most tender +years should be regarded as a whole, and not as the mere fragment of a +being; as a perfect member of a family—occupying a full and complete, +only a more limited sphere than older members: and all the rules and +regulations and arrangements of the family should have a reference to +this point. So long as a child is reckoned to be a mere cipher in +creation, or at most, as of no more practical importance, till the +arrival of his twenty-first birth day, or some other equally arbitrary +period, than our domestic animals—that is, of just sufficient +consequence to be fed, and caressed, and fondled, and made a pet of—so +long will our arrangements be made with reference to the comfort and +happiness of adults. There may indeed be here and there a child's chair, +or a child's carriage, or newspaper, or book; but there will seldom be, +except by stealth, any free juvenile conversation at the table or the +fireside. Here the child must sit as a blank or cypher, to ruminate on +the past, or to receive half formed and passive impressions from the +present.</p> + +<p>The arrangements of the infant school, also, seem designed for the same +purpose—to repress as much as possible the infantile desire for +amusement. Not that this was their original, nor that it now is their +legitimate intention. Their legitimate object is, or should be, not to +develope the intellect by over-working the tender brain, but to promote +cheerfulness and health and love and happiness, by well contrived +amusements, conducted as much as possible in the open air; and by +unremitting efforts to elicit and direct the affections.</p> + +<p>Infant schools should repress rather than encourage the hard study of +books. Lessons at this age should be drawn chiefly from objects in the +garden, the field, and the grove; from the flower, the plant, the tree, +the brook, the bird, the beast, the worm, the fly, the human body—the +sun, or the visible heavens. These lessons, whether given by the parent, +as constituting a part of the family arrangements, or by the infant or +primary school teacher, should, it is true, be regarded for the time +being as study, but they should never be long; and they should be +frequently relieved by the most free and unrestrained pastimes and +gambols of the young on the green grass, or beside the rippling stream, +uninfluenced, or at least unrepressed, by those who are set over them.</p> + +<p>The public or common school, overlooking as it does any direct attempts +to make provision for the amusement of the pupils, even during the +scanty recess that is afforded them once in three hours, would appear to +a stranger on this planet, at first sight, to be designed as much as +possible to defeat every intention of nature with reference to the +growth of the human frame. For we may often travel many hundred miles +and not see so much as an enclosed play ground; and never perhaps any +direct provision for particular and more favorable amusements.</p> + +<p>I might speak of other schools and places of resort for children, and +proceed to show how all our arrangements appear to be the offspring of a +species of utilitarianism which rejects every sport whose value cannot +be estimated in dollars and cents. I might even refer to those schools +of our country where these ultra utilitarian notions are carried to an +extent which excludes amusing conversation or reading even during +meal-time; and devotes the hours which were formerly spent in +recreation, to manual labor of some productive kind or other.—But I +forbear. Enough has been said to illustrate the position I have taken, +that there is in vogue a system which bears the marks of having been +contrived, if not by the enemies of our race, either openly or covertly, +at least by those whom ignorance renders scarcely less at war with the +general happiness.</p> + +<p>Now I would not deny nor attempt to deny that change of occupation of +body or mind is of itself an amusement, and one too of great value. +Undoubtedly it is so. To some children, studies of every kind are an +amusement; and there are few indeed to whom none are so. Labor, with +many, when alternated with study, is amusing. And yet, after all, unless +such labors are performed in company, where light and cheerful +conversation is sure to keep the mind away from the subjects about +which it has just been engaged, I am afraid that the purposes for which +amusements were designed, are very far from being <i>all</i> secured.</p> + +<p>But perhaps I am dwelling too long on the general principle that people +of every age, and children in particular, need, and must have +amusements, whether they are of a productive kind or not; and that it is +very far from being sufficient, were it either practicable or desirable, +to turn all study and labor into amusement. [Footnote: I will even say, +more distinctly than I have already done, that however popular the +contrary opinion may be, neither study nor work ought to be regarded as +mere amusement. I would, it is true, take every possible pains to render +both work and study agreeable; but I would at the same time have it +distinctly understood, that one of them is by no means the other; that, +on the contrary, work is <i>work</i>—study, <i>study</i>—and amusement, +<i>amusement</i>.] My business is with those who direct the first dawnings +of affection and intellect. Principles are by no means of less importance +on this account; but the limits of a work for young mothers do not admit +of anything more than a brief discussion of their importance.</p> + +<p>I will now proceed to speak of some of the more common amusements of the +nursery.</p> + +<p>I have seen very young children sit on the floor and amuse themselves +for nearly half an hour together, with piling up and taking down small +wooden cubes, of different sizes. Some of them, instead of being cubes, +however, may be of the shape of bricks. Their ingenuity, while they are +scarcely a year or two old, in erecting houses, temples, churches, &c., +is sometimes surprising. Girls as well as boys seem to be greatly amused +with this form of exercise; and both seem to be little less gratified in +destroying than in rearing their lilliputian edifices.</p> + +<p>Next to the latter kind of amusement, is the viewing of pictures. It is +surprising at what an early age children may be taught to notice +miniature representations of objects; living objects especially. +Representations of the works of art should come in a little later than +those of things in nature. I know a father who prepares volumes of +pictures, solely for this purpose; though he usually regards them not +only as a source of amusement to children, but as a medium of +instruction.</p> + +<p>Battledoor or shuttlecock may be taught to children of both sexes very +early; and it affords a healthy and almost untiring source of amusement. +It gives activity as well as strength to the muscles or moving powers, +and has many other important advantages. There is some danger, according +to Dr. Pierson [Footnote: See his Lecture before the American Institute +of Instruction] of distorting the spine by playing at shuttlecock too +frequently and too long; but this will seldom be the case with little +children in the nursery. Neither shuttlecock nor any other amusement +will secure their attention long enough to injure them very much.</p> + +<p>Perhaps this exercise comes nearer to my ideas of a perfect amusement +than almost any which could be named. The mind is agreeably occupied, +without being fatigued; and if the amusements are proportioned to the +age and strength of the child, there is very little fatigue of the body. +It gives, moreover, great practical accuracy to the eye and to the hand.</p> + +<p>A rocking-horse is much recommended for the nursery. I have had no +opportunity for observing the effects of this kind of amusement; but if +it is one half as valuable as some suppose, I should be inclined to +recommend it. But I am opposed to fostering in the rider lessons of +cruelty, by arming him with whips and spurs. If the young are ever to +learn to ride, on a living horse, the exercises of the rocking-horse +will, most certainly, be a sort of preparation for the purpose.</p> + +<p>Tops and marbles afford a great deal of rational amusement to the young; +and of a very useful kind, too. Spinning a top is second to no exercise +which I have yet mentioned, unless it is playing at shuttlecock.</p> + +<p>Dr. Dewees recommends a small backgammon table, with men, but without +dice. He says, also, that "children, as soon as they are capable of +comprehending the subject, should be taught draughts or checkers. This +game is not only highly amusing, but also very instructive." In another +place he heaps additional encomiums upon the game of checkers. "It +becomes a source of endless amusement," he says, "as it never tires, but +always instructs." Of exercises which instruct, however, as well as +amuse, I shall speak presently.</p> + +<p>The amusements called "morrice," "fox and geese," &c., with which some +of the children of almost every neighborhood are more or less +acquainted, are of the same general character and tendency as checkers. +So is a play, sometimes, but very improperly, called dice, in which two +parties play with a small bundle of wooden pins, not unlike knitting +pins in shape, but shorter.</p> + +<p>The writer to whom I have referred above recommends nine-pins and balls +of proper size, as highly useful both for diversion and exercise. If +they can be used without leading to bad habits and bad associations, I +think they may be useful.</p> + +<p>For girls, who demand a great deal more of exercise, both within doors +and without, skipping the rope is an excellent amusement. So also is +swinging. Both of these exercises may be used either out of doors, or +in the nursery.</p> + +<p>Trundling a hoop I have always regarded as an amusing out-of-door +exercise; and I am not sorry when I sometimes see girls, as well as +boys, engaged in it, under the eye of their mothers and teachers.</p> + +<p>Playing ball, of which there are many different games, and flying kites, +employ a large proportion if not all of the muscles of the body, in such +a manner as is likely to confirm the strength, and greatly improve the +health. The same may be said of skating in the winter, and swimming in +the summer. But these last are exercises over which the mother cannot, +ordinarily, have very much control.</p> + +<p>Under the head of amusements, it only remains for me to speak of a few +juvenile employments of a mixed nature. Of these I shall treat very +briefly, as they are a branch of the subject which does not necessarily +come within the compass of my present plan. They are exercises, too, +which should more properly come under the head of Infantile Instruction.</p> + +<p>Dissected maps afford children of every age a great fund of amusement; +but much caution is necessary, with those that are very young, not to +discourage or confound them by showing them too many at once. Thus if +we cut in pieces the map of one of the smaller United States, at the +county lines, or the whole United States, at the state lines, it is +quite as many divisions as they can manage. Cut up as large a state, +even, as Pennsylvania or New York is, into counties, and try to lead +them to amuse themselves by putting together so large a number, many of +which must inevitably very closely resemble each other, and it is ten to +one but you bewilder, and even perplex and discourage them. The same +results would follow from cutting up even the whole of a large county, +or a small state, into towns. I have usually begun with little children, +by requiring them to put together the eight counties of the small state +of Connecticut. In this case the counties are not only few, but there is +a very striking difference in their shape.</p> + +<p>A black board and a piece of chalk, along with a little ingenuity on the +part of the mother, will furnish the child with an almost endless +variety of amusement. Let him attempt to imitate almost any object which +interests him, whether among the works of nature or art. However rude +his pictures may be, do not laugh at, but on the contrary, endeavor to +encourage him. He may also be permitted to imitate letters and figures. +The elements of letters, too, both printed and written, may be given +him, and he may be required to put them together. Dissected pictures, as +well as dissected maps and letters, are useful, and to most children, +very acceptable.</p> + +<p>In short, the devices of an ingenious, thinking mother, for the +amusement of her very young children, are almost endless; and the great +danger is, that when a mother once enters deeply into the spirit of +these exercises, she will substitute them for those much more healthy +ones which have been already mentioned, such as require muscular +activity, or may be performed in the open air.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XII.</h2> + +<h3>CRYING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>"Crying," says Dr. Dewees, "should be looked upon as an exercise of much +importance;" and he is sustained in this view by many eminent medical +writers.</p> + +<p>But people generally think otherwise. Nothing is more common than the +idea that to cry is unbecoming; and children are everywhere taught, when +they suffer pain, to brave it out, and <i>not cry</i>. Such a direction—to +say nothing of its tendency to encourage hypocrisy—is wholly +unphilosophical. The following anecdote may serve in part to illustrate +my meaning. It is said to have been related by Dr. Rush.</p> + +<p>A gentleman in South Carolina was about to undergo a very painful +surgical operation. He had imbibed the idea that it was beneath the +dignity of a man ever to say or do anything expressive of pain. He +therefore refused to submit to the usual precaution of securing the +hands and feet by bandages, declaring to his surgeon that he had nothing +to fear from his being untied, for he would not move a muscle of his +body. He kept his word, it is true; but he died instantly after the +operation, from apoplexy.</p> + +<p>There is very little doubt, in the mind of any physiologist, in regard +to the cause of apoplexy in this case; and that it might have been +prevented by the relief which is always afforded by groans and tears.</p> + +<p>It is, I believe, very generally known, that in the profoundest grief, +people do not, and cannot shed tears; and that when the <i>latter</i> begin +to flow, it affords immediate relief.</p> + +<p>I do not undertake to argue from this, that crying is so important, +either to the young or the old, that it is ever worth while to excite or +continue it by artificial means; or that a habit of crying, so easily +and readily acquired by the young, is not to be guarded against as a +serious, evil. My object was first to show the folly of those who +denounce all crying, and secondly, to point out some of its +advantages—in the hope of preventing parents from going to that extreme +which borders upon stoicism.</p> + +<p>One of the most intelligent men I ever knew, frequently made it his +boast that he neither laughed nor cried on any occasion; and on being +told that both laughing and crying were physiologically useful, he only +ridiculed the sentiment.</p> + +<p>Crying is useful to very young infants, because it favors the passage of +blood in their lungs, where it had not before been accustomed to travel, +and where its motion is now indispensable. And it not only promotes the +circulation of the blood, but expands the air-cells of the lungs, and +thus helps forward that great change, by which the dark-colored impure +blood of the veins is changed at once into pure blood, and thus rendered +fit to nourish the system, and sustain life.</p> + +<p>But this is not all. Crying strengthens the lungs themselves. It does +this by expanding the little air-cells of which I have just spoken, and +not only accustoms them to being stretched, at a period, of all others, +the most favorable for this purpose, but frees them at the same time +from mucus, and other injurious accumulations.</p> + +<p>They, therefore, who oppose an infant's crying, know not what they do. +So far is it from being hurtful to the child, that its occasional +recurrence is, as we have already seen, positively useful. Some +practitioners of medicine, in some of the more trying situations in +which human nature can be placed, even encourage their patients to +suffer tears to flow, as a means of relief.</p> + +<p>Infants, it should also be recollected, have no other language by which +to express their wants and feelings, than sighs and tears. Crying is not +always an expression of positive pain; it sometimes indicates hunger and +thirst, and sometimes the want of a change of posture. This last +consideration deserves great attention, and all the inconveniences of +crying ought to be borne cheerfully, for the sake of having the little +sufferer remind us when nature demands a change of position. No child +ought to be permitted to remain in one position longer than two hours, +even while sleeping; nor half that time, while awake; and if nurses and +mothers will overlook this matter, as they often do, it is a favorable +circumstance that the child should remind them of it.</p> + +<p>Crying has been called the "waste gate" of the human system; the door of +escape to that excess of excitability which sometimes prevails, +especially among children and nervous adults. To all such persons it is +healthy—most undoubtedly so; nor do I know that its occasional +recurrence is injurious to any adult—a fastidious public sentiment to +the contrary notwithstanding.</p> + +<p>Some have supposed, that what is here said will be construed by the +young mother into a license to suffer her child to cry unnecessarily. +Perhaps, say they, she is a laboring woman, and wishes to be at work. +Well, she lays down her child in the cradle, or on the bed, and goes to +her work. Presently the child, becoming wet perhaps, begins to cry, as +well he might. But, instead of going to him and taking care of him, she +continues at her employment; and when one remonstrates against her +conduct as cruelty, she pleads the authority of the author of the "Young +Mother."</p> + +<p>All this may happen; but if it should, I am not answerable for it. I +have insisted strongly on guarding the child against wet clothing, and +on watching him with the utmost care to prevent all real suffering. +Mothers, like the specimen here given, if they happen to have a little +sensibility to suffering, and not much love of their offspring, +generally know of a shorter way to quiet their infants and procure time +to work, than that which is here mentioned. They have nothing to do but +to give them some cordial or elixir, whose basis is opium. Startle not, +reader, at the statement;—this abominable practice is followed by many +a female who claims the sacred name of mother. And many a wretch has +thus, in her ignorance, indolence or avarice, slowly destroyed her +children!</p> + +<p>I repeat, therefore, that I do not think my remarks on crying are +necessarily liable to abuse; though I am not sure that there are not a +few individuals to be found who may apply them in the manner above +mentioned—an application, however, which is as far removed from the +original intention of the author, as can possibly be conceived.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIII.</h2> + +<h3>LAUGHING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Laughing, like crying, has a good effect on the infantile lungs; nor is +it less salutary in other respects. "Laugh and be fat," an old adage, +has its meaning, and also its philosophy.</p> + +<p>There is an excess, however, to which laughing, no less than crying, may +be carried, and which we cannot too carefully avoid. But how little to +be envied—how much to be pitied—are they who consider it a weakness +and a sin to laugh, and in the plenitude of their wisdom, tell us that +<i>the Saviour of mankind never laughed</i>. When I hear this last assertion, +I am always ready to ask, whether the individual who makes it has read a +new revelation or a new gospel; for certainly none of the sacred books +which I have seen give us any such information.</p> + +<p>But I will not dwell here. The common notion on this subject, if not +ridiculous, is certainly strange. I will only add, that, come into vogue +as it might have done, there is no opinion more unfounded than the very +general one among adults, that children should be uniformly grave; and +that just in proportion as they laugh and appear frolicsome, just in the +same proportion are they out of the way, and deserving of reprehension.</p> + +<p>It is strange that it should be so, but I have seen many parents who +were miserable because their children were sportive and joyful. Oh, when +will the days of monkish sadness and austerity be over; and the public +sentiment in the christian world get right on this subject!</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIV."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIV.</h2> + +<h3>SLEEP.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">General remarks. Hints to fathers.—SEC. 1. Proper hours for repose. +Dark rooms. Noise.—SEC. 2. Place for sleeping. Sleeping +alone—reasons.—SEC. 3. Purity of the air in sleeping rooms.—SEC. 4. +The bed. Objections to feathers. Other materials.—SEC. 5. The covering +of beds. Covering the head.—SEC. 6. Night Dresses. Robes.—SEC. 7. +Posture of the body in sleep.—SEC. 8. State of the mind.—SEC. 9. +Quality of sleep.—SEC. 10. Quantity of sleep.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Not a few persons consider all rules relative to sleep as utterly +futile. They regard it as so much of a natural or animal process, that +if we are let alone we shall seldom err, at any age, respecting it. +Rules on the subject, above all, they regard as wholly misplaced.</p> + +<p>Those who entertain such views, would do well, in order to be +consistent, to go a little farther; and as breathing and eating and +drinking—nay, even <i>thinking</i>—are natural processes, deny the utility +of all rules respecting <i>them</i> also. Perhaps they would do well, +moreover, to deny that rules of any sort are valuable. But would not +this have the effect to bar the door perpetually against all human +improvement? Would it not be equivalent to saying, to a half-civilized, +because only half-christianized community—Go on with your barbarous +customs, and your uncleanly and unthinking habits, forever?</p> + +<p>But I have not so learned human nature. I regard man as susceptible of +endless progression. And I know of no way in which more rapid progress +can be made, than by enlightening young mothers on subjects which +pertain to our physical nature, and the means of physical improvement. +Not for the <i>sake</i> of that perishable part of man, the frame, but +because it is nearly in vain to attempt to improve the mind and heart, +without due attention to the frame-work, to which mind and heart, for +the present, are appended, and most intimately related.</p> + +<p>Let it be left to fathers to study the improvement of hounds and horses +and cattle, and at the same time to think themselves above the concerns +of the nursery. We may, indeed, read of a Cato once in three thousand +years, who was in the habit of quitting all other business in order to +be present when the nurse washed and rubbed his child. But our passion +for gain, in the present age, is so much more absorbing and +soul-destroying than the passion for military glory, that we cannot +expect many Catos. Oh no. All, or nearly all, must devolve on the +mother. The father has no time to attend to his children! What belongs +to the mother, if she can be duly awakened, may be at least <i>half</i> done; +what belongs to the father, must, I fear, be left undone.</p> + +<p>I am accustomed to regard every day—even of the infant—as a miniature +life. I am, moreover, accustomed to consider mental and bodily vigor, +not only for each separate day, but for life's whole day, as greatly +influenced by the circumstances of sleep; the HOUR, PLACE, PURITY OF THE +AIR, THE BED, THE COVERING, DRESS, POSTURE, STATE OF THE MIND, QUALITY, +QUANTITY, AND DURATION.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Hour for Repose.</i></h4> + +<p>Generally speaking, the night is the appropriate season for repose; but +in early infancy, it is <i>every</i> hour. I have already spoken of the vast +amount of sleep which the new-born infant requires, as well as of many +other circumstances connected with it, requiring our attention. Suffer +me, however, to enlarge, at the risk of a little repetition.</p> + +<p>What time the infant is awake, should be during the day. It is of very +great importance, in the formation of good habits, that he should be +undressed and put to bed, at evening, with as much regularity as if be +had not slept during the day for a single moment. It is also important +that he be permitted to sleep during the whole night, as uninterruptedly +as possible; and that when he is aroused, to have his position or +diapers changed, or to receive food, it should be done with little +parade and noise, and with as little light as possible. All persons, old +as well as young, sleep more quietly in a dark room, than in one where a +light is burning.</p> + +<p>I am well aware that the course here recommended, may be carried to an +excess which will utterly defeat the object intended, since there are +children to be found, who are so trained in this respect, that the +lightest tread upon the floor will awake, and perhaps frighten them. But +this is an excess which is not required. All that is necessary during +the night, is a reasonable degree of silence, in order to induce the +habit of continued rest, if possible. In the day time, on the contrary, +fatigue will impel a child to sleep occasionally, even in the midst of +noise. I am not sure that the habit of sleeping in the midst of noise is +not worth a little pains on the part of the mother. Nor is it improbable +that a habit of this kind, once acquired by the infant, might ultimately +be extended to the night, so that over-caution, even in regard to that +season, might gradually be laid aside.</p> + +<p>Dr. North, a distinguished medical practitioner in Hartford, Conn., +confirms the foregoing sentiments; and adds, that he deems it an +imperious duty of those parents who wish well to their infants, to form +in them the habit of sleeping when fatigued, whether the room be quiet +or noisy. With his children, no cradles or opiates are needed or used.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Place.</i></h4> + +<p>For some time after its birth, the infant should sleep near its mother, +though not in the same bed. The bedstead should be of the usual height +of bedsteads, and should be enclosed with a railing sufficient to secure +the infant from falling out, but not of such a structure as to hinder, +in any degree, a free circulation of the air.</p> + +<p>The reasons why a child ought to sleep alone, and not with the mother or +nurse, are numerous; but the following are the principal;</p> + +<p>1. The heat accumulated by the bodies of the mother and child both, is +often too great for health.</p> + +<p>2. The air is too impure. I have already spoken of the change in the +purity of the air which is produced by breathing in it. It is bad +enough for two adults to sleep in the same bed, breathing over and over +again the impure air, as they must do more or less, even if the bed is +very large;—but it is still worse for infants. Their lungs demand +atmospheric air in its utmost purity; and if denied it, they must +eventually suffer.</p> + +<p>3. But besides the change of the air by breathing, the surface of the +body is perpetually changing it in the same manner, as was stated in the +chapter on Ventilation. Now a child will almost inevitably breathe a +stream of this bad air, as it issues from the bed; and what is still +worse, it is very apt, in spite of every precaution, to get its head +covered up with the clothes, where it can hardly breathe anything else. +This, if frequently repeated, is slow but certain death;—as much so as +if the child were to drink poison in moderate quantities.</p> + +<p>Let me not be told that this is an exaggeration; that thousands of +mothers make it a point to cover up the beads of their infants; and that +notwithstanding this, they are as healthy as the infants of their +neighbors. I have not said that they would droop and die while infants. +The fumes of lead, which is a certain poison, may be inhaled, and yet +the child or adult who inhales them may live on, in tolerable health, +for many years. But suffer he must, in the end, in spite of every effort +and every hope. So must the child, whose head is covered habitually +with the bed clothing, where it is compelled to breathe not only the air +spoiled by its own skin, but also that which is spoiled by the much +larger surface of body of the mother or nurse.</p> + +<p>But I have proof on this subject. Friedlander, in his "Physical +Education," says expressly, that in Great Britain alone, between the +years 1686 and 1800, no less than 40,000 children died in consequence of +this practice of allowing them to sleep near their nurses. I was at +first disposed to doubt the accuracy of this most remarkable statement. +But when I consider the respectability of the authority from which it +emanated, and that it is only about 350 a year for that great empire, I +cannot doubt that the estimate is substantially correct. What a +sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and folly!</p> + +<p>It should be added, in this place, both to confirm the foregoing +sentiment, and to show that British mothers and nurses are not alone, +that Dr. Dewees has witnessed, in the circle of his practice, four +deaths from the same cause. If every physician in the United States has +met with as many cases of the kind, in proportion to his practice, as +Dr. D., the evil is about as great in this country as Dr. F. says it is +in Great Britain.</p> + +<p>If a child sleeps alone, it cannot of course be liable to as much +suffering of this kind as if it slept with another person; though much +precaution will still be necessary to keep its head uncovered, and +prevent its inhaling air spoiled by its own lungs and skin.</p> + +<p>4. There is one more evil which will be avoided by having a child sleep +alone. Many a mother has seriously injured her child by pressure. I do +not here allude to those monsters in human nature, whose besotted habits +have been the frequent cause of the suffocation and death of their +offspring, but to the more careful and tender mother, who would sooner +injure herself than her own child. Such mothers, even, have been known +to dislocate or fracture a limb![Footnote: There may be instances where +the debility of an infant will be so great that the mother or a nurse +must sleep with it, to keep it warm. But such cases of disease are very +rare.]</p> + +<p>To cap the climax of error in this matter, some mothers allow their +infants to lie on their arm, as a pillow. This practice not only exposes +them to all or nearly all the evils which have been mentioned, but to +one more; viz. the danger of being thrown from the bed.</p> + +<p>A young mother, with whom I was well acquainted, was sleeping one night +with her infant on her arm, when she made a sudden and rather violent +effort to turn in the bed, in doing which she threw the child upon the +floor with such violence as to fracture its little skull, and cause its +death.</p> + +<p>Enough, I trust, has now been said to convince every reasonable young +mother, where absolute poverty does not preclude comfort and health, +that her child ought never to be permitted to sleep in the same bed with +her; but that it should be placed on a bedstead by itself at a short +distance from her, and properly guarded from accidents—and above all, +from inhaling impure air.</p> + +<p>At a suitable age, a child may be removed from the nursery to a separate +chamber. Here, if the circumstances permit, it should still sleep by +itself; and if the bedstead be somewhat lower than ordinary, and the +room be not too small, it will need no watching.</p> + +<p>Perhaps this may be the proper place to say that there are more reasons +than one—and some of them are of a moral nature, too—why a child +should continue to sleep alone, after it leaves the nursery. Nor is it +sufficient to prohibit its sleeping with younger persons, and yet crowd +it into the bed with an aged grandfather or grandmother, or with both. +There is no excuse for a course like this, except the iron hand of +necessity. And even then, I should prefer to have a child of mine sleep +on the hard floor, at least during the summer season, rather than with +an aged person.</p> + +<p>Let it not be supposed I have imbibed the fashionable idea that it is +<i>peculiarly</i> unhealthy for the young to sleep with the old. I know this +doctrine has many learned advocates. And yet I doubt its correctness. I +believe that the manners and habits of the old may injure the young who +sleep with them, and I know that they render the air impure, like other +people. But I cannot see why the mere circumstance of their being <i>old</i> +should be a source of unhealthiness to their younger bed-fellows. Still +I say, that there are reasons enough against the practice I am opposing, +without this.</p> + +<p>Some parents allow dogs and cats to sleep with children. Others have a +prejudice against cats, but not against dogs. The truth is, that they +both contaminate the air by respiration and perspiration, in the same +manner that adults do. And aside from the fact that they are often +infested by lice and other insects, and addicted to uncleanly habits, +they ought always to be excluded, and with iron bars and bolts, if +necessary, from the beds of children. But of this, too, I have treated +elsewhere.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Purity of the Air.</i></h4> + +<p>The general importance of pure air has been mentioned. I have spoken of +the elements of the atmosphere in which we live, of the manner in +which it may be vitiated, and the consequences to health. I have +shown—perhaps at sufficient length—the impropriety of washing, drying, +and ironing clothes in the room where a child is kept; of cooking in the +room, especially on a stove; of suffering the floor or clothes, +particularly those of the child, to remain long wet, in the room; of +smoking tobacco, using spirits, burning oil with too long a wick, &c.</p> + +<p>All which has thus been said of the purity of the air of the nursery +generally, is applicable to that of all sleeping rooms. It is an +important point gained, when we can secure a nursery with folding doors +in the centre, so as, when we please, to make two rooms of it. In that +case, the division in which the bed is, can be completely ventilated a +little before night, and thus be comparatively pure for the reception of +both the mother and the child.</p> + +<p>Shall the windows and doors where a child sleeps, be kept closed; or +shall they be suffered to remain open a part or the whole of the night? +This must be determined by circumstances. If there are no doors but +such as communicate with apartments whose air is equally impure with +that in which the child is, it is preferable to keep them closed. If the +windows cannot be opened without exposing the child to a current of air, +it is perhaps the less of two evils, not to open them.</p> + +<p>But we are not usually driven to such extremities. In some instances, +windows are constructed—and all of them ought to be—so that they can +be lowered from the top. When this is not the case, something can be +placed before the window to break the current, so that it need not fall +directly upon the child. Closing the blinds will partially effect this, +where blinds exist.</p> + +<p>I have known many an individual who was in the habit of sleeping with +his windows open during the whole year, and without any obvious evil +consequences. Dr. Gregory was of this habit. But if adults—not trained +to it—can acquire such a habit with impunity, with how much more safety +could children be trained to it from the very first year. Macnish says, +"there can be no doubt that a gentle current pervading our sleeping +apartments, is in the highest degree ESSENTIAL TO HEALTH."</p> + +<p>This consideration—I mean the impurity of sleeping rooms, even after +every precaution has been used to keep them ventilated—affords one +of the strongest inducements to going abroad early in the morning +(especially when there is no other room which either adults or children +can occupy) while the nursery or chamber is aired and ventilated. The +utility of <i>rising</i> early, I hope no one can doubt; but some have doubts +of the propriety of going abroad, till the dew has "passed away." Such +should be reminded, by the foregoing train of remarks, that early +walking may be a choice of evils; and that if it <i>is</i> on the whole +advantageous to adults, it cannot be less so to children. And as soon as +the sun has chased away the vapors of the night, if the weather is +tolerable, most children should be carried abroad.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>The Bed.</i></h4> + +<p>This should never be of feathers. There are many reasons for this +prohibition, especially to the feeble.</p> + +<p>1. They are too warm. Infants should by all means be kept warm enough, +as I have all along insisted. But excess of heat excites or stimulates +the skin, causing an unnatural degree of perspiration, and thus inducing +weakness or debility.</p> + +<p>2. When we first enter a room in which there is a feather bed which has +been occupied during the night, we are struck with the offensive smell +of the air. This is owing to a variety of causes; one of which probably +is, that beds of this kind are better adapted to absorb and retain the +effluvia of our bodies. But let the causes be what they may, the effects +ought, if possible, to be avoided; for both experience and authority +combine to pronounce them very injurious.</p> + +<p>3. Feather beds—if used in the nursery—will inevitably discharge more +or less of dust and down; both of which are injurious to the tender +lungs of the infant.</p> + +<p>Mattresses are better for persons of every age, than soft feather beds. +They may be made of horse hair or moss; but hair is the best. If the +mattress does not appear to be warm enough for the very young infant, a +blanket may be spread over it. Dr. Dewees says that in case mattresses +cannot be had, "the sacking bottom" may be substituted, or "even the +floor;" at least in warm weather: "for almost anything," he adds, "is +preferable to feathers."</p> + +<p>Macnish, in his "Philosophy of Sleep," objects strongly to air beds, and +says that he can assert "from experience," that they are the very worst +that can possibly be employed. My theories—for I have had no experience +on the subject—would lead me to a similar conclusion. A British +writer of eminence assures us that the higher classes in Ireland, to a +considerable extent, accustom themselves and their infants to sleep on +bags of cut straw, overspread with blankets and a light coverlid; and +that the custom is rapidly finding favor. I have slept on straw, both in +winter and summer, for many years, yet I am always warm; and those who +know my habits say I use less <i>covering</i> on my bed than almost any +individual whom they have ever known.</p> + +<p>I have no hostility to soft beds, especially for young children and feeble +adults, could softness be secured without much heat and relaxation +of the system. On the contrary, it is certainly desirable, in itself, +to have the bed so soft that as large a proportion of the surface of +the body may rest on it as possible. But I consider hardness as a +much smaller evil than feathers.</p> + +<p>It is worthy of remark how generally physicians, for the last hundred +years, have recommended hard beds, especially straw beds or hair +mattresses, to their more feeble and delicate patients. This fact might +at least quiet our apprehensions in regard to their tendency on those +who are accustomed to them in early infancy.</p> + +<p>Some writers on these subjects appear to doubt whether, after all that +they say, they shall have much influence on mothers in inducing them to +give up feather beds for their infants. But they need not be so +faithless. Multitudes have already been reformed by their writings; and +multitudes larger still would be so, could they gain access to them. It +is a most serious evil that they are often so written and published that +comparatively few mothers will ever possess them.</p> + +<p>The pillow, as well as the bed, should be rather hard; and its thickness +should be much less than is usual, or we shall do mischief by bending +the neck, and thus compressing the vessels, and obstructing the +circulation of the blood. But on this subject I will say more, when I +come to treat on "Posture."</p> + +<p>The child's bed should not be placed near the wall, on account of +dampness. There is also, during the summer, another reason. Should +lightning strike the house, it will be much more apt to injure those who +are near the wall than other persons; as it seldom leaves the wall to +pass over the central part of the room.</p> + +<p>Curtains are not only useless, but injurious. They prevent a free +circulation of the air. Everything which has this tendency must be +studiously guarded against, in the management of infants.</p> + +<p>Nothing is more injurious to the old or the young than damp beds and +damp covering. It behoves, especially, all those who have the care of +infants, to see that everything about their beds is thoroughly dry. The +walls and clothes should also be dry; and wet clothes should never be +hung up in the room. By neglecting these precautions, colds, +rheumatisms, inflammations, fevers, consumptions, and death, may ensue. +Many a person loses his health, and not a few their lives, in this way. +The author of this work was once thrown into a fever from such a cause.</p> + +<p>Warming the bed is, in all cases, a bad practice. While in the nursery, +if the air be kept at a proper temperature, there will be no need of it; +after the child is assigned to a separate chamber, its enervating +tendency would result in more evil than good. It is better to let the +bed became gradually heated by the body, in a natural and healthy way.</p> + +<p>No person, and above all, no infant, should be suffered to sleep in a +bed that has been recently occupied by the sick. The bed and all the +clothes should first be thoroughly aired. Could we see with our eyes at +once, how rapidly these bodies of ours fill the air, and even the beds +we sleep in, with carbonic acid and other hurtful gases and impurities, +even while in health, but much more so in sickness, we should be +cautious of exposing the lungs of the tender infant, in such an +atmosphere, until everything had been properly cleansed, and the +apartments properly ventilated.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 5. <i>The Covering.</i></h4> + +<p>The covering of the bed should be sufficiently warm, but never any +warmer than is absolutely necessary to protect the child from +chilliness. The lightest covering which will secure this object is the +best. Perhaps there is nothing in use that, with so little weight, +secures so much heat as what are called "comfortables."</p> + +<p>The clothes should not be "tucked up" at the sides and foot of the bed +with too much care and exactness. For when the bed is once warmed +thoroughly with the child's body, the admission of a little fresh air +into it, when he elevates or otherwise moves his limbs, can do no harm, +but <i>may</i> do much of good, in the way of ventilation. I deem it +important, moreover, to inure children very early to little partial +exposures of this kind.</p> + +<p>Those mothers who, from over-tenderness, and want of correct information +on the subject, pursue a contrary course, and consider it as almost +certain death to have a particle of fresh air reach the bodies of their +infants during their slumbers, are generally sure to outwit themselves, +and defeat their very intentions. For by being thus tender of their +children, it often turns out that whenever the mother is ill, or when on +any other account she ceases to watch over them—and such times must, +in general, sooner or later come—they are much more liable to take cold +or sustain other injury, should they be exposed, than if they had been +treated more rationally.</p> + +<p>I knew a mother who would not trust her children to take care of their +own beds on retiring to rest, as long as they remained in her house, +even though they were twenty or thirty years old. But they had no better +or firmer constitutions than the other children of the same +neighborhood.</p> + +<p>Hardly anything can be more injurious than covering the head with the +bed clothes; and yet some mothers and nurses cover, in this way, not +only their own heads, but those of their children. I have elsewhere +shown how impure the air is, which is imprisoned under the bed clothes. +I hope those mothers who are willing to destroy <i>themselves</i> by covering +up their heads while they sleep, will at least have mercy on their +unoffending infants.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 6. <i>Night Dresses.</i></h4> + +<p>The grand rule on this point is, to wear as little dress during sleep as +possible. Some mothers not only suffer their infants to sleep in the +same shirt, cap, and stockings that they have worn during the day, but +add a night gown to the rest. No cap should be worn during the night, +any more than in the day time. Or if the foolish practice has been +adopted for the day, it should be discontinued at night. It is enough +for those adults whose long hair would otherwise be dishevelled, to wear +night caps, and subject themselves, as they inevitably do, to catarrh +and periodical headache. Children's heads should have nothing on them by +night; nor even by day, except to defend them from the rain or the hot +rays of the sun.</p> + +<p>The stockings, too, should be wholly laid aside at night, unless in the +case of those who are feeble, apt to have their feet cold, or +particularly liable to bowel complaints. Such may be allowed to sleep in +their stockings, but not in those which have been worn all the day.</p> + +<p>Indeed, neither children nor adults should ever wear a single garment in +the night which they have worn during the day. The reason is, that there +are too many causes of impurity in operation while we sleep, without our +wearing the clothes in which we have been perspiring during the +day-time—and which must be already more or less filled with the +effluvia of our bodies.</p> + +<p>It is a very easy thing to have a loose night gown to supply the place +of the shirt we have worn during the day; and if nothing else is +convenient, a spare shirt will answer. But both a night gown and shirt +should never be admitted, especially in warm weather. The garment to +supply the place of the shirt during the night, may be of calico in the +summer, and of flannel in the winter.</p> + +<p>The collar and wristbands of this night dress should be loose; and the +whole garment should be large and long. No article of dress should ever +press upon our bodies, so as in the least to impede the circulation; and +for this reason it is, that writers on physical education have inveighed +so much against cravats, straps, garters, &c. This caution, so important +to all, is doubly so to young mothers, on whom devolves the management +of the tender infant.</p> + +<p>When the child has been perspiring freely during the evening, just +before he is undressed, or when he has just been subjected to the warm +bath, it may be well to use a little care in undressing and exchanging +clothes, to prevent taking cold;—though it should ever be remembered, +that those children who are managed on a rational system will bear +slight exposures with far more safety, than they who have been managed +at random—sometimes, indeed, with great tenderness, but at others, +wholly neglected.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 7. <i>Posture of the Body.</i></h4> + +<p>In early infancy, children who are not stuffed rather than fed, may +occasionally be permitted to sleep on their backs, especially if they +incline to do so. But it will be well to encourage them to sleep on one +side, as soon as you can without great inconvenience.</p> + +<p>The right side, as a general rule, is preferable; because the stomach, +which lies towards the left side, is thus left uncompressed, and +digestion undisturbed. I would not, however, require a child to lie +always on the right side, but would occasionally change his position, +lest he should become unable to sleep at all, except in a particular +manner.</p> + +<p>I have said elsewhere, that the head ought to be a little raised, +especially if the child is liable to diseases of the brain. But this +remark, rather hastily thrown out, requires explanation.</p> + +<p>There is so much blood sent by the heart to the head and upper parts of +the system of infants, as to predispose those parts, especially the +brain, to disease. In a horizontal position of the body, there is more +blood sent to the brain than when the body is erect. This will show the +reader, at once, that if the infant is peculiarly exposed to diseases +of the brain—and it certainly is so—he ought to remain in a horizontal +posture as little as possible, except during sleep; and that even then +it is desirable to make his bed in such a manner as to elevate the head +and shoulders as much as we can without compressing the lungs, or +obstructing the circulation in the neck.</p> + +<p>I recommend, therefore, to raise the head of an infant's bedstead a +little higher than the foot; though not so much as to incline him to +slide downwards into the bed, for that would be to produce one evil in +curing another.</p> + +<p>Sir Charles Bell thinks that the common disease of infants called +<i>diabetes</i>, arises from their being permitted to sleep on their backs; +and that by breaking up the habit of lying in this position, and +accustoming them to lie on their sides, we shall prevent it. I doubt +whether the effect here referred to, is ever the result of such a cause. +Still I am as much opposed to the <i>habit</i> of sleeping on the back, as +Sir Charles Bell. It is quite injurious to free respiration.</p> + +<p>Closely allied to the subject of bodily position in general, is the +state of particular organs; especially the stomach and the senses. I +have already intimated that in order to have an infant sleep quietly, it +is desirable to darken the room. This is the more necessary, where +infants are unnaturally wakeful. In such cases, not only light should +be excluded from the eye, but sounds from the ear, odors from the +nostrils, &c. A remarkably full stomach is in the way of going quietly +to sleep, whether the person be old or young. Neither infants nor adults +ought to take food for some time previous to their going to sleep for +the night. Great bodily heat, as well as too great cold, is also +unfavorable. If too hot, the temperature of the infant should be +somewhat reduced by exposure to the air; if too cold, it should be +raised in a natural, healthy, and appropriate manner.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 8. <i>State of the Mind.</i></h4> + +<p>In giving directions how to procure pleasant dreams, Dr. Franklin +mentions as a highly important requisition, the possession of a quiet +conscience. A wise prescription, no doubt.</p> + +<p>But infants, as well as adults, in order to sleep quietly, should have +their minds and feelings in a state of tranquillity. The youngest child +has its "troubles;" and it is highly important, if not indispensable, to +<i>healthy</i> sleep, that the mother take all reasonable pains to remove +them before sleep is induced.</p> + +<p>We sometimes hear about children crying themselves to sleep, as if it +were a matter of no consequence; and sometimes, as if it were, on the +contrary, rather desirable. But is the sleep of an adult satisfying, who +goes to bed in trouble, and only sleeps because nature is so exhausted +that she cannot bear the protracted watchfulness any longer? Why then +should we expect it, in the case of the infant?</p> + +<p>I know an excellent father who is so far from believing this doctrine, +that he silences the cries of his child by the word of command—and +believes that in so doing, he promotes both his health and his +happiness. He would no more let him cry himself to sleep than he would +let him cough himself to sleep; though both crying and coughing, in +their places, may be and undoubtedly are salutary.</p> + +<p>Whatever may be the age and circumstances of an individual, he ought to +retire for rest with a cheerful mind. All anxiety about the future, all +regret about the past, all plans even, in regard to the business or +amusement of the morrow, should be kept wholly out of the mind. We +should yield ourselves up to the arms of sleep with the same quietude as +if life were finished, and we had nothing more to do or think of.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 9. <i>Quality of Sleep.</i></h4> + +<p>The soundness, as well as other qualities, of sleep, differs greatly in +different individuals; and even in the same night, with the same +individual in different circumstances. The first four or five hours of +sleep are usually more sound than the remainder. Hardly anything will +interrupt the repose of some persons during the early part of the night, +while they awake afterwards at the slightest noise or movement—the +chirping of a cricket, or the playing of a kitten.</p> + +<p>In profound sleep, we probably dream very little, if at all; but in +other circumstances, we are constantly disturbed by dreaming, and +sometimes start and wake in the greatest anxiety or horror.</p> + +<p>Nightmare is generally accompanied by dreams of the most distressing +kind. We imagine a wild beast, or a serpent in pursuit of us; or a rock +is detached from some neighboring cliff, and is about to roll upon and +crush us; and yet all our efforts to fly are unavailing. We seem chained +to the spot; but while in the very jaws of destruction, perhaps we +awake, trembling, and palpitating, and weary, as if something of a +serious nature had really happened.</p> + +<p>In the case of nightmare, it is more than probable that we fall asleep +with our stomachs too heavily loaded with food, or with a smaller +quantity of that which is highly indigestible. Or it may sometimes arise +from an improper position of the body, such as disturbs the action of +the stomach or lungs, or of both these organs. Lying on the back, when +we first go to sleep, is very apt to produce nightmare.</p> + +<p>But distressing dreams often follow an evening of anxious cares, +especially if those cares preyed upon us for the last half hour; and +also after late suppers, even if they are light—and late reading. Hence +the injunctions of the last section. Hence, too, the importance of +taking our last meal two or three hours before sleep, and of engaging, +during these hours, in cheerful conversation, and in the social and +private duties of religion. Family and private worship, in the evening, +are enjoined no less by philosophy than they are by christianity; and +every young mother will do well to understand this matter, and train her +offspring accordingly.</p> + +<p>"That sleep from which we are easily roused, is the healthiest," says +Macnish. "Very profound slumber partakes of the nature of apoplexy." I +should say, rather, that a medium between the two extremes is +healthiest. Profound apoplectic sleep, +I am sure, is injurious; but that from which we are too easily roused +cannot, it seems to me, be less so. Thus, I have often gone to sleep +with a resolution to wake at a certain hour, or at the striking of the +clock; and have found myself able to wake at the proposed time, almost +without one failure in twenty instances where I have made the trial. But +my sleep was obviously unsound, and certainly unsatisfying. The desire +to awake at a certain moment or period, seemed to buoy me above the +usual state of healthy sleep, and render me liable to awake at the +slightest disturbance. Were it not for sacrificing the ease of others, +it would be far better, in such cases, to rely upon some person to wake +us, instead of charging our own minds with it.</p> + +<p>The quality of our sleep will be greatly affected by the quantity. But +this thought, if extended, would anticipate the subject of our next +section; so easily does one thing, especially in physical education, run +into or involve another. I will therefore, for the present, only say +that if we confine ourselves to a smaller number of hours than is really +required, our sleep becomes too sound to be quite healthy, as if nature +endeavored to make up in quality, for want of due quantity. On the +contrary, if we attempt to sleep longer than is really necessary to +restore us, the quality of our sleep is not what it ought to be; for we +do not sleep soundly enough.</p> + +<p>The silence and darkness of the night tend to induce sleep of a better +quality than the noise and activity of day. It is unquestionably +desirable that children should be able to sleep, at least occasionally, +without absolute quiet. And yet such sleep cannot be sufficiently sound +to answer the purposes of health, if frequently repeated.</p> + +<p>Hence it is, perhaps—at least in part—that the maxim has obtained +currency, that one hour of sleep before midnight is worth two afterward. +The comparison has probably been made between the quiet and darksome +hours of evening and those which followed daybreak, when light, and +music, and bustle conspire, as they should, to make us wakeful. No +person can sleep as soundly and as effectually, when light reaches his +closed eyes, and sounds strike his ears, as in darkness and silence. He +may sleep, indeed, under almost any circumstances, when fatigue and +exhaustion demand it; but never so profoundly as when in absolute +abstraction of light, and complete quiet.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 10. <i>Quantity.</i></h4> + +<p>On this point much might be said, without exhausting the subject. But I +have already observed that infants, when first born, require to sleep +nearly their whole time. As they advance in years, the necessity for +sleep; however, diminishes, until they come to maturity, when it remains +for many years nearly stationary. In advanced age, the necessity for +sleep again increases, till we reach the extremest old age, or what is +usually called second childhood, when we again sometimes sleep nearly +the whole time.</p> + +<p>I have already remarked that much might be said on this subject; but I +do not think that the present occasion requires it. If the suggestions +which are made in the chapter on "Early Rising" should receive the +attention I flatter myself they merit, I do not believe children would +often sleep too long. If, on the contrary, they are suffered to lie late +in the morning, and then sit up late in the evening, all healthful +habits and tendencies will he so deranged or broken up, that nature, in +her indications, will by no means prove the unerring guide which she is +wont to do in other circumstances.</p> + +<p>A few thoughts here, on the quantity of sleep required by the young +after they approach maturity, may not be misplaced.</p> + +<p>Jeremy Taylor thought that for a healthy adult, three hours in +twenty-four were enough for all the purposes of sleep. Baxter thought +four hours about a reasonable time; Wesley, six; Lord Coke and Sir Wm. +Jones, seven; and Sir John Sinclair, eight. These were the <i>theories</i> of +men who were all eminent for their learning, and most of them for their +piety. How far their <i>practice</i> corresponded with their theories, we are +not, in every instance, told.</p> + +<p>But to come to the practice of several persons who have been +distinguished in the world. General Elliot, one of the most vigorous men +of his age, though living for his whole life on nothing but vegetables +and water, and who at sixty-four had scarcely begun to feel the +infirmities of old age, slept but four hours in twenty-four. Frederick +the Great of Prussia, and the illustrious British surgeon, John Hunter, +slept but five hours a day. Napoleon Bonaparte, for a great part of his +life, slept only four hours; and Lord Brougham is said to require no +more. Others, in numerous instances, require but six hours. But there +are others still, who consume eight.</p> + +<p>The conclusion—in my own mind—is, that with a good constitution and +active habits, men may habituate themselves to very different quantities +of sleep. Still I think that six hours are little enough for most +persons; and if a child, on arriving at maturity, is not inclined to +sleep much longer than that, I should not regard him as wasting time. +Most persons, it appears to me, require six hours of sound sleep in +twenty-four;—I mean between the ages of twenty and seventy.</p> + +<p>Macnish is the most liberal modern writer I am acquainted with, in his +allowance of time for sleep. Speaking of the wants of adults he +says—"No person who passes only eight hours in bed can be said to waste +his time in sleep." Yet he obviously contradicts himself on the very +same page; for he says expressly, that when a person is young, strong +and healthy, an hour or two less may be sufficient. But an hour or two +less than eight hours reduces the amount to seven or six hours. And +taking the whole period of life, to which he probably refers—say from +eighteen to forty—into consideration, there is a very considerable +difference between six hours and eight hours a day. If six hours are +"sufficient," it cannot be right to sleep eight hours.</p> + +<p>Let us here make a few estimates. If six hours are sufficient for sleep +between the ages of eighteen and forty, he who sleeps eight hours a day, +actually loses 16,060 hours—equal to nearly two whole years of life, or +about two years and three quarters of time in which we are usually +awake. This, in the meridian of life, is not a small waste. Permit it to +every person now in the United States, and the sum total of wasted time +to a single generation, would be 25,649,098 years—equal to the average +duration of the lives of 854,970 persons. The value of this time, as a +commodity in the market, at a low estimate—only forty dollars a +year—would be over A THOUSAND MILLIONS of DOLLARS! And its value, for +the purposes of mental and moral improvement, cannot be estimated except +in ETERNITY!</p> + +<p>Every young mother must derive from these considerations a motive to +discourage all unnecessary waste of time in sleep; while no one, as I +trust, will forget that to sleep too little is also dangerous to health, +and prejudicial to the general happiness.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XV."></a><h2>CHAPTER XV.</h2> + +<h3>EARLY RISING.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. How many are burnt up by parental neglect. +"Lecturing" them. What is an early hour?</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Some writer—I do not recollect who—has said that all children are +naturally early risers. And I cannot help coming to the same conclusion. +That they are not so, is no more proved from the fact that as things now +are they are generally found addicted to the contrary habit, than the +very general neglect of milk among the higher classes of our citizens, +proves that they have not a natural relish for it—when every one knows +that at our first setting out in life, milk is, almost without +exception, the sole article of human sustenance.</p> + +<p>One of the great difficulties in the way of early rising, as I have +already had occasion to say, is late sitting up. If children are not +accustomed to retire till nine or ten o'clock, nor then until they have +been subjected to all the excitements pertaining to fashionable +life—company, heated and impure air, stimulating drink, fruits, +high-seasoned food, and perhaps music—and are become actually feverish, +no one but an ignorant person or a brute ought to expect them to rise +early. Indeed, whatever may have been the cause, and whether it have +operated on high or low life, late retiring will inevitably result in +late rising. The current may be turned out of its course a little while, +it is true, but not always. It will ere long return to its accustomed +channel; perhaps to renew its course with increased pertinacity.</p> + +<p>Everything, in the morning, naturally invites to early rising. The +pleasant light, the music, at certain seasons, of some of the animated +tribes, and the joy which we feel in activity, and in the society of +those whom we love, all conspire to rouse us. If we have retired late, +however, and especially in a feverish condition, so that when we wake we +feel wretched, and, as sometimes happens, more fatigued than when we lay +down, other collateral motives may be needed.</p> + +<p>I have said that everything invites us, in the morning, to rise early; +but it was upon the presumption that our parents, and brothers, and +sisters set us a good example. If parents and other friends lie in bed +late themselves, can anything else be, expected of children? Admitting, +even, that they rise early themselves, if they never speak of early +rising as a pleasure, and connect along with it, in their children's +minds, pleasant associations, they would be unreasonable to expect +otherwise than that their children should cling to the morning couch, +till they are fairly compelled to rise as a relief from pain and +uneasiness.</p> + +<p>But when parents go farther than this, and actually discourage their +children from rising early, and use every means in their power short of +actual punishment—and sometimes even that—to make them lie still till +breakfast, in order that they may be out of the way, what shall we say? +And what is to be expected as the result?</p> + +<p>There is hope, however, under the last circumstances. People sometimes +carry things to an extreme that defeats their very purposes. Thus it +occasionally is, in the case before us. This forbidding children to rise +early, and threatening them if they do, sometimes excites their +curiosity, and leads them to the forbidden course of conduct, simply +<i>because</i> it is forbidden. Not a few persons among us possess the +disposition to be governed by what has sometimes been called the "rule +of contrary."</p> + +<p>I might stop here to show that there is nothing so well calculated to +develope and improve the mind and heart, even of parents themselves, as +the society of those whom God gives them to train for Him and their +country. I might show that not a few of those traits of character which +render the company of many old persons rather irksome, especially to the +young, have their origin in their neglect of the young, and of keeping +up, as long as circumstances will possibly admit, juvenile feelings, +actions, and habits.</p> + +<p>And yet what do we too often witness in life? Is not every effort made +to induce the young to lie in bed late that they may be out of the way? +Are they not placed, as soon as possible after they are up, with the +servants—if unfortunately there are any in the family—that they may be +out of the way? Are they not required to breakfast, and dine, and sup +elsewhere, if possible, that they may be out of the way? Do we not send +them to school, even the Sabbath school, to get them out of the way? Do +not some mothers even dose their infants with stupifying medicines to +lull them to sleep, in order to have them out of the way? And to crown +all, though they are quite too often permitted to sit up late in the +evening, to enjoy that society which they are denied so great a part of +the day-time, are they not occasionally put to bed early that they may +be out of the way, and that the parents may attend late parties, to +indulge in immoral or unhealthy habits?</p> + +<p>In the last instance, they are indeed sometimes put out of the way, in +the result—and with a vengeance. Many a child, nay, many thousands of +children, are burnt up yearly, while their parents are gone abroad in +the evening in quest of that enjoyment which ought to be found in the +bosom of their families. "In Westminster, a part of London, containing +less than two hundred thousand inhabitants, one hundred children were +thus destroyed, during a single year." And the moral results which +occasionally happen are a thousand times worse than burning. But enough +of this.</p> + +<p>The common practice of lecturing the young on the importance of early +rising, may have a good effect on a few; but in general, it is believed +to produce the contrary result. It is, in short, to sum up the whole +matter, the influence of parental example, and the speaking often of the +happiness which early rising affords, with perhaps the occasional +indulgence of the child in a pleasant morning walk, which, if he retires +early enough, are almost certain to produce in him the valuable habit of +early rising.</p> + +<p>But what is an early hour? Some call it early, when the sun is one hour +high; some at sunrise; others, when they hear of an early riser, +suppose he must be one who rises at least by daybreak.</p> + +<p>Midnight is, of course, as near the middle of the night as any hour; and +he who goes to bed four or five hours before midnight, will never +complain of those who insist that <i>he</i> is not an early riser who is not +up by four or five o'clock. In summer, no adult ought to lie in bed +after four o'clock, and no child, except the mere infant, after five.</p> + +<p>Much is said by a few writers, especially Macnish, of the danger of +rising before the sun has attained a sufficient height above the horizon +to chase away the vapors, and remove the dampness. But I must insist +upon earlier rising than this, though we should not choose to venture +abroad. Invigorated and restored as we are by sleep, I cannot think that +the dampness of the morning air is more injurious than the foul air of +some of our sleeping rooms.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVI."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVI.</h2> + +<h3>HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal—over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>While I have been very particular in enjoining on my readers the +importance of thoroughly ventilating their dwellings, I have also +insisted upon the necessity of taking children abroad, as much as +possible. Not, however, to harden them, so much as to give them a more +free access to air and light than they can have at home; and also—when +they are old enough—to cultivate the faculties of attention, +comparison, &c.</p> + +<p>The practice of attempting to harden children by frequent exposure to +air much colder than that to which they have been accustomed, without +sufficient additional clothing, is open to the same objections which +have been brought against cold bathing. Under the management of a +judicious medical practitioner, it may do great good to a few +constitutions; but its indiscriminate use would injure a thousand +infants for one who was benefited.</p> + +<p>True it is that if the child is protected against cold, no harm, but on +the contrary much good may result, from carrying him abroad into the +fresh air, even in very cold weather. But what can be more painful than +to see the little sufferers carried along when their limbs are purple, +or benumbed with cold? And how idle it is to hope that such exposure +hardens or improves the constitution!</p> + +<p>It is on the same mistaken principle that many adults go thinly clad, +late in the fall. I have seen men in November and December beating and +rubbing their hands, who, on being asked why they did not wear mittens, +replied, that if they should wear one pair of mittens so early in the +season, they should want two in the winter.</p> + +<p>Now I cheerfully admit that to put on additional clothing before the +severity of the weather demands it, actually produces the effect here +supposed; but to endure severe cold, on the contrary, never hardens +anybody. Nay, more, it enfeebles. Cold, when combined with the evils of +<i>poverty</i>, produces more mischief and destroys more lives than any one +disease in the whole catalogue of human maladies.</p> + +<p>Adam Smith says that it is not uncommon for mothers in the Highlands of +Scotland, who have borne twenty children, to have only two of them +alive.</p> + +<p>It may be difficult to say whether children are oftener destroyed by +over-tenderness than by neglect, and the evils incident to poverty. Both +extremes are common; while the happy medium—that of conducting a +child's education upon the principles of physiology, is rarely known, +and still more rarely followed.</p> + +<p>I have been much amused, and not a little instructed, by the following +anecdote on this point, from Dr. Dewees:</p> + +<p>We were speaking with a lady who had lost three or four children with +"croup," who informed us she was convinced, from absolute experiment, +that there was nothing like exposure to all kinds of weather to protect +and harden the system. By her first plan of managing her children, which +was by keeping them very warmly clad, she said she lost several by the +croup; but since she had adopted the opposite scheme, her children had +been perfectly healthy, and never had betrayed the slightest disposition +to that terrible disease which had robbed her of her children.</p> + +<p>Perhaps, madam, we observed, you did not, in making your first +experiments, attend to a number of details which might be thought +essential to the plan. You did not probably take the proper precautions +when you sent them into the cold air, or observe what was important for +them when they returned from it.</p> + +<p>"Oh, yes," she replied, "I took every possible care when they, were +going out. I always made them wear a very warm great coat, well lined +with baize, and a fur cape or collar. I always made them wear a +'comfortable' round their necks, made of soft woollen yarn. And as for +their feet, they were always protected by socks or over-shoes lined with +wool or fur, as the weather might be wet or dry."</p> + +<p>Do you believe, madam, they were kept at a proper degree of warmth by +these means?</p> + +<p>"Oh, certainly. Indeed, rather too warm; for they would often be in a +state of perspiration, they told me, when in the open air; especially if +they ran, slid, or skated."</p> + +<p>And what was done when they were thus heated?</p> + +<p>"Oh, they got cool enough before they reached home."</p> + +<p>And would they receive no injury in passing from this state of +perspiration to that of chill?</p> + +<p>"Not at all; for when this happened, I always made them take a little +warm brandy, or wine and water, and made them toast their feet well by +the fire." [Footnote: This absurd custom is a fruitful source of that +distressing condition of the hands and feet, in winter, called +"chilblains."]</p> + +<p>Did they sleep in a cold or warm room?</p> + +<p>"In a warm room. A good fire was always made in the stove before they +went to bed, which kept them quite warm all night."</p> + +<p>Would they never complain of being cold towards morning, when the stove +had become cold?</p> + +<p>"Yes, certainly; but then there were always at hand additional +bed-clothes, with which they could cover themselves."</p> + +<p>And did they always do it?</p> + +<p>"Oh, I suppose so."</p> + +<p>Well, madam, how did you carry your second plan into execution, which +you say was attended with such happy results?</p> + +<p>"I began by not letting them put on their great coats, except when the +weather was so cold as to require this additional covering, and did not +permit them to wear a 'comfortable' or fur round their necks. I took +away their over-shoes, and if their feet chanced to get wet, (for they +were always provided with good sound shoes,) the shoes were immediately +changed, if they were at home. If the weather was wet, or unusually +cold, they were permitted to wear their great coats, but not without. +If they came home very cold, they were not allowed to approach the fire +too soon. I gave them no warm, heating drinks, and accustomed them to +sleep in rooms without fire."</p> + +<p>Who does not recognize, in this second plan for the enjoyment of air and +exercise, as judicious a plan of physical education, so far as it goes, +as can well be pointed out? We were so successful as to convince this +lady, in a very short time, that our own plan of exposing the body was +precisely the one she had pursued with so much success.</p> + +<p>We also inquired of her what plan she pursued with her children, when +too young to be submitted to the rules just mentioned. She informed us +that it was the same system throughout, only the details varied as +circumstances of age, &c. made it necessary. That is, she sent her +children into the open air at very early periods of their lives, +provided in summer it was neither too wet nor too warm; in winter, when +the air was mild, dry and clear—but always carefully wrapped up, that +their little extremities might not suffer from cold. She never suffered +them to sleep in the open air, if it could be avoided; to prevent which, +as much as possible, she constantly charged the nurse to bring the +children home, as soon as she found them disposed to sleep, unless it +was when they were very young, at which time it was impossible to guard +against it.</p> + +<p>And when her children were sufficiently old to walk, she took care to +prepare them properly for it, whether it might be in warm, cold, or +moderate weather. She never sent them abroad for pleasure at the risk of +encountering a storm of any kind; nor permitted them to walk at the +hazard of getting wet or very muddy feet.</p> + +<p>Were the constitutions of your children pretty much the same? we +demanded of this lady.</p> + +<p>"No; one of my boys was extremely feeble, from his very birth."</p> + +<p>Did you treat him precisely as you did the others?</p> + +<p>"Yes, as far as regarded principles; that is, I permitted him to bear as +much of cold, heat or wet as his constitution would endure without pain +or injury. The degrees, however, were very different from those his +brothers bore, had they been determined by the measurement of the +thermometer, but precisely the same in effect, as far as could be +ascertained by consequences. Thus, if he were exposed to the same +temperature as his brothers, he experienced no more inconvenience from +it, when it was very low, than they, because he had additional covering +to protect him."</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVII.</h2> + +<h3>SOCIETY.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society illustrated. Early +diffidence. Selecting companions for children. Moral effects of society +on the young. Parents should play with their children.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Every mother is unquestionably as much bound to have an eye to the +society of her child, as to his food, drink or clothing. And if the +quality, amount and general character of the latter are important, those +of the former are by no means less so.</p> + +<p>It is indeed true that many a child has been happy, in a degree, in the +society of its mother alone, where the father was seldom seen, and the +brothers and sisters never. And it is equally true; that a few children +have so far preferred the society of their parents alone, as to become +disinclined to other society. But cases of this kind are only as +exceptions to the general rule; and are probably monstrous formations +of character. I cannot believe that any child, rightly educated, would +prefer the society of none but its parents, or even its parents and +brothers and sisters.</p> + +<p>A French author has written a considerable volume on the importance of +what he calls <i>gaiety</i>, but which he should prefer to call cheerfulness. +Among the rest, he maintains that it is indispensable to the best +health. But if so—and I do not doubt it—then it ought to be encouraged +in children, and the earlier the better. Now there is no way to +encourage cheerfulness in the young so effectually as by indulging them +with considerable society.</p> + +<p>That the thing may be carried to excess, I have no doubt. I have seen +mothers who permitted their children to play with their mates till they +became excited, and were thus led to continue their sports, not only +farther than cheerfulness and health demanded, but until they were +excessively fatigued, and almost made sick. And I believe that the +excitement of numbers, in infant and other schools, may be so great as +to be injurious, rather than salutary. Still I think these are rare +cases.</p> + +<p>Truth usually lies somewhere between extremes. To keep a child, +especially a boy, always in the nursery, or even in the parlor with his +mother, is one extreme; and to let him go abroad continually, till his +home and its smaller circle become insipid, is the other. A child +properly trained will <i>usually</i> prefer home, and only desire to go +abroad occasionally. He will rather need urging in the matter than +require restraint.</p> + +<p>But he must, at any rate, be taught to be sociable, not only for the +salve of cheerfulness and the consequent health, but for the sake of his +manners, his mind, and his morals.</p> + +<p>If it is a matter of indifference, in the formation of human character, +whether we mix in society or not, then, for anything I can see, an +improvement might be proposed in the construction of the material +universe. Instead of forming the planets so large—and this earth among +the rest—each might have been divided into hundreds of millions; and +every human being might have had a little planet, and an immortality, +exclusively his own. Such an arrangement would certainly prevent a great +many evils; and, among the rest, a great deal of quarrelling and +bloodshed.</p> + +<p>But divine wisdom is higher than human wisdom, and one world to hundreds +of millions of human beings has been made, instead of giving to each +individual of the universe a little world of his own, in which he might +have reigned sole monarch, and only wept, with Alexander, because none +of the other worlds were within his grasp. Where a family is already +large, other society will be unnecessary for some time; but where it +consists of a mother only, although her society is always to be +considered of the <i>first</i> importance, I cannot but think she ought to +take great pains to introduce her child occasionally to the company of +other children.</p> + +<p>That diffidence, which almost destroys the influence and the happiness +of many individuals, is often cherished, if not created, by too much +seclusion. Where there is a natural constitution which predisposes the +child to timidity and diffidence, the danger is greatly increased; and +parents should take unwearied pains to guard against it.</p> + +<p>It is hardly necessary for me to say, that great care should also be +used in selecting the companions of children. Their character will be +greatly influenced for life by their earlier associates. Friendships +between children are sometimes formed, while playing together, which are +interrupted only by death. Those parents who are so fond of controlling +the choice of their sons and daughters in regard to a companion for +life, at a period when control is generally resisted, would do well to +take a hint from what has here been suggested. There is no doubt but +they might often—very often—give such a direction to the embryo +affections of their infants and children, as would terminate only with +their existence.</p> + +<p>It is still less necessary to advert, in a work like this, to the effect +which much observation and experience shows good society to have on +purity, both physical and moral. Every one must have observed its +tendency to form habits of cleanliness, not to say neatness. There may +be excess, even in this. Young persons, of both sexes, often spend too +much time in preparing their dress for the reception or the visiting of +their friends. Still this is only the abuse of a good thing. Nor is it +less true, though it may be less obvious, that moral purity is more +likely to be secured where children and youth of both sexes associate a +great deal, from the earliest infancy. [Footnote: If this principle be +correct, what is the tendency of our numerous schools, which are +exclusively for one sex? Must there not be latent evil to counterbalance +some of the seeming good? For myself, I doubt whether moral character +can ever be formed in due proportion and harmony, where this separation +long exists.] There are tremendous cases of declension on record, which +establish this point beyond the possibility of debate.</p> + +<p>To say that the mother—and indeed both parents—ought to form a part of +the playing circle of the youngest children, in order to watch their +opening dispositions, to check what may be improper, and encourage what +ought to be encouraged, would be only to repeat what has often been +recommended by the best writers on education—but which must be +repeated, again and again, till it leaves an impression, especially on +CHRISTIAN parents. It is strange that many regard this matter as they +do, and appear not only ashamed to be seen sporting with their children, +but almost ashamed to have their children thus occupied. They might as +well be ashamed of the gambols of the kitten or the lamb; or of the +grave mother, as she turns aside occasionally to join in its frolics. +When will parents be willing to take lessons in education from that +brute world which they have been so long accustomed to overlook or +despise?</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XVIII."></a><h2>CHAPTER XVIII.</h2> + +<h3>EMPLOYMENTS.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Why young ladies, now-a-days, dislike domestic +employments. Miserable housewives—not to be wondered at. Mistake of one +class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>One important and never-to-be-forgotten employment of the young is the +cultivation of their minds; and another, that of their morals. But my +present purpose is only to speak of those employments denominated +manual, or physical.</p> + +<p>It is obvious, at the first glance, that the influence of the mother, in +our own country, at least, will be less over boys than over girls. We +leave it to savages and semi-savages to employ their females, and even +their mothers, in hard manual labor. Here, in America, what I should say +on the employment of boys would be more properly addressed to the YOUNG +FATHER.</p> + +<p>There are some exceptions to the general truth contained in the last +paragraph. Many a mother has—unconsciously at the time, but with no +less certainty than if she had done it intentionally—given a direction +to the whole current of her son's life; and this, too, at a very early +period. The mother of Benjamin West, the painter, if she did not give +the first tendency to his favorite pursuit, while he was yet a mere +child, at the least greatly confirmed him in it, by the manner of +expressing her surprise at one of his early performances. "My mother's +kiss," on that occasion, said he, "made me a painter." Nor are facts of +the same general character by any means uncommon.</p> + +<p>I know a poor mother who, in the absence of her husband at his weekly +or monthly labors, used to detain her eldest boy, then almost an +infant, from going to bed in the evening till her day's work was +finished—because, in her loneliness, she wanted his company—by telling +stories of eminent men, and especially of distinguished philanthropists, +until she had unconsciously kindled in him a philanthropic spirit, which +will not cease to burn till his death.</p> + +<p>But it is in forming the predilections of daughters for their destined +employments, that mothers are especially influential. Not so much by +their set lessons or lectures, however, as by the force of continued +example. No mother who sends her child away to be nursed, and +subsequently to her return seizes on every possible opportunity to keep +her out of the way and out of her sight, will be likely to give her any +choice of employment, or indeed any fondness for employment at all.</p> + +<p>Nor is it sufficient that she keep her daughter constantly under her +eye, with a view to qualify her for the duties of a housewife, if the +daughter see as plainly as in the light of mid-day, that the mother +dislikes the employment herself. She must love what she would have her +daughter love, and even what she would have her understand. Nor is it +sufficient that she <i>affect</i> a fondness for the employment; her love for +it must be real. Little girls have keener eyes and better judgments than +some mothers seem willing to believe or to admit.</p> + +<p>Many persons seem greatly surprised that the young ladies of modern days +have so little fondness for domestic life and domestic duties. How few, +it is often said, will do their own housework, if they can possibly get +a train of domestics around them; even though the care and oversight of +the domestics themselves gear them out more rapidly than bodily labor +would.</p> + +<p>But there is a reason for this hostility to domestic employments. It is +because mothers, almost universally, consider their occupations as mere +drudgery, and bring up their children in the same spirit. And what else +could be expected as the result? It would be an anomaly in the history, +of human nature, if the female members of families were to grow up in +love with ordinary domestic avocations, when they have been accustomed +to see their mothers, and nurses, and elder sisters complaining and +fretting while engaged in them; and showing by their actions, no less +than by their words, that they regarded themselves as miserable and +wretched.</p> + +<p>No wonder so many girls, of the present day, make miserable housewives. +No wonder a factory, a book-bindery, or a shoemaker's shop, is +considered preferable to the kitchen. No wonder the world degenerates, +because females, no longer healthfully employed, become pale and sickly, +spreading gloom and misery all around them, and transmitting the same +ills which themselves suffer to those who come after them.</p> + +<p>It is true, the guilt of this dereliction must not be charged wholly on +mothers; though they ought, unquestionably, to bear a large share of it. +Those who have, and ought to have, much influence in society, +erroneously, and I suppose thoughtlessly, help mothers along in their +evil ways. If there were a universal combination between certain classes +of mankind and the whole race of mothers, to ruin, rather than be +instrumental of reforming mankind, and of saving their deathless souls, +I hardly know how they could invent a much better, or at least a much +more certain plan, than that now in operation. So long as those who take +the lead in society, and govern the fashion in this matter, as others +govern it in the matter of dress, refuse, as a general rule, to form +alliances for life, except with those who practically despise house-hold +concerns—and so long as our houses are filled with domestics, whose +object is to aid these spoiled mothers, but whose real effect is to +complete their ruin, and accelerate the ruin of mankind—just so long +will human progress towards perfection be retarded.</p> + +<p>If mothers were in love with their occupations, and their daughters knew +it, then to the influence of a good example they could add many lessons +of instruction. These might be given in the way of natural, unstudied +conversation, and thus be not only heard with attention, but sink deep. +If the world is ever to be reformed, says Mr. Flint, in his Western +Review, woman, sensible, enlightened, well educated and principled, must +be the original mover in the great work. Every one who has considered +well the extent and nature of female influence, will concur in the +sentiment; and if he have one remaining particle of devotion to the +Father of spirits, he will send up the most fervent petitions to his +throne of mercy in behalf of this often depressed or enslaved half of +the human race, that they may speedily be emancipated, and become as +conspicuous in human redemption, as they have sometimes been in human +condemnation.</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XIX."></a><h2>CHAPTER XIX.</h2> + +<h3>EDUCATION OF THE SENSES.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Improving the senses. Examples of improvement. SEC. 1. Hearing—how +injured—how improved.—SEC. 2. Seeing—how injured.—SEC. 3. Tasting +and smelling—how benumbed—how preserved.—SEC. 4. Feeling. The blind. +Hints to parents. Education of both hands.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>Man is much less useful and happy in this world than he would be, if +more pains were taken by parents and teachers, as well as by himself, to +cultivate his senses—hearing, seeing, feeling; tasting, and +smelling—and to preserve their rectitude.</p> + +<p>The extent to which the senses can be improved or exalted, can best be +understood by observing how perfect they become when we are compelled to +cultivate them. Thus the blind, who are obliged to cultivate hearing, +feeling, and smelling, often astonish us by the keenness of these +senses. They will distinguish sounds—especially voices—which others +cannot; and with so much accuracy, as to remember for several years the +voice of a person in a large company, which they hear but once. They +will also distinguish small pieces of money, different fabrics and +qualities of cloth, &c.; and, in walking, often ascertain, by the +feeling of the air, or by other sensations, when they approach a +building, or any other considerable body. So the North American Indian, +whose habits of life seem to require it, can hear the footsteps of an +approaching enemy at distances which astonish us. So also the deaf and +dumb are very keen-sighted, and generally make very accurate +observations. Any reader who is sceptical in regard to the cultivation +of the senses, would do well to consult the account of Julia Brace, the +deaf and dumb and blind girl, as published in some of the early volumes +of the "Annals of Education."</p> + +<p>But it is hardly necessary to resort to the blind, or to savages, or to +the deaf and dumb, in order to prove man's susceptibility in this +respect. We may be reminded of the same fact by observing with what +accuracy the merchant tailor can distinguish, by feeling, the quality of +his goods; how quick a painter, an engraver, or a printer, will discover +errors in painting or printing, which wholly escape ordinary readers or +observers; and how quick the ear of a good musician will discover the +existence and origin of a discordant sound in his choir.</p> + +<p>Now I do not undertake to say or prove, that mankind would be better or +happier for having their senses all cultivated in the highest possible +degree; though I am not sure that this would not be the case. But so +long as a large proportion of our ideas enter our minds through the +medium of the five senses, it is desirable that something should be done +to perfect them, instead of overlooking the whole subject. What mothers +ought to do in this matter, deserves, therefore, a brief consideration.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 1. <i>Hearing.</i></h4> + +<p>The suggestion, in another place, to keep away caps from the child's +head, if duly attended to, is one means of perfecting, or at least of +preserving, the sense of hearing. For caps, by the heat they produce to +a part which cannot safely endure an increase of temperature, greatly +expose children to catarrhal affections; and many a catarrh has laid the +foundation for dulness of hearing, if not of actual deafness.</p> + +<p>The ears should be kept clean. If washed sufficiently often, and +syringed once a week with warm milk and water, or with very weak +soap-suds, gently warmed, the cerumen or ear wax will hardly be found +accumulated in such masses as to produce deafness. And yet such +accumulations, with such consequences, are by no means uncommon. It is +not long since a young man with whom I am acquainted, applied to an +eminent surgeon of Boston, on account of deafness in one ear, which had +become quite troublesome, and as it was feared, incurable. Syringing +with a large and strong syringe disengaged a large mass of cerumen, and +hearing was immediately restored.</p> + +<p>Children should be taught to distinguish sounds with closed eyes, or +blindfolded. We may strike on various objects, and ask them to tell what +we struck, &c. This will lead them to <i>observe</i> sounds; and will perfect +their hearing in a remarkable degree.</p> + +<p>There are also advantages to be derived from accustoming a child to a +great variety of sounds; both as regards their strength and character. +But this must only be occasional; for if the ear be constantly +accustomed to sounds of any kind, and more especially those which are +harsh or loud, the organ of hearing is liable to sustain injury. Music, +as it is now beginning to be taught to children in our schools, will do +much, I think, to improve the faculty of hearing.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 2. <i>Seeing.</i></h4> + +<p>The sight, says Addison, is the most perfect of all our senses; and this +is unquestionably true. But it is more or less perfect, in different +individuals, according to the early education they have received. +Sometimes, it is true, we are born near-or dim-sighted; but such cases +are comparatively rare.</p> + +<p>The question is sometimes asked why there are so many persons, +now-a-days, who lose their sight, become near-sighted, &c. very young. +It may be difficult to answer this question fully; yet I cannot help +thinking that the following are some of the causes.</p> + +<p>1. The great heat of our apartments, which, together with late hours and +much lamp light, affects the eyes unpleasantly, is believed to be among +the more prominent causes of early decay of sight. Formerly, our +apartments were neither so steadily nor so generally heated; and we rose +earlier, and consequently went to bed earlier.</p> + +<p>2. The fine print of a large proportion of our books, especially our +school books, has done immense injury. I do not believe that reading +fine print, occasionally, for a few moments at a time, or reading by a +very strong or very weak light in the same way, does harm. On the +contrary, I think it may strengthen and improve the sight. It is the +long continuance of these things that does the mischief; and the +mischief thus done is immense. I rejoice that printers and publishers +are beginning of late to use much larger type than they have done for +some years past.</p> + +<p>3. The early use of spectacles does mischief—I mean before they are +needed. After they begin to be needed, there is no advantage in delaying +to use them, as some do, for fear they shall wear them too soon. This is +about as wise as the practice of going cold to harden ourselves.</p> + +<p>4. Reading when we are fatigued, or ill, or have a very full stomach, is +another way to injure the sight.</p> + +<p>5. Rubbing the eyes with the fingers, or with anything else, does +inevitable mischief. The Germans have a proverb which says—"Never touch +your eye, except with your elbow." There is much of good sense in it.</p> + +<p>In short, there are a thousand ways in which that delicate organ, the +human eye, may sustain injury; and nearly as many in which it may be +strengthened, cultivated, and improved. But my limits merely permit me +to add, that the frequent but gentle application of water to the eye, +several times a day, at such a temperature as is most agreeable—but +cold, when it can be borne—is one of the best preservatives of sight +which the world affords.</p> + +<p>Connected alike with physical and intellectual education, is the +practice of measuring by the eye heights, distances, superfices, +weights, and solids. It is not difficult to train the eye to an accuracy +in this matter which would astonish the uninstructed.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 3. <i>Tasting and Smelling.</i></h4> + +<p>I do not know that it is worth our while to take pains, by any direct +methods, to cultivate the organs of taste or smell; but I think it +proper, at the least, to preserve their original rectitude.</p> + +<p>Many, I know, undertake to say, that were it not for our errors in +regard to food and drink, and were it not, in particular, for the +multitude of strange mixtures which tend to benumb those two senses, we +might determine the qualities of food and drink—whether they are +favorable or adverse—by means of taste and smell, like the animals. But +I do not believe this. The Creator has substituted reason, in us, for +instinct in the brute animals. It is not necessary that we should +possess the latter, when the former is so manifestly superior to it; and +accordingly I do not believe that it is given us, or any of that +acuteness of sensation which exists in the dog, the tiger, the vulture, +&c.—and which so closely resembles it.</p> + +<p>There can be no doubt—no reasonable doubt, certainly—that the wretched +customs of modern cookery benumb the senses of taste and smell, more or +less, and that high-seasoned food, condiments, and stimulating drinks do +the same; and should for this reason, were it for no other, be +studiously avoided.</p> + +<p>Closely connected with the organ of taste are the TEETH. A volume might +profitably be written on these—as on the eye. But I will only say that +they should be kept perfectly clean, either by rinsing or brushing, or +both, especially after eating; that they should be permitted to chew all +our food, instead of merely standing by as silent spectators to the +passage of that which is mashed, soaked, chopped, &c.; that they should +not be picked or cleaned with pins, or other equally hard instruments; +that they should not be used to crack nuts or other hard, indigestible +substances; and that the stomach, with which they are apt to sympathize +very strongly, should also be kept in a good and healthy condition.</p> +<br> + +<h4>SEC. 4. <i>Feeling.</i></h4> + +<p>Corpulence and slovenliness are generally among the more prolific +sources of a want of acuteness in feeling. The first is a disease, and +may be avoided by a proper diet, and by active mental and bodily +employment. Slovenliness we may of course avoid, whenever there is a +wish to do so, and an abundance of water.</p> + +<p>But the sense of feeling, or especially that accumulation of it which we +call TOUCH, and which seems to be specially located in the balls of the +fingers and on the palm of the hand, is susceptible of a degree of +improvement far beyond what would be the natural result of cleanliness, +and freedom from plethora or corpulence.</p> + +<p>I have already alluded, in my general remarks at the head of this +chapter, to the acuteness of this sense in the blind, as well as in the +dealer in cloths. I might add many more illustrations, but a single one, +in relation to the blind, which was accidentally omitted in that place, +will be sufficient.</p> + +<p>The blind at the Institution in this city, as well as in other similar +institutions, are now taught to read and write with considerable +facility. But how? Most of my readers may have heard how they read, but +I will describe the process as well as I can. A description of their +method of writing is more difficult.</p> + +<p>The letters are formed by pressing the paper, while quite moist, upon +rather large type, which raises a ridge in the line of every letter, and +which remains prominent after the paper is dry. In order to read, the +pupil has to feel out these ridges. A circular ridge on the paper he is +told is O; a perpendicular one, I; a crooked one, S; &c. They read music +and arithmetic printed in a similar manner. A few months of practice, in +this way, will enable an ingenious youth to read with considerable ease +and despatch.</p> + +<p>Now if nothing is wanting but a little training to render the touch so +accurate, would it not be useful to train every child to judge +frequently of the properties of bodies by this sense? And cannot every +one recall to his mind a thousand situations in which a greater accuracy +of this sense would have saved him much inconvenience, as well as +afforded him no little pleasure?</p> + +<p>I shall conclude this section with a few remarks on the HAND. The custom +of neglecting, or almost neglecting the left hand, though nearly +universal, in this country at least, appears to me to be +wrong—decidedly so. For although more blood may be sent to the right +arm than to the left, as physiologists say, yet the difference is not as +great at birth as it is afterward; so that education either weakens the +one or strengthens the other.</p> + +<p>Besides this, we occasionally find a person who is left-handed, as it is +called; that is, his left hand and arm are as much larger and stronger +than the right, as the right is usually stronger than the left. How is +this? Do we find a corresponding change in the internal structure? But +suppose it could be ascertained that such a change did exist, which I +believe has never been done, the question would still arise whether the +difference was the same at birth, or whether the more frequent use of +the left hand has not, in part, produced it.</p> + +<p>I do not mean, here, to intimate that a more frequent use of the left +hand than the right would make new blood-vessels grow where there were +none before. But it would certainly do one thing; it would make the same +vessels carry more blood than they did before, which is, in effect, +nearly the same thing:—for the more blood in the limb, as a general +rule, the more strength—provided the limb is in due health and +exercise.</p> + +<p>The inference which I wish the reader to make from all this is, that +since the left hand and arm, by due cultivation, and without essential +difference or change of structure to begin with, can occasionally be +made stronger than the right, it is fair to conclude that it may, if +found desirable, be always rendered more nearly equal to it than, in +adult years, we usually find it.</p> + +<p>The question is now fairly before us—Is such a result desirable? I +maintain that it is; and shall endeavor to show my reasons.</p> + +<p>How often is one hand injured by an accident, or rendered nearly useless +by disease? But if it should be the right, how helpless it makes us! The +man who is accustomed to shave himself, must now resort to a barber. If +he is a barber himself, or almost any other mechanic, his business must +be discontinued. Or if he is a clerk, he cannot use his left hand, and +must consequently lose his time. Or if amputation chances to be +performed on a favorite arm, how entirely useless to society we are, +till we have learned to use the other! It not only takes up a great deal +of valuable time to acquire a facility of using it, but if we are +already arrived at maturity, we can never use it so well as the other, +during our whole lives; because it is too late in life to increase its +size and strength much by constant exercise. Whereas in youth, it might +have been done easily.</p> + +<p>Is it not then important—for these and many more reasons—to teach a +child to use with nearly equal readiness, both of his hands? But if so, +who can do it better than the mother? And when can it be better done +than in the earliest infancy? When is the time which would be devoted to +it worth less than at this period?</p> + + + +<br><br><hr style="width: 65%;"><br><br> +<a name="CHAPTER_XX."></a><h2>CHAPTER XX.</h2> + +<h3>ABUSES.</h3> + +<blockquote class="small">Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school—at church—at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers.</blockquote> +<br> + +<p>It is difficult to determine, in regard to many things which concern the +management of the young, whether they belong most properly to moral or +physical education; so close is the connection between the two, and so +decidedly does everything, or nearly everything which relates to the +management of the body, have a bearing upon the formation of moral +character. This work might be extended very much farther, did it comport +with my original plan. But I hasten to close the volume, with a few +thoughts on certain abuses of the body, which prevail to a greater or +less extent in families and schools; and to which I have not adverted +elsewhere.</p> + +<p>The seats of children are usually bad, both at table and elsewhere. It +seems not enough that we condemn them to the use of knives, forks, +spoons, &c., of the same size with those of adults. We go farther; and +give them chairs of the same height and proportion with our own. There +are a few exceptions to the truth of this remark. Here and there we see +a child's chair, it is true—but not often.</p> + +<p>But how unreasonable is it to seat a child in a chair so high that his +feet cannot reach the floor; and so constructed that there is no outer +place on which the feet can rest. What adult would be willing to sit in +so painful a posture, with his legs dangling? No wonder children dislike +to sit much, in such circumstances. And it is a great blessing to both +parent and child that they do. No wonder children hate the Sabbath, +especially in those families where they are compelled to keep the day +holy by sitting motionless! Sabbath schools, though they bring with them +some evil along with a great deal of good, are a relief to the young in +this particular—especially if their seats are more comfortable +elsewhere than at home. They consider it much more tolerable to spend +the morning and intermission of the day in going and returning from +Sabbath school, than in constant and close confinement. They prefer +variety, and the occasional light and air of heaven, to monotony and +seclusion and silence.</p> + +<p>It happens, however, that the seats at the Sabbath school and at church, +are not always what they should be; nor, so far as church is concerned, +do I see that this evil can be wholly avoided. Children usually sit with +their parents, in the sanctuary—and they ought to do so: and the height +of the seats cannot, of course, accommodate both. If there is a building +erected solely for the use of the Sabbath school, the seats may be +constructed accordingly, without seriously incommoding anybody; but in +the church, I do not see, as I have once before observed, how the evil +can be remedied.</p> + +<p>The greatest trouble in regard to seats, however, is at the day school; +especially in our district or common schools. There, it is usual for +children to be confined six hours a day—and sometimes two in +succession—to hard, narrow, plank seats, a large proportion of which +are without backs, and raised so high that the feet of most of the +pupils cannot possibly touch the floor. There, "suspended," as I have +said in another work, [Footnote: See a "Prize Essay," on School Houses, +page 7.] "between the heavens and the earth, they are compelled to +remain motionless for an hour or an hour and a half together."</p> + +<p>I have also shown, in the same essay, that in regard to the desks, and +indeed many other things which pertain to, or are connected with the +school, very little pains is taken to provide for the physical welfare +or even comfort of the pupils; and that a thorough reform on the subject +appears to be indispensable.</p> + +<p>When I speak of hard plank seats, let me not be understood as hinting at +the necessity of cushions. When I wrote the essay above mentioned, I did +indeed believe that they were desirable. But I am now opposed to their +use, either by children or adults, even where a laborious employment +would seem to demand a long confinement to this awkward and unnatural +position. If our seats are cushioned, we shall sit too easily. I believe +that our health requires a hard seat; because its very hardness inclines +us to change, frequently, our position.</p> + +<p>But if we must sit, be it ever so short a time, our seats should always +have backs; and those which are designed for children, should not be so +high as to render them uncomfortable. Nor should the backs of seats be +so high as they usually are, either for children or adults. They should +never come much higher than the middle of the body. If they reach the +shoulders, they either favor a crouching forward, or interfere with the +free action of the lungs.</p> + +<p>This might be deemed a proper place for saying something on the position +of children in manufactories. But here a world of abuse opens upon my +view, the full development of which demands a large volume. How many +crooked spines, emaciated bodies, decaying lungs, as well as scrofulas, +fevers, and consumptions, are either induced or accelerated by these +unnatural employments! I mean they are unnatural for the <i>young</i>. As to +employing adults in them, I have nothing at present to say. But when I +think of the cruel custom of placing children in these places, whose +bodies—and were this the place, I might add, <i>minds</i>—are immature, and +especially girls, I am compelled, by the voice of conscience, and, as I +trust, by a regard to those laws which God has established in our +physical frames, but which are yet so strangely violated, to protest +against it. Better that no factories should exist, than that children +should be ruined in them as they now are. Better by far that we should +return, were it possible, to the primitive habits of New England—to +those by-gone days when mothers and daughters made the wearing apparel +of themselves and their families—when, if there was less of +intellectual cultivation, and less money expended for luxuries and +extravagances, there was much more of health and happiness.</p> + +<p>There is one more species of abuse to which, in closing, I wish to +direct maternal attention. I allude to injudicious modes of inflicting +corporal punishment.</p> + +<p>Let me not be understood to appear, in this place, as the advocate of +bodily punishments of any kind; for if they are even admissible under +some circumstances, I am fully convinced that in the way in which they +are commonly administered, they do much more harm than good.</p> + +<p>But leaving the question of their utility, in the abstract, wholly +untouched, and taking it for granted, for the present, that they are—as +is undoubtedly the fact—sometimes employed, and will continue to be so +for a great while to come, I proceed to speak of their more flagrant +abuses.</p> + +<p>Among these, none are more reprehensible than blows of any kind on the +head. Even the rod is objectionable for this purpose, since it exposes +the eyes. But the hand—in boxing the ears or striking in any way—is +more so. The bones of the head, in young children, are not yet firmly +knit together, and these concussions may injure the tender brain. I +know of whole families, whose mental faculties are dull, as the +consequence—I believe—of a perpetual boxing and striking of the head. +Some individuals are made almost idiots, in this very manner.—But the +worst is not yet told. Many teachers are in the habit of striking their +pupils' heads with thick heavy books; and with wooden rules. I have seen +one of the latter, of considerable size and thickness, broken in two +across the head of a very small boy; and this, too—such is the public +mind—in the presence of a mother who was paying a visit to the school. +I have seen parents and masters strike the heads of their children with +pieces of wood, of much larger size;—in one instance with a common +sized tailor's press-board; in another with the heavy end of a wooden +whip-handle, about an inch in diameter.</p> + +<p>Children are sometimes severely beaten across the middle of the +body—the region where lie the vital organs—the lungs, the heart, the +liver, &c. They are sometimes beaten too, across the joints, or in any +place that the excited, perhaps passionate teacher or parent can reach. +Rules and books are thrown with violence at pupils in school. There is a +story in the "Annals of Education," Vol. IV. at page 28, of a teacher +who threw a rule at a little boy, six years old, which struck him with +great force, within an inch of one of his eyes. Had it struck a little +nearer to his nose, it would, in all probability, have destroyed his +left eye.</p> + +<br><hr style="width: 45%;"><br> + +<p>But without extending these remarks any farther, every intelligent +mother who reads what I have already written, will see, as I trust, the +necessity of properly informing herself on the great subject of physical +education; and of being better prepared than she has hitherto been for +acquitting herself, with satisfaction, of those high and sacred +responsibilities which, in the wise arrangements of Nature and +Providence, devolve upon her.</p> +<br> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + +***** This file should be named 10482-h.htm or 10482-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/4/8/10482/ + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS," WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + + https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06 + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: + https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: + https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL + + + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/old/10482.txt b/old/10482.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2a9337 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8028 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Young Mother + Management of Children in Regard to Health + +Author: William A. Alcott + +Release Date: December 17, 2003 [EBook #10482] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + + + + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + + + + +THE YOUNG MOTHER, OR + +MANAGEMENT OF CHILDREN IN REGARD TO HEALTH. + +BY WM. A. ALCOTT + + +1836 + + + +ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. + +The present edition has been much enlarged. The author has added a +section on the conduct and management of the mother herself, besides +several other important amendments and additions. The whole has also +been carefully revised, and we cannot but indulge the hope that no +popular work of the kind will be found more perfect, or more worthy of +the public confidence. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + +CHAPTER I. THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +CHAPTER II. TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +CHAPTER III. VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air arising from lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +CHAPTER IV. THE CHILD'S DRESS. + +General principles--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us from cold; 3. from +injury. + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon's remarks. Transforming children into mummies. Use of a belly-band. +Evils produced by having it too tight. Cripples sometimes made. Absurdity +of confining the arms. Infants should be made happy. + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +Curious suggestion of a London writer. Advantages of his plan. Killing +with kindness. Dr. Buchan's opinion. Conformity to fashion. Tight-lacing +the chest. Its effects--dangerous. Physiology of the chest. Its motions. +An attempt to make the subject intelligible. Serious mistakes of some +writers. Appeal to facts. Color of females. Their breathing. Their +diseases. Customs of Tunis. Our own customs little less ridiculous. + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +Flannel in cold weather. Its use--1. As a kind +of flesh brush; 2. As a protection against taking cold; 3. As means of +equalizing the temperature. Clothing should be kept clean--often +changed--color--lightness--softness. Cotton apt to take fire. Silk +expensive. Linen not warm enough. Flannel under-clothes. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The power of habit, in this respect. Opinion that no clothing is +necessary. Anecdote of Alexander and the Scythian. Argument from +analogy. Begin right, in early life. We generally use too much +clothing. Should clothing be often varied?--objections to it. Avoid +dampness. + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +How caps produce disease. Nature's head-dress. Miserable apology for +caps. What diseases are avoided by going with the head bare. Judicious +remarks of a foreign writer. Covering the "open of the head." Wetting +the head with spirits. + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +Hats usually too warm. No covering needed in the house; and but little +in the sun or rain. Is it dangerous to go with the head always bare? + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The feet should be well covered. Why. Rule of medical men. No garters. +Objections to covering the feet considered. Shoes useful. Not too thick. +Thick soles. Mr. Locke's opinion. + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +These ought not to be used. Why. Substitutes. Practice of Dr. Dewees. +Needles--their danger. Shocking anecdote. + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +Changing wet clothing. Monstrous error--its evils. Clean as well as dry. +A lame excuse for negligence. No excuse sufficient but poverty. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Every restraint of body or limb injurious. Tight jackets. Stiff stocks +and thick cravats. Boots. Evils of having them too tight. A painful +sight. + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +Clothing should be loose for girls or boys. Girls to be kept warmer than +boys. Few girls comfortable, at home or abroad. Going out of warm rooms +into the night air. How it promotes disease. + + +CHAPTER V. CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +CHAPTER VI. BATHING. + +Practice of savage nations. Rather dangerous. Mistake of Rousseau. +Plunging into cold water at birth may produce immediate death. Hundreds +injured where one is benefited. Spirits added to the water. First +washings of the child--should be thorough. Rules in regard to the +temperature of both the water and the air. Washing an introduction to +bathing. Hour for bathing changes with age. Temperature of the water. +Size of a bathing vessel. Unreasonable fears of the warm bath. How they +arose. A list of common whims. Apology for opposing cold baths. Dr +Dewees' eight objections to them. Does cold water harden? Cold bath +sometimes useful under the care of a skilful physician. Its danger in other +cases. Rules for using the cold bath, if used at all. Securing a glow after +it. General management. Proper hour. Coming out of the bath. Dressing. +Singing. Bathing after a meal. Local bathing. Tea-spoonful of water in the +mouth. Its use. The shower bath. Vapor bath. Medicated bath. Sponging. +Conveniences for bathing indispensable to every family. General neglect +of bathing. Attention of the Romans to this subject. We treat domestic +animals better than children. + + +CHAPTER VII. FOOD. + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk the only appropriate food of infants. Unreasonableness +of some mothers. The tendency to ape foreign fashions. Nursing does not +weaken the mother. + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Much depends on the mother. Opinions of medical societies. Mothers +sometimes make children drunkards. The general fondness for excitements. +Hints to those whom it concerns. Caution to mothers. Opinions of Dr. +Dewees. Slavery of mothers to strong drink and exciting food. Opinions +of the Charleston Board of Health. + +SEC. 3. _Nursing, how often._ + +Children should never be nursed to quiet them. Stomach must have time +for rest. Regular seasons for nursing. Once in three hours. Difference +of constitution. Indulgence does not strengthen. Feeble children require +the strictest management. Nothing should be given between meals. + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +Errors. Repetition of aliment. Variety. Children over-fed. Appetite not +a safe guide. Training to gluttony. Illustrations of the principle. +Mankind eat twice as much as is necessary. + +SEC. 5. _How long should Milk be the only Food?_ + +First change in diet. Objections of mothers. Choice bits. Ignorance of +the nature of digestion. What digestion is. Food which the author of +nature assigned. + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +When feeding before teething is necessary. Diet of mothers. Substitute +for the mother's milk. How prepared. Variety not necessary to the +infant. Milk best from the same cow. Vessels in which it is used should +be clean. Sweet milk not heated too much. Not frozen. Disgusting +practices. Pure water. If not pure, boil it. Best of sugar. Is sugar +injurious? When the state of the mother's health forbids nursing. Use of +sucking-bottles. Feeding should in all cases be slow. Jolting children +after eating. Tossing. Sucking-bottle as a plaything. Evils of using it +as such. Dirty vessels. Poisonous ones. Character of nurses. Nursing at +both breasts. Age of the nurse. Parents should have the oversight, even +of a nurse. + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +Proper age for weaning. Cullen's opinion. Proper season of the year. +When the teeth have fairly protruded. First food given. New forms of +food. Animal broth. + +SEC. 8. _During the Process of Weaning._ + +The spring the best time for weaning. Should not be too sudden. The +process--how managed. Exciting an aversion to the breast. What solid +food should first be given. Buchan's opinion. Health of the mother. She +should--if possible--avoid medicine. + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +Views of Dr. Cadogan. Half the children that come into the world go out +of it before they are good for anything. Why? Owing chiefly to errors in +nursing, feeding, and clothing. Simplicity of children's food. Picture +of a modern table. Every dish tortured till it is spoiled. Plain, simple +food, generally despised. How bread is now regarded. How it ought to be. +Mr. Locke's opinion in favor of bread for young children, and against +the use of animal food. Does not differ materially from that of most +medical writers. Vegetable food generally preferred to animal. What is +true of youth, in this respect, is true of every age, with slight +exceptions. Who require most food. Mere bread and water not best. Bread +the staple article of diet. Best kind of bread. Objections to it. How +groundless they are. Fondness, for hot, new bread not natural. Fondness +of change. What it indicates. How it is caused. Train up a child in the +way he should go. We can like what food we please. Second best kind of +bread. Other kinds. Plain puddings. Indian cakes. Salt may be used, in +moderate quantity, but no other condiments. Of butter, cheese, milk, &c. +Potatoes, turnips, onions, beets, and other roots. Beans, peas, and +asparagus. No fat or gravies should be used. + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +Diversity of opinion. The cholera. Fruits useful. Seven plain rules in +regard to them. Other rules. A mistake corrected. Fruit before +breakfast. Four arguments in its favor. Particular fruits. Apples. Why +fruits brought to market are generally unfit to be eaten. Are good, ripe +fruits difficult of digestion? Cooking the apple? A man who lives +entirely on apples. Cutting down orchards. Pears, peaches, melons, +grapes. Mixing improper substances with summer fruits. + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +Confectionary sometimes poisonous. Case in New York. All, or nearly +all confectionaries injurious. Physical evils attending their use. +Intellectual evils. Moral evils. The last most to be dreaded. Slaves +to confectionary are on the road to gluttony, drunkenness, or +debauchery--perhaps all three. + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris's opinion of pastry. Various forms of it. Hot flour bread a +species of it. Produces, among other evils, eruptions on the face. +Appeal to mothers. + +SEC. 13. _Crude, or Raw Substances._ + +Salads, herbs, &c.--raw--cooked. Nuts, spices, mustard, horseradish, +onions, cucumbers, pickles, &c. None of these should be used, except as +medicine. + + +CHAPTER VIII. DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk +and water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad +food and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischiefs they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +CHAPTER IX. GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +CHAPTER X. EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +Objections to the use of cradles. Under what circumstances they are +least objectionable. + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +Carrying in the arms a suitable exercise for the first two months of +life. Danger of too early sitting up. Improper position in the arms. +Mothers must see to this themselves. Motion in the arms should be +gentle. No tossing, running, or jumping. Infants should not always be +carried on the same arm. + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +Creeping useful to health. Why. Go-carts and leading strings prohibited. +The longer children creep, the better. Their progress in learning to +stand. Let it be slow and natural. Let it be, as much as possible, by +their own voluntary efforts. + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +Walking in the nursery. Walking abroad. Hoisting children into carriages. +Walks should not become fatiguing. + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +Carriages useful before children can walk. Their construction. Should be +drawn steadily. Position of the child in them: Falling asleep. How long +this exercise should be continued. + +SEC. 6 _Riding on Horseback._ + +Never safe for infants. Riding schools. Objections to riding on +horseback, while very young. Tends to cruelty and tyranny. + + +CHAPTER XI. AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +CHAPTER XII. CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +CHAPTER XIII. LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +CHAPTER XIV. SLEEP. + +General remarks. A prevalent mistake. A hint to fathers. Few Catos. +Everything left to mothers. + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Night the season of repose, generally. Infants require all hours. +Sleeping in dark rooms. Excess of caution. Habit of sleeping amid noise. + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +Where the infant should sleep. Why alone. Poisoning by impure air. +Illustration. Proofs. Friedlander. Dr. Dewees. Destruction of children +by mothers. Anecdote. Moral reasons for having children sleep alone. +Sleeping with the aged. Sleeping with cats and dogs. + +SEC. 3 _Purity of the Air._ + +Nurseries. Windows open during the night. Lowering them from the top. +Habit of Dr. Gregory. Going abroad in the open air. + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +No feathers should be used. They are too warm. Their effluvia +oppressive. Other objections to their use. Mattresses. Air beds. Beds of +cut straw. Soft beds. Testimony of physicians. The pillow. Dampness. +Curtains. Warming the bed. Beds recently occupied by the sick. + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +Light covering. Mistakes of some mothers. Covering the head with bed +clothes. + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +As little dress during sleep as possible. No caps. No stockings. Loose +night shirt. No tight articles of nightdress. Frequent exchanging of +clothes. + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +Sleeping on the back--on the sides. Position of the head. The infant's +bedstead. Sir Charles Bell. Darkening the room. + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +Mental quiet favorable to sleep. Crying to sleep. A good father. All +anxiety should be avoided. + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +Soundness of our sleep. Nightmare. How produced. Late reading. Late +suppers. Influence of religion on sleep. Different opinions about sleep. +Truth midway between extremes. Effect of silence and darkness on our +sleep. Of sleep before midnight. Light unfavorable to sleep. + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +Infants need to sleep nearly the whole time. Number of hours required +for sleep. Opinions of eminent men. The author's own opinion. Statements +of Macnish. Estimates on the loss of time by over-sleeping. Hint to +young mothers. + + +CHAPTER XV. EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. Burning them up. "Lecturing" them. What is an early +hour? + + +CHAPTER XVI. HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +CHAPTER XVII. SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society. Early diffidence. +Selecting companions. Moral effects of society on the young. Parents +should play with their children. + + +CHAPTER XVIII. EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Disliking domestic employments. Miserable housewives--not +to be wondered at. Mistake of one class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +CHAPTER XIX. EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Extent to which the senses can be improved. Case of the blind. The +Indians. Julia Brace. Tailors, painters, &c. + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +Injury done by caps. Syringing the ears. Anecdote of deafness from +neglect. Means of improving the hearing. + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +Importance of seeing. Near-sighted people--why so common. Heat of our +rooms. Very fine print. Spectacles. Reading when tired. Rubbing the +eyes. Cold water to the eyes. + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +Benumbing the senses. How this has often been done. The teeth. How to +preserve them. + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness. Sense of touch. The blind--how taught to +read. Hint to parents. The hand. Neglecting the left hand. Physiology of +the hand and arm. Evils of being able to use but one hand. Both should +be educated. + + +CHAPTER XX. ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + + * * * * * + + +PREFACE. + +There is a prejudice abroad, to some extent, against agitating the +questions--"What shall we eat? What shall we drink? and Wherewithal +shall we be clothed?"--not so much because the Scriptures have charged +us not to be over "anxious" on the subject, as because those who pay the +least attention to what they eat and drink, are supposed to be, after +all, the most healthy. + +It is not difficult to ascertain how this opinion originated. There are +a few individuals who are perpetually thinking and talking on this +subject, and who would fain comply with appropriate rules, if they knew +what they were, and if a certain definite course, pursued a few days +only, would change their whole condition, and completely restore a +shattered or ruined constitution. But their ignorance of the laws which +govern the human frame, both in sickness and in health, and their +indisposition to pursue any proposed plan for their improvement long +enough to receive much permanent benefit from it, keep them, +notwithstanding all they say or do, always deteriorating. + +Then, on the other hand, there are a few who, in consequence of +possessing by nature very strong constitutions, and laboring at some +active and peculiarly healthy employment, are able for a few, and +perhaps even for many years, to set all the rules of health at defiance. + +Now, strange as it may seem, these cases, though they are only +exceptions (and those more apparent than real) to the general rule, are +always dwelt upon, by those who are determined to live as they please, +and to put no restraint either upon themselves or their appetites. For +nothing can be plainer--so it seems to me--than that, taking mankind by +families, or what is still better, by larger portions, they are most +free from pain and disease, as well as most healthy and happy, who pay +the most attention to the laws of human health, that is, those laws or +rules by whose observance alone, that health can be certainly and +permanently secured. + +But these families and communities are most healthy and happy, not +because they live in a proper manner, by fits and starts, but because +they have, from some cause or other, adopted and persevered in HABITS +which, compared with the habits of other families, or other communities, +are preferable; that is, more in obedience to the laws which govern the +human constitution. Not that even _they_ are "without sin" or error on +this subject--gross error too--but because their errors are fewer or +less destructive than those of their neighbors. + +Now is it possible that any intelligent father or mother of a family, +whose diet, clothing, exercise, &c. are thus comparatively well +regulated, would derive no benefit from the perusal of works which treat +candidly, rationally, and dispassionately, on these points? Is there a +mother in the community who is so destitute of reason and common sense +as not to desire the light of a broader experience in regard to the +tendency of things than she has had, or possibly can have, in her own +family? Is there one who will not be aided by understanding not only +that a certain thing or course is better than another, but also WHY it +is so? + +It is by no means the object of this little work to set people to +watching their stomachs from meal to meal, in regard to the effects of +food, drink, &c.; for nothing in the world is better calculated to make +dyspeptics than this. It is true, indeed, that some things may be +obviously and greatly injurious, taken only once; and when they are so, +they should be avoided. But in general, it is the effect of a habitual +use of certain things for a long time together--and the longer the +experiment the better--which we are to observe. + +A book to guide mothers in the formation of early good habits in their +offspring, should be the result of long observation and much experiment +on these points, but more especially of a thorough understanding of +human physiology. It should not consist so much of the conceits of a +single brain--perhaps half turned--as of the logical deductions of +severe science, and facts gleaned from the world's history. + +Here is a nation, or tribe of men, bringing up children to certain +habits, from generation to generation--and such and such is their +character. Here, again, is another large portion of our race, who, under +similar circumstances of climate, &c. &c., have, for several hundred +years, educated their children very differently, and with different +results. A comparison of things on a large scale, together with a close +attention to the constitution and relations of the human system, affords +ground for drawing conclusions which are or may be useful. If this book +shall not afford light derived from such sources, it were far better +that it had never been written. If it only sets people to watching over +the effects of things taken or used only for a single day, instead of +leading them from early infancy to form in their children such habits as +will preclude, in a great measure, the necessity of watching ourselves +daily, then let the day perish from the memory of the writer, in which +the plan of bringing it forth to the world was conceived. But he is +confident of better things. He does not believe that a work which, to +such an extent, GIVES THE REASON WHY, will be productive of more evil +than good. On the contrary, it must, if read, have the opposite effect. + +I do not deny that even after the formation of the best habits, there +will be a necessity of paying some attention to what we eat and what we +drink, from day to day, and from hour to hour; but only that the +tendency of this work is not to increase this necessity, but on the +contrary, to diminish it. In my own view; these occasions of inquiry in +regard to what is right, _physically_ as well as _morally_, are one part +of our trials in this world--one means of forming our characters. We are +constantly tempted to excess and to error, in spite of the most firm +habits of self-denial which can be formed. If we resist temptation, our +characters are improved. And it is by self-denial and self-government in +these smaller matters, that we are to hope for nearly all the progress +we can ever make in the great work of self-education. Great trials of +character come but seldom; and when they come, we are often armed +against them; but these little trials and temptations, coming upon us +every hour--these it is, after all, that give shape to our characters, +and make us constantly growing either better or worse, both in the sight +of God and man. But, as I have repeatedly said, the object of this work +is to diminish rather than to increase the frequency of these trials, +useful though they may be, if duly improved, in the formation of +virtuous, and even of holy character. + +There is a sense in which every infant may be said to be born healthy, +so that we may not only adopt the language of the poet, Bowring, and +say + + --"a child is born; + Take it, and make it a bud of _moral_ beauty," + +but we may also add--Take it and make it beautiful _physically_. For +though a hereditary predisposition undoubtedly renders some individuals +more susceptible than others to particular diseases, yet when the bodily +organization of an infant is complete, and the degree of vitality which +nature gives it is sufficient to propel the machinery of the frame, it +can scarcely be regarded as in any other state than that of health. + +Now if it be the intention of divine Providence (and who will doubt that +it is?) that the animal body should be capable of resisting with +impunity the impressions of heat, cold, light, air, and the various +external influences to which, at birth, it is subjected, it may be +properly asked why this primitive state of health cannot be maintained, +and diseases, and medicines, and even PREVENTIVES wholly avoided. + +But the reason is obvious. Civilized society has placed the human race +in artificial circumstances. Instead of listening to the dictates of +reason, making ourselves acquainted with the nature of the human +constitution, and studying to preserve it in health and vigor, we yield +to the government of ignorance and presumption. The first moment, even, +in which we draw breath, sees us placed under the control of individuals +who are totally inadequate to the important charge of preserving the +infant constitution in its original state, and aiding its progress to +maturity. And thus it is that though infants, as a general rule, may be +said to be born healthy, few actually remain so. Seldom, indeed, do we +find a person who has arrived at maturity wholly free from disease, even +in those parts of our country which are reckoned to have the most +healthy climate. + +It is indeed commonly said, that a large proportion, both of children +and adults, among the agricultural portion of our population, are +healthy. But it is not so. There is room for doubt whether, on the +whole, the farmers of this country are healthier than the mechanics, or +much more so than the manufacturers; or the whole mass of the country +population healthier than that of the crowded city. The causes of +disease are sufficiently numerous, in all places and conditions; and +this will continue to be the fact, not merely until parents and teachers +shall become more enlightened, but until many generations have been +trained under their enlightened influence. + +If the children and adults among our agricultural population derive from +their employments in the open air a more ruddy appearance than those +either of the city or country who are confined more to their rooms; or +to a vitiated atmosphere, and to numerous other sources of disease, and +if they _appear_ more favored with health, I have learned, by accurate +observation, that these appearances are somewhat deceptive. Their active +sports and employments in the open air give them a stronger appetite +than any other class of people; and the indulgence of this appetite, not +only with articles which are heating or indigestible in their nature, +but with an unreasonable quantity even of those which are considered +highly proper, is almost in an exact proportion. And it is hence +scarcely possible for the causes of disease and premature death to be +more operative in factories and in cities than in farm houses and the +country. Indeed it may be questioned whether the abuses of the ANIMAL +part of man--more common in some of their forms in country than in +city--though they may be less conspicuous, are not more certainly and +even more immediately destructive than those abuses which, in city life, +and bustle, and competition, affect more the MORAL nature. + +Be that as it may, however--for this is not the place for the grave +discussion of so broad a question--one thing, to my mind, is perfectly +clear, namely, that until physical education shall receive more +attention from all those who hold the sacred office of instructors of +the young, humanity can neither be much elevated nor improved. Mothers +and schoolmasters especially--they who, as Dr. Rush says, plant the +seeds of nearly all the good or evil in the world--must understand, most +deeply and thoroughly, the laws which regulate the various provinces of +the little world in which the soul resides, and which, like so many +states of a great confederacy, have not only their separate interests +and rights, but certain common and general ones; as well as those laws +by which the human constitution is related to and connected with the +objects which everywhere surround, and influence, and limit, and extend +it. + +This book contains little, if anything, new to those who are already +familiar with anatomy and physiology. Indeed, whatever may be its +claims, its merits or its demerits, it disclaims novelty. It is, indeed, +in one point of view, _original_;--I mean in its form, manner, and +arrangement. What I have written is chiefly from my own resources--the +results of patient study and observation, and careful reflection; but +that study and observation of human nature, and this reflection, have +been greatly aided by reading the writings of others. + +In the prosecution of the task which I had assigned myself, no work has +been of more service to me than an octavo volume of 548 pages, by Dr. +Wm. P. Dewees, of Philadelphia, entitled, "A Treatise on the Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children." It is one of the most valuable works +on Physical Education in the English language, as is evident from the +fact that notwithstanding its expense--three or four dollars--it has, in +nine years, gone through five editions. If it were written in such a +style, and published at such a price as would bring it within reach of +the minds and purses of the mass of the community, its sale would have +been, I think, much greater still; and the good which it has +accomplished would have been increased ten-fold. + +If the "YOUNG MOTHER" should be favorably received by the American +community, and prove extensively useful, it will undoubtedly be owing to +the fact that it presents so large a collection of facts and principles +on the great subject of physical education, in a manner so practical, +and at a price which is very low. To accomplish an object so desirable +is by no means an easy task. It was once said by the author of a huge +volume, that he wrote so large a work because he had not time to prepare +a smaller one. And however unaccountable it may be to those who have not +made the trial, it may be safely asserted, that to present, within +limits so small, anything like a system of Physical Education for the +guidance of young mothers, requires much more time, and labor, and +patience, than to prepare a work on the same subject twice as large. + +Nor is it to be expected, after all, that the work is, in all respects, +perfect. I have indeed done what I could to render it so; but am +conscious that future inquiries may lead to the discovery of errors. +Should such discoveries be made, they will be cheerfully acknowledged +and corrected; truth being, as it should be, the leading object. + + + * * * * * + + +THE YOUNG MOTHER. + + + +CHAPTER I. + +THE NURSERY. + +General remarks. Importance of a Nursery--generally overlooked. Its +walls--ceiling--windows--chimney. Two apartments. Sliding partition. +Reasons for this arrangement. Objections to carpets. Furniture, &c. +Feather beds. Holes or crevices. Currents of air. Cats and dogs. +"Sucking the child's breath." Brilliant objects. Squinting. Causes of +blindness. + + +It is far from being in the power of every young mother to procure a +suitable room for a nursery. In the present state of society, the +majority must be contented with such places as they can get. Still there +are various reasons for saying what a nursery should be. 1. It may be of +service to those who _have_ the power of selection. 2. Information +cannot injure those who _have not_. 3. It may lead those who have wealth +to extend the hand of charity in this important direction; for there +are not a few who have little sympathy with the wants and distresses of +the adult poor, who will yet open their hearts and unfold their hands +for the relief of suffering _infancy_. + +Among those who have what is called a nursery, few select for this +purpose the most appropriate part of the building. It is not +unfrequently the one that can best be spared, is most retired, or most +convenient. Whether it is most favorable to the health and happiness of +its occupants, is usually at best a secondary consideration. + +But this ought not so to be. A nursery should never, for example, be on +a ground floor, or in a shaded situation, or in any circumstances which +expose it to dampness, or hinder the occasional approach of the light of +the sun. It should be spacious, with dry walls, high ceiling, and tight +windows. The latter should always be so constructed that the upper sash +can be lowered when we wish to admit or exclude air. It should have a +chimney, if possible; but if not, there should be suitable holes in the +ceiling, for the purposes of ventilation. + +The windows should have shutters, so that the room, when necessary, can +be darkened--and green curtains. Some writers say that the windows +should have cross bars before them; but if they do not descend within +three feet of the floor, such an arrangement can hardly be required. + +It is highly desirable that every nursery should consist of two rooms, +opening into each other; or what is still better, of one large room, +with a sliding or swinging partition in the middle. The use of this is, +that the mother and child may retire to one, while the other is being +swept or ventilated. They would thus avoid damp air, currents, and dust. +Such an arrangement would also give the occupants a room, fresh, clean +and sweet, in the morning, (which is a very great advantage,) after +having rendered the air of the other foul by sleeping in it. + +In winter, and while there is an infant in the nursery, just beginning +to walk, it is recommended by many to cover the floor with a carpet. The +only advantage which they mention is, that it secures the child from +injury if it falls. But I have seldom seen lasting injury inflicted by +simple falls on the hard floor; and there are so many objections to +carpeting a nursery, since it favors an accumulation of dust, bad air, +damp, grease, and other impurities, that it seems to me preferable to +omit it. Many physicians, I must own, recommend carpets during winter, +though not in summer; and in no case, unless they are well shaken and +aired, at least once a week. + +No furniture should be admissible, except the beds for the mother and +child, a table, and a few chairs. With the best writers and highest +authorities on the subject, I am decidedly of opinion that all feather +beds ought effectually and forever to be excluded from nurseries. The +reasons for this prohibition will appear hereafter. + +Every nursery should, if possible, be free from holes or crevices; +otherwise the occupants will be exposed to currents of air, and their +sometimes terrible and always injurious consequences. The room may, in +this way, be kept at a lower medium temperature--a point of very great +importance. + +Cats and dogs, I believe, are usually excluded from the nursery; if not, +they ought to be. For though the apprehension of cats "sucking the +child's breath," is wholly groundless, yet they may be provoked by the +rude attacks of a child to inflict upon it a lasting injury. Besides, +they assist, by respiration, in contaminating the air, like all other +animals. + +If there are, in the nursery, objects which, from the vivacity or +brilliancy of their colors, attract the attention of the child, they +should never be presented to them sideways, or immediately over their +heads. The reason for this caution is, that children seek, and pursue +almost instinctively, bright objects; and are thus liable to contract a +habit of moving their eyes in an oblique direction, which _may_ +terminate in squinting. + +Many parents seem to take great pleasure in indulging the young infant +in looking at these bright objects; especially a lamp or a candle. If +the child is naturally strong and vigorous, no immediate perceptible +injury may arise; but I am confident in the opinion that the result is +often quite otherwise. For many weeks, if not many months of their early +existence, they should not be permitted to sit or lie and gaze at any +bright object, be it ever so weak or distant, unless placed exactly +before their eyes; and even in the latter case, it were better to avoid +it. + +Heat is also injurious to the eyes of all, and of course not less so to +children than to adults. But when a strong light and heat are conjoined, +as is the case of sitting around a large blazing fire--the former custom +of New England--it is no wonder if the infantile eyes become early +injured. No wonder that the generation now on the stage, early subjected +to these abuses, should be found almost universally in the use of +spectacles. + +This may be the most proper place for observing that great care ought to +be taken, at the birth of the child, to prevent a too sudden exposure of +the tender organ of vision to the light. We believe this caution is +generally omitted by the American physician, though it is one which +accords with the plainest dictates of common sense. Who of us has not +experienced the pain of emerging suddenly from the darkness of a cellar +to the ordinary light of day? The strongest eyes of the adult are +scarcely able to bear the transition. How much more painful to the +tender organs of the new-born infant must be the change to which it is +so frequently subjected? And how easy it is to prevent the pain and +danger of the change, by more effectually darkening the room into which +it is introduced! + +But we have testimony on this point. A distinguished German physician +states that he has known many cases of permanent blindness from this +very cause to which we have referred. The Principal of the Institution +for the Blind, at Vienna, says he is confident that most children who +appear to be born blind, are actually made blind by neglecting this same +precaution. + + + + +CHAPTER II. + +TEMPERATURE. + +General principle--"Keep cool." Our own sensations not always to be +trusted. Thermometer. Why infants require more external heat than +adults. Means of warmth. Air heated in other apartments. Clothes taking +fire. Stove--railing around it. Excess of heat--its dangers. + + +There is one general principle, on this subject, which is alike +applicable to all persons and circumstances. It is, to keep a little too +cool, rather than in the slightest degree too warm. In other words, the +lowest temperature which is compatible with comfort, is, in all cases, +best adapted to health; and a slight degree of coldness, provided it +amount not to a chill, and is not long continued, is more safe than the +smallest unnecessary degree of warmth. + +But the application of this rule to those over whom we have control, is +not without its difficulties. Our own sensations are so variable, +independently of external and obvious causes, that we cannot at all +times judge for others, especially for infants. The absolute and real +state of temperature in a room can only be ascertained by the aid of a +thermometer; and no nursery should ever be without one. It should be +placed, however, in such a situation as to indicate the real temperature +of the atmosphere, and not where it will give a false result. + +No mother should forget that the infant, at birth, has not the power of +generating heat, internally, to the extent which it possesses afterward. +The lungs have as yet but a feeble, inefficient action. The purification +of the blood, through their agency, is not only incomplete, but the heat +evolved is as yet inconsiderable. In the absence of internal heat, then, +there is an increased demand externally. If 60 be deemed suitable for +most other persons, the new-born infant may, for a few days, require 65 +or even 70. + +Much may and should be done in preserving the child in a proper +temperature by means of its clothing. On this point I shall speak at +length, in another part of this work. My present purpose is simply to +treat of the temperature of the nursery. + +The best way of warming a nursery--or indeed any other room, where MERE +warmth is demanded--is by means of air heated in other apartments, and +admitted through openings in the floor or fire-place. The air is not +only thus made more pure, but every possibility of accidents, such as +having the clothes take fire, is precluded. This last consideration is +one of very great importance, and I hope will not be much longer +overlooked in infantile education. + +Next to that, in point of usefulness and safety, is a stove, placed near +or IN the fire-place, and defended by an iron railing. Most people +prefer an open stove; and on some accounts it is indeed preferable, +especially where it is desirable to burn coal. Still I think that the +direct rays of the heat, and the glare of light from open stoves and +fire-places, particularly for the young, form a very serious objection +to their use. + +One of the strongest objections to open stoves and fire-places in the +nursery is, the increased exposure to accidents. I know it is said that +this evil may be avoided by laying aside the use of cotton, and wearing +nothing but worsted or flannel. This is indeed true; but I do not like +the idea of being compelled to dress children in flannel or worsted, at +all times when the least particle of fire is demanded; for this would be +to wear this stimulating kind of clothing, in our climate, the greater +part of the year. + +Besides, I write for many mothers who are compelled to use cotton, on +account of the expense of flannel. And if the stove be a close one, and +well defended by a railing, cotton will seldom expose to danger. Still, +as has been already said, the introduction of heated air from another +apartment, whenever it can possibly be afforded, is incomparably better +than either stoves or fire-places. + +Dr. Dewees is fully persuaded that the excessive heat of nurseries has +occasioned a great mortality among very young children. "In the first +place," he says, "it over-stimulates them; and in the second, it renders +them so susceptible of cold, that any draught of cold air endangers +their lives. They are in a constant perspiration, which is frequently +checked by an exposure to even an atmosphere of moderate temperature." +If this is but to repeat what has been already said, the importance of +the subject seems to be a sufficient apology. + + + + +CHAPTER III. + +VENTILATION. + +General ignorance of the constitution of the atmosphere. The subject +briefly explained. Oxygen gas. Nitrogen. Carbonic acid. Fires, candles, +and breathing dependent on oxygen. Danger from carbonic acid. How it +destroys people. Impurity of the air by means of lamps and candles. +Other sources of impurity. Experiment of putting the candle under the +bed-clothes. Covering the heads of infants while sleeping--its dangers. +Proportions of oxygen and nitrogen in pure and impure air. No wonder +children become sickly. Particular means of ventilating rooms. Caution +in regard to lamps. Washing, ironing, cooking, &c., in a nursery. Their +evil tendency. Fumigation--camphor, vinegar. + + +Few people take sufficient pains to preserve the air in any of their +apartments pure; for few know what the constitution of our atmosphere +is, and in how many ways and with what ease it is rendered impure. + +It is not my purpose to go into a learned, scientific account in this +place, or even in this work, of the constitution of the atmosphere. A +few plain statements are all that are indispensable. The atmosphere +which we breathe is composed of two different airs or gases. One of +these is called oxygen, [Footnote: Oxygen gas is the chief supporter of +combustion, as well as of respiration. It is the vital part, as it were, +of the air. No animal or vegetable could long exist without it. And yet +if alone, unmixed, it is too pure and too refined for animals to +breathe. Nitrogen gas, on the contrary, while alone, will not support +either respiration or combustion; mixed, however, with oxygen, it +dilutes it, and in the most happy manner fits it for reception into the +lungs.] and the other nitrogen. There is another gas usually found with +these two, in smaller quantity, called carbonic acid gas; but whether it +is necessary, in a very small quantity, to health, chemists, I believe, +are not agreed. One thing, however, is certain--that if any portion of +it is healthful, it must be very little--not more, certainly, than +one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of the whole mass. + +It is by means of the oxygen it contains, that air sustains life and +combustion. Were it not for this, neither fires nor candles would burn, +and no animal could breathe a single moment. Breathing consumes this +oxygen of the air very rapidly. When the oxygen is present in about a +certain proportion, combustion and respiration go on well, but when its +natural proportion is diminished, the fire does not burn so well, +neither does the candle; and no one can breathe so freely. + +Not only are breathing and combustion impeded or disturbed by the +diminution of oxygen in the atmosphere, but just in proportion as oxygen +is diminished by these two processes, or either of them, carbonic acid +is formed, which is not only bad for combustion, but much worse for +health. If any considerable quantity of it is inhaled, it appears to be +an absolute poison to the human system; and if in _very large quantity_, +will often cause immediate death. + +It is this gas, accumulated in large quantities, that destroys so many +people in close rooms, where there is no chimney, nor any other place +for the bad air to escape. But it not only kills people outright--it +partly kills, that is, it poisons, more or less, hundreds of thousands. + +In a nursery there is the mother and child, and perhaps the nurse, to +render the air impure by breathing, the fire and the lamp or candle to +contribute to the same result, besides several other causes not yet +mentioned. One of these is nearly related to the former. I allude to the +fact that our skins, by perspiration and by other means, are a source of +much impurity to the atmosphere; a fact which will be more fully +explained and illustrated in the chapter on Bathing and Cleanliness. It +is only necessary to say, in this place, that it is not the matter of +perspiration alone which, issuing from the skin, renders the air +impure; there are other exhalations more or less constantly going off +from every living body, especially from the lungs; and carbonic acid gas +is even formed all over the surface of the skin, as well as by means of +the lungs. + +One needs no better proof that carbonic acid is formed on the surface of +the body, than the fact that after the body has been closely covered all +night, if you introduce a candle under the bed-clothes into this +confined air, it will be quickly extinguished, because there is too +much carbonic acid gas there, and too little oxygen. + +We may hence see at once the evil of covering the heads of infants when +they lie down--a very common practice. The air, when pure, contains a +little more than 20 parts of oxygen, and a little less than 80 of +nitrogen. Breathing this air, as I have already shown, consumes the +oxygen, which is so necessary to life and health, and leaves in its +place an increase of nitrogen and carbonic acid gas, which are not +necessary to health, and the latter of which is even positively +injurious. But when the oxygen, instead of forming 20 or more parts in +100 of the atmosphere of the nursery, is reduced to 15 or 18 parts only, +and the carbonic acid gas is increased from 1 or 2 parts in 100, to 5, +6, 8 or 10--when to this is added the other noxious exhalations from the +body, and from the lamp or candle, fire-place, feather bed, stagnant +fluids in the room, &c., &c.--is it any wonder that children, in the +end, become sickly? What else could be expected but that the seeds of +disease, thus early sown, should in due time spring up, and produce +their appropriate fruits? + +It is sometimes said that fire in a room purifies it. It undoubtedly +does so, to a certain extent, if fresh air be often admitted; but not +otherwise. + +I have classed feather beds among the common causes of impurity. Dr. +Dewees also condemns them, most decidedly; and gives substantial reasons +for "driving them out of the nursery." + +In speaking of the structure of the room used for a nursery, I have +adverted to the importance of having a large or double room, with +sliding doors between, in order that the occupants may go into one of +them, while the other is being ventilated. But whatever may be the +structure of the room, the circumstances of the occupants, or the state +of the weather, every nursery ought to be most thoroughly ventilated, +once a day, at least; and when the weather is tolerable, twice a day. If +there is but one apartment, and fear is entertained of the dampness of +the fresh air introduced, or of currents, and if the mother and babe +cannot retire, there is a last resort, which is for them to get into +bed, and cover themselves a short time with the clothing. For though I +have prohibited the covering of the face with the bed-clothes for any +considerable length of time together, yet to do so for some fifteen or +twenty minutes is an evil of far less magnitude than to suffer an +apartment to remain without being ventilated, for twenty-four hours +together--a very common occurrence. + +When a lamp is kept burning in a nursery during the night, it should +always be placed at the door of the stove, or in the chimney place, that +its smoke, and the bad airs or gases which are formed, may escape. But +it is better, in general, to avoid burning lamps or candles during the +night. By means of common matches, a light may be produced, when +necessary, almost instantly; especially if you have a spirit lamp in the +nursery, or what is still better, one of spirit gas--that is, a mixture +of alcohol and turpentine. + +It is highly desirable that all washing, ironing, and cooking should be +avoided in the nursery. They load the air with noxious effluvia or +vapor, or with particles of dust; none of which ought ever to enter the +delicate lungs of an infant. + +Fumigations with camphor, vinegar, and other similar substances, have +long been in reputation as a means of purifying the air in sick-rooms +and nurseries; but they are of very little consequence. Fresh air, if it +can be had, is always better. + + + + +CHAPTER IV. + +THE CHILD'S DRESS + +General principles. SEC. 1. Swathing the body--its numerous evils.--SEC. +2. Form of the dress. Fashion. Tight lacing--its dangers. Structure and +motion of the chest. Diseases from tight lacing.--SEC. 3. Material of +dress. Flannel--its uses. Cleanliness. Cotton--silk--linen.--SEC. 4. +Quantity of dress. Power of habit. Anecdote. Begin right. Change. +Dampness.--SEC. 5. Caps--their evils. Going bare-headed.--SEC. 6. Hats +and bonnets.--SEC. 7. Covering for the feet. Stockings. Garters. +Shoes--thick soles.--SEC. 8. Pins--their danger. Shocking +anecdote.--SEC. 9. Remaining wet.--SEC. 10. Dress of boys. Tight +jackets. Stocks and cravats. Boots.--SEC. 11. Dress of girls--should be +loose. Temperature. Exposure to the night air. + + +Dress serves three important purposes:--1. To cover us; 2. To defend us +against cold; 3. To defend our bodies and limbs from injury. There is +one more purpose of dress; in case of deformity, it seems to improve the +appearance. + +In all our arrangements in regard to dress, whether of children or of +adults, we should ever keep in mind the above principles. The form, +fashion, material, application, and quantity of all clothing, +especially for infants, ought to be regulated by these three or four +rules. + +The subject of this chapter is one of so much importance, and embraces +such a variety of items, that it will be more convenient, both to the +reader and myself, to consider it under several minor heads. + + +SEC. 1. _Swathing the Body._ + +Buffon, in his "Natural History," says that in France, an infant has +hardly enjoyed the liberty of moving and stretching its limbs, before it +is put into confinement. "It is swathed," says he, "its head is fixed, +its legs are stretched out at full length, and its arms placed straight +down by the side of its body. In this manner it is bound tight with +cloths and bandages, so that it cannot stir a limb; indeed it is +fortunate that the poor thing is not muffled up so as to be unable to +breathe." + +All swathing, except with a single bandage around the abdomen, is +decidedly unreasonable, injurious and cruel. I do not pretend that the +remarks of M. Buffon are fully applicable to the condition of infants in +the United States. The good sense of the community nowhere permits us to +transform a beautiful babe quite into an Egyptian mummy. Still there +are many considerable errors on the subject of infantile dress, which, +in the progress of my remarks, I shall find it necessary to expose. + +The use of a simple band cannot be objected to. It affords a general +support to the abdomen, and a particular one to the _umbilicus_. The +last point is one of great importance, where there is any tendency to a +rupture at this part of the body--a tendency which very often exists in +feeble children. And without some support of this kind, crying, +coughing, sneezing, and straining in any way, might greatly aggravate +the evil, if not produce serious consequences. + +But, in order to afford a support to the abdomen in the best manner, it +is by no means necessary that the bandage should be drawn very tight. +Two thirds of the nurses in this country greatly err in this respect, +and suppose that the more tightly a bandage is drawn, the better. It +should be firm, but yet gently yielding; and therefore a piece of +flannel cut "bias," as it is termed, or, obliquely with respect to the +threads of which it is composed, is the most appropriate material. + +If the attention of the mother were necessary nowhere else, it would be +indispensable in the application of this article. If she do not take +special pains to prevent it, the erring though well meaning nurse may +so compress the body with the bandage as to produce pain and uneasiness, +and sometimes severe colic. Nay, worse evils than even this have been +known to arise. When a child sneezes, or coughs, or cries, the abdomen +should naturally yield gently; but if it is so confined that it cannot +yield where the band is applied, it will yield in an unnatural +proportion below, to the great danger of producing a species of rupture, +no less troublesome than the one which such tight swathing is designed +to prevent. + +But besides the bandage already mentioned, no other restraint of the +body and limbs of a child is at all admissible. The Creator has kindly +ordained that the human body and limbs, and especially its muscles, or +moving powers, shall be developed by exercise. Confine an arm or a leg, +even in a child of ten years of age, and the limb will not increase +either in strength or size as it otherwise would, because its muscles +are not exercised; and the fact is still more obvious in infancy. + +There is a still deeper evil. On all the limbs are fixed two sets of +muscles; one to extend, the other to draw up or bend the limb. If you +keep a limb extended for a considerable time, you weaken the one set of +muscles; if you keep it bent, you weaken the other. This weakness may +become so great that the limb will be rendered useless. There are cases +on record--well authenticated--where children, by being obliged to sit +in one place on a hard floor, have been made cripples for life. Hundreds +of others are injured, though they may not become absolutely crippled. + +I repeat it, therefore, their dress should be so free and loose that +they may use their little limbs, their neck and their bodies, as much as +they please; and in every desired direction. The practices of confining +their arms while they lie down, for fear they should scratch themselves +with their nails, and of pinning the clothes round their feet, are +therefore highly reprehensible. Better that they should even +occasionally scratch themselves with their nails, than that they should +be made the victims of injurious restraint. Who would think of tying up +or muffling the young lamb or kid? And even the young plant--what think +you would be the effect, if its leaves and branches could not move +gently with the soft breezes? Would the fluids circulate, and health be +promoted: or would they stagnate, and a morbid, sickly and dwarfish +state be the consequence? + +Those whose object is to make infancy, as well as any other period of +existence, a season of happiness, will not fail to find an additional +motive for giving the little stranger entire freedom in the land +whither he has so recently arrived, especially when he seems to enjoy +it so much. Who can be so hardened as to confine him, unless compelled +by the most pressing necessity? + + +SEC. 2. _Form of the Dress._ + +On this subject a writer in the London Literary Gazette of some eight or +ten years ago, lays down the following general directions, to which, in +cold weather, there can be but one possible objection, which is, they +are not _alamode_, and are not, therefore, likely to be followed. + +"All that a child requires, so far as regards clothing, in the first +month of its existence, is a simple covering for the trunk and +extremities of the body, made of a material soft and agreeable to the +skin, and which can retain, in an equable degree, the animal +temperature. These qualities are to be found in perfection in fine +flannel; and I recommend that the only clothing, for the first month or +six weeks, be a square piece of flannel, large enough to involve fully +and overlap the whole of the babe, with the exception of the head, which +should be left totally uncovered. This wrapper should be fixed by a +button near the breast, and left so loose as to permit the arms and legs +to be freely stretched, and moved in every direction. It should be +succeeded by a loose flannel gown with sleeves, which should be worn +till the end of the second month; after which it may be changed to the +common clothing used by children of this age." + +The advantages of such a dress are, that the movements of the infant +will be, as we have already seen, free and unrestrained, and we shall +escape the misery of hearing the screams which now so frequently +accompany the dressing and undressing of almost every child. No chafings +from friction, moreover, can occur; and as the insensible perspiration +is in this way promoted over the whole surface of the body, the sympathy +between the stomach and skin is happily maintained. A healthy sympathy +of this kind, duly kept up, does much towards preserving the stomach in +a good state, and the skin from eruptions and sores. + +But as I apprehend that christianity is not yet very deeply rooted in +the minds and hearts of parents, I have already expressed my doubts +whether they are prepared to receive and profit by advice at once +rational and physiological. Still I cannot help hoping that I shall +succeed in persuading mothers to have every part of a child's dress +perfectly loose, except the band already referred to; and that should be +but moderately tight. + +Common humanity ought to teach us better than to put the body of a +helpless infant into a _vise_, and press it to death, as the first mark +of our attention. Who has not been struck with a strange inconsistency +in the conduct of mothers and nurses, who, while they are so exceedingly +tender towards the infant in some points as to injure it by their +kindness, are yet almost insensible to its cries of distress while +dressing it? So far, indeed, are they from feeling emotions of pity, +that they often make light of its cries, regarding them as signs of +health and vigor. + +There can be no doubt, I confess, that the first cries of an infant, if +strong, both indicate and promote a healthy state of the lungs, to a +certain extent; but there will always be unavoidable occasions enough +for crying to promote health, even after we have done all we can in the +way of avoiding pain. They who only draw the child's dress the tighter, +the more it cries, are guilty of a crime of little less enormity than +murder. + +"Think," says Dr. Buchan, "of the immense number of children that die of +convulsions soon after birth; and be assured that these (its cries) are +much oftener owing to galling pressure, or some external injury, than to +any inward cause." This same writer adds, that he has known a child +which was "seized with convulsion fits" soon after being "swaddled," +immediately relieved by taking off the rollers and bandages; and he says +that a loose dress prevented the return of the disease. + +I think it is obvious that the utmost extent to which we ought to go, in +yielding to the fashion, as it regards form, is to use three pieces of +clothing--the shirt, the petticoat and the frock; all of which must be +as loose as possible; and before the infant begins to crawl about much, +the latter should be long, for the salve of covering the feet and legs. +At four or five years of age, loose trowsers, with boys, may be +substituted for the petticoat; but it is a question whether something +like the frock might not, with every individual, be usefully retained +through life. + +I wish it were unnecessary, in a book like this, to join in the general +complaint against tight lacing any part of the body, but especially the +chest. But as this work of torture is sometimes begun almost from the +cradle, and as prevention is better than cure, the hope of preventing +that for which no cure appears yet to have been found, leads me to make +a few remarks on the subject. + +As it has long been my opinion that one reason why mothers continue to +overlook the subject is, that they do not understand the structure and +motion of the chest, I have attempted the following explanation and +illustration. + +I have already said, that if we bandage tightly, for a considerable +time, any part of the human frame, it is apt to become weaker. The more +a portion of the frame which is furnished with muscles, those curious +instruments of motion, is used, provided it is not _over_-exerted, the +more vigorous it is. Bind up an arm, or a hand, or a foot, and keep it +bound for twelve hours of the day for many years, and think you it will +be as strong as it otherwise would have been? Facts prove the contrary. +The Chinese swathe the feet of their infant females; and they are not +only small, but weak. + +I have said their feet are smaller for being bandaged. So is a hand or +an arm. Action--healthy, constant action--is indispensable to the +perfect development of the body and limbs. Why it is so, is another +thing. But so it is; and it is a principle or law of the great Creator +which cannot be evaded. More than this; if you bind some parts of the +body tightly, so as to compress them as much as you can without +producing actual pain, you will find that the part not only ceases to +grow, but actually dwindles away. I have seen this tried again and +again. Even the solid parts perish under pressure. When a person first +wears a false head of hair, the clasp which rests upon the head, at the +upper part of the forehead, being new and elastic, and pressing rather +closely, will, in a few months, often make quite an indentation in the +cranium or bone of the head. + +Now is it probable--nay, is it possible--that the lungs, especially +those of young persons, can expand and come to their full and natural +size under pressure, even though the pressure should be slight? Must +they not be weakened? And if the pressure be strong, as it sometimes is, +must they not dwindle away? + +We know, too, from the nature and structure of the lungs themselves, +that tight lacing must injure them. Many mothers have very imperfect +notions of what physicians mean, when they say that corsets impede the +circulation, by preventing the full and undisturbed action of the lungs. +They get no higher ideas of the _motion_ of the _chest_, than what is +connected with bending the body forward and backward, from right to +left, &c. They know that, if dressed too tightly, _this_ motion is not +so free as it otherwise would be; but if they are not so closely laced +as to prevent that free bending of the body of which I have been +speaking, they think there can be no danger; or at least, none of +consequence. + +Now it happens that this sort of motion is not that to which physicians +refer, when they complain of corsets. Strictly speaking, this bending of +the whole body is performed by the muscles of the back, and not those +of the chest. The latter have very little to do with it. It is true, +that even _this_ motion ought not to be hindered; but if it is, the evil +is one of little comparative magnitude. + +Every time we breathe naturally, all the ribs, together with the breast +bone, have motion. The ribs rise, and spread a little outward, +especially towards the fore part. The breast bone not only rises, but +swings forward a little, like a pendulum. But the moment the chest is +swathed or bandaged, this motion must be hindered; and the more, in +proportion to the tightness. + +On this point, those persons make a sad mistake, who say that "a busk +not too wide nor too rigid seems to correspond to the supporting spine, +and to assist, rather than impede the efforts of nature, to keep the +body erect." + +Can we seriously compare the offices of the spine with those of the +ribs, and suppose that because the former is fixed like a post, at the +back part of the lungs, therefore an artificial post in front would be +useful? Why, we might just as well argue in favor of hanging weights to +a door, or a clog to a pendulum, in order to make it swing backwards and +forwards more easily. We might almost as well say that the elbow ought +to be made firm, to correspond with the shoulders, and thus become +advocates for letting the stays or bandages enclose the arm above the +elbow, and fasten it firmly to the side. Indeed, the consequences in the +latter case, aside from a little inconvenience, would not be half so +destructive to health as in the former. The ribs, where they join to the +back bone, form hinges; and hinges are made for motion. But if you +fasten them to a post in front, of what value are the hinges? + +If mothers ask, of what use this motion of the lungs is, it is only +necessary to refer them to the chapter on Ventilation, in which I trust +the subject is made intelligible, and a satisfactory answer afforded. + +But I might appeal to facts. Let us look at females around us generally. +Do their countenances indicate that they enjoy as good health as they +did when dress was worn more loosely? Have they not oftener a leaden +hue, as if the blood in them was darker? Are they not oftener +short-breathed than formerly? As they advance in life, have they not +more chronic diseases? Are not their chests smaller and weaker? And as +the doctrine that if one member suffers, all the other members suffer +with it, is not less true in physiology than in morals, do we not find +other organs besides the lungs weakened? Surgeons and physicians, who, +like faithful sentinels, have watched at their post half a century, +tell us, moreover, that if these foolish and injurious practices to +which I refer are tolerated two centuries longer, every female will be +deformed, and the whole race greatly degenerated, physically and +morally. + +Those with whom no arguments will avail, are recommended to read the +following remarks from the first volume of the Library of Health, p. +119: + +"It is related, on the authority of Macgill, that in Tunis, after a girl +is engaged, or betrothed, she is then _fattened_. For this purpose, she +is cooped up in a small room, and shackles of gold and silver are placed +upon her ancles and wrists, as a piece of dress. If she is to be married +to a man who has discharged, despatched, or lost a former wife, the +shackles which the former wife wore are put on the new bride's limbs, +and she is fed till they are filled up to a proper thickness. The food +used for this custom worthy of the barbarians is called _drough_, which +is of an extraordinary fattening quality, and also famous for rendering +the milk of the nurse rich and abundant. With this and their national +dish, _cuscasoo_, the bride is literally crammed, and many actually die +under the spoon." + +We laugh at all this, and well we may; but there are customs not very +far from home, no less ridiculous. + +"There is a country four or five thousand miles westward of Tunis, +where the females, to a very great extent, are emaciated for marriage, +instead being fattened. This process is begun, in part, by shackles--not +of gold and silver, perhaps, but of wood--but instead of being put on +loosely, and causing the body or limbs to fill them, they are made to +compress the body in the outset; and as the size of the latter +diminishes, the shackles are contracted or tightened. As with the +eastern, so with the western females, many of them die under the +process; though a far greater number die at a remote period, as the +consequence of it." + + +SEC. 3. _Material._ + +I have already committed myself to the reader as favoring the use of +soft flannel in cold weather, especially for children who are not yet +able to run about freely in the open air. The advantages of an early use +of this material, at least for under-clothes, are numerous. The +following are a few of them. + +1. Flannel, next to the skin, is a pleasant flesh brush; keeping up a +gentle and equable irritation, and promoting perspiration and every +other function which it is the office of the skin to perform, or assist +in performing. + +2. It guards the body against the cooling effects of evaporation, when +in a state of profuse perspiration. + +3. By preventing the heat of the body from escaping too rapidly, it +keeps up a steadier temperature on the surface than any other known +substance. The importance of the last consideration is greater, in a +climate like our own, than elsewhere. + +But there are limits to the use of this article of clothing. Whenever +the temperature of the atmosphere is so great, even without artificial +heat, that we no longer wish to retain the heat of the body by the +clothing, then all flannel should be removed at once, and linen should +be substituted; taking care to replace the flannel whenever the +temperature of the atmosphere, as indicated by the thermometer, or by +the child's feelings, may seem to require it. + +It should also be kept clean. There is a very general mistake abroad on +this subject. Many suppose that flannel can be worn longer without +washing than other kinds of cloth. On the contrary, it should be changed +oftener than cotton, or even linen, because it will absorb a great deal +of fluid, especially the matter of perspiration, which, if long +retained, is believed to ferment, and produce unhealthy, if not +poisonous gases. For this reason, too, flannel for children's clothing +should be white, that it may show dirt the more readily, and obtain the +more frequent washing; although it is for this very reason--its +liability to exhibit the least particles of dirt--that it is commonly +rejected. + +One caution more in regard to the use of flannel may be necessary. With +some children, owing to a peculiarity of constitution, flannel will +produce eruptions on the skin, which are very troublesome. Whenever this +is the case, the flannel should be immediately laid aside; upon which +the eruptions usually disappear. + +If parents would take proper pains to get the lighter, softer kinds of +flannel for this purpose, and be particular about its looseness and +quantity, I should prefer, as I have already intimated, to have very +young children, in our climate, wear this material the greater part of +the year, excepting perhaps July and August. + +My reasons for this course would be, first, that I like the stimulus of +soft flannel on the skin, if changed sufficiently often, better than +that of any other kind of clothing. Secondly, cotton is so liable to +take fire, that its use in the nursery and among little children seems +very hazardous. Thirdly, silk is not quite the appropriate material, as +a general thing, besides being too expensive; and fourthly, linen is +not warm enough, except in mid-summer. + +Except, therefore, in July and August, and in cases of idiosyncracy, +such as have just been alluded to, I would use flannel for the +under-clothes of young children, throughout the year. But whenever they +acquire sufficient strength to walk and run, and play much in the open +air, I would gradually lay aside the use of all flannel, even in winter. +Great attention, however, must be paid to the _quantity_. The parent +who, guided by this rule, should keep on her child the same amount of +flannel, and of the same thickness, from January to June 30th, and then, +on the first of July, should suddenly exchange it for thin linen, in +moderate quantity, might find trouble from it. It is better to make the +changes more gradually; otherwise, whatever may be the material of the +dress, the child will be likely to suffer. + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity._ + +The quantity of clothing used by different individuals of the same age, +in the same climate, possessing constitutions nearly alike, and +following similar occupations, is so different as to strike us with +surprise when we first observe the fact. + +One will wear nothing but a coarse linen or cotton shirt, coarse coat, +waistcoat, and pantaloons, and boots, in the coldest weather. He never, +unless it be on the Sabbath, puts on even a cravat, and never in any +case stockings or mittens. + +Another, in similar circumstances in all respects, constantly wears his +thick stockings, flannel wrapper and drawers, and cravat; and seldom +goes out, in cold weather, without mittens and an overcoat. He is not a +whit warmer: indeed he often suffers more from the cold, than his +neighbor who dresses in the manner just described. + +Why all this difference? It is no doubt the result of habit. Any +individual may accustom himself to much or little clothing. And the +earlier the habit is begun, the greater is its influence. + +Some persons, observing how little clothing one may accustom himself to +use and yet be comfortable, have told us, that so far as mere +temperature is concerned, we need no clothing at all. They relate the +story of the Scythian and Alexander. Alexander asked the former how he +could go without clothes in such a cold climate. He replied, by asking +Alexander how he could go with his face naked. "Habit reconciles us to +this;" was the reply. "Think me, then, _all_ face," said the Scythian. + +But admitting that certain individuals, and even a few rude tribes, +have gone without clothing; did they therefore follow, in this respect, +the intentions of nature? The greatest stickler for adhering to nature's +plan, cannot prove this. Analogy is against it. Most of the other +animals, even in hot climates, are furnished with a hairy covering from +the first; and in cold climates, the Author of their being has even +provided them with an increase of clothing for the winter. Their fur, on +the approach of cold weather, not only becomes whiter, and therefore +conducts the heat away from the body more slowly, but, as every dealer +in furs well understands, it becomes softer and thicker. And yet the +blood of the furred animals of cold countries is as warm as ours, if not +warmer. + +The inferences which it seems to me we ought to make from this are, that +if other animals require clothing, and even a change of clothing, so +does man; and that as the Creator has left him to provide, by his own +ingenuity, for a great many of his wants, instead of furnishing him with +instinct to direct him, so in relation to dress. And even if it could be +proved that dress were naturally unnecessary, with reference to +temperature, I should still defend its use on other principles. The few +speculative minds, therefore, that in the vagaries of their fancy, but +never in their practice, reject it, are not to be regarded. + +The principle laid down in the commencement of the chapter on +Temperature, is the great principle which should guide us in regard to +dress. But although we should always keep a little too cool rather than +a little too warm, it is by no means desirable to be cold. Any degree of +chilliness, long continued, interrupts the functions which the skin +ought to perform, and thus produces mischief. + +The same rules, in this respect, apply to eating, as well as to dress. +It is better to eat a little less than nature requires, than a little +more. It is a generally received opinion, however, that mankind +frequently, at least in this country, eat about twice as much as health +requires. This is owing to habit; and perhaps the power of the latter is +as great in this respect as in regard to dress. + +The great point in regard to food or dress is, to _begin_ right, and, +observing what nature requires--studying at the same time the testimony +of others--to endeavor to keep within the bounds she has assigned. It +has already been more than intimated, that if the nursery be kept in a +proper temperature, a single loose piece of dress is, for some time, all +that is required. In pursuance of this principle, through life, I +believe few persons would be found who would need more at one time than +a single suit of woollen clothes, even in the severest winters of our +northern climate. + +I have always observed that they who wear the greatest amount of +clothing, are most subject to colds. There are obvious reasons why it +should be so. This, then, if a fact, is one of the strongest reasons in +favor of acquiring a habit of going as thinly clad as we possibly can, +and not at the same time feel any inconvenience. + +But after all, whether it be winter or summer, we must vary our clothing +with the variations of the weather, as indicated by the thermometer, and +our own feelings. Sometimes, in our ever-changing and ever-changeable +climate, it may be necessary to vary our dress three or four times a +day. Some cry out against this practice as dangerous, but I have never +found it so. I have known persons who made it a constant practice; and I +never found that they sustained any injury from it, except the loss of a +little time; and the increase of comfort was more than enough to +compensate for that. There is one thing to be avoided, however, whether +we change our clothing--our linen especially--twice a day, or only twice +a week--which is, _dampness_. + + +SEC. 5. _Caps._ + +The practice of putting caps on infants is happily going by; and perhaps +it may be thought unnecessary for me to dwell a single moment on the +subject. But as the practice still prevails in some parts of the +country, it may be well to bestow upon it a few passing remarks. + +Many mothers have not considered that the circulation of the blood in +young infants is peculiarly active; that a large amount of blood is at +that period carried to the head; that in consequence of this, the head +is proportionably hotter than in adults; and that from this source +arises the tendency of very young children to brain-fever, dropsy in the +head, and other diseases of this part of the system. But these are most +undoubted facts. + +Hence one reason why the heads of infants should be kept as cool as +possible; and though a thin cap confines less heat than a thick head of +hair does when they are older, yet they are less able to bear it. The +truth is, that nature furnishes a covering for the head, just about as +fast as a covering is required, and the child's safety will permit. + +At the present day, few persons will probably be found, who will defend +the utility of caps, any longer than till the hair is grown. The +general apology for their use after this period, and indeed in most +instances before, is, that they look pretty. "What would people say to +see my darling without a cap?" + +But when the head is kept, from the first, totally uncovered, the hair +grows more rapidly, dandruff and other scurfy diseases rarely attack the +scalp; catarrh, snuffles, and other similar complaints, and above all, +dropsy in the head, seldom show themselves; and the period of cutting +teeth, that most dangerous period in the life of an infant, is passed +over with much more safety. + +"Nothing but custom," says a foreign writer, "can reconcile us to the +cap, with all its lace and trumpery ornaments, on the beautiful head of +a child; and I would ask any one to say candidly, whether he thinks the +children in the pictures of Titian and Raffaelle would be improved by +having their heads covered with caps, instead of the silken curls--the +adornment of nature--which cluster round their smiling faces. If there +were no other reason for disusing caps for infants, but the improvement +which it produces in the _appearance_ of the child, I would maintain +that this is a sufficient inducement." And I concur with him fully. + +As to the notion--now I hope nearly exploded--that it is necessary to +cover up the "open of the head," as it is called, nothing can be more +idle. This part of the head requires no more covering than any other +part; and if it did, all the dress in the world could not affect it in +the least, except to retard the growth of the bones, which, in due time, +ought to close up the space; and this effect, anything which keeps the +head too hot might help to produce. Of the folly of wetting the head +with spirits, or any other medicated lotions, and of making daily +efforts to bring it into shape, it is unnecessary to speak in the +present chapter. + + +SEC. 6. _Hats and Bonnets._ + +The hats worn in this country are almost universally too warm. But if it +is a great mistake in adults to wear thick, heavy hats, it is much more +so in the case of children. + +The infant in the nursery, as we have already seen, needs no covering of +the kind. It is absolutely necessary that the head should be kept as +cool as possible; and absolutely dangerous to cover it too warmly. At a +later period, however, the danger greatly diminishes, because the +circulation of the blood becomes more equal, and does not tend so much +towards the brain. + +Still, however, the head is hotter than the limbs, especially the hands +and feet; and I cannot help thinking that the hair is the only covering +which is perfectly safe, either in childhood or age; except in the +sunshine or in the storm. There may be--there probably is--some danger +in going without hat or bonnet in the hot sun; though I have known many +children, and some grown persons, who were constantly exposed in this +way, and yet appeared not to suffer from it. + +But this may be the proper place to state that we are ever in great +danger of deceiving ourselves on this subject. If the individuals who +follow practices usually regarded as pernicious, while their habits in +other respects are just like those of other persons around them who have +similar strength, &c. of constitution,--if these individuals, I say, +were wholly to escape disease, through life, or if they were to be so +much more free from it, and live to an age so much greater than others +as to constitute a striking and obvious difference in their favor, we +might then safely argue that the practices which they follow are at +least without dangers, if not of obvious advantage. But when we see them +beset with ills, like other people, it is not safe to pronounce their +habits favorable to health, since it is impossible to know whether some +of the ills which they suffer are not produced by them. + +These remarks are applicable to the disuse of any covering for the head +in the sun and in the rain. For you will find those who adopt this +practice from early infancy,[Footnote: I say, from early infancy; +because we may adopt the best habits in mature years, after our +constitutions have been broken up by error and vice, without effecting +anything more than to keep us from actually sinking at once. Indeed, in +most cases we ought not to expect more.] subject to as many diseases as +those around them with similar constitutions, but with habits somewhat +different; and as our diseases are generally the consequences of our +errors in one way or another, it is impossible to say with certainty +that some of them might not have arisen from exposure of the head. + +I should not hesitate, therefore, to advise all mothers to put a light +hat or bonnet on the heads of their children, whenever they are to be +exposed to the direct rays of the summer sun, or to the rain. And as we +cannot always foresee when and where these exposures will arise, and as +it is believed that these coverings, if light, will never be productive +of much injury while we are abroad in the open air, it will follow that +it is better to wear than to omit them. + +But while I contend for their use as consistent with health and sound +philosophy, I must not be understood as admitting the use of such hats +as are worn at present, even by children. They are, as I have said +before, too hot. What should be substituted, I am unable to determine; +but until something can be supplied, which would not be half so +oppressive as our common wool hats, I should regard it as the lesser +evil to omit them entirely. The danger of going bare-headed, if the +practice is commenced early, we know from the customs of some savage +nations, can never be very great. + + +SEC. 7. _Covering for the Feet._ + +The same reason for avoiding the use of any covering for the head, in +early infancy, is a sufficient reason for covering the feet well. For +just in proportion as the blood is sent to the head in superabundance, +and keeps up in it an undue degree of heat, just in the same proportion +is it sent to the feet in too _small_ a quantity, leaving these parts +liable to cold. Now it is a fundamental law with medical men, that the +feet ought to be kept warmer than the head, if possible; especially +while the child is very young, and exposed to brain diseases. + +So long, therefore, as children are young, and unable to exercise their +feet, stockings ought to be used, both in summer and winter; but I +prefer to have them short, unless long ones can be used without garters. +Everything in the shape of a garter or ligature round the limbs, body, +or neck of a child, except a single body-band, already mentioned in +another chapter, ought forever to be banished. + +It has often been objected, I know, that stockings will make the feet +tender. But as no child was ever hardened by _continued_ and severe cold +applied to any part of the body, but the contrary, so no one was ever +made more tender by being kept moderately warm. Excess of heat, like +excess of cold, will alike weaken either children or adults; but there +is little danger of heating the feet and legs of infants too much during +the first year of infancy. + +It is also said that stockings are apt to receive and retain wet. But as +I shall show in another place that wet clothes should be frequently +changed, this objection would be equally strong against wearing coats +and diapers. + +As to shoes, there is some variety of opinion among medical men. A few +hold that they cramp the feet, and prevent children from learning to +walk as early as they otherwise would. If it were best for children +that they should learn to walk as early as possible, the last objection +might have weight. But it seems to me not at all desirable to be in +haste about their walking. Indeed, I greatly prefer to retard their +progress, in this respect, rather than to hasten it. + +As to the first objection, that shoes cramp the feet too much, nearly +its whole force turns upon the question whether they are made of proper +materials or not. There is no need of making them of cow-hide, or any +other thick leather. The soles are the most important part. These will +defend the feet against pins, needles, and such other sharp substances +as are usually found on the floor; and the upper part of the shoe, so +long as the wearer remains in the nursery, may be made of the softest +and most yielding material--even of cloth. Infants' shoes should always +be made on two lasts, one for each foot. + +The philosopher Locke held, that in order to harden the young, their +shoes ought to be "so that they might leak and let in water, whenever +they came near it." There may be and probably is, no harm in having a +child wet his feet occasionally, provided he is soon supplied with dry +stockings again; but it is hazardous for either children or adults to go +too long in wet stockings, and especially to sit long in them, after +they have been using much active exercise. I am in favor of good, +substantial shoes and stockings for people of all ages and conditions, +and at all seasons; and believe it entirely in accordance with sound +economy and the laws of the human constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _Pins._ + +The custom of using ten or a dozen pins in the dressing of children, +ought by all means to be set aside. They not only often wound the skin, +but they have occasionally been known to penetrate the body and the +joints of the limbs. So many of these dreadful accidents occur, and +where no accident happens, so much pain is occasionally given by their +sharp points to the little sufferer, who cannot tell what the matter is, +that it is quite time the practice were abolished. + +Do you ask what can be substituted?--The following mode is adopted by +Dr. Dewees in his own family, as mentioned in his work on the "Physical +and Medical Treatment of Children," at page 86. + +"The belly-band and the petticoat have strings; and not a single pin is +used in their adjustment. The little shirt, which is always made much +larger than the infant's body, is folded on the back and bosom, and +these folds kept in their places by properly adjusting the body of the +petticoat: so far not a pin is used. The diaper requires one, but this +should be of a large size, and made to serve the double purpose of +holding the folds of this article, as well as keeping the belly-band in +its proper place; the latter having a small tag of double linen +depending from its lower margin, by which it is secured to the diaper, +by the same pin. + +"Should an extraordinary display of best 'bib and tucker' be required +upon any special occasion, a third pin may be admitted to ensure the +well-sitting of the 'frock' waist in front;--this last pin, however, is +applied externally; so that the risk of its getting into the child's +body is very small, even if it should become displaced." + +The writer from whom the last two paragraphs are taken, says be has seen +needles substituted for pins; and relates a long story of a child whose +life was well nigh destroyed in this manner. It underwent months of ill +health, and many moments of excruciating agony, before the cause of its +trouble was suspected. Sometimes its distress was so great that nothing +but large doses of laudanum, sufficient to stupify it, could afford the +least relief. At last a tumor was discovered by the attending physician, +near one of the bones on which we sit, and a needle was extracted two +inches long. The needle had been put in its clothes, and, by slipping +into the folds of the skin, had insinuated itself, unperceived, into the +child's body. It is pleasing to add, that, although the little sufferer +had now been ill seven or eight months, and had endured almost +everything but death,--fever, diarrhoea, and the most excruciating +pain,--it soon recovered. + +This shocking circumstance is enough, one would think, to deter every +mother or nurse, who becomes acquainted with it, from using needles in +infants' clothes. Happy would it be, if, in banishing needles, they +would contrive to banish pins also, and adopt either the plan of Dr. +Dewees, or one still more rational. + + +SEC. 9. _Remaining Wet._ + +On the subject of changing the wet clothing of a child, there is a +strange and monstrous error abroad; which is, that by suffering them to +remain wet and cold, we harden the constitution. The filthiness of this +practice is enough to condemn it, were there nothing else to be said +against it. + +It is insisted on by many, I know, that as water which is salt, when it +is applied to the skin, and suffered to remain long, while it secures +the point of hardening the child, prevents all possibility of its taking +cold, it hence follows, that wet diapers are not injurious. But this is +a mistake. Every time an infant is allowed to remain wet, we not only +endanger its taking cold, but expose it to excoriations of the skin, if +not to serious and dangerous inflammation. In short, if frequent changes +are not made, whatever some mothers and nurses may think, they may rest +assured, that the health of the child must sooner or later suffer as the +consequence. + +Nor is it enough to hang up a diaper by the fire, and, as soon as it is +dry, apply it again. It should be clean, as well as dry. Let us not be +told, that it is troublesome to wash so often. Everything is in a +certain sense troublesome. Everything in this world, which is worth +having, is the result of toil. Nothing but absolute poverty affords the +shadow of an excuse for neglecting anything which will promote the +health, or even the comfort of the tender infant. + +Of the impropriety and danger of suffering wet clothes to dry upon us, I +shall speak elsewhere; as well as of the evil of suffering children to +remain dirty,--their skins or their clothing. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on the Dress of Boys._ + +Whatever tends to disturb the growth of the body, or hinder the free +exercise of the limbs, during the infancy and childhood of both sexes +is injurious. And as every mother has the control of these things, I +have thought it desirable to append to this chapter a few thoughts on +the particular dress of each sex. I begin with that of boys. + +"Nothing can be more injurious to health," says a foreign writer, "than +the tight jacket, buttoned up to the throat, the well-fitted boots, and +the stiff stock." And his remarks are nearly as applicable to this +country as to England. The consequences of this preposterous method of +dressing boys, are diminutive manhood, deformity of person, and a +constitution either already imbued with disease, or highly susceptible +of its impression. + +No part of the modern dress of boys is more absurd, than the stiff +stock, or thick cravat. It is not only injurious by pressing on the +_jugular_ veins, and preventing the blood from freely passing out of the +head, but, by constantly pressing on the numerous and complex muscles of +the neck, at this period of life, it prevents their development; because +whatever hinders the action of the muscular parts, hinders their growth, +and makes them even appear as if wasted. + +It would be a great improvement, if this part of dress were wholly +discarded; and when is there so appropriate a time for setting it aside, +as _before we began to use it_; or rather while we are under the more +immediate care of our mothers? + +The use of jackets buttoned up to the throat, except in cold weather, is +objectionable; but this is very fortunately going out of fashion. + +Boots, if used at all, should fit well; to this there can be no possible +objection. What the writer, whom I have quoted, referred to, was +probably the tight boot, worn to prevent the foot from being large and +unseemly; but producing, as tight boots inevitably do, an injurious +effect upon the muscles, a constrained walk, and corns. + +What can be more painful, than to see little boys--yes, _little_ +boys--boys neither fifteen, nor twenty, nor twenty-five, walk as if they +were fettered and trussed up for the spit; unable to look down, or turn +their heads, on account of a thick stock, or two or three cravats piled +on the top of each other--and only capable of using their arms to dangle +a cane, or carry an umbrella, as they hobble along, perhaps on a hot +sun-shiny day in July or August? + +But this evil, you who are mothers, have it very generally in your power +to prevent, if you are only wise enough to secure that ascendancy over +your children's minds which the Author of their nature designed. At the +least, you can prevent it for a time--the most important period, too--by +your own authority. This you will not need any urging to induce you to +do, if you ever become thoroughly convinced of its pre-eminent folly. + + +SEC. 11. _On the Dress of Girls._ + +The same general principles which should guide the young mother in +regard to the dress of boys, are equally important and applicable in the +management of girls. The whole dress should, as much as possible, hang +loosely from the shoulders, without pressing on the body, or any part of +it. This, I say, is the grand point to be aimed at; and this is the only +great principle, whatever some mothers may think, which will lead to +true beauty of person, and gracefulness of gesture. + +There is, however, a slight difference to be made between the dress of +girls and that of boys. The greater delicacy of the female frame +requires that the surface of the body should be kept rather warmer, as +well as better protected from the vicissitudes of the atmosphere. + +But is this the fact? Is not the contrary true? While boys in the winter +are clad in warm woollen vestments, covering every part of their trunk, +many portions of the female frame, and especially many parts of their +limbs, are left so much exposed, that in cold weather you scarcely find +a girl abroad, who appears to be comfortable. + +Nay, they are not only uncomfortable abroad, but at home; and if I were +to present to mothers in detail, a tenth of the evils which their +daughters suffer from not adopting a warmer method of clothing, I should +probably be stared at by some, and laughed at by others. All this, too, +without speaking of going out of warm concert rooms, theatres, ball +rooms and lecture rooms, into the night air, or out of school rooms and +churches, to walk home with measured and stiffened pace, lest the sin +unpardonable of walking swiftly or RUNNING,--that active exercise which +health requires, which youthful feeling prompts, and which duty ought to +inspire,--should unwarily be committed. + +The tremendous evils of confining the lungs have been adverted to at +sufficient length. In reference to that general subject, I need only +add, that if the chest be not duly exercised and expanded, the liver, +the lungs, the stomach, digestion, absorption, circulation and +perspiration, are all hindered. And even so far as the various internal +organs of the body _are_ active, they act at a great disadvantage. The +blood which they "work up," is bad blood, and must be so, as long as the +lungs do not have free play. Hence may and do arise all sorts of +diseases; especially diseases of OBSTRUCTION; and such as are often very +difficult of removal. + +What can be a more pitiable sight than some modern girls going home from +school or church in winter? Thinly clad, the blood is all driven from +the surface upon the internal organs, and what remains is so loaded with +carbon, which the lungs ought but cannot discharge, that her skin has a +leaden hue; her teeth chatter; her very heart is chilled in her panting, +frozen bosom; she cannot run, and if she could, she must not, for it +would be vulgar! Every mother should shrink from the sight of such a +picture. + + + + +CHAPTER V. + +CLEANLINESS. + +Physiology of the human skin. Of checking perspiration. Diseases thus +produced. "Dirt" not "healthy." How the mistake originated. "Smell of +the earth." Effect of uncleanliness on the morals. Filthiness produces +bowel complaints. Changing dress for the sake of cleanliness. + + +No mother will ever pay that attention to cleanliness which its +importance to health and happiness demands, till she perceives its +necessity. And she will never perceive that necessity till she has +studied attentively the machinery of the human frame--and especially its +wonderful covering. + +The skin is pierced with little openings or _pores_, so numerous that +some have reckoned them at a million to every square inch. At all +events, they are so small that the naked eye can neither distinguish nor +count them; and so numerous, that we cannot pierce the skin with the +finest needle without hitting one or more of them. + +When we are in perfect health, and the skin clean, a gentle moisture or +mist continually oozes through these pores. This process is called +_perspiration_; and the moisture which thus escapes, the _matter_ of +perspiration. + +Perspiration may be checked in two ways. 1. by filth on the skin; 2. by +what is commonly called taking cold--for taking cold essentially +consists in chilling the skin to such a degree as to stop, for some +time, the escape of this moisture. Most persons have doubtless observed, +that in the first stages of a cold, they frequently have a very dry +skin. Whereas, when we are in health, the skin usually feels moist. + +Our health is not only endangered, and a foundation laid for fevers, +rheumatisms, and consumptions, by stopping the pores of the skin with +dirt, or anything else, but there is also danger from another and a very +different source. + +The blood, in its circulation through the body, is constantly becoming +impure; and as it thus comes back impure to the heart, is as constantly +sent to the lungs, where it comes in close contact with the air which we +breathe, and is purified. But this same purifying process which goes on +in the lungs, goes on, too, if the skin is in a pure, free, healthy +condition, all over the surface of the body. If it is not--if the skin +cannot do this part of the work--an additional burden is thus laid on +the lungs, which in this way soon become so overworked, that they +cannot perform their own proportion of the labor. And whenever this +happens, the health must soon suffer. + +The strange belief, that "dirt is healthy," has much influence on the +daily practice of thousands of those who are ignorant of the human +structure, and the laws which govern and regulate the animal economy. It +has probably originated in the well-known fact, that those children who +are allowed to play in the dirt, are often as healthy--and even _more_ +healthy--than those who are confined to the nursery or the parlor. + +Now, while it is admitted that this is a very common case, it is yet +believed that the former class of children would be still more vigorous +than they now are, if they were kept more cleanly, or were at least +frequently washed. It is not the dirt which promotes their health, but +their active exercise in the open air; the advantages of which are more +than sufficient to compensate for the injury which they sustain from the +dirt. That is to say, they retain, in spite of the dirt, better health +than those who are denied the blessings of pure air and abundant +exercise, and subjected to the opposite extreme of almost constant +confinement. + +There is something deceitful, after all, in the ruddy, blooming +appearance of those children who are left by the busy parent to play in +the road or field, without attention to cleanliness. If this were not +so, how comes it to pass that they suffer much more, not only from +chronic, but from acute diseases, than children whose parents are in +better circumstances? + +I am the more solicitous to combat a belief in the salutary tendency of +an unclean skin, because I know it prevails to some extent; and because +I know also, both from reason and from fact, that it is a gross error. + +It is, however, true, that years sometimes intervene, before the evil +consequences of dirtiness appear. The office of the vessels of the skin +being interrupted, an increase of action is imposed on other parts, +especially on those internal organs commonly called glands, which action +is apt to settle into obstinate disease. Hence, at least when aided by +other causes, often arise, in later life, after the source of the evil +is forgotten, if it were ever suspected, rheumatism, scrofula, jaundice, +and even consumption. + +There is a strange notion abroad, that the _smell_ of the earth is +beneficial, especially to consumptive persons. I honestly believe, +however, that it is more likely to create consumption than to cure it. +Besides, in what does this smell consist? Do the silex, the alumine, and +the other earths, with their compounds, emit any odor? Rarely, I +believe, unless when mixed with vegetable matter. But no gases +necessary to health are evolved during the decomposition of vegetable +matter; on the contrary, it is well known that many of them tend to +induce disease. + +I am thoroughly persuaded that too much attention cannot be paid to +cleanliness; and the demand for such attention is equally imperious in +the case of those who cultivate the earth, or labor in it, or on stone, +during the intervals of their useful avocations, as in the case of those +individuals who follow other employments. + +I must also protest against the doctrine, that the smell or taste of the +earth, much less a coat of it spread over the surface, and closing up, +for hours and days together, thousands and millions of those little +pores with which the Author of this "wondrous frame" has pierced the +skin, can have a salutary tendency. + +The opinion has been even maintained, that uncleanly habits are not only +unfavorable to health, but to morality. There can be no doubt that he +who neglects his person and dress will be found lower in the scale of +morals, other things being equal, than he who pays a due regard to +cleanliness. + +Some have supposed that a disposition to neglect personal cleanliness +was indicative of genius. But this opinion is grossly erroneous, and +has well nigh ruined many a young man. + +I am far from recommending any degree of fastidiousness on this subject. +Truth and correct practice usually lie between extremes. But I do and +must insist, that the connection between cleanliness of body and purity +of moral character, is much more close and direct than has usually been +supposed. + +But to return to the more immediate effects of cleanliness on health. +There is one class of diseases in particular which, in an eminent +degree, owe their origin to a neglect of cleanliness. I refer to the +bowel complaints so common among children during summer and autumn. +Except in case of teething, the use of unripe fruits, or the _abuse_ of +those which are in themselves excellent, it is probable that more than +half of the bowel complaints of the young are either produced or greatly +aggravated by a foul skin. + +The importance of washing the whole body in water will be insisted on in +the chapter on Bathing; it is therefore unnecessary to say anything +farther on that subject in this place, except to observe that whether +the washings of the body be partial or general, they should be thorough, +so far as they are carried. There are thousands of children who, in +pretending to wash their hands and face, will do little more than wet +the inside of their hands, and the tips of their noses and ears unless +great care is taken. + +Few things are more important than suitable changes of dress. There are +those, who, from principle, never wear the same under-garment but one +day without washing, either in summer or winter; and there are others +who, though they may wear an article without washing two or three +successive days, take care to change their dress at night--never +sleeping in a garment which they have worn during the day. + +It is a very common objection to suggestions like these, that they will +do very well for those who have wealth, but not for the poor;--that +_they_ have neither the time nor the means of attending to them. How can +they change their clothes every day? we are asked. And how can they +afford to have a separate dress for the night? + +There must be retrenchment in some other matters, it is admitted. In +order to find time for more washing, or money to pay others for the +labor, the poor must deny themselves a few things which they now +suppose, if they have ever thought at all on the subject, are conducive +to their happiness--but which are in reality either useless or +injurious. Something may be saved by a reasonable dress, as I have +already shown. Other items of expense, which might be spared with great +advantage to health and happiness, and applied to the purpose in +question, will be mentioned in the chapter on Food and Drink. + + + + +CHAPTER VI. + +ON BATHING. + +Danger of savage practices. Rousseau. Cold water at birth. First washing +of the child. Rules. Temperature. Bathing vessels. Unreasonable fears. +Whims. Views of Dr. Dewees. Hardening. Rules for the cold bath. Securing +a glow. Coming out of the bath. Local baths. Shower bath. Vapor bath. +Sponging. Neglect of bathing. The Romans. Treatment of children compared +with that of domestic animals. + + +Some of the hardy nations of antiquity, as well as a few savage tribes +of modern times, have been accustomed to plunge their new-born infants +into cold water. This is done for the two-fold purpose of washing and +hardening them. + +To all who reason but for a moment on this subject, the danger of such a +practice must be obvious. So sudden a change from a temperature of +nearly 100 of Fahrenheit to one quite low, perhaps scarcely 40, must +and does have a powerful effect on the nervous system even of an adult; +but how much more on that of a tender infant? We may form some idea of +this, by the suddenness and violence of its cries, by the sudden +contractions and relaxations of its limbs and body, and by its +palpitating heart and difficult breathing. + +Every one's experience may also remind him, that what produces at best a +momentary pain to himself, cannot otherwise than be painful to the +infant. In making a comparison between adults and infants, however, in +this respect, we should remember that the lungs of the infant do not get +into full and vigorous action until some time after birth; and that, on +this account, the hold they have on life is so feeble, that any powerful +shock, and especially that given by the cold bath, is ten times more +dangerous to them than to adults, or even to infants themselves, after a +few months have elapsed. + +It is surprising to me that so sensible a writer as Rousseau generally +is on education, should have encouraged this dangerous practice; and +still more so that many fathers even now, blinded by theory, should +persist in it, notwithstanding the pleadings of the mother or the nurse, +and the plainest dictates of common sense and common prudence.[Footnote: +Nothing is intended to be said here, which shall encourage unthinking +nurses or mothers in setting themselves against measures which have been +prescribed by higher authority,--I mean the physician. There are cases +of this kind, where it requires all the resolution which a father, +uninterrupted, can summon to his aid, to administer a dose or perform a +task, on which he knows the existence of his child may be depending: but +when the thoughtless entreaties of the mother or nurse are interposed, +it makes his condition most distressing. Mothers, in such cases, ought +to encourage rather than remonstrate. They who _do not_, are guilty of +cruelty, and--perhaps--of infanticide.] + +A child plunged into cold water at birth, by those whose theories carry +them so far as to do it even in the coldest weather, has sometimes been +twenty-four hours in recovering, notwithstanding the most active and +judicious efforts to restore it. In other instances the results have +been still more distressing. Dr. Dewees is persuaded that he has "known +death itself to follow the use of cold water," in this way--I believe he +means _immediate_ death--and adds, with great confidence, that he has +"repeatedly seen it require the lapse of several hours before reaction +could establish itself; during which time the pale and sunken cheeks and +livid lips declared the almost exhausted state" of the infant's +excitability.[Footnote: "Dewees on children" p. 72.] + +We need not hesitate to put very great confidence in the opinion here +expressed; for besides being a close and just observer of human nature, +Dr. D. has had the direction and management, in a greater or less +degree, of several thousands of new-born infants. + +Nothing, indeed, in the whole range of physical education, seems better +proved, than that while some few infants, whose constitutions are +naturally very strong, are invigorated by the practice in question, +others, in the proportion of hundreds for one, who are _less_ robust, +are injured for life; some of them seriously. + +Nor will spirits added to the water make any material difference. I am +aware that there is a very general notion abroad, that the injurious +effects of cold water, in its application both internally and +externally, are greatly diminished by the addition of a little spirit; +but it is not so. Does the addition of such a small quantity of spirit +as is generally used in these cases, materially alter the temperature? +Is it not the application of a cold liquid to a heated surface, still? +Can we make anything else of it, either more or less? + +I do not undertake to say, that the cold bath may not be so managed in +the progress of infancy, as to make it beneficial, especially to strong +constitutions. It is its indiscriminate application to all new-born +children, without regard to strength of constitution, or any other +circumstances, that I most strenuously oppose. Of its occasional use, +under the eye of a physician, and by parents who will discriminate, I +shall say more presently. + +Our first duty on receiving a new inhabitant of the world is, to see +that it is gently but thoroughly washed, in moderately warm soft water, +with fine soap. Special attention should be paid to the folds of the +joints, the neck, the arm pits, &c. For rubbing the body, in order to +disengage anything which might obstruct the pores, or irritate or fret +the skin, nothing can be preferable to a piece of soft sponge or +flannel. Though the operation should be thorough, and also as rapid as +the nature of circumstances will permit, all harshness should be +avoided. When finished, the child should be wiped perfectly dry with +soft flannel. + +While the washing is performed, the temperature of the room should be +but a few degrees lower than that of the water; and the child should not +be exposed to currents of cold air. If the weather is severe, or if +currents of air in the room cannot otherwise be avoided, the dressing, +undressing, washing, &c., may be done near the fire. And I repeat the +rule, it should always be done with as much rapidity as is compatible +with safety. + +Here will be seen one great advantage of simplicity in the form of +dress. If the more rational suggestions of our chapter on that subject +are attended to, it will greatly facilitate the process of washing, and +the subsequent daily process of bathing, which I am about to recommend +to my readers. + +This washing process is also an introduction to bathing. For it should +be repeated every day; but with less and less attention to the washing, +and more and more reference to the bathing. How long the child should +stay in the bath, must be left to experience. If he is quiet, fifteen +minutes can never be too long; and I should not object to twenty. If +otherwise, and you are obliged to remove him in five minutes, or even in +three, still the bathing will be of too much service to be dispensed +with. + +Nothing should be mixed with the water, if the infant is healthy, except +a little soap, as already mentioned. Some are fond of using salt; but it +is by no means necessary, and may do harm. + +The proper hour for bathing is the early part of the day, or about the +middle of the forenoon. This season is selected, because the process, +manage it as carefully as we may, is at first a little exhausting. As +the child grows older, however, and not only becomes stronger, but +appears to be actually refreshed and invigorated by the bath, it will be +advisable to defer it to a later and later hour. By the time the babe is +three months old, particularly in the warm season, the hour of bathing +may be at sunset. + +The degree of heat must be determined, in part, by observing its effect +on the child; and in part by a thermometer. For this, and for other +purposes, a thermometer, as I have already more than hinted, is +indispensable in every nursery. Our own sensations are often at best a +very unsafe guide. There is one rule which should always be +observed--never to have the temperature of the bath below that of the +air of the room. If the thermometer show the latter to be 70, the bath +should be something like 80; perhaps with feeble children, rather more. + +Great care ought always to be taken to proportion the air of the room +and the water of the bath to each other. If, for example, the +temperature of the room have been, for some time, unusually warm, that +of the water must not be so low as if it had been otherwise. On the +contrary, if the room have been, for a considerable time, rather cool, +the bath may be made several degrees cooler than in other circumstances. +But in no case and in no circumstances must a _warm_ bath--intended as +such, simply--be so warm or so cold, as to make the child uncomfortable; +whether the temperature be 70, 80, or 90. + +It is hardly necessary to add, that in bathing a young child, the vessel +used for the purpose should be large enough to give free scope to all +the motions of its extremities. Most children are delighted to play and +scramble about in the water. I know, indeed, that the contrary sometimes +happens; but when it does, it is usually--I do not say _always_--because +the countenances of those who are around express fear or apprehension; +for it is surprising how early these little beings learn to decipher our +feelings by our very countenances. + +Some of our readers may be surprised at the intimation that there are +mothers and nurses who have fears or apprehensions in regard to the +effects of the warm bath; but others--and it is for such that I write +this paragraph--will fully understand me. I have been often surprised at +the fact, but it is undoubted, that there is a strong prejudice against +warm bathing, in many parts of the country. In endeavoring to trace the +cause, I have usually found that it arose from having seen or heard of +some child who died soon after its application. I have had many a parent +remonstrate with me on the danger of the warm bath; and this, too, in +circumstances when it appeared to me, that the child's existence +depended, under God, on that very measure. Perhaps it is useless in such +cases, however, to reason with parents on the subject. The medical +practitioner must do his duty boldly and fearlessly, and risk the +consequences. + +But as I am writing, not for persons under immediate excitement, but for +those that may be reasoned with, it is proper to say, that in medicine, +the warm bath is so often used in extreme cases, and as a last resort, +even when death has already grasped, or is about to fix his grasp on the +sufferer, that it would be very strange if many persons _did not_ die, +just after bathing. But that the bathing itself ever produced this +result, in one case in a thousand, there is not the slightest reason for +believing. [Footnote: Let me not be understood as intimating that, the +general neglect of bathing, of which I complain so loudly, is _chiefly_ +owing to this unreasonable prejudice, though this no doubt has its sway. +On the contrary, I believe it is much oftener owing to ignorance, +indolence, and parsimony.] + +There are many more whims connected with bathing, as with almost +everything else, which it were equally desirable to remove. Some nurses +and mothers think that if the child's skin is wiped dry after bathing, +it will impair, if not destroy, the good effects of the operation. +Others still, shocking to relate, will even put it to bed in its wet +clothes; this, too, from principle. Not unlike this, is the belief, very +common among adults, that if we get our clothes wet--even our +stockings--we must, by all means, suffer them to dry on us; a belief +which, in its results, has sent thousands to a premature grave--and, +what is still worse, made invalids, for life, of a still greater number. + +I am aware, that in rejecting the indiscriminate cold bathing of +infants, I am treading on ground which is rather unpopular, even with +medical men; a large proportion of whom seem to believe that the +practice may be useful. But I am not _wholly_ alone. Dr. Dewees--of +whose large experience I have already spoken--and some others, do not +hesitate to avow similar sentiments. + +The objections of Dr. Dewees to cold bathing are the following. 1. There +often exists a predisposition to disease, which cold bathing is sure to +rouse to action. Or if the disease have already begun to affect the +system, the bath is sure to aggravate it. 2. Some children have such +feeble constitutions that they are sure to be permanently weakened by +it, rather than invigorated. 3. To those in whom there is the tendency +of a large quantity of blood to the head, lungs, liver, &c., it is +injurious. 4. In some, the shock produces a species of syncope, or +catalepsy. 5. The _reaction_, as shown by the heat which follows the +cold bath, is, in some cases, so great as to produce a degree of fever, +and consequent debility. 6. It never answers the purposes of +cleanliness--one great object of bathing--so well as the warm bath. 7. +It is always unpleasant or painful to the child; especially at first. 8. +It sometimes produces severe pain in the bowels. + +This is a very formidable list of objections; and certainly deserves +consideration. There is one statement made by Dr. D. in the progress of +his remarks on this subject, in which I do not concur. He says--"The +object of all bathing is to remove impurities arising from dust, +perspiration, &c., from the surface; that the skin may not be obstructed +in the performance of its proper offices." + +But the object of cold bathing, with many, is to _harden_; consequently +it is not true that cleanliness is the _only object_. If he means, even, +that cleanliness is the only _legitimate_ object of all bathing, I shall +still be compelled to dissent. + +If the cold bath could be used, always, by and with the direction of a +skilful physician, I believe its occasional use might be rendered +salutary. And although as it is now commonly used, I believe its effects +are almost anything but salutary, I do not deny that if its use were +cautiously and gradually begun, and judiciously conducted, it might be +the means of making children who are already robust, still more hardy +and healthy than before, and better able to resist those sudden changes +of temperature so common in our climate, and so apt to produce cold, +fever, and consumption. + +Cold bathing, in the hands of those who are ignorant of the laws of the +human frame--and such unfortunately and unaccountably most fathers and +mothers are--I cannot help regarding as a highly dangerous weapon; and +therefore it is, that in view of the whole subject, I cannot recommend +its general and indiscriminate use. + +If there are individuals, however, who are determined to employ it, in +the case of their more vigorous children, and without the advice or +direction of their family physician, I beg them to attend to the +following rules or principles, expressed as briefly as possible. + +In no ordinary case whatever, is the cold bath useful, unless it is +succeeded by that degree of warmth on the surface of the body which is +usually called a _glow_. This is a leading and important principle. The +contrary, that is, the injurious effects of cold bathing--its +_immediate_ bad effects, I mean--are shown by the skin remaining pale +and shrivelled after coming out of the bath, by its blue appearance, and +by its coldness, as well as by a sunken state of the eyes, and much +general languor. + +To secure this point--I mean the GLOW--it is indispensably important to +begin the use of cold water gradually; that is, to use it at first of +so high a temperature as to produce only a slight sensation of cold, and +to take special care that the skin be immediately wiped very dry, and +the temperature of the room be quite as high as usual. Afterward the +water may be cooled gradually, from week to week, though never more than +a degree or two at once. + +It will probably be unsafe to commence this practice of cold +bathing--even in the case of the most robust children--until they are at +least six months of age. + +The appropriate season will be the middle of the forenoon, the hour when +the system is usually the most vigorous, and at which we shall be most +likely to secure a reaction. At first, twice or three times a week are +as often as it will be safe to repeat it. Some writers recommend it +twice a day; but once is enough, under any ordinary circumstances. + +The method at first is, to give the infant a single plunge. Afterward, +when he becomes older, and more inured to it, he may be plunged several +times in succession. + +On taking him out of the bath, the skin should be wiped perfectly dry, +as in the case of the warm bath, and with the same or an increased +degree of attention to other circumstances--the temperature of the +room, the avoiding currents of air, &c. He should next be put in a soft, +warm blanket, and be kept for some time in a state of gentle motion; and +after a little time, should be dressed. + +I have already mentioned the importance of avoiding the manifestation of +fear, when we bathe a child; and the caution is particularly necessary +in the administration of the cold bath. Some writers even recommend, +that during the whole process of undressing, bathing, exercising, and +dressing, singing should be employed. There is philosophy in this +advice, and it is easily tried; but I cannot speak of it from +experience. + +There is one thing which may serve to calm our apprehensions--if we have +any--of danger; which is, that though the child's lungs are feeble at +first, from their not having been, like the heart, accustomed to +previous action, yet when they get fairly into motion and action, and +the child is a few months old, they are probably as strong, if not +stronger, in proportion, than those of adults. + +Bathing in cold water should never be performed immediately after a full +meal. Neither is it desirable to go to the contrary extreme, and bathe +when the stomach has been long empty; nor when the child's mental or +bodily powers are more than usually exhausted by fatigue. + +Although I have given these rules for those who are determined to use +the cold bath with their children, yet, for fear I shall be +misunderstood, I must be suffered to repeat, in this place, that, +uninformed as people generally are in regard to physiology, I cannot +advise even its moderate use. On the contrary, I would gladly dissuade +from it, as most likely, in the way it would inevitably be used, to do +more harm than good. + +There is no sort of objection to what might be called local bathing with +cold water. If the child's head is hot at any time, the temples, and +indeed the whole upper part of the head, may be very properly wet with +moderately cold water--taking care to avoid wetting the clothes. But +avoid, by all means, the common but foolish practice of putting spirits +in the water. + +A tea-spoonful of cold water cannot be too early put into the mouth of +the infant. The object is to cleanse or rinse the mouth; and the process +may be aided by wiping it out with a piece of soft linen rag. If a part +or all of the water should be swallowed, no harm will be done. This +practice, commenced almost as soon as children are born, has saved many +a sore mouth. + +There are other forms of bathing besides those already mentioned; among +which are the shower bath, the vapor bath, and the medicated bath. The +shower bath--for which purpose the water is commonly used cold--is but +poorly adapted to the wants of infants. The shock is much greater than +the common cold bath, and more apt to frighten; and fear is unfavorable +to reaction, or the production of a genial glow. + +The vapor bath is much better; and probably has quite as good an effect +as the common warm bath. The trouble and expense of procuring the +necessary apparatus is somewhat greater, however, as a mere bathing tub +costs but little, and can be made by every father who possesses common +ingenuity. But whatever may be the expense, it is indispensable in every +family; and whenever the pores of the skin are obstructed, a vapor +bathing apparatus is equally desirable. + +The medicated vapor bath is sometimes used; but I am not now treating of +infants who are sick, but of those who are in a state of health. + +The common warm bath is sometimes medicated by putting in salt. This, of +course, renders the water more stimulating to the skin; but except when +the perspiration is checked, or the skin peculiarly inactive from some +other cause--in other words, unless we are sick--it is seldom expedient +to use it. + +There is one substitute for the bathing tub, in the case of the cold +bath. I refer to the use of a wet cloth or sponge, applied rapidly to +the whole surface of the body. When this is done, the skin should be +wiped thoroughly dry immediately afterwards, as in the case of complete +immersion. + +The application of either a cloth or a sponge, filled with warm water, +to the skin, in this manner, even if continued for several minutes +together, is less efficacious than a continuous immersion. I repeat +it--no family ought to be without conveniences for bathing in warm water +daily. I speak now of every member of the family, young and old, as well +as the infant; and I refer particularly to the summer season: though I +do not think the practice ought to be wholly discontinued during the +winter. + +It will still be objected that this care of, and attention to the young, +in reference to health--this provision for bathing daily, and care to +see that it is performed--can never be afforded by the laboring portion +of the community. But I shall as strenuously insist on the contrary; and +trust I shall, in the sequel, produce reasons which will be +satisfactory. + +The great difficulty is, to convince parents that these things are +vastly more productive of health and happiness to their children--more +truly necessaries--than a great many things for which they now expend +their time and money. There is, and always has been--except, perhaps, +among the Jews, in the earliest periods of the history of that wonderful +nation--a strange disposition to overlook the happiness of the young. It +is not necessary to represent this dereliction as peculiar to modern +times, for we find traces of the same thing thousands of years ago. + +The Roman emperors--Dioclesian in particular--could make provision for +bathing, to an extent which now astonishes us; but for whom? For whom, I +repeat it, was incurred the enormous expense of fitting up and keeping +in repair accommodations for bathing at once 18,000 people? For adults; +and for adults alone. I do not say that children were not admitted, in +any case; but I say they were not contemplated in these arrangements. +Nothing was done--not a single thing--that would not have been done, had +there been no child under ten years of age in the whole empire. + +And what better than this do WE, now? We make provision for the +happiness of the adult. The most indigent person will find time and +money to spend for the gratification of his own senses, his pride, or +his curiosity; but his children--they may be overlooked! Or, if he has +an eye to the future happiness of his child, he conceives that he is +promoting it in the best possible degree, by endeavoring to lay up a few +dollars for his use, after his character is formed--at a period, as it +too often happens, when money will do him little good, since it can +neither purchase health, peace of mind, nor reputation. + +Far be it from me to say, that the poor--ground into the dust as they +are, by the force of circumstances operating with their own concurrence, +to make them ignorant, vicious, or miserable--can do for their children +all that is desirable. By no means. But they have it in their power to +do much more than they are at present doing. They have it in their +power, at least, to use the same good sense in the management of the +human being that they do in that of a pig, a calf, or a colt, or even a +young vegetable. No parent, let him be ever so poor, is found in the +habit of neglecting either of these in proportion to its infancy, and of +exerting himself only in proportion as it grows older. Common sense +tells him that the contrary is the true course; that however poor he may +be, he will be still poorer, if he do not take special pains with the +young animal, to rear it and with the young vegetable, to give it the +right direction, by keeping down the weeds, and pruning and watering it. +And I say again, that however deserving of censure the wealthy of a +Christian community may be in not directing the ignorant and vicious +into the right path, and in not expending more of their wealth on those +who are poor, in elevating their minds and their manners, and promoting +their health, still the latter are inexcusable for their present neglect +of their infant offspring, while they would not think of neglecting, on +the same principle, the offspring of their domestic animals. + + + + +CHAPTER VII. + +FOOD. + +SEC. 1. General principles.--SEC. 2. Conduct of the mother.--SEC. 3. +Nursing--rules in regard to it.--SEC. 4. Quantity of food. Errors. +Over-feeding. Gluttony.--SEC. 5. How long should milk be the child's +only food?--SEC. 6 Feeding before teething. Cow's milk. Sucking bottles. +Cleanliness. Nurses.--SEC. 7. Treatment from teething to weaning.--SEC. +8. Process of weaning-rules in regard to it.--SEC. 9. First food to be +used after weaning. Importance of good bread. Other kinds of food.--SEC. +10. Remarks on fruit.--SEC. 11. Evils and dangers of confectionary.--SEC. +12. Mischiefs of pastry.--SEC. 13. Crude and raw substances. + + +SEC. 1. _General Principles._ + +The mother's milk, in suitable quantity, and under suitable regulations, +is so obviously the appropriate food of an infant during the first +months of its existence, that it seems almost unnecessary to repeat the +fact. And yet the violations of this rule are so numerous and constant, +as to require a few passing remarks. + +There are some mothers who seem to have a perfect hatred of children; +and if they can find any plausible apology for neglecting to nurse them, +they will. Few, indeed, will publicly acknowledge a state of feeling so +unnatural; but there are some even of such. On the latter, all argument +would, I fear, be utterly lost. Of the former, there may, be hope. + +They tell us--and they are often sustained by those around them--that it +is very inconvenient to be so confined to a child that they cannot leave +home for a little while. Can it be their duty--for in these days, when +virtue and religion, and everything good, are so highly complimented, no +people are more ready to talk of _duty_ than they who have the least +regard to it--can it be their duty, they ask, to exclude themselves from +the pleasures and comforts of social life for half or two thirds of +their most active and happy years? Ought they not to go abroad, at least +occasionally? But if so, and their children have no other source of +dependence, must they not suffer? Is it not better, therefore, that they +should be early accustomed to other food, for a part of the time? +Besides, they may be sick; and then the child must rely on others; and +will it not be useful to accustom it early to do so? + +Perhaps few mothers are conscious that this train of reasoning passes +through their minds. But that something like it is often made the +occasion of substituting food which is less proper, for that furnished +by Divine Providence, there cannot be a doubt. And the mischief is, that +she who has gone so far, will not scruple, ere long, to go farther. And, +strange and unnatural as it may seem, that mothers should turn over +their children to be nursed wholly by others, in order to get rid of the +inconvenience of nursing them at their own bosoms, it is only carrying +out to its fullest extent, and reducing to practice, the train of +reasoning mentioned above. + +Nor is it necessary that I should stop here to denounce a course of +conduct so unchristian and savage. I know it is very common in some +countries; and those American mothers who ape the other eastern +fashions, or countenance their sons and daughters in doing it, will not +be slow to imitate this also--especially as it is a very _convenient_ +fashion. And I question whether I shall succeed in reasoning them out of +it. Habit, both of thought and action, is exceedingly powerful. I will, +therefore, confine myself chiefly to those efforts at prevention, from +which much more is to be hoped, in the present state of society, than +from direct attempts at cure. + +It will be soon enough to leave a child with another person, when the +mother is actually sick, or unavoidably absent; or when some other +adequate cause is known to exist. We are to be governed, in these and +similar cases, by general rules, and not by exceptions. The general +rule, in the present case, is, that mothers can nurse their own +children; and, if they have the proper disposition, that they can do it +uninterruptedly. + +But those who are so ready to become counsellors on these occasions, +will tell us, perhaps, that the child must be "fed to spare the mother." +That is to say, nursing weakens the mother, and the child must be taken +away, a part of the time, to save her strength. + +Now it may safely be doubted whether the process of nursing, in itself +considered, does weaken, at all. The Author of nature has made provision +for the secretion (formation) of the milk, whether the child receives it +or not. If it is not taken by the child, or drawn off in some other way, +one of two things must follow;--either it must be taken up by what are +called absorbent vessels, and carried into the circulation, and chiefly +thrown out of the system as waste matter, or it will prove a source of +irritation, if not of inflammation, to the organs themselves which +secrete it. In both cases, the strength of the mother is quite as likely +to be taxed, as if the child received the milk in the way that nature +intended. + +Besides, on this very principle, the plan of saving a mother's strength +by requiring another to nurse for her, is but saying that we will weaken +one person to save another. Or if we feed the child, to "spare its +mother," what is this, in practice, but to say that the works of the +Creator are very imperfect; and that he has thrown upon the mass of +mankind a task to which they are not equal? For the mass of mankind are +poor; and the poor, having neither the means nor the time to escape the +duties in question, must submit to them, while their more wealthy +neighbors escape. + +But it is idle to defend customs so monstrous. They admit of no defence +that has the slightest claim to solidity. The general rule then is, that +mothers should nurse their own children. + + +SEC. 2. _Conduct of the Mother._ + +Originally it was not my intention to give directions, in this volume, +in regard to the food, drink, &c., of the mother while nursing; but +repeated solicitations on this point, have led me to the conclusion that +a few general principles may be very properly introduced. + +The future health, and even the moral well-being of the child, depend +much more on the proper management of the mother herself than is usually +supposed. How, indeed, can it be other wise? How can the mother's blood +be constantly irritated with improper food and drink, without rendering +the milk so? And how can a child draw, daily and hourly, from this +feverish fountain, without being affected, not only in his physical +frame, but in his very temper and feelings? + +It is not enough that we adopt the principles already insisted on by +some of our wisest medical men, and even by one or two medical +societies,[Footnote: Those of Connecticut and New Hampshire.] that +children in this way often acquire a propensity for exciting drinks, +that may end in their downright intemperance. What if it should not, in +every case, proceed quite so far as to make the child a drunkard? If it +but lays the foundation of a constitutional fondness for _excitements_, +it tends to disease. Indeed that, in itself, is a disease; and one, too, +which is destroying more persons every year than the cholera, or even +the consumption. Consumption has at most only slain her tens of +thousands [Footnote: About 40,000 a year, in the United States, as nearly +as it can be estimated.] a year; but a fondness for exciting food and +drink--innocent and harmless as it is often supposed to be, and +therefore only the more dangerous a foe--does not fail to slay every +year, directly or indirectly, its hundreds of thousands. At least this +is my own opinion. + +Why, where can you find the individual who is not a slave to this +perpetual rage within--this perpetual cry, "Who will show us any" +physical "good"? Who, in this land of abundance, will eat or drink plain +things? Who will eat simple bread, meat, potatoes, rice, pudding, +apples, &c. or drink simple water? A few instances may be found, of +late, in which people confine themselves to simple water for drink; but +they are rather rare. And no wonder. They _must_ be rare so long as an +unnatural thirst is kept up everywhere by the most exciting and most +strange mixtures of food. Where, I again ask, is the person who will eat +and relish plain bread, plain meat, plain puddings, &c.? Certainly not +in the nursery. No young mother--scarcely one I mean--will, for a single +meal, confine herself to a piece of bread, the sweetest and best food in +the whole world, unless it is hot, or toasted, or soaked, or buttered. A +natural, healthy appetite, is as rare a thing on our planet, almost, as +an inhabitant of the sun or moon. + +I have seen more than one mother made sick by using, while nursing, +improper food and drink. I have known milk punch, taken by +stealth--(because how could the mother, it was said, ever have a supply +of food for her poor child without it!)--to kindle a fever that came +very near burning up the mother and child both. And yet, if I have once +or twice succeeded in convincing the mother that she was only suffering +the natural punishment of her own transgressions, I have never, so far +as I now recollect, succeeded in making her believe that her iniquities +were visited upon her unoffending infant. + +There is everywhere the most painful apathy on this most painful +subject. We see little children of all ages, everywhere, the victims of +debility, and pain, and suffering, and disease and death, and yet we +very seldom seem to search for one moment for the causes of this +premature destruction. In fact most parents--even many intelligent +mothers--at once stare, if you attempt to inquire into the causes of +their child's death, as if it was either a kind of sacrilege, or an +impeachment of their own parental affection. Diseases, even at this day, +with the sun of science blazing in meridian splendor, they seem to +regard as the judgments of heaven; and to think of tracing out the +causes of the early death of half our race, is, in their estimation, not +only idle, but wicked. + +Yet this is obviously one of the first steps, every, where, which +philanthropy demands; to say nothing of the demands of christianity. It +is the first step for the physician, the first step for the educator, +the first step for the parent, and above all, the mother. Nay; more--we +must not suppress so great and important a truth--it is the first step +for the legislator and the minister. What sense is there in continuing, +century after century, and age after age, to expend all our efforts in +merely _mending_ the diseased half of mankind, when those same efforts +are amply sufficient, if early and properly applied, not only to +continue the lives of the whole, but to make them _whole beings_, +instead of passing through life mere _fragments_ of humanity? + +But I must not forget that this is merely a small manual, not intended +for those who make it their profession to teach the laws of God and man, +but simply for young mothers. For the sake of erring humanity, would +that I could, but for one moment, divest myself of the idea, that in +writing for the young mother I am not writing for legislators and +ministers! Would that I could banish from my mind the deep conviction +that the mother is everywhere far more the law-giver to her infant--far +more the arbiter of the present and eternal destiny of her child--than +he who is more commonly regarded as such. + +Every mother owes it, not only to herself--for on this part she is not +_wholly_ forgetful--but to her offspring, to abstain, during the period +of nursing at least, from all causes which tend to produce a feverish +state of her fluids. Among these are every form of premature exertion, +whether in sitting up, laboring, conversing, or even thinking. It is of +very great importance that both the body and the mind should be kept +quiet; and the more so, the better. + +Among the particular causes of fever to the young mother, Dr. Dewees +enumerates spirits, wine, and other fermented liquors, a room too much +heated, closed curtains, confined air, too much exposure, and too much +company; and during the early period of confinement, broths and animal +food. + +There is nothing which he insists on more strongly, than the importance +of fresh air. Indeed, the practice of confining a nursing woman in a +space scarcely six feet square, and excluding the air surrounding her by +curtains and closed windows, and subjecting her to the necessity of +breathing twenty times the air that has already been as often +discharged, filled with poison, from her lungs, is not too strongly +reprobated by Dr. Dewees, or anybody else. But I have spoken of these +things in the chapter which treats on "The Nursery." I would only +observe, on this point, that if I were asked what one thing is most +indispensable to the health of the nursing woman, I would reply, Fresh +air; and if asked what were the second and third most important things, +I would still repeat--in imitation of the orator of old, in regard to +another subject--Fresh air, Fresh air. + +This important ingredient in human happiness, and especially in the +happiness of the young mother and her tender infant, can usually be had +within doors, if pains enough be taken. But if the weather is fine and +in every respect favorable, a woman who is in tolerable health may +venture abroad a little in about three weeks after her confinement, and +sometimes even in two. Whether her exercise be without or within doors, +however, she should be effectually protected against chills, and against +the influence of currents of cold air. + +It has been incidentally stated, that Dr. Dewees objects to the mother's +use, during her early period of nursing, of broths and animal food. This +is about as much as we could reasonably expect from one who belongs to a +profession whose members are, almost without exception, enslaved to the +practice of flesh-eating. But even this advice of his, if duly followed, +would be a great advance upon the practice which generally prevails. +There is so universal a belief among females that they demand, at this +period of their existence, not only a larger quantity of food than +usual, but also that which is more stimulating in its quality, as almost +to forbid the hopes of making much impression upon their minds. Many +young mothers seem to consider themselves as licensed, during a part of +their lives, not only to eat immoderately, and even to gluttony, but +also to swallow almost every species of vile trash which a vile world +affords. + +How long will it be, ere the mother can be induced to take as much pains +to select the most appropriate and most healthy aliment for herself and +her child, as she now does that which is demanded by a capricious +appetite, without the smallest reference to fitness or digestibility! +How long will it be ere the mother can be brought to believe and feel +that, in every step she takes, she is forming the habitation of an +immortal spirit--a spirit, too, whose character and destiny, both +present and eternal, must depend, in no small degree, upon the character +of the dwelling it occupies while passing through this stage of earthly +existence! How long will it be, before mothers can be made to believe +even these two simple truths, that the nourishment, which the human +being actually receives, is not always in exact proportion to the +quantity of nutritious food which he throws into his stomach, and that +the diet is always best for both mother and child, which is least +exciting. + +The Charleston Board of Health, during the existence of cholera in that +city in 1836, publicly announced that the "best food is the least +exciting," and this great truth is just as true in all other places and +circumstances on the globe as it was then in South Carolina. And though +I am far from believing that health depends more on food and drink than +on all other things put together, as many seem to suppose, yet I am +entirely of opinion that he who should devote himself successfully to +the work of applying this truth, in all its bearings, to the dietetic +practice of all mankind, would do more for their reformation--yes, and +their salvation too--than has yet been done by any merely _human_ being, +since the first day of the creation. + + +SEC. 3. _Nursing--how often._ + +Many lay it down, as an invariable rule, that no system can be pursued +with a child till it is six months old; and it must be admitted by all, +that for several months after birth there are serious difficulties in +the way of determining, with any degree of precision, how often a child +should be nursed or fed. Still, there are a few rules of universal +application; some of which are here presented. + +1. A child should never be nursed, merely to quiet it; for if this be +done, it will soon learn to cry, whenever it feels the slightest +uneasiness, not only from hunger, but from other causes; merely to be +gratified with nursing. Besides, if its cries should happen to be from +illness, it is ten to one but the reception of anything into the stomach +will do harm instead of good. + +2. The stomach, like every other organ in the body which is muscular, +must have time for rest; and this in the case of children as well as +adults. But to nurse them too frequently is in opposition to this rule, +and therefore of evil tendency. + +3. For reasons which may be seen by the last rule, there should be +regular seasons for nursing, and these should be adhered to, especially +by night. When very young, once in three hours may not be too frequent; +I believe that it is seldom proper to nurse a child more frequently than +this. But whenever three hours becomes a suitable period by day, once in +four hours will be often enough by night. I will not undertake to say at +what precise age children should be nursed at intervals of three and +four hours each; because some children are older, _constitutionally_, at +three months, than others are at four. + +There is one grand mistake, however, against which I must caution young +mothers; which is, not to indulge the vain expectation that feeble +infants will become robust, in proportion to their indulgence. On the +contrary, it is the more necessary to be strict with feeble children, +_because_ they are feeble. To keep them hanging at the breast to +invigorate them, is the very way to counteract our own intentions, and +defeat our own purpose. Seasons of entire rest are even more important +to their stomachs than to those of other persons. + +4. But in order to secure intervals of rest, both to the strong and the +feeble, we must avoid the pernicious habit of giving infants pap, and +other delicacies, "between meals." Many a child's health is ruined by +this practice. Nothing should be put into their stomachs for many +months--if they are in health--but the mother's milk. + +"This," says Dr. Dunglison, "is the sole food of the infant, and is +consequently sufficiently nutrient to maintain life, and to minister to +the growth, during the earliest periods of existence." [Footnote: +Elements of Hygiene, page 271.] In another place, he says, "Milk is an +appropriate nourishment at all ages, and is more so the nearer to +birth." + + +SEC. 4. _Quantity of Food._ + +"We all know," says Dr. Dewees, "how easily the stomach may be made to +demand more food than is absolutely required; first, by the repetition +of aliment, and secondly, by its variety;--therefore both of these +causes must be avoided. The stomach, like every other part, can, and +unfortunately does, acquire habits highly injurious to itself; and that +of demanding an unnecessary quantity of aliment is not one of the least. +It should, therefore, be constantly borne in mind, that it is not the +quantity of food taken into the stomach, that is available to the proper +purposes of the system; but the quantity which can be digested, and +converted into nourishment fit to be applied to such purposes." + +There is a great deal of truth in these remarks; and especially in the +closing one, that not all which is taken into the stomach is digested. +It is highly probable, that the least quantity which is usually given to +an infant is more than sufficient for the purposes of digestion; and +that nearly every child in the arms of its mother, is over-fed. + +I know it has been said, by some physicians--and by those who are +sensible men, in other respects, too--that the child's stomach is a +pretty correct guide in regard to quantity. If we give it too much, say +they, it will reject it;--as if that were an end of the matter. + +But it is not so. It is by no means harmless to fill the child's stomach +as full as is possible without overflowing. Such a process, though it +should not create disease directly, would produce a gluttonous habit. +The stomach, being muscular, may be increased in size by use, like all +other muscular organs. The hands, the arms, the legs, the feet, the +fleshy portions of the face, even, may be disproportionally enlarged by +constant use. Thus a sailor, who uses his hands and arms much more than +his legs and feet, has the former unusually large; one who is much +accustomed to walking, has large feet; and in a tailor, who from +childhood uses his lower limbs comparatively little, they are both small +and slender. On the same principle, the stomach, by inordinate use, and +by carrying unreasonable loads, may be made nearly twice as large as +nature intended, and may demand twice as much food. And I have no doubt +that the bulk of mankind, young and old, eat about twice as much as +nature, unperverted, would require. + +If the suggestions of our last section are duly attended to, one of the +causes which lead the stomach to demand an unreasonable quantity of food +will be avoided--I mean the too frequent "repetition of aliment." And if +we never depart from the general rule, already laid down, not to give +the infant anything but its mother's milk, we shall escape the evils +incident to variety. + + +SEC. 5. _How long should milk be the only food._ + +On this point, there is a great diversity of opinion. Perhaps the most +approved role, of universal application, is, that the first change +should be made in the child's diet, when the teeth begin to appear. + +This period, it is well known, cannot be fixed to any particular age, +but varies from the fifth to the twelfth month. + +Some mothers, who have borne with me patiently to this place, will +probably here object. "What child," they will ask, "would ever have any +strength, brought up so?" Not only a little pap and gruel is, in their +estimation, necessary, long before this period, but even many choice +bits of meat. + +Now I am very sure, that these choice bits--whatever they may be--given +to a child before it has teeth, not only do no good, but actually do +mischief. Indeed, that which does no good in the stomach must do harm, +of course; since it is not only in the way, but acts like a foreign body +there, producing more or less of irritation. + +I ought to state, in this place, that many people--mothers among the +rest--have very inadequate ideas of digestion. They appear to have no +farther notion of the digestive process than that it consists in +reducing to a pulp the substances which are swallowed; and hence, +whatever is reduced to a pulp, they regard as being digested. Whereas +nothing is better known to the anatomist and physiologist, than that +this--the formation of _chyme_ in the stomach--constitutes only a very +small part of the digestive process. The chyme must pass into the +duodenum and other portions of intestine beyond the stomach, and be +retained there for some time, before it will form perfect chyle. + +This is a more important part of the work of digestion than even the +former. For, suppose the chyme to be perfect, though even this may be +mere pulp, rather than chyme, and suppose it pass quietly along into the +duodenum and other small intestines. All this process, thus far, may go +on naturally enough, and yet the chyle may not be well formed, and the +chymous mass may find its way out of the system without answering any of +the purposes of nutrition. For no matter how well the food is dissolved +in the stomach, if it do not become good and proper chyle, the blood +which is formed will not be good and perfect blood; or, lastly, if it +_seem_ to make good blood, it may still be faulty, so that the +particles which should be applied to build up or repair the system, are +either not used, or if used, answer the purpose but imperfectly. + +We hence see how little prepared a large proportion of the community, +are, to judge of the digestibility or fitness of a substance for +infants, by their own observation and experience merely; and how much +more wisely they act, in contenting themselves with giving them--at +least until they have teeth--such food only as the Author of nature +seems to have assigned them; especially when thus course, is precisely +that which is recommended or sanctioned by nearly every judicious +physician, as well as by almost all our writers on health. + + +SEC. 6. _On Feeding before Teething._ + +Having laid down the general rule, that until the appearance of teeth, +the sole food of an infant should be the milk of its own mother, I +proceed to speak of some of the more common exceptions to it. + +EXCEPTION 1.--The first of these is when the supply furnished by the +mother is scanty. There may be two causes of the scantiness of this +supply; 1st, the want of suitable nourishment by the mother; and, 2dly, +a feeble constitution, or bad health. In the former case, it should be +her first object, as it undoubtedly will be that of her physician, to +improve the quality of her diet; and in the latter, to restore her +health, or at least invigorate her constitution. + +In regard to the proper diet of a _mother_, as such, as well as the +general management which her case requires, a volume might be written +without exhausting the subject. But I have already said as much on this +subject, in another place, as my limits will permit. + +But we cannot wait for the mother's health to improve, and allow the +infant to suffer, in the mean time, for a due supply of food. The +appropriate question now is, How shall such a supply be furnished? + +This should be done by means of an article resembling in its properties, +as closely as possible, the mother's milk. For this purpose, we have +only to mix with a suitable quantity of new cow's milk, one third of +water, and sweeten it a little with loaf sugar. This is to be given to +the child, at suitable intervals, and in proper quantities, by means of +a common sucking bottle. It is, indeed, sometimes given with the spoon; +but the bottle is better. + +To the question, whether the child should be confined to this, till the +period of weaning, Dr. Dewees answers, No. I am surprised at this; and +my surprise is increased, when I find him, almost in the very next +breath, urging with all his might, numerous reasons against the very +common notion, that children in early life require a variety of food. He +even insists on the importance of confining the child to a single +article of food when it is practicable. Yet he has not given us so much +as one reason why it is not practicable in the case before us; but has +gone on to speak of barley water, gum arabic water, rice water, +arrowroot, &c. I venture, therefore, to dissent from him, and to answer +the foregoing question in the affirmative. When one good and substantial +reason can be given for _change_, the decision will, however, be +reconsidered. + +I have already stated the general rule for preparing this substitute for +the mother's milk. But there are several minor directions, which may be +useful to those who are wholly without experience on the subject. + +If possible, the milk used should not only be just taken from the cow, +but should always be from the _same_ cow; for it is well known, that the +quality of milk often differs very materially, even among cows feeding +in the same pasture, or from the same pile of hay; and the stomach +becomes most easily reconciled to the mixture when it is uniform in its +qualities. Great care should also be taken to see that the cow whose +milk is used is young and healthy. + +The mixture should not be prepared any faster than it is wanted, and +should always be prepared in vessels perfectly clean and sweet, and +given as soon as possible after it is prepared, to prevent any degree of +fermentation. It is never so well to heat it by the fire. If taken from +the cow just before it is used, and if the water to be added is warm +enough, the temperature will hardly need to be raised any higher. + +When it is impracticable, in all cases, to take milk for this purpose +immediately from the cow, it should be kept, in winter, where it will +not freeze; and in summer, where there will be no tendency to acidity. + +Some mothers and nurses are addicted to the practice of passing the food +through their own mouths, before they give it to the child--with a view, +no doubt, to see that it is at a proper temperature. This practice is +not only wholly unnecessary, but altogether disgusting, and even +ridiculous. A thermometer would answer every purpose; and save even the +trouble of another disgusting practice--that of blowing it with the +breath. + +The most proper season for giving the child this preparation, is +immediately after it has been nursing. It is better for both mother and +child, that the latter should nurse just as often as though the supply +of food was adequate to his wants. And when his first supply is +exhausted, then let him make up his meal from the sucking bottle. The +great advantage of this plan is, that he will not be so likely in this +way to be over-fed. If he is really needy, he will accept the bottle, +even if he do not like it quite so well; if he refuse it, let him go +without till he is hungry enough to receive it. + +In regard to the water used in the preparation, only one thing needs to +be said; which is, that it should be pure. If it is not, it should by +all means be boiled. The sugar used should be of the very best kind; and +the quantity not large; since if the preparation be too sweet, it +readily becomes acid in the stomach. + +There has been, and still is, a controversy going on among medical men, +whether sugar is or is not hurtful to the young. "Who shall decide, when +doctors disagree?" has often been asked. Without undertaking the task +myself, I may perhaps be permitted to say, that I cannot see any reason +why a substance so pure, and so highly nutritious as sugar--if given in +very small quantity only--should prove injurious: though I do not regard +the reasoning of Dr. Dewees as very conclusive on the subject, when, in +reply to Dr. Cadogan, he has the following language--"If sugar be +improper, why does it so largely enter into the composition of the early +food of all animals? It is in vain that physicians declaim against this +article, since it forms between seven and eight per cent of the mother's +milk."--Now with me, the fact that milk and almost all other kinds of +food are furnished with a measure of this substance, is the strongest +reason I am acquainted with for making no additions. I believe, however, +that they may sometimes be made, but not for these reasons. + +EXCEPTION 2.--The second striking exception to the general rule that has +been laid down, is when the mother is unable to nurse her own child from +positive ill health, or when circumstances exist which render it +obviously improper that she should do it. The following are some of the +circumstances which render such a departure from nature indispensable. + +1. When the mother is affected strongly with a hereditary disease, such +as consumption or scrofula; or when her constitution is tainted, as it +were, with venereal disease, or other permanent affections. + +2. When nursing produces, uniformly, some very troublesome or dangerous +disease in the mother; as cough, colic, &c. + +3. There are a few instances in which the milk of the mother, owing to +an unknown cause, has been found by experience to disagree with the +child. In these circumstances, it is the unquestionable duty of the +mother to resort wholly to feeding. + +4. Sometimes the milk, at first abundant, fails suddenly, owing to some +accidental or constitutional defect; and this failure becomes habitual. +In all these circumstances, the proper resort is to a sucking bottle, or +a hired nurse. I generally prefer the latter. The cases which seem to me +to admit of the former, will be pointed out in the next section. + +"When the bottle is used," says Dr. Dewees, "much care is requisite to +preserve it sweet and free from all impurities, or the remains of the +former food, by which the present may be rendered impure or sour; for +which purpose a great deal of caution must be observed." + +The business of feeding a child, whether by the bottle or the spoon, +should never be hurried: the slower it is, the better. We should stop +from time to time, during the process. Nor should the nourishment be +given while lying down; it is much more pleasant, as well as more safe, +to sit up. + +A few thoughts more on the character and condition of the milk which we +give to the young, will conclude the second division of this section. + +Some are fond of boiling milk for infants; but to this I am decidedly +opposed, so long as they are in health. Boiling takes away, or appears +to take away, some of the best properties of the milk. + +It is true that milk which is boiled does not turn sour so readily in +hot weather; but it is quite unnecessary to boil milk in the common +manner in order to present its changing, since such a result can be +prevented by another process. You have only to put your milk in a +kettle, cover it closely, and heat it quickly to the boiling point, and +then remove and cool it as speedily as possible. This plan prevents the +rising to the surface of that coat or pellicle which contains some of +the most valuable properties of the milk. + +I have already said that it was as necessary that the stomach should +have rest as any other muscular organ. Some writers say that the infant +should be kept perfectly quiet, at least half an hour, after each meal. +This is certainly necessary with feeble children, but I question its +necessity in the case of those who are strong and robust. I would not +recommend, however, nor even tolerate, for one moment, the absurd +practice of _jolting_, so common with a few ignorant nurses and, +mothers, as if they could jolt down the food in the stomach with just as +much safety as they can shake down the contents of a farmer's bag of +produce. Such mothers as these should go and reside among the native +tribes of Indians in Guiana, in South America, where they make it a +point not only to stuff their children's stomachs as long as they will +hold, but actually to shake it down. + +Little less absurd than jolting is the custom of tossing a child high, +in quick succession, which is practised not only after meals, but at +other times. But on this point, I have treated elsewhere. + +Some give the sucking bottle to children as a plaything. This is just +about as wise a practice as that of giving them books as playthings. +Both are done, usually, to save the time and trouble of those whose +office it is to devote their time to the very purpose of managing and +educating their offspring. The evil, however, of suffering the child to +have the bottle when it pleases is, that he will thus be tasting food so +often as to interfere with and disturb the process of digestion, to his +great and lasting injury. For in this way, a part of the food will pass +from the stomach into the bowels unchanged, or at least but imperfectly +digested, where it is liable to become sour, and cause disease. It is +not to be doubted that many diarrhoeas, as well as, other bowel +affections, are produced in this way. Children that are always eating +are seldom healthy; and we may hence see the reason. + +In speaking of the importance of keeping the bottle, from which a child +takes his food, perfectly clean and sweet, I ought to have extended the +injunction much farther. There is a degree of slovenliness sometimes +observable in those who manage children, both when they are sick and +when they are in health, which even common sense cannot and ought not to +tolerate. Every vessel which is used in preparing or administering +anything for children, ought, after we have used it, to be immediately +and effectually cleansed. How shocking is it to see dirty vessels +standing in the nursery from hour to hour, becoming sour or impure! How +much more so still, to see food in copper vessels, or in the red earthen +ones, glazed with a poisonous oxyd! I speak now more particularly of +vessels in which food is given; for with the administration of medicine, +and nursing the sick, I do not intend in this volume to interfere. + +EXCEPTION 3.--We come now to the consideration of those cases--for such +it will not be doubted there are--where a hired nurse is to be preferred +to feeding by the hand. + +Before proceeding farther, however, it is important to say, that if a +nurse could always be procured whose health, and temper, and habits were +good, who had no infant of her own, and who would do as well for the +infant, in every respect, as his own mother, it would be preferable to +have no feeding by the hand at all. + +But such nurses are very scarce. Their temper, or habits, or general +health, will often be such as no genuine parent would desire, and such +as they ought to be sorry to see engrafted, in any degree, on the child. +For even admitting what is claimed by some, that the temper of the nurse +does _not_ affect the properties of the milk, and thus injure the child +both physically and morally, still much injury may and inevitably will +result from the influence of her constant presence and example. + +Others have infants of their own, in which case either their own child +or the adopted one will suffer; and in a majority of cases, it can +scarcely be doubted _which_ it will be. And I doubt the morality of +requiring a nurse, in these cases, to give up her own child wholly. If +_one_ must be fed, why not our own, as well as that of another? + +The only cases, then, which seem to me to justify the employment of a +nurse, are where she possesses at least the qualifications above +mentioned; and as these are rare, not many nurses, of course, would on +this principle be employed. But when employed, it is highly desirable +that the following rules should be observed: + +1: The nurse should suckle the child at both breasts; otherwise he is +liable to acquire a degree of crookedness in his form. There is another +evil which sometimes results from the too common neglect of this rule, +which is, that it endangers the deterioration of the quality of the +milk. + +2. The milk which is thus substituted for that of the mother, should be +as nearly as possible of the same age as the child who is to receive it. +It should be remembered, however, that the milk is not so good after the +twelfth or thirteenth month, nor _quite_ so good under the third. + +3. When the parent or some trusty and confidential friend can, without +the aid of interested spies and emissaries, have an eye to the general +treatment, and especially to the moral management, it should be done; +for even the best nurses may so differ in their principles, manners and +habits from the parent, that the latter would deem it preferable to +withdraw the child, and resort at once to feeding. + + +SEC. 7. _From Teething to Weaning._ + +This period will, of course, be longer or shorter according as the teeth +begin to appear earlier or later, and according to the time when it is +thought proper to wean. + +On few points, perhaps, has there existed a greater diversity of opinion +than in regard to the age most proper for weaning. The limits of this +work do not permit a thorough discussion of the question; and I shall +therefore be very brief in my remarks on the subject. + +Dr. Cullen, whose opinion on topics of this kind is certainly entitled +to much respect, thought that less than seven, or more than eleven +months of nursing was injurious. Yet in some countries, and even in some +parts of our own, the period is extended by the mother, from choice, to +two years. And although the milk is not so good after the thirteenth or +fourteenth month, I have never either known or heard that any evil +consequences followed from the practice. + +Dr. Loudon, a recent writer, observes, that the period of nursing has a +great influence over the numbers of mankind in various countries, as is +evinced by numerous facts. He adduces proofs of this, position. Thus, he +says, in China, where the population is excessive, and the inhuman +practice of infanticide is common, they wean a child as soon as it can +put its hand to its mouth. On the other hand, the Indians of North +America do not wean their children until they are old and strong enough +to run about: generally they are suckled for a period of more than two +years. + +He then enters into a physiological inquiry why it is that British +mothers do not usually suckle their children longer than ten months. He +seems--though he does not give us his precise opinion--to think that, in +all ordinary cases, the period of nursing ought to be protracted to two +or three years, and that perhaps it would be better still to extend it +to four or five. His remarks are so excellent, and withal so curious, +and their tendency so humane, that we venture to insert one or two of +his paragraphs entire. + +"Certain it is, that the milk does not diminish particularly at that +time, (ten months,) so far as regards quantity; and from the health of +children reared without spoon-meat beyond this time, it as certainly +undergoes no change in its quality. Children are sometimes so old before +weaning, as to be able to ask for the breast; and it has not been +remarked that the health of mothers, thus suckling, was in any way worse +than that of their neighbors. Altogether, then, it may be asserted, that +a mother is likely to enjoy better health, and to be less liable to +sickness and death during lactation, than during pregnancy. + +"Many women believe, or affect to believe, that the weakness they labor +under arises from some latent moral or physical cause; but this weakness +is not attributed to lactation in the earlier months of suckling, +because the mother then considers herself fulfilling a necessary duty, +which her constitution, for so long, is well able to bear. So soon, +however, as the period of lactation has passed over, as it is +established by custom or fashion, she imagines she is exceeding the +intentions of nature, and she forthwith concludes that the continuance +of suckling is the cause of her uncomfortable sensations. This whim +being entertained, the child is weaned, and too often becomes the victim +of a most reprehensible delusion. + +"Since nature has furnished the mother with milk for a longer period +than custom demands, it is evident that some good purpose for the mother +and child was intended in this arrangement. Had it been otherwise, the +secretion of milk would stop at a definite time, in like manner as the +period of gestation is definite. That a child, in comparison with the +young of the lower animals, is so long unable to provide for itself, +strongly tends to corroborate the proofs already advanced--that nature +originally had in view a more protracted period for lactation than is +now allowed. + +"Some writers, following the laws of nature, as they interpreted them, +fixed the period of weaning at fifteen months, when the infant has got +its eight incisors and four canine teeth. There are well-authenticated +instances of mothers having suckled their children for three, four, +five, and even seven consecutive years; we ourselves have known cases +of lactation being prolonged far three and for four years, with the +happiest results." + +It appears to me better, therefore, that the child should be nursed, in +all ordinary cases, from twelve to fifteen months; and when there are no +special objections, about two years. As the change, whenever it is made, +and however gradual it may be, is an important one, in its effects on +the stomach and bowels, it is better to wean a little earlier or a +little later, than to do so just at the close of summer or beginning of +autumn, at which season bowel complaints are most common, most severe, +and most dangerous. It is sufficiently unfortunate that teething should +commence just at this period; but when we add another cause of irregular +action, which we can control, to one which we _cannot_, we act very +unwisely. + +I have already observed that we may begin to feed children when the +teeth begin to appear. By this is not meant that we should do so while +the system is under the irritation to which teething usually, or at +least often, subjects it. But when this is over, and a few teeth have +appeared, it is usually a proper time to commence our operations. + +The first food given should be precisely of the kind which has been +recommended for those children who are fed by the hand. The rules and +restrictions by which we are to be guided, are the same, except in one +point, which is, that in the case we are now considering, the child +should be fed _between nursing_. + +Let not parents be anxious about their healthy children under two years, +who have a supply of good milk, either from the mother or from the cow. +For those that are feeble, a physician may and ought to prescribe--not +medicine, but appropriate food, drink, &c. + +When the grinding teeth have cut through, if we have any doubts in +regard to the nutritive qualities of the food we are giving, we may +improve it by adding, instead of the one third of pure water, a similar +quantity of gum arabic water, barley water, or rice water. Some use a +little weak animal broth; but this is unnecessary, and I think, on the +whole, injurious, except for purposes strictly medicinal. + +This course is so simple, and so far removed from that which is +generally adopted, that few mothers will probably be willing to pursue +it with perseverance, especially when the teeth appear very late. Those +who are, however, will be richly rewarded, in the end, in the +advantages; which will accrue to the child's health, and the vigor it +will ensure to his constitution. + + +SEC. 8. _During the process of Weaning._ + +It has already been shown that, in weaning, some regard should be had to +the season of the year; and that the end of summer and beginning of fall +are of all periods the most unfavorable. The best time, on every +account, is in the spring--in March, April, May, or June; and the next +best is during the months of October and November. But December, January +and February are better than July, August and September. + +Weaning should never be sudden. We may safely and properly call upon +those who are addicted to snuff or opium taking, tobacco chewing, rum +drinking, and other habits which are purely artificial, to break +off--_to wean themselves_--suddenly; since _they_ can do so with +considerable safety, and will seldom have the courage or the +perseverance to do it otherwise. But with the child, in regard to his +food, such a course will not be advisable. If we regard his future +health or happiness, he must be weaned gradually. + +The first proper step will be to give the child a little larger quantity +of the cow's milk and gum arabic mixture, between nursings, at the same +time increasing very gradually the intervals of nursing. When the +intervals become six hours distant from each other, it will be best to +add a little good bread to the milk with which it is fed, about two or +three times a day. Arrowroot jelly, if he can be made to relish it, will +be highly useful; but if not, some boiled rice, into which a little +arrowroot has been sprinkled while boiling, may be added to his milk. + +It may be worth the attempt to excite an aversion in the child to +nursing his mother, so that be will refuse to nurse, if possible, of his +own accord. This aversion may be excited by such an application of +aloes, or some other offensive substance, as will cause him to withdraw +himself from the breast as soon as he tastes it. + +A serious mistake is often made, in connection with weaning, in giving +the child not only too much food, but that which is too solid, or too +rich. This mistake has undoubtedly grown out of the belief that his +feeble condition _requires_ it; whereas the truth is, that he neither +needs food at this period, nor is capable of digesting it. For let us be +as judicious in the process of weaning as we may, the tone of the +child's stomach will be somewhat reduced, or in other words, its powers +of digestion will be weakened by it; and to give it strong food, or +overload it with that which is weaker, is not only unreasonable and +unphilosophical, but cruel. And if there should be a tendency in the +child's constitution to rickets, scrofula, consumption, and other +wasting diseases, such a course would be likely to bring them on, and +destroy life. + +"When milk will agree," says Dr. Dewees, "there is no food so proper. It +may be employed in any of its combinations, with good wheaten bread, +rice, sago, &c., only remembering that when either of these articles is +found to agree, it should be continued perseveringly, until it may +become offensive. In this case, some new combination may be required." I +do not see the necessity of continuing one kind of food till it +_offends_. Besides, I do not believe that these simple articles of food +are apt to become offensive to stomachs that have not already been +spoiled. But whether a single dish should or should not come to be +offensive, I greatly prefer an occasional change. + +Buchan, in his Advice to Mothers, has recommended it to them to boil +bread for their infants, in water. It should not, for this purpose--nor +indeed for any other--be new; it is best at one or two days, old. It may +be boiled in a small quantity of water, or what is still better, of +milk; or it may be steamed till it becomes soft and light, almost like +new bread, but without any of the objectionable properties of that which +is wholly new. To bread, thus prepared, is to be added a suitable +quantity of milk, fresh from the cow, and a little diluted with water, +but not boiled. + +But as there may be, here and there, at any age, a stomach with which +milk, with bread, or rice, or sago, will not agree--though I think they +must be very rare cases--we may be allowed to substitute for it a +solution of "gum arabic, in the proportion of an ounce to a pint of +water," to which may be added a little sugar; and if the child is old +enough to observe the color, just milk enough to change the appearance. +Another preparation for the same purpose consists of rennet whey, a +little sweetened, and "disguised, if necessary, as just stated." + +The health of the mother, too, during the period of weaning, often needs +great attention. Let her avoid medicine, however, if possible. A due +regard to food, drink, exercise, and rest of body and mind, &c., will +usually be found more effective, as well as more permanently +efficacious. + + +SEC. 9. _Food subsequently to Weaning._ + +You will allow me to introduce in this place, some of the sentiments of +Dr. Cadogan, an English physician, from a little work on the management +of children. [Footnote: Though Dr. C.'s remarks will apply more closely +to England in 1750, they are by no means inapplicable to the United +States in 1837.] I do it with the more pleasure because, though he wrote +almost a century ago, he urges the same general principles on which I +have all along been insisting: hence it will be seen that mine are no +new-fangled notions. His remarks refer to the young of every age, but +chiefly to early infancy and childhood. It will be found necessary, in +some instances, to abridge, but I shall endeavor not to misrepresent the +Doctor's views. + + * * * * * + +"Look over the bills of mortality. Almost half of those who fill up that +black list, die under five years of age; so that half the people that +come into the world go out of it again, before they become of the least +use to it or to themselves. To me, this seems to deserve serious +consideration. + +"It is ridiculous to charge it upon nature, and to suppose that infants +are more subject to disease and death than grown persons; on the +contrary, they bear pain and disease much better--fevers especially; and +for the same reason that a twig is less hurt by a storm than an oak. + +"In all the other productions of nature, we see the greatest vigor and +luxuriancy of health, the nearer they are to the egg or bud. When was +there a lamb, a bird, or a tree, that died because it was young? These +are under the immediate nursing of unerring nature; and they thrive +accordingly. + +"Ought it not, therefore, to be the care of every nurse and every +parent, not only to protect their nurslings from injury, but to be well +assured that their own officious services be not the greatest evils the +helpless creatures can suffer? + +"In the lower class of mankind, especially in the country, disease and +mortality are not so frequent, either among adults or their children. +Health and posterity are the portion of the poor--I mean the laborious. +The want of superfluity confines them more within the limits of nature; +hence they enjoy the blessings they feel not, and are ignorant of their +cause. + +"In the course of my practice, I have had frequent occasion to be fully +satisfied of this; and have often heard a mother anxiously say, 'the +child has not been well ever since it has done puking and crying.' + +"These complaints, though not attended to, point very plainly to the +cause. Is it not very evident that when a child rids its stomach of its +contents several times a day, it has been overloaded? While the natural +strength lasts, (for every child is born with more health and strength +than is generally imagined,) it cries at or rejects the superfluous +load, and _thrives apace_; that is, grows very fat, bloated, and +distended beyond measure, like a house lamb. + +"But in time, the same oppressive cause continuing, the natural powers +are overcome, being no longer able to throw off the unequal weight. The +child, now unable to cry any more, languishes and is quiet. + +"The misfortune is, that these complaints are not understood. The child +is swaddled and crammed on, till, after gripes, purging, &c., it sinks +under both burdens into a convulsion fit, and escapes farther torture. +This would be the case with the lamb, were it not killed, when full fat. + +"That the present mode of nursing is wrong, one would think needed no +other proof than the frequent miscarriages attending it, the death of +many, and the ill health of those that survive. But what I am going to +complain of is, that children, in general, are over-clothed and +over-fed, and fed and clothed improperly. To these causes I attribute +almost all their diseases. + +"But the feeding of children is much more important to them than their +clothing. Let us consider what nature directs in the case. If we follow +nature, instead of leading or driving her, we cannot err. In the +business of nursing, as well as physic, art, if it do not exactly copy +this original, is ever destructive. + +"If I could prevail, no child should ever be crammed with any unnatural +mixture, till the provision of nature was ready for it; nor afterwards +fed with any ungenial diet whatever, at least for the _first three +months_; for it is not well able to digest and assimilate other elements +sooner. + +"I have seen very healthy children that never ate or drank anything +whatever but their mother's milk, for the first ten or twelve months. +Nature seems to direct to this, by giving them no teeth till about that +time. The call of nature should be waited for to feed them with anything +more substantial; and the appetite ought ever to precede the food--not +only with regard to the daily meals, but those changes of diet which +opening, increasing life requires. But this is never done, in either +case; which is one of the greatest mistakes of all nurses. + +"When the child requires more solid sustenance, we are to inquire what +and how much is most proper to give it. We may be well assured there is +a great mistake either in the quantity or quality of children's food, or +both, as it is usually given them, because they are made sick by it; for +to this mistake I cannot help imputing nine in ten of all their +diseases. + +"As to quantity, there is a most ridiculous error in the common +practice; for it is generally supposed that whenever a child cries, it +wants victuals: it is accordingly fed ten or twelve or more times in a +day and night. This is so obvious a misapprehension, that I am surprised +it should ever prevail. + +"If a child's wants and motions be diligently and judiciously attended +to, it will be found that it never cries, but from pain. Now the first +sensations of hunger are not attended with pain; accordingly, a very +young child that is hungry will make a hundred other signs of its want, +before it will cry for food. If it be healthy, and quite easy in its +dress, it will hardly ever cry at all. Indeed, these signs and motions I +speak of are but rarely observed, because it seldom happens that +children are ever suffered to be hungry.[Footnote: That which we +commonly observe in them, in such cases, and call by the name of hunger, +the Doctor, I suppose would regard as morbid or unnatural feeling, +wholly unworthy of the name of HUNGER.] + +"In a few, very few, whom I have had the pleasure to see reasonably +nursed, that were not fed above two or three times in twenty-four hours, +and yet were perfectly healthy, active, and happy, I have seen these +signals, which were as intelligible as if they had spoken. + +"There are many faults in the quality of children's food. + +"1. It is not simple enough. Their paps, panadas, gruels, &c. are +generally enriched with sugar, spices, and other nice things, and +sometimes a drop of wine--none of which they ought ever to take. Our +bodies never want them; they are what luxury only has introduced, to the +destruction of the health of mankind. + +"2. It is not enough that their food should be simple; it should also be +light. Many people, I find, are mistaken in their notions of what is +light, and fancy that most kinds of pastry, puddings, custards, &c. are +light; that is, light of digestion. But there is nothing heavier, in +this sense, than unfermented flour and eggs, boiled hard, which are the +chief ingredients in some of these preparations. + +"What I mean by light food--to give the best idea I can of it--is, any +substance that is easily separated, and soluble in warm water. Good +bread is the lightest thing I know, and the fittest food for young +children. Cows' milk is also simple and light, and very good for them; +but it is often injudiciously prepared. It should never be boiled; for +boiling alters the taste and properties of it, destroys its sweetness, +and makes it thicker, heavier, and less fit to mix and assimilate with +the blood." + + * * * * * + +It is hardly necessary for me to repeat, that in these general views of +Dr. C., with a few exceptions, I entirely concur; indeed some of them +have already been presented. But I have expressed my doubts of the +soundness of his conclusion in regard to sugar. Used with food, in very +small quantity, by persons whose stomachs are already in a good +condition, both sugar and molasses, especially the former, appear to me +not only harmless, but wholesome and useful. + +On the subject of simplicity in children's food, I should be glad to +enlarge. There is nothing more important in diet than simplicity, and +yet I think there is nothing more rare. To suit the fashion, everything +must be mixed and varied. I have no objection to variety at different +meals, both for children and adults; indeed I am disposed to recommend +it, as will be seen hereafter. But I am utterly opposed to any +considerable variety at the same meal; and above all, in a single dish. +The simpler a dish can be, the better. + +But let us look, for a moment, at the dishes of food which are often +presented, even at what are called plain tables. + +Meats cannot be eaten--so many persons think--without being covered +with mustard, or pepper, or gravy--or soaked in vinegar; and not a few +regard them as insipid, unless several of these are combined. Few people +think a piece of plain boiled or broiled muscle (lean flesh) with +nothing on it but a little salt, is fit to be eaten. Everything, it is +thought, must be rendered more stimulating, or acrid; or must be +swimming in gravy, or melted fat or butter. + +Bread, though proverbially the staff of life, can scarcely be eaten in +its simple state. It must be buttered, or honied, or toasted, or soaked +in milk, or dipped in gravy. Puddings must have cherries or fruits of +some sort, or spices in them, and must be sweetened largely. Or +perhaps--more ridiculous still--they must have suet in them. And after +all this is done, who can eat them without the addition of sauce, or +butter, or molasses, or cream? Potatoes, boiled, steamed or roasted, +delightful as they are to an unperverted appetite, are yet thought by +many people hardly palatable till they are mashed, and buttered or +gravied; or perhaps soaked in vinegar. In short, the plainest and +simplest article for the table is deemed nearly unfit for the stomach, +till it has been buttered, and peppered, and spiced, and perhaps +_pearlashed_. Even bread and milk must be filled with berries or fruits. +Where can you find many adults who would relish a meal which should +consist entirely of plain bread, without any addition; of plain +potatoes, without anything on them except a little salt; of a plain rice +pudding, and nothing with it; or of plain baked or boiled apples or +pears? And _could_ such persons be found, how many of them would bring +up their children to live on such plain dishes? + +It need not be wondered at, that a palate which has been so long tickled +by variety, and by so many stimulating mixtures of food, should come to +regard cold water for drink as insipid; and should feel dissatisfied +with it, and desirous of boiling some narcotic or poisonous herb in it, +or brewing it with something which will impart to it more or less of +alcohol. The wonder is, not that some of our epicures become drunkards, +but that all of them do not. + +Dr. Cadogan alludes to a sad mistake everywhere made about _light_ food; +and condemns, very justly, hard-boiled custards, pastry, &c. It is very +strange that these substances--for these are among the injurious +articles which I call mixtures--should ever have obtained currency in +the world, to the exclusion of bread, which, as the same writer justly +says, is among the lightest articles of food which are known. + +It is strange, in particular, what views people have about bread. +Judging from what I see, I am compelled to believe that there are few +who regard it in any other light than as a kind of necessary evil. They +appear to eat it, not because they are fond of it, by itself, but +because they _must_ eat it; or rather, because it is a fashionable +article; and not to make believe they eat it, at the least, would be +unfashionable. They will get rid of it, however, when they can. And when +they must eat it, they soak it, or cover it with butter or milk, or +something else which will render it tolerable--or toast it. And use it +as they may, it must be hot from the oven. After it is once cold, very +few will eat it. The idea, above all, of making a full meal of simple +cold bread, twenty-four hours old, would be rejected by ninety-nine +persons in a hundred; and by some with abhorrence. + +People not only dislike bread, but regard it as unnutritious. I have +heard many a fond parent say to the child who ate no meat, and seemed to +depend almost wholly on bread--"Why, my dear child, you will starve if +you eat no meat. Do at least put some butter on your bread or your +potatoes." A thousand times have I been admonished, when eating my +vegetable dinner during the hot and fatiguing days of summer--for I was +bred to the farm, and ate little or no meat till I was fourteen years +of age--to eat more butter, or cheese, or something that would give me +strength; for I could not work, they said, without something more +nourishing than bread and the other vegetables. And yet few if any boys +of my age did more work, or performed it better, or with more ease, than +myself. And I early observed the same thing in other vegetable eaters. + +The truth is, there is nothing in the world better adapted to the daily +wants of the human stomach than good bread; and few things more +nutritious. There may be a little more nutriment in eggs or jelly; but +if the former are hard-boiled, the stomach cannot digest them; and fat +meat of any kind is digested with great difficulty. Indeed it is +doubtful whether stomachs in temperate climates digest fat at all. They +may dissolve it, but that is not making good chyle of it. They may even +reduce it to chyle; _but chyle is not blood_. Fat may slip through the +system without much of it _adhering_; and I think it pretty evident that +it usually does so. + +The muscle--the lean part of animals--may be nearly as nutritious as +good bread, and is more easily digested. But it is very far from being +proved that, for the healthy, those things are always best which are +most easily digested. Nobody will pretend that potatoes are better for +us than bread; and yet the experiments of Dr. Beaumont seem to prove +that boiled or roasted potatoes are much more quick and easy of +digestion than bread of the first and best quality. Even over-boiled +eggs and raw cabbage, bad as they are, are dissolved in the stomach, and +appear to be digested as quick, if not quicker, than good wheat bread. +But nobody in the world will pretend they form more wholesome food. +Neither is meat--even _lean_ meat--necessarily more wholesome, or better +calculated to give strength than bread, simply be cause it is more +quickly and easily digested. It would be nearer the truth to say, that +those substances which digest slowest (provided they do not irritate) +are best adapted to the wants of the human stomach. + +The philosopher LOCKE--perhaps from his knowledge of medicine--gives +some excellent directions on this subject. "Great care should be used," +be says, that the child "eat bread plentifully, both alone and with +everything else; and whatever he eats that is solid, make him chew it +well." This writer, by the way, supposed that the teeth were made to be +used in beating our food; and that we ought neither to swallow it +without chewing, as is customary in our busy New England, nor to mash or +soak it in order to save the labor of mastication--a practice almost +equally universal. But let us hear his own words. + +"As for his diet, it ought to be very plain and simple; and if I might +advise, flesh should be forborne, at least till he is two or three years +old. But of whatever advantage this may be to his future health and +strength, I fear it will hardly be consented to by parents, misled by +the custom of eating too much flesh themselves, who will be apt to think +their children--as they do themselves--in danger to be starved; if they +have not flesh at least twice a day. This I am sure, children would +breed their teeth with much less danger, be freer from diseases while +they were little, and lay the foundations of a healthy and strong +constitution much surer, if they were not crammed so much as they are, +by fond mothers and foolish servants, and were kept wholly from flesh +the first three or four years of their lives." + +Were Locke still living, I should like to interrogate him at this +place. He first speaks of giving children no meat till they are two or +three years old; and then afterwards extends the period to three or +four. The question I would put is this: If the child is healthier +without meat till he is three or four years old, why not till he is +thirteen or fourteen; or even till thirty, or forty, or seventy? And is +not Professor Stuart, of Andover--a meat eater himself, and an advocate +for its moderate use by those who have already been trained to the use +of it--is not the Professor, I say, more than half right when he +asserts, as I have heard him, that it may be well to train all children, +from the first, to the exclusive use of vegetable food? + +I have a few more extracts from Locke, particularly on the subject of +bread. + +"I should think that a good piece of well made and well baked brown +bread would be often the best breakfast for my young master. I am sure +it is as wholesome, and will make him as strong a man, as greater +delicacies; and if he be used to it, it will be as pleasant to him. + +"If he, at any time, call for victuals between meals, use him to nothing +but dry bread. If he be hungry more than wanton, bread will go down; and +if he be not hungry, it is not fit that he should eat. By this you will +obtain two good effects. First, that by custom he will come to be in +love with bread; for, as I said, our palates and stomachs, too, are +pleased with the things we are used to. Another good you will gain +hereby is, that you will not teach him to eat more nor oftener than +nature requires. + +"I do not think that all people's appetites are alike; some have +naturally stronger and some weaker stomachs. But this I think, that +many are made gormands and gluttons by custom, that were not so by +nature. And I see, in some countries, men as lusty and strong, that eat +but two meals a day, as those that have set their stomachs, by a +constant usage, to call on them for four or five. + +"The Romans usually fasted till supper, the only set meal, even of those +who ate more than once in a day; and those who used breakfasts, as some +did at eight, same at ten, others at twelve of the clock, and some +later, neither ate flesh nor had anything made ready for them. + +"Augustus, when the greatest monarch on the earth, tells us he took a +piece of dry bread in his chariot; and Seneca, in his 83d epistle, +giving an account how be managed himself when he was old, and his age +permitted indulgence, says that he used to eat a piece of dry bread for +his dinner, without the formality of sitting to it. Yet Seneca, as it is +well known, was wealthy. + +"The masters of the world were brought up with this spare diet, and the +young gentlemen of Rome felt no want of strength or spirit because they +ate but once a day. Or if it happened by chance that any one could not +fast so long as till supper, their only set meal, he took nothing but a +bit of dry bread, or at most a few raisins or some such slight thing +with it, to stay his stomach. And more than one set meal a day was +thought so monstrous that it was a reproach, as low as Caesar's time, to +make an entertainment, or sit down to a table, till towards sunset. +Therefore I judge it most convenient that my young master should have +nothing but bread for breakfast. I impute a great part of our diseases +in England to our eating too much flesh, and too little bread. Dry +bread, though the best nourishment, has the least temptation." + +I shall not undertake to defend all the sentiments of Mr. Locke in these +extracts; but in regard to the main point--the nutritive properties and +wholesome tendency of bread, and the importance of making it a principal +article of diet for children--I think his views are just. In short, they +do not differ, substantially, from those of a large proportion of the +best writers on this subject in every country, during the last three +hundred years. As if with one voice, they dissuade from the use of too +much animal food for the young, and encourage the use of a larger +proportion of vegetable food--bread, plain puddings, rice, potatoes, +turnips, beets, apples, pears, &c., and milk. + +Yet they all, or nearly all, seem to write just as if they did not +expect to be believed; or if believed, to be followed. They seem to +regard mankind as so inveterately attached to old habits, and so much +addicted to flesh eating, that there is little hope of reclaiming them. + +Now, though my opinions are no more entitled to respect than many of +theirs, I hope for greater success than they appear to do. I expect that +many young mothers who read this work, will be led to think and inquire +further on the subject; and if they find that the views here advanced +are in accordance with reason, and common sense, and higher authority, I +am not without hope that they will reform, and do what they can to +reform their neighbors. + +I have dwelt the longer, in this section, on the _general_ principles of +diet, because I am of opinion that whatever is true, on this subject, in +regard to the diet of children, soon after weaning, is equally, or +nearly equally applicable to the whole of childhood, youth, manhood and +age. It is not true that one period of life, and one mode of employment, +demands a diet essentially different from that which is demanded at +another period, and in other circumstances; provided always, that the +individual is in health. Occasional instances of the kind, there may be; +but they are not numerous. + +The digestive powers of the young are more nearly as strong as those of +the adult than is usually admitted, and they are much more active. They +require a less quantity of food, undoubtedly; and they should be fed at +shorter intervals. But as a general rule, what is best for them, as +regards its quality, at three years old, is best for them at thirty; or, +should they live so long, at ninety. I repeat it; there is very little +difference in the nature of the food required ever after teething. + +Let me not be understood as saying that the strong, and the robust, and +the active cannot digest food which the weak, and enervated, and +indolent cannot. Undoubtedly they can. But this does not prove that they +_ought_ to do it. It does not prove that their strength and vigor were +not given them for other purposes than to be expended on the poorer +substances for food, when they might have better. Nor is it true, as +often pretended, that the hard laborer needs either more food, or that +which is of a stronger quality, just in proportion to the severity of +his labor. The man or the child who labors moderately, just sufficient +for the purposes of health, and labors with his hands in the open air, +needs rather _more_ food than the indolent or the sedentary, or those +who labor to excess; but not that which is of a stronger quality. It is +he who labors to excess--if any difference of quality were required at +all--who should eat milder food, as well as less in quantity. + +Some physicians there are who tell us that all mankind would live +longer, as well as be more healthful, if they ate nothing but bread, and +drank nothing but water. It may be so, but I do not believe it. Water, +as I shall show hereafter, is indeed the only appropriate drink; but I +do not believe that bread, even after the second year, is in all cases +and circumstances the best food. Besides that the experiments of +Majendie and other physiologists go a little way--though not far, I +confess--to prove that animals generally, (and if so, why not man, as +well as the rest?) thrive best with some degree of variety in their +food, it seems to me more in accordance with the general intentions of +the Creator, so far as we can discover what they are. + +While, therefore, I deny that either milk or bread is better, in all +cases, for human sustenance, than any other articles of food, I must, at +the same time, be permitted to regard them as among the best, and as +deserving more general attention. Every infant, after leaving the +breast, should, as it seems to me, make bread, in some of its forms, a +chief article of food. + +This article, so justly and emphatically called the staff of life, may +be found in almost every country. Common sense seems to have dictated +the propriety of its use; though fashion has often led us to overlook +or despise it--like air, and fire, and water, and nearly every other +common but indispensable blessing. + +The best kind of bread is made from wheat, the worst from bark, +saw-dust, &c. Wood and bark afford so little nutriment, that it is only +in such countries as Norway, Sweden, Lapland. Iceland, Greenland, and +Siberia, that the inhabitants can be induced to make use of them. Here +they are often useful; either because people cannot get food which is +better, or to blend with their fat or oily animal food. For it should +never be forgotten, that healthy digestion requires a large proportion +of innutritious matter along with the pure nutriment. In order to make +bread from wheat, the meal should not be bolted. If it seems to contain +particles which are too coarse, it may be well to pass it through a +coarse family sieve; but the best bread I have ever eaten, as well as +the cleanest and neatest, was not sifted at all. + +I know there is an almost universal prejudice against this sort of +bread. Some complain that it scratches their throats; others, that it is +tasteless; and others still, that it does not agree with them. With +others there is another objection--which is that bread of this sort has +sometimes been called _dyspepsia_ bread; and with others still, that it +has been called _Graham_ bread. Either of these appellations seems +sufficient to condemn it. + +Now as to the harshness, this is owing to its being made of bad +materials, or to its being baked too hard, or kept too long. Much of +what they call dyspepsia bread, in our cities, is evidently made by +mixing the bran and flour of wheat after they have been once separated; +besides which, in not a few cases, the finest of the flour appears to be +taken away. Now bread made of such materials thus combined, will always +be darker colored, as well as harsher, than when made from the wheat, +simply ground without any bolting, and wet up in the usual manner. Such +bread is best two or three days old. After four days, it becomes dry and +somewhat harsh. + +They who complain that such bread is insipid, are persons whose +appetites have been injured by food which is high-seasoned; and who, if +they eat bread at all, must eat it hot, or soaked in butter. No wonder +such persons do not like plain bread, and say it is tasteless. But it +must not be denied that bakers often suffer this kind of bread to be +over-risen, in order to make it sufficiently light and porous. This +renders it less tasteful, and from the saleratus they use, less +wholesome. + +No child who has been accustomed, from the first, to good wheaten bread, +made of unbolted meal, and not less than one day old, will ever prefer +any other, until he has been rendered capricious on this subject, and +wishes to change for the sake of changing, or until he has been misled +by surrounding example. I speak from observation when I say that +infants, whose habits have not been depraved, will not prefer hot bread +of any kind. "It is hot, mother," I have heard them say, as an apology +for refusing a piece of bread; but never, "It is cold," or "It is too +old." + +It is the epicurean--it is he with whom it is a sufficient objection to +any kind of food whatever, that he has used it for several successive +meals or days--that is most ready to complain of good bread. He whose +habits are correct, and who is the more unwilling to change any of his +articles of diet, the longer he has been in the use of them, and who +only changes them, or uses variety, from principle--he, I say, will +never complain of harshness or want of taste in good wheat bread; nor +will it be an objection of weight with him that _Mr. Graham_ has +recommended it, or that it has either prevented or cured _dyspepsia_. + +Nor will the epicurean himself complain that bread is insipid, after +being confined to it for a month or six weeks. He will then find a +sweetness in it, for which he had long sought in vain in the more +delicate and costly viands of a luxurious, and expensive, and +unchristian modern table. + +It is they only who observe simplicity, and confine themselves to very +plain food, who truly enjoy pleasure in eating. The bulk of mankind +benumb their sense of taste by their high-seasoned, over-stimulating +food and drink, and by such constant variety and strange mixtures; and +thus, in their eager cry, "Who will show us any good?" they actually +enjoy less than he who eats plain food, and is contented with it. + +Bread of all kinds is greatly improved in whiteness and pleasantness by +being wet with milk; though even when wet with nothing but water, there +is a solid and rational sweetness to it, of which the despisers of +bread, and devourers of much flesh and condiments never dreamed, and +never will dream, till they reform their habits. + +If children are furnished with good bread, on the plan of Mr. Locke, +there is no doubt that they will relish it most keenly; that their +attachment to it will strengthen, and that unless we give them other +food occasionally, from principle, or seduce them by depraving their +tastes, they will continue it through life. "Train up a child in the way +he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it," is a +general rule, and has as few exceptions, when applied to the diet of a +child, as when it is applied to his moral tastes and preferences. + +With those parents who, though convinced of the justness of the views +here advanced, have already trained their children in the way they +should _not_ go, but are anxious to retrace their steps as far as +possible, there will here be a difficulty. "Our children," they will +say, "do not, at present, _relish_ the kind of bread you speak of; and +how shall we bring them to do so? or is the thing indeed possible?" + +The answer to these inquiries is easy. Such parents have only to confine +their children to the kinds of food which they deem proper for them, a +few weeks or a few months, and they will soon relish them. If those who +are old enough to be convinced can be brought to unite heartily in the +change, and to endeavor to be pleased with it, the work of reformation +will be more pleasant and probably more speedy. I have never found any +difficulty of bringing myself to relish in a very short time an article +of food for which I had no relish before, and to which I had even a +dislike, provided I was thoroughly convinced it was best for me, and was +earnest in the desire of change--except sweet oil, to which I was about +six months in becoming reconciled. + +It is with physical, as with moral habits, in their formation. We +should fix on what we believe, from experience, observation, and divine +and human testimony, is best for us, and habit will soon render it +agreeable. It is important, even to health, that food should be +agreeable; but as I have already said, what we know to be best for us +will soon become agreeable, if we confine ourselves to it; and to our +children also, if we confine them to it, in like manner. + +Next to bread made of wheat--when that cannot be procured--is a mixture +of wheat and Indian meal; but the proportion of the latter should be the +smallest. Wheat, rye, and Indian, in the proportion of one third of +each, make excellent bread, sometimes called _third_ bread. Rye and +Indian make a tolerable bread. Rye alone is not so good. The want, in +the latter, of the vegetable principle called gluten, makes its general +use of very questionable propriety. + +Indian meal alone, baked in cakes by the fire, if eaten only in small +quantities, is a very nutritious and by no means unwholesome bread. But +its sweetness, and the general fondness which people who are accustomed +to its use have for it, lead them to eat it in too large proportions, if +they use it while it is warm. In these circumstances, it proves itself +too active for the stomach and bowels. If warm, six ounces is as much +as a hearty adult ought to eat of it at once; and children should of +course take much less. It is less active on the bowels, and scarcely +less agreeable, as soon as we become accustomed to it, if eaten when it +is cold--even if baked in loaves, in the oven. + +Potatoes, added to unbolted wheat flour, make excellent bread; and so, +as I am informed, does rice. Of the latter, however, I have never eaten. +Oats and barley, and many other grains and substances, will make bread; +but it is of an inferior kind. + +The question may again recur, after this extended series of remarks, +whether I intend to confine the young almost exclusively to bread, in +one or another of its forms. We shall see how this is, presently. + +While bread, therefore, should constitute a part, at least, and +sometimes the whole of a meal, a great variety of other articles are not +only admissible, but desirable. Among these may be mentioned plain +puddings. + +One of the most wholesome puddings is made of Indian meal, enclosed in a +bag and boiled. Nearly allied to this is the common hasty pudding; but +the last is less wholesome, because it requires less chewing; and it +ought to have been observed, before now, that after weaning, any food +is digested better which has undergone the process of thorough +mastication. + +Boiled rice, though hardly to be regarded as a pudding, is very +nutritious, and very easy of digestion. I am not without doubts, +however, in regard to the utility of a large proportion of rice, as +food. A dinner of it, two or three times a week, I believe to be +wholesome; but used too frequently, it seems to me not active enough for +the stomach and bowels; having in this respect precisely a contrary +effect to that of warm Indian cakes. The common notion that rice has a +tendency to make people blind, is entirely unfounded. Its worst effect +is when eaten without being boiled through. In such cases, I have known +it to do mischief; perhaps because it was swallowed without much +chewing. Some grind it, and use the flour; but I cannot recommend it to +be used in this manner. + +The best pudding in the world is a loaf of bread, (What!--you will +say--bread again?) three or four or five days old, boiled, or rather +_steamed_, in milk. All kinds of bread are excellent for this purpose, +but wheat and Indian are the best. They are excellent even without +milk--that is, simply steamed. + +Puddings made of the flour of wheat, rye, buckwheat, &c., are less +wholesome than those which have been already mentioned. And all sorts +of puddings are less wholesome, when eaten as hot as our unreasonable +fashions require, than when their temperature is quite below that of our +bodies. I would not have them so cold as to chill us, for this would be +to go to the other, though less dangerous extreme; but they ought to be +cool. Too much heat is an unnatural stimulus, likely to leave more or +less debility behind it. In addition to this, those who eat hot food are +more exposed to take cold, in consequence of it. + +With none of these puddings ought we to mix any fruits, green or +dried--not even raisins. Some of the more important properties of nearly +every kind of fruit or berry are lost by boiling, unless we eat the +water in which they are boiled, and save the vapor which would otherwise +escape. I am not in favor of boiled fruit generally, especially if +boiled in puddings. + +Puddings, like most other kinds of food--even bread--may be slightly +salted: not that this is indispensable, but because the balance of human +testimony is in its favor. The argument that we evidently need salt +because the other animals require it, is without much weight. The other +animals do not _generally_ require or use it.[Footnote: Some +considerable savage nations use no salt, and a few have a strong +aversion to it.] The cases so often triumphantly mentioned, where +animals appear to thrive better from the use of it, are only exceptions +to the general rule, nor are they very numerous in comparison with the +whole race of animals. Still I have no objections to its moderate use. +It may be useful in preventing worms; though there are doubts even of +that. In large quantities, it is unquestionably hurtful. + +But neither fruits nor berries--permit me to repeat the sentiment--no, +nor any such thing as cinnamon or spices, nor even sugar or molasses in +any considerable quantity, should go into the composition of any sort of +pudding. If the puddings are not sweet enough without, it is better to +add a little sugar or molasses on your plate. Nor should sauces, or +cream, or butter, or suet be used in or upon them; though of all these +substances, cream is least injurious. Nutmegs, grated cheese, &c., are +unnecessary and hurtful. Cheese should never be eaten, in any way. + +There is one thing, however, which may be eaten in moderate quantity +with all sorts of puddings and with bread; I mean milk. I say eaten +_with_, for it is better never to put these substances, nor indeed any +other, _into_ the milk. The bread, pudding, &c., should be eaten by +itself, and the milk by itself, also. In this way we shall not be liable +to cheat the teeth out of what is justly their due, and then make the +deranged stomach and general system pay for it. + +Potatoes are a good article of diet--to be used once a day--though they +are not very nutritious. They are best either steamed or roasted in the +ashes. They are also excellent when boiled. Turnips are also good. +Onions are not so useful as is generally supposed, except for the +purposes of medicine. + +Beets; in small quantity, and carrots and asparagus, and above all, +beans and peas--but not their pods--are tolerable food once a day, +during most of the year, except it be the middle of the winter. But +neither these, nor potatoes, nor any other vegetables, ought to be +cooked in any way with fat, or fat meat, or butter; or be mashed after +they are cooked, or eaten with oil or butter. + +If there be an exception to this general rule--which may seem to be +rather sweeping--it should be in favor of a little sweet oil on rice, or +on bread puddings. But the common practice, founded upon the apparent +belief that we can scarcely eat anything until it is well covered with +lard or butter, is quite objectionable--nay, it is even disgusting. No +pure stomach would ever prefer oily bread, or pudding, or beans, or +peas; and most people would abhor the sight of such a strange +combination, were not habit, in its power to change our very nature, +almost omnipotent. + + +SEC. 10. _Remarks on Fruit._ + +There is a very great diversity of opinion on the subject of fruit. Some +maintain that all fruit, even in the most ripe and perfect state, is of +doubtful utility, especially for children. Others say none is hurtful, +if ripe, and eaten in moderate quantity. Some require care in making a +proper selection; but here again, in regard to what constitutes a proper +selection, there is a difference of opinion. Some consider fruits easy +of digestion; others believe they are digested only with very great +difficulty. + +When the cholera prevailed in the large cities of the United States, a +majority of the physicians believed all fruits, even those which were +ripe, to be injurious in their tendency. But it was insisted by the +minority--I think very justly--that whenever fruit appeared to be +injurious, it was accidental--that is, the disease, being prepared to +make its attack just at that time, happened to do so immediately after +the use of fruit, rather than something else, and especially in the +_season_ of fruits--or on account of excess; or (which was certainly +the case in some instances) because the quality of the fruit was bad. + +At present, the _weight_ of testimony on this subject--estimating +according to talent, and not according to numbers--is in favor of good +fruit, used with moderation--even in the face of the cholera. Dr. +Dunglison--one of the last to adopt such an opinion--appears to be in +its favor. + +On several points, in regard to fruit, I believe that among medical men +there is no essential difference of opinion. As I always prefer, in +controversies, to see in how many things antagonists agree, before +proceeding to the points in which they differ, I will here endeavor to +enumerate them. + +1. All unripe fruits, especially, if eaten raw and uncooked--let the +season, or prevalent disease, or individual, be what or who it may--are +unwholesome. + +2. Excess, in the use of the most wholesome fruits, under any +circumstances, is also injurious. + +3. Fruits, eaten immediately after a full meal, when the stomach is in +an improper condition for receiving anything more, contribute to +overtask the digestive powers, and must hence produce more or less of +injury. + +4. The skins and kernels of the larger fruits are unwholesome, because +indigestible. The skins of fruits, if beaten or masticated finely; may +appear to be digested, because dissolved; but I have already endeavored +to show that solution is not always digestion. + +5. Fruits of all kinds are most wholesome in their own country, and in +their own appropriate season. + +6. Dried fruits are less wholesome than fresh. + +7. Fruit of all kinds should be withheld from infants, until they have +teeth. + +Thus far, as I have already said, all agree; at least so far as I know. +There are several other points on which medical men are generally +agreed, though not universally. One of these is, that fruits, if eaten +at all, should usually form a part of a regular meal. Another is, that +it is better not to eat them immediately before going to bed. + +There are contradictory opinions among the mass of the community, +physicians as well as others, on the general intention of our summer +fruits. From the fact that children's diseases prevail more at the +season of the year when fruits are more abundant, many think the fruits +are the immediate cause of them. Others, and with better reason, suppose +that the latter are intended by the Author of nature to check or prevent +the bowel diseases of summer. + +Nothing, certainly, is more unnatural than to suppose that at the very +season of the year when so many other influences combine to awaken a +tendency to disease in the human system, the Creator should place before +our eyes an abundance of fruits, inviting us by all their cooling and +tempting properties, only to do us mischief. On the contrary, it seems +to me much more probable that many of them were designed for our +moderate use. In what quantity, under what circumstances, and which are +best, it is left to human experience to determine. + +Some say that fruit should never be eaten in the morning, before +breakfast. Now everything I know of the human constitution, together +with what I have learned from experience and observation, has been for +years leading me to the contrary opinion. Indeed, I am most fully +convinced, that of all periods for eating fruit, whether we use it alone +or make it a part of our regular meals, the morning, soon after we rise, +is the most favorable. [Footnote: I ought to remark, that as the morning +is the best time for eating _good_ fruit, so it is the very worst time +for eating it if _not_ good; and as a large proportion of that which is +eaten is unripe, or otherwise bad, this may account for the general +prejudice against eating it at this period.] My reasons are as follows: + +1. The rest and sleep of the preceding night has restored our general +vigor, and consequently has invigorated the stomach, so that digestion +will be more easily and perfectly accomplished. + +2. We have been, at our rising, so long without food on our stomachs, +that they are not likely to be oppressed by a moderate quantity of good, +ripe, wholesome fruit. In the course of our waking hours, meals follow +each other in such quick succession, and there is so much variety, even +at the plainest tables, to tempt us to excess, that there is more danger +of injury from the addition of fruit than at our first rising. + +3. I have never known any one to receive injury from the use of fruit in +this way, provided no other circumstance in relation to quantity, +quality, &c. had been disregarded. In my own case, the practice has, on +the contrary, seemed beneficial. + +4. There is one reason in favor of this practice which perhaps would +have less weight, if people rose as early in the morning as they ought; +or, in the language of Dr. Franklin to the inhabitants of Paris, if they +knew that the sun gives light as soon as he rises. I allude to the +demand which I conceive that the stomach makes for something, after so +long fasting, and the pernicious custom of late breakfasts. I am +persuaded that it is advisable to eat something nearly as soon as we +rise, be it never so early; and if we can get nothing else for +breakfast, and have not accustomed ourselves to relish a piece of good +bread, or some other simple thing, which requires no labor of +preparation, I think it perfectly proper to eat a small quantity of +fruit. + +We come now to the particular consideration of some of those fruits +which universal experience has shown to be the most salutary. + +Of all these, none is more wholesome than the apple. There is indeed a +great diversity in the quality even of this single article. Sweet apples +are the most nutritious; but perhaps those which are gently acid, and at +the same time mealy, are rather more cooling, and when eaten raw, and in +the heat of summer, not less wholesome. + +Apples which come to maturity very early in the season appear, as a +general rule, to be less rich, and even less perfect, than those which +ripen later. In view of this fact, some writers have endeavored to +dissuade us from their use; and among others, Mr. Locke. We may judge a +little what his opinions were, from his concluding remarks on the +subject:--"I never knew apples hurt anybody," says he, "after October." + +But although neither apples nor any other fruits which ripen uncommonly +early are quite so good as those which come in a little later, yet I do +not think they are to be wholly rejected, unless they have been raised +in hot houses. Fruits, and indeed vegetables in general, whose maturity +is hastened by artificial processes, must be less wholesome than when +brought to perfection in nature's own appropriate time and manner. I +ought to say, however, very distinctly, that of the fruits of any +particular tree, those which first ripen are always the worst; for they +are usually wormy, or otherwise defective. + +Most of the fruit, as well as other vegetables, brought to our city +markets in this country, is utterly unfit to be eaten. Sometimes it is +immature; sometimes it has a hot house maturity; sometimes it has been +picked so long that it has begun to decay. Many fruits--berries +especially--are in perfection for a very short period only. Mulberries, +for example--one kind especially--are not in perfection long enough to +carry to the market house, even though the distance were very small. +Luckily, however, very few mulberries are eaten. But the raspberry and +strawberry, if perfect when gathered, have usually begun to decay, +before they are purchased. That this appears to be rather unfrequent, is +because they are gathered before they are ripe. + +Dr. Dewees regards most fruits as difficult of digestion. I do not think +they are so, if perfect and ripe. The experiments of Dr. Beaumont, so +far as they prove any general principle, show conclusively that mellow +sweet apples are more quickly digested than any kind of vegetable food +whatever, except rice and sago. But even admitting they were slow of +digestion, I do not think--as I have already shown in another +place--that they ought on that account to be excluded. Besides, my +opinion differs from that of Dr. D. in regard to the strength of the +digestive powers of children. After teething, they seem to me to be able +to digest any substances which adults can; and with as little +difficulty. + +But to return:--No fruit is in perfection longer than the apple. +Besides, no fruit appears to be less injured in its nature and +properties by picking it a little before it is ripe, and preserving it +during the winter. It is on this account, more perhaps than any other, +that I value it more highly than all other fruits united. + +Apples may be used either raw or cooked. In either case, the skins and +seeds should be avoided, as has been before suggested. I am not ignorant +that WILLICH, in his "Lectures on Diet and Regimen"--an excellent work, +in the main--says that the seeds ought to be eaten; but I believe few +physiologists would comply with his injunction, especially when it is +considered that he recommends, in the same connection, that we swallow +the stones of cherries and plums. Strange how far our theories will +sometimes carry us! + +The apple is excellent when roasted or baked, especially the sweet +apple. It is very common, in some places, to eat baked sweet apples with +milk; and the practice is by no means a bad one. Indeed, baked or raw +apples might be advantageously made a part of at least one of our meals +every day. There is said to be a miserly farmer--a single gentleman--in +the western part of the state of Massachusetts, who has lived on nothing +but apples for his food, and water for his drink, about forty years. And +yet he is said to enjoy the most perfect health. I do not propose this +as an example worthy of imitation; but it shows that apples maybe made +to subserve an important purpose in diet. And though I have more than +once expressed an opinion highly unfavorable to the exclusive use of any +one article of diet, yet if I were to confine myself to any one thing, I +know of nothing except bread that I should prefer to good apples. Still, +however, I prefer a variety--sweet, sour, early, late, &c.; and I should +use them raw, roasted, baked, made into sauce with new or unfermented +cider, and boiled. Good apples, eaten raw, with bread, form not only a +very wholesome, but, to an unperverted appetite, a most delicious +dinner. + +Much has been said about cutting down orchards; but the whole seems to +me idle--for if the fruit is of a good quality, it may be used as food, +either for man or beast. And if not good, the trees ought either to be +destroyed or replaced by those that will produce fruit which is +better--even if the object were to make it into cider. I have said that +apples may be used both by man and beast. It is well known that most +domestic animals thrive well on good apples, especially sweet ones. Very +tolerable molasses is also sometimes made from sweet apples. + +Nearly everything which has been said above in regard to apples, will +apply to pears. The best varieties of this excellent fruit are quite as +nutritious and as wholesome as the apple; and as much improved for the +table by baking. I believe, however, that no cheap process has yet been +devised for keeping them as long in the winter. They may be preserved in +the form of sauce, prepared in the same way with common apple sauce. The +skins, of many kinds of pears are less injurious than those of apples; +but even the skins of pears need not be eaten. + +Some kinds of peaches are tolerably wholesome; but the stringy character +of their pulp appears to me to render them less so than apples and +pears, though I am not confident on this point. But if used at all, they +should be used in less quantity at one time. Tempting as their flavor +is, I seldom eat them, when I can get apples and pears; holding myself +in duty bound to use the _best_, even of the fruits. + +"Fruit," says Mr. Locke, "makes one of the most difficult chapters in +the government of health, especially that of children. Our first parents +ventured Paradise for it; and it is no wonder our children cannot stand +the temptation, though it cost them their health. The regulation of this +cannot come under any one general rule; for I am by no means of their +mind who would keep children wholly from fruit, as a thing totally +unwholesome for them, by which strict way they make them but the more +ravenous after it, to eat good or bad, ripe or unripe, all that they can +get, whenever they come at it. + +"Melons, peaches, most sorts of plums, and all sorts of grapes, in +_England_, I think children should be wholly kept from, as having a very +tempting taste, in a very unwholesome juice, so that if it were +possible, they should never so much as see them, or know that there was +any such thing. But strawberries, cherries, gooseberries and currants, +when thoroughly ripe, I think may be pretty safely allowed them." + +Excellent as these remarks are, in general, I do not like his entire +interdiction of the use of melons, peaches, plums, and grapes, even in +England. Peaches, to be sure, as they come at a season when apples or +pears, or both of them--which are more wholesome than peaches--are +abundant, may be better omitted, delicious as they are to the taste; and +I do not think very highly of plums. But melons, in very moderate +quantity, and grapes, if we eat nothing but the ripe pulp, rejecting +both the husk and the interior hard part, including the seeds, are, I +think, useful and wholesome. On the other hand, I should never place +cherries and gooseberries in the same list with strawberries; for the +latter are, if I may use the expression, infinitely the most wholesome. + +Many seem to think that not to eat all sorts of fruits is to despise, or +at least to treat with neglect the gifts of God, intended for our +reception; by which they mean, if they mean anything, that the use of +all sorts of fruits is already found out, even in the present +comparative infancy of the world. Now I do not suppose that God has made +anything in vain--absolutely so--though I do not think we have found out +the true uses of half the things which he has made and given us. And +among those things of which we are yet ignorant, are some of the fruits. +I do not believe it follows, necessarily, that because fruits are +created, we are obliged to use them all. + +Besides, if this is a rule, it is one which nobody follows. Every one +uses more of some sorts, and fewer of others; and a large proportion of +the community entirely reject some kinds. Now if the statement commonly +made, that all fruits are the gifts of God, and ought therefore to be +used by all persons, is correct, those who make the statement ought to +conform to it as a rule of their lives, and to eat all kinds of fruit +which the season and country affords; and not only eat all kinds, but +see that the whole of every kind is consumed; since to waste any portion +is to slight the good gifts of God. + +The result then is, that we cannot obey such a rule; but are driven back +to the mode which common sense dictates, which is, to make a selection, +using some, and rejecting others. And the value of studying the nature +of these fruits, by examining the experience of mankind in regard to +them, consists in the aid thus afforded us in making our selection +wisely. + +There is one very common error in the use of the smaller summer fruits, +such as strawberries, whortleberries, currants, &c., which is that of +mixing cream, wine, spices, sugar, &c., with them. We are thus tempted +to eat too great a quantity at once. Besides--which is a worse evil--we +change the proportions of the saccharine parts, and thus do all in our +power, by increasing a similarity in all fruits, to destroy that +agreeable variety which God has established, and which is probably +salutary. + + +SEC. 11. _Confectionary._ + +By confectionary we here mean the substances usually sold at those shops +in our cities distinguished by the general name of confectionaries, and +which consist either wholly of sugar, or of sugar and some other +substances combined. + +As to the use of a moderate quantity of pure sugar at our meals, whether +it is procured at a confectioner's shop or elsewhere, I do not know that +there is any strong objection to it; though I believe that it cannot be +regarded as indispensable to health--for were that the fact, it seems to +me to imply something short of infinite wisdom in the creation of +articles destined for our sustenance. But I have spoken on this subject +elsewhere. + +A part, however, of the contents of the confectionary shop are actually +poisonous. I refer to those things which are either frosted, as it is +called, or colored. The substances applied to the sugar for this purpose +are usually some mineral or vegetable poison; although the fact of its +being a poison may not always be known to the manufacturer. The most +unhappy consequences have occasionally followed the use of +confectionary, when poisoned in this manner. A family of four persons, +in New York, were made sick in this way in March of year before last, +and some of them came very near losing their lives. The "frosting" which +caused the mischief was pronounced by eminent chemists to be one fifth +rank poison.[Footnote: It is to be remembered that those who eat +confectionary so slightly poisoned that it does not make them sick at +once, may nevertheless be as much injured in their constitutions as they +who are poisoned outright. In the latter case, the poison is in part +thrown out of the body; in the former, it remains in it much longer--and +therefore more surely, though more slowly, accomplishes the work of +destruction.] The coloring substances used are sometimes poisonous, as +well as the frosting. + +Some of the articles sold at these shops consist of sugar mixed with +paste. Others are called sweetmeats; that is, fruits, or rinds of +fruits, preserved in sugar. All these substances, I believe, without +exception, are injurious. + +The great evils of confectionary yet remain to be mentioned. These are +of three kinds, physical, mental and moral. + +Some of the _physical_ evils have, it is true, just been mentioned; but +there is another evil of still greater magnitude. Young people who eat +confectionary, commonly eat it between meals. This produces mischief in +two ways. First, it keeps the stomach at work when it ought to rest; for +this, like every other muscular organ, requires its seasons of repose. +Secondly, it destroys gradually the appetite; so that when the regular +meal arrives, the accustomed keenness of appetite does not come with it. +And the consequence is, not so much that we do not eat enough, as that +we are fastidious, and eat a little of this, then a little of that; and +usually select the worst things. We are not hungry enough to make a meal +of a single article of plain food. And this evil goes on increasing, as +long as we have access to the confectionary shop. These statements +describe the case of thousands of pupils, of both sexes, at our schools +and seminaries. + +The _intellectual_ evil resulting from the use of confectionary consists +in the fondness for excitement which is produced. You will seldom find a +person who depends daily and almost hourly on some excitement to his +appetite and stomach, and is not satisfied with plain food, who will +content himself to _study_ without unnatural excitements of the mind. +Duty to himself or to others will not move him. He must have before him +the hope of reward, or the fear of punishment. He must be moved by +emulation or ambition, or some other questionable or wicked motive or +passion. + +But the _moral_ results, to the young, of using confectionary, are still +more dreadful. I do not here refer to the danger of meeting with bad +company at the shops themselves, or of going from these places of +pollution _directly_ to the grog-shop, the gambling-house, or the +brothel; though there is danger enough, even here. But I allude to the +tendency which a habit of not resting satisfied with plain food, but of +depending on exciting things, has, to make us dissatisfied with plain +moral enjoyments--the society of friends, and the quiet discharge of our +duty to God and our neighbor. Just in proportion as we gratify our +propensity for excitement at the confectioner's shop, just in the same +proportion do we expose ourselves to the, danger of yielding to +temptation, should other gratifications present themselves. The young of +both sexes who are in the use of confectionary, are on the high road to +gluttony, drunkenness, or debauchery; perhaps to all three. I do not say +they will certainly arrive there, for circumstances not quite miraculous +may pluck them as "brands from the burning;" but I do not hesitate to +say that such is the inevitable tendency; and I call on every mother and +teacher who reads this section, to beware of confectionaries, and see, +if possible, that the young never set foot in them. They are a road +through which thousands pass to the chamber of death--death to the +immortal spirit, as well as to the body, its vehicle. + +More might be added--for this is an important subject--but I trust I +have said enough. Those who have read and believe what I have written, +if they remain wholly unaffected and unmoved, would not be roused to +effort were anything to be added. + + +SEC. 12. _Pastry._ + +Dr. Paris, a distinguished British writer on diet, says that all pastry +is "an abomination." And yet, go where we will, we find it often on the +table. Hardly any one, whether old or young, attempts to do without it. + +There are indeed some, who will not eat pie-crust, or high-seasoned +cakes formed of paste; but yet will not hesitate to eat hot bread, or +rolls, or biscuits made of wheat flour, bolted. Now what is this but +paste? If we could see the contents of the stomach, an hour after the +mass is swallowed, we should find it to be paste, and _mere_ paste. + +And yet the evil is increasing everywhere. So generally is this true, +that a person who refuses to eat hot bread, or cake, or biscuit, is +deemed singular. He who ventures to lift his voice against it is deemed +an ascetic or a visionary. But such a voice must be raised, and heard, +too, whether its monitions are or are not regarded. + +Pastry is less objectionable, however, when used in the form of hot +bread, &c., than when butter or fat is mixed with it. Then it becomes +one of the most indigestible substances in the world. Besides, it not +only tries the patience of the stomach, but according to Willich, whose +authority ranks high, it tends to produce diseases of the skin, +especially a disease which he calls "copper in the face," and which he +pronounces incurable. + +I know not whether the eruptions so common on the faces of young people +in this country, and especially of young men, are in every instance +either produced or aggravated by pastry; but I am very sure of one +thing, viz., that those who are in the use of pastry, and have eruptions +of the skin of any kind, will not be apt to get well, as long as they +continue the use of this objectionable substance. + +Physicians are often consulted about eruptions on the face. When they +assign the real cause, which is undoubtedly connected with the improper +gratification of some of the appetites, in one way or another, it is +seldom that the patient has self-command enough to follow his +prescription of temperance or abstinence. Mothers, it is yours to +prevent this mischief;--first, by establishing correct physical habits; +secondly, by teaching your children the great duty of self-denial--not +only by precept, but by your own good example. + + +SEC. 13. _Crude or Raw Substances._ + +I have reserved this section for remarks on certain articles used at our +fashionable modern tables, of which I could not well find it convenient +to speak elsewhere. And first, of SALADS, and HERBS used in cooking; +such as asparagus, artichokes, spinage, plantain, cabbage, dock, +lettuce, water-cresses, chives, &c. + +Several of these substances are often eaten raw, in which state they are +exceedingly indigestible, at the best; and they are rendered still more +beyond the reach of the powers of the stomach, by the oil or vinegar +which is added to them. Boiled, they are more tolerable; especially +asparagus. In the midst, however, of such an abundance of excellent food +as this country affords, it is most surprising that anybody should ever +take it into their heads to eat such crude substances; and above all, +that they should fill children's stomachs with them. What child, with an +unperverted appetite, would not prefer a good ripe apple, or peach, or +pear, to the most approved raw salads?--and a good baked one, to the +best boiled asparagus? + +NUTS, in general, are probably made for other animals rather than man; +though of this we cannot in the present infancy of human knowledge be +quite certain. But if any of them were intended, by the Creator, for +man, it is the chesnut; and this should be boiled. Boiled chesnuts are +used as food, in many parts of southern Europe; and to a very +considerable extent. + +SPICES, as they are sometimes called, such as nutmeg, mace, pepper, +pimento; cubebs, cardamoms, juniper berries, ginger, calamus, cloves, +cinnamon, caraway, coriander, fennel, parsley, dill, sage, marjoram, +thyme, pennyroyal, lavender, hyssop, peppermint, &c., are unfit for the +human stomach--above all in infancy--except as medicines. + +There are several other vegetables equally objectionable with the last, +though they cannot be classed under the same head. Such are mustard, +horseradish, raw onions, garlic, cucumbers, and pickles. No appetite +which has not been accustomed to these substances in early infancy, will +ever require them. Not that they may not sometimes be useful in enabling +the stomach--at every age--to get rid of certain substances with which +it has been improperly or unreasonably loaded;--this is undoubtedly the +fact; ardent spirits would do the same. And it is with a view to some +such effect, generally, that medical writers have spoken in their favor. +Some of them stimulate the stomach to get rid of a load of _green_ +fruit; others, of a load of _fat_ or _salt_ food; others, again, +of too large a _quantity_ of food which is naturally wholesome. + +But in all these cases, they should be considered, not as food, but as +medicine; and we ought to call them by their right name. And if we +withhold the cause of the disease, there will be no need of the +medicine. + + + + +CHAPTER VIII. + +DRINKS. + +Infants need little drink. Adults, even, generally drink to cool +themselves. Simple water the best drink. Opinions of Dr. Oliver and Dr. +Dewees. Animal food increases thirst. Only one real drink in the world. +The true object of all drink. Tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, &c. Milk and +water, molasses and water, &c. Cider, wine, and ardent spirits. Bad food +and drink the most prolific sources of disease. Children naturally +prefer water. Danger of hot drinks. Cold drinks. Mischief they produce. +Caution to mothers. Extracts. Drinking cold water, while hot. + + +Children need little if any drink, so long as their food is nothing but +milk; nor indeed for some time afterward, unless they are indulged in +the use of animal food. Adults, even, very seldom drink merely to quench +natural thirst. In the summer, people usually drink either to cool +themselves, or to gratify a thirst which is wholly artificial. Tea, +coffee, beer, cider, and most other common drinks, when not used for the +sake of their coolness, are drank, both in winter and summer, for this +purpose. + +That this is the fact, we have the most abundant and unequivocal +evidence. I know that much is said of the demand which a profuse +perspiration creates among hard laborers in the summer. Such a sudden +abstraction of a large amount of fluid requires, it is said, a +proportional supply, or life would soon become extinct. Yet there are +many old men who have perspired profusely at their labor all their days, +and yet have drank nothing at all, except their tea, morning and +evening; and perhaps have eaten, for one or two of their meals daily, in +summer, a bowl of bread and milk. And some of them are among the most +remarkable instances of longevity which the country affords. + +How the system acquires a sufficient supply of moisture to keep up good +health, in these cases, I do not pretend to determine: perhaps it is +through the medium of the lungs. But at any rate, it can obtain it +without our drinking for that sole purpose, to the great danger of +exciting liver complaints, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, colds, rheumatisms, and +fevers. + +But if adults who perspire freely do not require much drink, children +certainly do not; and above all, young children. And if they do require +any thing, it is only simple water. The following remarks of Dr. Oliver, +of Hanover, N.H., are extracted from Dr. Mussey's late Prize Essay on +Ardent Spirits: + +"Who has not observed the extreme satisfaction which children derive +from quenching their thirst with pure water? And who that has perverted +his appetite for drink, by stimulating his palate with bitter beer, sour +cider, rum and water, and other beverages of human invention, but would +be a gainer, even on the score of mere animal gratification, without any +reference to health, if he could bring back his vitiated taste to the +simple relish of nature? + +"Children drink because they are dry. Grown people drink, whether dry or +not, because they have discovered a way of making drink pleasant. +Children drink water because this is a beverage of nature's own brewing, +which she has made for the purpose of quenching a natural thirst. Grown +people drink anything but water, because this fluid is intended to +quench only a natural thirst; and natural thirst is a thing which they +seldom feel." + +There is a great deal of truth, as well as of sound philosophy, in these +two paragraphs, and little less of truth in the following paragraph from +Dr. Dewees: + +"We have witnessed very often, with sorrow, parents giving to their +young children wine, or other stimulating liquors. Nature never intended +anything stronger than water to be the drink for children. This they +enjoy greatly; and much advantage is occasionally experienced from its +use, especially after they have commenced the use of animal food." + +Two things are to be observed in the last remarks, which are, that +children demand drink of any kind but seldom, and that even this +occasional demand is often the special result of the use of animal food. +Here comes out an important secret. It is the use of animal food, to a +very great degree, in adults and children both, that creates so much of +that unnatural thirst which prevails in the community. When we shall +come to lay aside animal food, in childhood, youth, manhood and age, +much that is now _called_ thirst will be banished; and much of the +intemperance and other kinds of sensuality which follow in its train. + +It has been sometimes said that there is but one kind of drink in the +world--and that is water. This is strictly, or rather _physiologically_ +true. For, though many mixtures are _called_ drinks, it is only the +water which they contain that answers any of the legitimate purposes for +which drink was intended by the Creator. + +The object of drink, besides quenching our thirst, or rather _while_ it +quenches it, is, not to be digested, like food, but to pass directly +from the stomach into the blood-vessels, and dilute and temper the +blood, rendering it more fit to answer the great purpose of sustaining +life and health. Now, there is nothing that can do this but water. +Alcohol cannot do it, nor can turpentine, oil, quicksilver, melted lead, +or any other liquid. + +Tea, coffee, chocolate, small beer, soda water, lemonade, &c., which are +nearly all water, quench the thirst very well, it is true; but not quite +so well as water alone would. The narcotic principle of the first two, +the alcoholic principle of the fourth, and the mucilage, nutriment, +acid, and alkali of the rest, are in the way; for thirst would be +quenched still better without them, even when it is of an unnatural +kind. + +Indeed, the same or similar remarks may be made in regard to all other +mixtures which are usually proposed as drinks. Even milk and water, +molasses and water, &c., in favor of which so much is said, are +objectionable, as mere drinks. Not that they contain anything poisonous, +but they evidently contain nutriment; and even this, except as a part or +the whole of a regular meal, does harm; for it sets the stomach at work +when it needs repose. Mere drink, as I have already said, is never +digested. + +But if the drinks above mentioned, and even milk and water, are +objectionable, what shall we say of cider, wine, and ardent +spirits?--substances which contain, the latter one half, and the two +former from one twentieth to one fourth alcohol. Surely, nobody will +deny that these substances ought, at all events, to be banished from the +nursery. And yet we occasionally find them there, not only for the use +of the mother, to the ruin of the child, indirectly--but also, in some +of their smoother forms, for the use of the child itself. + +I would not lay too much stress on food and drink; for, as I have +already observed, more than once, the causes of infantile ill health and +mortality are numerous. Still I must insist that, of all the sources of +disease, these are the most prolific. Much is done towards ruining the +health of children by the improper food and drink of the mother. But +when, in addition to all this, the children themselves are early fed +with animal food, and with stimulating drinks--punch, coffee, tea, +&c.--and an artificial thirst is early excited and rendered habitual, +their destruction, for time and eternity, is almost inevitable. + +Very few children relish any drink but water, or sweetened water, at +first; and where they do, it is probably hereditary. I have been struck +with their tastes and preferences; nor less with the folly of those +around them, in endeavoring to change them, by requiring them--almost +always against their will--to sip a little coffee, or a little tea, or +a little lemonade; or, it may be, a little toddy. Such children _may_ +escape the death of the drunkard or the debauchee; but if they do, it +will not be through the instrumentality of the parents. + +I am very much opposed to giving children hot drinks of any kind. If +they are to drink substances which are injurious, as tea or coffee, let +them be cool. I do not say _cold_, for that would be going to the other +extreme. But no drink, in any ordinary case, should be above the heat of +our bodies; that is, about 98 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer. Yet +the precautions of this paragraph will be almost unnecessary, if +children are confined--as they ought to be, and would be, did we not go +out of our way to teach them otherwise--to water, as their only drink. +Cold water is almost always preferred. Not one child in a thousand would +ever prefer it hot, until his taste had been perverted. No writer has +inveighed more against hot drinks of every kind, than the late William +Cobbett--and, as I think, with more justice. + +But, in avoiding one rock, we must not, as has already been intimated, +make shipwreck on another. Hot drinks, though they injure the powers of +the stomach, and by that means and through that medium, are one +principal cause of the almost universal early decay of teeth, are yet +less injurious, or at least less dangerous, immediately, than cold ones. +Mr. Locke, in speaking of the sports of a child, in the open air, has +the following quaint, but judicious remarks: + +"Playing in the open air has but this one danger in it, that I know; and +that is, that when he is hot with running up and down, he should sit or +lie down on the cold or moist earth. This, I grant, and drinking cold +drink, when they are hot with labor or exercise, brings more people to +the grave, or to the brink of it, by fevers and other diseases, than +anything I know. These mischiefs are easily enough prevented when he is +little, being then seldom out of sight. And if, during his childhood, he +be constantly and rigorously kept from sitting on the ground, or +drinking any cold liquor, while he is hot, the custom of forbearing, +grown into _habit_, will help much to preserve him, when he is no longer +under his maid's or tutor's eye. + +"More fevers and surfeits are got by people's drinking when they are +hot, than by any one thing I know. If he (the child) be very hot, he +should by no means _drink_; at least a good piece of bread, first to be +eaten, will gain time to warm his drink _blood hot_, which then he may +drink safely. If he be very dry, it will go down so warmed, and quench +his thirst better; and if he will not drink it so warmed, abstaining +will not hurt him. Besides, this will teach him to forbear, which is a +habit of the greatest use for health of mind and body too." + +The last remarks are full of wisdom. Mothers may depend upon it, that +every indulgence to which they accustom their children paves the way for +_habitual_ indulgence; and has a tendency to lead, indirectly, to +indulgence in other matters; and, on the contrary, every self-denial +which they can lead children to exercise, voluntarily--even in these +every-day matters of food, drink, exercise, &c. is so much gained in the +great work of self-denial and the resisting of temptation in matters of +higher importance. But I must not moralize too long; having dwelt on +this same point under the head Confectionary. I proceed, therefore, to +make a few more extracts from Mr. Locke: + +"Not being permitted to _drink_ without eating, will prevent the custom +of having the cup often at his nose; a dangerous beginning." + +"Men often bring habitual hunger and thirst on themselves by custom." + +"You may, if you please, bring any one to be thirsty every hour." + +"I once lived in a house, where, to appease a froward child, they gave +him _drink_ as often as he cried, so that he was constantly bibbing. +And though he could not speak, yet he drank more in twenty-four hours +than I did." + +"It is convenient, for health and sobriety, to drink no more than +natural thirst requires; and he that eats not salt meats, nor drinks +strong drink, will seldom thirst between meals." + +Great mischief is often done to their health by children at school; and +one instance of this is, in getting violently heated with exercise, and +then pouring down large quantities of cold water to cool themselves. I +once made it a habitual rule for pupils, that they must drink water, if +they drank it at all, on leaving their seats to go to their plays, but +not afterwards: and I was so situated that I could prevent the law from +being broken, as there was no spring or well to which they could have +access, privately. And though they thought the rule rather severe, I +have no doubt it saved them from much injury, and perhaps sometimes from +sickness. + + + + +CHAPTER IX. + +GIVING MEDICINE. + +"Prevention" better than "cure." Nine in ten infantile diseases caused +by errors in diet and drink. Signs of failing health. Causes of a bad +breath. Flesh eaters. Gormandizers. General rule for preventing disease. +When to call a physician. + + +So much error prevails in regard to the medical management of the young, +that a volume might be written without exhausting the subject.[Footnote: +Such a volume is in preparation. It is intended as a companion to the +present.] My present limits and plan allow of only a few remarks, and +those must be general. + +That "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," has so long ago +become a proverb, that it seems almost idle to repeat the sentiment. And +yet it is to be feared that very few receive it as a practical truth, in +the management of children. Now nothing is more certain than that it is +easier, as well as more humane, to prevent diseases than to cure them. + +I have elsewhere mentioned the opinion of a very eminent physician, +that nine in ten of children's diseases may be imputed to error with +regard to the quantity or the quality of their food. For myself, I am by +no means certain that nine out of ten is the exact proportion, though I +think the number is, at all events, very large. Few children, or even +grown persons, are seized with disease suddenly. Their progress towards +it is always gradual, and sometimes imperceptible. To a physician of any +tolerable degree of skill, however, there is no difficulty in observing +and pointing out the first steps towards illness; in those whose habits +of life are well known to him; and of foretelling the consequence. + +But since parents and nurses are not so well qualified as physicians to +make these observations, I will endeavor to point out a few certain +signs and symptoms by which they may know a child's health to be +declining, even before be appears to be sick.--For if these are +neglected, the evil increases, goes on from bad to worse, and more +violent and apparent complaints will follow, and perhaps end in +incurable diseases, which a timely remedy, or a slight change in the +diet and manner of life, would have infallibly prevented. + +"The first tendency to disease," says Dr. Cadogan, "may be observed in a +child's breath. It is not enough that the breath is not offensive; it +should be sweet and fragrant, like a nosegay of fresh flowers, or a pail +of new milk from a young cow that feeds upon the sweetest grass of the +spring; and this as well at first waking in the morning, as all day +long." [Footnote: Buchan's "Advice to Mothers," pages 337, 388] + +There is much of truth in these remarks; but if they are wholly true, +then very few children are perfectly healthy. For no child that eats +much animal food of any sort, or, what amounts to nearly the same thing, +much butter or gravy, will long retain the fragrant breath here alluded +to. Who has not observed the difference in this respect, between animals +in general which feed on flesh, and those which feed on grass? And +whether it is the character of their respective food that makes the +difference or not, it is also true that there is nearly as much +difference of breath between _men_ who use animal food and those who do +not, as between other animals. The breath of some of our enormous meat +eaters would almost remind one of a slaughter house. + +Nor is it the quality of food alone, that will induce a foul breath, +either in adults or infants. He who swallows such enormous quantities, +even of plain food, as by overloading and fatiguing the stomach, tend +gradually to debilitate it, will produce the same effect. The enormous +feeders of this full feeding country, whether they are young or old, +whether they inhabit the mountain or the vale, and whether they feed on +animal food or not, have generally a bad breath; and if they seldom +offend, it is because few feed otherwise. And it is not too much--in my +own opinion--to say of this whole class of gormandizers, no less than of +the flesh eaters, that they have laid for themselves the foundation of +future disease. + +One general rule may here be distinctly laid down. As a child's breath +becomes hot and feverish, or strong, or acid, we may be certain that +"digestion and surfeit have fouled and disturbed the blood; and now is +the time to apply a proper remedy, and prevent a train of impending +evils. Let the child be restrained in its food. Let it eat less, live +upon milk or thin broth for a day or two, and be carried (or walk if it +is able) a little more than usual in the open air." [Footnote: Advice to +Mothers, page 338] + +This rule is the more important, because, if duly persevered in, it will +generally prevent disease, and save the trouble and evil consequences of +taking medicine at all. Meanwhile it will be advisable to call in a +physician--not to give drugs, but to prevent the necessity of giving +them. There is a foolish fear abroad that physicians, if called before a +person is violently sick, will dose him with their drugs, as a matter of +course, till they _make_ him sick. But this, no judicious physician will +ever do. It may _have been_ done, though I believe it has been seldom. +The more general course is to defer calling for medical advice, till it +is too late to use preventive means; and medicine is then resorted to by +the physician as a sort of necessary evil. + +A judicious physician, seasonably called in, would in many instances +save a severe fit of sickness, besides a great deal of expense, both of +time and money. + +But if the first symptoms of approaching disease are overlooked--if the +child is fed, or rather crammed; with solid food as much as ever--and if +no medical advice is sought, his sleep will soon become disturbed; he +will be talking, starting, and tumbling about, and will have frightful +dreams; or he will at other times be found smiling and laughing. To +these, in the end, may be added, loss of appetite, paleness, emaciation, +weakness, cough, and consumption; or colics, worms, and convulsions. + +I do not undertake to say that the most judicious parental management, +aided by the greatest medical skill, will always prevent disease; far +from it. The child may and undoubtedly sometimes does inherit a tendency +to a particular disease; or he may be made sick by error in regard to +dress, exercise, &c. But so long as nine tenths of the disease and early +mortality of the young might be prevented by due attention to all these +means combined, so long will it be necessary to reiterate the sentiments +of the present section. + + + + +CHAPTER X + +EXERCISE. + +SEC. 1. Objections to the use of cradles.--SEC. 2. Carrying in the +arms--its uses and abuses.--SEC. 3. Creeping--why useful--to be +encouraged.--SEC. 4. Walking--general directions about it.--SEC. 5. +Riding abroad in carriages.--SEC. 6. Riding on horseback--objections. +Riding schools. + + +This subject may be considered under the following heads: ROCKING IN THE +CRADLE; CARRYING IN THE ARMS; CREEPING; WALKING; RIDING IN A CARRIAGE; +AND RIDING ON HORSEBACK. These I shall consider in their order. + + + +SEC. 1. _Rocking in the Cradle._ + +There are two opinions in regard to the use of the cradle in the +nursery. Some condemn it altogether; others think its occasional use +highly proper. Those who condemn it, do it chiefly on the ground that it +produces a whirling motion of the brain, which, while it inclines to +giddiness and lulls to sleep, disturbs, in some degree, the process of +digestion. + +It seems to me that there is weight to this objection; and although the +cradle has been extensively used without producing any obviously evil +effects, I should greatly prefer to have it universally laid aside. As +far as mere amusement is demanded, it is quite unnecessary, since there +are so many amusements which are far better. As a means of inducing +sleep, I am still more strongly opposed to it; for if a child be +rationally treated in every other respect, it will never need artificial +means to induce it to sleep. Nature will then be the most appropriate +directress in this matter. + +If there is a cradle in a nursery, it is almost always full of clothes +loaded with air more or less impure, and the child is buried in it more +than is compatible with health, even in the judgment of the mother or +the nurse; for so convenient is its use, and so great the temptation to +keep the child in it, that he will often be found soaking there a large +proportion of his time. Every one knows that the air has not so free +access to a child in the cradle as elsewhere, especially if it have a +kind of covering or hood to it, as we often see. Besides, the cradle is +a piece of furniture which takes up a great deal of space in the +nursery; and every one who has made the trial effectually, will, it +seems to me, greatly prefer its room to its company. + +If any cradle is to be used, those are best which are suspended by +cords, and are swung, rather than rocked. And this swinging should be in +a line with the body of the child as much as possible; as this motion is +less likely to produce injury than its opposite. + + +SEC. 2. _Carrying in the Arms._ + +This is the most appropriate exercise for the first two months of +existence; and indeed, one of the best for some time afterward. + +Although a healthy, thriving child ought to sleep, for some time after +birth, from two thirds to three fourths of his time, yet it should never +be forgotten that the demand for proper exercise during the rest of the +time, is not the less imperious on this account; but probably the more +so. + +I have already mentioned the importance of bathing, which is one form of +exercise, and of gentle motion in the arms, immediately afterward. The +same gentle motion should be often repeated during the day; care being +taken to hold the child in such a position as will be easy to him, and +favorable to the free exercise of all his limbs and muscles. + +There are many mothers and nurses, who not only rejoice that the infant +inclines to sleep a great deal, since it gives them more liberty, but +who take pains to prolong these hours beyond what nature requires, by +artificial means. I refer not only to the use of the cradle, but to +means still more artificial--the use of cordials and opiates, to which I +have already adverted. But whatever the means used may be, they defeat +the purposes of nature, and are in the highest degree reprehensible. +Nothing but the most chilling poverty should prevent the mother from +having the child--for a few weeks of its first existence at least--in +her own arms, nearly all the time which is not absolutely demanded for +repose. She should even invite it to wakefulness, rather than encourage +sleep. + +Attention to exercise ought to be commenced before the child is more +than ten days old. For this purpose he should be placed on his back, on +a pillow, in order that the body may rest at as many points as possible. +In this position he has the opportunity to move his limbs with the most +perfect freedom, and to exercise his numerous muscles. There is nothing +more important to the infant--not even sleep itself--than the action of +all his muscles; and nothing contributes more to his rapid growth. + +At first, the body should be kept, while on the arm, in nearly a +horizontal position, with the head perhaps a very little elevated; but +after a few weeks, it will be proper to change the position for a small +part of the time; placing the body so that it may form an angle of a few +degrees with the horizon. When this is done, however, it should always +be by placing the hand against the shoulders and head, in such a manner +as to support well the back; for it is extremely injurious to suffer the +feeble spine to sustain, at this early period, any considerable weight. + +Still more erroneous is the practice of some careless nurses, of +carrying the child quite upright a part of the time, almost without any +support at all. There can be no doubt that the spinal column of many a +child is injured for life in this way. There can be no apology for such +things. + +But it is not sufficient to denounce, merely, the custom of holding the +infant's body in an erect position. Every inquiring mother--and it is +for such, and no other, that I write--will naturally and properly ask +the reason why. + +The child is not born with all its bones solid. Some are mere cartilage +for a considerable time. This is the case with the bones of the back. +Now every person must see that the weight of the child's head and +shoulders, resting for a considerable time on the slender cartilaginous +spinal column, may easily bend it. And a curvature, thus given, may, and +often does, deform children for life. + +Dr. Dewees mentions a nurse who, from a foolish fondness for displaying +them, made the children consigned to her charge sit perfectly upright +before they were a month old. It is truly ludicrous, he says, to see the +little creatures sitting as straight as if they were stiffened by a back +board. It is truly _horrible_, I should say, rather than ludicrous. +Crooked spines must be the inevitable consequence, if nothing worse. + +The practice of bracing children, as it is called, by straps, back +boards, corsets, &c., where it has produced any effect at all, has +always had a tendency to crook the spine. This may be seen first, by +observing one shoulder to be lower than the other, and next by a +projection of the part of the shoulder blades next to the spine. +Whenever these changes begin to appear, it is time to send for a +physician, though it may often be too late to effect a cure. But on the +general subject of bracing and corseting, I have treated at sufficient +length elsewhere. + +There is another error committed in carrying children in the arms. The +head of the infant is often permitted either to hang constantly on one +side, or to roll about loosely; as if it hardly belonged to the body. +In the former case there is danger of producing a habit of holding the +head upon one side, which it will be very difficult to overcome; in the +latter, the spinal marrow itself may be injured--which would produce +alarming and perhaps fatal consequences. + +But all these evils, as has already been said, may be prevented, if the +hand is placed so as to support the head and shoulders. Let not the +mother, however, who reads this work, trust the matter wholly to a +nurse; she must see to it herself; else she incurs a most fearful +responsibility. The suggestions I have made are the more important in +the case of children either very fleshy or very feeble, and of those +disposed to rickets or scrofula; but they are important to all. + +I have said that the motion of the child, on the arm, should be gentle. +Many are in the habit of tossing infants about. There can be no +objection to a slight and slow movement up and down, for a minute or so +at a time; indeed, it is rather to be recommended, as likely to give +strength and vigor no less than pleasure to the child. But when such +movements are carried to excess, so as to frighten the child, they are +highly reprehensible. The shock thus produced to the nervous system has +sometimes been so great as to produce sudden death. Nor is it safe to +run, jump, or descend stairs hastily or violently, with a child in our +arms; and for similar reasons. + +Infants should not be carried always on the same arm, for there is +danger of contracting a habit of leaning to one side, and thus of +becoming crooked. On this account, the arm on which they rest should be +often changed. Nor should they be grasped too firmly. A skilful mother +will hold a child quite loosely, with the most perfect safety; while an +inexperienced one will grasp him so hard as to expose the soft bones to +be bent out of their place, and yet be quite as liable to let him fall +as she who handles him with more ease and freedom. + + +SEC. 3. _Creeping._ + +"Mankind must creep before they can walk," is an old adage often used to +remind us of that patient application which is so indispensable to +secure any highly important or valuable end. But it is as true +literally, as it is figuratively. The act of creeping exercises in a +remarkable degree nearly all the muscles of the body; and this, too, +without much fatigue. + +Some mothers there indeed are, who think it a happy circumstance if a +child can be taught to walk without this intermediate step. But such +mothers must have strange ideas of the animal economy. They must never +have thought of the pleasure which creeping affords the mind, or of the +vigor it imparts to the body. + +Children are wonderfully pleased with their own voluntary efforts. What +they can do themselves, yields them ten-fold greater pleasure than if +done by the mother or the nurse. Yet the latter are exceedingly prone to +forget or overlook all this--and to say, at least practically, that the +only proper efforts are those to which themselves give direction. + +They are moreover exceedingly fond of display. Some mothers seem to +act--in all they do with and for children--as if all the latter were +good for, was display and amusement. They feed them, indeed, and strive +to prolong their existence; but it appears to be for similar reasons to +those which would lead them to take kind care of a pet lamb. + +It is on this account that they dress them out in the manner they do, +strive to make them sit up straight, and prohibit their creeping. It is +on this account too, as much perhaps as any other, that go-carts and +leading strings are put in such early requisition. The contrary would be +far the safer extreme; and the parent who keeps his child scrambling +about upon the back as long as possible, and when he cannot prevent +longer an inversion of this position, retains him at creeping as long +as is in his power, is as much wiser, in comparison with him who urges +him forward to make a prodigy of him, as he is who, instead of making +his child a prodigy in mind or morals at premature age, holds him back, +and endeavors to have his mental and moral nature developed no faster +than his physical frame. + +I wish young mothers would settle it in their minds at once, that the +longer their children creep the better. They need have no fears that the +force of habit will retain them on their knees after nature has given +them strength to rise and walk; for their incessant activity and +incontrollable restlessness will be sure to rouse them as early as it +ought. Least of all ought the difficulty of keeping them clean, to move +them from the path of duty. + +Children who are allowed to crawl, will soon be anxious to do more. We +shall presently see them taking hold of a chair or a table, and +endeavoring to raise themselves up by it. If they fail in a dozen +attempts, they do not give up the point; but persevere till their +efforts are crowned with success. + +Having succeeded in raising themselves from the floor, they soon learn +to stand, by holding to the object by which they have raised themselves. +Soon, they acquire the art of standing without holding; [Footnote: The +art of standing, which consists in balancing one's self, by means of the +muscles of the body and lower limb--simple as it may seem to those who +have never reflected on the subject--is really an important acquisition +for a child of twelve or fifteen months. No wonder they feel a conscious +pride, when they find themselves able to stand erect, like the world +around them.] ere long they venture to put forward one foot--they then +repeat the effort and walk a little, holding at the same time by a +chair; and lastly they acquire, with joy to them inexpressible and to us +inconceivable, the art of "trudging" alone. + +When children learn to walk in nature's own way, it is seldom indeed +that we find them with curved legs, or crooked or clubbed feet. These +deformities are almost universally owing either to the mother or the +nurse. + +Let me be distinctly understood as utterly opposed, not only to +go-carts, leading strings, and every other _mechanical_ contrivance, to +induce children to walk before their legs are fit for it, but to efforts +of every kind, whose main object is the same. Teaching them to walk by +taking hold of one of their hands, is in some respects quite as bad as +any other mode; for if the child should fall while we have hold of his +hand, there is some danger of dislocating or otherwise injuring the +limb. + +Falls we must expect; but if a child is left to his own voluntary +efforts as much as possible, these falls will be fewer, and probably +less serious, than under any other circumstances. + + +SEC. 4. _Walking._ + +"The way to learn how to write without ruled lines, is _to rule_," was +the frequent saying of an old schoolmaster whom I once knew; and I may +say with as much confidence and with more truth, that "the way for a +child to learn to walk alone, is to hold by things." + +I have anticipated, in previous pages, much of what might have otherwise +been contained in this section. A few additional remarks are all that +will be necessary. + +At first, the nursery will be quite large enough for our young +pedestrian. Much time should elapse before he is permitted to go abroad, +upon the green grass;--not lest the air should reach him, or the sun +shine upon his face and hands, but because the surface of the ground is +so much less firm and regular than the floor, that he ought to be quite +familiar with walking on the latter, in the first place. + +But when he can walk well in the play ground, garden, fields, and +roads, it is highly desirable that he should go out more or less every +day, when the weather will possibly admit; nor would I be so fearful as +many are of a drop of rain or dew, or a breath of wind. For say what +they will in favor of riding, sailing, and other modes of exercise, +there is none equal to walking, as soon as a child is able;--none so +natural--none, in ordinary cases, so salutary. I know it is unpopular, +and therefore our young master or young miss must be hoisted into a +carriage, or upon the back of a horse, to the manifest danger of health +or limbs, or both. + +Who of us ever knew a herdsman or a shepherd who found it for the health +and well-being of the young calf or lamb to hoist it into a carriage, +and carry it through the streets, instead of suffering it to walk? Such +a thing would excite astonishment; and the man who should do it would be +deemed insane. The health and growth of our young domestic animals is +best promoted by suffering them to walk, run, and skip in their own way. +They ask no artificial legs, or horses, or carriages. But would it not +be difficult to find arguments in favor of carrying children about, when +they are able to walk, which would not be equally strong in favor of +carrying about lambs and calves and pigs. + +This is the more remarkable from the consideration, elsewhere urged, +that in general we take more rational pains about the physical +well-being of domestic animals, than of children. However, it will be +seen, on a little reflection, that the number of those who carry +children about, is, after all, very inconsiderable. The greater portion +of the community regard it as too troublesome or costly; and if poverty +brought with it no other evils than a permit to children to walk on the +legs which the Creator gave them, it could hardly be deemed a +misfortune. + +It is scarcely necessary to add that there will be nothing gained to the +young--or to persons of any age--from walks which are very long and +fatiguing. Walking should refresh and invigorate: when it is carried +beyond this, especially with the young child, we have passed the line of +safety. + + +SEC. 5. _Riding in Carriages._ + +It will be seen by the foregoing section, that I am not very friendly to +the use of carriages for the young, after they can walk. Before this +period, however, I think they may be often serviceable; and there are +occasional instances which may render them useful afterward. On this +account, I have thought it might be well to give the following general +directions. + +Carriages for children should be so constructed as not to be liable to +overset. To this end, the wheels must be low, and the axle unusually +extended. The body should be long enough to allow the child to lie down +when necessary; and so deep that he may not be likely to fall out. +Everything should be made secure and firm, to avoid, if possible, the +danger of accidents. + +The carriage should be drawn steadily and slowly; not violently, or with +a jerking motion. Such a place should be selected as will secure the +child--if necessary--from the full blaze of a hot sun. This point might +indeed be secured by having the carriage covered; but I am opposed to +covered carriages, for children or adults, unless we are compelled to +ride in the rain. + +While the child is unable to sit up without injury, and even for some +months afterwards, he ought by all means to lie down in a carriage, +because it requires more strength to sit in a seat which is moving, than +in a place where he is stationary. In assuming the horizontal position, +in a carriage, a pillow is needed, and such other arrangements as will +prevent too much rolling. + +After the child's strength will fairly permit, he may sit up in the +carriage, but he ought still to be secured against too much motion. As +his strength increases, however, the latter direction will be less and +less necessary. I need not repeat in this place, (had I not witnessed so +many accidents from neglect,) the caution recently given, that great +care should be taken to prevent the child from falling out of the +carriage. + +While children are riding abroad in cold weather, much pains should be +taken to see that they are suitably clothed. It is well to keep them in +motion, while they are in the carriage, and especially to guard against +their falling asleep in the open air, until they have become very much +accustomed to being out in it. + +It has been said by some writers, that a ride ought never to exceed the +length of half an hour; but no positive rule can be given, except to +avoid over-fatigue. + + +SEC. 6. _Riding on Horseback._ + +While children are very young, I think it both improper and unsafe to +take them abroad on horseback; I mean so long as they are in health. In +case of disease, this mode of exercise is sometimes one of the most +salutary in the world. But after boys are six or seven years old, and +girls ten, if they are ever to practise horsemanship, it is time for +them to begin; both because they are less apt to be unreasonably timid +at this age, and because they learn much more rapidly. + +So few parents are good horsemen, that if there is a riding school at +hand, I should prefer placing a child in it at once. But I wish to be +distinctly understood, that I do not consider it a matter of importance, +especially to females, that they should ever learn to ride at all. + +Some of the principal objections to riding on horseback, by boys, as an +ordinary exercise, are the following: + +1. Walking, as I have already intimated, is one of the most HEALTHY +modes of exercise in the world. It is nature's exercise; and was +unquestionably in exclusive use long before universal dominion was given +to man, if not for many centuries afterward; and I believe it would be +very difficult to prove that it interfered at all with human longevity; +for the first of our race lived almost a thousand years. + +2. Young children, in riding on horseback, are rather apt to acquire, +rapidly, the habit of domineering over animals. It seems almost needless +to say how easy the transition is, in such cases, should opportunity +offer, from tyranny over the brute slave, to tyranny over the human +being. There are slave-holders in the family and in the school, as well +as elsewhere. It is the SPIRIT of a person which makes him either a +tyrant or slave-holder. And let us beware how we foster this spirit in +the children whom God has given us. + + + + +CHAPTER XI. + +AMUSEMENTS. + +Universal need of amusements. Why so necessary. Error of schools. Error +of families. Infant schools, as often conducted, particularly injurious. +Lessons, or tasks, should be short. Mistakes of some manual labor +schools. Of particular amusements in the nursery. With small wooden +cubes--pictures--shuttlecock--the rocking horse--tops and +marbles--backgammon--checkers--morrice--dice--nine-pins--skipping the +rope--trundling the hoop--playing at ball--kites--skating and +swimming--dissected maps--black boards--elements of letters--dissected +pictures. + + +However heterodox the concession may be, I am one of those who believe +amusements of some sort or other to be universally necessary. Indeed I +cannot possibly conceive of an individual in health, whatever may be the +age, sex, condition, or employment, who does not need them, in a greater +or less degree. + +Now if by the term amusement, I merely meant employment, nobody would +probably differ from me--at least in theory. Every one is ready to admit +the importance of being constantly employed. A mind unemployed is a +VACANT mind. And a vacant or idle mind is "the devil's work-shop;" so +says the proverb. + +By amusement, however, I mean something more than mere employment; for +the more constantly an adult individual is employed, the greater, +generally, is his demand for amusement. Indolent persons have less need +of being amused than others; but perhaps there are few if any persons to +be found, who are so indolent as not to think continually, on one +subject or another. And it is this constant thinking, more than anything +else, that creates the necessity of which I am speaking. The mere +drudge, whether biped or quadruped--he, I mean, whose thinking powers +are scarcely alive--has little need of the relief which is afforded by +amusement. + +The young of all animals--man among the rest--appear to have such an +instinctive fondness for amusement, that so long as they are +unrestrained, they seldom need any urging on this point. In regard to +_quality_, the case is somewhat different. In this respect, most +children require attention and restraint; and some of them a great deal +of it. + +But what is the nature of the amusement which adults--nay, mankind +generally--require? I answer, it is relief from the employment of +thinking. For it is not that mankind do not really think at all, that +moralists complain so loudly. When they tell us that men will not +think, they mean that they will not think as rational beings. They +think, indeed; and so do the ox, and the horse, and the dog, and the +elephant--but not as rational men ought to do; and this it is that +constitutes the burden of complaint. But you will probably find few +persons belonging to the human species who do not think constantly, at +least while awake; and whose mental powers do not become fatigued, and +demand relief in amusement. + +Children's minds are so soon wearied by a continuous train of thinking, +even on topics which are pleasing to them, that they can seldom he +brought to give their attention to a single subject long at once. They +require almost incessant change; both for the sake of relief, and to +amuse for the _sake_ of amusement. And it is, to my own mind, one of +the most striking proofs of Infinite Wisdom in the creation of the human +mind, that it has, during infancy, such an irresistible tendency to +amusement. + +How greatly do they err, who grudge children, especially very young +children, the time which, in obedience to the dictates of their nature, +they are so fond of spending in sports and gambols! How much more +rational would it be to encourage and direct them in their amusements! +And how exceedingly unwise is the practice, whenever and wherever it +exists, of confining them to school rooms and benches, not only for +hours, but for whole half days at once. + +If individuals and circumstances were everywhere combined, with the +special purpose to oppose the intentions of nature respecting the human +being, at every step of his progress from the cradle to maturity, and +from maturity to the grave, I hardly know how they could contrive to +accomplish such a purpose more effectually than it is at present +accomplished. But it is proper that I should here explain a little. + +All our family arrangements tend to repress amusement. Everything is +contrived to facilitate business--especially the business or employments +of adults. The child is hardly regarded as a human being,--certainly not +as a _perfect_ being. He is considered as a mere fragment; or to change +the figure, as a plant too young to be of any real service to mankind, +because too young to bear any of its appropriate fruits. Whereas, in my +opinion, both infancy and childhood, at every stage, should bring forth +their appropriate fruits. In other words, the child of the most tender +years should be regarded as a whole, and not as the mere fragment of a +being; as a perfect member of a family--occupying a full and complete, +only a more limited sphere than older members: and all the rules and +regulations and arrangements of the family should have a reference to +this point. So long as a child is reckoned to be a mere cipher in +creation, or at most, as of no more practical importance, till the +arrival of his twenty-first birth day, or some other equally arbitrary +period, than our domestic animals--that is, of just sufficient +consequence to be fed, and caressed, and fondled, and made a pet of--so +long will our arrangements be made with reference to the comfort and +happiness of adults. There may indeed be here and there a child's chair, +or a child's carriage, or newspaper, or book; but there will seldom be, +except by stealth, any free juvenile conversation at the table or the +fireside. Here the child must sit as a blank or cypher, to ruminate on +the past, or to receive half formed and passive impressions from the +present. + +The arrangements of the infant school, also, seem designed for the same +purpose--to repress as much as possible the infantile desire for +amusement. Not that this was their original, nor that it now is their +legitimate intention. Their legitimate object is, or should be, not to +develope the intellect by over-working the tender brain, but to promote +cheerfulness and health and love and happiness, by well contrived +amusements, conducted as much as possible in the open air; and by +unremitting efforts to elicit and direct the affections. + +Infant schools should repress rather than encourage the hard study of +books. Lessons at this age should be drawn chiefly from objects in the +garden, the field, and the grove; from the flower, the plant, the tree, +the brook, the bird, the beast, the worm, the fly, the human body--the +sun, or the visible heavens. These lessons, whether given by the parent, +as constituting a part of the family arrangements, or by the infant or +primary school teacher, should, it is true, be regarded for the time +being as study, but they should never be long; and they should be +frequently relieved by the most free and unrestrained pastimes and +gambols of the young on the green grass, or beside the rippling stream, +uninfluenced, or at least unrepressed, by those who are set over them. + +The public or common school, overlooking as it does any direct attempts +to make provision for the amusement of the pupils, even during the +scanty recess that is afforded them once in three hours, would appear to +a stranger on this planet, at first sight, to be designed as much as +possible to defeat every intention of nature with reference to the +growth of the human frame. For we may often travel many hundred miles +and not see so much as an enclosed play ground; and never perhaps any +direct provision for particular and more favorable amusements. + +I might speak of other schools and places of resort for children, and +proceed to show how all our arrangements appear to be the offspring of a +species of utilitarianism which rejects every sport whose value cannot +be estimated in dollars and cents. I might even refer to those schools +of our country where these ultra utilitarian notions are carried to an +extent which excludes amusing conversation or reading even during +meal-time; and devotes the hours which were formerly spent in +recreation, to manual labor of some productive kind or other.--But I +forbear. Enough has been said to illustrate the position I have taken, +that there is in vogue a system which bears the marks of having been +contrived, if not by the enemies of our race, either openly or covertly, +at least by those whom ignorance renders scarcely less at war with the +general happiness. + +Now I would not deny nor attempt to deny that change of occupation of +body or mind is of itself an amusement, and one too of great value. +Undoubtedly it is so. To some children, studies of every kind are an +amusement; and there are few indeed to whom none are so. Labor, with +many, when alternated with study, is amusing. And yet, after all, unless +such labors are performed in company, where light and cheerful +conversation is sure to keep the mind away from the subjects about +which it has just been engaged, I am afraid that the purposes for which +amusements were designed, are very far from being _all_ secured. + +But perhaps I am dwelling too long on the general principle that people +of every age, and children in particular, need, and must have +amusements, whether they are of a productive kind or not; and that it is +very far from being sufficient, were it either practicable or desirable, +to turn all study and labor into amusement. [Footnote: I will even say, +more distinctly than I have already done, that however popular the +contrary opinion may be, neither study nor work ought to be regarded as +mere amusement. I would, it is true, take every possible pains to render +both work and study agreeable; but I would at the same time have it +distinctly understood, that one of them is by no means the other; that, +on the contrary, work is _work_--study, _study_--and amusement, +_amusement_.] My business is with those who direct the first dawnings +of affection and intellect. Principles are by no means of less importance +on this account; but the limits of a work for young mothers do not admit +of anything more than a brief discussion of their importance. + +I will now proceed to speak of some of the more common amusements of the +nursery. + +I have seen very young children sit on the floor and amuse themselves +for nearly half an hour together, with piling up and taking down small +wooden cubes, of different sizes. Some of them, instead of being cubes, +however, may be of the shape of bricks. Their ingenuity, while they are +scarcely a year or two old, in erecting houses, temples, churches, &c., +is sometimes surprising. Girls as well as boys seem to be greatly amused +with this form of exercise; and both seem to be little less gratified in +destroying than in rearing their lilliputian edifices. + +Next to the latter kind of amusement, is the viewing of pictures. It is +surprising at what an early age children may be taught to notice +miniature representations of objects; living objects especially. +Representations of the works of art should come in a little later than +those of things in nature. I know a father who prepares volumes of +pictures, solely for this purpose; though he usually regards them not +only as a source of amusement to children, but as a medium of +instruction. + +Battledoor or shuttlecock may be taught to children of both sexes very +early; and it affords a healthy and almost untiring source of amusement. +It gives activity as well as strength to the muscles or moving powers, +and has many other important advantages. There is some danger, according +to Dr. Pierson [Footnote: See his Lecture before the American Institute +of Instruction] of distorting the spine by playing at shuttlecock too +frequently and too long; but this will seldom be the case with little +children in the nursery. Neither shuttlecock nor any other amusement +will secure their attention long enough to injure them very much. + +Perhaps this exercise comes nearer to my ideas of a perfect amusement +than almost any which could be named. The mind is agreeably occupied, +without being fatigued; and if the amusements are proportioned to the +age and strength of the child, there is very little fatigue of the body. +It gives, moreover, great practical accuracy to the eye and to the hand. + +A rocking-horse is much recommended for the nursery. I have had no +opportunity for observing the effects of this kind of amusement; but if +it is one half as valuable as some suppose, I should be inclined to +recommend it. But I am opposed to fostering in the rider lessons of +cruelty, by arming him with whips and spurs. If the young are ever to +learn to ride, on a living horse, the exercises of the rocking-horse +will, most certainly, be a sort of preparation for the purpose. + +Tops and marbles afford a great deal of rational amusement to the young; +and of a very useful kind, too. Spinning a top is second to no exercise +which I have yet mentioned, unless it is playing at shuttlecock. + +Dr. Dewees recommends a small backgammon table, with men, but without +dice. He says, also, that "children, as soon as they are capable of +comprehending the subject, should be taught draughts or checkers. This +game is not only highly amusing, but also very instructive." In another +place he heaps additional encomiums upon the game of checkers. "It +becomes a source of endless amusement," he says, "as it never tires, but +always instructs." Of exercises which instruct, however, as well as +amuse, I shall speak presently. + +The amusements called "morrice," "fox and geese," &c., with which some +of the children of almost every neighborhood are more or less +acquainted, are of the same general character and tendency as checkers. +So is a play, sometimes, but very improperly, called dice, in which two +parties play with a small bundle of wooden pins, not unlike knitting +pins in shape, but shorter. + +The writer to whom I have referred above recommends nine-pins and balls +of proper size, as highly useful both for diversion and exercise. If +they can be used without leading to bad habits and bad associations, I +think they may be useful. + +For girls, who demand a great deal more of exercise, both within doors +and without, skipping the rope is an excellent amusement. So also is +swinging. Both of these exercises may be used either out of doors, or +in the nursery. + +Trundling a hoop I have always regarded as an amusing out-of-door +exercise; and I am not sorry when I sometimes see girls, as well as +boys, engaged in it, under the eye of their mothers and teachers. + +Playing ball, of which there are many different games, and flying kites, +employ a large proportion if not all of the muscles of the body, in such +a manner as is likely to confirm the strength, and greatly improve the +health. The same may be said of skating in the winter, and swimming in +the summer. But these last are exercises over which the mother cannot, +ordinarily, have very much control. + +Under the head of amusements, it only remains for me to speak of a few +juvenile employments of a mixed nature. Of these I shall treat very +briefly, as they are a branch of the subject which does not necessarily +come within the compass of my present plan. They are exercises, too, +which should more properly come under the head of Infantile Instruction. + +Dissected maps afford children of every age a great fund of amusement; +but much caution is necessary, with those that are very young, not to +discourage or confound them by showing them too many at once. Thus if +we cut in pieces the map of one of the smaller United States, at the +county lines, or the whole United States, at the state lines, it is +quite as many divisions as they can manage. Cut up as large a state, +even, as Pennsylvania or New York is, into counties, and try to lead +them to amuse themselves by putting together so large a number, many of +which must inevitably very closely resemble each other, and it is ten to +one but you bewilder, and even perplex and discourage them. The same +results would follow from cutting up even the whole of a large county, +or a small state, into towns. I have usually begun with little children, +by requiring them to put together the eight counties of the small state +of Connecticut. In this case the counties are not only few, but there is +a very striking difference in their shape. + +A black board and a piece of chalk, along with a little ingenuity on the +part of the mother, will furnish the child with an almost endless +variety of amusement. Let him attempt to imitate almost any object which +interests him, whether among the works of nature or art. However rude +his pictures may be, do not laugh at, but on the contrary, endeavor to +encourage him. He may also be permitted to imitate letters and figures. +The elements of letters, too, both printed and written, may be given +him, and he may be required to put them together. Dissected pictures, as +well as dissected maps and letters, are useful, and to most children, +very acceptable. + +In short, the devices of an ingenious, thinking mother, for the +amusement of her very young children, are almost endless; and the great +danger is, that when a mother once enters deeply into the spirit of +these exercises, she will substitute them for those much more healthy +ones which have been already mentioned, such as require muscular +activity, or may be performed in the open air. + + + + +CHAPTER XII. + +CRYING. + +Its importance. Danger of repressing a tendency to cry. Anecdote from +Dr. Rush. Physiology of crying. Folly of attempting wholly to suppress +it. + + +"Crying," says Dr. Dewees, "should be looked upon as an exercise of much +importance;" and he is sustained in this view by many eminent medical +writers. + +But people generally think otherwise. Nothing is more common than the +idea that to cry is unbecoming; and children are everywhere taught, when +they suffer pain, to brave it out, and _not cry_. Such a direction--to +say nothing of its tendency to encourage hypocrisy--is wholly +unphilosophical. The following anecdote may serve in part to illustrate +my meaning. It is said to have been related by Dr. Rush. + +A gentleman in South Carolina was about to undergo a very painful +surgical operation. He had imbibed the idea that it was beneath the +dignity of a man ever to say or do anything expressive of pain. He +therefore refused to submit to the usual precaution of securing the +hands and feet by bandages, declaring to his surgeon that he had nothing +to fear from his being untied, for he would not move a muscle of his +body. He kept his word, it is true; but he died instantly after the +operation, from apoplexy. + +There is very little doubt, in the mind of any physiologist, in regard +to the cause of apoplexy in this case; and that it might have been +prevented by the relief which is always afforded by groans and tears. + +It is, I believe, very generally known, that in the profoundest grief, +people do not, and cannot shed tears; and that when the _latter_ begin +to flow, it affords immediate relief. + +I do not undertake to argue from this, that crying is so important, +either to the young or the old, that it is ever worth while to excite or +continue it by artificial means; or that a habit of crying, so easily +and readily acquired by the young, is not to be guarded against as a +serious, evil. My object was first to show the folly of those who +denounce all crying, and secondly, to point out some of its +advantages--in the hope of preventing parents from going to that extreme +which borders upon stoicism. + +One of the most intelligent men I ever knew, frequently made it his +boast that he neither laughed nor cried on any occasion; and on being +told that both laughing and crying were physiologically useful, he only +ridiculed the sentiment. + +Crying is useful to very young infants, because it favors the passage of +blood in their lungs, where it had not before been accustomed to travel, +and where its motion is now indispensable. And it not only promotes the +circulation of the blood, but expands the air-cells of the lungs, and +thus helps forward that great change, by which the dark-colored impure +blood of the veins is changed at once into pure blood, and thus rendered +fit to nourish the system, and sustain life. + +But this is not all. Crying strengthens the lungs themselves. It does +this by expanding the little air-cells of which I have just spoken, and +not only accustoms them to being stretched, at a period, of all others, +the most favorable for this purpose, but frees them at the same time +from mucus, and other injurious accumulations. + +They, therefore, who oppose an infant's crying, know not what they do. +So far is it from being hurtful to the child, that its occasional +recurrence is, as we have already seen, positively useful. Some +practitioners of medicine, in some of the more trying situations in +which human nature can be placed, even encourage their patients to +suffer tears to flow, as a means of relief. + +Infants, it should also be recollected, have no other language by which +to express their wants and feelings, than sighs and tears. Crying is not +always an expression of positive pain; it sometimes indicates hunger and +thirst, and sometimes the want of a change of posture. This last +consideration deserves great attention, and all the inconveniences of +crying ought to be borne cheerfully, for the sake of having the little +sufferer remind us when nature demands a change of position. No child +ought to be permitted to remain in one position longer than two hours, +even while sleeping; nor half that time, while awake; and if nurses and +mothers will overlook this matter, as they often do, it is a favorable +circumstance that the child should remind them of it. + +Crying has been called the "waste gate" of the human system; the door of +escape to that excess of excitability which sometimes prevails, +especially among children and nervous adults. To all such persons it is +healthy--most undoubtedly so; nor do I know that its occasional +recurrence is injurious to any adult--a fastidious public sentiment to +the contrary notwithstanding. + +Some have supposed, that what is here said will be construed by the +young mother into a license to suffer her child to cry unnecessarily. +Perhaps, say they, she is a laboring woman, and wishes to be at work. +Well, she lays down her child in the cradle, or on the bed, and goes to +her work. Presently the child, becoming wet perhaps, begins to cry, as +well he might. But, instead of going to him and taking care of him, she +continues at her employment; and when one remonstrates against her +conduct as cruelty, she pleads the authority of the author of the "Young +Mother." + +All this may happen; but if it should, I am not answerable for it. I +have insisted strongly on guarding the child against wet clothing, and +on watching him with the utmost care to prevent all real suffering. +Mothers, like the specimen here given, if they happen to have a little +sensibility to suffering, and not much love of their offspring, +generally know of a shorter way to quiet their infants and procure time +to work, than that which is here mentioned. They have nothing to do but +to give them some cordial or elixir, whose basis is opium. Startle not, +reader, at the statement;--this abominable practice is followed by many +a female who claims the sacred name of mother. And many a wretch has +thus, in her ignorance, indolence or avarice, slowly destroyed her +children! + +I repeat, therefore, that I do not think my remarks on crying are +necessarily liable to abuse; though I am not sure that there are not a +few individuals to be found who may apply them in the manner above +mentioned--an application, however, which is as far removed from the +original intention of the author, as can possibly be conceived. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII. + +LAUGHING. + +"Laugh and be fat." Laughing is healthy. A common error. Monastic +notions yet too prevalent on this subject. + + +Laughing, like crying, has a good effect on the infantile lungs; nor is +it less salutary in other respects. "Laugh and be fat," an old adage, +has its meaning, and also its philosophy. + +There is an excess, however, to which laughing, no less than crying, may +be carried, and which we cannot too carefully avoid. But how little to +be envied--how much to be pitied--are they who consider it a weakness +and a sin to laugh, and in the plenitude of their wisdom, tell us that +_the Saviour of mankind never laughed_. When I hear this last assertion, +I am always ready to ask, whether the individual who makes it has read a +new revelation or a new gospel; for certainly none of the sacred books +which I have seen give us any such information. + +But I will not dwell here. The common notion on this subject, if not +ridiculous, is certainly strange. I will only add, that, come into vogue +as it might have done, there is no opinion more unfounded than the very +general one among adults, that children should be uniformly grave; and +that just in proportion as they laugh and appear frolicsome, just in the +same proportion are they out of the way, and deserving of reprehension. + +It is strange that it should be so, but I have seen many parents who +were miserable because their children were sportive and joyful. Oh, when +will the days of monkish sadness and austerity be over; and the public +sentiment in the christian world get right on this subject! + + + + +CHAPTER XIV + +SLEEP. + +General remarks. Hints to fathers.--SEC. 1. Proper hours for repose. +Dark rooms. Noise.--SEC. 2. Place for sleeping. Sleeping +alone--reasons.--SEC. 3. Purity of the air in sleeping rooms.--SEC. 4. +The bed. Objections to feathers. Other materials.--SEC. 5. The covering +of beds. Covering the head.--SEC. 6. Night Dresses. Robes.--SEC. 7. +Posture of the body in sleep.--SEC. 8. State of the mind.--SEC. 9. +Quality of sleep.--SEC. 10. Quantity of sleep. + + +Not a few persons consider all rules relative to sleep as utterly +futile. They regard it as so much of a natural or animal process, that +if we are let alone we shall seldom err, at any age, respecting it. +Rules on the subject, above all, they regard as wholly misplaced. + +Those who entertain such views, would do well, in order to be +consistent, to go a little farther; and as breathing and eating and +drinking--nay, even _thinking_--are natural processes, deny the utility +of all rules respecting _them_ also. Perhaps they would do well, +moreover, to deny that rules of any sort are valuable. But would not +this have the effect to bar the door perpetually against all human +improvement? Would it not be equivalent to saying, to a half-civilized, +because only half-christianized community--Go on with your barbarous +customs, and your uncleanly and unthinking habits, forever? + +But I have not so learned human nature. I regard man as susceptible of +endless progression. And I know of no way in which more rapid progress +can be made, than by enlightening young mothers on subjects which +pertain to our physical nature, and the means of physical improvement. +Not for the _sake_ of that perishable part of man, the frame, but +because it is nearly in vain to attempt to improve the mind and heart, +without due attention to the frame-work, to which mind and heart, for +the present, are appended, and most intimately related. + +Let it be left to fathers to study the improvement of hounds and horses +and cattle, and at the same time to think themselves above the concerns +of the nursery. We may, indeed, read of a Cato once in three thousand +years, who was in the habit of quitting all other business in order to +be present when the nurse washed and rubbed his child. But our passion +for gain, in the present age, is so much more absorbing and +soul-destroying than the passion for military glory, that we cannot +expect many Catos. Oh no. All, or nearly all, must devolve on the +mother. The father has no time to attend to his children! What belongs +to the mother, if she can be duly awakened, may be at least _half_ done; +what belongs to the father, must, I fear, be left undone. + +I am accustomed to regard every day--even of the infant--as a miniature +life. I am, moreover, accustomed to consider mental and bodily vigor, +not only for each separate day, but for life's whole day, as greatly +influenced by the circumstances of sleep; the HOUR, PLACE, PURITY OF THE +AIR, THE BED, THE COVERING, DRESS, POSTURE, STATE OF THE MIND, QUALITY, +QUANTITY, AND DURATION. + + +SEC. 1. _Hour for Repose._ + +Generally speaking, the night is the appropriate season for repose; but +in early infancy, it is _every_ hour. I have already spoken of the vast +amount of sleep which the new-born infant requires, as well as of many +other circumstances connected with it, requiring our attention. Suffer +me, however, to enlarge, at the risk of a little repetition. + +What time the infant is awake, should be during the day. It is of very +great importance, in the formation of good habits, that he should be +undressed and put to bed, at evening, with as much regularity as if be +had not slept during the day for a single moment. It is also important +that he be permitted to sleep during the whole night, as uninterruptedly +as possible; and that when he is aroused, to have his position or +diapers changed, or to receive food, it should be done with little +parade and noise, and with as little light as possible. All persons, old +as well as young, sleep more quietly in a dark room, than in one where a +light is burning. + +I am well aware that the course here recommended, may be carried to an +excess which will utterly defeat the object intended, since there are +children to be found, who are so trained in this respect, that the +lightest tread upon the floor will awake, and perhaps frighten them. But +this is an excess which is not required. All that is necessary during +the night, is a reasonable degree of silence, in order to induce the +habit of continued rest, if possible. In the day time, on the contrary, +fatigue will impel a child to sleep occasionally, even in the midst of +noise. I am not sure that the habit of sleeping in the midst of noise is +not worth a little pains on the part of the mother. Nor is it improbable +that a habit of this kind, once acquired by the infant, might ultimately +be extended to the night, so that over-caution, even in regard to that +season, might gradually be laid aside. + +Dr. North, a distinguished medical practitioner in Hartford, Conn., +confirms the foregoing sentiments; and adds, that he deems it an +imperious duty of those parents who wish well to their infants, to form +in them the habit of sleeping when fatigued, whether the room be quiet +or noisy. With his children, no cradles or opiates are needed or used. + + +SEC. 2. _Place._ + +For some time after its birth, the infant should sleep near its mother, +though not in the same bed. The bedstead should be of the usual height +of bedsteads, and should be enclosed with a railing sufficient to secure +the infant from falling out, but not of such a structure as to hinder, +in any degree, a free circulation of the air. + +The reasons why a child ought to sleep alone, and not with the mother or +nurse, are numerous; but the following are the principal; + +1. The heat accumulated by the bodies of the mother and child both, is +often too great for health. + +2. The air is too impure. I have already spoken of the change in the +purity of the air which is produced by breathing in it. It is bad +enough for two adults to sleep in the same bed, breathing over and over +again the impure air, as they must do more or less, even if the bed is +very large;--but it is still worse for infants. Their lungs demand +atmospheric air in its utmost purity; and if denied it, they must +eventually suffer. + +3. But besides the change of the air by breathing, the surface of the +body is perpetually changing it in the same manner, as was stated in the +chapter on Ventilation. Now a child will almost inevitably breathe a +stream of this bad air, as it issues from the bed; and what is still +worse, it is very apt, in spite of every precaution, to get its head +covered up with the clothes, where it can hardly breathe anything else. +This, if frequently repeated, is slow but certain death;--as much so as +if the child were to drink poison in moderate quantities. + +Let me not be told that this is an exaggeration; that thousands of +mothers make it a point to cover up the beads of their infants; and that +notwithstanding this, they are as healthy as the infants of their +neighbors. I have not said that they would droop and die while infants. +The fumes of lead, which is a certain poison, may be inhaled, and yet +the child or adult who inhales them may live on, in tolerable health, +for many years. But suffer he must, in the end, in spite of every effort +and every hope. So must the child, whose head is covered habitually +with the bed clothing, where it is compelled to breathe not only the air +spoiled by its own skin, but also that which is spoiled by the much +larger surface of body of the mother or nurse. + +But I have proof on this subject. Friedlander, in his "Physical +Education," says expressly, that in Great Britain alone, between the +years 1686 and 1800, no less than 40,000 children died in consequence of +this practice of allowing them to sleep near their nurses. I was at +first disposed to doubt the accuracy of this most remarkable statement. +But when I consider the respectability of the authority from which it +emanated, and that it is only about 350 a year for that great empire, I +cannot doubt that the estimate is substantially correct. What a +sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and folly! + +It should be added, in this place, both to confirm the foregoing +sentiment, and to show that British mothers and nurses are not alone, +that Dr. Dewees has witnessed, in the circle of his practice, four +deaths from the same cause. If every physician in the United States has +met with as many cases of the kind, in proportion to his practice, as +Dr. D., the evil is about as great in this country as Dr. F. says it is +in Great Britain. + +If a child sleeps alone, it cannot of course be liable to as much +suffering of this kind as if it slept with another person; though much +precaution will still be necessary to keep its head uncovered, and +prevent its inhaling air spoiled by its own lungs and skin. + +4. There is one more evil which will be avoided by having a child sleep +alone. Many a mother has seriously injured her child by pressure. I do +not here allude to those monsters in human nature, whose besotted habits +have been the frequent cause of the suffocation and death of their +offspring, but to the more careful and tender mother, who would sooner +injure herself than her own child. Such mothers, even, have been known +to dislocate or fracture a limb![Footnote: There may be instances where +the debility of an infant will be so great that the mother or a nurse +must sleep with it, to keep it warm. But such cases of disease are very +rare.] + +To cap the climax of error in this matter, some mothers allow their +infants to lie on their arm, as a pillow. This practice not only exposes +them to all or nearly all the evils which have been mentioned, but to +one more; viz. the danger of being thrown from the bed. + +A young mother, with whom I was well acquainted, was sleeping one night +with her infant on her arm, when she made a sudden and rather violent +effort to turn in the bed, in doing which she threw the child upon the +floor with such violence as to fracture its little skull, and cause its +death. + +Enough, I trust, has now been said to convince every reasonable young +mother, where absolute poverty does not preclude comfort and health, +that her child ought never to be permitted to sleep in the same bed with +her; but that it should be placed on a bedstead by itself at a short +distance from her, and properly guarded from accidents--and above all, +from inhaling impure air. + +At a suitable age, a child may be removed from the nursery to a separate +chamber. Here, if the circumstances permit, it should still sleep by +itself; and if the bedstead be somewhat lower than ordinary, and the +room be not too small, it will need no watching. + +Perhaps this may be the proper place to say that there are more reasons +than one--and some of them are of a moral nature, too--why a child +should continue to sleep alone, after it leaves the nursery. Nor is it +sufficient to prohibit its sleeping with younger persons, and yet crowd +it into the bed with an aged grandfather or grandmother, or with both. +There is no excuse for a course like this, except the iron hand of +necessity. And even then, I should prefer to have a child of mine sleep +on the hard floor, at least during the summer season, rather than with +an aged person. + +Let it not be supposed I have imbibed the fashionable idea that it is +_peculiarly_ unhealthy for the young to sleep with the old. I know this +doctrine has many learned advocates. And yet I doubt its correctness. I +believe that the manners and habits of the old may injure the young who +sleep with them, and I know that they render the air impure, like other +people. But I cannot see why the mere circumstance of their being _old_ +should be a source of unhealthiness to their younger bed-fellows. Still +I say, that there are reasons enough against the practice I am opposing, +without this. + +Some parents allow dogs and cats to sleep with children. Others have a +prejudice against cats, but not against dogs. The truth is, that they +both contaminate the air by respiration and perspiration, in the same +manner that adults do. And aside from the fact that they are often +infested by lice and other insects, and addicted to uncleanly habits, +they ought always to be excluded, and with iron bars and bolts, if +necessary, from the beds of children. But of this, too, I have treated +elsewhere. + + +SEC. 3. _Purity of the Air._ + +The general importance of pure air has been mentioned. I have spoken of +the elements of the atmosphere in which we live, of the manner in +which it may be vitiated, and the consequences to health. I have +shown--perhaps at sufficient length--the impropriety of washing, drying, +and ironing clothes in the room where a child is kept; of cooking in the +room, especially on a stove; of suffering the floor or clothes, +particularly those of the child, to remain long wet, in the room; of +smoking tobacco, using spirits, burning oil with too long a wick, &c. + +All which has thus been said of the purity of the air of the nursery +generally, is applicable to that of all sleeping rooms. It is an +important point gained, when we can secure a nursery with folding doors +in the centre, so as, when we please, to make two rooms of it. In that +case, the division in which the bed is, can be completely ventilated a +little before night, and thus be comparatively pure for the reception of +both the mother and the child. + +Shall the windows and doors where a child sleeps, be kept closed; or +shall they be suffered to remain open a part or the whole of the night? +This must be determined by circumstances. If there are no doors but +such as communicate with apartments whose air is equally impure with +that in which the child is, it is preferable to keep them closed. If the +windows cannot be opened without exposing the child to a current of air, +it is perhaps the less of two evils, not to open them. + +But we are not usually driven to such extremities. In some instances, +windows are constructed--and all of them ought to be--so that they can +be lowered from the top. When this is not the case, something can be +placed before the window to break the current, so that it need not fall +directly upon the child. Closing the blinds will partially effect this, +where blinds exist. + +I have known many an individual who was in the habit of sleeping with +his windows open during the whole year, and without any obvious evil +consequences. Dr. Gregory was of this habit. But if adults--not trained +to it--can acquire such a habit with impunity, with how much more safety +could children be trained to it from the very first year. Macnish says, +"there can be no doubt that a gentle current pervading our sleeping +apartments, is in the highest degree ESSENTIAL TO HEALTH." + +This consideration--I mean the impurity of sleeping rooms, even after +every precaution has been used to keep them ventilated--affords one +of the strongest inducements to going abroad early in the morning +(especially when there is no other room which either adults or children +can occupy) while the nursery or chamber is aired and ventilated. The +utility of _rising_ early, I hope no one can doubt; but some have doubts +of the propriety of going abroad, till the dew has "passed away." Such +should be reminded, by the foregoing train of remarks, that early +walking may be a choice of evils; and that if it _is_ on the whole +advantageous to adults, it cannot be less so to children. And as soon as +the sun has chased away the vapors of the night, if the weather is +tolerable, most children should be carried abroad. + + +SEC. 4. _The Bed._ + +This should never be of feathers. There are many reasons for this +prohibition, especially to the feeble. + +1. They are too warm. Infants should by all means be kept warm enough, +as I have all along insisted. But excess of heat excites or stimulates +the skin, causing an unnatural degree of perspiration, and thus inducing +weakness or debility. + +2. When we first enter a room in which there is a feather bed which has +been occupied during the night, we are struck with the offensive smell +of the air. This is owing to a variety of causes; one of which probably +is, that beds of this kind are better adapted to absorb and retain the +effluvia of our bodies. But let the causes be what they may, the effects +ought, if possible, to be avoided; for both experience and authority +combine to pronounce them very injurious. + +3. Feather beds--if used in the nursery--will inevitably discharge more +or less of dust and down; both of which are injurious to the tender +lungs of the infant. + +Mattresses are better for persons of every age, than soft feather beds. +They may be made of horse hair or moss; but hair is the best. If the +mattress does not appear to be warm enough for the very young infant, a +blanket may be spread over it. Dr. Dewees says that in case mattresses +cannot be had, "the sacking bottom" may be substituted, or "even the +floor;" at least in warm weather: "for almost anything," he adds, "is +preferable to feathers." + +Macnish, in his "Philosophy of Sleep," objects strongly to air beds, and +says that he can assert "from experience," that they are the very worst +that can possibly be employed. My theories--for I have had no experience +on the subject--would lead me to a similar conclusion. A British +writer of eminence assures us that the higher classes in Ireland, to a +considerable extent, accustom themselves and their infants to sleep on +bags of cut straw, overspread with blankets and a light coverlid; and +that the custom is rapidly finding favor. I have slept on straw, both in +winter and summer, for many years, yet I am always warm; and those who +know my habits say I use less _covering_ on my bed than almost any +individual whom they have ever known. + +I have no hostility to soft beds, especially for young children and feeble +adults, could softness be secured without much heat and relaxation +of the system. On the contrary, it is certainly desirable, in itself, +to have the bed so soft that as large a proportion of the surface of +the body may rest on it as possible. But I consider hardness as a +much smaller evil than feathers. + +It is worthy of remark how generally physicians, for the last hundred +years, have recommended hard beds, especially straw beds or hair +mattresses, to their more feeble and delicate patients. This fact might +at least quiet our apprehensions in regard to their tendency on those +who are accustomed to them in early infancy. + +Some writers on these subjects appear to doubt whether, after all that +they say, they shall have much influence on mothers in inducing them to +give up feather beds for their infants. But they need not be so +faithless. Multitudes have already been reformed by their writings; and +multitudes larger still would be so, could they gain access to them. It +is a most serious evil that they are often so written and published that +comparatively few mothers will ever possess them. + +The pillow, as well as the bed, should be rather hard; and its thickness +should be much less than is usual, or we shall do mischief by bending +the neck, and thus compressing the vessels, and obstructing the +circulation of the blood. But on this subject I will say more, when I +come to treat on "Posture." + +The child's bed should not be placed near the wall, on account of +dampness. There is also, during the summer, another reason. Should +lightning strike the house, it will be much more apt to injure those who +are near the wall than other persons; as it seldom leaves the wall to +pass over the central part of the room. + +Curtains are not only useless, but injurious. They prevent a free +circulation of the air. Everything which has this tendency must be +studiously guarded against, in the management of infants. + +Nothing is more injurious to the old or the young than damp beds and +damp covering. It behoves, especially, all those who have the care of +infants, to see that everything about their beds is thoroughly dry. The +walls and clothes should also be dry; and wet clothes should never be +hung up in the room. By neglecting these precautions, colds, +rheumatisms, inflammations, fevers, consumptions, and death, may ensue. +Many a person loses his health, and not a few their lives, in this way. +The author of this work was once thrown into a fever from such a cause. + +Warming the bed is, in all cases, a bad practice. While in the nursery, +if the air be kept at a proper temperature, there will be no need of it; +after the child is assigned to a separate chamber, its enervating +tendency would result in more evil than good. It is better to let the +bed became gradually heated by the body, in a natural and healthy way. + +No person, and above all, no infant, should be suffered to sleep in a +bed that has been recently occupied by the sick. The bed and all the +clothes should first be thoroughly aired. Could we see with our eyes at +once, how rapidly these bodies of ours fill the air, and even the beds +we sleep in, with carbonic acid and other hurtful gases and impurities, +even while in health, but much more so in sickness, we should be +cautious of exposing the lungs of the tender infant, in such an +atmosphere, until everything had been properly cleansed, and the +apartments properly ventilated. + + +SEC. 5. _The Covering._ + +The covering of the bed should be sufficiently warm, but never any +warmer than is absolutely necessary to protect the child from +chilliness. The lightest covering which will secure this object is the +best. Perhaps there is nothing in use that, with so little weight, +secures so much heat as what are called "comfortables." + +The clothes should not be "tucked up" at the sides and foot of the bed +with too much care and exactness. For when the bed is once warmed +thoroughly with the child's body, the admission of a little fresh air +into it, when he elevates or otherwise moves his limbs, can do no harm, +but _may_ do much of good, in the way of ventilation. I deem it +important, moreover, to inure children very early to little partial +exposures of this kind. + +Those mothers who, from over-tenderness, and want of correct information +on the subject, pursue a contrary course, and consider it as almost +certain death to have a particle of fresh air reach the bodies of their +infants during their slumbers, are generally sure to outwit themselves, +and defeat their very intentions. For by being thus tender of their +children, it often turns out that whenever the mother is ill, or when on +any other account she ceases to watch over them--and such times must, +in general, sooner or later come--they are much more liable to take cold +or sustain other injury, should they be exposed, than if they had been +treated more rationally. + +I knew a mother who would not trust her children to take care of their +own beds on retiring to rest, as long as they remained in her house, +even though they were twenty or thirty years old. But they had no better +or firmer constitutions than the other children of the same +neighborhood. + +Hardly anything can be more injurious than covering the head with the +bed clothes; and yet some mothers and nurses cover, in this way, not +only their own heads, but those of their children. I have elsewhere +shown how impure the air is, which is imprisoned under the bed clothes. +I hope those mothers who are willing to destroy _themselves_ by covering +up their heads while they sleep, will at least have mercy on their +unoffending infants. + + +SEC. 6. _Night Dresses._ + +The grand rule on this point is, to wear as little dress during sleep as +possible. Some mothers not only suffer their infants to sleep in the +same shirt, cap, and stockings that they have worn during the day, but +add a night gown to the rest. No cap should be worn during the night, +any more than in the day time. Or if the foolish practice has been +adopted for the day, it should be discontinued at night. It is enough +for those adults whose long hair would otherwise be dishevelled, to wear +night caps, and subject themselves, as they inevitably do, to catarrh +and periodical headache. Children's heads should have nothing on them by +night; nor even by day, except to defend them from the rain or the hot +rays of the sun. + +The stockings, too, should be wholly laid aside at night, unless in the +case of those who are feeble, apt to have their feet cold, or +particularly liable to bowel complaints. Such may be allowed to sleep in +their stockings, but not in those which have been worn all the day. + +Indeed, neither children nor adults should ever wear a single garment in +the night which they have worn during the day. The reason is, that there +are too many causes of impurity in operation while we sleep, without our +wearing the clothes in which we have been perspiring during the +day-time--and which must be already more or less filled with the +effluvia of our bodies. + +It is a very easy thing to have a loose night gown to supply the place +of the shirt we have worn during the day; and if nothing else is +convenient, a spare shirt will answer. But both a night gown and shirt +should never be admitted, especially in warm weather. The garment to +supply the place of the shirt during the night, may be of calico in the +summer, and of flannel in the winter. + +The collar and wristbands of this night dress should be loose; and the +whole garment should be large and long. No article of dress should ever +press upon our bodies, so as in the least to impede the circulation; and +for this reason it is, that writers on physical education have inveighed +so much against cravats, straps, garters, &c. This caution, so important +to all, is doubly so to young mothers, on whom devolves the management +of the tender infant. + +When the child has been perspiring freely during the evening, just +before he is undressed, or when he has just been subjected to the warm +bath, it may be well to use a little care in undressing and exchanging +clothes, to prevent taking cold;--though it should ever be remembered, +that those children who are managed on a rational system will bear +slight exposures with far more safety, than they who have been managed +at random--sometimes, indeed, with great tenderness, but at others, +wholly neglected. + + +SEC. 7. _Posture of the Body._ + +In early infancy, children who are not stuffed rather than fed, may +occasionally be permitted to sleep on their backs, especially if they +incline to do so. But it will be well to encourage them to sleep on one +side, as soon as you can without great inconvenience. + +The right side, as a general rule, is preferable; because the stomach, +which lies towards the left side, is thus left uncompressed, and +digestion undisturbed. I would not, however, require a child to lie +always on the right side, but would occasionally change his position, +lest he should become unable to sleep at all, except in a particular +manner. + +I have said elsewhere, that the head ought to be a little raised, +especially if the child is liable to diseases of the brain. But this +remark, rather hastily thrown out, requires explanation. + +There is so much blood sent by the heart to the head and upper parts of +the system of infants, as to predispose those parts, especially the +brain, to disease. In a horizontal position of the body, there is more +blood sent to the brain than when the body is erect. This will show the +reader, at once, that if the infant is peculiarly exposed to diseases +of the brain--and it certainly is so--he ought to remain in a horizontal +posture as little as possible, except during sleep; and that even then +it is desirable to make his bed in such a manner as to elevate the head +and shoulders as much as we can without compressing the lungs, or +obstructing the circulation in the neck. + +I recommend, therefore, to raise the head of an infant's bedstead a +little higher than the foot; though not so much as to incline him to +slide downwards into the bed, for that would be to produce one evil in +curing another. + +Sir Charles Bell thinks that the common disease of infants called +_diabetes_, arises from their being permitted to sleep on their backs; +and that by breaking up the habit of lying in this position, and +accustoming them to lie on their sides, we shall prevent it. I doubt +whether the effect here referred to, is ever the result of such a cause. +Still I am as much opposed to the _habit_ of sleeping on the back, as +Sir Charles Bell. It is quite injurious to free respiration. + +Closely allied to the subject of bodily position in general, is the +state of particular organs; especially the stomach and the senses. I +have already intimated that in order to have an infant sleep quietly, it +is desirable to darken the room. This is the more necessary, where +infants are unnaturally wakeful. In such cases, not only light should +be excluded from the eye, but sounds from the ear, odors from the +nostrils, &c. A remarkably full stomach is in the way of going quietly +to sleep, whether the person be old or young. Neither infants nor adults +ought to take food for some time previous to their going to sleep for +the night. Great bodily heat, as well as too great cold, is also +unfavorable. If too hot, the temperature of the infant should be +somewhat reduced by exposure to the air; if too cold, it should be +raised in a natural, healthy, and appropriate manner. + + +SEC. 8. _State of the Mind._ + +In giving directions how to procure pleasant dreams, Dr. Franklin +mentions as a highly important requisition, the possession of a quiet +conscience. A wise prescription, no doubt. + +But infants, as well as adults, in order to sleep quietly, should have +their minds and feelings in a state of tranquillity. The youngest child +has its "troubles;" and it is highly important, if not indispensable, to +_healthy_ sleep, that the mother take all reasonable pains to remove +them before sleep is induced. + +We sometimes hear about children crying themselves to sleep, as if it +were a matter of no consequence; and sometimes, as if it were, on the +contrary, rather desirable. But is the sleep of an adult satisfying, who +goes to bed in trouble, and only sleeps because nature is so exhausted +that she cannot bear the protracted watchfulness any longer? Why then +should we expect it, in the case of the infant? + +I know an excellent father who is so far from believing this doctrine, +that he silences the cries of his child by the word of command--and +believes that in so doing, he promotes both his health and his +happiness. He would no more let him cry himself to sleep than he would +let him cough himself to sleep; though both crying and coughing, in +their places, may be and undoubtedly are salutary. + +Whatever may be the age and circumstances of an individual, he ought to +retire for rest with a cheerful mind. All anxiety about the future, all +regret about the past, all plans even, in regard to the business or +amusement of the morrow, should be kept wholly out of the mind. We +should yield ourselves up to the arms of sleep with the same quietude as +if life were finished, and we had nothing more to do or think of. + + +SEC. 9. _Quality of Sleep._ + +The soundness, as well as other qualities, of sleep, differs greatly in +different individuals; and even in the same night, with the same +individual in different circumstances. The first four or five hours of +sleep are usually more sound than the remainder. Hardly anything will +interrupt the repose of some persons during the early part of the night, +while they awake afterwards at the slightest noise or movement--the +chirping of a cricket, or the playing of a kitten. + +In profound sleep, we probably dream very little, if at all; but in +other circumstances, we are constantly disturbed by dreaming, and +sometimes start and wake in the greatest anxiety or horror. + +Nightmare is generally accompanied by dreams of the most distressing +kind. We imagine a wild beast, or a serpent in pursuit of us; or a rock +is detached from some neighboring cliff, and is about to roll upon and +crush us; and yet all our efforts to fly are unavailing. We seem chained +to the spot; but while in the very jaws of destruction, perhaps we +awake, trembling, and palpitating, and weary, as if something of a +serious nature had really happened. + +In the case of nightmare, it is more than probable that we fall asleep +with our stomachs too heavily loaded with food, or with a smaller +quantity of that which is highly indigestible. Or it may sometimes arise +from an improper position of the body, such as disturbs the action of +the stomach or lungs, or of both these organs. Lying on the back, when +we first go to sleep, is very apt to produce nightmare. + +But distressing dreams often follow an evening of anxious cares, +especially if those cares preyed upon us for the last half hour; and +also after late suppers, even if they are light--and late reading. Hence +the injunctions of the last section. Hence, too, the importance of +taking our last meal two or three hours before sleep, and of engaging, +during these hours, in cheerful conversation, and in the social and +private duties of religion. Family and private worship, in the evening, +are enjoined no less by philosophy than they are by christianity; and +every young mother will do well to understand this matter, and train her +offspring accordingly. + +"That sleep from which we are easily roused, is the healthiest," says +Macnish. "Very profound slumber partakes of the nature of apoplexy." I +should say, rather, that a medium between the two extremes is +healthiest. Profound apoplectic sleep, I am sure, is injurious; but +that from which we are too easily roused cannot, it seems to me, +be less so. Thus, I have often gone to sleep with a resolution +to wake at a certain hour, or at the striking of the clock; +and have found myself able to wake at the proposed time, almost +without one failure in twenty instances where I have made the trial. But +my sleep was obviously unsound, and certainly unsatisfying. The desire +to awake at a certain moment or period, seemed to buoy me above the +usual state of healthy sleep, and render me liable to awake at the +slightest disturbance. Were it not for sacrificing the ease of others, +it would be far better, in such cases, to rely upon some person to wake +us, instead of charging our own minds with it. + +The quality of our sleep will be greatly affected by the quantity. But +this thought, if extended, would anticipate the subject of our next +section; so easily does one thing, especially in physical education, run +into or involve another. I will therefore, for the present, only say +that if we confine ourselves to a smaller number of hours than is really +required, our sleep becomes too sound to be quite healthy, as if nature +endeavored to make up in quality, for want of due quantity. On the +contrary, if we attempt to sleep longer than is really necessary to +restore us, the quality of our sleep is not what it ought to be; for we +do not sleep soundly enough. + +The silence and darkness of the night tend to induce sleep of a better +quality than the noise and activity of day. It is unquestionably +desirable that children should be able to sleep, at least occasionally, +without absolute quiet. And yet such sleep cannot be sufficiently sound +to answer the purposes of health, if frequently repeated. + +Hence it is, perhaps--at least in part--that the maxim has obtained +currency, that one hour of sleep before midnight is worth two afterward. +The comparison has probably been made between the quiet and darksome +hours of evening and those which followed daybreak, when light, and +music, and bustle conspire, as they should, to make us wakeful. No +person can sleep as soundly and as effectually, when light reaches his +closed eyes, and sounds strike his ears, as in darkness and silence. He +may sleep, indeed, under almost any circumstances, when fatigue and +exhaustion demand it; but never so profoundly as when in absolute +abstraction of light, and complete quiet. + + +SEC. 10. _Quantity._ + +On this point much might be said, without exhausting the subject. But I +have already observed that infants, when first born, require to sleep +nearly their whole time. As they advance in years, the necessity for +sleep; however, diminishes, until they come to maturity, when it remains +for many years nearly stationary. In advanced age, the necessity for +sleep again increases, till we reach the extremest old age, or what is +usually called second childhood, when we again sometimes sleep nearly +the whole time. + +I have already remarked that much might be said on this subject; but I +do not think that the present occasion requires it. If the suggestions +which are made in the chapter on "Early Rising" should receive the +attention I flatter myself they merit, I do not believe children would +often sleep too long. If, on the contrary, they are suffered to lie late +in the morning, and then sit up late in the evening, all healthful +habits and tendencies will he so deranged or broken up, that nature, in +her indications, will by no means prove the unerring guide which she is +wont to do in other circumstances. + +A few thoughts here, on the quantity of sleep required by the young +after they approach maturity, may not be misplaced. + +Jeremy Taylor thought that for a healthy adult, three hours in +twenty-four were enough for all the purposes of sleep. Baxter thought +four hours about a reasonable time; Wesley, six; Lord Coke and Sir Wm. +Jones, seven; and Sir John Sinclair, eight. These were the _theories_ of +men who were all eminent for their learning, and most of them for their +piety. How far their _practice_ corresponded with their theories, we are +not, in every instance, told. + +But to come to the practice of several persons who have been +distinguished in the world. General Elliot, one of the most vigorous men +of his age, though living for his whole life on nothing but vegetables +and water, and who at sixty-four had scarcely begun to feel the +infirmities of old age, slept but four hours in twenty-four. Frederick +the Great of Prussia, and the illustrious British surgeon, John Hunter, +slept but five hours a day. Napoleon Bonaparte, for a great part of his +life, slept only four hours; and Lord Brougham is said to require no +more. Others, in numerous instances, require but six hours. But there +are others still, who consume eight. + +The conclusion--in my own mind--is, that with a good constitution and +active habits, men may habituate themselves to very different quantities +of sleep. Still I think that six hours are little enough for most +persons; and if a child, on arriving at maturity, is not inclined to +sleep much longer than that, I should not regard him as wasting time. +Most persons, it appears to me, require six hours of sound sleep in +twenty-four;--I mean between the ages of twenty and seventy. + +Macnish is the most liberal modern writer I am acquainted with, in his +allowance of time for sleep. Speaking of the wants of adults he +says--"No person who passes only eight hours in bed can be said to waste +his time in sleep." Yet he obviously contradicts himself on the very +same page; for he says expressly, that when a person is young, strong +and healthy, an hour or two less may be sufficient. But an hour or two +less than eight hours reduces the amount to seven or six hours. And +taking the whole period of life, to which he probably refers--say from +eighteen to forty--into consideration, there is a very considerable +difference between six hours and eight hours a day. If six hours are +"sufficient," it cannot be right to sleep eight hours. + +Let us here make a few estimates. If six hours are sufficient for sleep +between the ages of eighteen and forty, he who sleeps eight hours a day, +actually loses 16,060 hours--equal to nearly two whole years of life, or +about two years and three quarters of time in which we are usually +awake. This, in the meridian of life, is not a small waste. Permit it to +every person now in the United States, and the sum total of wasted time +to a single generation, would be 25,649,098 years--equal to the average +duration of the lives of 854,970 persons. The value of this time, as a +commodity in the market, at a low estimate--only forty dollars a +year--would be over A THOUSAND MILLIONS of DOLLARS! And its value, for +the purposes of mental and moral improvement, cannot be estimated except +in ETERNITY! + +Every young mother must derive from these considerations a motive to +discourage all unnecessary waste of time in sleep; while no one, as I +trust, will forget that to sleep too little is also dangerous to health, +and prejudicial to the general happiness. + + + + +CHAPTER XV. + +EARLY RISING. + +All children naturally early risers. Evils of sitting up late at night. +Excitements in the evening. The morning, by its beauties, invites us +abroad. Example of parents. Forbidding children to rise early. Keeping +them out of the way. How many are burnt up by parental neglect. +"Lecturing" them. What is an early hour? + + +Some writer--I do not recollect who--has said that all children are +naturally early risers. And I cannot help coming to the same conclusion. +That they are not so, is no more proved from the fact that as things now +are they are generally found addicted to the contrary habit, than the +very general neglect of milk among the higher classes of our citizens, +proves that they have not a natural relish for it--when every one knows +that at our first setting out in life, milk is, almost without +exception, the sole article of human sustenance. + +One of the great difficulties in the way of early rising, as I have +already had occasion to say, is late sitting up. If children are not +accustomed to retire till nine or ten o'clock, nor then until they have +been subjected to all the excitements pertaining to fashionable +life--company, heated and impure air, stimulating drink, fruits, +high-seasoned food, and perhaps music--and are become actually feverish, +no one but an ignorant person or a brute ought to expect them to rise +early. Indeed, whatever may have been the cause, and whether it have +operated on high or low life, late retiring will inevitably result in +late rising. The current may be turned out of its course a little while, +it is true, but not always. It will ere long return to its accustomed +channel; perhaps to renew its course with increased pertinacity. + +Everything, in the morning, naturally invites to early rising. The +pleasant light, the music, at certain seasons, of some of the animated +tribes, and the joy which we feel in activity, and in the society of +those whom we love, all conspire to rouse us. If we have retired late, +however, and especially in a feverish condition, so that when we wake we +feel wretched, and, as sometimes happens, more fatigued than when we lay +down, other collateral motives may be needed. + +I have said that everything invites us, in the morning, to rise early; +but it was upon the presumption that our parents, and brothers, and +sisters set us a good example. If parents and other friends lie in bed +late themselves, can anything else be, expected of children? Admitting, +even, that they rise early themselves, if they never speak of early +rising as a pleasure, and connect along with it, in their children's +minds, pleasant associations, they would be unreasonable to expect +otherwise than that their children should cling to the morning couch, +till they are fairly compelled to rise as a relief from pain and +uneasiness. + +But when parents go farther than this, and actually discourage their +children from rising early, and use every means in their power short of +actual punishment--and sometimes even that--to make them lie still till +breakfast, in order that they may be out of the way, what shall we say? +And what is to be expected as the result? + +There is hope, however, under the last circumstances. People sometimes +carry things to an extreme that defeats their very purposes. Thus it +occasionally is, in the case before us. This forbidding children to rise +early, and threatening them if they do, sometimes excites their +curiosity, and leads them to the forbidden course of conduct, simply +_because_ it is forbidden. Not a few persons among us possess the +disposition to be governed by what has sometimes been called the "rule +of contrary." + +I might stop here to show that there is nothing so well calculated to +develope and improve the mind and heart, even of parents themselves, as +the society of those whom God gives them to train for Him and their +country. I might show that not a few of those traits of character which +render the company of many old persons rather irksome, especially to the +young, have their origin in their neglect of the young, and of keeping +up, as long as circumstances will possibly admit, juvenile feelings, +actions, and habits. + +And yet what do we too often witness in life? Is not every effort made +to induce the young to lie in bed late that they may be out of the way? +Are they not placed, as soon as possible after they are up, with the +servants--if unfortunately there are any in the family--that they may be +out of the way? Are they not required to breakfast, and dine, and sup +elsewhere, if possible, that they may be out of the way? Do we not send +them to school, even the Sabbath school, to get them out of the way? Do +not some mothers even dose their infants with stupifying medicines to +lull them to sleep, in order to have them out of the way? And to crown +all, though they are quite too often permitted to sit up late in the +evening, to enjoy that society which they are denied so great a part of +the day-time, are they not occasionally put to bed early that they may +be out of the way, and that the parents may attend late parties, to +indulge in immoral or unhealthy habits? + +In the last instance, they are indeed sometimes put out of the way, in +the result--and with a vengeance. Many a child, nay, many thousands of +children, are burnt up yearly, while their parents are gone abroad in +the evening in quest of that enjoyment which ought to be found in the +bosom of their families. "In Westminster, a part of London, containing +less than two hundred thousand inhabitants, one hundred children were +thus destroyed, during a single year." And the moral results which +occasionally happen are a thousand times worse than burning. But enough +of this. + +The common practice of lecturing the young on the importance of early +rising, may have a good effect on a few; but in general, it is believed +to produce the contrary result. It is, in short, to sum up the whole +matter, the influence of parental example, and the speaking often of the +happiness which early rising affords, with perhaps the occasional +indulgence of the child in a pleasant morning walk, which, if he retires +early enough, are almost certain to produce in him the valuable habit of +early rising. + +But what is an early hour? Some call it early, when the sun is one hour +high; some at sunrise; others, when they hear of an early riser, +suppose he must be one who rises at least by daybreak. + +Midnight is, of course, as near the middle of the night as any hour; and +he who goes to bed four or five hours before midnight, will never +complain of those who insist that _he_ is not an early riser who is not +up by four or five o'clock. In summer, no adult ought to lie in bed +after four o'clock, and no child, except the mere infant, after five. + +Much is said by a few writers, especially Macnish, of the danger of +rising before the sun has attained a sufficient height above the horizon +to chase away the vapors, and remove the dampness. But I must insist +upon earlier rising than this, though we should not choose to venture +abroad. Invigorated and restored as we are by sleep, I cannot think that +the dampness of the morning air is more injurious than the foul air of +some of our sleeping rooms. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI. + +HARDENING THE CONSTITUTION. + +Mistakes about hardening children. Their clothing. Much cold enfeebles. +The Scotch Highlanders. The two extremes equally fatal--over-tenderness +and neglect. An interesting anecdote from Dr. Dewees. + + +While I have been very particular in enjoining on my readers the +importance of thoroughly ventilating their dwellings, I have also +insisted upon the necessity of taking children abroad, as much as +possible. Not, however, to harden them, so much as to give them a more +free access to air and light than they can have at home; and also--when +they are old enough--to cultivate the faculties of attention, +comparison, &c. + +The practice of attempting to harden children by frequent exposure to +air much colder than that to which they have been accustomed, without +sufficient additional clothing, is open to the same objections which +have been brought against cold bathing. Under the management of a +judicious medical practitioner, it may do great good to a few +constitutions; but its indiscriminate use would injure a thousand +infants for one who was benefited. + +True it is that if the child is protected against cold, no harm, but on +the contrary much good may result, from carrying him abroad into the +fresh air, even in very cold weather. But what can be more painful than +to see the little sufferers carried along when their limbs are purple, +or benumbed with cold? And how idle it is to hope that such exposure +hardens or improves the constitution! + +It is on the same mistaken principle that many adults go thinly clad, +late in the fall. I have seen men in November and December beating and +rubbing their hands, who, on being asked why they did not wear mittens, +replied, that if they should wear one pair of mittens so early in the +season, they should want two in the winter. + +Now I cheerfully admit that to put on additional clothing before the +severity of the weather demands it, actually produces the effect here +supposed; but to endure severe cold, on the contrary, never hardens +anybody. Nay, more, it enfeebles. Cold, when combined with the evils of +_poverty_, produces more mischief and destroys more lives than any one +disease in the whole catalogue of human maladies. + +Adam Smith says that it is not uncommon for mothers in the Highlands of +Scotland, who have borne twenty children, to have only two of them +alive. + +It may be difficult to say whether children are oftener destroyed by +over-tenderness than by neglect, and the evils incident to poverty. Both +extremes are common; while the happy medium--that of conducting a +child's education upon the principles of physiology, is rarely known, +and still more rarely followed. + +I have been much amused, and not a little instructed, by the following +anecdote on this point, from Dr. Dewees: + +We were speaking with a lady who had lost three or four children with +"croup," who informed us she was convinced, from absolute experiment, +that there was nothing like exposure to all kinds of weather to protect +and harden the system. By her first plan of managing her children, which +was by keeping them very warmly clad, she said she lost several by the +croup; but since she had adopted the opposite scheme, her children had +been perfectly healthy, and never had betrayed the slightest disposition +to that terrible disease which had robbed her of her children. + +Perhaps, madam, we observed, you did not, in making your first +experiments, attend to a number of details which might be thought +essential to the plan. You did not probably take the proper precautions +when you sent them into the cold air, or observe what was important for +them when they returned from it. + +"Oh, yes," she replied, "I took every possible care when they, were +going out. I always made them wear a very warm great coat, well lined +with baize, and a fur cape or collar. I always made them wear a +'comfortable' round their necks, made of soft woollen yarn. And as for +their feet, they were always protected by socks or over-shoes lined with +wool or fur, as the weather might be wet or dry." + +Do you believe, madam, they were kept at a proper degree of warmth by +these means? + +"Oh, certainly. Indeed, rather too warm; for they would often be in a +state of perspiration, they told me, when in the open air; especially if +they ran, slid, or skated." + +And what was done when they were thus heated? + +"Oh, they got cool enough before they reached home." + +And would they receive no injury in passing from this state of +perspiration to that of chill? + +"Not at all; for when this happened, I always made them take a little +warm brandy, or wine and water, and made them toast their feet well by +the fire." [Footnote: This absurd custom is a fruitful source of that +distressing condition of the hands and feet, in winter, called +"chilblains."] + +Did they sleep in a cold or warm room? + +"In a warm room. A good fire was always made in the stove before they +went to bed, which kept them quite warm all night." + +Would they never complain of being cold towards morning, when the stove +had become cold? + +"Yes, certainly; but then there were always at hand additional +bed-clothes, with which they could cover themselves." + +And did they always do it? + +"Oh, I suppose so." + +Well, madam, how did you carry your second plan into execution, which +you say was attended with such happy results? + +"I began by not letting them put on their great coats, except when the +weather was so cold as to require this additional covering, and did not +permit them to wear a 'comfortable' or fur round their necks. I took +away their over-shoes, and if their feet chanced to get wet, (for they +were always provided with good sound shoes,) the shoes were immediately +changed, if they were at home. If the weather was wet, or unusually +cold, they were permitted to wear their great coats, but not without. +If they came home very cold, they were not allowed to approach the fire +too soon. I gave them no warm, heating drinks, and accustomed them to +sleep in rooms without fire." + +Who does not recognize, in this second plan for the enjoyment of air and +exercise, as judicious a plan of physical education, so far as it goes, +as can well be pointed out? We were so successful as to convince this +lady, in a very short time, that our own plan of exposing the body was +precisely the one she had pursued with so much success. + +We also inquired of her what plan she pursued with her children, when +too young to be submitted to the rules just mentioned. She informed us +that it was the same system throughout, only the details varied as +circumstances of age, &c. made it necessary. That is, she sent her +children into the open air at very early periods of their lives, +provided in summer it was neither too wet nor too warm; in winter, when +the air was mild, dry and clear--but always carefully wrapped up, that +their little extremities might not suffer from cold. She never suffered +them to sleep in the open air, if it could be avoided; to prevent which, +as much as possible, she constantly charged the nurse to bring the +children home, as soon as she found them disposed to sleep, unless it +was when they were very young, at which time it was impossible to guard +against it. + +And when her children were sufficiently old to walk, she took care to +prepare them properly for it, whether it might be in warm, cold, or +moderate weather. She never sent them abroad for pleasure at the risk of +encountering a storm of any kind; nor permitted them to walk at the +hazard of getting wet or very muddy feet. + +Were the constitutions of your children pretty much the same? we +demanded of this lady. + +"No; one of my boys was extremely feeble, from his very birth." + +Did you treat him precisely as you did the others? + +"Yes, as far as regarded principles; that is, I permitted him to bear as +much of cold, heat or wet as his constitution would endure without pain +or injury. The degrees, however, were very different from those his +brothers bore, had they been determined by the measurement of the +thermometer, but precisely the same in effect, as far as could be +ascertained by consequences. Thus, if he were exposed to the same +temperature as his brothers, he experienced no more inconvenience from +it, when it was very low, than they, because he had additional covering +to protect him." + + + + +CHAPTER XVII. + +SOCIETY. + +Duty of mothers in this matter. Children prefer the society of parents. +Importance of other society. Necessity of society illustrated. Early +diffidence. Selecting companions for children. Moral effects of society +on the young. Parents should play with their children. + + +Every mother is unquestionably as much bound to have an eye to the +society of her child, as to his food, drink or clothing. And if the +quality, amount and general character of the latter are important, those +of the former are by no means less so. + +It is indeed true that many a child has been happy, in a degree, in the +society of its mother alone, where the father was seldom seen, and the +brothers and sisters never. And it is equally true; that a few children +have so far preferred the society of their parents alone, as to become +disinclined to other society. But cases of this kind are only as +exceptions to the general rule; and are probably monstrous formations +of character. I cannot believe that any child, rightly educated, would +prefer the society of none but its parents, or even its parents and +brothers and sisters. + +A French author has written a considerable volume on the importance of +what he calls _gaiety_, but which he should prefer to call cheerfulness. +Among the rest, he maintains that it is indispensable to the best +health. But if so--and I do not doubt it--then it ought to be encouraged +in children, and the earlier the better. Now there is no way to +encourage cheerfulness in the young so effectually as by indulging them +with considerable society. + +That the thing may be carried to excess, I have no doubt. I have seen +mothers who permitted their children to play with their mates till they +became excited, and were thus led to continue their sports, not only +farther than cheerfulness and health demanded, but until they were +excessively fatigued, and almost made sick. And I believe that the +excitement of numbers, in infant and other schools, may be so great as +to be injurious, rather than salutary. Still I think these are rare +cases. + +Truth usually lies somewhere between extremes. To keep a child, +especially a boy, always in the nursery, or even in the parlor with his +mother, is one extreme; and to let him go abroad continually, till his +home and its smaller circle become insipid, is the other. A child +properly trained will _usually_ prefer home, and only desire to go +abroad occasionally. He will rather need urging in the matter than +require restraint. + +But he must, at any rate, be taught to be sociable, not only for the +salve of cheerfulness and the consequent health, but for the sake of his +manners, his mind, and his morals. + +If it is a matter of indifference, in the formation of human character, +whether we mix in society or not, then, for anything I can see, an +improvement might be proposed in the construction of the material +universe. Instead of forming the planets so large--and this earth among +the rest--each might have been divided into hundreds of millions; and +every human being might have had a little planet, and an immortality, +exclusively his own. Such an arrangement would certainly prevent a great +many evils; and, among the rest, a great deal of quarrelling and +bloodshed. + +But divine wisdom is higher than human wisdom, and one world to hundreds +of millions of human beings has been made, instead of giving to each +individual of the universe a little world of his own, in which he might +have reigned sole monarch, and only wept, with Alexander, because none +of the other worlds were within his grasp. Where a family is already +large, other society will be unnecessary for some time; but where it +consists of a mother only, although her society is always to be +considered of the _first_ importance, I cannot but think she ought to +take great pains to introduce her child occasionally to the company of +other children. + +That diffidence, which almost destroys the influence and the happiness +of many individuals, is often cherished, if not created, by too much +seclusion. Where there is a natural constitution which predisposes the +child to timidity and diffidence, the danger is greatly increased; and +parents should take unwearied pains to guard against it. + +It is hardly necessary for me to say, that great care should also be +used in selecting the companions of children. Their character will be +greatly influenced for life by their earlier associates. Friendships +between children are sometimes formed, while playing together, which are +interrupted only by death. Those parents who are so fond of controlling +the choice of their sons and daughters in regard to a companion for +life, at a period when control is generally resisted, would do well to +take a hint from what has here been suggested. There is no doubt but +they might often--very often--give such a direction to the embryo +affections of their infants and children, as would terminate only with +their existence. + +It is still less necessary to advert, in a work like this, to the effect +which much observation and experience shows good society to have on +purity, both physical and moral. Every one must have observed its +tendency to form habits of cleanliness, not to say neatness. There may +be excess, even in this. Young persons, of both sexes, often spend too +much time in preparing their dress for the reception or the visiting of +their friends. Still this is only the abuse of a good thing. Nor is it +less true, though it may be less obvious, that moral purity is more +likely to be secured where children and youth of both sexes associate a +great deal, from the earliest infancy. [Footnote: If this principle be +correct, what is the tendency of our numerous schools, which are +exclusively for one sex? Must there not be latent evil to counterbalance +some of the seeming good? For myself, I doubt whether moral character +can ever be formed in due proportion and harmony, where this separation +long exists.] There are tremendous cases of declension on record, which +establish this point beyond the possibility of debate. + +To say that the mother--and indeed both parents--ought to form a part of +the playing circle of the youngest children, in order to watch their +opening dispositions, to check what may be improper, and encourage what +ought to be encouraged, would be only to repeat what has often been +recommended by the best writers on education--but which must be +repeated, again and again, till it leaves an impression, especially on +CHRISTIAN parents. It is strange that many regard this matter as they +do, and appear not only ashamed to be seen sporting with their children, +but almost ashamed to have their children thus occupied. They might as +well be ashamed of the gambols of the kitten or the lamb; or of the +grave mother, as she turns aside occasionally to join in its frolics. +When will parents be willing to take lessons in education from that +brute world which they have been so long accustomed to overlook or +despise? + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII. + +EMPLOYMENTS. + +Influence of mothers over daughters. Anecdote of Benjamin West. Anecdote +of a poor mother. Of set lessons and lectures. Daughters under the +mother's eye. Why young ladies, now-a-days, dislike domestic +employments. Miserable housewives--not to be wondered at. Mistake of one +class of men. Mr. Flint's opinion. + + +One important and never-to-be-forgotten employment of the young is the +cultivation of their minds; and another, that of their morals. But my +present purpose is only to speak of those employments denominated +manual, or physical. + +It is obvious, at the first glance, that the influence of the mother, in +our own country, at least, will be less over boys than over girls. We +leave it to savages and semi-savages to employ their females, and even +their mothers, in hard manual labor. Here, in America, what I should say +on the employment of boys would be more properly addressed to the YOUNG +FATHER. + +There are some exceptions to the general truth contained in the last +paragraph. Many a mother has--unconsciously at the time, but with no +less certainty than if she had done it intentionally--given a direction +to the whole current of her son's life; and this, too, at a very early +period. The mother of Benjamin West, the painter, if she did not give +the first tendency to his favorite pursuit, while he was yet a mere +child, at the least greatly confirmed him in it, by the manner of +expressing her surprise at one of his early performances. "My mother's +kiss," on that occasion, said he, "made me a painter." Nor are facts of +the same general character by any means uncommon. + +I know a poor mother who, in the absence of her husband at his weekly +or monthly labors, used to detain her eldest boy, then almost an +infant, from going to bed in the evening till her day's work was +finished--because, in her loneliness, she wanted his company--by telling +stories of eminent men, and especially of distinguished philanthropists, +until she had unconsciously kindled in him a philanthropic spirit, which +will not cease to burn till his death. + +But it is in forming the predilections of daughters for their destined +employments, that mothers are especially influential. Not so much by +their set lessons or lectures, however, as by the force of continued +example. No mother who sends her child away to be nursed, and +subsequently to her return seizes on every possible opportunity to keep +her out of the way and out of her sight, will be likely to give her any +choice of employment, or indeed any fondness for employment at all. + +Nor is it sufficient that she keep her daughter constantly under her +eye, with a view to qualify her for the duties of a housewife, if the +daughter see as plainly as in the light of mid-day, that the mother +dislikes the employment herself. She must love what she would have her +daughter love, and even what she would have her understand. Nor is it +sufficient that she _affect_ a fondness for the employment; her love for +it must be real. Little girls have keener eyes and better judgments than +some mothers seem willing to believe or to admit. + +Many persons seem greatly surprised that the young ladies of modern days +have so little fondness for domestic life and domestic duties. How few, +it is often said, will do their own housework, if they can possibly get +a train of domestics around them; even though the care and oversight of +the domestics themselves gear them out more rapidly than bodily labor +would. + +But there is a reason for this hostility to domestic employments. It is +because mothers, almost universally, consider their occupations as mere +drudgery, and bring up their children in the same spirit. And what else +could be expected as the result? It would be an anomaly in the history, +of human nature, if the female members of families were to grow up in +love with ordinary domestic avocations, when they have been accustomed +to see their mothers, and nurses, and elder sisters complaining and +fretting while engaged in them; and showing by their actions, no less +than by their words, that they regarded themselves as miserable and +wretched. + +No wonder so many girls, of the present day, make miserable housewives. +No wonder a factory, a book-bindery, or a shoemaker's shop, is +considered preferable to the kitchen. No wonder the world degenerates, +because females, no longer healthfully employed, become pale and sickly, +spreading gloom and misery all around them, and transmitting the same +ills which themselves suffer to those who come after them. + +It is true, the guilt of this dereliction must not be charged wholly on +mothers; though they ought, unquestionably, to bear a large share of it. +Those who have, and ought to have, much influence in society, +erroneously, and I suppose thoughtlessly, help mothers along in their +evil ways. If there were a universal combination between certain classes +of mankind and the whole race of mothers, to ruin, rather than be +instrumental of reforming mankind, and of saving their deathless souls, +I hardly know how they could invent a much better, or at least a much +more certain plan, than that now in operation. So long as those who take +the lead in society, and govern the fashion in this matter, as others +govern it in the matter of dress, refuse, as a general rule, to form +alliances for life, except with those who practically despise house-hold +concerns--and so long as our houses are filled with domestics, whose +object is to aid these spoiled mothers, but whose real effect is to +complete their ruin, and accelerate the ruin of mankind--just so long +will human progress towards perfection be retarded. + +If mothers were in love with their occupations, and their daughters knew +it, then to the influence of a good example they could add many lessons +of instruction. These might be given in the way of natural, unstudied +conversation, and thus be not only heard with attention, but sink deep. +If the world is ever to be reformed, says Mr. Flint, in his Western +Review, woman, sensible, enlightened, well educated and principled, must +be the original mover in the great work. Every one who has considered +well the extent and nature of female influence, will concur in the +sentiment; and if he have one remaining particle of devotion to the +Father of spirits, he will send up the most fervent petitions to his +throne of mercy in behalf of this often depressed or enslaved half of +the human race, that they may speedily be emancipated, and become as +conspicuous in human redemption, as they have sometimes been in human +condemnation. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX. + +EDUCATION OF THE SENSES. + +Improving the senses. Examples of improvement. SEC. 1. Hearing--how +injured--how improved.--SEC. 2. Seeing--how injured.--SEC. 3. Tasting +and smelling--how benumbed--how preserved.--SEC. 4. Feeling. The blind. +Hints to parents. Education of both hands. + + +Man is much less useful and happy in this world than he would be, if +more pains were taken by parents and teachers, as well as by himself, to +cultivate his senses--hearing, seeing, feeling; tasting, and +smelling--and to preserve their rectitude. + +The extent to which the senses can be improved or exalted, can best be +understood by observing how perfect they become when we are compelled to +cultivate them. Thus the blind, who are obliged to cultivate hearing, +feeling, and smelling, often astonish us by the keenness of these +senses. They will distinguish sounds--especially voices--which others +cannot; and with so much accuracy, as to remember for several years the +voice of a person in a large company, which they hear but once. They +will also distinguish small pieces of money, different fabrics and +qualities of cloth, &c.; and, in walking, often ascertain, by the +feeling of the air, or by other sensations, when they approach a +building, or any other considerable body. So the North American Indian, +whose habits of life seem to require it, can hear the footsteps of an +approaching enemy at distances which astonish us. So also the deaf and +dumb are very keen-sighted, and generally make very accurate +observations. Any reader who is sceptical in regard to the cultivation +of the senses, would do well to consult the account of Julia Brace, the +deaf and dumb and blind girl, as published in some of the early volumes +of the "Annals of Education." + +But it is hardly necessary to resort to the blind, or to savages, or to +the deaf and dumb, in order to prove man's susceptibility in this +respect. We may be reminded of the same fact by observing with what +accuracy the merchant tailor can distinguish, by feeling, the quality of +his goods; how quick a painter, an engraver, or a printer, will discover +errors in painting or printing, which wholly escape ordinary readers or +observers; and how quick the ear of a good musician will discover the +existence and origin of a discordant sound in his choir. + +Now I do not undertake to say or prove, that mankind would be better or +happier for having their senses all cultivated in the highest possible +degree; though I am not sure that this would not be the case. But so +long as a large proportion of our ideas enter our minds through the +medium of the five senses, it is desirable that something should be done +to perfect them, instead of overlooking the whole subject. What mothers +ought to do in this matter, deserves, therefore, a brief consideration. + + +SEC. 1. _Hearing._ + +The suggestion, in another place, to keep away caps from the child's +head, if duly attended to, is one means of perfecting, or at least of +preserving, the sense of hearing. For caps, by the heat they produce to +a part which cannot safely endure an increase of temperature, greatly +expose children to catarrhal affections; and many a catarrh has laid the +foundation for dulness of hearing, if not of actual deafness. + +The ears should be kept clean. If washed sufficiently often, and +syringed once a week with warm milk and water, or with very weak +soap-suds, gently warmed, the cerumen or ear wax will hardly be found +accumulated in such masses as to produce deafness. And yet such +accumulations, with such consequences, are by no means uncommon. It is +not long since a young man with whom I am acquainted, applied to an +eminent surgeon of Boston, on account of deafness in one ear, which had +become quite troublesome, and as it was feared, incurable. Syringing +with a large and strong syringe disengaged a large mass of cerumen, and +hearing was immediately restored. + +Children should be taught to distinguish sounds with closed eyes, or +blindfolded. We may strike on various objects, and ask them to tell what +we struck, &c. This will lead them to _observe_ sounds; and will perfect +their hearing in a remarkable degree. + +There are also advantages to be derived from accustoming a child to a +great variety of sounds; both as regards their strength and character. +But this must only be occasional; for if the ear be constantly +accustomed to sounds of any kind, and more especially those which are +harsh or loud, the organ of hearing is liable to sustain injury. Music, +as it is now beginning to be taught to children in our schools, will do +much, I think, to improve the faculty of hearing. + + +SEC. 2. _Seeing._ + +The sight, says Addison, is the most perfect of all our senses; and this +is unquestionably true. But it is more or less perfect, in different +individuals, according to the early education they have received. +Sometimes, it is true, we are born near-or dim-sighted; but such cases +are comparatively rare. + +The question is sometimes asked why there are so many persons, +now-a-days, who lose their sight, become near-sighted, &c. very young. +It may be difficult to answer this question fully; yet I cannot help +thinking that the following are some of the causes. + +1. The great heat of our apartments, which, together with late hours and +much lamp light, affects the eyes unpleasantly, is believed to be among +the more prominent causes of early decay of sight. Formerly, our +apartments were neither so steadily nor so generally heated; and we rose +earlier, and consequently went to bed earlier. + +2. The fine print of a large proportion of our books, especially our +school books, has done immense injury. I do not believe that reading +fine print, occasionally, for a few moments at a time, or reading by a +very strong or very weak light in the same way, does harm. On the +contrary, I think it may strengthen and improve the sight. It is the +long continuance of these things that does the mischief; and the +mischief thus done is immense. I rejoice that printers and publishers +are beginning of late to use much larger type than they have done for +some years past. + +3. The early use of spectacles does mischief--I mean before they are +needed. After they begin to be needed, there is no advantage in delaying +to use them, as some do, for fear they shall wear them too soon. This is +about as wise as the practice of going cold to harden ourselves. + +4. Reading when we are fatigued, or ill, or have a very full stomach, is +another way to injure the sight. + +5. Rubbing the eyes with the fingers, or with anything else, does +inevitable mischief. The Germans have a proverb which says--"Never touch +your eye, except with your elbow." There is much of good sense in it. + +In short, there are a thousand ways in which that delicate organ, the +human eye, may sustain injury; and nearly as many in which it may be +strengthened, cultivated, and improved. But my limits merely permit me +to add, that the frequent but gentle application of water to the eye, +several times a day, at such a temperature as is most agreeable--but +cold, when it can be borne--is one of the best preservatives of sight +which the world affords. + +Connected alike with physical and intellectual education, is the +practice of measuring by the eye heights, distances, superfices, +weights, and solids. It is not difficult to train the eye to an accuracy +in this matter which would astonish the uninstructed. + + +SEC. 3. _Tasting and Smelling._ + +I do not know that it is worth our while to take pains, by any direct +methods, to cultivate the organs of taste or smell; but I think it +proper, at the least, to preserve their original rectitude. + +Many, I know, undertake to say, that were it not for our errors in +regard to food and drink, and were it not, in particular, for the +multitude of strange mixtures which tend to benumb those two senses, we +might determine the qualities of food and drink--whether they are +favorable or adverse--by means of taste and smell, like the animals. But +I do not believe this. The Creator has substituted reason, in us, for +instinct in the brute animals. It is not necessary that we should +possess the latter, when the former is so manifestly superior to it; and +accordingly I do not believe that it is given us, or any of that +acuteness of sensation which exists in the dog, the tiger, the vulture, +&c.--and which so closely resembles it. + +There can be no doubt--no reasonable doubt, certainly--that the wretched +customs of modern cookery benumb the senses of taste and smell, more or +less, and that high-seasoned food, condiments, and stimulating drinks do +the same; and should for this reason, were it for no other, be +studiously avoided. + +Closely connected with the organ of taste are the TEETH. A volume might +profitably be written on these--as on the eye. But I will only say that +they should be kept perfectly clean, either by rinsing or brushing, or +both, especially after eating; that they should be permitted to chew all +our food, instead of merely standing by as silent spectators to the +passage of that which is mashed, soaked, chopped, &c.; that they should +not be picked or cleaned with pins, or other equally hard instruments; +that they should not be used to crack nuts or other hard, indigestible +substances; and that the stomach, with which they are apt to sympathize +very strongly, should also be kept in a good and healthy condition. + + +SEC. 4. _Feeling._ + +Corpulence and slovenliness are generally among the more prolific +sources of a want of acuteness in feeling. The first is a disease, and +may be avoided by a proper diet, and by active mental and bodily +employment. Slovenliness we may of course avoid, whenever there is a +wish to do so, and an abundance of water. + +But the sense of feeling, or especially that accumulation of it which we +call TOUCH, and which seems to be specially located in the balls of the +fingers and on the palm of the hand, is susceptible of a degree of +improvement far beyond what would be the natural result of cleanliness, +and freedom from plethora or corpulence. + +I have already alluded, in my general remarks at the head of this +chapter, to the acuteness of this sense in the blind, as well as in the +dealer in cloths. I might add many more illustrations, but a single one, +in relation to the blind, which was accidentally omitted in that place, +will be sufficient. + +The blind at the Institution in this city, as well as in other similar +institutions, are now taught to read and write with considerable +facility. But how? Most of my readers may have heard how they read, but +I will describe the process as well as I can. A description of their +method of writing is more difficult. + +The letters are formed by pressing the paper, while quite moist, upon +rather large type, which raises a ridge in the line of every letter, and +which remains prominent after the paper is dry. In order to read, the +pupil has to feel out these ridges. A circular ridge on the paper he is +told is O; a perpendicular one, I; a crooked one, S; &c. They read music +and arithmetic printed in a similar manner. A few months of practice, in +this way, will enable an ingenious youth to read with considerable ease +and despatch. + +Now if nothing is wanting but a little training to render the touch so +accurate, would it not be useful to train every child to judge +frequently of the properties of bodies by this sense? And cannot every +one recall to his mind a thousand situations in which a greater accuracy +of this sense would have saved him much inconvenience, as well as +afforded him no little pleasure? + +I shall conclude this section with a few remarks on the HAND. The custom +of neglecting, or almost neglecting the left hand, though nearly +universal, in this country at least, appears to me to be +wrong--decidedly so. For although more blood may be sent to the right +arm than to the left, as physiologists say, yet the difference is not as +great at birth as it is afterward; so that education either weakens the +one or strengthens the other. + +Besides this, we occasionally find a person who is left-handed, as it is +called; that is, his left hand and arm are as much larger and stronger +than the right, as the right is usually stronger than the left. How is +this? Do we find a corresponding change in the internal structure? But +suppose it could be ascertained that such a change did exist, which I +believe has never been done, the question would still arise whether the +difference was the same at birth, or whether the more frequent use of +the left hand has not, in part, produced it. + +I do not mean, here, to intimate that a more frequent use of the left +hand than the right would make new blood-vessels grow where there were +none before. But it would certainly do one thing; it would make the same +vessels carry more blood than they did before, which is, in effect, +nearly the same thing:--for the more blood in the limb, as a general +rule, the more strength--provided the limb is in due health and +exercise. + +The inference which I wish the reader to make from all this is, that +since the left hand and arm, by due cultivation, and without essential +difference or change of structure to begin with, can occasionally be +made stronger than the right, it is fair to conclude that it may, if +found desirable, be always rendered more nearly equal to it than, in +adult years, we usually find it. + +The question is now fairly before us--Is such a result desirable? I +maintain that it is; and shall endeavor to show my reasons. + +How often is one hand injured by an accident, or rendered nearly useless +by disease? But if it should be the right, how helpless it makes us! The +man who is accustomed to shave himself, must now resort to a barber. If +he is a barber himself, or almost any other mechanic, his business must +be discontinued. Or if he is a clerk, he cannot use his left hand, and +must consequently lose his time. Or if amputation chances to be +performed on a favorite arm, how entirely useless to society we are, +till we have learned to use the other! It not only takes up a great deal +of valuable time to acquire a facility of using it, but if we are +already arrived at maturity, we can never use it so well as the other, +during our whole lives; because it is too late in life to increase its +size and strength much by constant exercise. Whereas in youth, it might +have been done easily. + +Is it not then important--for these and many more reasons--to teach a +child to use with nearly equal readiness, both of his hands? But if so, +who can do it better than the mother? And when can it be better done +than in the earliest infancy? When is the time which would be devoted to +it worth less than at this period? + + + + +CHAPTER XX. + +ABUSES. + +Bad seats for children at table and elsewhere. Why children hate Sunday. +Seats at Sabbath school--at church--at district schools. Suspending +children between the heavens and the earth. Cushions to sit on. Seats +with backs. Children in factories. Evils produced. Bodily punishment. +Striking the heads of children very injurious. Beating across the middle +of the body. Anecdote of a teacher. Concluding advice to mothers. + + +It is difficult to determine, in regard to many things which concern the +management of the young, whether they belong most properly to moral or +physical education; so close is the connection between the two, and so +decidedly does everything, or nearly everything which relates to the +management of the body, have a bearing upon the formation of moral +character. This work might be extended very much farther, did it comport +with my original plan. But I hasten to close the volume, with a few +thoughts on certain abuses of the body, which prevail to a greater or +less extent in families and schools; and to which I have not adverted +elsewhere. + +The seats of children are usually bad, both at table and elsewhere. It +seems not enough that we condemn them to the use of knives, forks, +spoons, &c., of the same size with those of adults. We go farther; and +give them chairs of the same height and proportion with our own. There +are a few exceptions to the truth of this remark. Here and there we see +a child's chair, it is true--but not often. + +But how unreasonable is it to seat a child in a chair so high that his +feet cannot reach the floor; and so constructed that there is no outer +place on which the feet can rest. What adult would be willing to sit in +so painful a posture, with his legs dangling? No wonder children dislike +to sit much, in such circumstances. And it is a great blessing to both +parent and child that they do. No wonder children hate the Sabbath, +especially in those families where they are compelled to keep the day +holy by sitting motionless! Sabbath schools, though they bring with them +some evil along with a great deal of good, are a relief to the young in +this particular--especially if their seats are more comfortable +elsewhere than at home. They consider it much more tolerable to spend +the morning and intermission of the day in going and returning from +Sabbath school, than in constant and close confinement. They prefer +variety, and the occasional light and air of heaven, to monotony and +seclusion and silence. + +It happens, however, that the seats at the Sabbath school and at church, +are not always what they should be; nor, so far as church is concerned, +do I see that this evil can be wholly avoided. Children usually sit with +their parents, in the sanctuary--and they ought to do so: and the height +of the seats cannot, of course, accommodate both. If there is a building +erected solely for the use of the Sabbath school, the seats may be +constructed accordingly, without seriously incommoding anybody; but in +the church, I do not see, as I have once before observed, how the evil +can be remedied. + +The greatest trouble in regard to seats, however, is at the day school; +especially in our district or common schools. There, it is usual for +children to be confined six hours a day--and sometimes two in +succession--to hard, narrow, plank seats, a large proportion of which +are without backs, and raised so high that the feet of most of the +pupils cannot possibly touch the floor. There, "suspended," as I have +said in another work, [Footnote: See a "Prize Essay," on School Houses, +page 7.] "between the heavens and the earth, they are compelled to +remain motionless for an hour or an hour and a half together." + +I have also shown, in the same essay, that in regard to the desks, and +indeed many other things which pertain to, or are connected with the +school, very little pains is taken to provide for the physical welfare +or even comfort of the pupils; and that a thorough reform on the subject +appears to be indispensable. + +When I speak of hard plank seats, let me not be understood as hinting at +the necessity of cushions. When I wrote the essay above mentioned, I did +indeed believe that they were desirable. But I am now opposed to their +use, either by children or adults, even where a laborious employment +would seem to demand a long confinement to this awkward and unnatural +position. If our seats are cushioned, we shall sit too easily. I believe +that our health requires a hard seat; because its very hardness inclines +us to change, frequently, our position. + +But if we must sit, be it ever so short a time, our seats should always +have backs; and those which are designed for children, should not be so +high as to render them uncomfortable. Nor should the backs of seats be +so high as they usually are, either for children or adults. They should +never come much higher than the middle of the body. If they reach the +shoulders, they either favor a crouching forward, or interfere with the +free action of the lungs. + +This might be deemed a proper place for saying something on the position +of children in manufactories. But here a world of abuse opens upon my +view, the full development of which demands a large volume. How many +crooked spines, emaciated bodies, decaying lungs, as well as scrofulas, +fevers, and consumptions, are either induced or accelerated by these +unnatural employments! I mean they are unnatural for the _young_. As to +employing adults in them, I have nothing at present to say. But when I +think of the cruel custom of placing children in these places, whose +bodies--and were this the place, I might add, _minds_--are immature, and +especially girls, I am compelled, by the voice of conscience, and, as I +trust, by a regard to those laws which God has established in our +physical frames, but which are yet so strangely violated, to protest +against it. Better that no factories should exist, than that children +should be ruined in them as they now are. Better by far that we should +return, were it possible, to the primitive habits of New England--to +those by-gone days when mothers and daughters made the wearing apparel +of themselves and their families--when, if there was less of +intellectual cultivation, and less money expended for luxuries and +extravagances, there was much more of health and happiness. + +There is one more species of abuse to which, in closing, I wish to +direct maternal attention. I allude to injudicious modes of inflicting +corporal punishment. + +Let me not be understood to appear, in this place, as the advocate of +bodily punishments of any kind; for if they are even admissible under +some circumstances, I am fully convinced that in the way in which they +are commonly administered, they do much more harm than good. + +But leaving the question of their utility, in the abstract, wholly +untouched, and taking it for granted, for the present, that they are--as +is undoubtedly the fact--sometimes employed, and will continue to be so +for a great while to come, I proceed to speak of their more flagrant +abuses. + +Among these, none are more reprehensible than blows of any kind on the +head. Even the rod is objectionable for this purpose, since it exposes +the eyes. But the hand--in boxing the ears or striking in any way--is +more so. The bones of the head, in young children, are not yet firmly +knit together, and these concussions may injure the tender brain. I +know of whole families, whose mental faculties are dull, as the +consequence--I believe--of a perpetual boxing and striking of the head. +Some individuals are made almost idiots, in this very manner.--But the +worst is not yet told. Many teachers are in the habit of striking their +pupils' heads with thick heavy books; and with wooden rules. I have seen +one of the latter, of considerable size and thickness, broken in two +across the head of a very small boy; and this, too--such is the public +mind--in the presence of a mother who was paying a visit to the school. +I have seen parents and masters strike the heads of their children with +pieces of wood, of much larger size;--in one instance with a common +sized tailor's press-board; in another with the heavy end of a wooden +whip-handle, about an inch in diameter. + +Children are sometimes severely beaten across the middle of the +body--the region where lie the vital organs--the lungs, the heart, the +liver, &c. They are sometimes beaten too, across the joints, or in any +place that the excited, perhaps passionate teacher or parent can reach. +Rules and books are thrown with violence at pupils in school. There is a +story in the "Annals of Education," Vol. IV. at page 28, of a teacher +who threw a rule at a little boy, six years old, which struck him with +great force, within an inch of one of his eyes. Had it struck a little +nearer to his nose, it would, in all probability, have destroyed his +left eye. + + * * * * * + +But without extending these remarks any farther, every intelligent +mother who reads what I have already written, will see, as I trust, the +necessity of properly informing herself on the great subject of physical +education; and of being better prepared than she has hitherto been for +acquitting herself, with satisfaction, of those high and sacred +responsibilities which, in the wise arrangements of Nature and +Providence, devolve upon her. + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Young Mother, by William A. Alcott + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE YOUNG MOTHER *** + +***** This file should be named 10482.txt or 10482.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/4/8/10482/ + +Produced by Stan Goodman and PG Distributed Proofreaders + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS," WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's +eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII, +compressed (zipped), HTML and others. + +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over +the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed. +VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving +new filenames and etext numbers. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000, +are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to +download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular +search system you may utilize the following addresses and just +download by the etext year. + + https://www.gutenberg.org/etext06 + + (Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99, + 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90) + +EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are +filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part +of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is +identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single +digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For +example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at: + + https://www.gutenberg.org/1/0/2/3/10234 + +or filename 24689 would be found at: + https://www.gutenberg.org/2/4/6/8/24689 + +An alternative method of locating eBooks: + https://www.gutenberg.org/GUTINDEX.ALL + + diff --git a/old/10482.zip b/old/10482.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fae723 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/10482.zip |
